help pls

2000-07-20 Thread Kimberly Vher




i set up a virtual domain then got this error

ul 20 15:00:59 tunayna qmail: 964076459.040630 delivery 50: failure:
This_message_is_looping:_it_already_has_my_Delivered-To_line._(#5.4.6)/
Jul 20 15:00:59 tunayna qmail: 964076459.041007 status: local 0/10 remote 0/20
Jul 20 15:00:59 tunayna qmail: 964076459.141130 bounce msg 942563 qp 712

what is my problem here?





Re: Announcing qmail-autoresponder version 0.91

2000-07-20 Thread wolfgang zeikat

i installed version 0.92.
it sends the reply and ignores the message when repeated immediately,
but it does not quote the original message.

can it do that?
and if so, can it shorten the original message to lets say 100 K or
something?

thanks,
wolfgang


  Also sprach Bruce Guenter [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 19.07.2000:
  Version 0.91 of qmail-autoresponder is now available at:
http://em.ca/~bruceg/qmail-autoresponder/
  




qmail-vacation

2000-07-20 Thread Robert Sander

Hi!

The link to qmail-vacation on www.qmail.org seems to be broken.
And qmail-vacation.pl on
http://www.kw.nl/~pike/ScripTz/qmail/qmail-vacation-1.3/ is not readable.
I am looking for another location...

Greetings
-- 
Robert Sander
Epigenomics AG   www.epigenomics.de   Kastanienallee 24
+493024345330  10435 Berlin



AutoReply Programs

2000-07-20 Thread Brendan Laws

Hi there peoples,

Does anyone know of a good auto reply program, that does both,
autoreply and still deliver mail to the user?

thank you

Brendan

 winmail.dat


Re: AutoReply Programs

2000-07-20 Thread Olivier M.

On Thu, Jul 20, 2000 at 06:16:26PM +1000, Brendan Laws wrote:
 Hi there peoples,
 
   Does anyone know of a good auto reply program, that does both,
 autoreply and still deliver mail to the user?


I'd suggest:

http://em.ca/~bruceg/qmail-autoresponder/

The choice about delivering the mail to the user or not
is yours : you put ./Maildir/ in you .qmail-xxx file
or not.

Regards,
Olivier
-- 
_
 Olivier Mueller - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - PGPkeyID: 0E84D2EA - Switzerland




re: qmail-vacation

2000-07-20 Thread Mikael Schmidt

 Hi!
 
 The link to qmail-vacation on www.qmail.org seems to be broken.
 And qmail-vacation.pl on
 http://www.kw.nl/~pike/ScripTz/qmail/qmail-vacation-1.3/ is not readable.
 I am looking for another location...
You can get it at ftp.itsec.nu/pub/daemons/qmail

 
 Greetings
 -- 
 Robert Sander
 Epigenomics AG   www.epigenomics.de   Kastanienallee 24
 +493024345330  10435 Berlin

Mikael Schmidt - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.itsec.nu/  -  http://teddybear.cx/




Re: qmail-vacation

2000-07-20 Thread Robert Sander

On Thu, Jul 20, 2000 at 07:53:32AM +, Mikael Schmidt wrote:
  The link to qmail-vacation on www.qmail.org seems to be broken.
  I am looking for another location...
 You can get it at ftp.itsec.nu/pub/daemons/qmail

I am in no luck today:

ERROR

The requested URL could not be retrieved



While trying to retrieve the URL: ftp://ftp.itsec.nu/pub/daemons/qmail 

The following error was encountered: 

  Connection Failed 

  The system returned: 

 (113) No route to host

The remote host or network may be down. Please try the request again. 
  
Greetings
-- 
Robert Sander
Epigenomics AG   www.epigenomics.de   Kastanienallee 24
+493024345330  10435 Berlin



qmail + pop

2000-07-20 Thread Jasper Jans

Hi..

I was wondering - what does qmail reply on to deliver email
for user authentication (valid username etc) so you dont end
up with mails bouncing - and does anyone know if there is
pop software available that does not reply on /etc/passwd
or /etc/shadow for password authentication but uses an other
file?
The reason for this is - I want to create many (10k+) email
accounts on a qmail machine with pop ability - without giving
those people access to the machine for anything else.
I'd like to keep /etc/passwd and /etc/shadow free of all those
entries - but if I have to I know I can always enter them there
and disable the shell they are using. How does qmail take that
actually?

Many questions - I hope you guys can answer them for me.

Thanks,
J.




Re: qmail-vacation

2000-07-20 Thread Magnus Bodin

On Thu, Jul 20, 2000 at 10:36:56AM +0200, Robert Sander wrote:
 On Thu, Jul 20, 2000 at 07:53:32AM +, Mikael Schmidt wrote:
   The link to qmail-vacation on www.qmail.org seems to be broken.
   I am looking for another location...
  You can get it at ftp.itsec.nu/pub/daemons/qmail
 
 I am in no luck today:

yes you are.
Here it is:http://x42.com/qmail/contrib/

/magnus

--
http://x42.com/



Re: qmail-vacation

2000-07-20 Thread Robert Sander

On Thu, Jul 20, 2000 at 10:43:29AM +0200, Magnus Bodin wrote:
 Here it is:http://x42.com/qmail/contrib/
Yes! x42.com is the place to go, thanks!
-- 
Robert Sander
Epigenomics AG   www.epigenomics.de   Kastanienallee 24
+493024345330  10435 Berlin



Re: qmail + pop

2000-07-20 Thread Gjermund Sorseth


  Jasper Jans [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
   
  and does anyone know if there is
  pop software available that does not reply on /etc/passwd
  or /etc/shadow for password authentication but uses an other file?
   
  The reason for this is - I want to create many (10k+) email
  accounts on a qmail machine with pop ability - without giving
  those people access to the machine for anything else.


I suggest you use Berkeley DB files to store your mail users
password file information. Then write a small library containing your
own implementation of getpwnam() and getspnam() that looks up users
in those files, and link the library with the standard checkpassword
program. This will give you very good results with litte work.

