[OT] Hey, Euro guys - how did this end up?
Hi Everybody! Lookie here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QVeMBNB0cIIfeature=related Sounds like some of our stuffed shirts - and we have a second amendment! -- Regards, Pete http://pete-theisen.com/ http://elect-pete-theisen.com/ ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/49cb2e24.9070...@verizon.net ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: avcxclasses used in a runtime environment
Finally I changed the approach to: 1. apply solution only in the runtime environment 2. copy vcx to tempory table: Select * from vcxname into table tmptable 3. use the AVCXCLASSES method to create the array with class names 4. delete the tempory table 5. use the ASCAN method for a lookup of the classname -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] Namens Coppens, Georges, FC (Provincialaat) Verzonden: woensdag 11 maart 2009 11:23 Aan: profoxt...@leafe.com Onderwerp: avcxclasses used in a runtime environment To instantiate a grid I have to test the existence of a class in a classlib. There is no problem in the development environment. But once the classlib is included in an application and the classlib is not a physical file on disk the named vcx is not found. In the form load method: THISFORM.cAppClassLib=app.vcx SET CLASSLIB TO app.vcx IN acerta.exe ADDITIVE In the 'anychange' method: lcAlias=THISFORM.aAlias(THIS.VALUE) SELECT (lcAlias) lnMax=AVCXCLASSES(laClass,THISFORM.cAppClassLib) The last line generates the error: file not found. What's wrong with this code? Thanks. Georges Coppens Dit bericht wordt verzonden vanuit een e-mailadres voor professioneel gebruik. De verantwoordelijken binnen de organisatie kunnen kennis nemen van alle berichten verzonden naar dit adres. Le présent message est envoyé d'une adresse e-mail pour usage professionnel. Les responsables de l'organisation peuvent prendre connaissance de tous les messages envoyés à cette adresse. This message is sent from an e-mail address for professional use only. The persons in charge of the organisation may take note of all messages sent to this address. --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html --- [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/364e27f9d3d53143b6f4f9594c16cfab04168...@s100-0001.fracarita.org ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: File Copy Problem
On Wed, 25 Mar 2009 21:49 +, Peter Hart ph...@peterhartcomputers.co.uk wrote: Does anyone know of a way to make sure when a file is copied to another file the new file will keep its case. Peter I know your problem is solved here but I'm not getting why case is important in the first place ? -- Alan Bourke alanpbou...@fastmail.fm ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/1238059471.20695.1307396...@webmail.messagingengine.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] DEA AGENT SHOOTS OWN FOOT
Leland F. Jackson, CPA wrote: DEA agent shoots own foot with Glock SW40. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mhIJOVD8hwY Hi Leland! Turns out the guy sued the federals over it. Claims it embarrassed him to have the video released. That, and the mandatory race card. http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/0411061foot1.html I understand Glocks are prone to that kind of accident. Pull the trigger even a little and it fires. Of course, that is HOW guns fire, but most take a REAL pull as opposed to the Glock's soft touch. How soft? Maybe as little as 5 LB. http://www.browardcrime.com/gun_maker_glock_frequently_sued_.htm -- Regards, Pete http://pete-theisen.com/ http://elect-pete-theisen.com/ ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/49cb5218.4040...@verizon.net ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: File Copy Problem
Hi Alan Ask the Female operators that. The consensus from the operators was, all the Males said it didn't matter and most of the Females said it looked prettier and was easier to read. After viewing the results I had to agree. Cheers Peter -Original Message- From: profox-boun...@leafe.com [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Alan Bourke Sent: 26 March 2009 09:31 To: profox@leafe.com Subject: RE: File Copy Problem On Wed, 25 Mar 2009 21:49 +, Peter Hart ph...@peterhartcomputers.co.uk wrote: Does anyone know of a way to make sure when a file is copied to another file the new file will keep its case. Peter I know your problem is solved here but I'm not getting why case is important in the first place ? -- Alan Bourke alanpbou...@fastmail.fm [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/a57fa4cf19531343a2ee11b57db8e3af04c...@server.peterhartcomputers.local ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
[OT] Gordon Brown gets torn a new one.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=94lW6Y4tBXseurl=http%3A%2F%2F * Join the OBAMA RESISTANCE MOVEMENT! http://www.cafepress.com/rightwingmike/6181419 ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/517343.51980...@web31406.mail.mud.yahoo.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
[JOB] VFP in Atlanta area
Type: Permanent Position: Visual FoxPro Developer - 78014 Skills: Northrop Grumman requires a proficient Visual Foxpro developer to support a Vaccine Management system for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). The successful candidate will have extensive experience developing complex applications in Microsoft Visual Foxpro. Skills and abilities required include: Design and create functionality in Foxpro and be able to perform development and system enhancements in Visual Foxpro. Analyze and enhance existing applications. Optimize code to reduce redundancy. Excellent knowledge of database design fundamentals and Datamodelling tools. Ability to research concepts, develop action items, and implement them to realize the goal of optimized code in a functional application that meets customer needs. Keen organizational, verbal, and writing skills. Work effectively in an existing cohesive team environment, sharing knowledge with team members while learning from them. Provide support for help desk representatives as needed. Experience with SQL Server and the deployment of .NET Framework applications is desired. Experience working within a government contract environment is a plus. Location: Atlanta, GA Apply Now: http://www.jobserve.us/ACR.aspx?a=47824158E8607D40D0 Not Interested: http://www.jobserve.us/AlchemyReject.aspx?a=2C085743E3F58CB5 -- Stephen Russell Sr. Production Systems Programmer Web and Windows Development Independent Contractor Memphis TN 901.246-0159 ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/c4313dbe0903260656g23e05fc1p94968fbe39f57...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
[OT] Mexico Drug violence images
Amazing set of pictures from the war that is raging today. http://www.boston.com/bigpicture/2009/03/mexicos_drug_war.html -- Stephen Russell Sr. Production Systems Programmer Web and Windows Development Independent Contractor Memphis TN 901.246-0159 ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/c4313dbe0903260722i38a43707l7771ab8a4c1ae...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] DEA AGENT SHOOTS OWN FOOT
That's hilarious. Thanks for the chuckle. Regards, LelandJ Pete Theisen wrote: Leland F. Jackson, CPA wrote: DEA agent shoots own foot with Glock SW40. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mhIJOVD8hwY Hi Leland! Turns out the guy sued the federals over it. Claims it embarrassed him to have the video released. That, and the mandatory race card. http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/0411061foot1.html I understand Glocks are prone to that kind of accident. Pull the trigger even a little and it fires. Of course, that is HOW guns fire, but most take a REAL pull as opposed to the Glock's soft touch. How soft? Maybe as little as 5 LB. http://www.browardcrime.com/gun_maker_glock_frequently_sued_.htm --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html --- ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/49cb9169.9010...@mail.smvfp.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Foxpro job in Florida
FoxPro Analyst Job Summary The Programmer/Analyst will primarily support the development, deployment and maintenance of FoxPro and Windows applications, and will also engage in supporting production applications primarily in the area of EDIs developed with FoxPro. Minimum Qualifications 1.Bachelor's degree in Computer Science, Information Technology or Information Systems OR Associate Degree/some college and equivalent work experience 2.Five (5) years professional experience in the IT field 3.Five (5) years Visual FoxPro development experience (version 7 and/or higher) 4.Two (2) years Oracle Database programming experience 5.Two (2) years Object Oriented programming 6.Knowledge of database design fundamentals and use of data modeling tools 7.Good organizational abilities, oral communications, and interpersonal skills 8.Ability to work with users to define needs, coordinate development, and provide training 9.Knowledge of customer service standards and procedures and a commitment to excellence in customer service 10.Ability to investigate and analyze information and to draw conclusions 11.Good technical writing skills and willingness to adequately document all work performed 12.Knowledge and skills in systems analysis, systems design and information architecture to effectively design and create databases Preferred Qualifications 1.One to two (1-2) years .Net application development using C# 2.One to two (1-2) years ASP.NET WEB development experience 3.Ability/willingness to learn healthcare vocabulary and syntax standards (ICD9, CPT4, ICD10, LOINC, SNOMED, UMLS, HL7) 4.Knowledge of current technological developments/trends in area of expertise 5.Knowledge of Visual Source Safe 6.Knowledge of SDLC and Agile methodologies 7.Knowledge of UML, XML and SOA Primary Responsibilities 1.Primary responsibility for the support of applications and tools in FoxPro including installation, updates/patches, upgrades, coding optimization, and resource management 2.Assist with administration, maintenance, development and implementation of legacy and new application designs 3.Participate in a second-level support team when applications or EDI transfers are deemed to be a support issue, including cross training other team members in fundamental support to better understand and effectively assume responsibility when programmers are not available 4.Review, program, test and apply changes and/or modifications to software applications 5.Work with IT Operations team to maintain server and client applications and patches on a Microsoft Windows environment If interested, contact: Nick Avren Technical Recruiter Apex Systems, Inc. 4010 Boy Scout BLVD Tampa FL.33607 813-281-8800 866-280-2739 Fax: 813-639-9877 nav...@apexsystemsinc.com www.apexsystemsinc.com ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/3009.69.251.251.31.1238081538.squir...@webmail.dssco.net ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [JOB] VFP in Atlanta area
Stephen Russell wrote: Type: Permanent Position: Visual FoxPro Developer - 78014 Skills: Northrop Grumman requires a proficient Visual Foxpro developer to support a Vaccine Management system for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). The successful candidate will have extensive experience developing complex applications in Microsoft Visual Foxpro. Skills and abilities required include: Design and create functionality in Foxpro and be able to perform development and system enhancements in Visual Foxpro. Analyze and enhance existing applications. Optimize code to reduce redundancy. Excellent knowledge of database design fundamentals and Datamodelling tools. Ability to research concepts, develop action items, and implement them to realize the goal of optimized code in a functional application that meets customer needs. Keen organizational, verbal, and writing skills. Work effectively in an existing cohesive team environment, sharing knowledge with team members while learning from them. Provide support for help desk representatives as needed. Experience with SQL Server and the deployment of .NET Framework applications is desired. Experience working within a government contract environment is a plus. Location: Atlanta, GA Apply Now: http://www.jobserve.us/ACR.aspx?a=47824158E8607D40D0 Not Interested: http://www.jobserve.us/AlchemyReject.aspx?a=2C085743E3F58CB5 Steve, Why do I see your name/info when I click on the link? Good luck, though! --Mike ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/3054.69.251.251.31.1238081695.squir...@webmail.dssco.net ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] hockey goals top ten video
Stephen Russell wrote: http://www.picvi.com/2009/03/25/hockey-goals/ Thanks! I loved it! I'm in the off-season now on my men's team...we start again in late May. Anyone else play ice hockey here besides me and Lou? ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/3074.69.251.251.31.1238081754.squir...@webmail.dssco.net ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Hey, Euro guys - how did this end up?
