Re: mailserver, can traceroute, cannot make SMTP connection
When I telnet to the host, the connection just hang. For example, I telnet to mta.excite.com 25, it just hang, no response but I can receive mail from their site. I hope I could get more idea on analyzing why the problem occured. Yes, I know that the problem seemed to be on my side, but what caused the problem, that I don't know. I hope someone can give my more idea about this. Thanks! Chrisanthy Carlane PPM Department PT. Circlecom Nusantara Indonesia Jakarta Stock Exchange Building, Tower I, Penthouse #31 fl. Jl. Jend. Sudirman kav.53-43 Jakarta 12190 phone:+62-21-515 fax:+62-21-5151672 email:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
POP3 Login
I'm experiencing a curious issue with qmail-popup/pop3d. qmail-popup is being called by tcpserver. It even works. POP3 server: wndrgrl.goldblatt.net 208.190.130.82/27 Other interface: 10.1.1.10 The 208.190.130.82 works quickly, efficiently, as expected, but in public. This interface is a 10 megabit NIC. The 10.1.1.10 interface is a totally separate 100 megabit LAN that I use to run my private services, like printer sharing, NFS, all the stuff I need but don't want exposed to the public. When I try to retrieve mail via POP3 on the PUBLIC interface, all goes well. When I try to retrieve mail via POP3 on the PRIVATE interface, it works, but where the public side takes about two seconds to complete an empty transaction, the private one takes as much as 60 seconds to authenticate (Eudora hangs on Logging in to server, which is its way of saying login/password). If Eudora doesn't get sick of waiting it EVENTUALLY works, but slowly. qmail-popup is invoked as follows: /usr/local/bin/tcpserver 0 110 /var/qmail/bin/qmail-popup wndrgrl.goldblatt.net /bin/checkpassword /var/qmail/bin/qmail-pop3d Maildir Per the documentation in various places, the FQDN is wndrgrl.goldblatt.net. Do I need -two- instances of qmail-popup -- one for each interface? Or does tcpserver bind to both interfaces at once? My gut reaction is that tcpserver binds to both interfaces, based on the fact that retrieval from the private interface does work, albeit slowly. Pointers toward a resolution or where to start looking, including FAQs and docs I've missed, are welcome. Thank you. age
Return messages from postmaster
Hello, I'm using vpopmail, and I have multiple domains in the same host. When sending a message to a non existent user in that domains, the sender never gets a return message indicating the problem, but the postmaster receives a copy of the original message. Here is the log generated: Apr 30 08:52:01myhost qmail: 988613521.448040 new msg 306265Apr 30 08:52:01 myhost qmail: 988613521.448323 info msg 306265: bytes 2013 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] qp 10412 uid 502Apr 30 08:52:01 myhost qmail: 988613521.531300 starting delivery 214170: msg 306265 to local [EMAIL PROTECTED]Apr 30 08:52:01 myhost qmail: 988613521.531559 status: local 1/10 remote 0/20Apr 30 08:52:01 myhost qmail: 988613521.531736 starting delivery 214171: msg 306265 to local [EMAIL PROTECTED]Apr 30 08:52:01 myhost qmail: 988613521.531886 status: local 2/10 remote 0/20Apr 30 08:52:01 myhost qmail: 988613521.571043 delivery 214170: success: did_1+0+0/Apr 30 08:52:01 myhost qmail: 988613521.571304 status: local 1/10 remote 0/20Apr 30 08:52:01 myhost qmail: 988613521.604037 delivery 214171: success: POP_user_does_not_exist,_but_will_deliver_to_/u1/vpopmail/domains/virtualdomain.com/postmaster/did_0+0+1/Apr 30 08:52:01 myhost qmail: 988613521.604305 status: local 0/10 remote 0/20Apr 30 08:52:01 myhost qmail: 988613521.604449 end msg 306265 Thanks in advance.
RE: Return messages from postmaster
postmaster has been set as a catch-all account. If [EMAIL PROTECTED] doesn't exist, postmaster will get it.(postmaster gets *@domain.com, minus existing users) If you want it to bounce, simply turn off the catch-all for postmaster and only [EMAIL PROTECTED] email will be delivered. -davidu -Original Message-From: Angel Durán [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, April 30, 2001 3:26 AMTo: QmailSubject: Return messages from postmaster Hello, I'm using vpopmail, and I have multiple domains in the same host. When sending a message to a non existent user in that domains, the sender never gets a return message indicating the problem, but the postmaster receives a copy of the original message. Here is the log generated: Apr 30 08:52:01myhost qmail: 988613521.448040 new msg 306265Apr 30 08:52:01 myhost qmail: 988613521.448323 info msg 306265: bytes 2013 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] qp 10412 uid 502Apr 30 08:52:01 myhost qmail: 988613521.531300 starting delivery 214170: msg 306265 to local [EMAIL PROTECTED]Apr 30 08:52:01 myhost qmail: 988613521.531559 status: local 1/10 remote 0/20Apr 30 08:52:01 myhost qmail: 988613521.531736 starting delivery 214171: msg 306265 to local [EMAIL PROTECTED]Apr 30 08:52:01 myhost qmail: 988613521.531886 status: local 2/10 remote 0/20Apr 30 08:52:01 myhost qmail: 988613521.571043 delivery 214170: success: did_1+0+0/Apr 30 08:52:01 myhost qmail: 988613521.571304 status: local 1/10 remote 0/20Apr 30 08:52:01 myhost qmail: 988613521.604037 delivery 214171: success: POP_user_does_not_exist,_but_will_deliver_to_/u1/vpopmail/domains/virtualdomain.com/postmaster/did_0+0+1/Apr 30 08:52:01 myhost qmail: 988613521.604305 status: local 0/10 remote 0/20Apr 30 08:52:01 myhost qmail: 988613521.604449 end msg 306265 Thanks in advance.
