Re: Editing and Selecting Video Tracks in Pro Tools Ultimate with Flo Tools

[TheOreoMonster]

Logic works similar to what’s being described here in Pro tools you can edit 
the audio for the video but not the video itself. Reaper and Final cut are 
probably what you would want to look at for Video editing. I haven’t tried 
final cut myself but use Reaper at the moment. 

> On Sep 19, 2020, at 7:04 PM, Rory McDonald  wrote:
> 
> As far as I know, your only options for video editing are logic, reaper or 
> final cut pro is usable. I don't think video editing is accessible in pro 
> tools.
> 
> Rory
> 
>> On Sep 19, 2020, at 3:32 PM, Tim Elder  wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> All,
>> 
>> Does Flo Tools work for selecting and editing video tracks?  I need to edit 
>> an imported video, using the audio as guide.  I am having trouble figuring 
>> out if the video track is selected.  Has anyone edited video files in Pro 
>> Tools with or without Flo Tools commands?  As of now, my shuffle mode edits 
>> to the audio are not being applied to the video track, which then makes the 
>> video very out of sync with the video.  
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
>> .
>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/2fa273c8-56b4-4a63-8f9a-9262983a7400o%40googlegroups.com
>>  
>> .
> 
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
> .
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/307EB1FA-CCB4-49A8-A09B-F6214A7B96C9%40rogers.com
>  
> .

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/A47E8171-66FE-4718-BE36-CE58220A6530%40gmail.com.

Re: ProTools will not launch

[TheOreoMonster]

After attempting to launch Pro Tools, Press VO F1 Twice quickly and see if 
there are any system notifications that require your attention first. 

> On Aug 27, 2020, at 8:53 PM, Johnnie Smith  wrote:
> 
> Somehow my Mac got upgraded to 10.15.6 And every since then proTools will not 
> launch nothing even shows up on the screen any thoughts or help on this would 
> be appreciated
> -- 
> 
> ne5l
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
> .
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/CAPg8%2BBbpz4vVr9Pr8_x272%3D-5Xf%2BC7Tp0JTBtxs553crwW3u1g%40mail.gmail.com
>  
> .

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/01E95B26-5824-4836-AC26-46D1598F5425%40gmail.com.

Re: changing or getting the voice print of something so I can make my voice sound different in Pro Tools 2020.5

[TheOreoMonster]

I think Izotope stuff has a 10 day  trial. The installer for their portal isn’t 
accessible but VOCR can get you through it. Other than that the plug ins are 
fairly accessible to varying degrees with the more recent stuff seeming more 
so.  Once again I haven’t used these in Pro Tools so  your mileage may vary. 

> On Aug 22, 2020, at 2:24 PM, Nick Gawronski  wrote:
> 
> Hi, I will look into that product are their support team helpful when it 
> comes to accessibility and do they have any trials before I buy?  Nick 
> Gawronski
> 
> On 8/22/2020 1:04 PM, Rory McDonald wrote:
>> Wait, vocal synth is accessible? What?
>> Damn I gotta get that.
>> 
>> Rory
>> 
>>> On Aug 22, 2020, at 12:55 PM, TheOreoMonster  
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> I don’t know what the process of sjidechaining is like in pro tools but I 
>>> have used Vocal Synth from Izotope to do something similar before.
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> On Aug 21, 2020, at 5:48 PM, Nick Gawronski  wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Hi, I am trying to find a method of loading a voice synthesizer or a 
>>>> friend's voice into Pro Tools with their permission and finding some pitch 
>>>> changing plugin that either exists in Pro Tools directly or something that 
>>>> I can buy that is accessible to allow me to record my voice and running it 
>>>> threw this plugin make my voice sound nearly like the synthesizer or my 
>>>> friend.  I have heard that users with vision can do this but was wondering 
>>>> what options exist for the Pro Tools user on the mac or in any windows 10 
>>>> pro 64 bits audio editor.  My plans are to use this method in audio 
>>>> productions once I learn it very well.  Nick Gawronski
>>>> 
>>>> -- 
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>>>> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>>>> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/e4bc02f5-1394-b920-4efc-c079266c00c6%40nickgawronski.com.
>>> -- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>>> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>>> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/F4F799E6-D4DF-40DB-AFDB-DE7DF93BF7B6%40gmail.com.
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/aa032409-d86d-1562-a8c4-c0076c8d5fbb%40nickgawronski.com.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/07C1C05C-6408-406B-89FB-700ED986AB78%40gmail.com.

Re: changing or getting the voice print of something so I can make my voice sound different in Pro Tools 2020.5

[TheOreoMonster]

I don’t know what the process of sjidechaining is like in pro tools but I have 
used Vocal Synth from Izotope to do something similar before. 


> On Aug 21, 2020, at 5:48 PM, Nick Gawronski  wrote:
> 
> Hi, I am trying to find a method of loading a voice synthesizer or a friend's 
> voice into Pro Tools with their permission and finding some pitch changing 
> plugin that either exists in Pro Tools directly or something that I can buy 
> that is accessible to allow me to record my voice and running it threw this 
> plugin make my voice sound nearly like the synthesizer or my friend.  I have 
> heard that users with vision can do this but was wondering what options exist 
> for the Pro Tools user on the mac or in any windows 10 pro 64 bits audio 
> editor.  My plans are to use this method in audio productions once I learn it 
> very well.  Nick Gawronski
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/e4bc02f5-1394-b920-4efc-c079266c00c6%40nickgawronski.com.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/F4F799E6-D4DF-40DB-AFDB-DE7DF93BF7B6%40gmail.com.

Re: Is there a way to restore your system back to the previous operating system?

[TheOreoMonster]

You can download the firmware updater from the native instrument site. I am 
sure google can point you to it. So long as you update the firmware, update 
everything else through native access and then run the standalone Komplete 
Kontrol app  to update and index all your libraries you should be set. 
KK-access.com <http://kk-access.com/> has an article on getting everything 
installed and set up. Also many on this list has said they are running 10.15.6 
with latest pro tools. 

> On Aug 21, 2020, at 2:30 PM, dingram...@earthlink.net wrote:
> 
> Hi oreo, how are you?  Where would I find the firmware updater for the ks88 
> mk2?  I ask this question because I know that I should probably update the 
> firmware for the ks88 mk2 before I update the nativeaccess application.  P.S. 
> does anyone happen to know whether pro tools works with Catalina version 
> 10.15.6, if so, then i'm in good shape but if not.  I'm not sure of where I 
> can get it from but first would I have to reinstall the operating system 
> before adding the other programs.  I did at least backup the operating system 
> on an external drive.  Thank you for any information that you might have 
> concerning my questions.
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-
>> From: TheOreoMonster 
>> Sent: Aug 21, 2020 10:33 AM
>> To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
>> Subject: Re: Is there a way to restore your system back to the previous 
>> operating system?
>> 
>> If this is still related to your KK keyboard not working, did you install 
>> the firmware updater for that keyboard and make sure it has the latest 
>> firmware? Sometimes if the latest  driver is installed  but the device 
>> doesn’t have the latest firmware it won’t work. Firmware isn’t handled 
>> through native access each keyboard has its own firmware updater app. 
>> Regarding older apple installers, they can be downloaded from apple’s 
>> servers, MacWorld or MacRumors or one of those sites should have a link to 
>> where you can grab the old OS versions from Apple. 
>> 
>> 
>>> On Aug 21, 2020, at 7:39 AM,  
>>>  wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi Phil, how did you download the older operating system from the internet, 
>>> where did you go to get the download.  I do have the backup but first I 
>>> wanted to make sure that everything is the way that it should be.  What 
>>> else should I do.  Thank you for any information that you may have 
>>> concerning my question.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -Original Message-
>>>> From: Phil Muir 
>>>> Sent: Aug 21, 2020 4:03 AM
>>>> To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
>>>> Subject: RE: Is there a way to restore your system back to the previous 
>>>> operating system?
>>>> 
>>>> You can download any older Apple operating systems from the Internet.  
>>>> Done that here.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Warm regards, Phil Muir
>>>> Accessibility Training
>>>> UK +44 (0) 1903-783-788
>>>> Mobile: UK +44-7968-136-246
>>>> E-mail:
>>>> i...@accessibilitytraining.co.uk
>>>> URL:
>>>> www.accessibilitytraining.co.uk/
>>>> -Original Message-
>>>> From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com  On Behalf Of 
>>>> dingram...@earthlink.net
>>>> Sent: 21 August 2020 09:37
>>>> To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
>>>> Subject: Re: Is there a way to restore your system back to the previous 
>>>> operating system?
>>>> 
>>>> Hi Nils, I first checked with apple to see if the now older operating 
>>>> system was available, but I found it not to be unless I take my system in 
>>>> to the store.  This is information that I found out.  But my question is 
>>>> whether anyone just happens to know whether this new operating system 
>>>> truly supports pro tools and other applications? I just heard that there's 
>>>> something new but I think that it is nativeaccess but i'm not sure What do 
>>>> you think?  Thank you for any information that you might have concerning 
>>>> my questions.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> -Original Message-
>>>>> From: 'Nils Michalski' via Pro Tools Accessibility 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Sent: Aug 20, 2020 11:35 AM
>>>>> To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
>>>>> Subject: Re: Is there a way to restore your system back to the previous 
>>>>> operating system?
>>>>> 
>>>>> First,
>>>>> Try to fix the issue inside your sys

Re: Is there a way to restore your system back to the previous operating system?

[TheOreoMonster]

If this is still related to your KK keyboard not working, did you install the 
firmware updater for that keyboard and make sure it has the latest firmware? 
Sometimes if the latest  driver is installed  but the device doesn’t have the 
latest firmware it won’t work. Firmware isn’t handled through native access 
each keyboard has its own firmware updater app. Regarding older apple 
installers, they can be downloaded from apple’s servers, MacWorld or MacRumors 
or one of those sites should have a link to where you can grab the old OS 
versions from Apple. 


> On Aug 21, 2020, at 7:39 AM,  
>  wrote:
> 
> Hi Phil, how did you download the older operating system from the internet, 
> where did you go to get the download.  I do have the backup but first I 
> wanted to make sure that everything is the way that it should be.  What else 
> should I do.  Thank you for any information that you may have concerning my 
> question.
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
>> From: Phil Muir 
>> Sent: Aug 21, 2020 4:03 AM
>> To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
>> Subject: RE: Is there a way to restore your system back to the previous 
>> operating system?
>> 
>> You can download any older Apple operating systems from the Internet.  Done 
>> that here.
>> 
>> 
>> Warm regards, Phil Muir
>> Accessibility Training
>> UK +44 (0) 1903-783-788
>> Mobile: UK +44-7968-136-246
>> E-mail:
>> i...@accessibilitytraining.co.uk
>> URL:
>> www.accessibilitytraining.co.uk/
>> -Original Message-
>> From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com  On Behalf Of 
>> dingram...@earthlink.net
>> Sent: 21 August 2020 09:37
>> To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
>> Subject: Re: Is there a way to restore your system back to the previous 
>> operating system?
>> 
>> Hi Nils, I first checked with apple to see if the now older operating system 
>> was available, but I found it not to be unless I take my system in to the 
>> store.  This is information that I found out.  But my question is whether 
>> anyone just happens to know whether this new operating system truly supports 
>> pro tools and other applications? I just heard that there's something new 
>> but I think that it is nativeaccess but i'm not sure What do you think?  
>> Thank you for any information that you might have concerning my questions.
>> 
>> 
>> -Original Message-
>>> From: 'Nils Michalski' via Pro Tools Accessibility 
>>> 
>>> Sent: Aug 20, 2020 11:35 AM
>>> To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
>>> Subject: Re: Is there a way to restore your system back to the previous 
>>> operating system?
>>> 
>>> First,
>>> Try to fix the issue inside your system. 
>>> In most cases you do not have to reinstall or go back to a previous 
>>> version. 
>>> 
>>> Von meinem iPhone gesendet
>>> 
 Am 20.08.2020 um 18:17 schrieb Nick Gawronski :
 
 Hi, I have been able to do this by just loging into my Apple ID and 
 downloading the installer for the version I wish to restore to and 
 just using directions on line on how to create an USB installation 
 key but first make sure you backup all of your data first.  There are 
 also programs like Super Duper and Carbon Copy Cloner that can make a 
 bootable drive backup of your system and I find those very accessible 
 and usable.  Nick Gawronski
 
> On 8/20/2020 6:57 AM, dingram...@earthlink.net wrote:
> How do you create the time machine backup so that you can restore the mac 
> mini back to the older operating system?
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
>> From: John Covici 
>> Sent: Aug 20, 2020 6:27 AM
>> To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
>> Subject: Re: Is there a way to restore your system back to the previous 
>> operating system?
>> 
>> Not unless you have a time machine backup with an older OS and you 
>> would have to restore your whole disk back to that time machine 
>> backup.
>> 
>> On Thu, 20 Aug 2020 06:21:01 -0400,  
>> wrote:
>>> Hi list members, i'd like to know if it is possible for me to restore 
>>> my mac mini to the previous operating system?  I ask this because I 
>>> wasn't sure whether pro Tools and or other programs would work properly 
>>> using the most current operating system which is Catalina 10.15.6.  
>>> Thank you for any information that you might have concerning this 
>>> question.
>>> 
>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>> Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>> an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/606789429.225.1597918861937%40wamui-kristoff.atl.sa.earthlink.net.
>>> 
>> --
>> Your life is like a penny.  You're going to lose it.  The question is:
>> How do
>> you spend it?
>> 
>>John Covici wb2una
>>   

Re: iZotope Ozone 9 VoiceOver Accessibility in Pro Tools?

[TheOreoMonster]

VOCR handles installing the plug in manager quite well. 


> On Jun 16, 2020, at 1:14 PM, Michael Holmes  
> wrote:
> 
> I can say based on their Elements plugins that accessibility in the PT plugin 
> window is on par with Waves. If you don’t have their software manager, you’ll 
> need a sighty to install the package, because it’s not a standard Apple 
> installer. On the flip side, the manager software is easier to VO than 
> AvidLink, and doesn’t require any sight after running the installer. As for 
> their standalone editor apps, they’re 50% accessible. You can navigate 
> controls and such, but the controls are geared toward looking at the waveform.
> 
> Not much help on Ozone specifically I know, but thought I’d share my 
> experience with the way their software is. Basically a more surgical Waves.
> 
>> On Jun 16, 2020, at 12:49, CHUCK REICHEL  
>> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi Guys,
>> anybody using iZotope Ozone 9?
>> Music Rebalance looks to be a game changer and before proceeding on I wanted 
>> to get some feedback from you guys first. :)
>> I do have a C|24 that i use for all the Waves and UAD and pt plugs and such 
>> so if thats the only way to use "iZotope Ozone 9" let me know?
>> Thanks
>> Chuck
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
>> .
>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/E36861BE-A366-4AE2-A6D2-22527F0F3318%40gmail.com
>>  
>> .
> 
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
> .
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/88652B40-2413-47A5-B20A-0605437D7586%40gmail.com
>  
> .

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/6678A17E-C0E3-4880-B06B-6B4A13699FE7%40gmail.com.

Re: Connecting a USB interface and mixer to MacBook Pro

[TheOreoMonster]

Question 1,  did you install the drivers for the A mixer first? If not start 
there and see if that resolves your issue. I have used many usb c to USB-a and 
usb-b adapters with no issues with various sound cards and mixers so I doubt 
that’s the issue here. 


> On Jun 11, 2020, at 4:30 PM, Toby Davey  wrote:
> 
> Hi, 
> 
> 
> 
> I have recently purchased an Allen and Heath ZEDI 10 interface / mixer to use 
> with my MacBook Pro both as an interface for use with recording straight into 
> Pro Tools and with Zoom too. 
> 
> 
> 
> The mixer works really well on it’s own (not connected to my Mac) which is 
> great.  
> 
> So I decided to plug the mixer into my MacBook Pro via the standard Apple USB 
> C to USB 2 adapter thinking that it would just plug and play. 
> 
> 
> 
> The Mixer has a Type-B USB connector on it and supplied with a USB 2 
> connecting cable.   
> 
> 
> 
> i plugged the cable into the mixer and the other end into the Apple USB C to 
> USB 2 adapter.  
> 
> 
> 
> Through the mixer headphones I was picking up a lot of interference such as  
> a sort of clicking noise.  Then my Mac started coming up with notifications 
> that the USB ports had been disconnected because a connected USB device was 
> taking up too much power. 
> 
> 
> 
> I have contacted Allen and Heath and they have suggested plugging in the USB 
> 2 cable into another adapter but I only have a few of the Apple ones that 
> everyone purchased when the MacBooks came out with USB C ports. 
> 
> 
> 
> They Also suggested that I might not have my MacBook set up properly for 
> external audio interfaces and devices and they sent me a link to a couple of 
> online articles from SweetWater.   
> 
> 
> 
> Would getting hold of a type B to USB C cable possibly solve the issue.
> 
> 
> 
> Should I have gone with another interface / mixer that would be USB C 
> compatible.  Only really need something with max 4 mono channels and a couple 
> of stereo channels. 
> 
> 
> 
> Cheers 
> 
> 
> 
> Toby 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
> .
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/eb8803b2-4a6c-49fa-baad-36ceea20cc20o%40googlegroups.com
>  
> .

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/634B9E00-33E5-40CD-881E-AE29FBECB9B5%40gmail.com.

Re: Splitting mp4 files

[TheOreoMonster]

I believe so. 


> On May 14, 2020, at 8:52 AM, Martin (Punky) Sopart  wrote:
> 
> Hello!
> 
> Is Quicktime accessible regarding setting splitt points?
> 
> Thanks and best! / Martin
>> -Original Message-
>> From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com]
>> On Behalf Of TheOreoMonster
>> Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2020 2:29 PM
>> To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
>> Subject: Re: Splitting mp4 files
>> 
>> Reaper is what I use for editing video, though QuickTime should be able to
>> split it into 3 different clips if that all you need.
>> 
>> 
>>> On May 14, 2020, at 8:04 AM, Martin (Punky) Sopart
>>  wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hello all!
>>> 
>>> Yesterday I got a mp4 file containing 3 songs.
>>> I have to splitt the file to get a mp4 file per song.
>>> 
>>> If I remember right, Pro Tools - at the moment - couldn't handle mp4 files?
>>> Could someone recommend some apps for that task?
>>> 
>>> Thanks in advance and best! / Martin
>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>> Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/00f701d629e7%24e380edb0%
>> 24aa82c910%24%40cakewalker.de.
>> 
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/88C90663-C55A-48B2-9CB6-
>> BE2DC99416EB%40gmail.com.
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/00fb01d629ee%24765c6410%2463152c30%24%40cakewalker.de.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/63F8CA63-9B5B-4403-80BB-D8EBFAADDE33%40gmail.com.

Re: Splitting mp4 files

[TheOreoMonster]

Reaper is what I use for editing video, though QuickTime should be able to 
split it into 3 different clips if that all you need. 


> On May 14, 2020, at 8:04 AM, Martin (Punky) Sopart  wrote:
> 
> Hello all!
> 
> Yesterday I got a mp4 file containing 3 songs.
> I have to splitt the file to get a mp4 file per song.
> 
> If I remember right, Pro Tools - at the moment - couldn't handle mp4 files?
> Could someone recommend some apps for that task?
> 
> Thanks in advance and best! / Martin
> 
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/00f701d629e7%24e380edb0%24aa82c910%24%40cakewalker.de.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/88C90663-C55A-48B2-9CB6-BE2DC99416EB%40gmail.com.

Re: New VOCR On Catalina

[TheOreoMonster]

Look at the read me for OCR where it tells you which permissions need to be 
granted. Then open System preferences and go to security and privacy and select 
the privacy tab. In there navigate to each category and make sure VOCR is 
allowed under each manually. 
You may have to unlock it by pressing VO Space where it says press to unlock at 
the bottom of the window, and type in your system password before you can make 
any changes.

> On May 1, 2020, at 11:25 AM,  
>  wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
>> From: Chi Kim 
>> Sent: Oct 8, 2019 6:03 AM
>> To: "logic-accessibil...@googlegroups.com" 
>> , "ptaccess@googlegroups.com" 
>> , "macvisionar...@googlegroups.com" 
>> 
>> Subject: New VOCR On Catalina
>> 
>> HI All,
>> 
>> Sorry for cross-posting, but I'm just writing to let everyone know that 
>> I just released a new experimental VOCR.
>> If you haven't heard VOCR, it's an app that lets you take screenshot of 
>> your mac screen, apply OCR, navigate the result, and move the mouse. 
>> It's similar to JAWS and NVDA feature.
>> MacOS Catalina finally included the OCR capability in their VisionKit 
>> that take advantage of machine learning.
>> In my opinion, it is much faster and accurate than Tesseract that 
>> previous VOCR utilized, and you don't have to deal with terminal.
>> Because the tight security in Catalina, there are multiple steps for the 
>> initial setup. You can read the instruction below.
>> https://github.com/chigkim/VOCR/tree/VK
>> Here's the link to download.
>> https://github.com/chigkim/VOCR/releases/download/v0.1.0-alpha.1/VOCR.v0.1.0-alpha.1.zip
>> This is highly experimental, so use at own your risk!
>> Lastly, this kind of feature should be really built in to VoiceOver in 
>> my opinion. If you know anyone at Apple, let them know.
>> Enjoy,
>> 
>> Chi
>> 
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/DM6PR05MB58176B1A002B6242821C4B80CE9A0%40DM6PR05MB5817.namprd05.prod.outlook.com.
> Hi, how are you? my name is David Ingram and I'm trying to configure the mac 
> mini to use with the new version of VOCR But i'm having a problem with the 
> privacy and security permissions and how to get that to work?  I'm new to all 
> of this and I'd like clear steps as to how to resolve the problem that i'm 
> having?  I can also be reached at 773-660-1803.  Thank you and look forward 
> to your call.
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/2067739559.3272.1588346705640%40wamui-dingo.atl.sa.earthlink.net.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/D71459A8-B097-4E63-A5F5-7DA23D47B0F3%40gmail.com.

Re: New to protools

[TheOreoMonster]

While the usability may be bit annoying at times depending on the plug ins, The 
isotope stuff is accessible … once you get past the installer  anyways. 


> On Apr 28, 2020, at 3:36 PM, Matthew Wirtala  wrote:
> 
> Hi all, I don't mean to hijack this thread but I am also a new Pro Tools user 
> who just picked it up after switching to using VoiceOver for my computer 
> interaction several months ago. If I could request access to the 
> above-mentioned Dropbox tutorials, I'd greatly appreciate it! My Dropbox 
> account is at quincyho...@gmail.com.
> 
> I intend to get to Flo Tools shortly. In the meantime, I am also wondering if 
> there are any threads dealing specifically with plugins that offer good 
> VoiceOver support? I just learned that Izotope doesn't develop accessible 
> plugins and am wondering what developers are at the forefront besides Avid 
> themselves? I'm mostly interested in vocal processing, effects and 
> mixing/mastering plugins if that helps at all.
> 
> I greatly appreciate this group and will do my best to search for existing 
> info prior to posting but wanted to put this out there as a bit of a hello to 
> the community.
> 
> Many thanks,
> Matt 
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
> .
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/49ee4fe8-c768-45e3-880a-63de301230ef%40googlegroups.com
>  
> .

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/5E46DE08-D0E0-409C-8319-7E21AA8849CB%40gmail.com.

Re: Anybody using the Valhalla vintage reverb plug-in in ProTools?

[TheOreoMonster]

Good to know. Thanks for sharing that. 


> On Mar 30, 2020, at 7:38 PM, Chi Kim  wrote:
> 
> Yes, PreSonus rep said "Automation with the FaderPort v2 is relegated to 
> volume automations," but FaderPorts 8 and 16 supports plugin automation.
> 
> On Saturday, March 28, 2020 at 4:30:58 PM UTC-4, TheOreoMonsteEr wrote:
> Is that still the case with V2? PreSonus did update the single FaderPort 
> after the FaderPort 8 and 16 came out. 
> 
> 
> > On Mar 28, 2020, at 4:08 PM, Slau Halatyn > wrote: 
> > 
> > The thing about the single Faderport is that it doesn't support plug-in 
> > automation control, kind of a dealbreaker for most. 
> > 
> > 
> >> On Mar 28, 2020, at 3:33 PM, TheOreoMonster > 
> >> wrote: 
> >> 
> >> From everything I have seen the FaderPort 8 is the least expensive option 
> >> for ProTools users. However people may  want to look into how compatible 
> >> the FaderPort is with ProTOols if a single fader is sufficient, as it’s 
> >> considerably less expensive. 
> >> 
> >>> On Mar 28, 2020, at 2:14 PM, Slau Halatyn > wrote: 
> >>> 
> >>> Hi Charles, 
> >>> I've never been in the market for a compact control surface and I don't 
> >>> follow too closely what's available currently. It seems like the Presonus 
> >>> Faderport 8 is fairly popular and has a true fader flip mode which is 
> >>> quite helpful. Apart from that, it gets pretty expensive very quickly. 
> >>> Perhaps some others may have more suggestions. 
> >>> Slau 
> >>> 
> >>> 
> >>>> On Mar 28, 2020, at 1:54 PM, Charles > wrote: 
> >>>> 
> >>>> Slau 
> >>>> 
> >>>> Thank you very much for that info. That is too bad. Since you mentioned 
> >>>> control surfaces, is there one that you can recommend for someone who 
> >>>> just works by himself at home? 
> >>>> 
> >>>> Sent from my iPhone 
> >>>> 
> >>>>> On Mar 28, 2020, at 1:37 PM, Slau Halatyn > 
> >>>>> wrote: 
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> Unfortunately, all Valhalla plug-ins are written in the JUCE platform 
> >>>>> which, depending on how the developer authors things, can lead to 
> >>>>> parameters not responding to the accessibility API. With a control 
> >>>>> surface, everything works fine but not with VoiceOver. I know the 
> >>>>> developer and will reach out to see if he can do anything about it for 
> >>>>> future releases. 
> >>>>> Slau 
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> 
> >>>>>> On Mar 28, 2020, at 12:45 PM, Charles > wrote: 
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>> I have just installed the Valhalla vintage rebirth and the Valhalla 
> >>>>>> delay plug-ins. I am using the latest version of ProTools and Mac OS X 
> >>>>>> 15. Though I am able to see all the parameters, I’m not able to change 
> >>>>>> any of them. Is anybody able to use the Valhalla plug-ins in ProTools? 
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>> Sent from my iPhone 
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>> -- 
> >>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
> >>>>>> Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. 
> >>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
> >>>>>> an email to ptac...@googlegroups.com <>. 
> >>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> >>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/MN2PR22MB195208988B665FE0B1E72CDEBBCD0%40MN2PR22MB1952.namprd22.prod.outlook.com
> >>>>>>  
> >>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/MN2PR22MB195208988B665FE0B1E72CDEBBCD0%40MN2PR22MB1952.namprd22.prod.outlook.com>.
> >>>>>>  
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> -- 
> >>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
> >>>>> Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. 
> >>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
> >>>>> an email to ptac...@googlegroups.com <>. 
> >>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> >>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptacc

Re: Anybody using the Valhalla vintage reverb plug-in in ProTools?

[TheOreoMonster]

Its a ProTools AAX issue as The parameters are accessible in Logic and Reaper 
on the Mac with VoiceOver. 


> On Mar 28, 2020, at 5:23 PM, Phil Muir  
> wrote:
> 
> that's really unfortunate. Sounds to me like it is a Mac OS voice-over thing 
> though because all of those plug-in parameters are definitely accessible on 
> the Windows platform in multiple doors.
> 
> 
> On 28 March 2020 17:37:45 Slau Halatyn  wrote:
> 
>> Unfortunately, all Valhalla plug-ins are written in the JUCE platform which, 
>> depending on how the developer authors things, can lead to parameters not 
>> responding to the accessibility API. With a control surface, everything 
>> works fine but not with VoiceOver. I know the developer and will reach out 
>> to see if he can do anything about it for future releases.
>> Slau
>> 
>> 
>>> On Mar 28, 2020, at 12:45 PM, Charles  wrote:
>>> I have just installed the Valhalla vintage rebirth and the Valhalla delay 
>>> plug-ins. I am using the latest version of ProTools and Mac OS X 15. Though 
>>> I am able to see all the parameters, I’m not able to change any of them. Is 
>>> anybody able to use the Valhalla plug-ins in ProTools?
>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>> -- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>>> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>>> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/MN2PR22MB195208988B665FE0B1E72CDEBBCD0%40MN2PR22MB1952.namprd22.prod.outlook.com.
>> 
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/CC8AC63F-642A-4336-9E3A-82E20EC2D57F%40gmail.com.
> 
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/1712306d2f0.27bf.db423894e9b0bc6221d01044e43225ea%40accessibilitytraining.co.uk.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/F986DD57-1309-4099-85B6-60F84B2CE424%40gmail.com.

Re: Anybody using the Valhalla vintage reverb plug-in in ProTools?

[TheOreoMonster]

Is that still the case with V2? PreSonus did update the single FaderPort after 
the FaderPort 8 and 16 came out. 


