Re: [qmailtoaster] Outlook 2003 hangs
I had the issue of outlook crashing all the time and leaving multiple outlook.exe's running, I found it easy to just make a shortcut on the desktop called fix crashed outlook which linked to a batch file under c:\batch\ inside the batch file I put taskkill /f /im outlook.exe that worked wonderfully for my cleints who refused to reboot their machines, I even had one set to run this via schedualed task, every day at 3am, its still running everyday he leaves outlook on, he comes back and outlook is shut, he complained about it for a while, but then he realised that it wasn't hanging any more in the middle of the day, heh On 28/03/2008, Istvan Köpe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I had a similar problem with Outlook 2003, but in my case the users were sending mails to hundreds of mail addresses. I created an email list and the problem was solved. Jake Vickers wrote: I know this has been brought up before, but I see some fresh new shiny faces on the list and maybe there is some new knowledge floating out there. I have a user that refuses to reboot Windows. He claims that it's a problem on my end, not his, and he should never have to reboot (but he also refuses to install updates since he says Windows and it's updates are not production stable yet - go figure). Anyway, he's running Office 2003, and every few days (about once a week to two weeks) his Outlook will hang sending messages. POP3 still works fine, but any and all messages hang in his outbox. A reboot solves this, but he keeps insisting that it's my problem and not Outlook's. This happens with plain messages, as well as ones with Word attachments. I do not show any SMTP errors on my end (I don't even show a connection in the logs to be honest) nor any other error messages. Outlook gives the error that the SMTP server is not responding and for him to contact his ISP. Other users can send emails fine using Outlook while his is giving this error message. Once a message is hung, and other messages he sends will also hang. Has anyone seen any type of solution to this? Other than changing to Thunderbird and/or Linux that is. I'm off to troll the KBs on MS's site and see if there are any solutions there. - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- David Campbell The information in this E-mail and any attachments is confidential. It is intended solely for the attention and use of the named addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, or person responsible for delivering this information to the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately. Unless you are the intended recipient or his/her representative you are not authorised to, and must not read, copy, distribute, use or retain this message or any part of it. Opinions, conclusions and other information expressed in this message are not given or endorsed by the sender unless otherwise indicated by an authorised officer independent of this message.
Re: [qmailtoaster] webmail is not accessible from the Internet
sounds like a firewall issue still... is there another machine you may test the redirection of port 80 to via your firewall, for example, if you run an apache installation on another computer, and you forward port 80 to that computer, from your internet gateway firewall do you get access to the other computer from the outside? this would rule out any firewall issues you may have with your internet gateway and narrow the issue to the qmailtoaster itself... On 22/03/2008, Tom Manliclic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello all, I can browse webmail from the local network and my problem is I cannot browse it from the Internet side. I'm quite sure that DNS and firewall configuration are correct. I even disabled firewall to see if it will pass through to no avail. Can someone please shed some light? Thank you for the help. - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- David Campbell E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] W: http://www.bigbighuge.com The information in this E-mail and any attachments is confidential. It is intended solely for the attention and use of the named addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, or person responsible for delivering this information to the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately. Unless you are the intended recipient or his/her representative you are not authorised to, and must not read, copy, distribute, use or retain this message or any part of it. Opinions, conclusions and other information expressed in this message are not given or endorsed by the sender unless otherwise indicated by an authorised officer independent of this message. ...when was the last time you did a backup?...
Re: [qmailtoaster] problem sending email over submission port in a terminal server profile
I can confirm that I have a bunch of clients on terminal server (server 2003 standard) running Microsoft Office Outlook 2003 and they have no issues with the submission port... the SSL error sounds like you've clicked on TLS or ticked the SSL options on the port selection tab.. double check that you have not ticked any tls or SSL options... Odds are good this could be a firewall issue, something blocking the outgoing port 587, either software on the server, or something on your gateway. On 06/03/2008, dnk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Does anyone on list here have a terminal server that has outlook clients connecting to a qmail toaster and using port 587? I get the typical Server does not support SSL error when trying to send email from the Terminal Server. All other win clients are fine. Ideas? dnk - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- David Campbell E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] W: http://www.bigbighuge.com The information in this E-mail and any attachments is confidential. It is intended solely for the attention and use of the named addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, or person responsible for delivering this information to the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately. Unless you are the intended recipient or his/her representative you are not authorised to, and must not read, copy, distribute, use or retain this message or any part of it. Opinions, conclusions and other information expressed in this message are not given or endorsed by the sender unless otherwise indicated by an authorised officer independent of this message. ...when was the last time you did a backup?...
Re: [qmailtoaster] behind firewall on LAN IP
Thank you very much eric, the firewall.sh script sounds more like what my problem is, so is it just a matter of adjusting the firewall.sh script, then running it again? Will that erase the old settings and reconfigure the qmt firewall? As for everyone else, my installation of qmt is the EXACT qmt the easy way from the front page installed on Centos4.3 except for domain keys at the end, the external firewall running as the gateway for this network should not even enter the discussion because its only local traffic, and yes the LAN functions appropriately for other PC's I have a few servers and vmware hosts with a few guests on it, and a few PC's and they all seem to function fine with regard to local traffic. On 04/03/2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I see someone posted about the firewall script. It completely skipped my mind as I don't use it when installing QMT. Mike - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- David Campbell E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] W: http://www.bigbighuge.com The information in this E-mail and any attachments is confidential. It is intended solely for the attention and use of the named addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, or person responsible for delivering this information to the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately. Unless you are the intended recipient or his/her representative you are not authorised to, and must not read, copy, distribute, use or retain this message or any part of it. Opinions, conclusions and other information expressed in this message are not given or endorsed by the sender unless otherwise indicated by an authorised officer independent of this message. ...when was the last time you did a backup?...
Re: [qmailtoaster] behind firewall on LAN IP
oh, one more question, how would I make this adjustment on a qmt-iso installation, seeing how it runs all the setup itself... I want to make sure just searching for firewall.sh editing and running it to correct the firewall wont screw up anything else... On 04/03/2008, Eric Shubert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: David Campbell wrote: Thank you very much eric, the firewall.sh script sounds more like what my problem is, so is it just a matter of adjusting the firewall.sh script, then running it again? Will that erase the old settings and reconfigure the qmt firewall? Yes, and yes. You're welcome. -- -Eric 'shubes' - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- David Campbell E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] W: http://www.bigbighuge.com The information in this E-mail and any attachments is confidential. It is intended solely for the attention and use of the named addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, or person responsible for delivering this information to the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately. Unless you are the intended recipient or his/her representative you are not authorised to, and must not read, copy, distribute, use or retain this message or any part of it. Opinions, conclusions and other information expressed in this message are not given or endorsed by the sender unless otherwise indicated by an authorised officer independent of this message. ...when was the last time you did a backup?...