qmail Digest 30 Apr 2001 10:00:01 -0000 Issue 1350
qmail Digest 30 Apr 2001 10:00:01 - Issue 1350 Topics (messages 61636 through 61668): qmail-inject 61636 by: C P 61637 by: Frank Tegtmeyer Which IMAP do you prefer with qmail? 61638 by: q question 61639 by: Robin S. Socha trouble with qmail 61640 by: Cameron Hanover 61642 by: RC 61650 by: Al Lipscomb 61653 by: RC 61654 by: Chris Johnson 61656 by: RC 61660 by: Tim Legant Is qmail best reserved for mailing list server purposes only? 61641 by: q question 61643 by: Russ Allbery 61645 by: John P 61646 by: Jason Brooke 61655 by: q question 61664 by: q question how do I ? 61644 by: Pupeno Where does the mail goes? 61647 by: Marco Calistri 61648 by: Alex Pennace 61651 by: Marco Calistri 61661 by: Tim Legant How can I get qmail to log extra information? 61649 by: Khai Doan lesoleil.com unexpected MAILER-DAEMON? 61652 by: Marco Calistri How can qmail scale? 61657 by: Foo Ji-Haw 61658 by: Daniel Duclos 61659 by: japc.co.sapo.pt log smtp ip connection 61662 by: lemoninsz 61663 by: Tim Legant Re: mailserver, can traceroute, cannot make SMTP connection 61665 by: postmaster.circlecom.co.id POP3 Login 61666 by: Aaron Goldblatt Return messages from postmaster 61667 by: Angel Durán 61668 by: davidu Administrivia: To unsubscribe from the digest, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To subscribe to the digest, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To bug my human owner, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To post to the list, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- hi all, i need to operate qmail-inject in a way so that it asks for subject on command prompt. Is this possible ??? please help regds, pratibha --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.246 / Virus Database: 120 - Release Date: 4/6/01 C P [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: i need to operate qmail-inject in a way so that it asks for subject on command prompt. Is this possible ??? Write a wrapper. For example (not tested): #!/bin/bash # read -p Subject: mailsubj $REPLY $* Regards, Frank I'm curious, not to really try to create a survey, but of those of you on this list using qmail with IMAP, which IMAP are you using? Thanks in advance! _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com * q question [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010429 16:38]: Your parents must hate you. I'm curious, not to really try to create a survey, but of those of you on this list using qmail with IMAP, which IMAP are you using? Courier - what else? Cyrus is nice but uses proprietary formats noone really needs and UW IMAP is brought to you by the security Gods that brohgt you pine. Mbwhahaha... http://mail.socha.net/about/ for a setup that makes me and my users equally happy. -- Robin S. Socha http://my.gnus.org/ - To boldly frobnicate what no newbie has grokked before. okee dokee. i'm having quite a time trying to get qmail to work right. for a while i was at least able to send mail from my box [running openbsd2.8] and receive it on my box, or send mail from it, and receive elsewhere, but not send from elsewhere and receive on it. now i can't send or receive anything, and i'm not sure what I did to change that. it looks like all the appropriate apps are running [4 or so, i think the documentation said], but nothing is getting delivered. i occassionally get an email bounced back if i send from elsewhere saying 'couldnt deliver for 7 days'. i just found the qmail/queue/mess folder, and it looks like there's a bunch of mail in there that's been waiting to be delivered for ages [probably around 2 weeks or more]. the only thing i knew to check was rcpthosts, and it's got localhost and the domain of my box listed there. i followed all the instructions best i could, moved around mailboxes and such. the only thing that i couldn't do had to do with removing sendmail, since something it told me to move just wasn't there. any help anybody could give me would be greatly appreciated. -- =--= -.c.- My mistress when she walks treads on the ground. okee dokee. i'm having quite a time trying to get qmail to work right. for a while i was at least able to send mail from my box [running openbsd2.8] and receive it on my box, or send mail from it, and receive elsewhere, but not send from elsewhere and receive on it. now i can't send or receive anything, and i'm not sure what I did to change that. it looks like all the appropriate apps are running [4 or so, i think the documentation said], but nothing is getting
Re: POP3 Login
On Mon, Apr 30, 2001 at 03:15:41AM -0500, Aaron Goldblatt wrote: When I try to retrieve mail via POP3 on the PRIVATE interface, it works, but where the public side takes about two seconds to complete an empty transaction, the private one takes as much as 60 seconds to authenticate (Eudora hangs on Logging in to server, which is its way of saying login/password). If Eudora doesn't get sick of waiting it EVENTUALLY works, but slowly. This question comes up about every three minutes on this list. See the list archives. Try searching for pop3 slow. Chris PGP signature
Re: POP3 Login
- Original Message - From: Chris Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Aaron Goldblatt [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, April 30, 2001 12:17 PM Subject: Re: POP3 Login Maybe it would be a good idea to discuss the options of tcpserver more thoroughly in LWQ and other qmail howto's.
Re: POP3 Login
qmail == qmail mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: - Original Message - Typical OE luser. -- Windows isn't a virus, viruses do something.
RE: POP3 Login
I'm experiencing a curious issue with qmail-popup/pop3d. [snip] When I try to retrieve mail via POP3 on the PUBLIC interface, all goes well. When I try to retrieve mail via POP3 on the PRIVATE interface, it works, but where the public side takes about two seconds to complete an empty transaction, the private one takes as much as 60 seconds to authenticate (Eudora hangs on Logging in to server, which is its way of saying login/password). If Eudora doesn't get sick of waiting it EVENTUALLY works, but slowly. Thank you. It's a DNS matter. The delay u're experimenting is due to the reverse DNS checking - certainly the server cannot get the intranet clients' name using theyr IP and your clients must wait for the DNS timeout. Wagner
Re: How can qmail scale?
On Mon, Apr 30, 2001 at 09:30:07AM +0800, Foo Ji-Haw wrote: Hi all, I'm trying to set up qmail to support a 200,000 user domain. Can someone pls recommend a feasible way to do this? I don't think adding 200,000 records in /etc/passwd is such a good idea. It's even not possible on 32bit-systems. You need a virtual user manager like vmailmgr or vpopmail I'd go with qmail-ldap for this amount - http://www.lifewithqmail.org/ldap/ -- Henning Brauer | BS Web Services Hostmaster BSWS| Roedingsmarkt 14 [EMAIL PROTECTED] | 20459 Hamburg http://www.bsws.de | Germany Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity. (Dennis Ritchie)
Re: POP3 Login
On Mon, Apr 30, 2001 at 12:21:32PM +0200, qmail mailing list wrote: Maybe it would be a good idea to discuss the options of tcpserver more thoroughly in LWQ and other qmail howto's. Dave already has this issue on his list for lwq. -- Henning Brauer | BS Web Services Hostmaster BSWS| Roedingsmarkt 14 [EMAIL PROTECTED] | 20459 Hamburg http://www.bsws.de | Germany Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity. (Dennis Ritchie)
Maildrop : Good info/examples ?
Hi all,
I am experimenting with dropmail in a combination with qmail...
Problem is it doesn't seem to work properly. Does anybody know where I
can find some good information / examples.
What I tried:
in ~/.qmail
|/usr/local/bin/maildrop
in ~/.mailfilter
if(/^From: *[EMAIL PROTECTED]/)
{
to INBOX.qMail List
}
in /etc/maildroprc
DEFAULT=./Maildir
Thx
Re: Maildrop : Good info/examples ?