Here's more about the object of contention; Treaty of Lisbon. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treaty_of_Lisbon Regards, LelandJ Pete Theisen wrote: Hi Everybody! Lookie here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QVeMBNB0cIIfeature=related Sounds like some of our stuffed shirts - and we have a second amendment! ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/49cb9f69.2030...@mail.smvfp.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: File Copy Problem
Peter Hart wrote: Hi Alan Ask the Female operators that. The consensus from the operators was, all the Males said it didn't matter and most of the Females said it looked prettier and was easier to read. After viewing the results I had to agree. but in the end, it's just the same file on the machine, regardless of case? Ughsome people!!! ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/3412.69.251.251.31.1238082982.squir...@webmail.dssco.net ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [JOB] VFP in Atlanta area
I thought Northrop Grumman made aircraft. -- Alan Bourke alanpbou...@fastmail.fm ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/1238082404.14508.1307456...@webmail.messagingengine.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: File Copy Problem
Sorry I had assumed there was some design/programmatic reason. Users eh? Shoot the lot of them, I say. -- Alan Bourke alanpbou...@fastmail.fm ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/1238082463.14673.1307457...@webmail.messagingengine.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] hockey goals top ten video
Yup. Our seasons are just starting back up. ::michael MB Software Solutions General Account wrote: Stephen Russell wrote: http://www.picvi.com/2009/03/25/hockey-goals/ Thanks! I loved it! I'm in the off-season now on my men's team...we start again in late May. Anyone else play ice hockey here besides me and Lou? [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/49cba3ea.2010...@gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: File Copy Problem
Well, case matters in some source control systems. That's why I know of MoveFile(). When a Linux file system gets involved, the same filename with different cases could be in the same folder, since they are not the same. -Original Message- From: MB Software Solutions General Account Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2009 11:56 AM Peter Hart wrote: Hi Alan Ask the Female operators that. The consensus from the operators was, all the Males said it didn't matter and most of the Females said it looked prettier and was easier to read. After viewing the results I had to agree. but in the end, it's just the same file on the machine, regardless of case? Ughsome people!!! ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/000401c9ae2a$084be1e0$18e3a5...@com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: File Copy Problem
Tracy Pearson wrote: Well, case matters in some source control systems. That's why I know of MoveFile(). When a Linux file system gets involved, the same filename with different cases could be in the same folder, since they are not the same. It isn't the OS that determines whether MyFile.txt or myfile.txt are the same file or not, but the filesystem in use. ext3fs, the most common Linux filesystem, does indeed treat those as separate files, while ntfs and fat wouldn't. Paul ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/49cbaab8.9030...@ulmcnett.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: File Copy Problem
On Mar 26, 2009, at 10:56 AM, MB Software Solutions General Account wrote: but in the end, it's just the same file on the machine, regardless of case? Ughsome people!!! That's true. I know that WhoRepresents.txt looks exactly the same as: WHOREPRESENTS.TXT -- Ed Leafe ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/deeced2d-dbd0-4580-8937-76ceea1da...@leafe.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: File Copy Problem
Ed Leafe wrote: On Mar 26, 2009, at 10:56 AM, MB Software Solutions General Account wrote: but in the end, it's just the same file on the machine, regardless of case? Ughsome people!!! That's true. I know that WhoRepresents.txt looks exactly the same as: WHOREPRESENTS.TXT and the point is? What's the difference? What's the point of a file system seeing filenames with case-sensitivity? ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/3980.69.251.251.31.1238086239.squir...@webmail.dssco.net ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: File Copy Problem
Paul McNett wrote: Tracy Pearson wrote: Well, case matters in some source control systems. That's why I know of MoveFile(). When a Linux file system gets involved, the same filename with different cases could be in the same folder, since they are not the same. It isn't the OS that determines whether MyFile.txt or myfile.txt are the same file or not, but the filesystem in use. ext3fs, the most common Linux filesystem, does indeed treat those as separate files, while ntfs and fat wouldn't. What's the sense in that, Paul? You folks who are proLinux could probably explain it to us Windoze folks. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/3980.69.251.251.31.1238086247.squir...@webmail.dssco.net ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: File Copy Problem
Tracy Pearson wrote: Well, case matters in some source control systems. That's why I know of MoveFile(). When a Linux file system gets involved, the same filename with different cases could be in the same folder, since they are not the same. Ran into something similar recently with a MySQL database on a Debian system. My INSERT INTO statement used a different casing than the table was on the web. This kind of stuff makes me wonder WHY the Linux folks insisted on casing sensitivities for filenames and stuff like this database issue. I mean, come on, does anyone really think the EMPLOYEE table is different than the employee table? STUPID ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/3986.69.251.251.31.1238086252.squir...@webmail.dssco.net ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: File Copy Problem
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 10:56 AM, MB Software Solutions General Account mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com wrote: Peter Hart wrote: Hi Alan Ask the Female operators that. The consensus from the operators was, all the Males said it didn't matter and most of the Females said it looked prettier and was easier to read. After viewing the results I had to agree. but in the end, it's just the same file on the machine, regardless of case? Ughsome people!!! Not on a Linux box. ;- -- Stephen Russell Sr. Production Systems Programmer Web and Windows Development Independent Contractor Memphis TN 901.246-0159 ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/c4313dbe0903261000n21bab08fw17533385bac0e...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [JOB] VFP in Atlanta area
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 10:34 AM, MB Software Solutions General Account Steve, Why do I see your name/info when I click on the link? Good luck, though! -- probably my data in teh key with that uri. -- Stephen Russell Sr. Production Systems Programmer Web and Windows Development Independent Contractor Memphis TN 901.246-0159 ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/c4313dbe0903261002wa860f27me51f5be74b6c9...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
[NF] listening to that servoy webinar
It just started. He says FP a lot but you can tell that it is a different product. -- Stephen Russell Sr. Production Systems Programmer Web and Windows Development Independent Contractor Memphis TN 901.246-0159 ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/c4313dbe0903261004p379d4351o7bbbab041a080...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: File Copy Problem
I would imagine it stems from the C programming language in that variables are case sensitive, and since Unix Linux are very strongly tied to C, they probably kept the design concept the same when making the filesystem. As to whether it makes sense or not, it's really what you are used to. Since we are mostly Windows users, it doesn't make sense, as we are not used to it. Unix/Linux natives are used to it, and probably think having them be equal despite case differences is foolish. I will admit that I can't think of an objective reason why case sensitivity *should* matter for files, but there might be other people who can think of a good reason. I mean, come on, does anyone really think the EMPLOYEE table is different than the employee table? STUPID ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/20090326170551.ddf4a98...@marge.leafe.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
[NF] joke
Important Women's Health Issue: Do you have feelings of inadequacy? Do you suffer from shyness? Do you sometimes wish you were more assertive? If you answered yes to any of these questions, ask your doctor or pharmacist about Margaritas. Margaritas are the safe, natural way to feel better and more confident about yourself and your actions. Margaritas can help ease you out of your shyness and let you tell the world that you're ready and willing to do just about anything. You will notice the benefits of Margaritas almost immediately and with a regimen of regular doses you can overcome any obstacles that prevent you from living the life you want to live. Shyness and awkwardness will be a thing of the past and you will discover many talents you never knew you had. Stop hiding and start living, with Margaritas.. Margaritas may not be right for everyone. Women who are pregnant or nursing should not use Margaritas. However, women who wouldn't mind nursing or becoming pregnant are encouraged to try it. Side effects may include Dizziness, nausea, vomiting, incarceration Loss of motor control Loss of clothing Loss of money Table dancing Headache Dehydration Dry mouth And a desire to sing Karaoke WARNING: The consumption of Margaritas may make you think you are whispering when you are not. WARNING: The consumption of Margaritas may cause you to tell your friends over and over again that you love them. WARNING: The consumption of Margaritas may cause you to think you can sing. WARNING: The consumption of Margaritas may make you think you can logically converse with members of the opposite sex without spitting. After careful research one has learned that red wine and champagne may be interchangeable with the product - Margarita. Please pass this on to your wives and girlfriends. Don't let that inner shyness and low self esteem go untreated. Try Margarita, little salt and lime -- Stephen Russell Sr. Production Systems Programmer Web and Windows Development Independent Contractor Memphis TN 901.246-0159 ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/c4313dbe0903261008h6564d692o574bffca0772c...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: File Copy Problem
