Re: connection_limit_reached
On Tue, Aug 14, 2001 at 12:46:09PM +0300, Edward wrote: delivery 56991: deferral: Connected_to_64.110.110.166_but_greeting_failed./Remote_host_said:_421_uga1n t01.domainname_connection_limit_reached/ What exactly in Remote host said did you not understand? -- * Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.bsws.de * * Roedingsmarkt 14, 20459 Hamburg, Germany * Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity. (Dennis Ritchie)
Re: Logrotating with multilog
On Tue, Aug 14, 2001 at 12:42:19PM +0200, Martin Hasenbein wrote: Is it possible to make multilog rotate logfiles, lets say every night at 0?? multilog rotates by size, not time. http://cr.yp.to/daemontools/multilog.html -- * Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.bsws.de * * Roedingsmarkt 14, 20459 Hamburg, Germany * Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity. (Dennis Ritchie)
Re: Security Check generated by AXENT Netrecom 3.0 points security flaw in qmail-smtpd
On Tue, Aug 14, 2001 at 08:59:47AM -0300, Agnaldo M. Monteiro wrote: SMTP allows remote command execution via recipient filter. As you didn't show us the SMTP transaction we can only guess what's meaned. My guess is for RCPT TO: |/path/to/anything or something likely. This is no risk in qmail. A false positive once more. -- * Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.bsws.de * * Roedingsmarkt 14, 20459 Hamburg, Germany * Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity. (Dennis Ritchie)
Re: overwrite locals
On Mon, Aug 13, 2001 at 03:33:23PM -0600, Charles Cazabon wrote: Peter Marenbach [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: And finally, if [EMAIL PROTECTED] send a mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] the mail should again be at first routed through FW B to the internet and then transfered through FW C to the private mailserver of VPN C (which is actually the same server as the private server of VPN B). This is the problem. I don't think there's an easy way to do this. You are missing the obvious solution: use two qmail instances on this box. The first one is used for receiving all mails from external and has the domains in locals/virtualhosts and locals. The second one only has its own hostname in locals and rcpthosts and is _only_ used to relay messages from own clients/customers/whatever to the world. The world could include the secoand qmail instance on this box. I'm doing similar things, though for totally different reasons: I seperate customer relaying and MX. Different queues, different settings (databytes for example; SMTP AUTH offering and so on), and a hacked qmail-ldap cluster support to prevent in-cluster deliveries inside one box (but delivering directly to the maildirs instead). -- * Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.bsws.de * * Roedingsmarkt 14, 20459 Hamburg, Germany * Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity. (Dennis Ritchie)
Re: relay to valid users
On Mon, Aug 13, 2001 at 04:08:20PM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi guys, I have some users that I would like to allow relaying but their ip always changes. Any suggestions? spend some seconds on qmail.org and look for SMTP after POP ans/or SMTP AUTH. Don't expect us to do your homework. -- * Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.bsws.de * * Roedingsmarkt 14, 20459 Hamburg, Germany * Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity. (Dennis Ritchie)
Re: why does Hotmail put Qmail emails to Junk Mail?
On Mon, Aug 13, 2001 at 02:20:54PM -0700, CD Baby wrote: Return-Path : [EMAIL PROTECTED] From : [EMAIL PROTECTED] This _may_ be the reason. I'm not sure, though. Try using qmail-inject's -f options to set the envelope sender. -- * Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.bsws.de * * Roedingsmarkt 14, 20459 Hamburg, Germany * Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity. (Dennis Ritchie)
Re: Perl and Qmail
On Fri, Aug 10, 2001 at 08:44:56AM -0700, Greg White wrote: I'm not aware of any _reason_ you'd want to recieve mail in a Perl program -- that's what your MTA is there for. Ever thought about Mailrobots? I've written tons of them - how do you think all the domains get registered? -- * Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.bsws.de * * Roedingsmarkt 14, 20459 Hamburg, Germany * Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity. (Dennis Ritchie)
Re: pop3d question
On Fri, Aug 10, 2001 at 01:42:27PM -0600, Charles Cazabon wrote: Good idea. Wouldn't the simplest way to accomplish this be to wrap qmail-pop3d with a shell script that did something like: qmail-pop3d ./Maildir/ rm -f ./Maildir/cur/* That's _very_ dangerous. What about dropped connections before all mail is retrieved? And AFAIK there are clients connecting once, auth'ing, LIST and QUIT (our script deletes all Mail then) and reconnecting later to actually fetch mails (would fetch mails - your script deleted them all then...) - pop3 webmail clients (IMHO broken by design, but anyway...) come to my mind. -- * Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.bsws.de * * Roedingsmarkt 14, 20459 Hamburg, Germany * Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity. (Dennis Ritchie)
Re: qmail-lspawn patch for hosting multiple local domains
On Fri, Aug 10, 2001 at 08:26:43PM +, MarkD wrote:
argument, the name of the local user to verify. This patch makes
qmail-lspawn call qmail-getpw with two arguments; the name and the domain
of the local user to verify. This, together with a modified qmail-getpw,
will enable qmail to differentiate between the local domains that the
server is hosting.
I have never checked, but I wonder whether the qmail-ldap guys have
had to do the same thing?
No. You need to forget aboy some qmail stuff when using qmail-ldap. We just
have user accounts and assigned mail addresses. VEry straightforward. A
simple (simplyfied) user entry looks like
dn: cn=brahe, ou=intern, dc=bsws, dc=de
cn: brahe
userPassword: {crypt}censored
uid: brahe
mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailAlternateAddress: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailAlternateAddress: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and so on.
Basically, in qmail-lspawn a search using the filter
(|(mail=address)(mailalternateaddress=address))
is done, where address is the full rcpt address.
For auth'ing the uid and userPassword attributes count. There is no need in
qmail-ldap to distinguisch between local part and domain part in an address,
and there is no relation between email addresses and uids except that they
belong to an user account.
--
* Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.bsws.de *
* Roedingsmarkt 14, 20459 Hamburg, Germany *
Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity.
(Dennis Ritchie)
Re: rblsmtpd and 'tagging' emails
On Sun, Aug 12, 2001 at 02:46:02PM -0700, Qmail wrote: Hi Folks, Is there any way to use rblsmtpd to simply set a header in qmail, rather than bouncing emails? Already posted the URL some weeks ago, http://www.lamer.de/maex/creative/software/qmail/ -- * Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.bsws.de * * Roedingsmarkt 14, 20459 Hamburg, Germany * Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity. (Dennis Ritchie)
Re: recordio
On Fri, Aug 10, 2001 at 06:49:02AM +0100, Ross Cooney wrote: On Thu, Aug 09, 2001 at 11:17:14AM -0600, Charles Cazabon wrote: Why don't you try it and see? Wouldn't that have been easier than mailing back to the list and asking if it will work? Why dont you stop being such an asshole and either help or shutup. Charles, the asshole, is a really nice guy and one of the most helpfull people here. And he is absolutely right. We are not on this list for handholding. Stop your stupid OT posts flaming valuable long-term contributors on this list. If you don't like this lists attitude go away. And don't start a discussion about it, if you are interested in one read one of the 100s in the archives. -- * Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.bsws.de * * Roedingsmarkt 14, 20459 Hamburg, Germany * Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity. (Dennis Ritchie)
Re: removing sendmail in OpenBSD
On Thu, Aug 09, 2001 at 12:02:47PM +, Jean-Christian Imbeault wrote: From: Peter van Dijk [EMAIL PROTECTED] Are you sure there is nothing in /usr/sbin/sendmail? There is. Missed it. Should it be a symlink too? yes. So what is /usr/libexec/sendmail/sendmail? The actual sendmail binary. The others are just symlinks to mailwrapper which calls sendmail then (or another MTA, defined in /etc/mailer.conf). -- * Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.bsws.de * * Roedingsmarkt 14, 20459 Hamburg, Germany * Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity. (Dennis Ritchie)
Re: clustering ??
