Re: [qmailtoaster] OCR antispam for QMT

[PakOgah]

sorry , I can't access the website
http://fuzzyocr.own-hero.net/browser/tags/tarballs/FuzzyOcr-2.3b.tar.gz

does any body can submit fuzzyocr to rapidshare or megaupload and sent me
teh link or send me in private email

thx you.


> Hi Carlo ,
>
> You need to install separately the dependencies , here are my guidelines
>
> 1. NetPBM - Verify if you have netpbm if you dont have then you can
> install it using yum
>  #   yum install netpbm
>  #  yum install netpbm-progs
>
> 2.Libungif  -  Verify if you have libungif installed if you dont have then
> you can install it using yum
> # yum install libungif
> # yum install libungif-progs
>
> 3. Gocr - Download it (
> http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/jocr/gocr-0.44.tar.gz ) the run
> # tar zxvf gocr-0.44.tar.gz
>cd to gocr directory then
> # ./confgure
> # make
> # make install
>
> 4. Install Perl modules ( String::Approx and Time::Hires ) you can install
> this via CPAN
>
> 5. Download FuzzyOCR (
> http://fuzzyocr.own-hero.net/browser/tags/tarballs/FuzzyOcr-2.3b.tar.gz )
> untar the file then Put the FuzzyOcr.cf and the
> FuzzyOcr.pm files into /etc/mail/spamassassin
> # mv FuzzyOcr.words.sample FuzzyOcr.words ( and put
> FuzzyOcr.words to /etc/mail/spamassasin )
> # touch /etc/mail/spamassassin/FuzzyOcr.log
> # chmod 644 /etc/mail/spamassassin/FuzzyOcr.log
> # touch /etc/mail/spamassassin/FuzzyOcr.hashdb
> # chmod 644 /etc/mail/spamassassin/FuzzyOcr.hashdb
> # vi /etc/mail/spamassassin/FuzzyOcr.cf
>
> verify the path of the helper application changing the
> path if necessary
>
> uncomment focr_enable_image_hashing and change it
> value to 1
>
> run spamassassin -D --lint
> restart your spamd
>
>
> thats it :-)
>



-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [qmailtoaster] rules de jour via qtp-menu

[Jake Vickers]

Erik A. Espinoza wrote:

This is the new link: http://mysite.verizon.net/mkettler_sa/antidrug.cf

Actually the best thing to do is comment the line out, or remove 
antidrug from your config (already fixed, will be in next version). The 
antidrug file you're looking at is for 2.6 versions only. It's been 
included as a default in the new SA installations.


smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: [qmailtoaster] rules de jour via qtp-menu

[Erik A. Espinoza]

This is the new link: http://mysite.verizon.net/mkettler_sa/antidrug.cf

On 3/22/07, Jake Vickers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Erik A. Espinoza wrote:
> This was reported here:
> http://devel.qmailtoaster.com/flyspray/?do=details&task_id=18
>
> QTP has a different bug tracker, so I closed the ticket and set the
> close message to report to http://qtp.qmailtoaster.com/
?
Thanks.




-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [qmailtoaster] rules de jour via qtp-menu

[Jake Vickers]

Erik A. Espinoza wrote:

This was reported here:
http://devel.qmailtoaster.com/flyspray/?do=details&task_id=18

QTP has a different bug tracker, so I closed the ticket and set the
close message to report to http://qtp.qmailtoaster.com/

?
Thanks.


smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: [qmailtoaster] rules de jour via qtp-menu

[Jake Vickers]

dnk wrote:

It is:

qmailtoaster-plus-0.2.10-1.3.12
Send me a copy (offlist) of your /etc/rulesdujour/config and 
rules_du_jour script please.
I think what happened is I fixed it, but it won't be out until the next 
release - have to go back over my notes.

Thanks.


smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: [qmailtoaster] rules de jour via qtp-menu

[Erik A. Espinoza]

This was reported here:
http://devel.qmailtoaster.com/flyspray/?do=details&task_id=18

QTP has a different bug tracker, so I closed the ticket and set the
close message to report to http://qtp.qmailtoaster.com/

Erik

On 3/22/07, dnk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

It is:

qmailtoaster-plus-0.2.10-1.3.12



On 3/22/07, Jake Vickers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> dnk wrote:
> > has anyone else had this error after running the rules de jour in the
> > qtp-menu?
> >
> > Lint output: [3975] warn: config: failed to parse line, skipping: README:
> > [3975] warn: config: failed to parse line, skipping: WARNING: YOU HAVE
> > DOWNLOADED THIS RULESET from COMCAST. I am TERMINATING THIS ACCOUNT.
> > [3975] warn: config: failed to parse line, skipping: Someone else will
> > eventually have control of this webspace, possibly a malicious
> > spammer.
> > [3975] warn: config: failed to parse line, skipping: STOP using RDJ on
> > this file *NOW*
> > [3975] warn: config: failed to parse line, skipping: Also, make note
> > of the fact that this file is for users of SA 2.64 and below.
> > [3975] warn: config: unparseable chars in 'if you are running SA 3.0.0
> > or higher, you already have antidrug and this file': '3.0.0'
> > [3975] warn: config: failed to parse line, skipping: will merely
> > downgrade any improvements made by the SA devs.
> > [3975] warn: config: failed to parse line, skipping: Antidrug now
> > lives at:
> > [3975] warn: config: failed to parse line, skipping:
> > http://mysite.verizon.net/mkettler_sa/antidrug.cf
> > [3975] warn: lint: 9 issues detected, please rerun with debug enabled
> > for more information
> >
> > What is the best way to get rid of this?
> >
> It should have been fixed in the new version. What version of QTP are
> you running?
>
>

-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [qmailtoaster] rules de jour via qtp-menu

[dnk]

