[qmailadmin] copyright notice

2011-01-14 Thread Trey Nolen
We received a notice of unauthorized use of an image in the mail today. 
The image in question is the picture of the mailbox on the qmailadmin
login screen named middleleft1.png.  I didn't find anyone bringing this
up on the mailing list archives.  Has anyone else received this notice?
The notice we received was from gettyimages
(http://www.gettyimages.com).  They are asking for a $600 settlement. 
Any comments or advice?


Trey Nolen


!DSPAM:4d30845732717060877232!



Re: [qmailadmin] copyright notice

2011-01-14 Thread Rick Romero

Quoting Matt Brookings m...@inter7.com:

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-

   Hash: SHA1
  
   On 01/14/2011 11:13 AM, Trey Nolen wrote:
   We received a notice of unauthorized use of an image in the mail today.
   The image in question is the picture of the mailbox on the qmailadmin
   login screen named middleleft1.png.  I didn't find anyone bringing this
   up on the mailing list archives.  Has anyone else received this notice?
   The notice we received was from gettyimages
   (http://www.gettyimages.com).  They are asking for a $600 settlement.
   Any comments or advice?
  
   Ignore them.  They're incorrect.


Who created that?  gettyimages are trying to sell the image:
http://www.gettyimages.com/Search/Search.aspx?contractUrl=2language=en-USfamily=creativeassetType=imagep=%23CA27907

Image: #CA27907

Rick


!DSPAM:4d30860f32711814529779!


Re: [qmailadmin] copyright notice

2011-01-14 Thread Dave Steinberg

On 1/14/2011 12:21 PM, Rick Romero wrote:

Quoting Matt Brookings m...@inter7.com mailto:m...@inter7.com:


 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
 Hash: SHA1

 On 01/14/2011 11:13 AM, Trey Nolen wrote:
 We received a notice of unauthorized use of an image in the mail today.
 The image in question is the picture of the mailbox on the qmailadmin
 login screen named middleleft1.png. I didn't find anyone bringing this
 up on the mailing list archives. Has anyone else received this notice?
 The notice we received was from gettyimages
 (http://www.gettyimages.com). They are asking for a $600 settlement.
 Any comments or advice?

 Ignore them. They're incorrect.



Who created that? gettyimages are trying to sell the image:
http://www.gettyimages.com/Search/Search.aspx?contractUrl=2language=en-USfamily=creativeassetType=imagep=%23CA27907

Image: #CA27907


First, the requisite IANAL.

I'm not sure I'd be comfortable ignoring the unauthorized use notice. 
I'd be the one getting fined and dealing with the hassle, not inter7. 
Do you guys have copyright over the image or is it licensed 
appropriately from the copyright holder?


I would guess that getty is going to continue bothering the OP unless 
there is some sort of response indicating that he is using the image 
legally.


Regards,
--
Dave Steinberg
http://www.geekisp.com/
http://www.steinbergcomputing.com/
http://www.redterror.net/

!DSPAM:4d308e9932711812379194!



Re: [qmailadmin] copyright notice

2011-01-14 Thread Matt Brookings
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 01/14/2011 11:57 AM, Dave Steinberg wrote:
 I'm not sure I'd be comfortable ignoring the unauthorized use notice.
 I'd be the one getting fined and dealing with the hassle, not inter7.
 Do you guys have copyright over the image or is it licensed
 appropriately from the copyright holder?

The guy who remade the templates way back when had ownership of the
image.  Gettyimages has some web bot that goes around looking for
images they sell.  Semi-automated harassment.

If you're concerned about the image, open it up, paste white all over
it, and be done with it.
- -- 
/*
Matt Brookings m...@inter7.com   GnuPG Key FAE0672C
Software developer Systems technician
Inter7 Internet Technologies, Inc. (815)776-9465
*/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAk0wkGIACgkQIwet2/rgZyySBACdGEEF+9+bZuK9FmSj5Vfk6+f9
iiQAn3RU5zZwsdhZUbz41aXW7y8HPuVN
=7VYp
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


Re: [qmailadmin] copyright notice

2011-01-14 Thread Trey Nolen


On 01/14/2011 12:05 PM, Matt Brookings wrote:
 On 01/14/2011 11:57 AM, Dave Steinberg wrote:
  I'm not sure I'd be comfortable ignoring the unauthorized use notice.
  I'd be the one getting fined and dealing with the hassle, not inter7.
  Do you guys have copyright over the image or is it licensed
  appropriately from the copyright holder?

