help!!! failure notice
People, Am just new here, just like to ask from you good ideas of whats the problem/cause of my configuration wherein when i send a message from remote machine it bounces and got this message below. Just wanna move to Qmail from Sendmail... thanks. 8) -- Forwarded message -- Date: 25 Nov 1999 08:22:24 - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: failure notice Hi. This is the qmail-send program at server.linux.cebu.pilnet.com. I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses. This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out. [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Sorry. Although I'm listed as a best-preference MX or A for that host, it isn't in my control/locals file, so I don't treat it as local. (#5.4.6) --- Below this line is a copy of the message. Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: (qmail 534 invoked from network); 25 Nov 1999 08:22:24 - Received: from unknown (HELO trinity.cebu.pilnet.com) ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) by server.linux.cebu.pilnet.com with SMTP; 25 Nov 1999 08:22:24 - Received: from localhost (janjan@localhost) by trinity.cebu.pilnet.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA14259 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 25 Nov 1999 16:15:37 +0800 Date: Thu, 25 Nov 1999 16:15:37 +0800 (PHT) From: "Gene Frederick F. Boniel" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII "To Be or Not To Be." Gene Frederick F. Boniel HPS Software and Communications Corp. Pilipino Internet - Cebu Systems Administrator Home Page URL : http://www.janjan.dorm.org Email me at : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Call/Text me at : 0917-9203704 ICQ No. :16660287
RE: help!!! failure notice
Add your host (server.linux.cebu.pilnet.com) in the $QMAIL/control/local Best regards Michael -Original Message- From: Gene Frederick F. Boniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, 25 November, 1999 16:22 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: help!!! failure notice People, Am just new here, just like to ask from you good ideas of whats the problem/cause of my configuration wherein when i send a message from remote machine it bounces and got this message below. Just wanna move to Qmail from Sendmail... thanks. 8) -- Forwarded message -- Date: 25 Nov 1999 08:22:24 - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: failure notice Hi. This is the qmail-send program at server.linux.cebu.pilnet.com. I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses. This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out. [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Sorry. Although I'm listed as a best-preference MX or A for that host, it isn't in my control/locals file, so I don't treat it as local. (#5.4.6) --- Below this line is a copy of the message. Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: (qmail 534 invoked from network); 25 Nov 1999 08:22:24 - Received: from unknown (HELO trinity.cebu.pilnet.com) ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) by server.linux.cebu.pilnet.com with SMTP; 25 Nov 1999 08:22:24 - Received: from localhost (janjan@localhost) by trinity.cebu.pilnet.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA14259 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 25 Nov 1999 16:15:37 +0800 Date: Thu, 25 Nov 1999 16:15:37 +0800 (PHT) From: "Gene Frederick F. Boniel" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII "To Be or Not To Be." Gene Frederick F. Boniel HPS Software and Communications Corp. Pilipino Internet - Cebu Systems Administrator Home Page URL : http://www.janjan.dorm.org Email me at : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Call/Text me at : 0917-9203704 ICQ No. :16660287
Re: Using qmail from to pull mail
hi David, you can (or even should) use fetchmail ( http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/fetchmail/) for that task. fetchmail is able to fetch (what a surprise) any number of pop3 accounts and pop3-multidrop and delivers the mail to a local MTA - which of course is qmail. hope that helps alexander -- Alexander Jernejcic, E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] IntelliNet EDV-Dienstleistungsges.m.b.H., Mariahilferstraße 103, 1060 Wien Tel.: 595 23 88, Fax: 595 23 90 Ursprüngliche Nachricht Am 11/25/99, 12:51:51 AM, schrieb "Darvin Zuch" [EMAIL PROTECTED] zum Thema Using qmail from to pull mail: Good Morning All. I'm really hoping someone can help me. I'm needing to set up a mail server for a local school. The nature of their internet connection is you're not limited getting out on any port but comming in is blocked by firewall or nat at the isp. This means I can send out mail easily enough but how do I recieve email. Is there a way I can pull mail from an external mail server or somthing? Any help would be greatly appreciated Darvin Zuch mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Canada
quoted-printable encoding
Hello, Is there a patch to automatically decode quoted-printable and remove the: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable header? (some of the users have odd ball japanese mail clients which have problems with charset="iso-2022-jp" webmail becoming unreadable) Thanks in advance, Masuo
Re: Force mailqueue to send?
There is no standard unix. The semantics of killall vary among unices, therefore Thomas is right to comment on my use of 'killall'. i think there is. the famous POSIX is a standart AFAIK but not all unixes are POSIX compliant. andd the command that sends the TERM signal to all the processes in Linux is called "killall5". dd
Relay Problem
Hi, I am trying to setup the the qmail-antirelay for my mail server. I did exactly the same as mentioned on this documents. http://qmail-docs.surfdirect.com.au/docs/qmail-antirelay.html I have this entry on my /etc/tcp.smtp file 202.51.69.:allow,RELAYCLIENT="" 127.:allow,RELAYCLIENT="" :allow and I did installed the ucspi-tcp-0.84.tar.gz from the qmail ftp site. But when I tried to send from other IP's than 202.51.69.* it works perfectly. What do I do wrong here. Thanx KK any suggestion pls.