-- 
Gjermund Sorseth



qmail Digest 20 Jul 2000 10:00:00 -0000 Issue 1068

2000-07-20 Thread qmail-digest-help


qmail Digest 20 Jul 2000 10:00:00 - Issue 1068

Topics (messages 44984 through 45072):

Password changed via the web
44984 by: Mark Lo

Please help me out on this
44985 by: Hitesh Thakkar
45033 by: Dave Sill

Help-qmail not receiving mail
44986 by: Lydia
44990 by: Lydia
44991 by: Lydia
44992 by: Lydia
44993 by: Lydia
44994 by: Lydia

problem qmail
44987 by: Agus Hariadi
45050 by: Noel Mistula
45055 by: Ben Beuchler
45057 by: Paul Farber
45058 by: Ihnen, David

Antigen found JS/Kak.Worm virus
44988 by: UMR CIS Antigen

cannot start qmail
44989 by: Agus Hariadi
44996 by: Magnus Bodin

"routing" a qmail setup
44995 by: martin langhoff
44997 by: Greg Owen
45004 by: martin langhoff
45006 by: Petr Novotny
45007 by: Greg Owen
45020 by: martin langhoff

any update "Virus Subject List"?
44998 by: Chris Chan

Re: Urgent Help Needed
44999 by: Steven M. Klass
45036 by: asantos

checkpassword
45000 by: Audouy Jérôme
45003 by: çééí äìôøï

Bounce Back Message
45001 by: lkhanna.hss.hns.com
45002 by: Petr Novotny

Re: Announcing qmail-autoresponder version 0.91
45005 by: Bruce Guenter
45063 by: wolfgang zeikat

Re: message route to different folder for virtual domain user
45008 by: Chester Chee
45014 by: Chester Chee

Re: Password changed via the web - big issue 
45009 by: John van V.
45012 by: Vince Vielhaber
45027 by: Goran Blazic

secondary mail server
45010 by: sonam.escape.com
45011 by: Ben Beuchler
45013 by: sonam.escape.com
45015 by: Ben Beuchler
45026 by: sonam.escape.com
45029 by: Greg Owen

very urgent :qq Truoble in home directory
45016 by: reach_prashant.zeenext.com
45021 by: Paul Jarc

qmailUID and QmailGID confused ?
45017 by: reach_prashant.zeenext.com

multiple tcpserver's spawning
45018 by: Ben Beuchler
45019 by: markd.bushwire.net

qmail-inject problem
45022 by: William D. Wilmoth
45034 by: Dave Sill

How to grab the envelope contents while filtering?
45023 by: tibbs.joshd.kendle.com
45025 by: Ihnen, David
45038 by: asantos
45040 by: tibbs.joshd.kendle.com
45041 by: Ihnen, David
45044 by: tibbs.joshd.kendle.com
45047 by: Bruce Guenter
45048 by: Bruce Guenter

http://www.unixzone.com/virus/ is down.
45024 by: Jeremy Fowler

Re: How to grab the envelope contents while filtering? - syntax e rror
45028 by: Ihnen, David
45037 by: tibbs.joshd.kendle.com

Re: Defining  as local and not remote
45030 by: Dave Sill

Re: several mail domains on one machine
45031 by: Dave Sill

Re: | preline procmail
45032 by: Dave Sill
45061 by: Devinder

AMaViS (was: http://www.unixzone.com/virus/ is down.)
45035 by: Magnus Bodin

Routing mail for a specific domain
45039 by: Enrique Vadillo
45042 by: Ronny Haryanto
45043 by: Ihnen, David

Re: How do I stop this spam test from failing?
45045 by: John R. Levine

from-adresse in bounce-mail
45046 by: michael.renner.gmx.de
45049 by: Aaron L. Meehan

Virus incident
45051 by: Salia Aouar
45052 by: [OFFICE3] Panda Antivirus for Exchange Server

General, (Can't find in FAQ)
45053 by: Jonathan D. Poole
45054 by: Adam McKenna
45056 by: Paul Farber

Amavis problems
45059 by: Jeremy Fowler

Internet Mail 2000
45060 by: D. J. Bernstein

help pls
45062 by: Kimberly Vher

qmail-vacation
45064 by: Robert Sander
45067 by: Mikael Schmidt
45068 by: Robert Sander
45070 by: Magnus Bodin
45071 by: Robert Sander

AutoReply Programs
45065 by: Brendan Laws
45066 by: Olivier M.

qmail + pop
45069 by: Jasper Jans
45072 by: Gjermund Sorseth

Administrivia:

To unsubscribe from the digest, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To subscribe to the digest, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To bug my human owner, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To post to the list, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


--



Hi,

 I would like to know how to change user's password via the web, as
I know, (qmail) mail userl's password is corresponding to Redhat linux
user's password.  Please give me any idea of how to let my user change
password via the web.  And the web server and qmail server is located at
different machine.

Thank You so much for your help

Mark Lo








Dear sir,

I have started using Qmail for intranet mail and enabled POP,IMAP and
webmail access. No issues it works fine. I loaded EZLML for mailing list and
it is nice to 

Error message...

2000-07-20 Thread Mario Rafael



 Hi I am checking the logs and I 
keep geting this error..

Jul 20 13:30:01 svr2 qmail: 964092601.235310 alert: 
cannot start: unable to open mutex

 Qmail dosent receive nor send any 
mail, could someone help me and tell me what is "mutex"?.. how can I fix 
this?.

Thanks.

Mario Rafael


dot-qmail with ./named.pipe == invalid argument #4.3.0

2000-07-20 Thread Jay J

Greetings from a happy new qmail user (first post),

** qmail 1.03
** linux-2.2.16-:i386-:-:pentium-:-

As part of a ritualistic adventure to the edges of qmail sanity, I
brazenly created a fifo to be read by a perl "daemon".

Using a .qmail file in a real-user's home dir that read:

./inmail.pipe

(BTW - I'm also using fastforward, but this is an actual user account
without aliasing)

Long story short -- qmail wrote to the pipe just fine but justifiably
barfs at the end. (Uhh, stat call or something?)

error
Jul 20 10:43:03 mn qmail: 964089783.401047 delivery 3225: deferral:
Unable_to_write_./inmail.pipe:_invalid_argument._(#4.3.0)/
/error

So .. I proceeded to create a writer.sh:

#!/bin/sh
cat  ./inmail.pipe

and modified .qmail:

| ./writer.sh

This appears to work fine, as I had hoped.

Why would I do such a crazy thing in the first place?

I've compiled with QUEUE_EXTRA and plan to use it to mangle
incoming/outgoing messages for [EMAIL PROTECTED]  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 

More precisely, I plan to attach ticket # headers, update the "bug
reports" database, and route incoming replies to the sales/support
person who was first to respond. Blah blah blah .. using Perl.

I switched to qmail 1) specifically for QUEUE_EXTRA, 2) security,
security, security, and 3) out of desperation and displeasure with
sendmail (Sorry sendmail hackers).

So why the FIFO? I'm concerned about spawning many-a-Perl at 2.5MB
each on my lowly P75 DNS/Firewall/qmail box. So the idea of a single
reader is attractive ..