It is:

qmailtoaster-plus-0.2.10-1.3.12



On 3/22/07, Jake Vickers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

dnk wrote:
> has anyone else had this error after running the rules de jour in the
> qtp-menu?
>
> Lint output: [3975] warn: config: failed to parse line, skipping: README:
> [3975] warn: config: failed to parse line, skipping: WARNING: YOU HAVE
> DOWNLOADED THIS RULESET from COMCAST. I am TERMINATING THIS ACCOUNT.
> [3975] warn: config: failed to parse line, skipping: Someone else will
> eventually have control of this webspace, possibly a malicious
> spammer.
> [3975] warn: config: failed to parse line, skipping: STOP using RDJ on
> this file *NOW*
> [3975] warn: config: failed to parse line, skipping: Also, make note
> of the fact that this file is for users of SA 2.64 and below.
> [3975] warn: config: unparseable chars in 'if you are running SA 3.0.0
> or higher, you already have antidrug and this file': '3.0.0'
> [3975] warn: config: failed to parse line, skipping: will merely
> downgrade any improvements made by the SA devs.
> [3975] warn: config: failed to parse line, skipping: Antidrug now
> lives at:
> [3975] warn: config: failed to parse line, skipping:
> http://mysite.verizon.net/mkettler_sa/antidrug.cf
> [3975] warn: lint: 9 issues detected, please rerun with debug enabled
> for more information
>
> What is the best way to get rid of this?
>
It should have been fixed in the new version. What version of QTP are
you running?




-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [qmailtoaster] rules de jour via qtp-menu

[Jake Vickers]

dnk wrote:
has anyone else had this error after running the rules de jour in the 
qtp-menu?


Lint output: [3975] warn: config: failed to parse line, skipping: README:
[3975] warn: config: failed to parse line, skipping: WARNING: YOU HAVE
DOWNLOADED THIS RULESET from COMCAST. I am TERMINATING THIS ACCOUNT.
[3975] warn: config: failed to parse line, skipping: Someone else will
eventually have control of this webspace, possibly a malicious
spammer.
[3975] warn: config: failed to parse line, skipping: STOP using RDJ on
this file *NOW*
[3975] warn: config: failed to parse line, skipping: Also, make note
of the fact that this file is for users of SA 2.64 and below.
[3975] warn: config: unparseable chars in 'if you are running SA 3.0.0
or higher, you already have antidrug and this file': '3.0.0'
[3975] warn: config: failed to parse line, skipping: will merely
downgrade any improvements made by the SA devs.
[3975] warn: config: failed to parse line, skipping: Antidrug now 
lives at:

[3975] warn: config: failed to parse line, skipping:
http://mysite.verizon.net/mkettler_sa/antidrug.cf
[3975] warn: lint: 9 issues detected, please rerun with debug enabled
for more information

What is the best way to get rid of this?

It should have been fixed in the new version. What version of QTP are 
you running?


smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

[qmailtoaster] rules de jour via qtp-menu

[dnk]

has anyone else had this error after running the rules de jour in the qtp-menu?

Lint output: [3975] warn: config: failed to parse line, skipping: README:
[3975] warn: config: failed to parse line, skipping: WARNING: YOU HAVE
DOWNLOADED THIS RULESET from COMCAST. I am TERMINATING THIS ACCOUNT.
[3975] warn: config: failed to parse line, skipping: Someone else will
eventually have control of this webspace, possibly a malicious
spammer.
[3975] warn: config: failed to parse line, skipping: STOP using RDJ on
this file *NOW*
[3975] warn: config: failed to parse line, skipping: Also, make note
of the fact that this file is for users of SA 2.64 and below.
[3975] warn: config: unparseable chars in 'if you are running SA 3.0.0
or higher, you already have antidrug and this file': '3.0.0'
[3975] warn: config: failed to parse line, skipping: will merely
downgrade any improvements made by the SA devs.
[3975] warn: config: failed to parse line, skipping: Antidrug now lives at:
[3975] warn: config: failed to parse line, skipping:
http://mysite.verizon.net/mkettler_sa/antidrug.cf
[3975] warn: lint: 9 issues detected, please rerun with debug enabled
for more information

What is the best way to get rid of this?

d

-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [qmailtoaster] Help interpreting a qmail log.

[Jim Shupert, Jr.]

This may be a ..very newbie question...
but matters such as
" ...in the next release of the qmail-toaster package ..."
... this is where it is good to do updating via qmaip-plus.

meaning - when one updates ( via qmailToaster-plus )
You get the 'Next' release - the current release- yes?

or to say it another way - would you be suggesting that
James F. Jarrett update again when the newest vers comes out?

thanks

j

- Original Message - 
From: "Erik A. Espinoza" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

To: 
Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2007 2:11 PM
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Help interpreting a qmail log.



Please provide qmail-toaster versions:

rpm -qa | grep toaster

If I had to guess, you are running an old version of the qmail-toaster
package with the bad qmail-dk, which rejected mail silently.

We will be disabling qmail-dk by default altogether in the next
release of the qmail-toaster package. It is just too broken.

Erik

On 3/22/07, James F. Jarrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:

Thanks for all the suggestions: Here is what I have done:

Verified (In /var/log/qmail/smtp) that the mail was received by the
toster.

Found *NO* other references to the student's e-mail address ANYWHERE in
ANY of the log files other than that one, and there is nothing in the
teacher's mail queue (tho that is not surprising as all our teachers
download their mail with outlook).

So I guess it just vanished...


>
>
--
James F. Jarrett
Information Systems Associate
Charlotte Country Day School



-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]






-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [qmailtoaster] Help interpreting a qmail log.

[Erik A. Espinoza]

I imagine you are talking about DomainKeys.