 The guy who remade the templates way back when had ownership of the
 image.  Gettyimages has some web bot that goes around looking for
 images they sell.  Semi-automated harassment.

 If you're concerned about the image, open it up, paste white all over
 it, and be done with it.

I'd definitely remove the image and/or substitute it with something
else, but the notice that we receive indicates that just removing the
image does not absolve our responsibility to pay the fees.   Do you have
any proof of ownership for the image by the creator of the templates? 
Do you know who the creator was so that we might could make direct contact?


Trey Nolen





!DSPAM:4d309dab32716942481002!



AW: [qmailadmin] copyright notice

2011-01-14 Thread Dennis Körner
Yes it was me who wrote that blog entry. And I'm surprised that someone of 
Inter7 is respondig to this now. When I wrote to Inter7 and to this list some 
years ago. Noone of Inter7 was interested in that issue. They are _really_ 
ignorant to still distribute this image in an open source package maintained by 
them.
As I had contact to the original author of this image (Eric Pearle) it is 
_clear_ that Inter7 has _no_ licence for this picture. Because this image is 
under exclusive licencing by getty. And getty does not licence this picture for 
redistribution.
If you ask me: Inter7 is knowingly bringing users of qmailadmin in legal 
difficulties. And they are also ingorant about that. This is really hurting OS.

Regards
Dennis Körner 


---
Netzwerge Hamburg e.K.
Wandsbeker Zollstraße 13
22041 Hamburg
Tel.: 0 40 - 20 00 35 62
Fax: 0 40 - 20 00 35 61
i...@netzwerge.de
www.netzwerge.de
Amtsgericht Hamburg, HRA 104698

-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Johannes Weberhofer, Weberhofer GmbH [mailto:off...@weberhofer.at] 
Gesendet: Freitag, 14. Januar 2011 20:49
An: qmailadmin@inter7.com
Betreff: Re: [qmailadmin] copyright notice

I think, the image should be replaced in the next release; even when the fee 
could easily be reduced, it would be good to elimiate that problem.

It seems, that Getty works systematically; I have found one German case 
description: 
http://www.denniskoerner.de/blog/2010/04/19/arger-mit-getty-images-und-den-waldorf-anwalten-wegen-qmailadmin/
(english translation: 
http://translate.google.com/translate?js=nprev=_thl=deie=UTF-8layout=2eotf=1sl=detl=enu=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.denniskoerner.de%2Fblog%2F2010%2F04%2F19%2Farger-mit-getty-images-und-den-waldorf-anwalten-wegen-qmailadmin%2F
  ).

Best regards
Johannes


Am 14.01.11 20:02, schrieb Trey Nolen:


 On 01/14/2011 12:05 PM, Matt Brookings wrote:
 On 01/14/2011 11:57 AM, Dave Steinberg wrote:
 I'm not sure I'd be comfortable ignoring the unauthorized use notice.
 I'd be the one getting fined and dealing with the hassle, not inter7.
 Do you guys have copyright over the image or is it licensed 
 appropriately from the copyright holder?

 The guy who remade the templates way back when had ownership of the 
 image.  Gettyimages has some web bot that goes around looking for 
 images they sell.  Semi-automated harassment.

 If you're concerned about the image, open it up, paste white all over 
 it, and be done with it.

 I'd definitely remove the image and/or substitute it with something 
 else, but the notice that we receive indicates that just removing the
 image does not absolve our responsibility to pay the fees.   Do you have
 any proof of ownership for the image by the creator of the templates?
 Do you know who the creator was so that we might could make direct contact?


