RE: [NF] Lightweight Task Manager
How about... ToDoList on codeproject [http://www.codeproject.com/tools/todolist2.asp] (which I use for all sorts of things) Or the free version of googles business offering? Personally I found it unflexable and irritating but it might be OK for you. Regards Michael Hawksworth -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matthew Jarvis Sent: 18 May 2007 22:23 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [NF] Lightweight Task Manager Can someone recommend a nicely featured yet lightweight task manager i.e. reminder program? I've got my sales manager harping on me to install Outlook just so he can use the calendar thingy - and that ain't gonna happen... I use Outlook at home and like this calendar feature quite a bit but I don't allow Outlook at our company. TIA, Matt Matthew S. Jarvis IT Manager Bike Friday - "Performance that Packs." www.bikefriday.com 541/687-0487 x140 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
[NF] Roy Osherove, It is Time for Violence
Thought this would amuse some of you... http://tinyurl.com/2qyvq6 Regards Michael Hawksworth --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/related text/plain (text body -- kept) image/gif --- ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] I love contracting!
You have to be full of bull-bleep -- up to your eyelids. MB Software Solutions wrote: > Chet Gardiner wrote: > >> (and >> had to pay his huge severance) >> > I must learn how to get that kind of job...you know, the one where you > get a huge severance after they cut you loose. The "Golden Handshake" > as its called, right? > > ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] Scanning documents to PDF
Virgil Bierschwale wrote: > I've got a HP 3030 laserjet, fax, scanner that works good > > > > I need to scan in some documents and convert them to PDF so that I can put > them on the new chamber of commerce web site that I'm building. > We have a large canon machine here that does the same sort of thing. When scanning you can choose what type of file it will save (PDF/JPEG/TIF) it then gets emailed to you. See if this machine has a similar setup. Peter ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] I love contracting!
Golden Parachute On 5/20/07, MB Software Solutions <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Chet Gardiner wrote: > > (and > > had to pay his huge severance) > I must learn how to get that kind of job...you know, the one where you > get a huge severance after they cut you loose. The "Golden Handshake" > as its called, right? ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] Scanning documents to PDF
On 5/20/07, Pablo H Rivera Sr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have the 2007 Office Suite and it can "convert"... Is this the _Microsoft_ Office 2007 suite? I've got no experience with MS Office 2007. That has a license that prevents me from using it, and isn't available on my preferred platforms. But OpenOffice.org 2.x does allow export of word processing documents into PDFs, with no add-ons required, and it does retain hyperlinks. And it can convert your Word documents into a standard XML format, to boot. And it's free. -- Ted Roche Ted Roche & Associates, LLC http://www.tedroche.com ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
[NF] It's all about choice (but what about the money)?
Checked out this site after following a recent link posted here: http://creativecommons.org/ I understand the motto "it's all about choice" and "free as in choice, not beer" and even that folks involved in open source make money because they're used as paid consultants for things like implementation, etc., but do the people who serve at creativecommons and other places just volunteer their time for free? -- Michael J. Babcock, MCP MB Software Solutions, LLC http://mbsoftwaresolutions.com http://fabmate.com "Work smarter, not harder, with MBSS custom software solutions!" ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
[NF] The Bible speaks of eXtreme Programming (sort of)
Saw this in a weekly inspirational email and had to smile as it related (somewhat) to XP: Two are better than one, because they have a good return for their work: If one falls down, his friend can pick him up. But pity the man who falls and has no one to help him up! -Ecclesiastes 4:9-10 Friends, co-workers, partners, spouses – all these can be illustrations of the above principle. Some people think they are better off alone, however, we were made to be in community with others. Do you sabotage community or develop it in your life? -- Michael J. Babcock, MCP MB Software Solutions, LLC http://mbsoftwaresolutions.com http://fabmate.com "Work smarter, not harder, with MBSS custom software solutions!" ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] It's all about choice (but what about the money)?
On 5/21/07, MB Software Solutions <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > but do the people who serve at creativecommons and other places just > volunteer their time for free? There are volunteers and there are paid staff, just like any other non-profit. Click the About link (http://creativecommons.org/about) to learn: "Creative Commons is a Massachusetts-chartered 501(c)(3) tax-exempt charitable corporation. For more information, see the corporate charter, by-laws, most recent tax return and most recent audited financial statement." -- Ted Roche Ted Roche & Associates, LLC http://www.tedroche.com ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [NF] It's all about choice (but what about the money)?
No Idea on that. My time trying to revamp the chamber of commerce is for free, which I can't afford, but oh well, its something I want to do. Started revamping their website this morning at http://www.harpertexas.com Hopefully by the end of the week I'll have it completed and yep, its all for free Virgil Bierschwale http://www.bierschwalesolutions.com http://www.jobsforourfuture.com/index.php -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of MB Software Solutions Sent: Monday, May 21, 2007 7:58 AM To: Profox Subject: [NF] It's all about choice (but what about the money)? Checked out this site after following a recent link posted here: http://creativecommons.org/ I understand the motto "it's all about choice" and "free as in choice, not beer" and even that folks involved in open source make money because they're used as paid consultants for things like implementation, etc., but do the people who serve at creativecommons and other places just volunteer their time for free? -- Michael J. Babcock, MCP MB Software Solutions, LLC http://mbsoftwaresolutions.com http://fabmate.com "Work smarter, not harder, with MBSS custom software solutions!" [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Want to activate child form launched in parent (but keep parentopen)
> > Is Desktop =.T. on the parent form? Is the parent form modal? > These are forms within the VFP main window. Both have Desktop = .F. Modal or Modeless? -- Derek ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] It's all about choice (but what about the money)?
On 5/21/07, Virgil Bierschwale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > My time trying to revamp the chamber of commerce is for free, which I can't > afford, but oh well, its something I want to do. > Started revamping their website this morning at http://www.harpertexas.com But with any luck, it will end up with a "Contact Virgil for website development" link across the bottom, right? -- Ted Roche Ted Roche & Associates, LLC http://www.tedroche.com ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [NF] It's all about choice (but what about the money)?
Real Estate Virgil Bierschwale http://www.bierschwalesolutions.com http://www.jobsforourfuture.com/index.php -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ted Roche Sent: Monday, May 21, 2007 8:43 AM To: profox@leafe.com Subject: Re: [NF] It's all about choice (but what about the money)? On 5/21/07, Virgil Bierschwale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > My time trying to revamp the chamber of commerce is for free, which I can't > afford, but oh well, its something I want to do. > Started revamping their website this morning at http://www.harpertexas.com But with any luck, it will end up with a "Contact Virgil for website development" link across the bottom, right? -- Ted Roche Ted Roche & Associates, LLC http://www.tedroche.com [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] UMPC future prediction....what do you think?
On 5/20/07, Whil Hentzen (Pro*) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > And you never know when that breakthrough will happen. True. And in the meantime, something like the Palm Treo 755p looks pretty tempting at $279... http://www.palm.com/us/products/smartphones/treo755p/ Compared to dropping $1500+ on a UMPC, a sub-$300 device that suitable for notes, calendars and phone lookups makes a lot of sense. Wish it had Wi-Fi, though... -- Ted Roche Ted Roche & Associates, LLC http://www.tedroche.com ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
FPW 2.6 Change default printer in Vista
Hello, Is there a way to change the default printer in Vista from FPW 2.6 I used to do it in W98 no problem, but I don't have Vista to test. The trick was to change the default printer line in the WIN.INI file. Does Vista have a WIN.INI file and does it have a printer section like W98. Maybe it still works the same. Thanks, Kent ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] UMPC future prediction....what do you think?