MB Software Solutions General Account wrote: Paul McNett wrote: Tracy Pearson wrote: Well, case matters in some source control systems. That's why I know of MoveFile(). When a Linux file system gets involved, the same filename with different cases could be in the same folder, since they are not the same. It isn't the OS that determines whether MyFile.txt or myfile.txt are the same file or not, but the filesystem in use. ext3fs, the most common Linux filesystem, does indeed treat those as separate files, while ntfs and fat wouldn't. What's the sense in that, Paul? You folks who are proLinux could probably explain it to us Windoze folks. As I said, it isn't a Linux thing, it's a 'feature' of certain filesystems. Just because I'm a Linux user and advocate and use a case-sensitive filesystem doesn't mean I necessarily agree with it. I believe it is simply one of those things that is there for historical reasons. We are talking about filesystems that have been evolving for 30+ years. Changing it now could cause a heap of trouble for existing files. It also doesn't really cause as many problems as you appear to assume it would. The only time I've had an issue with this is back when I used to use CVS as my source control for VFP, and *VFP* had this really wonky behavior where it would change the case of certain file extensions, which would throw a wrench in the backend csv as now we have two files: the .vct and the .VCT. But I still blame that on VFP, not on CVS or Linux, or even the filesystem, as they were just doing what they were asked to do. Paul ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/49cbb6a9.1000...@ulmcnett.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [JOB] VFP in Atlanta area
Stephen Russell wrote: On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 10:34 AM, MB Software Solutions General Account Steve, Why do I see your name/info when I click on the link? Good luck, though! -- probably my data in teh key with that uri. Ah, the license-plate method. That is *so* 1995! Paul ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/49cbb6c8@ulmcnett.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: File Copy Problem
I can see all the arguments but if I can just add my pennies sorry (cents) worth isn't it the same as naming a variable using CamelCase Upper and lower case makes things so much more readable. Would we ever use Upper case for the lc part of lcTheFileIWantToSaveOnTheHardDrive. My clients employees just felt that they could find a file in a folder so much easier using Upper Case for the filename and lower for the subsequent changes. Seeing the results now it does shout at you that these are the edited files. Anyway I was taught that the customer is King or dare I say Queen and should be treated as if they know best. Cheers Peter Peter Hart Computers By the way, it's just cost me approximately £10.00 more for each copy of Windows XP Professional OEM that I have just purchased. Is that a ploy to get us to sell Vista or just because of the dollar exchange rate. Computer components are cheaper than a few weeks ago. -Original Message- From: profox-boun...@leafe.com [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Alan Bourke Sent: 26 March 2009 16:01 To: profox@leafe.com Subject: Re: File Copy Problem Sorry I had assumed there was some design/programmatic reason. Users eh? Shoot the lot of them, I say. -- Alan Bourke alanpbou...@fastmail.fm [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/a57fa4cf19531343a2ee11b57db8e3af04c...@server.peterhartcomputers.local ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: File Copy Problem
MB Software Solutions General Account wrote: Ed Leafe wrote: On Mar 26, 2009, at 10:56 AM, MB Software Solutions General Account wrote: but in the end, it's just the same file on the machine, regardless of case? Ughsome people!!! That's true. I know that WhoRepresents.txt looks exactly the same as: WHOREPRESENTS.TXT and the point is? What's the difference? What's the point of a file system seeing filenames with case-sensitivity? Snicker. It's actually a good example. Look again, grasshopper. Look CLOSER. Being as I am, by nature, a Perv, I read the two examples above completely differently. The first reminded me of contact information, then second reminded me of a shopping list. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/49cbb772.5010...@taconic.net ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: File Copy Problem
Paul McNett wrote: MB Software Solutions General Account wrote: Paul McNett wrote: Tracy Pearson wrote: Well, case matters in some source control systems. That's why I know of MoveFile(). When a Linux file system gets involved, the same filename with different cases could be in the same folder, since they are not the same. It isn't the OS that determines whether MyFile.txt or myfile.txt are the same file or not, but the filesystem in use. ext3fs, the most common Linux filesystem, does indeed treat those as separate files, while ntfs and fat wouldn't. What's the sense in that, Paul? You folks who are proLinux could probably explain it to us Windoze folks. As I said, it isn't a Linux thing, it's a 'feature' of certain filesystems. Just because I'm a Linux user and advocate and use a case-sensitive filesystem doesn't mean I necessarily agree with it. I believe it is simply one of those things that is there for historical reasons. We are talking about filesystems that have been evolving for 30+ years. Changing it now could cause a heap of trouble for existing files. It also doesn't really cause as many problems as you appear to assume it would. The only time I've had an issue with this is back when I used to use CVS as my source control for VFP, and *VFP* had this really wonky behavior where it would change the case of certain file extensions, which would throw a wrench in the backend csv as now we have two files: the .vct and the .VCT. But I still blame that on VFP, not on CVS or Linux, or even the filesystem, as they were just doing what they were asked to do. Oh, I forgot to mention the main reason I like case-sensitivity in general: It doesn't let you get sloppy. I look back at my VFP code today, code I was proud of, and I can't believe how inconsistent I was in whitespace and casing. Things like: IF ... ... ... else ... ... endif and calling it m.CustomerName in one place and m.customername in another. Case-sensitivity simply doesn't allow for this unforgivable sloppiness, so the sloppiness doesn't happen in the first place. I think the same argument could be made for files in a filesystem. Being sloppy with naming will result in problems. Paul ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/49cbb83c.6040...@ulmcnett.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: File Copy Problem
-Original Message- From: profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Paul McNett Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2009 10:16 AM To: profoxt...@leafe.com Subject: Re: File Copy Problem Case-sensitivity simply doesn't allow for this unforgivable sloppiness, I'll forgive you Paul (but the compiler won't) Matt Jarvis Programmer/DBA King | Retail Solutions Electronic Privacy Notice. This e-mail, and any attachments, contains information that is, or may be, covered by electronic communications privacy laws, and is also confidential and proprietary in nature. If you are not the intended recipient, please be advised that you are legally prohibited from retaining, using, copying, distributing, or otherwise disclosing this information in any manner. Instead, please reply to the sender that you have received this communication in error, and then immediately delete it. Thank you in advance for your cooperation. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/3e2cccb1767f7d4aab5384dd8e54525104679...@exchmail1.kingrs.local ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Update field value
I'd like to update a field value by allowing the user to click a button that has a value as it's caption. There will be multiple buttons each with its own distinct value. I can put code in the click of each button knowing it's assigned value, and that will do the job, but would rather use a form method. Is there a way to have the method determine which button was clicked, and therefore assign the new value to the field. The code I'm using now in the button.click is: SELECT bidboard UPDATE bidboard SET amount = 6000 llok = tableupdate(1,.f.,'bidboard') thisform.refresh James E Harvey Hanover Shoe Farms, Inc. M.I.S./Corresponding Officer Off: 717-637-8931 fax: 717-637-6766 email: jhar...@hanoverpa.com ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/005c01c9ae3f$c8ef7a00$5ace6e...@com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Update field value
Jim Harvey wrote: I'd like to update a field value by allowing the user to click a button that has a value as it's caption. There will be multiple buttons each with its own distinct value. I can put code in the click of each button knowing it's assigned value, and that will do the job, but would rather use a form method. Is there a way to have the method determine which button was clicked, and therefore assign the new value to the field. The code I'm using now in the button.click is: SELECT bidboard UPDATE bidboard SET amount = 6000 llok = tableupdate(1,.f.,'bidboard') thisform.refresh If I'm following you correctly, I would create a form method MyMethod with a parameter. In the button click, I'd either call Thisform.MyMethod(1) (Where the numeric is different for each button), or better yet ThisForm.MyMethod(this.name) (allowing for exactly the same code in each button) Then in the method, use a CASE statement, and proceed from there. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/49cbba9f.9050...@taconic.net ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: File Copy Problem
Vince, WhoRepresents.txt looks exactly the same as: WHOREPRESENTS.TXT The first reminded me of contact information, The second reminded me of a shopping list ABSOLUTELY BRILLIANT!! :) I'm going to be laughing about your remark all day. Thanks! Malcolm ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/1238088983.19244.1307477...@webmail.messagingengine.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: File Copy Problem
You're 100% right, I think it's one of VFP's few downsides. I wish there was a way to *enforce* case sensitivity with variables in VFP (consistency is a good thing). To some extent, perhaps I'd even like to see strict data typing, although I wouldn't want to lose macro expansion and other cool tricks as a result. Whenever I spend lots of time working in C/C++, and switch back to VFP, and see my all my unintentional inconsistencies with case, and who knows about data typing mistakes, it makes me shudder. It's the only major limitation in my mind of VFP, but then again, I'm willing to bet most other VFP coders probably see it as a big advantage. I just wish there was an option to support both ways. Oh, I forgot to mention the main reason I like case-sensitivity in general: It doesn't let you get sloppy. I look back at my VFP code today, code I was proud of, and I can't believe how inconsistent I was in whitespace and casing. Things like: IF ... ... ... else ... ... endif and calling it m.CustomerName in one place and m.customername in another. Case-sensitivity simply doesn't allow for this unforgivable sloppiness, so the sloppiness doesn't happen in the first place. I think the same argument could be made for files in a filesystem. Being sloppy with naming will result in problems. Paul ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/20090326173705.968f298...@marge.leafe.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: File Copy Problem
That reminds me of the NOWHERE folder on OS/2. The developer meant is as NowHere and many users saw it as NoWhere. There were hidden files in the folder, but it looked empty. Delete the folder and all the desktop icons would go away. -Original Message- From: Vince Teachout Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2009 1:12 PM MB Software Solutions General Account wrote: Ed Leafe wrote: On Mar 26, 2009, at 10:56 AM, MB Software Solutions General Account wrote: but in the end, it's just the same file on the machine, regardless of case? Ughsome people!!! That's true. I know that WhoRepresents.txt looks exactly the same as: WHOREPRESENTS.TXT and the point is? What's the difference? What's the point of a file system seeing filenames with case-sensitivity? Snicker. It's actually a good example. Look again, grasshopper. Look CLOSER. Being as I am, by nature, a Perv, I read the two examples above completely differently. The first reminded me of contact information, then second reminded me of a shopping list. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/000801c9ae3a$69571260$3c0537...@com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] joke
