RE: that domain isn't in my list of allowed rcpthosts
better use tcpserver though. tcp-env as described in the FAQ didn't work on my Linux system. Apparently the Environment Variable RELAYCLIENT didn't get set. Ciao Leo -Original Message- From: Robert Eric Pearse [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, October 14, 2000 12:52 AM To: MaD dUCK Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: that domain isn't in my list of allowed rcpthosts or maybe i should have read 5.4 of the FAQ in the tarball. ;-) thanks,
Re: Bogus MAIL FROM (SPAM)
On Mon, Oct 16, 2000 at 02:19:52PM +1100, Brett Randall wrote: is addressed to my e-mail address (in the To: header), so it isn't a normal, cheap one that simply connects to many many servers, it Here's what I've done to combat unsolicited commercial e-mail: I don't give out my real address. Pretty much ny time I give out an address (submit it on a form, give it to a company I'm dealing with, put it on a web-page or mail list), I use a one-time address. Like, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]". If I'm signing up at the foobar.com web site, I'll use "[EMAIL PROTECTED]". You get the idea. Particularly useful on Usenet where I use "jafo-200010" (year-month) so I can gradually expire them as the UCE picks up. I bitch and moan and boycott companies that I do business with who sell or otherwise provide my address to others (remember, I can tell because of the above). I used the badrcptto patch so that in addition to rejecting on the envelope from address, I can do the same with the to. I used to use a bounce, but the UCE almost always had invalid return addresses so I just started refusing e-mail for it. I set up a filter for my inbox which sorts out things based on recpieint, does a MAPS lookup as it's being put in my mail folder, and other fairly complex rules, and sorts them out. See ftp.tummy.com:/pub/tummy/pyspam for the code as it is after a week of poking. All this has reduced the UCE going in to my main box to about 2 messages per day. This is on an address I've had for a decade, mind you, and I have in the past gotten 10 or more UCE messages per day. I did an evaluation of a SMTP filter program last weekend, and while it was thorough, I didn't like it. Cost around $5k per machine, and just was fairly inflexable. I mean, if you're charging those rates, you're selling to large customers (ISPs, businesses, etc). The problem is that this was an all or nothing, it had no ability to tune it on a user-by-user basis. I can just hear the users calling in "I'm waiting for an imporant e-mail, but it's getting bounced. FIX IT!" Sean -- "I feel so insignificant... Like people are laughing at me." "You--You ARE a clown..." -- Bob Newhart Sean Reifschneider, Inimitably Superfluous [EMAIL PROTECTED] tummy.com - Linux Consulting since 1995. Qmail, KRUD, Firewalls, Python
RE: MTA and \r\n problems
Tell them to download either download the source-code from qmail to check it themselves, or to fix the problem! Gee, those windows shops are so convinced of themselves that they don't even notice their obvious mistakes. Ciao Leo -Original Message- From: Rich Feather [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 13, 2000 9:36 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: MTA and \r\n problems Okay, I have inherited a legacy Active Server Pages/VB environment that uses ASPEmail to send HTML email messages to a qmail relay server. I keep getting the dreaded LF bounce. After talking to Persits Software (the makers of the component), they're convinced that qmail is stripping the CRLF and replacing it with simply a LF. My questions are, is this a reasonable behavior from qmail and, if so, how would I fix it? Thanks.
2 QUESTIONS
Hi all. I have 2 questions to submit. 1)The first is a newbye question about ezmlm program. Can i create mailing list without user name? In the examples doc, i must supply [EMAIL PROTECTED], but if i want to create only [EMAIL PROTECTED] (like [EMAIL PROTECTED])? 2)I'm managing a mail server with qmail. I have about 200 users and 50 virtual domains, and all my configuration works correctly. I have created about 180 real users (passwd and shadow files) in my system for managing virtual domains accounts. I know that many servers (with qmail) over the internet, host a lot of virtual users (1), but i can't think they created 9000 real users!! Someone can tell me if there was a method to avoid the creation of real account for managing virtual users? Thanks.
Re: 2 QUESTIONS
Linux [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: 1)The first is a newbye question about ezmlm program. Can i create mailing list without user name? In the examples doc, i must supply [EMAIL PROTECTED], but if i want to create only [EMAIL PROTECTED] (like [EMAIL PROTECTED])? Simple. Just create a .qmail-user file in ~alias. This works just the same as creating a .qmail-dash file in ~user. BUT from now on, please ask ezmlm questions on the ezmlm list? -- === |User: |Href: |Status:| --- |Brett Randall |http://xbox.ipsware.com/|Hibernating| === Generated by Microsoft Ass-Watcher s/(c)/(!c)/g 2003
OT: Microsoft - Linux announcement
http://www.nationalpost.com/search/story.html?f=/stories/20001012/426367.html Not related to qmail whatsoever, but it is what I consider to be an interesting article (albeit short on detail) about Microsoft's efforts to move into the Linux material with the help of Corel. -- === |User: |Href: |Status:| --- |Brett Randall |http://xbox.ipsware.com/|Hibernating| === Generated by Microsoft Ass-Watcher s/(c)/(!c)/g 2003
Re: 2 QUESTIONS
On Mon, Oct 16, 2000 at 09:18:58AM +0200, Linux wrote: 2)I'm managing a mail server with qmail. I have about 200 users and 50 virtual domains, and all my configuration works correctly. I have created about 180 real users (passwd and shadow files) in my system for managing virtual domains accounts. I know that many servers (with qmail) over the internet, host a lot of virtual users (1), but i can't think they created 9000 real users!! Someone can tell me if there was a method to avoid the creation of real account for managing virtual users? Yes: if you use vmailmgr http://www.vmailmgr.org, you will need only one real account per domain, and with vpopmail (check qmail.orG), only one account. Both have own mailing lists. Regards, Olivier -- _ Olivier Mueller - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - PGPkeyID: 0E84D2EA - Switzerland PGP signature
