RE: off site mail delivery for virt domain
Try: biblicalstudies.com:alias-bibli in virtualdomains and place this file, .qmail-bibli-default in /var/qmail/alias containing, &[EMAIL PROTECTED] in .qmail-bibli-default works for me. gary > -Original Message- > From: Paul Farber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, January 29, 1999 6:24 PM > To: qmail mailing list > Subject: off site mail delivery for virt domain > > > hello all.. > > how can I set up a virtual domain that will automagically forward e-mail > to an e-amil address off site??? > > I have the biblicalstudies.com in rcpthosts and > biblicalstudies.com:&[EMAIL PROTECTED] in virtualdomains. > > My searching of the faq's leads me to belive that I would be wrong, and > that I need to put a .qmail-bibstudy in the qmail/alias with &[EMAIL PROTECTED], > and change the virtualdomains to biblicalstudies.com:bibstudy. > > AM I getting warm? > > Paul D. Farber II > Farber Technology > 717-628-5303 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
off site mail delivery for virt domain
hello all.. how can I set up a virtual domain that will automagically forward e-mail to an e-amil address off site??? I have the biblicalstudies.com in rcpthosts and biblicalstudies.com:&[EMAIL PROTECTED] in virtualdomains. My searching of the faq's leads me to belive that I would be wrong, and that I need to put a .qmail-bibstudy in the qmail/alias with &[EMAIL PROTECTED], and change the virtualdomains to biblicalstudies.com:bibstudy. AM I getting warm? Paul D. Farber II Farber Technology 717-628-5303 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mangling From: headers by recipient domain
Hi folks, I'm looking to upgrade my site's sendmail system to qmail, but a difficulty I'm having is providing a robust mechanism for translating 'From: ' headers of all mail (usually incoming from network) subject to the recipient domain. This is a site requirement; sadly, although the world-wide company mail hubs know how to route `@ourhost.companydomain' they don't know how to do handle our internet domain and it may not be feasible getting the other company sites (world-wide) to fix their routing for our domain. Therefore this header re-work is necessary (sendmail has been doing this for us for some time). Therefore all mail to the internet would be stamped '@ourdomain', but all company mail to companydomain stamped '@ourhost.companydomain'; this is to avoid replied to sensitive company mail being routed via the internet. What's the best strategy to approach this with qmail? Thus far I'd decided on a virtualdomain as follows: companydomain:alias-companydomain and in ~alias/.qmail-company-domain: | preline -d -f swap_from | qmail-remote relay.ourdomain $SENDER $RECIPIENT 'swap_from' is obviously a program to explicitely change the From: field to the company required one one. This solution works OK in normal circumstances but is not at all robust because if the relay is down then the mail gets lost. It seems as though qmail-send isn't designed to listen to what a virtualdomain returns - it just deletes it from the queue and assumes the piped programs will know what to do with it(?) I really do not wish to have to open a two-way pipe to qmail-remote just to read what it returns - even then if I re-inject failures using new-inject or qmail-inject back in to the queue it will loop inefficiently (not using the usual defferal mechanism) and I'd have to hack sleeps in to it just to avoid the load sensible ... one of my arguments for using qmail is that it's massively simpler for an administrater to set up than sendmail (and it is, provided everyone else's domain is also set up properly). I hope someone can tell me that I'm doing it all wrong and that there's a simpler and more robust way of solving this header re-writing problem efficiently! Many thanks in advance, Paul -- Paul Halliday ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) MIS Department Sony Manufacturing Co UK(BGD) __ | Disclaimer: Any opinions expressed in this message are not necessarily those | | of the corporation and should therefore be assumed my own. | ~~ * * * * * Notice Of Disclaimer & Confidentiality * * * * * The contents of this E:Mail message does not in any way constitute the opinion of Sony Manufacturing Co. UK, but that of the individual person who composed it. It is intended for the named addressee only and it contains information which may be confidential and privileged. Unless you are the named addressee or authorised to receive it on their behalf, you may not use, copy or disclose it's contents to anyone else. If you have received this message by mistake please contact: Sony Manufacturing Co. UK., Bridgend Industrial Est., Bridgend, Mid Glam, CF31 3YH. Tel (+44) 01656 767000, Fax (+44) 01656 767222 MIS Manager
Re: qmail eats up my memory
At 07:22 PM 1/29/99 +0100, Harald Hanche-Olsen wrote: >- Van Liedekerke Franky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >| qmail version: 1.03 >| >| after a couple of hours, the qmail-lspawn process became huge >| (813M), eating up all my memory and of course blocking everything. >| Anybody seen this before? > >[silence] > >Apparently, nobody has. I certainly haven't. I've never seen nor heard of it on this list. > Apart from this, does >it seem to behave normally? Do the logs show local messages being >delivered, etc? If it happens again, could you trace system calls, >and see if anything is out of the ordinary is happening (apart from a >bunch of break()s, that is)? Also tell us more about the OS, C compiler and libraries. What versions? Regards.