Re: LWQ translators wanted
errm and i can do my best for a turkish translation... QMAIL KISS YOU!!11!! eheh no way, that guy's totally dumb, you can't even compare him to me man. some say he's actually a very smart person who made an extra lame page and got millions of hits and became world-wide famous this way. a local newspaper here said he demanded c.a. $50.000 from a TV station that wanted to make an interiew with him. i roflmao whenever i visit his holy page and i'm sorry about the way he represents my country :/ love, peace etc, dd
greeting failed
Hi, our qmail server works pretty well. But since a few days ago we can't receive mails from a special site. Thes use qmail too. Error message on remote site is Connected to x.x.x.x but greeting failed. I'm not going to try again; this message has been in the queue too long. Any ideas? Thank, Frank
RE: help!!! failure notice
but this are the hosts in my $QMAIL/control/locals : localhost server.linux.cebu.pilnet.com and of course as well as my $QMAIL/control/rcpthost file. am using redhat 6.0 and using procmail-3.13.1...with this am planning to send it throught my $homedir/.qmail spoolfile. i know how to setup this thing using procmail and sendmail but i wanna try qmail. anybody here? i need help. On Thu, 25 Nov 1999, Michael Boman wrote: Add your host (server.linux.cebu.pilnet.com) in the $QMAIL/control/local Best regards Michael -Original Message- From: Gene Frederick F. Boniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, 25 November, 1999 16:22 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: help!!! failure notice People, Am just new here, just like to ask from you good ideas of whats the problem/cause of my configuration wherein when i send a message from remote machine it bounces and got this message below. Just wanna move to Qmail from Sendmail... thanks. 8) -- Forwarded message -- Date: 25 Nov 1999 08:22:24 - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: failure notice Hi. This is the qmail-send program at server.linux.cebu.pilnet.com. I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses. This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out. [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Sorry. Although I'm listed as a best-preference MX or A for that host, it isn't in my control/locals file, so I don't treat it as local. (#5.4.6) --- Below this line is a copy of the message. Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: (qmail 534 invoked from network); 25 Nov 1999 08:22:24 - Received: from unknown (HELO trinity.cebu.pilnet.com) ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) by server.linux.cebu.pilnet.com with SMTP; 25 Nov 1999 08:22:24 - Received: from localhost (janjan@localhost) by trinity.cebu.pilnet.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA14259 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 25 Nov 1999 16:15:37 +0800 Date: Thu, 25 Nov 1999 16:15:37 +0800 (PHT) From: "Gene Frederick F. Boniel" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII "To Be or Not To Be." Gene Frederick F. Boniel HPS Software and Communications Corp. Pilipino Internet - Cebu Systems Administrator Home Page URL : http://www.janjan.dorm.org Email me at : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Call/Text me at : 0917-9203704 ICQ No. :16660287
Re: Maildir as link
I can't seem to check new emails when using Maildir. What I did was this. Maildir in ~doods is a symlink to /var/spool/mail/doods. If I send to doods, the mail goes in /var/spool/mail/doods. The only problem now is that this user can't retrieve his emails. Are there any variables that I should change for my users? What am I missing here? As always, thanks a lot! Jeff Hayward wrote: On Wed, 24 Nov 1999, Edward Castillo-Jakosalem wrote: filesystem will be affected. I also cannot increase the /home quota. Can we instead link each user's Maildir to a different subdirectory so that the /home quota won't be jeopardized? Or does anyone had similar setup like this? If your system supports symlinks to directories you can point ~/Maildir to /var/mail/user/ or whatever. The only caveat is that all the subdirectories of /var/mail/user/ must be on a single file system. -- Jeff Hayward -- Regards, Edward Castillo-Jakosalem
Re: Maildir as link
I can't seem to check new emails when using Maildir. What I did was this. Maildir in ~doods is a symlink to /var/spool/mail/doods. i may have misunderstood your situation but Maildir is a directory and /var/spool/mail/doods is a txt file and the formats of mbox and maildir are totally different. it's obvious that this linking won't solve the problem. you should decide which one to use, the mbox format or the maildir format. maildir's said to be more stable but pine says that that format's too slow, dunno. i prefer maildir anyway. If I send to doods, the mail goes in /var/spool/mail/doods. The only problem now is that this user can't retrieve his emails. Are there any variables that I should change for my users? What am I missing here? if the user's getting his/her mail via POP3 there shoudln't be any prob. if he/she's using pine or elm or sth like that then read the FAQ, it tells you what to do. there are two wrappers coming with qmail, pinq and elq that convert the maildir format to mbox and run pine (or elm) afterwards. i am using these with no probs... hope this helps a bit and sorry about my bad language, love, etc etc dd
qmail Digest 25 Nov 1999 11:00:01 -0000 Issue 830
qmail Digest 25 Nov 1999 11:00:01 - Issue 830 Topics (messages 33524 through 33593): Solaris-Qmail 33524 by: Ali Parlar 33531 by: Anand Buddhdev 33551 by: Russell Nelson Status of queued email 33525 by: Michael Boman 33526 by: petervd.vuurwerk.nl 33552 by: Russell Nelson Re: Can I deny certien users? 33527 by: Edward Castillo-Jakosalem Re: Alias oddity 33528 by: Peter Haworth 33554 by: Brandon Ibach Re: subdomaine adressing and qmail 33529 by: Häffelin Holger 33543 by: Dave Sill Re: Force mailqueue to send? 33530 by: Anand Buddhdev 33532 by: Steve Kapinos 33533 by: thomas.erskine-dated-1071beae9be5271f.crc.ca 33534 by: petervd.vuurwerk.nl 33535 by: Petr Novotny 33536 by: petervd.vuurwerk.nl 33537 by: Adam D . McKenna 33550 by: Russell Nelson 33553 by: claudio.nieder.symmetrix.ch 33587 by: dd Re: [Q] Sorry, no mailbox here by that name. (#5.1.1) ??? 33538 by: Dave Sill Re: sniffing 33539 by: Scott D. Yelich Getting blank email with every real email. 33540 by: Joseph Malinowski 33547 by: Dave Sill Help! 33541 by: Miki Shapiro Re: Maildir as link 33542 by: Dave Sill 33544 by: Edward Castillo-Jakosalem 33545 by: Soffen, Matthew 33546 by: Chris Johnson 33548 by: Jeff Hayward 33592 by: Edward Castillo-Jakosalem 33593 by: dd Re: line feeds with carriage return 33549 by: Russell Nelson smtproutes and MX aliases 33555 by: Matthew Harrell 33556 by: mabrown.securepipe.com 33557 by: Matthew Harrell 33558 by: John R. Levine 33559 by: Matthew Harrell 33560 by: MikeINET.aol.com 33562 by: Matthew Harrell 33564 by: Chris Johnson 33582 by: Matthew Harrell HELP!! 33561 by: MikeINET.aol.com 33563 by: Tim Hunter 33565 by: MikeINET.aol.com Using qmail from to pull mail 33566 by: Darvin Zuch 33569 by: RaTao von J 33585 by: Alexander Jernejcic BSD/OS 4.01 resource limits 33567 by: Mark Hoffman Help with rblsmtpd 33568 by: Julian Alvarez Venegas 33571 by: Julian Alvarez Venegas 33572 by: Julian Alvarez Venegas remote 20/20 33570 by: Abel Lucano Qmail Send sleep time.. 33573 by: Philip Gabbert 33574 by: Chris Johnson 33581 by: Philip Gabbert Re: Mail abuse in syslog 33575 by: Todd A. Jacobs 33576 by: John R. Levine 33577 by: Russell Nelson Re: Help with fastforward 33578 by: Steve Kapinos Hmmm... Corel Linux 33579 by: Russell Nelson 33580 by: Peter Cavender help!!! failure notice 33583 by: Gene Frederick F. Boniel 33584 by: Michael Boman 33591 by: Gene Frederick F. Boniel quoted-printable encoding 33586 by: Masuo Gates Relay Problem 33588 by: IT Personal Re: LWQ translators wanted 33589 by: dd greeting failed 33590 by: Frank Greven Administrivia: To unsubscribe from the digest, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To subscribe to the digest, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To