[qmailtoaster] behind firewall on LAN IP
I have no problems running QMT when I give it its own public IP address but when I try to run one behind a firewall with a local IP address it doesn't work unless I disable the firewall, and then of course it all goes to shit... Is there any way to run this thing behind a firewall, and what do I need to do to make it do so? Or do I simply have to look at another solution for running a mail server behind a firewall? Thanks
Re: [qmailtoaster] behind firewall on LAN IP
I cant ping or ssh to it or browse to its IP from another local IP On 03/03/2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It fully works fine with a private IP, I've had up to three systems up on NAT IP's working. When you say it's not working, you might want to explain a little more so that there is a sense of what the problem is. Perhaps the firewall is doing something funky which is preventing the mail from getting in/out. Mike On Mon, 3 Mar 2008 14:17:18 +1100, David Campbell wrote: I have no problems running QMT when I give it its own public IP address but when I try to run one behind a firewall with a local IP address it doesn't work unless I disable the firewall, and then of course it all goes to shit... Is there any way to run this thing behind a firewall, and what do I need to do to make it do so? Or do I simply have to look at another solution for running a mail server behind a firewall? Thanks - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- David Campbell E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] W: http://www.bigbighuge.com The information in this E-mail and any attachments is confidential. It is intended solely for the attention and use of the named addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, or person responsible for delivering this information to the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately. Unless you are the intended recipient or his/her representative you are not authorised to, and must not read, copy, distribute, use or retain this message or any part of it. Opinions, conclusions and other information expressed in this message are not given or endorsed by the sender unless otherwise indicated by an authorised officer independent of this message. ...when was the last time you did a backup?...
Re: [qmailtoaster] qq soft reject (mail server temporarily rejected message (#4.3.0)
I'm still stuck on this, anyone have any ideas? On 15/02/2008, David Campbell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: every single mail that comes from @anz.com gets rejected. I am alos having a TLS issue with this server sending to 1 other Exchange server that I know of.. the two issues could be related, its in another thread of this mailing list. On 14/02/2008, Jake Vickers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: David Campbell wrote: Hi guys, I know you are all getting to love me, but I have a funny issue and I would like to see what you think I have a cleint that recieves emails daily from their accoutn manager at their bank, which they cannot recieve the isntant we switched over the qmailtoaster from hmailserver I checked the logs for anz.com and came up with this in the logs @400047b1ffb81b860734 qmail-smtpd: qq soft reject (mail server temporarily rejected message (#4.3.0)): MAILFROM:[EMAIL PROTECTED] RCPTTO:[EMAIL PROTECTED] I have checked spamd and clamd logs and there are no errors in there that I can find... This is only happening for this ONE domain so far that people have complained about, though there are other qq soft reject messages in the smtp log, what can be done to fix this? Does it happen all the time, or only intermittently? -- David Campbell E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] W: http://www.bigbighuge.com The information in this E-mail and any attachments is confidential. It is intended solely for the attention and use of the named addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, or person responsible for delivering this information to the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately. Unless you are the intended recipient or his/her representative you are not authorised to, and must not read, copy, distribute, use or retain this message or any part of it. Opinions, conclusions and other information expressed in this message are not given or endorsed by the sender unless otherwise indicated by an authorised officer independent of this message. ...when was the last time you did a backup?...
Re: [qmailtoaster] qq soft reject (mail server temporarily rejected message (#4.3.0)
every single mail that comes from @anz.com gets rejected. I am alos having a TLS issue with this server sending to 1 other Exchange server that I know of.. the two issues could be related, its in another thread of this mailing list. On 14/02/2008, Jake Vickers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: David Campbell wrote: Hi guys, I know you are all getting to love me, but I have a funny issue and I would like to see what you think I have a cleint that recieves emails daily from their accoutn manager at their bank, which they cannot recieve the isntant we switched over the qmailtoaster from hmailserver I checked the logs for anz.com and came up with this in the logs @400047b1ffb81b860734 qmail-smtpd: qq soft reject (mail server temporarily rejected message (#4.3.0)): MAILFROM:[EMAIL PROTECTED] RCPTTO:[EMAIL PROTECTED] I have checked spamd and clamd logs and there are no errors in there that I can find... This is only happening for this ONE domain so far that people have complained about, though there are other qq soft reject messages in the smtp log, what can be done to fix this? Does it happen all the time, or only intermittently?
Re: [qmailtoaster] 3 simple Qs
It leaves you open to more spam because emails addressed to invalid addresses are not rejected as there are no longer any invalid addresses, it sends any spam, even incorrectly addresses spam, to your mailbox, this leaves you open to receiving emails directed at accounts that the spam server is just guessing exist. On 15/02/2008, Jim Shupert, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks for that Helmut.. so having a catch all leaves one suseptable to more spam... that is interesting. [ i wonder why ] thanks ALL and have a great day! j - Original Message - From: Helmut Fritz [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2008 3:18 PM Subject: RE: [qmailtoaster] 3 simple Qs I also do not use or want a catchall. Allows too much spam in... -Original Message- From: Natalio Gatti [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2008 12:11 PM To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] 3 simple Qs Jim: On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 4:28 PM, Jim Shupert, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: so My q is is there a BEST way to delete ?- is one way better than the other? Both ways are equally effective. also - I do not have quotas on my users - are there any long term problems with that? The only problem you can face is more users with big inbox. and I do not have a catch all account - so should I ? mm, I don't use it, I discard those mails. Salutti, Natalio. - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- David Campbell E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] W: http://www.bigbighuge.com The information in this E-mail and any attachments is confidential. It is intended solely for the attention and use of the named addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, or person responsible for delivering this information to the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately. Unless you are the intended recipient or his/her representative you are not authorised to, and must not read, copy, distribute, use or retain this message or any part of it. Opinions, conclusions and other information expressed in this message are not given or endorsed by the sender unless otherwise indicated by an authorised officer independent of this message. ...when was the last time you did a backup?...