> On Mar 28, 2020, at 4:08 PM, Slau Halatyn  wrote:
> 
> The thing about the single Faderport is that it doesn't support plug-in 
> automation control, kind of a dealbreaker for most.
> 
> 
>> On Mar 28, 2020, at 3:33 PM, TheOreoMonster  wrote:
>> 
>> From everything I have seen the FaderPort 8 is the least expensive option 
>> for ProTools users. However people may  want to look into how compatible the 
>> FaderPort is with ProTOols if a single fader is sufficient, as it’s 
>> considerably less expensive. 
>> 
>>> On Mar 28, 2020, at 2:14 PM, Slau Halatyn  wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi Charles,
>>> I've never been in the market for a compact control surface and I don't 
>>> follow too closely what's available currently. It seems like the Presonus 
>>> Faderport 8 is fairly popular and has a true fader flip mode which is quite 
>>> helpful. Apart from that, it gets pretty expensive very quickly. Perhaps 
>>> some others may have more suggestions.
>>> Slau
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> On Mar 28, 2020, at 1:54 PM, Charles  wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Slau
>>>> 
>>>> Thank you very much for that info. That is too bad. Since you mentioned 
>>>> control surfaces, is there one that you can recommend for someone who just 
>>>> works by himself at home?
>>>> 
>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>> 
>>>>> On Mar 28, 2020, at 1:37 PM, Slau Halatyn  wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Unfortunately, all Valhalla plug-ins are written in the JUCE platform 
>>>>> which, depending on how the developer authors things, can lead to 
>>>>> parameters not responding to the accessibility API. With a control 
>>>>> surface, everything works fine but not with VoiceOver. I know the 
>>>>> developer and will reach out to see if he can do anything about it for 
>>>>> future releases.
>>>>> Slau
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Mar 28, 2020, at 12:45 PM, Charles  wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I have just installed the Valhalla vintage rebirth and the Valhalla 
>>>>>> delay plug-ins. I am using the latest version of ProTools and Mac OS X 
>>>>>> 15. Though I am able to see all the parameters, I’m not able to change 
>>>>>> any of them. Is anybody able to use the Valhalla plug-ins in ProTools?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>>>> Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>>>>> an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/MN2PR22MB195208988B665FE0B1E72CDEBBCD0%40MN2PR22MB1952.namprd22.prod.outlook.com.
>>>>> 
>>>>> -- 
>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>>>>> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>>>>> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/CC8AC63F-642A-4336-9E3A-82E20EC2D57F%40gmail.com.
>>>> 
>>>> -- 
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>>>> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>>>> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/MN2PR22MB1952F76B27CAFBDED99259A1BBCD0%40MN2PR22MB1952.namprd22.prod.outlook.com.
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>>> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>>> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>> https://groups.googl

Re: Anybody using the Valhalla vintage reverb plug-in in ProTools?

[TheOreoMonster]

>From everything I have seen the FaderPort 8 is the least expensive option for 
>ProTools users. However people may  want to look into how compatible the 
>FaderPort is with ProTOols if a single fader is sufficient, as it’s 
>considerably less expensive. 

> On Mar 28, 2020, at 2:14 PM, Slau Halatyn  wrote:
> 
> Hi Charles,
> I've never been in the market for a compact control surface and I don't 
> follow too closely what's available currently. It seems like the Presonus 
> Faderport 8 is fairly popular and has a true fader flip mode which is quite 
> helpful. Apart from that, it gets pretty expensive very quickly. Perhaps some 
> others may have more suggestions.
> Slau
> 
> 
>> On Mar 28, 2020, at 1:54 PM, Charles  wrote:
>> 
>> Slau
>> 
>> Thank you very much for that info. That is too bad. Since you mentioned 
>> control surfaces, is there one that you can recommend for someone who just 
>> works by himself at home?
>> 
>> Sent from my iPhone
>> 
>>> On Mar 28, 2020, at 1:37 PM, Slau Halatyn  wrote:
>>> 
>>> Unfortunately, all Valhalla plug-ins are written in the JUCE platform 
>>> which, depending on how the developer authors things, can lead to 
>>> parameters not responding to the accessibility API. With a control surface, 
>>> everything works fine but not with VoiceOver. I know the developer and will 
>>> reach out to see if he can do anything about it for future releases.
>>> Slau
>>> 
>>> 
 On Mar 28, 2020, at 12:45 PM, Charles  wrote:
 
 I have just installed the Valhalla vintage rebirth and the Valhalla delay 
 plug-ins. I am using the latest version of ProTools and Mac OS X 15. 
 Though I am able to see all the parameters, I’m not able to change any of 
 them. Is anybody able to use the Valhalla plug-ins in ProTools?
 
 Sent from my iPhone
 
 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 To view this discussion on the web visit 
 https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/MN2PR22MB195208988B665FE0B1E72CDEBBCD0%40MN2PR22MB1952.namprd22.prod.outlook.com.
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>>> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>>> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/CC8AC63F-642A-4336-9E3A-82E20EC2D57F%40gmail.com.
>> 
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/MN2PR22MB1952F76B27CAFBDED99259A1BBCD0%40MN2PR22MB1952.namprd22.prod.outlook.com.
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/8EB23231-4F13-40C6-BEB2-8C0840267322%40gmail.com.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/735DCAB6-2724-4F33-84C4-F7CF6026EA3A%40gmail.com.

Re: Editing Videos on mac

[TheOreoMonster]

There is the Video Processor which is a plug in that should let you do things 
like that. I heard its doable but I never had to use it yet myself. 

> On Mar 24, 2020, at 5:48 PM, ⁨Ramy Moustafa Saber رامي مصطفى صابر⁩ 
> <⁨ramy.moustaf...@gmail.com⁩> wrote:
> 
> Aha great, can you add a title or something to the video?
> 
> 
>> On Mar 24, 2020, at 6:23 PM, TheOreoMonster  wrote:
>> 
>> I use reaper for this. Editing video works just like editing audio. Just be 
>> sure to set the project to match the video frame rate and etc and you 
>> shouldn’t have any issues visually with the exported video. 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> On Mar 24, 2020, at 10:27 AM, ⁨Ramy Moustafa Saber رامي مصطفى صابر⁩ 
>>> <⁨ramy.moustaf...@gmail.com⁩> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi all:
>>> 
>>> I know that Pro tools 2019 now does not support editing videos, but i have 
>>> videos that i need to do a very small editing, just cut some parts, p 
>>> Merging 2 videos etc,
>>> can you recomeend a good Free video editor that is accessible on mac?
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>>> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>>> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/667E6452-C9DE-4A4F-824F-53CAC13FD4A8%40gmail.com.
>> 
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/7A91D32E-CCB1-4F86-8E56-FBCB3E40A43C%40gmail.com.
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/F25F4F16-06D7-4F2A-BA58-8E3348D808B7%40gmail.com.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/CBA60054-725F-4AE6-B0F0-CBB3FE9C7300%40gmail.com.

Re: Editing Videos on mac

[TheOreoMonster]

I use reaper for this. Editing video works just like editing audio. Just be 
sure to set the project to match the video frame rate and etc and you shouldn’t 
have any issues visually with the exported video. 

 


> On Mar 24, 2020, at 10:27 AM, ⁨Ramy Moustafa Saber رامي مصطفى صابر⁩ 
> <⁨ramy.moustaf...@gmail.com⁩> wrote:
> 
> Hi all:
> 
> I know that Pro tools 2019 now does not support editing videos, but i have 
> videos that i need to do a very small editing, just cut some parts, p Merging 
> 2 videos etc,
> can you recomeend a good Free video editor that is accessible on mac?
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/667E6452-C9DE-4A4F-824F-53CAC13FD4A8%40gmail.com.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/7A91D32E-CCB1-4F86-8E56-FBCB3E40A43C%40gmail.com.

Re: O c r

[TheOreoMonster]

 <http://twitter.com/chrisduffley> | YouTube 
>> <http://youtube.com/christopherduffley> | Instagram 
>> <http://instagram.com/christopherduffley>
>> 
>> On Mar 15, 2020, at 11:31 PM, Slau Halatyn > <mailto:slauhala...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>> 
>> My bad, I said "Security and Privacy" rather than Users and Groups." You'll 
>> need to use the Security and Privacy pane to set other things for VOCR. 
>> You'll definitely need to do a Google search for VOCR Github and Catalina to 
>> find the web page that includes detailed instructions on how to get 
>> everything working.
>> Best,
>> Slau
>> 
>> 
>>> On Mar 15, 2020, at 7:56 PM, jimmie smith >> <mailto:jimmie.harold.sm...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Under security and privacy, I'm not seeing any logon tab. I go to the 
>>> privacy tab, look at the table, and still do not see anything labeled log 
>>> on items. Am I missing something?
>>> 
>>> From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com <mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com> 
>>> mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com>> on behalf of 
>>> Slau Halatyn mailto:slauhala...@gmail.com>>
>>> Sent: Friday, March 13, 2020 6:52:43 PM
>>> To: PTAccess List >> <mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com>>
>>> Subject: Re: O c r
>>>  
>>> To have it load at startup, go to System Preferences>Security and Privacy 
>>> and go to the Login Items tab. Unlock the window with your system password. 
>>> Go to the Add button and pressing it will bring up a file browser. Navigate 
>>> to your Applications folder and select VOCR and press Return. That'll add 
>>> VOCR to your startup items.
>>> HTH,
>>> Slau
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> On Mar 13, 2020, at 6:28 PM, jimmie smith >>> <mailto:jimmie.harold.sm...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> For some reason, I have to load mine every time the computer starts. Did I 
>>>> miss something in the set up? Is it supposed to be this way?
>>>>  
>>>> From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com <mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com> 
>>>> mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com>> on behalf 
>>>> of TheOreoMonster >>> <mailto:monkeypushe...@gmail.com>>
>>>> Sent: Friday, March 13, 2020 9:43:25 AM
>>>> To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com <mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com> 
>>>> mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com>>
>>>> Subject: Re: O c r
>>>>  
>>>> The new version that runs on Catalena does not require Keyboard Maestro at 
>>>> all. Its entirely stand alone as its using apples Vision Kit API. Once you 
>>>> open it from your applications folder you will need to give it the  
>>>> appropriate permissions and then you should be up and running. The read me 
>>>> file should explain all the permissions you need to give it. 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> On Mar 13, 2020, at 7:10 AM, Tibor Pásztor >>>> <mailto:wolfimusi...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Catalina runs on the macbook. Yes, I installed the alpha version released 
>>>>> last fall. I downloaded the trial version of keyboard maestro and 
>>>>> installed it. Where can I read what steps I need to take to make ocr work?
>>>>> Thanks for the information!
>>>>> Pásztor Tibor 
>>>>> 
>>>>>> 2020. márc. 13. dátummal, 11:54 időpontban Devin Oxman 
>>>>>> mailto:devinox...@gmail.com>> írta:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Which version of macOS are you running? The oder version of VOCR 
>>>>>> required a number of secondary tools to be installed to work correctly, 
>>>>>> and as I haven't used that version I can't help. The new alpha version 
>>>>>> released last fall to coincide with macOS Catalina only requires 
>>>>>> keyboard maestro to be installed as far as I am aware.
>>>>>> Devin
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Mar 13, 2020, at 6:51 AM, Tibor Pásztor >>>>>> <mailto:wolfimusi...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Hello! New information to me is that the VOCR application exists. There 
>>>>>>> was a podcast on applevis in the summer of 2019 that I listened to on 
>>>>>>> the topic. I downloaded the application from the link I submitted 

Re: O c r

[TheOreoMonster]

Yes unless you add it to the list of apps that start up when your computer do. 
The previous version was a set of keyboard maestro scripts and since keyboard 
maestro had its engine set to run at start up you could always runs keyboard 
maestro scripts after restarting without having to launch anything first. 


> On Mar 13, 2020, at 6:28 PM, jimmie smith  
> wrote:
> 
> 
> For some reason, I have to load mine every time the computer starts. Did I 
> miss something in the set up? Is it supposed to be this way?
> From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com  on behalf of 
> TheOreoMonster 
> Sent: Friday, March 13, 2020 9:43:25 AM
> To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com 
> Subject: Re: O c r
>  
> The new version that runs on Catalena does not require Keyboard Maestro at 
> all. Its entirely stand alone as its using apples Vision Kit API. Once you 
> open it from your applications folder you will need to give it the  
> appropriate permissions and then you should be up and running. The read me 
> file should explain all the permissions you need to give it. 
> 
> 
>> On Mar 13, 2020, at 7:10 AM, Tibor Pásztor > <mailto:wolfimusi...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>> 
>> Catalina runs on the macbook. Yes, I installed the alpha version released 
>> last fall. I downloaded the trial version of keyboard maestro and installed 
>> it. Where can I read what steps I need to take to make ocr work?
>> Thanks for the information!
>> Pásztor Tibor
>> 
>>> 2020. márc. 13. dátummal, 11:54 időpontban Devin Oxman 
>>> mailto:devinox...@gmail.com>> írta:
>>> 
>>> Which version of macOS are you running? The oder version of VOCR required a 
>>> number of secondary tools to be installed to work correctly, and as I 
>>> haven't used that version I can't help. The new alpha version released last 
>>> fall to coincide with macOS Catalina only requires keyboard maestro to be 
>>> installed as far as I am aware.
>>> Devin
>>> 
>>>> On Mar 13, 2020, at 6:51 AM, Tibor Pásztor >>> <mailto:wolfimusi...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Hello! New information to me is that the VOCR application exists. There 
>>>> was a podcast on applevis in the summer of 2019 that I listened to on the 
>>>> topic. I downloaded the application from the link I submitted earlier, 
>>>> copied it to the applications directory when I launch nothing happens.
>>>> What do I need to do to work? What options do I need to install?
>>>> Thanks!
>>>> 
>>>> Pásztor Tibor
>>>> 
>>>>> 2020. márc. 5. dátummal, 7:00 időpontban jimmie smith 
>>>>> mailto:jimmie.harold.sm...@gmail.com>> 
>>>>> írta:
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thanks,  Installed and working well.  Access installers that I have not 
>>>>> been able to access before.
>>>>> From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com <mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com> 
>>>>> mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com>> on behalf 
>>>>> of Devin Oxman mailto:devinox...@gmail.com>>
>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, March 4, 2020 11:12:01 PM
>>>>> To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com <mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com> 
>>>>> mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com>>
>>>>> Subject: Re: O c r
>>>>>  
>>>>> Here’s a direct link to the download file
>>>>> 
>>>>> https://github.com/chigkim/VOCR/releases/download/v0.1.0-alpha.10/VOCR.v0.1.0-alpha.10.zip
>>>>>  
>>>>> <https://github.com/chigkim/VOCR/releases/download/v0.1.0-alpha.10/VOCR.v0.1.0-alpha.10.zip>
>>>>> Here’s a more general link to the github repository
>>>>> 
>>>>> https://github.com/chigkim/VOCR <https://github.com/chigkim/VOCR>
>>>>> Dev
>>>>> 
>>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>> www.cathedralbeats.com <http://www.cathedralbeats.com/>
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Mar 3, 2020, at 5:55 PM, TheOreoMonster >>>>> <mailto:monkeypushe...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Google VOCR GITHUB and you should find it. 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Mar 3, 2020, at 5:52 PM, jimmie smith >>>>>> <mailto:jimmie.harold.sm...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Now that my Mac and ProTools are all up-to-date, I was looking for the 
>&

Re: O c r

[TheOreoMonster]

The new version that runs on Catalena does not require Keyboard Maestro at all. 
Its entirely stand alone as its using apples Vision Kit API. Once you open it 
from your applications folder you will need to give it the  appropriate 
permissions and then you should be up and running. The read me file should 
explain all the permissions you need to give it. 


> On Mar 13, 2020, at 7:10 AM, Tibor Pásztor  wrote:
> 
> Catalina runs on the macbook. Yes, I installed the alpha version released 
> last fall. I downloaded the trial version of keyboard maestro and installed 
> it. Where can I read what steps I need to take to make ocr work?
> Thanks for the information!
> Pásztor Tibor
> 
>> 2020. márc. 13. dátummal, 11:54 időpontban Devin Oxman > <mailto:devinox...@gmail.com>> írta:
>> 
>> Which version of macOS are you running? The oder version of VOCR required a 
>> number of secondary tools to be installed to work correctly, and as I 
>> haven't used that version I can't help. The new alpha version released last 
>> fall to coincide with macOS Catalina only requires keyboard maestro to be 
>> installed as far as I am aware.
>> Devin
>> 
>>> On Mar 13, 2020, at 6:51 AM, Tibor Pásztor >> <mailto:wolfimusi...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hello! New information to me is that the VOCR application exists. There was 
>>> a podcast on applevis in the summer of 2019 that I listened to on the 
>>> topic. I downloaded the application from the link I submitted earlier, 
>>> copied it to the applications directory when I launch nothing happens.
>>> What do I need to do to work? What options do I need to install?
>>> Thanks!
>>> 
>>> Pásztor Tibor
>>> 
>>>> 2020. márc. 5. dátummal, 7:00 időpontban jimmie smith 
>>>> mailto:jimmie.harold.sm...@gmail.com>> 
>>>> írta:
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks,  Installed and working well.  Access installers that I have not 
>>>> been able to access before.
>>>> From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com <mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com> 
>>>> mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com>> on behalf 
>>>> of Devin Oxman mailto:devinox...@gmail.com>>
>>>> Sent: Wednesday, March 4, 2020 11:12:01 PM
>>>> To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com <mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com> 
>>>> mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com>>
>>>> Subject: Re: O c r
>>>>  
>>>> Here’s a direct link to the download file
>>>> 
>>>> https://github.com/chigkim/VOCR/releases/download/v0.1.0-alpha.10/VOCR.v0.1.0-alpha.10.zip
>>>>  
>>>> <https://github.com/chigkim/VOCR/releases/download/v0.1.0-alpha.10/VOCR.v0.1.0-alpha.10.zip>
>>>> Here’s a more general link to the github repository
>>>> 
>>>> https://github.com/chigkim/VOCR <https://github.com/chigkim/VOCR>
>>>> Dev
>>>> 
>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>> www.cathedralbeats.com <http://www.cathedralbeats.com/>
>>>> 
>>>>> On Mar 3, 2020, at 5:55 PM, TheOreoMonster >>>> <mailto:monkeypushe...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Google VOCR GITHUB and you should find it. 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Mar 3, 2020, at 5:52 PM, jimmie smith >>>>> <mailto:jimmie.harold.sm...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Now that my Mac and ProTools are all up-to-date, I was looking for the 
>>>>>> new OCR. The links that I have no longer work. Could someone please send 
>>>>>> me the link to get the new OCR for Catalina?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>>>> Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>>>>> an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
>>>>>> <mailto:ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com>.
>>>>>> To view this discussion on the web 
>>>>>> visithttps://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/DM6PR01MB4395DC4B658A5E401089E474F6E40%40DM6PR01MB4395.prod.exchangelabs.com
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/DM6PR01MB4395DC4B658A5E401089E474F6E40%40DM6PR01MB4395.prod.exchangelabs.com?utm_medium=email_source=footer>.
>>>>>

Re: O c r Apollo console accessibility.

[TheOreoMonster]

A couple years ago when the soft tube one console got UAD integration we were 
discussing it on here and what I was told on this list made me decide it wasn’t 
worth the hassle. I just search the archives and found the excerpt:

I've been using it for 2 months now and I do like it a lot. There will be a 
large learning curve because it's an extremely visual unit but you can get by 
enough to make it work. The bottom line is you'll have to get lots of sighted 
assistance to set it up, especially if you're working through the UA console. 
Once it is set up you can save your settings and they will be restored when you 
launch it. The nobs are all continuous so you will never know where you are 
which is the biggest problem. You can't flatten out an EQ once you have turned 
a nob but you can bypass it with a button. The only way to get around this is 
to actually go back to a preset and come back in but of course you will have 
lost all of your settings. I strictly use this on input signals so I can 
quickly dial in some EQ and compression. If you're going to use it as a plugin 
on a track I believe it's not worth the trouble because it's quite time 
consuming to figure out where you are 

this time. You may have better luck combining it with OCR, but still sounds 
like it may be a slow workflow, vs using the UAD plug ins in the DAW where they 
are accessible and then you can use with a control surface to speed up 
workflow. However the Unison aspect is not available in the DAW I am aware.  
Keep us posted on your experiences. 


> On Mar 6, 2020, at 12:28 PM, Devin Oxman  wrote:
> 
> It's fairly easy to adjust toggles, but sliders and nobs are still 
> inaccessible. I just bought a soft-tube console one as it has a mode which 
> can control UAD software and I'm hoping that it will increase the parameter 
> access.
> Dev
> 
>> On Mar 6, 2020, at 10:06 AM, TheOreoMonster > <mailto:monkeypushe...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>> 
>> So are you able to access the presets or adjust plug in parameters once you 
>> put them in the unison slot? I imagine you have to constantly re scan the 
>> screen with OCR every time you change something? 
>> 
>>> On Mar 5, 2020, at 8:53 PM, Devin Oxman >> <mailto:devinox...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi Steve,
>>> I've been able to add inserts to the unison slot, change mono to stereo, 
>>> turn input monitoring on/off, things of that sort.
>>> Still can't access the mixing matrix.
>>> I'd love to hear from Joe as well as to what they have working.
>>> Chuck, I haven't heard anything about Luna, but will drop Scott a friendly 
>>> email in the morning.
>>> Will of course post any updates here.
>>> Dev
>>> 
>>>> On Mar 5, 2020, at 4:10 PM, CHUCK REICHEL >>> <mailto:soundpicturerecord...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Hi Steve,
>>>> Joe out in LA has been using the Apollo console; for a while now.
>>>> Thats all I know!
>>>> If you want more details you'll half to ask him.
>>>> He's on this list.
>>>> In the mean time has any body heard from UA about VoiceOver accessibility 
>>>> with the "LUNA" software coming out?
>>>> Whats going to be interesting is "the Apollo "luna" recording app for all 
>>>> thunderbolt equipped UAD units.
>>>> Hey guys if you want to drop Scott Greiner >>> <mailto:sgrei...@uaudio.com>>
>>>> a friendly email asking about LUNA and voiceover please do!
>>>> HTH
>>>> Chuck
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On Mar 5, 2020, at 3:31 PM, TheOreoMonster wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Rudimentary access to the UAD Console? Elaborate please? What sort of 
>>>>> rudimentary things can you do with this? 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thanks, 
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Mar 5, 2020, at 3:21 PM, Devin Oxman >>>>> <mailto:devinox...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Yeah, it really works well for what it is, I mean at this point 
>>>>>> considering it’s  using the vision-kit APIs from Catalina, this is 
>>>>>> something that Apple should be including as a built-in feature of 
>>>>>> voiceover.
>>>>>> I’ve even been able to use it for rudimentary access to the universal 
>>>>>> audio Consol, which otherwise is completely in accessible
>>>>>> Dev
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>>> www.cathedralbeats.com <http://www.cathedralbeats.com/>
>

Re: O c r Apollo console accessibility.

[TheOreoMonster]

So are you able to access the presets or adjust plug in parameters once you put 
them in the unison slot? I imagine you have to constantly re scan the screen 
with OCR every time you change something? 

> On Mar 5, 2020, at 8:53 PM, Devin Oxman  wrote:
> 
> Hi Steve,
> I've been able to add inserts to the unison slot, change mono to stereo, turn 
> input monitoring on/off, things of that sort.
> Still can't access the mixing matrix.
> I'd love to hear from Joe as well as to what they have working.
> Chuck, I haven't heard anything about Luna, but will drop Scott a friendly 
> email in the morning.
> Will of course post any updates here.
> Dev
> 
>> On Mar 5, 2020, at 4:10 PM, CHUCK REICHEL > <mailto:soundpicturerecord...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi Steve,
>> Joe out in LA has been using the Apollo console; for a while now.
>> Thats all I know!
>> If you want more details you'll half to ask him.
>> He's on this list.
>> In the mean time has any body heard from UA about VoiceOver accessibility 
>> with the "LUNA" software coming out?
>> Whats going to be interesting is "the Apollo "luna" recording app for all 
>> thunderbolt equipped UAD units.
>> Hey guys if you want to drop Scott Greiner > <mailto:sgrei...@uaudio.com>>
>> a friendly email asking about LUNA and voiceover please do!
>> HTH
>> Chuck
>> 
>> 
>> On Mar 5, 2020, at 3:31 PM, TheOreoMonster wrote:
>> 
>>> Rudimentary access to the UAD Console? Elaborate please? What sort of 
>>> rudimentary things can you do with this? 
>>> 
>>> Thanks, 
>>> 
>>>> On Mar 5, 2020, at 3:21 PM, Devin Oxman >>> <mailto:devinox...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Yeah, it really works well for what it is, I mean at this point 
>>>> considering it’s  using the vision-kit APIs from Catalina, this is 
>>>> something that Apple should be including as a built-in feature of 
>>>> voiceover.
>>>> I’ve even been able to use it for rudimentary access to the universal 
>>>> audio Consol, which otherwise is completely in accessible
>>>> Dev
>>>> 
>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>> www.cathedralbeats.com <http://www.cathedralbeats.com/>
>>>> 
>>>>> On Mar 5, 2020, at 1:00 AM, jimmie smith >>>> <mailto:jimmie.harold.sm...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thanks,  Installed and working well.  Access installers that I have not 
>>>>> been able to access before.
>>>>> From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com <mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com> 
>>>>> mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com>> on behalf 
>>>>> of Devin Oxman mailto:devinox...@gmail.com>>
>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, March 4, 2020 11:12:01 PM
>>>>> To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com <mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com> 
>>>>> mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com>>
>>>>> Subject: Re: O c r
>>>>>  
>>>>> Here’s a direct link to the download file
>>>>> 
>>>>> https://github.com/chigkim/VOCR/releases/download/v0.1.0-alpha.10/VOCR.v0.1.0-alpha.10.zip
>>>>>  
>>>>> <https://github.com/chigkim/VOCR/releases/download/v0.1.0-alpha.10/VOCR.v0.1.0-alpha.10.zip>
>>>>> Here’s a more general link to the github repository
>>>>> 
>>>>> https://github.com/chigkim/VOCR <https://github.com/chigkim/VOCR>
>>>>> Dev
>>>>> 
>>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>> www.cathedralbeats.com <http://www.cathedralbeats.com/>
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Mar 3, 2020, at 5:55 PM, TheOreoMonster >>>>> <mailto:monkeypushe...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Google VOCR GITHUB and you should find it. 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Mar 3, 2020, at 5:52 PM, jimmie smith >>>>>> <mailto:jimmie.harold.sm...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Now that my Mac and ProTools are all up-to-date, I was looking for the 
>>>>>>> new OCR. The links that I have no longer work. Could someone please 
>>>>>>> send me the link to get the new OCR for Catalina?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>>> You received this

Re: O c r

[TheOreoMonster]

Rudimentary access to the UAD Console? Elaborate please? What sort of 
rudimentary things can you do with this? 

Thanks, 

> On Mar 5, 2020, at 3:21 PM, Devin Oxman  wrote:
> 
> Yeah, it really works well for what it is, I mean at this point considering 
> it’s  using the vision-kit APIs from Catalina, this is something that Apple 
> should be including as a built-in feature of voiceover.
> I’ve even been able to use it for rudimentary access to the universal audio 
> Consol, which otherwise is completely in accessible
> Dev
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> www.cathedralbeats.com
> 
>> On Mar 5, 2020, at 1:00 AM, jimmie smith  
>> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Thanks,  Installed and working well.  Access installers that I have not been 
>> able to access before.
>> From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com  on behalf of 
>> Devin Oxman 
>> Sent: Wednesday, March 4, 2020 11:12:01 PM
>> To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com 
>> Subject: Re: O c r
>>  
>> Here’s a direct link to the download file
>> 
>> https://github.com/chigkim/VOCR/releases/download/v0.1.0-alpha.10/VOCR.v0.1.0-alpha.10.zip
>>  
>> <https://github.com/chigkim/VOCR/releases/download/v0.1.0-alpha.10/VOCR.v0.1.0-alpha.10.zip>
>> Here’s a more general link to the github repository
>> 
>> https://github.com/chigkim/VOCR <https://github.com/chigkim/VOCR>
>> Dev
>> 
>> Sent from my iPhone
>> www.cathedralbeats.com
>> 
>>> On Mar 3, 2020, at 5:55 PM, TheOreoMonster  wrote:
>>> 
>>> Google VOCR GITHUB and you should find it. 
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> On Mar 3, 2020, at 5:52 PM, jimmie smith >>> <mailto:jimmie.harold.sm...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Now that my Mac and ProTools are all up-to-date, I was looking for the new 
>>>> OCR. The links that I have no longer work. Could someone please send me 
>>>> the link to get the new OCR for Catalina?
>>>> 
>>>> -- 
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>>>> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>>>> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
>>>> <mailto:ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com>.
>>>> To view this discussion on the web 
>>>> visithttps://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/DM6PR01MB4395DC4B658A5E401089E474F6E40%40DM6PR01MB4395.prod.exchangelabs.com
>>>>  
>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/DM6PR01MB4395DC4B658A5E401089E474F6E40%40DM6PR01MB4395.prod.exchangelabs.com?utm_medium=email_source=footer>.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>>> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>>> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
>>> <mailto:ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com>.
>>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/00A24035-9CDA-4F27-B031-C54551D5288F%40gmail.com
>>>  
>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/00A24035-9CDA-4F27-B031-C54551D5288F%40gmail.com?utm_medium=email_source=footer>.
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
>> <mailto:ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com>.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/1EBCD7C2-830E-40B3-BD48-EF25258B0834%40gmail.com
>>  
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/1EBCD7C2-830E-40B3-BD48-EF25258B0834%40gmail.com?utm_medium=email_source=footer>.
>> 
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
>> <mailto:ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com>.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/DM6PR01MB4395B02DE0F0D58FF2C4B06BF6E20%40DM6PR01MB4395.prod.exchangelabs.com
>>  
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/DM6PR01MB4395B02DE0F0D58FF2C4B0

Re: O c r

[TheOreoMonster]

Google VOCR GITHUB and you should find it. 