 Trey Nolen





 


-- 
|-
|  weberhofer GmbH | Johannes Weberhofer
|  information technologies| Geschäftsführer
|  Austria, 1080 Wien, Blindengasse 52/3
|
|  Firmenbuch: 225566s, Handelsgericht Wien
|  UID: ATU55277701
|
|  phone : +43 (0)1 5454421 0  | email: off...@weberhofer.at
|  fax   : +43 (0)1 5454421 19 | web  : http://www.weberhofer.at
|  mobile: +43 (0)699 11998315 |
|-




!DSPAM:4d30bd0632715598312382!



Re: AW: [qmailadmin] copyright notice

2011-01-14 Thread Trey Nolen
We have removed the image from our servers, but I would be interested to
know your resolution with regards to getty?  Did you pay them?

Trey Nolen


On 01/14/2011 03:15 PM, Dennis Körner wrote:
 Yes it was me who wrote that blog entry. And I'm surprised that someone of 
 Inter7 is respondig to this now. When I wrote to Inter7 and to this list some 
 years ago. Noone of Inter7 was interested in that issue. They are _really_ 
 ignorant to still distribute this image in an open source package maintained 
 by them.
 As I had contact to the original author of this image (Eric Pearle) it is 
 _clear_ that Inter7 has _no_ licence for this picture. Because this image is 
 under exclusive licencing by getty. And getty does not licence this picture 
 for redistribution.
 If you ask me: Inter7 is knowingly bringing users of qmailadmin in legal 
 difficulties. And they are also ingorant about that. This is really hurting 
 OS.

 Regards
 Dennis Körner 


 ---
 Netzwerge Hamburg e.K.
 Wandsbeker Zollstraße 13
 22041 Hamburg
 Tel.: 0 40 - 20 00 35 62
 Fax: 0 40 - 20 00 35 61
 i...@netzwerge.de
 www.netzwerge.de
 Amtsgericht Hamburg, HRA 104698

 -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
 Von: Johannes Weberhofer, Weberhofer GmbH [mailto:off...@weberhofer.at] 
 Gesendet: Freitag, 14. Januar 2011 20:49
 An: qmailadmin@inter7.com
 Betreff: Re: [qmailadmin] copyright notice

 I think, the image should be replaced in the next release; even when the fee 
 could easily be reduced, it would be good to elimiate that problem.

 It seems, that Getty works systematically; I have found one German case 
 description: 
 http://www.denniskoerner.de/blog/2010/04/19/arger-mit-getty-images-und-den-waldorf-anwalten-wegen-qmailadmin/
 (english translation: 
 http://translate.google.com/translate?js=nprev=_thl=deie=UTF-8layout=2eotf=1sl=detl=enu=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.denniskoerner.de%2Fblog%2F2010%2F04%2F19%2Farger-mit-getty-images-und-den-waldorf-anwalten-wegen-qmailadmin%2F
   ).

 Best regards
 Johannes


 Am 14.01.11 20:02, schrieb Trey Nolen:

 On 01/14/2011 12:05 PM, Matt Brookings wrote:
 On 01/14/2011 11:57 AM, Dave Steinberg wrote:
 I'm not sure I'd be comfortable ignoring the unauthorized use notice.
 I'd be the one getting fined and dealing with the hassle, not inter7.
 Do you guys have copyright over the image or is it licensed 
 appropriately from the copyright holder?
 The guy who remade the templates way back when had ownership of the 
 image.  Gettyimages has some web bot that goes around looking for 
 images they sell.  Semi-automated harassment.

 If you're concerned about the image, open it up, paste white all over 
 it, and be done with it.
 I'd definitely remove the image and/or substitute it with something 
 else, but the notice that we receive indicates that just removing the
 image does not absolve our responsibility to pay the fees.   Do you have
 any proof of ownership for the image by the creator of the templates?
 Do you know who the creator was so that we might could make direct contact?


 Trey Nolen








!DSPAM:4d30bd9d32711135820217!