Re: [qmailtoaster] New webinterface for qmailtoaster
I myself installed it on a vmware box yesterday as well, it installs alot faster than QMTISO and theres alot of stuff in the menu, not sure I like it, its one of those menu systems that will grow on you with use I think, but yeah, it has alot of the functionality that I think would be great for qmt, it even installs squirelmail so that you can change your own password and change your away message inside squirelmail by default which I thought was pretty cool. On 13/02/2008, PakOgah [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I haven't use deepofix in real-production environment, I am only testing it on vmware to test the control panel. the installation, straight forward, simpler than qmtiso since they installed the package using binary files (compiling from source not needed) after that admin can open the control panel using web-browser and it seems almost all function is available. from creating domain, account or milist, to change IP address and view log. so ssh to server and typing command is not neccessary so it very suitable for novice admin with little knowledge of linux to manage mailserver. and if community support not able to help you, commercial support is available. so when JP, planned to get nice webinterface, I am very anxious and support him 100% note: updated of access list WOW, I had never seen deepofix before... Im seriously considering switching camps, does anybody ahve experiences they would like to share with deepofix? On 13/02/2008, PakOgah [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Wow JP that's a great idea... I'll support it by became beta-tester and documentor :) for reference, I think you should see deep-o-fix control panel http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=156141 http://www.deeproot.co.in/deepofix there is demo on their site and access level for webinterface (just my idea) 1. user: - can reset their password, set forward, vacation notice etc (like qmailadmin plugin of squirrelmail) - unsubs from milist their subscribed - subscribe to milist with the same domain (yes ezmlm already provide long information how to unsub, and subscribe via email but then users seem so confuse due to many information provided) 2. moderator: - the same as user plus - can create/edit/delete milist - subscribe/unsub the milist member 3. account manager - the same as moderator plus: - can reset user password from domain that assigned to them - can create/edit/delete user account from domain that assigned to them 4. monitoring - can view all qmailtoaster logs - can view isoqlog - can view qmailmrtg - server status/information (like CPU, memory, HDD usage) 5. admin - the same as account manager and monitoring plus - can control /edit qmail behavior/control files - can control server service, - can manages domain - change IP address.. - or even can reboot /shutdown the server :) Jean-Paul van de Plasse wrote: Hi List, It has been my plan for some time to get a smooth working and looking webinterface for qmailtoaster. Not to brag, but I have the programming skills (php/c/c++) and I also would not mind hiring a designer to make the designs. The only 2 problems I have had so far that stopped me from starting are time and input.. The first one is not going to change in the near future, but somewhere down the line there always can be found some time.. Concerning the second I would like your input, what are the things people want to see in such an interface.. And are there other people capable and willing to invest some time in this? Honestly I rather see the energy that goes wasted into the thread about Mike's remarks about qmt invested in a thread about functionality and ideas how we can make the missing part of qmt.. I think it would at least need the following - management tool for the administrator, to administer domains and settings of qmt - a qmailadmin replacement that works more logical - both with a neat looking design and easy to give your own look and feel (that is not overwritten on every update). Regards, JP - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- David Campbell E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] W: http://www.bigbighuge.com The information in this E-mail and any attachments is confidential. It is intended solely for the attention and use of the named addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, or person responsible for delivering this information to the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately. Unless you are the intended recipient or his/her representative you are not authorised to, and must not read, copy, distribute, use
Re: [qmailtoaster] New webinterface for qmailtoaster
WOW, I had never seen deepofix before... Im seriously considering switching camps, does anybody ahve experiences they would like to share with deepofix? On 13/02/2008, PakOgah [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Wow JP that's a great idea... I'll support it by became beta-tester and documentor :) for reference, I think you should see deep-o-fix control panel http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=156141 http://www.deeproot.co.in/deepofix there is demo on their site and access level for webinterface (just my idea) 1. user: - can reset their password, set forward, vacation notice etc (like qmailadmin plugin of squirrelmail) - unsubs from milist their subscribed - subscribe to milist with the same domain (yes ezmlm already provide long information how to unsub, and subscribe via email but then users seem so confuse due to many information provided) 2. moderator: - the same as user plus - can create/edit/delete milist - subscribe/unsub the milist member 3. account manager - the same as moderator plus: - can reset user password - can create/edit/delete user account 4. monitoring - can view all qmailtoaster logs - can view isoqlog - can view qmailmrtg - server status/information (like CPU, memory, HDD usage) 5. admin - the same as account manager and monitoring plus - can control /edit qmail behavior/control files - can control server service, - change IP address.. - or even can reboot /shutdown the server :) Jean-Paul van de Plasse wrote: Hi List, It has been my plan for some time to get a smooth working and looking webinterface for qmailtoaster. Not to brag, but I have the programming skills (php/c/c++) and I also would not mind hiring a designer to make the designs. The only 2 problems I have had so far that stopped me from starting are time and input.. The first one is not going to change in the near future, but somewhere down the line there always can be found some time.. Concerning the second I would like your input, what are the things people want to see in such an interface.. And are there other people capable and willing to invest some time in this? Honestly I rather see the energy that goes wasted into the thread about Mike's remarks about qmt invested in a thread about functionality and ideas how we can make the missing part of qmt.. I think it would at least need the following - management tool for the administrator, to administer domains and settings of qmt - a qmailadmin replacement that works more logical - both with a neat looking design and easy to give your own look and feel (that is not overwritten on every update). Regards, JP - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- David Campbell E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] W: http://www.bigbighuge.com The information in this E-mail and any attachments is confidential. It is intended solely for the attention and use of the named addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, or person responsible for delivering this information to the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately. Unless you are the intended recipient or his/her representative you are not authorised to, and must not read, copy, distribute, use or retain this message or any part of it. Opinions, conclusions and other information expressed in this message are not given or endorsed by the sender unless otherwise indicated by an authorised officer independent of this message. ...when was the last time you did a backup?...
[qmailtoaster] qq soft reject (mail server temporarily rejected message (#4.3.0)
Hi guys, I know you are all getting to love me, but I have a funny issue and I would like to see what you think I have a cleint that recieves emails daily from their accoutn manager at their bank, which they cannot recieve the isntant we switched over the qmailtoaster from hmailserver I checked the logs for anz.com and came up with this in the logs @400047b1ffb624a241fc CHKUSER accepted sender: from [EMAIL PROTECTED]:: remote anz.com:unknown:202.2.57.126 rcpt : sender accepted @400047b1ffb62939e2ec CHKUSER accepted rcpt: from [EMAIL PROTECTED]:: remote anz.com:unknown:202.2.57.126 rcpt [EMAIL PROTECTED] : found existing recipient @400047b1ffb62bddf524 CHKUSER accepted rcpt: from [EMAIL PROTECTED]:: remote anz.com:unknown:202.2.57.126 rcpt [EMAIL PROTECTED] : found existing recipient @400047b1ffb62e59edbc CHKUSER accepted rcpt: from [EMAIL PROTECTED]:: remote anz.com:unknown:202.2.57.126 rcpt [EMAIL PROTECTED] : found existing recipient . some other stuff unrelated @400047b1ffb81b860734 qmail-smtpd: qq soft reject (mail server temporarily rejected message (#4.3.0)): MAILFROM:[EMAIL PROTECTED] RCPTTO:[EMAIL PROTECTED] I have checked spamd and clamd logs and there are no errors in there that I can find... This is only happening for this ONE domain so far that people have complained about, though there are other qq soft reject messages in the smtp log, what can be done to fix this?
Re: [qmailtoaster] New webinterface for qmailtoaster
I always struggle with spam assassin it would be great if the interface
could make that easier, with blurbs about what options control what not just
direct access to a bunch of parameters. And some easier way of getting it to
sa-learn-spam and sa-learn-ham
This thread is focusing on the INTERFACE, so as far as the interface goes, I
would love a web-based interface that could intuitively configure spam
assassin and if possible have access to a simple sa-learn from a virtual
imap mailbox form that can be posted
On 12/02/2008, Sergio Minini {NETKEY} [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For the sake of a wishlist, how about the chance to configure SpamAssassin
and/or spamdyke?
Regards.
---
Sergio Minini
NetKey Solutions
( 4742.1101
http://www.netkey.com.ar
http://www.totemsoft.com.ar
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 11, 2008 4:27 PM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] New webinterface for qmailtoaster
How about starting with simple, smaller steps, and making
those work
well, before asking for pie in the sky.
Fair enough, like I said, just a wish list :).
Either way, I can offer up resources if needed.
Mike
-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
David Campbell
E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
W: http://www.bigbighuge.com
The information in this E-mail and any attachments is confidential. It is
intended solely for the attention and use of the named addressee(s). If you
are not the intended recipient, or person responsible for delivering this
information to the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately.
Unless you are the intended recipient or his/her representative you are not
authorised to, and must not read, copy, distribute, use or retain this
message or any part of it. Opinions, conclusions and other information
expressed in this message are not given or endorsed by the sender unless
otherwise indicated by an authorised officer independent of this message.
...when was the last time you did a backup?...