Is that crazy? Suggestions? (Other than "Pentium II's are cheap") :-)

-Jay J

p.s. Many thanks for qmail  friends



Re: AutoReply Programs

2000-07-20 Thread William E. Baxter

The qtools package contains replier, a utility for setting up
autorepliers.  It filters each message through a program of your
choice.  That program or your .qmail file can deliver the message in
addition to generating a reply.

Regards,
W.

On Thu, Jul 20, 2000 at 06:16:26PM +1000, Brendan Laws wrote:
 Hi there peoples,
 
   Does anyone know of a good auto reply program, that does both,
 autoreply and still deliver mail to the user?
 
 thank you
 
 Brendan





Re: General, (Can't find in FAQ)

2000-07-20 Thread William D. Wilmoth

You need to set up selective relaying.  Here are a couple of links you
should take a look at:

 http://qmail-docs.surfdirect.com.au/docs/qmail-antirelay.html  this one may
be dead.
 http://www.palomine.net/qmail/relaying.html

"Jonathan D. Poole" wrote:

 I was hopeing some of you guys could help me understand where to allow
 only say, 192.168.0.1/21 to be sending through my qmail server.  I can't
 seem to find the docs for this, in specifically to my situation.

 Any help, or pointing to a document, or url, or anything would be
 appreciated.

 Thank You
 Jonathan D. Poole

--
William D. Wilmoth
Network Administrator
Service Transport, Inc.
Phone: (800) 528 - 1616 x226
Fax:   (931) 520 - 7185

Visit us on the web: http://www.service-transport.com





Re: How to grab the envelope contents while filtering?

2000-07-20 Thread tibbs . joshd


Actually, I was looking at the release notes, not the man page, but yes I
should have known that from version 1.0. Thanks.

As for the empty messages, I found that if my filter has no output a blank
message is sent to the envelope recipients. I circumvented by this
modification to qmail-qfilter.c v1.0:

/* remap the appropriate FDs and exec qmail-queue */
int run_qmail_queue(int tmpfd, int envpipe[2])
{
struct stat mystat;
struct stat *ptr_mystat;
ptr_mystat=mystat;
fstat(tmpfd,ptr_mystat);
if (mystat.st_size  5){
  if(close(envpipe[1]) == -1 ||
 dup2(tmpfd, 0) != 0 || close(tmpfd) == -1 ||
 dup2(envpipe[0], 1) != 1 || close(envpipe[0]) == -1 ||
 close(2) == -1)
return QQ_WRITE_ERROR;
  execl(QMAIL_QUEUE, QMAIL_QUEUE, 0);
  return QQ_INTERNAL;
}
return QQ_SUCCESS;
}

It's kind of a hack, but it works so far. Should I continue to use this method or is 
there a better solution here?

Thanks again for all your help and patience with a newbie. :)

Josh






Bruce Guenter [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 07/19/2000 06:14:42 PM

To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:  Re: How to grab the envelope contents while filtering?


On Wed, Jul 19, 2000 at 05:01:48PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Yup, I use the mess822 stuff too, but I need envelope addresses, not
header
 addresses.

 I see now that qmail-qfilter 1.3 sets QMAILRCPTS to the message
recipients.
 I assume this is envelope recipients. If so, I'm halfway there. I just
need
 to doctor up 1.3 a little bit to also pass a variable for envelope sender
 (and to drop empty messages). Can anyone confirm?

The same man page tells you that qmail-qfilter sets QMAILUSER and
QMAILHOST to the username and hostname portions of the envelope sender.
Dropping empty messages is something you can do in your filter.
--
Bruce Guenter [EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://em.ca/~bruceg/



 $RFC822.eml
 C.DTF


Re: [Fwd: Amavis problems] (fwd)

2000-07-20 Thread Rainer Link


Hi!

Please read below. 

-- 
Rainer Link, SuSE GmbH, eMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED], Web: www.suse.de
Developer of  A Mail Virus Scanner (AMaViS): http://amavis.org/
Founder of Linux AntiVirus Project: http://lavp.sourceforge.net/

-- Forwarded message --
Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2000 15:50:46 +0200
From: Marc Lehmann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Rainer Link [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Fwd: Amavis problems] (fwd)

On Thu, Jul 20, 2000 at 11:20:28AM +0200, Rainer Link [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Please read the forwarded message elow. As I'm currently very busy with
 other stuff, I did not tested it. But it sounds like a bug in the new
 Convert-UUlib to me. Thanks
 
 Can't locate loadable object for module Convert::UUlib in @INC (@INC

Convert::UUlib obviously isn't installed correctly. I doubt this has
anything to do with Convert::UUlib, but rather something with incorrect
permissions...

-- 
  -==- |
  ==-- _   |
  ---==---(_)__  __   __   Marc Lehmann  +--
  --==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ /   [EMAIL PROTECTED] |e|
  -=/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\   XX11-RIPE --+
The choice of a GNU generation   |
 |




patch to qmail-vacation

2000-07-20 Thread Robert Sander

Hi!

I have made a little patch to qmail-vacation. It had the nasty behaviour
to regexp the Delivered-To lines. Very uncomfortable if you are dealing
with virtual domains...
See attachment.

Greetings
-- 
Robert Sander
Epigenomics AG   www.epigenomics.de   Kastanienallee 24
+493024345330  10435 Berlin


--- vacation.pl.origThu Jul 20 16:09:37 2000
+++ vacation.pl Thu Jul 20 16:09:51 2000
@@ -411,8 +411,8 @@
 
 if ($check_to_and_cc)
 {
-   ($to) = ($header =~ /To:\s+(.*)/i);
-   ($cc) = ($header =~ /Cc:\s+(.*)/i);
+   ($to) = ($header =~ /^To:\s+(.*)/i);
+   ($cc) = ($header =~ /^Cc:\s+(.*)/i);
$to .= ', ' . $cc if $cc;
$to = lc($to);
 



Re: dot-qmail with ./named.pipe == invalid argument #4.3.0

2000-07-20 Thread Chris, the Young One

On Thu, Jul 20, 2000 at 07:00:04AM -0500, Jay J wrote:
! Long story short -- qmail wrote to the pipe just fine but justifiably
! barfs at the end. (Uhh, stat call or something?)

I think the mailfile() function in qmail-local.c calls fsync() at the
end. If my man page is right, fsync() works only on regular files.

The failure can be attributable to other reasons, but I find the above
to be the most likely explanation.

