VFP9 autodownload
Someone once helped me with a neat routine so that my client can click a button in my app and take you straight to a specified website. This has really helped me where I want the client to do an update to my application. I want to take this a step further. The web page has (say) 5 files they can choose from. So, to eliminate downloading the wrong file, can I get the client to click inside the app which will: 1 Jump them to the correct website 2 AND locate the specified file 3 AND begin the download process without any user intervention/clicking requirement Sytze ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Emulate Auto Fit from Excel
I queried this about a year ago I think and never received much response. If you ever figure this out, please let me know Sytze [EMAIL PROTECTED] On 4/25/07, Chris Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I am converting a excel spreadsheet to a report layout. In excel the Auto > Fit feature was used to make sure the information always fitted (or made use > of) the space available. > > Is it possible to do this on a report in VFP9, report listener maybe ? > > TIA > > Chris. > > > --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- > multipart/alternative > text/plain (text body -- kept) > text/html > --- > > [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Signs of the Times
On Apr 27, 2007, at 12:48 AM, Pete Theisen wrote: > On Friday 27 April 2007 12:27 am, Robert Calco wrote: >> Incidentally the degree to which Democrats have managed to transfer >> their collective neuroses entirely to one person -- the person of >> George W. Bush -- is truly a mass-psychological phenomenon. It >> eclipses even the good ol' days of Clinton bashing, which I fondly >> recall. I mean, I never hated the man to the core of my being > > Hi Bob! > > I did. I can't abide it when a man cheats on his wife. He is > basically taking > twice his share of the women, while I (and many other men) don't > have one > woman he has two. Paradoxically, I might understand your passion if I believed Hillary! was heterosexual Also I think you hugely undercount how many women Bubba had... ;-) - Bob > I say internment to the adulterers, toss them in with the > faggots. > -- > Regards, > > Pete > http://www.pete-theisen.com/ > > [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: MSSQL database creation/modification/maintenancescripting/functions?
Stephen the Cook wrote: > Try www.red-gate.com look for the SQL Compare. There is a bundle that will > put 3 apps of theirs together, SQL & Data compare as well as another that I > can't remember it's name right now. > Isn't that Rod Paddock's company? His was red-something. > I use it to keep 4 versions of the same db up to date and roll changes as > needed. Schema, procs are a snap to deal with. > > Paid for by developer and not server. > Huh? You're mixing fruits! Did you mean to say "developer and not employer" ?? -- Michael J. Babcock, MCP MB Software Solutions, LLC http://mbsoftwaresolutions.com http://fabmate.com "Work smarter, not harder, with MBSS custom software solutions!" ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Signs of the Times
>>> Can't fix it. What did they say? Surely it wasn't the outcry we >>> have today, I would have remembered that! >> >> They were wholly behind him and sounded outright neo-conservative! > > Hi Bob! > > ... I think Leland knew > what I meant LOL. That should have been your first clue that what you said didn't make sense. :P BTW Pete we have to get together some time, me you and Stephen Wolfe. (And anyone else who lives in the Tampa area and doesn't mind imbibing moderate quantities of properly chilled adult libations with radical republican machiavellian theocratic right wing neo- conservative one-party juggernauts.) ;) - Bob > -- > Regards, > > Pete > http://www.pete-theisen.com/ > > [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Signs of the Times
On Friday 27 April 2007 12:27 am, Robert Calco wrote: > Incidentally the degree to which Democrats have managed to transfer > their collective neuroses entirely to one person -- the person of > George W. Bush -- is truly a mass-psychological phenomenon. It > eclipses even the good ol' days of Clinton bashing, which I fondly > recall. I mean, I never hated the man to the core of my being Hi Bob! I did. I can't abide it when a man cheats on his wife. He is basically taking twice his share of the women, while I (and many other men) don't have one woman he has two. I say internment to the adulterers, toss them in with the faggots. -- Regards, Pete http://www.pete-theisen.com/ ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Form Modifications
Virgil Bierschwale wrote: > Yep. > I've managed projects like that before, so I did the honorable thing (in my > opinion) and told them, you can't count on me to deliver this. > > I know when I lead teams before, I typically figured 90 days to get them up > to speed on the environment alone, assuming their coding skills were good. > Chamber of commerce, you say.do they have a budget for more than 30+ days? -- Michael J. Babcock, MCP MB Software Solutions, LLC http://mbsoftwaresolutions.com http://fabmate.com "Work smarter, not harder, with MBSS custom software solutions!" ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Signs of the Times
On Thursday 26 April 2007 11:53 pm, Robert Calco wrote: > >>> Well, the only ones complaining only complain when an R does what > >>> the president is doing. C-man was all over Kosovo, rocket attacked Al > >>> Qaeda in the desert and not a peep from the Ds. > >> > >> That's not entirely accurate. Fix your MP3 player and listen to the > >> quotes I sent out in my 'Name Those Voices' thread > >> > >> They weren't exactly quiet. > > Can't fix it. What did they say? Surely it wasn't the outcry we > > have today, I would have remembered that! > > They were wholly behind him and sounded outright neo-conservative! Hi Bob! OK, I should have said not a *negative* peep from them. I think Leland knew what I meant LOL. -- Regards, Pete http://www.pete-theisen.com/ ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Signs of the Times
Bob, They hate Bush because he believes that Jesus Christ is his Lord and Savior. Had Bush been an Atheist, there wouldn't be the hatred for him that there is. --- Robert Calco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Incidentally the degree to which Democrats have > managed to transfer > their collective neuroses entirely to one person -- > the person of > George W. Bush -- is truly a mass-psychological > phenomenon. It > eclipses even the good ol' days of Clinton bashing, > which I fondly > recall. I mean, I never hated the man to the core of > my being, like > these people hate Dubya, I just found him absurd and > embarrassing. > Hell I find Bush absurd and embarrassing, especially > when attempting > to speak off the cuff on camera, but I don't think > he's either stupid > or evil. And I never meditated on his potential > assassination or > wished America would lose in Kosivo over my beliefs > about his character. > > Someone supposedly so stupid and so evil duped so > many people who > consider themselves so smart and so righteous---how > do they look > themselves in the mirror, I wonder? > > Hate and lust for power ooze out of everything Reid > says and Pelosi > does. > > (Seriously---she'll go across the world to visit > Bashir Assad, and > offer idly to visit with Adolf Amadinutjob---but > doesn't have time to > meet General Patraeus before a vote basically > telling him he's full > of sh*t?) > > - Bob > > On Apr 27, 2007, at 12:08 AM, Michael Madigan wrote: > > > When the Islamofascists celebrated the Democratic > > Victory in November, you know the Bush > administration > > did the right thing in invading Iraq. > > > > > > > > --- Robert Calco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> In all seriousness, that half our population has > >> forgotten -- > >> literally forgotten -- our collective complicity > in > >> debating whether > >> to invade Iraq not once, but twice, and accepting > >> the argument of pre- > >> emption (not "immanent threat" as some like to > >> recast the past) as > >> sufficient grounds to do what we did on a large > >> BIPARTISAN basis > >> means we're about due for another reminder what > that > >> was all about. > >> > >> Sad, but it's on its way. Get ready. > >> > >> - Bob > >> > >> On Apr 27, 2007, at 12:04 AM, Leland F. Jackson, > CPA > >> wrote: > >> > >>> What war? The war on terrorism is not really a > >> war that should > >>> qualify > >>> the president to claim war time powers, any more > >> that the war on > >>> drug is > >>> a real war, or the war on poverty, etc. > >>> > >>> Regards, > >>> > >>> LelandJ > >>> > >>> Pete Theisen wrote: > On Thursday 26 April 2007 10:33 pm, Leland F. > >> Jackson, CPA wrote: > > > I don't think its legal to overthrow the US > >> Constitutional form of > > government by any means, if its against the > >> wishes of the American > > people. As Bill Arnold would say, the > American > >> people have and are > > being duped. Overthrow of the American > >> government by other mean > > such as > > treachery and deceit should also be illegal. > > > > Hi Leland! > > You are wrong. The constitution itself provides > >> an amendment > process, Article > V. > > The current whining, however, is over the > >> administration's use of the > president's war powers. They never say anything > >> when a D president > uses the > same power. > > >>> > >>> > >>> [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Signs of the Times
Incidentally the degree to which Democrats have managed to transfer their collective neuroses entirely to one person -- the person of George W. Bush -- is truly a mass-psychological phenomenon. It eclipses even the good ol' days of Clinton bashing, which I fondly recall. I mean, I never hated the man to the core of my being, like these people hate Dubya, I just found him absurd and embarrassing. Hell I find Bush absurd and embarrassing, especially when attempting to speak off the cuff on camera, but I don't think he's either stupid or evil. And I never meditated on his potential assassination or wished America would lose in Kosivo over my beliefs about his character. Someone supposedly so stupid and so evil duped so many people who consider themselves so smart and so righteous---how do they look themselves in the mirror, I wonder? Hate and lust for power ooze out of everything Reid says and Pelosi does. (Seriously---she'll go across the world to visit Bashir Assad, and offer idly to visit with Adolf Amadinutjob---but doesn't have time to meet General Patraeus before a vote basically telling him he's full of sh*t?) - Bob On Apr 27, 2007, at 12:08 AM, Michael Madigan wrote: > When the Islamofascists celebrated the Democratic > Victory in November, you know the Bush administration > did the right thing in invading Iraq. > > > > --- Robert Calco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> In all seriousness, that half our population has >> forgotten -- >> literally forgotten -- our collective complicity in >> debating whether >> to invade Iraq not once, but twice, and accepting >> the argument of pre- >> emption (not "immanent threat" as some like to >> recast the past) as >> sufficient grounds to do what we did on a large >> BIPARTISAN basis >> means we're about due for another reminder what that >> was all about. >> >> Sad, but it's on its way. Get ready. >> >> - Bob >> >> On Apr 27, 2007, at 12:04 AM, Leland F. Jackson, CPA >> wrote: >> >>> What war? The war on terrorism is not really a >> war that should >>> qualify >>> the president to claim war time powers, any more >> that the war on >>> drug is >>> a real war, or the war on poverty, etc. >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> LelandJ >>> >>> Pete Theisen wrote: On Thursday 26 April 2007 10:33 pm, Leland F. >> Jackson, CPA wrote: > I don't think its legal to overthrow the US >> Constitutional form of > government by any means, if its against the >> wishes of the American > people. As Bill Arnold would say, the American >> people have and are > being duped. Overthrow of the American >> government by other mean > such as > treachery and deceit should also be illegal. > Hi Leland! You are wrong. The constitution itself provides >> an amendment process, Article V. The current whining, however, is over the >> administration's use of the president's war powers. They never say anything >> when a D president uses the same power. >>> >>> >>> [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Signs of the Times