Re: AW: [qmailadmin] copyright notice

2011-01-14 Thread Matt Brookings
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 01/14/2011 03:15 PM, Dennis Körner wrote:
 Yes it was me who wrote that blog entry. And I'm surprised that someone of 
 Inter7 is respondig to this now. When I wrote to Inter7 and to this list some 
 years ago. Noone of Inter7 was interested in that issue. They are _really_ 
 ignorant to still distribute this image in an open source package maintained 
 by them.
 As I had contact to the original author of this image (Eric Pearle) it is 
 _clear_ that Inter7 has _no_ licence for this picture. Because this image is 
 under exclusive licencing by getty. And getty does not licence this picture 
 for redistribution.
 If you ask me: Inter7 is knowingly bringing users of qmailadmin in legal 
 difficulties. And they are also ingorant about that. This is really hurting 
 OS.

We have not knowingly distributed any copyrighted material without
license.  Currently, it is our understanding that the image was added
to the qmailadmin login template by someone who held a license to use
the image.  We will be looking into this.

My own personal advise would be to blank the image on your personal
qmailadmin login page until we have verified whether or not the image
will be removed from the package.

Thanks!
- -- 
/*
Matt Brookings m...@inter7.com   GnuPG Key FAE0672C
Software developer Systems technician
Inter7 Internet Technologies, Inc. (815)776-9465
*/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAk0wvsgACgkQIwet2/rgZyyjeQCgjWRub3tIUDeCp9HbwtcmP4Oj
fgUAnjgvXGZ1/3HUW+rGAcOUgxhCQ3ek
=eldq
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


AW: AW: [qmailadmin] copyright notice

2011-01-14 Thread Dennis Körner
I looked on their normal pricing for using that picture in the web und doubled 
that fee as fine. In Germany they normally take 35 Euro. So I gave them 70 
Euro. After that they were satisfied. But I also wrote them (through my lawyer).

---



Netzwerge Hamburg e.K.
Dennis Körner
Wandsbeker Zollstraße 13
22041 Hamburg

Tel.: 0 40 - 20 00 35 62
Fax: 0 40 - 20 00 35 61

i...@netzwerge.de
www.netzwerge.de

Amtsgericht Hamburg, HRA 104698


-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Trey Nolen [mailto:supp...@internetpro.net] 
Gesendet: Freitag, 14. Januar 2011 22:18
An: qmailadmin@inter7.com
Betreff: Re: AW: [qmailadmin] copyright notice

We have removed the image from our servers, but I would be interested to know 
your resolution with regards to getty?  Did you pay them?

Trey Nolen


On 01/14/2011 03:15 PM, Dennis Körner wrote:
 Yes it was me who wrote that blog entry. And I'm surprised that someone of 
 Inter7 is respondig to this now. When I wrote to Inter7 and to this list some 
 years ago. Noone of Inter7 was interested in that issue. They are _really_ 
 ignorant to still distribute this image in an open source package maintained 
 by them.
 As I had contact to the original author of this image (Eric Pearle) it is 
 _clear_ that Inter7 has _no_ licence for this picture. Because this image is 
 under exclusive licencing by getty. And getty does not licence this picture 
 for redistribution.
 If you ask me: Inter7 is knowingly bringing users of qmailadmin in legal 
 difficulties. And they are also ingorant about that. This is really hurting 
 OS.

 Regards
 Dennis Körner


 ---
 Netzwerge Hamburg e.K.
 Wandsbeker Zollstraße 13
 22041 Hamburg
 Tel.: 0 40 - 20 00 35 62
 Fax: 0 40 - 20 00 35 61
 i...@netzwerge.de
 www.netzwerge.de
 Amtsgericht Hamburg, HRA 104698

 -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
 Von: Johannes Weberhofer, Weberhofer GmbH 
 [mailto:off...@weberhofer.at]
 Gesendet: Freitag, 14. Januar 2011 20:49
 An: qmailadmin@inter7.com
 Betreff: Re: [qmailadmin] copyright notice

 I think, the image should be replaced in the next release; even when the fee 
 could easily be reduced, it would be good to elimiate that problem.

 It seems, that Getty works systematically; I have found one German 
 case description: 
 http://www.denniskoerner.de/blog/2010/04/19/arger-mit-getty-images-und
 -den-waldorf-anwalten-wegen-qmailadmin/
 (english translation: 
 http://translate.google.com/translate?js=nprev=_thl=deie=UTF-8layout=2eotf=1sl=detl=enu=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.denniskoerner.de%2Fblog%2F2010%2F04%2F19%2Farger-mit-getty-images-und-den-waldorf-anwalten-wegen-qmailadmin%2F
   ).