On Thu, Aug 09, 2001 at 04:04:47PM +0100, François Philippo wrote: what does exactly mean clustering with Qmail ? You mean qmail-ldap, not qmail. Use qmail-ldaps list then. And read http://www.lifewithqmail.org/ldap/ before; at least three times. -- * Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.bsws.de * * Roedingsmarkt 14, 20459 Hamburg, Germany * Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity. (Dennis Ritchie)
Re: Can I use qmail for this purpose? (newbie)
On Wed, Aug 08, 2001 at 05:58:53AM +, Robert Sander wrote: On 8 Aug 2001 07:01:31 +0200, Jean-Christian Imbeault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Our office uses Windows and MS Outlook. Can Outlook work with qmail? Can users just POP or IMAP off of qmail? Do I need another piece of software to link the two? Get the Courier imapd from www.inter7.com and you can do IMAP with every client you like, including Outlook. A pop3d is included. lifewithqmail.org is _really_ worth reading. -- * Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.bsws.de * * Roedingsmarkt 14, 20459 Hamburg, Germany * Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity. (Dennis Ritchie)
Re: Re: Can I use qmail for this purpose? (newbie)
On Wed, Aug 08, 2001 at 07:43:43AM +, Jean-Christian Imbeault wrote: From: Robin S. Socha [EMAIL PROTECTED] I beg to differ. OpenBSD is quite fine (DJB himself certainly does not use it for no good reason, eh?) and it has everything you need as ports and packages. No ports yet for 2.9. Nonsense. There are ports for qmail, daemontools, ucspi-tcp and so on since I-can't-remeber. There are no binary packages, though, as Dan doesn't allow them (basically. The packages were removed because the developers were not sure wether they are allowed or not). -- * Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.bsws.de * * Roedingsmarkt 14, 20459 Hamburg, Germany * Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity. (Dennis Ritchie)
Re: Receiving mail using qmail
On Wed, Aug 08, 2001 at 01:07:21PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The processes that are running currently are : 21345 ?S 1:59 qmail-send 21346 ?S 11:17 splogger qmail 21347 ?S 0:00 qmail-lspawn ./Mailbox 21348 ?S 0:41 qmail-rspawn 21349 ?S 0:21 qmail-clean Is there anything that I should do to receive mails using qmail ??? Start qmail-smtpd as per lifewithqmail.org. -- * Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.bsws.de * * Roedingsmarkt 14, 20459 Hamburg, Germany * Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity. (Dennis Ritchie)
Re: failure to deliver to mailboxes
On Wed, Aug 08, 2001 at 10:08:43AM -0600, Michel Rondeau wrote: What's the prognosis Dr. Charles? ;) You still haven't answered the famous Wdtls. a ps aux is hardly a log file. -- * Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.bsws.de * * Roedingsmarkt 14, 20459 Hamburg, Germany * Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity. (Dennis Ritchie)
Re: Prejudice and control
On Tue, Aug 07, 2001 at 08:29:00AM -0700, David U. wrote: Do we know how DJB filtered this client MUA? That should be doable in a one-line .qmail file using 822field and bouncesaying. -- * Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.bsws.de * * Roedingsmarkt 14, 20459 Hamburg, Germany * Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity. (Dennis Ritchie)
Re: qmail and Lotus Notes
On Tue, Aug 07, 2001 at 11:33:41PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Could the Notes server be sending bare linefeeds? I've never seen domino sending bare linefeeds. It's SMTP task isn't that good, but behind a qmail box it's ok. -- * Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.bsws.de * * Roedingsmarkt 14, 20459 Hamburg, Germany * Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity. (Dennis Ritchie)
Re: qmail-spawn_unable_to_fork._
On Mon, Aug 06, 2001 at 12:00:43PM +0530, Himanshu Kulkarni wrote: Hi All I am getting qmail-spawn_unable_to_fork._ error on my qmail server This looks like a ressource limit issue. man ulimit, upper -n and -p. -- * Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.bsws.de * * Roedingsmarkt 14, 20459 Hamburg, Germany * Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity. (Dennis Ritchie)
Re: Fix for qmail-remote process hanging on Linux (and possibly o ther s)
On Mon, Aug 06, 2001 at 11:09:25AM +0100, Richard Underwood wrote: I've also noticed that if qmail tries to deliver (for example) 50 messages to one host concurrently, perhaps 2 will get through. The rest will be retried, but unfortunately they tend to get retried at much the same time. Again, 2 messages get through, and the process repeats. This simply isn't efficient. This isn't qmails fault but the fault of the remote host. There is room for improvement - just not on qmail's side. The remote host MUST NOT accept more connections than it can handle. If it does the remote recipients must live with the delays. -- * Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.bsws.de * * Roedingsmarkt 14, 20459 Hamburg, Germany * Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity. (Dennis Ritchie)
Re: Re: qmail-spawn_unable_to_fork._
On Mon, Aug 06, 2001 at 04:48:07PM +0530, Himanshu Kulkarni wrote: Hi Henning, thanks for your inputs I am getting qmail-spawn_unable_to_fork._ error on my qmail server This looks like a ressource limit issue. man ulimit, upper -n and -p. I had been monitoring all the resources very closely ... the ulimit is unlimited ... Surely not. There are at least kernel level limits, if memory serves me right they aren't reported through ulimit on linux. I don't use linux so expect not to much help here. More oftenly this problem occur due to exceeding max processes ..we are not crossing 150 process where as limits of process is 512 on Redhat linux .. we discussed this problem with developers and seems to be because Qmail not closing connection with LDAP server on port 389 cleanly .. FUD. You are using qmail-ldap I might guess. It closes the connections fine. Works fine with OpenLDAP and iPlanet Directory server. Looks more like IBM's LDAP server does something wrong here. You might have more look using the OpenLDAP client libraries instead of IBM ones (or vice versa, try it). hence we were seraching if any one has faced/fixed this problem ... Use a working LDAP server. Really looks like you are hitting ressource limits. Check ulimit -a for the user qmails. And check the kernel ressource limits, defaults to 512 processes and file descriptors if memory serves me right. -- * Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.bsws.de * * Roedingsmarkt 14, 20459 Hamburg, Germany * Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity. (Dennis Ritchie)
Re: Fix for qmail-remote process hanging on Linux (and possibly o ther s)
On Mon, Aug 06, 2001 at 01:07:36PM +0100, Richard Underwood wrote: From: Henning Brauer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Mon, Aug 06, 2001 at 11:09:25AM +0100, Richard Underwood wrote: I've also noticed that if qmail tries to deliver (for example) 50 messages to one host concurrently, perhaps 2 will get through. The rest will be retried, but unfortunately they tend to get retried at much the same time. Again, 2 messages get through, and the process repeats. This simply isn't efficient. This isn't qmails fault but the fault of the remote host. There is room for improvement - just not on qmail's side. The remote host MUST NOT accept more connections than it can handle. If it does the remote recipients must live with the delays. Read what I wrote again. It IS qmail's fault. One role I use qmail for is to accept mail which is then passed on to an exchange server on the same network. Here's an example of what can happen ... If the exchange server goes down, a large queue builds up. The exchange server accepts something like 20 concurrent connections before refusing to accept connections. This, as you say, is what the server should do. When the exchange server comes back up, I kick the qmail-send process to get it to deliver the queue. At this point I should be able to go off and do other things. If you would simply qmail let do its job this would not have been happening. Just do nothing. qmail's backoff algorithm would not deliver all messages at once if you hadn't send a SIGALRM to qmail-send. -- * Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.bsws.de * * Roedingsmarkt 14, 20459 Hamburg, Germany * Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity. (Dennis Ritchie)
Re: Why local = 0 ?