! Is that crazy? Suggestions? (Other than "Pentium II's are cheap") :-)

Forking is cheap. :-)

---Chris K.
-- 
 Chris, the Young One |_ but what's a dropped message between friends? 
  Auckland, New Zealand |_ this is UDP, not TCP after all ;) ---John H. 
http://cloud9.hedgee.com/ |_ Robinson, IV  
 PGP: 0xCCC6114E/0x706A6AAD |_ 



Re: qmail-inject problem

2000-07-20 Thread William D. Wilmoth

I ran the trace and found that I am getting a permissions error at the
receiving users home directory.  So just as a test I ran chmod 744 on
that directory and got the same error. Sorry I am still new at this
permissions game...  What is the deal?  744 should give read to all
right???

Dave Sill wrote:

 "William D. Wilmoth" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I am getting the following error when trying to mail from any user
 without root access:
 
 qmail-inject: fatal: read error
 
 I am pretty sure that this is a permissions issue, but where???

 Run qmail-inject via a system call tracer (strace/truss/par/etc.) to
 where it's failing.

 -Dave

--
William D. Wilmoth
Network Administrator
Service Transport, Inc.
Phone: (800) 528 - 1616 x226
Fax:   (931) 520 - 7185

Visit us on the web: http://www.service-transport.com





Re: qmail-inject problem

2000-07-20 Thread Chris, the Young One

On Thu, Jul 20, 2000 at 09:53:41AM -0500, William D. Wilmoth wrote:
!  What is the deal?  744 should give read to all
! right???

Read permission allows you to list the directory. It does not allow you
to access it; for that you need the execute permission.

Try 0755.

---Chris K.
-- 
 Chris, the Young One |_ but what's a dropped message between friends? 
  Auckland, New Zealand |_ this is UDP, not TCP after all ;) ---John H. 
http://cloud9.hedgee.com/ |_ Robinson, IV  
 PGP: 0xCCC6114E/0x706A6AAD |_ 



Re: How to grab the envelope contents while filtering?

2000-07-20 Thread Bruce Guenter

On Thu, Jul 20, 2000 at 09:24:33AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 As for the empty messages, I found that if my filter has no output a blank
 message is sent to the envelope recipients. I circumvented by this
 modification to qmail-qfilter.c v1.0:

What are you trying to do?  Why are you not sending any output to
qmail-queue?  qmail-qfilter allows you to filter the headers and body of
a messages before it reaches qmail-queue.
-- 
Bruce Guenter [EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://em.ca/~bruceg/

 PGP signature


Re: Announcing qmail-autoresponder version 0.91

2000-07-20 Thread Bruce Guenter

On Thu, Jul 20, 2000 at 09:55:23AM +0200, wolfgang zeikat wrote:
 i installed version 0.92.
 it sends the reply and ignores the message when repeated immediately,
 but it does not quote the original message.
 
 can it do that?

Yes.  Run "qmail-autoresponder -h" for a complete option listing.

 and if so, can it shorten the original message to lets say 100 K or
 something?

Not yet, but I suppose this would be a good idea.
-- 
Bruce Guenter [EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://em.ca/~bruceg/

 PGP signature


Re: How to grab the envelope contents while filtering?

2000-07-20 Thread tibbs . joshd


I have a filter the looks at file attachments in the message. If certain
file types are attached, the message delivery is stopped (ie. no output
from the filter). Without the qmail-qfilter hack, qmail-queue gets only the
envelope and sends what amounts to an empty message to the envelope
recipients. With the hack, if the message is  5 characters, qmail-queue is
not run.

Josh





Bruce Guenter [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 07/20/2000 12:13:03 PM

To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:  Re: How to grab the envelope contents while filtering?


On Thu, Jul 20, 2000 at 09:24:33AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 As for the empty messages, I found that if my filter has no output a
blank
 message is sent to the envelope recipients. I circumvented by this
 modification to qmail-qfilter.c v1.0:

What are you trying to do?  Why are you not sending any output to
qmail-queue?  qmail-qfilter allows you to filter the headers and body of
a messages before it reaches qmail-queue.
--
Bruce Guenter [EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://em.ca/~bruceg/



 $RFC822.eml
 C.DTF


Re: How to grab the envelope contents while filtering?

2000-07-20 Thread Bruce Guenter

On Thu, Jul 20, 2000 at 12:42:27PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I have a filter the looks at file attachments in the message. If certain
 file types are attached, the message delivery is stopped (ie. no output
 from the filter).

If you want to block a message, exit with a permanent error code (ie 31).
-- 
Bruce Guenter [EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://em.ca/~bruceg/

 PGP signature


Re: How to grab the envelope contents while filtering?

2000-07-20 Thread tibbs . joshd


I saw that in your example, but it causes a delivery failure, which is not
what I want to happen. I need the message to be accepted and silently
dropped if it meets certain criteria. I do the appropriate notification on
the back end.

I suppose qmail-qfilter can be patched so that qmail-queue is not run on a
specific filter exit code, no?

Josh





Bruce Guenter [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 07/20/2000 12:55:28 PM

To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:  Re: How to grab the envelope contents while filtering?


On Thu, Jul 20, 2000 at 12:42:27PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I have a filter the looks at file attachments in the message. If certain
 file types are attached, the message delivery is stopped (ie. no output
 from the filter).

If you want to block a message, exit with a permanent error code (ie 31).
--
Bruce Guenter [EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://em.ca/~bruceg/



 $RFC822.eml
 C.DTF


the bounce bounced!

2000-07-20 Thread michael . renner

Hello,
when I mail for an unknown user arraived a bounce
message is generated. But this message bounce,
my smarthost wont deliver that:
cut--
Hi. This is the maildirbounce program at terramenta.de.
I tried to deliver a bounce message to this address, but the bounce bounced!

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
195.20.224.204 said: 503 Valid RCPT TO recipient must precede DATA

--- Below this line is the original bounce.

Return-Path: 
Received: (qmail 2419 invoked for bounce); 20 Jul 2000 16:31:09 -
cut--

I see the problem: The empty Return-Path, but I don`t
know where to fix this!

Any hints or pointers?
-- 
|Michael Renner  E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]|
|D-72072 Tuebingen   Germany  |
mail -s "get pgp key" [EMAIL PROTECTED]  /dev/null
mail -s "get gpg key" [EMAIL PROTECTED]  /dev/null
|Don't drink as root!ESC:wq



Re: help pls

2000-07-20 Thread Dave Sill

Kimberly Vher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

i set up a virtual domain then got this error

ul 20 15:00:59 tunayna qmail: 964076459.040630 delivery 50: failure:
This_message_is_looping:_it_already_has_my_Delivered-To_line._(#5.4.6)/
Jul 20 15:00:59 tunayna qmail: 964076459.041007 status: local 0/10 remote 0/20
Jul 20 15:00:59 tunayna qmail: 964076459.141130 bounce msg 942563 qp 712

what is my problem here?