bug my human owner, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To post to the list, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- does anybody know how i compile qmail in my home directory without installing (it is a SunOs 5.6 system)? On Wed, Nov 24, 1999 at 11:59:53AM +0100, Ali Parlar wrote: That's easy: cd to your home directory, unzip and untar the qmail distribution, cd into qmail-1.03 directory and type "make". This will compile qmail, but you can't really run it, unless you install it according to the instructions. does anybody know how i compile qmail in my home directory without installing (it is a SunOs 5.6 system)? -- Anand Ali Parlar writes: does anybody know how i compile qmail in my home directory without installing (it is a SunOs 5.6 system)? You need to be root. There is no way to install qmail without being root, because it needs to chown files. That said, change conf-qmail to be the directory under your home directory (e.g. /home/ali/qmail). Then follow the instructions in INSTALL. -- -russ nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://russnelson.com Crynwr sells support for free software | PGPok | Government schools are so 521 Pleasant Valley Rd. | +1 315 268 1925 voice | bad that any rank amateur Potsdam, NY 13676-3213 | +1 315 268 9201 FAX | can outdo them. Homeschool! Is there a way I can see why mail are being queued (if the reciving host is down, if the SMTP server is down and so on)? Best regards /Michael Boman -- Michael Boman, Systems Engineer WizOffice.Com Pte Ltd - 16 Tannery Lane, #06-00 Crystal Time Building, Singapore. 347778 Your Online Office Wizard -
Re: Maildir as link
I'm sorry if I gave incomplete details. I have executed maildirmake /var/spool/mail/doods and then linked this one to ~doods. So now, ~doods contains Maildir - /var/spool/mail/doods. I have also set 700 permissions to this directory and made its owner doods. I have another machine and made similar setup that works fine. The only difference of these other machine is that it is running qmail-popup with qmail-pop3d. The machine that I am having problem is running the usual qpopper. Any suggestion? Thanks!!! dd wrote: I can't seem to check new emails when using Maildir. What I did was this. Maildir in ~doods is a symlink to /var/spool/mail/doods. i may have misunderstood your situation but Maildir is a directory and /var/spool/mail/doods is a txt file and the formats of mbox and maildir are totally different. it's obvious that this linking won't solve the problem. you should decide which one to use, the mbox format or the maildir format. maildir's said to be more stable but pine says that that format's too slow, dunno. i prefer maildir anyway. If I send to doods, the mail goes in /var/spool/mail/doods. The only problem now is that this user can't retrieve his emails. Are there any variables that I should change for my users? What am I missing here? if the user's getting his/her mail via POP3 there shoudln't be any prob. if he/she's using pine or elm or sth like that then read the FAQ, it tells you what to do. there are two wrappers coming with qmail, pinq and elq that convert the maildir format to mbox and run pine (or elm) afterwards. i am using these with no probs... hope this helps a bit and sorry about my bad language, love, etc etc dd -- Regards, Edward Castillo-Jakosalem
Re: help!!! failure notice
On the qmail list [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: but this are the hosts in my $QMAIL/control/locals : localhost server.linux.cebu.pilnet.com You need linux.cebu.pilnet.com, since the destination address is [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Sorry. Although I'm listed as a best-preference MX or A for that host, it isn't in my control/locals file, so I don't treat it as local. (#5.4.6)
Re: Relay Problem
Just curious. Have you already compiled your tcp.smtp file into cdb format? Is your tcpserver already running? Take a look at http://cr.yp.to/qmail/faq/servers.html#tcpserver-smtpd for more details. IT Personal wrote: Hi, I am trying to setup the the qmail-antirelay for my mail server. I did exactly the same as mentioned on this documents. http://qmail-docs.surfdirect.com.au/docs/qmail-antirelay.html I have this entry on my /etc/tcp.smtp file 202.51.69.:allow,RELAYCLIENT="" 127.:allow,RELAYCLIENT="" :allow and I did installed the ucspi-tcp-0.84.tar.gz from the qmail ftp site. But when I tried to send from other IP's than 202.51.69.* it works perfectly. What do I do wrong here. Thanx KK any suggestion pls. -- Regards, Edward Castillo-Jakosalem
Re: help!!! failure notice
"Gene Frederick F. Boniel" wrote: but this are the hosts in my $QMAIL/control/locals : localhost server.linux.cebu.pilnet.com You also have to add linux.cebu.pilnet.com to control/locals and control/rcpthosts. When you're through give the qmail-send process a HUP. Good luck! and of course as well as my $QMAIL/control/rcpthost file. am using redhat 6.0 and using procmail-3.13.1...with this am planning to send it throught my $homedir/.qmail spoolfile. i know how to setup this thing using procmail and sendmail but i wanna try qmail. anybody here? i need help. On Thu, 25 Nov 1999, Michael Boman wrote: Add your host (server.linux.cebu.pilnet.com) in the $QMAIL/control/local Best regards Michael -Original Message- From: Gene Frederick F. Boniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, 25 November, 1999 16:22 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: help!!! failure notice People, Am just new here, just like to ask from you good ideas of whats the problem/cause of my configuration wherein when i send a message from remote machine it bounces and got this message below. Just wanna move to Qmail from Sendmail... thanks. 8) -- Forwarded message -- Date: 25 Nov 1999 08:22:24 - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: failure notice Hi. This is the qmail-send program at server.linux.cebu.pilnet.com. I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses. This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out. [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Sorry. Although I'm listed as a best-preference MX or A for that host, it isn't in my control/locals file, so I don't treat it as local. (#5.4.6) --- Below this line is a copy of the message. Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: (qmail 534 invoked from network); 25 Nov 1999 08:22:24 - Received: from unknown (HELO trinity.cebu.pilnet.com) ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) by server.linux.cebu.pilnet.com with SMTP; 25 Nov 1999 08:22:24 - Received: from localhost (janjan@localhost) by trinity.cebu.pilnet.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA14259 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 25 Nov 1999 16:15:37 +0800 Date: Thu, 25 Nov 1999 16:15:37 +0800 (PHT) From: "Gene Frederick F. Boniel" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII "To Be or Not To Be." Gene Frederick F. Boniel HPS Software and Communications Corp. Pilipino Internet - Cebu Systems Administrator Home Page URL : http://www.janjan.dorm.org Email me at : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Call/Text me at : 0917-9203704 ICQ No. :16660287 -- Regards, Edward Castillo-Jakosalem
AW: Relay Problem
Easy to solve: Change your last line (:allow) to :deny. Then this setup only allows connections from 127. and 202.51.69. . I think, that's what you want. CU, Holger -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: IT Personal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Gesendet am: Donnerstag, 25. November 1999 13:01 An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff: Relay Problem Hi, I am trying to setup the the qmail-antirelay for my mail server. I did exactly the same as mentioned on this documents. http://qmail-docs.surfdirect.com.au/docs/qmail-antirelay.html I have this entry on my /etc/tcp.smtp file 202.51.69.:allow,RELAYCLIENT="" 127.:allow,RELAYCLIENT="" :allow and I did installed the ucspi-tcp-0.84.tar.gz from the qmail ftp site. But when I tried to send from other IP's than 202.51.69.* it works perfectly. What do I do wrong here. Thanx KK any suggestion pls.