When the Islamofascists celebrated the Democratic Victory in November, you know the Bush administration did the right thing in invading Iraq. --- Robert Calco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In all seriousness, that half our population has > forgotten -- > literally forgotten -- our collective complicity in > debating whether > to invade Iraq not once, but twice, and accepting > the argument of pre- > emption (not "immanent threat" as some like to > recast the past) as > sufficient grounds to do what we did on a large > BIPARTISAN basis > means we're about due for another reminder what that > was all about. > > Sad, but it's on its way. Get ready. > > - Bob > > On Apr 27, 2007, at 12:04 AM, Leland F. Jackson, CPA > wrote: > > > What war? The war on terrorism is not really a > war that should > > qualify > > the president to claim war time powers, any more > that the war on > > drug is > > a real war, or the war on poverty, etc. > > > > Regards, > > > > LelandJ > > > > Pete Theisen wrote: > >> On Thursday 26 April 2007 10:33 pm, Leland F. > Jackson, CPA wrote: > >> > >>> I don't think its legal to overthrow the US > Constitutional form of > >>> government by any means, if its against the > wishes of the American > >>> people. As Bill Arnold would say, the American > people have and are > >>> being duped. Overthrow of the American > government by other mean > >>> such as > >>> treachery and deceit should also be illegal. > >>> > >> > >> Hi Leland! > >> > >> You are wrong. The constitution itself provides > an amendment > >> process, Article > >> V. > >> > >> The current whining, however, is over the > administration's use of the > >> president's war powers. They never say anything > when a D president > >> uses the > >> same power. > >> > > > > > > [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Signs of the Times
In all seriousness, that half our population has forgotten -- literally forgotten -- our collective complicity in debating whether to invade Iraq not once, but twice, and accepting the argument of pre- emption (not "immanent threat" as some like to recast the past) as sufficient grounds to do what we did on a large BIPARTISAN basis means we're about due for another reminder what that was all about. Sad, but it's on its way. Get ready. - Bob On Apr 27, 2007, at 12:04 AM, Leland F. Jackson, CPA wrote: > What war? The war on terrorism is not really a war that should > qualify > the president to claim war time powers, any more that the war on > drug is > a real war, or the war on poverty, etc. > > Regards, > > LelandJ > > Pete Theisen wrote: >> On Thursday 26 April 2007 10:33 pm, Leland F. Jackson, CPA wrote: >> >>> I don't think its legal to overthrow the US Constitutional form of >>> government by any means, if its against the wishes of the American >>> people. As Bill Arnold would say, the American people have and are >>> being duped. Overthrow of the American government by other mean >>> such as >>> treachery and deceit should also be illegal. >>> >> >> Hi Leland! >> >> You are wrong. The constitution itself provides an amendment >> process, Article >> V. >> >> The current whining, however, is over the administration's use of the >> president's war powers. They never say anything when a D president >> uses the >> same power. >> > > > [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Signs of the Times
On Apr 26, 2007, at 11:44 PM, Pete Theisen wrote: > On Thursday 26 April 2007 11:26 pm, Robert Calco wrote: >> On Apr 26, 2007, at 11:24 PM, Pete Theisen wrote: >>> Hi Leland! >>> >>> Well, the only ones complaining only complain when an R does what >>> the >>> president is doing. C-man was all over Kosovo, rocket attacked Al >>> Qaeda in >>> the desert and not a peep from the Ds. >> >> Pete: >> >> That's not entirely accurate. Fix your MP3 player and listen to the >> quotes I sent out in my 'Name Those Voices' thread >> >> They weren't exactly quiet. > > Hi Bob! > > Can't fix it. What did they say? Surely it wasn't the outcry we > have today, I > would have remembered that! They were wholly behind him and sounded outright neo-conservative! - Bob > -- > Regards, > > Pete > http://www.pete-theisen.com/ > > [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] More Evidence of Intelligent Life on Earth
Leland ol' pal: On Apr 27, 2007, at 12:35 AM, Leland F. Jackson, CPA wrote: > Its good to have you back Bob, and to see you haven't lost a step > while > away. You're fully up to speed already, and its just your first > week back. Life throws a lot of curves. Adaptability is the key. :) > > I enjoyed listening to the link you provided, (eg I never got the > video > to work), about the previous Democratic Administration's belief that > Saddam had WMD, and I couldn't help but chuckle a little wondering if > you are still looking for them. I found them. They are in charge of Congress now. :( > > Now you're tell me, and the Scientific community form 113 countries > around the world, who just completed a 6 year study of global warming > and climate change, that global warming is just a figment of our > imagination, even though the esteem pannel of Scientist have > statistically place a 90% probability that humans are responsible for > global warming and climate change. No, I'm saying the inference that CO2 is the cause is what requires a lot of make-believe to accept. It's sooner a symptom than the cause. And it sure as hell isn't a 'pollutant'. Science indeed! Furthermore the argument man can fix it by focusing on CO2 borders on lunacy. First clue should be this: anything Al Gore promotes is by definition a pig-in-a-poke. (NAFTA included... and carbon offsets! Oh my Lord what a fraud! It's the modern secular equivalent to the Catholic Church's medieval practice of indulgences.) The man hasn't made an honest argument in his life. That's quite an achievement---even for a politician. > > I've learned that trying to reason with you on issue you have made up > your mind about is like beating my head against a brick wall. I've learned that you should probably stop abusing the wall that way. It isn't helping your arguments either. ;) > Trying to > change people who are in denial is funny that way. Welcome back, > and I > look forward to some stimulating debates with you as the 2008 > elections > draw near. Aye, and likewise. :) - Bob > > Regards, > > LelandJ > > > On 04/26/2007 Robert Calco wrote: >> Leland's capacity for ratiocination is startling even for an >> accountant. I simply don't run into such high quality specimens of >> non sequiturs and false inference, not to mention absurdity, even in >> all the daily 'team meetings' I endure in IT (there naturally the >> issue is quantity, not quality). > > > > [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Signs of the Times
On Thursday 26 April 2007 11:26 pm, Robert Calco wrote: > On Apr 26, 2007, at 11:24 PM, Pete Theisen wrote: > > Hi Leland! > > > > Well, the only ones complaining only complain when an R does what the > > president is doing. C-man was all over Kosovo, rocket attacked Al > > Qaeda in > > the desert and not a peep from the Ds. > > Pete: > > That's not entirely accurate. Fix your MP3 player and listen to the > quotes I sent out in my 'Name Those Voices' thread > > They weren't exactly quiet. Hi Bob! Can't fix it. What did they say? Surely it wasn't the outcry we have today, I would have remembered that! -- Regards, Pete http://www.pete-theisen.com/ ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] More Evidence of Intelligent Life on Earth
Its good to have you back Bob, and to see you haven't lost a step while away. You're fully up to speed already, and its just your first week back. I enjoyed listening to the link you provided, (eg I never got the video to work), about the previous Democratic Administration's belief that Saddam had WMD, and I couldn't help but chuckle a little wondering if you are still looking for them. Now you're tell me, and the Scientific community form 113 countries around the world, who just completed a 6 year study of global warming and climate change, that global warming is just a figment of our imagination, even though the esteem pannel of Scientist have statistically place a 90% probability that humans are responsible for global warming and climate change. I've learned that trying to reason with you on issue you have made up your mind about is like beating my head against a brick wall. Trying to change people who are in denial is funny that way. Welcome back, and I look forward to some stimulating debates with you as the 2008 elections draw near. Regards, LelandJ On 04/26/2007 Robert Calco wrote: > Leland's capacity for ratiocination is startling even for an > accountant. I simply don't run into such high quality specimens of > non sequiturs and false inference, not to mention absurdity, even in > all the daily 'team meetings' I endure in IT (there naturally the > issue is quantity, not quality). ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] New Strider Knife
On Friday 27 April 2007 12:07 am, Leland F. Jackson, CPA wrote: > http://www.stallionleather.com/ Hi Leland! Interesting link, thanks. Don't have a PT 92 AR holster, though. I could get a holster for a regular PT 92 and reform it by soaking it and letting it dry on the gun, but I think I will look a little longer before I do that. -- Regards, Pete http://www.pete-theisen.com/ ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Signs of the Times
On Apr 26, 2007, at 11:24 PM, Pete Theisen wrote: > > Hi Leland! > > Well, the only ones complaining only complain when an R does what the > president is doing. C-man was all over Kosovo, rocket attacked Al > Qaeda in > the desert and not a peep from the Ds. > Pete: That's not entirely accurate. Fix your MP3 player and listen to the quotes I sent out in my 'Name Those Voices' thread They weren't exactly quiet. - Bob > -- > Regards, > > Pete > http://www.pete-theisen.com/ > > [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Name Those Voices
The first link is an MP3 file and the other two are YouTube... - bob On Apr 26, 2007, at 11:02 PM, Pete Theisen wrote: > On Thursday 26 April 2007 9:16 pm, Robert Calco wrote: > > Hi Bob! > > Crashes my audio. Must be a Winders only site/ > >> http://tinyurl.com/38w4sy >> >> - - - >> >> A good exercise for people with short-term memory loss. >> >> For the hearing impaired, try the lip-sync version---can you read >> their >> lips? >> >> - - - >> >> http://tinyurl.com/37pxtc >> >> And another version: >> >> http://tinyurl.com/yoccz9 >> >> - Bob >> >> [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Signs of the Times
On Friday 27 April 2007 12:04 am, Leland F. Jackson, CPA wrote: > What war? The war on terrorism is not really a war that should qualify > the president to claim war time powers, any more that the war on drug is > a real war, or the war on poverty, etc. Hi Leland! Well, the only ones complaining only complain when an R does what the president is doing. C-man was all over Kosovo, rocket attacked Al Qaeda in the desert and not a peep from the Ds. > > On Thursday 26 April 2007 10:33 pm, Leland F. Jackson, CPA wrote: > >> I don't think its legal to overthrow the US Constitutional form of > >> government by any means, if its against the wishes of the American > >> people. As Bill Arnold would say, the American people have and are > >> being duped. Overthrow of the American government by other mean such as > >> treachery and deceit should also be illegal. > > You are wrong. The constitution itself provides an amendment process, > > Article V. > > > > The current whining, however, is over the administration's use of the > > president's war powers. They never say anything when a D president uses > > the same power. -- Regards, Pete http://www.pete-theisen.com/ ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] New Strider Knife
http://www.stallionleather.com/ Regards, LelandJ On 04/26/2007 Pete Theisen wrote: > Hi Leland! > > Concealment, maybe an inside the belt job. Imagine carrying an 18 round 9mm > for personal defense. It is even a little smaller than my .38 sixgun! Got a > link for Stallion? ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Signs of the Times
What war? The war on terrorism is not really a war that should qualify the president to claim war time powers, any more that the war on drug is a real war, or the war on poverty, etc. Regards, LelandJ Pete Theisen wrote: > On Thursday 26 April 2007 10:33 pm, Leland F. Jackson, CPA wrote: > >> I don't think its legal to overthrow the US Constitutional form of >> government by any means, if its against the wishes of the American >> people. As Bill Arnold would say, the American people have and are >> being duped. Overthrow of the American government by other mean such as >> treachery and deceit should also be illegal. >> > > Hi Leland! > > You are wrong. The constitution itself provides an amendment process, Article > V. > > The current whining, however, is over the administration's use of the > president's war powers. They never say anything when a D president uses the > same power. > ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] New Strider Knife
On Thursday 26 April 2007 10:40 pm, Leland F. Jackson, CPA wrote: > I got a holster for my 90-TWO over on Stallion Leather, for about > $110.00. What kind of holster do you want, (eg IWB, shoulder, pocket, > ankle, duty, etc) Hi Leland! Concealment, maybe an inside the belt job. Imagine carrying an 18 round 9mm for personal defense. It is even a little smaller than my .38 sixgun! Got a link for Stallion? -- Regards, Pete http://www.pete-theisen.com/ ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] More Evidence of Intelligent Life on Earth