Insufficient data. *How* did you set up the virtual domain? You've
obviously made a mistake, but until we see what you did, we can't tell 
what it was.

-Dave



Re: the bounce bounced!

2000-07-20 Thread Aaron L. Meehan

Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
 Hello,
 when I mail for an unknown user arraived a bounce
 message is generated. But this message bounce,
 my smarthost wont deliver that:

 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
 195.20.224.204 said: 503 Valid RCPT TO recipient must precede DATA

Well, the way I read it is that it's saying the *recipient* is not
valid.  Your whole mail situation seems to be complicated by you using
a smarthost that doesn't behave properly, but we can only guess as to
what is really going on with the limited information available.

As an observation, in my opinion, that error message, although
technically correct to a fault, is not worded in such a way that the
average user could understand.  Exim, hmm.

 Return-Path: 
 Received: (qmail 2419 invoked for bounce); 20 Jul 2000 16:31:09 -
 cut--
 
 I see the problem: The empty Return-Path, but I don`t
 know where to fix this!

The Return-Path is *supposed to be empty* if the message is a delivery
notification (like a bounce).  Your smarthost should not be caring
whether you send mail with null return-paths.

Aaron




Re: the bounce bounced!

2000-07-20 Thread Dave Sill

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

cut--
Hi. This is the maildirbounce program at terramenta.de.
I tried to deliver a bounce message to this address, but the bounce bounced!

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
195.20.224.204 said: 503 Valid RCPT TO recipient must precede DATA

--- Below this line is the original bounce.

Return-Path: 
Received: (qmail 2419 invoked for bounce); 20 Jul 2000 16:31:09 -
cut--

What is "maildirbounce"? It seems to be not speaking proper SMTP. At
least, 195.20.224.204 is claiming that it sent a DATA comamnd before a 
RCPT command, which is seriously wrong. Is this problem repeatable?

-Dave



Re: How to grab the envelope contents while filtering?

2000-07-20 Thread Chris, the Young One

On Thu, Jul 20, 2000 at 01:18:02PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
! I saw that in your example, but it causes a delivery failure, which is not
! what I want to happen. I need the message to be accepted and silently
! dropped if it meets certain criteria. I do the appropriate notification on
! the back end.

To quote a certain Russ Nelson post, just make a .qmail file containing
simply, ``#''. Anything sent to the associated address will not have any
action taken on them.

If you can get qmail-qfilter to forward stuff to an arbitrary address,
that perhaps is the simplest way.

---Chris K.
-- 
 Chris, the Young One |_ heartbleed (OpenBSD/i386) has now been up for 
  Auckland, New Zealand |_ all of 22 days, 16:12:29 
http://cloud9.hedgee.com/ |_ 
 PGP: 0xCCC6114E/0x706A6AAD |_ 



qmail died again... 3x in 3 weeks

2000-07-20 Thread Paul Farber

Hello all, I had another qmail failure... i say that because qmail seems
to be the only service affected. I lump tcpserver, smtpd and pop3d in
as qmail for now as I don't have a definative place to look.

Here is the ps output after the crash at 12:35 today:

1 ?S  0:51 init
2 ?SW 0:01 [kflushd]
3 ?SW 0:11 [kupdate]
4 ?SW 0:00 [kpiod]
5 ?SW 0:04 [kswapd]
6 ?SW0:00 [mdrecoveryd]
  339 ?S657:23 syslogd -m 0
  350 ?SW 0:00 [klogd]
  366 ?S  0:00 /usr/sbin/atd
  382 ?S  0:00 crond
  398 ?S  0:01 inetd
  414 ?S  0:01 /usr/local/sbin/sshd
  430 ?SW 0:00 [lpd]
  463 ?S  0:02 /usr/local/apache/bin/httpsd
  466 ?SW 0:00 [gcache]
  485 ?SW 0:00 [supervise]
  486 ?S  1:43 splogger qmail
  487 ?S 32:32 qmail-send
  501 ?SW 0:00 [supervise]
  502 ?SW 0:00 [splogger]
  503 ?S  2:31 tcpserver -p -q -r -c100 -x
/etc/tcprules.d/qmail-smt  
  504 ?S  0:51 qmail-lspawn # Using
qmail-local to deliver messages
  505 ?S  0:15 qmail-rspawn
  505 ?S  0:15 qmail-rspawn
  506 ?S  0:29 qmail-clean
  520 ?SW 0:00 [supervise]
  521 ?S  0:30 tcpserver -q -R -H -c100 -x
/etc/tcprules.d/qmail-pop  
  535 ?SW 0:00 [supervise]
  536 ?S  0:06 tcpserver -q -R -H -c100 -u0 -g0
vmail.f-tech.net pop  
  669 tty2 SW 0:00 [mingetty]
  670 tty3 SW 0:00 [mingetty]
  671 tty4 SW 0:00 [mingetty]
  672 tty5 SW 0:00 [mingetty]
  673 tty6 SW 0:00 [mingetty]
  822 tty1 S  0:00 login -- root
30124 ?S  0:00 /usr/local/apache/bin/httpsd
30313 ?S  0:00 /usr/local/apache/bin/httpsd
30369 ?S  0:00 /usr/local/apache/bin/httpsd
 5254 ?S  0:00 /usr/local/apache/bin/httpsd
 5262 ?S  0:00 /usr/local/apache/bin/httpsd
 5263 ?S  0:00 /usr/local/apache/bin/httpsd
12132 ?S  0:00 /usr/local/apache/bin/httpsd
14163 ?S  0:00 /usr/local/apache/bin/httpsd
 7065 ?S  0:00 /usr/local/apache/bin/httpsd
 8274 ?S  0:00 /usr/local/apache/bin/httpsd
21419 ?S  0:00 /usr/local/apache/bin/httpsd
21461 ?S  0:00 /usr/local/apache/bin/httpsd
21461 ?S  0:00 /usr/local/apache/bin/httpsd
21477 ?S  0:00 /usr/local/apache/bin/httpsd
22458 ?S  0:00 in.identd -l -e -o
22637 tty1 S  0:00 -bash
22699 tty1 R  0:00 ps ax

No pop3 or smtp services were available, telnet didn't work either.
I have identd commented out in inet.conf, so I have no idea where it is
coming from, or how it started.

