Re: Need some EQ lessons
Right me off list and I could help you out. Sent from my iPhone > On Jun 8, 2022, at 11:18 AM, Dammie Onafeko wrote: > > > Hi guys: > > A great day to you all. I am in need of some EQ lessons, and I'm thinking if > anyone would be willing to show me some nitty gritty things. I would greatly > appreciate any help. Thanks for your anticipated time and support. > > Best, > > Dammie > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/CAN%3Dh5d9XWTyDFQc%2BM_xDsCM_ijpKQ%2Byj5DVB0N%3DcsPT_9hmh%2BQ%40mail.gmail.com. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/330049BD-EBE1-4BA8-95B4-339D9245E68B%40gmail.com.
Re: Attention Matt Diemert
Hello, I'm just waiting for the tutorials and sample track to come back from mastering. Things are on track for a late October Release. Hth. Sent from my iPhone > On Oct 2, 2020, at 3:10 PM, clgillan...@gmail.com wrote: > > > Sorry, couldn't find your private e-mail address in my contacts. > > Was wondering the status on the ProTools with Speech corse. I know you were > making an updated version. I'd like to buy it, if it's ready. > > Chris. > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/0abb01d698ef%24b85b1170%2429113450%24%40gmail.com. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/41CA5C45-5A73-4AB4-80F5-50344F238A7A%40gmail.com.
watching level monitor with flo tools in pt 2020."5
Hi all, Just set up a brand new mac book today with pt and flo tools etc. However when I double press l on a track to get the level read out nothing happens. It's passing signal as I can hear the microphone and it records fine. Any thoughts On what I might be missing here. Works perfectly fine on my old iMac 2012 Thanks for any suggestions Sent from my iPhone -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/BE35A302-8EF3-44A2-BD35-9C0659B7309F%40gmail.com.
Re: Whatsapp group
Just an for the record, running 2 older imac's with 8Gb of ram here with latest pt blotools and km, with a complete suite of ua plugs, and a bunch others, have probably had one or two cpu over loads within the past year, and typically happened on sessions of 80 or more tracks. So, while I agree that 8Gb is less than ideal, I'd be surprised if that's the exact culprit here.. Best: Matt Sent from my iPhone > On Apr 22, 2020, at 6:13 PM, Devin Oxman wrote: > > Count me in on that as well > Devin > >> On Apr 21, 2020, at 4:08 PM, Steven wrote: >> >> I would also like to join the WhatsApp group >> >> >> Cheers, >> Steven Salas >> Vice-President >> Austin Council of the Blind >> On Apr 21, 2020, at 3:00 PM, Christopher Gilland wrote: >>> >>> Guys, I'd love to join the whatsapp group, >>> >>> >>> Can someone send me the info? I do have Whatsapp installed, I think. If not >>> though I can get it again really really really easily. >>> >>> >>> Chris. >>> >>> >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >>> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >>> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >>> To view this discussion on the web visit >>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/cdffdd3d-a023-84a4-5d4e-478ca24da2bc%40gmail.com. >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >> To view this discussion on the web visit >> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/735FC582-23CF-4851-814D-FC3B511E4228%40gmail.com. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/C24C9F67-4772-4600-88E3-E8D369F2333E%40gmail.com. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/323BBA64-DD3F-490B-A9D0-2E4283CE8543%40gmail.com.
Re: Formal professional pro tools training for the blind and visually impaired
Also, just a quick mention, that I plan to release Pro Tools with Speech 2.0 in the next month or so. This version will go deeper than the previous release: as of now the sections are recording, editing, mixing, mastering, and releasing a track. I walk through the entire process including releasing a new song to iTunes and spotify via distrokid. More details coming very soon! Sent from my iPhone > On Apr 19, 2020, at 10:13 AM, Jay Paschal wrote: > > I can testify for IC Music, great training and thorough! > > “Be who you desire & desire who you wish to be”Sent from my iPhone > >>> On Apr 19, 2020, at 8:20 AM, Byron Harden wrote: >>> >> Good morning Mr. Baskis, Byron here from I See Music llc where we train the >> totally blind and visually impaired in audio production and studio >> engineering as it pertains to adaptive tech and techniques. Please feel free >> to explore all options of training per our web site, which I’ll link you to >> here below. Hope you and your family are remaining healthy and safe in these >> crazy times Mr. Baskis. If you have any further questions after reviewing >> the site, I’ll look forward to speaking with you soon sir and enjoy the rest >> of your weekend. >> best >> www.iseemusic.org >> >>> On Apr 18, 2020, at 4:04 PM, Christopher Gilland >>> wrote: >>> >>> Yes. I got your message privately. I'll be reaching out soon. >>> >>> >>> Chris. >>> On 04/18/2020 04:20 PM, Steve Baskis wrote: Chris, I wrote you a personal email off of the PT access groups message board. Not sure if it went to your junk or if you got it, but would love to speak about training whenever you’re free. First I would like to get to know you and understand your services though. Thanks, Steve > On Apr 18, 2020, at 14:50, Chris Gilland wrote: > > Hey steve. > > I train individuals on PT, so if I can be of any help, let me know. > > $35.00USD via PayPal, with a minimum 1 hour commitment payment must be > received up front before training begins. > > Chris. > >> On Apr 18, 2020, at 1:08 PM, steve baskis wrote: >> >> Slau or anybody else, >> >> Is there any professional training out there for Utilizing flo >> tools/ProTools From a blind/visually impaired perspective? I understand >> that there are a lot of formal well produced videos on ProTools >> specifically, but what about for the blind and visually impaired? Are >> there mentors, or people who are willing to teach individuals for a >> hourly rate? I am wondering because it seems like the community is >> expanding and the world is becoming more accessible every year. I would >> like to refer people or push the information on the web and make more >> people aware of what is possible. I do understand that we are a minority >> in the sense of blindness and visual impairments and especially sound >> engineering, but doesn’t hurt to ask. >> >> Respectfully, >> Steve Baskis >> Baskis.com >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >> Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >> an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >> To view this discussion on the web visit >> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/B1529AE6-F295-4E74-B616-D2BD92EB8CB3%40gmail.com. > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/4B1BE438-2E85-4502-9132-E188E9F95637%40gmail.com. >>> >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >>> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >>> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >>> To view this discussion on the web visit >>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/c527ba92-d9c1-8dc8-8204-f3eb05e232f2%40gmail.com. >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >> To view this discussion on the web visit >> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/080FA2EB-FCCE-4B4C-B7D3-A9D5691BF117%40gmail.com. > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To view
Re: virtual Numpad
> Finally got around to trying this, thanks for the tip, worked just as you > suggested! > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Sep 11, 2019, at 6:30 PM, Slau Halatyn wrote: > > Hi Matt, > > Not sure if this is related but sometimes the VEK decides it's not going to > work and the way to get it back is to go to the Menu Extras menu and quit VEK > then go to the application itself and relaunch it. Let me know if that solves > the issue. > Best, > Slau > > > On Sep 11, 2019, at 5:50 PM, mcdiem...@gmail.com wrote: > > Hi all, just a quick question. > Have latest PT 2019, and flotools installed. Recently for some reason the > virtual numberpad has stopped working. As far as I can tell everything else > works as expected, but this feature no longer works. > Any thoughts as to what could be going on here. > All My best: > Matt. www.mattcarsonmusic.com > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/008701d568ea%24e1aac9c0%24a5005d40%24%40gmail.com. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/45D40FC9-572C-4B76-855A-BFCBD0E8F039%40gmail.com. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptaccess/40BEF4FA-B33E-4A9B-B4DB-FB59A1FD5451%40gmail.com.
Re: best way to learn protools. Question for Matt
You can reach me at mcdiem...@gmail.com Sent from my iPhone > On Jun 24, 2019, at 4:08 PM, Nathaniel Kile wrote: > > Hello Matt, > Can you pass your email my way? > Mine is, heavens4r...@gmail.com > > > > Nate Kile, > Assistive Technology Instructor, Tech Vision > Specialist in Technology/Training/Teaching for blind/low vision/virtual > instruction for schools > Also Private training to your needs > 907-444-3707 > Website with hundreds of informational articles & lessons on PC, Office > products, Mac, iPad/iTools and more, all done with keystrokes: > www.yourtechvision.com > > > From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com On Behalf Of Matt > Diemert > Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2019 4:54 PM > To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com > Subject: Re: best way to learn protools. > > If you write me off list, I can help you out. > Thanks. > Matt Diemert. > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Apr 17, 2019, at 8:39 PM, Katie Zodrow wrote: > > Hi Chris. Thanks for explaining how Matt does the ProTools with Speech > tutorials. This sounds great. I know the website has been down for a while, > but where can I purchase the tutorials if I decide I want to get them? > Thanks. > Katie > > On Apr 17, 2019, at 5:03 PM, Christopher Gilland > wrote: > > Ricky, I couldn't have said it better! I agree 100 million percent. The > material is a little bit outdated, I'll admit that, but for what you get, > it's absolutely phenomenal! In fact, I even find myself two years out from > purchasing it going back and reviewing things over and over. There are just > so many things Matt covers in this tutorial. Especially in the editing > section. I've gotta say, I would never be where I am today with PT had I not > gotten the PTWS tutorials. Words cannot even express how greatful I am to > Matt for putting them together. It really! truly helped me embrace the DAW at > my own pace, feeling extremely comfortable along the way. And what I love is, > he doesn't, for those who haven't heard it, just lecture you like, to do X, > do Y. Once Y's done, jump on your head, bark like a dog, then oink like a > pig. LOL! In all seriousness though, he actually goes through, does it, and > let's you hear, and shows you. > > What I also like is, he not only shows you what to do, but also what not! to > do. There were a few places where he obviously undoes the action, but he > actually very intentionally epically breaks things in his mix a bit, just to > show you why certain things would not be a good idea in certain contexts. > This way, you kind of have that Aa! OK moment. > > I absolutely would say he's gained my full trust. If he ever makes an updated > version of these tutorials, even if we don't get them complementary since we > already bought the original, and even if we get no discount for already being > a customer, that's fine. I'd still purchase them in a heartbeat with > absolutely no hesitation. > > Chris. > On 04/17/2019 02:08 PM, Ricky Prevatte wrote: > Great job on the album mat. Folks I highly recommend Protools with speech > even though it is a little old this is a great thing. If you have to travel > at a higher pace then pay the cost for a more expensive class it will make > you the boss. But if you are traveling slow like me Protools with speech is > the way to go I would also say the Protools with speech should be a > prerequisite. It will help you to understand what you need to ask Byrin and > others. I still refer to it even today. absolutely. > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Apr 16, 2019, at 10:45 PM, Kurt Lantz wrote: > > Hey! Good job Matt! It sounds very good! > > blindm...@gmail.com > > > > On Apr 16, 2019, at 5:57 AM, Matt Diemert wrote: > > Steve, > Rob and I tracked and mixed all this in pro tools. > > Hope you enjoy it. > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Apr 16, 2019, at 2:31 AM, Steve Sparrow wrote: > > Hey matt. i’m keen to hear the album. I’ll check it out some time this week. > Out of interest did you record it yourself, or parts of it. I’d be interested > in this. > Steve > > > > On 16 Apr 2019, at 12:00 am, Matt Diemert wrote: > > Cris, > Just look up Matt Carson on apple music. > The name of the album is no regrets. > > > Matt Diemert > Check out my music at > www.mattcarsonmusic.com > Folow me on Facebook at > www.facebook.com/mattcarsonmusic > > From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com On Behalf Of > Christopher Gilland > Sent: Monday, April 15, 2019 9:56 AM > To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com > Subject: Re: best way
Re: best way to learn protools.
If you write me off list, I can help you out. Thanks. Matt Diemert. Sent from my iPhone > On Apr 17, 2019, at 8:39 PM, Katie Zodrow wrote: > > Hi Chris. Thanks for explaining how Matt does the ProTools with Speech > tutorials. This sounds great. I know the website has been down for a while, > but where can I purchase the tutorials if I decide I want to get them? >> Thanks. > Katie >> On Apr 17, 2019, at 5:03 PM, Christopher Gilland >> wrote: >> >> Ricky, I couldn't have said it better! I agree 100 million percent. The >> material is a little bit outdated, I'll admit that, but for what you get, >> it's absolutely phenomenal! In fact, I even find myself two years out from >> purchasing it going back and reviewing things over and over. There are just >> so many things Matt covers in this tutorial. Especially in the editing >> section. I've gotta say, I would never be where I am today with PT had I not >> gotten the PTWS tutorials. Words cannot even express how greatful I am to >> Matt for putting them together. It really! truly helped me embrace the DAW >> at my own pace, feeling extremely comfortable along the way. And what I love >> is, he doesn't, for those who haven't heard it, just lecture you like, to do >> X, do Y. Once Y's done, jump on your head, bark like a dog, then oink like a >> pig. LOL! In all seriousness though, he actually goes through, does it, and >> let's you hear, and shows you. >> >> >> >> What I also like is, he not only shows you what to do, but also what not! to >> do. There were a few places where he obviously undoes the action, but he >> actually very intentionally epically breaks things in his mix a bit, just to >> show you why certain things would not be a good idea in certain contexts. >> This way, you kind of have that Aa! OK moment. >> >> >> >> I absolutely would say he's gained my full trust. If he ever makes an >> updated version of these tutorials, even if we don't get them complementary >> since we already bought the original, and even if we get no discount for >> already being a customer, that's fine. I'd still purchase them in a >> heartbeat with absolutely no hesitation. >> >> >> >> Chris. >> >>> On 04/17/2019 02:08 PM, Ricky Prevatte wrote: >>> Great job on the album mat. Folks I highly recommend Protools with speech >>> even though it is a little old this is a great thing. If you have to travel >>> at a higher pace then pay the cost for a more expensive class it will make >>> you the boss. But if you are traveling slow like me Protools with speech is >>> the way to go I would also say the Protools with speech should be a >>> prerequisite. It will help you to understand what you need to ask Byrin and >>> others. I still refer to it even today. absolutely. >>> >>> Sent from my iPhone >>> >>> On Apr 16, 2019, at 10:45 PM, Kurt Lantz wrote: >>> >>>> Hey! Good job Matt! It sounds very good! >>>> >>>> blindm...@gmail.com >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Apr 16, 2019, at 5:57 AM, Matt Diemert wrote: >>>> >>>>> Steve, >>>>> Rob and I tracked and mixed all this in pro tools. >>>>> >>>>> Hope you enjoy it. >>>>> >>>>> Sent from my iPhone >>>>> >>>>> On Apr 16, 2019, at 2:31 AM, Steve Sparrow >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hey matt. i’m keen to hear the album. I’ll check it out some time this >>>>>> week. Out of interest did you record it yourself, or parts of it. I’d be >>>>>> interested in this. >>>>>> Steve >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 16 Apr 2019, at 12:00 am, Matt Diemert wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Cris, >>>>>>> Just look up Matt Carson on apple music. >>>>>>> The name of the album is no regrets. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Matt Diemert >>>>>>> Check out my music at >>>>>>> www.mattcarsonmusic.com >>>>>>> Folow me on Facebook at >>>>>>> www.facebook.com/mattcarsonmusic >>>>>>> >>>>>>> From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com On Behalf >>>>>>> Of Chri
Re: best way to learn protools.
Steve, Rob and I tracked and mixed all this in pro tools. Hope you enjoy it. Sent from my iPhone > On Apr 16, 2019, at 2:31 AM, Steve Sparrow wrote: > > Hey matt. i’m keen to hear the album. I’ll check it out some time this week. > Out of interest did you record it yourself, or parts of it. I’d be interested > in this. > Steve > > >> On 16 Apr 2019, at 12:00 am, Matt Diemert wrote: >> >> Cris, >> Just look up Matt Carson on apple music. >> The name of the album is no regrets. >> >> >> Matt Diemert >> Check out my music at >> www.mattcarsonmusic.com >> Folow me on Facebook at >> www.facebook.com/mattcarsonmusic >> >> From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com On Behalf Of >> Christopher Gilland >> Sent: Monday, April 15, 2019 9:56 AM >> To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com >> Subject: Re: best way to learn protools. >> >> Matt, >> >> Is your country album released yet which you speak of? I'd absolutely love >> to hear it if so. I've got access to Apple Music, or could bill it to my >> AT&T wireless account with my Android phone, provided it's on Google Play >> Music. It would probably be easiest though for me to stream it with my A.M >> subscription, like I have done with your Christian E.P, which BTW, if you >> guys have not heard, you're intensely missing out; as it is excellent! >> >> Chris. >>> On 04/15/2019 09:52 AM, Matt Diemert wrote: >>> Good morning all, >>> I apologize for the delay but wanted to speak on this briefly. >>> >>> I’ve been working on releasing my own country album for the past year and a >>> half and it took up nearly every free moment I had available. Then, when I >>> started getting some ideas together for PT 12, 2019 was announced, and I >>> figured we better hold off, so that I didn’t create something only to have >>> it out of date again. >>> I have recorded along while making this album, so hope to release some new >>> tutorials soon. I do hope to update our materials later this year. In the >>> mean time, if anyone wishes to purchase the PTWS tutorials, feel free to >>> email me privately, and I can still provide a secure link. >>> Feel free to email off list if I can answer any questions. >>> All my best. >>> >>> >>> Matt Diemert >>> Check out my music at >>> www.mattcarsonmusic.com >>> Folow me on Facebook at >>> www.facebook.com/mattcarsonmusic >>> >>> From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com On Behalf Of >>> jimmie smith >>> Sent: Sunday, April 14, 2019 3:56 PM >>> To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com >>> Subject: Re: best way to learn protools. >>> >>> I am not able to find those tutorials. It seems that the website is no >>> longer available. Does anyone still have these? I would love to read all of >>> them. >>> >>> >>> From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com on behalf of Steve Sparrow >>> >>> Sent: Sunday, April 14, 2019 4:27 AM >>> To: 'Joy Bausch' via Pro Tools Accessibility >>> Subject: Re: best way to learn protools. >>> >>> I can still voutch for protools with speech. It might be a bit out of date >>> sure. Matt and Robb did those tutorials on protools 10. There is a lot more >>> accessibility these days, with the wonderful flo tools and some new >>> features, But most of the concepts haven’t changed that much. That is how I >>> learned protools and i’d say if it’s still available it would still be a >>> good way to learn protools out of the box. and then deal with flotools as >>> you go along. You might find the odd short cut has changed, but most of it >>> is still relevant. I don’t know how I would have done it if it had not been >>> for protools with speech. I still refer back to this tutorial at times >>> Steve >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>> On 13 Apr 2019, at 6:52 am, Ronald J Glaser >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> This is true, you did say you would do this. >>>> What is interesting is that the protools with speech web site does not >>>> have anything that is upto date for the newest versions of Protools. >>>> With the courses that are offered on the web site, what in the lines of >>>> voiceover accessibility do they cover? Just wondering. >>>>> On 4/12/2019 3:34 PM, Christopher Gilland wrote
RE: best way to learn protools.
Cris, Just look up Matt Carson on apple music. The name of the album is no regrets. Matt Diemert Check out my music at <http://www.mattcarsonmusic.com> www.mattcarsonmusic.com Folow me on Facebook at <http://www.facebook.com/mattcarsonmusic> www.facebook.com/mattcarsonmusic From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com On Behalf Of Christopher Gilland Sent: Monday, April 15, 2019 9:56 AM To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: best way to learn protools. Matt, Is your country album released yet which you speak of? I'd absolutely love to hear it if so. I've got access to Apple Music, or could bill it to my AT&T wireless account with my Android phone, provided it's on Google Play Music. It would probably be easiest though for me to stream it with my A.M subscription, like I have done with your Christian E.P, which BTW, if you guys have not heard, you're intensely missing out; as it is excellent! Chris. On 04/15/2019 09:52 AM, Matt Diemert wrote: Good morning all, I apologize for the delay but wanted to speak on this briefly. I’ve been working on releasing my own country album for the past year and a half and it took up nearly every free moment I had available. Then, when I started getting some ideas together for PT 12, 2019 was announced, and I figured we better hold off, so that I didn’t create something only to have it out of date again. I have recorded along while making this album, so hope to release some new tutorials soon. I do hope to update our materials later this year. In the mean time, if anyone wishes to purchase the PTWS tutorials, feel free to email me privately, and I can still provide a secure link. Feel free to email off list if I can answer any questions. All my best. Matt Diemert Check out my music at <http://www.mattcarsonmusic.com> www.mattcarsonmusic.com Folow me on Facebook at <http://www.facebook.com/mattcarsonmusic> www.facebook.com/mattcarsonmusic From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com <mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com> <mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com> On Behalf Of jimmie smith Sent: Sunday, April 14, 2019 3:56 PM To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com <mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com> Subject: Re: best way to learn protools. I am not able to find those tutorials. It seems that the website is no longer available. Does anyone still have these? I would love to read all of them. _ From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com <mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com> on behalf of Steve Sparrow mailto:i...@sparrowsound.com.au> > Sent: Sunday, April 14, 2019 4:27 AM To: 'Joy Bausch' via Pro Tools Accessibility Subject: Re: best way to learn protools. I can still voutch for protools with speech. It might be a bit out of date sure. Matt and Robb did those tutorials on protools 10. There is a lot more accessibility these days, with the wonderful flo tools and some new features, But most of the concepts haven’t changed that much. That is how I learned protools and i’d say if it’s still available it would still be a good way to learn protools out of the box. and then deal with flotools as you go along. You might find the odd short cut has changed, but most of it is still relevant. I don’t know how I would have done it if it had not been for protools with speech. I still refer back to this tutorial at times Steve On 13 Apr 2019, at 6:52 am, Ronald J Glaser mailto:ronaldjglas...@gmail.com> > wrote: This is true, you did say you would do this. What is interesting is that the protools with speech web site does not have anything that is upto date for the newest versions of Protools. With the courses that are offered on the web site, what in the lines of voiceover accessibility do they cover? Just wondering. On 4/12/2019 3:34 PM, Christopher Gilland wrote: Ron, have I not also agreed to work with you one on one? And, I even told you, I'd not charge you anything. Chris. On 04/12/2019 03:06 PM, Ronald J Glaser wrote: >From what i am seeing here, the Courses are about 800 dollars. If I am looking >at the web site correctly. On 4/12/2019 12:35 PM, Steven wrote: Is this like a one on one thing, or is it a classroom setting online? Cheers, Steven Salas On Apr 12, 2019, at 11:33 AM, Michael Holmes mailto:m.richard.hol...@gmail.com> > wrote: Hi Richard, I can personally vouch for the quality of learning from I See Music. It would be hard to put the training into a prerecorded format, because there are many different approaches and workflows which benefit the most from live instruction and discussion. I started the PT course with Jason Dasent having already known a lot about the topics, and still picked up a lot of workflow enhancements and different mixing techniques I learned through discussion. I hope my input has helped explain things. Best,
RE: best way to learn protools.