I just realized in the last few exchanges involving Leland how much I miss ProFox! Leland's capacity for ratiocination is startling even for an accountant. I simply don't run into such high quality specimens of non sequiturs and false inference, not to mention absurdity, even in all the daily 'team meetings' I endure in IT (there naturally the issue is quantity, not quality). BTW Leland I don't mean to throw your brain patterns into a blue screen but Mars' caps are melting rather quickly too. Go figure! http://tinyurl.com/24k59w Granted Dr. Madigan didn't author the article but I still think the source's credibility is sufficient to post on ProFox OT. ;) - Bob On Apr 26, 2007, at 10:55 PM, Pete Theisen wrote: > On Thursday 26 April 2007 9:56 pm, Leland F. Jackson, CPA wrote: >> Why are the glaciers of the arctic region melting at such an alarming >> pace? The glaciers were millions of year in building, and now >> they are >> melting over a couple of human generations. Sounds like something >> wrong >> to me. > > Hi Leland! > > Why is it so chilly here in Sarasota even as I speak? 75F! It will > be 65 by > morning! I know, the warmth I crave is up in ice qaeda melting > glaciers. > -- > Regards, > > Pete > http://www.pete-theisen.com/ > > [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Signs of the Times
On Thursday 26 April 2007 10:33 pm, Leland F. Jackson, CPA wrote: > I don't think its legal to overthrow the US Constitutional form of > government by any means, if its against the wishes of the American > people. As Bill Arnold would say, the American people have and are > being duped. Overthrow of the American government by other mean such as > treachery and deceit should also be illegal. Hi Leland! You are wrong. The constitution itself provides an amendment process, Article V. The current whining, however, is over the administration's use of the president's war powers. They never say anything when a D president uses the same power. -- Regards, Pete http://www.pete-theisen.com/ ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Name Those Voices
On Thursday 26 April 2007 9:16 pm, Robert Calco wrote: Hi Bob! Crashes my audio. Must be a Winders only site/ > http://tinyurl.com/38w4sy > > - - - > > A good exercise for people with short-term memory loss. > > For the hearing impaired, try the lip-sync version---can you read their > lips? > > - - - > > http://tinyurl.com/37pxtc > > And another version: > > http://tinyurl.com/yoccz9 > > - Bob > > [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
[OT] The Trouble with Islam
http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=418_1176494781 Right Wing, Conservative and Republican Gear! http://www.cafepress.com/rightwingmike Thoroughbred Horse Racing Group http://sports.groups.yahoo.com/group/mikes_horse_racing/ ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] More Evidence of Intelligent Life on Earth
On Thursday 26 April 2007 9:56 pm, Leland F. Jackson, CPA wrote: > Why are the glaciers of the arctic region melting at such an alarming > pace? The glaciers were millions of year in building, and now they are > melting over a couple of human generations. Sounds like something wrong > to me. Hi Leland! Why is it so chilly here in Sarasota even as I speak? 75F! It will be 65 by morning! I know, the warmth I crave is up in ice qaeda melting glaciers. -- Regards, Pete http://www.pete-theisen.com/ ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] New Strider Knife
On Thursday 26 April 2007 9:48 pm, Leland F. Jackson, CPA wrote: > If Kim's North Korea army is trained anywhere near a > well as his body guards, we could be in a heap of trouble if we go in > there. Hi Leland! If we should have to destroy that part of the Axis of Evil I think the most appropriate action would be a "nuclear accident" at their bomb facility. Martial art is inneffective against nuclear accidents. -- Regards, Pete http://www.pete-theisen.com/ ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] This is classic
> > Glad you're back Bob...you're the light of the party.. Thanks Jean! It must have been dark times indeed, considering how glum my post was! ;) Now that I'm settled into the new job and, unlike the previous one, it doesn't consume my entire existence, I have a little time for ProFox fun and amusement. How have you been doing? - Bob > > A+ > jml > > [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] New Strider Knife
On Thursday 26 April 2007 8:13 pm, Ricardo Aráoz wrote: > Vince Teachout wrote: > > Leland F. Jackson, CPA wrote: > >> I > >> recently added a new pocket knife as a member of my collection. It is > >> a Strider knife model "SnG Drop Point (Gen6) Folder". It is my > >> understanding Strider knives are the best. Below are links to a few > >> pictures. The handgun on the left is my 90-TWO, and the handgun on the > >> right is my PX4. > > > > Nothing says "Your worst nightmare, come to life" like a well-armed > > CPA! :-) > > Check the Wagner knife. Nice piece. > > http://www.officer.com/article/article.jsp?siteSection=3&id=33658 Hi Ricardo! I have a number of knives in my kitchen drawer. However, I consider my guns the second line of defense, the first line being the well secured perimeter of my condo. In a defense situation I would consider a knife a very distant third line, but I do have knives. -- Regards, Pete http://www.pete-theisen.com/ ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: Form Modifications
Yep. I've managed projects like that before, so I did the honorable thing (in my opinion) and told them, you can't count on me to deliver this. I know when I lead teams before, I typically figured 90 days to get them up to speed on the environment alone, assuming their coding skills were good. Virgil Bierschwale Armstrong and Skipper Real Estate (830) 329-6774 Cell (830) 864-4799 Fax (830) 864-4726 Home http://www.bierschwale.com http://www.bierschwalesolutions.com http://www.JobsForOurFuture.com/index.php -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Vince Teachout Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2007 9:34 PM To: ProFox Email List Subject: Re: Form Modifications Virgil Bierschwale wrote: > Thanks, > Just got back from a chamber of commerce meeting, so I'll have to try it > tomorrow if I still have a job. > Let them know tonight that I can handle any type of typical database stuff, > 2.6 stuff, but I need more time to get up to speed on the OOP stuff. > No problem building the forms, etc. from scratch, but I'm having a hell of a > time when they have "ONLY" custom classes that are up to the top of my head > in custom code that is linked to multiple systems with all of it being > proprietary and no documentation. > You're in deep doo-doo. You sound like you've got a heck of a learning curve ahead of you. Call if you get in a bind. -- Vince Teachout Caracal Software www.caracal.net 518-733-9411 [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [OT] Signs of the Times
That's a good point. Unfortunately most of the Left want the United States to cease to exist in favor of some Communist Utopia. We see how well that's worked in Cuba. --- Virgil Bierschwale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Its not that they are being duped. > Its that people have a natural tendency to do > "empire building", whether it > be at work, or elsewhere and when they do that they > surround themselves with > like minded people, typically "yes men". > > That's why I would much rather see organizations or > groups made up of people > that don't necessarily see eye to eye, BUT they > agree on the final > destination > > Virgil Bierschwale > Armstrong and Skipper Real Estate > (830) 329-6774 Cell > (830) 864-4799 Fax > (830) 864-4726 Home > http://www.bierschwale.com > http://www.bierschwalesolutions.com > http://www.JobsForOurFuture.com/index.php > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf > Of Leland F. Jackson, CPA > Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2007 9:34 PM > To: ProFox Email List > Subject: Re: [OT] Signs of the Times > > I don't think its legal to overthrow the US > Constitutional form of > government by any means, if its against the wishes > of the American > people. As Bill Arnold would say, the American > people have and are > being duped. Overthrow of the American government > by other mean such as > treachery and deceit should also be illegal. > > Regards, > > LelandJ > > Pete Theisen wrote: > > On Thursday 26 April 2007 6:53 pm, Leland F. > Jackson, CPA wrote: > > > > > >> If the Bush Administration, the Neocons, and some > members of the Radical > >> Religious Righters were working toward a goal of > establishing a new form > >> of government for the "New American Century", > what do you think the > >> punishment should be? > >> > > > > Hi Leland! > > > > I think everything they have done and are doing is > legal and if so, there > > should be no witch hunt to begin with, and > certainly no punishment. It is > > legal to attempt to change the government by > peaceful means. > > > > > >> You mean that you wish them (gasp) physical harm? > As in "support peace or > >> I'll kill you"? > >> > > > [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] New Strider Knife
Leland F. Jackson, CPA wrote: > A knife, properly thrown by someone that has a strong throwing arm, has > plenty of thrust. Much like an arrow which can easily penetrate a sand > bag that would stop most bullets. The arrow and knife have more mass > than most bullets, and the mass is focuses on a small area of the knife > point with plenty of weight behind the point driving it into the target, > and with proper skill, a knife can be throw very accurately at close range. > Yawbut, you can still miss, and hit or miss, you're knifeless. -- Vince Teachout Caracal Software www.caracal.net 518-733-9411 ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Form Modifications
Virgil Bierschwale wrote: > Thanks, > Just got back from a chamber of commerce meeting, so I'll have to try it > tomorrow if I still have a job. > Let them know tonight that I can handle any type of typical database stuff, > 2.6 stuff, but I need more time to get up to speed on the OOP stuff. > No problem building the forms, etc. from scratch, but I'm having a hell of a > time when they have "ONLY" custom classes that are up to the top of my head > in custom code that is linked to multiple systems with all of it being > proprietary and no documentation. > You're in deep doo-doo. You sound like you've got a heck of a learning curve ahead of you. Call if you get in a bind. -- Vince Teachout Caracal Software www.caracal.net 518-733-9411 ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] New Strider Knife
On Thursday 26 April 2007 8:44 pm, Leland F. Jackson, CPA wrote: > Here is a link with a little history to the Second Amendment to the > Constitution: > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitu >tion > > or > > http://tinyurl.com/an2ny Hi Leland! Wow! What a resource. -- Regards, Pete http://www.pete-theisen.com/ ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: Form Modifications
Thanks, Just got back from a chamber of commerce meeting, so I'll have to try it tomorrow if I still have a job. Let them know tonight that I can handle any type of typical database stuff, 2.6 stuff, but I need more time to get up to speed on the OOP stuff. No problem building the forms, etc. from scratch, but I'm having a hell of a time when they have "ONLY" custom classes that are up to the top of my head in custom code that is linked to multiple systems with all of it being proprietary and no documentation. Not a problem with time, but I've only had about 20 hrs so far to devote to it and I still haven't received my copy of VFP from the Microsoft ISV program that I paid for, so I don't really have a practice area to play in. Virgil Bierschwale Armstrong and Skipper Real Estate (830) 329-6774 Cell (830) 864-4799 Fax (830) 864-4726 Home http://www.bierschwale.com http://www.bierschwalesolutions.com http://www.JobsForOurFuture.com/index.php -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Vince Teachout Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2007 6:51 PM To: ProFox Email List Subject: Re: Form Modifications Virgil Bierschwale wrote: > I keep getting this error message: > "Cannot delete objects because some are members of a parent class" > > Here's the scenario. > This company needs a new form, so I clone one (copy one), rename it and > change all the values (grids, fields, etc.) like I would have done in the > ole fp2.6 days.. > > I'm beginning to believe this isn't possible in vfp9 and that I need to read > the books that I bought and learn the whole oop thing, but I haven't the > time because they need it done tonight... > > Oh boy, going to be a long one. > > A couple of things: If you look in the Other tab, you'll find the name of the Base Class. Open the base class, SAVE AS somethingElse, then Hack up the SomethingElse, and create a new form based on that. Or, if it's only a few objects that need deleting, I just set there sizes to 1X1, and set visible = .f. -- Vince Teachout Caracal Software www.caracal.net 518-733-9411 [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: MSSQL database creation/modification/maintenancescripting/functions?