After stopping qmail.init, vpopmail, pop3d and smtpd this is a list of the
new processes:

23026 tty1 S  0:00 supervise /var/lock/qmail qmail-start # Using
qmail-l23027 tty1 S  0:00 splogger qmail
23028 tty1 S  0:00 qmail-send
23029 tty1 S  0:00 qmail-lspawn # Using qmail-local to deliver
messages
23030 tty1 S  0:00 qmail-rspawn
23031 tty1 S  0:00 qmail-clean
23032 tty1 S  0:00 qmail-remote pa-arng.ngb.army.mil
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
23043 tty1 S  0:00 supervise
/var/lock/qmail-smtpd tcpserver -p -q -r -c
23044 tty1 S  0:00
splogger qmail-smptd
23045 tty1 S  0:00 tcpserver -p -q -r -c100 -x
/etc/tcprules.d/qmail-smt
23056 tty1 S  0:00 supervise
/var/lock/qmail-pop3d tcpserver -q -R -H -c
23057 tty1 S  0:00
tcpserver -q -R -H -c 100 -x /etc/tcprules.d/qmail-pop
23085 tty1 S
0:00 supervise /var/lock/qmail-vpop3d tcpserver -q -R -H -
23086 tty1 S 0:00 tcpserver -q -R -H -c100 -u0 -g0
vmail.f-tech.net pop23092 tty1 S
0:00 qmail-popup vmail.f-tech.net /home/vpopmail/bin/vchkp
23093 tty1 S 0:00 qmail-vpop3d Maildir
23094 tty1 Z 0:00 [tcprules defunct]
23100 tty1 S  0:00 qmail-popup mail.f-tech.net checkpassword
qmail-pop3d
23101 tty1 S  0:00 qmail-pop3d Maildir
23341 tty1 S  0:00 qmail-smtpd
23374 tty1 S  0:00 qmail-smtpd

Notice that I have a new pid 23094 tcprules defunct, but the pid seems
to indicate that it was from the restart of the services, not the original
ps output.

The mail log just before the stoppage indicates that tcpserver encountered
a huge number of cname lookup failures for outgoing mail. but DNS was
fine (the main dsn server is still running, and I do not cache entries on
the mail server).

Going the the mail log I see:

Jul 20 11:30:19 mail qmail: 964107019.317584 status: local 1/100 remote
51/100
Jul 20 11:30:20 mail qmail: 964107020.447592 delivery 118231: deferral:
qmail-spawn_unable_to_fork._(#4.3.0)/

and 

Jul 20 11:48:28 mail qmail: 964108108.168548 status: local 0/100 remote
46/100
Jul 20 11:48:35 mail qmail: 

Re: qmail died again... 3x in 3 weeks

2000-07-20 Thread markd

On Thu, Jul 20, 2000 at 02:16:21PM -0400, Paul Farber wrote:
 Hello all, I had another qmail failure... i say that because qmail seems
 to be the only service affected. I lump tcpserver, smtpd and pop3d in
 as qmail for now as I don't have a definative place to look.
 
 Here is the ps output after the crash at 12:35 today:

Which looks ok to me. All the processes that are needed, seem to be
there.

 No pop3 or smtp services were available, telnet didn't work either.

What do you mean by "available?". What happened when you tried to connect
to those ports?

 I have identd commented out in inet.conf, so I have no idea where it is
 coming from, or how it started.

What do you expect identd to tell you that's relevant to qmail?

 After stopping qmail.init, vpopmail, pop3d and smtpd this is a list of the
 new processes:

Apart from the qmail-remotes, what relevant differences do you see
between this and the last ps?

 23026 tty1 S  0:00 supervise /var/lock/qmail qmail-start # Using
 qmail-l23027 tty1 S  0:00 splogger qmail
 23028 tty1 S  0:00 qmail-send
 23029 tty1 S  0:00 qmail-lspawn # Using qmail-local to deliver
 messages

Is this a heavily edited 'ps' output? It makes if difficult if it is.

 Notice that I have a new pid 23094 tcprules defunct, but the pid seems
 to indicate that it was from the restart of the services, not the original
 ps output.

tcprules hasn't much to do with the running of qmail though.

 The mail log just before the stoppage indicates that tcpserver encountered
 a huge number of cname lookup failures for outgoing mail. but DNS was
 fine (the main dsn server is still running, and I do not cache entries on
 the mail server).

What do you mean by DNS "was fine"? Do you mean it had reachability to
resolve queries or do you mean that the process was running?

My suspicion is that you lost the ability to do DNS lookups and
that stalled reverse lookups which stalls all processes that want to
do that (such as a wrappered telnet).

 Going the the mail log I see:
 
 Jul 20 11:30:19 mail qmail: 964107019.317584 status: local 1/100 remote
 51/100
 Jul 20 11:30:20 mail qmail: 964107020.447592 delivery 118231: deferral:
 qmail-spawn_unable_to_fork._(#4.3.0)/
 
 and 
 
 Jul 20 11:48:28 mail qmail: 964108108.168548 status: local 0/100 remote
 46/100
 Jul 20 11:48:35 mail qmail: 964108115.918335 delivery 118202: deferral:
 Connected_to_24.0.95.29_but_connection_died._(#4.4.2)/
 
 then 
 
 Jul 20 12:01:47 mail qmail: 964108907.824767 status: local 0/100 remote
 47/100
 Jul 20 12:01:47 mail qmail: 964108907.917107 delivery 118245: deferral:
 CNAME_lookup_failed_temporarily._(#4.4.3)/
 
 Concurrancy went up to 51 for remote, local 1 during the 30 minutes it
 took to fail.

And what do you make of that? The first message tells me that you
haven't given qmail-send enough resources to start all the processes
you've configured it for - but it's not fatal.


Mark.



Re: How to grab the envelope contents while filtering?

2000-07-20 Thread Bruce Guenter

On Thu, Jul 20, 2000 at 01:18:02PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I saw that in your example, but it causes a delivery failure, which is not
 what I want to happen. I need the message to be accepted and silently
 dropped if it meets certain criteria. I do the appropriate notification on
 the back end.
 
 I suppose qmail-qfilter can be patched so that qmail-queue is not run on a
 specific filter exit code, no?

Yes, that would be the best bet.  I'll pick a new exit code and modify
qmail-qfilter to immediately exit with success without running
qmail-queue.
-- 
Bruce Guenter [EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://em.ca/~bruceg/

 PGP signature


Re: How to grab the envelope contents while filtering?

2000-07-20 Thread Bruce Guenter

On Thu, Jul 20, 2000 at 12:34:21PM -0600, Bruce Guenter wrote:
 Yes, that would be the best bet.  I'll pick a new exit code and modify
 qmail-qfilter to immediately exit with success without running
 qmail-queue.

Just to follow up to myself, would 99 be appropriate?  In a .qmail file,
code 99 means that the delivery was successful, but don't continue with
any other deliveries.  This would be equivalent.
-- 
Bruce Guenter [EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://em.ca/~bruceg/

 PGP signature


Re: qmail died again... 3x in 3 weeks

2000-07-20 Thread Paul Farber

telnetting to port 25 and 110 just timed out.  DNS was fine... it means
just that, I could ping via hostname and the dns logs show it was running.
No other host (the web server specifically) showed a dns failure (log
files had hostnames resolved during the 30 minute mail 'outage'.