Re: qmail eats up my memory
On Fri 1999-01-29 (15:04), Van Liedekerke Franky wrote: > qmail version: 1.03 > > after a couple of hours, the qmail-lspawn process became huge (813M), eating > up all my memory and of course blocking everything. > Anybody seen this before? I had a similar problem a while back, but it turned out not to be a qmail problem at all. One of the other sysadmins had upgraded some libraries used by qmail. After recompiling and reinstalling everything worked perfectly. - Keith -- Keith Burdis - MSc (Com Sci) - Rhodes University, South Africa Email : [EMAIL PROTECTED] WWW : http://www.rucus.ru.ac.za/~keith/ IRC : Panthras JAPH "Any technology sufficiently advanced is indistinguishable from a perl script" Standard disclaimer. ---
Re: qmail eats up my memory
Van Liedekerke Franky wrote: > > qmail version: 1.03 > > after a couple of hours, the qmail-lspawn process became huge (813M), eating > up all my memory and of course blocking everything. > Anybody seen this before? I've never heard of this before. What OS are you running this on? Did you install a binary distribution or compile from source? If from source, what compiler did you use? If from binary, what binary dist did you use? Anything else "different" about your system? -- Brian L. Gentry Technical Analyst Sprint Paranet Seahawks Branch -- Boca Raton, FL
Re: qmail eats up my memory
- Van Liedekerke Franky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: | qmail version: 1.03 | | after a couple of hours, the qmail-lspawn process became huge | (813M), eating up all my memory and of course blocking everything. | Anybody seen this before? [silence] Apparently, nobody has. I certainly haven't. Apart from this, does it seem to behave normally? Do the logs show local messages being delivered, etc? If it happens again, could you trace system calls, and see if anything is out of the ordinary is happening (apart from a bunch of break()s, that is)? - Harald
Re: If it's not in $HOME/Maildir, where is it?
On Fri, Jan 29, 1999 at 08:45:48AM -0800, Bob McLaren wrote: > It's strange, I've noticed that when the system does automatic emails to the > "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" account the maillog reflects the message successfully > being sent to local [EMAIL PROTECTED] Whereas when I try to send a message > to any account using telnet on SMTP port 25 the maillog reports a succesful > delivery to local @mydomain.com. It now appears to me that somehow > qmail-smtpd is not recieving user information from the SMTP session. Here is > a sample SMTP session. > 220 mydomain.com ESMTP > helo dude > 250 mydomain.com > mail bob > 250 ok > rcpt bob > 250 ok > data > 354 go ahead > This is a test > . > 250 ok 917628297 qp 1514 > quit > 221 mydomain.com Try entering the SMTP stuff using the correct protocol: 220 mydomain.com ESMTP helo dude.mydomain.com 250 mydomain.com mail from:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 250 ok rcpt to:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 250 ok data 354 go ahead Subject: This is a test This is a test. . 250 ok 917628297 qp 1514 quit 221 mydomain.com Chris
Re: On local sends, Bounce to sender(user), not to postmaster
On Thu, Jan 28, 1999 at 09:54:10PM -0700, Joel Shellman wrote: > I see. Thank you--that is good information to know. > Unfortunately, I still need a solution for legacy stuff. In > the future, I will remember that for new scripts we deploy. > > Please comment on the following solution: > I will make a .qmail-anonymous alias in the > /var/qmail/alias/ directory and have it be a script that > will resend it to whatever is in the From: header. > > |forward $SENDER But SENDER *is* the envelope sender , and in case of a bounce, it is mailer-daemon. Can you show me a full bounce ? Mate
Re: Multiple outgoing messages
Mark Delany <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > At 10:14 AM 1/29/99 +0100, Frank D. Cringle wrote: > >Hmmm... when I look at the headers of your message as received here, I > >see that it reached me via UUCP/BSMTP. > > Ahh. But he might be being especially clever and saying that only sendmail > is able to be arranged to issue an rmail with multiple recipients. True. I interpreted Joe's message as claiming "you can't use UUCP with qmail". > Is it F=m > that enables this feature in the mailer definition? Oh dear, I haven't a clue. I have successfully erased sendmail.cf from my memory. I guess a MUA or mailing list running on a UUCP-connected host could use a substitute qmail-queue program, to pipe the message directly into uux instead of going via qmail-queue -> qmail-send -> uux. That would be easy if/when all callers of qmail-queue (qmail-inject in this case) take its name from an environment variable. No VERPs for the mailing list then, of course. -- Frank Cringle, [EMAIL PROTECTED] voice: (+49 2304) 467101; fax: 943357