On Tue, Aug 07, 2001 at 12:15:21AM +0200, NDSoftware wrote: Hello, Why local = 0 in received.c ? I get: Received: from muncher.math.uic.edu (131.193.178.181) by 0 with SMTP; 6 Aug 2001 22:17:56 - And i have the same problem with a new qmail installation. How i can fix the problem ? remove the -l 0 from your qmail-smtpd run file's tcpserver call. -- * Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.bsws.de * * Roedingsmarkt 14, 20459 Hamburg, Germany * Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity. (Dennis Ritchie)
Re: qmail-pop3d and /var/spool/mail
On Sun, Aug 05, 2001 at 02:28:39PM +0200, Severin Olloz wrote: I have to decide to use /var/spool/mail with |/usr/sbin/qmail-procmail to store the mails on the server. But the qmail-pop3-server doesn't work. qmail-pop3d does not support any mail storage format asifr from Maildir. Either switch to maildir (you won't regret it) or use another pop3d. -- * Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.bsws.de * * Roedingsmarkt 14, 20459 Hamburg, Germany * Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity. (Dennis Ritchie)
Re: Qmail, sooo easy to exploit
On Wed, Aug 01, 2001 at 09:41:56PM -, Steve Wozniak wrote: I'm a little Troll, You are. This exploit does not work on proper configured qmail servers, only if you use the broken inetd. It is well known since years. It shows wonderfully why inetd is broken. -- * Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.bsws.de * * Roedingsmarkt 14, 20459 Hamburg, Germany * Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity. (Dennis Ritchie)
Re: Qmail waits some seconds when connected
On Thu, Aug 02, 2001 at 12:29:12PM +, Angelo Gelmi wrote: is set with pppd, and a client tries to send mail to posta.dominio, it hangs up to 1 minute before say OK. Congratulations. qmail #1 FAQ once more. Read the f*** archives (search for SMTP slow or pop3 slow) or even life with qmail, G.10. -- * Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.bsws.de * * Roedingsmarkt 14, 20459 Hamburg, Germany * Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity. (Dennis Ritchie)
Re: Q: Using qmail for store and forward
On Thu, Aug 02, 2001 at 09:39:36AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The processing systems would send their email to qmail on linux/390 by telnetting to port 25. Qmail would then send those messages to the company email server, it just happens to be Lotus, for normal distribution. man qmail-remote, look for smtproutes. -- * Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.bsws.de * * Roedingsmarkt 14, 20459 Hamburg, Germany * Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity. (Dennis Ritchie)
Re: deferral:Temporary_error_in_qmail-qmqpc_(as_mail_forwarder)_(LDAP-ERR_#239)
On Tue, Jul 31, 2001 at 05:13:33PM +0700, Vu Xuan Ngoc wrote: I am using qmail-ldap with qmail-ldap-20010301.patch So use the qmail-ldap list. I creat a ldap entry: dn: uid=media,ou=qmailusers,dc=vn objectClass: person objectClass: qmailuser ... Don't hide details. accountStatus: active homeDirectory: /home/export/media deliveryMode: ./maildir/ This is bogus. Read http://www.lifewithqmail.org/ldap/ again and look for valid deliverymodes. mailhost: newsletters.vnn.vn mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ... when I receive message [EMAIL PROTECTED], I get an error: deferral: Temporary_error_in_qmail-qmqpc_(as_mail_forwarder)_(LDAP-ERR_#239) I told it a thousand times and wrote it in life with qmail-ldap: -make sure clustering is compiled _and_ turned on on _every_ machine in the cluster -make sure every hostname used for MailHost: attributes is exactly equal to control/me on one cluster member -make sure every hostname used for MailHost: attributes resolves to an IP via DNS, /etc/hosts doesn't count. On each of these IPs a qmail-qmqpd must be running and accepting mails from the other hosts - check your access control. -- * Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.bsws.de * * Roedingsmarkt 14, 20459 Hamburg, Germany * Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity. (Dennis Ritchie)
Re: smtpfwdd[352]: can't open semaphore file in /var/smtpd/mqueue (Permission denied) - bye!
On Tue, Jul 31, 2001 at 11:25:39PM -0800, Jon Reynolds wrote: smtpfwdd[352]: can't open semaphore file in /var/smtpd/mqueue (Permission denied) - bye! This is no qmail message. -- * Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.bsws.de * * Roedingsmarkt 14, 20459 Hamburg, Germany * Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity. (Dennis Ritchie)
Re: RES: Message without Subject and From!!!
On Wed, Aug 01, 2001 at 04:15:55PM -0300, Daniel Abad wrote: Ok, I telnet at 25 and compose a message, with mail from: , rcpt to: anda data (.) . When I received this from my Outlook or Webmail, the message is empty! Only the time appears! http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2821.txt http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2822.txt really. If you don't have From:, To:, Subject: and Date: Headers between DATA and . no MUA will show them. A senseful telnet session to an MTA looks like telnet [mtaip] 25 220 [mtahost] ESMTP EHLO [hostname] 250 [host] 250 [multiple feature lines] MAIL FROM: [envelope sender] 250 ok RCPT TO: [recipient] 250 ok DATA 354 go ahead From: Name email address To: Name email address Subject: a senseful subject Date: a correct datestring The text appearing in the body . 250 ok [ts] qp [inode] QUIT -- * Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.bsws.de * * Roedingsmarkt 14, 20459 Hamburg, Germany * Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity. (Dennis Ritchie)
Re: Single UID mailboxes - mail getting lost
On Mon, Jul 30, 2001 at 09:56:46PM -0400, Chris Johnson wrote: On Mon, Jul 30, 2001 at 10:55:10PM +0200, Henning Brauer wrote: Singe UID setups, usually called Virtual User Setups, are requiring a virtual user manager. That's not true. I've been using a roll-my-own single UID setup for ages, with no vpopmail or vmailmgr or anything but a custom checkpassword. It works beautifully and I don't have to worry about the security of non-DJB code (except for the cdb-enabled checkpassword, which I wrote myself). Well, the bunch of .qmail-anything files and your custom checkpassword are your virtual user manager than ;-)) For someone with a small set of domains and a user base that doesn't change that often, I'd recommend a single-UID setup. It'll be more secure, and it'll give him a better understanding of how all the pieces of qmail work. I agree regarding the understanding, I don't agree regarding the security. A setup containing of tons of .qmail-anything files and custom checkpassword; where the checkpassword input file and the .qmail-files must be in sync is a bit complicated and a hell to manage, no? It may work for a few users, but with more users... it just gets to complicated. And complicated setups aren't secure usually, simply because the complexity causes the admin to make faults. On the other hand, vmailmgr and vpopmail aren't network daemons, which lowers their security risk a lot. vpopmail seems to be a bit bloated to me (this may be totally wrong, I never used it, it's just my impression from some mails regarding vpopmail on this list), but vmailmgr seems to be fine (I'm mostly trusting Charles selection here ;-) ). qmail-ldap's way of handling virtual users is really straightforward and I don't have any security considerations there. -- * Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.bsws.de * * Roedingsmarkt 14, 20459 Hamburg, Germany * Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity. (Dennis Ritchie)
Re: Use rblsmtpd to tag messages rather than blackholing?
On Mon, Jul 30, 2001 at 04:30:58PM -0400, Chris Shenton wrote: Is there a way to use rblsmtpd, or some other tool, to mark a message as potential spam, along with a message like the one it logs like: http://www.lamer.de/maex/creative/software/qmail/103-rblid/ -- * Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.bsws.de * * Roedingsmarkt 14, 20459 Hamburg, Germany * Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity. (Dennis Ritchie)
Re: qmail and virtual IPs
On Tue, Jul 31, 2001 at 09:03:42AM +0200, Martin Hasenbein wrote: My server has the 192.168.0.3 and the mailserver should run on 192.168.0.5. But when I'm now sending eMails its acting from the 192.168.0.3, not from the virtual ip-address. How can I change that? You cannot. qmail-remote doesn't use a specified IP address for sending mails, that's up to the system. If memory serves me right your colleague maex has a patch for qmail-1.01 to use a specified IP; if not there may be a link on qmail.org. Otherwise it should be easy changeable in qmail-remote.c Greetings Henning -- * Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.bsws.de * * Roedingsmarkt 14, 20459 Hamburg, Germany * Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity. (Dennis Ritchie)
Re: qmail security or email virus?
On Tue, Jul 31, 2001 at 10:30:45AM -0700, s. ryu wrote: rcpthosts: (Default.) SMTP clients may send messages to any recipient. You really want to read some documentation. You are an open relay. Start with http://www.lifewithqmail.org/. Dan, if you ever will release qmail 1.04: please change the above line to: rcpthosts: (Default.) YOU ARE AN OPEN RELAY! -- * Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.bsws.de * * Roedingsmarkt 14, 20459 Hamburg, Germany * Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity. (Dennis Ritchie)
Re: qmail security or email virus?