Derek Kalweit <> wrote: >> On MSSQL 2K you can right-click the database and chose "All Tasks > >> Generate SQL Script..." to generate TSQL scripts. You can do this for >> individual objects, too. Query Analyzer has similar functionality if >> you left click an object in the object browser pane. > > This can create a database creation script, but it can't create a > database update script. I need an adaptable script that will detect > the current state of the database(what fields, indexes, etc. are > present), and update accordingly to the current version. > > Thanks. Try www.red-gate.com look for the SQL Compare. There is a bundle that will put 3 apps of theirs together, SQL & Data compare as well as another that I can't remember it's name right now. I use it to keep 4 versions of the same db up to date and roll changes as needed. Schema, procs are a snap to deal with. Paid for by developer and not server. Stephen Russell DBA / .Net Developer Memphis TN 38115 901.246-0159 "A good way to judge people is by observing how they treat those who can do them absolutely no good." ---Unknown http://spaces.msn.com/members/srussell/ No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.463 / Virus Database: 269.6.0/775 - Release Date: 4/24/2007 5:43 PM ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [OT] Signs of the Times
Its not that they are being duped. Its that people have a natural tendency to do "empire building", whether it be at work, or elsewhere and when they do that they surround themselves with like minded people, typically "yes men". That's why I would much rather see organizations or groups made up of people that don't necessarily see eye to eye, BUT they agree on the final destination Virgil Bierschwale Armstrong and Skipper Real Estate (830) 329-6774 Cell (830) 864-4799 Fax (830) 864-4726 Home http://www.bierschwale.com http://www.bierschwalesolutions.com http://www.JobsForOurFuture.com/index.php -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Leland F. Jackson, CPA Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2007 9:34 PM To: ProFox Email List Subject: Re: [OT] Signs of the Times I don't think its legal to overthrow the US Constitutional form of government by any means, if its against the wishes of the American people. As Bill Arnold would say, the American people have and are being duped. Overthrow of the American government by other mean such as treachery and deceit should also be illegal. Regards, LelandJ Pete Theisen wrote: > On Thursday 26 April 2007 6:53 pm, Leland F. Jackson, CPA wrote: > > >> If the Bush Administration, the Neocons, and some members of the Radical >> Religious Righters were working toward a goal of establishing a new form >> of government for the "New American Century", what do you think the >> punishment should be? >> > > Hi Leland! > > I think everything they have done and are doing is legal and if so, there > should be no witch hunt to begin with, and certainly no punishment. It is > legal to attempt to change the government by peaceful means. > > >> You mean that you wish them (gasp) physical harm? As in "support peace or >> I'll kill you"? >> [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] New Strider Knife
On Thursday 26 April 2007 7:32 pm, Ed Leafe wrote: > On Apr 26, 2007, at 8:19 PM, Leland F. Jackson, CPA wrote: > > I think that close enough to being a member of a well regulated > > Militia, even though I don't think the 2nd Amemdment to the > > Constitution > > hinges on the requirement of being a member of a well regulated > > Militia. > > I guess that they just threw that clause in there for no reason, > then? What then is the purpose of the inclusion of the first clause > of the 2nd Amendment? Hi Ed! It made perfect sense at the time. At that time the militia was considered all of the people. -- Regards, Pete http://www.pete-theisen.com/ ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] New Strider Knife
On Thursday 26 April 2007 8:26 pm, Leland F. Jackson, CPA wrote: > Here is an article on a recent Federal Court ruling regarding the 2nd > Amendment, which received very little coverage for some reason. > > http://newsbusters.org/node/11334 Hi Leland! I wonder what Ann Coulter would have to say about Mayor Adrian Fenty (D-Washington, DC), considering her not being able to talk about John Edwards LOL? -- Regards, Pete http://www.pete-theisen.com/ ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Bill Moyer's Buying the War show
On Thursday 26 April 2007 7:28 pm, Ricardo Aráoz wrote: > Michael Madigan wrote: > > Bill Moyers should be hung for treason. > > Spoken as a true member of the 'Free World'! (freedom of speech?) Hi Ricardo! And other members of those enjoying free speech are free to tell Moyers to shut up. -- Regards, Pete http://www.pete-theisen.com/ ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] This is classic
On Thursday 26 April 2007 7:25 pm, Ricardo Aráoz wrote: > I must point out when you are not > answering to what I wrote, when you are changing the subject (however > subtly). Hi Ricardo! Of course, you have never and would never do THAT! -- Regards, Pete http://www.pete-theisen.com/ ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] New Strider Knife
On Thursday 26 April 2007 8:19 pm, Leland F. Jackson, CPA wrote: >I don't think the 2nd Amemdment to the Constitution > hinges on the requirement of being a member of a well regulated Militia. Hi Leland! Recent court decisions, and the Bush administration, agree with you. Isn't that a comfort? -- Regards, Pete http://www.pete-theisen.com/ ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] New Strider Knife
A knife, properly thrown by someone that has a strong throwing arm, has plenty of thrust. Much like an arrow which can easily penetrate a sand bag that would stop most bullets. The arrow and knife have more mass than most bullets, and the mass is focuses on a small area of the knife point with plenty of weight behind the point driving it into the target, and with proper skill, a knife can be throw very accurately at close range. Regards, LelandJ On 04/26/2007 Ricardo Aráoz wrote: > I always thought throwing a bad tactic. Not enough penetration power, > any leather garment may thwart the throw, and worse, you loose your knife. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] This is classic
On Thursday 26 April 2007 7:18 pm, Ricardo Aráoz wrote: > 'FRANCE' is not dangerous to the rest > >> of the world. Muslim youth riots are INTERNAL problems of the country > >> and not a danger to the rest of the world. > > > > You are dangerously wrong. France is at least nominally part of the free > > world, and if she is attacked from within or without, the whole free > > world is also attacked. > > > > Even Argentina's security is diminished by internal trouble in France. > > Isolationism only worked in the 5th century or so, if even then. > > Christ! Do you still believe in the Domino Theory? > 'free world'? Hi Ricardo! Gotten you off of that atheist kick, have I? "Free world" is an English idiom often used by people of a certain age. I didn't say anything about the Domino Theory, but come to think of it . . . http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_World http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domino_Theory -- Regards, Pete http://www.pete-theisen.com/ ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] More Evidence of Intelligent Life on Earth
Michael Madigan wrote: > CO2 is an insignificant greenhouse gas. Water vapor > is much more significant. How do we lower water vapor > in the atmosphere? > Whenever you start thinking and that white smoke comes out of your ears. > > > --- Ricardo Aráoz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Michael Madigan wrote: >>> The fact remains that CO2 in the atmosphere is a >>> trailing indicator. The Oceans heat up then CO2 >> is >>> released into the atmosphere, CO2 in the >> atmosphere >>> doesn't heat up the ocean. >>> >> And a gun won't kill you.. >> >> It's the bullet, silly! >> >> >> ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] More Evidence of Intelligent Life on Earth
Except the vast majority of scientist don't believe it. Only the scientists who make a living off the junk science do. --- "Leland F. Jackson, CPA" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You're right, I'm not qualified to speak on global > warming, but I do > know enough to listen and trust the vast majority of > the scientific > community who are tell me that we have a problem. > > Regards, > > LelandJ > > Michael Madigan wrote: > > So I guess you aren't qualified to speak about > global > > warming then. > > > > > > --- "Leland F. Jackson, CPA" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > > > >> Yeah, but I earned my CPA certificate, which is > >> sitting on my wall. > >> Where is your Phd Diploma in physics? LOL > >> > >> > >> Michael Madigan wrote: > >> > >>> You're welcome. > >>> > >>> --- "Leland F. Jackson, CPA" > >>> > >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>> > Thanks for that science class Mr. Michael > > >> Madigan, > >> > Phd physics. > > Regards, > > LelandJ > > On 04/26/2007 Michael Madigan wrote: > > > > The fact remains that CO2 in the atmosphere > is > > > >> a > >> > > trailing indicator. The Oceans heat up then > > > >> CO2 > >> > > > > > is > > > > released into the atmosphere, CO2 in the > > > > > atmosphere > > > > doesn't heat up the ocean. > > > > > ___ > Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com > Subscription Maintenance: > http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox > OT-free version of this list: > http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech > Searchable Archive: > http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox > This message: > > > > > > http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >>> > >>> > ** All postings, unless explicitly stated > > >> otherwise, > >> > are the opinions of the author, and do not > constitute legal or medical advice. This > > >> statement > >> > is added to the messages for those lawyers who > > >> are > >> > too stupid to see the obvious. > > > > >>> > >>> [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] More Evidence of Intelligent Life on Earth
CO2 is an insignificant greenhouse gas. Water vapor is much more significant. How do we lower water vapor in the atmosphere? --- Ricardo Aráoz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Michael Madigan wrote: > > The fact remains that CO2 in the atmosphere is a > > trailing indicator. The Oceans heat up then CO2 > is > > released into the atmosphere, CO2 in the > atmosphere > > doesn't heat up the ocean. > > > > And a gun won't kill you.. > > It's the bullet, silly! > > > > > ___ > Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com > Subscription Maintenance: > http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox > OT-free version of this list: > http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech > Searchable Archive: > http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox > This message: > http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] > ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, > are the opinions of the author, and do not > constitute legal or medical advice. This statement > is added to the messages for those lawyers who are > too stupid to see the obvious. > ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] More Evidence of Intelligent Life on Earth
You're right, I'm not qualified to speak on global warming, but I do know enough to listen and trust the vast majority of the scientific community who are tell me that we have a problem. Regards, LelandJ Michael Madigan wrote: > So I guess you aren't qualified to speak about global > warming then. > > > --- "Leland F. Jackson, CPA" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > >> Yeah, but I earned my CPA certificate, which is >> sitting on my wall. >> Where is your Phd Diploma in physics? LOL >> >> >> Michael Madigan wrote: >> >>> You're welcome. >>> >>> --- "Leland F. Jackson, CPA" >>> >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >>> wrote: >>> >>> >>> Thanks for that science class Mr. Michael >> Madigan, >> Phd physics. Regards, LelandJ On 04/26/2007 Michael Madigan wrote: > The fact remains that CO2 in the atmosphere is > >> a >> > trailing indicator. The Oceans heat up then > >> CO2 >> > > is > released into the atmosphere, CO2 in the > > atmosphere > doesn't heat up the ocean. > > ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: > http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>> >>> ** All postings, unless explicitly stated >> otherwise, >> are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This >> statement >> is added to the messages for those lawyers who >> are >> too stupid to see the obvious. >>> >>> [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] More Evidence of Intelligent Life on Earth
Michael Madigan wrote: > The fact remains that CO2 in the atmosphere is a > trailing indicator. The Oceans heat up then CO2 is > released into the atmosphere, CO2 in the atmosphere > doesn't heat up the ocean. > And a gun won't kill you.. It's the bullet, silly! ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] New Strider Knife