Re: Mail abuse in syslog
On 0, Russell Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Todd A. Jacobs writes: On Thu, 11 Nov 1999, Subba Rao wrote: Why am I getting this message? All the outbound/inbound mail is transfering fine. Somehow your IP address has ended up on the RBL. You are being actively blocked as a spammer. If you are not a spammer, follow the directions to have yourself removed from the RBL. I'll bet Subba is dialling up to the net using ibm.net's dialups. They're almost certainly to be on the DUL. One of the people he's trying to send email to is a DUL subscriber. And a damn good idea that is, too, if you look at the amount of spam that comes from dialups. The solution, if you're running qmail on a dialup box, is to insert a wildcard smtproute pointing to ibm.net's SMTP server. Like this (but just guessing at ibm.net's SMTP server name): echo ':mail.ibm.net' /var/qmail/control/smtproutes This is right on the mark. I use Qmail on my server, but have dial-up connection. I became aware of DUL once I started using Qmail. Now, I have my smtp server from ibm.net in the smtproutes and the world is a happy place. It is my turn to fight spam. :-) I am going for the rblsmtpd package. Subba Rao [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://pws.prserv.net/truemax/
Host and user rewriting
Hi, I am running a qmail mail exchanger for a University. We have one Novell Groupwise Server doing mail, and quite a few other unix and apple servers. I have changed from sendmail to qmail, and it seems like I cannot get the following to work on it like it did on sendmail. Some of the servers host names have to be changed when the mail leaves and enters the mail exchanger, ie. foo.server.edu changes to server.edu, but bar.server.edu must not be changed. Selected users want their mail to be intercepted before it is passed on to the smtproute, and to be forwarded to another email, without the need to have a complete userlist on the mailexchanger ex. [EMAIL PROTECTED] must not go to the standard server, but to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks for all who contribute to this mlist Istvan
qmail and popper's maildrop
Hi again! I just wanted to know if qmail-pop3d creates a temp maildrop just like qpopper and where. Can we direct it to another directory? This will be of great concern on our server since we setup quotas on /var/spool/mail. Thanks again for any help and more power! -- Regards, DOODS
Re: Maildir as link
On Thu, Nov 25, 1999 at 07:13:41PM +0800, DOODS wrote: I'm sorry if I gave incomplete details. I have executed maildirmake /var/spool/mail/doods and then linked this one to ~doods. So now, ~doods contains Maildir - /var/spool/mail/doods. I have also set 700 permissions to this directory and made its owner doods. I have another machine and made similar setup that works fine. The only difference of these other machine is that it is running qmail-popup with qmail-pop3d. The machine that I am having problem is running the usual qpopper. qpopper doesn't understand the maildir format. If you're using maildir, use qmail-popup/qmail-pop3d. Chris
Re: AW: Relay Problem
On Thu, Nov 25, 1999 at 01:07:25PM +0100, Häffelin Holger wrote: Easy to solve: Change your last line (:allow) to :deny. Then this setup only allows connections from 127. and 202.51.69. . I think, that's what you want. Are you crazy? That will block all incoming mail, except those sent from 202.51.69. and loopback. Ricardo -- +--- | Ricardo Cerqueira - [EMAIL PROTECTED] | PGP Key fingerprint - B7 05 13 CE 48 0A BF 1E 87 21 83 DB 28 DE 03 42 | FCCN/RCCN - Fundacao para a Computacao Cientifica Nacional | Av. Brasil, 101 / 1700-066 Lisboa / Portugal *** Tel: (+351) 218440100
Re: AW: Relay Problem
Err... I don't think he is crazy. I did almost what he does, (except for 127.), and my qmail can send and receive all incoming and outgoing mail from any remote machine. I think by doing what he say, we will be able to disallow machine that is not part of the local network to use the mail server to relay emails Sei Heng Ricardo Cerqueira wrote: On Thu, Nov 25, 1999 at 01:07:25PM +0100, Häffelin Holger wrote: Easy to solve: Change your last line (:allow) to :deny. Then this setup only allows connections from 127. and 202.51.69. . I think, that's what you want. Are you crazy? That will block all incoming mail, except those sent from 202.51.69. and loopback. Ricardo -- +--- | Ricardo Cerqueira - [EMAIL PROTECTED] | PGP Key fingerprint - B7 05 13 CE 48 0A BF 1E 87 21 83 DB 28 DE 03 42 | FCCN/RCCN - Fundacao para a Computacao Cientifica Nacional | Av. Brasil, 101 / 1700-066 Lisboa / Portugal *** Tel: (+351) 218440100
Re: AW: Relay Problem
On Fri, Nov 26, 1999 at 12:08:30AM +0800, Ang Sei Heng wrote: Err... I don't think he is crazy. I did almost what he does, (except for 127.), and my qmail can send and receive all incoming and outgoing mail from any remote machine. I think by doing what he say, we will be able to disallow machine that is not part of the local network to use the mail server to relay emails No. Whether he is actually crazy may be subject to debate, but what he suggested is wrong. :deny as the last line of his rules file will cause SMTP connections that are not coming from his local LAN to be denied altogether. While this will stop relaying, it'll stop it at the expense of being able to receive mail from the Internet at all. In short, do *not* put :deny as the last rule (or any rule) in your rules file. Chris
Re: AW: Relay Problem