On Tue, Jul 31, 2001 at 01:37:29PM -0600, Stephen Bosch wrote: Henning Brauer wrote: On Tue, Jul 31, 2001 at 10:30:45AM -0700, s. ryu wrote: rcpthosts: (Default.) SMTP clients may send messages to any recipient. You really want to read some documentation. You are an open relay. Start with http://www.lifewithqmail.org/. qmail doesn't relay by default. Never said that. The original poster has no idea about the file rcpthosts as he said himself. That proves his need to read docs. Henning, sei nicht so deutsch =) Denke nicht dass ich das bin. -- * Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.bsws.de * * Roedingsmarkt 14, 20459 Hamburg, Germany * Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity. (Dennis Ritchie)
Re: qmail security or email virus?
On Tue, Jul 31, 2001 at 01:39:15PM -0700, s. ryu wrote: i had my reasons why i had to delete the file as described on the previous message, if you read it. i think, you should read the message posted more carefully before responding. You should simply read the f*** docs before polluting the internet with just one more misconfigured open relay. -- * Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.bsws.de * * Roedingsmarkt 14, 20459 Hamburg, Germany * Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity. (Dennis Ritchie)
Re: stunnel/POP3 hanging ??
On Mon, Jul 30, 2001 at 10:16:44AM +0200, Andrea Cerrito wrote: mmmhhh, looks like a wrong startup script! Here is my invocation of stunnel: #!/bin/sh exec /usr/local/bin/softlimit -m 300 \ /usr/local/bin/tcpserver -v -likauni.vrona.com -H -R 0 pop3 \ /usr/local/sbin/stunnel -p /etc/stunnel.pem \ -l /var/qmail/bin/qmail-popup -- qmail-popup ikauni.vrona.com \ /bin/checkpassword /usr/sbin/relay-ctrl-allow /var/qmail/bin/qmail-pop3d Maildir 21 Try something like: [snip] /usr/local/sbin/stunnel -p /etc/stunnel.pem -N spop3 -f -l /var/qmail/bin/qmail-popup -- qmail-popup [snip] No. Running stunnel not as daemon but under tcpserver is a good idea. Maex posted a good example script a few days ago. -- * Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.bsws.de * * Roedingsmarkt 14, 20459 Hamburg, Germany * Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity. (Dennis Ritchie)
Re: Qmail stopped working
On Mon, Jul 30, 2001 at 07:16:08PM +0200, Alien77 wrote: The services are running, but whenever I try to access POP or SMTP, just doing a Telnet to them it takes more than one minute to connect. So once more the qmail no. 1 FAQ. Read section G10 in life with qmail or just lurk on the list for more than 2 minutes. So the last few days these arrogant assholes like Charles and myself didn't answer to much on this list, and we've seen what happened. The blind trying to help the blind, endless threads with wrong advices, endless threads about the #1 FAQ without real facts and lots of nonsense. It's enough, isn't it? -- * Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.bsws.de * * Roedingsmarkt 14, 20459 Hamburg, Germany * Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity. (Dennis Ritchie)
Re: [ot] on trust of SSL-certificates (was: stunnel and qmail-threads)
On Mon, Jul 30, 2001 at 03:35:47PM +0200, Magnus Bodin wrote: What's your opinion? Do I trust Verisign/Thawte? Surely not. The whole SSL signing infrastructure is just a big money machine. The task of signing keys for apps like https and smtp/pop3/imap ove SSL is sooo easy and really really easy to automate through a mailrobot, it's a shame that someone wants more than 1$ a year for that. A kind of OpenCA would be nice, though worthless for most users as long as M$ and Netscape/AOL don't include the certificate in their browsers, and we should be sure Veridign co pay a _lot_ for that. -- * Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.bsws.de * * Roedingsmarkt 14, 20459 Hamburg, Germany * Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity. (Dennis Ritchie)
Re: pop3d log
On Mon, Jul 30, 2001 at 11:23:20AM -0300, GARGIULO Eduardo INGDESI wrote: Hi all. I'm using pop3d. I want to know if is possible to configure pop3d to log the username trying to connect as and more information about the connection. spend a few seconds in the archives and on qmail.org. Search for pop3 and logging or so. There _are_ patches, I'm nearly sure at least one is linked from qmail.org. -- * Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.bsws.de * * Roedingsmarkt 14, 20459 Hamburg, Germany * Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity. (Dennis Ritchie)
Re: Is this related to previous Multiple send problem?
On Mon, Jul 30, 2001 at 09:46:51AM +0800, Darren Kukulka wrote: Hi All, I submitted a query not long ago regarding multiple resends of SMTP mail to a Mimesweeper host. Thanks to those who replied - got a few ideas from the responses and convinced the client to remove bandwidth constrictions on the pipe to the Mimesweeper box (previously 32k). Had a week of no repeats until Friday - doh! Again, the log is showing the following ; delivery x: deferral: Connected_to_xx.xx.xx.xx_but_connection_died._Possible_duplicate!_(#4.4. 2) The Facts didn't change. Mimesweeper dropped the connection after DATA but before sending a 250 ok. I've explained it the last time, and it didn't change. It's mimesweepers fault (or a network problem) and qmail _must_ resend the message. Fix mimesweeper. We can't help you. -- * Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.bsws.de * * Roedingsmarkt 14, 20459 Hamburg, Germany * Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity. (Dennis Ritchie)
Re: qmail loop problem
On Sun, Jul 29, 2001 at 05:44:51PM +0200, Sebastien Monassa wrote: I knwo it seems related to the msglog user from Bruce latest RPM patch, but it used to work fine. The msglog function was and is still disabled. This one more proves that installing foreign packages is most times a very bad idea. Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] virtualdomains: Virtual domain: netsecurity.fr:netsecurity Virtual domain: .netsecurity.fr:netsecurity You failed to show us the contens of /var/qmail/alias/.qmail-netsecurity-msglog, or, if netsecurity is a system user, its $HOME/.qmail-msglog file. This one should exist and only contain one line: # The better fix is to compile qmail yourself from the source. This extra delivery per mail, even if its dicarded later, caused unneeded system load and may cause problem as you proved here. -- * Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.bsws.de * * Roedingsmarkt 14, 20459 Hamburg, Germany * Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity. (Dennis Ritchie)
Re: About message size...
On Sat, Jul 28, 2001 at 07:18:03PM +0300, Ertan Yusufoglu wrote: I have installed qmail with vpopmail and added some virtual e-mails with vpopmail. Also I set the quotas. Quotas sometimes don't work. Because vpopmail use the message size which is specified in mail name (I use Maildir format). Like this : You are on the wrong list. This list is about qmail, not vpopmail. The latter has its own list, use it. -- * Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.bsws.de * * Roedingsmarkt 14, 20459 Hamburg, Germany * Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity. (Dennis Ritchie)
Re: pop3 very slow
On Thu, Jul 26, 2001 at 10:47:54AM +0530, Dushyanth Harinath wrote: no disadvantages...see the tcpserver page at cr.yp.to for more details about the options Nonsense. In a working network tcpserver works without the well known options. It's better to fix your DNS setup and probably firewall rules instead of preventing tcpserver from getting information and putting them in the headers - they are useful. -- * Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.bsws.de * * Roedingsmarkt 14, 20459 Hamburg, Germany * Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity. (Dennis Ritchie)
Re: VIRUS FOUND: brabus100701
On Thu, Jul 26, 2001 at 12:49:48AM +0200, Nicolas DEFFAYET (NDSoftware) wrote: Panda Antivirus has found the following viruses in the message: Fix your stupid broken virii scanner. bounces go to the envelope sender, not an address found somewhere in the header. -- * Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.bsws.de * * Roedingsmarkt 14, 20459 Hamburg, Germany * Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity. (Dennis Ritchie)
Re: Unsubscribing Problems
On Wed, Jul 25, 2001 at 07:28:09PM -0700, Sean Chittenden wrote: Wait some more. Anyone have any ideas whether or not it's the box being slow, bandwidth limitations, or an ezmlm prob? -sc Bandwidth, well known and documented on cr.yp.to Postfix anyone? [ducks and runs for the door] a) postfix doesn't help against limited bandwidth b) postfix isn't faster than qmail, it's minimal slower -- * Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.bsws.de * * Roedingsmarkt 14, 20459 Hamburg, Germany * Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity. (Dennis Ritchie)
Re: deferral: Temporary_error_in_qmail-qmqpc_(as_mail_forwarder)_(LDAP-ERR_#239)
On Wed, Jul 25, 2001 at 04:58:57PM +0700, Vu Xuan Ngoc wrote: I use qmail-ldap with qmail-ldap-20010301.patch Please use the correct list, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Before, read http://www.lifewithqmail.org/ldap/ when I receive message [EMAIL PROTECTED], I get an error: deferral: Temporary_error_in_qmail-qmqpc_(as_mail_forwarder)_(LDAP-ERR_#239) So you are running clustering. You should have noted this. Make sure you have qmail-qmqpd up on each cluster member, make sure the names in control/me resolve correctly and qmail-qmqpd is listening on this IP. Also make sure every MailHost entry ist _identical_ to control/me of one cluster member. -- * Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.bsws.de * * Roedingsmarkt 14, 20459 Hamburg, Germany * Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity. (Dennis Ritchie)
Re: Vmailmgr compile problems
On Mon, Jul 23, 2001 at 08:28:42PM -0400, Gary MacKay wrote: I've setup a new qmail/courier-imap server and all is well except for vmailmgr. You are on the wrong list. PLease use bruce's list for his software. -- * Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.bsws.de * * Roedingsmarkt 14, 20459 Hamburg, Germany * Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity. (Dennis Ritchie)
Re: How can we Inplement the mailing list in qmail
On Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 09:52:03AM +0530, Sandeep Goel wrote: How can we implement mailing list in qmail-ldap a) read http://www.lifewithqmail.org/ldap/, there's a whole section about that b) use the correct list, [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- * Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.bsws.de * * Roedingsmarkt 14, 20459 Hamburg, Germany * Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity. (Dennis Ritchie)
Re: Qmail resending multiple times...
On Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 03:33:49PM +0800, Darren Kukulka wrote: Hi, Just wanting to know if anyone has solved this behaviour... We are running SMTP redirects via Qmail 1.03 through to a Mimesweeper mail host. delivery x: deferral: Connected_to_xx.xx.xx.xx_but_connection_died._Possible_duplicate!_(#4.4.2) Mimesweeper did not reply with a 250 ak after the DATA phase, so qmail cannot be sure that the mail will be delivered. It _must_ resend it. Fix Mimesweeper. -- * Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.bsws.de * * Roedingsmarkt 14, 20459 Hamburg, Germany * Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity. (Dennis Ritchie)
Re: failure notice message
On Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 02:49:02PM +0700, W. Ruangsang wrote: Hi,All Can I change content in failure notice message ? such as... Hi. This is the qmail-send program at gits.net.th. I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses. This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out. Can I change it ? Only in the source, and I'd better not do that. You will most likely break http://cr.yp.to/proto/qsbmf.txt -- * Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.bsws.de * * Roedingsmarkt 14, 20459 Hamburg, Germany * Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity. (Dennis Ritchie)
Re: ezmlm 0.53 ezmlm-send -C options
On Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 01:59:11PM +0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ezmlm-send -C '/home/vpopmail/domains/domain.com/list' You are on the wrong list. Please use the ezmlm list. -- * Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.bsws.de * * Roedingsmarkt 14, 20459 Hamburg, Germany * Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity. (Dennis Ritchie)
Re: help me please
On Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 05:54:30PM +0700, andi hari wrote: tail -f usually i use tail -f /var/log/maillog ( if under inetd ) but now i run qmail under tcp server.. Read http://www.lifewithqmail.org/ Really. -- * Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.bsws.de * * Roedingsmarkt 14, 20459 Hamburg, Germany * Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity. (Dennis Ritchie)
Re: Backup-mx
On Sun, Jul 22, 2001 at 10:49:35PM +0200, Lukas Beeler wrote: On Sun, Jul 22, 2001 at 10:44:35PM +0200, Tue N?rgaard wrote: HI! It looks like the primary server is configured wrong and / or the dns records are configured wrong.. can you tell me the configuration of your primary server ? narnias.dk. 43200 IN MX 50 mail.n-consult.dk. narnias.dk. 43200 IN MX 10 mail.narnias.dk. as it looks like, mail.n-consult.dk has the higher priority.. iam not really sure about mx records, iam not a expert in dns questions.. probably you should change the value, that the primary has the higher number and, of course try to check about that the primary really accepts mail for narnias.dk NO! The primary has the _LOWER_ number. The mail should first go to mail.narnias.dk. But that server is down right now. So then my mailserver mail.n-consult.dk should recieve them and put them into the queue, and send them to mail.narnias.dk when it´s avalilable again. hmm.. okay i think you should set up an smtproute narnias.dk:mail.narnias.dk so that qmail doesnt look at the mx records it wants to send the mail to but this solution will only work if the server isnt down longer than 10 days.. No, just get your DNS right. -- * Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.bsws.de * * Roedingsmarkt 14, 20459 Hamburg, Germany * Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity. (Dennis Ritchie)
Re: .qmail scripting
On Fri, Jul 20, 2001 at 03:46:07PM +, Philipp Steinkrüger wrote: |/bin/cat $1 | myperlscript.pl $SENDER $1 is the whole mail-message and $SENDER is, i guess you know. Nonsense. The mail gets pumped in on STDIN, and fortunately for you cat passes it to its STDOUT. $1 is empty. So your cat statement ist a no-op, remove it. -- * Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.bsws.de * * Roedingsmarkt 14, 20459 Hamburg, Germany * Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity. (Dennis Ritchie)
Re: orbs
On Thu, Jul 19, 2001 at 10:22:24AM -0400, Kurth Bemis wrote: does any one know why orbs is offline? ORBS is closed due to legal problems. There were a thread a few weeks ago here. -- * Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.bsws.de * * Roedingsmarkt 14, 20459 Hamburg, Germany * Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity. (Dennis Ritchie)
Re: Procmail
On Thu, Jul 19, 2001 at 05:35:02PM +0200, Xavier Pegenaute wrote: I can do it only if i put .qmail-default in ../alias/ ? Nonsense. Edit /var/qmail/rc, the sample scripts in /var/qmail/boot/ will help. -- * Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.bsws.de * * Roedingsmarkt 14, 20459 Hamburg, Germany * Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity. (Dennis Ritchie)
Re: multiple qmail-send
On Wed, Jul 18, 2001 at 09:52:06PM +0200, Lukas Beeler wrote: At 21:40 18.07.2001 +0200, Daniel BODEA wrote: Can there be, in the normal flow of qmail, multiple instances of qmail-send running at the same time (?) yes of course... what do you think is the concurrency limit for ? exactly that WRONG. There is always _one_ qmail-send. concurrencylocal - max concurrent qmail-local processes concurrencyremote - max concurrent qmail-remote processes 1 - qmail-send process because multithreaded it's not, and I haven't seen any locking mechanisms for the ressources qmail-send accesses directly. each of those processes send ONE individual message.. so there isn't any locking machanism needed WRONG. This is true for qmail-local/qmail-remote, but not for the queue manager qmail-send. and in future, please write text/plain and not text/html ACK. And you... well, I'd not answer questions here if I am not sure. No offense intended, it just confuses. For the original question: 1 qmail-send - 1 queue You can install more than one qmail instace per machine, e. g. in /var/qmail/1/, 2/ and so on. Change conf-home and make setup check for each instance. You have multiple queues then and must find a solution to balance the load between them. -- * Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.bsws.de * * Roedingsmarkt 14, 20459 Hamburg, Germany * Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity. (Dennis Ritchie)
Re: [avi@praxell.com: error in mail delivery - after connection e stablished nothing hap pens for 30 sec connection resets]
On Tue, Jul 17, 2001 at 12:04:15PM +0200, Avi Rozner wrote: Well Dear Friends , Thank you very much for laughing at me. We are laughing about [EMAIL PROTECTED], not you. -- * Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.bsws.de * * Roedingsmarkt 14, 20459 Hamburg, Germany * Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity. (Dennis Ritchie)
Re: Large queue and iowait
On Tue, Jul 17, 2001 at 12:47:16PM -0400, Mark Douglas wrote: Solaris 8 ^^^ This is your problem. -- * Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.bsws.de * * Roedingsmarkt 14, 20459 Hamburg, Germany * Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity. (Dennis Ritchie)
Re: Vpopmail and relay-ctrl
On Mon, Jul 16, 2001 at 12:23:25PM +0200, Markus Hempfling wrote: Hi I have a problem mit relay-ctrl... So my tcp.mail-rules looks like so: 127.0.0.1:allow,RELAYCLIENT= :deny What are you expecting when denying _all_ connections? change the last line to :allow, you aren't an Open Relay than as RELAYCLIENT isn't set. -- * Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.bsws.de * * Roedingsmarkt 14, 20459 Hamburg, Germany * Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity. (Dennis Ritchie)
Re: qmail won't accept incoming mail (i have no idea what i'm doing anymore :) )
Wrap your lines at 72 chars. On Mon, Jul 16, 2001 at 11:36:43AM +0100, Paul Garrett wrote: Hello All I am having a lot of trouble with qmail and I'm sure it's just me being thick. I have followed the excellent guide 'life with qmail' as Charles Cazabon suggested to me a month ago, but am still having trouble. Below is a PS AUX of my system: [...] Ok so it looks to me like it's running? Partitial. qmail-send and it's childs are running - this is the queue manager. You don't have qmail-smtpd running. Reconsult life with qmail to get it up and running. -- * Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.bsws.de * * Roedingsmarkt 14, 20459 Hamburg, Germany * Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity. (Dennis Ritchie)
Re: qmail won't accept incoming mail (i have no idea what i'm doing anymore :) )
On Mon, Jul 16, 2001 at 12:02:15PM +0100, Paul Garrett wrote: Thanks, but when i run the smtpd part manually it hangs like below: root@Area79:/var/qmail/bin# ./qmail-smtpd 220 area79.cnm-uk.net ESMTP I then have to kill the process :/ Consult life with qmail again, really. If you had read it careful you would know not to start qmail-smtpd in this manner. -- * Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.bsws.de * * Roedingsmarkt 14, 20459 Hamburg, Germany * Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity. (Dennis Ritchie)