Good morning all, I apologize for the delay but wanted to speak on this briefly. I’ve been working on releasing my own country album for the past year and a half and it took up nearly every free moment I had available. Then, when I started getting some ideas together for PT 12, 2019 was announced, and I figured we better hold off, so that I didn’t create something only to have it out of date again. I have recorded along while making this album, so hope to release some new tutorials soon. I do hope to update our materials later this year. In the mean time, if anyone wishes to purchase the PTWS tutorials, feel free to email me privately, and I can still provide a secure link. Feel free to email off list if I can answer any questions. All my best. Matt Diemert Check out my music at <http://www.mattcarsonmusic.com> www.mattcarsonmusic.com Folow me on Facebook at <http://www.facebook.com/mattcarsonmusic> www.facebook.com/mattcarsonmusic From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com On Behalf Of jimmie smith Sent: Sunday, April 14, 2019 3:56 PM To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: best way to learn protools. I am not able to find those tutorials. It seems that the website is no longer available. Does anyone still have these? I would love to read all of them. _ From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com <mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com> on behalf of Steve Sparrow mailto:i...@sparrowsound.com.au> > Sent: Sunday, April 14, 2019 4:27 AM To: 'Joy Bausch' via Pro Tools Accessibility Subject: Re: best way to learn protools. I can still voutch for protools with speech. It might be a bit out of date sure. Matt and Robb did those tutorials on protools 10. There is a lot more accessibility these days, with the wonderful flo tools and some new features, But most of the concepts haven’t changed that much. That is how I learned protools and i’d say if it’s still available it would still be a good way to learn protools out of the box. and then deal with flotools as you go along. You might find the odd short cut has changed, but most of it is still relevant. I don’t know how I would have done it if it had not been for protools with speech. I still refer back to this tutorial at times Steve On 13 Apr 2019, at 6:52 am, Ronald J Glaser mailto:ronaldjglas...@gmail.com> > wrote: This is true, you did say you would do this. What is interesting is that the protools with speech web site does not have anything that is upto date for the newest versions of Protools. With the courses that are offered on the web site, what in the lines of voiceover accessibility do they cover? Just wondering. On 4/12/2019 3:34 PM, Christopher Gilland wrote: Ron, have I not also agreed to work with you one on one? And, I even told you, I'd not charge you anything. Chris. On 04/12/2019 03:06 PM, Ronald J Glaser wrote: >From what i am seeing here, the Courses are about 800 dollars. If I am looking >at the web site correctly. On 4/12/2019 12:35 PM, Steven wrote: Is this like a one on one thing, or is it a classroom setting online? Cheers, Steven Salas On Apr 12, 2019, at 11:33 AM, Michael Holmes mailto:m.richard.hol...@gmail.com> > wrote: Hi Richard, I can personally vouch for the quality of learning from I See Music. It would be hard to put the training into a prerecorded format, because there are many different approaches and workflows which benefit the most from live instruction and discussion. I started the PT course with Jason Dasent having already known a lot about the topics, and still picked up a lot of workflow enhancements and different mixing techniques I learned through discussion. I hope my input has helped explain things. Best, Mike Sent from my iPhone On 12 Apr 2019, at 11:50, Richard Corey mailto:rickcore...@gmail.com> > wrote: Hey Byron, do you also have videos where we can listen to them? Ricky On Apr 12, 2019, at 9:44 AM, Byron Harden mailto:sticomu...@gmail.com> > wrote: GOOD MORNING RONALD, I AM BYRON HARDEN FROM I SEE MUSIC WARE WE TRAIN THE BLIND IN AUDIO PRODUCTION AS IT PERTAINS TO ACCESSIBILITY. PRO TOOLS IS ONE OF OUR COURSES OFFERED IN MULTIPLE FORMATS. IF YOU WOULD LIKE FURTHER INFO, YOU CAN VISIT WWW.ISEEMUSIC.ORG <http://www.iseemusic.org/> or ring me at (312)(810)-1001, for any additional question you may have. best On Apr 12, 2019, at 7:39 AM, Ronald J Glaser mailto:ronaldjglas...@gmail.com> > wrote: What is the best source to learn protools? I am just starting out like I had said a while back. I have protools 2018.12 I believe and am wondering. this. are there any free/ or paid Courses to learn Protools for the blind? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. To unsubscribe from this group
Re: Any news on the PT with Speech Website?
Hello, Working away at getting up and running! As I'm sure you know updating everything can take some time. Stay tuned, and I'll be sure to post when we're back up! Thanks. Sent from my iPhone > On Sep 8, 2018, at 1:17 PM, Steve Matzura wrote: > > I tried going there today and got redirected somewhere Malwarebytes didn't > like. This bodes ill methinks. However, I checked with http://www.whois.net > and learned that this site does still exist, is registered with GoDaddy, was > last updated in July, and will expire next July. Matt or Rob, any news on > this? > > > P.S.: Just tried it again, this time from the link on the YouTube page, and > got an error I've never seen before--"Too many requests." Badness. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: Pro tools with speech still active
Nate, thanks for bringing this to my attention. Apparently we have an outage, I'm working now to get everything up, With it being a holiday weekend, this might not happen unil early in the week Thanks again. Sent from my iPhone > On Dec 22, 2017, at 7:37 PM, Nathaniel Kile wrote: > > Hello everyone, > Whenever I try to go to pro tools with speech, the page will not load. I have > been trying for the last two days. Is the page still available? > I have tried on two different computers as well as my phone. If it is due to > my internet security, this is not a good sign for the page because I have > very minimal settings and 99% of pages load for me with out any problems. > Thanks for any thoughts, > Nate Kile, > Assistive Technology Instructor, Tech Vision > Specialist in Technology/Training/Teaching for blind/low vision/virtual > instruction for schools > Also Private training to your needs > 907-444-3707 > Website with hundreds of informational articles & lessons on PC, Office > products, Mac, iPad/iTools and more, all done with keystrokes: > www.yourtechvision.com > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: Editing problem, please please help!
personally, when I just want to delete audio and not move anything I use grid mode, F 4. just my prefered method of editing. Sent from my iPhone > On Jul 18, 2016, at 4:07 PM, Jesse Kragiel wrote: > > When I edit a track, say a vocal, instead of just keeping everything in time, > time is deleted from the vocal. For instance, if I'm trimming the noise from > the beginning of the vocal, and select from the start of the song to the > start of the vocal and press delete, instead of just deleting all the data I > don't want, it actually is moving the vocal back to the beginning of the > song, making it out of sync with the music. It only does this in certain > files, and others work just fine. What could be the problem, and how do I fix > it? Thanks in advance for any help you can give. > Jesse > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: changing nudge value and nudging in protools
Hello, the modifier to select is actually shift not control, so as far as that goes there is not a conflict. So shift tab and shift option tab. Sent from my iPhone > On Jun 8, 2016, at 9:32 AM, 'Joy Bausch' via Pro Tools Accessibility > wrote: > > Hey Slau, > first of all, thanks for clarifying. Now, here's something I've been thinking > about, in regard to the shortcuts you mentioned: > besides the ctrl-tab: select next region, there obviously also is: > ctrl-option-tab: select previous region. This shortcuts is not so usable for > us, since ctrl-option are the VoiceOver-keys. Here's the question: is it > possible to define which set of those keys are used for VO? In other words, > could one specify that only ctrl-option on the right side of spacebar act as > VO-keys? > > Joy > > > Von meinem iPhone gesendet > >> Am 08.06.2016 um 14:59 schrieb Slau Halatyn : >> >> Just two corrections to the previous message: >> To cycle through the nudge values, use Option-Command with the plus or >> minus keys on the num pad. Pressing the plus and minus keys alone (without >> any modifiers) will do one of two things: if a clip is selected, it'll nudge >> the clip and, if no clip is selected, it'll nudge the insertion point. >> >> Also, Control-Tab is not the shortcut for moving to the previous clip >> boundary. Control-Tab will select the next clip. To move to the previous >> clip boundary, use Option-Tab. In this case, assuming you've just split the >> file and need to select to the previous boundary, you can add Shift to the >> Option-Tab and that will select to the previous boundary, thus selecting the >> clip. >> HTH, >> Slau >> >>> On Jun 8, 2016, at 6:36 AM, Christopher-Mark Gilland >>> wrote: >>> >>> OK, Slau covered this about 2 weeks ago, as I had the same question. >>> >>> Let me see if I can remember this. This is actually good, as it'll >>> reenforce what he tought me. Let's see what I retained. >>> >>> First off, you need to set your nudge value. To do this, use the numpad >>> plus and minus keys. Plus will increase your nudge value, while minus will >>> obviously decrease it. >>> >>> Another way you could do this, though not nearly as convenient is to go >>> into the edit window. There should be a cluster in here you can interact >>> with then set it manually. Again, that way probably isn't recommended >>> though, as it's just easier to use your plus and minus keys on your numpad. >>> I did however want to point out that this is another method, just so you'd >>> know. >>> >>> Once your nudge value is correctly set, you need to make the bit of audio >>> you wish to nudge into its own clip/region. This is the part where I got >>> stuck before. If you don't do this part, it won't work. >>> >>> In your track list table, make sure that the tracks you want to be >>> menipulating through this nudge are selected, first and foremost. Once >>> done, move to the beginning of the audio that you need to nudge. Then, >>> press command+E to split the region at that point. >>> >>> Now, move to the end point of the audio you need to nudge forward or >>> backward. Then, do the same thing. Press command+E again to split the >>> region. So, basically, in a nutshell, what you've done up to this point is >>> you've split that area off into its own region, if that makes sense. The >>> reason you did this twice is because you are isolating that area of audio >>> into its own section, if you will. you had to make a boundery though. >>> This is why the first command+E split at the beginning of the audio to be >>> nudged. The second command+E split again at the end of the audio. >>> >>> The best way I could explain this is, think about having a sheet of paper >>> with a line drawn horizontally all the way across the sheet of paper. >>> Halfway across the paper, you have a small little circle. You're wanting >>> to get that circle as a sheet of paper all by itself. So, how would you do >>> that? Well? You'd have to cut with your scissors two times wouldn't you? >>> Once right on the left side of the circle, and again once right on the >>> right side of the circle. That's essentially what you're doing here. >>> Think of the audio you're wanting to nudge as that little circle. So you >>> have to split it on both sides. >>> >>> Anyway, after you do the command+E to split at the end of the audio, you >>> now need to move to the previous region. The reason is because right now, >>> you are positioned right at the end of the audio you want to nudge, most >>> likely. therefore, you're out of bounds of that region we just isolated. >>> So, next, press ctrl+Tab. This will move you to the previous region mark. >>> Now, what I! like to do, just to be on the safe side is, I like to move >>> just a tad into the actual region itself. This way I know that I'm located >>> within the region, and that nothing willy milly is going to ha
New song is in iTunes
For those who were interested here is the iTunes link to the new song. The final master sounds better imo than the mix i shared a few weeks ago. Enjoy. Closely I'll Follow - Single by Matthew Diemert https://itun.es/us/Z68Zab -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. Sent from my iPhone -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: Avid is a recipient of the 2016 Access Award from AFB
Excellent achievement, and well-deserved recognition! I have only used ProTools for about three years now, but I can say I have seen it considerable evolution in the accessibility and user experience during this period Sent from my iPhone > On Feb 8, 2016, at 12:41 PM, Slau Halatyn wrote: > > I'm happy to say that it's now official: Avid is a recipient of the 2016 > Access Award from AFB. Here's the press release: > http://www.afb.org/info/about-us/press-room/press-release-archive/afb-announces-2016-access-award-winners/1245 > > Ed Gray will be in Arlington representing Avid and accepting the award on > behalf of the company. > > Cheers, > Slau > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: Sharing a new song.
Sure thing feel free. Sent from my iPhone > On Feb 2, 2016, at 3:04 PM, Ricky Prevatte wrote: > > Enjoyed that we might cover that tune in a service. Like it that much would > that be OK? > > Ricky Prevatte LMBT1154 > >> On Feb 2, 2016, at 9:10 AM, mcdiemert . wrote: >> >> My wife and I wrote this last August, and Rob and I recorded, and >> mixed this month. Will be in iTunes soon, but if anyone cares to >> listen >> http://www.noisetrade.com/matthewdiemert/closely-ill-follow >> down on the heading that says sample before you download or something >> to that affect. >> Hope you enjoy. >> >> -- >> Warm Regards: >> Matt Diemert >> 330-980-0046 >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: Digi 003
, The Mackie board does have fader flip, but when flipped, they work the send levels. Sent from my iPhone > On Feb 2, 2016, at 10:36 AM, Ricky Prevatte wrote: > > Papa would a Mackie help you? You may be able to get rid of the O2 and 03 and > get a Mackie like I am doing and use your onyx board. I will keep you posted > but you may be like me if it is broke do not fix it. And as I have already > said my recording capabilities do not need repair Presonus rocks the house. > > Ricky Prevatte LMBT1154 > >> On Feb 2, 2016, at 1:03 AM, Poppa Bear wrote: >> >> That X32 was the talk of the town in the blind community for a while, but I >> myself have a love hate relationship with Beranger and would rather not buy >> anymore gear from them, now if I find something in a pawn shop for pennies >> on the dollar I may toss it in the gear locker. At this point having an ADAT >> is an almost must have for any interface that I consider. Well, thanks for >> the info, I will have to check out some sound demos on YouTube and see if I >> can get a feel for the overall sound quality. >> -Original Message- >> From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On Behalf >> Of TheOreoMonster >> Sent: Monday, February 01, 2016 8:40 PM >> To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com >> Subject: Re: Digi 003 >> >> Yeah it was down to the ONYX and A&H for me. I went with the A&H cuz its did >> 18 by 18 instead of the mackie which only was 16 by 16. and actually the >> A&H can do 26 by 26 since it has a ADAT as well. The additional io/options >> to be used as a surface was was put it over the top for me. Personally if i >> am gonna get a mixer i want it to bring its own analog flavor to the mix so >> to speak and i don’t want to have to memorize screens and pages of stuff to >> set things i just want knobs and buttons lol. Thats kind of why i haven’t >> gotten into the x32 craze. >>> On Feb 2, 2016, at 12:16 AM, Poppa Bear wrote: >>> >>> Sounds kind of like my Mackie Onyx board. I have both the Onyx, 003 and a >>> 002 sitting around, but I am still contemplating getting something else if >>> I could justify it. The thing with the 003 is that even though it is rock >>> solid on PT, it doesn't seem to be as user friendly on other daws, the >>> problem with the onyx is that it is not considered a full surface,. >>> >>> -Original Message- >>> From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On >>> Behalf Of TheOreoMonster >>> Sent: Monday, February 01, 2016 8:07 PM >>> To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com >>> Subject: Re: Digi 003 >>> >>> It’s A&H so the are known for their mic press and the 4 band eq on th >>> board. The converters seemed very nice in my experience. Unlike the >>> Studio live from presounus its an analog mixer with the audio not going >>> digital till it hits the Firewire bus. The StudioLive is digital so it gets >>> converted to digit as soon as the signal hits the mic press. >>> some On Feb 1, 2016, at 11:54 PM, Poppa Bear wrote: What did that Allen and Heath run you? How are the built in pre's and the conversion? Thanks -Original Message- From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of TheOreoMonster Sent: Monday, February 01, 2016 7:04 PM To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: Digi 003 This is why i ended up going with the Allen & Heath Zed R16 mixer over the Presounus. Its a mixer, interface and control surface all none. No motorized faders but soft take over so things don’t just jump when you start moving faders.. > On Jan 31, 2016, at 9:20 AM, Ricky Prevatte > wrote: > > I will try and work it out it is going to be a big opportunity to adapt > and change everything. Presonus Mike pres are wonderful but no > automation, no control surface overall and no plug in work. I will have > to adapt I can always use the mixer for live application and work out a > way to expand the studio when I track a bigger band. > > Ricky Prevatte LMBT1154 > >> On Jan 30, 2016, at 2:28 PM, Poppa Bear wrote: >> >> I hope you can get it soarted out. I really enjoy mine. The pre's and >> the conversion aren’t to die for, but the SPDIF can solve any of those >> issues. They are typically a rock solid peace IMO and I haven't really >> came across anything over the last 4 or 5 years that is under 3 grand >> that I would trade up for and even then I would have to justify a larger >> surface with what my clients actually need. >> >> -Original Message- >> From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On >> Behalf Of Ricky Prevatte >> Sent: Saturday, January 30, 2016 5:11 AM >> To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com >> Subject: Digi 003 >> >> Well got me a new preowne
Re: Digi 003
Someone can correct me if I'm wrong, and actually I would love to be wrong, but as far as in ProTools with the controller, I am only able to manipulate plug-ins using the rotary pots. Sent from my iPhone > On Feb 1, 2016, at 6:36 PM, Ricky Prevatte wrote: > > That is about what I would do with it. Except I wouldn't want it to move > parameters on an EQ I just like to have that Fater in my hand it is ear to > hand type thing. > > Ricky Prevatte LMBT1154 > >> On Feb 1, 2016, at 6:16 PM, Matt Diemert wrote: >> >> I used a Maki extensively in the recording process, from arming tracks, to >> adjusting faders on the fly, to obviously being able to use punch mode, >> solos and mutes. As far as mixing goes I do use it a good bit but more so >> for creating a static mix, with volume faders and panning. Obviously, it >> comes in handy when using automation! While I have found it to work with >> the plug-ins, because it does not flip the faders, I typically use more of a >> keyboard approach to plug-ins. >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >>> On Feb 1, 2016, at 5:37 PM, Ricky Prevatte wrote: >>> >>> I surely just almost bought one brand-new for about 600 more than you're >>> talking about at Sweetwater. I saw one for sale on Craigs list for 600 a >>> few weeks ago just missed it. I want something that will work with logic >>> and ProTools. What all are you doing with the unit Matt? How deep can you >>> go in ProTools for example EQ parameter availability and how much work with >>> the plug-ins will the Mackie do? My sales rep from Sweetwater and I agree >>> Mackie will be the best bet for me using both logic and ProTools. We may >>> not agree on where I should purchase one. >>> >>> Ricky Prevatte LMBT1154 >>> >>>> On Feb 1, 2016, at 5:07 PM, Matt Diemert wrote: >>>> >>>> Hello, you can probably find a Mackie universal pro controller on >>>> reverb.com for under $400. >>>> I have used one of these for the past year or so and they work fairly well >>>> Sent from my iPhone >>>> >>>>> On Feb 1, 2016, at 4:55 PM, Ricky Prevatte >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Just no audio playback. The surface came up and it control pan, transport >>>>> and volume and other things. I did not do my research very well I thought >>>>> it would also control logic Pro X as well but it would not and that >>>>> played a great part in my returning the item. I still could not get any >>>>> audio playback from ProTools or logic Pro X as well. We thought it may be >>>>> a conflict with the Presonus drivers. I will have to find a dedicated >>>>> surface that will do both platforms. I am really happy about my Presonus >>>>> capabilities that was a hard thing to give up in the first place. I just >>>>> could not let something that worked go. Any suggestion on a control >>>>> surface would be appreciated? >>>>> >>>>> Ricky Prevatte LMBT1154 >>>>> >>>>>> On Feb 1, 2016, at 12:46 PM, Slau Halatyn wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Just curious: did you install the 003 family driver? Was it an audio >>>>>> issue or the surface itself not coming up in the Hardware Setup dialog? >>>>>> Slau >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Feb 1, 2016, at 12:38 PM, Ricky Prevatte >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Digi going back to music go round. It is not going to work out for me, >>>>>>> will not do logic, cannot get it situated with ProTools no audio >>>>>>> playback or record for logic or ProTools. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Ricky Prevatte LMBT1154 >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Jan 30, 2016, at 10:16 AM, TheOreoMonster >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> This is a question you should direct to Avid and or PreSounus Tech >>>>>>>> support. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Jan 30, 2016, at 9:11 AM, Ricky Prevatte >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Well got me a new preowned Digi003. I am having problems getting it >>>>>>>>> installed
Re: Digi 003
I used a Maki extensively in the recording process, from arming tracks, to adjusting faders on the fly, to obviously being able to use punch mode, solos and mutes. As far as mixing goes I do use it a good bit but more so for creating a static mix, with volume faders and panning. Obviously, it comes in handy when using automation! While I have found it to work with the plug-ins, because it does not flip the faders, I typically use more of a keyboard approach to plug-ins. Sent from my iPhone > On Feb 1, 2016, at 5:37 PM, Ricky Prevatte wrote: > > I surely just almost bought one brand-new for about 600 more than you're > talking about at Sweetwater. I saw one for sale on Craigs list for 600 a few > weeks ago just missed it. I want something that will work with logic and > ProTools. What all are you doing with the unit Matt? How deep can you go in > ProTools for example EQ parameter availability and how much work with the > plug-ins will the Mackie do? My sales rep from Sweetwater and I agree Mackie > will be the best bet for me using both logic and ProTools. We may not agree > on where I should purchase one. > > Ricky Prevatte LMBT1154 > >> On Feb 1, 2016, at 5:07 PM, Matt Diemert wrote: >> >> Hello, you can probably find a Mackie universal pro controller on reverb.com >> for under $400. >> I have used one of these for the past year or so and they work fairly well >> Sent from my iPhone >> >>> On Feb 1, 2016, at 4:55 PM, Ricky Prevatte wrote: >>> >>> Just no audio playback. The surface came up and it control pan, transport >>> and volume and other things. I did not do my research very well I thought >>> it would also control logic Pro X as well but it would not and that played >>> a great part in my returning the item. I still could not get any audio >>> playback from ProTools or logic Pro X as well. We thought it may be a >>> conflict with the Presonus drivers. I will have to find a dedicated surface >>> that will do both platforms. I am really happy about my Presonus >>> capabilities that was a hard thing to give up in the first place. I just >>> could not let something that worked go. Any suggestion on a control surface >>> would be appreciated? >>> >>> Ricky Prevatte LMBT1154 >>> >>>> On Feb 1, 2016, at 12:46 PM, Slau Halatyn wrote: >>>> >>>> Just curious: did you install the 003 family driver? Was it an audio issue >>>> or the surface itself not coming up in the Hardware Setup dialog? >>>> Slau >>>> >>>>> On Feb 1, 2016, at 12:38 PM, Ricky Prevatte >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Digi going back to music go round. It is not going to work out for me, >>>>> will not do logic, cannot get it situated with ProTools no audio playback >>>>> or record for logic or ProTools. >>>>> >>>>> Ricky Prevatte LMBT1154 >>>>> >>>>>> On Jan 30, 2016, at 10:16 AM, TheOreoMonster >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> This is a question you should direct to Avid and or PreSounus Tech >>>>>> support. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Jan 30, 2016, at 9:11 AM, Ricky Prevatte >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Well got me a new preowned Digi003. I am having problems getting it >>>>>>> installed in protools 11.4 and logic pro x. I think there is a >>>>>>> conflict with my presonus mixer drivers. so does any one know if >>>>>>> the digi >>>>>>> and the presonus studio live mixer are going to stay in constant >>>>>>> conflict. What I am asking is do all presonus drivers need to be >>>>>>> uninstalled for the digi to run? I know they will not work in tandom. >>>>>>> I need to know so I can make a judgementcall as to keep the digi or >>>>>>> send it back. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>>>> Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. >>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>>>>>> an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>>>> >>>>
