Re: vpopmail
Spades writes: > Hi, > > I configured everything well and to work, thanks to iv0. > However most of my pop3 clients do not allow their pop3 syntax: > > username%pop.domain.com. > > coz of the % > > Any idea how to remedy this. > > > > Spades (CService5) > CService Nick Password > http://cservice.galaxynet.org > > ` _ , ' >- (o)o) - > -*-*-*-*-*-*-*-ooO'(_)--Ooo-*-*-* > Bryan, Lee Chenghui | > ICQ UIN: 1558635| > [EMAIL PROTECTED]| > Global - irc.provalue.net | > = > > > > "A man of words and not of deeds is like >a garden full of weeds..." For Outlook and Outlook express I user the email address ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and in Netscape I use username%domain.com as Netscape don't like '@' in the username - the same goes for Outlook Express on Mac. So far I haven't seen anything that chokes on the precent sign. Best regards Michael Boman -- W I Z O F F I C E . C O M P T E L T D - Your Online Office Wizard 16 Tannery Lane, Crystal Time Building, #04-00, Singapore 347778 Voice : (+65) 844 3228 [extension 118] Fax : (+65) 842 7228 Pager : (+65) 92 93 29 49 ICQ : 5566009 Mobile: (+65) 97 87 39 14 eMail : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]URL : http://www.wizoffice.com
Re: vpopmail
Hi, I configured everything well and to work, thanks to iv0. However most of my pop3 clients do not allow their pop3 syntax: username%pop.domain.com. coz of the % Any idea how to remedy this. Spades (CService5) CService Nick Password http://cservice.galaxynet.org ` _ , ' - (o)o) - -*-*-*-*-*-*-*-ooO'(_)--Ooo-*-*-* Bryan, Lee Chenghui | ICQ UIN: 1558635| [EMAIL PROTECTED]| Global - irc.provalue.net | = "A man of words and not of deeds is like a garden full of weeds..."
Where is setuser ?
ulimit -v 2048 csh -cf '/var/qmail/rc &' supervise /var/lock/qmail-smtpd tcpserver -v -x/etc/tcp.smtp.cdb -u$USERID -g$GROUPID 0 25 \ rblsmtpd qmail-smtpd 2>&1 | setuser qmaill accustamp | \ setuser qmaill cyclog -s500 -n5 /var/log/qmail/qmail-smtpd & I want to run this script from my init My question is, where could I found "setuser" command ? because W/O this, the script won't work, and I must do manually the command. --- AFLHI 058009990407128029/089802---(102598//991024)
Re: Running qmail on a 4x Xeon 550MHz system
On Sat, 25 Mar 2000, Adam McKenna wrote: > On Sat, Mar 25, 2000 at 11:36:44PM +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > I agree. I manage a similar system (quad Xeon, 1GB memory) with a > > loadaverage of 0.3 or thereabouts. > > In other words, your quad Xeon is being wasted. You could replace it with a > single Pentium II or Pentium III machine. Depends on what you mean by wasted. Nobody's worried about the mail system being overloaded (bandwidth now becoming the limiting factor). It keeps The Man off my back. IMHO, a small price to pay. Of course, yes, it could be handled by a PII for now, but I'd still rather have the quad Xeon with the redundant hardware goodies (and a service contract) than an off-the-shelf PII, or even one built by my own hands. > > Although I'm not familiar with the intricacies of how load is > > distributed across multiple CPUs among different OS's, I would suspect > > something is wrong with your system. > > That is an absolutely terrible thing to say. You don't know anything about > his system Granted, I'm not a sysadmin by profession, and I've only been using qmail for ~4 months, but I've been running a similar system (aside from the ReiserFS) under a similar load. From my limited experience, and our record of loadaverages over the past 3.5 weeks, a load average of 1.4 would indicate something out of the ordinary. > (and obviously, not enough about Unix or computers in general) to > make an accurate analysis based on his post. Please refrain from saying such > things in the future unless you're sure you know what you're talking about. Brian -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.baquiran.com AIM: bbaquiran
Re: Running qmail on a 4x Xeon 550MHz system
On Sat, 25 Mar 2000, John White wrote: > It's interesting that you're using ReiserFS. Are you doing > that for /var/qmail/queue? If you're not using the packing tails feature, it should do ok. > Are you implying that it's qmail's job to manage what processes > get scheduled for time on which CPU instead of the OS? :-) -- Thorkild