Oh ya... how silly I am... what he mention is changing the last line... Chris Johnson wrote: On Fri, Nov 26, 1999 at 12:08:30AM +0800, Ang Sei Heng wrote: Err... I don't think he is crazy. I did almost what he does, (except for 127.), and my qmail can send and receive all incoming and outgoing mail from any remote machine. I think by doing what he say, we will be able to disallow machine that is not part of the local network to use the mail server to relay emails No. Whether he is actually crazy may be subject to debate, but what he suggested is wrong. :deny as the last line of his rules file will cause SMTP connections that are not coming from his local LAN to be denied altogether. While this will stop relaying, it'll stop it at the expense of being able to receive mail from the Internet at all. In short, do *not* put :deny as the last rule (or any rule) in your rules file. Chris
Re: AW: Relay Problem
So by removing the last line (instead of changing to deny) should work! Sei Heng Chris Johnson wrote: On Fri, Nov 26, 1999 at 12:08:30AM +0800, Ang Sei Heng wrote: Err... I don't think he is crazy. I did almost what he does, (except for 127.), and my qmail can send and receive all incoming and outgoing mail from any remote machine. I think by doing what he say, we will be able to disallow machine that is not part of the local network to use the mail server to relay emails No. Whether he is actually crazy may be subject to debate, but what he suggested is wrong. :deny as the last line of his rules file will cause SMTP connections that are not coming from his local LAN to be denied altogether. While this will stop relaying, it'll stop it at the expense of being able to receive mail from the Internet at all. In short, do *not* put :deny as the last rule (or any rule) in your rules file. Chris
Re: quoted-printable encoding
On Thu, 25 Nov 1999, Masuo Gates wrote: Hello, Is there a patch to automatically decode quoted-printable and remove the: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable header? No. Qmail never edits message contents.
RE: Hmmm... Corel Linux
On Thu, 25 Nov 1999, Peter Cavender wrote: If that is the case, I may very well ditch RH for my co-lo...I have two floppies worth of "mods" to my base RH 6.1. Does Corel include all the extra goodies: checkpasswd,ucspi-tcp,daemontools,etc?? Does the .deb extension mean they are using the Debian installer thingey? Corel distro is based on Debian. You should be able to install any Debian pkg on top of Corel.
Re: Relay Problem
Right.. that's exactly what's going to happen. If you take a good at the document, it will say that :allow is rather contradictarary to the relaying exercise. :allow with no IP address will allow ANYBODY to use the mail server.. remove :allow and rebuild the tcp.smtp.cdb again and it will work just fine. :) Philip From: IT Personal [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 25 Nov 1999 15:01:03 +0300 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Relay Problem Hi, I am trying to setup the the qmail-antirelay for my mail server. I did exactly the same as mentioned on this documents. http://qmail-docs.surfdirect.com.au/docs/qmail-antirelay.html I have this entry on my /etc/tcp.smtp file 202.51.69.:allow,RELAYCLIENT="" 127.:allow,RELAYCLIENT="" :allow and I did installed the ucspi-tcp-0.84.tar.gz from the qmail ftp site. But when I tried to send from other IP's than 202.51.69.* it works perfectly. What do I do wrong here. Thanx KK any suggestion pls.
Re: Relay Problem
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 25 Nov 99, at 10:06, Philip Gabbert wrote: Right.. that's exactly what's going to happen. If you take a good at the document, it will say that :allow is rather contradictarary to the relaying exercise. :allow with no IP address will allow ANYBODY to use the mail server.. You got it all confused, man. :allow and :deny control who can _connect_. Setting or not-setting the environment variable RELAYCLIENT controls who can _relay_. Certainly you _want_ people to connect to your server, don't you? remove :allow and rebuild the tcp.smtp.cdb again and it will work just fine. :allow is default anyway. If you put it there or take it out, you don't change anything. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP 6.0.2 -- QDPGP 2.60 Comment: http://community.wow.net/grt/qdpgp.html iQA/AwUBOD17uVMwP8g7qbw/EQI9kQCg2Rf+SfXEL1x4DJNLXxBVDjVBNjoAoLuz tVtnh3CMG2eUhcpoqIBLN+Jj =2RP7 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- Petr Novotny, ANTEK CS [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.antek.cz PGP key ID: 0x3BA9BC3F -- Don't you know there ain't no devil there's just God when he's drunk. [Tom Waits]
Re: Relay Problem
On Thu, Nov 25, 1999 at 10:06:38AM -0700, Philip Gabbert wrote: Right.. that's exactly what's going to happen. If you take a good at the document, it will say that :allow is rather contradictarary to the relaying exercise. :allow with no IP address will allow ANYBODY to use the mail server.. remove :allow and rebuild the tcp.smtp.cdb again and it will work just fine. You've got some things mixed up... what the docs say is that :allow is _redundant_, since that is the normal behavior. and that IS what you want. Everybody is supposed to connect to your mail port. You DO want to allow connections; the "trick" is to create an env. variable named RELAYCLIENT when a connection comes from one of the specified networks. If that variable doesn't exist, qmail won't relay, but will still allow connections. Resuming, his file is OK. Something else is wrong, but we don't have enough data to find out what that is (is there a cdb file? Is it being used by tcpserver? is there a control/rcpthosts file?) Ricardo -- +--- | Ricardo Cerqueira - [EMAIL PROTECTED] | PGP Key fingerprint - B7 05 13 CE 48 0A BF 1E 87 21 83 DB 28 DE 03 42 | FCCN/RCCN - Fundacao para a Computacao Cientifica Nacional | Av. Brasil, 101 / 1700-066 Lisboa / Portugal *** Tel: (+351) 218440100
Re: Relay Problem