Re: [qmailtoaster] problems sending to 1 exchange server
still having issues with this one... is there anyway to force any mails sent to this particular domain/server to be sent without using TLS? Some kind of relaying configuration or the like? On 11/02/2008, David Campbell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: looking through some mail-list archives I can see that apparently some Cisco Pix firewalls attempt to correct the SMTP transaction and stuff up TLS, and all our stuff comes and goes through a Cisco PIX firewall... so this may be the issue... Is there any way to force the qmailtoaster not to use TLS when sending to this particular server/domain ? On 11/02/2008, David Campbell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: SOrry, missed your reply. I'm still having issues with this, here is an update on what happens in the SEND log @400047aaca162d9f09fc starting delivery 23710: msg 10749661 to remote [EMAIL PROTECTED] @400047aaca162d9f9a84 status: local 0/10 remote 1/60 @400047aaca1724b6c7e4 delivery 23710: deferral: TLS_connect_failed;_connected_to_218.185.4.135./ @400047aaca1724b6fe94 status: local 0/10 remote 0/60 @400047aaca461cefc4ac new msg 10749528 @400047aaca461cf012cc info msg 10749528: bytes 855 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] qp 27701 uid 89 @400047aaca461d5a03e4 starting delivery 23711: msg 10749528 to local [EMAIL PROTECTED] @400047aaca461d5a5204 status: local 1/10 remote 0/60 @400047aaca4621431d24 delivery 23711: success: did_0+0+1/ @400047aaca4621437ecc status: local 0/10 remote 0/60 @400047aaca462143adac end msg 10749528 @400047aaca5b210e2e5c starting delivery 23712: msg 10749712 to remote [EMAIL PROTECTED] @400047aaca5b210e844c status: local 0/10 remote 1/60 @400047aaca5c0920b15c delivery 23712: deferral: TLS_connect_failed;_connected_to_218.185.4.135./ @400047aaca5c0924fb04 status: local 0/10 remote 0/60 @400047aaca5c18a8187c new msg 10749528 On 07/02/2008, Eric Shubes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You won't see much in the smtp (or submission) log. The problem is occurring on the outbound side of the toaster, which will be in the send log. Is there any indication there? If not, the only thing I can think of would be to turn on recordio on the send daemon and see what they're saying to each other. You can find instructions on using recordio in the list archives. Would be nice to have that on the wiki. David Campbell wrote: yeah thats what I dont understand, this is the only server it has issues with, I have access to the server via mstsc and I have checked its smtp server and it definitely does not require TLS and doesn't even have a cert installed, they are however running GFI mailessentials and that does something with the smtp service utilizing, as far as I can tell, BLACK MAGIC I checked the smtp log on the qmailtoaster and nothing is really standing out @400047aa25b30e6bbbfc tcpserver: pid 23200 from 218.185.4.140 http://218.185.4.140 @400047aa25b30e6beadc tcpserver: ok 23200 mta2.lan2go.net.au:218 http://mta2.lan2go.net.au:218.185.6.102:25 :218.185.4.140::2769 @400047aa25b31cb83dd4 CHKUSER accepted sender: from [EMAIL PROTECTED]:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: remote rmshp:unknown:218.185.4.140 http://218.185.4.140 rcpt : sender accepted @400047aa25b404e6a18c CHKUSER relaying rcpt: from [EMAIL PROTECTED]:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: remote rmshp:unknown:218.185.4.140 http://218.185.4.140 rcpt [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : client allowed to relay @400047aa25b40a8bda1c CHKUSER accepted rcpt: from [EMAIL PROTECTED]:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: remote rmshp:unknown:218.185.4.140 http://218.185.4.140 rcpt [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : found existing recipient @400047aa25b412168bec CHKUSER relaying rcpt: from [EMAIL PROTECTED]:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: remote rmshp:unknown:218.185.4.140 http://218.185.4.140 rcpt [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : client allowed to relay @400047aa25b41992d63c CHKUSER relaying rcpt: from [EMAIL PROTECTED]:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: remote rmshp:unknown:218.185.4.140 http://218.185.4.140 rcpt [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : client allowed to relay the client got identical TLS bouncebacks for all addresses @lancare.com.au http://lancare.com.au (the exchange server) On 07/02/2008, *Eric Shubes* [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: David Campbell wrote: I have a feeling this is the exchange servers problem, but I was wondering if anyone could help me with some insight into this issue Whenever I try and send mail to it, I get this error Hi. This is the qmail-send program at ###MY_QMAILTOASTER!!! http://mta2.lan2go.net.au/ I'm afraid I wasn't able
Re: [qmailtoaster] outlook randomly + repeatedly asking users for their network password
thank you very much for your input, that did the trick nicely On 12/02/2008, David Campbell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://forums.mysql.com/read.php?24,15350,28036 haha, just read that, thanks for your reply though, I'm a total noob. I have updated the max_connections and we shall just see how it goes... it should be able to handle more connections, its a dual dual-core xeon with 4gb of ram... lol On 12/02/2008, Jean-Paul van de Plasse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.0/en/too-many-connections.html [mysqld] max_connections=500 (default is 100).. JP - Original Message - *From:* David Campbell [EMAIL PROTECTED] *To:* qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com *Sent:* Tuesday, February 12, 2008 1:44 AM *Subject:* Re: [qmailtoaster] outlook randomly + repeatedly asking users for their network password what limits do I change, here is a copy of my /etc/my.cnf file [mysqld] datadir=/var/lib/mysql socket=/var/lib/mysql/mysql.sock # Default to using old password format for compatibility with mysql 3.x # clients (those using the mysqlclient10 compatibility package). old_passwords=1 [mysql.server] user=mysql basedir=/var/lib [mysqld_safe] err-log=/var/log/mysqld.log pid-file=/var/run/mysqld/mysqld.pid On 12/02/2008, David Campbell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: funny, I got mysql server limit errors when I imported my users via a shell script, I will try editing this and let you know how I go On 12/02/2008, Jean-Paul van de Plasse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, This can happen due to too many connections to your mysql server.. You could up the limits a bit in /etc/my.cnf JP - Original Message - *From:* David Campbell [EMAIL PROTECTED] *To:* qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com *Sent:* Tuesday, February 12, 2008 1:32 AM *Subject:* Re: [qmailtoaster] outlook randomly + repeatedly asking users for their network password This issue never happened when we were using another mailserver though (hmailserver.com+windows svr2k3), only since switching to qmailtoaster, and I cant exactly tell people to edit their registry, these are people who barely understand the concept of pressing the start menu I just don't understand why qmailtoaster has so many problems authenticating people :( On 12/02/2008, Tim Mancour [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The Outlook password dialog box is rather annoying. If you are typing when the dialog pops-up, your password gets overwritten by whatever you are typing. Then the user will typically press the Okay button which causes the password to be overwritten. I always have the users press the Cancel button to avoid this problem. If, after correcting their password, the problem persistents then look at http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;321652. -- *From:* David Campbell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *Sent:* Monday, February 11, 2008 6:36 PM *To:* qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com *Subject:* [qmailtoaster] outlook randomly + repeatedly asking users for their network password HELP! All the heavy users of the qmail toaster I have running (the users that have their outlook open all day and it send/receives every 5 minutes or so are having issues where the qmailtoaster constantly asks them for the password, I have never seen the error myself, but customers are driving me nuts with support calls about their email that keeps asking them for the password :( Has anyone experienced this before? As far as I can tell everything is working fine, and about 60% of the users have never seen the error, so I have no idea whats wrong... -- David Campbell E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] W: http://www.bigbighuge.com The information in this E-mail and any attachments is confidential. It is intended solely for the attention and use of the named addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, or person responsible for delivering this information to the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately. Unless you are the intended recipient or his/her representative you are not authorised to, and must not read, copy, distribute, use or retain this message or any part of it. Opinions, conclusions and other information expressed in this message are not given or endorsed by the sender unless otherwise indicated by an authorised officer independent of this message. ...when was the last time you did a backup?... -- David Campbell E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] W: http://www.bigbighuge.com The information in this E-mail
Re: [qmailtoaster] outlook randomly + repeatedly asking users for their network password
This issue never happened when we were using another mailserver though ( hmailserver.com+windows svr2k3), only since switching to qmailtoaster, and I cant exactly tell people to edit their registry, these are people who barely understand the concept of pressing the start menu I just don't understand why qmailtoaster has so many problems authenticating people :( On 12/02/2008, Tim Mancour [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The Outlook password dialog box is rather annoying. If you are typing when the dialog pops-up, your password gets overwritten by whatever you are typing. Then the user will typically press the Okay button which causes the password to be overwritten. I always have the users press the Cancel button to avoid this problem. If, after correcting their password, the problem persistents then look at http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;321652. -- *From:* David Campbell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *Sent:* Monday, February 11, 2008 6:36 PM *To:* qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com *Subject:* [qmailtoaster] outlook randomly + repeatedly asking users for their network password HELP! All the heavy users of the qmail toaster I have running (the users that have their outlook open all day and it send/receives every 5 minutes or so are having issues where the qmailtoaster constantly asks them for the password, I have never seen the error myself, but customers are driving me nuts with support calls about their email that keeps asking them for the password :( Has anyone experienced this before? As far as I can tell everything is working fine, and about 60% of the users have never seen the error, so I have no idea whats wrong... -- David Campbell E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] W: http://www.bigbighuge.com The information in this E-mail and any attachments is confidential. It is intended solely for the attention and use of the named addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, or person responsible for delivering this information to the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately. Unless you are the intended recipient or his/her representative you are not authorised to, and must not read, copy, distribute, use or retain this message or any part of it. Opinions, conclusions and other information expressed in this message are not given or endorsed by the sender unless otherwise indicated by an authorised officer independent of this message. ...when was the last time you did a backup?...