The only way to truly disable it is to do the following:
# cd /var/qmail/bin
# ln -sf qmail-queue.orig qmail-queue

This will be done on the next qmail-toaster release.

Modifying the tcp rules does not properly disable it. The qmail-dk
code is just horrid and broken. It will not be put back in until it is
fixed.

Erik

On 3/22/07, Janno Sannik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

dumb quiestion, but what should be modified in tcprules to disable it
(just by removing environment variable?)?

David Sánchez Martín wrote:
> About domainkeys patch:
>
> AFAIK i only had _unlogged_rejects_ (qq permanent errors) of accepting mail
> and NOT silent deletions.
>
> Sender should receive a nice mail rejection notice from qmail, and email is
> not lost, just refused.
>
> On the other hand, I truly think dk must be disabled, in a current toaster
> deployment.
>
>
> *-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*
>  |
> David Sanchez Martin | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Administrador de Sistemas|   http://www.e2000.es
> E2000 Nuevas Tecnologias |
>  |
> E2000 Organizacion de Empresarios|Tel : +34 902 19 61 77
>   Mediadores de Seguros  |
>  |
> Agustin Bravo Esquina Calle C|
> 33120 Pravia Asturias Spain  |
>  |
> *-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*
>
>
>
> -Mensaje original-
> De: James F. Jarrett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Enviado el: jueves, 22 de marzo de 2007 19:18
> Para: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
> Asunto: Re: [qmailtoaster] Help interpreting a qmail log.
>
> Right I know, in my first message I said later that same day we updated
> to a newer version that does not delete silently.  *BUT* I had (and
> have* domainkeys disabled!
>
> James
>
> On Thu, 2007-03-22 at 11:11 -0700, Erik A. Espinoza wrote:
>
>> Please provide qmail-toaster versions:
>>
>> rpm -qa | grep toaster
>>
>> If I had to guess, you are running an old version of the qmail-toaster
>> package with the bad qmail-dk, which rejected mail silently.
>>
>> We will be disabling qmail-dk by default altogether in the next
>> release of the qmail-toaster package. It is just too broken.
>>
>> Erik
>>
>> On 3/22/07, James F. Jarrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
> wrote:
>
>>> Thanks for all the suggestions: Here is what I have done:
>>>
>>> Verified (In /var/log/qmail/smtp) that the mail was received by the
>>> toster.
>>>
>>> Found *NO* other references to the student's e-mail address ANYWHERE in
>>> ANY of the log files other than that one, and there is nothing in the
>>> teacher's mail queue (tho that is not surprising as all our teachers
>>> download their mail with outlook).
>>>
>>> So I guess it just vanished...
>>>
>>>
>>>

>>> --
>>> James F. Jarrett
>>> Information Systems Associate
>>> Charlotte Country Day School
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -
>>>  QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
>>> -
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> -
>>  QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>
>>


-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [qmailtoaster] Help interpreting a qmail log.

[Janno Sannik]

dumb quiestion, but what should be modified in tcprules to disable it 
(just by removing environment variable?)?


David Sánchez Martín wrote:

About domainkeys patch:

AFAIK i only had _unlogged_rejects_ (qq permanent errors) of accepting mail
and NOT silent deletions.

Sender should receive a nice mail rejection notice from qmail, and email is
not lost, just refused.

On the other hand, I truly think dk must be disabled, in a current toaster
deployment.


*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*
 |
David Sanchez Martin | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Administrador de Sistemas|   http://www.e2000.es
E2000 Nuevas Tecnologias |
 |
E2000 Organizacion de Empresarios|Tel : +34 902 19 61 77
  Mediadores de Seguros  |
 |
Agustin Bravo Esquina Calle C|
33120 Pravia Asturias Spain  |
 |
*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*



-Mensaje original-
De: James F. Jarrett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Enviado el: jueves, 22 de marzo de 2007 19:18

Para: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Asunto: Re: [qmailtoaster] Help interpreting a qmail log.

Right I know, in my first message I said later that same day we updated
to a newer version that does not delete silently.  *BUT* I had (and
have* domainkeys disabled!

James

On Thu, 2007-03-22 at 11:11 -0700, Erik A. Espinoza wrote:
  

Please provide qmail-toaster versions:

rpm -qa | grep toaster

If I had to guess, you are running an old version of the qmail-toaster
package with the bad qmail-dk, which rejected mail silently.

We will be disabling qmail-dk by default altogether in the next
release of the qmail-toaster package. It is just too broken.

Erik

On 3/22/07, James F. Jarrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


wrote:
  

Thanks for all the suggestions: Here is what I have done:

Verified (In /var/log/qmail/smtp) that the mail was received by the
toster.

Found *NO* other references to the student's e-mail address ANYWHERE in
ANY of the log files other than that one, and there is nothing in the
teacher's mail queue (tho that is not surprising as all our teachers
download their mail with outlook).

So I guess it just vanished...


  


--
James F. Jarrett
Information Systems Associate
Charlotte Country Day School



-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


  

-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]






-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [qmailtoaster] Help interpreting a qmail log.

[David Sánchez Martín]

About domainkeys patch:

AFAIK i only had _unlogged_rejects_ (qq permanent errors) of accepting mail
and NOT silent deletions.

Sender should receive a nice mail rejection notice from qmail, and email is
not lost, just refused.

On the other hand, I truly think dk must be disabled, in a current toaster
deployment.


*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*
 |
David Sanchez Martin | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Administrador de Sistemas|   http://www.e2000.es
E2000 Nuevas Tecnologias |
 |
E2000 Organizacion de Empresarios|Tel : +34 902 19 61 77
  Mediadores de Seguros  |
 |
Agustin Bravo Esquina Calle C|
33120 Pravia Asturias Spain  |
 |
*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*



-Mensaje original-
De: James F. Jarrett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Enviado el: jueves, 22 de marzo de 2007 19:18
Para: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Asunto: Re: [qmailtoaster] Help interpreting a qmail log.