Sorry.. I meant relay, not use :) From: "Petr Novotny" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Organization: ANTEK CS Date: 25 Nov 1999 17:10:49 - To: Philip Gabbert [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Relay Problem -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 25 Nov 99, at 10:06, Philip Gabbert wrote: Right.. that's exactly what's going to happen. If you take a good at the document, it will say that :allow is rather contradictarary to the relaying exercise. :allow with no IP address will allow ANYBODY to use the mail server.. You got it all confused, man. :allow and :deny control who can _connect_. Setting or not-setting the environment variable RELAYCLIENT controls who can _relay_. Certainly you _want_ people to connect to your server, don't you? remove :allow and rebuild the tcp.smtp.cdb again and it will work just fine. :allow is default anyway. If you put it there or take it out, you don't change anything. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP 6.0.2 -- QDPGP 2.60 Comment: http://community.wow.net/grt/qdpgp.html iQA/AwUBOD17uVMwP8g7qbw/EQI9kQCg2Rf+SfXEL1x4DJNLXxBVDjVBNjoAoLuz tVtnh3CMG2eUhcpoqIBLN+Jj =2RP7 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- Petr Novotny, ANTEK CS [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.antek.cz PGP key ID: 0x3BA9BC3F -- Don't you know there ain't no devil there's just God when he's drunk. [Tom Waits]
Re: Hmmm... Corel Linux
On Thu, Nov 25, 1999 at 12:38:53AM -0500, Peter Cavender wrote: If that is the case, I may very well ditch RH for my co-lo...I have two floppies worth of "mods" to my base RH 6.1. Does Corel include all the extra goodies: checkpasswd,ucspi-tcp,daemontools,etc?? Does the .deb extension mean they are using the Debian installer thingey? Corel Linux is based on Debian.. Is this debian-package provided by corel? Or maybe Debian now has a binary qmail package (They have a source package for a while now). greetings, FLorian Pflug Please keep us posted! I agree... ;-)
Re: MX question related to diff. A and MX record
On Mon, Nov 22, 1999 at 07:53:26AM -0500, Sam wrote: On Mon, 22 Nov 1999, Einar Bordewich wrote: Does a mailserver always look at the MX record, and not the A record for a domain? Yes. I never had troubles with A Records pointing to something different then MX-Records. But I had big trouble, when I tried using a CNAME for the domain, instead of an A record. using: domain.com MX 25 smtp.domain.com domain.com CNAME www.domain.com www.domain.com A 1.1.1.1 smtp.domain.com A 1.1.1.2 made sendmail send mails to our webserver... ;-) Back a few years, I know we had a problem related to mail going to the webserver instead the mailserver, when the domain was set up with an A record that was different than the IP address of the hostname pointed to by MX. Does this still count, or is this a solved issue? This was never the case with Qmail. well - since the problems are with the sender, using qmail for your own mail-server doesn´t help you... greetings, Florian Pflug
Re: AW: Relay Problem
No. Whether he is actually crazy may be subject to debate Erm... I didn't mean to say Häffelin Holger is literally crazy :) My apologies to Häffelin for any misunderstandigs. Ricardo -- +--- | Ricardo Cerqueira - [EMAIL PROTECTED] | PGP Key fingerprint - B7 05 13 CE 48 0A BF 1E 87 21 83 DB 28 DE 03 42 | FCCN/RCCN - Fundacao para a Computacao Cientifica Nacional | Av. Brasil, 101 / 1700-066 Lisboa / Portugal *** Tel: (+351) 218440100
Re: Hmmm... Corel Linux
Florian G. Pflug writes: Is this debian-package provided by corel? Yes, it appears to be a binary. The only reason why certain parties have had a problem with the binaries is because they have to be adapted on a per-machine basis including uids. Well, if you ship the system with the qmail uids from the start, it's no problem. And indeed, there they are: alias:*:70:65534:qmail alias:/var/qmail/alias:/bin/sh qmaild:*:71:65534:qmail daemon:/var/qmail:/bin/sh qmails:*:72:70:qmail send:/var/qmail:/bin/sh qmailr:*:73:70:qmail remote:/var/qmail:/bin/sh qmailq:*:74:70:qmail queue:/var/qmail:/bin/sh qmaill:*:75:65534:qmail log:/var/qmail:/bin/sh qmailp:*:76:65534:qmail pw:/var/qmail:/bin/sh -- -russ nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://russnelson.com Crynwr sells support for free software | PGPok | Government schools are so 521 Pleasant Valley Rd. | +1 315 268 1925 voice | bad that any rank amateur Potsdam, NY 13676-3213 | +1 315 268 9201 FAX | can outdo them. Homeschool!
Re: MX question related to diff. A and MX record
On Thu, Nov 25, 1999 at 08:25:12PM +, Florian G. Pflug wrote: using: domain.com MX 25 smtp.domain.com domain.com CNAME www.domain.com Repeat this a 100 times: a CNAME entry may have no other ressource records or I'll get errors "has CNAME and other data (invalid)" which I can look up in my logfiles After that go and fix your zone file. \Maex -- SpaceNet GmbH | http://www.Space.Net/ | Yeah, yo mama dresses Research Development| mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | you funny and you need Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 | Tel: +49 (89) 32356-0| a mouse to delete files D-80807 Muenchen | Fax: +49 (89) 32356-299 |
Re: Hmmm... Corel Linux
On Thu, Nov 25, 1999 at 12:49:00PM -0500, Russell Nelson wrote: Florian G. Pflug writes: Is this debian-package provided by corel? Yes, it appears to be a binary. The only reason why certain parties have had a problem with the binaries is because they have to be adapted on a per-machine basis including uids. Well, if you ship the system with the qmail uids from the start, it's no problem. And indeed, there they are: I have no problem with binary distributions - i love them, especially with debian - just an "apt-get install qmail" and you have qmail... Thank you, corel alias:*:70:65534:qmail alias:/var/qmail/alias:/bin/sh qmaild:*:71:65534:qmail daemon:/var/qmail:/bin/sh qmails:*:72:70:qmail send:/var/qmail:/bin/sh qmailr:*:73:70:qmail remote:/var/qmail:/bin/sh qmailq:*:74:70:qmail queue:/var/qmail:/bin/sh qmaill:*:75:65534:qmail log:/var/qmail:/bin/sh qmailp:*:76:65534:qmail pw:/var/qmail:/bin/sh this is an debian for quite a while - since they have qmail-source packages greetings, Florian Pflug