[qmailtoaster] outlook randomly + repeatedly asking users for their network password
HELP! All the heavy users of the qmail toaster I have running (the users that have their outlook open all day and it send/receives every 5 minutes or so are having issues where the qmailtoaster constantly asks them for the password, I have never seen the error myself, but customers are driving me nuts with support calls about their email that keeps asking them for the password :( Has anyone experienced this before? As far as I can tell everything is working fine, and about 60% of the users have never seen the error, so I have no idea whats wrong...
Re: [qmailtoaster] outlook randomly + repeatedly asking users for their network password
http://forums.mysql.com/read.php?24,15350,28036 haha, just read that, thanks for your reply though, I'm a total noob. I have updated the max_connections and we shall just see how it goes... it should be able to handle more connections, its a dual dual-core xeon with 4gb of ram... lol On 12/02/2008, Jean-Paul van de Plasse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.0/en/too-many-connections.html [mysqld] max_connections=500 (default is 100).. JP - Original Message - *From:* David Campbell [EMAIL PROTECTED] *To:* qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com *Sent:* Tuesday, February 12, 2008 1:44 AM *Subject:* Re: [qmailtoaster] outlook randomly + repeatedly asking users for their network password what limits do I change, here is a copy of my /etc/my.cnf file [mysqld] datadir=/var/lib/mysql socket=/var/lib/mysql/mysql.sock # Default to using old password format for compatibility with mysql 3.x # clients (those using the mysqlclient10 compatibility package). old_passwords=1 [mysql.server] user=mysql basedir=/var/lib [mysqld_safe] err-log=/var/log/mysqld.log pid-file=/var/run/mysqld/mysqld.pid On 12/02/2008, David Campbell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: funny, I got mysql server limit errors when I imported my users via a shell script, I will try editing this and let you know how I go On 12/02/2008, Jean-Paul van de Plasse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, This can happen due to too many connections to your mysql server.. You could up the limits a bit in /etc/my.cnf JP - Original Message - *From:* David Campbell [EMAIL PROTECTED] *To:* qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com *Sent:* Tuesday, February 12, 2008 1:32 AM *Subject:* Re: [qmailtoaster] outlook randomly + repeatedly asking users for their network password This issue never happened when we were using another mailserver though (hmailserver.com+windows svr2k3), only since switching to qmailtoaster, and I cant exactly tell people to edit their registry, these are people who barely understand the concept of pressing the start menu I just don't understand why qmailtoaster has so many problems authenticating people :( On 12/02/2008, Tim Mancour [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The Outlook password dialog box is rather annoying. If you are typing when the dialog pops-up, your password gets overwritten by whatever you are typing. Then the user will typically press the Okay button which causes the password to be overwritten. I always have the users press the Cancel button to avoid this problem. If, after correcting their password, the problem persistents then look at http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;321652. -- *From:* David Campbell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *Sent:* Monday, February 11, 2008 6:36 PM *To:* qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com *Subject:* [qmailtoaster] outlook randomly + repeatedly asking users for their network password HELP! All the heavy users of the qmail toaster I have running (the users that have their outlook open all day and it send/receives every 5 minutes or so are having issues where the qmailtoaster constantly asks them for the password, I have never seen the error myself, but customers are driving me nuts with support calls about their email that keeps asking them for the password :( Has anyone experienced this before? As far as I can tell everything is working fine, and about 60% of the users have never seen the error, so I have no idea whats wrong... -- David Campbell E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] W: http://www.bigbighuge.com The information in this E-mail and any attachments is confidential. It is intended solely for the attention and use of the named addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, or person responsible for delivering this information to the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately. Unless you are the intended recipient or his/her representative you are not authorised to, and must not read, copy, distribute, use or retain this message or any part of it. Opinions, conclusions and other information expressed in this message are not given or endorsed by the sender unless otherwise indicated by an authorised officer independent of this message. ...when was the last time you did a backup?... -- David Campbell E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] W: http://www.bigbighuge.com The information in this E-mail and any attachments is confidential. It is intended solely for the attention and use of the named addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, or person responsible for delivering this information to the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately. Unless you are the intended
Re: [qmailtoaster] outlook randomly + repeatedly asking users for their network password
funny, I got mysql server limit errors when I imported my users via a shell script, I will try editing this and let you know how I go On 12/02/2008, Jean-Paul van de Plasse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, This can happen due to too many connections to your mysql server.. You could up the limits a bit in /etc/my.cnf JP - Original Message - *From:* David Campbell [EMAIL PROTECTED] *To:* qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com *Sent:* Tuesday, February 12, 2008 1:32 AM *Subject:* Re: [qmailtoaster] outlook randomly + repeatedly asking users for their network password This issue never happened when we were using another mailserver though ( hmailserver.com+windows svr2k3), only since switching to qmailtoaster, and I cant exactly tell people to edit their registry, these are people who barely understand the concept of pressing the start menu I just don't understand why qmailtoaster has so many problems authenticating people :( On 12/02/2008, Tim Mancour [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The Outlook password dialog box is rather annoying. If you are typing when the dialog pops-up, your password gets overwritten by whatever you are typing. Then the user will typically press the Okay button which causes the password to be overwritten. I always have the users press the Cancel button to avoid this problem. If, after correcting their password, the problem persistents then look at http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;321652. -- *From:* David Campbell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *Sent:* Monday, February 11, 2008 6:36 PM *To:* qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com *Subject:* [qmailtoaster] outlook randomly + repeatedly asking users for their network password HELP! All the heavy users of the qmail toaster I have running (the users that have their outlook open all day and it send/receives every 5 minutes or so are having issues where the qmailtoaster constantly asks them for the password, I have never seen the error myself, but customers are driving me nuts with support calls about their email that keeps asking them for the password :( Has anyone experienced this before? As far as I can tell everything is working fine, and about 60% of the users have never seen the error, so I have no idea whats wrong... -- David Campbell E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] W: http://www.bigbighuge.com The information in this E-mail and any attachments is confidential. It is intended solely for the attention and use of the named addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, or person responsible for delivering this information to the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately. Unless you are the intended recipient or his/her representative you are not authorised to, and must not read, copy, distribute, use or retain this message or any part of it. Opinions, conclusions and other information expressed in this message are not given or endorsed by the sender unless otherwise indicated by an authorised officer independent of this message. ...when was the last time you did a backup?... -- David Campbell E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] W: http://www.bigbighuge.com The information in this E-mail and any attachments is confidential. It is intended solely for the attention and use of the named addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, or person responsible for delivering this information to the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately. Unless you are the intended recipient or his/her representative you are not authorised to, and must not read, copy, distribute, use or retain this message or any part of it. Opinions, conclusions and other information expressed in this message are not given or endorsed by the sender unless otherwise indicated by an authorised officer independent of this message. ...when was the last time you did a backup?...