Right I know, in my first message I said later that same day we updated
to a newer version that does not delete silently.  *BUT* I had (and
have* domainkeys disabled!

James

On Thu, 2007-03-22 at 11:11 -0700, Erik A. Espinoza wrote:
> Please provide qmail-toaster versions:
> 
> rpm -qa | grep toaster
> 
> If I had to guess, you are running an old version of the qmail-toaster
> package with the bad qmail-dk, which rejected mail silently.
> 
> We will be disabling qmail-dk by default altogether in the next
> release of the qmail-toaster package. It is just too broken.
> 
> Erik
> 
> On 3/22/07, James F. Jarrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > Thanks for all the suggestions: Here is what I have done:
> >
> > Verified (In /var/log/qmail/smtp) that the mail was received by the
> > toster.
> >
> > Found *NO* other references to the student's e-mail address ANYWHERE in
> > ANY of the log files other than that one, and there is nothing in the
> > teacher's mail queue (tho that is not surprising as all our teachers
> > download their mail with outlook).
> >
> > So I guess it just vanished...
> >
> >
> > >
> > >
> > --
> > James F. Jarrett
> > Information Systems Associate
> > Charlotte Country Day School
> >
> >
> >
> > -
> >  QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> 
> -
>  QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
-- 
James F. Jarrett
Information Systems Associate
Charlotte Country Day School



-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
BEGIN:VCARD
VERSION:2.1
N:Sánchez Martín;David
FN:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
ORG:E2000 Financial Investments, S.A.;Centro de Nuevas Tecnologías
TITLE:Administrador de Sistemas
TEL;WORK;VOICE:902196177
ADR;WORK;ENCODING=QUOTED-PRINTABLE:;;Agust=EDn Bravo 17 2=BA B=0D=0A33120 PRAVIA;Asturias;;;Espa=F1a
LABEL;WORK;ENCODING=QUOTED-PRINTABLE:Agust=EDn Bravo 17 2=BA B=0D=0A33120 PRAVIA=0D=0AAsturias=0D=0AEspa=F1a
URL;WORK:http://www.e2000.es
EMAIL;PREF;INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
REV:20060705T152542Z
END:VCARD


smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Re: [qmailtoaster] Help interpreting a qmail log.

[James F. Jarrett]

Sorry, when I replied I didn't give you what you asked for..

vqadmin-toaster-2.3.4-1.3.2
ezmlm-toaster-0.53.324-1.3.2
autorespond-toaster-2.0.4-1.3.2
maildrop-toaster-2.0.3-1.3.4
ezmlm-cgi-toaster-0.53.324-1.3.2
qmailadmin-toaster-1.2.9-1.3.3
simscan-toaster-1.3.1-1.3.5
vpopmail-toaster-5.4.13-1.3.3
clamav-toaster-0.90.1-1.3.11
courier-authlib-toaster-0.59.1-1.3.5
control-panel-toaster-0.5-1.3.3
maildrop-toaster-devel-2.0.3-1.3.4
send-emails-toaster-0.5-1.3.3
ucspi-tcp-toaster-0.88-1.3.4
qmail-toaster-1.03-1.3.14
courier-imap-toaster-4.1.2-1.3.6
libdomainkeys-toaster-0.68-1.3.2
qmail-pop3d-toaster-1.03-1.3.14
squirrelmail-toaster-1.4.9a-1.3.5
qmailtoaster-plus-0.2.8-1.3.10
daemontools-toaster-0.76-1.3.2
libsrs2-toaster-1.0.18-1.3.2
ripmime-toaster-1.4.0.6-1.3.2
isoqlog-toaster-2.1-1.3.3
qmailmrtg-toaster-4.2-1.3.2
spamassassin-toaster-3.1.8-1.3.7

On Thu, 2007-03-22 at 11:11 -0700, Erik A. Espinoza wrote:
> Please provide qmail-toaster versions:
> 
> rpm -qa | grep toaster
> 
> If I had to guess, you are running an old version of the qmail-toaster
> package with the bad qmail-dk, which rejected mail silently.
> 
> We will be disabling qmail-dk by default altogether in the next
> release of the qmail-toaster package. It is just too broken.
> 
> Erik
> 
> On 3/22/07, James F. Jarrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Thanks for all the suggestions: Here is what I have done:
> >
> > Verified (In /var/log/qmail/smtp) that the mail was received by the
> > toster.
> >
> > Found *NO* other references to the student's e-mail address ANYWHERE in
> > ANY of the log files other than that one, and there is nothing in the
> > teacher's mail queue (tho that is not surprising as all our teachers
> > download their mail with outlook).
> >
> > So I guess it just vanished...
> >
> >
> > >
> > >
> > --
> > James F. Jarrett
> > Information Systems Associate
> > Charlotte Country Day School
> >
> >
> >
> > -
> >  QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> 
> -
>  QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
-- 
James F. Jarrett
Information Systems Associate
Charlotte Country Day School



-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [qmailtoaster] Help interpreting a qmail log.

[James F. Jarrett]

Right I know, in my first message I said later that same day we updated
to a newer version that does not delete silently.  *BUT* I had (and
have* domainkeys disabled!