Re: quoted-printable encoding
Is there a patch to automatically decode quoted-printable and remove the: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable header? No. Qmail never edits message contents. I know, that is why I asked if somebody had writen a patch. If nobody has, I'll write one myself. Masuo
quota patch
Hi! I just downloaded the patch to make quota exceeded failures a permanent one. However, I am getting problems running the patch. (I am not much familiar with patching programs. Sorry.) Is there a complete instruction available for this? Thank you! -- Regards, DOODS
Re: MX question related to diff. A and MX record
Hi, domain.com MX 25 smtp.domain.com domain.com CNAME www.domain.com a CNAME entry may have no other ressource records or I'll get errors That interests me too. Let's say I've got server.xy.ch which provides mail and web services for a number of virtual domains. Thus for each ss that and is nevertheless correct?uch domain I have domain.ch CNAME server.xy.ch and have setup the web server to accept http://domain.ch and the mail server accepts [EMAIL PROTECTED] addresses. Now for some reason, I want to migrate the web server to web.xy.ch while keeping mail on server.xy.ch. What would be the correct solution? I would have also attempted the MX/CNAME construct shown above, as domain.com MX server.xy.ch domain.com A IP address of web.xy.ch has the obvious disadvantage, that you replicate the ip address of web.xy.ch multiple times, once for each such virtual domain. And I wouldn't have supposed, that while with an A/MX pair mailers do prefer MX over A, they wouldn't do it in a CNAME/MX configuration. Is there any other solution which avoid mapping of multiple domains to the same IP-address and is legal? claudio -- Claudio Nieder,Symmetrix AG,Seefeldstr. 231,CH-8008 Zürich phn:+411 381 8880 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.symmetrix.ch fax:+411 381 2127
Re: MX question related to diff. A and MX record
Hi, ... mail and web services for a number of virtual domains. Thus for each ss that and is nevertheless correct?uch domain I have ... I'm not only too dumb to understand DNS, but also to use an editor. This should say ... mail and web services for a number of virtual domains. Thus for each such domain I have ... claudio -- Claudio Nieder,Symmetrix AG,Seefeldstr. 231,CH-8008 Zürich phn:+411 381 8880 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.symmetrix.ch fax:+411 381 2127
RE: quota patch
I didn't patch qmail, I installed (copied it and put a line in the user's configuration) and works 100% without the problems of compiling. Hi! I just downloaded the patch to make quota exceeded failures a permanent one. However, I am getting problems running the patch. (I am not much familiar with patching programs. Sorry.) Is there a complete instruction available for this? Thank you! -- Regards, DOODS
[Q] is there options for distinct upper or lower case letter in mail account?
Hi~ I have just installed qmail + mysql in my RedHat 6.0 system and It work well. But there is a little problem.. "qmail + mysql" dosen't distinct upper or lower case letter. I want to distinct. Is there any option to do that in qmail? if not, how can I realize it? Thank you.
qmailadmin problem
Qmailadmin problem-- I have a default domain named dnet.com.sg.I need to administer this default domain (dnet.com.sg) through qmailadmin.For which you sent me the following steps were carried out.How the linking was1. vadddomain virtualdomain postmaster password [ vadddomaindnet.com.sg postmaster password]2. vdeluser postmaster@virtualdomain -vdeluser [EMAIL PROTECTED]]3. mv ~vpopmail/users/* ~vpopmail/domains/virtualdomain [ mv~vpopmail/user/* ~vpopmail/domains/dnet.com.sg4. vadduser postmaster@virtualdomain password -- [vadduser[EMAIL PROTECTED]5. rm -rf ~vpopmail/users6. ln -s ~vpopmail/domains/virtual domains ~vpopmail/users [ln -s~vpopmail/domains/dnet.com.sg ~vpopmail/usersHow are you adding your new users?I am adding new users through qmailadminAlso I checked the /home/vpopmail/users/vpasswd file and this is what itshowsmichael:nGm5DKNLzkosM:1:0:Pop User byCLI:/home/vpopmail/users/michael:NOQUOTAjfk:VjAy3pH0unBCg:1:0:Pop User by CLI:/home/vpopmail/users/jfk:NOQUOTAben:fTiJ5fw07M/C.:1:0:Pop User by CLI:/home/vpopmail/users/ben:NOQUOTApostmaster:zoQ3REGBw7VnQ:1:0:Pop User byCLI:/home/vpopmail/domains/dnet.com.sg/postmaster:NOQUOTAadmin:QQEQJEPnfzKuM:1:0:Pop User byCGI:/home/vpopmail/domains/dnet.com.sg/admin:NOLOGINleon:mzbxpVBnnUDU6:1:0:Pop User byCGI:/home/vpopmail/domains/dnet.com.sg/leon:NOLOGINzoet:XCJ468.cRRcSA:1:0:Pop User by CLI:/home/vpopmail/users/zoet:NOQUOTAjcyhf:CvUuj4guJfzQA:1:0:Pop User byCGI:/home/vpopmail/domains/dnet.com.sg/jcyhf:NOLOGINslhjpoh:lzYTPFFbxZ7VI:1:0:Pop User byCGI:/home/vpopmail/domains/dnet.com.sg/slhjpoh:NOLOGIN~Why is it saying NOLOGIN to those users I created using qmailadmin andNOQUOTA to those users which i created through vpopmail.Could anyone help me regarding this
Moderating ezmlm
I guess that maybe this isn't the right place to ask this question, but I'll try anyway. I want to moderate some of my mailing lists in the following way: 1) Some of the lists I want to personally add/delete people from and no other then the subscribers should be able to post or get any message (with the 'get' instruction). 2) One list I want to specify who can post to the list. The list should be free to subscribe/unsubscribe to. I am also hosting several MX sites on my mail server and I want that [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED] is NOT the same mailing list, but two separate lists. Best regards Michael Boman -- Michael Boman, Systems Engineer WizOffice.Com Pte Ltd - 16 Tannery Lane, #06-00 Crystal Time Building, Singapore. 347778 Your Online Office Wizard - http://www.wizoffice.com/
hi guys.. quick answer..