Re: Running qmail on a 4x Xeon 550MHz system
> I'm using ReiserFS (which, BTW, is working very well). My > mailsystem receives 70'000 mails a day and the throughput > is just about twice that. Average mails sent per second > varies around 70-170 mails. It's interesting that you're using ReiserFS. Are you doing that for /var/qmail/queue? At what rate are you able to inject messages into the queue without causing serialization of qmail-send? > I wonder if qmail understands that I'm running a quad- > processor system, as it doesn't seem to deliver messages > faster when the queue builds up. When I run single-threaded > programs which use 100% of one processor, qmail will not > deliver mail! Are you implying that it's qmail's job to manage what processes get scheduled for time on which CPU instead of the OS? John
unsubscribe qmail
unsubscribe qmail
Re: Running qmail on a 4x Xeon 550MHz system
On Sat, Mar 25, 2000 at 11:36:44PM +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Sat, 25 Mar 2000, Ruben van der Leij wrote: > > > On Sat, Mar 25, 2000 at 12:48:04PM +, Andreas Aardal Hanssen wrote: > > > > > Does anyone have any idea what could be the problem? The > > > disk IO is very low and my computer is *really* sleeping, > > > with a load average (uptime etc) of approx. 1.4.. > > > > A loadaverage of 1.4 means you have on average 1.4 task waiting to run. Or, > > to put it in percentages: your machine has 140% of it's time filled with > > tasks that want to run. > > > Even for an idle quad Xeon, that is way to high. Um, no. Even if you (incorrectly) express load average as a percentage of processing capacity in use, a load average of 1.4 on a 4-way system would still only indicate 35% of available capacity in use. It is also very possible to achieve high load averages without using 100% of your processor. I've seen machines with one processor, that regularly have a load average over 2, and are only using 10-15% of the processor. > I agree. I manage a similar system (quad Xeon, 1GB memory) with a > loadaverage of 0.3 or thereabouts. In other words, your quad Xeon is being wasted. You could replace it with a single Pentium II or Pentium III machine. > Although I'm not familiar with the intricacies of how load is > distributed across multiple CPUs among different OS's, I would suspect > something is wrong with your system. That is an absolutely terrible thing to say. You don't know anything about his system (and obviously, not enough about Unix or computers in general) to make an accurate analysis based on his post. Please refrain from saying such things in the future unless you're sure you know what you're talking about. --Adam
Ask ./: What Makes A UNIX System UNIX?
Just found this on slahdot.org ;) POSIX_ME_HARDER (Score:0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday March 25, @10:42AM EST (#28) If Dan Bernstein's software runs on it, it's Unix -- Lars
unsubscribe qmail
Re: Adding X-Deliver-To Header for Virtual Domains
>From the list archives: http://www.ornl.gov/its/archives/mailing-lists/qmail/1998/04/msg00174.html or in a vpopmail .qmail-default: | (echo X-Envelope-To: "$DEFAULT@$HOST"; cat) | /home/vpopmail/bin/vdelivermail '' bounce-no-mailbox Chris Bond wrote: > Hi, > > How can I add a header X-Deliver-To that has final destination of the > email. The reason I need to do this is because the To or CC header is not > enough information for a program to deliver the mail correctly. > > The domain in question I need to do this with is a "Virtual Domain" setup > in qmail. To some extent this already exists in the header Delivered-To, > the only problem is it looks like the following: > > Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > If you can remove the virtual username and dash and put this into the > X-Deliver-To header this would slove the problem in a stroke. > > Thanks, > Chris -- Robert Sanderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ETRN.com, Inc. - The Internet Answering Service. http://www.ETRN.com
Receiving error messages back when sending mail.
Problems. I installed Wmail, but aparently I forgot some stuff to do.
Perhaps any of you can help. When I send an email to myself, I receive the
following error message back (by the by, emailing from myself to myself on
the localhost seems to work just fine.)