On Mar 26, 2009, at 12:08 PM, Stephen Russell wrote: Important Women's Health Issue: [OT], please. There is nothing technical in this post. -- Ed Leafe ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/dae3ee70-8093-4ee8-a72f-d2142c415...@leafe.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: File Copy Problem
On Mar 26, 2009, at 11:50 AM, MB Software Solutions General Account wrote: That's true. I know that WhoRepresents.txt looks exactly the same as: WHOREPRESENTS.TXT and the point is? What's the difference? Most people see the second and read it as 'whore presents'. That was the intended humor. What's the point of a file system seeing filenames with case- sensitivity? So you think that 'E' and 'e' should be the same letter? What about these: É, é, Ë, ë, Ê, ê How about C, c, Ç and ç? Case-insensitivity is a difficult issue involving character sets, encodings, collations, etc. But even if you stick to plain old ASCII, just remember that 69 != 101. -- Ed Leafe ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/8fdb1858-1d4a-4c6f-8b29-af7610bfe...@leafe.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [NF] joke
Technically speaking, that is correct! John Harvey -Original Message- From: profox-boun...@leafe.com [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Ed Leafe Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2009 12:54 PM To: ProFox Email List Subject: Re: [NF] joke On Mar 26, 2009, at 12:08 PM, Stephen Russell wrote: Important Women's Health Issue: [OT], please. There is nothing technical in this post. -- Ed Leafe [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/00f301c9ae3e$cbdd67a0$639836...@harvey@shelbynet.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Update field value
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 1:22 PM, Jim Harvey jhar...@hanoverpa.com wrote: I'd like to update a field value by allowing the user to click a button that has a value as it's caption. There will be multiple buttons each with its own distinct value. I can put code in the click of each button knowing it's assigned value, and that will do the job, but would rather use a form method. Is there a way to have the method determine which button was clicked, and therefore assign the new value to the field. The code I'm using now in the button.click is: SELECT bidboard UPDATE bidboard SET amount = 6000 llok = tableupdate(1,.f.,'bidboard') thisform.refresh - just a guess here: Click event for each button calls a single method with a param that states the button.text You can then use a CASE to separate the code that is unique to the button. HTH -- Stephen Russell Sr. Production Systems Programmer Web and Windows Development Independent Contractor Memphis TN 901.246-0159 ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/c4313dbe0903261131h6dd4y795a68d172b80...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: File Copy Problem
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 5:24 PM, Ed Leafe e...@leafe.com wrote: On Mar 26, 2009, at 10:56 AM, MB Software Solutions General Account wrote: but in the end, it's just the same file on the machine, regardless of case? Ughsome people!!! That's true. I know that WhoRepresents.txt looks exactly the same as: WHOREPRESENTS.TXT Only if you have a dirty mind. A+ jml ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/a2b0cc710903261133t184172acu867ef81e5be91...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
[OT] Grow our economy?
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0309/20526.html Legalize pot to generate new jobs. pretty funny. -- Stephen Russell Sr. Production Systems Programmer Web and Windows Development Independent Contractor Memphis TN 901.246-0159 ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/c4313dbe0903261136g3ca3844cw612f02371f8f0...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [OT] Grow our economy?
Yep, in the medical field, treating all the potheads for crashes. John Harvey -Original Message- From: profox-boun...@leafe.com [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Stephen Russell Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2009 1:37 PM To: ProFox Email List Subject: [OT] Grow our economy? http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0309/20526.html Legalize pot to generate new jobs. pretty funny. -- Stephen Russell Sr. Production Systems Programmer Web and Windows Development Independent Contractor Memphis TN 901.246-0159 [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/012a01c9ae42$6e3966e0$4aac34...@harvey@shelbynet.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] joke
Stephen Russell wrote: Important Women's Health Issue: Steve...I think you've been having too many of these margaritas...this is [OT]! ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/2320.69.251.251.31.1238093656.squir...@webmail.dssco.net ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] listening to that servoy webinar
Stephen Russell wrote: It just started. He says FP a lot but you can tell that it is a different product. Well...it IS a different product! Didn't DotNet take the same approach on their marketing to VFPers? ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/2308.69.251.251.31.1238093663.squir...@webmail.dssco.net ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: File Copy Problem
Paul McNett wrote: As I said, it isn't a Linux thing, it's a 'feature' of certain filesystems. Just because I'm a Linux user and advocate and use a case-sensitive filesystem doesn't mean I necessarily agree with it. I believe it is simply one of those things that is there for historical reasons. We are talking about filesystems that have been evolving for 30+ years. Changing it now could cause a heap of trouble for existing files. Ok, but the programmer who deliberately has two tables (Employees and employees) should be shot on sight/site. eg ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/2306.69.251.251.31.1238093670.squir...@webmail.dssco.net ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: File Copy Problem
Peter Hart wrote: By the way, it's just cost me approximately £10.00 more for each copy of Windows XP Professional OEM that I have just purchased. Is that a ploy to get us to sell Vista or just because of the dollar exchange rate. Computer components are cheaper than a few weeks ago. You've got to pay for the downgrade to WinXP...that's the way they sold the notion awhile back, any way. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/2319.69.251.251.31.1238093677.squir...@webmail.dssco.net ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: File Copy Problem
Vince Teachout wrote: Snicker. It's actually a good example. Look again, grasshopper. Look CLOSER. Being as I am, by nature, a Perv, I read the two examples above completely differently. The first reminded me of contact information, then second reminded me of a shopping list. Aaaah yesI see it now! ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/2321.69.251.251.31.1238093684.squir...@webmail.dssco.net ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: File Copy Problem
Paul McNett wrote: Oh, I forgot to mention the main reason I like case-sensitivity in general: It doesn't let you get sloppy. I look back at my VFP code today, code I was proud of, and I can't believe how inconsistent I was in whitespace and casing. Things like: IF ... ... ... else ... ... endif and calling it m.CustomerName in one place and m.customername in another. Case-sensitivity simply doesn't allow for this unforgivable sloppiness, so the sloppiness doesn't happen in the first place. Well, you certainly set the bar high (or higher than most), sir! ;-) I think the same argument could be made for files in a filesystem. Being sloppy with naming will result in problems. Nopenot gonna side with you on that one. When it comes to the file system, I shouldn't have to care if it's saved as Crap or CRAP or crap or just plain sh!t. g ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/2306.69.251.251.31.1238093691.squir...@webmail.dssco.net ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: File Copy Problem
Ed Leafe wrote: Most people see the second and read it as 'whore presents'. That was the intended humor. What's the point of a file system seeing filenames with case- sensitivity? So you think that 'E' and 'e' should be the same letter? What about these: É, é, Ë, ë, Ê, ê How about C, c, Ç and ç? Case-insensitivity is a difficult issue involving character sets, encodings, collations, etc. But even if you stick to plain old ASCII, just remember that 69 != 101. Jeez, Ed...what hoops did you have to go through to type those characters? The going the extra mile award today goes to Ed Leafe for demonstrating above and beyond the normal poster!!! Everyone should just use plain ol' simple Engrish. gdr JK!! ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/2328.69.251.251.31.1238093722.squir...@webmail.dssco.net ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Update field value
Vince Teachout wrote: Jim Harvey wrote: I'd like to update a field value by allowing the user to click a button that has a value as it's caption. There will be multiple buttons each with its own distinct value. I can put code in the click of each button knowing it's assigned value, and that will do the job, but would rather use a form method. Is there a way to have the method determine which button was clicked, and therefore assign the new value to the field. The code I'm using now in the button.click is: SELECT bidboard UPDATE bidboard SET amount = 6000 llok = tableupdate(1,.f.,'bidboard') thisform.refresh If I'm following you correctly, I would create a form method MyMethod with a parameter. In the button click, I'd either call Thisform.MyMethod(1) (Where the numeric is different for each button), or better yet ThisForm.MyMethod(this.name) (allowing for exactly the same code in each button) Vince -- you meant ThisForm.MyMethod(this) (...not just the name attribute, but the actual object) right? ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/2330.69.251.251.31.1238093728.squir...@webmail.dssco.net ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: File Copy Problem
MB Software Solutions General Account wrote: Ok, but the programmer who deliberately has two tables (Employees and employees) should be shot on sight/site. eg No, there may be good reasoning behind it, that works for them. Paul ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/49cbd054.4030...@ulmcnett.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: File Copy Problem
MB Software Solutions General Account wrote: Jeez, Ed...what hoops did you have to go through to type those characters? The going the extra mile award today goes to Ed Leafe for demonstrating above and beyond the normal poster!!! Ed's great, but typing special characters isn't hard at all. Just type Option+e, then type the letter you want to accent. So, Option+e,a yields á. Option+u,e yields ë. Etc. What y'all should do is consider upgrading your computers to something modern. ;) Paul ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/49cbd12d.5030...@ulmcnett.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Grow our economy?