> True. And in the meantime, something like the Palm Treo 755p looks > pretty tempting at $279... > > http://www.palm.com/us/products/smartphones/treo755p/ > > Compared to dropping $1500+ on a UMPC, a sub-$300 device that suitable > for notes, calendars and phone lookups makes a lot of sense. Wish it > had Wi-Fi, though... UMPC's run Visual Foxpro applications-- Palm/PocketPC's don't. We offer UMPC's as an option for table-side ordering for our restaurant POS app, and it works far, far, far better than our PocketPC offering(which uses Terminal Services with a screen hack I wrote to maximize screen usage). The UMPC is a full PC and works very well running VFP apps with very good performance. There are definitely mobile needs beyond that of simple PIM devices, just not mainstream yet. I believe for general consumer/business use, UMPC's won't catch on. Pocket PC's aren't stable enough(worst OS stability I've experienced in modern days). I haven't used a Palm-based device in years, so hopefully they've gotten a lot better since... Cell phone OS's are crap-- Microsoft's "SmartPhone" is OK, but still has some stability issues similar to PocketPC's, and it isn't a full PocketPC OS, so it can't run all the applications a real PocketPC runs... While has it right on screen size-- there needs to be alternatives. Holographs are a ways off, and I'm guessing people won't want to wear eyepieces too much(maybe something flip down over one eye, but not overall goggles or anything). I honestly think the up and coming technology is roll-up screens. A device that will, when rolled up, be the size of a cell phone, but you can pull it apart, unrolling a screen that could be much larger. Technology for this exists today in R&D labs, and I hope to see it in consumer devices within a few years. -- Derek ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] It's all about choice (but what about the money)?
Virgil Bierschwale wrote: > No Idea on that. > My time trying to revamp the chamber of commerce is for free, which I can't > afford, but oh well, its something I want to do. > Started revamping their website this morning at http://www.harpertexas.com > > Hopefully by the end of the week I'll have it completed and yep, its all for > free > The Open Source community will love you for it! -- Michael J. Babcock, MCP MB Software Solutions, LLC http://mbsoftwaresolutions.com http://fabmate.com "Work smarter, not harder, with MBSS custom software solutions!" ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] Lightweight Task Manager
> Why not. > Outlook is excellent for sharing calendars, tasks, etc.. > > Nothing better on the market if you're in the corporate world. Yes, Outlook is awesome when hooked to an Exchange server. When in a POP3 or IMAP configuration it is severely limited, as the calendars/contacts/etc are stored locally in a PST file and shared calendars, distribution lists, etc. don't work. There's a connector from Bynari that supposedly lets a person at least store the calendar items, tasks, contacts, etc. on an IMAP server, but when I tried it, it was pretty horrible-- insisting on transfering everything in the background, etc.-- it did not deal with my 1GB IMAP mailbox very well at all, and didn't even download properly in the background when I went to lunch. True, I'm not using one of their "supported" IMAP servers, it did seem to work, just poorly... -- Derek ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] UMPC future prediction....what do you think?
Ted Roche wrote: > http://www.palm.com/us/products/smartphones/treo755p/ > > Wish it had Wi-Fi, though... > > "The Government insists Wi-Fi is safe, but a Panorama investigation shows that radio frequency radiation levels in some schools are up to three times the level found in the main beam of intensity from mobile phone masts." http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/panorama/6674675.stm I know this is coming from wireless access points and not the above device but interesting nevertheless. Might have a look at the programme later, or even tape it. Peter ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Want to activate child form launched in parent (but keep parentopen)
Derek Kalweit wrote: >>> Is Desktop =.T. on the parent form? Is the parent form modal? >>> > > >> These are forms within the VFP main window. Both have Desktop = .F. >> > > Modal or Modeless? > > > Modeless. -- Michael J. Babcock, MCP MB Software Solutions, LLC http://mbsoftwaresolutions.com http://fabmate.com "Work smarter, not harder, with MBSS custom software solutions!" ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Transaction/buffering question
I'm writing a utility to correct some data that involves 3 tables in 2 separate DBCs. I want to wrap the whole thing in a transaction and only commit my changes if the update succeeds in all 3 tables. My first thought was to nest the tableupdates and commit or rollback after each tableupdate. Something like this: ...(pseudo-code) BEGIN TRANS IF TABLEUPDATE(table1) IF TABLEUPDATE(table2) IF TABLEUPDATE(table3) END TRANS ELSE ROLLBACK ENDIF ELSE ROLLBACK ENDIF ELSE ROLLBACK ENDIF ... But then I thought why not put all 3 tableupdates in an IF statement like this: ...(pseudo-code) BEGIN TRANS IF TABLEUPDATE(table1) AND TABLEUPDATE(table2) AND TABLEUPDATE(table3) END TRANS ELSE ROLLBACK ENDIF ... In particular, I'm wondering how transactions work when multiple DBCs are involved. Any opinions/caveats on the pros & cons of each of these approaches? I'm most concerned with data integrity as opposed to performance as this will (hopefully) be a one-time fix. TIA -- Richard Kaye Vice President Artfact/RFC Systems Voice: 617.219.1038 Fax: 617.219.1001 For the fastest response time, please send your support queries to: Technical Support - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Australian Support - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet Support - [EMAIL PROTECTED] All Other Requests - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - This message has been checked for viruses before sending. - ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Want to activate child form launched in parent (but keep parentopen)
> >>> Is Desktop =.T. on the parent form? Is the parent form modal? > >> These are forms within the VFP main window. Both have Desktop = .F. > > Modal or Modeless? > Modeless. Do you have a setfocus() or anything similar in code on the parent form? Possibly in a timer? -- Derek ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] It's all about choice (but what about the money)?
On 5/21/07, MB Software Solutions <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The Open Source community will love you for it! Not if he's doing it in Dreamweaver and ASPX! -- Ted Roche Ted Roche & Associates, LLC http://www.tedroche.com ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Transaction/buffering question
Hi Richard I do the following. LOCAL lok lok=.F. BEGIN TRANS IF TABLEUPDATE(table1) IF TABLEUPDATE(table2) lok=.T. ELSE *Message - something went wrong with table2 ENDIF ELSE *Message -something wrong with table1 ENDIF IF lok END TRANSACTION *Do any post save operations ELSE *Store the failed error messages in the error table ROLLBACK TABLEREVERT(table1) TABLEREVERT(table2) ENDIF _Ajit Abraham ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [NF] It's all about choice (but what about the money)?
Web expressions, PDF Trying to make it where they can maintain their documents in word and them simply ftp the new PDF whenever they make a change. That way they won't need a programmer if something happens to me. Virgil Bierschwale http://www.bierschwalesolutions.com http://www.jobsforourfuture.com/index.php -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ted Roche Sent: Monday, May 21, 2007 9:53 AM To: profox@leafe.com Subject: Re: [NF] It's all about choice (but what about the money)? On 5/21/07, MB Software Solutions <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The Open Source community will love you for it! Not if he's doing it in Dreamweaver and ASPX! -- Ted Roche Ted Roche & Associates, LLC http://www.tedroche.com [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] UMPC future prediction....what do you think?