Date:
25 Mar 2000 16:31:58 -
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | Block address
To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
failure delivery
Add Addresses
-- *** ---
Message from yahoo.com.
Unable to deliver message to the following address(es).
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
209.67.50.14 does not like recipient.
Remote host said: 553 sorry, that domain isn't in my list of allowed
rcpthosts (#5.7.1)
Giving up on 209.67.50.14.
--- Original message follows.
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: (qmail 12236 invoked by uid 60001); 25 Mar 2000 16:31:57
-
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from [145.85.27.34] by web1004.mail.yahoo.com; Sat, 25 Mar
2000 08:31:57 PST
Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2000 08:31:57 -0800 (PST)
From: Maarten van <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Qmail attempt 1
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Qmail attempt
--- ***
Can you help?
Karn (Ruler of Karchan, Keeper of the Key to the Room of Lost Souls
--
Maarten van Leunen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.il.fontys.nl/~maartenl
http://www.karchan.org
('The most important thing about having goals is having one.'
Geoffrey F. Abert)
Re: qmail-ldap needed
>where can I get qmail-ldap, I would like to implement it. And where can I >get a HOWTO? Try www.nrg4u.com , there is also some documentation stuff and mailinglist available. - Roland
Re: Re^3: Running qmail on a 4x Xeon 550MHz system
On Sat, Mar 25, 2000 at 04:51:10PM -, Andreas Aardal Hanssen wrote: > My point was: qmail should interpret 25% of this load as the > capability of these computers are 4x what a normal computer > can handle with the same configuration in 1x. > > I want mail delivery to go much faster, the computer can do > much better than this!!! I want the qmail-send program to deliver > 4x as many mails. Mail delivery is typically not CPU bound. You could probably add another 4 CPUs and not see any significant improvement in throughput. Mail delivery is pretty much 100% I/O bound. And, with the way qmail writes its queue files, it becomes mostly seek-time bound as well (due to running many fsync's). -- Bruce Guenter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://em.ca/~bruceg/
Re: Running qmail on a 4x Xeon 550MHz system
On Sat, Mar 25, 2000 at 04:10:14PM +0100, Ruben van der Leij wrote: > > Does anyone have any idea what could be the problem? The > > disk IO is very low and my computer is *really* sleeping, > > with a load average (uptime etc) of approx. 1.4.. > > A loadaverage of 1.4 means you have on average 1.4 task waiting to run. Or, > to put it in percentages: your machine has 140% of it's time filled with > tasks that want to run. Not quite. It means that, on average, 1.4 tasks were ready to run. On a 4 processor machine, that means that there were still two completely idle CPUs. A load average of 4 would mean all 4 CPUs are 100% busy. -- Bruce Guenter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://em.ca/~bruceg/
Re^3: Running qmail on a 4x Xeon 550MHz system
At 4:51 PM + 3/25/00, Andreas Aardal Hanssen wrote: > >>> Does anyone have any idea what could be the problem? The disk IO is very low and my computer is *really* sleeping, with a load average (uptime etc) of approx. 1.4.. >>> A loadaverage of 1.4 means you have on average 1.4 task waiting to run. Or, >>> to put it in percentages: your machine has 140% of it's time filled with >>> tasks that want to run. >>> Even for an idle quad Xeon, that is way to high. >> I agree. I manage a similar system (quad Xeon, 1GB memory) with a >> loadaverage of 0.3 or thereabouts. >> Although I'm not familiar with the intricacies of how load is >> distributed across multiple CPUs among different OS's, I would suspect >> something is wrong with your system. > >Ok, the average of 1.4 was taken at the start of this discussion, >with great activity. The load average is now down to 0.7 and >dropping. > >My point was: qmail should interpret 25% of this load as the >capability of these computers are 4x what a normal computer >can handle with the same configuration in 1x. > >I want mail delivery to go much faster, the computer can do >much better than this!!! I want the qmail-send program to deliver >4x as many mails. But qmail doesn't "know" what the load on your machine is, or how many processors are available. Scheduling of processes is controlled by the operating system, not the processes themselves. There might be something wrong with the way your OS is set up. There are things that you can do to "tune" a qmail installation, like setting concurrency remote. IIRC they're covered by "Life with qmail". Start at www.qmail.org. > >Andreas > >-- >Andreas Aardal Hanssen >Software Developer >mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- -- Paul J. Schinder NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Code 693 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re^3: Running qmail on a 4x Xeon 550MHz system