Leland F. Jackson, CPA wrote: > Boker looks like they make some nice knifes. > > I hate the thought of hand to hand combat and would take extraordinary > mean to avoid it. Might get messy, yes. But I'm more inclined to knives than guns. And if I had to kill I think a knife would be more satisfactory. A knife is silent, easy to carry and hide, very good for surprise attacks. > > I took judo classes while stationed a Bergstrom AFB, Austin, Texas. In > the first lesson, the class learned how to take a fall. In the second > class we learned how to throw an opponent by kicking his legs out from > under him. On the third class, we learned how to throw the opponent > over our right shoulder. Also, on the third lesson we did some real > sparring, and I damn near whip the who class, taking on opponents one at > a time. I won 13 matches straight. Once got into a Judo tournament. Everybody had higher rank than me. But I had to find a way. So I found out strangling was allowed. So in every match I didn't care about being thrown but to bring the opponent down with me. In the floor I knew what was going on and had that extra second to strangle them. Finally a bloke saw through the strategy and pinned me down and won. Got second place. Lesson: static strategies are not good. Some other time I was attending a karate school. I was also banging the head instructor's girl (she also did karate), good thing he never found out (he was south american champion). But second in command did found out, so he put me against three opponents. It was easy for a while (applied a Musashi tactic against many opponents described in the Go Rin no Sho, you maneuver them into a line and then they will be crashing (?) into each other), but the bastard let it go on and on. I eventually got tired and started receiving blows. At one time I was against a wall and the blokes stopped hitting me (they saw I was done for), the instructor shouted at them telling them to hit me (in the street no one will stop). Then I had to leave school, too dangerous. > Then some B52 pilot was able to > throw me and wouldn't let me up, so he won. I was exhausted by then, > and didn't even know that being held down counted as a throw, (eg you > win a match by throwing you opponent twice, so the B52 pilot won by > throwing me and pinning me down for a period). The instructor of the > class wanted to take me down to San Antonio to compete in a tournament, > but my boss wouldn't let me go, so that was the end of judo for me. > > The Strider knife is great, but it amazingly light. I haven't tried it > yet, but I don't think it would be a very good throwing knife. Back in > my younger days, I could throw a knife pretty well, which would beat the > hell out of fighting hand to hand. I always thought throwing a bad tactic. Not enough penetration power, any leather garment may thwart the throw, and worse, you loose your knife. > > I saw a video over on the Beretta forum on North Korea's Kim's body > guards. Those guys are really good. I wouldn't get into go hand to > hand with anyone like that, even if I had a knife and they didn't. They > are extreme well trained in the Marshall Arts and my advice would be to > avoid hand to hand combat with types like that at all cost. > > Kim's body guards could pound bricks into a pile of power with their > hand, they could use their forehead to bust bricks and boards and even > drive nails into 4 by 4s. They took turns busting cane over each others > backs, and were pretty aerobic, even when using a handgun, and almost > alway hit their targets. Those guys would put the US Secret Service > folks to sham. If Kim's North Korea army is trained anywhere near a > well as his body guards, we could be in a heap of trouble if we go in there. > > Regards, > > LelandJ > > > Ricardo Aráoz wrote: >> Vince Teachout wrote: >> >>> Leland F. Jackson, CPA wrote: >>> I recently added a new pocket knife as a member of my collection. It is a Strider knife model "SnG Drop Point (Gen6) Folder". It is my understanding Strider knives are the best. Below are links to a few pictures. The handgun on the left is my 90-TWO, and the handgun on the right is my PX4. >>> Nothing says "Your worst nightmare, come to life" like a well-armed >>> CPA! :-) >>> >>> >>> >>> >> Check the Wagner knife. Nice piece. >> >> http://www.officer.com/article/article.jsp?siteSection=3&id=33658 >> >> ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute le
Re: [OT] More Evidence of Intelligent Life on Earth
So I guess you aren't qualified to speak about global warming then. --- "Leland F. Jackson, CPA" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yeah, but I earned my CPA certificate, which is > sitting on my wall. > Where is your Phd Diploma in physics? LOL > > > Michael Madigan wrote: > > You're welcome. > > > > --- "Leland F. Jackson, CPA" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > > > >> Thanks for that science class Mr. Michael > Madigan, > >> Phd physics. > >> > >> Regards, > >> > >> LelandJ > >> > >> On 04/26/2007 Michael Madigan wrote: > >> > >>> The fact remains that CO2 in the atmosphere is > a > >>> trailing indicator. The Oceans heat up then > CO2 > >>> > >> is > >> > >>> released into the atmosphere, CO2 in the > >>> > >> atmosphere > >> > >>> doesn't heat up the ocean. > >>> > >> > >> > >> ___ > >> Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com > >> Subscription Maintenance: > >> http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox > >> OT-free version of this list: > >> http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech > >> Searchable Archive: > >> http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox > >> This message: > >> > >> > > > http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >> ** All postings, unless explicitly stated > otherwise, > >> are the opinions of the author, and do not > >> constitute legal or medical advice. This > statement > >> is added to the messages for those lawyers who > are > >> too stupid to see the obvious. > >> > >> > > > > > > [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] New Strider Knife
I don't know if the Beretta forum would be a good place to ask this question, but it might be. You might also try the Glock forum: http://www.berettaforum.net/ http://www.glocktalk.com/ Regards, LelandJ Pete Theisen wrote: > On Thursday 26 April 2007 7:47 pm, Leland F. Jackson, CPA wrote: > >> Who here is a believer in the 2nd Admendment to the Constitution? I >> recently added a new pocket knife as a member of my collection. It is >> a Strider knife model "SnG Drop Point (Gen6) Folder". It is my >> understanding Strider knives are the best. Below are links to a few >> pictures. The handgun on the left is my 90-TWO >> > > Hi Leland! > > Cool knife. Interesting that Strider knives are said to be the best. > > The 90 TWO is a lot like my Taurus PT 92 AR. Do you know of a holster that > will fit the AR? > ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] New Strider Knife
I got a holster for my 90-TWO over on Stallion Leather, for about $110.00. What kind of holster do you want, (eg IWB, shoulder, pocket, ankle, duty, etc) Regards, LelandJ Pete Theisen wrote: > On Thursday 26 April 2007 7:47 pm, Leland F. Jackson, CPA wrote: > >> Who here is a believer in the 2nd Admendment to the Constitution? I >> recently added a new pocket knife as a member of my collection. It is >> a Strider knife model "SnG Drop Point (Gen6) Folder". It is my >> understanding Strider knives are the best. Below are links to a few >> pictures. The handgun on the left is my 90-TWO >> > > Hi Leland! > > Cool knife. Interesting that Strider knives are said to be the best. > > The 90 TWO is a lot like my Taurus PT 92 AR. Do you know of a holster that > will fit the AR? > ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] More Evidence of Intelligent Life on Earth
Yeah, but I earned my CPA certificate, which is sitting on my wall. Where is your Phd Diploma in physics? LOL Michael Madigan wrote: > You're welcome. > > --- "Leland F. Jackson, CPA" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > >> Thanks for that science class Mr. Michael Madigan, >> Phd physics. >> >> Regards, >> >> LelandJ >> >> On 04/26/2007 Michael Madigan wrote: >> >>> The fact remains that CO2 in the atmosphere is a >>> trailing indicator. The Oceans heat up then CO2 >>> >> is >> >>> released into the atmosphere, CO2 in the >>> >> atmosphere >> >>> doesn't heat up the ocean. >>> >> >> >> ___ >> Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com >> Subscription Maintenance: >> http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox >> OT-free version of this list: >> http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech >> Searchable Archive: >> http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox >> This message: >> >> > http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, >> are the opinions of the author, and do not >> constitute legal or medical advice. This statement >> is added to the messages for those lawyers who are >> too stupid to see the obvious. >> >> > > > [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] New Strider Knife
On Thursday 26 April 2007 7:47 pm, Leland F. Jackson, CPA wrote: > Who here is a believer in the 2nd Admendment to the Constitution? I > recently added a new pocket knife as a member of my collection. It is > a Strider knife model "SnG Drop Point (Gen6) Folder". It is my > understanding Strider knives are the best. Below are links to a few > pictures. The handgun on the left is my 90-TWO Hi Leland! Cool knife. Interesting that Strider knives are said to be the best. The 90 TWO is a lot like my Taurus PT 92 AR. Do you know of a holster that will fit the AR? -- Regards, Pete http://www.pete-theisen.com/ ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Signs of the Times
I don't think its legal to overthrow the US Constitutional form of government by any means, if its against the wishes of the American people. As Bill Arnold would say, the American people have and are being duped. Overthrow of the American government by other mean such as treachery and deceit should also be illegal. Regards, LelandJ Pete Theisen wrote: > On Thursday 26 April 2007 6:53 pm, Leland F. Jackson, CPA wrote: > > >> If the Bush Administration, the Neocons, and some members of the Radical >> Religious Righters were working toward a goal of establishing a new form >> of government for the "New American Century", what do you think the >> punishment should be? >> > > Hi Leland! > > I think everything they have done and are doing is legal and if so, there > should be no witch hunt to begin with, and certainly no punishment. It is > legal to attempt to change the government by peaceful means. > > >> You mean that you wish them (gasp) physical harm? As in "support peace or >> I'll kill you"? >> ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] More Evidence of Intelligent Life on Earth
You're welcome. --- "Leland F. Jackson, CPA" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks for that science class Mr. Michael Madigan, > Phd physics. > > Regards, > > LelandJ > > On 04/26/2007 Michael Madigan wrote: > > The fact remains that CO2 in the atmosphere is a > > trailing indicator. The Oceans heat up then CO2 > is > > released into the atmosphere, CO2 in the > atmosphere > > doesn't heat up the ocean. > > > > > ___ > Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com > Subscription Maintenance: > http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox > OT-free version of this list: > http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech > Searchable Archive: > http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox > This message: > http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] > ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, > are the opinions of the author, and do not > constitute legal or medical advice. This statement > is added to the messages for those lawyers who are > too stupid to see the obvious. > ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] This is classic
Robert Calco wrote: > > On Thursday, April 26, 2007, at 04:25PM, "Ricardo Aráoz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > >>> The riots themselves are as I see it a sign of a deeper threat to >>> European civilization. France may be no threat in the narrow sense >>> you insist on imposing on the discussion, but its cultural demise is. >> So youngsters rioting is a 'cultural demise'? What about hooligans >> rioting through Europe? Is that also a 'cultural demise'? The deep >> 'football conspiracy' threat? >> I perceive you as constantly looking for an enemy, probably cultural. > > I'm not looking for enemies. I'm noting with dismay cultural trends that in > the context of the Islamofascist movement over the last 20+ years portend bad > things, aided and abetted by the retarded policies of a socialist movement > now over 100 years old that (may) have gutted Europe of its will to survive. > My bigger concern is the United States, and trends here are also ominous. > > I perceive you as constantly looking for a rhetorical argument, never > actually making substantive points. > We should shoot guys like you. Is that 'substantive' enough? Let see BANG, BANG, PING! Nope. Can't stop being rhetorical in posts. >>> Incidentally I have every right to read what you write and disagree >>> with how you frame the issue. It does not mean I don't comprehend >>> what you are saying. >>> >> You certainly have every right. But I must point out when you are not >> answering to what I wrote, when you are changing the subject (however >> subtly). > > Subtly changing the subject? > > Jeez! > > 1. Explain to me on what level I failed to address the subject of this > thread. (This will be hard since I established the subject of this thread... > but good luck.) > > 2. Then, explain to me how your point had anything to do with my original > subject. I was never at any point saying France was a danger to the rest of > the world in the sense you mean or any other sense. Who whom here!? > > - Bob > >> ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] More Evidence of Intelligent Life on Earth
Thanks for that science class Mr. Michael Madigan, Phd physics. Regards, LelandJ On 04/26/2007 Michael Madigan wrote: > The fact remains that CO2 in the atmosphere is a > trailing indicator. The Oceans heat up then CO2 is > released into the atmosphere, CO2 in the atmosphere > doesn't heat up the ocean. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Signs of the Times
On Thursday 26 April 2007 6:53 pm, Leland F. Jackson, CPA wrote: > > If the Bush Administration, the Neocons, and some members of the Radical > Religious Righters were working toward a goal of establishing a new form > of government for the "New American Century", what do you think the > punishment should be? Hi Leland! I think everything they have done and are doing is legal and if so, there should be no witch hunt to begin with, and certainly no punishment. It is legal to attempt to change the government by peaceful means. > You mean that you wish them (gasp) physical harm? As in "support peace or > I'll kill you"? -- Regards, Pete http://www.pete-theisen.com/ ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] More Evidence of Intelligent Life on Earth