James

On Thu, 2007-03-22 at 11:11 -0700, Erik A. Espinoza wrote:
> Please provide qmail-toaster versions:
> 
> rpm -qa | grep toaster
> 
> If I had to guess, you are running an old version of the qmail-toaster
> package with the bad qmail-dk, which rejected mail silently.
> 
> We will be disabling qmail-dk by default altogether in the next
> release of the qmail-toaster package. It is just too broken.
> 
> Erik
> 
> On 3/22/07, James F. Jarrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Thanks for all the suggestions: Here is what I have done:
> >
> > Verified (In /var/log/qmail/smtp) that the mail was received by the
> > toster.
> >
> > Found *NO* other references to the student's e-mail address ANYWHERE in
> > ANY of the log files other than that one, and there is nothing in the
> > teacher's mail queue (tho that is not surprising as all our teachers
> > download their mail with outlook).
> >
> > So I guess it just vanished...
> >
> >
> > >
> > >
> > --
> > James F. Jarrett
> > Information Systems Associate
> > Charlotte Country Day School
> >
> >
> >
> > -
> >  QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> 
> -
>  QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
-- 
James F. Jarrett
Information Systems Associate
Charlotte Country Day School



-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [qmailtoaster] Help interpreting a qmail log.

[Erik A. Espinoza]

Please provide qmail-toaster versions:

rpm -qa | grep toaster

If I had to guess, you are running an old version of the qmail-toaster
package with the bad qmail-dk, which rejected mail silently.

We will be disabling qmail-dk by default altogether in the next
release of the qmail-toaster package. It is just too broken.

Erik

On 3/22/07, James F. Jarrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Thanks for all the suggestions: Here is what I have done:

Verified (In /var/log/qmail/smtp) that the mail was received by the
toster.

Found *NO* other references to the student's e-mail address ANYWHERE in
ANY of the log files other than that one, and there is nothing in the
teacher's mail queue (tho that is not surprising as all our teachers
download their mail with outlook).

So I guess it just vanished...


>
>
--
James F. Jarrett
Information Systems Associate
Charlotte Country Day School



-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [qmailtoaster] Help interpreting a qmail log.

[James F. Jarrett]

Thanks for all the suggestions: Here is what I have done:

Verified (In /var/log/qmail/smtp) that the mail was received by the
toster.

Found *NO* other references to the student's e-mail address ANYWHERE in
ANY of the log files other than that one, and there is nothing in the
teacher's mail queue (tho that is not surprising as all our teachers
download their mail with outlook).

So I guess it just vanished...


> 
> 
-- 
James F. Jarrett
Information Systems Associate
Charlotte Country Day School



-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [qmailtoaster] Help interpreting a qmail log.

[Steve Huff]

On Mar 22, 2007, at 1:47 PM, James F. Jarrett wrote:


A teacher at our school just came to me and said a student claimed to
have sent her an e-mail that she did not receive.  I did a search  
of the

smtp log and found these entries:

@400045f187171dd611b4 CHKUSER accepted sender: from 
remote  rcpt <> : sender
accepted
@400045f187171e46b5a4 CHKUSER accepted rcpt: from   
remote

 rcpt
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : found existing recipient


(The  and  are the student and teacher's email addresses
respectively).  I have two questions:

1:  How do I turn this information into a *TIME* of attempted  
delivery.


]$ cat ccdlog | tai64nlocal
2007-03-09 11:10:53.500568500 CHKUSER accepted sender: from  
 remote   
rcpt <> : sender accepted
2007-03-09 11:10:53.507950500 CHKUSER accepted rcpt: from   
remote  rcpt  
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : found existing recipient



2:  The teacher says she never got the mail, how do I figure out what
happened to it?


Have you already done a recursive grep through the teacher's Maildir  
looking for ?


It's probably not a bad idea to crosscheck with /var/log/qmail/clamd/ 
current and spamd/current to see if either of those logs show the  
student's mail being rejected or tagged as spam.




Oddly enough, we were running an older version of the toaster, and we
updated it to the current version that very evening (About 6:00 pm)  
but

that was *AFTER* this took place.

I only mention this as I had heard that the older version of the  
toaster

we were running had much poorer logging than the new one, and is the
main reason we updated.


-Steve

--
If this were played upon a stage now, I could condemn it as an  
improbable fiction. - Fabian, Twelfth Night, III,v





-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [qmailtoaster] Help interpreting a qmail log.

[David Sánchez Martín]

>
>1:  How do I turn this information into a *TIME* of attempted delivery.

Just pipe it thru tai64nlocal, like this:

cat mylogfile | tai64nlocal


>2:  The teacher says she never got the mail, how do I figure out what
>happened to it?

You must search it in the correspondent /var/log/qmail/send/* file.


>Oddly enough, we were running an older version of the toaster, and we
>updated it to the current version that very evening (About 6:00 pm) but
>that was *AFTER* this took place.
>
>I only mention this as I had heard that the older version of the toaster
>we were running had much poorer logging than the new one, and is the
>main reason we updated.

Logging in qmail was allways admin-unfriendly. It's great for statistical
tools but
not for seein it directly.

BEGIN:VCARD
VERSION:2.1
N:Sánchez Martín;David
FN:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
ORG:E2000 Financial Investments, S.A.;Centro de Nuevas Tecnologías
TITLE:Administrador de Sistemas
TEL;WORK;VOICE:902196177
ADR;WORK;ENCODING=QUOTED-PRINTABLE:;;Agust=EDn Bravo 17 2=BA B=0D=0A33120 PRAVIA;Asturias;;;Espa=F1a
LABEL;WORK;ENCODING=QUOTED-PRINTABLE:Agust=EDn Bravo 17 2=BA B=0D=0A33120 PRAVIA=0D=0AAsturias=0D=0AEspa=F1a
URL;WORK:http://www.e2000.es
EMAIL;PREF;INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
REV:20060705T152542Z
END:VCARD


smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

[qmailtoaster] Help interpreting a qmail log.