>>> Does anyone have any idea what could be the problem? The >>> disk IO is very low and my computer is *really* sleeping, >>> with a load average (uptime etc) of approx. 1.4.. >> A loadaverage of 1.4 means you have on average 1.4 task waiting to run. Or, >> to put it in percentages: your machine has 140% of it's time filled with >> tasks that want to run. >> Even for an idle quad Xeon, that is way to high. > I agree. I manage a similar system (quad Xeon, 1GB memory) with a > loadaverage of 0.3 or thereabouts. > Although I'm not familiar with the intricacies of how load is > distributed across multiple CPUs among different OS's, I would suspect > something is wrong with your system. Ok, the average of 1.4 was taken at the start of this discussion, with great activity. The load average is now down to 0.7 and dropping. My point was: qmail should interpret 25% of this load as the capability of these computers are 4x what a normal computer can handle with the same configuration in 1x. I want mail delivery to go much faster, the computer can do much better than this!!! I want the qmail-send program to deliver 4x as many mails. Andreas -- Andreas Aardal Hanssen Software Developer mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Running qmail on a 4x Xeon 550MHz system
On Sat, 25 Mar 2000, Ruben van der Leij wrote: > On Sat, Mar 25, 2000 at 12:48:04PM +, Andreas Aardal Hanssen wrote: > > > Does anyone have any idea what could be the problem? The > > disk IO is very low and my computer is *really* sleeping, > > with a load average (uptime etc) of approx. 1.4.. > > A loadaverage of 1.4 means you have on average 1.4 task waiting to run. Or, > to put it in percentages: your machine has 140% of it's time filled with > tasks that want to run. > Even for an idle quad Xeon, that is way to high. I agree. I manage a similar system (quad Xeon, 1GB memory) with a loadaverage of 0.3 or thereabouts. Although I'm not familiar with the intricacies of how load is distributed across multiple CPUs among different OS's, I would suspect something is wrong with your system. Brian -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.baquiran.com AIM: bbaquiran
Running qmail on a 4x Xeon 550MHz system
>> Does anyone have any idea what could be the problem? The > >> disk IO is very low and my computer is *really* sleeping, > >> with a load average (uptime etc) of approx. 1.4.. > A loadaverage of 1.4 means you have on average 1.4 task > waiting to run. Or, > to put it in percentages: your machine has 140% of it's time > filled with tasks that want to run. > Even for an idle quad Xeon, that is way to high. A slight correction there, the uptime program gives a load average accumulating on each and every process. If five processes want 100% processor time, you will get an output from 'uptime' saying '5'. An average of 1.4 is high, but absolutely not as high as 140% of your computer's resources!! ;) 1.4 might mean that I have 10 processes requesting 14%, but that's not the same as a 140% processor load. Andreas -- Andreas Aardal Hanssen Software Developer mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: POP3 && sticky bit, IMHO
Russell Nelson writes: > IMHO, qmail-pop3 should deny access to a Maildir if the home directory > it is stored in has the sticky bit set. It's consistent with > qmail-local, which will refuse to deliver mail to such a home > directory. I know, I know: > > sh -c 'if test -k .; then qmail-pop3d Maildir; else qmail-pop3d /etc/skel/Maildir; >fi ' Much more likely that this would work as intended: sh -c 'if test -k .; then qmail-pop3d /etc/skel/Maildir; else qmail-pop3d Maildir; fi ' -- -russ nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://russnelson.com Crynwr sells support for free software | PGPok | "Ask not what your country 521 Pleasant Valley Rd. | +1 315 268 1925 voice | can force other people to Potsdam, NY 13676-3213 | +1 315 268 9201 FAX | do for you..." -Perry M.
Re: /var/qmail/rc under supervise?