Re: Digi 003
Hello, you can probably find a Mackie universal pro controller on reverb.com for under $400. I have used one of these for the past year or so and they work fairly well Sent from my iPhone > On Feb 1, 2016, at 4:55 PM, Ricky Prevatte wrote: > > Just no audio playback. The surface came up and it control pan, transport and > volume and other things. I did not do my research very well I thought it > would also control logic Pro X as well but it would not and that played a > great part in my returning the item. I still could not get any audio playback > from ProTools or logic Pro X as well. We thought it may be a conflict with > the Presonus drivers. I will have to find a dedicated surface that will do > both platforms. I am really happy about my Presonus capabilities that was a > hard thing to give up in the first place. I just could not let something that > worked go. Any suggestion on a control surface would be appreciated? > > Ricky Prevatte LMBT1154 > >> On Feb 1, 2016, at 12:46 PM, Slau Halatyn wrote: >> >> Just curious: did you install the 003 family driver? Was it an audio issue >> or the surface itself not coming up in the Hardware Setup dialog? >> Slau >> >>> On Feb 1, 2016, at 12:38 PM, Ricky Prevatte wrote: >>> >>> Digi going back to music go round. It is not going to work out for me, will >>> not do logic, cannot get it situated with ProTools no audio playback or >>> record for logic or ProTools. >>> >>> Ricky Prevatte LMBT1154 >>> On Jan 30, 2016, at 10:16 AM, TheOreoMonster wrote: This is a question you should direct to Avid and or PreSounus Tech support. > On Jan 30, 2016, at 9:11 AM, Ricky Prevatte > wrote: > > Well got me a new preowned Digi003. I am having problems getting it > installed in protools 11.4 and logic pro x. I think there is a conflict > with my presonus mixer drivers. so does any one know if the digi > and the presonus studio live mixer are going to stay in constant > conflict. What I am asking is do all presonus drivers need to be > uninstalled for the digi to run? I know they will not work in tandom. > I need to know so I can make a judgementcall as to keep the digi or send > it back. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>> >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >>> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >>> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: PT with speech tutorials
Hello, I would venture a guess that perhaps you did not install the air expansion pack that comes with ProTools 12? If not some of the instruments and/or plug-ins may not work. Feel free to write me off list if you have other questions, I have tested these tutorials and 910 11 and 12 and for the most part they all work fine. Sent from my iPhone > On Dec 25, 2015, at 1:00 PM, Andy B. wrote: > > I was attempting to go through the editing and mixing tutorial from > protoolswithspeech.com. Unfortunately, PT 12.4 and the version they use are > different so much so, that it is difficult to follow along. In fact, when I > load the sessions they provided to follow along with, the outs were > reassigned, the instrument tracks are broken, and a fair amount of the plugs > used either cost money, or don’t exist in my setup. Is there an easy way to > fix this problem? > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: cross fades
Steve, it sounds to me like you don't have a selection made between two regions. Make sure that you do in fact have a selection made as command F is still in fact the keystroke for cross fades Sent from my iPhone > On Oct 6, 2015, at 3:03 PM, Steve Sparrow wrote: > > Hi. just wondering what the short cut key stroke is to bring up the cross > fades diologue box so as to crossfade reegens. . in mat and rob’s tutorial > they say to use command f, but this does not seem to work hear. > > I am running p t 11.3, i am wondering if this was a p t 10 thing. Has the > key stroke changed, or is this an issue at my end. > When i hit command f, nothing happens at all here. thanks guys. > Steve > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: Waves and UAD Plug-in
The only other thing that I would say makes you a D plug-ins spectacular to me, is one of the presets are all in the standard ProTools presets drop down. Secondly every parameter in the UAD plug-in is numbered. This means if you're working with a plug that has 30 40 parameters and you need to get down to say number 30, you can quickly use the item chooser to type in the number of the parameter you need to move to.k these numbers seem to line up very well with my Maki control as well for what it's worth. Sent from my iPhone > On Sep 23, 2015, at 9:51 PM, James Lee wrote: > > Thanks All. It's good to hear both of them are accessible. > > JL > >> On 9/22/2015 9:05 PM, TheOreoMonster wrote: >> The plug ins in Pro Tools are accessible with UA but not much else is. UA’s >> tech support is good about removing in and authorizing and setting up trials >> for you if you don’t have eyes around. With something like move mouse or >> better yet keyboard metro you could probably get some scripts going for the >> console and etc though. Think someone did a set but i haven’t gotten a >> chance to play with that myself yet. >> >>> On Sep 22, 2015, at 3:32 PM, Nickus de Vos wrote: >>> >>> Hi >>> Matt, how is the UAD application windows? Also accessible? >>> >>> Sent from my iPhone >>> >>>> On 22 Sep 2015, at 19:27, Matt Diemert wrote: >>>> >>>> Personally, I'm a much bigger fan of the UAD plug-ins! Sound wise I think >>>> they sound better. From an excess ability standpoint, the layout of the U >>>> a D plugs trumps many plugs that I've ever worked with. >>>> >>>> Sent from my iPhone >>>> >>>>> On Sep 22, 2015, at 1:06 PM, Poppa Bear wrote: >>>>> >>>>> The waves stuff shows up in the Pro tools plug-in windows and you can >>>>> change the parameters. The preset lists on the other hand will have to be >>>>> downloaded from somebody around here or put together with sighted help. >>>>> The waves presets are in the waves gie and need to be saved into the pro >>>>> tools preset list in order to be able to scroll through them. >>>>> HTH >>>>> >>>>> -Original Message- >>>>> From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On >>>>> Behalf Of James Lee >>>>> Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 5:57 AM >>>>> To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com >>>>> Subject: Waves and UAD Plugins >>>>> >>>>> Hi All, >>>>> >>>>> I know few people here are using Waves and UAD, and they also created >>>>> presets for them. Having said that, how accessible are they with >>>>> Voiceover? >>>>> Do parameters show up on the plugin window, or do you need to use >>>>> control surface and memorize knobs order for each plugin? >>>>> Thinking about getting UAD analog classics Plus or Waves ssl. >>>>> Any other suggestion? >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> >>>>> JL >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >>>>> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. >>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >>>>> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >>>>> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. >>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >>>>> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>> -- >>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >>>> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. >>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >>>> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >>> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >>> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: Waves and UAD Plug-in
Hello, I don't have an Apollo, but I have a satellite to Duo So I can run all of the latest plugs. They are excellent and extremely accessible! Sent from my iPhone > On Sep 22, 2015, at 3:00 PM, Poppa Bear wrote: > > Hey Matt, you are talking about the UA Apollo Plug ins right? I have been > meaning to get down to my churches PT set up and check them out. > > -Original Message- > From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On Behalf > Of Matt Diemert > Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 9:27 AM > To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com > Subject: Re: Waves and UAD Plug-in > > Personally, I'm a much bigger fan of the UAD plug-ins! Sound wise I think > they sound better. From an excess ability standpoint, the layout of the U a D > plugs trumps many plugs that I've ever worked with. > > Sent from my iPhone > >> On Sep 22, 2015, at 1:06 PM, Poppa Bear wrote: >> >> The waves stuff shows up in the Pro tools plug-in windows and you can change >> the parameters. The preset lists on the other hand will have to be >> downloaded from somebody around here or put together with sighted help. The >> waves presets are in the waves gie and need to be saved into the pro tools >> preset list in order to be able to scroll through them. >> HTH >> >> -Original Message- >> From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On >> Behalf Of James Lee >> Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 5:57 AM >> To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com >> Subject: Waves and UAD Plugins >> >> Hi All, >> >> I know few people here are using Waves and UAD, and they also created >> presets for them. Having said that, how accessible are they with Voiceover? >> Do parameters show up on the plugin window, or do you need to use >> control surface and memorize knobs order for each plugin? >> Thinking about getting UAD analog classics Plus or Waves ssl. >> Any other suggestion? >> Thanks, >> >> JL >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: Waves and UAD Plug-in
Personally, I'm a much bigger fan of the UAD plug-ins! Sound wise I think they sound better. From an excess ability standpoint, the layout of the U a D plugs trumps many plugs that I've ever worked with. Sent from my iPhone > On Sep 22, 2015, at 1:06 PM, Poppa Bear wrote: > > The waves stuff shows up in the Pro tools plug-in windows and you can change > the parameters. The preset lists on the other hand will have to be downloaded > from somebody around here or put together with sighted help. The waves > presets are in the waves gie and need to be saved into the pro tools preset > list in order to be able to scroll through them. > HTH > > -Original Message- > From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On Behalf > Of James Lee > Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 5:57 AM > To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com > Subject: Waves and UAD Plugins > > Hi All, > > I know few people here are using Waves and UAD, and they also created > presets for them. Having said that, how accessible are they with Voiceover? > Do parameters show up on the plugin window, or do you need to use > control surface and memorize knobs order for each plugin? > Thinking about getting UAD analog classics Plus or Waves ssl. > Any other suggestion? > Thanks, > > JL > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: Very very! helpful discovery in ProTools 12.2.
Hello, option K toggles in put only monitoring. Sent from my iPhone > On Sep 3, 2015, at 8:17 PM, Slau Halatyn wrote: > > Command-i brings up the Session Info window. I've never known there to be a > shortcut for it but maybe there is one. > > Slau > >> On Sep 3, 2015, at 7:26 PM, Poppa Bear wrote: >> >> I thought it was always there by pressing command and the letter “I: to turn >> input monitoring on or off. >> >> From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] >> Sent: Thursday, September 03, 2015 3:17 AM >> To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com >> Subject: Re: Very very! helpful discovery in ProTools 12.2. >> >> Think that's always been there mate, but thanks for sharing. >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> On 2 Sep 2015, at 21:47, Christopher-Mark Gilland >> wrote: >> >> Slau didn't cover this in his recording, but I found something really really >> really nice! Maybe it's been there all along, but I never have seen it >> prior to this version. I interacted with a track in a session I am working >> on. I noticed that just before the record enable arm button, there is now a >> button which says track input monitor. Oh my God that is nice! The thing >> is, I don't always want to have a track armed just to be able to hear it. >> the other thing too I've found is, if a track is armed, as soon as you hit >> the space bar to start playing, that track then would no longer be heard >> through the monitor until I stopped playback. The only way around that was >> to arm the track, then instead of hitting play, I'd have to hit record, >> which of corse is definitely! not a good thing. The fact that now arm and >> monitor input are separated is incredible! >> >> Just a little thing I thought I'd share with you guys. >> >> Chris. >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email toptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email toptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: Compressor parameters reset back to defaults whenever I close the plugin window
We are in the process of updating knots and bolts. However, in ProTools 10 there was no access to the table within the plug-in to add parameters to be automated, so the only option at that point, was to ensure that every parameter was automated. Obviously, this meant checking that checkbox. Sent from my iPhone > On Aug 29, 2015, at 11:17 AM, Robin Kipp wrote: > > Hello Slau and Chris, > thanks for that! > Yes, the problem here was in fact the ‚plugin controls default to > auto-enabled‘ checkbox within the PT settings. I had turned this on because > it was highly recommended by Matt and Rob in the PT With Speech tutorial, but > I guess things have changed here in PT 11. Anyways, looks like I’m good to go > now as all my settings are now being applied properly! > Many thanks, > Robin >> Am 29.08.2015 um 01:30 schrieb Slau Halatyn : >> >> Hi Robin, >> >> The first thing I would check is under the Mixing tab of the Preferences >> dialog under the Setup menu. There's a checkbox to have plug-in automation >> default to the enabled state. The first thing I would do is make sure it's >> unchecked. >> >> Second, I would make sure plug-in automation is not enabled in the >> Automation window. If it was enabled and, if at any point, your track was in >> Automation Write mode, you will have had some parameters written that will >> revert the plug-in parameters to their default or preset state. >> >> To tell you the truth, I'm not sure if simply even having the checkbox >> checked once at the outset will screw up things for the current session. >> I've never had this issue but it's the kind of thing that, once you're aware >> of it, having that checkbox unchecked will help in the future. >> >> To see if you do have any automation parameters written, go to the Edit >> window and interact with the track and go to the button that says >> "waveform." This is the track view display button. Pop it open and see if >> there's anything listed under "plug-in." If so, I'll chime in with further >> options. >> >> best, >> >> Slau >> >>> On Aug 28, 2015, at 6:49 PM, Robin Kipp wrote: >>> >>> Hi all! >>> So… By now I made it to the mixing module of the PRo Tools With Speech >>> tutorials and up until this point everything went very smoothly! However, >>> I’m now experiencing a rather frustrating problem… So, Basically I’ve got >>> this vocal track to which I applied the BF-76 compressor using inserts. >>> Now, when I VO space on that insert to bring up the plugin window, I can >>> tell that there’s quite a difference in how things are labeled from the >>> tutorial, probably because Matt and Rob are using PT 10 whereas I’m on PT >>> 11. Even though the labels are a little confusing, I could locate the >>> relevant parameters without much trouble. Now, when I change the input and >>> output values, I noticed that those parameters stay at whatever value I set >>> them to even when I close that floating window. However, there is an >>> annoying issue when I change either the attack, release or ratio >>> parameters. I can interact with and modify them as usual, and if I stop >>> interacting, move the focus elsewhere within the plugin window and then >>> return they will still have the same values. However, and this is where it >>> gets annoying, I’ve found that as soon as I move the VO focus out of the >>> plugin window, either by closing the window or by simply selecting a >>> different window, as soon as I move the VO focus back to the compressor I >>> find that the parameters simply reverted back to their defaults, e.g. >>> attack 3.0, release 5.1 and a ratio of 4:1… I’ve tried this a couple times >>> now, relaunched PT, tried setting those parameters with cursor tracking >>> disabled - yet I’m still seeing the same annoying behavior! I really really >>> hope that there’s a simple solution for that, or maybe it’s just a case of >>> me doing something wrong due to lack of experience! >>> Either way, if anyone of you could point me in the right direction I would >>> greatly appreciate that! >>> Many thanks, >>> Robin >>> >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >>> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >>> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googleg
Re: entering in tempo values
Chad, did you turn off the conductor track? Also if you hit voiceover shift space perhaps try heading back space a few times first and then typing and 130. See if that helps at all Sent from my iPhone > On Aug 28, 2015, at 11:29 AM, Chad Baker wrote: > > hi i am having a heck of a time trying to enter in a tempo value > i want 130 and its at 120 > i clicked in the edit field and typed 130 and enter and it put 120.1300 > i did vo shift space on the tempo field > any suggestions to try > thanks > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: confirmed plug-in automation issue
Good morning, I will definitely check on this today! We had a few sections that we tracked for our tutorials that we actually omitted in the final product, and I believe this was one of them! Again, I will also go check on my machine running ProTools 10 today. Let you know this afternoon. Sent from my iPhone > On Aug 28, 2015, at 10:51 AM, Slau Halatyn wrote: > > Hi Matt, > > It would be helpful to know whether it was truly working or whether it was > volume or pan automation that worked. Let me know. > > Slau > >> On Aug 28, 2015, at 10:28 AM, Martin (Punky) Sopart >> wrote: >> >> Matt! >> >> During your tutorials I think you only automated a fade by using the volume >> slider inside the master fader. >> >> Best! / Martin >>> -Original Message- >>> From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] >>> On Behalf Of Matt Diemert >>> Sent: Friday, August 28, 2015 4:18 PM >>> To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com >>> Subject: Re: confirmed plug-in automation issue >>> >>> Actually, I believe in ProTools 10.0 it was possible to automate plug-ins >>> from >>> the keyboard. I vaguely remember doing a bid on it during the creation >>> process of our tutorials, and I think we decided against it for one reason >>> or >>> another but I'm going to see if I can track down the audio and listen to it >>> to >>> see if it worked. I also have an old machine around here that still has 10 >>> on it >>> maybe I will fire it up when I get home tonight and just make sure that I'm >>> right. >>> >>> Sent from my iPhone >>> >>>> On Aug 28, 2015, at 9:54 AM, Slau Halatyn wrote: >>>> >>>> I just got into the studio and confirmed the issue with trying to write >>> automation using only VoiceOver. Over the years where we've had no less >>> than 10 VoiceOver users beta test Pro Tools, not once has anybody reported >>> this issue. That, of course, is not surprising since most of the users have >>> control surfaces and would never dream of writing automation using only >>> VoiceOver. Those testers without a surface clearly never got around to >>> testing this specific aspect. From an accessibility standpoint, the >>> knee-jerk >>> reaction is to look at things that are unlabeled or invisible, etc. >>> Functionality >>> such as this is taking it a step further and so it's not inconceivable how >>> this >>> could be the case. I've confirmed the behavior in both version 11 and 12 >>> and I >>> doubt it was any different going back to version 8. >>>> >>>> Anyway, as I said earlier, this won't get fixed in the upcoming release >>>> but I'll >>> submit a bug report for the future. >>>> >>>> Slau >>>> >>>> -- >>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. >>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >>> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>> >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >>> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >>> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: confirmed plug-in automation issue
Actually, I believe in ProTools 10.0 it was possible to automate plug-ins from the keyboard. I vaguely remember doing a bid on it during the creation process of our tutorials, and I think we decided against it for one reason or another but I'm going to see if I can track down the audio and listen to it to see if it worked. I also have an old machine around here that still has 10 on it maybe I will fire it up when I get home tonight and just make sure that I'm right. Sent from my iPhone > On Aug 28, 2015, at 9:54 AM, Slau Halatyn wrote: > > I just got into the studio and confirmed the issue with trying to write > automation using only VoiceOver. Over the years where we've had no less than > 10 VoiceOver users beta test Pro Tools, not once has anybody reported this > issue. That, of course, is not surprising since most of the users have > control surfaces and would never dream of writing automation using only > VoiceOver. Those testers without a surface clearly never got around to > testing this specific aspect. From an accessibility standpoint, the knee-jerk > reaction is to look at things that are unlabeled or invisible, etc. > Functionality such as this is taking it a step further and so it's not > inconceivable how this could be the case. I've confirmed the behavior in both > version 11 and 12 and I doubt it was any different going back to version 8. > > Anyway, as I said earlier, this won't get fixed in the upcoming release but > I'll submit a bug report for the future. > > Slau > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: Cannot start recording by pressing CMD + spacebar in PT 11
I have found that if I do not delete the i'll, and empty the trash, it does not work. So backing it up and have actually been a mistake because the file does get regenerated want to reboot your computer. Sent from my iPhone > On Aug 26, 2015, at 12:07 PM, Robin Kipp wrote: > > Hi, > thanks for pointing me in the right direction! After some Googling, I found > various posts by people having the exact same problem, however most of them > are quite dated (2007 and earlier). I found the tip about removing > ~/Library/Preferences/com.apple.symbolichotkeys.plist so I backed up the file > and then removed it from that folder. Unfortunately, however, this didn’t > actually solve the problem for me… I tried rebooting, then creating a new > session but without any luck… So, in case you do have any more details or an > article that you could share I definitely would greatly appreciate that! > All the best, > Robin >> Am 26.08.2015 um 15:46 schrieb mcdiemert . : >> >> I've had this happen to me at times when I switch keyboards, or use a >> wireless/Bluetooth KB. >> There is a symbolic hotkeys files that needs deleted and preferences >> as far as spot light need reset. I'll try to dig the article up if I >> can when I'm back today, but if you google the issue it should pop up. >> >> >>> On 8/26/15, Robin Kipp wrote: >>> Hi Peter, >>> I’m on a 2013 Mac Pro using a Bluetooth keyboard. >>> HTH and thanks for the response! >>> Robin >>> >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >>> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >>> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> >> >> -- >> Warm Regards: >> Matt Diemert >> 330-980-0046 >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: Auto tune 8 or auto tune efx with BO?