On 30 Apr 2001 14:50:31 +0200,
Tom Vandeplas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
in ~/.qmail
|/usr/local/bin/maildrop
in ~/.mailfilter
if(/^From: *[EMAIL PROTECTED]/)
{
to INBOX.qMail List
}
in /etc/maildroprc
DEFAULT=./Maildir
You really want to subscribe to any mailing-list using an address like
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Then put ./Maildir/.qmail/ into ~vandeplas/.qmail-qmaillist and
receive all the list's mails to that directory.
Greetings
--
Robert Sander
Computer Scientist Epigenomics AG
Bioinformatics RDwww.epigenomics.com Kastanienallee 24
+493024345330 10435 Berlin
[Announce] oMail-webmail 0.98.2
Bonjour! A new version of oMail-webmail is now available: this is version 0.98.2, with some news: Major changes since 0.97: * Security fix: remote IP is checked again * new configuration variables (fixed/variable font) * FreeBSD fixes * new translation for Czech * and a completely redesigned addressbook, with backward compatibity Todo: better design for the addressbook. I won't be able to work on it the next weeks, so patches are welcome! Import routines (from OE, NS, Eudora) are also on this todo list (too much work currently, sorry...). You will find more infos about this GPL-licensed software, as well as an online demo of latest version under http://webmail.omnis.ch/omail.pl?action=about * Download: http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/omail/omail-webmail-0.98.2.tar.gz * Other URL's: (cvs, releases, etc) http://freshmeat.net/projects/omail-webmail/ * If you are interested to help, fell free to get the files from the anonymous CVS, and you are welcome on the devel mailing list. * There are currently 2 mailing lists : - omail-news : read-only announce mailing list (for new release announces) http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/omail-news - omail-devel : public mailing list for devel support. http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/omail-devel * Changelog: 30.apr.01 - Version 0.98.2 - om [EMAIL PROTECTED] * added some more fields to the address book * fix for tmp attach dir creation * added more save buttons on prefs screen * automatic focus on password field if login is known [nr] * release 0.98.2 out. 21.apr.01 - Version 0.98.1 - om [EMAIL PROTECTED] * javascript fixes [jn] * unread mails are now in bold [idea from mz] * small html/lang fixes * added translation for Czech [jn] * updated translation for Polish [pk] * updated translation for Danish [te] 20.apr.01 - Version 0.98.0 - om [EMAIL PROTECTED] * completely redesigned the addressbook, keeping backward compatibility: old addressbook will be converted on first access. TODO: - add all new strings - nicer forms - implement import routines for outlook/ns messenger/mutt/pine * fixed logout, and removed trash_empty from sub logout() * improved error messages from verifiysession (too old, non existant, etc.) * dead attachments from older sessions will also be removed automaticaly * updated translations for en/de/fr (addressbook stuff) 20.apr.01 - Version 0.97.1 - om [EMAIL PROTECTED] * security fix: $check_remote_host is now checked again. * onelogin fixes * updateted verifysession in omail-prefs.pl * new configuration variable : display email in variable or fixed-width font * possibiltity to define the fonts in the .lang files (suggested by Jakub) * applied patch from Jon Mansey about the behavior of $ and $ under FreeBSD * applied patch from Jakub sent on 18 Feb 2001 ($#headers pb.) * minor html/style fixes Greetings, Olivier -- _ Olivier Mueller - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - PGPkeyID: 0E84D2EA - Switzerland qmail projects: http://omail.omnis.ch - http://webmail.omnis.ch PGP signature
queue problems
hi how can I completely purge queue of messages and fix the annoying bounce message? ... unforunately half asleep I noticed a problems with a message and deleted without stopping qmail 2001-04-29 01:47:12.220485500 delivery 4: deferral: Connected_to_139.222.230.4_but_sender_was_rejected./Remote_ho st_said:_451_rejected:_temporarily_unable_to_verify_sender_address_(try_agai n_later)_[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ 2001-04-29 01:47:12.220507500 status: local 0/10 remote 0/20 2001-04-29 01:53:17.305329500 starting delivery 5: msg 16099 to remote @uea.ac.uk 2001-04-29 01:53:17.305344500 status: local 0/10 remote 1/20 2001-04-29 01:53:17.327085500 delivery 5: failure: qmail-spawn_unable_to_open_message._(#4.3.0)/I'm_not_going_to_ try_again;_this_message_has_been_in_the_queue_too_long./ 2001-04-29 01:53:17.370680500 status: local 0/10 remote 0/20 2001-04-29 01:53:17.548407500 warning: trouble injecting bounce message, will try later 2001-04-29 01:55:21.579339500 warning: trouble injecting bounce message, will try later 2001-04-29 01:57:25.606358500 warning: trouble injecting bounce message, will try later 2001-04-29 01:59:29.633383500 warning: trouble injecting bounce message, will try later 2001-04-29 02:01:33.660444500 warning: trouble injecting bounce message, will try later I deleted the message then the next delivery of the mail failed and I thought darn I forgot to stop qmail, so I restarted it and then errors on bounce messages started appearing the problems are that the hostname I set qmail up under was fbm.sdns.net and sdns.net keeps dissappearing so I changed all the qmail control files to fbm.yi.org but when I sent from elsewhere it still used the sdns.net address also there has been problems with the mail servers at uea (norwich uni) now there are more messages in my queue that are undeliverable, so I would like to clear the queue safely, I presume they would expire after a while but I would like to get rid of them so I can test that I have qmail working without getting tonnes of old error messages from old emails Neil PS sorry to obscure part of my logs but my sisters email address isnt relivant _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
Re: queue problems
Neil Grant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ... unforunately half asleep I noticed a problems with a message and deleted without stopping qmail Download queue-fix from the link at www.qmail.org and compile it -- if you're using the big-todo patch for qmail, you'll also need to patch queue-fix. Then stop qmail, and run queue-fix on your queue. It should be able to handle this. Charles -- --- Charles Cazabon[EMAIL PROTECTED] GPL'ed software available at: http://www.qcc.sk.ca/~charlesc/software/ Any opinions expressed are just that -- my opinions. ---
username@domain@domain relay hole !
Hello all , I have recently installed a new qmail server an i am interested in working with soon but i figured out that qmail doesn't solve the situation of relaying this address type: username@domain@domain while username@domain is the person to which i am intersted in sending mail and the @domain is my mail domain and the mail server relay this king of address that conclude two '@' signes and gives spammers and other people use qmail as relay to their own intrests . When I type 'qmail-showctl' I see that qmail covers the '%' situation but is there any solution for the problem I have just mentioned . I am sure that you all concerned about this as I do because it makes your server an open relay to this trick . I would realy like to solve it so , it any of you are aware of any solution within qmail or other one , this might help us all . Thanks , Nissim Penias .
Re: Where does the mail goes?