 Best regards
 Johannes


 Am 14.01.11 20:02, schrieb Trey Nolen:

 On 01/14/2011 12:05 PM, Matt Brookings wrote:
 On 01/14/2011 11:57 AM, Dave Steinberg wrote:
 I'm not sure I'd be comfortable ignoring the unauthorized use notice.
 I'd be the one getting fined and dealing with the hassle, not inter7.
 Do you guys have copyright over the image or is it licensed 
 appropriately from the copyright holder?
 The guy who remade the templates way back when had ownership of the 
 image.  Gettyimages has some web bot that goes around looking for 
 images they sell.  Semi-automated harassment.

 If you're concerned about the image, open it up, paste white all 
 over it, and be done with it.
 I'd definitely remove the image and/or substitute it with something 
 else, but the notice that we receive indicates that just removing the
 image does not absolve our responsibility to pay the fees.   Do you have
 any proof of ownership for the image by the creator of the templates?
 Do you know who the creator was so that we might could make direct contact?


 Trey Nolen











!DSPAM:4d30bf0032711372221071!



AW: AW: [qmailadmin] copyright notice

2011-01-14 Thread Dennis Körner
Hi Matt,

I wrote two mails to your company in 2008 (qmailadmin@inter7.com and 
k...@inter7.com) and got _no_ response about that. So your company should have 
known about that.
I also talked to Gabriel Ambühl from Switzerland. He thought that picture came 
from Inter7.

Here are copies of these Mails:

---
2008-11-05 14:30 CET
qmailadmin@inter7.com
Hello! 

Yesterday I got a letter from getty images, UK. They told me I am using an 
image from their database without having paid for it and I have to pay 1250 
Euros now for that and remove the image. I was really shure not having used any 
images not taken by myself or not being bundled with any software I installed. 
So I read on to see which image they point at. It was the image shown at the 
login-screen of qmailadmin, which still was the original image that came with 
that package! That little postbox with the flying 'E' 
(http://mail.inter7.com/cgi-bin/qmailadmin). I'm a little bit confused now. 
Does anyone still have that image online or know, if it was licenced to Inter7? 

Thank You
Dennis


---
And on
2008-11-27 23:30 CET
k...@inter7.com
Hello Ken,

 

a few days ago I wrote on the qmailadmin-mailinglist that getty sent me an 
invoice over 1200 Euros (ca. 1500 US-$) because I used one of their images (the 
mailbox-image at the qmailadmin-Loginscreen) an my website. But I think noone 
takes this serious. Do you know if there exists a legal license for that image 
from getty for the qmailadmin-project? Or do you know who put this image in the 
project? In the changelog is nothing about that. If getty sues me in germany it 
would be very important for me to know who put this image in the project and if 
he had the proper license from getty to do this. If this were the case i could 
save a lot of money.

 

Thank you for your help!

Dennis Körner

--


---
Netzwerge Hamburg e.K.
Wandsbeker Zollstraße 13
22041 Hamburg
Tel.: 0 40 - 20 00 35 62
Fax: 0 40 - 20 00 35 61
i...@netzwerge.de
www.netzwerge.de
Amtsgericht Hamburg, HRA 104698

-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Matt Brookings [mailto:m...@inter7.com] 
Gesendet: Freitag, 14. Januar 2011 22:23
An: qmailadmin@inter7.com
Betreff: Re: AW: [qmailadmin] copyright notice

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 01/14/2011 03:15 PM, Dennis Körner wrote:
 Yes it was me who wrote that blog entry. And I'm surprised that someone of 
 Inter7 is respondig to this now. When I wrote to Inter7 and to this list some 
 years ago. Noone of Inter7 was interested in that issue. They are _really_ 
 ignorant to still distribute this image in an open source package maintained 
 by them.
 As I had contact to the original author of this image (Eric Pearle) it is 
 _clear_ that Inter7 has _no_ licence for this picture. Because this image is 
 under exclusive licencing by getty. And getty does not licence this picture 
 for redistribution.
 If you ask me: Inter7 is knowingly bringing users of qmailadmin in legal 
 difficulties. And they are also ingorant about that. This is really hurting 
 OS.