John wrote: Yep, in the medical field, treating all the potheads for crashes. Hi John! I worked in the body shop business for several years. The difference between a pot fueled crash and an alcohol fueled crash is profound. When you find beer cans in the car it is sort of bad, when you find pot seeds the thing is nearly totaled if it is new, it is totaled if it is older. http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0309/20526.html Legalize pot to generate new jobs. -- Regards, Pete http://pete-theisen.com/ http://elect-pete-theisen.com/ ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/49cbd313.5070...@verizon.net ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: File Copy Problem
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 8:02 PM, Paul McNett p...@ulmcnett.com wrote: MB Software Solutions General Account wrote: Jeez, Ed...what hoops did you have to go through to type those characters? The going the extra mile award today goes to Ed Leafe for demonstrating above and beyond the normal poster!!! Ed's great, but typing special characters isn't hard at all. Just type Option+e, then type the letter you want to accent. So, Option+e,a yields á. Option+u,e yields ë. Etc. What y'all should do is consider upgrading your computers to something modern. ;) Paul And i have them on my keyboard A+ jml ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/a2b0cc710903261216j7c8e01d4hd66ee0d2e896c...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] listening to that servoy webinar
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 1:54 PM, MB Software Solutions General Account mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com wrote: Stephen Russell wrote: It just started. He says FP a lot but you can tell that it is a different product. Well...it IS a different product! Didn't DotNet take the same approach on their marketing to VFPers? I listened to it and got a few laughs out of it. I called one of their staff after it was over. They are an outfit with a good product. Costly as well. They don't go into the license that states that you are going to have them on site to help you get up to speed. They say that the same end product you are creating will run on either web or win no code needed for that separation. They also state that one beni in their code will force data changes done on other workstations to your display in real time, in both web or win. That just sounds like a con. Web is dissociated from data. They site a company that started in the first version of .NET and then converted to ver 2 and then again for ver 3.5 They had 2500 forms and more reports. They said that the project was only 75% complete in 3 years. 4 developers who were also doing break fix on old system. I have no idea on the form complexity for this app but I think that a complex form is probably 16-32 hrs or maybe more depending on the requirements. So taking the low end value, 16hrs, that times 70% of the bulk forms requires 13.46 man years just for the forms, let alone the reporting. This is a monster app. Not sure how long I would have put into a project plan. -- Stephen Russell Sr. Production Systems Programmer Web and Windows Development Independent Contractor Memphis TN 901.246-0159 ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/c4313dbe0903261228o6e205299i27302f169d69a...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Update field value
MB Software Solutions General Account wrote: Vince -- you meant ThisForm.MyMethod(this) (...not just the name attribute, but the actual object) right? No, in my example (again, assuming I understood the question) only a property that can be tested by a CASE statement needs to be passed. So if the Button name was ButtVal1, the click method Thisform.MyMethod(this.name) would send the parm ButtVal1 to the method, and a CASE would then process for ( CASE lMyParm = ButtVal1 ) ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/49cbd7a7.3020...@taconic.net ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: File Copy Problem
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 1:33 PM, Jean Laeremans laeremans.jeanma...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 5:24 PM, Ed Leafe e...@leafe.com wrote: On Mar 26, 2009, at 10:56 AM, MB Software Solutions General Account wrote: but in the end, it's just the same file on the machine, regardless of case? Ughsome people!!! That's true. I know that WhoRepresents.txt looks exactly the same as: WHOREPRESENTS.TXT Only if you have a dirty mind. --- I do. ;- -- Stephen Russell Sr. Production Systems Programmer Web and Windows Development Independent Contractor Memphis TN 901.246-0159 ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/c4313dbe0903261230v4c7386f1wc6dced4d54494...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
[NF] SQL Server - is a table locked?
Trying to track down some oddball behavior and suspect a file lock issue... I'm trying to get a list of tables (or whatever) that SQL Server 2000 might have locked and am attempting to use a combo of sp_lock and a SELECT of some sort to make it happen. I'm not familiar enough with this stuff to know how to manipulate output from one thing to another. Something like: exec sp_lock( select id from sysobjects); Am I on the right track or can someone show me the magic key? TIA, Matt Jarvis Programmer/DBA King | Retail Solutions Electronic Privacy Notice. This e-mail, and any attachments, contains information that is, or may be, covered by electronic communications privacy laws, and is also confidential and proprietary in nature. If you are not the intended recipient, please be advised that you are legally prohibited from retaining, using, copying, distributing, or otherwise disclosing this information in any manner. Instead, please reply to the sender that you have received this communication in error, and then immediately delete it. Thank you in advance for your cooperation. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/3e2cccb1767f7d4aab5384dd8e54525104679...@exchmail1.kingrs.local ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Update field value
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 12:29 PM, Vince Teachout tea...@taconic.net wrote: MB Software Solutions General Account wrote: Vince -- you meant ThisForm.MyMethod(this) (...not just the name attribute, but the actual object) right? No, in my example (again, assuming I understood the question) only a property that can be tested by a CASE statement needs to be passed. So if the Button name was ButtVal1, the click method Thisform.MyMethod(this.name) would send the parm ButtVal1 to the method, and a CASE would then process for ( CASE lMyParm = ButtVal1 ) So why not pass this? You can then reference the button.Caption (or any other property) directly and not need any CASE statement. -- Fred --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html --- ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/3392e7100903261239s7c7c15d1lf7b05a1b9287d...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: File Copy Problem
Paul McNett wrote: MB Software Solutions General Account wrote: Ok, but the programmer who deliberately has two tables (Employees and employees) should be shot on sight/site. eg No, there may be good reasoning behind it, that works for them. I'm buying this guy the best steak dinner available if he can justify to me why he needs 2 tables--one called Employees and another called employees. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/3023.69.251.251.31.1238099202.squir...@webmail.dssco.net ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: File Copy Problem
Paul McNett wrote: What y'all should do is consider upgrading your computers to something modern. ;) Paul You mean to them thar fruity Appler compooters? g ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/3023.69.251.251.31.1238099219.squir...@webmail.dssco.net ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Update field value
Vince Teachout wrote: No, in my example (again, assuming I understood the question) only a property that can be tested by a CASE statement needs to be passed. So if the Button name was ButtVal1, the click method Thisform.MyMethod(this.name) would send the parm ButtVal1 to the method, and a CASE would then process for ( CASE lMyParm = ButtVal1 ) Oh...I thought you meant that they were similar objects and hence had the same interface, so referring to the common object was the way. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/3027.69.251.251.31.1238099232.squir...@webmail.dssco.net ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Update field value
Fred Taylor wrote: So why not pass this? You can then reference the button.Caption (or any other property) directly and not need any CASE statement. -- Fred My point exactly. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/3025.69.251.251.31.1238099240.squir...@webmail.dssco.net ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Update field value
Fred Taylor wrote: On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 12:29 PM, Vince Teachout tea...@taconic.net wrote: So why not pass this? You can then reference the button.Caption (or any other property) directly and not need any CASE statement. In this example, how does it eliminate the need for CASE? Again, assuming I am understanding the problem correctly (ie, change a value, depending on which button I pressed.), what's the difference between: CASE myParam = button1 and CASE oMyParam.Name = button1 ? ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/49cbe5be.5050...@taconic.net ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: File Copy Problem
MB Software Solutions General Account wrote: I'm buying this guy the best steak dinner available if he can justify to me why he needs 2 tables--one called Employees and another called employees. One for the IMPORTANT Employees, and one for the rest of us! I'll take my steak medium rare, please! ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/49cbe60a.2060...@taconic.net ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: Update field value
Going back to the original request: I'd like to update a field value by allowing the user to click a button that has a value as it's caption. Would result with: UPDATE bidboard SET amount = val(oButton.Caption) -Original Message- From: Vince Teachout Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2009 4:30 PM Fred Taylor wrote: On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 12:29 PM, Vince Teachout tea...@taconic.net wrote: So why not pass this? You can then reference the button.Caption (or any other property) directly and not need any CASE statement. In this example, how does it eliminate the need for CASE? Again, assuming I am understanding the problem correctly (ie, change a value, depending on which button I pressed.), what's the difference between: CASE myParam = button1 and CASE oMyParam.Name = button1 ? ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/001401c9ae51$e20915c0$a61b41...@com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Update field value
Tracy Pearson wrote: Going back to the original request: I'd like to update a field value by allowing the user to click a button that has a value as it's caption. Would result with: UPDATE bidboard SET amount = val(oButton.Caption) Or, again, within a form method, which was my understanding: UPDATE bidboard SET amount = val(MyParm) Tomato, TaMahto. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/49cbe910.2010...@taconic.net ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Update field value
Tracy Pearson wrote: Going back to the original request: I'm going to chalk this one up to I rushed through original e-mail, didn't understand the actual problem, and don't care enough to look up the original on the archives. Especially since the actual problem seems to have been solved. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/49cbe9e4.5010...@taconic.net ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] SQL Server - is a table locked?