> On Mar 3, 2020, at 5:52 PM, jimmie smith  
> wrote:
> 
> 
> Now that my Mac and ProTools are all up-to-date, I was looking for the new 
> OCR. The links that I have no longer work. Could someone please send me the 
> link to get the new OCR for Catalina?
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
> .
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/DM6PR01MB4395DC4B658A5E401089E474F6E40%40DM6PR01MB4395.prod.exchangelabs.com
>  
> .

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/00A24035-9CDA-4F27-B031-C54551D5288F%40gmail.com.

Re: EuCon issue trying to connect control surface with Pro Tools

[TheOreoMonster]

Pretty sure he is referring to the security and privacy system preference, If 
there isn’t something under the general tab asking you to allow it, then go to 
the privacy tab and select accessibility. If its not listed in the second 
column you should be able to add it manually with the Add button.  

> On Feb 8, 2020, at 4:39 PM, Toby Davey  wrote:
> 
> Hi Sean, 
> Not sure what you mean…on my Mac there is nothing in system preferences under 
> security for this or in preferences in Pro Tools.  Could you give some more 
> details as to what you mean?
> Cheers 
> Toby 
> 
> 
>> On 8 Feb 2020, at 20:27, Sean A. Cummins > > wrote:
>> 
>> Under security, you need to allow for Yukon under the accessibility tab.
>> 
>> Sent from my iPhone, so forgive Siri’s mistakes and my brevity.
>> 
>>> On Feb 8, 2020, at 12:03 PM, Toby Davey >> > wrote:
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Hi, 
>> 
>> I have been trying to connect my new Pro Tools Dock to my Mac but seem to 
>> have an issue with EuCon seeing the Dock. 
>> 
>> I have done all the steps as required so far in setting things up.  
>> Connected the Dock to my Mac, switched it on with my Mac up and running.  
>> Registered the Dock with Avid.  Downloaded and installed EuCon on my Mac.  
>> It is after this stage that I have a problem. 
>> 
>> According to the instructions after installing EuCon and having to restart 
>> my Mac to install it, when restarting my Mac with the Dock connected there 
>> should be a lit EuCon icon on the task bar.  
>> 
>> No EuCon icon appears on the Task bar and my sighted wife checked this for 
>> me too.
>> 
>> In Mac preferences there is a tab for EuCon and an empty table of devices.  
>> On Googling around I can’t seem to find any answers or suggestions on how to 
>> either get the EuCon onto the task bar or any hints and tips on what to do. 
>> 
>> I have a USB C to Ethernet adaptor which is connecting my Dock to my Mac and 
>> I can see the adaptor in network connections in preferences.  
>> 
>> I have been into Pro Tools and ticked the box for EuCon connections just in 
>> case. 
>> 
>> I have tried powering down my Mac and Dock and restarting but can’t seem to 
>> get them to talk to each other. 
>> 
>> I would have called Avid Support here in the UK but they are not open over 
>> the weekend. 
>> 
>> Any suggestions greatly appreciated.  
>> 
>> Cheers 
>> 
>> Toby 
>> 
>> , 
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
>> .
>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/80a85e9e-8e98-4b8f-b8f8-4d00ee0d8e0d%40googlegroups.com
>>  
>> .
>> 
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the 
>> Google Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/ptaccess/8cQyYuK3Jss/unsubscribe 
>> .
>> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to 
>> ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
>> .
>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/B283911B-F6D0-4B92-92A2-7EDCFF490F46%40gmail.com
>>  
>> .
> 
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
> .
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/B723AFFD-666E-4DE0-B637-FAD859051F9D%40gmail.com
>  
> .

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/67D3167B-518F-41E5-B64B-978D7AAC2632%40gmail.com.

Re: Plug-in recommendation

[TheOreoMonster]

Your best bet is probably gonna be getting into the Complete Control system. If 
you want to think outside the box a bit you could look at something like 
logic/mainstage. Massive amounts of instruments included. You could route 
MainStage into protools and record it as audio using something like  sound 
flower.. If you go the logic route you can do stuff in logic and then bounce 
them out and import into pro tools.  


> On Feb 5, 2020, at 4:37 PM, jimmie smith  
> wrote:
> 
> 
> I am looking for a plug-in that is accessible. I mentioned a few months back, 
> but I bought sample tank for. None of it is accessible. Does anyone know if 
> any such program that a blind person can use without having to have side 
> assistance to pull up bases, keyboards, drums, pianos.
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
> .
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/DM6PR01MB43951834CB49ED555AC3875BF6070%40DM6PR01MB4395.prod.exchangelabs.com
>  
> .

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/731BA5BE-ED3B-4EC6-98BE-C86ED92D31DF%40gmail.com.

Re: are there any good plug-ins for achieving this task?

[TheOreoMonster]

The Waves one you can get a Waves rep to remote in and install. That’s most 
likely the paid one Michael  was referring to. The Izotope installer isn’t 
accessible but the plug in itself should be. Izotope unlike waves won’t remote 
in to install for you so you will probably have to use AIRA if you don’t have a 
sighted family member or friend near by. 


> On Jan 24, 2020, at 2:54 PM, Christopher Gilland  
> wrote:
> 
> Wait, I'm totally confused. The Oreo Monster said it was free, now you're 
> saying it's $20? Um, OK? Uh...
> 
> 
> As for getting custom presets made or getting things installed, it actually, 
> now that I think about it shouldn't be a terribly terribly big deal. I do 
> have Team Viewer, and I do have Aira, so... yeah...
> 
> 
> Chris.
> 
> On 01/24/2020 01:23 PM, Michael Holmes wrote:
>> The installer isn’t accessible, and some plugins aren’t clearly labeled, but 
>> you can have a customer rep remote in and install, or have sighted 
>> assistance. Once installed, their plugins are decently accessible. This one 
>> is entirely usable with VO and has individual parameters for hiss, cracks, 
>> pops, flutter, distortion, and different combinations of record materials 
>> and needle type. It’s pretty well designed and may be worth the $29 and 
>> assisted install if you want all the controls.
>> 
>> Sent from my iPhone
>> 
>>> On Jan 24, 2020, at 13:01, Christopher Gilland  
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> The only issue is, I may have been given wrong information here, but I was 
>>> told that their plugins were not very accessible.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Chris.
>>> 
>>>> On 01/24/2020 12:47 PM, TheOreoMonster wrote:
>>>> Izotope’s Vinyl is a free plug in.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>>> On Jan 24, 2020, at 12:27 PM, Michael Holmes 
>>>>>>  wrote:
>>>>> I don’t know of any free ones, but you could always use the vinyl crackle 
>>>>> audio from the Pro Sound Effects First library, and loop it to fit the 
>>>>> track you are working on. Otherwise, Waves Abbey Road Vinyl goes on sale 
>>>>> for $29 often, and it has a lot of control.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Maybe someone else will have an idea on free plugins, but these may be a 
>>>>> good alternative if not.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Jan 24, 2020, at 12:18, Christopher Gilland  
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> specifically for free, are there any plug-ins I could use and 
>>>>>> instantiate on an insert without too much configuration which would 
>>>>>> allow me to very intentionally introduce some random cracks, pops, 
>>>>>> clicks, and crackles within a recording to make it sound like it was 
>>>>>> recorded on to Ann lp vinyl?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Chris.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>>>> Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>>>>> an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/D1CA254E-485B-423B-959D-910F1B20122C%40gmail.com.
>>>>> -- 
>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>>>>> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>>>>> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/F872BC04-75D8-4F16-9F82-288E541C488C%40gmail.com.
>>> -- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>>> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>>> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/6931295b-811e-0408-6a1e-99bd2f13ee78%40gmail.com.
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/ad822d29-79ad-d509-cfc4-ce7a8571d329%40gmail.com.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/1280ED83-BDDA-4E0F-8AD3-BF845B2AD15D%40gmail.com.

Re: are there any good plug-ins for achieving this task?

[TheOreoMonster]

Izotope’s Vinyl is a free plug in. 


> On Jan 24, 2020, at 12:27 PM, Michael Holmes  
> wrote:
> 
> I don’t know of any free ones, but you could always use the vinyl crackle 
> audio from the Pro Sound Effects First library, and loop it to fit the track 
> you are working on. Otherwise, Waves Abbey Road Vinyl goes on sale for $29 
> often, and it has a lot of control.
> 
> Maybe someone else will have an idea on free plugins, but these may be a good 
> alternative if not.
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
>> On Jan 24, 2020, at 12:18, Christopher Gilland  wrote:
>> 
>> specifically for free, are there any plug-ins I could use and instantiate 
>> on an insert without too much configuration which would allow me to very 
>> intentionally introduce some random cracks, pops, clicks, and crackles 
>> within a recording to make it sound like it was recorded on to Ann lp vinyl?
>> 
>> Chris.
>> 
>> Sent from my iPhone
>> 
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/D1CA254E-485B-423B-959D-910F1B20122C%40gmail.com.
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/F872BC04-75D8-4F16-9F82-288E541C488C%40gmail.com.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/43A07EA0-59A4-4E83-AD81-D0147DF7CD43%40gmail.com.

Re: Question about iLoks and the iLok manager

[TheOreoMonster]

The different brands may do stuff from their booths or press conferences on 
youtube. The panels put on by the NAMM organizations or brands on the other 
hand are a little harder to find online after the fact if you didn’t attend 
them in person. 


> On Jan 5, 2020, at 11:17 AM, Slau Halatyn  wrote:
> 
> No idea whether they do anything on YouTube. I'd imagine they'd simply host 
> it on their web site.
> Slau
> 
> 
>> On Jan 5, 2020, at 3:51 AM, Ronald J. Glaser > > wrote:
>> 
>> would you happen to know,  if namm has a YouTube channel?
>> 
>> A Smile on your face shows Gods grace!
>> 
>>> On Jan 4, 2020, at 5:52 PM, Slau Halatyn >> > wrote:
>>> 
>>> Panels aren't streamed but sometimes recorded. Main show floor 
>>> presentations are sometimes streamed. Not sure if this year's stuff will 
>>> be. FWIW, the Pro Tools / Sibelius accessibility presentations by me and 
>>> Chi will be on Saturday at 5 P.M. and Sunday at 3:30 P.M. Pacific Standard 
>>> Time.
>>> Slau
>>> 
>>> 
 On Jan 4, 2020, at 4:20 PM, Ronald van Rhijn >>> > wrote:
 
 Don’t know, sorry.
 
 
 
> Op 4 jan. 2020, om 17:50 heeft Christopher Gilland  > het volgende geschreven:
> 
> Would you happen to know if they stream their presentations?
> 
> 
> 
> Chris.
> 
> On 01/04/2020 07:55 AM, Ronald van Rhijn wrote:
>> NAMM stands for the National Association of Music Merchants and is a 
>> trade organization for music gear ...
>> This years trade show is from january 16 to 19 january.
>> 
>> hth,
>> Ronald
>> 
>>> Op 4 jan. 2020, om 10:27 heeft Christopher Gilland 
>>> mailto:clgillan...@gmail.com>> het volgende 
>>> geschreven:
>>> 
>>> E! I hope and pray that they will not get rid of the iLoks that're 
>>> just regular USB type A. What about people like me who have older macs, 
>>> and can't aford a newer one at the time.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> By the way, what is NAMM? I feel dumb for asking, but...
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Chris.
>>> 
>>> On 01/03/2020 04:51 PM, Slau Halatyn wrote:
 Actually, I think one of the announcements at NAMM will probably be a 
 USB C iLok key. We'll see…
 Slau
 
 
> On Jan 3, 2020, at 3:55 PM, Jesse Kragiel  > wrote:
> 
> One issue is that all the new Mac laptops are USB C, so in order to 
> use the iLok key, you'd need an adapter or hub to make it happen. I 
> use Main Stage in live settings, and I leave my iLok key at home 
> because I don't want it damaged or stolen. However, I authorize PT in 
> the cloud, and most of the instruments I use have 2 or 3 simultaneous 
> activations allowed, so at least one is always on the iLok, which is 
> always plugged into the studio iMac. That's just my scenario.
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
> Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, 
> send an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
> .
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/5f781950-263d-4245-9ea3-f5c04592401a%40googlegroups.com
>  
> .
 
 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
 Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
 an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
 .
 To view this discussion on the web visit 
 https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/9B81B666-E059-4873-8564-A940A9DFC116%40gmail.com
  
 .
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>> Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>> an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
>>> .
>>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/3c022a7e-8d36-862a-ad99-239887f6ada7%40gmail.com
>>>  
>>> .
>> 
>> -- 

Re: Question about iLoks and the iLok manager

[TheOreoMonster]

Chris you have a gen 2 iLok. I got mine earlier than 2011 with ProTools 9 also 
and it ws a gen 2. The really small ones are gen 3. Also Gen 1 is no longer 
supported by a lot of licenses so it’s safe to assume you have a gen 2. 


> On Jan 4, 2020, at 4:38 AM, Christopher Gilland  wrote:
> 
> While we're on this subject, what happens if God forbid, I'm activating 
> something, and have a power serge, or something just weird glitches, and my 
> iLok gets toasted? Would Avid replace the asset? I know they wouldn't replace 
> the iLok. That's understandable. I wouldn't expect for them to do that, but 
> would they at least! replace the asset, provided I was willing to get another 
> iLok at my own expense? If so, I might go ahead and order me another one just 
> to have as a backup.
> 
> 
> 
> Quite frankly, I want to upgrade my iLok anyway, as I think I might have the 
> 1st generation. I know this as, when Ron gots his iLok, I felt his, and man! 
> it's physically dementionally in size much smaller, and his also doesn't have 
> the little protection cap over the USB end of the apparatus.
> 
> 
> 
> I got my iLok included in the box with the DVD's to my m-Audio Fast Tracks 
> C400 interface back in 2011 when I ordered from Sweetwater. I basically got 
> the ProTools 9 MPower bundle with the interface. This is why I'm saying, I 
> think I have the 1st gen. Also, it's already half full with licenses I need, 
> I do believe. If I remember this correctly, Slau, you or someone else will 
> have to confirm this, but didn't the 1st gens only give you 100 assets? I'm 
> already up to 40. So, yeah...
> 
> 
> 
> Chris.
> 
> On 01/03/2020 02:24 PM, Slau Halatyn wrote:
>> My understanding is that the replacement of licenses is up to the discretion 
>> of the developer. To me, it's kind of a no-brainer to use an iLok key for 
>> everything if possible. That said, it's also been convenient to just throw a 
>> license on the drive to free up a USB slot if necessary. Horses for courses, 
>> I guess.
>> Slau
>> 
>> 
>>> On Jan 3, 2020, at 1:48 PM, Nick Gawronski >> > wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi, What would happen if your hard drive crashed with the license on it and 
>>> you had no backup made could the license be restored?  If say I did have a 
>>> full backup could I just restore everything back to the new drive?  I am 
>>> just asking so I would know what I would have to do if something happened.  
>>> Nick Gawronski
>>> On Fri, 3 Jan 2020, Slau Halatyn wrote:
>>> 
 Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2020 11:32:18 -0500
 From: Slau Halatyn mailto:slauhala...@gmail.com>>
 Reply-To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com 
 To: PTAccess List >>> >
 Subject: Re: Question about iLoks and the iLok manager
 That's not correct. What it requires is an Internet connection which can 
 certainly be wireless. The connection can technically even be over an iOS 
 device. What it does not require is the iLok key
 itself but an Internet connection is the key, so to speak.HTH,
 Slau
 
  On Jan 3, 2020, at 10:45 AM, Ronald van Rhijn >>> > wrote:
 I have learned from my Pro Tools dealer that the Cloud only registration 
 needs a wired internet connection, no wifi will do. , Anyone know why this 
 is the case? I would definately like to
 have a ilok-less setup. 
 Ronald
  
  Op 3 jan. 2020, om 15:08 heeft Christopher Gilland 
 mailto:clgillan...@gmail.com>> het volgende 
 geschreven:
 Slau,
 Thank you for your help. That's pretty much what i suspected for the 
 answer, but I definitely do appreciate your confirmation on the matter.
 Have a wonderful rest of your day.
 Chris.
 On 01/02/2020 11:04 PM, Slau Halatyn wrote:
  There are 3 main variables to iLok licensing as it relates to 
 location and they are determined by the developer. It's up to the 
 developer to determine whether a license can
  be activated to an iLok, a computer and the cloud. Some developers 
 allow all three while some only allow one or two. The third generation 
 iLok can store at least 512
  licenses if not more. I'd imagine there's no theoretical maximum for 
 computer activation slots. One disadvantage with computer activation is 
 that you have to remove all
  license activations if you're formatting the drive. Apart from that, 
 portability is a big factor for some users.HTH,
 Slau
 
  On Jan 2, 2020, at 8:54 PM, Christopher Gilland 
 mailto:clgillan...@gmail.com>> wrote:
 For reasons which go beyond the scope of this e-mail, and would get way 
 too long-winded for me to attempt explaining, I won't bore you with why I 
 ask this question. I know
 typically, this isn't something most people probably would do, all be it 
 the option's there, but I have to ask at least 

Re: Question about iLoks and the iLok manager

[TheOreoMonster]

Chris, usb-c to usb A and vice versa converters are like $5. So if they ever do 
switch the iLok’s over which they probably will at some point in the distant 
future you will be fine. 


> On Jan 4, 2020, at 4:27 AM, Christopher Gilland  wrote:
> 
> E! I hope and pray that they will not get rid of the iLoks that're just 
> regular USB type A. What about people like me who have older macs, and can't 
> aford a newer one at the time.
> 
> 
> 
> By the way, what is NAMM? I feel dumb for asking, but...
> 
> 
> 
> Chris.
> 
> On 01/03/2020 04:51 PM, Slau Halatyn wrote:
>> Actually, I think one of the announcements at NAMM will probably be a USB C 
>> iLok key. We'll see…
>> Slau
>> 
>> 
>>> On Jan 3, 2020, at 3:55 PM, Jesse Kragiel >> > wrote:
>>> 
>>> One issue is that all the new Mac laptops are USB C, so in order to use the 
>>> iLok key, you'd need an adapter or hub to make it happen. I use Main Stage 
>>> in live settings, and I leave my iLok key at home because I don't want it 
>>> damaged or stolen. However, I authorize PT in the cloud, and most of the 
>>> instruments I use have 2 or 3 simultaneous activations allowed, so at least 
>>> one is always on the iLok, which is always plugged into the studio iMac. 
>>> That's just my scenario.
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>>> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>>> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
>>> .
>>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/5f781950-263d-4245-9ea3-f5c04592401a%40googlegroups.com
>>>  
>>> .
>> 
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
>> .
>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/9B81B666-E059-4873-8564-A940A9DFC116%40gmail.com
>>  
>> .
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
> .
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/3c022a7e-8d36-862a-ad99-239887f6ada7%40gmail.com
>  
> .

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/094FA9FB-EAD0-4F1E-B180-A6B9DFF1CFF6%40gmail.com.

Re: Send not working

[TheOreoMonster]

They can still proof read and spell check before sending. 


> On Dec 30, 2019, at 7:52 PM, Christopher Gilland  
> wrote:
> 
> Slau,
> 
> 
> 
> With the absolute utmost of respect, what about those people who may have 
> dexterity issues, and don't have an addiquit way with their mobile devices to 
> type aside from voice input via dictation??
> 
> 
> 
> Enough said. Again, I mean this with all due respect. I'm not trying to 
> argue. I'm only trying to shed a possible perspective on this that may have 
> not been considered.
> 
> On 12/30/2019 05:18 PM, Slau Halatyn wrote:
>> My first recommendation is to not try to dictate messages when attempting to 
>> communicate on a technically-oriented mailing list. Just my two sense. So 
>> that you fully appreciate my comment, check my spelling above.
>> Beyond that, sends working or not has nothing to do with Flo Tools, of 
>> course. Make sure your preference for sends defaulting to infinite 
>> resistance is unchecked. With the installation of the previous version of 
>> Pro Tools, many preferences automatically became reset.
>> HTH,
>> Slau
>> 
>> 
>>> On Dec 30, 2019, at 3:03 PM, jimmie smith >> > wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> I have no reason or no explanation for this. I came in, turned on my studio 
>>> computer, set up some sense, and they won't work. I have checked to make 
>>> sure that the flow to his template is loaded, and do everything just like 
>>> I've always done. But, even with new sessions, new tracks, deleting sense, 
>>> reassigning sans, they do not work. I did not know what else to say I hope 
>>> someone has a suggestion.
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>>> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>>> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
>>> .
>>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/DM6PR01MB439536E7CB332B422F546223F6270%40DM6PR01MB4395.prod.exchangelabs.com
>>>  
>>> .
>> 
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
>> .
>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/B6C4501C-F114-4290-A893-C4DCBE3F68ED%40gmail.com
>>  
>> .
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
> .
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/cad80c25-e946-855d-e6e4-cedb744c9652%40gmail.com
>  
> .

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/BCF8A6A9-A9A7-4AE3-96DF-3842A5EFCF3C%40gmail.com.

Re: a very simple mastering Stratgies for just Karaoke songs

[TheOreoMonster]

If these are multi tracks being mixed down and bounced out to a stereo file, 
then a little compression, and perhaps a limiter after that. 

> On Dec 14, 2019, at 4:32 AM, ⁨Ramy Moustafa Saber رامي مصطفى صابر⁩ 
> <⁨ramy.moustaf...@gmail.com⁩> wrote:
> 
> Hi all:
> 
> 
> I have about 30 Karaoke Tracks that will use them in my Live concert,
> I know that Mastering is not a Subject to conver in an email or 100s, but I 
> do not need to master an album, just these 30 Tracks to be ok in the Live 
> concert, not so much bass, not so much Tribble, etc,
> so, I will use Eq on each track, but is there any other advice that i can 
> follow to achieve this?
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/10711915-50F1-476F-9488-5E69123719B1%40gmail.com.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/91F7F1A1-F359-404C-8D9D-3F3FC2695769%40gmail.com.

Re: I don't know how to deal with this gain staging issue in ProTools, please please help!

[TheOreoMonster]

If its not the headphones then its your interface. Time to see about a warranty 
replacement or something. 

> On Dec 13, 2019, at 5:17 PM, Christopher Gilland  
> wrote:
> 
> it is not the headphones. I've tried about five different pairs. i'll 
> different makes and models.
> 
> 
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
>> On Dec 13, 2019, at 13:15, TheOreoMonster  wrote:
>> 
>>  Then its probably his headphones. He should try cranking the volume up 
>> with a few different pairs of headphones and that will reveal whether its 
>> the headphones creating the noise or the headphone amp if he’s eliminatedthe 
>> mic pre from the equation 
>> 
>>> On Dec 13, 2019, at 10:52 AM, Ronald J Glaser >> <mailto:ronaldjglas...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> I have the same Interface as chris; and I do not know about Chris's 
>>> particular set of cans, but my set of cans do not exibit a his at least 
>>> that is what I am hearing. but my cans come from Yamaha. Not sure if that 
>>> matters, or is there something enharent about headphone amps that I am 
>>> missing?
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Ron.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On 12/12/2019 12:27 PM, TheOreoMonster wrote:
>>>> Why not just crank the headphone output so you can hear it during 
>>>> recording. Just turn VoiceOver’s Volume down you can do this quickly by 
>>>> using VO+Shift+Command+ left or Right arrows to find VoiceOver’s Volume, 
>>>> and then using VO+Shift+Command+Up and down arrows to turn the volume up 
>>>> or down. This allows you to adjust VO volume on the fly without leaving 
>>>> pro tools.  Once you are done you can turn VoiceOver back up and turn the 
>>>> volume back down on the headphones. Use Notification Center to turn on do 
>>>> not disturb while recording so you aren’t interrupted with any system 
>>>> sounds while recording so nothing will blast your ears out. 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> On Dec 12, 2019, at 12:22 PM, Christopher Gilland >>>> <mailto:clgillan...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Does that work though with monitoring in my cans before recording? That's 
>>>>> the main issue. I know how to turn it back up after it's recorded, but 
>>>>> the issue isn't after recorded. It's before. I'm trying to get it where 
>>>>> at such a low level during the actual tracking process, I can hear what I 
>>>>> need to hear through my cans without having to crank them to high heaven 
>>>>> to compensate for the lower input signal.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Chris.
>>>>> 
>>>>> On 12/12/2019 12:19 PM, TheOreoMonster wrote:
>>>>>> I am surprised they gave you that complicat setup, especially 
>>>>>> considering iTunes doesn’t give you a way to export tracks once the 
>>>>>> volume has been lowered on them. Just use clip gain to lower the 
>>>>>> instrumental track and it basically does everything Sweetwater told you 
>>>>>> to do in one simple step. 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Dec 12, 2019, at 12:14 PM, Christopher Gilland 
>>>>>>> mailto:clgillan...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Slau,
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> What Sweetwater actually told me is, lower the karaoke track in iTunes 
>>>>>>> before importing it to PT.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I'm not totally sure how to do that, but anyway, then, once that is 
>>>>>>> lowered to fit my vocal level, import into PT, then add my vocal track, 
>>>>>>> but here's the catch. They told me, then, also add a stereo master 
>>>>>>> fader. Then, take that master fader, and only use it as a gain adder. 
>>>>>>> Meaning, you're not really per sé doing anything with the master fader 
>>>>>>> more than using it to add gain. Then, move that master fader volume 
>>>>>>> from it's default 0DB location back up to reach the normal audible 
>>>>>>> level. Presto! Done!
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I was always under the imp

Re: I don't know how to deal with this gain staging issue in ProTools, please please help!

[TheOreoMonster]

I won’t disagree with this and I have used a miller set up at times over the 
years but also it can lead to more complications in the case of the person in 
question here especially considering they are already so confused over 
something that can be resolved  by simply turning down the instrumental and 
turning up the headphones to compensate. 
Great suggestion though. 


> On Dec 13, 2019, at 1:09 PM, Michael Holmes  
> wrote:
> 
> I’ve found that investing in a small mixer with subgroups and separate 
> outputs works for direct monitor issues.
> In a small setup, something like a Mackie 802VLZ would work. You can record 
> through one bus, monitor PT on another, and bring VO and system sounds in 
> through the Mac headphone outs with a 3.5mm TRS to RCA cable. That way you 
> have physical control and extra headroom. There are cheaper mixers that can 
> do this. Just seek out mixers with buses or groups. Different brands have 
> different terms, but they’re pretty similar.
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
>> On Dec 13, 2019, at 10:52, Ronald J Glaser  wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> I have the same Interface as chris; and I do not know about Chris's 
>> particular set of cans, but my set of cans do not exibit a his at least that 
>> is what I am hearing. but my cans come from Yamaha. Not sure if that 
>> matters, or is there something enharent about headphone amps that I am 
>> missing?
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Ron.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On 12/12/2019 12:27 PM, TheOreoMonster wrote:
>>> Why not just crank the headphone output so you can hear it during 
>>> recording. Just turn VoiceOver’s Volume down you can do this quickly by 
>>> using VO+Shift+Command+ left or Right arrows to find VoiceOver’s Volume, 
>>> and then using VO+Shift+Command+Up and down arrows to turn the volume up or 
>>> down. This allows you to adjust VO volume on the fly without leaving pro 
>>> tools.  Once you are done you can turn VoiceOver back up and turn the 
>>> volume back down on the headphones. Use Notification Center to turn on do 
>>> not disturb while recording so you aren’t interrupted with any system 
>>> sounds while recording so nothing will blast your ears out. 
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> On Dec 12, 2019, at 12:22 PM, Christopher Gilland >>> <mailto:clgillan...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Does that work though with monitoring in my cans before recording? That's 
>>>> the main issue. I know how to turn it back up after it's recorded, but the 
>>>> issue isn't after recorded. It's before. I'm trying to get it where at 
>>>> such a low level during the actual tracking process, I can hear what I 
>>>> need to hear through my cans without having to crank them to high heaven 
>>>> to compensate for the lower input signal.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Chris.
>>>> 
>>>> On 12/12/2019 12:19 PM, TheOreoMonster wrote:
>>>>> I am surprised they gave you that complicat setup, especially considering 
>>>>> iTunes doesn’t give you a way to export tracks once the volume has been 
>>>>> lowered on them. Just use clip gain to lower the instrumental track and 
>>>>> it basically does everything Sweetwater told you to do in one simple 
>>>>> step. 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Dec 12, 2019, at 12:14 PM, Christopher Gilland >>>>> <mailto:clgillan...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Slau,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> What Sweetwater actually told me is, lower the karaoke track in iTunes 
>>>>>> before importing it to PT.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I'm not totally sure how to do that, but anyway, then, once that is 
>>>>>> lowered to fit my vocal level, import into PT, then add my vocal track, 
>>>>>> but here's the catch. They told me, then, also add a stereo master 
>>>>>> fader. Then, take that master fader, and only use it as a gain adder. 
>>>>>> Meaning, you're not really per sé doing anything with the master fader 
>>>>>> more than using it to add gain. Then, move that master fader volume from 
>>>>>> it's default 0DB location back up to reach the normal audible level. 
>>>>>> Presto! Done!
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I was always

Re: I don't know how to deal with this gain staging issue in ProTools, please please help!