qmail Digest 16 Oct 2000 10:00:01 -0000 Issue 1155
qmail Digest 16 Oct 2000 10:00:01 - Issue 1155 Topics (messages 50623 through 50658): Re: Bogus MAIL FROM (SPAM) 50623 by: Alexander Jernejcic 50624 by: Jurjen Oskam 50628 by: Chris Johnson 50639 by: Adam McKenna 50640 by: MaD dUCK 50642 by: Aaron Newcomb 50643 by: Brett Randall 50644 by: Brett Randall 50653 by: Sean Reifschneider (OT) Vmailmgr and Vpopmail 50625 by: Joomy 50626 by: Olivier M. X-Fetchmail-Warning 50627 by: Horacio INFO qmailmrtg v2.0 50629 by: Sean C Truman Re: courier-imapd netscape messanger for windows == complete fuckup... any ideas? 50630 by: Georg Lutz 50634 by: Martin Jespersen 50638 by: Georg Lutz Virtual domains question 50631 by: Willis L. Sarka 50633 by: Ronny Haryanto tcpserver daemon tools and xinetd 50632 by: John Chronakis Problems with rbldns? 50635 by: Hubbard, David 50636 by: Chris Johnson 50637 by: Hubbard, David Re: [Linux/x86] dietlibc linked tcpserver 50641 by: Russell Nelson MCSE Worth It? OR Not. (WAS RE: Bogus MAIL FROM (SPAM)) 50645 by: Aaron Newcomb 50647 by: MaD dUCK Re: tcpserver 50646 by: Cliff Cole Re: [vmailmgr] Some question 50648 by: Bruce Guenter Distributed E-mail Document v0.1.1 available 50649 by: Brett Randall 50650 by: Brett Randall pop/imap connection error from MS window98. 50651 by: Sam Wun Re: that domain isn't in my list of allowed rcpthosts 50652 by: Leonard Tulipan Re: MTA and \r\n problems 50654 by: Leonard Tulipan 2 QUESTIONS 50655 by: Linux 50656 by: Brett Randall 50658 by: Olivier M. Re: Microsoft - Linux announcement 50657 by: Brett Randall Administrivia: To unsubscribe from the digest, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To subscribe to the digest, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To bug my human owner, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To post to the list, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- hi, What about ISP's? I am not one so why should I care? but you are likely to receive a mail from a mailserver belonging to the ISP's domain with a customers sender-domain. ;) a == Alexander Jernejcic email:[EMAIL PROTECTED] begin LOVE-LETTER-UND-NIX-DAZUGELERNT.txt.vbs I am a Signature, not a Virus! end == On Sat, 14 Oct 2000 23:37:32 -0400, "Aaron Newcomb" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: By the same source I mean that the HELO or EHLO line I see in my log has the same host name. Also, I use tcpserver to run qmail-smtpd, but if running it HELO or EHLO are easily faked, and IMHO it wouldn't be safe to do any (permanent) filtering on that. Basically, the program/person sending the mail can decide what to put in the HELO-line. The receiving mailer can then check from which IP adress that particular connection is from, and can act on that information (log something, deny service, etc.). end -- Jurjen Oskam * carnivore! * http://www.stupendous.org/ for PGP key assassinate nuclear iraq clinton kill bomb USA eta ira cia fbi nsa kill president wall street ruin economy disrupt phonenetwork atomic bomb sarin nerve gas bin laden military -*- DVD Decryption at www.stupendous.org -*- On Sun, Oct 15, 2000 at 03:01:19AM -0600, Andy Bradford wrote: Thus said "Aaron Newcomb" on Sun, 15 Oct 2000 01:26:30 EDT: Yes. That makes sense. I knew there had to be a way. Thanks for the help. The most offending address is 210.133.28.162. Additionally, you might want to report them to www.mail-abuse.org as an Open Relay. 210.133.28.162 is already listed in ORBS and RSS. I can see in my logs that I've rejected a few things from that host myself in the recent past. Chris On Sat, Oct 14, 2000 at 08:33:54PM -0400, Aaron Newcomb wrote: So, are you saying there is no way to block certain hosts in qmail? I find that hard to believe. Qmail has been a pretty good package so far, and I can't believe that would be so limited in this area. Also, what do you mean I will not be able to "receive mail from a large percentage of the domains on the internet." You stated that you want to block mail from hosts that have a different domain in the SMTP MAIL FROM: and the HELO. You obviously don't understand the implications of what you are asking. Do you think that every mail domain on the internet is hosted on a separate machine? I have not had any problems up to this point. Lastly, I am not sure what comment you are trying to make about my MCSE certification, but I am proud of the training I have had on all the operating systems I work with whether they be MS, UX, Linux or otherwise. I'm proud of you too. --Adam -- Adam McKenna [EMAIL PROTECTED] | "No matter
Using QMAIL and SENDMAIL
Hi, On my companys site we handle a few large mailing lists and sending one though sendmail takes a few hours at the moment and is getting longer! We want to setup QMAIL on the server so we can send the newsletters though qmail from our perl scripts. We don't want to use qmail for all pop3 etc at the moment. So is it possable to setup qmail on the server and just use it to send emails though it from perl? And keep sendmail running for everything else? Thanks in advance, Jon
Re: Using QMAIL and SENDMAIL
"Jon" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On my companys site we handle a few large mailing lists and sending one though sendmail takes a few hours at the moment and is getting longer! We want to setup QMAIL on the server so we can send the newsletters though qmail from our perl scripts. We don't want to use qmail for all pop3 etc at the moment. What makes you think that using qmail means you have to use it for POP3? You can use qmail for smtp only, you know. It is totally compatible with the /var/spool/mail/user format if you NEED to continue using it. Think about it...it is more secure, more flexible, more everything. You won't regret a changeover and it will save you a whole lot of hassle trying to run two smtp servers at once. So is it possable to setup qmail on the server and just use it to send emails though it from perl? And keep sendmail running for everything else? Theoretically, yes. But am I going to be the poor sod to try and explain sendmail and qmail on one system? Not likely... Thanks in advance, Jon Take my advice and you won't regret it. Promise. -- === |User: |Href: |Status:| --- |Brett Randall |http://xbox.ipsware.com/|Hibernating| === Generated by Microsoft Ass-Watcher s/(c)/(!c)/g 2003
qmail Memphis RPM relaying by default?