Re: local queue delivery
- Van Liedekerke Franky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: | does anybody know how I can make qmail deliver messeages that are in | queue/local, to a remote host? Do they all have the same recipient? If so, create a ~alias/.qmail-something file for that recipient which forwards the mail to the remote host. Or if you wish to do this for *every* message in the local queue, do the same with a .qmail-default file. Just remember that a .qmail file in ~alias/ can never override an existing user; use the users/assign mechanism for that. It's hard to be more specific without more specific information. Hopefully, this is enough to get you going. - Harald
Re: On local sends, Bounce to sender
Unfortunately, the correct behavior of an MTA is to bounce to the envelope sender. But this behavior of qmail can be changed --- by modifying the cgi scripts. In what sense is it impractical to modify them? If they invoke sendmail, just add the -f flag (with the appropriate address) and done. If there are many cgi scripts, a single sed script might make the modification for you. Perhaps if you show the relevant part of a typical script, we could come up with a sed(perl,awk) script. Another possibility is to install wrappers to the scripts, and the wrapper would set the appropriate qmail-inject(=sendmail) variables. -- --- Mate Wierdl | Dept. of Math. Sciences | University of Memphis
Re: If it's not in $HOME/Maildir, where is it?
Mirko Zeibig wrote: > On Thu, 28 Jan 1999 13:29:45 -0800, Bob McLaren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >The MAIL=$HOME/Maildir environment variable in my /etc/profile is set > >and verified. > I think this should be MAIL=$HOME/Maildir/ with an ending slash. > > Regards > Mirko > -- > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] myhome_aka_~:http://sites.inka.de/picard > RedHat=~/rh52_isdn.htmlteles16.3c=~/teles163c/teles163c_contents.html > life's a http://www.uni-karlsruhe.de/~etcetera It's strange, I've noticed that when the system does automatic emails to the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" account the maillog reflects the message successfully being sent to local [EMAIL PROTECTED] Whereas when I try to send a message to any account using telnet on SMTP port 25 the maillog reports a succesful delivery to local @mydomain.com. It now appears to me that somehow qmail-smtpd is not recieving user information from the SMTP session. Here is a sample SMTP session. 220 mydomain.com ESMTP helo dude 250 mydomain.com mail bob 250 ok rcpt bob 250 ok data 354 go ahead This is a test . 250 ok 917628297 qp 1514 quit 221 mydomain.com After this I check the /var/log/maillog and get the following; Jan 29 08:44:57 www qmail: 917628297.127658 new msg 1015872 Jan 29 08:44:57 www qmail: 917628297.127934 info msg 1015872: bytes 198 from <> qp 1514 uid 0 Jan 29 08:44:57 www qmail: 917628297.216379 starting delivery 29: msg 1015872 to local @mydomain.com Jan 29 08:44:57 www qmail: 917628297.216568 status: local 1/10 remote 0/20 Jan 29 08:44:57 www qmail: 917628297.218447 delivery 29: success: Jan 29 08:44:57 www qmail: 917628297.218631 status: local 0/10 remote 0/20 Jan 29 08:44:57 www qmail: 917628297.218761 end msg 1015872 See how it says "local @mydomain.com" shouldn't it say "local [EMAIL PROTECTED]"? -- Bob McLaren
Re: On local sends, Bounce to sender(user), not to postmaster