On 30-Apr-2001 Tim Legant wrote: On Mon, Apr 30, 2001 at 01:40:15AM +0200, Marco Calistri wrote: If my $HOME doesn't contains any dot qmail or even it is empty, where the incoming mail is stored? Does the file exist, or not? If it doesn't exist, qmail follows the default delivery instructions provided on the 'qmail-start' command line. If it does exist but has no delivery instructions, i.e. no forwards, no commands, no mailboxes or maildirs, but only comments, qmail throws the mail away. Tim Gosh! 54 messages lost! ... TKS Tim! --Marco
Re: username@domain@domain relay hole !
Nissim Penias [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have recently installed a new qmail server an i am interested in working with soon but i figured out that qmail doesn't solve the situation of relaying this address type: username@domain@domain [...] I am sure that you all concerned about this as I do because it makes your server an open relay to this trick . No, it doesn't. What makes you think it does? To qmail, there's nothing special about an '@' symbol inside the local-part of an email address. For example, a message to foo@[EMAIL PROTECTED], handled by a qmail server which handles mail for baz.net, will be delivered to local user foo@bar. If you don't have such a user, the message will bounce. In no circumstances will the message be relayed to the server which handles mail for domain bar. Charles -- --- Charles Cazabon[EMAIL PROTECTED] GPL'ed software available at: http://www.qcc.sk.ca/~charlesc/software/ Any opinions expressed are just that -- my opinions. ---
username@domain@domain relay hole !!!
Hello all , I have recently installed a new qmail server an i am interested in working with soon but i figured out that qmail doesn't solve the situation of relaying this address type: username@domain@domain while username@domain is the person to which i am intersted in sending mail and the @domain is my mail domain and the mail server relay this king of address that conclude two '@' signes and gives spammers and other people use qmail as relay to their own intrests . When I type 'qmail-showctl' I see that qmail covers the '%' situation but is there any solution for the problem I have just mentioned . I am sure that you all concerned about this as I do because it makes your server an open relay to this trick . I would realy like to solve it so , it any of you are aware of any solution within qmail or other one , this might help us all . Thanks , Nissim Penias .
Fw: username@domain@domain relay hole !
- Original Message - From: Nissim Penias [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Charles Cazabon [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, April 30, 2001 4:40 PM Subject: Re: username@domain@domain relay hole ! - Original Message - From: Charles Cazabon [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, April 30, 2001 4:20 PM Subject: Re: username@domain@domain relay hole ! Nissim Penias [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have recently installed a new qmail server an i am interested in working with soon but i figured out that qmail doesn't solve the situation of relaying this address type: username@domain@domain [...] I am sure that you all concerned about this as I do because it makes your server an open relay to this trick . No, it doesn't. What makes you think it does? To qmail, there's nothing special about an '@' symbol inside the local-part of an email address. For example, a message to foo@[EMAIL PROTECTED], handled by a qmail server which handles mail for baz.net, will be delivered to local user foo@bar. If you don't have such a user, the message will bounce. In no circumstances will the message be relayed to the server which handles mail for domain bar. Charles -- --- Charles Cazabon[EMAIL PROTECTED] GPL'ed software available at: http://www.qcc.sk.ca/~charlesc/software/ Any opinions expressed are just that -- my opinions. --- Hello Charles , What I meen is that if I am sending mail using the SMTP protocol telnet mailserver 25 ) and I am using address foo@[EMAIL PROTECTED] and I am holding kuku.com the mail will be relayed from my mail server kuku.com to foo@bar . I tried it and the qmail-smtpd log says delivering foo@bar insted of dropping it . This meens that users outside my domain can use any qmail server this way to relay to outside existing adresses . Thanks , Nissim .
Re: POP3 Login
Hi. I also have the same problem 2 days ago. And I solved it after some kind soul helped me out. Anyway, just add -R and the -H switch to tcpserver. -R disables IDENT -H disables reverse DNS lookups Your new line should look like this /usr/local/bin/tcpserver -R -H 0 110 /var/qmail/bin/qmail-popup wndrgrl.goldblatt.net /bin/checkpassword /var/qmail/bin/qmail-pop3d Maildir Best Regards David - Original Message - From: Aaron Goldblatt [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, April 30, 2001 4:15 PM Subject: POP3 Login I'm experiencing a curious issue with qmail-popup/pop3d. qmail-popup is being called by tcpserver. It even works. POP3 server: wndrgrl.goldblatt.net 208.190.130.82/27 Other interface: 10.1.1.10 The 208.190.130.82 works quickly, efficiently, as expected, but in public. This interface is a 10 megabit NIC. The 10.1.1.10 interface is a totally separate 100 megabit LAN that I use to run my private services, like printer sharing, NFS, all the stuff I need but don't want exposed to the public. When I try to retrieve mail via POP3 on the PUBLIC interface, all goes well. When I try to retrieve mail via POP3 on the PRIVATE interface, it works, but where the public side takes about two seconds to complete an empty transaction, the private one takes as much as 60 seconds to authenticate (Eudora hangs on Logging in to server, which is its way of saying login/password). If Eudora doesn't get sick of waiting it EVENTUALLY works, but slowly. qmail-popup is invoked as follows: /usr/local/bin/tcpserver 0 110 /var/qmail/bin/qmail-popup wndrgrl.goldblatt.net /bin/checkpassword /var/qmail/bin/qmail-pop3d Maildir Per the documentation in various places, the FQDN is wndrgrl.goldblatt.net. Do I need -two- instances of qmail-popup -- one for each interface? Or does tcpserver bind to both interfaces at once? My gut reaction is that tcpserver binds to both interfaces, based on the fact that retrieval from the private interface does work, albeit slowly. Pointers toward a resolution or where to start looking, including FAQs and docs I've missed, are welcome. Thank you. age
Re: Fw: username@domain@domain relay hole !