Good morning, the Melda plugs work pretty well, but there nothing super Duper! I have used their tuning plug-in a few times and it helped, but not nearly as flexible as auto tune. Sent from my iPhone > On Aug 7, 2015, at 7:36 AM, Christopher-Mark Gilland > wrote: > > Yes. E F X is accessible. I used to use it before upgrading to 8.1 Native. > It works perfectly. I upgraded as I needed a bit more flexability, but > accessibility alone wasn't an issue at all. > > Chris. > > - Original Message - > From: Shawn Brock > To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com > Sent: Friday, August 07, 2015 7:32 AM > Subject: Re: Auto tune 8 or auto tune efx with BO? > > Hi Slau, > > Thanks very much for the feedback. I think I will download a demo of each, > and report back to the list my findings. > > Not to hijack my own thread, but another project I have is to download the > collection of 24 free plugins from Melda Production. They also have a vocal > tuning plugin as part of that offering. Anyone tried this suite? > > http://www.meldaproduction.com/plugins/product.php?id=MFreeEffectsBundle > > > > Sent from my iPhone > >> On Aug 6, 2015, at 6:59 PM, Slau Halatyn wrote: >> >> Hi Shawn, >> >> I'm not sure if the EFX version is accessible. I'd imagine that it is but, >> then again, that's just an educated guess. AutoTune 8 is certainly >> accessible and works well. >> >> Slau >> >> On Aug 6, 2015, at 6:49 PM, Shawn Brock wrote: >> >>> Hi all, >>> I have a gig recording vocals for a client. Being that I just got going in >>> PT two months ago, I haven't built up a plethora of AX plugs, and Auto Tune >>> is a must have for some folks. Just wondering if it is worth shelling out >>> the extra cash on 8, or if EFX would offer the same access with VO? It >>> seems that EFX just don't have graphical tuning node, which I would guess >>> we can't use anyhow... And yes I know, I could just doqnload the demos and >>> see for myself, but I had some hope that some of you would be willing to >>> share your experiences... I could always fire up my Windows computer for >>> this session, but I would rather just have those days behind me... >>> Thanks, >>> Shawn will >>> Sent from my iPhone >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >>> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >>> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: Sliding by Milla Seconds
I am in ProTools 11, so from the edit window, I use the item chooser and find the nudge button. Then I voiceover space on that button and type in the value I want for example zero. Zero. 10. Sent from my iPhone > On Jun 2, 2015, at 5:12 PM, Poppa Bear wrote: > > Sorry, where do you change the nudge values? > > -Original Message- > From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On Behalf > Of mcdiemert . > Sent: Tuesday, June 02, 2015 11:40 AM > To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com > Subject: Re: Sliding by Milla Seconds > > If you had a stereo track, using the context menu shift VO M you could split > to mono. If it's a mono track already, using the same menu duplicate the > track. Then make a selection of the second track, several ways you could do > that I'd probably start at the first region, and use shift option return to > select to the end. Set your nudge value to your desired value, and press > minus to move it back in time. > These are the short and sweet directions. If this doesn't make sense please > say so, and I'll try to be more clear. > > HTH. > > >> On 6/2/15, Poppa Bear wrote: >> If I want to split an say acoustic guitar track into two monos and >> slide one track back say 10 milla seconds, then what is the best way >> to go in PT? I don't want to use a plug because I want to save a few >> processor punches for bigger plugin needs. >> >> Thanks >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >> Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >> an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > > > -- > Warm Regards: > Matt Diemert > 330-980-0046 > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: trimming a drum loop in Pro Tools 12
Nick, the easiest way to extend a selection through the end of the song is to duplicate it. You could also use the repeat option under the edit menu. Sent from my iPhone > On May 6, 2015, at 3:42 PM, Nick Gawronski wrote: > > Hi, I think I now have the loop as good as I can get it. What would be > the quickest method for taking the entire loop in loop playback and > extending it to the end of the song? I tried to record the loop when loop > playback was on on to another track but I can't get this process to work > when I send the drum loop to a bus then make a new track it does not > record the loop over and over like I wish. One suggestion for future > tutorials for the blind on Pro Tools is to cover things such as these > where so far searching the web has only told me mouse methods for doing > these tasks or to update the tutorials when new versions or accessibility > fixes come out so the tutorials could be as useful for the newer versions > of Pro Tools as they are for the older versions. Keeping around the older > content I think is a great idea but also adding new content would help us > students a lot who have projects we need to complete. I did try using the > trim tool but had no luck with it and the keyboard. Nick Gawronski >> On Wed, May 6, 2015 1:58 am, Stefan Albertshauser wrote: >> Hi Nick, >> >> >> What I would suggest is: >> 1. go to the end of the clip >> 2. Turn Tab to Transient on >> 3. Press Option + Shift + Tab to select the silence after the last >> transient and then delete it. >> >> Hope that helps. >> >> >> Best Stefan >> >>> Am 05.05.2015 um 22:38 schrieb Nick Gawronski : >>> >>> >>> Hi, I am having to make a remix of a song we did in class. I was given >>> a drum loop that I need to trim the end as there is quietness at the >>> end I need to clean up so when I use loop playback and have the clip >>> selected the drum loop plays purfectly. What is the easiest way to >>> remove no sound at the end of the loop once shift and tab are used to >>> select it as using normal down and up errow I am not purfectly aligned? >>> Then the directions tell me to use the trimmer tool in TCE mode so the >>> end of the loop aligns exactly with the 2 measures of the songs grids >>> the loop is in time with the rest of the song. The drum loop is on >>> it's own track as one clip. AFTER this I again need to use the trimmer >>> to extend the loop to the end of the song. After this I have to slide >>> the loop to match the bass drum the directions say to vision but my >>> instructor told me to try to do this step with the keyboard is this >>> even possible? Is changing and programming in the tempo something I am >>> going to be able to do accessible as well as speeding up the song after >>> changing the tracks from sample to tick based which I can do as I know >>> which button that is in the track. We did not get the loops for this >>> project until today and the project should be finished by Thurseday I >>> did look over all of the Pro Tools with speech tutorials but in version >>> 12 things look different then they did in 10 so this is why am posting >>> these questions as I would like to get this project done so I can turn >>> it in. Any help would be great. Nick Gawronski >>> >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>> an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, >>> visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit >> https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: Fade out for a clip
Hello, if you have your selection made, why not try option G for fade out. Then, if you wish to change the shape of the fade you can use command F. Sent from my iPhone > On May 6, 2015, at 11:40 AM, John André Lium-Netland > wrote: > > Hi, > > I would like to create a fade-out for a clip/region, but when I use the > Create Fade dialog (command-F), I’m only able to create fade-ins. It seems > like the settings I’m able to do with VoiceOver is not changing the type of > fade from a fade-in to a fade-out. Anyone had any experience with this? > > Best, > John André > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: pt ran out of cpu power
Steve, what do you have your buffer size set to? If it's lower, consider switching to 1024. Sent from my iPhone > On Apr 30, 2015, at 6:40 PM, Steve Sparrow wrote: > > Hi anyone seen this. > when trying to bounce to disk in real time in p t 11.31 i’m getting the > following error message. > protools ran out of cpu power try reactivating plugins or removing native > plugins. aae 9173. > i’d be happy to uninstall my plugs and reinstall if need be. How ever > everything is running fine apart from when i try to bounce in real time to > disk. No problem if i enable off line bounce,or what ever it’s called. > Any thoughts. > Steve > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: SPL free ranger eq question
I grabbed the Air eq this morning, but I’m not loving the way moving parameters from the keyboard works with VO and PT 11. I’ll try with my surface later today. On Apr 13, 2015, at 12:20 AM, Chris Smart wrote: > oh and i was a huge fan of the Maag4 EQ from Plugin Alliance, until the > Eiosis Air EQ. That one is now my go-to for almost everything. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: Stereo Wideners
BX solo is a free plug-in from plug-in alliance, it is a very nice widener. In fact I can't recommend enough the plug-ins from plug-in alliance. Recently have started using the SPL ranger EQ, and the mag EQ! Wonderful and accessible Sent from my iPhone > On Apr 12, 2015, at 3:06 PM, Slau Halatyn wrote: > > Hi JPR, > > I'm sure their plug-ins are great. They're simply cumbersome for a VoiceOver > user. Further, their installer is absolutely inaccessible. The stuff is > visually pretty dated and I'm sure it's all authored on the Windows side of > things. Still, at least they do offer a free bundle as well as their very > affordable offerings. I'll probably check out a few more of their plug-ins > eventually. > > Best, > > Slau > >> On Apr 12, 2015, at 12:45 PM, Jean-Philippe Rykiel >> wrote: >> >> Dear Slau. >> there are all like this, because most of the parameters concern Melda's very >> versatile modulation matrix. They have all kinds of internalLFOs, envelope >> followers, step sequencers and so on. Of course, you don't have to use >> these. But the problem is these parameters layout. The developer explained >> me that he could not change it anymore for backward compatibility >> reasons,so the parameters come in an order I can only describe as a good >> idea at a time. >> Nevertheless, they are great and cheap. >> Best, >> JPR >> >> http://www.jprykiel.com >> http://soundcloud.com/ryksounet >> http://twitter.com/ryksounet >> http://facebook.com/jeanphilipperykiel >> >> Le 12/04/2015 18:34, Slau Halatyn a écrit : >>> Melda is certainly one of the most prolific plug-in developers but, I have >>> to say, it's overwhelming how many parameters they manage to pack into a >>> plug-in. I think their basic flanger has something like 90 parameters and >>> one of their synths has something like 400 parameters. I'm sure it's great >>> stuff but it's really quite cluttered. That said, I've only taken a look at >>> about 3 of their playg-ins. Maybe the rest aren't quite as jammed. >>> >>> Slau >>> On Apr 12, 2015, at 11:58 AM, Chris Smart wrote: thanks At 11:43 AM 4/12/2015, you wrote: > dear Chris, > Melda productions has amazing and very affordable stuff, some parts of > their plug-ins are not accessible but many parameters can be used via > your DAW's automation. > http://www.meldaproduction.com/download.php > have a look. Among these are stereo enhancers, equalisers, vocoders, and > weirder things. > Enjoy, > JPR > > http://www.jprykiel.com > http://soundcloud.com/ryksounet > http://twitter.com/ryksounet > http://facebook.com/jeanphilipperykiel > > Le 12/04/2015 17:31, Chris Smart a écrit : >> Can anyone recommend a stereo widener that doesn't cause lots of phasing >> problems or ruin things when the mix is collapsed to mono? >> >> I have Waves S1 here and an older version of iZotope Ozone but am >> looking for other suggestions to try. >> >> thanks >> Chris > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: stereo track question
>From the tracklist table, if you select the track you should be able to press >voiceover shift M and in the same context menu where you could rename a track > you should see the option to split to mono. Sent from my iPhone > On Apr 3, 2015, at 6:55 AM, Steve Sparrow wrote: > > Hi. yes there is. I had to google this the other day. But have not tried to > do it as yet. Apparently, when you are in the track list, i think you have to > select the track, then there is a drop down menu, hopefully v o m will bring > up the appropriate menue. there is supposed to be an option in there called > split to tracks. This creates two extra tracks from the stereo track. so you > can then delete the one you don’t want, if need be. > > As i say. this came from the knowledge base on the avid web site. So you may > need to google this issue to get the full deal. But from what i can see it’s > basically doable. > h t h. > Steve > >> On 3 Apr 2015, at 5:48 am, Brian Howerton wrote: >> >> Hello all, >> If a track was imported as a stereo track, is there a way in PT to split the >> left and right tracks of the stereo track in to two mono tracks? Thanks, >> Brian >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: Having a bit of an issue with Ezdrummer2 for the Mac demo version
Addictive drums too can be used as a plug-in in ProTools 11 though it is an accessible. Sent from my iPhone > On Apr 2, 2015, at 5:43 AM, Scott Chesworth wrote: > > That's disappointing news. There's a basic level of usability under > Windows in standalone and as a VSTI, shame it doesn't appear to have > made it across to the Mac version. Keep us posted if you find a fix. > > Scott > >> On 4/2/15, Krister Ekstrom wrote: >> Hi there, >> I'm trying to test the EZDrummer 2 for the Mac, the demo version to see how >> it sounds, because i was under the impression and correct me if i'm wrong >> please, that Addictive drums 2 could not be used at all even as a plugin >> under Pro tools 11. I have installed EZDrummer and when i open the app in >> stand-alone mode all i get is "busy busy", now i don't expect EzDrummer to >> work or rather to be accessible in stand-alone mode, but here's the thing, >> when i open it as a plugin under Protools 11.3 Protools crashes and opens >> the crash reporter. Anyone have had this happen or am i missing something? >> /Krister >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: problem deleting selection
Hello, I doubt having a demonstration copy install is your issue here. When I first started with ProTools it was as a demo and I don't recall us ever being a problem. If you're using ProTools 11, unselect every track in the project, using voice over . Then reselect only the track that you wish to delete material from. The fact that you can delete audio using the tutorials just makes me there is just a selection problem going on here. Feel free to write me privately and perhaps I can give you a step-by-step Sent from my iPhone > On Apr 1, 2015, at 4:13 PM, Poppa Bear wrote: > > Tom, that could be it, many demos have restrictions and that may be one. > > -Original Message- > From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On Behalf > Of Tom Hessels > Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2015 11:43 AM > To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com > Subject: RE: problem deleting selection > > A strange thougt but good it be the 30-days trial I'm using? > I searched on the Avid website but good not find any restrictions of the demo. > > Tom. > > > > -Original Message- > From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On Behalf > Of Tom Hessels > Sent: woensdag 1 april 2015 21:34 > To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com > Subject: RE: problem deleting selection > > Hi Poppa, > Yes I selected the track. > I tried what you suggested but this also didn't work. > I think I had to start reading all the documentation. > It's always difficult to change from one program to another. > I've worked with cakewalk sonar for years and then you think that migrating > Can't be so difficult. Stupid thought... > But I will still give it a try. I was very impressed by the possibility to > make my own sounds in Ultra analog from Applied acoustics. > In the older days on winxp when using directixer this was also possible > within sonar. But now you can only do this in sonar using synth rack view. > And thas is very, very lot of work. > > Tom. > > > > > > -Original Message- > From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On Behalf > Of Poppa Bear > Sent: woensdag 1 april 2015 21:00 > To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com > Subject: RE: problem deleting selection > > Sorry to ask such a basic question Tom, but you are making sure that the > track you want to edit is selected? Let me ask you this, maybe create a new > track with audio on it, go to a section of the track, press the down arrow > and then press Shift, option, Delete at once and then the delete key and see > if it clears the section from the place you pressed the down arrow to the end > of the song. > > -Original Message- > From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On Behalf > Of Tom Hessels > Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2015 10:49 AM > To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com > Subject: RE: problem deleting selection > > Hi Slau, > It still doesn't work. > It becomes a bit confusing for me. > I loaded the session that the protools with speech boys provides with the > edit tutorial. > When I make a selection in one of the tracks of this session and delete it it > works fine. But when I add a new track and record something on it and then > make a selection and try to delete it it doesn't work. > I explore botgh tracks but can't find any difference. > Do you understand whats's happening here? > > Tom. > > > > > > -Original Message- > From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On Behalf > Of Slau Halatyn > Sent: zondag 29 maart 2015 16:42 > To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com > Subject: Re: problem deleting selection > > Hi tom, > > One of two things might be happening: > 1. Make sure you have track and edit selections linked as well as the edit > and timeline linked. this is under the Options menu. It sounds like you might > not actually have the track selected and/or the edit selection is not > actually linked to the timeline. > 2. You might not have waveforms being displayed. Make sure you see the word > waveform in the track view of the Edit window. > > Check those things for now. > > HTH, > > Slau > >> On Mar 29, 2015, at 2:07 PM, Tom Hessels wrote: >> >> Hi, >> I’m migrating from Sonar to Pro tools and that results in a lot of dumb >> questions. >> I.ve already learned a lot from podcasts from Kevin and pt with speech. >> But there’s still a problem with deleting a selection. >> I’m selecting a peace of audio using the up and down arrow keys. >> When pressing the spacebar I hear the selection. But when I press the >> backspace nothing happens accept when hitting the spacebar I hear the audio >> from start point of selection to the end of the track. >> What am I missing? >> Tom. >> >> >> >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to ptaccess+unsubscr
Re: Control surface help
David,, if you can get your hands on an alpha track, that would meet yourneeds. It has the ability to control plugs. Sent from my iPhone > On Feb 13, 2015, at 10:21 PM, David Eagle wrote: > > Alas you can not. Perhaps if the plugin parameters could be controlled by > midi values then plugins might be controllable - I don’t know. I have a > Beringer BCF2000 which I think works with ProTools under the HUI mode. I > think this also allows me to control send faders as well as track and > busfaders. At least that’s a start, but I could buy Reaper for £60 and > control anything I wanted with midi. > > OK, I’ll stop moaning. I’ve been suckered into using ProTools - it’s > extremely accessible - and so I’ll just have to put up with its idiosyncratic > quirks, which, let’s face it, are driven by making money through forcing you > to buy proprietary software. The Avid Artist control surfaces, which allow > you to control plugins, cost over £1000. Not sure I’m going to earn enough > from audio to justify that. > > > > > >> On 14 Feb 2015, at 02:26, Ricky Prevatte wrote: >> >> I truly do not know have not tried. Fact is I haven't used it that much I am >> getting ready to. Eat Q is not something I'm going to be doing with the >> control surface. >> >> Ricky Prevatte LMBT1154 >> >>> On Feb 13, 2015, at 8:54 PM, David Eagle wrote: >>> >>> Thanks for that Ricky. I’ve had a look on the Internet. I assume that you >>> can’t control plugin parameters with this? It seems as if this is the case >>> for surfaces that run in HUI mode. Does the Faderport allow you to change >>> EQ settings for instance, or is it just track volume and pan? >>> >>> Thanks. >>> >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >>> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >>> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: p t 10 and a a x plugins
Personally, I run version 10.0. This ensures that I have access to RTAS plugs. Ensures that I can access things like addictive drums,and VCC from slate digital. Sent from my iPhone > On Feb 9, 2015, at 2:14 PM, Steve Sparrow wrote: > > hey nick. i was under the impression that the ram could not be upgraded in > the mac easily.can this actually be done. > Steve > >> On 10 Feb 2015, at 5:08 am, Nick Gawronski wrote: >> >> Hi, I just took my mac book pro late model 2011 and got it upgraded to 16 GB >> the maximum amount of ram so yes get the system upgraded to the maximum even >> if you have to spend a little more as I don't really need that much ram but >> I feel that this ram will get it's uses. Nick Gawronski >>> On 2/9/2015 12:05 PM, Steve Sparrow wrote: >>> Hi. yes i can raise the buffer size, but when i rais it up to the next >>> setting, 128 samples, i am getting annoying delay, si 64 samples seems to >>> be the only setting where it sounds reasonable.e for tracking. I do have a >>> couple of plugins, compressor and a reverb unit set up swell, so i know >>> this adds to the load. is there anything else i can do to minimise clicks >>> and pops. Really i think the answer would more than likely be more ram. >>> Steve >>> On 9 Feb 2015, at 10:45 pm, TheOreoMonster wrote: If you are having pops and clicks in your audio raise the sample size of your buffer. So long as you aren’t trying to monitor through effects this shouldn’t affect anything. There was also a way to trash AAX plug ins so that it would force PT 10 to fall back to RTAS versions which were accessible. but there is a caviot regarding that, which I am blanking on at the moment, maybe someone else can weigh in there. > On Feb 9, 2015, at 3:57 AM, Steve Sparrow > wrote: > > Hi. i am thinking about using protools 10.39 fro some of my recording for > a while. Reason being this system really needs more ram. i only have 4 > gig in this thing. the machine tseems to run better in protools 10. only > thing is the plugins seem a bit inaccessible. I think this was mentioned > in the mat and rob tutorial. is there as issue with 10.39 and a a x,is > there a way of using my plugins in 10.39 or is there something i can do > to make them accessible. > > If this is not possible, i’ll put up with a few pops and clicks until i > get a new mac. > Steve > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: Virtual instrument issue.
I'll give that a look when I get back home this afternoon. Thanks so much for all the help. Sent from my iPhone > On Jan 30, 2015, at 9:40 AM, Slau Halatyn wrote: > > Matt, > > Have you looked at the track to see how the controller #64 data has been > captured? I'm not sure what's been recorded/captured via MIDI but, if holding > down the pedal yields the desired result, insert a controller #64 event On at > the beginning of the piece and see if that duplicates the effect. > > Slau > >> On Jan 30, 2015, at 9:24 AM, Matt Diemert wrote: >> >> Kevin, it responds if the pedal is just permanently held down.but otherwise >> it's almost like every hit comes down perfectly on the click with no sustain >> whatsoever. >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >>> On Jan 30, 2015, at 9:23 AM, Kevin Reeves wrote: >>> >>> When you hold the petal down and play the session, is the track properly >>> responding to all the petal up and down events, or does it now behave like >>> the petal is permanently being held down? >>> >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >>> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >>> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: Virtual instrument issue.
Kevin, it responds if the pedal is just permanently held down.but otherwise it's almost like every hit comes down perfectly on the click with no sustain whatsoever. Sent from my iPhone > On Jan 30, 2015, at 9:23 AM, Kevin Reeves wrote: > > When you hold the petal down and play the session, is the track properly > responding to all the petal up and down events, or does it now behave like > the petal is permanently being held down? > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: Virtual instrument issue.
Same behavior! Interestingly enough, I opened a project from July with many grand instantiated, and played it back and it plays back perfectly fine it's about six minutes of piano Sent from my iPhone > On Jan 30, 2015, at 9:12 AM, Kevin Reeves wrote: > > I think this is a bug in Mini Grand, oddly enough. > Try instantiating Xpand 2 and pick one of their pianos. Not as good, but > still worth the test. See if the same thing happens. > > Kevin > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: Virtual instrument issue.
Good morning, even with midi merge set to off the problem persists. The only way that the piano sounds normal, is if the track is armed and I'm holding down the sustain pedal.i've tracked virtual piano several times without this happening though it has happened to me once before and I scrapped the idea. I'm just wondering if there's anyway for me to bounce the midi to an audio track so that at least I have the normal sounding piano.any thoughts would be appreciated. Sent from my iPhone > On Jan 29, 2015, at 8:10 PM, Slau Halatyn wrote: > > Hi Matt, > > This is a known and quite infamous bug that has been in Pro Tools since, wait > for it, version 7. Yes, that's right. I truly have no idea why this bug still > hasn't been squashed. Anyway, don't hold your breath but here's a work-around: > > Don't use MIDI Merge. That kind of sucks for those who like to use that mode > but, hey, you can always just use regular punch-in recording and you'll > pretty much get the same results for piano/keyboard playing. > > Hope that helps, > > Slau > >> On Jan 29, 2015, at 6:53 PM, mcdiemert . wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> wondering if anyone has seen this behavior. In both PT 10 and 11, I >> create a virtual instrument track, and instantiate the mini grand >> plugin. I arm the track, and record a pass and when I play it back, >> it was as if I didn't use the sustain pedal. However, if I press play >> while holding the sustain pedal and continue doing so as the pass >> plays, the piano sounds fine. I've tested with an m audio 61 USB, as >> well as an older clavenova with midi out. >> Any thoughts would be greatly appreciated. >> >> -- >> Warm Regards: >> Matt Diemert >> 330-980-0046 >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: Numb pad is still down
I have used a Logitech wireless keyboard with ProTools for the past two years with no problems whatsoever! It is USB over infrared.and this sounds like exactly what Papa is using. Sent from my iPhone > On Jan 7, 2015, at 8:03 AM, Slau Halatyn wrote: > > OK, that's confusing. If it's wireless, how is it USB? Is it one of those USB > plug-in dongles that transmits a BlueTooth signal? At any rate, the problem > clearly isn't with Pro Tools. You need to grab an Apple Pro keyboard for > around $40. If you're determined to be wireless, use the Apple wireless > keyboard with one of the wireless num pads from Belkin or anything that Apple > sells in the Apple Store online. Those two solutions work with no problems. > > HTH, > > Slau > >> On Jan 6, 2015, at 11:14 PM, Poppa Bear wrote: >> >> Hello Slau, it is a wireless USB keyboard with built in NUMB pad. The Num >> pad commander works, but none of the normal num pad keystrokes work what so >> ever, not even entering in values. >> >> -Original Message- >> From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On Behalf >> Of Slau Halatyn >> Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2015 2:36 PM >> To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com >> Subject: Re: Numb pad is still down >> >> Papa, >> >> It sounds like there's a system level problem with your num pad. There are >> no commands to turn off the num pad in Pro Tools. It's either classic, >> Transport or Shuttle (on HD systems). Apart from that, num lock and num pad >> commander are the only other variables. Does num pad commander work >> correctly? Can you enter values from the num pad? Can you enter counter >> values? are you using an extended keyboard or is it a separate num pad? USB? >> BlueTooth? >> >> Slau >> >>> On Jan 6, 2015, at 5:44 PM, Poppa Bear wrote: >>> >>> I’ve taken a break for a few days in the studio, but my numb pad PT >>> commands are still not working. Rew, FWD, record, marker, nudge, metronome, >>> none of these functions will work from the numb pad. I can flip on and off >>> the numb pad commander, I can turn numb lock on and off, but I cannot use >>> any PT commands with it. Any more thoughts would be great. >>> >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >>> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >>> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: Protools 11
Good morning, as far as plug-ins are concerned, the stock plug-ins Included with ProTools work very well with voiceover. Also many third-party plug-ins are accessible in ProTools 11. As far as installation goes, you will need sighted assistance when using the Ilok manager. Sent from my iPhone > On Jan 4, 2015, at 9:29 AM, Christian wrote: > > Hi folks, > OK, so now I got the Ilok and ready to install Protools trial later today. > Was just wondering how it is with he effects, will I be able to access them? > I read somewhere that there could be problems with that. > And also, will I need sighted assistance with activating Protools or how is > it with the Ilok system? > Many thanks! > Christian > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: Christmas tune
Definitely enjoyed both songs. Was that a real her Monica on the Christmas song, or was it a virtual instrument? Sent from my iPhone > On Dec 24, 2014, at 5:49 AM, Nick Gawronski wrote: > > Hi, I did enjoy both songs. Did you do all parts of these songs? Nick > Gawronski >> On 12/23/2014 6:33 PM, Rui Vilarinho wrote: >> hmm... since nobody liked the cover , i picked the guitar and bang bang, I >> recorded another one,a Xmas tune though! >> Merry Xmas guys ... grin . >> https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/16775692/FelizNatal%2CRuiVilarinho.mp3 >> >> Rui Vilarinho >> >> - Original Message - From: "Rui Vilarinho" >> To: >> Sent: Sunday, December 21, 2014 11:23 PM >> Subject: Re: Christmas tune >> >> >>> Hi guys, so... it's Xmas season, and a new year is right on the corner >>> right?! >>> I hope you have great time with your loving ones. >>> Slau, greatXmas tune! thanks for sharing. >>> hmm...Chris... after reading your mail I was expecting a song a lot worse! >>> probably you just need to find your confort zone, wherever that means! grin >>> . >>> I dont have any Xmas song but I have one that I made weeks ago that at >>> least talks about clouds, butterflys, fairlytails and so on ... Well, I >>> cant remember if I already shared the folowing cover, anyway I share here >>> with you guys, hope you like it! >>> >>> https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/16775692/LittleWing-RuiVilarinho.mp3 >>> >>> All good, >>> Rui Vilarinho >>> >>> >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >>> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >>> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: Christmas tune
Slau, that was excellent! The piano was gorgeous. In the spirit of sharing original Christmas songs, here is a song that my wife wrote two weeks ago. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=f_fnAxENx5s Sent from my iPhone > On Dec 19, 2014, at 11:53 PM, Sean A. Cummins wrote: > > Thanks Slau, I genuinely needed that... > > Merry Christmas > > Sean > > - Original Message - > From: Slau Halatyn > To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com > Sent: Friday, December 19, 2014 2:38 PM > Subject: Christmas tune > > I was just waiting to make sure there was a YouTube version available, lest I > was accused of pimping the tune… > > Here's a song I co-wrote some years ago entitled "If Every day Were > Christmas." Some will remember the big version I produced back in 2005. This > is my own, solo version, as originally intended—mellower and, let's face it, > what's a holiday tune without a little schmaltz? > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cckXxjCkLxU&feature=youtu.be > > For what it's worth (and that would happen to be around 99 cents), it's > available in the iTunes store as well: > https://itunes.apple.com/us/album/if-every-day-were-christmas/id946585587?i=946585588 > > And now, back to our regularly scheduled program. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: cannot delete audio
I have seen this happen quite often and ProTools version 11. It does not happen at all and 10, and if I have multiple tracks in a project more than five or six, it typically behaves as expected. My workaround is exactly what David has described here. Sent from my iPhone > On Dec 4, 2014, at 11:38 AM, David Eagle wrote: > > Just to correct my last message. I seemingly have to navigate to the track > below the one I want to change, and hit control and P. Then the track above > will delete. I’m only working with one audio track in my files at the moment. > I have three tracks in my project. A blank audio track, a master fader track, > and a track with some audio on. I cannot delete the audio unless I navigate > to the track below and press control P. No idea why. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: Slate Digital Virtual Mix Rack: Accessibility Fail!