Re: [qmailtoaster] outlook randomly + repeatedly asking users for their network password
what limits do I change, here is a copy of my /etc/my.cnf file [mysqld] datadir=/var/lib/mysql socket=/var/lib/mysql/mysql.sock # Default to using old password format for compatibility with mysql 3.x # clients (those using the mysqlclient10 compatibility package). old_passwords=1 [mysql.server] user=mysql basedir=/var/lib [mysqld_safe] err-log=/var/log/mysqld.log pid-file=/var/run/mysqld/mysqld.pid On 12/02/2008, David Campbell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: funny, I got mysql server limit errors when I imported my users via a shell script, I will try editing this and let you know how I go On 12/02/2008, Jean-Paul van de Plasse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, This can happen due to too many connections to your mysql server.. You could up the limits a bit in /etc/my.cnf JP - Original Message - *From:* David Campbell [EMAIL PROTECTED] *To:* qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com *Sent:* Tuesday, February 12, 2008 1:32 AM *Subject:* Re: [qmailtoaster] outlook randomly + repeatedly asking users for their network password This issue never happened when we were using another mailserver though ( hmailserver.com+windows svr2k3), only since switching to qmailtoaster, and I cant exactly tell people to edit their registry, these are people who barely understand the concept of pressing the start menu I just don't understand why qmailtoaster has so many problems authenticating people :( On 12/02/2008, Tim Mancour [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The Outlook password dialog box is rather annoying. If you are typing when the dialog pops-up, your password gets overwritten by whatever you are typing. Then the user will typically press the Okay button which causes the password to be overwritten. I always have the users press the Cancel button to avoid this problem. If, after correcting their password, the problem persistents then look at http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;321652. -- *From:* David Campbell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *Sent:* Monday, February 11, 2008 6:36 PM *To:* qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com *Subject:* [qmailtoaster] outlook randomly + repeatedly asking users for their network password HELP! All the heavy users of the qmail toaster I have running (the users that have their outlook open all day and it send/receives every 5 minutes or so are having issues where the qmailtoaster constantly asks them for the password, I have never seen the error myself, but customers are driving me nuts with support calls about their email that keeps asking them for the password :( Has anyone experienced this before? As far as I can tell everything is working fine, and about 60% of the users have never seen the error, so I have no idea whats wrong... -- David Campbell E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] W: http://www.bigbighuge.com The information in this E-mail and any attachments is confidential. It is intended solely for the attention and use of the named addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, or person responsible for delivering this information to the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately. Unless you are the intended recipient or his/her representative you are not authorised to, and must not read, copy, distribute, use or retain this message or any part of it. Opinions, conclusions and other information expressed in this message are not given or endorsed by the sender unless otherwise indicated by an authorised officer independent of this message. ...when was the last time you did a backup?... -- David Campbell E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] W: http://www.bigbighuge.com The information in this E-mail and any attachments is confidential. It is intended solely for the attention and use of the named addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, or person responsible for delivering this information to the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately. Unless you are the intended recipient or his/her representative you are not authorised to, and must not read, copy, distribute, use or retain this message or any part of it. Opinions, conclusions and other information expressed in this message are not given or endorsed by the sender unless otherwise indicated by an authorised officer independent of this message. ...when was the last time you did a backup?... -- David Campbell E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] W: http://www.bigbighuge.com The information in this E-mail and any attachments is confidential. It is intended solely for the attention and use of the named addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, or person responsible for delivering this information to the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately. Unless you are the intended recipient or his/her representative you are not authorised to, and must
Re: [qmailtoaster] Mails going to junk folder of hotmail when sent from qmail
have you setup your domain for SPL? Does your IP address have a Reverse DNS entry? Is your internet connection a home connection or is it a full business connection? On 12/02/2008, senthil vel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, We are using qmail toaser and the outbound mails are routed to a anti spam firewall. But when mails sent to hotmail id, they are going to junk folder. Can anyone suggest any recovery. Thanks in advance. S.Senthilvel -- David Campbell E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] W: http://www.bigbighuge.com The information in this E-mail and any attachments is confidential. It is intended solely for the attention and use of the named addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, or person responsible for delivering this information to the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately. Unless you are the intended recipient or his/her representative you are not authorised to, and must not read, copy, distribute, use or retain this message or any part of it. Opinions, conclusions and other information expressed in this message are not given or endorsed by the sender unless otherwise indicated by an authorised officer independent of this message. ...when was the last time you did a backup?...
Re: [qmailtoaster] New webinterface for qmailtoaster
oh god yes, thats the only thing I dislike about QMT, its just so damned ugly, all my clients are like, ew, whats with the green lines and stuff? no offense, its a great system, but its ugly. Also, whats the deal with qmailadmin, you click on T for example, and the page starts with the last user names from S, thats really anoying I Think what needs to happen, is perhaps not so much outlandish styling, keep it plain and professional looking, because it looks like a geocities homepage right now It would be awesome if there was some way to easily configure the qmail control files from the interface, and possible give access to the qmail-plus stuff, and a nice way to read the error logs etc for the server, perhaps with a text highlighter that highlights bad things in a different color... On 11/02/2008, Jean-Paul van de Plasse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi List, It has been my plan for some time to get a smooth working and looking webinterface for qmailtoaster. Not to brag, but I have the programming skills (php/c/c++) and I also would not mind hiring a designer to make the designs. The only 2 problems I have had so far that stopped me from starting are time and input.. The first one is not going to change in the near future, but somewhere down the line there always can be found some time.. Concerning the second I would like your input, what are the things people want to see in such an interface.. And are there other people capable and willing to invest some time in this? Honestly I rather see the energy that goes wasted into the thread about Mike's remarks about qmt invested in a thread about functionality and ideas how we can make the missing part of qmt.. I think it would at least need the following - management tool for the administrator, to administer domains and settings of qmt - a qmailadmin replacement that works more logical - both with a neat looking design and easy to give your own look and feel (that is not overwritten on every update). Regards, JP -- David Campbell E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] W: http://www.bigbighuge.com The information in this E-mail and any attachments is confidential. It is intended solely for the attention and use of the named addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, or person responsible for delivering this information to the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately. Unless you are the intended recipient or his/her representative you are not authorised to, and must not read, copy, distribute, use or retain this message or any part of it. Opinions, conclusions and other information expressed in this message are not given or endorsed by the sender unless otherwise indicated by an authorised officer independent of this message. ...when was the last time you did a backup?...