Some T-SQL to do it: snip SELECT t1.request_session_id as spid, t1.resource_type as type, t1.resource_database_id as dbid, (case resource_type WHEN 'OBJECT' THEN object_name(t1.resource_associated_entity_id) WHEN 'DATABASE' THEN ' ' ELSE (SELECT object_name(object_id) FROM sys.partitions WHERE hobt_id=resource_associated_entity_id) END) AS objname, t1.resource_description as description, t1.request_mode as mode, t1.request_status as status, t2.blocking_session_id FROM sys.dm_tran_locks AS t1 LEFT OUTER JOIN sys.dm_os_waiting_tasks AS t2 ON t1.lock_owner_address = t2.resource_address /snip -- Alan Bourke alanpbou...@fastmail.fm ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/1238102014.28771.1307513...@webmail.messagingengine.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: File Copy Problem
Micheal, I'm buying this guy the best steak dinner available if he can justify to me why he needs 2 tables--one called Employees and another called employees. - EMPLOYEES for 'upper' employees (get the big bonuses) - Employees for 'proper' employees (word hard, keep their mouth shut) - employees for 'lower' employees (hourly employees, contractors) I'll looking forward to my steak dinner. ;) Malcolm ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/1238102296.25956.1307514...@webmail.messagingengine.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: File Copy Problem
Vince Teachout wrote: MB Software Solutions General Account wrote: I'm buying this guy the best steak dinner available if he can justify to me why he needs 2 tables--one called Employees and another called employees. One for the IMPORTANT Employees, and one for the rest of us! I'll take my steak medium rare, please! LOL!!! You and Malcolm and I can eat at Fleming's here in Baltimore...the absolute best steak dinner I've ever had!!! http://www.flemingssteakhouse.com/ ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4653.69.251.251.31.1238103501.squir...@webmail.dssco.net ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Update field value
I agree with this. We have something similar. The name of the button should be the value you want to store. The caption should be something similar. In cmdbutton.click() put thisform.StoreThisValue(This.Name) Now you can simply copy this button and change the name and caption of the other buttons. No need to change click() Depending on your values, you could make that the caption and pass this.caption so you do not need to modify the button names - Original Message - From: Vince Teachout To: ProFox Email List Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2009 10:25 AM Subject: Re: Update field value Jim Harvey wrote: I'd like to update a field value by allowing the user to click a button that has a value as it's caption. There will be multiple buttons each with its own distinct value. I can put code in the click of each button knowing it's assigned value, and that will do the job, but would rather use a form method. Is there a way to have the method determine which button was clicked, and therefore assign the new value to the field. The code I'm using now in the button.click is: SELECT bidboard UPDATE bidboard SET amount = 6000 llok = tableupdate(1,.f.,'bidboard') thisform.refresh If I'm following you correctly, I would create a form method MyMethod with a parameter. In the button click, I'd either call Thisform.MyMethod(1) (Where the numeric is different for each button), or better yet ThisForm.MyMethod(this.name) (allowing for exactly the same code in each button) Then in the method, use a CASE statement, and proceed from there. [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/010c01c9ae5a$37ba84b0$8600a...@w2k3s02 ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [NF] SQL Server - is a table locked?
-Original Message- From: profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Alan Bourke Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2009 2:14 PM To: profoxt...@leafe.com Subject: Re: [NF] SQL Server - is a table locked? Some T-SQL to do it: snip SELECT t1.request_session_id as spid, t1.resource_type as type, t1.resource_database_id as dbid, snipped -- Alan Bourke alanpbou...@fastmail.fm Thanks Alan... but I'm getting an error msg when I run it... Is this code for SQL Server 2000? I've run it with all my DB's and can't find the missing sys related files: Server: Msg 208, Level 16, State 1, Line 1 Invalid object name 'sys.partitions'. Server: Msg 208, Level 16, State 1, Line 1 Invalid object name 'sys.dm_tran_locks'. Server: Msg 208, Level 16, State 1, Line 1 Invalid object name 'sys.dm_os_waiting_tasks'. I'm assuming I'm just missing something obvious... Matt Jarvis Programmer/DBA King | Retail Solutions 541-349-8512 Electronic Privacy Notice. This e-mail, and any attachments, contains information that is, or may be, covered by electronic communications privacy laws, and is also confidential and proprietary in nature. If you are not the intended recipient, please be advised that you are legally prohibited from retaining, using, copying, distributing, or otherwise disclosing this information in any manner. Instead, please reply to the sender that you have received this communication in error, and then immediately delete it. Thank you in advance for your cooperation. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/3e2cccb1767f7d4aab5384dd8e54525104679...@exchmail1.kingrs.local ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
[OT] Dallas police chief apologizes for conduct of officer who drew gun on NFL player outside hospital
Below are links to an incident that occurred in Plano, Texas, an up-scale, predominately white suberb of Dallas, Texas. Plano, Texas was recently ranked the 5th most conservative city in the USA. #--- Excerpt: Dallas Police Chief David Kunkle stood in front of a dozen news cameras this afternoon at police headquarters to apologize for the behavior of an officer who stopped a family outside a hospital emergency room. http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/dn/latestnews/stories/032609dnmetcopstop.3e9c080.html or http://tinyurl.com/cr45dp #--- Regards, LelandJ ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/49cbf690.5020...@mail.smvfp.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Dallas police chief apologizes for conduct of officer who drew gun on NFL player outside hospital
All this cop had to do is follow them up to the room to verify their story. He should be fired. * Join the OBAMA RESISTANCE MOVEMENT! http://www.cafepress.com/rightwingmike/6181419 --- On Thu, 3/26/09, Leland F. Jackson, CPA lela...@mail.smvfp.com wrote: From: Leland F. Jackson, CPA lela...@mail.smvfp.com Subject: [OT] Dallas police chief apologizes for conduct of officer who drew gun on NFL player outside hospital To: ProFox Email List profox@leafe.com Date: Thursday, March 26, 2009, 5:41 PM Below are links to an incident that occurred in Plano, Texas, an up-scale, predominately white suberb of Dallas, Texas. Plano, Texas was recently ranked the 5th most conservative city in the USA. #--- Excerpt: Dallas Police Chief David Kunkle stood in front of a dozen news cameras this afternoon at police headquarters to apologize for the behavior of an officer who stopped a family outside a hospital emergency room. http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/dn/latestnews/stories/032609dnmetcopstop.3e9c080.html or http://tinyurl.com/cr45dp #--- Regards, LelandJ ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/49cbf690.5020...@mail.smvfp.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/904350.79354...@web31404.mail.mud.yahoo.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Dallas police chief apologizes for conduct of officer who drew gun on NFL player outside hospital
I agree. Must police officers works unsupervised, and must exercise initiative tempered with judgement in carrying out their duties. The driver of the car was driving with his emergency lights on. He stop at the red light, before preceding through it. When the police officer turned on his red/blue lights to signal for the car driver to pull over, the car driver did not try to flee, but did continue on allowing the police officer to follow. When the car driver entered the hospital property and stop at the emergency room, it have been a strong hint to the police officer that all was not well and there could be a pending health care emergency. The police officer's priorities should have shifted toward providing help to the passengers of the car; rather, than enforcing any minor traffic violations. I suspect the police officer really isn't suited to the job, and should be reassigned or forced to seek employment more in line with his personality traits and abilities. Regards, LelandJ Michael Madigan wrote: All this cop had to do is follow them up to the room to verify their story. He should be fired. * Join the OBAMA RESISTANCE MOVEMENT! http://www.cafepress.com/rightwingmike/6181419 --- On Thu, 3/26/09, Leland F. Jackson, CPA lela...@mail.smvfp.com wrote: From: Leland F. Jackson, CPA lela...@mail.smvfp.com Subject: [OT] Dallas police chief apologizes for conduct of officer who drew gun on NFL player outside hospital To: ProFox Email List profox@leafe.com Date: Thursday, March 26, 2009, 5:41 PM Below are links to an incident that occurred in Plano, Texas, an up-scale, predominately white suberb of Dallas, Texas. Plano, Texas was recently ranked the 5th most conservative city in the USA. #--- Excerpt: Dallas Police Chief David Kunkle stood in front of a dozen news cameras this afternoon at police headquarters to apologize for the behavior of an officer who stopped a family outside a hospital emergency room. http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/dn/latestnews/stories/032609dnmetcopstop.3e9c080.html or http://tinyurl.com/cr45dp #--- Regards, LelandJ [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/49cc14f7.6070...@mail.smvfp.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: Update field value