[TheOreoMonster]

 Then its probably his headphones. He should try cranking the volume up with a 
few different pairs of headphones and that will reveal whether its the 
headphones creating the noise or the headphone amp if he’s eliminatedthe mic 
pre from the equation 

> On Dec 13, 2019, at 10:52 AM, Ronald J Glaser  
> wrote:
> 
> I have the same Interface as chris; and I do not know about Chris's 
> particular set of cans, but my set of cans do not exibit a his at least that 
> is what I am hearing. but my cans come from Yamaha. Not sure if that matters, 
> or is there something enharent about headphone amps that I am missing?
> 
> 
> 
> Ron.
> 
> 
> 
> On 12/12/2019 12:27 PM, TheOreoMonster wrote:
>> Why not just crank the headphone output so you can hear it during recording. 
>> Just turn VoiceOver’s Volume down you can do this quickly by using 
>> VO+Shift+Command+ left or Right arrows to find VoiceOver’s Volume, and then 
>> using VO+Shift+Command+Up and down arrows to turn the volume up or down. 
>> This allows you to adjust VO volume on the fly without leaving pro tools.  
>> Once you are done you can turn VoiceOver back up and turn the volume back 
>> down on the headphones. Use Notification Center to turn on do not disturb 
>> while recording so you aren’t interrupted with any system sounds while 
>> recording so nothing will blast your ears out. 
>> 
>> 
>>> On Dec 12, 2019, at 12:22 PM, Christopher Gilland >> <mailto:clgillan...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Does that work though with monitoring in my cans before recording? That's 
>>> the main issue. I know how to turn it back up after it's recorded, but the 
>>> issue isn't after recorded. It's before. I'm trying to get it where at such 
>>> a low level during the actual tracking process, I can hear what I need to 
>>> hear through my cans without having to crank them to high heaven to 
>>> compensate for the lower input signal.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Chris.
>>> 
>>> On 12/12/2019 12:19 PM, TheOreoMonster wrote:
>>>> I am surprised they gave you that complicat setup, especially considering 
>>>> iTunes doesn’t give you a way to export tracks once the volume has been 
>>>> lowered on them. Just use clip gain to lower the instrumental track and it 
>>>> basically does everything Sweetwater told you to do in one simple step. 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> On Dec 12, 2019, at 12:14 PM, Christopher Gilland >>>> <mailto:clgillan...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Slau,
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> What Sweetwater actually told me is, lower the karaoke track in iTunes 
>>>>> before importing it to PT.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> I'm not totally sure how to do that, but anyway, then, once that is 
>>>>> lowered to fit my vocal level, import into PT, then add my vocal track, 
>>>>> but here's the catch. They told me, then, also add a stereo master fader. 
>>>>> Then, take that master fader, and only use it as a gain adder. Meaning, 
>>>>> you're not really per sé doing anything with the master fader more than 
>>>>> using it to add gain. Then, move that master fader volume from it's 
>>>>> default 0DB location back up to reach the normal audible level. Presto! 
>>>>> Done!
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> I was always under the impression you really don't want a master fader 
>>>>> though unless you're literally doing mastering type techniques. Or is 
>>>>> that just it though: you kind of *are!* doing a mastering technique by 
>>>>> doing this. All be it, you're not really doing anything substantial with 
>>>>> the fader more than adding gain, but... still... Is that a way to go, or 
>>>>> like me, can you see some potential problems with this method. I'm not 
>>>>> really planning to add any final processing to the over all master mix 
>>>>> like compression, dithering, final e queueing etc.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Chris.
>>>>> 
>>>>> On 12/12/2019 11:27 AM, Slau Halatyn wrote:
>>>>>> Turn down the mastered track to a manageable level to accommodate your 
>>>>>> vocal recording. Once you've recorded the vocal, process the vocal to a 
>>>>>> comparable quality of com

Re: I don't know how to deal with this gain staging issue in ProTools, please please help!

[TheOreoMonster]

Pretty much my suggestion regarding clip gain. Trim plug in does the same just 
its done  as a plug in insert as well. Chris regarding your noise on the 
headphones when you turn it up, unless that noise is the headphone  amp and not 
coming from the mic pre, you will have the same issue if you boost the level 
inside of protools instead of turning down clip gain.  The other question here 
is are you using direct monitoring on the interface or input monitoring through 
pro tools? I’d suggest turning direct monitoring off and using input monitoring 
myself. 


> On Dec 12, 2019, at 12:30 PM,   
> wrote:
> 
> Why not use a trem plugin on the music track and turn it down until it feels 
> under the microphone? 
>  
> From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com <mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com> 
> mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com>> On Behalf Of 
> Christopher Gilland
> Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2019 12:23 PM
> To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com <mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com>
> Subject: Re: I don't know how to deal with this gain staging issue in 
> ProTools, please please help!
>  
> Does that work though with monitoring in my cans before recording? That's the 
> main issue. I know how to turn it back up after it's recorded, but the issue 
> isn't after recorded. It's before. I'm trying to get it where at such a low 
> level during the actual tracking process, I can hear what I need to hear 
> through my cans without having to crank them to high heaven to compensate for 
> the lower input signal.
>  
> Chris.
> On 12/12/2019 12:19 PM, TheOreoMonster wrote:
>> I am surprised they gave you that complicat setup, especially considering 
>> iTunes doesn’t give you a way to export tracks once the volume has been 
>> lowered on them. Just use clip gain to lower the instrumental track and it 
>> basically does everything Sweetwater told you to do in one simple step.  
>>  
>> 
>> 
>>> On Dec 12, 2019, at 12:14 PM, Christopher Gilland >> <mailto:clgillan...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>  
>>> Slau,
>>>  
>>> What Sweetwater actually told me is, lower the karaoke track in iTunes 
>>> before importing it to PT.
>>>  
>>> I'm not totally sure how to do that, but anyway, then, once that is lowered 
>>> to fit my vocal level, import into PT, then add my vocal track, but here's 
>>> the catch. They told me, then, also add a stereo master fader. Then, take 
>>> that master fader, and only use it as a gain adder. Meaning, you're not 
>>> really per sé doing anything with the master fader more than using it to 
>>> add gain. Then, move that master fader volume from it's default 0DB 
>>> location back up to reach the normal audible level. Presto! Done!
>>>  
>>> I was always under the impression you really don't want a master fader 
>>> though unless you're literally doing mastering type techniques. Or is that 
>>> just it though: you kind of *are!* doing a mastering technique by doing 
>>> this. All be it, you're not really doing anything substantial with the 
>>> fader more than adding gain, but... still... Is that a way to go, or like 
>>> me, can you see some potential problems with this method. I'm not really 
>>> planning to add any final processing to the over all master mix like 
>>> compression, dithering, final e queueing etc.
>>>  
>>> Chris.
>>> On 12/12/2019 11:27 AM, Slau Halatyn wrote:
>>>> Turn down the mastered track to a manageable level to accommodate your 
>>>> vocal recording. Once you've recorded the vocal, process the vocal to a 
>>>> comparable quality of compression and remix the two. You'll probably end 
>>>> up having to limit your vocal some if the music was mastered particularly 
>>>> hot. 
>>>>  
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> On Dec 12, 2019, at 11:21 AM, Christopher Gilland >>>> <mailto:clgillan...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>>  
>>>>> Guys, we've discussed this before, I think, quite some time back, but the 
>>>>> answers I got were kind of vague, and honestly, and this is of no offense 
>>>>> to any of you all, weren't very helpful at the time. That's no fault of 
>>>>> you all. It might have just been my knowledge/experience at that time was 
>>>>> not of such that I could fully grasp the concepts.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Here is the situation again though. Trust me, too. I've Googled like 
>>>>> crazy. I spent over about 3 hours last night Youtubing, and just Googling 
>&

Re: I don't know how to deal with this gain staging issue in ProTools, please please help!

[TheOreoMonster]

Why not just crank the headphone output so you can hear it during recording. 
Just turn VoiceOver’s Volume down you can do this quickly by using 
VO+Shift+Command+ left or Right arrows to find VoiceOver’s Volume, and then 
using VO+Shift+Command+Up and down arrows to turn the volume up or down. This 
allows you to adjust VO volume on the fly without leaving pro tools.  Once you 
are done you can turn VoiceOver back up and turn the volume back down on the 
headphones. Use Notification Center to turn on do not disturb while recording 
so you aren’t interrupted with any system sounds while recording so nothing 
will blast your ears out. 


> On Dec 12, 2019, at 12:22 PM, Christopher Gilland  
> wrote:
> 
> Does that work though with monitoring in my cans before recording? That's the 
> main issue. I know how to turn it back up after it's recorded, but the issue 
> isn't after recorded. It's before. I'm trying to get it where at such a low 
> level during the actual tracking process, I can hear what I need to hear 
> through my cans without having to crank them to high heaven to compensate for 
> the lower input signal.
> 
> 
> 
> Chris.
> 
> On 12/12/2019 12:19 PM, TheOreoMonster wrote:
>> I am surprised they gave you that complicat setup, especially considering 
>> iTunes doesn’t give you a way to export tracks once the volume has been 
>> lowered on them. Just use clip gain to lower the instrumental track and it 
>> basically does everything Sweetwater told you to do in one simple step. 
>> 
>> 
>>> On Dec 12, 2019, at 12:14 PM, Christopher Gilland >> <mailto:clgillan...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Slau,
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> What Sweetwater actually told me is, lower the karaoke track in iTunes 
>>> before importing it to PT.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> I'm not totally sure how to do that, but anyway, then, once that is lowered 
>>> to fit my vocal level, import into PT, then add my vocal track, but here's 
>>> the catch. They told me, then, also add a stereo master fader. Then, take 
>>> that master fader, and only use it as a gain adder. Meaning, you're not 
>>> really per sé doing anything with the master fader more than using it to 
>>> add gain. Then, move that master fader volume from it's default 0DB 
>>> location back up to reach the normal audible level. Presto! Done!
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> I was always under the impression you really don't want a master fader 
>>> though unless you're literally doing mastering type techniques. Or is that 
>>> just it though: you kind of *are!* doing a mastering technique by doing 
>>> this. All be it, you're not really doing anything substantial with the 
>>> fader more than adding gain, but... still... Is that a way to go, or like 
>>> me, can you see some potential problems with this method. I'm not really 
>>> planning to add any final processing to the over all master mix like 
>>> compression, dithering, final e queueing etc.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Chris.
>>> 
>>> On 12/12/2019 11:27 AM, Slau Halatyn wrote:
>>>> Turn down the mastered track to a manageable level to accommodate your 
>>>> vocal recording. Once you've recorded the vocal, process the vocal to a 
>>>> comparable quality of compression and remix the two. You'll probably end 
>>>> up having to limit your vocal some if the music was mastered particularly 
>>>> hot.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> On Dec 12, 2019, at 11:21 AM, Christopher Gilland >>>> <mailto:clgillan...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Guys, we've discussed this before, I think, quite some time back, but the 
>>>>> answers I got were kind of vague, and honestly, and this is of no offense 
>>>>> to any of you all, weren't very helpful at the time. That's no fault of 
>>>>> you all. It might have just been my knowledge/experience at that time was 
>>>>> not of such that I could fully grasp the concepts.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Here is the situation again though. Trust me, too. I've Googled like 
>>>>> crazy. I spent over about 3 hours last night Youtubing, and just Googling 
>>>>> in general and am coming up pretty much empty handed.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> I normally record lead vocals on top of already purchased instrumental 
>>>>> tracks, so I'm not really normally working with stems. Once in a while, 
>>>>> I'll 

Re: I don't know how to deal with this gain staging issue in ProTools, please please help!

[TheOreoMonster]

I am surprised they gave you that complicat setup, especially considering 
iTunes doesn’t give you a way to export tracks once the volume has been lowered 
on them. Just use clip gain to lower the instrumental track and it basically 
does everything Sweetwater told you to do in one simple step. 


> On Dec 12, 2019, at 12:14 PM, Christopher Gilland  
> wrote:
> 
> Slau,
> 
> 
> 
> What Sweetwater actually told me is, lower the karaoke track in iTunes before 
> importing it to PT.
> 
> 
> 
> I'm not totally sure how to do that, but anyway, then, once that is lowered 
> to fit my vocal level, import into PT, then add my vocal track, but here's 
> the catch. They told me, then, also add a stereo master fader. Then, take 
> that master fader, and only use it as a gain adder. Meaning, you're not 
> really per sé doing anything with the master fader more than using it to add 
> gain. Then, move that master fader volume from it's default 0DB location back 
> up to reach the normal audible level. Presto! Done!
> 
> 
> 
> I was always under the impression you really don't want a master fader though 
> unless you're literally doing mastering type techniques. Or is that just it 
> though: you kind of *are!* doing a mastering technique by doing this. All be 
> it, you're not really doing anything substantial with the fader more than 
> adding gain, but... still... Is that a way to go, or like me, can you see 
> some potential problems with this method. I'm not really planning to add any 
> final processing to the over all master mix like compression, dithering, 
> final e queueing etc.
> 
> 
> 
> Chris.
> 
> On 12/12/2019 11:27 AM, Slau Halatyn wrote:
>> Turn down the mastered track to a manageable level to accommodate your vocal 
>> recording. Once you've recorded the vocal, process the vocal to a comparable 
>> quality of compression and remix the two. You'll probably end up having to 
>> limit your vocal some if the music was mastered particularly hot.
>> 
>> 
>>> On Dec 12, 2019, at 11:21 AM, Christopher Gilland >> > wrote:
>>> 
>>> Guys, we've discussed this before, I think, quite some time back, but the 
>>> answers I got were kind of vague, and honestly, and this is of no offense 
>>> to any of you all, weren't very helpful at the time. That's no fault of you 
>>> all. It might have just been my knowledge/experience at that time was not 
>>> of such that I could fully grasp the concepts.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Here is the situation again though. Trust me, too. I've Googled like crazy. 
>>> I spent over about 3 hours last night Youtubing, and just Googling in 
>>> general and am coming up pretty much empty handed.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> I normally record lead vocals on top of already purchased instrumental 
>>> tracks, so I'm not really normally working with stems. Once in a while, 
>>> I'll do something which takes more than 2 tracks, one for the music, one 
>>> for my vofal, but that's rare. Regardless, this is occuring.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> In the past, I made a really really bad habbit of cranking my input gain on 
>>> the mike input way up. Well, OK, fine. Not way up, but up enough to get 
>>> good audible level going into PT. I obviously needed the level to be 
>>> balanced with the music track.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Problem is, that music track usually would have been mastered at gain unity 
>>> 0, which you know, anything above that, you're clipping. This means 
>>> anything I drove on top of the music track, that's gonna push my master 
>>> over that 0 no no limit. But! I had to. Or so I thought. It's the only way 
>>> I could get any good volume on my mike input.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> So, a few things. First my hardware. This way you know what we're working 
>>> with. This interface is popular enough, surely you all know enough at least 
>>> about it to help. I'm running a Focusrite scarlet 2I2 interface, and the 
>>> first generation of a Blue Bluebird microphone. Let me be clear. This is 
>>> the Bluebird, not the baby bottle. Again, the first gen, not the 2nd, nor 
>>> the beta.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Now, I'm trying to break that habbit of running my gain so hot. I'm finding 
>>> that with where my input dial on the scarlet now is set, I'm on my peeks 
>>> hitting probably around -13DB or so on average, and again, that's on the 
>>> loudest peeks of my vocals. Obviously, that's much much better.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> The problem is, when recording, obviously having the level that low, I 
>>> can't hear myself hardly at all in my cans. I normally have to get around 
>>> -2 to 0DB in my peek meter on the output of the vocal track in PT before I 
>>> can really hear myself well.. Also, when playing things back, it's barely 
>>> audible.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Obviously, same problem with my keyboard using a virtual synth, or for that 
>>> mind, patching it directly in the scarlet. As for my vocal, I get that to 
>>> hear it well in my cans, and on the final mix I could pop a compressor on 
>>> the vocal, like the Gray compressor, and 

Re: I don't know how to deal with this gain staging issue in ProTools, please please help!

[TheOreoMonster]

Use Clip gain to bring down the level of the instrumental track so you can hear 
your vocals as needed. Once you mix your vocals you can use clip gain to adjust 
the level of the instrumental track back up a little if you need to get it to 
blend with the vocals better. 

> On Dec 12, 2019, at 11:21 AM, Christopher Gilland  
> wrote:
> 
> Guys, we've discussed this before, I think, quite some time back, but the 
> answers I got were kind of vague, and honestly, and this is of no offense to 
> any of you all, weren't very helpful at the time. That's no fault of you all. 
> It might have just been my knowledge/experience at that time was not of such 
> that I could fully grasp the concepts.
> 
> 
> Here is the situation again though. Trust me, too. I've Googled like crazy. I 
> spent over about 3 hours last night Youtubing, and just Googling in general 
> and am coming up pretty much empty handed.
> 
> 
> I normally record lead vocals on top of already purchased instrumental 
> tracks, so I'm not really normally working with stems. Once in a while, I'll 
> do something which takes more than 2 tracks, one for the music, one for my 
> vofal, but that's rare. Regardless, this is occuring.
> 
> 
> In the past, I made a really really bad habbit of cranking my input gain on 
> the mike input way up. Well, OK, fine. Not way up, but up enough to get good 
> audible level going into PT. I obviously needed the level to be balanced with 
> the music track.
> 
> 
> Problem is, that music track usually would have been mastered at gain unity 
> 0, which you know, anything above that, you're clipping. This means anything 
> I drove on top of the music track, that's gonna push my master over that 0 no 
> no limit. But! I had to. Or so I thought. It's the only way I could get any 
> good volume on my mike input.
> 
> 
> So, a few things. First my hardware. This way you know what we're working 
> with. This interface is popular enough, surely you all know enough at least 
> about it to help. I'm running a Focusrite scarlet 2I2 interface, and the 
> first generation of a Blue Bluebird microphone. Let me be clear. This is the 
> Bluebird, not the baby bottle. Again, the first gen, not the 2nd, nor the 
> beta.
> 
> 
> Now, I'm trying to break that habbit of running my gain so hot. I'm finding 
> that with where my input dial on the scarlet now is set, I'm on my peeks 
> hitting probably around -13DB or so on average, and again, that's on the 
> loudest peeks of my vocals. Obviously, that's much much better.
> 
> 
> The problem is, when recording, obviously having the level that low, I can't 
> hear myself hardly at all in my cans. I normally have to get around -2 to 0DB 
> in my peek meter on the output of the vocal track in PT before I can really 
> hear myself well.. Also, when playing things back, it's barely audible.
> 
> 
> Obviously, same problem with my keyboard using a virtual synth, or for that 
> mind, patching it directly in the scarlet. As for my vocal, I get that to 
> hear it well in my cans, and on the final mix I could pop a compressor on the 
> vocal, like the Gray compressor, and set it to a preset like steady, which 
> very very significantly does boost the volume. The only issue is, no, I'm not 
> clipping, but adding compression for the simple reason to boost that output 
> gain is a horrible! idea in most cases. It's adding color, sometimes 
> saturation, etc. that I definitely do not want into the mix taking away the 
> natural beauty of the vocal characteristics.
> 
> 
> Yes, I could get a pre like a cloud lifter, but that's gonna present the same 
> issue. You turn up that input, bam! now you're clippen again. I don't think 
> the issue is on my input side. - I'm fully convinced of that. This is an 
> output thing. As level wize, my peek meter in PT is showing just fine at -13 
> roughly.
> 
> 
> I know I also could turn down the music track. Way down. Then, add a 
> stereo master fader track, and turn it's output volume slider way way up to 
> compensate, but is that really the best methodology? I have to run that thing 
> with no plugs on the master fader up to nearly positive 8 or 9 DB to get the 
> volume back to normal comfortable listening. Remember. I'm trying to 
> compensate for that lower -13DB level going in.
> 
> 
> I don't think the Scarlet has a separate IO path output just for headphones 
> alone, so I can't exactly create a bus in the IO settings, then send to it 
> individually creating a submix.
> 
> 
> On the master fader though, again, going to +8 or 9 DB... yeah! That's barely 
> giving any headroom at all. Maybe I have a ton on the mike, but, yeah. I get 
> I could turn up the output level itself on the vocal track but is that really 
> a safe thing to do? I was always told you wana try keeping your vocal tracks 
> output volume sliders as close to that default 0DB as possible. Only interact 
> with Voiceover on those sliders and crank them as a very last resort. I'm 
> told 

Re: OFB.ME/TALENTMUSICCENTER Clarett 8 PREX help

[TheOreoMonster]

If memory serves correct I believe the second headphone jack can be made to 
take the signal of one of th  output pairs on the back. For example 7/8 or 
9/10, if you have that option enable in Focusrite Control, You can just set the 
headphone bus to output to that pair of outputs and then the second headphone 
jack on the front will receive whatever is sent to the headphone bus as well. 


> On Dec 8, 2019, at 6:42 AM, ⁨Ramy Moustafa Saber رامي مصطفى صابر⁩ 
> <⁨ramy.moustaf...@gmail.com⁩> wrote:
> 
> Hi:Now am using the headphone kac on the back, because i failed using the 
> front ones, can not seprate them at all.
> 
> 
>> On Dec 6, 2019, at 4:34 AM, TheOreoMonster  wrote:
>> 
>> Are you using a headphone amp plugged into one of the outputs on the back, 
>> or are you trying to use the second headphone jack on the unit  for this?
>> 
>>> On Dec 5, 2019, at 4:01 PM, ⁨Ramy Moustafa Saber رامي مصطفى صابر⁩ 
>>> <⁨ramy.moustaf...@gmail.com⁩> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi all:
>>> 
>>> I bought my Clarett 8 Prex from more than 7 month, and i use it with 
>>> happiness, the only thing that i can not configure, is that how can i 
>>> differenciate the outputs, i need to send all my Protools session to main1 
>>> and 2, but my headphone OX to another out etc, can anyone that has this 
>>> card try to help me?
>>> I even set with a sited assistance to make the templet, but we fail in 
>>> doing this.
>>> any help will be highly Appreciated
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>>> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>>> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/409CDDE1-5734-4E70-8C7A-0861BD6EF96D%40gmail.com.
>> 
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/2EBF7D62-60CC-4354-BF75-50D81A556939%40gmail.com.
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/3BDDE1FF-43B1-4F82-B7CD-5AB28F090A82%40gmail.com.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/589384A4-84ED-436D-AF03-CDC3F87B7611%40gmail.com.

Re: Addding more chorus?

[TheOreoMonster]

Once again that depends on what you are looking to double. If you want to 
double all the vocal tracks in the project then put it on that aux. if you only 
want to double some put it on those tracks. Alternatively you can put it on a 
new AUX and send only the tracks you want to double to that AUX without messing 
up the current set up. 


> On Dec 5, 2019, at 8:56 AM, ⁨Ramy Moustafa Saber رامي مصطفى صابر⁩ 
> <⁨ramy.moustaf...@gmail.com⁩> wrote:
> 
> I routed all my Vocal stuff to an ox via bus, so,  must i put the Doubler on 
> the ox or the audio track itself?
> 
>> On Dec 5, 2019, at 3:28 PM, TheOreoMonster  wrote:
>> 
>> That depends on what exactly you are trying to accomplish and how you want 
>> things routed. 
>> 
>> 
>>> On Dec 5, 2019, at 5:14 AM, ⁨Ramy Moustafa Saber رامي مصطفى صابر⁩ 
>>> <⁨ramy.moustaf...@gmail.com⁩> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Ok thanks but should i put the nector on the Vocal ox itself or on every 
>>> mono audio track?
>>> 
>>>> On Dec 5, 2019, at 2:09 AM, TheOreoMonster  
>>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> I can’t speak to that as I no longer have a pro tools license to pull it 
>>>> up in. I have been able to use Nectar 2 successfully in Logic and Reaper 
>>>> but with most Izotope plug ins its a little tricky to get them going 
>>>> sometimes. 
>>>> 
>>>>> On Dec 4, 2019, at 7:01 PM, ⁨Ramy Moustafa Saber رامي مصطفى صابر⁩ 
>>>>> <⁨ramy.moustaf...@gmail.com⁩> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Hi:
>>>>> I have teh nector already, but it seems that it is not accessible at all, 
>>>>> can you tell me how can you use it?
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Dec 5, 2019, at 1:29 AM, ⁨Ramy Moustafa Saber رامي مصطفى صابر⁩ 
>>>>>> <⁨ramy.moustaf...@gmail.com⁩> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Hi all:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> sometimes i got Vocal tracks but not mini, and i need a good Blug-in to 
>>>>>> increase the Vocal tracks, i used the Doubler 4 from Avid and it’s 
>>>>>> working with E-pianos and so on, but with Vocal it is so artificial, 
>>>>>> sometimes i doublicate some Chorus tracks and start moving one of them a 
>>>>>> little forward to give a Vocal sense do not know if  this is good or 
>>>>>> not, but ths is all i can do, if you know any other good plug-in that 
>>>>>> can do the trick, please share.
>>>>>> Thansk
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> -- 
>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>>>>> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>>>>> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/AFAAD598-2750-4EBB-81DA-736BB18530F2%40gmail.com.
>>>> 
>>>> -- 
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>>>> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>>>> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/6ED92351-E1CD-4B9F-A642-9F965970B434%40gmail.com.
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>>> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>>> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/D33DD3BF-5133-4574-987D-59AA5E4CD779%40gmail.com.
>> 
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/0F1DE928-B02B-4E41-A570-D1ED790D0FEC%40gmail.com.
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/EF847FE7-B70F-4C5E-AC13-7BAD83C85370%40gmail.com.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/81C6E1B8-ACD9-4C90-A8CA-AD5586805DF1%40gmail.com.

Re: an alternative to Vocaligne

[TheOreoMonster]

Check the PTAccess Folder as I think there maybe scripts for all of them in 
there. 

> On Dec 5, 2019, at 8:57 AM, ⁨Ramy Moustafa Saber رامي مصطفى صابر⁩ 
> <⁨ramy.moustaf...@gmail.com⁩> wrote:
> 
> Anything of Vocallign will work or spacific version?
> 
> 
>> On Dec 5, 2019, at 3:27 PM, TheOreoMonster  wrote:
>> 
>> I don’t know of anything else like Vocalign short of using something like 
>> Antares Harmony engine or Nectar’s Harmony module to fake the double with a 
>> Unison voice. That being said set up an alert on eBay or reverb and you may 
>> find a deal on someone selling their license at some point. Also Get on the 
>> Vocalign mailing list as they run sales from time to time. 
>> 
>> 
>>> On Dec 5, 2019, at 5:26 AM, ⁨Ramy Moustafa Saber رامي مصطفى صابر⁩ 
>>> <⁨ramy.moustaf...@gmail.com⁩> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi all:
>>> 
>>> Another Vocal question.
>>> I am not able to get the Vocalign these days, so asking if there is any 
>>> alternative to fix vocal tracks to be together?
>>> what i need to fix exactly is that some esses or tees letters can not get 
>>> synced, and the singers can not achieve this, is there a manual way to make 
>>> a tidy vocal track? or i should use Vocalign?
>>> Thanks
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>>> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>>> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/ED34539B-6420-49C1-A5FD-8CD49912DE9E%40gmail.com.
>> 
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/86F85468-07DB-4A92-BB8E-6A7C43788454%40gmail.com.
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/563BD0FE-F1E3-47CE-8BC1-29F941CBDFF1%40gmail.com.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/84518147-D853-4A08-99DA-F52B07FBC9AB%40gmail.com.

Re: OFB.ME/TALENTMUSICCENTER Clarett 8 PREX help

[TheOreoMonster]

Are you using a headphone amp plugged into one of the outputs on the back, or 
are you trying to use the second headphone jack on the unit  for this?

> On Dec 5, 2019, at 4:01 PM, ⁨Ramy Moustafa Saber رامي مصطفى صابر⁩ 
> <⁨ramy.moustaf...@gmail.com⁩> wrote:
> 
> Hi all:
> 
> I bought my Clarett 8 Prex from more than 7 month, and i use it with 
> happiness, the only thing that i can not configure, is that how can i 
> differenciate the outputs, i need to send all my Protools session to main1 
> and 2, but my headphone OX to another out etc, can anyone that has this card 
> try to help me?
> I even set with a sited assistance to make the templet, but we fail in doing 
> this.
> any help will be highly Appreciated
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/409CDDE1-5734-4E70-8C7A-0861BD6EF96D%40gmail.com.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/2EBF7D62-60CC-4354-BF75-50D81A556939%40gmail.com.

Re: Addding more chorus?

[TheOreoMonster]

That depends on what exactly you are trying to accomplish and how you want 
things routed. 