I had to reinstall Qmail a couple months ago, and used the Memphis RPM. I didn't pay much attention to default parameters, as I copied qmail/control from my old install. Well it turns out that Memphis is using tcprules, and tcprules.d/qmail-smtpd happened to be: :allow,RELAYCLIENT="" ... Which I found out the hard way after a spammer used my system as a relay ... Doh! I don't know how it got set up that way.
Spam control
Being a newbie to Qmail I am interested in how other people are controlling their spam rules. I run quite a few virtual domains that require me to allow people from other networks than my own to send and receive mail through my server. What is the best way to setup your server so you can't be used to spam people to death, but still let your users get in and out? KRis
Re: qmail-local.c bug?
On Thu, Oct 12, 2000 at 05:57:46AM -, D. J. Bernstein wrote: Peter van Dijk writes: It's a bug, and it's an overflow-like one, but it doesn't seem exploitable just now. Scares the shit out of me nonetheless. You are confused. The qmail-local program runs with the permissions of the user who owns the .qmail file. The treatment of bogus .qmail files has no relevance to security. Hmmm, very good point there. However, would you admit that this is, even tho not security-related, a bug? Do take note that when I say 'exploitable' I'm using it in a very broad way - I'd call a buffer overflow in 'nslookup' exploitable (actually, I did :) even if users can't gain any extra privs with it. Hmm, what about the case where people have ftp access with the added 'bonus' that their .qmail files get a +x, or any other legitimate way of editing .qmail files with a +x? I know of at least one free-hosting company that does so. What if it turns out that they can use this bug to make qmail-local execute arbitrary code? Greetz, Peter -- dataloss networks '/ignore-ance is bliss' - me
RE: OT: courier-imapd netscape messanger for windows == complete fuckup... any ideas?
I am using courier-imap with Outlook, Outlook Express, Netscape Messenger, and Eudora, along with sqwebmail. It is a wonderful product. I don't have any problems, even with somewhere around 30 folders and subfolders. I have a good feeling you have misconfigured something. -Original Message- From: Martin Jespersen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, October 15, 2000 2:22 PM To: Georg Lutz Cc: Qmail mailing list Subject: Re: OT: courier-imapd netscape messanger for windows == complete fuckup... any ideas? Hi Georg, Definition root-level folders = folders on the same level as the INBOX in the filesystem directory structure. Example: INBOX == ~mylogin/Maildir/ Trash == ~mylogin/Trash/ Sent == ~mylogin/Sent/ etc... I have made a Maildir folder under ~mylogin as ~mylogin/Maildir/ using maildirmake and there is no problem delivering to it or reading from it. The problem is this: Courier-imapd refuse to create root-level folders and insists that all folders should be created as subfolder of the INBOX folder. Example: INBOX == ~mylogin/Maildir/ Trash == ~mylogin/Maildir/Trash/ Sent == ~mylogin/Maildir/Sent/ Furthermore, since courier-imapd uses '.' as separator instead of the standard '/' that other Maildir-like message structures like Mh use all folders are created with a . infront. Example: INBOX == ~mylogin/Maildir/ Trash == ~mylogin/Maildir/.Trash/ Sent == ~mylogin/Maildir/.Sent/ The problem basically seems to be that the guy who wrote courier-imapd is so hooked on the rfc's that he made a imap server that breakes all clients :( (or at least netscape messanger and microsoft outlook, which are used by the larger part of internet users as MUA) At first i thought that this was due to the silly choice of personal Namespace that he made, ie. INBOX which is a more or less reserved word in most MUA's. But although i patched the source to use PRIVA instead it still fucked up. So i guess it might be the '.' seperator that is the problem, though i am in know way knowledgable enough about the imap specs to base this on anything else than gut-feeling as a professional programmer of many years. But before i take on the task of making a complete working patch for courier imapd which supports standard MUA's i would like to be sure that no-one has done this before me, since i am hard pressed on time as it is, and actually need a good working imap server that supports Maildir now ;) I thought about contacting the guy who wrote it, but i must admit that after reading the FAQ and BUGS section on the download site i doubt very much that he in anyway cares about my problems since he seems to think that all MUA's that doesn't speak imap his way should be fixed *shrug*. That is an attitude that is hard to find usefull for the rest of us IMHO. Regards Martin Jespersen Georg Lutz wrote: Hi Martin, what do you mean by "root-level-folders" ? With a MUA you can only create folders in your INBOX. If you want to create public-shared-folders you have to use maildirmake (which is part of courier-imap), perhaps with a combination of /usr/lib/courierimap/etc/maildirshared. How folders in your private namespace are displayed, depends on the MUA you are using. In Netscape this are all subfolders of "INBOX". But for further information you should look at man maildirmake or at the courier-mailing-list. I am quite happy with courier-imap and I would not recommend any other imapd with maildir-patches. Bye Georg Martin Jespersen schrieb: Hi all, My MUA is netscape messanger 4.73 for windows and i am not about to change this so spare me any rants about getting another MUA. I am currently using wu-imapd v4.7 with maildir patch, but i am not quite satisfied with (the maildir driver has a few missing features that are really anoying). So i am trying to get courier imapd 1.1 up and running, and it runs just fine, but... It refused to create root-level subfolders and i can only create subfolders under the INBOX. i have tried to reconfigure/reinstall 10 times now with and without the --enable-workaround.. i have even tried to modify the source code to use PRIVA as the personal namespace instead of INBOX (yeah i changed it everywhere and make check worked fine) but it is a no-go... maybe it would work if i completely rewrote the namespace structure of courier-imapd and changed the subfolder delimiter from "." to "/" like mh use since mh seems to work fine except being super-slow and outdated in alot of ways is there anyone who is succesfully running courier with support for netscape out there? going through the sourcecode it seems that courier actually insists that root-level folders should reside under ./Maildir/ eg. the trashfolder is file-system wise created as ./Maildir/Trash/ can anyone answer me this: why? isn't this just begging for MUA problems? *ARGH the pain!* if anyone knows of ANY imap server
Re: emergency phone numbers (was: Volunteers for a multilog patch?)