Nissim Penias [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: username@domain@domain [...] I am sure that you all concerned about this as I do because it makes your server an open relay to this trick . No, it doesn't. What makes you think it does? To qmail, there's nothing special about an '@' symbol inside the local-part of an email address. What I meen is that if I am sending mail using the SMTP protocol telnet mailserver 25 ) and I am using address foo@[EMAIL PROTECTED] and I am holding kuku.com the mail will be relayed from my mail server kuku.com to foo@bar Prove it -- show us the unedited logs of this happening. What I think is your log shows your system trying to deliver to local user foo@bar, and you're misreading it. Charles -- --- Charles Cazabon[EMAIL PROTECTED] GPL'ed software available at: http://www.qcc.sk.ca/~charlesc/software/ Any opinions expressed are just that -- my opinions. ---
Re: queue problems
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Charles Cazabon wrote: Neil Grant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ... unforunately half asleep I noticed a problems with a message and deleted without stopping qmail Download queue-fix from the link at www.qmail.org and compile it -- Doesn't seem to be reachable at the moment. Here's a direct link: http://www.netmeridian.com/e-huss/ - -d - -- David Talkington http://www.spotnet.org PGP key: http://www.prairienet.org/~dtalk/dt000823.asc -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP 6.5.8 Comment: Made with pgp4pine 1.75-6 iQEVAwUBOu2D8b1ZYOtSwT+tAQFP2gf/Yehi9jpWjQ/3/sQV6uzFbBIl/MYDbv5H aBOFPEhZoNXK3t3N4IazuRokh1XjuxfwgynGdgJRxn4h/2UH/tRni90jk0sPpR1H +Sj5Wu4ucGX9ONd0Vw9lkQBNdlkJDATfvkvaFhT9JKMkPOd8sz16hcVxAvAUlCuV aUBhem/jqpkHXy5CTYk9K3o8lgcDqJpmatrC56j5DzQ8Y0bUBN1nh2EiIlaqcIqw gO6FTCn0pUvH+WAa4X9zXofjh9S8lc16E4i86rUzE+GR/56HmVY3xopoaj0+VJCL vmbRtPKfDhDoZeNwiITghTiRbRHmsAb2Xl8S7h8ywnV6ydPhs3RzfQ== =cGYQ -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: username@domain@domain relay hole !
At 08:20 AM 4/30/01 -0600, Charles Cazabon wrote: Nissim Penias [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have recently installed a new qmail server an i am interested in working with soon but i figured out that qmail doesn't solve the situation of relaying this address type: username@domain@domain [...] I am sure that you all concerned about this as I do because it makes your server an open relay to this trick . No, it doesn't. What makes you think it does? To qmail, there's nothing special about an '@' symbol inside the local-part of an email address. For example, a message to foo@[EMAIL PROTECTED], handled by a qmail server which handles mail for baz.net, will be delivered to local user foo@bar. If you don't have such a user, the message will bounce. In no circumstances will the message be relayed to the server which handles mail for domain bar. Charles -- Charles, I think Nissim is correct. I have tested several qmail servers and this does happen. -Rob Sportsline Operations Dept. 954-351-2120 x4528 or x4234 AIM: rg1454bb ICQ: 30834081 http://cbs.sportsline.com
wildmat patch ???
Hello all , I opened qmail-1.03.tar.gz and patched it with the wildmat patch and ren : make qmail-smtpd in order to activate the badmailpatterns . During compilation of the qmail-smtpd i get the folowing error : qmail-smtpd.c : In function `main': qmail-smtpd.c:417:return type of `main' is not `int' make:*** [qmail-smtpd] Error1 Do anyone know how to solve this . P.S: --- I allready have a qmail server running i am just trying to buils a new qmial-smtpd according to the wildmat patch README . Thanks , Nissim .
Re: username@domain@domain relay hole !
On Mon, Apr 30, 2001 at 11:27:57AM -0400, Robert Geller wrote: I think Nissim is correct. I have tested several qmail servers and this does happen. I am sure he is not: $ telnet mail.space.net smtp Trying 195.30.0.8... Connected to mail.space.net. Escape character is '^]'. 220 mail.space.net ESMTP MAIL FROM: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 250 ok RCPT TO: [EMAIL PROTECTED]@space.net 250 ok DATA 354 go ahead Subject: relay test . 250 ok 988645099 qp 20023 quit 221 mail.space.net Connection closed by foreign host. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: failure notice [EMAIL PROTECTED]@space.net No such user. That other have relay open/misconfigured qmail servers isn't a prove :-) \Maex
Re: username@domain@domain relay hole !
Robert Geller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: username@domain@domain [...] I am sure that you all concerned about this as I do because it makes your server an open relay to this trick . No, it doesn't. [...] In no circumstances will the message be relayed to the server which handles mail for domain bar. I think Nissim is correct. I have tested several qmail servers and this does happen. No, he is incorrect. The example you sent me in private mail doesn't show this happening either. I have yet to see the logs of a single instance of this form of relaying being allowed to happen through a qmail server. Sending mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]@baz.net will be accepted by qmail if baz.net is in rcpthosts. If it's local, qmail will try to deliver it to local user [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- qmail knows the difference between a local recipient and a remote recipient, so it won't try to send this on to the MX for bar.com. If baz.net is in rcpthosts, but not in locals or virtuals, qmail will then forward the whole thing on to the primary MX for baz.net. If this is what is happening, it's not (unauthorized) relaying at all, and doesn't involve bar.com at any point. Charles -- --- Charles Cazabon[EMAIL PROTECTED] GPL'ed software available at: http://www.qcc.sk.ca/~charlesc/software/ Any opinions expressed are just that -- my opinions. ---
Postmaster : sorry, no mailbox here with that name - fastforward problem ?
hello, i have a qmail virtual domain "test.com" with vpopmail. all virtual users works fine. i have created /etc/aliases and put some aliases like "postmaster: [EMAIL PROTECTED]" launched /var/qmail/bin/newaliases to create /etc/aliases.cdb (this is ok) i have puted this line "/var/qmail/bin/fastforward -d /etc/aliases.cdb" in 2 files: /var/qmail/alias/.qmail-default /var/qmail/alias/and _qmail-postmaster when i send a msg to [EMAIL PROTECTED] qmail-send says : Postmaster : "sorry, no mailbox here with that name" [EMAIL PROTECTED] is ok (treated as local box) any idea why is fastforward ignoring the forwading ?? My config: debian 2.2 - qmail 1.03 - fastforward 0.51 - vpopmail - checklocalpwd 1.0.- ./Maildir/ format
Re: username@domain@domain relay hole !
On Mon, Apr 30, 2001 at 10:37:20AM -0600, Charles Cazabon wrote: If baz.net is in rcpthosts, but not in locals or virtuals, qmail will then forward the whole thing on to the primary MX for baz.net. If this is what is happening, it's not (unauthorized) relaying at all, and doesn't involve bar.com at any point. An if there is a .qmail-default file for the domain baz.net that forwards all emails to [EMAIL PROTECTED] this is no unauthorized relaying either :-))) \Maex -- SpaceNet AG| Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 | Fon: +49 (89) 32356-0 Research Development | D-80807 Muenchen| Fax: +49 (89) 32356-299 Stress is when you wake up screaming and you realize you haven't fallen asleep yet.
Postmaster - fastforward problem
hello, i have a qmail virtual domain "test.com" with vpopmail. all virtual users works fine. i have created /etc/aliases and put some aliases like "postmaster: [EMAIL PROTECTED]" launched /var/qmail/bin/newaliases to create /etc/aliases.cdb (this is ok) i have puted this line "/var/qmail/bin/fastforward -d /etc/aliases.cdb" in 2 files: /var/qmail/alias/.qmail-default /var/qmail/alias/and _qmail-postmaster when i send a msg to [EMAIL PROTECTED] qmail-send says : Postmaster : "sorry, no mailbox here with that name" [EMAIL PROTECTED] is ok (treated as local box) any idea why is fastforward ignoring the forwading ?? My config: debian 2.2 - qmail 1.03 - fastforward 0.51 - vpopmail - checklocalpwd 1.0.- ./Maildir/ format thx José.