> On Dec 5, 2019, at 5:14 AM, ⁨Ramy Moustafa Saber رامي مصطفى صابر⁩ 
> <⁨ramy.moustaf...@gmail.com⁩> wrote:
> 
> Ok thanks but should i put the nector on the Vocal ox itself or on every mono 
> audio track?
> 
>> On Dec 5, 2019, at 2:09 AM, TheOreoMonster  wrote:
>> 
>> I can’t speak to that as I no longer have a pro tools license to pull it up 
>> in. I have been able to use Nectar 2 successfully in Logic and Reaper but 
>> with most Izotope plug ins its a little tricky to get them going sometimes. 
>> 
>>> On Dec 4, 2019, at 7:01 PM, ⁨Ramy Moustafa Saber رامي مصطفى صابر⁩ 
>>> <⁨ramy.moustaf...@gmail.com⁩> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi:
>>> I have teh nector already, but it seems that it is not accessible at all, 
>>> can you tell me how can you use it?
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> On Dec 5, 2019, at 1:29 AM, ⁨Ramy Moustafa Saber رامي مصطفى صابر⁩ 
>>>> <⁨ramy.moustaf...@gmail.com⁩> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Hi all:
>>>> 
>>>> sometimes i got Vocal tracks but not mini, and i need a good Blug-in to 
>>>> increase the Vocal tracks, i used the Doubler 4 from Avid and it’s working 
>>>> with E-pianos and so on, but with Vocal it is so artificial, sometimes i 
>>>> doublicate some Chorus tracks and start moving one of them a little 
>>>> forward to give a Vocal sense do not know if  this is good or not, but ths 
>>>> is all i can do, if you know any other good plug-in that can do the trick, 
>>>> please share.
>>>> Thansk
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>>> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>>> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/AFAAD598-2750-4EBB-81DA-736BB18530F2%40gmail.com.
>> 
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/6ED92351-E1CD-4B9F-A642-9F965970B434%40gmail.com.
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/D33DD3BF-5133-4574-987D-59AA5E4CD779%40gmail.com.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/0F1DE928-B02B-4E41-A570-D1ED790D0FEC%40gmail.com.

Re: an alternative to Vocaligne

[TheOreoMonster]

I don’t know of anything else like Vocalign short of using something like 
Antares Harmony engine or Nectar’s Harmony module to fake the double with a 
Unison voice. That being said set up an alert on eBay or reverb and you may 
find a deal on someone selling their license at some point. Also Get on the 
Vocalign mailing list as they run sales from time to time. 


> On Dec 5, 2019, at 5:26 AM, ⁨Ramy Moustafa Saber رامي مصطفى صابر⁩ 
> <⁨ramy.moustaf...@gmail.com⁩> wrote:
> 
> Hi all:
> 
> Another Vocal question.
> I am not able to get the Vocalign these days, so asking if there is any 
> alternative to fix vocal tracks to be together?
> what i need to fix exactly is that some esses or tees letters can not get 
> synced, and the singers can not achieve this, is there a manual way to make a 
> tidy vocal track? or i should use Vocalign?
> Thanks
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/ED34539B-6420-49C1-A5FD-8CD49912DE9E%40gmail.com.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/86F85468-07DB-4A92-BB8E-6A7C43788454%40gmail.com.

Re: Addding more chorus?

[TheOreoMonster]

I can’t speak to that as I no longer have a pro tools license to pull it up in. 
I have been able to use Nectar 2 successfully in Logic and Reaper but with most 
Izotope plug ins its a little tricky to get them going sometimes. 

> On Dec 4, 2019, at 7:01 PM, ⁨Ramy Moustafa Saber رامي مصطفى صابر⁩ 
> <⁨ramy.moustaf...@gmail.com⁩> wrote:
> 
> Hi:
> I have teh nector already, but it seems that it is not accessible at all, can 
> you tell me how can you use it?
> 
> 
>> On Dec 5, 2019, at 1:29 AM, ⁨Ramy Moustafa Saber رامي مصطفى صابر⁩ 
>> <⁨ramy.moustaf...@gmail.com⁩> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi all:
>> 
>> sometimes i got Vocal tracks but not mini, and i need a good Blug-in to 
>> increase the Vocal tracks, i used the Doubler 4 from Avid and it’s working 
>> with E-pianos and so on, but with Vocal it is so artificial, sometimes i 
>> doublicate some Chorus tracks and start moving one of them a little forward 
>> to give a Vocal sense do not know if  this is good or not, but ths is all i 
>> can do, if you know any other good plug-in that can do the trick, please 
>> share.
>> Thansk
>> 
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/AFAAD598-2750-4EBB-81DA-736BB18530F2%40gmail.com.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/6ED92351-E1CD-4B9F-A642-9F965970B434%40gmail.com.

Re: Addding more chorus?

[TheOreoMonster]

Antares Harmony engine is probably the best thing I have found for this so far. 
Izotope Nectar does something similar but I haven’t used nectar 3 yet so no 
clue how easy it is to configure. Iotope also has a free vocal doubler plug in 
but it just sounds like a slightly better version of the waves doubler in my  
opinion. 

> On Dec 4, 2019, at 6:29 PM, ⁨Ramy Moustafa Saber رامي مصطفى صابر⁩ 
> <⁨ramy.moustaf...@gmail.com⁩> wrote:
> 
> Hi all:
> 
> sometimes i got Vocal tracks but not mini, and i need a good Blug-in to 
> increase the Vocal tracks, i used the Doubler 4 from Avid and it’s working 
> with E-pianos and so on, but with Vocal it is so artificial, sometimes i 
> doublicate some Chorus tracks and start moving one of them a little forward 
> to give a Vocal sense do not know if  this is good or not, but ths is all i 
> can do, if you know any other good plug-in that can do the trick, please 
> share.
> Thansk
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/2A10E953-5796-4C2B-8BE6-770FC23F45E9%40gmail.com.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/E58BA90B-4F39-4B7A-AE3F-CCB944EEDE8F%40gmail.com.

Re: Looking to PT templets, and need to understand THe Reason for the Headphone send?

[TheOreoMonster]

It is for sending to headphones. You would change the output on those aux 
tracks to whatever outputs on your interface the headphone amp is plugged into 
or if or which ever output your interface will also send to the headphone,. 
It’s usually prefacer so Volume adjustments you make in the DAW won’t affect 
the level sending to the headphones. 

> On Dec 4, 2019, at 6:26 PM, ⁨Ramy Moustafa Saber رامي مصطفى صابر⁩ 
> <⁨ramy.moustaf...@gmail.com⁩> wrote:
> 
> Hi all:
> 
> I’m now studying the Protools Templets and need to understand why each track 
> has a send called headphones, and why it is pre and active, and not like all 
> other sends by passed for instance?
> also, is this for sending this track to headphone or not or it has another 
> Reason?
> Thanks for helping
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/D077A3D3-E0F3-48E9-A0FE-01F36F742214%40gmail.com.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/6D03178A-8F58-4391-804E-FFD00122FAF4%40gmail.com.

Re: Workflow question

[TheOreoMonster]

You can indeed do this with pro tools. Once all the edits are done just 
consolidate the file and you should be able to grab the modified file out of 
the session folder in finder. 


> On Nov 7, 2019, at 6:42 AM, Steve Sparrow  wrote:
> 
> Hi Martin. To my knowledge this is not possible with protools or any other 
> multi track based daw. you will need a two track editor like Sound forge for 
> mac. There is another one called twisted wav that works with mac. i think 
> audacity might do this too and it works with mac. How ever I don’t use 
> audacity, so not sure about this. 
> Steve
> 
>> On 7 Nov 2019, at 8:01 pm, Martin (Punky) Sopart  wrote:
>> 
>> Hello all Pro Tools experts!
>> 
>> Is there a fast way - destructive and without the need to bounce - to edit
>> an inported wave file.
>> Ddesired edits are truncating beginnings/ends and normalizing.
>> 
>> The goal should be editing, saving the sission and grabbing the modified
>> original wave file via Finder.
>> 
>> In the past I did this with another app on a Windows machine and want to do
>> it on my Mac now.
>> Especially with Pro Tools.
>> 
>> Thank you and best! / Martin
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/006901d59552%245ef63bb0%241ce2b310%24%40cakewalker.de.
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/0D7D6821-8EB4-4A70-9085-C465360FAE37%40sparrowsound.com.au.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/63C55907-94C7-4882-AD45-E7BF47FED69F%40gmail.com.

Re: One final question of my own about instantiating reverbs

[TheOreoMonster]

Mono reverbs and delays have their place. But this also varies from DAW to DAW. 
Logic  for example will let you do a mono to stereo instance of something like 
a reverb or delay. Not sure if PT does. If it doesn’t, then yes you will have 
to send the mono vocal to a stereo AUX track if you want a stereo reverb. 


> On Nov 2, 2019, at 11:32 AM, Niklas Karlsson  
> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I guess another disadvantage to put the reverb directly on the vocal track is 
> that, if it’s a mono track, you will not get the stereo effect of the reverb 
> itself.
> 
> Best,
> Niklas
> 
> Skickat från min iPhone
> 
>> 2 nov. 2019 kl. 16:13 skrev TheOreoMonster :
>> 
>> IF you only have one vocal track or one track that needs the reverb, there 
>> is nothing wrong with putting it on the track as an insert and adjusting the 
>> wet dry mix in the plug in. Busses make more sense if you are sending 
>> multiple tracks. 
>> If someone uses a lot of track templates however and they already have a. 
>> Template with an aux track with the verb they want on it, they may just  
>> load that template and route the single vocal track to it. It saves them the 
>> time of instantiating and setting up the reverb in an  insert. 
>> 
>> 
>>> On Nov 2, 2019, at 9:55 AM, Christopher Gilland  
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> While we're on the subject of helping Danny with his verb issue, I figured 
>>> I'd ask this question.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> When, if ever, is it appropriate to put a reverb plug directly on an insert 
>>> of an audio or mono track?
>>> 
>>> 
>>> I usually have been putting the reverb directly on one of the inserts of 
>>> the audio track for my vocal, then simply going into the plug itself, and 
>>> adjusting the wet/dry mix ratio within the plug itself.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Evidently, that isn't the best way to do this though. Everyone I've seen 
>>> online, and read about seems to do it via sends to an AUX track instead. I 
>>> could see this if you're trying to take multiple tracks, and adjust the 
>>> reverb together for all tracks, but if you only have one lead vocal track, 
>>> and that's all you wanna verb, then would my method not work?
>>> 
>>> 
>>> I'm just trying, ultimately, to figure out what things to ask myself to 
>>> determine what would be the best workflow. I know it will depend on a 
>>> application per application scenareo basis, but... yeah...
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Chris.
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>>> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>>> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>> https://eur04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgroups.google.com%2Fd%2Fmsgid%2Fptaccess%2F090f9fff-03f4-20a9-b481-65b859917bf1%2540gmail.comdata=02%7C01%7C%7C6447556ac8fa44aa03a208d75fa7428f%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435%7C1%7C0%7C637083044280727163sdata=u3ASh2sNkYgmLLi25%2BxKUoKX9gKNLrP%2Fg%2BfEcIZ46Zk%3Dreserved=0.
>> 
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>> https://eur04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgroups.google.com%2Fd%2Fmsgid%2Fptaccess%2F6093BF50-45B5-4156-ADF1-64FD1EE4AAED%2540gmail.comdata=02%7C01%7C%7C6447556ac8fa44aa03a208d75fa7428f%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435%7C1%7C0%7C637083044280727163sdata=uWrHduKJJW9QiO5EJl%2BTu4kA%2BWgM56voBo2kYCACqKQ%3Dreserved=0.
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/HE1PR0301MB23462B3B6A6B745087CBD4E29C7D0%40HE1PR0301MB2346.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/FD923877-7BED-4B3C-80B2-F5F21AC58119%40gmail.com.

Re: Don't know what I'm doing wrong, please help!

[TheOreoMonster]

The steps Christopheroutlined should work. As I stated in an earlier email, 
Starting in Pro Tools 9 I think it was you could just add an AUX track to the 
project and then route your Audio/Midi tracks to the aux track with out having 
to mess with buss routings anymore. 

The edit/mix group idea however would not be appropriate in this case. 


> On Nov 2, 2019, at 9:45 AM, Christopher Gilland  wrote:
> 
> I see the entire problem.
> 
> 
> You're routing is a bit off.
> 
> 
> Try this.
> 
> 
> 1. Create your Connection audio track.
> 
> 
> 2. Create your radio FX audio track.
> 
> 
> 3. On your Connections track, interact with sends A/F.
> 
> 
> 4. On Send A, VO+Space on the top up, and go down to new track. Be careful 
> here. Not the track sub menu. It's below that. It will literally say "New 
> Track". This will force ProTools to create the AUX track for you, with all 
> routing set correctly.
> 
> 
> 5. Now, go to your Radio FX track. We're almost going to do the same thing 
> here, but not quite. You now have already set an AUX track, so interact again 
> with sends A/F, only this time, again, now, we're on the radio FX track, not 
> the connectionstrack.
> 
> 
> 6. On Send A of the Radio FX track, go into the popup for send A. This time, 
> instead of going to new track, go to the tracks sub menu, then find the AUX 
> track you created in the previous steps. Now, things should be routed.
> 
> 
> 7. Now, go rename the AUX track to something more recognizable: "Group FX"
> 
> 
> 8. Finally, go to the AUX track, and interact with inserts, not sends, but 
> inserts, A-F. On insert A, instantiate your reverb. We're doing this on the 
> AUX track, not your two audio tracks. Beware.
> 
> 
> There. Now play it back. You should definitely hear the reverb, if you did 
> this correctly.
> 
> 
> On another note for the list entirely, given that he's naming that 3rd track, 
> "Group FX" it sounds like he's just trying to group both the audio tracks 
> into one, so he can instantiate reverb across both at the same time. I could 
> be wrong, so Danny, let us know if I'm incorrect on this theory.
> 
> 
> If that is the case, would it not be easier for him to create an edit/mix 
> group, then assign both of those audio tracks to that group, then just apply 
> the reverb to the group? The only thing I could think that may not work for 
> that method is the fact, if he does it as an edit/mix group, wouldn't that 
> mean he'd destructively have to print the verb directly to the track with 
> something like audiosuite? If so, then, yeah, definitely not probably what 
> he's looking for. I just thought however I'd mention.
> 
> 
> Chris.
> 
> On 11/02/2019 01:14 AM, Dammie Onafeko wrote:
>> Hi guys:
>> 
>> I did what yo'll told me to do and I can't still hear the reverb. This
>> is what I have:
>> a track Connection, another called Radio Effect, and the Aux called Group 
>> Verb.
>> I routed sends oA of Connections and Radio Effect to Group Verb.
>> Then I go into sends A of Group Verb, VO space on it to open the menu,
>> and went down to bus 3, 4.
>> I did same thing for Connections and Radio Effect.
>> While in the sends menu, I went to the level fader and took it to -15
>> I don't how to control the dryness and wetness.
>> When I play the audio back, I couldn't hear the reverb effect. What am
>> I still doing wrong? Somebody help!
>> 
>> Best,
>> 
>> Dammie
>> 
>> On 11/1/19, TheOreoMonster  wrote:
>>> When you use a send, you ae sending a copy of the audio signal So in essence
>>> you are creating a wet/dry blend. This is useful for things like reverb and
>>> delays  or other time based effects. When you put the reverb or delay on the
>>> aux track, you will want to set it to be 100% wet. Then the send level will
>>> act as the wet dry balance. Since the original audio track’s output is still
>>> going to the master fader, and the AUX’s output is also going to the master
>>> fader, the send level will set how much of that dry signal” gets pushed into
>>> the reverb and as a result how much reverb’ed signal shows up in the master
>>> fader.
>>> Chaning the output of the track to the AUX or bus, means you are sending all
>>> the tracks signal to a bus and not a duplicate of it as  you would be if you
>>> use a send. A useful example for this use case is lets say you have 5 vocal
>>> tracks. You can set the output of those 5 tracks to a AUX or bus, and now
>>> you can just EQ and compress all your vocals and use that AUX/Bus fader as a
>&g

Re: Don't know what I'm doing wrong, please help!

[TheOreoMonster]

When you use a send, you ae sending a copy of the audio signal So in essence 
you are creating a wet/dry blend. This is useful for things like reverb and 
delays  or other time based effects. When you put the reverb or delay on the 
aux track, you will want to set it to be 100% wet. Then the send level will act 
as the wet dry balance. Since the original audio track’s output is still going 
to the master fader, and the AUX’s output is also going to the master fader, 
the send level will set how much of that dry signal” gets pushed into the 
reverb and as a result how much reverb’ed signal shows up in the master fader. 
Chaning the output of the track to the AUX or bus, means you are sending all 
the tracks signal to a bus and not a duplicate of it as  you would be if you 
use a send. A useful example for this use case is lets say you have 5 vocal 
tracks. You can set the output of those 5 tracks to a AUX or bus, and now you 
can just EQ and compress all your vocals and use that AUX/Bus fader as a master 
fader for the vocals. But since the AUX/bus is still being sent to the master 
fader you still get the vocals in the mix. 



> On Nov 1, 2019, at 4:53 PM, Christopher Gilland  wrote:
> 
> So, what is the difference in using a send on an audio track, sending to an 
> AUX track, then letting PT do the routing, vs. setting your output IO of an 
> audio track to a bus, then going to an AUX track, and setting the input to 
> that same bus, and leaving, on the AUX track, your output IO set to your main 
> out L/R?
> 
> 
> IN other words, what I'm asking is, what's the difference in doing this with 
> a send, vs doing it via your IO paths without a send involved?
> 
> 
> I've seen it done both ways. I know there is a key major difference, and a 
> reason why you'd do the ladder, but I just can't seem to grasp why?
> 
> 
> Chris.
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/4f5216dd-0016-a2c2-501e-33750b22bcb4%40gmail.com.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/4B1161A7-A4A8-4DC8-9C1A-2894D82AF1AA%40gmail.com.

Re: Don't know what I'm doing wrong, please help!

[TheOreoMonster]

If I am not mistaken starting in Pro Tools 9 you could just create an AUX 
track, it automatically does the bus routing for you now. But you want to route 
the two audio tracks to the AUX tracks and not the other way around. Also 
PreFader means that the track is sent to the AUX track before the track fader. 
That means adjusting the track fader won’t adjust  the level being sent to the 
AUX track. In order to adjust the level being sent to the aux track you will 
have to use the send level. Post fader means that when you adjust the track 
fader it will also  mess with what’s being sent to the AUX track. Sending to 
the AUX pre effects means the signal is sent to the AUX before any insert FX. 

> On Nov 1, 2019, at 4:21 PM, Christopher Gilland  wrote:
> 
> Niklas,
> 
> 
> The way you describe this, wouldn't that also send the dry signal from the 
> audio track? What if you only wanted to send the trail effects of the verb, 
> but nothing more. You only wanted to send wet, not dry? Is that where you 
> change the send on the audio track to prefader instead of post? I never 
> totally have gotten that concept. I've tried to, but it just doesn't make 
> sense.
> 
> 
> I think where I'm getting confused is, I'm not understanding what is meant by 
> the send coming before or after the effects chain.
> 
> 
> Chris.
> 
> On 11/01/2019 08:11 AM, Niklas Karlsson wrote:
>> Hi,
>> 
>> You need to set the input of the AUX track to a bus and then use the sends 
>> on the audio track to send the audio to the reverb.
>> The send must point at the same bus as the input of the AUX track.
>> 
>> In the sends window, you can choose how much of the audio you want to send 
>> to the reverb, the more you send, the more reverb the audio gets.
>> 
>> Hope that helps! :)
>> 
>> Best,
>> Niklas
>> 
>> Skickat från min iPhone
>> 
>>> 1 nov. 2019 kl. 06:56 skrev Dammie Onafeko :
>>> 
>>> Hi guys:
>>> 
>>> A glorious day to you all. I'm trying to instantiate a reverb on two
>>> tracks, so I created an AUx track routed to both audio tracks. I
>>> insert the reverb on the AUx track. Afterwards, I played the tracks,
>>> but I can hear rverb effect. Am I suppose to change the Io or the
>>> output? Please help! I don't know what I'm doing wrong. Thanks!
>>> 
>>> Best,
>>> 
>>> Dammie
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>>> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>>> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/CAN%3Dh5d9vY-1Q-36CTyq2Z8Q2SBUr_8MLVWj%2BpgXeXXLtdJGJCA%40mail.gmail.com.
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/a66ac003-b23a-a0f6-3f43-f99aad3fe546%40gmail.com.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/A904B97E-B55A-42F1-BD7D-F9C4E8118C95%40gmail.com.

Re: Disaster!

[TheOreoMonster]

Chris, he said do a web search, not an App Store search. They are still 
available on apple’s servers and in the App Store you just won’t fine it 
through a store search. For some reason they stop putting the old versions in 
your purchases When Sierra came out and thats why el cap is the last one you 
see there. But a web search should turn them up on apple’s server and then link 
you to the App Store to download the more recent ones. And Also,  MacOS 
installed l licensed from your account wouldn’t work on his computer unless you 
were willing to sign in with your Apple ID. Anyways, here is the link you  need 
for Mojave. Download and install from his machine. 

https://apps.apple.com/us/app/macos-mojave/id1398502828?mt=12 … 



> On Oct 25, 2019, at 4:52 PM, Christopher Gilland  
> wrote:
> 
> incorrect. We have already tried that. no results whatsoever pop up when 
> doing that search from the app store regardless who's computer I use.
> 
> Apple is telling me that Mojave is not even available on their servers any 
> longer. I know this is not true, as, explain this one to me. If that was the 
> case, then why on my friends computer was I able to go into Internet recovery 
> and when they are, after selecting our Internet network, it specifically told 
> me downloading 10.14 Mojave, and there was a progress bar going across the 
> screen, and also an estimated time which kept moving.
> 
> The problem is, once it was done downloading, it gave me a screen with the 
> globe and a white triangle inside that globe. Below that, it's simply said 
> support.apple.com and that is as far as it would go. It would not do anything 
> past that.
> 
> if truly Mojave was not available on their servers anymore as Apple told me, 
> then why on earth did it fully download evidently from the Internet recovery? 
> That's what doesn't make any sense to me. I'm being told one thing, yet the 
> mat is clearly showing completely different results. just to be completely 
> transparent, this process with Internet recovery was done on his computer not 
> mine. Further, when I searched for Mojave, that also was done on his 
> computer, and even was done under his Apple ID, not mine.
> 
> i'm not sure if you sent this to me privately, or if this was sent on the 
> list, but just in case the ladder, this is getting a bit off topic, so going 
> forward, I ask anyone to please respond to me privately if you have any 
> further suggestions.
> 
> Chris.
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
>> On Oct 25, 2019, at 16:43, John Gunn  wrote:
>> 
>> Chris,
>> On the machine all you have to do is do a web search for Mojave installer 
>> download that to that machine. The reason your install didn’t work because 
>> you installed on your machine if I’m not mistaken. So in a nutshell, just do 
>> a search for Mojave installer on that machine and reinstalled and that 
>> should work.
>> 
>> Sent from my iPhone
>> 
>>> On Oct 25, 2019, at 3:07 PM, Christopher Gilland  
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> So, I am helping a friend of mine, who admittedly, did something against 
>>> probably better judgement of listening to advice. Now, he/she has gotten 
>>> themselves in a bit of a mess.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Though people have been warning for now to basically avoid Catalina like 
>>> the plague, as plugins often stop working, PT itself isn't certified and 
>>> has major issues, heck, not that this is exactly OT, but even Reaper 
>>> apparently has major issues and won't run...
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Anyway, they upgraded their mac mini 2018 to Catalina. I'm not sure how 
>>> much was them not listening, vs. how much was them not seeing the warnings 
>>> that have been discussed in various places.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> I happened to have an old Mojave installer lying around on my mac from 
>>> earlier. So, I managed to use Disk MakerX and create a bootable USB drive 
>>> of the Mojave installer, but evidently, it appears to be dammaged.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Of corse, we didn't know this until the phase of reinstallation after 
>>> repartitioning their Catalina Macintosh HD, so, basically now, their drive 
>>> went to being wiped. I wound up having to do an internet network install, 
>>> and get them back on Catalina, so they'd have at least something usable. 
>>> All be it, PT is out the question, but at least their system would boot.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> I tried doing command+option+shift+R to get into internet recovery which 
>>> would download the version of the OS their system came with originally, 
>>> which was Mojave. Unfortunately, this isn't working. When I looked in my 
>>> purchase history in the app store, I cannot find Mohave in the history 
>>> dating all the way back to 2010, which obviously, Mojave wasn't in 
>>> existance at that point, so if I don't see it going that far back, then we 
>>> gotta problem.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> I checked, but I do not have a Super Duper backup of Mojave. The only thing 
>>> I have is one of Sierra 10.12, and another of an early seed 10.15 

Re: VOCR and iMac 27

[TheOreoMonster]

Contact the waves support number for your country/region and let them  know you 
are blind and need help authorizing the software. They will remote into your 
system and do the authorization process for you. 


> On Oct 19, 2019, at 11:45 AM, Martin (Punky) Sopart  
> wrote:
> 
> Hello Jesse!
> 
> Regarding Waves Central VOCR gets no access to all the informations on screen.
> Using the touchpad helps but freezes the app.
> 
> Superior drummer 2 and some Isotope stuff worked fine using VOCR, but for 
> Waves I needed a remote assistance.
> 
> Best! / Martin
> 
> 
> On Oct 19, 2019, at 17:01, Chi Kim  > wrote:
> 
> Hey Jesse,
> 
> 
> 
> I assuming you're using Tesseract version since you can't run Pro Tools on 
> Catalina.
> 
> The result of VOCR depends on the what Tesseract gives, so there isn't really 
> much you can do in order to improve.
> 
> The new VOCR has better result from using the OCR engine from built-into 
> Catalina.
> 
> Hopefully when Pro Tools becomes compatible with Catalina, more people could 
> take advantage of it.
> 
> Also sometimes turning off VoiceOver visuals with vo+command+f11 helps.
> 
> VoiceOver cursor indicator and captions panels get overlaid on top of a 
> window, so it can interfere with the screenshot.
> 
> Lastly, there's a chance that there isn't many words on the screen.
> 
> The interface could be consist of just icons, sliders, and knobs instead of 
> words.
> 
> Thus, you might be reading what Tesseract is trying to make words out of 
> pictures that are not actual words.
> 
> 
> 
> Chi
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On 10/18/2019 5:05 PM, Jesse Kragiel wrote:
>> Hi! I'm super late to the VOCR party, and I'm ashamed of that. I'm running a 
>> 27 inch iMac 5K and VOCR is hit and miss inside of plugin windows such as 
>> Waves stuff. Am I doing something wrong, or is this just the nature of the 
>> beast? Where it works, it's amazing, but where it doesn't, it speaks 
>> gibberish. Any suggestions to optimize things better?
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
>> .
>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/62852340-6667-49bd-aee6-8d0e4ad81c70%40googlegroups.com
>>  
>> .
> 
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
> .
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/DM6PR05MB5817A780B2EBF069835F4B2DCE6F0%40DM6PR05MB5817.namprd05.prod.outlook.com
>  
> .
> 
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
> .
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/C27A6773-C0DC-450B-BAF7-3DA58CA8DA7E%40cakewalker.de
>  
> .

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/0C02E2C5-F0E9-4E34-B792-317DF87B315A%40gmail.com.

Re: Flotools sounds

[TheOreoMonster]

Do you have system sounds routed through your Focusrite?  The FloTools sounds 
are most likely using system sounds routing and not VoiceOver’s. 