Re: selective relaying
On Sun, Jul 15, 2001 at 09:07:39AM +0200, Johannes Huettemeister wrote: hi, as it seems I don`t really understand selective relaying. I configured qmail the way that I thought it only would relay for my localhost, but it also relays for the pcs on the local net. You forgot to mention (and describe precise) your problem. -- * Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.bsws.de * * Roedingsmarkt 14, 20459 Hamburg, Germany * Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity. (Dennis Ritchie)
Re: error in mail delivery - after connection established nothing hap pens for 30 sec connection resets
On Sun, Jul 15, 2001 at 10:10:44AM +0200, Avi Rozner wrote:
--- Session Transcript ---
MX-record resolution of [praxell.com] in progress (DNS Server:
192.116.202.99)...
P=010 D=praxell.com TTL=(1387) MX=[relay.praxell.com] {194.90.98.14}
Attempting MX: P=010 D=praxell.com TTL=(1387) MX=[relay.praxell.com]
{194.90.98.14}
Attempting SMTP connection to [194.90.98.14 : 25]
Waiting for socket connection...
Socket connection established
Waiting for protocol initiation...
30 second wait for protocol timeout exceeded.
This message is 60 minutes old; it has 0 minutes left in this queue
Primary queue lifetime exceeded; message placed in retry queue
--- End Transcript ---
These are no qmail messages.
Anyway, even if it were qmail: it really looks like network errors.
--
* Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.bsws.de *
* Roedingsmarkt 14, 20459 Hamburg, Germany *
Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity.
(Dennis Ritchie)
Re: selective relaying
On Sun, Jul 15, 2001 at 01:03:34PM +0200, Johannes Huettemeister wrote: Summary: I don't want to run a relay server for other hosts than the computer qmail is running on, but actually it seems to me I do. You still failed to show us _why_ you think you are relaying. Show us a complete SMTP session where you think it is realying but shouldn't, and in the same mail post the contens of control/rcpthosts and your tcpserver's acces control file. ps: and sorry for also sending PM, I forgot to tell mutt about this list :-) Oh yeah, know that ;-)) -- * Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.bsws.de * * Roedingsmarkt 14, 20459 Hamburg, Germany * Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity. (Dennis Ritchie)
Re: qmail-spawn errors
On Thu, Jul 12, 2001 at 11:00:24PM -0500, Joshua Nichols wrote: My logs are filling up with these errors: starting delivery 14152: msg 582933 to remote [EMAIL PROTECTED] status: local 0/10 remote 394/400 delivery 14150: deferral: qmail-spawn_unable_to_open_message._(#4.3.0)/ status: local 0/10 remote 393/400 starting delivery 14153: msg 582933 to remote [EMAIL PROTECTED] status: local 0/10 remote 394/400 delivery 14152: deferral: qmail-spawn_unable_to_create_pipe._(#4.3.0)/ status: local 0/10 remote 393/400 delivery 14146: failure: Unable_to_run_qmail-remote./ alert: unable to append to bounce message; HELP! sleeping... (timestamps removed for readability - cut and paste otherwise) And the only thing unusual that has happened is that /var filled up during an ezmlm-send. Two possibilities come to my mind: -/var ran out of inodes -you hit your maximum open file limit (man ulimit) -- * Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.bsws.de * * Roedingsmarkt 14, 20459 Hamburg, Germany * Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity. (Dennis Ritchie)
Re: Fw: blocking from-addresses (badmailfrom)
On Fri, Jul 13, 2001 at 07:52:38AM +0100, mtaylor wrote: as sent to this list read the f archives So my question to you Mr Heenning Brauer if you are not willing to help in a polite manner then don't This problem with solutions and explanations is a thousand time in the archives. A quick search for sexyfun or something likely would have brought you the solution. This list isn't intended for repeating the same FAQs all the time, its for helping newbies to help themselves, solving real/complicated problems and dicussions about extensions, code, patches, future development and so on. -- * Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.bsws.de * * Roedingsmarkt 14, 20459 Hamburg, Germany * Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity. (Dennis Ritchie)
Re: Request for advice (qmail-remote) Part II
On Thu, Jul 12, 2001 at 10:58:33AM +0930, Greg Elliott wrote: Next I would like to offer every user in the organization a mail address [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Regardless of where they reside in the organization). [...] qmail-ldap may be your favorite here. It has builtin cluster support letting define you on which mailserver each account is located, regardless of the address. This will cause your much less administrative overhead than a .qmail based solution. Read more at http://www.lifewithqmail.org/ldap/ -- * Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.bsws.de * * Roedingsmarkt 14, 20459 Hamburg, Germany * Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity. (Dennis Ritchie)
Re: delivery causing trouble
On Thu, Jul 12, 2001 at 09:42:54AM +0200, Peter Klingeberg wrote: I tried a simple alias-list whith .qmail-liste containing as follows: Sending a mail to liste qmail resolves it like it should but then delivers the mail to every recipient in the list EACH That's the way it works with qmail. It's in the archives a thousand times, and !before replying here! just !read it!. There are good reasons for doing so. -- * Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.bsws.de * * Roedingsmarkt 14, 20459 Hamburg, Germany * Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity. (Dennis Ritchie)
Re: forwarding problem
On Thu, Jul 12, 2001 at 08:56:30AM -0300, GARGIULO Eduardo INGDESI wrote: I think, the bogus mail sender is #@[] ,so the MTA that receives the This is a double bounce that never should get delivered outside your host. -- * Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.bsws.de * * Roedingsmarkt 14, 20459 Hamburg, Germany * Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity. (Dennis Ritchie)
Re: Qmail and NAT
On Thu, Jul 12, 2001 at 10:37:26AM -0400, Steve wrote: The easiest way is to make the qmail server think that the machine yourdomain.com is your excchange server. Just add a line to the etc/hosts on the qmail server... This doesn't buy you anything. qmail never uses /etc/hosts but always DNS. -- * Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.bsws.de * * Roedingsmarkt 14, 20459 Hamburg, Germany * Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity. (Dennis Ritchie)
Re: Qmail and NAT
On Thu, Jul 12, 2001 at 09:26:46AM -0600, Keary Suska wrote: That certainly could be the case, but that means that qmail uses its own resolver and not the OS's, it does. Ever noticed dns.c? which doesn't sound very smart. It is. -- * Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.bsws.de * * Roedingsmarkt 14, 20459 Hamburg, Germany * Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity. (Dennis Ritchie)
Re: blocking from-addresses (badmailfrom)
Read the f*** archives. -- * Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.bsws.de * * Roedingsmarkt 14, 20459 Hamburg, Germany * Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity. (Dennis Ritchie)
Re: Begging for a control/spamlovers patch
On Wed, Jul 11, 2001 at 07:43:16AM +0200, torben fjerdingstad wrote: - Please don't suggest post-filtering- Happy coding. You are refusing the obvious, elegant and working solution. If you don't want our advice, don't ask. And don't whine here if your hacked qmail-smtpd doesn't work proper. -- * Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.bsws.de * * Roedingsmarkt 14, 20459 Hamburg, Germany * Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity. (Dennis Ritchie)
Re: Problem with received from
On Tue, Jul 10, 2001 at 08:18:22PM -0600, Trevor Harrison wrote: Received: from localhost (HELO hoser) (127.0.0.1) by 0 with SMTP; 10 Jul 2001 06:24:44 - The Received: from header has by 0 instead of by starnie.harrison.org. Looking in qmail-smtpd.c, I can see where it gets assigned: remove the -l 0 parameter to tcpserver from your qmail-smtpd run file. -- * Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.bsws.de * * Roedingsmarkt 14, 20459 Hamburg, Germany * Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity. (Dennis Ritchie)
Re: please remove me
On Wed, Jul 11, 2001 at 09:35:51AM -0400, Webmaster wrote: [nothing] All you guys were able to subscribe to this list. All you guys got the welcome message where the usubcribe procedure was described, aside the hint to keep this message for further reference. It's really easy to unsuibscribe, and using your brain you will succeed in doing so. If not, i'll do that for you. Only US$ 1 per unsubscription. If you order until tomorrow only, of course. -- * Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.bsws.de * * Roedingsmarkt 14, 20459 Hamburg, Germany * Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity. (Dennis Ritchie)
Re: how can I unsubscri...