Scott, so far both the RTA ass and aax Versions are unusable. Nothing is labeled that makes any sense. I was able to get the revival plug to work by having someone cited drag it into the plug-in. Then I moved the thickness parameter and saved it as a default plug-in. So at least I can move the thickness and shimmer settings for the free plug. Sent from my iPhone > On Nov 25, 2014, at 2:49 PM, Scott Chesworth wrote: > > Urgh, disappointing. > > I've never managed to get a response directly from Steven himself > (tried via Twitter as I couldn't find an email). Based on that, I'd > say you'd likely be spending time more productively hitting up Paul > via email and getting on the phone with Kevin. Either way, please make > them aware of it man. I'll do the same. > > One thing... before Chris and I and whoever else here cares enough to > start a mini crusade, could someone tried this with the AAX format? I > ask because it strikes me as odd that presumably anyone using a > control surface will also be being served up a raw deal. That's a lot > of users, surely! That makes me wonder whether it's something that's > gone awry during the port process, rather than the automatable > parameters being this shoddy across the board... > > Scott > >> On 11/25/14, Chris Smart wrote: >> Hi folks. >> >> I don't know what the situation is like under ProTools on the Mac, >> but on Windows, Slate Digital's VMR is an accessibility fail. >> >> Their other plug-ins (VBC VCC VTM) expose parameters with meaningful >> names and in Sonar, I can adjust them in the Inspector., and use them >> on just about everything. I assume a similar thing happens in Reaper >> when you list parameters. >> >> When you install VMR, one of the possibilities given is to install >> individual modules. This suggests that possibly, you could then work >> with the VMR components as individual plug-ins. Nope. You insert >> the VMR on a track or bus, and that's it! >> >> Looking at the list of exposed parameters we have the following: >> Bypass on/off: I assume this is a global bypass. >> Then we have a list of A power on/off through H power on/off: I >> assume this is power on/off for each of eight slots in the rack. We >> also have A through H solos, which I assume solo each of eight slots >> in the rack. Since individual components like EQ's and compressors >> can be reordered by sighted users, these parameter labels tell us >> nothing useful, such as the contents of each rack slot. >> >> Then it gets more obtuse. A1 through A16, B1 through B16, all the way >> to H1 through H16. >> >> I'm going to submit a ticket to technical support, but if someone has >> a direct email for Steven Slate himself, perhaps he should be made >> aware of this. >> >> It's a shame, since given the quality of this stuff, I was going to >> replace my Waves Neave and 1176 emulations with this, among other things. >> >> >> Chris >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: Protools with Mac Mini
Also, if I remember correctly, the new model has two thunderbolt ports. This could be very important at some point in time. Sent from my iPhone > On Nov 4, 2014, at 11:22 AM, ashley cox wrote: > > I’d probably go with the 2012 model and upgrade the ram > >> On 4 Nov 2014, at 16:20, Black wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> Does anyone work with ProTools on new Mac Mini latest 2014? >> I’m making a decision to buy between the 2012 and 2014 model. >> The main difference between dose is the CPU For the same price the 2012 >> model contains 2.3 quart core I7 Gen3 4 Gb ram, while the 2014 model >> consists of 2.6 duo core I5 gen4 8 Gb ram. >> Wich one should I choose? >> Best, >> Black >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: click track
Hello, if you have a numeric keypad press the number seven. Sent from my iPhone > On Jul 27, 2014, at 10:25 PM, Steve Sparrow wrote: > > Hi. anyone tell me how to enable the click track in p t. i have set my tempo, > and all that stuff, just not sure how to enable it and disable the click. > Steve > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: Can anyone give me any tips on using Addictive drums with ProTools please?
Trevor, I believe I posted my side of presets to the list several months back. If you're unable to find that link in the archive, I will try to email it to you when I get home. They are not perfect but there's a good bit of them probably nearly 80 or 90 Sent from my iPhone > On Jul 10, 2014, at 1:17 PM, "trevor" wrote: > > I got my son to help me put addictive drums on today. > I opened up ProTools and selected a stereo instrument track, sorted out the > outputs and opened up inserts. > Then I chose instruments and then Addictive drums. > they came blasting through loud and proud and they sounded excellent. > when I tried to change them there wern’t any options in the combo box, only > the factory default. > Not happy with this, I started clicking over to the right of that and sure > enough, I managed to find quite a lot of presets and I was happy with that, > until, I couldn’t get to them any more. > Does anyone know a fool proof way of accessing the addictive drums presets > please? > > Thank you, > > Trevor > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: How should I handle this situation?
Chuck, you certainly could do it this way, but sometimes I want to do multiple tracks at the same time so the plug-in method what's easier for me. Sent from my iPhone > On Jul 9, 2014, at 11:02 AM, CHUCK REICHEL > wrote: > > Hi Matt, > Jason posted the pt key commands for adjusting clip gain several months ago. > So may be Jason can chime in to give the steps to using clip gain again? > I haven't used the steps as of yet so I can't give you the exact steps. > YMMV > Chuck > > > CHUCK REICHEL > soundpicturerecord...@gmail.com > www.SoundPictureRecording.com > 954-742-0019 > Isaiah 26 : 3 > Thou wilt keep him in perfect peace, whose mind is stayed on thee: because > he trusteth in thee. > > In GOD I Trust > >> On Jul 9, 2014, at 9:55 AM, mcdiemert . wrote: >> >> Rosco, >> I'm on the road much of this morning, and mid day, but will try to do >> this for you when I'm back home. I'll email you privately with the >> public link. >> >>> On 7/9/14, Rosco Vittore wrote: >>> If you could dropbox those plug presets to me, and explain how to go about >>> importing them, that would be very appreciated. >>> >>> I don't personally have the Dropbox software, so doing a share folder would >>> >>> not be the easiest. If you could just e-mail me a public link to get them, >>> >>> that would be great. >>> >>> Rosco. >>> >>> - Original Message - >>> From: "mcdiemert ." >>> To: >>> Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2014 8:45 AM >>> Subject: Re: How should I handle this situation? >>> >>> >>>> Rosco, Typically, I use the Trem plugin which would allow you to say >>>> adjust the gain down 10db sort of acting as a pad. However, In pro >>>> Tools 11, I can't seem to get VO to adjust the slider in this plug in. >>>> I have made a few presets of 5db incraments which I could potentially >>>> put in dropbox if you had any intrest in approaching it this way. This >>>> is another reason why I keep PT 10 around there are just a few plugs >>>> that I need in a pinch that I have little access to in PT 11. >>>> >>>> >>>>> On 7/9/14, Rosco Vittore wrote: >>>>> Guys, >>>>> >>>>> I do understand that this may be more a mixing question than it is a PT >>>>> question in and of itself. Therefore, I'm going to be brief. >>>>> >>>>> The story goes, that I have a song which I need to record my lead vocals >>>>> >>>>> on >>>>> >>>>> the top of. The music has already been done as a Sound Choice karaoke >>>>> soundtrack which I have ripped from CD into lossless wave format. >>>>> Effectively, I need to import this wave file on a stereo audio track in >>>>> PT >>>>> 11. That's not the issue though; I definitely know how to do that. The >>>>> problem is, as most of you know, any production material which is in >>>>> final >>>>> release mainstream finalization is most likely going to already be >>>>> mixed, >>>>> and more likely still, mastered. This means that they're going to ride >>>>> their >>>>> >>>>> fader as close to 0DB as they can. The issue is, by default, in PT, the >>>>> meter is set to show my input level, which is generally exactly what I'd >>>>> want. In this case however, I need to find some way before doing >>>>> anything >>>>> with my master fader that I can get that karaoke track down to about >>>>> a -14 >>>>> to -12 DB level. If I run my fader on the track from the default of 0DB >>>>> downward to a negative value, say, -4DB we'll just say, that isn't going >>>>> >>>>> to >>>>> >>>>> effect the meter readout right to the right of that fader since we're >>>>> dealing with the input level, not the output. Am I understanding >>>>> correctly? >>>>> >>>>> In other words, regardless where I move that volume slider, the meter >>>>> isn't >>>>> >>>>> going to change read a lower or higher value than before. >>>>> >>>>> If this is the case, and I'm correct, then what's the best technique for &g
Re: PT 11: I finally? diddit! Now, I have a few questions.
Chris, you are definitely able to run both ProTools 10, and 11, on the same system! I do it daily, as there are still some plug-ins that I have not been able to update to the new format! Sent from my iPhone > On Jul 3, 2014, at 7:25 PM, "Christopher-Mark Gilland" > wrote: > > I finally got ahold of Sweetwater and got myself upgraded from PT 10, to > PT11! They even helped me with the ILok barrier. I'm in business, and now > am downloading all my dmg's. > > OK, so... I do have a couple of questions. there may be a somewhat fair > amount here, and I'm positive I'll have more for you all as I progress, > however, I'd appreciate answers to as many of these as you all can provide > promptly. > > 1. It was my understanding that I could run ProTools 10.0 and ProTools 11.X > both on the same Mac computer. Now, Matt from Sweetwater is telling me > differently. I'm definitely! not blaming anyone here one way or another on > this theory. I simply am asking for my own curiosity if this still is true. > Matt claimed that it used to be the case, yes, but not anymore. I just want > this confirmed. > > 2. Am I understanding correctly that the Air Creative Collection is > basically my virtual instruments? Did that basically replace Xpand2? If so, > is selecting my bank/preset, IE, woodwinds/brass then flute, considered > accessible? > > 3. I hear that RTas is basically now becoming legacy. It's still around, > yeah, but slowly but surely people are leaning more away from it and toward > the new AAX plugins. So, my 3rd question is, are the new AAX plugins which > come with PT11 accessible, as far as using the librarian menu etc? I know in > 10.0 they really weren't, and you basically kind of had to hack things a bit > to replace them all with the old RTas ones. Is this still true? If so, I > need step by step instructions on how to do it. > > 4. Finally, aside from offline bouncing, what other cool new things will I > find from PT 10.0 to the newest build of 11 that would benefit someone like > me who uses Voiceover and is totally blind? Before anyone comments, no, I > don't have a braille display... Oh sweet Jesus, do I wish! I understand I > could look at the documentation, which believe me, I will, but, that's only > gonna help me from a generalized standpoint. It's not really gonna base it > on V O support. > > 5. Finally, Yes, I'm on the latest public official non-beta build of OSX > Mavericks. I presume that this'll be OK? Sweetwater said it shouldn't be > any problem whatsoever. > Anyhow, thank you for all of the help. Now, to finish getting those DMG's, > and then purchase the remaining packages from protools with speech. > > Bye yall! > > Chris. > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: most accessible pro tools 10 and 11 combination
>From what I can tell, this is also where ProTools puts the plug-ins for >version 11, so this would have an adverse effect on him as he's running both >10 and 11. This is why I personally run version 10.0, and version 11.1.3. >Rather than running an updated version of 10. It gives me access to both our >TAS, and AAS plug-ins. Sent from my iPhone > On Jun 28, 2014, at 12:09 AM, TheOreoMonster wrote: > > That's exactly why i thought you were doing and thats not where to delete > them from. > The correct path is on your macintosh HD/Library folder. I don't remember the > exact path right now as I do not have pro tools installed on this mac at > the moment. But in that library folder you should find an avid or digidesign > folder and a plug in folder in there, where you should find the .aax > files.On Jun 27, 2014, at 7:58 PM, Nick Gawronski > wrote: > >> Hi, I am going into the Avid folder and then I believe the pro tools folder >> then going into the AAX folder and deleting all of those files in that >> alias. I then go back and delete the alias to make sure things are removed. >> Is this the best process? Nick Gawronski >>> On 6/27/2014 12:22 AM, TheOreoMonster wrote: >>> Where are you removing the AAX plug ins from? I find most people are >>> removing them from the degidesign or avid folder in their application >>> folder and i think that just delete the alieus (aka the shortcut as you may >>> think of it on windows) but not the actual plug ins. On Jun 18, 2014, at 4:42 AM, Nick Gawronski wrote: Hi, With pro tools 10.3.9 I have tried the method of removing the AAX plugins but the RTAS plugins don't appear and when I go into any effects with the AAX plugins I find that they are not very usable at all. What is the most accessible combination of pro tools 10 and pro tools 11 that is around currently and how do I get both of these installations working properly where I can use the plugins? Nick Gawronski -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: Where am i?
Hello, the best way to do this, is to use voiceovers hotspot features. I would put a hot spot at start, end, and length Sent from my iPhone > On Apr 16, 2014, at 9:34 PM, "Poppa Bear" wrote: > > I am not in front of my mac right now, but it is in the edit screen under one > of your clusters, I just can't remember the name. If I turn PT on here soon > I will let you know the name of the cluster that you need to interact with, > it is related to the currser. > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: taking the plunge
Hello, not sure if it works in sonar, but I have used it in reaper under windows with success. I have tracked entire albums with this unit and the sound quality couple with ProTools comes out very nicely Sent from my iPhone > On Apr 12, 2014, at 8:11 PM, Steve Sparrow wrote: > > Ok. Thanks for this mat. I have heard good things about the scarlet. Think > i’ll just go and check this out. > Do you know if it works with windows and jaws, running sonar. > I am just getting in to the mac, only had one for a couple of weeks. I will > more than likely be running sonar 8.5.3 for at least a few months yet. But > tools is ware i’m heading i think. > Focus right do some nice stuff. > Thanks again. > Steve >> On 12 Apr 2014, at 11:06 pm, Matt Diemert wrote: >> >> Good morning, I personally use the scarlet 18 I 20, fromfocusrite is pretty >> much the sapphire 40. One major advantage is you don't really need to use >> the Scarlet makes control. Once installed I simply just use this in >> ProTools. Very decent sounding unit for the price point! I'm very impressed >> with it >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >>> On Apr 11, 2014, at 10:46 PM, Steve Sparrow >>> wrote: >>> >>> Just to add to my last email. I have also looked at the usb pre sonis and >>> would consider this if is accessible with voice over, I’ve also thought >>> about the apolo, but there is not much i o on the u a d stuff. But i’ve >>> heard great things about there plugging. I know ford and others on this >>> list uses u a d plugging, But i’m not sure about accessibility on there >>> hardware. >>> As i said, i’m happy to consider all options. I’d also settle for less mic >>> press if everything else was looking good. >>> >>> Steve >>>> On 12 Apr 2014, at 2:48 am, Poppa Bear wrote: >>>> >>>> Well Steve, I would think about the Digi 002, 003 or avid artust series. >>>> The Digi 002 will be the cheepist, but if you need good built in preamps, >>>> it is the bottom of the line more or less. Also, the 002 can work with >>>> Protools 11, but may not carry over to any versions after 11, I have a 002 >>>> and a 003 as well as the onyx 1620I. Are you going to use outboard pres or >>>> converters? Are you going to be recording professionally for clients, or >>>> for more personal stuff? These answers will make a difference. If you were >>>> recording for your self, you could probably get away with some of the UA >>>> apollo stuff and have some decent converters, pres and affects/plugs, but >>>> if you will have larger sessions where you would record multable sources >>>> at once then a control surface would be the way to go IMO. >>>> - Original Message - >>>> From: Steve Sparrow >>>> To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com >>>> Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2014 9:43 PM >>>> Subject: RE: taking the plunge >>>> >>>> Hey Poppa bear. I was wondering if you could tell me what audio >>>> interface-soundcard you run with pro tools. I’m interested to know what >>>> you rrun , as I’m about to upgrade, and need more advice on choosing >>>> something, that will take care of all my audio needs, and is accessable. >>>> I’ve bought a mac book pro, and am learning voice over, and I love it. >>>> Hoping to start investigating tools in a couple of months >>>> Stgeve >>>> >>>> >>>> From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com[mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On >>>> Behalf OfPoppa Bear >>>> Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2014 1:58 AM >>>> To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com >>>> Subject: Re: taking the plunge >>>> >>>> Hello Steve, this is Poppa Bear from the midi list, glad you made it over >>>> here, Chris Smart is over here now and a couple others as well. Slau gave >>>> you a good solad bottem line answer. After almost two years with PT, I >>>> can't see myself going back to Sonar for recording/engineering. I can't >>>> speak on the music production side as much because I am mainly running PT >>>> to record, mix and master my clients now. >>>> - Original Message - >>>> From: Slau Halatyn >>>> To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com >>>> Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2014 7:08 AM >>>> Subject: Re: taking the plunge >>>> >>>> Hi Steve, >>>> >>>> We
Re: taking the plunge
Good morning, I personally use the scarlet 18 I 20, fromfocusrite is pretty much the sapphire 40. One major advantage is you don't really need to use the Scarlet makes control. Once installed I simply just use this in ProTools. Very decent sounding unit for the price point! I'm very impressed with it Sent from my iPhone > On Apr 11, 2014, at 10:46 PM, Steve Sparrow wrote: > > Just to add to my last email. I have also looked at the usb pre sonis and > would consider this if is accessible with voice over, I’ve also thought about > the apolo, but there is not much i o on the u a d stuff. But i’ve heard > great things about there plugging. I know ford and others on this list uses u > a d plugging, But i’m not sure about accessibility on there hardware. > As i said, i’m happy to consider all options. I’d also settle for less mic > press if everything else was looking good. > > Steve >> On 12 Apr 2014, at 2:48 am, Poppa Bear wrote: >> >> Well Steve, I would think about the Digi 002, 003 or avid artust series. The >> Digi 002 will be the cheepist, but if you need good built in preamps, it is >> the bottom of the line more or less. Also, the 002 can work with Protools >> 11, but may not carry over to any versions after 11, I have a 002 and a 003 >> as well as the onyx 1620I. Are you going to use outboard pres or converters? >> Are you going to be recording professionally for clients, or for more >> personal stuff? These answers will make a difference. If you were recording >> for your self, you could probably get away with some of the UA apollo stuff >> and have some decent converters, pres and affects/plugs, but if you will >> have larger sessions where you would record multable sources at once then a >> control surface would be the way to go IMO. >> - Original Message - >> From: Steve Sparrow >> To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com >> Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2014 9:43 PM >> Subject: RE: taking the plunge >> >> Hey Poppa bear. I was wondering if you could tell me what audio >> interface-soundcard you run with pro tools. I’m interested to know what you >> rrun , as I’m about to upgrade, and need more advice on choosing something, >> that will take care of all my audio needs, and is accessable. >> I’ve bought a mac book pro, and am learning voice over, and I love it. >> Hoping to start investigating tools in a couple of months >> Stgeve >> >> >> From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com[mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On Behalf >> OfPoppa Bear >> Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2014 1:58 AM >> To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com >> Subject: Re: taking the plunge >> >> Hello Steve, this is Poppa Bear from the midi list, glad you made it over >> here, Chris Smart is over here now and a couple others as well. Slau gave >> you a good solad bottem line answer. After almost two years with PT, I can't >> see myself going back to Sonar for recording/engineering. I can't speak on >> the music production side as much because I am mainly running PT to record, >> mix and master my clients now. >> - Original Message - >> From: Slau Halatyn >> To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com >> Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2014 7:08 AM >> Subject: Re: taking the plunge >> >> Hi Steve, >> >> Welcome to the list. I can't comment on the comparison to sonar as I've >> never used it. I've used Pro Tools since around 2001 after switching from an >> analog console and multitrack tape machine. I won't sugarcoat it: you have a >> steep learning curve in front of you. You'll need to understand VoiceOver >> like the back of your hand as well as have a good grasp of the OS and how it >> works. Aside from that, Pro Tools is undoubtedly a complex program but so is >> Sonar and you learned that over time so, most importantly, you'll have to >> plan to spend a bunch of time learning it if you decide to go down this path. >> >> Cheers, >> >> Slau >> >> On Mar 12, 2014, at 7:26 AM, Steve Sparrow wrote: >> >> >> >> >> From: Steve Sparrow [mailto:i...@sparrowsound.com.au] >> Sent: Wednesday, March 12, >> Hi. My name is Steve Sparrow. I have just joined the list here. I am very >> seriously considering working with pro tools. I am currently a sonar user >> running sonar 8.5 with jaws. I am now considering pro tools, mainly because >> as we know the current sonar is no longer as accessable as it was. I have >> not bought a mac yet, but I think I’m getting very close to doing so. I know >> a little about voice over, and would be happy to put the time in to learning >> it. But I have never used pro tools and no nothing of it’s workings. So not >> really sured just where to start. I guess the first thing to find out is >> just how much access we have. I run a recording studio, and use sonar just >> about all the time. Does pro tools give us as much accessability as what I >> am used too in sonar. I am quiet happy to put the time in to learning a new >> system, if I can turn it in to a good solid work hor
Re: control surfaces
I'm on Mavericks as well, but the Alpha track works seamlessly! Sent from my iPhone > On Mar 21, 2014, at 7:28 AM, John Gunn wrote: > > Slau, > > A friend of mind is using the Presonus fader port and it uses the HUE > configuration but thanks for asking. > > Regarding Matt's suggestion I am unable to find one and when going to > Frontierdesign.com the latest drivers is for Lion and I'm on Mavericks. > > John > > >> On Mar 20, 2014, at 7:16 AM, Slau Halatyn wrote: >> >> Hi John, >> >> Check to see if it uses the HUI protocol which Pro Tools uses to connect >> with many control surfaces. If so, there's a good chance it'll work but, as >> always, checking with the manufacturer is perhaps the best way to confirm >> whether it'll be recognized. >> >> Keep us posted, >> >> Slau >> >>> On Mar 20, 2014, at 6:43 AM, John Gunn wrote: >>> >>> Hello, >>> >>> Besides of a control surface, has anyone had or use the Presonus fader >>> Port? I have an Mbox Pro and a modest setup which is why I am asking. >>> >>> John >>> >>> On Mar 19, 2014, at 7:13 PM, Slau Halatyn wrote: You might consider the Avid Artist series. From what I recall, Jason Dasent went that route. Again, not sure what your budget is. Slau > On Mar 19, 2014, at 7:14 PM, Jed Barton wrote: > > Haven't looked at anything yet, any ideas? > > -Original Message- > From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On > Behalf > Of Slau Halatyn > Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2014 6:38 PM > To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com > Subject: Re: control surfaces > > What have you already looked at in your budget? >> On Mar 17, 2014, at 10:53 PM, Jed Barton wrote: >> >> Hey guys, >> I am about to buy my protools setup. What I need is a good control > surface, >> something with an audio scrub wheel. Do you have any suggestions? >> >> Cheers, >> Jed >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>> >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >>> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >>> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: Universal audio plugs
There is currently no way to check out the demos without having one of their pieces of hardware to run to the plug-ins. That's the disappointing thing at times. Sent from my iPhone > On Mar 13, 2014, at 11:34 AM, Chris Smart wrote: > > Check out the demos. many of the UA plugs are excelent! > > I don't yet have the hardware to run them here on the Windows side, but they > really are nice. Especially good for me at least are the reverbs. > At 10:57 AM 3/13/2014, you wrote: >> I was checking these out yesterday online. I wonder how they are on PT11. >> The Church I go to has one. I wonder if the 32bit floating point they have >> is a step up or down from PT 64 capabilities? Never the less, it is nice to >> know now. Thanks for the feedback. >> - Original Message - From: "mcdiemert ." >> To: "ptaccess" >> Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2014 5:04 AM >> Subject: Universal audio plugs >> >> >>> Good morning all, >>> I had a chance to check out some universal audio plugs the other night >>> on my friends rig. He is running pt 9.3 so, these are RTAS plugs, but >>> the plugs worked seamlessly with Voice over! I tried probably 3 or 4 >>> compressors, including the neve, and LA-2 as well as the 140 reverb, >>> and ocean way verb. I ordered an apollo twin duo yesterday as it >>> comes with 12 of the UAD plugs at no additional cost. >>> Just thought this might be welcomed news to some of you. >>> >>> -- >>> Warm Regards: >>> Matt Diemert >>> 330-980-0046 >>> >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >>> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >>> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: Instructions for using clip gain.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >> >>>> Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. >> >>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >> >>>> an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >> >>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. >> >>> >> >>> -- >> >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> >>> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. >> >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> >>> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >> >>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. >> >> >> >> -- >> >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> >> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. >> >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> >> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >> >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. >> > >> > -- >> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> > "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. >> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> > email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >> > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. >> > >> >> >> -- >> Warm Regards: >> Matt Diemert >> 330-980-0046 >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: Novice User - Track Selection Issue