The fact remains that CO2 in the atmosphere is a trailing indicator. The Oceans heat up then CO2 is released into the atmosphere, CO2 in the atmosphere doesn't heat up the ocean. --- "Leland F. Jackson, CPA" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yeah, but they are melting really fast. I wouldn't > be so worried, if > the glaciers were taking their time to melt and life > on earth had > 500,000 or 1,000,000 years to adjust and evolve for > the changing > climate, but evolution doesn't work fast enough to > adjust to glaciers > that melt over a couple of generation unless your a > micro body of some > kind. > > Regards, > > LelandJ > > > Michael Madigan wrote: > > The Glaciers are melting because the Earth is > going > > through a heating cycle due an increase in solar > > energy. > > > > > > > > > > --- "Leland F. Jackson, CPA" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > > > >> Why are the glaciers of the arctic region melting > at > >> such an alarming > >> pace? The glaciers were millions of year in > >> building, and now they are > >> melting over a couple of human generations. > Sounds > >> like something wrong > >> to me. > >> > >> Regards, > >> > >> LelandJ > >> > >> Robert Calco wrote: > >> > >>> http://tinyurl.com/39kcck > >>> > >>> - - - > >>> > >>> Patterson said much of the up-to-date research > >>> > >> indicates that "changes in the brightness of the > >> sun" are almost certainly the primary cause of > the > >> warming trend since the end of the "Little Ice > Age" > >> in the late 19th century. Human emissions of > carbon > >> dioxide (CO2), the gas of concern in most plans > to > >> curb climate change, appear to have little effect > on > >> global climate, he said. > >> > >>> "I think the proof in the pudding, based on what > >>> > >> (media and governments) are saying, (is) we're > about > >> three quarters of the way (to disaster) with the > >> doubling of CO2 in the atmosphere," said > Patterson. > >> "The world should be heating up like crazy by > now, > >> and it's not. The temperatures match very closely > >> with the solar cycles." > >> > >>> Patterson explained CO2 is not a pollutant, but > an > >>> > >> essential plant food. > >> > >>> > >>> ... > >>> > >>> "All the money wasted on Kyoto in a year could > >>> > >> provide clean drinking water for Africa," said > >> Patterson. "We're into a new era of science with > the > >> discussion of solar forces. Eventually, Kyoto is > >> going to fall by the wayside. In the meantime, > I'm > >> worried we're going to spend millions that could > >> have been spent on something better like air > >> pollution." > >> > >>> ... > >>> > >>> Global warming assertions are based on > >>> > >> inconclusive evidence put forth in science > reports > >> that had not been published yet, he said. > >> > >>> "The media takes (inconclusive) information that > >>> > >> only suggests there could be a climate problem > and > >> turns it into an environmental catastrophe," said > >> Harris. > >> > >>> "They continually say we only have 10 years > left, > >>> > >> and they've been saying it for 20 years, and it's > >> ridiculous," he said. "The only reason I got > >> involved in talking to media is that I think our > >> resources are being mismanaged. > >> > >>> "Go after something real and tangible like air > >>> > >> pollution." > >> > >>> - - - > >>> > >>> A & Men. > >>> > >>> - Bob > >>> > >>> > >>> [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
[OT] Name Those Voices
http://tinyurl.com/38w4sy - - - A good exercise for people with short-term memory loss. For the hearing impaired, try the lip-sync version---can you read their lips? - - - http://tinyurl.com/37pxtc And another version: http://tinyurl.com/yoccz9 - Bob ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] More Evidence of Intelligent Life on Earth
Yeah, but they are melting really fast. I wouldn't be so worried, if the glaciers were taking their time to melt and life on earth had 500,000 or 1,000,000 years to adjust and evolve for the changing climate, but evolution doesn't work fast enough to adjust to glaciers that melt over a couple of generation unless your a micro body of some kind. Regards, LelandJ Michael Madigan wrote: > The Glaciers are melting because the Earth is going > through a heating cycle due an increase in solar > energy. > > > > > --- "Leland F. Jackson, CPA" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > >> Why are the glaciers of the arctic region melting at >> such an alarming >> pace? The glaciers were millions of year in >> building, and now they are >> melting over a couple of human generations. Sounds >> like something wrong >> to me. >> >> Regards, >> >> LelandJ >> >> Robert Calco wrote: >> >>> http://tinyurl.com/39kcck >>> >>> - - - >>> >>> Patterson said much of the up-to-date research >>> >> indicates that "changes in the brightness of the >> sun" are almost certainly the primary cause of the >> warming trend since the end of the "Little Ice Age" >> in the late 19th century. Human emissions of carbon >> dioxide (CO2), the gas of concern in most plans to >> curb climate change, appear to have little effect on >> global climate, he said. >> >>> "I think the proof in the pudding, based on what >>> >> (media and governments) are saying, (is) we're about >> three quarters of the way (to disaster) with the >> doubling of CO2 in the atmosphere," said Patterson. >> "The world should be heating up like crazy by now, >> and it's not. The temperatures match very closely >> with the solar cycles." >> >>> Patterson explained CO2 is not a pollutant, but an >>> >> essential plant food. >> >>> >>> ... >>> >>> "All the money wasted on Kyoto in a year could >>> >> provide clean drinking water for Africa," said >> Patterson. "We're into a new era of science with the >> discussion of solar forces. Eventually, Kyoto is >> going to fall by the wayside. In the meantime, I'm >> worried we're going to spend millions that could >> have been spent on something better like air >> pollution." >> >>> ... >>> >>> Global warming assertions are based on >>> >> inconclusive evidence put forth in science reports >> that had not been published yet, he said. >> >>> "The media takes (inconclusive) information that >>> >> only suggests there could be a climate problem and >> turns it into an environmental catastrophe," said >> Harris. >> >>> "They continually say we only have 10 years left, >>> >> and they've been saying it for 20 years, and it's >> ridiculous," he said. "The only reason I got >> involved in talking to media is that I think our >> resources are being mismanaged. >> >>> "Go after something real and tangible like air >>> >> pollution." >> >>> - - - >>> >>> A & Men. >>> >>> - Bob >>> >>> >>> [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] More Evidence of Intelligent Life on Earth
The Glaciers are melting because the Earth is going through a heating cycle due an increase in solar energy. --- "Leland F. Jackson, CPA" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Why are the glaciers of the arctic region melting at > such an alarming > pace? The glaciers were millions of year in > building, and now they are > melting over a couple of human generations. Sounds > like something wrong > to me. > > Regards, > > LelandJ > > Robert Calco wrote: > > http://tinyurl.com/39kcck > > > > - - - > > > > Patterson said much of the up-to-date research > indicates that "changes in the brightness of the > sun" are almost certainly the primary cause of the > warming trend since the end of the "Little Ice Age" > in the late 19th century. Human emissions of carbon > dioxide (CO2), the gas of concern in most plans to > curb climate change, appear to have little effect on > global climate, he said. > > > > "I think the proof in the pudding, based on what > (media and governments) are saying, (is) we're about > three quarters of the way (to disaster) with the > doubling of CO2 in the atmosphere," said Patterson. > "The world should be heating up like crazy by now, > and it's not. The temperatures match very closely > with the solar cycles." > > > > Patterson explained CO2 is not a pollutant, but an > essential plant food. > > > > ... > > > > "All the money wasted on Kyoto in a year could > provide clean drinking water for Africa," said > Patterson. "We're into a new era of science with the > discussion of solar forces. Eventually, Kyoto is > going to fall by the wayside. In the meantime, I'm > worried we're going to spend millions that could > have been spent on something better like air > pollution." > > > > ... > > > > Global warming assertions are based on > inconclusive evidence put forth in science reports > that had not been published yet, he said. > > > > "The media takes (inconclusive) information that > only suggests there could be a climate problem and > turns it into an environmental catastrophe," said > Harris. > > > > "They continually say we only have 10 years left, > and they've been saying it for 20 years, and it's > ridiculous," he said. "The only reason I got > involved in talking to media is that I think our > resources are being mismanaged. > > > > "Go after something real and tangible like air > pollution." > > - - - > > > > A & Men. > > > > - Bob > > > > [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] More Evidence of Intelligent Life on Earth
Why are the glaciers of the arctic region melting at such an alarming pace? The glaciers were millions of year in building, and now they are melting over a couple of human generations. Sounds like something wrong to me. Regards, LelandJ Robert Calco wrote: > http://tinyurl.com/39kcck > > - - - > > Patterson said much of the up-to-date research indicates that "changes in the > brightness of the sun" are almost certainly the primary cause of the warming > trend since the end of the "Little Ice Age" in the late 19th century. Human > emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2), the gas of concern in most plans to curb > climate change, appear to have little effect on global climate, he said. > > "I think the proof in the pudding, based on what (media and governments) are > saying, (is) we're about three quarters of the way (to disaster) with the > doubling of CO2 in the atmosphere," said Patterson. "The world should be > heating up like crazy by now, and it's not. The temperatures match very > closely with the solar cycles." > > Patterson explained CO2 is not a pollutant, but an essential plant food. > > ... > > "All the money wasted on Kyoto in a year could provide clean drinking water > for Africa," said Patterson. "We're into a new era of science with the > discussion of solar forces. Eventually, Kyoto is going to fall by the > wayside. In the meantime, I'm worried we're going to spend millions that > could have been spent on something better like air pollution." > > ... > > Global warming assertions are based on inconclusive evidence put forth in > science reports that had not been published yet, he said. > > "The media takes (inconclusive) information that only suggests there could be > a climate problem and turns it into an environmental catastrophe," said > Harris. > > "They continually say we only have 10 years left, and they've been saying it > for 20 years, and it's ridiculous," he said. "The only reason I got involved > in talking to media is that I think our resources are being mismanaged. > > "Go after something real and tangible like air pollution." > - - - > > A & Men. > > - Bob > > [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] New Strider Knife
Boker looks like they make some nice knifes. I hate the thought of hand to hand combat and would take extraordinary mean to avoid it. I took judo classes while stationed a Bergstrom AFB, Austin, Texas. In the first lesson, the class learned how to take a fall. In the second class we learned how to throw an opponent by kicking his legs out from under him. On the third class, we learned how to throw the opponent over our right shoulder. Also, on the third lesson we did some real sparring, and I damn near whip the who class, taking on opponents one at a time. I won 13 matches straight. Then some B52 pilot was able to throw me and wouldn't let me up, so he won. I was exhausted by then, and didn't even know that being held down counted as a throw, (eg you win a match by throwing you opponent twice, so the B52 pilot won by throwing me and pinning me down for a period). The instructor of the class wanted to take me down to San Antonio to compete in a tournament, but my boss wouldn't let me go, so that was the end of judo for me. The Strider knife is great, but it amazingly light. I haven't tried it yet, but I don't think it would be a very good throwing knife. Back in my younger days, I could throw a knife pretty well, which would beat the hell out of fighting hand to hand. I saw a video over on the Beretta forum on North Korea's Kim's body guards. Those guys are really good. I wouldn't get into go hand to hand with anyone like that, even if I had a knife and they didn't. They are extreme well trained in the Marshall Arts and my advice would be to avoid hand to hand combat with types like that at all cost. Kim's body guards could pound bricks into a pile of power with their hand, they could use their forehead to bust bricks and boards and even drive nails into 4 by 4s. They took turns busting cane over each others backs, and were pretty aerobic, even when using a handgun, and almost alway hit their targets. Those guys would put the US Secret Service folks to sham. If Kim's North Korea army is trained anywhere near a well as his body guards, we could be in a heap of trouble if we go in there. Regards, LelandJ Ricardo Aráoz wrote: > Vince Teachout wrote: > >> Leland F. Jackson, CPA wrote: >> >>> I >>> recently added a new pocket knife as a member of my collection. It is >>> a Strider knife model "SnG Drop Point (Gen6) Folder". It is my >>> understanding Strider knives are the best. Below are links to a few >>> pictures. The handgun on the left is my 90-TWO, and the handgun on the >>> right is my PX4. >>> >>> >> Nothing says "Your worst nightmare, come to life" like a well-armed >> CPA! :-) >> >> >> >> > > Check the Wagner knife. Nice piece. > > http://www.officer.com/article/article.jsp?siteSection=3&id=33658 > > > [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] This is classic
On Thursday, April 26, 2007, at 04:25PM, "Ricardo Aráoz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> The riots themselves are as I see it a sign of a deeper threat to >> European civilization. France may be no threat in the narrow sense >> you insist on imposing on the discussion, but its cultural demise is. > >So youngsters rioting is a 'cultural demise'? What about hooligans >rioting through Europe? Is that also a 'cultural demise'? The deep >'football conspiracy' threat? >I perceive you as constantly looking for an enemy, probably cultural. I'm not looking for enemies. I'm noting with dismay cultural trends that in the context of the Islamofascist movement over the last 20+ years portend bad things, aided and abetted by the retarded policies of a socialist movement now over 100 years old that (may) have gutted Europe of its will to survive. My bigger concern is the United States, and trends here are also ominous. I perceive you as constantly looking for a rhetorical argument, never actually making substantive points. >> >> Incidentally I have every right to read what you write and disagree >> with how you frame the issue. It does not mean I don't comprehend >> what you are saying. >> > >You certainly have every right. But I must point out when you are not >answering to what I wrote, when you are changing the subject (however >subtly). Subtly changing the subject? Jeez! 1. Explain to me on what level I failed to address the subject of this thread. (This will be hard since I established the subject of this thread... but good luck.) 2. Then, explain to me how your point had anything to do with my original subject. I was never at any point saying France was a danger to the rest of the world in the sense you mean or any other sense. Who whom here!? - Bob > > > > > [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
[OT] Honoring our heroes
http://images.ucomics.com/comics/tt/2007/tt070426.gif -- Ed Leafe -- http://leafe.com -- http://dabodev.com ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: quiet?