Re: POP3 Login
From: |nix ZixinG [EMAIL PROTECTED] -R disables IDENT -H disables reverse DNS lookups Actually thats not always enough. I had -H and -R and still had the dreaded slow response times. http://cr.yp.to/ucspi-tcp/tcpserver.html says (and LWQ should also) -l localname: Do not look up the local host name in DNS; use localname for the environment variable $TCPLOCALHOST. A common choice for localname is 0. To avoid loops, you must use this option for servers on TCP port 53. Mine look like: tcpserver -l0 -v -H -R 0 pop-3 /var/qmail/bin/qmail-popup (and so on) tcpserver -l0 -v -p -H -R -x /home/vpopmail/etc/tcp.smtp.cdb -c $MAXSMTPD ( and so on) Hope that helped, Rick Up P.S. Should we all just just add the response to this FAQ our signatures?
¾Ç©f³Q....XXX...
Àsô, ¤µ¦~¯uªº¤£¦n¹L,§Ú¤w¸g´«¤FNÓ¤u§@.. §@«á¤½¥q¤S˳¬¤F...³o¤@®a¤½¥qÆZ¦nª±ªº.. §Ú¦b¬ü°ê¦³¸òElena¤@°_ª±¹L¥xÆW¤]¯u¥ý¶i.. §A¦n¦n¬Ý¬Ý..§Ṳ́]¥i¥H¶}¤@¶¡.. «ö¤U±ªº³s µ²- ©P¬ü¶³... p.s. ¬P´Á¤» Friday's ¨£±!!
[ANNOUNCE] TMDA 0.10 - python-based anti-spam system for qmail
I'm pleased to announce a new major release of my Tagged Message Delivery Agent (TMDA). New in release 0.10: * The amkCrypto package is no longer necessary. With this release, only the core Python language distribution version 1.5.2 or higher is required to run TMDA. See the `UPGRADE' file if you are upgrading from a previous TMDA release. * Many new features added, and some small bugs fixed. Further release announcements will take place on the tmda-announce mailing list http://libertine.org/lists/listinfo/. About TMDA: TMDA is an OSI certified Python application for qmail systems designed to significantly reduce (or eliminate) the amount of SPAM/UCE you receive by using unique, cryptographically enhanced (called tagged) e-mail addresses. TMDA can both filter your incoming e-mail, and tag your outgoing address. For more information, download locations, and installation instructions, visit the TMDA homepage: URL:http://tmda.sourceforge.net/ Enjoy, Jason R. Mastaler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) PA HREF=http://tmda.sourceforge.net;TMDA 0.10/A - A qmail-based anti-SPAM system. (30-Apr-2001)
Problem with virtualdomains and VERPs (with patch)
qmail-send handles virtual domains (by prepending the virtual domain prefix) before it creates a Variable Envelope Return Path. This creates problems for me on my master mail server. For example, if I am the user [EMAIL PROTECTED], and I address a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and I request a VERP (say, by setting the r flag in QMAILINJECT), and control/virtualdomains has the following line: foo.com:blah ...then the VERP reads sender-blah-recip=foo.com instead of the correct sender-recip=foo.com. Incidentally, I noticed this because ezmlm is not removing dead accounts from my mailing lists because the VERPs are wrong. The appended patch seems to fix the problem. - Pat diff -u -r1.2 qmail-send.c --- qmail-send.c2001/04/23 15:40:29 1.2 +++ qmail-send.c2001/04/30 17:00:25 @@ -171,6 +171,7 @@ int j; int k; + recip = stripvdomprepend(recip); i = str_len(sender); if (i = 4) if (str_equal(sender + i - 4,-@[]))
masquerading and autoeresponders
Greetings, Forgive my newbieness, this is the first Unix based mail project that I have had to bring up to production standards.. Currently I have Qmail functioning in all respects but 2, #1 being Qmail must be able to rewrite the headers of outgoing mail so that it all looks to be coming from bonair.stanford.edu instead of fops-monitor.stanford.edu. The accounts on both machines are identical and currently I want to be able just to have bonair .forward to fops-monitor for our trial stages. #2 being I cannot seem to get this autoresponder working properly, on our current machine (sendmail), the vacation program seems to function fine, though under Qmail when I tried it, it started a massive message loop. Any ideas or instructions would be greatly appreciated. -David Chait
release qmailinstallmachime0.01
Hello list. I've made this script to get qmail1.03 working on a redhat machine in one step. I've installed so and it works, any way it must be no complete. Give me your comments the steps are: 1##put the sig 4 .gz in /usr/src/qmail and qmailinstallmachine.txt there too ##qmail-1.03.tar.gz ##ucspi-tcp-0.88.tar.gz ##daemontools-0.70.tar.gz ##checkpassword-0.90.tar.gz 2##edit qmailinstallmachine.txt an with vi and follow the steps there say at: #2 TWO!!#edit this file with vi editor. 3##definition of variables##use any editor only 2 var's 4 run it ! cd /usr/src/qmail/ you must be here ! $./qmailinstallmachine.txt if it say text file bussy (i don't know whi $cp qmailinstallmachine.txt anyname.sh $ ./anyname.sh ###that is all### this is a resume, more specified in the same script. then read life with qmail so you will can do maildirs and fine configurations. I stiil are not happy with the log method. I hear for sugestions or examples. the file is at: http://www.audimed.com.ar/lucas/qmail103/qmailinstallmachine0-01.txt THX qmail list !
Stopping Message to msglog@domain.com
Folks, Everytime an email is sent to my qmail server, I receive a message to the postmasters account indicating that msglog is an unknown user on my domain. [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Sorry, no mailbox here by that name. vpopmail (#5.1.1) My .qmail-mslog file contains nothing but comments. Is there someway to stop this? Thanks, Ted
Re: A news.newusers.questions's Guide to Qmail
Robin S. Socha [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Bet they'll never publish my comments... I'm afraid the same will be true for mine.