Re: [qmailtoaster] New webinterface for qmailtoaster
I'm not sure it should go the the extent of javascript or css based drop downs, thats just asking for problems, but I would like to see the BUTTONS replaced with text links, because its so much easier to click text links with the middle button and open them in new tabs in firefox... On 11/02/2008, Eric Shubes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Jean-Paul van de Plasse wrote: Hi List, It has been my plan for some time to get a smooth working and looking webinterface for qmailtoaster. Not to brag, but I have the programming skills (php/c/c++) and I also would not mind hiring a designer to make the designs. The only 2 problems I have had so far that stopped me from starting are time and input.. The first one is not going to change in the near future, but somewhere down the line there always can be found some time.. Concerning the second I would like your input, what are the things people want to see in such an interface.. And are there other people capable and willing to invest some time in this? Honestly I rather see the energy that goes wasted into the thread about Mike's remarks about qmt invested in a thread about functionality and ideas how we can make the missing part of qmt.. I think it would at least need the following - management tool for the administrator, to administer domains and settings of qmt - a qmailadmin replacement that works more logical - both with a neat looking design and easy to give your own look and feel (that is not overwritten on every update). Regards, JP I've been thinking along the same lines. I'm rather fond of the web interface of IPCop (http://ipcop.org/), with various drop-down tabs for all of the functionality. It's very easy to use (note, the actual software works a tad bit differently than the web site). I'd like to see something similar for the toaster, and would be willing to participate in its development. -- -Eric 'shubes' - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- David Campbell E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] W: http://www.bigbighuge.com The information in this E-mail and any attachments is confidential. It is intended solely for the attention and use of the named addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, or person responsible for delivering this information to the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately. Unless you are the intended recipient or his/her representative you are not authorised to, and must not read, copy, distribute, use or retain this message or any part of it. Opinions, conclusions and other information expressed in this message are not given or endorsed by the sender unless otherwise indicated by an authorised officer independent of this message. ...when was the last time you did a backup?...
Re: [qmailtoaster] problems sending to 1 exchange server
SOrry, missed your reply. I'm still having issues with this, here is an update on what happens in the SEND log @400047aaca162d9f09fc starting delivery 23710: msg 10749661 to remote [EMAIL PROTECTED] @400047aaca162d9f9a84 status: local 0/10 remote 1/60 @400047aaca1724b6c7e4 delivery 23710: deferral: TLS_connect_failed;_connected_to_218.185.4.135./ @400047aaca1724b6fe94 status: local 0/10 remote 0/60 @400047aaca461cefc4ac new msg 10749528 @400047aaca461cf012cc info msg 10749528: bytes 855 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] qp 27701 uid 89 @400047aaca461d5a03e4 starting delivery 23711: msg 10749528 to local [EMAIL PROTECTED] @400047aaca461d5a5204 status: local 1/10 remote 0/60 @400047aaca4621431d24 delivery 23711: success: did_0+0+1/ @400047aaca4621437ecc status: local 0/10 remote 0/60 @400047aaca462143adac end msg 10749528 @400047aaca5b210e2e5c starting delivery 23712: msg 10749712 to remote [EMAIL PROTECTED] @400047aaca5b210e844c status: local 0/10 remote 1/60 @400047aaca5c0920b15c delivery 23712: deferral: TLS_connect_failed;_connected_to_218.185.4.135./ @400047aaca5c0924fb04 status: local 0/10 remote 0/60 @400047aaca5c18a8187c new msg 10749528 On 07/02/2008, Eric Shubes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You won't see much in the smtp (or submission) log. The problem is occurring on the outbound side of the toaster, which will be in the send log. Is there any indication there? If not, the only thing I can think of would be to turn on recordio on the send daemon and see what they're saying to each other. You can find instructions on using recordio in the list archives. Would be nice to have that on the wiki. David Campbell wrote: yeah thats what I dont understand, this is the only server it has issues with, I have access to the server via mstsc and I have checked its smtp server and it definitely does not require TLS and doesn't even have a cert installed, they are however running GFI mailessentials and that does something with the smtp service utilizing, as far as I can tell, BLACK MAGIC I checked the smtp log on the qmailtoaster and nothing is really standing out @400047aa25b30e6bbbfc tcpserver: pid 23200 from 218.185.4.140 http://218.185.4.140 @400047aa25b30e6beadc tcpserver: ok 23200 mta2.lan2go.net.au:218 http://mta2.lan2go.net.au:218.185.6.102:25 :218.185.4.140::2769 @400047aa25b31cb83dd4 CHKUSER accepted sender: from [EMAIL PROTECTED]:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: remote rmshp:unknown:218.185.4.140 http://218.185.4.140 rcpt : sender accepted @400047aa25b404e6a18c CHKUSER relaying rcpt: from [EMAIL PROTECTED]:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: remote rmshp:unknown:218.185.4.140 http://218.185.4.140 rcpt [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : client allowed to relay @400047aa25b40a8bda1c CHKUSER accepted rcpt: from [EMAIL PROTECTED]:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: remote rmshp:unknown:218.185.4.140 http://218.185.4.140 rcpt [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : found existing recipient @400047aa25b412168bec CHKUSER relaying rcpt: from [EMAIL PROTECTED]:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: remote rmshp:unknown:218.185.4.140 http://218.185.4.140 rcpt [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : client allowed to relay @400047aa25b41992d63c CHKUSER relaying rcpt: from [EMAIL PROTECTED]:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: remote rmshp:unknown:218.185.4.140 http://218.185.4.140 rcpt [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : client allowed to relay the client got identical TLS bouncebacks for all addresses @lancare.com.au http://lancare.com.au (the exchange server) On 07/02/2008, *Eric Shubes* [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: David Campbell wrote: I have a feeling this is the exchange servers problem, but I was wondering if anyone could help me with some insight into this issue Whenever I try and send mail to it, I get this error Hi. This is the qmail-send program at ###MY_QMAILTOASTER!!! http://mta2.lan2go.net.au/ I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses. This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out. [EMAIL PROTECTED]: TLS connect failed; connected to ###BAD_EXCHANGE_SERVERS_IP### I'm not going to try again; this message has been in the queue too long. and ideas? this qmailtoaster is a completely standard Centos 4.3 install as per qmailtoaster instruction guide -- David Campbell Any hints in the send log? qmail-send appears to be unable to establish a TLS connection with the exchange server (am I stating the obvious?). Why is it attempting to establish a TLS (secure) connection? -- -Eric 'shubes' - QmailToaster
Re: [qmailtoaster] problems sending to 1 exchange server