Wolfe, Stephen S YA-02 6 MDSS/SGSI wrote: > Me, up to my ass in coding work and none of it in VFP. All of it is in > VBscript. > > For intranet/extranet work? -- Michael J. Babcock, MCP MB Software Solutions, LLC http://mbsoftwaresolutions.com http://fabmate.com "Work smarter, not harder, with MBSS custom software solutions!" ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
[OT] More Evidence of Intelligent Life on Earth
http://tinyurl.com/39kcck - - - Patterson said much of the up-to-date research indicates that "changes in the brightness of the sun" are almost certainly the primary cause of the warming trend since the end of the "Little Ice Age" in the late 19th century. Human emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2), the gas of concern in most plans to curb climate change, appear to have little effect on global climate, he said. "I think the proof in the pudding, based on what (media and governments) are saying, (is) we're about three quarters of the way (to disaster) with the doubling of CO2 in the atmosphere," said Patterson. "The world should be heating up like crazy by now, and it's not. The temperatures match very closely with the solar cycles." Patterson explained CO2 is not a pollutant, but an essential plant food. ... "All the money wasted on Kyoto in a year could provide clean drinking water for Africa," said Patterson. "We're into a new era of science with the discussion of solar forces. Eventually, Kyoto is going to fall by the wayside. In the meantime, I'm worried we're going to spend millions that could have been spent on something better like air pollution." ... Global warming assertions are based on inconclusive evidence put forth in science reports that had not been published yet, he said. "The media takes (inconclusive) information that only suggests there could be a climate problem and turns it into an environmental catastrophe," said Harris. "They continually say we only have 10 years left, and they've been saying it for 20 years, and it's ridiculous," he said. "The only reason I got involved in talking to media is that I think our resources are being mismanaged. "Go after something real and tangible like air pollution." - - - A & Men. - Bob ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Bill Moyer's Buying the War show
He'll get a trial, and when convicted, I would love to pull the lever. --- Ricardo Aráoz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Michael Madigan wrote: > > Treason isn't considered freedom of speech. > > > > And you were named a judge when? Or do you worship > Mr.Lynch? > > > > > > --- Ricardo Aráoz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> Michael Madigan wrote: > >>> Bill Moyers should be hung for treason. > >>> > >> Spoken as a true member of the 'Free World'! > >> (freedom of speech?) > >> > >>> --- Bill Arnold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> > If you missed the Bill Moyers show last night, > it > will be repeated on > PBS (channel 13 here) this week. If you have > any > sense at all of caring > about what happened - and far more importantly, > >> if > you appreciate what > happened as prelude to what is yet to come, I > >> urge > you to watch it and > to think about it. > > The mass media pump-up for the invasion of the > ME > was larger and more > pervasive then I experienced or realized. I > >> didn't > know, for one > example, that Oprah was selling the invasion to > >> her > millions of fans. I > had known about the Donohue firing, but not the > details as he himself > describes it on this show. > > And so on. Moyers puts the case, the > facts/stats/evidence that this > country was massively duped on the table for > >> anyone > to see. One of his > guests mentions, with a sense of awe, just how > "clever" the perps were > about it. > > Right up front, he identifies the neocon gang > as > >> the > perps behind the > curtain, but the show is focused on the media's > role, not the gang > itself, but there's no doubt that the road he's > >> on > ends at neocon > central. > > This story is about what happened, but unless > >> you're > in a hole somewhere > or have your eyes and ears taped, you'll > >> appreciate > that it's not over. > Some names have changed, but the forces behind > >> the > invasion are still > there. The NY Times, the Washington Post, the > >> Wall > Street Journal, Fox > News, etc. haven't lost an iota of power, and > to > this day continue to > lead this country on a march to our ruin for > >> their > cause. > > A part of me thinks that it's too late now, > that > >> the > forces that gang > have set in motion cannot be stopped, but the > stronger part refuses to > accept that fate. I trust, because I must, that > >> the > true spirit of the > American and British people has yet to rise, > but > that it will happen, > because it must. > > Please watch this show. > > > Bill > > > > > ___ > Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com > Subscription Maintenance: > http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox > OT-free version of this list: > http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech > Searchable Archive: > http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox > This message: > http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] > ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, > are the opinions of the author, and do not > constitute legal or medical advice. This statement > is added to the messages for those lawyers who are > too stupid to see the obvious. > ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] New Strider Knife
Most of my write-offs, (eg I use the accural method of accounting), came from AA members, who I agreed to help and/or represent, who had much bigger problems in getting their lives back together, than in paying me. Otherwise, my A/R collections were good, so I hardly ever had to go visit anyone with my guns. HahaaH Regards, LelandJ Vince Teachout wrote: > Leland F. Jackson, CPA wrote: > >> I'm totally harmless, but I will take up for myself if attacked. >> >> >> > Leland: "I REALLY don't think you should claim that deduction." > > Client: " Uhm... Ok.. sir." > > > > > ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] New Strider Knife
Vince Teachout wrote: > Leland F. Jackson, CPA wrote: >> I >> recently added a new pocket knife as a member of my collection. It is >> a Strider knife model "SnG Drop Point (Gen6) Folder". It is my >> understanding Strider knives are the best. Below are links to a few >> pictures. The handgun on the left is my 90-TWO, and the handgun on the >> right is my PX4. >> > > Nothing says "Your worst nightmare, come to life" like a well-armed > CPA! :-) > > > Check the Wagner knife. Nice piece. http://www.officer.com/article/article.jsp?siteSection=3&id=33658 ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Bill Moyer's Buying the War show
Michael Madigan wrote: > Treason isn't considered freedom of speech. > And you were named a judge when? Or do you worship Mr.Lynch? > > --- Ricardo Aráoz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Michael Madigan wrote: >>> Bill Moyers should be hung for treason. >>> >> Spoken as a true member of the 'Free World'! >> (freedom of speech?) >> >>> --- Bill Arnold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> If you missed the Bill Moyers show last night, it will be repeated on PBS (channel 13 here) this week. If you have any sense at all of caring about what happened - and far more importantly, >> if you appreciate what happened as prelude to what is yet to come, I >> urge you to watch it and to think about it. The mass media pump-up for the invasion of the ME was larger and more pervasive then I experienced or realized. I >> didn't know, for one example, that Oprah was selling the invasion to >> her millions of fans. I had known about the Donohue firing, but not the details as he himself describes it on this show. And so on. Moyers puts the case, the facts/stats/evidence that this country was massively duped on the table for >> anyone to see. One of his guests mentions, with a sense of awe, just how "clever" the perps were about it. Right up front, he identifies the neocon gang as >> the perps behind the curtain, but the show is focused on the media's role, not the gang itself, but there's no doubt that the road he's >> on ends at neocon central. This story is about what happened, but unless >> you're in a hole somewhere or have your eyes and ears taped, you'll >> appreciate that it's not over. Some names have changed, but the forces behind >> the invasion are still there. The NY Times, the Washington Post, the >> Wall Street Journal, Fox News, etc. haven't lost an iota of power, and to this day continue to lead this country on a march to our ruin for >> their cause. A part of me thinks that it's too late now, that >> the forces that gang have set in motion cannot be stopped, but the stronger part refuses to accept that fate. I trust, because I must, that >> the true spirit of the American and British people has yet to rise, but that it will happen, because it must. Please watch this show. Bill ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] New Strider Knife
David Crooks wrote: > On Thursday, April 26, 2007 7:48 PM Leland F. Jackson, CPA wrote: > >> Who here is a believer in the 2nd Admendment to the Constitution? I >> recently added a new pocket knife as a member of my collection. It is > >> a Strider knife model "SnG Drop Point (Gen6) Folder". It is my > understanding Strider knives are the best. >> Below are links to a few pictures. The handgun on the left is my > 90-TWO, and the handgun on the right is my >> PX4. I also purchased a new GunVault to keep the handgun secure when > not neede, but with quick, fast access if >the shit ever hit the fan. > > > > I support the right to arm bears! > > Also, I see who will win the duel between the knife and the handgun! > > David L. Crooks > > Remember, no one gets out alive! > That would depend on engagement distance, who perceives the need for killing first and how fast you draw. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] New Strider Knife
Leland F. Jackson, CPA wrote: > I'm totally harmless, but I will take up for myself if attacked. > > Leland: "I REALLY don't think you should claim that deduction." Client: " Uhm... Ok.. sir." -- Vince Teachout Caracal Software www.caracal.net 518-733-9411 ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] New Strider Knife
Michael Madigan wrote: > Wasn't Manson a CPA? > > Charles Manson? Not according to Wiki - he never finished high school. NORMAN Manson, yes, but Norm's never owned a gun, AFAIK. -- Vince Teachout Caracal Software www.caracal.net 518-733-9411 ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] New Strider Knife
I'm totally harmless, but I will take up for myself if attacked. Regards, LelandJ Vince Teachout wrote: > Leland F. Jackson, CPA wrote: > >> I >> recently added a new pocket knife as a member of my collection. It is >> a Strider knife model "SnG Drop Point (Gen6) Folder". It is my >> understanding Strider knives are the best. Below are links to a few >> pictures. The handgun on the left is my 90-TWO, and the handgun on the >> right is my PX4. >> >> > > Nothing says "Your worst nightmare, come to life" like a well-armed > CPA! :-) > > > > ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] New Strider Knife
Wasn't Manson a CPA? --- Vince Teachout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Leland F. Jackson, CPA wrote: > > I > > recently added a new pocket knife as a member of > my collection. It is > > a Strider knife model "SnG Drop Point (Gen6) > Folder". It is my > > understanding Strider knives are the best. Below > are links to a few > > pictures. The handgun on the left is my 90-TWO, > and the handgun on the > > right is my PX4. > > > > Nothing says "Your worst nightmare, come to life" > like a well-armed > CPA! :-) > > > > -- > Vince Teachout > Caracal Software > www.caracal.net > 518-733-9411 > > > > ___ > Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com > Subscription Maintenance: > http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox > OT-free version of this list: > http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech > Searchable Archive: > http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox > This message: > http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] > ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, > are the opinions of the author, and do not > constitute legal or medical advice. This statement > is added to the messages for those lawyers who are > too stupid to see the obvious. > ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] New Strider Knife
Leland F. Jackson, CPA wrote: > I > recently added a new pocket knife as a member of my collection. It is > a Strider knife model "SnG Drop Point (Gen6) Folder". It is my > understanding Strider knives are the best. Below are links to a few > pictures. The handgun on the left is my 90-TWO, and the handgun on the > right is my PX4. > Nothing says "Your worst nightmare, come to life" like a well-armed CPA! :-) -- Vince Teachout Caracal Software www.caracal.net 518-733-9411 ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Form Modifications
Virgil Bierschwale wrote: > I keep getting this error message: > "Cannot delete objects because some are members of a parent class" > > Here's the scenario. > This company needs a new form, so I clone one (copy one), rename it and > change all the values (grids, fields, etc.) like I would have done in the > ole fp2.6 days.. > > I'm beginning to believe this isn't possible in vfp9 and that I need to read > the books that I bought and learn the whole oop thing, but I haven't the > time because they need it done tonight... > > Oh boy, going to be a long one. > > A couple of things: If you look in the Other tab, you'll find the name of the Base Class. Open the base class, SAVE AS somethingElse, then Hack up the SomethingElse, and create a new form based on that. Or, if it's only a few objects that need deleting, I just set there sizes to 1X1, and set visible = .f. -- Vince Teachout Caracal Software www.caracal.net 518-733-9411 ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] New Strider Knife
Here is a link with a little history to the Second Amendment to the Constitution: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution or http://tinyurl.com/an2ny Regards, LelandJ On 04/26/2007 Ed Leafe wrote: > I guess that they just threw that clause in there for no reason, > then? What then is the purpose of the inclusion of the first clause > of the 2nd Amendment? ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] New Strider Knife
On Apr 26, 2007, at 8:19 PM, Leland F. Jackson, CPA wrote: > I think that close enough to being a member of a well regulated > Militia, even though I don't think the 2nd Amemdment to the > Constitution > hinges on the requirement of being a member of a well regulated > Militia. I guess that they just threw that clause in there for no reason, then? What then is the purpose of the inclusion of the first clause of the 2nd Amendment? -- Ed Leafe -- http://leafe.com -- http://dabodev.com ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] New Strider Knife
The second amendment was added to prevent Government tyrany. --- "Leland F. Jackson, CPA" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I served in the US Air Force for 4 years as a clerk. > One year of > service was in Vietnam, (eg Apr 67 to Apr 68), I > was then a member of > the National Guard; although, the Nation Guard never > called me back up. > I'm now a vet with foreign war experience. > > I think that close enough to being a member of a > well regulated > Militia, even though I don't think the 2nd Amemdment > to the Constitution > hinges on the requirement of being a member of a > well regulated Militia. > > Regards, > > LelandJ > > > Ed Leafe wrote: > > On Apr 26, 2007, at 8:03 PM, Leland F. Jackson, > CPA wrote: > > > > > >> Of course, I'm talk about the right to bear arms. > >> > >> A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the > security of a free > >> State, the right of the people to keep and bear > Arms, shall not be > >> infringed. > >> > >> http://www.usconstitution.net/const.html#Am2 > >> > > > > I never realized you were part of a > well-regulated Militia. > > > > -- Ed Leafe > > -- http://leafe.com > > -- http://dabodev.com > > > > > > > > [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] New Strider Knife
Here is an article on a recent Federal Court ruling regarding the 2nd Amendment, which received very little coverage for some reason. http://newsbusters.org/node/11334 Regards, LelandJ Ed Leafe wrote: > On Apr 26, 2007, at 8:03 PM, Leland F. Jackson, CPA wrote: > > >> Of course, I'm talk about the right to bear arms. >> >> A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free >> State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be >> infringed. >> >> http://www.usconstitution.net/const.html#Am2 >> > > I never realized you were part of a well-regulated Militia. > > -- Ed Leafe > -- http://leafe.com > -- http://dabodev.com > > > > [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Bill Moyer's Buying the War show