On Sat, Mar 25, 2000 at 06:07:16AM -0800, John Conover wrote: > Is there a way to run /var/qmail/rc (or qmail-start,) under supervise > to insure they are always running? Yep. Just do it. I use svscan, and created a qmail directory in /service. /service/qmail/run looks like this: #!/bin/sh exec env - PATH="/var/qmail/bin:$PATH" qmail-start ./Maildir/ /service/qmail/log/run looks like this: #!/bin/sh exec setuidgid qmaill multilog t s50 ./main supervise now oversees my whole qmail operation. Chris
/var/qmail/rc under supervise?
Is there a way to run /var/qmail/rc (or qmail-start,) under supervise to insure they are always running? Thanks, John -- John Conover[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.johncon.com/ 631 Lamont Ct. Tel. 408.370.2688 http://www.johncon.com/ntropix/ Campbell, CA 95008 Fax. 408.379.9602 http://www.johncon.com/nformatix/
Re: qmail not delivering to ./Maildir/
On Sat, Mar 25, 2000 at 04:20:14AM -0800, John Conover wrote: > Now, I have the same problem on a new machine-Debian 2.1, qmail 1.03. > > qmail-inject DOES deliver to ./Maildir/, but normal mail does not. > > Any suggestions on how to track down the problem, (I'm at my wits end > on it)? Read qmail-1.03/REMOVE.sendmail It looks like your old sendmail is still around. Regards, Uwe
Re: Another (slightly different) cr lf question
On Fri, Mar 24, 2000 at 04:47:18PM -0800, thomas wrote: > Is there an easy way to have qmail either not do the crlf -> lf translation > on files it delivers locally, or is there any easy way to undo this? No. No. > We have IMAP clients accessing these files directly off the unix box, > and they miss the cr Hm - strange. Question to the knowing: aren't IMPA servers supposed to translate the local line end conventions to CR/LF before sending the articles over the wire? Regards, Uwe
Running qmail on a 4x Xeon 550MHz system
Hello, I'm currently administrating the mail delivery system on a system as described in the subject, with 1GB of SDRAM and 100GB disk. I'm using ReiserFS (which, BTW, is working very well). My mailsystem receives 70'000 mails a day and the throughput is just about twice that. Average mails sent per second varies around 70-170 mails. I wonder if qmail understands that I'm running a quad- processor system, as it doesn't seem to deliver messages faster when the queue builds up. When I run single-threaded programs which use 100% of one processor, qmail will not deliver mail! Does anyone have any idea what could be the problem? The disk IO is very low and my computer is *really* sleeping, with a load average (uptime etc) of approx. 1.4.. Hope for an answer, Andreas -- Andreas Aardal Hanssen Software Developer mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
qmail pop3 & outlook express (encoding problem)
Hi, I am Redhat linux 6.1 user. I'm trying to use qmail as pop3 server. And like many free mail services I wanted to insert footnote(banner, url so on) to mail. With mailing list's answer I modified the qmail source and inserted the footnote. After several tests, I found some problems. If the mail is written in plain text-case of using pine, there is no problem. If I use outlook express, I can choose content type(html, text) and encoding methods(base 64, quoted printable, 7bits). So when I choose 7bits, there is no problem. But in other cases the footnotes is not recognizable or not seen. (not recognizable: chose text and different encoding methods(except 7 bits) not seen: chose html ) I use Korean. Because Korean is 8 bits character, there are many problems(especially encoding). How can I solve this problem? According to the mail header, should I change the footnote? Is there any methods or module to change the encoded content(7bits -> base 64 and so forth)? Thank you...
qmail not delivering to ./Maildir/
A couple of weeks ago, someone mentioned in the list that qmail stopped delivering to ./Maildir/ Now, I have the same problem on a new machine-Debian 2.1, qmail 1.03. qmail-inject DOES deliver to ./Maildir/, but normal mail does not. Any suggestions on how to track down the problem, (I'm at my wits end on it)? Thanks, John -- John Conover[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.johncon.com/ 631 Lamont Ct. Tel. 408.370.2688 http://www.johncon.com/ntropix/ Campbell, CA 95008 Fax. 408.379.9602 http://www.johncon.com/nformatix/
Re: Compilation error
On Thu, Mar 23, 2000 at 04:55:59PM -0300, Erico Augusto Bettoni wrote:
> I'm trying to compile qmail-1.03 on a solaris 2.5.1 with gcc-2.95.2 and
> bintuils-2.9.1 (ld). I've adjusted conf-cc and conf-ld:
>
> conf-cc:
> gcc -02
typo. -O2, not -02.