On 15 Oct 2000, Chris K. Young wrote: Quoted from Peter Samuel: - 911 is the emergency number in North America, while it is 000 in Oz, 999 in NZ and UK etc. 999 in New Zealand? Not unless you use pulse dialling! :-) (Hint: most phones in New Zealand do tone dialling. And rotary phones in New Zealand are labelled backwards to what I've seen in other places.) That's what confused me! I've not been in NZ since 1980 and I remember that their emergency number was the hardest to dial on a rotary phone (like Australia's 000), I'd forgotten that their rotary phones were backwards, hence 111 is the hardest number to dial. (Or close to it). A New Zealand station (channel 2, I think) used to screen ``Rescue 911'' (that American programme) on TV, and some kids actually dialled 911 in an emergency. :-( So since then, channel 2 had another series, ``Rescue 111''. Similar problems in Oz. -- Regards Peter -- Peter Samuel[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.e-smith.org (development)http://www.e-smith.com (corporate) Phone: +1 613 368 4398 Fax: +1 613 564 7739 e-smith, inc. 1500-150 Metcalfe St, Ottawa, ON K2P 1P1 Canada "If you kill all your unhappy customers, you'll only have happy ones left"
Re: OT: courier-imapd netscape messanger for windows == complete fuckup... any ideas?
Are you able to make it create folders on the same level as INBOX or only as subfolders of INBOX? /Martin Tim Hunter wrote: I am using courier-imap with Outlook, Outlook Express, Netscape Messenger, and Eudora, along with sqwebmail. It is a wonderful product. I don't have any problems, even with somewhere around 30 folders and subfolders. I have a good feeling you have misconfigured something. -Original Message- From: Martin Jespersen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, October 15, 2000 2:22 PM To: Georg Lutz Cc: Qmail mailing list Subject: Re: OT: courier-imapd netscape messanger for windows == complete fuckup... any ideas? Hi Georg, Definition root-level folders = folders on the same level as the INBOX in the filesystem directory structure. Example: INBOX == ~mylogin/Maildir/ Trash == ~mylogin/Trash/ Sent == ~mylogin/Sent/ etc... I have made a Maildir folder under ~mylogin as ~mylogin/Maildir/ using maildirmake and there is no problem delivering to it or reading from it. The problem is this: Courier-imapd refuse to create root-level folders and insists that all folders should be created as subfolder of the INBOX folder. Example: INBOX == ~mylogin/Maildir/ Trash == ~mylogin/Maildir/Trash/ Sent == ~mylogin/Maildir/Sent/ Furthermore, since courier-imapd uses '.' as separator instead of the standard '/' that other Maildir-like message structures like Mh use all folders are created with a . infront. Example: INBOX == ~mylogin/Maildir/ Trash == ~mylogin/Maildir/.Trash/ Sent == ~mylogin/Maildir/.Sent/ The problem basically seems to be that the guy who wrote courier-imapd is so hooked on the rfc's that he made a imap server that breakes all clients :( (or at least netscape messanger and microsoft outlook, which are used by the larger part of internet users as MUA) At first i thought that this was due to the silly choice of personal Namespace that he made, ie. INBOX which is a more or less reserved word in most MUA's. But although i patched the source to use PRIVA instead it still fucked up. So i guess it might be the '.' seperator that is the problem, though i am in know way knowledgable enough about the imap specs to base this on anything else than gut-feeling as a professional programmer of many years. But before i take on the task of making a complete working patch for courier imapd which supports standard MUA's i would like to be sure that no-one has done this before me, since i am hard pressed on time as it is, and actually need a good working imap server that supports Maildir now ;) I thought about contacting the guy who wrote it, but i must admit that after reading the FAQ and BUGS section on the download site i doubt very much that he in anyway cares about my problems since he seems to think that all MUA's that doesn't speak imap his way should be fixed *shrug*. That is an attitude that is hard to find usefull for the rest of us IMHO. Regards Martin Jespersen Georg Lutz wrote: Hi Martin, what do you mean by "root-level-folders" ? With a MUA you can only create folders in your INBOX. If you want to create public-shared-folders you have to use maildirmake (which is part of courier-imap), perhaps with a combination of /usr/lib/courierimap/etc/maildirshared. How folders in your private namespace are displayed, depends on the MUA you are using. In Netscape this are all subfolders of "INBOX". But for further information you should look at man maildirmake or at the courier-mailing-list. I am quite happy with courier-imap and I would not recommend any other imapd with maildir-patches. Bye Georg Martin Jespersen schrieb: Hi all, My MUA is netscape messanger 4.73 for windows and i am not about to change this so spare me any rants about getting another MUA. I am currently using wu-imapd v4.7 with maildir patch, but i am not quite satisfied with (the maildir driver has a few missing features that are really anoying). So i am trying to get courier imapd 1.1 up and running, and it runs just fine, but... It refused to create root-level subfolders and i can only create subfolders under the INBOX. i have tried to reconfigure/reinstall 10 times now with and without the --enable-workaround.. i have even tried to modify the source code to use PRIVA as the personal namespace instead of INBOX (yeah i changed it everywhere and make check worked fine) but it is a no-go... maybe it would work if i completely rewrote the namespace structure of courier-imapd and changed the subfolder delimiter from "." to "/" like mh use since mh seems to work fine except being super-slow and outdated in alot of ways is there anyone who is succesfully running courier with support for netscape out there? going through the sourcecode it seems that courier actually
How to hide the ip address of the client sender from the message header?
194.194.194.194 LAN || mail--INTERNET-Firewall-+--mail (192.168.0.2) mydomain2.com +--mypc (192.168.0.3) mydomain.com I'm using a pop3 server on mail.mydomain2.com. I'have received a message from mail.mydomain.com and in the header message there are the following text lines: Received: from mail.mydomain.com ([194.194.194.194]) by www (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id e9G9FZq12616 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 11:15:35 +0200 Received: (qmail 2553 invoked from network); 16 Oct 2000 09:09:58 - Received: from unknown (HELO mypc) (192.168.0.3) ^^^ by 192.168.0.2 with SMTP; 16 Oct 2000 09:09:58 - ^^ ... In the header appears the host name and the ip address of the client sender and the internal ip address of the qmail server (either protected by firewall). How to scrub the private ip addresses from the header? Thanks in advance for any help. francesco
Re: How to hide the ip address of the client sender from the message header?