Hi there, Just looking through the FAQ's now but if anyone knows how to make a ezmlm mailing list archive web-able that'd be great. The mailing list in question is archived, i'm just wondering how i would get that onto the web. Thanks! Regards, Marc-Adrian Napoli Connect Infobahn Australia +61 2 92811750
Re: MX question related to diff. A and MX record
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Is there any other solution which avoid mapping of multiple domains to the same IP-address and is legal? No. Well, yes, map multiple domains each to its own IP address. -- -russ nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://russnelson.com Crynwr sells support for free software | PGPok | Government schools are so 521 Pleasant Valley Rd. | +1 315 268 1925 voice | bad that any rank amateur Potsdam, NY 13676-3213 | +1 315 268 9201 FAX | can outdo them. Homeschool!
help!!! failure notice (fwd)
I installed qmail and with procmail so that all mails will be sent to $HOME/.qmail i just couldnt understand...for the first time i send a remote message...there seems to be no problem...it successfully be delivered.but well the second time it bounces and seems dont know what the main problem is...this shown below are the bounce message from where my qmail is locatedsaying that there no mailbox by my newly created accountanybody could help me please? thanks... -- Forwarded message -- Date: 26 Nov 1999 06:11:21 - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: failure notice Hi. This is the qmail-send program at server.linux.cebu.pilnet.com. I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses. This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out. From MAILER-DAEMON Fri Nov 26 14:11:00 [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Sorry, no mailbox here by that name. (#5.1.1) Date: Fri, 26 Nov 1999 14:11:00 +0800 (PHT)@server.linux.cebu.pilnet.com: Sorry, no mailbox here by that name. (#5.1.1) Subject: DON'T DELETE THIS MESSAGE -- FOLDER INTERNAL [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Sorry, no mailbox here by that name. (#5.1.1) X-IMAP: 0943596657 [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Sorry, no mailbox here by that name. (#5.1.1) Status: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Sorry, no mailbox here by that name. (#5.1.1) This text is part of the internal format of your mail folder, and is [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Sorry, no mailbox here by that name. (#5.1.1) a real message. It is created automatically by the mail system [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Sorry, no mailbox here by that name. (#5.1.1) If deleted, important folder data will be lost, and it will be [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Sorry, no mailbox here by that name. (#5.1.1) Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Sorry, no mailbox here by that name. (#5.1.1) with the data reset to initial [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Sorry, no mailbox here by that name. (#5.1.1) Received: (qmail 3496 invoked from network); 26 Nov 1999 06:10:52 [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Sorry, no mailbox here by that name. (#5.1.1) by server.linux.cebu.pilnet.com with SMTP; 26 Nov 1999 06:10:52 [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Sorry, no mailbox here by that name. (#5.1.1) by trinity.cebu.pilnet.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Sorry, no mailbox here by that name. (#5.1.1) MIME-Version: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Sorry, no mailbox here by that name. (#5.1.1) Date: Fri, 26 Nov 1999 14:04:07 +0800 (PHT)@server.linux.cebu.pilnet.com: Sorry, no mailbox here by that name. (#5.1.1) To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Sorry, no mailbox here by that name. (#5.1.1) Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Sorry, no mailbox here by that name. (#5.1.1) Status: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Sorry, no mailbox here by that name. (#5.1.1) X-Status:@server.linux.cebu.pilnet.com: Sorry, no mailbox here by that name. (#5.1.1) X-UID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Sorry, no mailbox here by that name. (#5.1.1) X-Keywords:@server.linux.cebu.pilnet.com: Sorry, no mailbox here by that name. (#5.1.1) "To Be or Not To Be."@server.linux.cebu.pilnet.com: Sorry, no mailbox here by that name. (#5.1.1) Gene Frederick F. [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Sorry, no mailbox here by that name. (#5.1.1) HPS Software and Communications [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Sorry, no mailbox here by that name. (#5.1.1) Pilipino Internet - [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Sorry, no mailbox here by that name. (#5.1.1) Systems [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Sorry, no mailbox here by that name. (#5.1.1) Home Page URL : http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Sorry, no mailbox here by that name. (#5.1.1) Call/Text me at : [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Sorry, no mailbox here by that name. (#5.1.1) ICQ No. :[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Sorry, no mailbox here by that name. (#5.1.1) From: Mail System Internal Data [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Sorry, I couldn't find any host named server.linux.cebu.pilnet.com. (#5.1.2) From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Nov 26 06:10:52 1999: Sorry, I couldn't find any host named trinity.cebu.pilnet.com?Fri?Nov?26?06:10:52?1999. (#5.1.2) Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Sorry, I couldn't find any host named trinity.cebu.pilnet.com. (#5.1.2) From: "Gene Frederick F. Boniel" [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Sorry, I couldn't find any host named trinity.cebu.pilnet.com. (#5.1.2) Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Sorry, I couldn't find any host named trinity.cebu.pilnet.com. (#5.1.2) Email me at : [EMAIL PROTECTED]: 202.58.117.4 does not like recipient. Remote host said: 550 " Email me at : janjan"@cebu.pilnet.com... User unknown Giving up on 202.58.117.4. for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 26 Nov 1999 14:04:07 +0800: Sorry, I couldn't find any host named server.linux.cebu.pilnet.com;?Fri,?26?Nov?1999?14:04:07?+0800. (#5.1.2) Received: from unknown (HELO trinity.cebu.pilnet.com) ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
AW: AW: Relay Problem
Ok, I've got a configuration with two mailservers. One incoming and one outgoing. Sorry, I forgot that not everybody has this setup. You're right, in your situation it would not allow recieving mail from the internet. So you've got to setup a rcpthosts file, otherwise the setting of RELAYCLIENT makes no sense. By setting RELAYCLIENT you tell qmail to ignore rcpthosts file and so you can relay. Sorry, I shocked you this way. It was not my intention! CU Holger -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Ricardo Cerqueira [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Gesendet am: Donnerstag, 25. November 1999 16:50 An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff: Re: AW: Relay Problem On Thu, Nov 25, 1999 at 01:07:25PM +0100, Häffelin Holger wrote: Easy to solve: Change your last line (:allow) to :deny. Then this setup only allows connections from 127. and 202.51.69. . I think, that's what you want. Are you crazy? That will block all incoming mail, except those sent from 202.51.69. and loopback. Ricardo -- +--- | Ricardo Cerqueira - [EMAIL PROTECTED] | PGP Key fingerprint - B7 05 13 CE 48 0A BF 1E 87 21 83 DB 28 DE 03 42 | FCCN/RCCN - Fundacao para a Computacao Cientifica Nacional | Av. Brasil, 101 / 1700-066 Lisboa / Portugal *** Tel: (+351) 218440100