I see. Thank you--that is good information to know. Unfortunately, I still need a solution for legacy stuff. In the future, I will remember that for new scripts we deploy. Please comment on the following solution: I will make a .qmail-anonymous alias in the /var/qmail/alias/ directory and have it be a script that will resend it to whatever is in the From: header. |forward $SENDER After testing this, it seemed to work fine. Anyone see any possible problems with this? What would happen if somehow the From: header was from anonymous and this kept sending to itself--it wouldn't go in an infinite loop, would it? Qmail would break it out and ship it to postmaster or something? To consolidate messages, I just saw the post from Mike Meyer, and one reason it's not practical to change the cgi-scripts is because I do not know where they are--the host's own them (which is another reason, I would need to inform them of the action), some of them may be compiled, etc. Setting up qmail was relatively easy for everyone especially because it can be automated. So far as I know, the cgi-scripts are running /usr/lib/sendmail to put send the messages. As for changing the environment for sendmail, that certainly is a possibility, however if the above method works, it is much simpler. Thanks again for all the help--I must say this is a very helpful list--and quick replies. Joel Shellman knOcean Interactive Corporation http://corp.knOcean.com/ "Timothy L. Mayo" wrote: > > Sendmail in this case was and is broken. The RFCs REQUIRE the bounce to > be sent to the envelope sender NOT the From: address in the mail headers. > Fix your scripts. qmail's behavior is correct. > > On Thu, 28 Jan 1999, Joel Shellman wrote: > > > I do appreciate everyone's responses, unfortunately they all > > gave the same solution which is unacceptable. We run > > numerous clients and it would not be proper to require the > > cgi-script to do so and should not be necessary. I should > > have said that changing the cgi scripts is impractical. > > > > Sendmail handled this situation fine by returning it to the > > user who sent it. There must be some way to set up qmail so > > it will use the From header for bounces instead of the > > return-path, or set the return-path to the from. If you > > notice in the headers below, the From: header is set > > correctly to the one the bounce should be returned to. > > > > Thanks, > > > > Joel Shellman > > knOcean Interactive Corporation > > http://corp.knOcean.com/ > > > > Mate Wierdl wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, Jan 28, 1999 at 11:18:53AM -0700, Joel Shellman wrote: > > > > I am a recent convert from sendmail to qmail (of just > > > > several days) and have run into a difficulty. Using > > > > sendmail, if I automatically sent email from a cgi script, > > > > and it bounced--it would bounce back to the user. However, > > > > right now with the qmail setup, I (being the postmaster) am > > > > getting all the returned mail. How can I fix this? > > > > > > > > Here is an example: > > > > > > > > Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > Received: (qmail 7386 invoked by uid 60001); 29 Jan 1999 > > > > 03:42:13 - > > > > Date: 29 Jan 1999 03:42:13 - > > > > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Reply-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Subject: Life Styles Plus - Your submission & Info > > > > > > > > Those are the headers of the email that bounced. Apparently > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] doesn't exist. Why was this > > > > email not bounced back to [EMAIL PROTECTED]? I see the > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (which would indeed > > > > go to me)--is that the problem? > > > > > > Yes, the bounce goes to the envelope sender which is the address in the > > > Return-Path header. Before you (the script) send the mail, set, for > > > example, MAILUSER, MAILHOST and QMAILINJECT=f. See man qmail-inject and FAQ. > > > > > > Or you can use qmail-inject directly to send the message and use the -f flag. > > > > > > Mate > > > Mate > > > > - > Timothy L. Mayo mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Senior Systems Manager > localconnect(sm) > http://www.localconnect.net/ > > The National Business Network Inc. http://www.nb.net/ > One Monroeville Center, Suite 850 > Monroeville, PA 15146 > (412) 810- Phone > (412) 810-8886 Fax
Re: On local sends, Bounce to sender(user), not to postmaster
Joel Shellman writes: > I am a recent convert from sendmail to qmail (of just > several days) and have run into a difficulty. Using > sendmail, if I automatically sent email from a cgi script, > and it bounced--it would bounce back to the user. However, > right now with the qmail setup, I (being the postmaster) am > getting all the returned mail. How can I fix this? Read the manual page for qmail-inject, and use the -f option.