On Mon, Oct 16, 2000 at 04:11:56PM +0200, Francesco Munaretto wrote: 194.194.194.194 LAN || mail--INTERNET-Firewall-+--mail (192.168.0.2) mydomain2.com +--mypc (192.168.0.3) mydomain.com I'm using a pop3 server on mail.mydomain2.com. I'have received a message from mail.mydomain.com and in the header message there are the following text lines: Received: from mail.mydomain.com ([194.194.194.194]) by www (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id e9G9FZq12616 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 11:15:35 +0200 Received: (qmail 2553 invoked from network); 16 Oct 2000 09:09:58 - Received: from unknown (HELO mypc) (192.168.0.3) ^^^ by 192.168.0.2 with SMTP; 16 Oct 2000 09:09:58 - ^^ ... In the header appears the host name and the ip address of the client sender and the internal ip address of the qmail server (either protected by firewall). How to scrub the private ip addresses from the header? If you're using tcpserver, try putting this in your rules file: 192.168.0.:allow,TCPREMOTEHOST="",TCPREMOTEIP="",RELAYCLIENT="" Chris
virtual domains
Hi, I apologize for the trivial question, but I can't make it work,and I'm getting crazy! I have one domain only and, according to "vpopmail administration guide", I want to set it as virtual (in the nearest future there will be more than one) How should my /var/qmail/control/ files look like now (one domain only)? Thank you. Marco [EMAIL PROTECTED]
qmail-pop3d
Hi All, I've installed qmail using the maildir's; All is working well, but the qmail-popup/pop3d combination is waiting a very long time (30-60 sec.) when an external cliënt log's in... They have no DNS and they work with DHCP addresses that are in a B-class network... I think it's trying to resolve the cliënts IP address which could take a long time since it can never find it... Thx in advance, Jeroen.
Re: fastforward
brett randal: have you ever worked with fastforward??? if some users want to use fastforward and send mails to local and remote users without .qmail files let them do it! richard: it works fine with fastforward to send mails to local and remote users: if you want to get mails for [EMAIL PROTECTED] and deliver it local to user test2 und remote to [EMAIL PROTECTED] do the following steps: - don´t add the domains "domain1.com" and "domain2.com" to /var/qmail/control/locals !!! -echo domain1.com /var/qmail/control/rcpthosts -echo domain1.com:alias /var/qmail/control/virtualdomains -To activate /etc/aliases, put this line into ~alias/.qmail-default: | fastforward -d /etc/aliases.cdb - put the following line to /etc/aliases: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: test2, [EMAIL PROTECTED] -/var/qmail/bin/newaliases - svc -t /service/qmail now it should work :-))) if you have problems with this ask me per mail carsten At 04:21 15.10.00, you wrote: Richard Sjögårdh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: user: [EMAIL PROTECTED], user where user is the local user who also want all mails delivered home. You may want to try using .qmail files if you want the mail to be delivered to the local user and a remote user. Try the following lines in the user's $HOME/.qmail [EMAIL PROTECTED] ./Maildir/ That will accomplish what you want. Basically, having an alias means that something that isn't real points to a place that is real. Sendmail's implementation, although the first, is stupid and incoherent. It doesn't even adhere to the real meaning of the word alias. If you have a lot like this (why? Why not just allow home users to pick up their mail via IMAP if they need access at home and work?), then you may want to whack up a quick perl or sed script to take care of it. -- === |User: |Href: |Status:| --- |Brett Randall |http://xbox.ipsware.com/|Hibernating| === Generated by Microsoft Ass-Watcher s/(c)/(!c)/g 2003
RE: qmail-pop3d
hi, if you use tcpserver try the -R and -H flag to avoid reverse dns and tcpremoteinfo lookups ;) a == Alexander Jernejcic email:[EMAIL PROTECTED] begin LOVE-LETTER-UND-NIX-DAZUGELERNT.txt.vbs I am a Signature, not a Virus! end == -Original Message- From: Jeroen ten Berge [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 16, 2000 7:25 PM To: Qmail mailing list Subject: qmail-pop3d Hi All, I've installed qmail using the maildir's; All is working well, but the qmail-popup/pop3d combination is waiting a very long time (30-60 sec.) when an external cliënt log's in... They have no DNS and they work with DHCP addresses that are in a B-class network... I think it's trying to resolve the cliënts IP address which could take a long time since it can never find it... Thx in advance, Jeroen.