> On Oct 10, 2019, at 12:32 PM,   
> wrote:
> 
> That’s actually what’s weird, I actually root VO through my iMac but that 
> particular sound comes through my Focusrite. 
>  
>  
> From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com  
> mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com>> On Behalf Of 
> Slau Halatyn
> Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2019 11:03 AM
> To: PTAccess List  >
> Subject: Re: Flotools sounds
>  
> Woah! You're routing VoiceOver through your main monitors?! No wonder… Most 
> people route VoiceOver through their computer's system sound whether it's 
> laptop or iMac, etc.
> 
> 
>> On Oct 10, 2019, at 10:26 AM, mcdiem...@gmail.com 
>>  wrote:
>>  
>> That’d be great. It can be pretty frightening when that pops through all of 
>> the monitors when trying to adjust something on the fly when listening up 
>> loud. 
>>  
>>  
>> From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com 
>> > > On Behalf Of Slau Halatyn
>> Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2019 9:46 AM
>> To: PTAccess List > >
>> Subject: Re: Flotools sounds
>>  
>> Hi Matt,
>> Ah, OK, that tiny sound is there to indicate that a macro has successfully 
>> been executed. With the insert menu popping up, however, that's a VoiceOver 
>> sound and not anything to do with Flo Tools. We haven't gotten into 
>> customization of sound effects with Flo Tools in order to try and keep a 
>> consistent experience and, frankly, it would mean quite a lot of 
>> programming. If that little sound bothers you, I can give you pretty simple 
>> instructions on how and what to delete in the script. Let me know. Cheers,
>> Slau
>>  
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> On Oct 10, 2019, at 9:34 AM, >> > >> > wrote:
>>>  
>>> Here’s an example. 
>>> If I am focused on a track and insert a has a plug, if I press one twice 
>>> quickly to open the plug there is a beep.  In fact the same sound heard in 
>>> your other example (IE) unsoloing all tracks.
>>> HTH. 
>>>   
>>>  
>>> From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com  
>>> mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com>> On Behalf Of 
>>> Slau Halatyn
>>> Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2019 9:28 AM
>>> To: PTAccess List >> >
>>> Subject: Re: Flotools sounds
>>>  
>>> Hi Matt,
>>>  
>>> Nmm, I'm not sure what you mean and which sound you're referring to. Flo 
>>> Tools itself isn't supposed to make any particular sound except for when 
>>> performing lengthier tasks like unmuting, unsoloing or deselecting all 
>>> tracks. Other than that, there's the level monitor but that doesn't work in 
>>> the plug-in window as far as I recall. You If there's a macro that's stuck 
>>> in some kind of loop (which I've never seen), you can go to the Keyboard 
>>> Maestro menu extra and choose to cancel all macros. LMK if that helps and 
>>> we can take it further to figure it out.
>>> Best,
>>> Slau
>>>  
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
 On Oct 10, 2019, at 9:22 AM, mcdiem...@gmail.com 
  wrote:
  
 I’m sure this has been covered before so forgive me, but I couldn’t seem 
 to locate an answer. How do I turn off the flotools/ KM sounds.  
 Specifically the beep sound that occurs when a plug opens or when you are 
 at the top of the plugin menu? 
 Thanks. 
 Best:
 Matt Diemert
 www.mattcarsonmusic.com 
  
  
 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
 .
 To view this discussion on the web visit 
 https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/00e701d57f6d%24d3dcbf80%247b963e80%24%40gmail.com
  
 .
>>> 
>>>  
>>> -- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>>> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>>> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
>>> .
>>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/FE49DA23-13B9-4E13-BE6F-0DB32AD3C9E6%40gmail.com
>>>  
>>> .
>>>  
>>> -- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 

Re: Flotools sounds

[TheOreoMonster]

Also, not sure if most are aware you can adjust VoiceOver’s Volume independent 
of System volume whether they are routed to the same output or not. Its 
VO+Command+Shift+Up/down  in HighSierra and later and VO+Command+up/Down in 
Sierra and earlier. 
> On Oct 10, 2019, at 11:05 AM, Slau Halatyn  wrote:
> 
> Not to mention, the system sounds are a fraction of the level of VoiceOver, 
> so there's that too :)
> 
> 
>> On Oct 10, 2019, at 11:01 AM, TheOreoMonster > <mailto:monkeypushe...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>> 
>> You could also route your systems sounds to the built in speaker while still 
>> routing VoiceOver to your monitors. That way  those sounds don’t blast 
>> through your monitors. 
>> 
>> 
>>> On Oct 10, 2019, at 10:26 AM, >> <mailto:mcdiem...@gmail.com>> >> <mailto:mcdiem...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> That’d be great. It can be pretty frightening when that pops through all of 
>>> the monitors when trying to adjust something on the fly when listening up 
>>> loud. 
>>>  
>>>  
>>> From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com <mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com> 
>>> mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com>> On Behalf Of 
>>> Slau Halatyn
>>> Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2019 9:46 AM
>>> To: PTAccess List >> <mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com>>
>>> Subject: Re: Flotools sounds
>>>  
>>> Hi Matt,
>>> Ah, OK, that tiny sound is there to indicate that a macro has successfully 
>>> been executed. With the insert menu popping up, however, that's a VoiceOver 
>>> sound and not anything to do with Flo Tools. We haven't gotten into 
>>> customization of sound effects with Flo Tools in order to try and keep a 
>>> consistent experience and, frankly, it would mean quite a lot of 
>>> programming. If that little sound bothers you, I can give you pretty simple 
>>> instructions on how and what to delete in the script. Let me know. Cheers,
>>> Slau
>>>  
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> On Oct 10, 2019, at 9:34 AM, >>> <mailto:mcdiem...@gmail.com>> >>> <mailto:mcdiem...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>  
>>>> Here’s an example. 
>>>> If I am focused on a track and insert a has a plug, if I press one twice 
>>>> quickly to open the plug there is a beep.  In fact the same sound heard in 
>>>> your other example (IE) unsoloing all tracks.
>>>> HTH. 
>>>>   
>>>>  
>>>> From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com <mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com> 
>>>> mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com>> On Behalf 
>>>> Of Slau Halatyn
>>>> Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2019 9:28 AM
>>>> To: PTAccess List >>> <mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com>>
>>>> Subject: Re: Flotools sounds
>>>>  
>>>> Hi Matt,
>>>>  
>>>> Nmm, I'm not sure what you mean and which sound you're referring to. Flo 
>>>> Tools itself isn't supposed to make any particular sound except for when 
>>>> performing lengthier tasks like unmuting, unsoloing or deselecting all 
>>>> tracks. Other than that, there's the level monitor but that doesn't work 
>>>> in the plug-in window as far as I recall. You If there's a macro that's 
>>>> stuck in some kind of loop (which I've never seen), you can go to the 
>>>> Keyboard Maestro menu extra and choose to cancel all macros. LMK if that 
>>>> helps and we can take it further to figure it out.
>>>> Best,
>>>> Slau
>>>>  
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> On Oct 10, 2019, at 9:22 AM, mcdiem...@gmail.com 
>>>>> <mailto:mcdiem...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>  
>>>>> I’m sure this has been covered before so forgive me, but I couldn’t seem 
>>>>> to locate an answer. How do I turn off the flotools/ KM sounds.  
>>>>> Specifically the beep sound that occurs when a plug opens or when you are 
>>>>> at the top of the plugin menu? 
>>>>> Thanks. 
>>>>> Best:
>>>>> Matt Diemert
>>>>> www.mattcarsonmusic.com <http://www.mattcarsonmusic.com/>
>>>>>  
>>>>>  
>>>>> -- 
>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>>>>> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receivi

Re: Flotools sounds

[TheOreoMonster]

You could also route your systems sounds to the built in speaker while still 
routing VoiceOver to your monitors. That way  those sounds don’t blast through 
your monitors. 


> On Oct 10, 2019, at 10:26 AM,   
> wrote:
> 
> That’d be great. It can be pretty frightening when that pops through all of 
> the monitors when trying to adjust something on the fly when listening up 
> loud.
>  
>  
> From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com  On Behalf Of Slau 
> Halatyn
> Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2019 9:46 AM
> To: PTAccess List 
> Subject: Re: Flotools sounds
>  
> Hi Matt,
> Ah, OK, that tiny sound is there to indicate that a macro has successfully 
> been executed. With the insert menu popping up, however, that's a VoiceOver 
> sound and not anything to do with Flo Tools. We haven't gotten into 
> customization of sound effects with Flo Tools in order to try and keep a 
> consistent experience and, frankly, it would mean quite a lot of programming. 
> If that little sound bothers you, I can give you pretty simple instructions 
> on how and what to delete in the script. Let me know. Cheers,
> Slau
>  
> 
> 
>> On Oct 10, 2019, at 9:34 AM, > > > > wrote:
>>  
>> Here’s an example. 
>> If I am focused on a track and insert a has a plug, if I press one twice 
>> quickly to open the plug there is a beep.  In fact the same sound heard in 
>> your other example (IE) unsoloing all tracks.
>> HTH. 
>>   
>>  
>> From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com  
>> mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com>> On Behalf Of 
>> Slau Halatyn
>> Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2019 9:28 AM
>> To: PTAccess List > >
>> Subject: Re: Flotools sounds
>>  
>> Hi Matt,
>>  
>> Nmm, I'm not sure what you mean and which sound you're referring to. Flo 
>> Tools itself isn't supposed to make any particular sound except for when 
>> performing lengthier tasks like unmuting, unsoloing or deselecting all 
>> tracks. Other than that, there's the level monitor but that doesn't work in 
>> the plug-in window as far as I recall. You If there's a macro that's stuck 
>> in some kind of loop (which I've never seen), you can go to the Keyboard 
>> Maestro menu extra and choose to cancel all macros. LMK if that helps and we 
>> can take it further to figure it out.
>> Best,
>> Slau
>>  
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> On Oct 10, 2019, at 9:22 AM, mcdiem...@gmail.com 
>>>  wrote:
>>>  
>>> I’m sure this has been covered before so forgive me, but I couldn’t seem to 
>>> locate an answer. How do I turn off the flotools/ KM sounds.  Specifically 
>>> the beep sound that occurs when a plug opens or when you are at the top of 
>>> the plugin menu? 
>>> Thanks. 
>>> Best:
>>> Matt Diemert
>>> www.mattcarsonmusic.com 
>>>  
>>>  
>>> -- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>>> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>>> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
>>> .
>>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/00e701d57f6d%24d3dcbf80%247b963e80%24%40gmail.com
>>>  
>>> .
>> 
>>  
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
>> .
>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/FE49DA23-13B9-4E13-BE6F-0DB32AD3C9E6%40gmail.com
>>  
>> .
>>  
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
>> .
>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/00f801d57f6f%2460609f20%242121dd60%24%40gmail.com
>>  
>> .
> 
>  
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
> .
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> 

Re: Flotools inspector not working.

[TheOreoMonster]

If its anything like Flogic, it’s Shift+Slash to toggle the inspector on/off 
and not just slash. Also some commands are probably global and will work 
whether the inspector is on or off. 

> On Sep 26, 2019, at 8:55 PM, Rory McDonald  wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> I've restarted the computer to no effect. Hitting / does nothing, nor do any 
> of the single key commands like s for solo and so on. I have not tried any 
> flotools commands such as command F1 or 2, but I imagine if the inspector 
> isn't working they probably won't. Any ideas on what to try? I originally 
> thought it was that keyboard maestro wasn't running, but even with it running 
> I'm having no luck.
> Any help would be appreciated. 
> Rory
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/9B31B3E5-1220-4476-A76E-E91DE18C57A0%40rogers.com.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/3EA400A9-BA77-4A1C-8FEE-640ABD135406%40gmail.com.

Re: any better accessible pluggins bundle the community could recommend?

[TheOreoMonster]

You mention pro tools presets, If you are only using the presets and not taking 
the time to dial in things like EQ  and etc Then I am not sure recommending new 
plug ins will do the trick. Especially with EQ plug ins presets are a rough 
estimation at best as there is no way to know what the source will sound like 
since everyone is using different gear to capture it.   Compression presets may 
get you a little closer in the ballpark but you may still need to adjust things 
like the threshold or ratio to dial it in a bit. I’d recommend instead of 
spending money in search of better presets to spend some time instead and get 
more similar with the basics of the tools you are having trouble with. If I 
misunderstood the question and you aren’t mostly relying on presets, I 
apologize. 


> On Aug 28, 2019, at 12:22 AM, Dammie Onafeko  wrote:
> 
> Hi guys:
> 
> A wonderful Wednesday to you al. I need better accessible plugins
> apart from the ProTools presets. The ProTools presets don't seem to
> give me all I want. The Izotopes Music Essentials bundles I bought 6
> weeks ago is not that better either. In the EQ of the Music Essential
> bundle, that is the Nectar, Ozone 8, & Neutron 8 or so, there's just a
> single factory preset. What plugins do you guys for the most part use
> and are confident of their efficiency? I'd greatly appreciate every
> contributions. Thanks y'all!
> 
> Best,
> 
> Dammie
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/CAN%3Dh5d9dSjjRgUj2SYZRCfThNi3c%3D8bRbBNDjrf4Vsb7X6fBvA%40mail.gmail.com.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/D6AE6AE4-1497-44FD-B17C-D9CED652E464%40gmail.com.

Re: Instantiating pluggins but ...

[TheOreoMonster]

Yes two different ways to accomplish the same task. The advantage of writing 
automation is that the sound  isn’t printed to the audio and can be undone 
later by deleting the automation. 

> On Aug 27, 2019, at 6:02 PM, Christopher Gilland  
> wrote:
> 
> Actually, no. It doesn't; I'm still a bit confused.
> 
> Wouldn't the scenareo you describe be better suited by writing effect 
> automation to the track over that five second selection? I guess what I'm 
> saying is, what would be the advantage of using one over the other, or is 
> this one of those cases where some choose a ford, some choose a lamborghini. 
> Either will get you to the same destination. It's just which one you prefer.
> 
> Chris.
> 
> On 08/27/2019 06:11 PM, Dammie Onafeko wrote:
>> Hi Christopher:
>> Let me clear the confusion real quick. The difference is that
>> instantiating the plugin in using the Insert apply the effect to the
>> whole track. Instantiating through the audio suite in the meanu
>> applies the effect to a selected portion of audio in the track. Let
>> say you want 5seconds  of a 15 seconds audio to sound like it's coming
>> from a transistor radio. You can easily make your 5secs insertion
>> using the up and down arrows, for instace. Then VO plus M to bring up
>> the menu and go for audio suite to select what you need. Once your
>> desired choice is rendered, the selected audio portion takes the form
>> of the effect applied, leaving the rest of the audio portion in the
>> track untouched.
>> Hope this clears the confusion Chris.
>> On 8/27/19, Christopher Gilland  wrote:
>>> I'm a little confused.
>>> 
>>> What is the difference in using Audio Suite vs just simply instantiating
>>> the plugin on an insert of a track?
>>> 
>>> Chris.
>>> 
>>> On 08/27/2019 05:32 PM, Dammie Onafeko wrote:
 Hi guys:
 
 A great afternoon to you all. I'm encountering something strange. I'm
 instantiating plugins on a clip through the audio suit but the plugins
 don't seem to be applied. When I preview processing, I could hear what
 I'm applying on the clip. However, once I rendered it, close the
 window, and play the track , it sounds the same as though I never
 applied any plugins to it. Please help! I don't know what I'm doing
 wrong. Anyone with an idea of what could happening? I would greatly
 appreciate the support. Thanks!
 
 Best,
 
 Dammie
 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>>> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>>> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/ae175ae7-f7a6-4903-ab0d-0aea24ad873a%40gmail.com.
>>> 
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/5649633a-d6a2-03a3-852b-cb9e26beff08%40gmail.com.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/78E92CC0-8E86-4C32-9CB3-D3F7ABDD397C%40gmail.com.

Re: A quick vocal question

[TheOreoMonster]

Try to think what made  the flawless take so flawless, and how you can 
duplicate it? Is the song  in his sweet spot range wise, if not consider 
changing the key. Should be easy enough to do with a high quality pitch plug 
in. 


> On Aug 15, 2019, at 5:22 AM, Christopher Gilland  
> wrote:
> 
> So... I've run into a situation which I haven't yet in all my time recording 
> had happen. Quite frankly, this might be the first, but I'm damn sure it 
> won't be the last, so I'd rather figure out now early in my learning process 
> how to deal with this.
> 
> I've got a vocalist who's recording lead vocals in my studio. Problem is, at 
> one point, they were not confident at all. I mean it was sow'w'w! sad! It 
> broke my heart, literally every day watching them try so hard through their 
> sessions to bang out a vocal and stay on key with good breathing technique, 
> etc.
> 
> Part of being a producer can, not always, but sometimes can! as in this case, 
> involve having a vocal coach. In this case that was me.
> 
> I kept trying to encourage the poor guy, and tell him, look, you may not be 
> an Elvis Presley, or a Paul McCartney, etc. etc, one a the big guys, but you 
> know what? That's Ow'w, kayy. Relax! Just be yourself.
> 
> Every few lines, he kept saying, dammit, this just isn't working.
> 
> The thing is, yes it was! Beautifully actually. He just didn't trust himself.
> 
> Well, last night, we tracked a few things, and will be doing so later today 
> as well. The problem is, we had something very weird happen last night, and 
> it's starting to be another issue entirely.
> 
> Last night, he came in, stood at that microphone with the cans on his ears, 
> and let me tell you what... this guy blew it dead! I mean, he knocked it slam 
> dunk! I dono what he did, but he was so on key it was ridiculous! His diction 
> was flawless, his timing couldn't have been better, etc.
> 
> The issue is, he noticed this too, and was so excited that just as he'd start 
> really nailing things, he'd stop, just from laughing with joy. He's like, I 
> don't believe this! I'm actually pulling this off for once! I kept telling 
> him, wayta! gow'w! Problem though is, now, after that incident happened, now, 
> he's gone the other way off the deep end. First he wasn't confident enough. 
> Now, he's becoming rapidly so! confident that he's practically botching his 
> vocals left and right because he's so into it that he's losing concentration 
> in thinking how darn good things are starting to sound and come together.
> 
> As a producer/coach, how do you all deal with this when you get someone who 
> can't get through things, not because it's not working, but more they keep 
> losing concentration. He's like, I can't help it, dude! It sounds so darn 
> good all a sudden.
> 
> Should I maybe back off his mike a bit in his cans so that he concentrates 
> more on the accompiniment, or should I back off encouraging him so much, I 
> just dono.
> 
> Chris.
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/30aaed67-92ab-3679-562e-6e2fc38a10f7%40gmail.com.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/B9660129-1FFD-48A4-A516-B6E41D7CED04%40gmail.com.

Re: careful with Keyboard Maestro 9

[TheOreoMonster]

It should give you the option when it reminds you the first time. Also the 
upgrade price is till October so you may want to set a personal reminder if you 
plan to upgrade in the future and still get the discounted price. 


> On Aug 14, 2019, at 4:54 PM, Christopher Gilland  
> wrote:
> 
> Is there a way we can set KM so that it won't nag us about there being an 
> update from 8 to 9?
> 
> I've not seen one yet that I know of, but I just wanna be sure it's not gonna 
> start doing so in the future if I don't elect to upgrade.
> 
> Chris.
> 
> On 08/14/2019 01:58 PM, Slau Halatyn wrote:
>> For those thinking of updating to Keyboard Maestro 9, everything looks fine 
>> however, there's one important thing to remember: If you're using Flo Tools, 
>> don't reinstall Flo Tools into KM9 with the current installer. The current 
>> installer is only meant for Keyboard Maestro version 8. If you already have 
>> Flo Tools installed, you're good to go and, frankly, there's no reason to 
>> ever reinstall Flo Tools unless you're doing a flo Tools update. There will 
>> probably need to be a new installer to support Keyboard Maestro version 9 
>> but that'll take a little while. So, feel free to go to KM9 but don't 
>> reinstall flo Tools for  any reason for the time being. We'll keep you 
>> posted when there's any further news.
>> cheers,
>> Slau
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/b85b087b-1d5b-baa0-dbed-57fee6862a10%40gmail.com.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/AD5D4E2B-DADD-4594-B467-9EE2BF731B85%40gmail.com.

Re: Reading meters correctly with Voiceover

[TheOreoMonster]

Chances are what’s happening here is your karaoke track has been brick wall 
limited to be consistent at -1db. Just turn the fader down on the karaoke track 
or use clip gain to Brin it down. So its hitting your master fader at around 
-12 db. So long as your master fader isn’t clipping you will be fine. To get 
headroom so you don’t clip your master fader just turn down the individual 
tracks. The individual track  isn’t clipping as you are still below 0db. 


> On Jul 7, 2019, at 1:06 PM, Christopher Gilland  wrote:
> 
> OK, can someone explain two things to me?
> 
> Audio track: If I interact with the track strip, then go one past the mute 
> button, I see the output volume fader slider, but here's the weird thing I'm 
> not getting. After importing a karaoke track downloaded from the internet, 
> (Legally of corse,) and importing it on a track, I see mute, the output 
> volume fader which is by default at 0DB, then I see the level meter. The odd 
> thing though is, I have meters hold peek infinent enabled, that meter right 
> past that volume fader keeps staying at -1DB, and no matter what I do, I 
> can't VO+Space to reset it. There's no way I'm actively sending -1DB of 
> signal to that track. For one, my phantom power isn't on, and 2, the track's 
> not even armed, so I couldn't be sending that amount of level. It's virtually 
> impossible! Why won't it therefore let me reset it to infinity?
> 
> To further weird things out, past that level meter, on the track, I see a 
> second! output level volume fader which yes, I can adjust. Granted, it's not 
> near as sensitive as the first one, but it does work. Then, I see the peek 
> meter. The peek meter will! let me reset it to infinity.
> 
> So, I'm trying to make sure this karaoke track doesn't go over -12DB. I don't 
> wanna clip even before adding my vocals, so I need some headroom. I can't 
> however tell what I need to be paying attention to. That -1DB on the first 
> level meter that won't seem to reset after playing about one minute of the 
> track, or do I need to more be looking at that second peek meter that will! 
> let me reset it.
> 
> Is there any way I can get PT only to show me that one peek meter?
> 
> And secondly, any idea why either l or p aren't working in FloTools to read 
> those things to me?
> 
> Chris.
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/5e288675-7af1-e234-512d-71c8230255af%40gmail.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/6FC4256B-7A06-4B0E-A17D-019109658C4A%40gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: focusrite Scarlett 8I6 3rd GEN

[TheOreoMonster]

Providing the 3rd ben works with the Focusrite control iOS app they should have 
control over some stuff. Sighted help will be needed to pair the desktop app 
with the iOS app. Focusrite control should be able to remote in and set this 
up. If they want  a great interface with non of those hassles, look at the 
Behringer U-Phoria line. The 404HD or the 1820 should do the trick, depending 
on what features are needed. Check the reviews and specks on the Behringer 
stuff  and don’t write it off because of the Behringer name. 

> On Jul 4, 2019, at 4:29 PM, Jørgen Skov Nielsen  wrote:
> 
> Hi  list
> I help a friend with selecting the right soundcard, and i have found the new 
> soundcard from focusrite Scarlett  8I6 3rd GEN
> 
> 
> But is this card accessible for a blind person.
> My friend use mac and windows, and i want to know, if this card is a good 
> choise for a blind perspective.
> Thanks in advance.
> Best regards
> Jorgen
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/3DBAD51A-60C0-4A63-B3BA-F1358F5494A2%40gmail.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/3DFDA3D7-D148-4EAD-81B6-B0333D9B059F%40gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: Keyboard has gone crazy.

[TheOreoMonster]

Some third party keyboards map strangely to the Mac.  In most cases its just a 
matter of reassigning the Option and command keys so they are in the right 
order,. It’s been a while since I see one go that crazy. 


> On Jul 3, 2019, at 12:31 PM, jimmie smith  
> wrote:
> 
>  I bought a third  party USB keyboard for my Mac. It has a number pad. After 
> installing the keyboard, I did voice over K for keyboard help. My function 
> keys are now speaking crazy names. For example, F one says F 14. F4 says 
> copy. There is no longer a checkbox in the Apple preferences under keyboard 
> that says keyboard function keys will act normally. Are there any suggestions?
> 
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
> .
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/SN6PR01MB4304E888D05AC8FCB4F5B8CCF6FB0%40SN6PR01MB4304.prod.exchangelabs.com
>  
> .
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout 
> .

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/5744C679-6DD3-4B6A-ADB1-34847B930EF0%40gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: accessibility of the focusrite control sof

[TheOreoMonster]

Agreed but if its one of the unit that support the iOS app they just need 
assistance once to get it paired. Also make snapshots for  all your known use 
cases since you can switch on the fly. I agree though, there is stuff out there 
that is either accessible or you just don’t have to deal with control software. 


> On Jul 2, 2019, at 11:17 PM, Devon West  wrote:
> 
> The issue with having people remote in is that any time you need to
> make on the fly changes you're stuck dealing with customer service
> etc. It's definitely not any substitute. If you're looking for fully
> idependant manipulation of settings and controls definitely skip the
> focusright stuff. If you can handle letting someone set it and forget
> it then the world is your oyster.
> 
> On 7/2/19, TheOreoMonster  wrote:
>> Some stuff can be done from the iOS app, however you will need sighted
>> assistance to pair the iOS app with the iOS app before you can use it.
>> Focusrite support is good about Remoting into your system to pair them as
>> well as make changes you may need in the control software on the computer
>> and saving it as a snapshot for you.
>> 
>> 
>>> On Jul 2, 2019, at 10:30 PM, Ronald J Glaser 
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> For those of you who use the focusrite control software, either with your
>>> mac, or with your IOS devices how accessible is the software?
>>> Are there any limiatations, or anything that would make the software
>>> unsuable?
>>> 
>>> Ron.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>>> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>>> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/7edc08e0-8849-4b2e-ccb6-12984abe510c%40gmail.com.
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>> 
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/B2492AD6-0DD8-4DDD-BCC1-889354FAD1BD%40gmail.com.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>> 
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/CABPM6Bfhy%3DUrb7C%2BopWYbSQ3sAM4Z81ZGq0seN%2BwdoLRxakwZg%40mail.gmail.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/B496667C-1D26-43CC-8AF2-2F10DDDEC0C4%40gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: accessibility of the focusrite control sof

[TheOreoMonster]

Some stuff can be done from the iOS app, however you will need sighted 
assistance to pair the iOS app with the iOS app before you can use it. 
Focusrite support is good about Remoting into your system to pair them as well 
as make changes you may need in the control software on the computer and saving 
it as a snapshot for you. 


> On Jul 2, 2019, at 10:30 PM, Ronald J Glaser  wrote:
> 
> For those of you who use the focusrite control software, either with your 
> mac, or with your IOS devices how accessible is the software?
> Are there any limiatations, or anything that would make the software unsuable?
> 
> Ron.
> 
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/7edc08e0-8849-4b2e-ccb6-12984abe510c%40gmail.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/B2492AD6-0DD8-4DDD-BCC1-889354FAD1BD%40gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: Addictive drums two

[TheOreoMonster]

I think it is if you purchase the NKS scripts for Contact and you have one of 
the Native Instruments Komplee Kontrol keyboards to use it with. 

> On Jun 25, 2019, at 3:55 PM, jimmie smith  
> wrote:
> 
>  I just purchased addictive drums to without asking the important question, 
> is it accessible? Do any of you know if it is and if it's not how do I make 
> it accessible. 
> 
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
> .
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/SN6PR01MB43045B6FD2CEEE16ACA8C875F6E30%40SN6PR01MB4304.prod.exchangelabs.com
>  
> .
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout 
> .

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/EA6507C5-45EB-4D4D-8808-408AD64C1D6F%40gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: Sondcard issue - next step

[TheOreoMonster]

Just try installing it again

> On Jun 21, 2019, at 12:48 PM, Martin (Punky) Sopart  
> wrote:
> 
> And do you know how to get that situation back?
> 
> Am 21.06.2019 um 18:00 schrieb TheOreoMonster :
> 
> Yes normally it will but when you click on it during an installation the new 
> app is the last thing in that window with the accept button  just before the 
> part that ask you to lock/unlock the window. 
> 
> 
>> On Jun 21, 2019, at 11:32 AM, Martin (Punky) Sopart  
>> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi!
>> 
>> Strange, the general tap only showes all the password stuff...
>> Avid is going to call on Monday for a remote session.
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com]
>>> On Behalf Of TheOreoMonster
>>> Sent: Friday, June 21, 2019 5:28 PM
>>> To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
>>> Subject: Re: Sondcard issue - next step
>>> 
>>> If memory serves correct when you get the notice during installation the
>>> accept button you are looking for is usually right on the general tab that 
>>> it
>>> comes up showing. You shouldn’t have to switch to the privacy tab.
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> On Jun 21, 2019, at 5:46 AM, Martin (Punky) Sopart 
>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Hello Slau and others!
>>>> 
>>>> I just installed the MBox Pro 3rd generation on another Mac mini 2017
>>> (same
>>>> specs).
>>>> Here the warning regarding security & privacy occured and the button to
>>> open
>>>> the system prefs was there.
>>>> After pressing that button the settings for security & privacy opened and
>>>> that's it.
>>>> Checking all categories under "Privacy", no item to allow or accept.
>>>> And so the same result on the second mac.
>>>> 
>>>> My idea now is the os version.
>>>> The soundcard driver is for Mojave 10.14.4 and I'm running 10.14.5.
>>>> Could that difference cause the issue?
>>>> 
>>>> Best! / Martin
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> --
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>>> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/00fc01d52816%242264a370%2
>>> 4672dea50%24%40cakewalker.de.
>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>> 
>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>>> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>>> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/0DEC3090-6D49-4C99-891A-
>>> E3E7C9B93065%40gmail.com.
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>> 
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/01f001d52846%2498b5f120%24ca21d360%24%40cakewalker.de.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/0BEA4797-3A38-4A58-BC0D-02F34F3AE8BA%40gmail.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/ED9241C1-6A32-43D1-AAFF-242D4841E6B2%40cakewalker.de.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/BD371670-EB5F-4243-A943-D1AA560567E0%40gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: Sondcard issue - next step

[TheOreoMonster]

Yes normally it will but when you click on it during an installation the new 
app is the last thing in that window with the accept button  just before the 
part that ask you to lock/unlock the window. 