I have the ps output saved as files, gpm cut/paste will only go so far.

qmail unable to fork is a new one for me.  I have concurrency set to 100,
and ulimit returns unlimited (from the command line).

ulimit -a shows
core file size (blocks)  100
data seg size (kbytes)   unlimited
file size (blocks)   unlimited
max memory size (kbytes) unlimited
stack size (kbytes)  8192
cpu time (seconds)   unlimited
max user processes   2048
pipe size (512 bytes)8
open files   1024
virtual memory (kbytes)  2105343


System memory available:
Mem:  131022848 125976576  5046272  8724480 77127680 23965696
Swap: 41250816  3854336 37396480
MemTotal:127952 kB
MemFree:   4928 kB
MemShared: 8520 kB
Buffers:  75320 kB
Cached:   23404 kB
SwapTotal:40284 kB
SwapFree: 36520 kB

I can see a large emailing from 1 single user in the logs, 2 of over
50 bounced (from qmail-qread). but I'm
pretty sure I've had CC's or To: of 150 before without problems (from a
site we host).

What else can I do to up the available resources???

Paul Farber
Farber Technology
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ph  570-628-5303
Fax 570-628-5545

On Thu, 20 Jul 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 On Thu, Jul 20, 2000 at 02:16:21PM -0400, Paul Farber wrote:
  Hello all, I had another qmail failure... i say that because qmail seems
  to be the only service affected. I lump tcpserver, smtpd and pop3d in
  as qmail for now as I don't have a definative place to look.
  
  Here is the ps output after the crash at 12:35 today:
 
 Which looks ok to me. All the processes that are needed, seem to be
 there.
 
  No pop3 or smtp services were available, telnet didn't work either.
 
 What do you mean by "available?". What happened when you tried to connect
 to those ports?
 
  I have identd commented out in inet.conf, so I have no idea where it is
  coming from, or how it started.
 
 What do you expect identd to tell you that's relevant to qmail?
 
  After stopping qmail.init, vpopmail, pop3d and smtpd this is a list of the
  new processes:
 
 Apart from the qmail-remotes, what relevant differences do you see
 between this and the last ps?
 
  23026 tty1 S  0:00 supervise /var/lock/qmail qmail-start # Using
  qmail-l23027 tty1 S  0:00 splogger qmail
  23028 tty1 S  0:00 qmail-send
  23029 tty1 S  0:00 qmail-lspawn # Using qmail-local to deliver
  messages
 
 Is this a heavily edited 'ps' output? It makes if difficult if it is.
 
  Notice that I have a new pid 23094 tcprules defunct, but the pid seems
  to indicate that it was from the restart of the services, not the original
  ps output.
 
 tcprules hasn't much to do with the running of qmail though.
 
  The mail log just before the stoppage indicates that tcpserver encountered
  a huge number of cname lookup failures for outgoing mail. but DNS was
  fine (the main dsn server is still running, and I do not cache entries on
  the mail server).
 
 What do you mean by DNS "was fine"? Do you mean it had reachability to
 resolve queries or do you mean that the process was running?
 
 My suspicion is that you lost the ability to do DNS lookups and
 that stalled reverse lookups which stalls all processes that want to
 do that (such as a wrappered telnet).
 
  Going the the mail log I see:
  
  Jul 20 11:30:19 mail qmail: 964107019.317584 status: local 1/100 remote
  51/100
  Jul 20 11:30:20 mail qmail: 964107020.447592 delivery 118231: deferral:
  qmail-spawn_unable_to_fork._(#4.3.0)/
  
  and 
  
  Jul 20 11:48:28 mail qmail: 964108108.168548 status: local 0/100 remote
  46/100
  Jul 20 11:48:35 mail qmail: 964108115.918335 delivery 118202: deferral:
  Connected_to_24.0.95.29_but_connection_died._(#4.4.2)/
  
  then 
  
  Jul 20 12:01:47 mail qmail: 964108907.824767 status: local 0/100 remote
  47/100
  Jul 20 12:01:47 mail qmail: 964108907.917107 delivery 118245: deferral:
  CNAME_lookup_failed_temporarily._(#4.4.3)/
  
  Concurrancy went up to 51 for remote, local 1 during the 30 minutes it
  took to fail.
 
 And what do you make of that? The first message tells me that you
 haven't given qmail-send enough resources to start all the processes
 you've configured it for - but it's not fatal.
 
 
 Mark.
 




Re: qmail-inject problem

2000-07-20 Thread William D. Wilmoth

I tried changing permissions to 711 as well still didn't work.

I even tried 777

The parent directories seem okay as well???

"William D. Wilmoth" wrote:

 I am getting the following error when trying to mail from any user
 without root access:

 qmail-inject: fatal: read error

 I am pretty sure that this is a permissions issue, but where???

 --
 William D. Wilmoth
 Network Administrator
 Service Transport, Inc.
 Phone: (800) 528 - 1616 x226
 Fax:   (931) 520 - 7185

 Visit us on the web: http://www.service-transport.com

--
William D. Wilmoth
Network Administrator
Service Transport, Inc.
Phone: (800) 528 - 1616 x226
Fax:   (931) 520 - 7185

Visit us on the web: http://www.service-transport.com





Re: dot-qmail with ./named.pipe == invalid argument #4.3.0

2000-07-20 Thread David Dyer-Bennet

Jay J [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes on 20 July 2000 at 07:00:04 -0500

  So why the FIFO? I'm concerned about spawning many-a-Perl at 2.5MB
  each on my lowly P75 DNS/Firewall/qmail box. So the idea of a single
  reader is attractive ..
  
  Is that crazy? Suggestions? (Other than "Pentium II's are cheap") :-)

AMD K-6's are cheap?  :-)  Compared to what your time is worth

Write your procedure in C?  

Test performance of the perl version to see if your concerns are
supported?  The 2.5MB each includes considerable code shared between
all invocations on the systems I'm familiar with.
-- 
Photos: http://dd-b.lighthunters.net/ Minicon: http://www.mnstf.org/minicon
Bookworms: http://ouroboros.demesne.com/ SF: http://www.dd-b.net/dd-b 
David Dyer-Bennet / Welcome to the future! / [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Slow Slow Mail Delivery, Not Trigger Permissions

2000-07-20 Thread jca

Anyone know why mail delivery could be extremely slow? My trigger file is setup 
correctly and I am looking for some really really helpful answers, soon *gulp* 

REgards,

Julian




Maildir support for emacs vm

2000-07-20 Thread Erich


I've been using qmail for a long time, with Maildir and rmail.  I use
the mdmovemail program which is available on the Qmail site, and it
works fine with rmail.