Re: tcpserver daemon tools and xinetd
"John Chronakis" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: qmail.org and qmail's author clearlly suggest to use tcpserver for qmail-smtpd and this is enough for me. But there is not any clear suggestion for using daemon tools instead of a superserver like xinetd (inetd is out of the question). In addition, the "install" file from the qmail source destribution has an example for using inetd to launch qmail-smtpd and pop3d. qmail-smtpd can be served via inetd, xinetd, or tcpserver. The INSTALL file suggested inetd because it used to be the preferred method. The current recommendation is tcpserver from ucspi-tcp. I don't know how well xinetd works with qmail, though. One thing you need is the ability to set environment variables based on the IP address of the remote system. If xinetd can do that--it's been years since I've touched it--then it should work well with qmail. On the other hand qmail-howto, and allmost every othe document about qmail, are suggesting using daemon tools. ucspi-tcp, not daemontools, although daemontools is also recommended. Friends of mine working as administrators in medium size ISPs, are suggesting to use qmail-smtpd and qmail-pop3d with xinetd like they do. Why do they prefer it to tcpserver? All these different oppinions confused me. It's better to have a confusing array of options than to be stuck with a single frustrating utility. I just want to know the best way to control qmail since I am expecting a high number of mail users. What I am concerned is a reliable, stable and efficient mail delivery. You can't go wrong with ucspi-tcp + daemontools. -Dave
Re: Directory ownerships
Subba Rao [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have been using David Sill's qmail startup script until now. I started tweaking this script, since I have upgrade my distro. Now, I have all my qmail system setup the way it was. According to David's startup script, we would be using the "supervise" to run the tcpserver. These are the following directories that were created to support this script. /var/supervise/qmail/send /var/supervise/qmail/smtpd /var/log/qmail/send /var/log/qmail/smtpd What should be the owner.group settings for this directory be? The current settings are the following, drwxr-x--- 3 root qmail4096 Aug 15 13:40 /var/supervise/ drwxr-xr-x 6 qmaill qmail4096 Aug 15 13:41 /var/log/qmail/ When I start David's script, I get the following error messages. * Send Agent Started... multilog: fatal: unable to switch to current directory: access denied * Network Agent Started... multilog: fatal: unable to switch to current directory: access denied Done. /var/supervise needs to be readable/executable by other. You may also need to check/adjust: / /var /var/supervise/qmail /var/supervise/qmail/send /var/supervise/qmail/send/log /var/supervise/qmail/smtp /var/supervise/qmail/smtp/log /var/log /var/log/qmail /var/log/qmail/send /var/log/qmail/smtpd -Dave
RE: Spam control
hi, there are quite a lot of mailthreads concerning this in the list-archive. but to put the in a nutshell: set up rcpthosts carefully put ip's allowed to relay in tcp.smtp tell tcpserver to use tcp.smtp.cdb (-x /etc/tcp.smtp.cdb) that should do the basic setup for not to be an open relay. for further setups (authentication etc) go through the archive and have a look at the qmail homepage http://www.qmail.org/ and - of course - read Dave Sill's Life With Qmail http://web.infoave.net/~dsill/lwq.html ;) a == Alexander Jernejcic email:[EMAIL PROTECTED] begin LOVE-LETTER-UND-NIX-DAZUGELERNT.txt.vbs I am a Signature, not a Virus! end == -Original Message- From: Kris Keele [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 16, 2000 2:46 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Spam control Being a newbie to Qmail I am interested in how other people are controlling their spam rules. I run quite a few virtual domains that require me to allow people from other networks than my own to send and receive mail through my server. What is the best way to setup your server so you can't be used to spam people to death, but still let your users get in and out? KRis
Sended mails disappears
hello all, i set up qmail with mysql support, it seems to me that all looks nice, but i problem i got, if i send a email to a qmail adress, it nevers come to the mailbox !... and no denied or error messages will be reply, so it looks like it's really sended, also if i write a email from new qmail to qmail user, no failure messages come but the messages are not in the box i was looking on the faq, it seemds to me :like qmail procces (all 4 or 5 are active, like qmail-spawn, clean,send ...) should all be startet, the Maildir is created an right owned, the /qmail/rc script starts with the Maildir option. any ideas or knowledges ?.. .. thanks 4 all .. mike
Bounce-no-mailbox AND postmaster vpopmail delivery
Hi guys, I'm using vpopmail and marketing people told (without asking me) that email for [EMAIL PROTECTED] would bounce to sender AND delivered to postmaster. Any ideias how I could achieve this? The best one I had was a .qmail-default like this /var/qmail/bin/vdelivermail '' bounce-no-mailbox /var/qmail/bin/vdelivermail '' [EMAIL PROTECTED] My vertical bar is broken, but I think you got it. And then filter identical messages. But it's quite stupid. Thanks in advance []s Davi
RE: Bounce-no-mailbox AND postmaster vpopmail delivery
I would think it would be more like: | /var/qmail/bin/vdelivermail '' bounce-no-mailbox /home/postmaster/Maildir/ -- Tony Publiski World Wide Net, Inc. +1 (734) 513-7707 x 2012 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 16, 2000 3:08 PM To: Qmail mailing list Subject: Bounce-no-mailbox AND postmaster vpopmail delivery Hi guys, I'm using vpopmail and marketing people told (without asking me) that email for [EMAIL PROTECTED] would bounce to sender AND delivered to postmaster. Any ideias how I could achieve this? The best one I had was a .qmail-default like this /var/qmail/bin/vdelivermail '' bounce-no-mailbox /var/qmail/bin/vdelivermail '' [EMAIL PROTECTED] My vertical bar is broken, but I think you got it. And then filter identical messages. But it's quite stupid. Thanks in advance []s Davi
Re: Bounce-no-mailbox AND postmaster vpopmail delivery
But this way EVERY message will also goes to postmaster. I dunno what's the return value of vdelivermail in a bounce, but depending it all messages will go to postmaster, except the ones that bounced (according to qmail-command man page) Thanks Tony, but it doesn't work (I tried anyway). []s Davi Tony Publiski escritas: I would think it would be more like: | /var/qmail/bin/vdelivermail '' bounce-no-mailbox /home/postmaster/Maildir/ -- Tony Publiski World Wide Net, Inc. +1 (734) 513-7707 x 2012 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 16, 2000 3:08 PM To: Qmail mailing list Subject: Bounce-no-mailbox AND postmaster vpopmail delivery Hi guys, I'm using vpopmail and marketing people told (without asking me) that email for [EMAIL PROTECTED] would bounce to sender AND delivered to postmaster. Any ideias how I could achieve this? The best one I had was a .qmail-default like this /var/qmail/bin/vdelivermail '' bounce-no-mailbox /var/qmail/bin/vdelivermail '' [EMAIL PROTECTED] My vertical bar is broken, but I think you got it. And then filter identical messages. But it's quite stupid. Thanks in advance []s Davi