Or tomayto Al -Original Message- From: profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of MB Software Solutions General Account Sent: 26 March 2009 21:37 To: profoxt...@leafe.com Subject: Re: Update field value Vince Teachout wrote: Tomato, TaMahto. or tomato...which is totally different from the others on some file systems. gdr [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/3c5ac8e3871846ec8374a7eeb46f7...@gsl.local ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
[OT] No common sense anymore
They're charging a 14yo girl with sending child pornography for sending photos of herself. How ridiculous. http://www.nbcnewyork.com/news/local/Girl-Charged-With-Child-Porn-for-Posting-Nude-Pics-of-Self.html * Join the OBAMA RESISTANCE MOVEMENT! http://www.cafepress.com/rightwingmike/6181419 ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/774686.66381...@web31402.mail.mud.yahoo.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [OT] No common sense anymore
World wide the child porn charge is getting well and truly out of hand. Over here we had a person convicted and confirmed on appeal of possessing child porn for having the 'adult' Simpsons cartoon (bart and lisa). The judges said that bart and lisa are 'children'. And on and on it goes. True child porn is evil. A teenager taking nude photos of herself and sending them to someone is not. It is dumb - not evil. And who wants to stand up against child porn laws and their uses? No-one. Until the day arrives that possession of a photo of any child is a crime - including drawings, cartoons and literature. I'm sick to death of this utter crap that charges CHILDREN with child porn charges like this. Where are the politicians with a brain, wehere are the judges with a conscience. In NSW here there was concern that child porn convictions were low and people where getting off for the technicality of the cops being unable to prove the girl in the photo was under 18. So what do they do? Pass a law saying that if a child is dressed in a style that is 16yo then that person can be considered underage unless you can prove otherwise. Its getting to the stage that it is dangerous to own a digital camera. Id like to say this is from the 'only in america' file but it aint. It's happening everywhere. -Original Message- From: profox-boun...@leafe.com [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Michael Madigan Sent: Friday, 27 March 2009 2:40 PM To: profox@leafe.com Subject: [OT] No common sense anymore They're charging a 14yo girl with sending child pornography for sending photos of herself. How ridiculous. http://www.nbcnewyork.com/news/local/Girl-Charged-With-Child-Porn-for-Postin g-Nude-Pics-of-Self.html * Join the OBAMA RESISTANCE MOVEMENT! http://www.cafepress.com/rightwingmike/6181419 [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/004201c9ae96$2aa147f0$7fe3d7...@com.au ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [OT] No common sense anymore
Yeah I remember the cartoon nonsense. There have been many instances of parents taking pictures of their kids in the pool or bathtub being arrested because the Wal-Mart photo clerk called the police. It used to be that child pornography only applied to children involved in a sex act or posed or dressed in a lewd way. Now a 14yo girl sending nude pictures to herself to friends, while stupid and not something you want your child doing, is faced with being arrested and becoming a convicted felon. Crazy. * Join the OBAMA RESISTANCE MOVEMENT! http://www.cafepress.com/rightwingmike/6181419 --- On Fri, 3/27/09, Geoff Flight data...@adam.com.au wrote: From: Geoff Flight data...@adam.com.au Subject: RE: [OT] No common sense anymore To: 'ProFox Email List' profox@leafe.com Date: Friday, March 27, 2009, 12:40 AM World wide the child porn charge is getting well and truly out of hand. Over here we had a person convicted and confirmed on appeal of possessing child porn for having the 'adult' Simpsons cartoon (bart and lisa). The judges said that bart and lisa are 'children'. And on and on it goes. True child porn is evil. A teenager taking nude photos of herself and sending them to someone is not. It is dumb - not evil. And who wants to stand up against child porn laws and their uses? No-one. Until the day arrives that possession of a photo of any child is a crime - including drawings, cartoons and literature. I'm sick to death of this utter crap that charges CHILDREN with child porn charges like this. Where are the politicians with a brain, wehere are the judges with a conscience. In NSW here there was concern that child porn convictions were low and people where getting off for the technicality of the cops being unable to prove the girl in the photo was under 18. So what do they do? Pass a law saying that if a child is dressed in a style that is 16yo then that person can be considered underage unless you can prove otherwise. Its getting to the stage that it is dangerous to own a digital camera. Id like to say this is from the 'only in america' file but it aint. It's happening everywhere. -Original Message- From: profox-boun...@leafe.com [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Michael Madigan Sent: Friday, 27 March 2009 2:40 PM To: profox@leafe.com Subject: [OT] No common sense anymore They're charging a 14yo girl with sending child pornography for sending photos of herself. How ridiculous. http://www.nbcnewyork.com/news/local/Girl-Charged-With-Child-Porn-for-Postin g-Nude-Pics-of-Self.html * Join the OBAMA RESISTANCE MOVEMENT! http://www.cafepress.com/rightwingmike/6181419 [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/004201c9ae96$2aa147f0$7fe3d7...@com.au ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/965447.51867...@web31404.mail.mud.yahoo.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [OT] No common sense anymore
One would think that 'child pornography' should involve both a child and pornography. Now it can involve someone who is not a child (just looks possibly like one), a cartoon, text and it does not have to be pornographic - just potentially so in the eyes of 'someone'. That covers a great deal of material. And the sentences now dished out mean you are a registered sex offender once you get out of jail... for downloading a photo that would be at best erotic in the eyes of some. In the meantime the guy nextdoor who beats his wife in front of his kid gets a community service order. Frankly the application of these laws scare me as I'm afraid that some photo I download accidentally or take might be construed as pornographic in this brave new world where 18+ can do ANYTHING and 17 years 364 days cant even take photos of themselves! And lets not forget browser hijackers like coolwebsearch etc... -Original Message- From: profox-boun...@leafe.com [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Michael Madigan Sent: Friday, 27 March 2009 3:19 PM To: ProFox Email List Subject: RE: [OT] No common sense anymore Yeah I remember the cartoon nonsense. There have been many instances of parents taking pictures of their kids in the pool or bathtub being arrested because the Wal-Mart photo clerk called the police. It used to be that child pornography only applied to children involved in a sex act or posed or dressed in a lewd way. Now a 14yo girl sending nude pictures to herself to friends, while stupid and not something you want your child doing, is faced with being arrested and becoming a convicted felon. Crazy. * Join the OBAMA RESISTANCE MOVEMENT! http://www.cafepress.com/rightwingmike/6181419 --- On Fri, 3/27/09, Geoff Flight data...@adam.com.au wrote: From: Geoff Flight data...@adam.com.au Subject: RE: [OT] No common sense anymore To: 'ProFox Email List' profox@leafe.com Date: Friday, March 27, 2009, 12:40 AM World wide the child porn charge is getting well and truly out of hand. Over here we had a person convicted and confirmed on appeal of possessing child porn for having the 'adult' Simpsons cartoon (bart and lisa). The judges said that bart and lisa are 'children'. And on and on it goes. True child porn is evil. A teenager taking nude photos of herself and sending them to someone is not. It is dumb - not evil. And who wants to stand up against child porn laws and their uses? No-one. Until the day arrives that possession of a photo of any child is a crime - including drawings, cartoons and literature. I'm sick to death of this utter crap that charges CHILDREN with child porn charges like this. Where are the politicians with a brain, wehere are the judges with a conscience. In NSW here there was concern that child porn convictions were low and people where getting off for the technicality of the cops being unable to prove the girl in the photo was under 18. So what do they do? Pass a law saying that if a child is dressed in a style that is 16yo then that person can be considered underage unless you can prove otherwise. Its getting to the stage that it is dangerous to own a digital camera. Id like to say this is from the 'only in america' file but it aint. It's happening everywhere. -Original Message- From: profox-boun...@leafe.com [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Michael Madigan Sent: Friday, 27 March 2009 2:40 PM To: profox@leafe.com Subject: [OT] No common sense anymore They're charging a 14yo girl with sending child pornography for sending photos of herself. How ridiculous. http://www.nbcnewyork.com/news/local/Girl-Charged-With-Child-Porn-for-Postin g-Nude-Pics-of-Self.html * Join the OBAMA RESISTANCE MOVEMENT! http://www.cafepress.com/rightwingmike/6181419 [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/004301c9ae98$87921690$96b643...@com.au ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [OT] No common sense anymore