Treason isn't considered freedom of speech. --- Ricardo Aráoz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Michael Madigan wrote: > > Bill Moyers should be hung for treason. > > > > Spoken as a true member of the 'Free World'! > (freedom of speech?) > > > --- Bill Arnold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> If you missed the Bill Moyers show last night, it > >> will be repeated on > >> PBS (channel 13 here) this week. If you have any > >> sense at all of caring > >> about what happened - and far more importantly, > if > >> you appreciate what > >> happened as prelude to what is yet to come, I > urge > >> you to watch it and > >> to think about it. > >> > >> The mass media pump-up for the invasion of the ME > >> was larger and more > >> pervasive then I experienced or realized. I > didn't > >> know, for one > >> example, that Oprah was selling the invasion to > her > >> millions of fans. I > >> had known about the Donohue firing, but not the > >> details as he himself > >> describes it on this show. > >> > >> And so on. Moyers puts the case, the > >> facts/stats/evidence that this > >> country was massively duped on the table for > anyone > >> to see. One of his > >> guests mentions, with a sense of awe, just how > >> "clever" the perps were > >> about it. > >> > >> Right up front, he identifies the neocon gang as > the > >> perps behind the > >> curtain, but the show is focused on the media's > >> role, not the gang > >> itself, but there's no doubt that the road he's > on > >> ends at neocon > >> central. > >> > >> This story is about what happened, but unless > you're > >> in a hole somewhere > >> or have your eyes and ears taped, you'll > appreciate > >> that it's not over. > >> Some names have changed, but the forces behind > the > >> invasion are still > >> there. The NY Times, the Washington Post, the > Wall > >> Street Journal, Fox > >> News, etc. haven't lost an iota of power, and to > >> this day continue to > >> lead this country on a march to our ruin for > their > >> cause. > >> > >> A part of me thinks that it's too late now, that > the > >> forces that gang > >> have set in motion cannot be stopped, but the > >> stronger part refuses to > >> accept that fate. I trust, because I must, that > the > >> true spirit of the > >> American and British people has yet to rise, but > >> that it will happen, > >> because it must. > >> > >> Please watch this show. > >> > >> > >> Bill > >> > >> > >> > >> ___ > >> Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com > >> Subscription Maintenance: > >> http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox > >> OT-free version of this list: > >> http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech > >> Searchable Archive: > >> http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox > >> This message: > >> > > > http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> ** All postings, unless explicitly stated > otherwise, > >> are the opinions of the author, and do not > >> constitute legal or medical advice. This > statement > >> is added to the messages for those lawyers who > are > >> too stupid to see the obvious. > >> > > > > > ___ > Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com > Subscription Maintenance: > http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox > OT-free version of this list: > http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech > Searchable Archive: > http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox > This message: > http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] > ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, > are the opinions of the author, and do not > constitute legal or medical advice. This statement > is added to the messages for those lawyers who are > too stupid to see the obvious. > ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Bill Moyer's Buying the War show
Michael Madigan wrote: > Bill Moyers should be hung for treason. > Spoken as a true member of the 'Free World'! (freedom of speech?) > --- Bill Arnold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> If you missed the Bill Moyers show last night, it >> will be repeated on >> PBS (channel 13 here) this week. If you have any >> sense at all of caring >> about what happened - and far more importantly, if >> you appreciate what >> happened as prelude to what is yet to come, I urge >> you to watch it and >> to think about it. >> >> The mass media pump-up for the invasion of the ME >> was larger and more >> pervasive then I experienced or realized. I didn't >> know, for one >> example, that Oprah was selling the invasion to her >> millions of fans. I >> had known about the Donohue firing, but not the >> details as he himself >> describes it on this show. >> >> And so on. Moyers puts the case, the >> facts/stats/evidence that this >> country was massively duped on the table for anyone >> to see. One of his >> guests mentions, with a sense of awe, just how >> "clever" the perps were >> about it. >> >> Right up front, he identifies the neocon gang as the >> perps behind the >> curtain, but the show is focused on the media's >> role, not the gang >> itself, but there's no doubt that the road he's on >> ends at neocon >> central. >> >> This story is about what happened, but unless you're >> in a hole somewhere >> or have your eyes and ears taped, you'll appreciate >> that it's not over. >> Some names have changed, but the forces behind the >> invasion are still >> there. The NY Times, the Washington Post, the Wall >> Street Journal, Fox >> News, etc. haven't lost an iota of power, and to >> this day continue to >> lead this country on a march to our ruin for their >> cause. >> >> A part of me thinks that it's too late now, that the >> forces that gang >> have set in motion cannot be stopped, but the >> stronger part refuses to >> accept that fate. I trust, because I must, that the >> true spirit of the >> American and British people has yet to rise, but >> that it will happen, >> because it must. >> >> Please watch this show. >> >> >> Bill >> >> >> >> ___ >> Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com >> Subscription Maintenance: >> http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox >> OT-free version of this list: >> http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech >> Searchable Archive: >> http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox >> This message: >> > http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, >> are the opinions of the author, and do not >> constitute legal or medical advice. This statement >> is added to the messages for those lawyers who are >> too stupid to see the obvious. >> > ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] This is classic
Wolfe, Stephen S YA-02 6 MDSS/SGSI wrote: > Ricardo, > > Bob, did read what you said and addressed you words directly, I don't > understand the whine? > Hahahaha! And which is the emoticon for 'whining' > v/r > > > //SIGNED// > > Stephen S. Wolfe, YA2, DAF > 6th MDG Data Services Manager > 6th MDG Information System Security Officer > Comm (813) 827-9994 DSN 651-9994 > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ricardo Aráoz > Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2007 9:46 PM > To: ProFox Email List > Subject: Re: [OT] This is classic > > Robert Calco wrote: >> On Apr 25, 2007, at 5:48 AM, Ricardo Aráoz wrote: >> >>> Don't have a standing on this issue of French internal politics, >>> France >>> is not dangerous to the rest of the world. But. >> I disagree. Consider the Muslim youth riots of not-so-long-ago. >> France is a microcosm of what European left-leaning policies have >> wrought on what used to be called European culture, and within a few >> short decades, if trends continue, the radical Muslims who preach >> death to the West from the underbelly of European society will have >> overtaken several nuclear nations by attrition. >> >> That's a reason to at least care about European politics. >> > > Please, read what I wrote. I say 'FRANCE' is not dangerous to the rest > of the world. Muslim youth riots are INTERNAL problems of the country > and not a danger to the rest of the world. > > ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] This is classic
Robert Calco wrote: > On Apr 25, 2007, at 9:46 PM, Ricardo Aráoz wrote: > >> Robert Calco wrote: >>> On Apr 25, 2007, at 5:48 AM, Ricardo Aráoz wrote: >>> Don't have a standing on this issue of French internal politics, France is not dangerous to the rest of the world. But. >>> I disagree. Consider the Muslim youth riots of not-so-long-ago. >>> France is a microcosm of what European left-leaning policies have >>> wrought on what used to be called European culture, and within a few >>> short decades, if trends continue, the radical Muslims who preach >>> death to the West from the underbelly of European society will have >>> overtaken several nuclear nations by attrition. >>> >>> That's a reason to at least care about European politics. >>> >> Please, read what I wrote. I say 'FRANCE' is not dangerous to the rest >> of the world. Muslim youth riots are INTERNAL problems of the country >> and not a danger to the rest of the world. > > I read what you wrote, both then and now, and I still disagree. > > The riots themselves are as I see it a sign of a deeper threat to > European civilization. France may be no threat in the narrow sense > you insist on imposing on the discussion, but its cultural demise is. So youngsters rioting is a 'cultural demise'? What about hooligans rioting through Europe? Is that also a 'cultural demise'? The deep 'football conspiracy' threat? I perceive you as constantly looking for an enemy, probably cultural. > > Incidentally I have every right to read what you write and disagree > with how you frame the issue. It does not mean I don't comprehend > what you are saying. > You certainly have every right. But I must point out when you are not answering to what I wrote, when you are changing the subject (however subtly). ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] New Strider Knife
I served in the US Air Force for 4 years as a clerk. One year of service was in Vietnam, (eg Apr 67 to Apr 68), I was then a member of the National Guard; although, the Nation Guard never called me back up. I'm now a vet with foreign war experience. I think that close enough to being a member of a well regulated Militia, even though I don't think the 2nd Amemdment to the Constitution hinges on the requirement of being a member of a well regulated Militia. Regards, LelandJ Ed Leafe wrote: > On Apr 26, 2007, at 8:03 PM, Leland F. Jackson, CPA wrote: > > >> Of course, I'm talk about the right to bear arms. >> >> A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free >> State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be >> infringed. >> >> http://www.usconstitution.net/const.html#Am2 >> > > I never realized you were part of a well-regulated Militia. > > -- Ed Leafe > -- http://leafe.com > -- http://dabodev.com > > > > [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] This is classic
Pete Theisen wrote: > On Wednesday 25 April 2007 9:46 pm, Ricardo Aráoz wrote: > >>> I disagree. Consider the Muslim youth riots of not-so-long-ago. >>> France is a microcosm of what European left-leaning policies have >>> wrought on what used to be called European culture, and within a few >>> short decades, if trends continue, the radical Muslims who preach >>> death to the West from the underbelly of European society will have >>> overtaken several nuclear nations by attrition. >>> >>> That's a reason to at least care about European politics. >> Please, read what I wrote. I say 'FRANCE' is not dangerous to the rest >> of the world. Muslim youth riots are INTERNAL problems of the country >> and not a danger to the rest of the world. > > Hi Ricardo! > > You are dangerously wrong. France is at least nominally part of the free > world, and if she is attacked from within or without, the whole free world is > also attacked. > > Even Argentina's security is diminished by internal trouble in France. > Isolationism only worked in the 5th century or so, if even then. Christ! Do you still believe in the Domino Theory? It's bullshait! How long will you use that scary picture? And what the hell is the f.cking 'free world'? Please name the members. And please tell me what does 'free' stand for? Is Saudi Arabia (an ally of USA) part of the 'free world'? And Russia? ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: Form Modifications
Thanks... Virgil Bierschwale Armstrong and Skipper Real Estate (830) 329-6774 Cell (830) 864-4799 Fax (830) 864-4726 Home http://www.bierschwale.com http://www.bierschwalesolutions.com http://www.JobsForOurFuture.com/index.php -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matthew Jarvis Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2007 6:12 PM To: profox@leafe.com Subject: Re: Form Modifications Virgil Bierschwale wrote: > I keep getting this error message: > "Cannot delete objects because some are members of a parent class" > > Here's the scenario. > This company needs a new form, so I clone one (copy one), rename it and > change all the values (grids, fields, etc.) like I would have done in the > ole fp2.6 days.. > > I'm beginning to believe this isn't possible in vfp9 and that I need to read > the books that I bought and learn the whole oop thing, but I haven't the > time because they need it done tonight... > > Oh boy, going to be a long one. > > > > Virgil Bierschwale here's a hack off the top of my head, UNTESTED and NO IDEA if it will work or not.. BACKUP the form to a very safe place open the scx in the browser and locate what looks to be the main record for the container look in the memo fields for a ref to another container or base class or something of the VFP-specific classes. Change it to something else and see what happens... OR find the objects (textbozxes, combos whatever) that are within the container copy/paste them somewhere else delete the whole thing copy/paste them back Matthew S. Jarvis IT Manager Bike Friday - "Performance that Packs." www.bikefriday.com 541/687-0487 x140 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Form Modifications
Virgil Bierschwale wrote: > I keep getting this error message: > "Cannot delete objects because some are members of a parent class" > > Here's the scenario. > This company needs a new form, so I clone one (copy one), rename it and > change all the values (grids, fields, etc.) like I would have done in the > ole fp2.6 days.. > > I'm beginning to believe this isn't possible in vfp9 and that I need to read > the books that I bought and learn the whole oop thing, but I haven't the > time because they need it done tonight... > > Oh boy, going to be a long one. > > > > Virgil Bierschwale here's a hack off the top of my head, UNTESTED and NO IDEA if it will work or not.. BACKUP the form to a very safe place open the scx in the browser and locate what looks to be the main record for the container look in the memo fields for a ref to another container or base class or something of the VFP-specific classes. Change it to something else and see what happens... OR find the objects (textbozxes, combos whatever) that are within the container copy/paste them somewhere else delete the whole thing copy/paste them back Matthew S. Jarvis IT Manager Bike Friday - "Performance that Packs." www.bikefriday.com 541/687-0487 x140 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] New Strider Knife
On Apr 26, 2007, at 8:03 PM, Leland F. Jackson, CPA wrote: > Of course, I'm talk about the right to bear arms. > > A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free > State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be > infringed. > > http://www.usconstitution.net/const.html#Am2 I never realized you were part of a well-regulated Militia. -- Ed Leafe -- http://leafe.com -- http://dabodev.com ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Signs of the Times
On Apr 26, 2007, at 6:53 PM, Leland F. Jackson, CPA wrote: > I had to do some research on this. It is against the law for > anyone to > conspire to overthrow the US government by force or violence. It was also against the law to conspire to overthrow King George III. "That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness." -- Ed Leafe -- http://leafe.com -- http://dabodev.com ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] New Strider Knife
Of course, I'm talk about the right to bear arms. A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. http://www.usconstitution.net/const.html#Am2 Regards, LelandJ Ed Leafe wrote: > On Apr 26, 2007, at 7:47 PM, Leland F. Jackson, CPA wrote: > > >> Who here is a believer in the 2nd Admendment to the Constitution? >> > > Which part of it? Or the thing in its entirety? > > -- Ed Leafe > -- http://leafe.com > -- http://dabodev.com > > > > [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] New Strider Knife
On Apr 26, 2007, at 7:47 PM, Leland F. Jackson, CPA wrote: > Who here is a believer in the 2nd Admendment to the Constitution? Which part of it? Or the thing in its entirety? -- Ed Leafe -- http://leafe.com -- http://dabodev.com ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [OT] New Strider Knife
On Thursday, April 26, 2007 7:48 PM Leland F. Jackson, CPA wrote: >Who here is a believer in the 2nd Admendment to the Constitution? I >recently added a new pocket knife as a member of my collection. It is >a Strider knife model "SnG Drop Point (Gen6) Folder". It is my understanding Strider knives are the best. >Below are links to a few pictures. The handgun on the left is my 90-TWO, and the handgun on the right is my >PX4. I also purchased a new GunVault to keep the handgun secure when not neede, but with quick, fast access if >the shit ever hit the fan. I support the right to arm bears! Also, I see who will win the duel between the knife and the handgun! David L. Crooks Remember, no one gets out alive! ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