> On Jun 21, 2019, at 11:32 AM, Martin (Punky) Sopart  
> wrote:
> 
> Hi!
> 
> Strange, the general tap only showes all the password stuff...
> Avid is going to call on Monday for a remote session.
>> -Original Message-
>> From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com]
>> On Behalf Of TheOreoMonster
>> Sent: Friday, June 21, 2019 5:28 PM
>> To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
>> Subject: Re: Sondcard issue - next step
>> 
>> If memory serves correct when you get the notice during installation the
>> accept button you are looking for is usually right on the general tab that it
>> comes up showing. You shouldn’t have to switch to the privacy tab.
>> 
>> 
>>> On Jun 21, 2019, at 5:46 AM, Martin (Punky) Sopart 
>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hello Slau and others!
>>> 
>>> I just installed the MBox Pro 3rd generation on another Mac mini 2017
>> (same
>>> specs).
>>> Here the warning regarding security & privacy occured and the button to
>> open
>>> the system prefs was there.
>>> After pressing that button the settings for security & privacy opened and
>>> that's it.
>>> Checking all categories under "Privacy", no item to allow or accept.
>>> And so the same result on the second mac.
>>> 
>>> My idea now is the os version.
>>> The soundcard driver is for Mojave 10.14.4 and I'm running 10.14.5.
>>> Could that difference cause the issue?
>>> 
>>> Best! / Martin
>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>> Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/00fc01d52816%242264a370%2
>> 4672dea50%24%40cakewalker.de.
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>> 
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/0DEC3090-6D49-4C99-891A-
>> E3E7C9B93065%40gmail.com.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/01f001d52846%2498b5f120%24ca21d360%24%40cakewalker.de.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/0BEA4797-3A38-4A58-BC0D-02F34F3AE8BA%40gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: Sondcard issue - next step

[TheOreoMonster]

If memory serves correct when you get the notice during installation the accept 
button you are looking for is usually right on the general tab that it comes up 
showing. You shouldn’t have to switch to the privacy tab. 


> On Jun 21, 2019, at 5:46 AM, Martin (Punky) Sopart  wrote:
> 
> Hello Slau and others!
> 
> I just installed the MBox Pro 3rd generation on another Mac mini 2017 (same
> specs).
> Here the warning regarding security & privacy occured and the button to open
> the system prefs was there.
> After pressing that button the settings for security & privacy opened and
> that's it.
> Checking all categories under "Privacy", no item to allow or accept.
> And so the same result on the second mac.
> 
> My idea now is the os version.
> The soundcard driver is for Mojave 10.14.4 and I'm running 10.14.5.
> Could that difference cause the issue?
> 
> Best! / Martin
> 
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/00fc01d52816%242264a370%24672dea50%24%40cakewalker.de.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/0DEC3090-6D49-4C99-891A-E3E7C9B93065%40gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: Soundcard issue- small step forward

[TheOreoMonster]

Have you tried just installing it again to see if it brings back that option?


> On Jun 20, 2019, at 3:11 PM, Martin (Punky) Sopart  wrote:
> 
> Hello Slau and thanks for answering!
> 
> I had been there before and tryed again now.
> The table only contains one item and that is the one for Pro Tools.
> Never the less I also unchecked and rechecked this one without success.
> 
> I tryed to uninstall using the uninstaller and checked the Avid site for a 
> manual remove of the Mbox files.
> Nothing brought back that security message again.
> 
> Best! / Martin
> 
> On Jun 20, 2019, at 15:36, Slau Halatyn  wrote:
> 
> Hi Martin,
> Open the Security and Privacy  Preference Pane and go to the end of the 
> window and unlock the pane with your password. Enable the Privacy tab and 
> move to the categories. Select the Microphone category and move to the table. 
> You should see your interface's driver there. Check the checkbox and restart 
> your machine. That should solve the issue.
> HTH,
> Slau
> 
> 
>> On Jun 20, 2019, at 7:33 AM, Martin (Punky) Sopart  
>> wrote:
>> 
>> Hello again!
>> 
>> During the first installation I must have missed a message regarding 
>> security and privacy.
>> That message is gone now.
>> No uninstall and reinstall brings it back to confirm.
>> 
>> Does anybody know how to handle  such a task?
>> 
>> Thank you! / Martin
>> 
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/6CDCBEA8-DC88-4C53-842B-A529CFBFD9FB%40cakewalker.de.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/0F432D3B-DABD-4AF8-B1B2-B337C2F2AD70%40gmail.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/1235D0FD-2E88-4C11-925F-A828225640AC%40cakewalker.de.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/56AB8A83-67E5-4572-BEDD-7F4DC83AC9F7%40gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: focusrite scarlette 8i6

[TheOreoMonster]

Contact Focusrite support and find out what the deal is. 


> On Jun 17, 2019, at 2:02 PM, Ronald J Glaser  wrote:
> 
> this is the only model of this interface there is not  second generation for 
> it.
> 
> So I guess this means that when the new mac OSX come out that my interface 
> may not work for me then correct?
> 
> On 6/17/2019 12:26 PM, TheOreoMonster wrote:
>> IF memory serves correct that warning mostly just means that its 32 bit code 
>> and as MacOS is 64it, it they are dropping support for 32bit code in newer 
>> versions.  Check the Focusrite website to see if they have updated the 
>> drivers for your device. If you are using the original Scarlet and not a 
>> Scarlet MKII however it may just be the end of the road for support. As I 
>> said, check with Focusrite though.
>> 
>>> On Jun 17, 2019, at 11:04 AM, Ronald J Glaser  
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Ok, I have the focusrite scarlette 8i6 protools 2019.5 mac OSX mohave mac 
>>> mini with 3.2 ghz processer, 32 gigs of ram, a six core processer.
>>> 
>>> When I launch the scarlette control software via the short cuts i created 
>>> so I can switch between no direct monitar, and with direct moniter I get 
>>> the warning that the scarlette software/interface will not work with future 
>>> versions of Mac OSX.  How can A person tell if An interfacw will work for 
>>> them  continuesley with out breaking compatability?
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>>> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>>> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/b40d1cfa-e85d-8541-6290-3f55366c338b%40gmail.com.
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/fddfaddb-970d-e97e-fe96-e5fc35976b0f%40gmail.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/2AAE83EF-9E48-49D9-BEAE-081254E2E9E7%40gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: focusrite scarlette 8i6

[TheOreoMonster]

IF memory serves correct that warning mostly just means that its 32 bit code 
and as MacOS is 64it, it they are dropping support for 32bit code in newer 
versions.  Check the Focusrite website to see if they have updated the drivers 
for your device. If you are using the original Scarlet and not a Scarlet MKII 
however it may just be the end of the road for support. As I said, check with 
Focusrite though. 

> On Jun 17, 2019, at 11:04 AM, Ronald J Glaser  
> wrote:
> 
> Ok, I have the focusrite scarlette 8i6 protools 2019.5 mac OSX mohave mac 
> mini with 3.2 ghz processer, 32 gigs of ram, a six core processer.
> 
> When I launch the scarlette control software via the short cuts i created so 
> I can switch between no direct monitar, and with direct moniter I get the 
> warning that the scarlette software/interface will not work with future 
> versions of Mac OSX.  How can A person tell if An interfacw will work for 
> them  continuesley with out breaking compatability?
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/b40d1cfa-e85d-8541-6290-3f55366c338b%40gmail.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/07D30E32-6D87-41A4-BDB5-45DB948CE7AE%40gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: Cannot enable VoiceOver to be controlled with Apple script

[TheOreoMonster]

I saw another thread somewhere about VO preferences being changed or  not 
sticking when screen curtain is on. Try turning screen curtain off if its on. 
 

> On Feb 14, 2018, at 2:39 PM, Chi Kim  wrote:
> 
> HI Christian,
> 
> 
> Create another admin user under users and groups from system preference, 
> login to the new user, run VoiceOver, and see if it'll let you check it.
> 
> If it does, that means something got messed up with current user setting.
> 
> You could also Send an email to apple accessibility, and see what they say.
> 
> Keep us posted.
> 
> 
> Chi
> On 2/14/2018 1:51 PM, Christian wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> 
>> OK, so I tried this but still no luck. Running OS High Sierra. This is 
>> really annoying.
>> I don’t like to reinstall everything and  startover.
>> Any other tips?
>> Many thanks,
>> Christian
>> 
>>> 14 feb. 2018 kl. 08:54 skrev Chi Kim :
>>> 
>>> If uncheck and checking it doesn't fix the issue, reset all Voiceover
>>> preferences by:
>>> 
>>> Open up voiceover utility
>>> 
>>> go to menu bar with vo+m
>>> 
>>> go to file menu
>>> 
>>> Select reset all voiceover preference.
>>> 
>>> Go back to the general category and see if it lets you check allow
>>> VoiceOVer to be controlled with AppleScript
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Chi
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On 2/13/2018 8:33 PM, Slau Halatyn wrote:
 This was a rare issue for a couple of people and it seemed to exist in 
 High Sierra but, if you uncheck and recheck the checkbox, supposedly it 
 sorts itself out. Perhaps it's worth a try.
 Slau
 
>>> -- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>>> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>>> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>> 
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: Best microphones to use with protools.

[TheOreoMonster]

> If I had to make one recommendation its the Electro Voice RE320. Great on 
> vocals and  instruments.  Whether that be electric guitar cabs or miking up 
> an acoustic guitar, etc etc. Also no phantom power required  On Feb 10, 2018, 
> at 9:29 PM, Chris Smart  wrote:
> 
> i'm sure the web is full of "best vocal mic for under $500" type articles. 
> keep searching for various instruments and applications.
> 
> At 12:26 AM 2/11/2018, you wrote:
> 
>> Figure out what you are willing to spend first, and then look on Sweetwater 
>> or similar retailer's sites to find mics for various applications in that 
>> price range.
>> 
>> At 09:43 PM 2/10/2018, you wrote:
>>> I could go to a guitar center, but Not sure what brands they have I have 
>>> heard of some really odd branded microphone names but am trying to find 
>>> good places to hear demos, and the like for microphones, Sweetwater I can 
>>> visit their site but do they have audio demos on there of the mics they 
>>> sell? Also what about sam ash?
>>> Ronald Glaser
>>> 
>>> Founder of Genuine Safe Haven Ministries
>>> http://www.gshministry.org
>>> ronald.gla...@gshministry.org
>>> 980-500-9575X402 Mon-Fri 8AM-5PM.
>>> 
 On Feb 10, 2018, at 7:57 PM, Andre Jarreau 
 <andre.jarr...@earthlink.net> wrote:
 
 Ok, how many microphone do you need.  And what ballpark are you looking to 
 spend.
 
 For live work the dynamic Shure 58 is the industry workhorse even some big 
 name artist use.  Cost $99
 
 The Shure 58 can also be used in the studio depending what sound you are 
 going for.
 
 My sense is that if you are asking these questions that you are new to the 
 home recording studio scene.  If that is the case your mic locker should 
 only have one mic, the Sure 58.  Over time you can bring in artists that 
 might have their own mics and you will be exposed to new sounds and grow 
 your mic needs organically.  To kick things off go with the 58.
 
 If you are micing instruments the Sure 57 also $99 is a good one.
 
 The 57 & 58 do not require phantom power so one less thing to worry about. 
  And they are rugged and last a long time.
 
 If you branch out into condenser phantom powered mics look for cardioid 
 mic patterns.  One you have to be right on top of to make sound.  This 
 will help eliminate unwanted noise that is natural to the room you are 
 recording in.  Large diaphragm for voice and small diaphragm for 
 instrument recording.  But note condenser mics don̢۪t like to to be 
 dropped.
 
 Ribbon mics are through the roof expensive, are fragile, and should be 
 handled by experienced sound engineers only.
 
 These are just a few thoughts on mics.  If you want to go further into 
 various mics then be a little more precise in the purpose you are to use 
 mics for.  Broadcast is a little vague.
 
 Hope this helps.
 
 Andre
 
 
 
 
 From: 
 ptaccess@googlegroups.com[mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com]
  On Behalf Of Ronald J. Glaser
 Sent: Saturday, February 10, 2018 4:11 PM
 To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
 Subject: Re: Best microphones to use with protools.
 
 For studio work, and possible live work as well along with broadcasting.
 Ronald Glaser
 
 Founder of Genuine Safe Haven Ministries
 http://www.gshministry.org
 ronald.gla...@gshministry.org
 980-500-9575X402 Mon-Fri 8AM-5PM.
 
 
 On Feb 10, 2018, at 11:00 AM, Andre Jarreau 
 <andre.jarr...@earthlink.net> wrote:
 
 This is a Huge question.
 
 Depends on purpose.  Live performance, strictly studio, mic for 
 instruments, Drums.
 
 Several types of mic̢۪s I know of.
>> .
 
 Ribbon- strictly studio and delicate some what fragile but great sound.
 
 Condenser-  This mic is phantom powered and come in come in small and 
 large diaphragm types.
 
 Dynamic-  good all around mic for live performance and studio work 
 including micing instruments and vocals.
 
 There may be other mic types I am forgetting or are unfamiliar with.  In 
 any event many manufacturers making lots of mics.  So pic your budget $99 
 to $8 or 9 thousand.
 
 Narrow things down for the list and someone might have good 
 recommendations for your purpose and budget.
 
 Best
 
 Andre
 
 From: 
 ptaccess@googlegroups.com[mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com]
  On Behalf Of Ronald J. Glaser
 Sent: Saturday, February 10, 

Re: Superior Drummer? Omnisphere? Slate plugins?

[TheOreoMonster]

> If I remember correctly this basically means if you save presets with stuff 
> loaded into VMR already you can  get to the parameters but we are unable to 
> load stuff into an empty rack with a screen reader? On Feb 6, 2018, at 3:56 
> PM, Slau Halatyn  wrote:
> 
> Superior Drummer 2 is accessible through Flo Tools plug-in views to a fair 
> degree. Omnisphere is accessible through Komplete Kontrol and Slate is pretty 
> much as accessible as it is on Windows.
>> On Feb 6, 2018, at 5:48 PM, 'Gary Readfern-Gray' via Pro Tools Accessibility 
>>  wrote:
>> 
>> Hi everyone,
>> 
>> well, the subject says it all. has anyone had any luck accessing
>> Superior Drummer, Omnisphere or any of the slate plugins, particularly
>> those in VMR with VO in PT? I think I saw something a while ago saying
>> that there is some access to Superior Drummer. Which version is that
>> in, 2 or 3?
>> 
>> How about Omnisphere? I've read they now have the ability to select
>> patches via MIDI program change messages, but I don't see how that
>> helps unless you've got an accessible list of all the patches and
>> their bank and patch numbers.
>> Thanks.
>> 
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: Focusrite audio interfaces.

[TheOreoMonster]

> This explains why I have heard it a lot lately in relation to podcasting and 
> the monitor mix you send the person on Skype. That being said, If you look at 
> the specs for any interface you are looking at it will tell you if there is a 
> direct monitoring knob or button. Like I said I think every interface has 
> this feature now so its not like you are gonna find one without direct 
> monitoring.

> On Feb 4, 2018, at 8:52 AM, Chris Smart <csma...@cogeco.ca> wrote:
> 
> ok, after doing some googling, it does seem to be a common term in the 
> broadcast industry.
> https://www.telosalliance.com/support/Mix-Minus-Demystified
> At 11:43 AM 2/4/2018, you wrote:
>> My friend Chris Gilland had told me that it is called mix minus. So keeping 
>> it at direct monitoring then which audio interfaces have a switch or knob to 
>> either turn on or the direct monitoring of what you are mixing/recording 
>> then?
>> Ronald Glaser
>> 
>> Founder of Genuine Safe Haven Ministries
>> <http://www.gshministry.org>http://www.gshministry.org
>> ronald.gla...@gshministry.org
>> 980-500-9575X402 Mon-Fri 8AM-5PM.
>> 
>>> On Feb 4, 2018, at 10:19 AM, Chris Smart 
>>> <<mailto:csma...@cogeco.ca>csma...@cogeco.ca> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Ron, I've never heard anybody say "mix minus" until you.
>>> 
>>> Direct monitoring is what it's called.
>>> 
>>> At 07:19 AM 2/4/2018, you wrote:
>>>> Thatis what I need to know if any of these interfaces we have been talking 
>>>> about as such a switch/ or button to do this, wouldn̢۪t this be be 
>>>> called mix minus?
>>>> Ronald Glaser
>>>> 
>>>> Founder of Genuine Safe Haven Ministries
>>>> <<http://www.gshministry.org>http://www.gshministry.org>http://www.gshministry.org
>>>> <mailto:ronald.gla...@gshministry.org>ronald.gla...@gshministry.org
>>>> 980-500-9575X402 Mon-Fri 8AM-5PM.
>>>> 
>>>>> On Feb 4, 2018, at 4:18 AM, TheOreoMonster 
>>>>> <<mailto:monkeypushe...@gmail.com>monkeypushe...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Pretty much  every modern interface these days have some form of direct 
>>>>> monitoring. Some have a button to turn it on or off, others a knob to 
>>>>> blend the exact amount of the incoming signal with playback from the DAW.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Feb 3, 2018, at 12:49 PM, Ronald J. Glaser 
>>>>>> <<mailto:ronaldjglas...@gmail.com>ronaldjglas...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> What I mean about the Mix Minus is that you can turn off and on the 
>>>>>> direct monitoring of what you wan to monitor. Does this make more sense?
>>>>>> Ronald Glaser
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Founder of Genuine Safe Haven Ministries
>>>>>> <http://www.gshministry.org/>http://www.gshministry.org
>>>>>> <mailto:ronald.gla...@gshministry.org>ronald.gla...@gshministry.org
>>>>>> 980-500-9575X402 Mon-Fri 8AM-5PM.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Feb 1, 2018, at 11:04 AM, TheOreoMonster 
>>>>>>> <<mailto:monkeypushe...@gmail.com>monkeypushe...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> More specifically  a situation where you would use a mix minus. If you 
>>>>>>>> just want to monitor what you are recording while recording it any 
>>>>>>>> audio interface should handle that. None of the mentioned audio 
>>>>>>>> interfaces have a control surface built in.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On Feb 1, 2018, at 4:21 AM, Ronald J. Glaser 
>>>>>>>> <<mailto:ronaldjglas...@gmail.com>ronaldjglas...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> I am wanting to do vocals, voice over work, podcasting, and also 
>>>>>>>> broadcasting in general everything and anything you might do with an 
>>>>>>>> audio interface/mixer. Also does any of these contain a control 
>>>>>>>> surface?
>>>>>>>> Ronald Glaser
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Founder of Genuine Safe Haven Ministries
>>>>>>>> <http://www.gshministry.org/>http://www.gshministry.org
>

Re: Focusrite audio interfaces.

[TheOreoMonster]

Pretty much  every modern interface these days have some form of direct 
monitoring. Some have a button to turn it on or off, others a knob to blend the 
exact amount of the incoming signal with playback from the DAW. 


> On Feb 3, 2018, at 12:49 PM, Ronald J. Glaser <ronaldjglas...@gmail.com> 
> wrote:
> 
> What I mean about the Mix Minus is that you can turn off and on the direct 
> monitoring of what you wan to monitor. Does this make more sense?
> Ronald Glaser
> 
> Founder of Genuine Safe Haven Ministries
> http://www.gshministry.org <http://www.gshministry.org/>
> ronald.gla...@gshministry.org
> 980-500-9575X402 Mon-Fri 8AM-5PM.
> 
>> On Feb 1, 2018, at 11:04 AM, TheOreoMonster <monkeypushe...@gmail.com 
>> <mailto:monkeypushe...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> More specifically  a situation where you would use a mix minus. If you just 
>>> want to monitor what you are recording while recording it any audio 
>>> interface should handle that. None of the mentioned audio interfaces have a 
>>> control surface built in.
>> 
>>> On Feb 1, 2018, at 4:21 AM, Ronald J. Glaser <ronaldjglas...@gmail.com 
>>> <mailto:ronaldjglas...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> I am wanting to do vocals, voice over work, podcasting, and also 
>>> broadcasting in general everything and anything you might do with an audio 
>>> interface/mixer. Also does any of these contain a control surface?
>>> Ronald Glaser
>>> 
>>> Founder of Genuine Safe Haven Ministries
>>> http://www.gshministry.org <http://www.gshministry.org/>
>>> ronald.gla...@gshministry.org <mailto:ronald.gla...@gshministry.org>
>>> 980-500-9575X402 Mon-Fri 8AM-5PM.
>>> 
>>>> On Feb 1, 2018, at 1:04 AM, TheOreoMonster <monkeypushe...@gmail.com 
>>>> <mailto:monkeypushe...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> What sort of workflows are you asking about here? That may help us more 
>>>> specifically answer your question. Also the zoom L12 mixer may be worth 
>>>> look as well.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> On Jan 31, 2018, at 6:04 PM, Ronald J. Glaser <ronaldjglas...@gmail.com 
>>>>> <mailto:ronaldjglas...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> A question for you all does the focus right interfaces have mix minus 
>>>>> capability?
>>>>> Ronald Glaser
>>>>> 
>>>>> Founder of Genuine Safe Haven Ministries
>>>>> http://www.gshministry.org <http://www.gshministry.org/>
>>>>> ronald.gla...@gshministry.org <mailto:ronald.gla...@gshministry.org>
>>>>> 980-500-9575X402 Mon-Fri 8AM-5PM.
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Jan 22, 2018, at 12:34 PM, Chris Smart <csma...@cogeco.ca 
>>>>>> <mailto:csma...@cogeco.ca>> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> that's mostly on the Mac side though right? Core Audio has a lot going 
>>>>>> for it (grin)
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> At 01:17 PM 1/22/2018, you wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Modern interfaces I have felt with are smart about taking their buffer 
>>>>>>> size and sample rate etc settings from the DAW and I haven’t had to 
>>>>>>> change them in the Interfaces control panel.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> > On Jan 22, 2018, at 8:42 AM, Chris Smart <csma...@cogeco.ca 
>>>>>>> > <mailto:csma...@cogeco.ca>> wrote:
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > you can change buffer settings and other things yourself? that's 
>>>>>>> > great to know!
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > Is this a current Scarlet interface or one of the first generation 
>>>>>>> > ones?
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > At 10:32 AM 1/22/2018, you wrote:
>>>>>>> >> I use the focusrite scarlette
>>>>>>> >> , It is accessible. It is 599
>>>>>>> >> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>> >> > On Jan 20, 2018, at 7:08 AM, Ronald J. Glaser 
>>>>>>> >> > <ronaldjglas...@gmail.com <mailto:ronaldjglas...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>>> >> > What do you all think of the Focusrite audio interfaces? Whi

Re: Focusrite audio interfaces.

[TheOreoMonster]

> More specifically  a situation where you would use a mix minus. If you just 
> want to monitor what you are recording while recording it any audio interface 
> should handle that. None of the mentioned audio interfaces have a control 
> surface built in.

> On Feb 1, 2018, at 4:21 AM, Ronald J. Glaser <ronaldjglas...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> I am wanting to do vocals, voice over work, podcasting, and also broadcasting 
> in general everything and anything you might do with an audio 
> interface/mixer. Also does any of these contain a control surface?
> Ronald Glaser
> 
> Founder of Genuine Safe Haven Ministries
> http://www.gshministry.org <http://www.gshministry.org/>
> ronald.gla...@gshministry.org
> 980-500-9575X402 Mon-Fri 8AM-5PM.
> 
>> On Feb 1, 2018, at 1:04 AM, TheOreoMonster <monkeypushe...@gmail.com 
>> <mailto:monkeypushe...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>> 
>> What sort of workflows are you asking about here? That may help us more 
>> specifically answer your question. Also the zoom L12 mixer may be worth look 
>> as well.
>> 
>> 
>>> On Jan 31, 2018, at 6:04 PM, Ronald J. Glaser <ronaldjglas...@gmail.com 
>>> <mailto:ronaldjglas...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> A question for you all does the focus right interfaces have mix minus 
>>> capability?
>>> Ronald Glaser
>>> 
>>> Founder of Genuine Safe Haven Ministries
>>> http://www.gshministry.org <http://www.gshministry.org/>
>>> ronald.gla...@gshministry.org <mailto:ronald.gla...@gshministry.org>
>>> 980-500-9575X402 Mon-Fri 8AM-5PM.
>>> 
>>>> On Jan 22, 2018, at 12:34 PM, Chris Smart <csma...@cogeco.ca 
>>>> <mailto:csma...@cogeco.ca>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> that's mostly on the Mac side though right? Core Audio has a lot going for 
>>>> it (grin)
>>>> 
>>>> At 01:17 PM 1/22/2018, you wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Modern interfaces I have felt with are smart about taking their buffer 
>>>>> size and sample rate etc settings from the DAW and I haven’t had to 
>>>>> change them in the Interfaces control panel.
>>>>> 
>>>>> > On Jan 22, 2018, at 8:42 AM, Chris Smart <csma...@cogeco.ca 
>>>>> > <mailto:csma...@cogeco.ca>> wrote:
>>>>> >
>>>>> > you can change buffer settings and other things yourself? that's great 
>>>>> > to know!
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Is this a current Scarlet interface or one of the first generation ones?
>>>>> >
>>>>> > At 10:32 AM 1/22/2018, you wrote:
>>>>> >> I use the focusrite scarlette
>>>>> >> , It is accessible. It is 599
>>>>> >> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> > On Jan 20, 2018, at 7:08 AM, Ronald J. Glaser 
>>>>> >> > <ronaldjglas...@gmail.com <mailto:ronaldjglas...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>> >> >
>>>>> >> > What do you all think of the Focusrite audio interfaces? Which are 
>>>>> >> > accessible to us?
>>>>> >> >
>>>>> >> > Ron
>>>>> >> >
>>>>> >> > --
>>>>> >> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>>> >> > Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>>>>> >> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, 
>>>>> >> > send an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
>>>>> >> > <mailto:ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com>.
>>>>> >> > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout 
>>>>> >> > <https://groups.google.com/d/optout>.
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> --
>>>>> >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>>> >> Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>>>>> >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>>>> >> an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
>>>>> >> <mailto:ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com>.
>>>>> >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout 
>>>>> >> <https://groups.google.com/d/optout>.
>>

Re: Waves: Ultimate Channel Strip Plugin

[TheOreoMonster]

No additional hardware is required. This is software that is launched from with 
in the DAW. 


> On Jan 29, 2018, at 5:37 PM, Andre Jarreau  
> wrote:
> 
> This sounds great.  Might be a dumb question but have to ask.  
> 
> Do these WAVES plug-ins download directly into the DAW, or audio interface?
> 
> What hardware is required if any?
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On Behalf 
> Of Chris Smart
> Sent: Monday, January 29, 2018 2:03 PM
> To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
> Subject: RE: Waves: Ultimate Channel Strip Plugin
> 
> check out the video!
> 
> 
> At 02:46 PM 1/29/2018, you wrote:
>> Read the article.  Wow.  Thanks.
>> Andre
>> 
>> -Original Message-
>> From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com]
>> On Behalf Of Chris Smart
>> Sent: Monday, January 29, 2018 1:00 PM
>> To: vipaudioacc...@freelists.org
>> Cc: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
>> Subject: Waves: Ultimate Channel Strip Plugin
>> 
>> Wow, this one might give me option anxiety!
>> https://www.waves.com/creating-the-scheps-omni-channel
>> 
>> 
>> Chris
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> "There are two means of refuge from the miseries of life: music and 
>> cats." - Albert Schweitzer
>> 
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>> Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>> an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>> 
>> 
>> ---
>> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
>> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>> 
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>> Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>> an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> "There are two means of refuge from the miseries of life: music and cats." - 
> Albert Schweitzer 
> 
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: Focusrite audio interfaces.

[TheOreoMonster]

What sort of workflows are you asking about here? That may help us more 
specifically answer your question. Also the zoom L12 mixer may be worth look as 
well.


> On Jan 31, 2018, at 6:04 PM, Ronald J. Glaser  
> wrote:
> 
> A question for you all does the focus right interfaces have mix minus 
> capability?
> Ronald Glaser
> 
> Founder of Genuine Safe Haven Ministries
> http://www.gshministry.org 
> ronald.gla...@gshministry.org
> 980-500-9575X402 Mon-Fri 8AM-5PM.
> 
>> On Jan 22, 2018, at 12:34 PM, Chris Smart > > wrote:
>> 
>> that's mostly on the Mac side though right? Core Audio has a lot going for 
>> it (grin)
>> 
>> At 01:17 PM 1/22/2018, you wrote:
>> 
>>> Modern interfaces I have felt with are smart about taking their buffer size 
>>> and sample rate etc settings from the DAW and I haven’t had to change 
>>> them in the Interfaces control panel.
>>> 
>>> > On Jan 22, 2018, at 8:42 AM, Chris Smart >> > > wrote:
>>> >
>>> > you can change buffer settings and other things yourself? that's great to 
>>> > know!
>>> >
>>> > Is this a current Scarlet interface or one of the first generation ones?
>>> >
>>> > At 10:32 AM 1/22/2018, you wrote:
>>> >> I use the focusrite scarlette
>>> >> , It is accessible. It is 599
>>> >> Sent from my iPhone
>>> >>
>>> >> > On Jan 20, 2018, at 7:08 AM, Ronald J. Glaser 
>>> >> > > wrote:
>>> >> >
>>> >> > What do you all think of the Focusrite audio interfaces? Which are 
>>> >> > accessible to us?
>>> >> >
>>> >> > Ron
>>> >> >
>>> >> > --
>>> >> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>> >> > Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>>> >> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>> >> > an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
>>> >> > .
>>> >> > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout 
>>> >> > .
>>> >>
>>> >> --
>>> >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>> >> Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>>> >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>> >> an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
>>> >> .
>>> >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout 
>>> >> .
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > 
>>> > "There are two means of refuge from the miseries of life: music and 
>>> > cats." - Albert Schweitzer
>>> > --
>>> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>>> > "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>>> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>>> > email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
>>> > .
>>> > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout 
>>> > .
>>> 
>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>>> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>>> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
>>> .
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout 
>>> .
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> "There are two means of refuge from the miseries of life: music and cats." - 
>> Albert Schweitzer 
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
>> .
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout 
>> .
> 
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
> .
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout 
> .