Re: On local sends, Bounce to sender(user), not to postmaster
You left out a vital bit of information - what are the cgi scripts doing to put the mail in the queue? Assuming that they're just invoking the qmail sendmail interface (since you can't change the cgi-scripts, that's reasonable), you could change *that* to set the appropriate environment variables. I do wonder how you managed to get to a state where you could install qmail on all the clients, but can't changing the cgi scripts on those same clients is impractical. Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1999 20:59:35 -0700 > From: Joel Shellman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: On local sends, Bounce to sender(user), not to postmaster > > I do appreciate everyone's responses, unfortunately they all > gave the same solution which is unacceptable. We run > numerous clients and it would not be proper to require the > cgi-script to do so and should not be necessary. I should > have said that changing the cgi scripts is impractical. > > Sendmail handled this situation fine by returning it to the > user who sent it. There must be some way to set up qmail so > it will use the From header for bounces instead of the > return-path, or set the return-path to the from. If you > notice in the headers below, the From: header is set > correctly to the one the bounce should be returned to. > > Thanks, > > Joel Shellman > knOcean Interactive Corporation > http://corp.knOcean.com/ > > Mate Wierdl wrote: > > > > On Thu, Jan 28, 1999 at 11:18:53AM -0700, Joel Shellman wrote: > > > I am a recent convert from sendmail to qmail (of just > > > several days) and have run into a difficulty. Using > > > sendmail, if I automatically sent email from a cgi script, > > > and it bounced--it would bounce back to the user. However, > > > right now with the qmail setup, I (being the postmaster) am > > > getting all the returned mail. How can I fix this? > > > > > > Here is an example: > > > > > > Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Received: (qmail 7386 invoked by uid 60001); 29 Jan 1999 > > > 03:42:13 - > > > Date: 29 Jan 1999 03:42:13 - > > > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Reply-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Subject: Life Styles Plus - Your submission & Info > > > > > > Those are the headers of the email that bounced. Apparently > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] doesn't exist. Why was this > > > email not bounced back to [EMAIL PROTECTED]? I see the > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (which would indeed > > > go to me)--is that the problem? > > > > Yes, the bounce goes to the envelope sender which is the address in the > > Return-Path header. Before you (the script) send the mail, set, for > > example, MAILUSER, MAILHOST and QMAILINJECT=f. See man qmail-inject and FAQ. > > > > Or you can use qmail-inject directly to send the message and use the -f flag. > > > > Mate > > Mate >
qmail eats up my memory
qmail version: 1.03 after a couple of hours, the qmail-lspawn process became huge (813M), eating up all my memory and of course blocking everything. Anybody seen this before?
local queue delivery
does anybody know how I can make qmail deliver messeages that are in queue/local, to a remote host?
Re: On local sends, Bounce to sender(user), not to postmaster
I do appreciate everyone's responses, unfortunately they all gave the same solution which is unacceptable. We run numerous clients and it would not be proper to require the cgi-script to do so and should not be necessary. I should have said that changing the cgi scripts is impractical. Sendmail handled this situation fine by returning it to the user who sent it. There must be some way to set up qmail so it will use the From header for bounces instead of the return-path, or set the return-path to the from. If you notice in the headers below, the From: header is set correctly to the one the bounce should be returned to. Thanks, Joel Shellman knOcean Interactive Corporation http://corp.knOcean.com/ Mate Wierdl wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 28, 1999 at 11:18:53AM -0700, Joel Shellman wrote: > > I am a recent convert from sendmail to qmail (of just > > several days) and have run into a difficulty. Using > > sendmail, if I automatically sent email from a cgi script, > > and it bounced--it would bounce back to the user. However, > > right now with the qmail setup, I (being the postmaster) am > > getting all the returned mail. How can I fix this? > > > > Here is an example: > > > > Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Received: (qmail 7386 invoked by uid 60001); 29 Jan 1999 > > 03:42:13 - > > Date: 29 Jan 1999 03:42:13 - > > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Reply-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Life Styles Plus - Your submission & Info > > > > Those are the headers of the email that bounced. Apparently > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] doesn't exist. Why was this > > email not bounced back to [EMAIL PROTECTED]? I see the > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (which would indeed > > go to me)--is that the problem? > > Yes, the bounce goes to the envelope sender which is the address in the > Return-Path header. Before you (the script) send the mail, set, for > example, MAILUSER, MAILHOST and QMAILINJECT=f. See man qmail-inject and FAQ. > > Or you can use qmail-inject directly to send the message and use the -f flag. > > Mate > Mate