On 5/21/07, Peter Cushing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "The Government insists Wi-Fi is safe, but a Panorama investigation > shows that radio frequency radiation levels in some schools are up to > three times the level found in the main beam of intensity from mobile > phone masts." I'd be a lot more worried about UV radiation right now than radio waves. Skin cancers from UV are (excuse the expression) sky-rocketing, while brain tumors from cell phones and wifi are anecdotal at best. Are we [OT] yet? -- Ted (former 10CFR20 radiation worker) (Oh! That explains it!) Roche Ted Roche & Associates, LLC http://www.tedroche.com ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] UMPC future prediction....what do you think?
Ted Roche wrote: > On 5/21/07, Peter Cushing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> "The Government insists Wi-Fi is safe, but a Panorama investigation >> shows that radio frequency radiation levels in some schools are up to >> three times the level found in the main beam of intensity from mobile >> phone masts." >> > > I'd be a lot more worried about UV radiation right now than radio > waves. Skin cancers from UV are (excuse the expression) sky-rocketing, > while brain tumors from cell phones and wifi are anecdotal at best. > > Are we [OT] yet? > > No - you spolied it and mentioned wifi (again) ! ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] UMPC future prediction....what do you think?
Ted Roche wrote: > I'd be a lot more worried about UV radiation right now than radio > waves. Skin cancers from UV are (excuse the expression) sky-rocketing, > while brain tumors from cell phones and wifi are anecdotal at best. > > But. I was alway told that sun tan lotion was for wimps :-) > Are we [OT] yet? > > Hopefully not that desperate. Peter ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] UMPC future prediction....what do you think?
> "The Government insists Wi-Fi is safe, but a Panorama investigation > shows that radio frequency radiation levels in some schools are up to > three times the level found in the main beam of intensity from mobile > phone masts." Maybe it would be helpful if the kids wore tinfoil hats? As Ted points out, there are far bigger threats in this world today than WiFi It's really sad to me that the poll on that site shows 60%/40% are worried/not worried about WiFi. Lemmings, wanting to believe everything is going to kill them... I wonder if there's a street outside the schools? Those fumes from the exhaust probably do far more damage than WiFi ever could.. -- Derek ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [NF] Scanning documents to PDF
All the more and cleaner power to you! ;) I need stay in step with my employer's preferred office suite, which is by _Microsoft_. PabloSr - Value, above all, persons, not things! Peace. Valora, sobre todo, personas, no cosas! Paz. - * -Original Message- * From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:profoxtech- * [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ted Roche * Sent: Monday, May 21, 2007 8:21 AM * To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Subject: Re: [NF] Scanning documents to PDF * * On 5/20/07, Pablo H Rivera Sr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * wrote: * * > I have the 2007 Office Suite and it can "convert"... * * Is this the _Microsoft_ Office 2007 suite? * * I've got no experience with MS Office 2007. That has a * license that * prevents me from using it, and isn't available on my * preferred * platforms. * * But OpenOffice.org 2.x does allow export of word * processing documents * into PDFs, with no add-ons required, and it does retain * hyperlinks. * And it can convert your Word documents into a standard * XML format, to * boot. And it's free. * * -- * Ted Roche * Ted Roche & Associates, LLC * http://www.tedroche.com * * * ___ * Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com * Subscription Maintenance: * http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox * OT-free version of this list: * http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech * Searchable Archive: * http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox * This message: * http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/c9415b01070521052 * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are * the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal * or medical advice. This statement is added to the * messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the * obvious. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] UMPC future prediction....what do you think?
Derek Kalweit wrote: >> "The Government insists Wi-Fi is safe, but a Panorama investigation >> shows that radio frequency radiation levels in some schools are up to >> three times the level found in the main beam of intensity from mobile >> phone masts." >> > > Maybe it would be helpful if the kids wore tinfoil hats? > > As Ted points out, there are far bigger threats in this world today > than WiFi It's really sad to me that the poll on that site shows > 60%/40% are worried/not worried about WiFi. Lemmings, wanting to > believe everything is going to kill them... I wonder if there's a > street outside the schools? Those fumes from the exhaust probably do > far more damage than WiFi ever could.. > > > I heard that the recent news of tons of dead bees are being attributed to cell-phone/wi-fi signals "polluting" the air. ??? We need the bees! ;-) -- Michael J. Babcock, MCP MB Software Solutions, LLC http://mbsoftwaresolutions.com http://fabmate.com "Work smarter, not harder, with MBSS custom software solutions!" ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] UMPC future prediction....what do you think?
On 5/21/07, Derek Kalweit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Maybe it would be helpful if the kids wore tinfoil hats? Well, I can sympathize. Invisible but harmful stuff is all around us, and the general public just doesn't have the education to know what's (likely to be) harmless. Fear of the unknown is reasonable, and a general distrust of government authority is also pretty reasonable these days. (Are we [OT] yet?) If you were given an alpha-emitting cookie, a beta-emitting cookie and a gamma-emitting cookie and told you had to eat one, put one in your pocket, and throw one away, would you know the right answer? (Without googling?) -- Ted Roche Ted Roche & Associates, LLC http://www.tedroche.com ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] UMPC future prediction....what do you think?
On 5/21/07, Ted Roche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If you were given an alpha-emitting cookie, a beta-emitting cookie and > a gamma-emitting cookie and told you had to eat one, put one in your > pocket, and throw one away, would you know the right answer? (Without > googling?) eh ,yes. A+ jml ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] UMPC future prediction....what do you think?
On 5/21/07, Jean Laeremans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > eh ,yes. You would? How's that? -- Ted Roche Ted Roche & Associates, LLC http://www.tedroche.com ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] UMPC future prediction....what do you think?
> If you were given an alpha-emitting cookie, a beta-emitting cookie and > a gamma-emitting cookie and told you had to eat one, put one in your > pocket, and throw one away, would you know the right answer? (Without > googling?) No. And that's why we have the FCC, the World Health Organization, and many other authorities on these subjects to protect us. All of these agencies tell us WiFi is not a major concern, and in fact the evidence through research shows it very trivial-- this article alone states, 600 times below the threshold! I'm not one for blindly trusting government, their respective agencies, etc., but I really hate to see the public attention taken away from things that do matter for trivial things simply in the name of ratings, as this seems to be... "Wifi? oh-- I have that, maybe I should watch!" Just my 2 cents... -- Derek ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] UMPC future prediction....what do you think?
> > eh ,yes. > You would? How's that? Maybe he used yahoo. ;-) -- Derek ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] UMPC future prediction....what do you think?
On 5/21/07, Ted Roche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 5/21/07, Jean Laeremans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > eh ,yes. > > You would? How's that? Maybe because i had to study things like those long before the internet let alone google existed ? after all that's only college stuff A+ jml ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] UMPC future prediction....what do you think?