> Users and groups are created and /var/qmail too.
> Both of them are the GNU one's.
Both of what? GNU users?
> ./load auto-str substdio.a error.a str.a
> ld: warning: cannot find entry symbol _start; defaulting to 00010074
can you compile, link and run trivial programs?
echo "int main(void) { write(1,"hello world\n",12); exit(42); }" >x.c
gcc -o x x.c && ./x
Your development system may be seriously crippled.
Regards, Uwe
Re: help qmail + fastforward + mailing list
On Fri, Mar 24, 2000 at 07:50:02PM +0100, G.Z. wrote: > when I write to listar@mydomain the alias reads > listar: "|/home/listar/listar" > but mail is delivered to the Mailbox of the listar account This is how the alias mechanism is designed to work: mail gets delivered to alias (and fastforward) only if there is no account for that address. In this case there is a listar account, so /etc/aliases will not be used. echo "|/home/listar/listar" >~listar/.qmail chown listar ~listar/.qmail > when i write to mylist@mydomain I get an error message in qmail log like > delivery 1: deferral: sh:_/home/listar/listar:Permission_denied/ chmod +x /home/listar/listar Regards, Uwe
Re: How I delay the sending of a message?
On Fri, Mar 24, 2000 at 12:46:22PM +0100, Eduardo Calderón Chao wrote: > Is it posible to inject a message, but that the qmail does not try to > send it until within two days, for example? It's possible to get this behaviour through some hacks (FAQ 5.3 plus serialmail, for example). You can use "at" for that, too. Regards, Uwe
Re: qmail-pop3d: connection closed by foreign host
On Thu, Mar 23, 2000 at 07:01:07PM -0800, Juara Com wrote: > What am I doing wrong? Don't know. Try running strace -vs 512 -o out -f \ /var/qmail/bin/qmail-popup qmail-popup juara.com /usr/sbin/logpopauth-pre \ /bin/checkpassword /var/qmail/bin/qmail-pop3d Maildir there may be a hint around the end of the file "out". Regards, Uwe
Re: MX records changed, but mails still go through old mailserver...
On Fri, Mar 24, 2000 at 08:51:25PM -, Gabriel Ambuehl wrote: > but mails are still handled by the old mailserver. If I use the new one as > SMTP server directly, the mails are delivered locally (using qmail and > vpopmail). Has anyone got an idea what's going on here? Yes. Your MX record for mail.buz.ch will only be used for mails to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mail for [EMAIL PROTECTED] is sent to the IP address buz.ch (209.15.28.27), which happens to be identical to the old MX for mail.buz.ch. You need to add another MX record, this time for the buz.ch and not for mail.buz.ch. In bind-speak: buz.ch IN MX 10 mail.buz.ch It might take some time until all name servers have learned about this. Regards, Uwe
POP3 && sticky bit, IMHO
IMHO, qmail-pop3 should deny access to a Maildir if the home directory it is stored in has the sticky bit set. It's consistent with qmail-local, which will refuse to deliver mail to such a home directory. I know, I know: sh -c 'if test -k .; then qmail-pop3d Maildir; else qmail-pop3d /etc/skel/Maildir; fi ' Still, shouldn't that be included in qmail-pop3d? -- -russ nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://russnelson.com Crynwr sells support for free software | PGPok | "Ask not what your country 521 Pleasant Valley Rd. | +1 315 268 1925 voice | can force other people to Potsdam, NY 13676-3213 | +1 315 268 9201 FAX | do for you..." -Perry M.