[James F. Jarrett]

A teacher at our school just came to me and said a student claimed to
have sent her an e-mail that she did not receive.  I did a search of the
smtp log and found these entries:

@400045f187171dd611b4 CHKUSER accepted sender: from 
remote  rcpt <> : sender
accepted
@400045f187171e46b5a4 CHKUSER accepted rcpt: from  remote
 rcpt
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : found existing recipient


(The  and  are the student and teacher's email addresses
respectively).  I have two questions:

1:  How do I turn this information into a *TIME* of attempted delivery.

2:  The teacher says she never got the mail, how do I figure out what
happened to it?

Oddly enough, we were running an older version of the toaster, and we
updated it to the current version that very evening (About 6:00 pm) but
that was *AFTER* this took place.

I only mention this as I had heard that the older version of the toaster
we were running had much poorer logging than the new one, and is the
main reason we updated.

Thanks for any help.

James
-- 
James F. Jarrett
Information Systems Associate
Charlotte Country Day School



-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[qmailtoaster] OT . Experiences with ucarp protocol

[Max Fontana]

Hi all.
Sorry for this litte OT. Just wanted to know if someone has already 
experimented with this "failover solution" applied to qmailtoaster .

As always , many many thanks in advance!
Max
Italy



-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [qmailtoaster] weekly thread

[Janno Sannik]

1) yes!
2) no comments
3) poll would be nice to know how much guys are running what :) Then it 
would be statistically clear if it's worth it or not.

Since I'm using RH/CENT/FC i can't comment on it much further.

Erik A. Espinoza wrote:

Hey Guys,

Here are some topics I'd like brought up! Anyone can bring up whatever
they want, of course.

1) Separate Patches: What do you guys think about moving from the
Mandrake style of patching to a Red Hat style of patching within rpms.
In the old Mandrake style, you would combine all of the different
patches into one big patch and apply that in the rpm. In the Red Hat
style, you keep each patch separate, like we have been doing recently
with the bigdns and require-auth patches on qmail-toaster. I prefer
the Red Hat style because when upgrades come out, such as the new
chkuser, we only have to rework the patches applied after the chkuser
patch, where as with the Mandrake style, you have to redo the whole
patch.

2) 1.4 Branch. I want to start the 1.4/maintenance branch soon. I
think it should include the following:
a) Simpler macros. We should tie similar OS's together, such as
cnt4/fc3  and fc4/fc5/fc6. This will make the spec files a lot easier
to read.
b) support for fc7/cnt5
c) patch cleanup on qmail-toaster + new chkuser

3) Mandriva/SuSE Support. Should we keep working on these? Seems that
the majority of our users are on FC or CentOS, is it worth using the
limited developer time we have to keep these OS's supported? Should we
just drop these?

Thanks,
Erik

-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[qmailtoaster] spamd stopped

[Kisakye Alex]

Hi All,

Just checked my #qmailctl stat  and I realized my spamd isn't running! This
is what I get from the spamd logs.

Anyone with idea on how to combat this

--

@40004601e17301592184 spamd: cannot create /tmp/spamd-3600-init: File
exists at /usr/bin/spamd line 2144.

@40004601e174026e9cac [3602] error: spamd: cannot create
/tmp/spamd-3602-init: File exists at /usr/bin/spamd line 2144.

 

--

ALex

Re: [qmailtoaster] Email Sending Failed... HELP!!

[Eric \"Shubes\"]

Your SPF record is a DNS TXT record that resides in your domain's
authoritative DNS server. See http://wiki.qmailtoaster.com/index.php/SPF

Gabriel Lai wrote:
> Hi Eric,
> 
> How do I configure for that?
> 
> thx
> 
> - Original Message 
> From: "Eric "Shubes"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
> Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2007 11:05:06 PM
> Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Email Sending Failed... HELP!!
> 
> Is outbound included in your SPF record?
> 
> Gabriel Lai wrote:
>> Eric, I used Outbound too ;) that's why I'm wondering why it doesn't
>> allow me to enter into their mail server. Moreover, I've check outbound
>> is not in the spam database... :(
>>
>> - Original Message 
>> From: "Eric "Shubes"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
>> Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2007 12:31:36 PM
>> Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Email Sending Failed... HELP!!
>>
>> P.V.Anthony wrote:
>>> On this day, 21-March-2007 11:19 AM,  Gabriel Lai wrote:
 nop, i don't have a reverse dns, what should I do? I host my dns under
 Dyndns.org due to my internet ISP is giving me Dynamic IP. So I've to
 host under Dyndns.org
>>>
>>> From what I understand, only the ISP that you got the Dynamic IP can
>>> give the reverse dns. Plus this is a dynamic IP so it may be difficult
>>> to get the reverse dns. I do not think you will get it.
>>>
>>> Now for the solution. If you are in the office where the dynamic IP is
>>> used, use the smtp server of your ISP.
>>>
>>> The simple way is just to configure your Thunderbird or any other email
>>> client to the smtp server of your ISP.
>>>
>>> The other way is to configure Qmail to send all outgoing emails to the
>>> ISP's smtp server. I know it can be done but I do not know how.
>>>
>>> If you are in Singapore, call me.
>>>
>>> P.V.Anthony
>>>
>>
>> I'm on a dynamic (pseudo-static) IP address too. You'll need to have an
>> outgoing relay service to reach many servers, more and more due to
>> blocklisting of dynamic addresses (thanks in part to zen.spamhaus). I use
>> dyndns.org's mailhop service. It's quite affordable, and works really
> well.
>> You configure your toaster to send outgoing mail via dyndns.org's mailhop
>> relay using the /var/qmail/control/smtproutes file. You can do this
>> selectively by destination domain (what I still do), or just let mailhop
>> handle everything.
>>
>> Alternatively, your ISP's smtp server might be used (some ISPs allow this,
>> some restrict use to their domain name). You can see if this works also by
>> adding an entry to /var/qmail/control/smtproutes to route outgoing
> email via
>> your ISP's smtp server.
>>
>> See http://wiki.qmailtoaster.com/index.php/Smtproutes for details on
> setting
>> up smtproutes.
>>
>> HTH
>>
>> --
>> -Eric 'shubes'
>>
> 
> 
> -- 
> -Eric 'shubes'
> 