Ted Roche wrote: > On 5/21/07, Derek Kalweit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> Maybe it would be helpful if the kids wore tinfoil hats? >> > > Well, I can sympathize. Invisible but harmful stuff is all around us, > and the general public just doesn't have the education to know what's > (likely to be) harmless. Fear of the unknown is reasonable, and a > general distrust of government authority is also pretty reasonable > these days. (Are we [OT] yet?) > > If you were given an alpha-emitting cookie, a beta-emitting cookie and > a gamma-emitting cookie and told you had to eat one, put one in your > pocket, and throw one away, would you know the right answer? (Without > googling?) > > Eat the alpha pocket the beta and ditch the gamma ? ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] UMPC future prediction....what do you think?
On May 21, 2007, at 11:07 AM, Ted Roche wrote: > (Are we [OT] yet?) We are (or at least I am) now. > a gamma-emitting cookie I'd eat the gamma one, because as a kid I thought it sounded like it would be cool to emit Gamma Rays! Seriously, people uneducated in science believe *anything.* We just had an article in the paper about local people believing that minuscule amounts of CFC's in their drinking water are causing every ailment from diabetes to a IBS (in a *dog*). I wish I were making this up. Some were saying it is Love Canal or Erin Brokovich (sp?) all over again. Even the state Health Department is saying "Uh, No." My former father-in-law actually believed "Chariots of the Gods." Of course there is *no other possible explanation* to how the Egyptians built the pyramids than that space aliens designed them and flying saucers carried the blocks. Ken ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Transaction/buffering question
Thanks, Ajit. That's one vote for methodology #1. Ajit Abraham wrote: > Hi Richard > > I do the following. > > LOCAL lok > lok=.F. > BEGIN TRANS > IF TABLEUPDATE(table1) > IF TABLEUPDATE(table2) >lok=.T. > ELSE > *Message - something went wrong with table2 > ENDIF > ELSE > *Message -something wrong with table1 > ENDIF > > IF lok >END TRANSACTION >*Do any post save operations > ELSE > *Store the failed error messages in the error table > ROLLBACK > TABLEREVERT(table1) > TABLEREVERT(table2) > ENDI -- Richard Kaye Vice President Artfact/RFC Systems Voice: 617.219.1038 Fax: 617.219.1001 For the fastest response time, please send your support queries to: Technical Support - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Australian Support - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet Support - [EMAIL PROTECTED] All Other Requests - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - This message has been checked for viruses before sending. - ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] UMPC future prediction....what do you think?
On 5/21/07, Paul Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Eat the alpha pocket the beta and ditch the gamma ? > Good enough. I actually forgot about the neutron cookie. That's the one to toss, but your choices work, too, given the question: http://everything2.com/index.pl?node_id=1406211 -- Ted Roche Ted Roche & Associates, LLC http://www.tedroche.com ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] UMPC future prediction....what do you think?
Paul Newton wrote: > Ted Roche wrote: > >> On 5/21/07, Derek Kalweit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >> >>> Maybe it would be helpful if the kids wore tinfoil hats? >>> >>> >> Well, I can sympathize. Invisible but harmful stuff is all around us, >> and the general public just doesn't have the education to know what's >> (likely to be) harmless. Fear of the unknown is reasonable, and a >> general distrust of government authority is also pretty reasonable >> these days. (Are we [OT] yet?) >> >> If you were given an alpha-emitting cookie, a beta-emitting cookie and >> a gamma-emitting cookie and told you had to eat one, put one in your >> pocket, and throw one away, would you know the right answer? (Without >> googling?) >> >> >> > Eat the alpha pocket the beta and ditch the gamma ? > OK so I got two wrong - that's not as bad as getting all three wrong. Of course I'm disappointed (I would have preferred to get all three right) but getting just one wrong wasn't an option, was it ? ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] UMPC future prediction....what do you think?
Ted Roche wrote: > On 5/21/07, Paul Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Eat the alpha pocket the beta and ditch the gamma ? >> >> > > Good enough. I actually forgot about the neutron cookie. That's the > one to toss, but your choices work, too, given the question: > > http://everything2.com/index.pl?node_id=1406211 > > Well another site says unequivocally (but perhaps unjustifiedly) eat the gamma, pocket the beta and ditch the alpha - hence the other mail I just sent (I looked it up after my original answer) ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] UMPC future prediction....what do you think?
You should eat the gamma if you want to become the Incredible Hulk... Paul Newton wrote: > Well another site says unequivocally (but perhaps unjustifiedly) eat the > gamma, pocket the beta and ditch the alpha - hence the other mail I just > sent (I looked it up after my original answer -- Richard Kaye Vice President Artfact/RFC Systems Voice: 617.219.1038 Fax: 617.219.1001 For the fastest response time, please send your support queries to: Technical Support - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Australian Support - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet Support - [EMAIL PROTECTED] All Other Requests - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - This message has been checked for viruses before sending. - ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] UMPC future prediction....what do you think?
Richard Kaye wrote: > You should eat the gamma if you want to become the Incredible Hulk... > > Paul Newton wrote: > >> Well another site says unequivocally (but perhaps unjustifiedly) eat the >> gamma, pocket the beta and ditch the alpha - hence the other mail I just >> sent (I looked it up after my original answer >> > > Anyway the question is not really fair in that it does not give any information about the relative "activities" of the emitters, the quantities present and their chemical identities (maybe all three emitters could have been isotpes of arsenic !). Leave any of them long enough and they would all be safe to eat ! ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
[NF] Permutation/Probabiliy question (WAS UMPC future prediction....what do you think?)
Paul Newton wrote: >> Eat the alpha pocket the beta and ditch the gamma ? >> >> > OK so I got two wrong - that's not as bad as getting all three wrong. > Of course I'm disappointed (I would have preferred to get all three > right) but getting just one wrong wasn't an option, was it ? > No takers ? OK is there a general solution to this type of problem: Four counters (Red, Green, Blue, Yellow) 24 distinct ways of arranging them. 1 correct arrangement (say Red, Green, Blue, Yellow) How are the incorrect arrangements distributed (what is the probablity distribution of the incorrect arrangements) based on numer of counters in the wrong position ? For five counters ? For n counters ? ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: UMPC future prediction....what do you think?
On 5/19/07, MB Software Solutions <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Your thoughts on UMPC's future? And in return, MB, might we have your thoughts on the UMPC? $1500 replacements for high-school waitresses, or useful machines? (I don't think I'd ever be tempted to overtip a cute UMPC.) Where would you see them applicable where tablets, laptops, notebooks, subnotebooks, desktop machines or kiosks don't apply? Niche form factor or the Next Big Thing? -- Ted Roche Ted Roche & Associates, LLC http://www.tedroche.com ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: UMPC future prediction....what do you think?