I typically use this if for some reason I have all tracks selected because pressing control p at this point would not change the selection. Nv S from my iPhone > On Feb 27, 2014, at 8:40 AM, Scott Chesworth wrote: > > Hey Slau, > > Just curious, what's the difference between that CTRL+Option+; > keystroke to retract the insertion cursor from the bottom track and > using CTRL+P to select the track above? I've never encountered the > keystroke you mentioned, trying to think of a use case where it'd > apply so there's more chance I'll remember it. > > Scott > >> On 2/27/14, Slau Halatyn wrote: >> To retract the insertion cursor from the bottom-most track, use the keyboard >> shortcut Control-Option-semicolon. This, however, is also the VoiceOver >> command for keyboard lock. So, you must first pass the shortcut through with >> Control-Option-tab, then use Control-Option-semicolon to retract the >> insertion from the bottom track. From there, you can use Control--semicolon >> and Control-p to move the insertion cursor to the desired track for >> editing. >> >> If all else absolutely fails and, for some reason, you can't get the cursor >> retracted, create a new track which whill automatically deselect the other >> tracks and the insertion cursor will be in the new track. Move the cursor >> with the shortcut keys to the desired track. >> >> BTW, make sure the All group isn't enabled or else the insertion cursor will >> be within all tracks no matter what you do. >> >> HTH, >> >> Slau >> >> On Feb 27, 2014, at 2:16 AM, Des Delgadillo >> wrote: >> >>> Hi: >>> >>> I'm curious as to whether someone else has encountered this issue and how, >>> if at all, they were able to solve it. When in the track list, I notice >>> that once a track is selected, I cannot unselect it. So when I need to >>> select and edit a different track, my consequent edit will be applied to >>> both tracks. >>> >>> I have tried everything I could think of, including quitting and >>> re-opening my session to no avail. Is there a shortcut or step I might be >>> missing? Any direction would be greatly appreciated. >>> Des >>> >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >>> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >>> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: Drum tracks, the saga continues
Be sure to unzip the file, and place it in the location I indicated. Once done you can place this plug on a track, and then choose one of these presets as a starting point. If then you didn't want to try and drum an entire song, You could drum a few measures of the song, and duplicate the measure, and/or copy and paste and put it in various points of the song. Also consider looking in to midi merge. It would allow you to say put a kick and snare in first, and go back and put all your accessory drums in place. Sent from my iPhone > On Feb 19, 2014, at 3:27 PM, Scott Chesworth wrote: > > Hey Matt, > > Would be great if I could grab those presets for Addictive from you? > As things stand I'm tweaking kit sounds using the automatable controls > in Reaper, but there's close to 250 controls to wade through, so some > presets as starting points would likely be a huge timesaver! Plus, as > I move over to PT for composition, I've no idea whether we get the > same amount of access on that platform yet. > > Cheers > > Scott > > >> On 2/19/14, matt diemert wrote: >> Krister, >> I have much of the precets for AD, but, at this point, I've never been >> able to use the built-in loops, grooves that they offer. I switch >> between precets, and build my own drums manually via an m-Audio >> keyboard. I'm a huge fan of Adictive and just bought the jaz brush >> pack, as my third AD pack add on. Have you considered using addictive >> to create loops for the things you are working with? Meaning maybe you >> play a few bars of something, and quantize it, and duplicate it to >> create a drum track? If you decide you want to buy addictive, reach >> out to me, and I'd be happy to gather up my presets. >> >>> On 2/19/14, Krister Ekstrom wrote: >>> When i wrote to XLN, all they said were, "We're sorry our program doesn't >>> work for you" and i got the impression they didn't want to help at all. >>> If >>> it was possible to get preset files for either addictive drums or strike >>> i'd >>> buy AD without delay and have someone sighted help me with installing it, >>> since their online installer won't work at all for us, that is, it works >>> when you fill in details about your name and such, but then it changes >>> interface from plain html into something unreadable for Voiceover and then >>> i >>> can't do a thing with it. >>> But as i said any help with preset files for either Strike or AD or any >>> alternative suggestion is greatly appreciated. >>> Thanks. >>> /Krister >>> >>>> 19 feb 2014 kl. 19:44 skrev Scott Chesworth : >>>> >>>> I'm sure I recall someone saying that XLN were really helpful in >>>> providing them with a bunch of preset files for Addictive Drums. >>>> Question is, what format does Pro Tools need? Could I bring over fxp >>>> files for example? >>>> >>>> Scott >>>> >>>>> On 2/19/14, Krister Ekstrom wrote: >>>>> Hi there, >>>>> I have so far tried to use Strike 2 and Addictive drums the demo >>>>> version, >>>>> but none of them has styles or kits in the presets list, all it says is >>>>> "factory defaults". >>>>> I have also tried XLN Electric grand since i love the sound of the >>>>> Yamaha >>>>> CP80 electric grand piano but it's hard to work with, but i think it >>>>> can >>>>> be >>>>> editable from a midi keyboard. When it comes to Synths i have had >>>>> somewhat >>>>> success with the Arturia CS-80V. You can't get to the presets, however >>>>> you >>>>> can edit parameters and unlike in Pro tools 10 you now see the value of >>>>> the >>>>> parameters change as you arrow up and down in them and there are quite >>>>> a >>>>> lot >>>>> of parameters you can now tweak. >>>>> Hope this helps somewhat. >>>>> /Krister >>>>> >>>>>> 19 feb 2014 kl. 17:42 skrev Scott Chesworth : >>>>>> >>>>>> Interested in any answers here too. I'm throwing together a bunch of >>>>>> new tunage at the moment and was hoping to bring the composition side >>>>>> of things over to PT 11. I'm relatively productive editing and mixing >>>>>> in PT, but composition itself is a hither to
Re: Drum tracks, the saga continues
Scott, Give me a day, or so, and I'll throw them in Dropbox. Some of the names aren't always right as I forgot about chucks trick for copying the last thing said by VO. Also, some seem duplicated, because I created a version with outs, meaning they could be sent to individual tracks to have complete control over compression and EQ on individual pieces. I personally kept version 10.0 around on my system to maintain access to RTAS plugs, and in doing so all of the controls within AD are usable from VO. There are however, several things we can't get to, as far as changing out pieces and setting up outs, so there is where presets are extremely helpful. I think there is nearly 70 of them. On 2/19/14, Scott Chesworth wrote: > Hey Matt, > > Would be great if I could grab those presets for Addictive from you? > As things stand I'm tweaking kit sounds using the automatable controls > in Reaper, but there's close to 250 controls to wade through, so some > presets as starting points would likely be a huge timesaver! Plus, as > I move over to PT for composition, I've no idea whether we get the > same amount of access on that platform yet. > > Cheers > > Scott > > > On 2/19/14, matt diemert wrote: >> Krister, >> I have much of the precets for AD, but, at this point, I've never been >> able to use the built-in loops, grooves that they offer. I switch >> between precets, and build my own drums manually via an m-Audio >> keyboard. I'm a huge fan of Adictive and just bought the jaz brush >> pack, as my third AD pack add on. Have you considered using addictive >> to create loops for the things you are working with? Meaning maybe you >> play a few bars of something, and quantize it, and duplicate it to >> create a drum track? If you decide you want to buy addictive, reach >> out to me, and I'd be happy to gather up my presets. >> >> On 2/19/14, Krister Ekstrom wrote: >>> When i wrote to XLN, all they said were, "We're sorry our program >>> doesn't >>> work for you" and i got the impression they didn't want to help at all. >>> If >>> it was possible to get preset files for either addictive drums or strike >>> i'd >>> buy AD without delay and have someone sighted help me with installing >>> it, >>> since their online installer won't work at all for us, that is, it works >>> when you fill in details about your name and such, but then it changes >>> interface from plain html into something unreadable for Voiceover and >>> then >>> i >>> can't do a thing with it. >>> But as i said any help with preset files for either Strike or AD or any >>> alternative suggestion is greatly appreciated. >>> Thanks. >>> /Krister >>> >>> 19 feb 2014 kl. 19:44 skrev Scott Chesworth : >>> >>>> I'm sure I recall someone saying that XLN were really helpful in >>>> providing them with a bunch of preset files for Addictive Drums. >>>> Question is, what format does Pro Tools need? Could I bring over fxp >>>> files for example? >>>> >>>> Scott >>>> >>>> On 2/19/14, Krister Ekstrom wrote: >>>>> Hi there, >>>>> I have so far tried to use Strike 2 and Addictive drums the demo >>>>> version, >>>>> but none of them has styles or kits in the presets list, all it says >>>>> is >>>>> "factory defaults". >>>>> I have also tried XLN Electric grand since i love the sound of the >>>>> Yamaha >>>>> CP80 electric grand piano but it's hard to work with, but i think it >>>>> can >>>>> be >>>>> editable from a midi keyboard. When it comes to Synths i have had >>>>> somewhat >>>>> success with the Arturia CS-80V. You can't get to the presets, however >>>>> you >>>>> can edit parameters and unlike in Pro tools 10 you now see the value >>>>> of >>>>> the >>>>> parameters change as you arrow up and down in them and there are quite >>>>> a >>>>> lot >>>>> of parameters you can now tweak. >>>>> Hope this helps somewhat. >>>>> /Krister >>>>> >>>>> 19 feb 2014 kl. 17:42 skrev Scott Chesworth >>>>> : >>>>> >>>>>> Interested in any answers here too. I'm throwing together a bunch of >>>>>> new tunage at the mome
Re: Drum tracks, the saga continues
;>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>> Groups >>>>> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. >>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>>>> an >>>>> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. >>>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>> Groups >>>> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. >>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>>> an >>>> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. >>> >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups >>> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>> an >>> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. >>> >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > -- Warm Regards: Matt Diemert 330-980-0046 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: Changing start of a song
Hello, it's 9 on the numeric Sent from my iPhone > On Feb 10, 2014, at 5:09 PM, Slau Halatyn wrote: > > That is bizarre… I don't remember that behavior under Snow Leopard but, then > again, I didn't use version 9 all that much. One more thought: Have you tried > using a num pad shortcut for toggling MIDI Merge? If I'm not mistaken, there > should be one. I don't recall. My control surface has a dedicated button for > toggling those things and I don't normally use the num pad for MIDI functions. > > Slau > >> On Feb 10, 2014, at 4:52 PM, Eric Lambier wrote: >> >> It's bloody annoying cause I can select or deselect conductor, metronome, >> wait for note, tempo, and count in toggle >>> On 2014-02-10, at 4:41 PM, Slau Halatyn wrote: >>> >>> Hi Eric, >>> >>> I'm not sure why you're seeing that but I'd have to guess that you're on >>> Mountain Lion? Buttons don't reflect correct states in Mountain Lion. >>> clicking on the MIDI Merge button under Mavericks works correctly as it >>> does in snow Leopard. Let me know if that's the case for you. >>> >>> Slau >>> On Feb 10, 2014, at 4:19 PM, Eric Lambier wrote: Hi Slau I have a question about the midi merge feature in the transport window. I can't seem to deselect it. I've re booted and tried different sessions templates and it still won't shut off. Any idea why? Many thanks Eric > On 2014-02-04, at 1:10 PM, Slau Halatyn wrote: > > If you do the following, it should work. It assumes you have linked the > Edit and Timeline and that edit selection follows track selection under > your Options menu. > 1. Show all tracks. > 2. Go to the edit window. > 3. Press Command-Option-3 (on the numbers row) to bring keyboard focus to > the Groups List. > 4. Press Shift-1 which is the shortcut for the "all" group. > 5. Move the insertion point to the beginning of the song. Most of the > time, if you've scrubbed or played back somewhere in the session, > pressing Return to get to the start and tab once should bring you right > to the beginning of the first region. Mind you, if the song wasn't edited > to begin with, there might be a count-off bar or a few seconds of > fiddling around before the song really starts. If you wish to get rid of > that, get the insertion point to exactly where you want the playback to > start. > 6. Make sure you're in shuffle mode by pressing f1. > 7. While holding Shift, press return to select everything to the > beginning of the session. > 8. Press Delete. > > Keep in mind to disable the all group by pressing Shift-1 and that > keyboard focus is on the groups table so, if there are other groups in > the session and you inadvertently type, you might be enabling or > disabling groups. A good thing to do would be to get into Keyboard focus > mode with Command-Option-1. Of course, there, you might also > inadvertently type a command that might cause an edit function but I'm > assuming you're not randomly pressing letters while not in some dialog > box. You should be fine otherwise. > > HTH, > > Slau > >> On Feb 4, 2014, at 12:23 PM, Poppa Bear wrote: >> >> So, some of my clients come in with instrumentals that start late into >> the metradome count and I can sometimes manipulate the start point buy >> cutting space at the front end and using shuffle, but it isn't fool >> proof. I noticed the change start point feature under the event/time >> menue, but havent got a handle on it. Is there some pointers to getting >> it to work? >> Thanks >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >> Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >> an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. >>> >>> >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >>> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
Massy plugins
Hi all, for those of you who may be on the look out for some accessible plugs, here is a pack that works very well with PT 8 through 10 as they are RTAS plugins. As I understand it, they are free to try and don't expire, you are encouraged to buy any that you like. You will get a message the first time your pro tools is opened after installing the plugs inviting you to upgrade ETC, just say no and move on. http://masseyplugins.com/#try HTH Matt -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: PACE Anti-Piracy's response regarding iLok License Manager accessibility
ank you for your email. >>>>> >>>>>I wanted to let you know that we have received >>>>>your emails and understand the situation. We too >>>>>are frustrated that the development tools we are >>>>>working with do not fully support these things >>>>>out of the box. We had our engineering spend >>>>>time to research this last Autumn and it is >>>>>going to be a big project to upgrade all of the >>>>>tools and deal with. Unfortunately it would >>>>>break some key components by moving forward to >>>>>that version and cause us to have to rewrite >>>>>more code. If it was a few days or a week - it >>>>>would have been done already but it will be at >>>>>least a few months of work (when it can be >>>>>scheduled) and a complete regressive test of the application and all >>>>>features. >>>>> >>>>>I hope you understand that >>>>><<http://ilok.com/>http://ilok.com/><http://ilok.com/>iLok.com >>>>>as it was could not >>>>>be supported. The weekly, sometimes daily, >>>>>changes in browsers made it nearly impossible >>>>>for us to keep up. In addition there features >>>>>and security issues that could not be solved in >>>>>the browser, hence we moved to the client side >>>>>model. Largely feedback has been extremely positive. >>>>> >>>>>For a site that is free to users our resources >>>>>are, unfortunately, somewhat limited. We will >>>>>be looking to when we can move to the newest >>>>>version of the tools and then take advantage of >>>>>the features that allow better access. The >>>>>code is not and Xcode project it is a cross >>>>>platform development toolset that is used worldwide. >>>>> >>>>>This topic is discussed at all meetings about >>>>>iLok License Manager and when we can make such >>>>>improvements. Once we are able to make such >>>>>improvements we will certainly contact you so >>>>>that you can assist us in being sure that these features fit your >>>>> needs. >>>>> >>>>>Again, thank you for your email. >>>>> >>>>>Very Best Regards, >>>>> >>>>>Andrew >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>-- >>>>>Andrew Kirk >>>>>Vice President >>>>>PACE Anti-Piracy, Inc >>>>>1860 South Bascom Avenue >>>>>Campbell, CA 95008 >>>>>Voice: (408) 377-9774 Ext 653 >>>>>web: >>>>><<http://www.paceap.com/>http://www.paceap.com/>www.paceap.com >>>>>and <<http://ilok.com/>http://ilok.com/><http://ilok.com/>iLok.com >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>On Jan 10, 2014, at 10:03 AM, Slau Halatyn >>>>><<<mailto:s...@besharpstudios.com>mailto:s...@besharpstudios.com><mailto:s...@besharpstudios.com>s...@besharpstudios.com> >>>>> >>>>>wrote: >>>>> >>>>>Hi Andrew, >>>>> >>>>>Thanks for your response. It's good to know that >>>>>the issue is on your radar. Being that the >>>>>license manager is cross-platform, you face very >>>>>much the same situation Avid did. I look forward >>>>>to assisting with testing when you do eventually >>>>>get to that point. Frankly, I believe that the >>>>>estimate of "months" of work is grossly >>>>>miscalculated and I hope that doesn't deter your >>>>>team too long. I'm confident that, once the work >>>>>does begin, you'll find that it's not at all as >>>>>complex as you might think. I've witnessed it >>>>>myself with Avid and I'm sure your experience >>>>>will be much the same. Thanks again for taking >>>>>the time to reply and I look forward to working with you. >>>>> >>>>>Best, >>>>> >>>>>Slau >>>>> >>>>>Slau Halatyn >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>On January 10, 2014, Andrew Kirk wrote: >>>>>Hi Slau, >>>>> >>>>>iLok License Manager is made with a tool called >>>>>Qt >>>>>(<<http://qt-project.org/>http://qt-project.org/>http://qt-project.org) >>>>>and we must switch to a newer version that came >>>>>out just when we went to release ILM. There have >>>>>been some major changes so this is not just one >>>>>feature but effects the entire application. I >>>>>think 2 months is actually an aggressive >>>>>estimate. We already spent a man week just >>>>>looking at it and trying to get a short cut >>>>>similar to your initial suggestion for allowing >>>>>voiceover etc.. In our case this is not just >>>>>using Xcode and Visual Studio - if that were the >>>>>case - this would be already done. >>>>> >>>>>This is high on our list and we will be in touch. I appreciate your >>>>>support. >>>>> >>>>>Thank you. >>>>> >>>>>Andrew >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>-- >>>>>You received this message because you are >>>>>subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. >>>>>To unsubscribe from this group and stop >>>>>receiving emails from it, send an email to >>>>><mailto:ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com>ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >>>>>For more options, visit >>>>><<https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out>https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out>https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. >>>>> >>>>>-- >>>>>You received this message because you are >>>>>subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. >>>>>To unsubscribe from this group and stop >>>>>receiving emails from it, send an email to >>>>><mailto:ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com>ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >>>>>For more options, visit >>>>><<https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out>https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out>https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. >>>> >>>>-- >>>>You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>> Groups >>>>"Pro Tools Accessibility" group. >>>>To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>>> an >>>>email to >>>><mailto:ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com>ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >>>>For more options, visit >>>><https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out>https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. >>> >>>-- >>>You received this message because you are >>>subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. >>>To unsubscribe from this group and stop >>>receiving emails from it, send an email >>>to<mailto:ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com>ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >>>For more options, visit >>><https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out>https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. >>> >>> >>>-- >>>You received this message because you are >>>subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. >>>To unsubscribe from this group and stop >>>receiving emails from it, send an email >>>to<mailto:ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com>ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >>>For more options, visit >>><https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out>https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. >> >>-- >>You received this message because you are >>subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. >>To unsubscribe from this group and stop >>receiving emails from it, send an email to >>ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >>For more options, visit >><https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out>https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > -- Warm Regards: Matt Diemert 330-980-0046 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: Clearing solo for all tracks.
Poppa, As far as I'm able to tell, the only way to solo safe a track is to physically click the solo button in track strip while holding down command. In other words, when I'm on the solo button, I press voiceover command f5 to bring mouse focus to the button, and while holding down command, click on my mouse. In regards to the other question, I typically keep my solo on xhor so that my solo follows what ever track is selected, if I need to sol up ultiple things I make my selection across those tracks first then solo. Hope this helps. On 1/10/14, Poppa Bear wrote: > I don't want to highjack your post, but I am wondering something about > soloing as well, is there a shortcut key command to put tracks on safe solo > mode? > - Original Message - > From: studiojay > To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com > Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2014 8:42 PM > Subject: Clearing solo for all tracks. > > > Hi everyone, is there a way to clear solos for all tracks in a session? > Some times, I may have a track soloed and I can't remember which track it is > especially in large sessions and the soloed track may not be playing at the > posision in the session I am currently playing. I have to go through each > track to find the soloed track. Thanks in advance for any help. Jason > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > -- Warm Regards: Matt Diemert 330-980-0046 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: Accessibility pt10.3.8 vs pt11.1
you are subscribed to the Google >>>>> Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. >>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>>>> an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >>> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >>> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > -- Warm Regards: Matt Diemert 330-980-0046 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: FYI Pro Tools 11.1 is now available.
her the 10.3.7 or the paid >>>>>>> 11.0 >>>>>>> update but when the 10.3.7 update is selected I am not able to find >>>>>>> the >>>>>>> download links for it no matter what I try. I have tried this >>>>>>> process on >>>>>>> both lion and mountain lion and no luck. I also talked to people at >>>>>>> the >>>>>>> Guitar Center and they suggested I call Avid about possibley remoting >>>>>>> into >>>>>>> my system once I buy the upgrade to transfer the ilok license my >>>>>>> question >>>>>>> is is that process of getting them into your computer accessible and >>>>>>> how >>>>>>> can I access this 10.3.7 update as I want to have 10 updated before >>>>>>> buying >>>>>>> 11? Nick Gawronski >>>>>>> On 1/1/2014 9:10 AM, studiojay wrote: >>>>>>>> HHi Slau and every one, First of all, let me wish everyone on the >>>>>>>> list a >>>>>>>> very happy new year. Slau, thanks so much for a super Christmas and >>>>>>>> new >>>>>>>> year gift. I am really amazed at how much more of the program that >>>>>>>> is >>>>>>>> accessible now. The channel strip plug-in is amazing. Really >>>>>>>> appreciate >>>>>>>> every thing that's being done >>>>>>>> JasonTuesday, December 31, 2013 3:05:15 PM UTC-4, Slau Halatyn >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> Thanks, Byron, but none of this would've happened without the >>>>>>>> foresight >>>>>>>> of key people at Digidesign and avid as well as Apple. There will be >>>>>>>> an >>>>>>>> opportunity for the community at large to help take it up a notch >>>>>>>> as >>>>>>>> well. More to come soon. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Best, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Slau >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Dec 31, 2013, at 5:49 AM, byron harden >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> hello all. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> i would like to publicly thank slau for all of the hard work. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> it is paying off. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> chers to a great humanbing, >>>>>>>>> On Dec 27, 2013, at 4:05 PM, Gordon Kent >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> This is good news. I was actually playing around a bit last night >>>>>>>>>> with >>>>>>>>>> the pro remote app for the iphone and pt10. It does give you a >>>>>>>>>> lot of >>>>>>>>>> stuff and you can do things like mix automation and select regions >>>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>> run the transport. I haven’t figured out how to get at inserts >>>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>> sends in the mix view yet. I should try it on the iPad instead >>>>>>>>>> because >>>>>>>>>> it would fit a lot more at once. You can run four instances of it >>>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>> handle 32 tracks at once. If I could get it to take the whole >>>>>>>>>> screen >>>>>>>>>> on the iPad i imagine I could get at a lot of stuff. You do get >>>>>>>>>> values >>>>>>>>>> for everything, and PT responds quickly to your commands. It’s a >>>>>>>>>> bit >>>>>>>>>> quirky getting it to connect to your wifi network sometimes but >>>>>>>>>> once it >>>>>>>>>> is on it works wherever you go. I want to try it with braille so >>>>>>>>>> that >>>>>>>>>> I can do vocals and stuff with no speech going. >>>>>>&g
Re: Protools accessibility
On the cd I recently finished, I used several of the stock synthesizers for keys and drums. I also used addictive drums for four of the songs. While every piece wasn't accessible, I was able to find work around for most things while there were some major issues in version ten, I personally found some amazing uses for pro tools that I have never experienced in my windows days! Sent from my iPhone > On Jan 5, 2014, at 8:46 AM, Jermaine George > wrote: > > Hi, yes. As with most DAWs, they all include their own stock synths, and all > sorts of other plugins. As far as I know, the ones I have used (Deverb, and > others) are accessible to some degree, and even more so if you have a control > surface. Pro-tools does come with synths such as vacuum, TL Metro, and I > think Hybrid. However I personally do not make use of them for other reasons > other than accessibility. issues. > From an honest standpoint, the only "Usible" stock synths worth looking in to > are those found in Logic and Garageband. But that's just my personal > preference. > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: FYI Pro Tools 11.1 is now available.