Now, however, it is time for me to upgrade to a MUA with better
support for MIME.  It seems like the best choice for emacs is vm.

It was easy to install vm into emacs, and it works fine for sending
mail, but I can't get it to receive mail using mdmovemail.

I put this line in my .vm:

(setq vm-movemail-program "/usr/local/qmail/bin/mdmovemail")

and I setenv MAIL to ~/Maildir/, and that should be all it needs, but
it doesn't work.  I'm pretty sure what's happening is that vm is
looking in ~/Maildir for a file with the same name as my username, and
when it doesn't find it, it assumes that there is no mail for me, and
gives up happily.

I search the archives of this list, and found some mail from a few
years ago, with a wrapper for mdmovemail, but that did not seem like a
reliable way to do this, so I didn't even try it.

Does anyone have some recomendations?  Maybe a patch to vm?  I'm very
ready to switch to vm from rmail, because it seems like a better way
to go.

Thanks,

e



Re: qmail died again... 3x in 3 weeks

2000-07-20 Thread Ricardo Cerqueira

 
 Have you thought about migrating to the latest version of
 daemontools and it's startup idiom?  More importantly, 
 using cyclog?

That would be kind of difficult with the _latest_ version. :)
Try multilog :)

RC

-- 
+---
| Ricardo Cerqueira  
| PGP Key fingerprint  -  B7 05 13 CE 48 0A BF 1E  87 21 83 DB 28 DE 03 42 
| Novis  -  Engenharia ISP / Rede Técnica 
| Pç. Duque Saldanha, 1, 7º E / 1050-094 Lisboa / Portugal
| Tel: +351 21 3166700 (24h/dia) - Fax: +351 21 3166701



qmail: 964126783.245290 delivery 15092: failure: Sorry,_no_mailbox_here_by_that_name._(#5.1.1)

2000-07-20 Thread Baden Hughes


I've looked elsewhere, there's no info on it in the FAQ:

- moved a user home directory from one partition to another, ensuring
symlinks are updated etc
- confirm user still exists on system
- confirm permissions are still set appropriately for all directories
- persistent error message : qmail: 964126783.245290 delivery 15092:
failure: Sorry,_no_mailbox_here_by_that_name._(#5.1.1)

Has qmail lost it's list of user homedirs ? How do I put a still existing
user back into qmail's list of known recipients.



Re: procmail/vpopmail

2000-07-20 Thread Chester Chee

Hi,

Does anyone has an experience using procmail with vpopmail (virtual domain)? 
I am trying to setup procmail to filter "junk" mail to specific mail folder 
for vpopmail user. And it does not seem to work at all. My vpopmail users 
access their mail via IMAP instead of Maildir. Am I using the right approach 
to taggle this problem? Any pointer or help is greatly appreciated. Thanks 
in advance.

Here is my .procmailrc:-

:0:
* ^X-JunkMail: Yes
junk-mail

Chester


Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com




avoid mail bomp

2000-07-20 Thread Nguyen Hong Son

Hi
Have someone know how to avoid dupplicate messages, it mean that avoid the 
loop messages from a hacker for destroying emsil system ?
Thank

Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com




Unable to send a huge file

2000-07-20 Thread Ismal Hisham Darus

Hi,

  I don't know where the problem is .. but in my my case, we have two 
qmail servers server0 and server1 (not using inetd.. of course :)). 
When somebody send files exceeding 2.5mb, he get a bouce mail stating 
that :

Remote host said: 552 Requested mail action aborted: exceeded storage 
allocation.

when i check /var/qmail/control/databytes .. I already set it to 
1500 which i believe to be 15mb. The order of sending is not 
matter because it happen both ways ie . when send from server0 .. 
server1 return the same message and when sending from server1 .. 
server0 also return the same message.

please let me know if i need to apply some patches.






Ismal Hisham Mohd Darus
Asst. Manager, System Support
John Hancock Life Insurance (Malaysia) Berhad







Re: Unable to send a huge file

2000-07-20 Thread markd

That message isn't coming from qmail. Are you sure the mail client
of "somebody"is configured to use your servers? Maybe they have it
pointed to their ISP or some other mail server.


Regards.

On Fri, Jul 21, 2000 at 09:34:41AM +0800, Ismal Hisham Darus wrote:
 Hi,
 
   I don't know where the problem is .. but in my my case, we have two 
 qmail servers server0 and server1 (not using inetd.. of course :)). 
 When somebody send files exceeding 2.5mb, he get a bouce mail stating 
 that :
 
 Remote host said: 552 Requested mail action aborted: exceeded storage 
 allocation.
 
 when i check /var/qmail/control/databytes .. I already set it to 
 1500 which i believe to be 15mb. The order of sending is not 
 matter because it happen both ways ie . when send from server0 .. 
 server1 return the same message and when sending from server1 .. 
 server0 also return the same message.
 
 please let me know if i need to apply some patches.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Ismal Hisham Mohd Darus
 Asst. Manager, System Support
 John Hancock Life Insurance (Malaysia) Berhad



Re: Unable to send a huge file

2000-07-20 Thread asantos

From: Ismal Hisham Darus [EMAIL PROTECTED]
When somebody send files exceeding 2.5mb, he get a bouce mail stating
that :


Is that 2.5 mb before or after encoding? Depending on the encoding, 2.5mb
can well become 15 mb... difficult, but possible.

Test it the other way around: if you lower databytes to, for example, 5 MB,
can you mail a file exceeding 900 kb?

Armando





forced queeuing

2000-07-20 Thread mikec

Does anyone know if there is a way to force qmail to queue mail rather than 
bouncing it? i.e., qmail is set to relay all mail to a different mail server. 
But then the mail server process on the second machine goes down, so the machine 
reponds but refuses smtp connections. Qmail begins bouncing all incoming mail. 
How can I prevent qmail from bouncing everything?








new home for qmail-vacation

2000-07-20 Thread Peter Samuel

I've received lots of requests asking where qmail-vacation has gone.

Its new home is

http://www.gormand.com.au/peters/tools

Same applies to my version of eliminate-dups.

I've asked Russell to update the www.qmail.org page but he must be busy
at present.

I'm not subscribed to the list at present - about to emigrate to Canada, so 
I have lots of things to do instead of reading mail :(

Regards
Peter
--
Peter Samuel[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Technical Consultantor at present:
Gormand Pty Ltd [EMAIL PROTECTED]