-- 
-Eric 'shubes'

-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [qmailtoaster] adding additional domains to a toaster

[Natalio Gatti]

>> Correct. The web interface has been broken for a while, but it's still
>> there to do some general things like seeing all domains, password, etc.
>> easily. Creating domains with it will cause sporadic issues.
>> It's normal - okay, not normal, but known about.
> When you create the new domain via vqadmin, did you change the default
> values of "accounts", "forwards" ... and such? If you leave it in "0",
> then that's the problem.
> You have to specify the estimated number of accounts, lists and such
> so you can create them via qmailadmin.
Actually I've had issues doing it that way as well. I had a domain that
no matter how I created it in the web page would always give me whacked
out numbers when listed. If I deleted the domain and created one with a
different name it would work okay. Just that particular domain (even
when I created it AFTER the working fake-domain) always got insane
values when created.


wowww, never happened to me... an other point to stop using vqadmin.
It was a nice web UI!

-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [qmailtoaster] adding additional domains to a toaster

[Jake Vickers]

Natalio Gatti wrote:

On 3/21/07, Jake Vickers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


Correct. The web interface has been broken for a while, but it's still
there to do some general things like seeing all domains, password, etc.
easily. Creating domains with it will cause sporadic issues.
It's normal - okay, not normal, but known about.

When you create the new domain via vqadmin, did you change the default
values of "accounts", "forwards" ... and such? If you leave it in "0",
then that's the problem.
You have to specify the estimated number of accounts, lists and such
so you can create them via qmailadmin.
Actually I've had issues doing it that way as well. I had a domain that 
no matter how I created it in the web page would always give me whacked 
out numbers when listed. If I deleted the domain and created one with a 
different name it would work okay. Just that particular domain (even 
when I created it AFTER the working fake-domain) always got insane 
values when created.


smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: [qmailtoaster] adding additional domains to a toaster

[Natalio Gatti]

On 3/21/07, Jake Vickers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

dnk wrote:
> So in my steps getting used to the "toaster", I have run into the
> following and was looking for clarification:
>
> 1) When I add a new domain to my toaster, is this to be done VIA the
> CLI as opposed to the web interface? I tried via the web interface,
> but when logging in with the postmaster account to manage the new
> domain, I had certian menu items missing, and could not add users,
> etc. When adding VIA the command line, all seems to work as it should.
> I just wanted to be sure if this the norm, or if my toaster has a
> glitch.
>
Correct. The web interface has been broken for a while, but it's still
there to do some general things like seeing all domains, password, etc.
easily. Creating domains with it will cause sporadic issues.
It's normal - okay, not normal, but known about.

When you create the new domain via vqadmin, did you change the default
values of "accounts", "forwards" ... and such? If you leave it in "0",
then that's the problem.
You have to specify the estimated number of accounts, lists and such
so you can create them via qmailadmin.

Salutti,
Natalio

-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [qmailtoaster] weekly thread

[tobbe]

An i can gladly help continue the support for mandriva and i will add 
pclinuxos to this one also, since i am a 3d party mandriva and a core  
pclinuxos rpm dev.
I have already done a lot of patching for this already

Torbjörn Turpeinen (Thac)

Den Wednesday 21 March 2007 20:20:59 skrev Johannes Weberhofer, Weberhofer 
GmbH:
> Hello Erik,
>
> all your suggestions are great!
>
> 1)  is definitly better and easier to maintain.
>
> 2a) is a great idea. I have been working on that, because I like to
> make it running on all SuSE versions from 9.1 and SLES 9+10.
> I have prepeared a bunch of patches for the current spec files,
> which I will comment and send to the list in a seperate mail.
> I hope, it will be useful for you.
>
> 3)  SuSE distribution should definitly be kept. I think,
> when 2a) is implemented, it is relativly easy to support
> many distributions.
>
> Your work is great, keep on!
>
> Johannes
>
> Erik A. Espinoza schrieb:
> > Hey Guys,
> >
> > Here are some topics I'd like brought up! Anyone can bring up whatever
> > they want, of course.
> >
> > 1) Separate Patches: What do you guys think about moving from the
> > Mandrake style of patching to a Red Hat style of patching within rpms.
> > In the old Mandrake style, you would combine all of the different
> > patches into one big patch and apply that in the rpm. In the Red Hat
> > style, you keep each patch separate, like we have been doing recently
> > with the bigdns and require-auth patches on qmail-toaster. I prefer
> > the Red Hat style because when upgrades come out, such as the new
> > chkuser, we only have to rework the patches applied after the chkuser
> > patch, where as with the Mandrake style, you have to redo the whole
> > patch.
> >
> > 2) 1.4 Branch. I want to start the 1.4/maintenance branch soon. I
> > think it should include the following:
> > a) Simpler macros. We should tie similar OS's together, such as
> > cnt4/fc3  and fc4/fc5/fc6. This will make the spec files a lot easier
> > to read.
> > b) support for fc7/cnt5
> > c) patch cleanup on qmail-toaster + new chkuser
> >
> > 3) Mandriva/SuSE Support. Should we keep working on these? Seems that
> > the majority of our users are on FC or CentOS, is it worth using the
> > limited developer time we have to keep these OS's supported? Should we
> > just drop these?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Erik
> >
> > -
> > QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [qmailtoaster] restrict long subjects

[Jake Vickers]

ashok wrote:


Hi Jake,,

 


As of now pne particular user I,e me J

 

May be we could make a patch in general. or a script to restrict long 
subjects for QT.