Ted Roche wrote: > On 5/19/07, MB Software Solutions <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> Your thoughts on UMPC's future? >> > > And in return, MB, might we have your thoughts on the UMPC? $1500 > replacements for high-school waitresses, or useful machines? (I don't > think I'd ever be tempted to overtip a cute UMPC.) Where would you see > them applicable where tablets, laptops, notebooks, subnotebooks, > desktop machines or kiosks don't apply? Niche form factor or the Next > Big Thing? > > > After seeing them used at DisneyWorld some years ago, I thought it could be the NBT; however, like with so many other things (like the TabletPC, voice-recognition, OCR-reader software, cell-phone apps, etc. etc., they seem to be more of a "wow" factor and not really taking hold. I'm guessing it's a cost issue, because they're certainly better than trying to monkey with small cell phones, and certainly easier to hold (like a video game controller!) as opposed to having to hold a laptop sized unit. Then again, look at companies like FedEx/DHL/UPS/USPS--they use small devices (don't know if they're considered UMPCs though?) daily for tracking purposes. -- Michael J. Babcock, MCP MB Software Solutions, LLC http://mbsoftwaresolutions.com http://fabmate.com "Work smarter, not harder, with MBSS custom software solutions!" ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
sys(2335)
I created a little program that will generate a weekly report. I am using VFP 8.0. I want to run this .exe on the server using windows task scheduler. I issued a sys(2335) to turn off modal communications. It generates an error however when I issue a report form command which I am doing to generate a PDF file. Should I disable the sys 2335 and then do report form and then reset it or is there some other way of handling this? Thank you Judith Barer Star-K Kosher Certification 122 Slade Ave Baltimore, MD 21208 410 484 4110 Fax 410 653 9293 --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html --- ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: Transaction/buffering question
>> That's one vote for methodology #1.<< I vote for methodology #1 for two reasons: 1) you have more options to inform the user (or the tester) relative to what did not go as expected 2) Much simpler to debug than the one IF statement approach. Rick White Light Computing, Inc. www.whitelightcomputing.com www.swfox.net www.rickschummer.com ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Transaction/buffering question
Rick Schummer wrote: >>> That's one vote for methodology #1.<< >>> > > I vote for methodology #1 for two reasons: > 1) you have more options to inform the user (or the tester) relative to what > did not go as expected > 2) Much simpler to debug than the one IF statement approach. > > Rick > White Light Computing, Inc. > I vote similarly with the distinguished gentleman from the great state of Michigan as well, Mr. Original Poster, sir! -- Michael J. Babcock, MCP MB Software Solutions, LLC http://mbsoftwaresolutions.com http://fabmate.com "Work smarter, not harder, with MBSS custom software solutions!" ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
[OT] Ed's god. :-)
And all this time I thought Ed was just being a wise-ass! http://news.com.com/8301-10784_3-9721119-7.html?part=rss&subj=news&tag=2547-1040_3-0-5 (see photo half-way down) -- Vince Teachout Caracal Software www.caracal.net 518-733-9411 ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Ed's god. :-)
On May 21, 2007, at 2:59 PM, Vince Teachout wrote: > And all this time I thought Ed was just being a wise-ass! > > http://news.com.com/8301-10784_3-9721119-7.html? > part=rss&subj=news&tag=2547-1040_3-0-5 Yes, all you non-believers will one day see the light of the FSM! -- Ed Leafe -- http://leafe.com -- http://dabodev.com ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
[NF] Desktop Publishing Software
A local charity I work with has been sent some Publisher files which they need to open and modify. Can anyone recommend a suitable Open Source DTP package that is cheap (preferably free ). I could Google but would prefer a recommendation. TIA John Weller 01380 723235 07976 393631 ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
FoxForward - Early bird deadline approaching
There is just a couple of days left until the FoxForward Early Bird registration deadline on the 25th of May. The attendees are slowly trickling in and we've been updating the "Who Is Coming" page. There will probably be a rush for the last minute registration. That's just fine, but don't forget! Register today! $350 through Friday $450 through the end of June -Kevin CULLY Technologies, LLC Sponsor of FoxForward 2007 foxforward.net ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: FoxForward - Early bird deadline approaching
Kevin Cully wrote: > There is just a couple of days left until the FoxForward Early Bird > registration deadline on the 25th of May. > > The attendees are slowly trickling in and we've been updating the "Who > Is Coming" page. There will probably be a rush for the last minute > registration. That's just fine, but don't forget! Register today! > > $350 through Friday > $450 through the end of June > > -Kevin > CULLY Technologies, LLC > > Sponsor of FoxForward 2007 > foxforward.net > And an extra bonus---PortaBar courtesy of the veterans (iirc!) -- Michael J. Babcock, MCP MB Software Solutions, LLC http://mbsoftwaresolutions.com http://fabmate.com "Work smarter, not harder, with MBSS custom software solutions!" ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: FoxForward - Early bird deadline approaching
I'm still waiting on Koziol to post a picture. -Kevin CULLY Technologies, LLC Sponsor of FoxForward 2007 foxforward.net MB Software Solutions wrote: > And an extra bonus---PortaBar courtesy of the veterans (iirc!) > ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] Desktop Publishing Software
On 5/21/07, John Weller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > A local charity I work with has been sent some Publisher files which they > need to open and modify. Can anyone recommend a suitable Open Source DTP > package that is cheap (preferably free ). I could Google but would > prefer a recommendation. I doubt that the Publisher file format is freely-available, so they may have trouble opening the files with anything other than Publisher. I ran into this problem with Visio a while ago. Scribus is a great DTP package, free in cost and source. It will open standard PostScript and PDF files, so if they can get their sender to convert and retransmit, they could be in business. Assuming Microsoft outputs standard PostScript or PDF. Ha, ha. -- Ted Roche Ted Roche & Associates, LLC http://www.tedroche.com ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [NF] Desktop Publishing Software
Thanks Ted - I had a horrible suspicion that that might be the case! Ah well, back to the drawing board. John Weller 01380 723235 07976 393631 > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Ted Roche > Sent: 21 May 2007 21:28 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [NF] Desktop Publishing Software > > > On 5/21/07, John Weller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > A local charity I work with has been sent some Publisher files > which they > > need to open and modify. Can anyone recommend a suitable Open > Source DTP > > package that is cheap (preferably free ). I could Google but would > > prefer a recommendation. > > I doubt that the Publisher file format is freely-available, so they > may have trouble opening the files with anything other than Publisher. > I ran into this problem with Visio a while ago. > > Scribus is a great DTP package, free in cost and source. It will open > standard PostScript and PDF files, so if they can get their sender to > convert and retransmit, they could be in business. Assuming Microsoft > outputs standard PostScript or PDF. Ha, ha. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [NF] Desktop Publishing Software
On Monday, May 21, 2007 4:28 PM Ted Roche wrote: >I doubt that the Publisher file format is freely-available, so they may have trouble opening the >files with anything other than Publisher. >I ran into this problem with Visio a while ago. >Scribus is a great DTP package, free in cost and source. It will open standard PostScript and PDF >files, so if they can get their sender to convert and retransmit, they could be in business. >Assuming Microsoft outputs standard PostScript or PDF. Ha, ha. Any application can print to a 'PDF' printer if it is installed. David L. Crooks ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] Desktop Publishing Software
On May 21, 2007, at 3:38 PM, John Weller wrote: > I had a horrible suspicion that that might be the case! Ah > well, back to the drawing board. How many files/pages are there? Hey, *somebody* in here has to have Publisher installed, and could PDF'inate them for you. It is part of M$ Orifice Perfeshional, after all. I have O-2000, without Publisher installed, but it is on the CD. If that version is OK, and if nobody else steps forward, send them to me. I'll put Publisher in temporarily, generate PDF's, and send them back to you. Ken ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] Desktop Publishing Software
Kenneth Kixmoeller/fh wrote: > On May 21, 2007, at 3:38 PM, John Weller wrote: > > >> I had a horrible suspicion that that might be the case! Ah >> well, back to the drawing board. >> > > How many files/pages are there? > > Hey, *somebody* in here has to have Publisher installed, and could > PDF'inate them for you. It is part of M$ Orifice Perfeshional, after > all. I have O-2000, without Publisher installed, but it is on the CD. > If that version is OK, and if nobody else steps forward, send them to > me. > > I'll put Publisher in temporarily, generate PDF's, and send them back > to you. > > Ken > > John I've got Publisher already installed and would also be happy to help ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [NF] Desktop Publishing Software
Many thanks to all who responded. I have Publisher installed also and could make the changes but they want to modify the original document by adding some specific data which would be best done by their people. I'll look at using Scribus and possibly re-create the document in Scribus so they can work on it. John Weller 01380 723235 07976 393631 > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Paul Newton > Sent: 21 May 2007 22:11 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [NF] Desktop Publishing Software > > > Kenneth Kixmoeller/fh wrote: > > On May 21, 2007, at 3:38 PM, John Weller wrote: > > > > > >> I had a horrible suspicion that that might be the case! Ah > >> well, back to the drawing board. > >> > > > > How many files/pages are there? > > > > Hey, *somebody* in here has to have Publisher installed, and could > > PDF'inate them for you. It is part of M$ Orifice Perfeshional, after > > all. I have O-2000, without Publisher installed, but it is on the CD. > > If that version is OK, and if nobody else steps forward, send them to > > me. > > > > I'll put Publisher in temporarily, generate PDF's, and send them back > > to you. > > > > Ken > > > > > John > > I've got Publisher already installed and would also be happy to help ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] UMPC future prediction....what do you think?