Re: fastforward
Carsten Mueller [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: brett randal: have you ever worked with fastforward??? Well, if you could read, my surname has 2 l's (randall). And yes, I use fastforward extensively. if some users want to use fastforward and send mails to local and remote users without .qmail files let them do it! ... if you want to get mails for [EMAIL PROTECTED] and deliver it local to user test2 und remote to [EMAIL PROTECTED] do the following steps: No, he said in the original e-mail that he would like to have the following line in aliases: user: [EMAIL PROTECTED], user NOT user: [EMAIL PROTECTED], anotheruser From his description, he wants an e-mail that is addressed to user to be delivered to that SAME user locally (ie to their maildir), and to another e-mail address elsewhere. That is the syntax and description Richard gave, that is what I told him to use .qmail files for. Sendmail's implementation of aliases, even though they invented them, is wrong. It should theoretically create a loop, but it doesn't. Richard, please clarify your question so we can help you properly. -- === |User: |Href: |Status:| --- |Brett Randall |http://xbox.ipsware.com/|Hibernating| === Generated by Microsoft Ass-Watcher s/(c)/(!c)/g 2003
newbie question: forward (almost) all mail to one address
hi, i want all mail sent to my server (except root, postmaster, abuse and MAILER-DAEMON) to go to one address. any suggestions on the best way to configure that would be appreciated. thanks, pearse
Re: newbie question: forward (almost) all mail to one address
"Robert Eric Pearse" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: i want all mail sent to my server (except root, postmaster, abuse and MAILER-DAEMON) to go to one address. Set up your domain as a virtual domain. ie in /var/qmail/control/virtualdomains, put: mydomain.com: user Then add mydomain.com to /var/qmail/control/rcpthosts and /var/qmail/control/locals, and restart qmail. You can then create .qmail-postmaster, .qmail-root, etc files in ~user, or if you are feeling really inventive, try fastforward with a bit of a modification in the .qmail-default file so that undeliverable mails are delivered to a maildir. -- === |User: |Href: |Status:| --- |Brett Randall |http://xbox.ipsware.com/|Hibernating| === Generated by Microsoft Ass-Watcher s/(c)/(!c)/g 2003
Re: newbie question: forward (almost) all mail to one address
On 16-Oct-2000, Robert Eric Pearse wrote: i want all mail sent to my server (except root, postmaster, abuse and MAILER-DAEMON) to go to one address. any suggestions on the best way to configure that would be appreciated. Read about EXTENSION ADDRESSES in man dot-qmail. Hint: .qmail-default Ronny
Re: newbie question: forward (almost) all mail to one address
Ronny Haryanto [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On 16-Oct-2000, Robert Eric Pearse wrote: i want all mail sent to my server (except root, postmaster, abuse and MAILER-DAEMON) to go to one address. any suggestions on the best way to configure that would be appreciated. Read about EXTENSION ADDRESSES in man dot-qmail. Hint: .qmail-default Doh! What was I thinking? :) Robert...forget what I said about virtual domains, just use ~alias/.qmail-default to deliver to a maildir (but still read man dot-qmail). -- === |User: |Href: |Status:| --- |Brett Randall |http://xbox.ipsware.com/|Hibernating| === Generated by Microsoft Ass-Watcher s/(c)/(!c)/g 2003
Re: newbie question: forward (almost) all mail to one address
echo cliff .qmail-default /etc/init.d/svscan stop /etc/init.d/svscan start sent mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and it bounced like so instead of going to [EMAIL PROTECTED] am i missing something? tia, pearse === Hi. This is the qmail-send program at cliff.carorder.com. I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses. This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out. [EMAIL PROTECTED]: This message is looping: it already has my Delivered-To line. (#5.4.6) --- Below this line is a copy of the message. Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: (qmail 11051 invoked by alias); 16 Oct 2000 22:15:51 - Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: (qmail 11048 invoked by alias); 16 Oct 2000 22:15:51 - Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: (qmail 11045 invoked from network); 16 Oct 2000 22:15:51 - Received: from mail.carorder.com (HELO notesapps.carorder.com) (149.74.187.70) by 216.34.168.210 with SMTP; 16 Oct 2000 22:15:51 - Received: from jabroni ([149.74.14.145]) by notesapps.carorder.com (Lotus Domino Release 5.0.3) with SMTP id 2000101617180356:2546 ; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 17:18:03 -0500 Message-ID: 009401c037be$fbc80ec0$910e4a95@jabroni From: "Robert Eric Pearse" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: test Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2000 17:18:17 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 X-MIMETrack: Itemize by SMTP Server on Apps/Carorder(Release 5.0.3 |March 21, 2000) at 10/16/2000 05:18:03 PM, Serialize by Router on Apps/Carorder(Release 5.0.3 |March 21, 2000) at 10/16/2000 05:18:05 PM, Serialize complete at 10/16/2000 05:18:05 PM Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" test
Re: newbie question: forward (almost) all mail to one address
"Robert Eric Pearse" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: echo cliff .qmail-default /etc/init.d/svscan stop /etc/init.d/svscan start sent mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and it bounced like so instead of going to [EMAIL PROTECTED] am i missing something? Look below: Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] What does that say? Is that how you spell cliff? My guess is you misspelled in the echo line. Take a look. tia, pearse -- === |User: |Href: |Status:| --- |Brett Randall |http://xbox.ipsware.com/|Hibernating| === Generated by Microsoft Ass-Watcher s/(c)/(!c)/g 2003
Re: newbie question: forward (almost) all mail to one address
ha! thanks, man! ;-) - Original Message - From: "Brett Randall" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: "Robert Eric Pearse" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 16, 2000 5:31 PM Subject: Re: newbie question: forward (almost) all mail to one address "Robert Eric Pearse" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: echo cliff .qmail-default /etc/init.d/svscan stop /etc/init.d/svscan start sent mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and it bounced like so instead of going to [EMAIL PROTECTED] am i missing something? Look below: Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] What does that say? Is that how you spell cliff? My guess is you misspelled in the echo line. Take a look. tia, pearse -- === |User: |Href: |Status:| --- |Brett Randall |http://xbox.ipsware.com/|Hibernating| === Generated by Microsoft Ass-Watcher s/(c)/(!c)/g 2003
Aliases
Hi, I have a system with qmail and ezmlm. I've created a user to manage all the mailing lists we host, and set up the proper aliases for -subscribe -unsubscribe and -help. However, I don't know how to set up the -get.xxx aliases. Any help?