qmail Digest 25 Mar 2000 11:00:01 -0000 Issue 951
qmail Digest 25 Mar 2000 11:00:01 - Issue 951 Topics (messages 39018 through 39040): Adding X-Deliver-To Header for Virtual Domains 39018 by: Chris Bond 39024 by: iv0 unsubscribe qmail 39019 by: Marvel Carvalho How I delay the sending of a message? 39020 by: Eduardo Calderón Chao Re: Qmail-pop3d 39021 by: Support proxying mail through to another system 39022 by: Shaun Gibson qmail and coda - follow ... 39023 by: Thomas Mangin Office courier-imap & vchkpw 39025 by: Derek Smith 39027 by: Christopher Seawood Re: Qmail Forward 39026 by: Dave Sill Queue Frozen 39028 by: imherk.hushmail.com 39032 by: markd.bushwire.net Re: web mail 39029 by: Shad Young 39034 by: Olivier M. another users/assign file question 39030 by: Brad Kanipe help qmail + fastforward + mailing list 39031 by: G.Z. Spam bill passes House subcommittee 39033 by: vogelke.c17mis.region2.wpafb.af.mil MX records changed, but mails still go through old mailserver... 39035 by: Gabriel Ambuehl 39036 by: Chris Johnson Create Maildir automatically when a new user is added 39037 by: swilson.alabama.aaa.com 39038 by: Chad Day 39039 by: Antonio Dias Another (slightly different) cr lf question 39040 by: thomas Administrivia: To unsubscribe from the digest, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To subscribe to the digest, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To bug my human owner, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To post to the list, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Hi, How can I add a header X-Deliver-To that has final destination of the email. The reason I need to do this is because the To or CC header is not enough information for a program to deliver the mail correctly. The domain in question I need to do this with is a "Virtual Domain" setup in qmail. To some extent this already exists in the header Delivered-To, the only problem is it looks like the following: Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] If you can remove the virtual username and dash and put this into the X-Deliver-To header this would slove the problem in a stroke. Thanks, Chris Chris Bond wrote: > > Hi, > > How can I add a header X-Deliver-To that has final destination of the > email. The reason I need to do this is because the To or CC header is not > enough information for a program to deliver the mail correctly. > > The domain in question I need to do this with is a "Virtual Domain" setup > in qmail. To some extent this already exists in the header Delivered-To, > the only problem is it looks like the following: > > Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > If you can remove the virtual username and dash and put this into the > X-Deliver-To header this would slove the problem in a stroke. > > Thanks, > Chris We've done that with the development version of vpopmail 3.4.12. Instead of a header that has: virtualdomain-user@virtualdomain It puts user@virtualdomain Ken Jones http://www.inter7.com/vpopmail/ unsubscribe qmail Hi, Is it posible to inject a message, but that the qmail does not try to send it until within two days, for example? Thanks, Eduardo Thanks for all your help. It all seemed to be working. But for some reason if you generate email from the machine it gets sent. But any email that come from another machine just seems to vanish. How can I trace the email from the time it get recived till the time it should have been sent out to the internet. Could you or someone on the list send me in the rite direction for the info or give me some help. Thanks. Sorry to be a novice at MTA's but just begining at MTA's I can do most other things needed. > On Thu, Mar 23, 2000 at 04:38:48PM +1100, Support wrote: > > supervise /var/lock/qmail-smtpd tcpserver -v -x > > /etc/tcp.smtp.cdb -u$USERID -g$GROUPID 0 25 \ > > rblsmtpd qmail-smtpd 2>&1 | setuser qmaill accustamp | \ > > setuser qmaill cyclog -s500 -n5 /var/log/qmail/qmail-smtpd & > > > > Thats what is listed in rc.local and all seems to run execpt relay by > > tcp.smtp.cdb > > > > 127.0.0.1:allow,RELAYCLIENT="" > > 203.42.152.:allow,REALYCLIENT="" > ^^^ > You have a typo here. REALYCLIENT should be RELAYCLIENT. > > Chris Hi there I have a situation with my new (qmail & ldap) and old (post.office) systems. The old system holds the bulk of the mailboxes. I need some suggestions for the following : 1) I need to be able to hand (proxy?) connections to the post.office system if a lookup in the ldap/qmail system returns that the mailbox is not local to that box. The proviso for this is that the envelope must remain unmodified. Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated. -- Shaun Gibson A