The laws are too broad. * Join the OBAMA RESISTANCE MOVEMENT! http://www.cafepress.com/rightwingmike/6181419 --- On Fri, 3/27/09, Geoff Flight data...@adam.com.au wrote: From: Geoff Flight data...@adam.com.au Subject: RE: [OT] No common sense anymore To: 'ProFox Email List' profox@leafe.com Date: Friday, March 27, 2009, 12:57 AM One would think that 'child pornography' should involve both a child and pornography. Now it can involve someone who is not a child (just looks possibly like one), a cartoon, text and it does not have to be pornographic - just potentially so in the eyes of 'someone'. That covers a great deal of material. And the sentences now dished out mean you are a registered sex offender once you get out of jail... for downloading a photo that would be at best erotic in the eyes of some. In the meantime the guy nextdoor who beats his wife in front of his kid gets a community service order. Frankly the application of these laws scare me as I'm afraid that some photo I download accidentally or take might be construed as pornographic in this brave new world where 18+ can do ANYTHING and 17 years 364 days cant even take photos of themselves! And lets not forget browser hijackers like coolwebsearch etc... -Original Message- From: profox-boun...@leafe.com [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Michael Madigan Sent: Friday, 27 March 2009 3:19 PM To: ProFox Email List Subject: RE: [OT] No common sense anymore Yeah I remember the cartoon nonsense. There have been many instances of parents taking pictures of their kids in the pool or bathtub being arrested because the Wal-Mart photo clerk called the police. It used to be that child pornography only applied to children involved in a sex act or posed or dressed in a lewd way. Now a 14yo girl sending nude pictures to herself to friends, while stupid and not something you want your child doing, is faced with being arrested and becoming a convicted felon. Crazy. * Join the OBAMA RESISTANCE MOVEMENT! http://www.cafepress.com/rightwingmike/6181419 --- On Fri, 3/27/09, Geoff Flight data...@adam.com.au wrote: From: Geoff Flight data...@adam.com.au Subject: RE: [OT] No common sense anymore To: 'ProFox Email List' profox@leafe.com Date: Friday, March 27, 2009, 12:40 AM World wide the child porn charge is getting well and truly out of hand. Over here we had a person convicted and confirmed on appeal of possessing child porn for having the 'adult' Simpsons cartoon (bart and lisa). The judges said that bart and lisa are 'children'. And on and on it goes. True child porn is evil. A teenager taking nude photos of herself and sending them to someone is not. It is dumb - not evil. And who wants to stand up against child porn laws and their uses? No-one. Until the day arrives that possession of a photo of any child is a crime - including drawings, cartoons and literature. I'm sick to death of this utter crap that charges CHILDREN with child porn charges like this. Where are the politicians with a brain, wehere are the judges with a conscience. In NSW here there was concern that child porn convictions were low and people where getting off for the technicality of the cops being unable to prove the girl in the photo was under 18. So what do they do? Pass a law saying that if a child is dressed in a style that is 16yo then that person can be considered underage unless you can prove otherwise. Its getting to the stage that it is dangerous to own a digital camera. Id like to say this is from the 'only in america' file but it aint. It's happening everywhere. -Original Message- From: profox-boun...@leafe.com [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Michael Madigan Sent: Friday, 27 March 2009 2:40 PM To: profox@leafe.com Subject: [OT] No common sense anymore They're charging a 14yo girl with sending child pornography for sending photos of herself. How ridiculous. http://www.nbcnewyork.com/news/local/Girl-Charged-With-Child-Porn-for-Postin g-Nude-Pics-of-Self.html * Join the OBAMA RESISTANCE MOVEMENT! http://www.cafepress.com/right[excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/723584.60979...@web31407.mail.mud.yahoo.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or
RE: [OT] No common sense anymore
Yes but that is true in many situations and both police and the courts are supposed to draw it in a little bit and apply commonsense and due diligence. Neither occurs. -Original Message- From: profox-boun...@leafe.com [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Michael Madigan Sent: Friday, 27 March 2009 3:38 PM To: ProFox Email List Subject: RE: [OT] No common sense anymore The laws are too broad. * Join the OBAMA RESISTANCE MOVEMENT! http://www.cafepress.com/rightwingmike/6181419 --- On Fri, 3/27/09, Geoff Flight data...@adam.com.au wrote: From: Geoff Flight data...@adam.com.au Subject: RE: [OT] No common sense anymore To: 'ProFox Email List' profox@leafe.com Date: Friday, March 27, 2009, 12:57 AM One would think that 'child pornography' should involve both a child and pornography. Now it can involve someone who is not a child (just looks possibly like one), a cartoon, text and it does not have to be pornographic - just potentially so in the eyes of 'someone'. That covers a great deal of material. And the sentences now dished out mean you are a registered sex offender once you get out of jail... for downloading a photo that would be at best erotic in the eyes of some. In the meantime the guy nextdoor who beats his wife in front of his kid gets a community service order. Frankly the application of these laws scare me as I'm afraid that some photo I download accidentally or take might be construed as pornographic in this brave new world where 18+ can do ANYTHING and 17 years 364 days cant even take photos of themselves! And lets not forget browser hijackers like coolwebsearch etc... -Original Message- From: profox-boun...@leafe.com [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Michael Madigan Sent: Friday, 27 March 2009 3:19 PM To: ProFox Email List Subject: RE: [OT] No common sense anymore Yeah I remember the cartoon nonsense. There have been many instances of parents taking pictures of their kids in the pool or bathtub being arrested because the Wal-Mart photo clerk called the police. It used to be that child pornography only applied to children involved in a sex act or posed or dressed in a lewd way. Now a 14yo girl sending nude pictures to herself to friends, while stupid and not something you want your child doing, is faced with being arrested and becoming a convicted felon. Crazy. * Join the OBAMA RESISTANCE MOVEMENT! http://www.cafepress.com/rightwingmike/6181419 --- On Fri, 3/27/09, Geoff Flight data...@adam.com.au wrote: From: Geoff Flight data...@adam.com.au Subject: RE: [OT] No common sense anymore To: 'ProFox Email List' profox@leafe.com Date: Friday, March 27, 2009, 12:40 AM World wide the child porn charge is getting well and truly out of hand. Over here we had a person convicted and confirmed on appeal of possessing child porn for having the 'adult' Simpsons cartoon (bart and lisa). The judges said that bart and lisa are 'children'. And on and on it goes. True child porn is evil. A teenager taking nude photos of herself and sending them to someone is not. It is dumb - not evil. And who wants to stand up against child porn laws and their uses? No-one. Until the day arrives that possession of a photo of any child is a crime - including drawings, cartoons and literature. I'm sick to death of this utter crap that charges CHILDREN with child porn charges like this. Where are the politicians with a brain, wehere are the judges with a conscience. In NSW here there was concern that child porn convictions were low and people where getting off for the technicality of the cops being unable to prove the girl in the photo was under 18. So what do they do? Pass a law saying that if a child is dressed in a style that is 16yo then that person can be considered underage unless you can prove otherwise. Its getting to the stage that it is dangerous to own a digital camera. Id like to say this is from the 'only in america' file but it aint. It's happening everywhere. -Original Message- From: profox-boun...@leafe.com [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Michael Madigan Sent: Friday, 27 March 2009 2:40 PM To: profox@leafe.com Subject: [OT] No common sense anymore They're charging a 14yo girl with sending child pornography for sending photos of herself. How ridiculous. http://www.nbcnewyork.com/news/local/Girl-Charged-With-Child-Porn-for-Postin g-Nude-Pics-of-Self.html * Join the OBAMA RESISTANCE MOVEMENT! [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance:
[NF]Downad/Conficker, Who's the April fool?
http://countermeasures.trendmicro.eu/downadconficker-whos-the-april-fool/ ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/700376.96973...@web31406.mail.mud.yahoo.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