Re: On local sends, Bounce to sender(user), not to postmaster
Sendmail in this case was and is broken. The RFCs REQUIRE the bounce to be sent to the envelope sender NOT the From: address in the mail headers. Fix your scripts. qmail's behavior is correct. On Thu, 28 Jan 1999, Joel Shellman wrote: > I do appreciate everyone's responses, unfortunately they all > gave the same solution which is unacceptable. We run > numerous clients and it would not be proper to require the > cgi-script to do so and should not be necessary. I should > have said that changing the cgi scripts is impractical. > > Sendmail handled this situation fine by returning it to the > user who sent it. There must be some way to set up qmail so > it will use the From header for bounces instead of the > return-path, or set the return-path to the from. If you > notice in the headers below, the From: header is set > correctly to the one the bounce should be returned to. > > Thanks, > > Joel Shellman > knOcean Interactive Corporation > http://corp.knOcean.com/ > > Mate Wierdl wrote: > > > > On Thu, Jan 28, 1999 at 11:18:53AM -0700, Joel Shellman wrote: > > > I am a recent convert from sendmail to qmail (of just > > > several days) and have run into a difficulty. Using > > > sendmail, if I automatically sent email from a cgi script, > > > and it bounced--it would bounce back to the user. However, > > > right now with the qmail setup, I (being the postmaster) am > > > getting all the returned mail. How can I fix this? > > > > > > Here is an example: > > > > > > Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Received: (qmail 7386 invoked by uid 60001); 29 Jan 1999 > > > 03:42:13 - > > > Date: 29 Jan 1999 03:42:13 - > > > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Reply-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Subject: Life Styles Plus - Your submission & Info > > > > > > Those are the headers of the email that bounced. Apparently > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] doesn't exist. Why was this > > > email not bounced back to [EMAIL PROTECTED]? I see the > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (which would indeed > > > go to me)--is that the problem? > > > > Yes, the bounce goes to the envelope sender which is the address in the > > Return-Path header. Before you (the script) send the mail, set, for > > example, MAILUSER, MAILHOST and QMAILINJECT=f. See man qmail-inject and FAQ. > > > > Or you can use qmail-inject directly to send the message and use the -f flag. > > > > Mate > > Mate > - Timothy L. Mayo mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Senior Systems Manager localconnect(sm) http://www.localconnect.net/ The National Business Network Inc. http://www.nb.net/ One Monroeville Center, Suite 850 Monroeville, PA 15146 (412) 810- Phone (412) 810-8886 Fax
checkpasswd using CDB file....
do you know where I can find a patch of checkpasswd which uses a CDB file? In the qmail web page there is no link... thanks Dino
qmail Digest 29 Jan 1999 11:00:10 -0000 Issue 535
qmail Digest 29 Jan 1999 11:00:10 - Issue 535 Topics (messages 21043 through 21135): Bouncing specific users 21043 by: Anand Buddhdev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 21044 by: "Petr Novotny" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 21046 by: Anand Buddhdev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 21049 by: Mate Wierdl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 21050 by: Peter Gradwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "solutions for spam" 21045 by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 21051 by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 21056 by: "Chris Garrigues" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 21057 by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 21060 by: Peter van Dijk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 21062 by: Chris Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 21064 by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 21067 by: Chris Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 21070 by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 21072 by: "Scott D. Yelich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 21074 by: Russell Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 21077 by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 21120 by: "Luca Olivetti" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 21122 by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] TCPServer and Relaying 21047 by: root <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 21048 by: "Petr Novotny" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> convert netscape mails to qmail 21052 by: Van Liedekerke Franky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 21053 by: "Sam" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 21054 by: Van Liedekerke Franky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 21055 by: Bart Blanquart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 21059 by: Peter van Dijk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> checkpassword 21058 by: Chris Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 21061 by: "Scott D. Yelich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Virtual domains using qmail 21063 by: Chris Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Best way to defer mail