> If you were given an alpha-emitting cookie, a beta-emitting cookie and > a gamma-emitting cookie and told you had to eat one, put one in your > pocket, and throw one away, would you know the right answer? (Without > googling?) I was _required_ to throw one away. I couldn't surreptitiously keep it and munch on it late at night when everyone else was asleep? Seems a damn freakin' shame to waste a cookie. There are lots of computer programmers in who would just LOVE to have _part_ of a cookie, you know. Whil ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
VFP9-SQL
Hi folk I have (IMHO) a neat search facility but a puzzling little problem. Very basically, it comes up with a message SQL: statement too long It's ok if the sql string is around 700, but not at 900 Does anyone know what the max is for myfields It goes like; select * from (malias) where at(mysearch,&myfields)>0 Sytze ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: VFP9-SQL
Sytze de Boer wrote: > Hi folk > > I have (IMHO) a neat search facility but a puzzling little problem. > Very basically, it comes up with a message SQL: statement too long > > It's ok if the sql string is around 700, but not at 900 > Does anyone know what the max is for myfields > > It goes like; select * from (malias) where at(mysearch,&myfields)>0 > > Sytze > Hi Sytze! I can't recall the SYS() command, but I believe there's one that allows you to extend the SQL statement length. -- Michael J. Babcock, MCP MB Software Solutions, LLC http://mbsoftwaresolutions.com http://fabmate.com "Work smarter, not harder, with MBSS custom software solutions!" ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
VB to VFP
Hi Folk I have about 15 lines in VB code that I need to convert into VFP(9) I tried a utility from Sweet Potato but it's not quite complete Can anyone help me ? (Gimme your email address and I can send the txt file) MANY thanks in anticipation Sytze ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
[NF] Cities struggle with wireless Internet
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070521/ap_on_hi_te/municipal_wireless_woes Was widely available WiFi across big cities really a big deal to get anyway? It sounded like more headaches/hurdles than worth the promise, imo. And don't forget the harmful effects to Mother Nature's bees! (Just kidding on that last point...that's speculation!) -- Michael J. Babcock, MCP MB Software Solutions, LLC http://mbsoftwaresolutions.com http://fabmate.com "Work smarter, not harder, with MBSS custom software solutions!" ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [OT] Was Contracting now it's Fun time
MB Software Solutions <> wrote: > Stephen Russell wrote: >> I just wanted to let anyone know that the AdRibbers are back smoking >> on the river at boot R007. If your in the neighborhood, drop by and >> grab a pint I made plenty. If it's feeding time you may even get a >> rib or two ;-> >> >> I'll be back at a computer maybe Sunday night. >> >> > > What date(s)? (And no, this isn't NF...it's OT!!) I'm back! It was Thursday the 17th through Sat. To much fun was had again. Stephen Russell DBA / .Net Developer Memphis TN 38115 901.246-0159 "A good way to judge people is by observing how they treat those who can do them absolutely no good." ---Unknown http://spaces.msn.com/members/srussell/ No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.467 / Virus Database: 269.7.6/813 - Release Date: 5/20/2007 7:54 AM ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: VB to VFP
Sytze de Boer <> wrote: > Hi Folk > I have about 15 lines in VB code that I need to convert into VFP(9) I > tried a utility from Sweet Potato but it's not quite complete Can > anyone help me ? (Gimme your email address and I can send the txt > file) Just put the code out here. Stephen Russell DBA / .Net Developer Memphis TN 38115 901.246-0159 "A good way to judge people is by observing how they treat those who can do them absolutely no good." ---Unknown http://spaces.msn.com/members/srussell/ No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.467 / Virus Database: 269.7.6/813 - Release Date: 5/20/2007 7:54 AM ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
[OT] Need a name for a new dog
I am having a hard time finding a new name for a little lab dog I picked up a week ago. She came into the house as Raven, but it's not a keeper of a name. She is small for a lab, say 40 pounds at best. She is just over a year old. Ebony is out as is Jet. Any ideas? Stephen Russell DBA / .Net Developer Memphis TN 38115 901.246-0159 "A good way to judge people is by observing how they treat those who can do them absolutely no good." ---Unknown http://spaces.msn.com/members/srussell/ No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.467 / Virus Database: 269.7.6/813 - Release Date: 5/20/2007 7:54 AM ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [OT] Need a name for a new dog
Higgins.. We used to have a duck with that name Virgil Bierschwale http://www.bierschwalesolutions.com http://www.jobsforourfuture.com/index.php -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Stephen Russell Sent: Monday, May 21, 2007 9:52 PM To: 'ProFox Email List' Subject: [OT] Need a name for a new dog I am having a hard time finding a new name for a little lab dog I picked up a week ago. She came into the house as Raven, but it's not a keeper of a name. She is small for a lab, say 40 pounds at best. She is just over a year old. Ebony is out as is Jet. Any ideas? Stephen Russell DBA / .Net Developer Memphis TN 38115 901.246-0159 "A good way to judge people is by observing how they treat those who can do them absolutely no good." ---Unknown http://spaces.msn.com/members/srussell/ No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.467 / Virus Database: 269.7.6/813 - Release Date: 5/20/2007 7:54 AM [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] An Inconvenient Poll
- Original Message - From: "Ricardo Aráoz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "ProFox Email List" Sent: Friday, May 18, 2007 11:13 PM Subject: Re: [OT] An Inconvenient Poll > Hi Petey, > > Can't you get it through your thick head? You are in THEIR country, and > they want you OUT (does "yankee go home" ring a bell?) > > Let's make it easier for you to understand, I know it will be hard to > stretch you imagination, but give it a try. > > We (a very powerful country) have invaded USA to set you free from this > terrorist leader Sad... sorry, Dubya. > Now, for sure the Repubs will actively fight us (sunnis?). Pure meaningless speculation. Will never happen, so why cook up a fictitious example? ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [OT] An Inconvenient Poll
I hope you're right, but I fear that you are wrong. When you're king of the mountain, somebody is always trying to knock you off and right now we're selling all our technology and giving away all of our money which makes it a matter of time. Virgil Bierschwale http://www.bierschwalesolutions.com http://www.jobsforourfuture.com/index.php -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nicholas Geti Sent: Monday, May 21, 2007 10:09 PM To: ProFox Email List Subject: Re: [OT] An Inconvenient Poll - Original Message - From: "Ricardo Aráoz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "ProFox Email List" Sent: Friday, May 18, 2007 11:13 PM Subject: Re: [OT] An Inconvenient Poll > Hi Petey, > > Can't you get it through your thick head? You are in THEIR country, and > they want you OUT (does "yankee go home" ring a bell?) > > Let's make it easier for you to understand, I know it will be hard to > stretch you imagination, but give it a try. > > We (a very powerful country) have invaded USA to set you free from this > terrorist leader Sad... sorry, Dubya. > Now, for sure the Repubs will actively fight us (sunnis?). Pure meaningless speculation. Will never happen, so why cook up a fictitious example? [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Need a name for a new dog