We have not knowingly distributed any copyrighted material without license.  
Currently, it is our understanding that the image was added to the qmailadmin 
login template by someone who held a license to use the image.  We will be 
looking into this.

My own personal advise would be to blank the image on your personal qmailadmin 
login page until we have verified whether or not the image will be removed from 
the package.

Thanks!
- --
/*
Matt Brookings m...@inter7.com   GnuPG Key FAE0672C
Software developer Systems technician
Inter7 Internet Technologies, Inc. (815)776-9465
*/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAk0wvsgACgkQIwet2/rgZyyjeQCgjWRub3tIUDeCp9HbwtcmP4Oj
fgUAnjgvXGZ1/3HUW+rGAcOUgxhCQ3ek
=eldq
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

!DSPAM:4d30c10532711395415866!



Re: AW: AW: [qmailadmin] copyright notice

2011-01-14 Thread Matt Brookings
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 01/14/2011 03:32 PM, Dennis Körner wrote:
 Hi Matt,
 
 I wrote two mails to your company in 2008 (qmailadmin@inter7.com and 
 k...@inter7.com) and got _no_ response about that. So your company should 
 have known about that.
 I also talked to Gabriel Ambühl from Switzerland. He thought that picture 
 came from Inter7.

Sorry, this was not brought to my attention.  Inter7 is not the source
of this image.  It was added by a contributor.
- -- 
/*
Matt Brookings m...@inter7.com   GnuPG Key FAE0672C
Software developer Systems technician
Inter7 Internet Technologies, Inc. (815)776-9465
*/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAk0wwuEACgkQIwet2/rgZyyKygCggeRv49E7ZGwh9EPl81c1+PFQ
TgUAoIvzvE9WWUXdQWerqpB+sB+248py
=pfwk
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


[qmailadmin] qmailadmin 1.2.15 on SourceForge

2011-01-14 Thread Matt Brookings
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

qmailadmin v1.2.15 is available on SourceForge.  The change updates
the login screen background to be solid white.

Alternatively, you may 'wget
http://mail.inter7.com/images/qmailadmin/middleleft1.png' to manually
update your existing installation.

Thanks!
- -- 
/*
Matt Brookings m...@inter7.com   GnuPG Key FAE0672C
Software developer Systems technician
Inter7 Internet Technologies, Inc. (815)776-9465
*/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAk0ww1kACgkQIwet2/rgZyz/dACfa3oFUxgkIw2hmVKDse2f0rz6
OgsAnjEpNE45dLa62PcForavf716GBfR
=lzvR
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


AW: [qmailadmin] qmailadmin 1.2.15 on SourceForge

2011-01-14 Thread Dennis Körner
Thanks for the quick response. That's exactly what I did on my local 
installation. Good to know that this is fixed.


---
Netzwerge Hamburg e.K.
Wandsbeker Zollstraße 13
22041 Hamburg
Tel.: 0 40 - 20 00 35 62
Fax: 0 40 - 20 00 35 61
i...@netzwerge.de
www.netzwerge.de
Amtsgericht Hamburg, HRA 104698

-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Matt Brookings [mailto:m...@inter7.com] 
Gesendet: Freitag, 14. Januar 2011 22:43
An: qmailadmin@inter7.com
Betreff: [qmailadmin] qmailadmin 1.2.15 on SourceForge

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

qmailadmin v1.2.15 is available on SourceForge.  The change updates the login 
screen background to be solid white.

Alternatively, you may 'wget
http://mail.inter7.com/images/qmailadmin/middleleft1.png' to manually update 
your existing installation.

Thanks!
- --
/*
Matt Brookings m...@inter7.com   GnuPG Key FAE0672C
Software developer Systems technician
Inter7 Internet Technologies, Inc. (815)776-9465
*/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAk0ww1kACgkQIwet2/rgZyz/dACfa3oFUxgkIw2hmVKDse2f0rz6
OgsAnjEpNE45dLa62PcForavf716GBfR
=lzvR
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

!DSPAM:4d30c42132712114213511!