Re: Aliases
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I have a system with qmail and ezmlm. I've created a user to manage all the mailing lists we host, and set up the proper aliases for -subscribe -unsubscribe and -help. However, I don't know how to set up the -get.xxx aliases. While I don't doubt that people on this list (not me) know how to do this, this question should really be asked on the ezmlm mailing list ([EMAIL PROTECTED]). -- === |User: |Href: |Status:| --- |Brett Randall |http://xbox.ipsware.com/|Hibernating| === Generated by Microsoft Ass-Watcher s/(c)/(!c)/g 2003
Re: Bounce-no-mailbox AND postmaster vpopmail delivery
also sprach davi: But this way EVERY message will also goes to postmaster. I dunno what's the return value of vdelivermail in a bounce, but depending it all messages will go to postmaster, except the ones that bounced (according to qmail-command man page) From the vdelivermail man page: _ RETURN VALUE 0 if all steps were successful. 100 if user is over quota or bounce-no-mailbox is set and no matching user is found. _ You can check the return code of vdelivermail for 100 and, if found, deliver to the postmaster mailbox. /pg -- Peter Green : Gospel Communications Network, SysAdmin : [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- I've hacked the Xaw3d library to give you a Win95 like interface and it is named Xaw95. You can replace your Xaw3d library. Oh God, this is so disgusting! (Seen on c.o.l.development.apps, about the "Win95 look-alike")
devlivery problem
Oct 17 01:52:15 srv-mail qmail: 971751135.337576 delivery 33: deferral: Sorry,_I_wasn't_able_to_establish_an_SMTP_connection._(#4.4.1)/ what is meaning ? * thanks.
Re: devlivery problem
"Mike A. Sauvain" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Oct 17 01:52:15 srv-mail qmail: 971751135.337576 delivery 33: deferral: Sorry,_I_wasn't_able_to_establish_an_SMTP_connection._(#4.4.1)/ what is meaning ? * thanks. It means what it says...probably a case of the smtp server not running. Try telnetting to port 25 of the machine you are trying to send e-mail to. If it is one of your own machines, we can probably help. If you are trying to send it somewhere else in the world, its not your problem. -- === |User: |Href: |Status:| --- |Brett Randall |http://xbox.ipsware.com/|Hibernating| === Generated by Microsoft Ass-Watcher s/(c)/(!c)/g 2003
Re: devlivery problem
It my server, an im behind a firewall.. cu ;) - Original Message - From: "Brett Randall" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: "Mike A. Sauvain" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2000 3:01 AM Subject: Re: devlivery problem "Mike A. Sauvain" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Oct 17 01:52:15 srv-mail qmail: 971751135.337576 delivery 33: deferral: Sorry,_I_wasn't_able_to_establish_an_SMTP_connection._(#4.4.1)/ what is meaning ? * thanks. It means what it says...probably a case of the smtp server not running. Try telnetting to port 25 of the machine you are trying to send e-mail to. If it is one of your own machines, we can probably help. If you are trying to send it somewhere else in the world, its not your problem. -- === |User: |Href: |Status:| --- |Brett Randall |http://xbox.ipsware.com/|Hibernating| === Generated by Microsoft Ass-Watcher s/(c)/(!c)/g 2003
RE: devlivery problem
Timeout or rejection when trying establish a TCP connection to the remote server. Try it yourself with the telnet program and see if you can establish such a connection. Chances are you can't. Doing so will allow you to tell if its a no-route or no-data timeout or what. The message comes from the last line in the main function of qmail-remote.c - which I suspect only occurs when the attempts to connect time out. David -Original Message- From: Mike A. Sauvain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 16, 2000 5:57 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: devlivery problem Oct 17 01:52:15 srv-mail qmail: 971751135.337576 delivery 33: deferral: Sorry,_I_wasn't_able_to_establish_an_SMTP_connection._(#4.4.1)/ what is meaning ? * thanks.
Re: devlivery problem
"Mike A. Sauvain" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: It my server, an im behind a firewall.. cu ;) Still not enough information about what you are trying to do here. Anyway, I've answered your question...I've told you what the error is. Maybe you just need to configure your firewall to allow port 25 requests through to your mail server, or you need to port forward port 25. I don't know, depends what you are trying to do. -- /BR Manager InterPlanetary Solutions http://ipsware.com/
Re: devlivery problem
and it seems now to work, it was the smtp deamon, hasd an error on the starting sequence..* thankss..* ... Its my server, and im behind a firewall.. Oct 17 01:52:15 srv-mail qmail: 971751135.337576 delivery 33: deferral: Sorry,_I_wasn't_able_to_establish_an_SMTP_connection._(#4.4.1)/ what is meaning ? * thanks. i set up qmail with mysql support, it seems to me that all looks nice, but i problem i got, if i send a email to a qmail adress, it nevers come to the mailbox !... and no denied or error messages will be reply, so it looks like it's really sended, also if i write a email from new qmail to qmail user, no failure messages come but the messages are not in the box i was looking on the faq, it seemds to me :like qmail procces (all 4 or 5 are active, like qmail-spawn, clean,send ...) should all be startet, the Maildir is created an right owned, the /qmail/rc script starts with the Maildir option. any ideas or knowledges ?.. .. thanks 4 all .. mike
vpopmail
Are there rpm packages available for vpopmail and qmailadmin? -Colin
Re: vpopmail
[ send e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] to subscribe to the vpopmail mailing list. ] also sprach ch: Are there rpm packages available for vpopmail and qmailadmin? No. A UID and GID is required at compile-time to build the vpopmail package. Since there is no vpopmail RPM, I'm guessing that no one has gone through the trouble of making one for qmailadmin. /pg -- Peter Green : Gospel Communications Network, SysAdmin : [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Footnotes are for things you believe don't really belong in LDP manuals, but want to include anyway. (Joel N. Weber II discussing the 'make' chapter of the Linux Programmer's Guide)
Limiting simultaneous connections from an IP address
A while back somebody mentioned in passing an add-on that allowed connection limiting based on IP address. I can't find it at on the webpage at qmail.org, or in the FAQ or LWQ. I'm currently doing it with a patched version of tcpserver, but would rather do it the qmail way - anybody got a pointer? Thanks, Rick. -- Rick Lyons WebCentral