On Monday 21 May 2007 10:51 pm, Stephen Russell wrote: > I am having a hard time finding a new name for a little lab dog I picked up > a week ago. She came into the house as Raven, but it's not a keeper of a > name. She is small for a lab, say 40 pounds at best. She is just over a > year old. > > Ebony is out as is Jet. Any ideas? Hi Stephen! Hillary. What else? -- Regards, Pete http://www.pete-theisen.com/ ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [NF] Desktop Publishing Software
Would Publisher 2007 be any good to do what is needed? If so, although I can only print documents to a PDF file (Adobe has not put out the fix to be able to use PDFMaker), I can assist too. ;) PabloSr - Value, above all, persons, not things! Peace. Valora, sobre todo, personas, no cosas! Paz. - * -Original Message- * From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:profoxtech- * [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Newton * Sent: Monday, May 21, 2007 5:11 PM * To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Subject: Re: [NF] Desktop Publishing Software * * Kenneth Kixmoeller/fh wrote: * > On May 21, 2007, at 3:38 PM, John Weller wrote: * > * > * >> I had a horrible suspicion that that might be the * case! Ah * >> well, back to the drawing board. * >> * > * > How many files/pages are there? * > * > Hey, *somebody* in here has to have Publisher * installed, and could * > PDF'inate them for you. It is part of M$ Orifice * Perfeshional, after * > all. I have O-2000, without Publisher installed, but * it is on the CD. * > If that version is OK, and if nobody else steps * forward, send them to * > me. * > * > I'll put Publisher in temporarily, generate PDF's, and * send them back * > to you. * > * > Ken * > * > * John * * I've got Publisher already installed and would also be * happy to help * * * * * ___ * Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com * Subscription Maintenance: * http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox * OT-free version of this list: * http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech * Searchable Archive: * http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox * This message: * http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] * xpertise.com * ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are * the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal * or medical advice. This statement is added to the * messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the * obvious. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [NF] Desktop Publishing Software
I'm using publisher 2007 to develop the page listed at http://www.harpertexas.com under the members tab. If I create a link in publisher such as the one for a & e woodworks, and then print it using Adobe Acrobat 8 Professional, it loses the link and I then need to go into acrobat and recreate the links. Any way around that ? I've been trying to stay away from writing any code because this system needs to be user maintainable, although I'm beginning to believe it would be simpler to put the data in mysql or sql server so that it will be dynamic. Problem is, then I end up having to develop all the front ends to maintain it and I simply don't have the time right now. Thanks, Virgil Bierschwale http://www.bierschwalesolutions.com http://www.jobsforourfuture.com/index.php -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pablo H Rivera Sr Sent: Monday, May 21, 2007 10:26 PM To: profox@leafe.com Subject: RE: [NF] Desktop Publishing Software Would Publisher 2007 be any good to do what is needed? If so, although I can only print documents to a PDF file (Adobe has not put out the fix to be able to use PDFMaker), I can assist too. ;) PabloSr - Value, above all, persons, not things! Peace. Valora, sobre todo, personas, no cosas! Paz. - * -Original Message- * From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:profoxtech- * [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Newton * Sent: Monday, May 21, 2007 5:11 PM * To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Subject: Re: [NF] Desktop Publishing Software * * Kenneth Kixmoeller/fh wrote: * > On May 21, 2007, at 3:38 PM, John Weller wrote: * > * > * >> I had a horrible suspicion that that might be the * case! Ah * >> well, back to the drawing board. * >> * > * > How many files/pages are there? * > * > Hey, *somebody* in here has to have Publisher * installed, and could * > PDF'inate them for you. It is part of M$ Orifice * Perfeshional, after * > all. I have O-2000, without Publisher installed, but * it is on the CD. * > If that version is OK, and if nobody else steps * forward, send them to * > me. * > * > I'll put Publisher in temporarily, generate PDF's, and * send them back * > to you. * > * > Ken * > * > * John * * I've got Publisher already installed and would also be * happy to help * * * * * ___ * Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com * Subscription Maintenance: * http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox * OT-free version of this list: * http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech * Searchable Archive: * http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox * This message: * http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] * xpertise.com * ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are * the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal * or medical advice. This statement is added to the * messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the * obvious. [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Debate Rises On World Bank Succession
Original Message - From: "Leland F. Jackson, CPA" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Saturday, May 19, 2007 12:16 PM Subject: [OT] Debate Rises On World Bank Succession > President Bush will have to be very careful in who he chooses to be Paul > D. Wolfowitz's successor to lead the World Bank. For example if > President Bush selected someone like John Bolton or Tony Blair, who are > identified as right-wing conservative hawk closely associated with the > Neo-Conservative ideology, there could be trouble. It appear president > Bush has not only driven the country in a deficit position, Deficits are coming down rapidly because of the spending Bush pushed through early on. Tax Receipts Exceed Treasury Predictions http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/05/04/AR2005050402134.html ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [OT] Need a name for a new dog
Hmmm, how bout bitch? John -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Stephen Russell Sent: Monday, May 21, 2007 9:52 PM To: 'ProFox Email List' Subject: [OT] Need a name for a new dog I am having a hard time finding a new name for a little lab dog I picked up a week ago. She came into the house as Raven, but it's not a keeper of a name. She is small for a lab, say 40 pounds at best. She is just over a year old. Ebony is out as is Jet. Any ideas? Stephen Russell DBA / .Net Developer Memphis TN 38115 901.246-0159 "A good way to judge people is by observing how they treat those who can do them absolutely no good." ---Unknown http://spaces.msn.com/members/srussell/ No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.467 / Virus Database: 269.7.6/813 - Release Date: 5/20/2007 7:54 AM [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]@shelbynet.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Need a name for a new dog