Re: Help abot qmail and vpomail
Huh? You are thinking of locals or virtualdomains here. The domain must be in locals if qmail should accept and queue mail fro that domain. Yes, but *only* if the domain should not be treated as a virtual domain, or if the domain used the standard /etc/passwd for user verification. -K Do not meddle in the affairs of dragons, because you are crunchy and taste good with ketchup. From: Henning Brauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2001 00:05:21 +0200 To: Qmail [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Help abot qmail and vpomail On Fri, Apr 27, 2001 at 03:26:06PM -0600, Keary Suska wrote: If you want qmail to act as a mail gateway to the NT machine, simply put the NT domain in the SMTProutes control file, and do _not_ accept delivery (i.e. don't have the domain in your rcpthosts file). Huh? You are thinking of locals or virtualdomains here. The domain must be in locals if qmail should accept and queue mail fro that domain. -- Henning Brauer | BS Web Services Hostmaster BSWS| Roedingsmarkt 14 [EMAIL PROTECTED] | 20459 Hamburg http://www.bsws.de | Germany Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity. (Dennis Ritchie)
Re: Is qmail best reserved for mailing list server purposes only?
One last note on this thread. While rereading the FAQ, I came across this which indicates qmail has brakes to keep from generating denial of service attacks. http://cr.yp.to/qmail/faq/efficiency.html Does qmail back off from dead hosts? Answer: Yes. qmail has three backoff features: ... Qmail backs off very well, but doesn't work all that well with sendmail under heavy load. The problem is that sendmail keeps accepting connections even when it doesn't have enough system resources to accept mail, and tends to thrash to death. (Qmail systems usually use tcpserver which enforces a maximum number of simultaneous connections rejecting any beyond that limit.) But since sendmail doesn't reject connections, qmail can't tell that the recipient system isn't responding. Sendmail users tend to assume that anything sendmail does must be right, and anything different must be wrong, so they often blame qmail for opening too many connections. In reality, the connections could just as easily come from any other mail system, of course. -- John R. Levine, IECC, POB 727, Trumansburg NY 14886 +1 607 387 6869 [EMAIL PROTECTED], Village Trustee and Sewer Commissioner, http://iecc.com/johnl, Member, Provisional board, Coalition Against Unsolicited Commercial E-mail
adding custom bounce headers (was Re: How do you handle the double bounces?)
Frank Tegtmeyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: If the TMDA-bounces would be marked somehow (inserted header or something like that) they could be sorted out from the double bounces. For that tmda-filter would have to inject a self made bounce message and use a result code of 99 instead of 100. It's a little more complicated but would heavily increase my acceptance of TMDA (speaking as postmaster, of course). [copying the qmail list on this one to solicit a wider audience] I'm willing to entertain this because I also want the ability to add a Reply-To header to bounce messages containing the valid tagged address so that legitimate senders can reply more easily to bounces. While I'm there I could add a second header distinguishing the bounce as TMDA generated. But the question is how to best implement this. Is there an easy way to add custom headers to qmail bounce messages? I'd like to avoid duplicating qmail-send's bounce generation code. This could get complicated having to take into account qmail-control settings like `bouncefrom', `bouncehost' and stuff. Any suggestions? -- (TMDA - http://tmda.sourceforge.net/) (A qmail-based SPAM reduction system)
Relay for domains in rcpthosts
I want to allow relaying of all domains in my rcpthosts file. While I know this is a very bad thing to do this is only a very temporary measure. I have searched high and low for this...and I cant find the answer! Thanks, ross
Re: Relay for domains in rcpthosts
i think you're essentially referring to how to maintain a secondary MX. qmail will not attempt local delivery to any host that is in rcpthosts, but is not in locals/me. if you are running under tcpserver, make sure that you're not preventing any connections you want, and you should be fine. On Mon, 30 Apr 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I want to allow relaying of all domains in my rcpthosts file. While I know this is a very bad thing to do this is only a very temporary measure. I have searched high and low for this...and I cant find the answer! Thanks, ross
Re: Is qmail best reserved for mailing list server purposes only?
--- John R. Levine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Qmail backs off very well, but doesn't work all that well with sendmail under heavy load. The problem is that sendmail keeps accepting connections even when it doesn't have enough system resources to accept mail, and tends to thrash to death. well - it's VERY misconfigured sendmail ;) (Qmail systems usually use tcpserver which enforces a maximum number of simultaneous connections rejecting any beyond that limit.) But since sendmail doesn't reject connections, qmail can't tell that the recipient system isn't responding. It rejects, really Sendmail users tend to assume that anything sendmail does must be right, and anything different must be wrong, so they often blame qmail for opening too many connections. In reality, the connections could just as easily come from any other mail system, of course. I'm not sure how qmail works if you are sending 100 messages from server to another one. Does it open 100 connections concurrently? --- Oleg -- John R. Levine, IECC, POB 727, Trumansburg NY 14886 +1 607 387 6869 [EMAIL PROTECTED], Village Trustee and Sewer Commissioner, http://iecc.com/johnl, Member, Provisional board, Coalition Against Unsolicited Commercial E-mail __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Auctions - buy the things you want at great prices http://auctions.yahoo.com/
Re: Is qmail best reserved for mailing list server purposes only?
Russ Allbery wrote: Rather, it tries to bounce them and the bounce bounces as undeliverable. The solution is for ORBS to stop probing systems from which no spam has ever been sent and for which there is no reason to suspect a lack of security. they were a lot easier to igore when they were still calling themselves dorkslayers -- David Nicol 816.235.1187 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Parse, munge, repeat.
Re: Is qmail best reserved for mailing list server purposes only?
Oleg Polyakov wrote: I'm not sure how qmail works if you are sending 100 messages from server to another one. Does it open 100 connections concurrently? it opens maxconcurrency connections. It doesn't have per-site concurrency limit, unles you patch it. It is reccommended, if you are having a problem killing a particular smtp peer, to trap all outgoing mail for it by defining it as a local virtual host, and then passing the stack of mail in the local virtual host's MailDir to the peer with something called serialmail. -- David Nicol 816.235.1187 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Parse, munge, repeat.