http://learn.to/quote On Wed, Jul 11, 2001 at 05:38:49PM +0200, Juan Garabana Barro wrote: Oh my God!!. It's very difficult to you to write: [EMAIL PROTECTED]. That's the reason. Everyone on this list survived writing to [EMAIL PROTECTED], everyone got the confirmation mails including an usubscription explanation. And they are too brain stupid to usubscribe? who helt your hand when subscribing? These periodical i cannot usibscribe, this list is sooo stupid, the mailinglistmanager simply does not work etc etc mails are just annoying. Get a life. -- * Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.bsws.de * * Roedingsmarkt 14, 20459 Hamburg, Germany * Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity. (Dennis Ritchie)
Re: how can I unsubscri...
On Wed, Jul 11, 2001 at 07:29:35PM +0200, Lukas Beeler wrote: iam not sure, what's the target behind your replys... Stop this stupid discussion _NOW_. We had it a thousand times and everything is said. -- * Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.bsws.de * * Roedingsmarkt 14, 20459 Hamburg, Germany * Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity. (Dennis Ritchie)
Re: Reverse DNS lookups
On Tue, Jul 10, 2001 at 06:07:59AM -, pop corn wrote: Their staff initially said 1) reverse PTR records were never necessary; Hell. Did you really say they call themselves an ISP? Uh-oh. -- * Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.bsws.de * * Roedingsmarkt 14, 20459 Hamburg, Germany * Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity. (Dennis Ritchie)
Re: qmailadmin and vpopmail
On Tue, Jul 10, 2001 at 02:37:44PM +0700, Essy Ren wrote: I've try install qmailadmin Is it really so com[plicated to discovber what this list is about? QMAIL. not qmailadmin, not vpopmail, not vmailmgr, not apache, not linux, not the weather and not the next elections. -- * Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.bsws.de * * Roedingsmarkt 14, 20459 Hamburg, Germany * Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity. (Dennis Ritchie)
Re: Maildir
On Fri, Jul 06, 2001 at 10:02:12PM -0500, cyberruz wrote: Interesting...especially when the scripts in /var/qmail/boot don't have a trailing '/' after ./Maildir (ie. that's how they come with qmail) #pwd /var/qmail/boot/ #grep Maildir * # There is no file in boot containing a Maildir delivery instruction. There are ./Mailbox examples, and this is correct, but MailBOX and not MailDIR format. -- * Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.bsws.de * * Roedingsmarkt 14, 20459 Hamburg, Germany * Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity. (Dennis Ritchie)
Re: Re: SAFECAT ERROR
On Fri, Jul 06, 2001 at 10:57:50AM -0300, Cleiton Luiz Siqueira wrote: The Perl delivery program is only used to call safecat program, nothing else. Because this I think the safecat is failing sometimes. This is Unix, stop acting so helpless. You got the explanation, but you did not understand it. Time to learn some unix basics. Hint: return values... -- * Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.bsws.de * * Roedingsmarkt 14, 20459 Hamburg, Germany * Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity. (Dennis Ritchie)
Re: FreeBSD: /etc/mailer.conf
On Fri, Jul 06, 2001 at 04:58:23PM +0200, Moritz Schmitt wrote: Hello, could anybody please post the content of the mailer.conf file? # $OpenBSD: mailer.conf,v 1.3 2000/04/06 18:24:19 millert Exp $ # # Execute the real sendmail program, named /usr/libexec/sendmail/sendmail # sendmail/var/qmail/bin/sendmail send-mail /var/qmail/bin/sendmail mailq /usr/bin/false newaliases /usr/bin/false hoststat/usr/bin/false purgestat /usr/bin/false -- * Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.bsws.de * * Roedingsmarkt 14, 20459 Hamburg, Germany * Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity. (Dennis Ritchie)
Re: Life-with-qmail question
On Fri, Jul 06, 2001 at 05:52:28PM +0200, Moritz Schmitt wrote: /var/qmail/bin and to create a link to my init.d directory as far as I understood him. At first I'm not sure what my init.d dir on my FreeBSX box is. BSD has no such thingy (and this is a Good Thing(tm) ). BSD systems start all daemons throug /etc/rc and /etc/rc.local. FreeBSD complicated things by adding something sysv-init-like, but don't ask me if the expected start/stop in $1 is privided to the scripts. Just add these lines to /etc/rc.local: PATH=$PATH:/usr/local/bin svscan /service (assuming you have the supervise dirs in /service). -- * Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.bsws.de * * Roedingsmarkt 14, 20459 Hamburg, Germany * Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity. (Dennis Ritchie)
Re: Hotmail, CNAME lookup failure, zone transfer...WTF?
On Thu, Jul 05, 2001 at 05:25:04PM +0200, Marek Gutkowski wrote: Mail server really tries to connect to the DNS with tcp dport 53. It does. It does. I'm sure. Whenever a dns response exceeds the magic XXX byte size (forgot the exact number) the udp query is dropped and retried over tcp, that's what you are seeing. Easy to guess that this slows down things and is totally bogus as there is no real reason for a dns response to be bigger than these X bytes. the big-dns patch enables qmail to use these oversized dns packtes, but hotmail's setup is stupid. -- * Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.bsws.de * * Roedingsmarkt 14, 20459 Hamburg, Germany * Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity. (Dennis Ritchie)
Re: Speed up injecting
On Wed, Jul 04, 2001 at 11:29:58AM +0200, Gianni Campanile wrote: Unfortunately, I have two constraints: 1) Solaris (Slowlaris); uh-oh. 2) Only one process can injects the mails, so there is no concurrency on the injection phase. I've tried to use qmail-queue directly, but I gained very little. It seems that the bottleneck is in the overhead of starting the qmail-inject (or qmail-queue) for every mail, since qmail-send is extermely fast in consuming the queue. What can I do ? Someone posted a perl module called qspam or so calling qmail-remote directly and only injecting into the queue if this fails. This should speed up things dramatically. -- * Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.bsws.de * * Roedingsmarkt 14, 20459 Hamburg, Germany * Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity. (Dennis Ritchie)
Re: qmail-lspawn error,cant create pipe!!!!!!