Hillary? --- Stephen Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am having a hard time finding a new name for a > little lab dog I picked up > a week ago. She came into the house as Raven, but > it's not a keeper of a > name. She is small for a lab, say 40 pounds at > best. She is just over a > year old. > > Ebony is out as is Jet. Any ideas? > > Stephen Russell > DBA / .Net Developer > > Memphis TN 38115 > 901.246-0159 > > "A good way to judge people is by observing how they > treat those who can do > them absolutely no good." > ---Unknown > > http://spaces.msn.com/members/srussell/ > > No virus found in this outgoing message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.5.467 / Virus Database: 269.7.6/813 - > Release Date: 5/20/2007 > 7:54 AM > > > > > ___ > Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com > Subscription Maintenance: > http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox > OT-free version of this list: > http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech > Searchable Archive: > http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox > This message: > http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] > ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, > are the opinions of the author, and do not > constitute legal or medical advice. This statement > is added to the messages for those lawyers who are > too stupid to see the obvious. > Anti-Illegal Alien Gear! http://www.cafepress.com/rightwingmike/2064119 Thoroughbred Horse Racing Group http://sports.groups.yahoo.com/group/mikes_horse_racing/ ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [OT] Need a name for a new dog
Nappy-headed bitch --- john harvey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hmmm, how bout bitch? > > John > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf > Of Stephen Russell > Sent: Monday, May 21, 2007 9:52 PM > To: 'ProFox Email List' > Subject: [OT] Need a name for a new dog > > I am having a hard time finding a new name for a > little lab dog I picked up > a week ago. She came into the house as Raven, but > it's not a keeper of a > name. She is small for a lab, say 40 pounds at > best. She is just over a > year old. > > Ebony is out as is Jet. Any ideas? > > Stephen Russell > DBA / .Net Developer > > Memphis TN 38115 > 901.246-0159 > > "A good way to judge people is by observing how they > treat those who can do > them absolutely no good." > ---Unknown > > http://spaces.msn.com/members/srussell/ > > No virus found in this outgoing message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.5.467 / Virus Database: 269.7.6/813 - > Release Date: 5/20/2007 > 7:54 AM > > > > [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [NF] Desktop Publishing Software
Regrettably Adobe has not announced when they will distribute a fix for that Acrobat limitation. I understand that they are working on fixing it. PabloSr - Value, above all, persons, not things! Peace. - * -Original Message- * [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Virgil Bierschwale * * I'm using publisher 2007 to develop the page listed at * http://www.harpertexas.com under the members tab. * * If I create a link in publisher such as the one for a & * e woodworks, and * then print it using Adobe Acrobat 8 Professional, it * loses the link and I * then need to go into acrobat and recreate the links. * * Any way around that ? *** MUCH CHOPPED *** ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [OT] Need a name for a new dog
Java, sounds small and cute and sounds simple, lots to learn and may bite you one day. ::a -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Stephen Russell Sent: 22 May 2007 03:52 To: 'ProFox Email List' Subject: [OT] Need a name for a new dog I am having a hard time finding a new name for a little lab dog I picked up a week ago. She came into the house as Raven, but it's not a keeper of a name. She is small for a lab, say 40 pounds at best. She is just over a year old. Ebony is out as is Jet. Any ideas? Stephen Russell DBA / .Net Developer Memphis TN 38115 901.246-0159 "A good way to judge people is by observing how they treat those who can do them absolutely no good." ---Unknown http://spaces.msn.com/members/srussell/ No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.467 / Virus Database: 269.7.6/813 - Release Date: 5/20/2007 7:54 AM [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
[OT] Holy Crap! :Lebanon vs Palestine ?
Just watched special segment on CNN International.
My God - Your God - Their God -
Lebanon vs Palestine?
Palestine Terrorists Mirroring Al Qaeda ?
WOW.
Big Fucking WOW.
YMMV [Bill]
PS - same reporters [CNN] - 24 hours ago, mentioned Al Queda top
stronghold is in Pakistan - can we bomb those Muslims Please? Pony Nuke, 5
kg payloads?
--
William Sanders / efGroup {rmv the DOT BOB to reply}
VFP Webhosting? You BET! -> http://efgroup.net/vfpwebhosting
Failing dotNet Project? -> http://www.dotnetconversions.com
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [OT] Need a name for a new dog
How about Open Source? Compiler? Debugger? Virus? Trojan? Worm? --- Adam Buckland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Java, sounds small and cute and sounds simple, lots > to learn and may bite you one day. > > ::a > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Stephen Russell > Sent: 22 May 2007 03:52 > To: 'ProFox Email List' > Subject: [OT] Need a name for a new dog > > I am having a hard time finding a new name for a > little lab dog I picked up > a week ago. She came into the house as Raven, but > it's not a keeper of a > name. She is small for a lab, say 40 pounds at > best. She is just over a > year old. > > Ebony is out as is Jet. Any ideas? > > Stephen Russell > DBA / .Net Developer > > Memphis TN 38115 > 901.246-0159 > > "A good way to judge people is by observing how they > treat those who can do > them absolutely no good." > ---Unknown > > http://spaces.msn.com/members/srussell/ > > No virus found in this outgoing message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.5.467 / Virus Database: 269.7.6/813 - > Release Date: 5/20/2007 > 7:54 AM > > > > [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Holy Crap! :Lebanon vs Palestine ?
On Tuesday 22 May 2007 2:07 am, William Sanders / EFG wrote: > Just watched special segment on CNN International. > > My God - Your God - Their God - > Lebanon vs Palestine? > Palestine Terrorists Mirroring Al Qaeda ? > WOW. > Big Fucking WOW. > > YMMV [Bill] > PS - same reporters [CNN] - 24 hours ago, mentioned Al Queda top > stronghold is in Pakistan - can we bomb those Muslims Please? Pony Nuke, 5 > kg payloads? Hi Bill! Can't. Ed, Leland and Bill vetoed it. World War III except this time the bad guys win thanks to the bleeding heart Ds giving aid and comfort to the enemy. -- Regards, Pete http://www.pete-theisen.com/ ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Transaction/buffering question
Hi Richard, I learnt that (and other tips) from Whil Hentzen's book, "The Fundamentals". And of course, scores of tips from the Profox community. _Ajit Abraham Kingdom of Bahrain ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Holy Crap! :Lebanon vs Palestine ?
OK, so how is this George Bush's fault again?
--- William Sanders / EFG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just watched special segment on CNN International.
>
> My God - Your God - Their God -
> Lebanon vs Palestine?
> Palestine Terrorists Mirroring Al Qaeda ?
> WOW.
> Big Fucking WOW.
>
> YMMV [Bill]
> PS - same reporters [CNN] - 24 hours ago, mentioned
> Al Queda top
> stronghold is in Pakistan - can we bomb those
> Muslims Please? Pony Nuke, 5
> kg payloads?
>
> --
> William Sanders / efGroup {rmv the DOT BOB to reply}
> VFP Webhosting? You BET! ->
> http://efgroup.net/vfpwebhosting
> Failing dotNet Project? ->
> http://www.dotnetconversions.com
>
>
>
> ___
> Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
> Subscription Maintenance:
> http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
> OT-free version of this list:
> http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
> Searchable Archive:
> http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
> This message:
>
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise,
> are the opinions of the author, and do not
> constitute legal or medical advice. This statement
> is added to the messages for those lawyers who are
> too stupid to see the obvious.
>
Anti-Illegal Alien Gear!
http://www.cafepress.com/rightwingmike/2064119
Thoroughbred Horse Racing Group
http://sports.groups.yahoo.com/group/mikes_horse_racing/
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