from an application 21065 by: Michael Amster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 21068 by: Chris Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> I'm stuck 21066 by: Dave Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 21078 by: Harald Hanche-Olsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 21085 by: "Brian L. Gentry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 21092 by: James Smallacombe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Multiple outgoing messages 21069 by: "Mark Carpenter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 21073 by: Chris Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 21075 by: "Mark Carpenter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 21076 by: Dave Sill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 21080 by: Chris Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 21086 by: Russell Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 21087 by: "Len Budney" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 21100 by: "Mark Carpenter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 21101 by: "Mark Carpenter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 21106 by: "cap" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 21109 by: "Joe Garcia" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 21110 by: "Mark Carpenter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2 by: Paul Schinder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 21115 by: Chris Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 21117 by: "Sam" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 21118 by: Mark Delany <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 21124 by: Mate Wierdl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 21125 by: Chris Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 21134 by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Frank D. Cringle) 21135 by: Mark Delany <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Newbie configuration 21071 by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 21083 by: Russell Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Pattern-matching and filtering 21079 by: Kai MacTane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 21084 by: "Len Budney" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 21089 by: Peter van Dijk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 21090 by: Russell Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 21097 by: "Len Budney" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> qmail-pop3d 21081 by: Ramesh Vadlapatla <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 21082 by: Chris Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> two questions about set-up 21088 by: "Joe Garcia" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 21093 by: Chris Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 21094 by: Russell Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 21098 by: "Joe Garcia" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 21102 by: "Scott D. Yelich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 21104 by: "Joe Garcia" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 21107 by: John R Levine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 21113 by: "Joe Garcia" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> When the book coming out Russell?? 21091 by: "Joe Garcia" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 21096 by: Russell Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Complicated problem with fastforward and aliases 21095 by: Cristiano Lincoln Mattos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 21099 by: Vince Vielhaber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> If it's not in $HOME/Maildir, where is it? 21103 by: Bob McLaren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 21116 by: Bob McLaren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 21123 by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mirko Zeibig) FW: Multiple outgoing messages 21105 by: "Joe Garcia" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> problems with list? 21108 by: "Racer X" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 21112 by: Richard Letts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 21119 by: Kai MacTane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Another mailing list needed (Was: Re: problems with list?) 21114 by: "Andrzej Kukula" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> qmail-stmpd receiving mail from ccMail 21121 by: [EMAIL PR
Re: Multiple outgoing messages
At 10:14 AM 1/29/99 +0100, Frank D. Cringle wrote: >"Joe Garcia" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Hey some of us youngins weren't around for the low bandwidth (modem) email >> days, which is what UUCP was created for. I couldn't even begin to tell you >> how to set up UUCP it my life depended on it. >:) The funny part about >> this is that I am old enough to remeber a pre-web Internet. >> >> Anyway he is correct that is the best way to do it. Unfortunately qmail >> won't do that, only one I know of is the beast, Sendmail. > >Hmmm... when I look at the headers of your message as received here, I >see that it reached me via UUCP/BSMTP. Ahh. But he might be being especially clever and saying that only sendmail is able to be arranged to issue an rmail with multiple recipients. Is it F=m that enables this feature in the mailer definition? Regards.