Thanks for the clarification, the release notes on the website are quite misleading, as they indicate the current version 11. 1. And 10. 3. Was not supported under mavericks. This is in the write up for December 23. Thanks again for letting us know. Sent from my iPhone > On Jan 3, 2014, at 10:02 AM, Slau Halatyn wrote: > > Yes, I'm running Mavericks. Avid officially supports Mavericks with 11 and > 10.3.8. > > Slau > >> On Jan 3, 2014, at 8:45 AM, Matt Diemert wrote: >> >> Slau The README for the latest version says that 11.1 and 10.3 cannot be >> supported under Mavericks. Are you running Mavericks on your laptop >> currently? >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >>> On Jan 3, 2014, at 8:41 AM, Slau Halatyn wrote: >>> >>> Hi Scott, >>> >>> I'm not sure exactly what you read but Pro Tools 11 and 10 can coexist on >>> the same partition. That's what I currently have on my laptop. >>> >>> Slau >>> >>>> On Jan 3, 2014, at 4:17 AM, Scott Chesworth >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hey folks, >>>> >>>> In plundering the Avid site for an 11.1 demo (which still doesn't seem >>>> to be available), I noticed this potential gotcha in the late breaking >>>> readme stuff: >>>> •Pro Tools 11.1 co-install with Pro Tools 10.x is not supported using >>>> Mac OS X 10.9 Mavericks ( >>>> >>>> This is a bit of a bummer, seeing as it's exactly what I hoped to do >>>> until the cash for an upgrade to 11 becomes available. Does not >>>> supported mean it flat out doesn't work, or just that they won't take >>>> tech support requests about it? >>>> >>>> Cheers for any info >>>> >>>> Scott >>>> >>>>> On 1/3/14, TheOreoMonster wrote: >>>>> Yes avid process of demoting into your system is accessible. If memory >>>>> serves correct, they send you a link, you go there and click the accept or >>>>> permit button allowing them into your system. Tech support should be on >>>>> the >>>>> phone with you th e whole time and tell you what they are doing if VO >>>>> isn’t >>>>> speaking it. >>>>> >>>>> BTW thanks for the tip on 10.3.8. I was wondering why it was only showing >>>>> the Paid 11.0 upgrade and not 10.3.8 as well. >>>>> >>>>>> On Jan 1, 2014, at 1:37 PM, Nick Gawronski >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi, When trying to update to pro tools 10.3.7 I get to the software >>>>>> updates screen after the software update check upon pro tools startup >>>>>> told >>>>>> me a new version was out and there was that link you select after you >>>>>> press the get updates button that says "internal link" it is a red orange >>>>>> errow and I get one of two options either the 10.3.7 or the paid 11.0 >>>>>> update but when the 10.3.7 update is selected I am not able to find the >>>>>> download links for it no matter what I try. I have tried this process on >>>>>> both lion and mountain lion and no luck. I also talked to people at the >>>>>> Guitar Center and they suggested I call Avid about possibley remoting >>>>>> into >>>>>> my system once I buy the upgrade to transfer the ilok license my question >>>>>> is is that process of getting them into your computer accessible and how >>>>>> can I access this 10.3.7 update as I want to have 10 updated before >>>>>> buying >>>>>> 11? Nick Gawronski >>>>>>> On 1/1/2014 9:10 AM, studiojay wrote: >>>>>>> HHi Slau and every one, First of all, let me wish everyone on the list a >>>>>>> very happy new year. Slau, thanks so much for a super Christmas and new >>>>>>> year gift. I am really amazed at how much more of the program that is >>>>>>> accessible now. The channel strip plug-in is amazing. Really appreciate >>>>>>> every thing that's being done >>>>>>> JasonTuesday, December 31, 2013 3:05:15 PM UTC-4, Slau Halatyn wrote: >>>>>>> Thanks, Byron, but none of this would've happened without the foresight >>>>>>> of key people at Digidesign and avid as wel
Re: FYI Pro Tools 11.1 is now available.
iew yet. I should try it on the iPad instead because >>>>>>> it would fit a lot more at once. You can run four instances of it to >>>>>>> handle 32 tracks at once. If I could get it to take the whole screen >>>>>>> on the iPad i imagine I could get at a lot of stuff. You do get values >>>>>>> for everything, and PT responds quickly to your commands. It’s a bit >>>>>>> quirky getting it to connect to your wifi network sometimes but once it >>>>>>> is on it works wherever you go. I want to try it with braille so that >>>>>>> I can do vocals and stuff with no speech going. >>>>>>> Gord >>>>>>>> On Dec 27, 2013, at 3:59 PM, Slau Halatyn wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> As many of you will recall, I practically threw in the towel a couple >>>>>>>> of months ago. As it turned out, there were programmers turning wheels >>>>>>>> without my knowledge. When I was made aware of this, frankly, it was a >>>>>>>> bit of a surprise. Actually, there are things in the works now that >>>>>>>> will bring even more improvements in the next release. I'm not >>>>>>>> supposed to say yet but, if all >>>>>>>> goes according to plan, I believe the next two releases will bring us >>>>>>>> to as close as full access as we can get. Very exciting times. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> slau >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Dec 27, 2013, at 3:02 PM, Poppa Bear wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> This is great, thanks to all who have been behind the seens to >>>>>>>>> continue to carry this torch mile after mile, and big thanks to Slau >>>>>>>>> who has put in only God knows how much energy to keep this on the >>>>>>>>> board as a extremely viable option for blind producers and >>>>>>>>> musicians. >>>>>>>>> - Original Message - >>>>>>>>> From: Slau Halatyn >>>>>>>>> To: ptac...@googlegroups.com >>>>>>>>> Sent: Friday, December 27, 2013 8:41 AM >>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: FYI Pro Tools 11.1 is now available. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The fixes mentioned sound pretty obscure when they're worded in that >>>>>>>>> fashion but, for what it's worth, there are a ton of fixes not the >>>>>>>>> least of which is access to plug-ins unlike that which we had in the >>>>>>>>> past. I'd love to list all of the improvements but there are so many >>>>>>>>> that it would be >>>>>>>>> difficult. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Best, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Slau >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Dec 27, 2013, at 9:55 AM, matt diemert wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Also, for those interested 10.3.8 was released Monday as well. >>>>>>>>>> Grabbing it now to determine if there are any useful upgrades. I >>>>>>>>>> ordered my pt 11 Upgrade just now, but have to wait until eye balls >>>>>>>>>> are around for iLock purposes! >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On 12/27/13, Chris Norman wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> That's pretty amazing. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I'll be tapping that when I've got another mac! :-) >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Have fun all, and hope you all had a merry christmas etc. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On 27/12/2013 14:42, matt diemert wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> Here is a list of accessibility fixes that I found on a forum. >>>>>>>>>>>> Certainly not saying this is exhaustive, but It's a
Re: FYI Pro Tools 11.1 is now available.
Looks like Proremote all one word. Light and pro versions Sent from my iPhone > On Dec 28, 2013, at 5:51 PM, "J. R. Westmoreland" wrote: > > Gordon > > I can’t find the app on the app store. Is it there? What is the exact name? > > J. R. > > > > From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On Behalf > Of Gordon Kent > Sent: Saturday, December 28, 2013 2:33 PM > To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com > Subject: Re: FYI Pro Tools 11.1 is now available. > > Yeah, I thik it may have potential. There’s just so much stuff around now to > play around with that it’s hard to cover all of it and still get real work > done. I’ll have to bring the iPad over to the studio and install the app on > it to give it a try. I have a focus 40 blue that I can pair up the ipad to. > THe tricky thing is that I’ll have to remember to turn blue tooth off on the > mac then. I could use the braille note but it doesn’t have the whiz wheels > and all the navigation stuff the focus has. I have that real little one, the > braille pen, that is only 12 characters but does have a nifty joy stick but I > thik the 40 character display is the way to go. > Gord > On Dec 28, 2013, at 3:16 AM, J. R. Westmoreland wrote: > > > Very neat. I have to look into this. That is, if I can keep my iPad behaving > correctly. I tried using an app whose name I don't remember right now with an > older version of PT and it worked a bit but not as well as I'd hoped. > Thanks Gordon, this is great news. We love that braille, yes? > > Best, > J. R. > > > On Dec 27, 2013, at 3:05 PM, Gordon Kent wrote: > > > This is good news. I was actually playing around a bit last night with the > pro remote app for the iphone and pt10. It does give you a lot of stuff and > you can do things like mix automation and select regions and run the > transport. I haven’t figured out how to get at inserts and sends in the mix > view yet. I should try it on the iPad instead because it would fit a lot > more at once. You can run four instances of it to handle 32 tracks at once. > If I could get it to take the whole screen on the iPad i imagine I could get > at a lot of stuff. You do get values for everything, and PT responds quickly > to your commands. It’s a bit quirky getting it to connect to your wifi > network sometimes but once it is on it works wherever you go. I want to try > it with braille so that I can do vocals and stuff with no speech going. > Gord > On Dec 27, 2013, at 3:59 PM, Slau Halatyn wrote: > > > As many of you will recall, I practically threw in the towel a couple of > months ago. As it turned out, there were programmers turning wheels without > my knowledge. When I was made aware of this, frankly, it was a bit of a > surprise. Actually, there are things in the works now that will bring even > more improvements in the next release. I'm not supposed to say yet but, if > all goes according to plan, I believe the next two releases will bring us to > as close as full access as we can get. Very exciting times. > > slau > > On Dec 27, 2013, at 3:02 PM, Poppa Bear wrote: > > > This is great, thanks to all who have been behind the seens to continue to > carry this torch mile after mile, and big thanks to Slau who has put in only > God knows how much energy to keep this on the board as a extremely viable > option for blind producers and musicians. > - Original Message - > From: Slau Halatyn > To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com > Sent: Friday, December 27, 2013 8:41 AM > Subject: Re: FYI Pro Tools 11.1 is now available. > > The fixes mentioned sound pretty obscure when they're worded in that fashion > but, for what it's worth, there are a ton of fixes not the least of which is > access to plug-ins unlike that which we had in the past. I'd love to list all > of the improvements but there are so many that it would be difficult. > > Best, > > Slau > > On Dec 27, 2013, at 9:55 AM, matt diemert wrote: > > > Also, for those interested 10.3.8 was released Monday as well. > Grabbing it now to determine if there are any useful upgrades. I > ordered my pt 11 Upgrade just now, but have to wait until eye balls > are around for iLock purposes! > > > On 12/27/13, Chris Norman wrote: > > That's pretty amazing. > > I'll be tapping that when I've got another mac! :-) > > Have fun all, and hope you all had a merry christmas etc. > > On 27/12/2013 14:42, matt diemert wrote: > > Here is a list of accessibility fixes that I found on a forum. > Certainly not saying this is exhaustive, but It's al
Re: FYI Pro Tools 11.1 is now available.
Same garbage! Sent from my iPhone > On Dec 28, 2013, at 10:23 AM, Chris Norman > wrote: > > How are we on iLok accessibility? > > Sent from my iPhone > >> On 28 Dec 2013, at 12:59, Matt Diemert wrote: >> >> Any chance someone could share the setup file? I have the 11.2, but when I >> check for update it's not finding any other updates! I have the I locked 11 >> bundle license and installed on my I lock! Just need to set up for the >> 11.one. >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >>> On Dec 28, 2013, at 3:16 AM, "J. R. Westmoreland" wrote: >>> >>> Very neat. I have to look into this. That is, if I can keep my iPad >>> behaving correctly. I tried using an app whose name I don't remember right >>> now with an older version of PT and it worked a bit but not as well as I'd >>> hoped. >>> Thanks Gordon, this is great news. We love that braille, yes? >>> >>> Best, >>> J. R. >>> >>> >>>> On Dec 27, 2013, at 3:05 PM, Gordon Kent wrote: >>>> >>>> This is good news. I was actually playing around a bit last night with >>>> the pro remote app for the iphone and pt10. It does give you a lot of >>>> stuff and you can do things like mix automation and select regions and run >>>> the transport. I haven’t figured out how to get at inserts and sends in >>>> the mix view yet. I should try it on the iPad instead because it would >>>> fit a lot more at once. You can run four instances of it to handle 32 >>>> tracks at once. If I could get it to take the whole screen on the iPad i >>>> imagine I could get at a lot of stuff. You do get values for everything, >>>> and PT responds quickly to your commands. It’s a bit quirky getting it to >>>> connect to your wifi network sometimes but once it is on it works wherever >>>> you go. I want to try it with braille so that I can do vocals and stuff >>>> with no speech going. >>>> Gord >>>>> On Dec 27, 2013, at 3:59 PM, Slau Halatyn wrote: >>>>> >>>>> As many of you will recall, I practically threw in the towel a couple of >>>>> months ago. As it turned out, there were programmers turning wheels >>>>> without my knowledge. When I was made aware of this, frankly, it was a >>>>> bit of a surprise. Actually, there are things in the works now that will >>>>> bring even more improvements in the next release. I'm not supposed to say >>>>> yet but, if all goes according to plan, I believe the next two releases >>>>> will bring us to as close as full access as we can get. Very exciting >>>>> times. >>>>> >>>>> slau >>>>> >>>>>> On Dec 27, 2013, at 3:02 PM, Poppa Bear wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> This is great, thanks to all who have been behind the seens to continue >>>>>> to carry this torch mile after mile, and big thanks to Slau who has put >>>>>> in only God knows how much energy to keep this on the board as a >>>>>> extremely viable option for blind producers and musicians. >>>>>> - Original Message - >>>>>> From: Slau Halatyn >>>>>> To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com >>>>>> Sent: Friday, December 27, 2013 8:41 AM >>>>>> Subject: Re: FYI Pro Tools 11.1 is now available. >>>>>> >>>>>> The fixes mentioned sound pretty obscure when they're worded in that >>>>>> fashion but, for what it's worth, there are a ton of fixes not the least >>>>>> of which is access to plug-ins unlike that which we had in the past. I'd >>>>>> love to list all of the improvements but there are so many that it would >>>>>> be difficult. >>>>>> >>>>>> Best, >>>>>> >>>>>> Slau >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Dec 27, 2013, at 9:55 AM, matt diemert wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Also, for those interested 10.3.8 was released Monday as well. >>>>>>> Grabbing it now to determine if there are any useful upgrades. I >>>>>>> ordered my pt 11 Upgrade just now, but have to wait until eye balls >>>>>>> are around for iLock purposes! >>>>>>> >>>>>>>
Re: FYI Pro Tools 11.1 is now available.
Any chance someone could share the setup file? I have the 11.2, but when I check for update it's not finding any other updates! I have the I locked 11 bundle license and installed on my I lock! Just need to set up for the 11.one. Sent from my iPhone > On Dec 28, 2013, at 3:16 AM, "J. R. Westmoreland" wrote: > > Very neat. I have to look into this. That is, if I can keep my iPad behaving > correctly. I tried using an app whose name I don't remember right now with an > older version of PT and it worked a bit but not as well as I'd hoped. > Thanks Gordon, this is great news. We love that braille, yes? > > Best, > J. R. > > >> On Dec 27, 2013, at 3:05 PM, Gordon Kent wrote: >> >> This is good news. I was actually playing around a bit last night with the >> pro remote app for the iphone and pt10. It does give you a lot of stuff and >> you can do things like mix automation and select regions and run the >> transport. I haven’t figured out how to get at inserts and sends in the mix >> view yet. I should try it on the iPad instead because it would fit a lot >> more at once. You can run four instances of it to handle 32 tracks at once. >> If I could get it to take the whole screen on the iPad i imagine I could >> get at a lot of stuff. You do get values for everything, and PT responds >> quickly to your commands. It’s a bit quirky getting it to connect to your >> wifi network sometimes but once it is on it works wherever you go. I want >> to try it with braille so that I can do vocals and stuff with no speech >> going. >> Gord >>> On Dec 27, 2013, at 3:59 PM, Slau Halatyn wrote: >>> >>> As many of you will recall, I practically threw in the towel a couple of >>> months ago. As it turned out, there were programmers turning wheels without >>> my knowledge. When I was made aware of this, frankly, it was a bit of a >>> surprise. Actually, there are things in the works now that will bring even >>> more improvements in the next release. I'm not supposed to say yet but, if >>> all goes according to plan, I believe the next two releases will bring us >>> to as close as full access as we can get. Very exciting times. >>> >>> slau >>> >>>> On Dec 27, 2013, at 3:02 PM, Poppa Bear wrote: >>>> >>>> This is great, thanks to all who have been behind the seens to continue to >>>> carry this torch mile after mile, and big thanks to Slau who has put in >>>> only God knows how much energy to keep this on the board as a extremely >>>> viable option for blind producers and musicians. >>>> - Original Message - >>>> From: Slau Halatyn >>>> To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com >>>> Sent: Friday, December 27, 2013 8:41 AM >>>> Subject: Re: FYI Pro Tools 11.1 is now available. >>>> >>>> The fixes mentioned sound pretty obscure when they're worded in that >>>> fashion but, for what it's worth, there are a ton of fixes not the least >>>> of which is access to plug-ins unlike that which we had in the past. I'd >>>> love to list all of the improvements but there are so many that it would >>>> be difficult. >>>> >>>> Best, >>>> >>>> Slau >>>> >>>>> On Dec 27, 2013, at 9:55 AM, matt diemert wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Also, for those interested 10.3.8 was released Monday as well. >>>>> Grabbing it now to determine if there are any useful upgrades. I >>>>> ordered my pt 11 Upgrade just now, but have to wait until eye balls >>>>> are around for iLock purposes! >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> On 12/27/13, Chris Norman wrote: >>>>>> That's pretty amazing. >>>>>> >>>>>> I'll be tapping that when I've got another mac! :-) >>>>>> >>>>>> Have fun all, and hope you all had a merry christmas etc. >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 27/12/2013 14:42, matt diemert wrote: >>>>>>> Here is a list of accessibility fixes that I found on a forum. >>>>>>> Certainly not saying this is exhaustive, but It's all I've been able >>>>>>> to track down thus far! >>>>>>> ◾PTSW-184656: AudioSuite window now includes Plug-In name. >>>>>>> ◾PTSW-180095: Added Applescript support for the “Save Session Copy” >>>>>>&g
Re: FYI Pro Tools 11.1 is now available.
I'm assuming there is no demo of 11.1 as of yet. looks like 11.0.2 is the latest demo. On 12/27/13, Poppa Bear wrote: > This is great, thanks to all who have been behind the seens to continue to > carry this torch mile after mile, and big thanks to Slau who has put in only > God knows how much energy to keep this on the board as a extremely viable > option for blind producers and musicians. > - Original Message - > From: Slau Halatyn > To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com > Sent: Friday, December 27, 2013 8:41 AM > Subject: Re: FYI Pro Tools 11.1 is now available. > > > The fixes mentioned sound pretty obscure when they're worded in that > fashion but, for what it's worth, there are a ton of fixes not the least of > which is access to plug-ins unlike that which we had in the past. I'd love > to list all of the improvements but there are so many that it would be > difficult. > > > Best, > > > Slau > > > On Dec 27, 2013, at 9:55 AM, matt diemert wrote: > > > Also, for those interested 10.3.8 was released Monday as well. > Grabbing it now to determine if there are any useful upgrades. I > ordered my pt 11 Upgrade just now, but have to wait until eye balls > are around for iLock purposes! > > > On 12/27/13, Chris Norman wrote: > > That's pretty amazing. > > I'll be tapping that when I've got another mac! :-) > > Have fun all, and hope you all had a merry christmas etc. > > On 27/12/2013 14:42, matt diemert wrote: > > Here is a list of accessibility fixes that I found on a forum. > Certainly not saying this is exhaustive, but It's all I've been > able > to track down thus far! > ◾PTSW-184656: AudioSuite window now includes Plug-In name. > ◾PTSW-180095: Added Applescript support for the “Save Session Copy” > command. > ◾PTSW-180085: Improved support for Nudge values with the VoiceOver > accessibility option in OSX. > ◾PTSW-180084: Improved support for memory locations with the > VoiceOver > accessibility option in OSX. > ◾PTSW-180083: Improved support for the Click II plug-in with the > VoiceOver accessibility option in OSX. > ◾PTSW-180082: Improved support for Memory Locations with the > VoiceOver > accessibility option in OSX. > ◾PTSW-180080: Improved support for window configurations with the > VoiceOver accessibility option in OSX. > ◾PTSW-189731: Improved support for track selector, preset > selection, > and automation controls from within plug-in windows with the > VoiceOver > accessibility option in OSX. > ◾PTSW-180081: Improved support for Delete Unused Playlist dialogs > with > the VoiceOver accessibility option in OSX. > ◾PTSW-180078: Improved support for Beat Detective with the > VoiceOver > accessibility option in OSX > > > On 12/27/13, Dread Beat Dadz wrote: > > This is the update with the accessibility improvements. I have not > gotten > a > > chance to play around with it extensively, but at first glance it > does > seem > > to be more accessible than 11.0.3. The update was release on > 12/23/2013. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the > Google > Groups > "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, > send > an > email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > > > > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups > "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send > an > email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > > > > > -- > Warm Regards: > Matt Diemert > 330-980-0046 > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send > an email toptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the G
Re: FYI Pro Tools 11.1 is now available.
Also, for those interested 10.3.8 was released Monday as well. Grabbing it now to determine if there are any useful upgrades. I ordered my pt 11 Upgrade just now, but have to wait until eye balls are around for iLock purposes! On 12/27/13, Chris Norman wrote: > That's pretty amazing. > > I'll be tapping that when I've got another mac! :-) > > Have fun all, and hope you all had a merry christmas etc. > > On 27/12/2013 14:42, matt diemert wrote: >> Here is a list of accessibility fixes that I found on a forum. >> Certainly not saying this is exhaustive, but It's all I've been able >> to track down thus far! >> ◾PTSW-184656: AudioSuite window now includes Plug-In name. >> ◾PTSW-180095: Added Applescript support for the “Save Session Copy” >> command. >> ◾PTSW-180085: Improved support for Nudge values with the VoiceOver >> accessibility option in OSX. >> ◾PTSW-180084: Improved support for memory locations with the VoiceOver >> accessibility option in OSX. >> ◾PTSW-180083: Improved support for the Click II plug-in with the >> VoiceOver accessibility option in OSX. >> ◾PTSW-180082: Improved support for Memory Locations with the VoiceOver >> accessibility option in OSX. >> ◾PTSW-180080: Improved support for window configurations with the >> VoiceOver accessibility option in OSX. >> ◾PTSW-189731: Improved support for track selector, preset selection, >> and automation controls from within plug-in windows with the VoiceOver >> accessibility option in OSX. >> ◾PTSW-180081: Improved support for Delete Unused Playlist dialogs with >> the VoiceOver accessibility option in OSX. >> ◾PTSW-180078: Improved support for Beat Detective with the VoiceOver >> accessibility option in OSX >> >> >> On 12/27/13, Dread Beat Dadz wrote: >>> This is the update with the accessibility improvements. I have not gotten >>> a >>> >>> chance to play around with it extensively, but at first glance it does >>> seem >>> >>> to be more accessible than 11.0.3. The update was release on 12/23/2013. >>> >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups >>> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>> an >>> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. >>> >> > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > -- Warm Regards: Matt Diemert 330-980-0046 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: FYI Pro Tools 11.1 is now available.