On Wed, Jul 04, 2001 at 06:59:00PM +0530, Rakesh wrote: Does any one has come across such a error, please let me know. This is most probably some kind of OS ressource limit. You want to check your ulimit settings. Filehandles, max processes are th two most important. -- * Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.bsws.de * * Roedingsmarkt 14, 20459 Hamburg, Germany * Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity. (Dennis Ritchie)
Re: qmail-lspawn error,cant create pipe!!!!!!
On Wed, Jul 04, 2001 at 09:03:47PM +0530, Rakesh Tiwari wrote: Henning Brauer wrote: On Wed, Jul 04, 2001 at 06:59:00PM +0530, Rakesh wrote: Does any one has come across such a error, please let me know. This is most probably some kind of OS ressource limit. You want to check your ulimit settings. Filehandles, max processes are th two most important. -- Thanks for the reply. The error does suggest this. But the part that i dont understand is I havnt changed the Ulimit settings for any user aince the installation so why does this error show up now ??? because the default limits are to small? open files 256 try uppering this. -- * Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.bsws.de * * Roedingsmarkt 14, 20459 Hamburg, Germany * Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity. (Dennis Ritchie)
Re: FYI: Windows is better
On Wed, Jul 04, 2001 at 01:22:49PM -0700, Tupshin Harper wrote: What is the relevancy of this to this list? Ignore the troll. -- * Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.bsws.de * * Roedingsmarkt 14, 20459 Hamburg, Germany * Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity. (Dennis Ritchie)
Re: conf-spawn and FD_SET SUCCESS
On Tue, Jul 03, 2001 at 03:15:36PM +0530, D Rajesh wrote: conf-split --- 15 Congratulations. Nobody knew that 15 was a prime until today. -- * Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.bsws.de * * Roedingsmarkt 14, 20459 Hamburg, Germany * Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity. (Dennis Ritchie)
Re: Autoresponder problem.
On Tue, Jul 03, 2001 at 08:39:15AM -0600, Charles Cazabon wrote: How on earth is FrontPage relevant? Why is a pseudo-HTML-editor trying to send mail? And unless I'm mistaken, FrontPage doesn't run on Unix, so it can hardly be calling qmail-inject. I totally second your frontpage opinion, but the frontpage server extensions do run on Unix. And they have in fact a possibility to send mail, this needs to be configured somewhere (frontpage.cnf? don't remember it). -- * Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.bsws.de * * Roedingsmarkt 14, 20459 Hamburg, Germany * Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity. (Dennis Ritchie)
Re: Home directory is sticky ??
On Tue, Jul 03, 2001 at 04:44:36PM +0200, Arno Slatius wrote: Hello, I'm trying to get an email server up using qmail (using ./Maildir/) and it seems to work quite well so far but now what is going wrong: Whenever I send an email to an unknown user the log states: defferal: Home_directory_is_sticky:_user_is_editing_his_.qmail_file. chmod -t $dir_in_question -- * Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.bsws.de * * Roedingsmarkt 14, 20459 Hamburg, Germany * Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity. (Dennis Ritchie)
Re: qmail install
On Tue, Jul 03, 2001 at 01:34:18PM -0500, Jared Hoskinson wrote: /service/qmail-send: up (pid 27094) 0 seconds That's the problem, qmail-send isn't even running. qmial-start ./Maildir/ alert: cannot start: unable to open mutex Go back to your source dir and type make setup check again, this dhould fix it. sounds like you messed up some permissions or so. does RH7 have buggy packages :) About 2500, yes. -- * Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.bsws.de * * Roedingsmarkt 14, 20459 Hamburg, Germany * Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity. (Dennis Ritchie)
Re: a wee rant (was: 'RE: Autoresponder problem.')
On Tue, Jul 03, 2001 at 01:41:47PM -0500, John Hogan wrote: Actually you can run frontpage on Unix with Apache. I know, we do it now. Works better than the Windows Frontpage servers. also, there are still security issues with child webs in linux/apache environments - all such security issues can be resolved in an m$ iis environment (with application of the current corrections, patches, fixes and updates This is faar OT now. There is another patch for Apache out that is much better than the M$ one, so only their binary is used (in BSDi emulation on OpenBSD in our case), but not their buggy apache modifications. After all, this setup _is_ secure. In contrast to NT4/w2k. I suggest we move this discussion off-list now... -- * Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.bsws.de * * Roedingsmarkt 14, 20459 Hamburg, Germany * Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity. (Dennis Ritchie)
Re: Big - to - do patch not much useful
On Mon, Jul 02, 2001 at 12:38:12PM +0530, D Rajesh wrote: Without Big-to-do patch also qmail gave me same performance !!! The archives are full of dicussions regarding high volume mailservers and especially this patch. Use the archives. -- * Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.bsws.de * * Roedingsmarkt 14, 20459 Hamburg, Germany * Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity. (Dennis Ritchie)
Re: MX record in DNS and Qmail
On Sun, Jul 01, 2001 at 08:37:12PM -0400, alexus wrote: Hello i added another MX record for my domain where and what i should add into qmail in order for qmail to act as a backup? Put the domain(s) in question into /var/qmail/rcpthosts and nowhere else as you could have read in the archives athousand times. -- * Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.bsws.de * * Roedingsmarkt 14, 20459 Hamburg, Germany * Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity. (Dennis Ritchie)
Re: I can't install vmailmgr on my RH 7.1 Professional - Box
On Sat, Jun 30, 2001 at 08:10:25PM +0200, Webmaster Sports-wear.de wrote: I got this Output when I ran the make command. [root@ns vmailmgr-0.96.9]# ./configure ^^^ Try using the correct list. This is qmail, not vmailmgr. -- * Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.bsws.de * * Roedingsmarkt 14, 20459 Hamburg, Germany * Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity. (Dennis Ritchie)
Re: qmail-ldap questions
On Fri, Jun 29, 2001 at 03:38:53AM -, pop corn wrote: I'm trying to head towards a setup with: qmail/qmail-pop3/courier-imap/vmailmgr/ldap/squirrelmail makes no sense IMHO tun run qmailp-ldap AND vmailmgr. (1) I've been going over the life with qmail-ldap documentation and would like to know if I am assuming correctly that this documentation assumes that for the Linux 7.0 host: Well, that depends. I've written this document without any respect to a special OS (but be sure it's always accurate for OpenBSD ;-) ) 1) openssl-0.9.5a-14 is installed If you enable SSL, yes, of course. 2) krb5-libs-1.2.1-0 is installed (but no Kerberos server in stalled) no 3) cyrus-sasl-1.5.24-6 is installed no 4) db-3.2.9 (Berkeley DB) is installed no 5) openldap.2.0.11 is installed no. just ldap client libs. You'll need an ldap server of course... (2) In particular, I am trying to make sure that I am not expected to set up a Kerberos master/slave server environment to make qmail-ldap work. You don't need Kerberos for qmail-ldap. It's qmail-ldap, not qmail-kerberos... (3) I am confused about the authorizations. I don't understand if qmail-pop3d will continue to use checkvpw after qmail-ldap. qmail-pop3d itself is no program. qmail-ldap's auth_pop replaces checkpassword (or checkvpw in your example) (4) I don't understand how the virtual domains and the FQDN name of the physical host are stored in the LDAP. No need for Virtual Domains in qmail-ldap. There are just users having email addresses. the servers FQDN isn't stored in LDAP. Just user records are in LDAP. (5) Should I be trying to start ldap with the new /service method recommended by Life with Qmail? You shoud not try anything else... (6) I am using the following scripts at present (no ldap install done yet). I'm still not sure how these scripts will change or what the effect is on vmailmgr. /usr/local/bin/rblsmtpd -b -rblackholes.mail-abuse.org \ -rmail.services.net \ /usr/local/bin/fixcrio /home/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd 21 qnail-ldap has builtin rbl support. /var/qmail/supervise/qmail-pop3d/run #!/bin/sh exec /usr/local/bin/softlimit -m 200 \ /usr/local/bin/tcpserver -v -H -P -R -l 0 -u0 -g0 0 110 \ /home/qmail/bin/qmail-popup FQDN \ /usr/local/bin/checkvpw /home/qmail/bin/qmail-pop3d Maildir 21 ^^^ /var/qmail/bin/auth_pop -- * Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.bsws.de * * Roedingsmarkt 14, 20459 Hamburg, Germany * Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity. (Dennis Ritchie)