 

I don't think a patch is warranted yet. If it becomes a problem for 
multiple users (or breaks the system) then a patch may be written. 
Otherwise it's just one of those things you'll have to work around.
I have a persistant problem with 3 users in particular that try and 
email 70M attachments all the time and lock up their Outlook client 
trying to send the message, and then again when trying to process the 
bounce. And the same happens from time to time with probably 65% of my 
users. It's just something I have to deal with.

Sorry.


smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: [qmailtoaster] wiki question

[Jake Vickers]

dnk wrote:

ok, I have been posting various questions to this list, and every so
often I get a response with a link to a page on the toaster wiki. Then
I feel like i have to remove my foot from my mouth for asking a dumb
question.

For example on one of my other questions, I was pointed to:

http://wiki.qmailtoaster.com/index.php/Certificate

Now when I go to the main wiki page (http://wiki.qmailtoaster.com) - I
can not find any links to the page listed
(http://wiki.qmailtoaster.com/index.php/Certificate) above.
There's lots of info in there, but it's not always linked directly to 
the main page (the index is built on-the-fly from that page). Like your 
Certificate page, on the bottom you can see a link called "What links 
here". That shows the pages that link to that particular one:


The following pages link to *Certificate 
*:


   * SSL 
   * Configuration 


So you can get there by the SSL page (not on the main page, so not in 
the index) or by the Configuration page (which is on the main page, and 
in the index).
Wikis are a great idea but they're far from perfect, and putting a link 
to every piece of information on the main page (and thus in the index) 
would make that almost unreadable IMHO as well. I know I'm guilty of 
creating something on there, and then thinking of where to tie it in later.
Anyway, try the search feature. A search for "certificate" takes you 
straight to the above link.
The info may be in there, and if so, may not be in a place where you 
would think to link. Or just ask on the list and I'm sure someone will 
send you a link until you get the hang of it.


smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: [qmailtoaster] php 5 and mysql 5 with toaster

[Jake Vickers]

dnk wrote:

Are there any known issues with usinging php5 and mysql 5 with the
toaster? I was looking to install these from the centos repo onto a
toaster. Just wanted to know if there is anything to look out for.

[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# rpm -qa | grep php
php-5.0.4-10.5
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# uptime
06:53:53 up 50 days, 15:51,  1 user,  load average: 0.20, 0.08, 0.02

Last reboot was for a kernel change and I wanted to play it safe. I'm 
running Mysql4 though - Toaster works on 5 as well.




smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: [qmailtoaster] weekly thread

[AM]

Hi Erik,

I've been using SUSE and RedHat for some time and I've seen both styles.
AFAIK the first means more labor and time but the second leaves, sometimes, 
to
strange bugs in the src. SuSE is using delta for bin and src packages for 
quite a

while...

As far as 2) I think that having the "thing" simplified would be a great 
ideia... As
much of the distros versions are very similiar, if not almost the same, in 
structure.


I'm currently using just SuSE 9,10.x and it works great, generaly no issues 
:))
This reporting to 6 toasters running in production and 2 more on the way 
(switching from exchange).

Almost no problems, beside bugs :) and simscan ..., running all toasteres in
php5, mysql5 and it works out of the box. The things you must tweak are 
generaly

control panel related, like paths and so and some 64bit links.

The only 2 bits I don't use is qtp and squirrelmail because I've some tweaks 
to the src like:
eMPF in qmail-smtpd, regex and per user settings spamassassin in simscan, 
roundcube as webmail

client along with squirrel outlook skin.

Thanks all who contributed to this great toaster.

AM
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

- Original Message - 
From: "Erik A. Espinoza" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

To: 
Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2007 6:02 PM
Subject: [qmailtoaster] weekly thread



Hey Guys,

Here are some topics I'd like brought up! Anyone can bring up whatever
they want, of course.

1) Separate Patches: What do you guys think about moving from the
Mandrake style of patching to a Red Hat style of patching within rpms.
In the old Mandrake style, you would combine all of the different
patches into one big patch and apply that in the rpm. In the Red Hat
style, you keep each patch separate, like we have been doing recently
with the bigdns and require-auth patches on qmail-toaster. I prefer
the Red Hat style because when upgrades come out, such as the new
chkuser, we only have to rework the patches applied after the chkuser
patch, where as with the Mandrake style, you have to redo the whole
patch.

2) 1.4 Branch. I want to start the 1.4/maintenance branch soon. I
think it should include the following:
a) Simpler macros. We should tie similar OS's together, such as
cnt4/fc3  and fc4/fc5/fc6. This will make the spec files a lot easier
to read.
b) support for fc7/cnt5
c) patch cleanup on qmail-toaster + new chkuser

3) Mandriva/SuSE Support. Should we keep working on these? Seems that
the majority of our users are on FC or CentOS, is it worth using the
limited developer time we have to keep these OS's supported? Should we
just drop these?

Thanks,
Erik

-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [qmailtoaster] php 5 and mysql 5 with toaster

[Janno Sannik]

Running ok php 5.1.6 and latest toaster (qmail-toaster-1.03.1.3.14) /w 
mysql4.

but I don't use control-panel anyways..


Ryan Gibbons wrote:
I am using version 1.2-1.3.2, so I am not sure if he is talking about 
the qmailtoaster version, or the simscan version, but with this one I 
am not having any problems.


Ryan Gibbons wrote:
I'm using mysql 5.0 and php 5.1 without any issues, I normally have 
uptimes of about 6 - 9 months, and even then it is b/c the datacenter 
issues, not the server.


dnk wrote:

Are there any known issues with usinging php5 and mysql 5 with the
toaster? I was looking to install these from the centos repo onto a
toaster. Just wanted to know if there is anything to look out for.

Thanks!
d

-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]





-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]