qmail on OSF/Unix (Digital) and C2security
Hi all, How I can use qmail on OSF/Unix (Digital) and C2security ? I cann't authen password by checkpassword program. Can you help me ? How to? Thank you SOC
¶W§C»ù15¦TTFT LCD ¿Ã¹õ
ªü²», ÁÙ¦b¥Î¬M¹³ºÞªº¿Ã¹õ¶Ü? ¨ì®É«á¤Ó¦h¿ç®g½u¨S¦³¿ìªk¼°_¨Ó!!! ¨Ó¬Ý¬Ý³o¤@Óºô¯¸...¦³ LCD TFT ªº¿Ã¹õ³á!! http://www.megarats.com ¤p«}
removing a particular *recipient* from the queue
How do I stop qmail from attempting to deliver a message to a particular recipient? I don't want to remove the entire message from the queue; I just want it to stop trying to deliver to a broken mail server. I already know about qmHandle, and that won't work here. I'm running qmail 1.03 and ezmlm-idx 0.40. Several mail servers are broken - they close the SMTP connection before verifying that they received the message, causing qmail to re-attempt delivery later (as it should). This results in ...connection_died._Possible_duplicate!_(#4.4.2) log messages, which, in fact, are true - the recipient is getting a copy every time qmail re-attempts delivery. I've looked at the qmail queue files and see that remote/NN/XX contains a list of addresses. From what I can deduce, those separated by [EMAIL PROTECTED] are deliveries that are unsuccessful, whereas [EMAIL PROTECTED] are successfully completed. I presume this is where qmail-qread gets its information. Could I possibly hand-edit the remote/NN/XX file and remove the particuar address? Any other ideas, like perhaps tricking qmail-remote into thinking that the address is to be locally delivered? Thanks, Omar
Re: removing a particular *recipient* from the queue
On Mon, Apr 30, 2001 at 11:23:21PM -0400, Omar Thameen wrote: How do I stop qmail from attempting to deliver a message to a particular recipient? I don't want to remove the entire message from the queue; I just want it to stop trying to deliver to a broken mail server. I already know about qmHandle, and that won't work here. I'm running qmail 1.03 and ezmlm-idx 0.40. Several mail servers are broken - they close the SMTP connection before verifying that they received the message, causing qmail to re-attempt delivery later (as it should). This results in ...connection_died._Possible_duplicate!_(#4.4.2) log messages, which, in fact, are true - the recipient is getting a copy every time qmail re-attempts delivery. I've looked at the qmail queue files and see that remote/NN/XX contains a list of addresses. From what I can deduce, those separated by [EMAIL PROTECTED] are deliveries that are unsuccessful, whereas [EMAIL PROTECTED] are successfully completed. I presume this is where qmail-qread gets its information. Could I possibly hand-edit the remote/NN/XX file and remove the particuar address? Any other ideas, like perhaps tricking qmail-remote into thinking that the address is to be locally delivered? Yes, but why? Are you worried that this is polluting your logs? Why intentionally break something to accomplish something that your qmail system will do on its own after queuelifetime expires? As far as being tricky, man qmail-remote. --Adam
Re: POP3 Login
On Tue, May 01, 2001 at 10:02:24AM -0700, Rick Updegrove wrote: P.S. Should we all just just add the response to this FAQ our signatures? What a great idea! Tim -- * * * | 1) It's SLOW!-- man tcpserver - especially -R,-H,-l qmail | 2) Roaming users -- http://www.lifewithqmail.org/lwq.html#relaying FAQS | 3) Secondary MX -- list in rcpthosts, NOT in locals/virtualdomains * * * | 4) Discard mail -- # line ONLY, in appropriate .qmail file
Re: masquerading and autoeresponders
On Mon, Apr 30, 2001 at 12:38:04PM -0700, David Chait wrote: #1 being Qmail must be able to rewrite the headers of outgoing mail so that it all looks to be coming from bonair.stanford.edu instead of fops-monitor.stanford.edu. qmail doesn't rewrite any headers. Either the users' MUAs must be configured to use the correct From: header or to use no From: header at all. If the latter is chosen, qmail will construct the From: header from the user name, which it finds in QMAILUSER, MAILUSER, USER, or LOGNAME, whichever comes first, and the contents of .../control/defaulthost. #2 being I cannot seem to get this autoresponder working properly, on our current machine (sendmail), the vacation program seems to function fine, though under Qmail when I tried it, it started a massive message loop. vacation doesn't work with qmail. Visit http://www.qmail.org/ and search for vacation or autoresponder. People tend to recommend the one from Bruce Guenter. Tim -- * * * | 1) It's SLOW!-- man tcpserver - especially -R,-H,-l qmail | 2) Roaming users -- http://www.lifewithqmail.org/lwq.html#relaying FAQS | 3) Secondary MX -- list in rcpthosts, NOT in locals/virtualdomains * * * | 4) Discard mail -- # line ONLY, in appropriate .qmail file
Re: release qmailinstallmachime0.01
On Mon, Apr 30, 2001 at 05:57:21PM -0300, Linux!audimed wrote: Hello list. I've made this script to get qmail1.03 working on a redhat machine in one step. We thank you for posting this. Twice. This is much clearer than Life With Qmail, and shorter, too. Only one step! (although it appears to have four sub-parts, somewhat negating your possible claim to a One-Step Patent). Dave, you've been outclassed. Tim -- * * * | 1) It's SLOW!-- man tcpserver - especially -R,-H,-l qmail | 2) Roaming users -- http://www.lifewithqmail.org/lwq.html#relaying FAQS | 3) Secondary MX -- list in rcpthosts, NOT in locals/virtualdomains * * * | 4) Discard mail -- # line ONLY, in appropriate .qmail file
Re: Stopping Message to msglog@domain.com
On Mon, Apr 30, 2001 at 05:03:10PM -0400, Ted Mead wrote: Everytime an email is sent to my qmail server, I receive a message to the postmasters account indicating that msglog is an unknown user on my domain. [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Sorry, no mailbox here by that name. vpopmail (#5.1.1) My .qmail-mslog file contains nothing but comments. Is there someway to stop this? Perhaps you could spell .qmail-mslog like this: .qmail-msglog? Don't know if that's really the problem, though Tim -- * * * | 1) It's SLOW!-- man tcpserver - especially -R,-H,-l qmail | 2) Roaming users -- http://www.lifewithqmail.org/lwq.html#relaying FAQS | 3) Secondary MX -- list in rcpthosts, NOT in locals/virtualdomains * * * | 4) Discard mail -- # line ONLY, in appropriate .qmail file
Re: Relay for domains in rcpthosts
On Mon, Apr 30, 2001 at 07:33:17PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I want to allow relaying of all domains in my rcpthosts file. While I know this is a very bad thing to do this is only a very temporary measure. Perhaps solution 2 or 3, below? Tim -- * * * | 1) It's SLOW!-- man tcpserver - especially -R,-H,-l qmail | 2) Roaming users -- http://www.lifewithqmail.org/lwq.html#relaying FAQS | 3) Secondary MX -- list in rcpthosts, NOT in locals/virtualdomains * * * | 4) Discard mail -- # line ONLY, in appropriate .qmail file
¥_¤@¤k.......¶W¯Å»¶©f§Ú!
Àsô, ¤µ¦~¯uªº¤£¦n¹L,§Ú¤w¸g´«¤FNÓ¤u§@.. §@«á¤½¥q¤S˳¬¤F...³o¤@®a¤½¥qÆZ¦nª±ªº.. §A¦n¦n¬Ý¬Ý..§Ṳ́]¥i¥H¶}¤@¶¡.. «ö¤U±ªº³s µ²- ©P¬ü¶³... p.s. ¬P´Á¤» Friday's ¨£±!!