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: Flo tools for logic

[TheOreoMonster]

1. The direct link to the flogic repository page is:
https://github.com/chigkim/Flogic 
Make sure you read the readme in its entirety first.
2. You can always download the latest Flogic from this link.
https://github.com/chigkim/flogic/archive/master.zip 

3. If you have a problem or suggestion  for the scripts, please file an issue 
on Github instead of writing emails. This helps us to keep track of different 
issues.
First, create a Github account at https://github.com/ .
Then go to the repository page, and click issues. Direct link is:
https://github.com/chigkim/flogic/issues 

scheme through the currently open issues and make sure you're not creating a 
duplicate.
If you find an issue related to yours, read through the comments and provide if 
you have additional comment.
If you can't find the issue you're looking for, Then clikc new issue.
Once you create a new issue or comment on an existing issue, you'll get an 
email if someone else comments on it. You can also directly reply to the email 
to comment as well.
However, make sure your email only contains your reply, not the original email. 
Select all and delete before  writing your response. This helps the issue page 
clean, and hides personal email addresses showing up in the comment.


> On Jan 29, 2018, at 6:42 AM, Andre Woods  wrote:
> 
> Unfortunatley, I am unable to locate it
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
>> On Jan 29, 2018, at 2:35 AM, Peter Durieux  
>> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> Yes, there is. Do a google search for flogic. 
>> 
>> Hth
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -Peter Durieux
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> Op 29 jan. 2018 om 00:50 heeft Andre Woods  het 
>>> volgende geschreven:
>>> 
>>> I was curious to know if there is a set of macros for logic like flo tools 
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>>> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>>> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>> 
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: Focusrite audio interfaces.

[TheOreoMonster]

Modern interfaces I have felt with are smart about taking their buffer size and 
sample rate etc settings from the DAW and I haven’t had to change them in the 
Interfaces control panel. 

> On Jan 22, 2018, at 8:42 AM, Chris Smart  wrote:
> 
> you can change buffer settings and other things yourself? that's great to 
> know!
> 
> Is this a current Scarlet interface or one of the first generation ones?
> 
> At 10:32 AM 1/22/2018, you wrote:
>> I use the focusrite scarlette
>> , It is accessible. It is 599
>> Sent from my iPhone
>> 
>> > On Jan 20, 2018, at 7:08 AM, Ronald J. Glaser  
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > What do you all think of the Focusrite audio interfaces? Which are 
>> > accessible to us?
>> >
>> > Ron
>> >
>> > --
>> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> > "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> > email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>> 
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> "There are two means of refuge from the miseries of life: music and cats." - 
> Albert Schweitzer 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: Focusrite audio interfaces.

[TheOreoMonster]

I owned a Clarett interface and while the control software wasn’t accessible at 
the time what was accessible was loading presets that were created with sighted 
assistance. The iOS app however was pretty accessible but you did need sighted  
assistance to pair it to the the desktop app  before the iOS app could control 
your unit. Also Focusrite support was great about Remoting into your system to 
do the parts that needed sighted assistance. 


> On Jan 22, 2018, at 10:08 AM, Chris Smart  wrote:
> 
> ah ok
> 
> At 11:20 AM 1/22/2018, you wrote:
>> Think this is on the Mac side.
>> 
>> -Original Message-
>> From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
>> Of Chris Smart
>> Sent: 22 January 2018 15:42
>> To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
>> Subject: Re: Focusrite audio interfaces.
>> 
>> you can change buffer settings and other things yourself? that's great to
>> know!
>> 
>> Is this a current Scarlet interface or one of the first generation ones?
>> 
>> At 10:32 AM 1/22/2018, you wrote:
>> >I use the focusrite scarlette
>> >, It is accessible. It is 599
>> >Sent from my iPhone
>> >
>> > > On Jan 20, 2018, at 7:08 AM, Ronald J. Glaser
>> >  wrote:
>> > >
>> > > What do you all think of the Focusrite audio interfaces? Which
>> > are accessible to us?
>> > >
>> > > Ron
>> > >
>> > > --
>> > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the
>> > Google Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>> > > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>> > send an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> > > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>> >
>> >--
>> >You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>> >Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>> >To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>> >send an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> >For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> "There are two means of refuge from the miseries of life: music and
>> cats." - Albert Schweitzer
>> 
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>> 
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> "There are two means of refuge from the miseries of life: music and cats." - 
> Albert Schweitzer 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: OT: Software question

[TheOreoMonster]

GarageBand doesn’t require any special interfaces. If an audio interface is 
core audio compatible which basically means if it supports  working on the Mac 
it will work in garage band. Same with midi controllers. GarageBand is great 
about detecting any connected midi device and usually all you have to do is 
plug one in for GB to find it and start using it immediately. 
On Jan 11, 2018, at 11:12 PM, Andre Jarreau  wrote:
> 
> Cool, thanks.
> 
> Andre
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On Behalf 
> Of Keith Reedy
> Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2018 8:29 PM
> To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
> Subject: Re: OT: Software question
> 
> The specs of your interface should tell you if it is GarageBand compatible.
> HTH.
> Keith Reedy
>> On Jan 11, 2018, at 10:36 AM, Andre Jarreau  
>> wrote:
>> 
>> Would a standard audio interface and surface controller be used with 
>> Garage Band?  Thanks Andre
>> 
>> -Original Message-
>> From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On 
>> Behalf Of Keith Reedy
>> Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2018 9:18 AM
>> To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
>> Subject: Re: OT: Software question
>> 
>> Martin,
>> 
>> You mite want to at least give GarageBand a look.  I used it a few years ago 
>> and it served me well.
>> Happy tracking.
>> Keith Reedy
>>> On Jan 11, 2018, at 4:28 AM, Martin (Punky) Sopart  
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hello and a happy 2018 all!
>>> 
>>> Is there an accessible  pice of software for Mac users out there like 
>>> BandInABox.
>>> Just for pre production and practicing. Setting the cords, genre etc. 
>>> and having a kind of playback.
>>> 
>>> Thanks and best! ( Martin
>>> 
>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>>> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>>> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>> 
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>> 
>> 
>> ---
>> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
>> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>> 
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
> 
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: Thunderbolt Ports

[TheOreoMonster]

TB1 & TB 2 plugs are the same. TB3 & USB- C plugs are the same. However be 
aware that while TB3 and USB-C share the same physical plug, unless a port 
specifically says it supports TB3 its just a  USB-C port. I believe currently 
in the apple eco system, the single port MacBook is the sole USB-C only device. 
All the other apple computers that has that size  ports support TB3 and USB-C. 
 
On Jan 11, 2018, at 9:37 PM, Andre Jarreau <andre.jarr...@earthlink.net> wrote:
> 
> Are TB2 & TB3 plugs the same?  Or different?  
> Thanks
> From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com <mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com> 
> [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com <mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com>] On 
> Behalf Of TheOreoMonster
> Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2018 5:47 PM
> To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com <mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com>
> Subject: Re: Thunderbolt Ports
>  
> If you have a Mac that has standard USB ports in addition to Thunderbolt 
> ports then you have thunderbolt 2 ports. The only Mac laptops with 
> Thunderbolt 3 ports are the new ones that just have 4 Thunderbolt 3/USB-c 
> ports on them. 
> 
> 
> On Jan 11, 2018, at 5:58 PM, Andre Jarreau <andre.jarr...@earthlink.net 
> <mailto:andre.jarr...@earthlink.net>> wrote:
>  
> Didn’t do a very good job with google.  But, hacking around the machine I saw 
> a spec called speed.  Speed is 20 Ghz.  Would it be safe to say this reflects 
> a TB3 port?
>  
> Andre
>  
> From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com <mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com> 
> [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com <mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com>] On 
> Behalf Of Nickus de Vos
> Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2018 1:38 PM
> To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com <mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com>
> Subject: Re: Thunderbolt Ports
>  
> Just google Macbook Pro late 2016 specifications. Think it’s everymac.com 
> <http://everymac.com/> which will even allow you to enter your serial number 
> and give you the spec for your exact machine.
> 
> 
> 
> On 11 Jan 2018, at 20:42, Andre Jarreau <andre.jarr...@earthlink.net 
> <mailto:andre.jarr...@earthlink.net>> wrote:
>  
> Hi everyone.  Does anyone know how to determine if TB ports on a Mac Book Pro 
> are TB2 or TB3?  Called Apple twice and one tech said it was TB2 then another 
> tech said TB3.
>  
> I have a Mac Book Pro 15, late 2016.  Any help appreciated.
> Thanks
> Andre
>  
>  
> <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email_source=link_campaign=sig-email_content=emailclient_term=icon>
> 
> Virus-free. www.avast.com 
> <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email_source=link_campaign=sig-email_content=emailclient_term=link>
>  
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
> <mailto:ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com>.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout 
> <https://groups.google.com/d/optout>.
>  
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
> <mailto:ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com>.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout 
> <https://groups.google.com/d/optout>.
>  
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
> <mailto:ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com>.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout 
> <https://groups.google.com/d/optout>.
>  
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
> <mailto:ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com>.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout 
> <https://groups.google.com/d/optout>.
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
> <mailto:ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com>.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout 
> <https://groups.google.com/d/optout>.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: Thunderbolt Ports

[TheOreoMonster]

If you have a Mac that has standard USB ports in addition to Thunderbolt ports 
then you have thunderbolt 2 ports. The only Mac laptops with Thunderbolt 3 
ports are the new ones that just have 4 Thunderbolt 3/USB-c ports on them. 

> On Jan 11, 2018, at 5:58 PM, Andre Jarreau  
> wrote:
> 
> Didn’t do a very good job with google.  But, hacking around the machine I saw 
> a spec called speed.  Speed is 20 Ghz.  Would it be safe to say this reflects 
> a TB3 port?
>  
> Andre
>  
> From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com  
> [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com ] On 
> Behalf Of Nickus de Vos
> Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2018 1:38 PM
> To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com 
> Subject: Re: Thunderbolt Ports
>  
> Just google Macbook Pro late 2016 specifications. Think it’s everymac.com 
>  which will even allow you to enter your serial number 
> and give you the spec for your exact machine.
> 
> 
> On 11 Jan 2018, at 20:42, Andre Jarreau  > wrote:
>  
> Hi everyone.  Does anyone know how to determine if TB ports on a Mac Book Pro 
> are TB2 or TB3?  Called Apple twice and one tech said it was TB2 then another 
> tech said TB3.
>  
> I have a Mac Book Pro 15, late 2016.  Any help appreciated.
> Thanks
> Andre
>  
>  
> 
>   
> Virus-free. www.avast.com 
> 
>  
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
> .
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout 
> .
>  
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
> .
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout 
> .
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
> .
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout 
> .

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: For Sale, Universal Audio Apollo Twin

[TheOreoMonster]

Is this the original or MKII version? Solo, Duo, or Quad?


> On Jan 6, 2018, at 11:32 AM, Jesse Kragiel  wrote:
> 
> I am interested in selling this audio interface. It is less than a year old, 
> has been kept on a desk the whole time I've had it, and works beautifully. 
> Thunderbolt cable not included. Asking $650, and I have PayPal. Email me 
> privately if interested.
> Jesse
> 
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
> .
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout 
> .

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: Where is the starting point....

[TheOreoMonster]

This is why I recommend 15” MacBooks over the 13” counterparts for any serious 
production work. The quad core  processors and discrete graphics can certainly 
help. But yes, you definately get similar specs cheaper in an iMac than a 
laptop. 


> On Jan 6, 2018, at 11:39 AM, Jesse Kragiel  wrote:
> 
> The entry level 27-inch iMac is a good choice if budget is a concern. Its 
> processor is beefy enough to handle Pro Tools, and memory is user upgradable. 
> I have a 2015 MacBook Pro, and wish I'd gotten the iMac, but there are times 
> when I have to take the studio mobile, and record on the go. My MacBook Pro 
> hangs quite a bit more than I'd like, and I can't run as many plugins either. 
> Get the iMac.
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
> .
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout 
> .

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: Where is the starting point....

[TheOreoMonster]

Generally speaking in both the PC and Macintosh world. You will get more power 
for less money in a desktop.  Also Desktops may have a wider selection of ports 
built in. Desktops will also usually have a larger variety of Processors to 
choose from as they aren't as limited by cooling and power concerns as they 
would be in a laptop. 


> On Jan 1, 2018, at 5:28 PM, Andre Jarreau  wrote:
> 
> Is the IMac more powerful than an Mac Book Pro?  
> Andre
>  
> From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com  
> [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com ] On 
> Behalf Of Slau Halatyn
> Sent: Monday, January 01, 2018 1:58 PM
> To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com 
> Subject: Re: Where is the starting point
>  
> The most powerful computer you can afford is always the best choice. An iMac 
> will virtually always be more powerful than an equivalently released laptop. 
> budget is essentially an issue that everybody deals with and you simply have 
> to decide what the maximum investment you can make will end up being. Keep in 
> mind that you'll also need to budget for an external media drive. If you have 
> an internal SSD, you can get away with recording to it but you'll be limited 
> and Avid definitely does not recommend using the system drive for recording. 
> Just a heads up.
> Slau
>  
>> On Jan 1, 2018, at 1:33 AM, adarsh nair nandanam > > wrote:
>>  
>> Hi guys
>> I'd like to work with protules but the budget is the main 
>> issue.also I didn't used a mackintosh devise yet wich is best? 
>> Mac mini or imac?
>> Please help me...I need your help.
>>  
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
>> .
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout 
>> .
> 
>  
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
> .
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout 
> .
> 
>  
> 
>   Virus-free. www.avast.com 
> 
>  
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
> .
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout 
> .

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: Questions about pro tools when starting out

[TheOreoMonster]

The windows keyboard will work fine. Also in System preferences you can switch 
the modifier keys so that Command and option keys work as they should. 


> On Dec 25, 2017, at 3:17 PM, Rory McDonald  wrote:
> 
> Hey all! I got pro tools as a christmas present! I don't have it yet, but its 
> coming in a few days, the ilock. I will get the software online. However, I 
> do not yet have a full size mac keyboard, so do not have a num pad. I have my 
> pc keyboard for my desktop, but that, i imagine, wouldn't work as its ment 
> for windows. Is there simple things I can do when just starting out that 
> don't require a num pad? Keep in mind also that I know basically nothing 
> about how to use pro tools, and am still debating whether to buy the pro 
> tools with speech tutorials as i've heard they are no longer worth it for 
> learning since so much has changed. Are they something I should buy? Or is 
> there too many changes to bother? I imagine they'll still be good for 
> beginners right?
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: BR1600-CD

[TheOreoMonster]

Unless you can play with one before hand or get one with a good return policy, 
personally I wouldn’t go that route. The problem is those things as I remember 
it has a lot of deeper menu options and those things aren’t self voicing. So 
unless you can play with one to see what limitations you would be working 
within, a laptop and a small interface would probably be the more accessible 
portable rig for us. You can still  treat a DAW like a “tape Machine” if you 
want to. It’s up to you how complex  you make it.


> On Dec 19, 2017, at 2:03 PM, Andre Jarreau  
> wrote:
> 
> Hi guys,
>  
> I am considering the BR1600-CD studio in a box to record tracks with; 
> especially since it’s portable.  Boss doesn’t make it any more but they can 
> still be found.
>  
> If I go this route then I would not need an audio interface.  But.  Would a 
> surface controller be needed?  One like the Softube Console one Mark II.
>  
> Waste of time? Money? Thoughts?
>  
> Andre
> 
>  
> 
>   Virus-free. www.avast.com 
> 
>  
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
> .
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout 
> .

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: For UA oppolo users: potentially huge increase in accessibility with soft tube controller

[TheOreoMonster]

The way the UAD software works wen last I used it, it installed all the UAD 
plug ins, and used your authorization file to see which one are authorized to 
your account. So even in Pro Tools, unless you sort through and hide the ones 
you do not have authorizations for you will have to scroll through a lot of 
plug ins to find the ones you want. When you load a plug in you don’t have an 
authorization for it will prompt you to purchase it or authorize a demo ( a 
process that is not accessible btw). I say that to say this. UAD has about 100 
plug ins in their arsenal alone, So even if the Console one hardware had the 
means of  allowing one to choose a plug in to load to a blank slot in the UAD 
console software, one would still have to cycle through a long list to select 
the plug in to load. And if the UAD console software still shows up as blank to 
VoiceOver, We still won’t be able to select plug ins since there will be no 
spoken feedback. I’d love to be proven wrong here and have this all be 
accessible, I still have plug ins collecting dust in my UAD account I’d like to 
use. But unless the UAD console  software is now visible to voiceover somewhat 
(which btw anyone who has a UAD Apollo and running the latest version of the 
software can answer) We are still in the same boat. 

> On Nov 30, 2017, at 10:23 PM, Andre Jarreau <andre.jarr...@earthlink.net> 
> wrote:
> 
> Very interesting.  it is my newbee understanding with the Console Mark II 
> that after installation and and initialization all loaded plugins are 
> recognized automatically and choosing which plugin is easily done.  
>  
> If I am correct the Apollo has a free software download that allows greater 
> control by the Mark II.  So the Mark II can be handled by listening and 
> turning knobs as you say.  I feel there is something to this 
> controller-interface-software combination.  However I might be as right as 
> wrong can be, dunno yet.  
>  
> Really looking forward to finding out what Slau and Nate will learn from 
> their contacts who have tested the Mark II with VO.
>  
> Andre
>  
> From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com <mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com> 
> [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com <mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com>] On 
> Behalf Of TheOreoMonster
> Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2017 8:53 PM
> To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com <mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com>
> Subject: Re: For UA oppolo users: potentially huge increase in accessibility 
> with soft tube controller
>  
> Yes the goal of the Console one (the hardware control surface) is so that 
> engineers won’t have to look at the screen. However in the UAD Console (the 
> software emulating a mixer interface for the UAD Apollo audio interface) one 
> would first need to use a mouse to select a blank plug in slot and load a 
> plug into said slot. Once a plug in is loaded and selected,  One can use the 
> Console one (hardware control surface) to  change the parameters in the 
> loaded plug in.  Because they are adjusting the knobs from a hardware 
> surface, they won’t have to look at the screen and can close their eyes and 
> adjust until things sound right. Given that so far there is no VoiceOver 
> support in the UAD Console 
>> (the software emulating a mixer interface for the UAD Apollo audio 
>> interface) we still have to figure out a way to get the plug in loaded into 
>> a blank slot on a given channel , before we can start changing it’s 
>> parameters with the Console One (hardware control surface). This is why I 
>> don’t force the Console one (hardware control surface) changing the game as 
>> far as allowing us to use the UAD Console. In pro tools this won’t be an 
>> issue as  the pro tools mixer is accessible so we can load a plug in into a 
>> blank slot there and change the parameters with the Console one (Hardware 
>> control surface). On Nov 30, 2017, at 3:18 PM, Andre Jarreau 
>> <andre.jarr...@earthlink.net <mailto:andre.jarr...@earthlink.net>> wrote:
>>  
>> Interesting, I was told the Console One is made so audio engineers would not 
>> have to look at the screen at all.
>>  
>> The unit also has control over all Apollo plugins.  It would seem if changes 
>> were made to the Apollo interface One could dig into PT with VO and find out 
>> what is going on.  That way the Console One screen would not be as relevant.
>> Andre
>>  
>> From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com <mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com> 
>> [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com <mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com>] On 
>> Behalf Of Nathaniel Kile
>> Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2017 2:06 PM
>> To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com <mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com>
>> Subject: RE: For UA oppolo us

Re: For UA oppolo users: potentially huge increase in accessiblity with soft tube controler

[TheOreoMonster]

; 907-444-3707
>> Website with hundreds of informational articles & lessons on PC, Office 
>> products, Mac, iPad/iTools and more, all done with keystrokes: 
>> www.yourtechvision.com <http://www.yourtechvision.com/>
>>  
>>  
>>  
>> From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com <mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com> 
>> [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com <mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com>] On 
>> Behalf Of TheOreoMonster
>> Sent: Monday, November 27, 2017 5:48 PM
>> To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com <mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com>
>> Subject: Re: For UA oppolo users: potentially huge increase in accessiblity 
>> with soft tube controler
>>  
>> Console one was made to control some of the soft tube plug ins and the UAD 
>> plug in and now the UAD console. I don’t know how much functionality it has 
>> outside of those areas as in if it can be use to control the DAW as well. 
>> Also It seems PreSonus took some additional steps to allow some 
>> functionality with pro tools in the fader port 8, that you wouldn’t normally 
>> get with a non Avid/ProTOols controller, so you may still be interested in 
>> the Fader Port. Speaking of which zounds has the fader port 8 for $100 off 
>> today. 
>> https://www.zzounds.com/prodsearch?q=blackfriday2017=3297=email_C2294700_source=WhatCountsEmail_medium=zzounds_newsletterzZounds+NWAY%5B1%5D+Active_campaign=C2294700+112717+Cyber+Monday+Deals&_wcsid=302FD9A23B98DD8D3723FA4D86F9D65D2E6AE64CBF1B101C
>>  
>> <https://www.zzounds.com/prodsearch?q=blackfriday2017=3297=email_C2294700_source=WhatCountsEmail_medium=zzounds_newsletterzZounds+NWAY%5b1%5d+Active_campaign=C2294700+112717+Cyber+Monday+Deals&_wcsid=302FD9A23B98DD8D3723FA4D86F9D65D2E6AE64CBF1B101C>
>>  
>>  
>>> On Nov 27, 2017, at 9:28 PM, Andre Jarreau <andre.jarr...@earthlink.net 
>>> <mailto:andre.jarr...@earthlink.net>> wrote:
>>>  
>>> Hi Guys,
>>> Am I to understand the new SoftTube Controller One can take the place of a 
>>> FaderPort surface controller for accessible PT control?  That and an Apollo?
>>>  
>>> Andre
>>>  
>>> From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com <mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com> 
>>> [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com <mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com>] On 
>>> Behalf Of Nathaniel Kile
>>> Sent: Monday, November 27, 2017 6:25 PM
>>> To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com <mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com>
>>> Subject: RE: For UA oppolo users: potentially huge increase in accessiblity 
>>> with soft tube controler
>>>  
>>> Hello Bryan,
>>> Thank you for sharing. When I am done with work I will check it out. I got 
>>> my Apollo 8P in the mail today.
>>>  
>>>  
>>>  
>>> Nate Kile,
>>> Assistive Technology Instructor, Tech Vision 
>>> Specialist in Technology/Training/Teaching for blind/low vision/virtual 
>>> instruction for schools
>>> Also Private training to your needs
>>> 907-444-3707
>>> Website with hundreds of informational articles & lessons on PC, Office 
>>> products, Mac, iPad/iTools and more, all done with keystrokes: 
>>> www.yourtechvision.com <http://www.yourtechvision.com/>
>>>  
>>>  
>>> From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com <mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com> 
>>> [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com <mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com>] On 
>>> Behalf Of Brian Casey
>>> Sent: Monday, November 27, 2017 3:06 PM
>>> To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com <mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com>
>>> Subject: For UA oppolo users: potentially huge increase in accessiblity 
>>> with soft tube controler
>>>  
>>> Hi all, 
>>>  
>>> Not a UA interface user myself but thought  I should post this given recent 
>>> discussions on interfaces. 
>>>  
>>> At first glance it seems a 500 buvk inbestment in soft tube's controler 
>>> could open up physical control of many funvtions of the oppolo which are 
>>> not yet accessible with boice over. 
>>>  
>>> https://www.softube.com/index.php?id=apollocentral 
>>> <https://www.softube.com/index.php?id=apollocentral>
>>>  
>>> Please note I have no hands experience with these products, though O am a 
>>> fan of the 2 soft tube plugins I own. 
>>>  
>>> Brian.
>>> 
>>> Sent from my smart-ish phone!
>>> -- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>&g

Re: Apogee Black Friday sale

[TheOreoMonster]

Think you are confusing your brands there. The Apogee elements do not have any 
knobs or buttons on them. So you would have to use the iOS app, (free) or get 
the apogee element control,  a  USB controller for the element interface ($199) 
or use Logic where it can be controlled from the channel strip as well. The 
Clarett would require the iOS app the exception being the Clarett 8PreX. The 
8PreX has enough buttons and knobs on it that you won’t need the iOS app as 
much. The Satellite is for the UAD  system..UAD plug ins run off their DSP 
chips instead of using your computer’s CPU. This is why you have to have a UAD 
Apollo, (their line of audio interfaces which also have some of their DSP on 
board) or a UAD satellite card (just a card with DSP power to run their plug 
ins only and has no I/O like an audio interface would.). In order to use their 
plug ins.  The Apollo mixer is not accessible which Is why I had suggested if 
someone  wants to use UAD plug ins just get one of their satellite cards and 
get a different interface like  one of the apogee element series. Thats 
probably where your confusion came in that you need satellite card to use one 
of the Apogee elements. Hope this clears everything up. 

> On Nov 22, 2017, at 4:50 PM, Andre Jarreau <andre.jarr...@earthlink.net> 
> wrote:
> 
> Thought the apogee elements was said to not be accessible without a ($600) 
> satellite.  And the Claric was accessible with buttons, knobs and sliders 
> right out the box.  
>  
> From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On Behalf 
> Of TheOreoMonster
> Sent: Wednesday, November 22, 2017 1:47 PM
> To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
> Subject: Apogee Black Friday sale
>  
> We were discussing interfaces on the list recently and the apogee elements 
> kept coming up. You can get reforms directly from apogee  on some nice Black 
> Friday discounts. 
> http://www.apogeedigital.com/black-friday?utm_source=Zoho+CRM+Contacts_campaign=639c9243e9-black-friday-2017_announcement_medium=email_term=0_03b1375b20-639c9243e9-101853633_cid=639c9243e9_eid=c99277d469
>  
> <http://www.apogeedigital.com/black-friday?utm_source=Zoho+CRM+Contacts_campaign=639c9243e9-black-friday-2017_announcement_medium=email_term=0_03b1375b20-639c9243e9-101853633_cid=639c9243e9_eid=c99277d469>
>  
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
> <mailto:ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com>.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout 
> <https://groups.google.com/d/optout>.
> 
>  
> <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email_source=link_campaign=sig-email_content=emailclient_term=icon>
>   Virus-free. www.avast.com 
> <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email_source=link_campaign=sig-email_content=emailclient_term=link>
>  
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
> <mailto:ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com>.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout 
> <https://groups.google.com/d/optout>.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: Pulled the trigger on the UA Apollo8P and have a question

[TheOreoMonster]

Can you point me to where one can get a copy of this OSC application for 
windows accessibility? 
This is why stuff like the Arturia AudioFuse and the PreSonus Quantum is 
promising. All the routing is done in the DAW as the latency is low enough  now 
that we won’t need  stuff like the total mix app to keep latency down.  Of 
course in the case of stuff like the x32 or other mixers with fx and internal 
routing for live sound etc. OSC still makes sense if its implemented. UAD on 
the other hand, if their latency figures are what they are reporting, and their 
plug ins can already see which UAD cards are installed, why not just enable the 
native plug ins to activate Unison  from with in the DAW and ditch the UAD 
console. Of course if they did that we would still need UAD  to make activating 
demos or purchase licenses accessible. 
 
> On Nov 22, 2017, at 5:26 PM, Chris Smart  wrote:
> 
> Implement accessibility for Mac and Windows folks you mean? Not all blind 
> audio professionals are using the Mac.
> 
> Another option would be to request support for OSC, Open Sound Control 
> protocol, similar to how RME have done with their hardware, since we now have 
> a utility to access that with our Windows screen readers - hopefully soon to 
> be ported to the Mac as well.
> 
> In the RME case, we can now fully access the hardware, the DSP, set up all 
> the routing etc. in RME's extensive application called TotalMix FX.
> 
> Chris
> 
> At 05:17 PM 11/22/2017, you wrote:
>> Hi Nate,
>> No not yet!
>> Everybody Join me in emailing Scott Greiner the product manager for Apollo, 
>> <sgrei...@uaudio.com>  again.
>> Bill Putnam only has to say to  Scott Greiner implement VoiceOver 
>> accessibility for the UA console app and bang its done!
>> 
>> The squeaky wheel gets the grease!
>> Chuck
>> 
>> 
>> On Nov 22, 2017, at 2:31 PM, Nathaniel Kile wrote:
>> 
>>> Hello everyone,
>>> I went a head and pulled the trigger on an Apollo blackface 8P with the 
>>> free satellite. The Sweet water took off around $500 so I said, what the 
>>> heck.
>>> Question, I know that the plugins can be run natively, but can the UA 
>>> concil be accessed with voice over yet?
>>> Any thoughts are appreciated.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Nate Kile,
>>> Assistive Technology Instructor, Tech Vision
>>> Specialist in Technology/Training/Teaching for blind/low vision/virtual 
>>> instruction for schools
>>> Also Private training to your needs
>>> 907-444-3707
>>> Website with hundreds of informational articles & lessons on PC, Office 
>>> products, Mac, iPad/iTools and more, all done with keystrokes: 
>>> www.yourtechvision.com
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>>> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>>> email to 
>>> ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>> For more options, visit 
>>> https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>> 
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to 
>> ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> "There are two means of refuge from the miseries of life: music and cats." - 
> Albert Schweitzer 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.