Re: Multiple outgoing messages
"Joe Garcia" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hey some of us youngins weren't around for the low bandwidth (modem) email > days, which is what UUCP was created for. I couldn't even begin to tell you > how to set up UUCP it my life depended on it. >:) The funny part about > this is that I am old enough to remeber a pre-web Internet. > > Anyway he is correct that is the best way to do it. Unfortunately qmail > won't do that, only one I know of is the beast, Sendmail. Hmmm... when I look at the headers of your message as received here, I see that it reached me via UUCP/BSMTP. Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: (qmail 7714 invoked by uid 5); 28 Jan 1999 22:26:29 - Received: from lilly.ping.de by cliwe.ping.de with BSMTP (rgsmtp-qm-ot 0.5) for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 28 Jan 1999 22:26:29 - Received: (qmail 4892 invoked from network); 28 Jan 1999 22:01:35 - Received: from muncher.math.uic.edu (131.193.178.181) by lilly.ping.de with SMTP; 28 Jan 1999 22:01:35 - -- Frank Cringle, [EMAIL PROTECTED] voice: (+49 2304) 467101; fax: 943357
Re: Qmail sending to 'root@localhost'
On Fri, 29 Jan 1999 08:45:19 +, Chris Naden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >/var/qmail/alias/.qmail-root ># >&[EMAIL PROTECTED] ># You have to point to a real user, like chris@gwydion (BTW is that sth. celtic?). Your entry will cause a loop, as qmail will use your .qmail-root again, but since qmail is really clever, by inserting always a "Delivered to" it will detect the loop and stop delivery. Regards Mirko -- mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] myhome_aka_~:http://sites.inka.de/picard RedHat=~/rh52_isdn.htmlteles16.3c=~/teles163c/teles163c_contents.html life's a http://www.uni-karlsruhe.de/~etcetera
Re: Qmail sending to 'root@localhost'
Chris Naden wrote: > > Hello again everyone. > > I read in the instructions that under qmail no mail is delivered > to root@localhost, so you had to put in an alias to root; I did this. > > /var/qmail/alias/.qmail-root > # > &[EMAIL PROTECTED] > # This alias is taking mail addressed to root, and sending it to root. Probably not what you had in mind ;-) What you need to do is have the alias pointing to your personal account. My .qmail-root files contains: &moe which sends to user 'moe' on the local machine. I suppose I could have put ' &[EMAIL PROTECTED] ', though. > > However; all mail, both internal and external, directed to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] is bounced with the error > > 'this_message_already_has_my_Delievered_to_line' > > Can anyone tell me what to do about this? > > ~Chris -- Allen Versfeld [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wandata "I hate quotations" - Ralph Waldo Emerson
Qmail sending to 'root@localhost'
Hello again everyone. I read in the instructions that under qmail no mail is delivered to root@localhost, so you had to put in an alias to root; I did this. /var/qmail/alias/.qmail-root # &[EMAIL PROTECTED] # However; all mail, both internal and external, directed to [EMAIL PROTECTED] is bounced with the error 'this_message_already_has_my_Delievered_to_line' Can anyone tell me what to do about this? ~Chris
Re: when does a message get split
At 04:57 PM 1/29/99 +1100, Mark Delany wrote: >At 22:40 28/01/99 -0600, Mate Wierdl wrote: >>With all the talk about passing mail through serialline: When does a >>message with multiple recipients get split? > >By qmail-send. It makes the decision to split a multi-recipient mail into >individual deliveries. And if you need to know when qmail-send is involved. Have a look at the INTERNALS file. Dan. A mini-qmail diagram in there would be handy. Regards.
Re: On local sends, Bounce to sender(user), not to postmaster
From: Joel Shellman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :Those are the headers of the email that bounced. Apparently :[EMAIL PROTECTED] doesn't exist. Why was this :email not bounced back to [EMAIL PROTECTED]? I see the :[EMAIL PROTECTED] (which would indeed :go to me)--is that the problem? yes, mail bounces to the return-path. Add a return-path header to your cgi script. :Thank you, : :Joel Shellman --Adam
On local sends, Bounce to sender(user), not to postmaster
I am a recent convert from sendmail to qmail (of just several days) and have run into a difficulty. Using sendmail, if I automatically sent email from a cgi script, and it bounced--it would bounce back to the user. However, right now with the qmail setup, I (being the postmaster) am getting all the returned mail. How can I fix this? Here is an example: Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: (qmail 7386 invoked by uid 60001); 29 Jan 1999 03:42:13 - Date: 29 Jan 1999 03:42:13 - Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Life Styles Plus - Your submission & Info Those are the headers of the email that bounced. Apparently [EMAIL PROTECTED] doesn't exist. Why was this email not bounced back to [EMAIL PROTECTED]? I see the [EMAIL PROTECTED] (which would indeed go to me)--is that the problem? Thank you, Joel Shellman knOcean Interactive http://corp.knOcean.com/
Re: when does a message get split
At 22:40 28/01/99 -0600, Mate Wierdl wrote: >With all the talk about passing mail through serialline: When does a >message with multiple recipients get split? By qmail-send. It makes the decision to split a multi-recipient mail into individual deliveries. >More precisely, following TOISP in the serialmail package: Is the >message already split when it is in ~alias/pppdir/, or they get split >after (by maildirsmtp?!). Since the mail has gone thru qmail-send to qmail-local to a Maildir, then it's split in this circumstance. Regards.