Here is a list of accessibility fixes that I found on a forum. Certainly not saying this is exhaustive, but It's all I've been able to track down thus far! ◾PTSW-184656: AudioSuite window now includes Plug-In name. ◾PTSW-180095: Added Applescript support for the “Save Session Copy” command. ◾PTSW-180085: Improved support for Nudge values with the VoiceOver accessibility option in OSX. ◾PTSW-180084: Improved support for memory locations with the VoiceOver accessibility option in OSX. ◾PTSW-180083: Improved support for the Click II plug-in with the VoiceOver accessibility option in OSX. ◾PTSW-180082: Improved support for Memory Locations with the VoiceOver accessibility option in OSX. ◾PTSW-180080: Improved support for window configurations with the VoiceOver accessibility option in OSX. ◾PTSW-189731: Improved support for track selector, preset selection, and automation controls from within plug-in windows with the VoiceOver accessibility option in OSX. ◾PTSW-180081: Improved support for Delete Unused Playlist dialogs with the VoiceOver accessibility option in OSX. ◾PTSW-180078: Improved support for Beat Detective with the VoiceOver accessibility option in OSX On 12/27/13, Dread Beat Dadz wrote: > This is the update with the accessibility improvements. I have not gotten a > > chance to play around with it extensively, but at first glance it does seem > > to be more accessible than 11.0.3. The update was release on 12/23/2013. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > -- Warm Regards: Matt Diemert 330-980-0046 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: My cd has been released
Not at all! For spotify users it's there as well! Sent from my iPhone > On Dec 19, 2013, at 11:47 AM, "Poppa Bear" wrote: > > Matt, do you mind if I share this on another blind music related list? > - Original Message - From: "matt diemert" > To: "ptaccess" > Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2013 9:11 AM > Subject: My cd has been released > > >> Hi all, >> Appologize for the shameless promotion here, but I recently released >> my first EP "sunday morning to iTunes, as well as various digital >> distributors. This CD was recorded, edited, and mixed by me, with >> ProTools 10, with the Waves bundle plug ins using voiceover, and at >> times an alpha track for plugs and automation. If any of you would >> like to check out the sample tracks in iTunes, it can be found at: >> https://itunes.apple.com/us/album/sunday-morning-ep/id784841753 >> >> While I have done much of this type work in the past, it was always >> with lower end gear, and DAW's, so I'd be interested in any feedback >> you folks have. >> Take care. >> >> -- >> Warm Regards: >> Matt Diemert >> 330-980-0046 >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: My cd has been released
Yes, www.cdbaby.com handled it! It was $49 for digital distribution, I submitted it Monday night and they had it already to go by late last night! Well worth the money in my opinion. Sent from my iPhone > On Dec 18, 2013, at 6:19 PM, Gabe Vega - CEO Commtech LLC > wrote: > > I'm just curious but what company did you use for all the stores digital > distribution? Did one company take care of all the stores for you? Any info > you could provide will be great please appreciate it. > > Gabe Vega - CEO > Commtech LLC > The leader of computer support, training and web development services > Web: http://commtechusa.net > Twitter: http://twitter.com/commtechllc > Facebook: http://facebook.com/commtechllc > Email: i...@commtechusa.net > Phone: (888) 351-5289 Ext. 710 > Fax: (480) 535-7649 > >> On Dec 18, 2013, at 12:23 PM, matt diemert wrote: >> >> The clips seem considerabley shorter here but, >> >> >> http://www.amazon.com/Sunday-Morning-Matthew-Diemert/dp/B00HE5R9X0/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1387386972&sr=8-1&keywords=matthew+diemert+sunday+morning >> >> >> >> >> >>> On 12/18/13, Poppa Bear wrote: >>> I'm trying to pull it up on Itunes, but it always gives me trouble on this >>> PC. Is it on Amazon at all? I may try on the mac later on. >>> - Original Message - >>> From: "matt diemert" >>> To: "ptaccess" >>> Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2013 9:11 AM >>> Subject: My cd has been released >>> >>> >>>> Hi all, >>>> Appologize for the shameless promotion here, but I recently released >>>> my first EP "sunday morning to iTunes, as well as various digital >>>> distributors. This CD was recorded, edited, and mixed by me, with >>>> ProTools 10, with the Waves bundle plug ins using voiceover, and at >>>> times an alpha track for plugs and automation. If any of you would >>>> like to check out the sample tracks in iTunes, it can be found at: >>>> https://itunes.apple.com/us/album/sunday-morning-ep/id784841753 >>>> >>>> While I have done much of this type work in the past, it was always >>>> with lower end gear, and DAW's, so I'd be interested in any feedback >>>> you folks have. >>>> Take care. >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Warm Regards: >>>> Matt Diemert >>>> 330-980-0046 >>>> >>>> -- >>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >>>> >>>> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. >>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >>>> >>>> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. >>> >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >>> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >>> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. >> >> >> -- >> Warm Regards: >> Matt Diemert >> 330-980-0046 >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: My cd has been released
The clips seem considerabley shorter here but, http://www.amazon.com/Sunday-Morning-Matthew-Diemert/dp/B00HE5R9X0/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1387386972&sr=8-1&keywords=matthew+diemert+sunday+morning On 12/18/13, Poppa Bear wrote: > I'm trying to pull it up on Itunes, but it always gives me trouble on this > PC. Is it on Amazon at all? I may try on the mac later on. > - Original Message - > From: "matt diemert" > To: "ptaccess" > Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2013 9:11 AM > Subject: My cd has been released > > >> Hi all, >> Appologize for the shameless promotion here, but I recently released >> my first EP "sunday morning to iTunes, as well as various digital >> distributors. This CD was recorded, edited, and mixed by me, with >> ProTools 10, with the Waves bundle plug ins using voiceover, and at >> times an alpha track for plugs and automation. If any of you would >> like to check out the sample tracks in iTunes, it can be found at: >> https://itunes.apple.com/us/album/sunday-morning-ep/id784841753 >> >> While I have done much of this type work in the past, it was always >> with lower end gear, and DAW's, so I'd be interested in any feedback >> you folks have. >> Take care. >> >> -- >> Warm Regards: >> Matt Diemert >> 330-980-0046 >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> >> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> >> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > -- Warm Regards: Matt Diemert 330-980-0046 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
My cd has been released
Hi all, Appologize for the shameless promotion here, but I recently released my first EP "sunday morning to iTunes, as well as various digital distributors. This CD was recorded, edited, and mixed by me, with ProTools 10, with the Waves bundle plug ins using voiceover, and at times an alpha track for plugs and automation. If any of you would like to check out the sample tracks in iTunes, it can be found at: https://itunes.apple.com/us/album/sunday-morning-ep/id784841753 While I have done much of this type work in the past, it was always with lower end gear, and DAW's, so I'd be interested in any feedback you folks have. Take care. -- Warm Regards: Matt Diemert 330-980-0046 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: Editing questions
If the audio is at the very becoming of a track, easiest way to do this is press play, and drop a down arrow right where the audio that you do want begins. You may need to nudge around to be precise with this point. Press shift enter to select from where you dropped your down arrow back to the top of the track. At this point you can listen to your selection or press delete to get rid of it. Hope this helps. Sent from my iPhone > On Dec 17, 2013, at 9:25 AM, Slau Halatyn wrote: > > Hi John, > > First, you'll have to make sure that the checkbox under the Operations tab of > Pro Tools preferences is set for insertion to follow scrub. Also, check the > box for audio during fast forward and rewind. Under the main menu bar, make > sure to check the option for linking track selection and edit selection. > > Now, make sure you have a track selected. At least once from the time you > open the session, you'll need for there to be an insertion point or cursor > created within that track If you have a control surface with a scrub wheel, > simply engaging the scrub function will automatically create an insertion > cursor. If you're not using a surface, use shuttle mode or just fast forward > for a moment. All of these actions will create an insertion point within the > track. Once you've done that, you don't have to do it again. > > There are so many ways to edit audio that it's difficult to encapsulate but, > for starters, you have 4 modes which are Shuffle, Slip, Spot and Grid. 99.9% > of the time you'll either use Shuffle or Slip. The names are somewhat vague. > Shuffle means if you cut or delete a region or clip, the audio that follows > it will move up by the amount you've cut or deleted. Slip mode means all of > the audio that follows what you've cut or deleted stays exactly where it > originally was. > > There is, of course, the technique of using down and up arrows during > playback to select a range and then cut or delete. For this to work well, you > have to make sure the insertion is not following playback in the Pro Tools > preferences. Control-n toggles this setting. > > Other than that,, Command-e splits regions. Tab and Option-Tab moves forward > or backward to the next region boundary. Using Shift along with the previous > shortcuts makes a selection. > > Those are the most basic things to remember. It can get a whole lot more > complex but that should get you going. > > Slau > >> On Dec 17, 2013, at 8:12 AM, John Gunn wrote: >> >> Hello All, >> >> I recorded from a tape and about 5 seconds of dead air. >> >> I want to select that area then delete/clear. >> >> So far I have had no luck. Can someone give me directions and what I need >> to keep checked and unchecked under options ETC. >> >> John >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: AD drums
was able to get a demo, however, when I launch pt, it tells me there is no authorization for the plug adictivedrums.aax and asks to put it in the not used plg in folder. I've written XLN but wondering if any of you have thoughts or experience. On 11/12/13, Ricky Prevatte wrote: > I would love to try addictive drums if there is presets for GarageBand. I > may do that when I go to ProTools. Does anyone know about superior drummer? > Is it usable with the Mac? > > Ricky Prevatte LMBT1154 > >> On Nov 12, 2013, at 10:46 AM, Monkey Pusher >> wrote: >> >> I believe there was one from their website, but it wasn't the most >> easiest or accessilbe thing to grab from when i went looking for it a >> while ago. However from what i do remmember, the browser wasn't >> accessible but i believe kevin reeves made track presets for both Pro >> TOols and Garage Band for all the presets that he was willing to share >> at the time. >> >>> On 11/12/13, matt diemert wrote: >>> Does anyone know if there is a demo out there for addictive drums? >>> I've looked all over the web site, and don't see one, but have seen >>> mention of one here and on other groups. >>> Thanks. >>> >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups >>> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>> an >>> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > -- Warm Regards: Matt Diemert 330-980-0046 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
AD drums
Does anyone know if there is a demo out there for addictive drums? I've looked all over the web site, and don't see one, but have seen mention of one here and on other groups. Thanks. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: Instrument Track
Speaking of instrument tracks, I've never had reason to use these before, but I have interest in trying this out. What do I need to use the virtual instruments in PT 10? Do I need some sort of external midi keyboard? If so, what do folks recommend? How accessible is this type of tracking in PT? THanks for any guidance you all can offer. On 10/21/13, Christopher-Mark Gilland wrote: > I never could get boom to work. Is it like XPand2 in that I can simply > select a kit, then just arm the track and play? Apparently, it's not quite > > that easy. > > Chris. > > > Visit my Audioboo page for freely available music which I have recorded. > > http://www.audioboo.fm/chrisgilland > > For updates to my Audioboo page, you also are more than welcome to follow me > > on Twitter. > > http://www.twitter.com/clgillandmusic > - Original Message - > From: "Poppa Bear" > To: > Sent: Monday, October 21, 2013 6:34 PM > Subject: Re: Instrument Track > > >> The bulk of all the sounds are going to be under the Expand instrument >> plugin. For drums, both the expand has drums as well as the boom plugin. >> With each instrument selection you have dozens of settings to change the >> sounds to your own taist. >> HTH >> - Original Message - >> From: >> To: >> Sent: Monday, October 21, 2013 12:39 PM >> Subject: Instrument Track >> >> >>> Hello All, >>> >>> As the subject states, I know how to create an instrment track being >>> stereo >>> ETC but need some suggestions choosing one. >>> >>> Last week a friend of mine showed me the Hammon B3 and what a sound. >>> >>> Again any thoughts or suggestions will be appreciated and thanks. >>> >>> John >>> >>> >>> mail2web - Check your email from the web at >>> http://mail2web.com/ . >>> >>> >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >>> >>> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >>> >>> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> >> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> >> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > -- Warm Regards: Matt Diemert 330-980-0046 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: Pro Tools 10.3.7 Help
Yes, I am using version 10 and it works perfectly here was just using it to set up a project! Sent from my iPhone > On Oct 16, 2013, at 12:12 PM, "Poppa Bear" wrote: > > I believe so, it does in 9. > - Original Message - From: > To: > Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2013 8:03 AM > Subject: Re: Pro Tools 10.3.7 Help > > >> Thanks much all but I know Nate you are us ing 8 so my question, does this >> still apply in 10? >> >> >> >> Original email: >> - >> From: Poppa Bear heavens4r...@gmail.com >> Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2013 08:03:00 -0800 >> To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com >> Subject: Re: Pro Tools 10.3.7 Help >> >> >> Didn't know that about transport, thanks. >> - Original Message - From: "Matt Diemert" >> To: >> Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2013 7:55 AM >> Subject: Re: Pro Tools 10.3.7 Help >> >> >>> Also, its command 1 for transport if i am not mistaken. alternatively, >> you >>> can also use the keystrokes the Papa mentioned.s >>> >>> Sent from my iPhone >>> >>>> On Oct 16, 2013, at 11:53 AM, "Poppa Bear" >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hey buddy, you can turn off the click track by pressing 7 on the number >>>> pad and the count in I believe by pressing 8 on the pad as well. Let me >>>> know if this is what you needed help with. >>>> - Original Message - From: >>>> To: >>>> Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2013 6:19 AM >>>> Subject: Pro Tools 10.3.7 Help >>>> >>>> >>>>> Hello All, >>>>> >>>>> In Pro Tools 10.3.7 how does one turn off count-in as well turning off >>>>> click track? >>>>> >>>>> A friend of mine sent me some audio tracks and never used click track or >>>>> count-in. >>>>> >>>>> When trying to access keyboard shortcuts for whatever reason I am not >>>>> seeing them, any thoughts? >>>>> >>>>> John >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> mail2web - Check your email from the web at >>>>> http://mail2web.com/ . >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>> Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. >>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>>>> an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. >>>> >>>> -- >>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >> Groups >>>> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. >>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >> an >>>> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. >>> >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >>> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >>> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. >> >> >> >> mail2web - Check your email from the web at >> http://mail2web.com/ . >> >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: Pro Tools 10.3.7 Help
Also, its command 1 for transport if i am not mistaken. alternatively, you can also use the keystrokes the Papa mentioned.s Sent from my iPhone > On Oct 16, 2013, at 11:53 AM, "Poppa Bear" wrote: > > Hey buddy, you can turn off the click track by pressing 7 on the number pad > and the count in I believe by pressing 8 on the pad as well. Let me know if > this is what you needed help with. > - Original Message - From: > To: > Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2013 6:19 AM > Subject: Pro Tools 10.3.7 Help > > >> Hello All, >> >> In Pro Tools 10.3.7 how does one turn off count-in as well turning off >> click track? >> >> A friend of mine sent me some audio tracks and never used click track or >> count-in. >> >> When trying to access keyboard shortcuts for whatever reason I am not >> seeing them, any thoughts? >> >> John >> >> >> mail2web - Check your email from the web at >> http://mail2web.com/ . >> >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: Lost a track in a paid session yesterday
I can certainly see how that could be helpful to some, but since I'm very specific with my names I don't even pay attention to the number the voiceover reads when going through the playlist manager. I name so specifically that in my notes I can write down exactly which playlist I may have like a course OraVerse from. Sent from my iPhone > On Oct 2, 2013, at 10:28 AM, Scott Chesworth wrote: > > I take a slightly different approach. If it's a track I know I'll use > playlists on, I usually leave the first playlist blank and comp onto > that. Main reason being that when PT assigns numbers to playlists, > then the playlist numbers PT adds on stay in sync with the number of > the take. For some reason, I find that helps me to keep track of stuff > a little easier. > > Hth > > Scott > >> On 10/2/13, matt diemert wrote: >> Absolutely, Working with the play lists allows two things, you can >> keep focus on the play list in the edit window, and use the track >> table in the mix window to quickly select tracks. My favorite feature >> of PT on a mac is being able to keep focus in two different windows! >> It's extremely easy to quickly create a new PL between takes to give >> who evers singing or playing a breath, at the end I create a new blank >> play list, called comped, and once I've comped it, I duplicate it, and >> do my fades/cross fades etc, this insures if I don't like a fade, I >> can go back to the original comped track. >> >>> On 10/2/13, Scott Chesworth wrote: >>> Hmmm, I dunno man, when I'm already dealing with sessions that have >>> high enough track counts as to feel cumbersome, adding a new one for >>> each take doesn't seem to improve the workflow all that much here, it >>> just delays the inevitable. I'd probably end up doing even more button >>> bashing comping the best stuff together from multiple tracks versus >>> multiple playlists. A lot of the time I'm comping with the artist >>> present now rather than doing it on my own time, so the button bashing >>> is bad no matter what stage it comes at. >>> >>>> On 10/2/13, TheOreoMonster wrote: >>>> yeah, you can, but i pretty much live in the track list table and use >>>> the >>>> Shift+a shortcut a lot to arm or unarm tracks. So its quick to unarm, >>>> move >>>> to the next and arm. >>>>> On Oct 1, 2013, at 8:34 PM, "Poppa Bear" wrote: >>>>> >>>>> So you creat a new track for each full take? That's something, I >>>>> imagine >>>>> you could end up with alot of active tracks at some point, but if it >>>>> works , that's the bottem line. >>>>> - Original Message - From: "TheOreoMonster" >>>>> >>>>> To: >>>>> Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2013 4:23 PM >>>>> Subject: Re: Lost a track in a paid session yesterday >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> That's why i never use playlist. It would slow me down too much to have >>>>> to >>>>> to go cycle through them in that manner. can create 5 new tracks at >>>>> once >>>>> and cycle through rename as we do a take all quickly in the edit >>>>> window >>>>> and if they aren't adjacent or contiguous item chooser can be useful. I >>>>> keep notes and comp the takes down to one track before mix time so i >>>>> don't >>>>> end up with too many tracks then. >>>>> On Oct 1, 2013, at 7:57 PM, Scott Chesworth >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Ooh la la, I didn't know that keystroke existed to create new and >>>>>> duplicate playlists. Cool! >>>>>> >>>>>> Does anyone know whether there are keystrokes to cycle through >>>>>> playlists on the selected track? At the moment, I do this by going to >>>>>> the edit window, interacting with the track and popping the playlist >>>>>> selector menu, so a keystroke would save untold amounts of button >>>>>> bashing here. >>>>>> >>>>>> Cheers >>>>>> >>>>>> Scott >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 10/1/13, Poppa Bear wrote: >>>>>>> I figur that I'm just paying my Protools dues right now. >>>>>>> thanks again. >>>>>>> - Ori
Re: Lost a track in a paid session yesterday
; >>>>> Secondly, control \ (or whatever that key is in the crook of the >>>>> enter >>>>> key), will make a new playlist, and control command \ (same key), >>>>> makes >>>>> a >>>>> duplicate of the new playlist. >>>>> >>>>> Be mindful though, that if you make more than 5 or so playlists, >>>>> the >>>>> oldest ones seem to disappear, and I'm not entirely sure why. I don't >>>>> usually make that many takes though, so I didn't bother looking into >>>>> it. >>>>> >>>>> I'm not sure if there's a shortcut for moving between playlists. >>>>> >>>>> HTH, >>>>> >>>>> On 01/10/2013 18:08, Poppa Bear wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hey folks, I had a pretty good 3 hour session yesterday, but at >>>>> some >>>>> point I went to clear a track, but accidently had two tracks selected >>>>> so >>>>> I >>>>> lost a good vocal take and didn't notice it in time to just do a >>>>> typical >>>>> undo function. How would I start thinking about how to retreve tracks >>>>> back >>>>> in situations like this? In Sonar there is a history of changes to go >>>>> into >>>>> in order to undo stuff like this even if you have made other changes. >>>>> I >>>>> have >>>>> not got into the play list stuff much, but I am wondering if it is the >>>>> direction I need to start heading in. In my sessions it is normaly >>>>> good >>>>> take >>>>> or bad take and we just keep it, or redue it, most clients I have had >>>>> haven't cared about tying peaces of good takes together to get the >>>>> best >>>>> of >>>>> all the takes, but I would still like to get a better handle on this >>>>> so >>>>> I >>>>> can block up that chink in my armor. >>>>> Thanks all over for any thoughts >>>>> -- >>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the >>>>> Google >>>>> Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. >>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from >>>>> it, >>>>> send an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >>>>> For more options, visit >>>>> https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>> Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. >>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, >>>>> send >>>>> an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>> Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. >>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, >>>>> send >>>>> an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>> Groups >>>>> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. >>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>>>> an >>>>> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>> Groups >>>>> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. >>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>>>> an >>>>> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. >>>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>> Groups >>>> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. >>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>>> an >>>> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. >>> >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups >>> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>> an >>> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups >>> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>> an >>> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. >> > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > -- Warm Regards: Matt Diemert 330-980-0046 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: New user questions
..@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > > > > mail2web - Check your email from the web at > http://mail2web.com/ . > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > > > -------- > mail2web - Check your email from the web at > http://mail2web.com/ . > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > -- Warm Regards: Matt Diemert 330-980-0046 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: Lost a track in a paid session yesterday
Poppaa, Playlist is absolutely the way to go here. I never get rid of a take unless it's a partial take, meaning we knew part way in there was problems. I have found a couple of things, if you lay your projects out the same way every time it's a lot easier to quickly navigate from point a to point b. An example, and while many may not like this approach it's worked for me. I always lay the ryth section of my project far left, meaning it's the first tracks I creat. Then drums and bass are in the middle, lastly, vocals, harmonies aux tracks are near the end. When tracking vocals, I always create a playlist, called vox whoever's singing T1. Then once the take is complete, I instantly name my next take. I personally keep notes as to which takes as well as at what marker have parts I prefer. this way if I do decide to comp, I can quickly go back to say, t3, chorus 2 which maybe at marker 4. This saves lots of time when working with various vocal tracks. I do the same with guitar parts or piano parts as well. I believe by default PT will auto save every 5 minutes, so there's a good chance you still have that track in a backup file with in your sessions folder. On 10/1/13, Poppa Bear wrote: > Hey folks, I had a pretty good 3 hour session yesterday, but at some point I > went to clear a track, but accidently had two tracks selected so I lost a > good vocal take and didn't notice it in time to just do a typical undo > function. How would I start thinking about how to retreve tracks back in > situations like this? In Sonar there is a history of changes to go into in > order to undo stuff like this even if you have made other changes. I have > not got into the play list stuff much, but I am wondering if it is the > direction I need to start heading in. In my sessions it is normaly good take > or bad take and we just keep it, or redue it, most clients I have had > haven't cared about tying peaces of good takes together to get the best of > all the takes, but I would still like to get a better handle on this so I > can block up that chink in my armor. > Thanks all over for any thoughts > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > -- Warm Regards: Matt Diemert 330-980-0046 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