looking through some mail-list archives I can see that apparently some Cisco Pix firewalls attempt to correct the SMTP transaction and stuff up TLS, and all our stuff comes and goes through a Cisco PIX firewall... so this may be the issue... Is there any way to force the qmailtoaster not to use TLS when sending to this particular server/domain ? On 11/02/2008, David Campbell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: SOrry, missed your reply. I'm still having issues with this, here is an update on what happens in the SEND log @400047aaca162d9f09fc starting delivery 23710: msg 10749661 to remote [EMAIL PROTECTED] @400047aaca162d9f9a84 status: local 0/10 remote 1/60 @400047aaca1724b6c7e4 delivery 23710: deferral: TLS_connect_failed;_connected_to_218.185.4.135./ @400047aaca1724b6fe94 status: local 0/10 remote 0/60 @400047aaca461cefc4ac new msg 10749528 @400047aaca461cf012cc info msg 10749528: bytes 855 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] qp 27701 uid 89 @400047aaca461d5a03e4 starting delivery 23711: msg 10749528 to local [EMAIL PROTECTED] @400047aaca461d5a5204 status: local 1/10 remote 0/60 @400047aaca4621431d24 delivery 23711: success: did_0+0+1/ @400047aaca4621437ecc status: local 0/10 remote 0/60 @400047aaca462143adac end msg 10749528 @400047aaca5b210e2e5c starting delivery 23712: msg 10749712 to remote [EMAIL PROTECTED] @400047aaca5b210e844c status: local 0/10 remote 1/60 @400047aaca5c0920b15c delivery 23712: deferral: TLS_connect_failed;_connected_to_218.185.4.135./ @400047aaca5c0924fb04 status: local 0/10 remote 0/60 @400047aaca5c18a8187c new msg 10749528 On 07/02/2008, Eric Shubes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You won't see much in the smtp (or submission) log. The problem is occurring on the outbound side of the toaster, which will be in the send log. Is there any indication there? If not, the only thing I can think of would be to turn on recordio on the send daemon and see what they're saying to each other. You can find instructions on using recordio in the list archives. Would be nice to have that on the wiki. David Campbell wrote: yeah thats what I dont understand, this is the only server it has issues with, I have access to the server via mstsc and I have checked its smtp server and it definitely does not require TLS and doesn't even have a cert installed, they are however running GFI mailessentials and that does something with the smtp service utilizing, as far as I can tell, BLACK MAGIC I checked the smtp log on the qmailtoaster and nothing is really standing out @400047aa25b30e6bbbfc tcpserver: pid 23200 from 218.185.4.140 http://218.185.4.140 @400047aa25b30e6beadc tcpserver: ok 23200 mta2.lan2go.net.au:218 http://mta2.lan2go.net.au:218.185.6.102:25 :218.185.4.140::2769 @400047aa25b31cb83dd4 CHKUSER accepted sender: from [EMAIL PROTECTED]:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: remote rmshp:unknown:218.185.4.140 http://218.185.4.140 rcpt : sender accepted @400047aa25b404e6a18c CHKUSER relaying rcpt: from [EMAIL PROTECTED]:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: remote rmshp:unknown:218.185.4.140 http://218.185.4.140 rcpt [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : client allowed to relay @400047aa25b40a8bda1c CHKUSER accepted rcpt: from [EMAIL PROTECTED]:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: remote rmshp:unknown:218.185.4.140 http://218.185.4.140 rcpt [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : found existing recipient @400047aa25b412168bec CHKUSER relaying rcpt: from [EMAIL PROTECTED]:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: remote rmshp:unknown:218.185.4.140 http://218.185.4.140 rcpt [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : client allowed to relay @400047aa25b41992d63c CHKUSER relaying rcpt: from [EMAIL PROTECTED]:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: remote rmshp:unknown:218.185.4.140 http://218.185.4.140 rcpt [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : client allowed to relay the client got identical TLS bouncebacks for all addresses @lancare.com.au http://lancare.com.au (the exchange server) On 07/02/2008, *Eric Shubes* [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: David Campbell wrote: I have a feeling this is the exchange servers problem, but I was wondering if anyone could help me with some insight into this issue Whenever I try and send mail to it, I get this error Hi. This is the qmail-send program at ###MY_QMAILTOASTER!!! http://mta2.lan2go.net.au/ I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses. This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out. [EMAIL PROTECTED]: TLS connect failed; connected to ###BAD_EXCHANGE_SERVERS_IP### I'm not going to try again; this message has been in the queue too long. and ideas
Re: [qmailtoaster] New webinterface for qmailtoaster
any symbian phone - symbian putty ssh :D nothin like admining a mail server from the middle of a field full of cows On 11/02/2008, Harry Zink [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Whatever you do, make it heavily CSS based, which will make it easier to create alternate interfaces, like for the iPhone. Being able to administer your mail server from an iPhone would be (to me) the ultimate tool. Harry On Feb 10, 2008, at 12:44 PM, Jean-Paul van de Plasse wrote: Hi List, It has been my plan for some time to get a smooth working and looking webinterface for qmailtoaster. Not to brag, but I have the programming skills (php/c/c++) and I also would not mind hiring a designer to make the designs. The only 2 problems I have had so far that stopped me from starting are time and input.. The first one is not going to change in the near future, but somewhere down the line there always can be found some time.. Concerning the second I would like your input, what are the things people want to see in such an interface.. And are there other people capable and willing to invest some time in this? Honestly I rather see the energy that goes wasted into the thread about Mike's remarks about qmt invested in a thread about functionality and ideas how we can make the missing part of qmt.. I think it would at least need the following - management tool for the administrator, to administer domains and settings of qmt - a qmailadmin replacement that works more logical - both with a neat looking design and easy to give your own look and feel (that is not overwritten on every update). Regards, JP -- David Campbell E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] W: http://www.bigbighuge.com The information in this E-mail and any attachments is confidential. It is intended solely for the attention and use of the named addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, or person responsible for delivering this information to the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately. Unless you are the intended recipient or his/her representative you are not authorised to, and must not read, copy, distribute, use or retain this message or any part of it. Opinions, conclusions and other information expressed in this message are not given or endorsed by the sender unless otherwise indicated by an authorised officer independent of this message. ...when was the last time you did a backup?...
Re: [qmailtoaster] VQAdmin Problem
it sounds like the installation didn't complete properly, I myself use the QMT-ISO package and it works fine for my machines (I recently installed the latest one) I wouldn't trust that installation if those folders were missing and I'd say reformat and try again. NOTE: you do know that the QMT-ISO package has to restart the server several times before everything is installed? Next time, check if those directories exist before you start transfering your backup On 08/02/2008, Ben Mills [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Robert S Galloway wrote: Howdy, I just installed a new server with the QMT-ISO disc and I'm having trouble adding a domain to the server with VQAdmin. The install is default, but I have done a qtp-restore with data from my old server. Basically, when I add the domain with VQAdmin, everything looks like it works, but then I go back to view domain and it says that there is no postmaster. Also, there is no directory under /home/vpopmail/domains. Actually, the more I look at this, I think it is a completely hosed install. There is no /var/qmail/control folder like my other install. I'm not really sure where to start troubleshooting this. Can someone get me pointed in the right direction? I have no idea why you don't have /var/qmail/control. Domainkeys, TLS cert (pem) and lots of other stuff go there by default. The HELO string, for that matter, is set by a file in that dir. But I can assure you that adding domains via VQadmin isn't very reliable. They should be added from the command line. Ben - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- David Campbell E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] W: http://www.bigbighuge.com The information in this E-mail and any attachments is confidential. It is intended solely for the attention and use of the named addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, or person responsible for delivering this information to the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately. Unless you are the intended recipient or his/her representative you are not authorised to, and must not read, copy, distribute, use or retain this message or any part of it. Opinions, conclusions and other information expressed in this message are not given or endorsed by the sender unless otherwise indicated by an authorised officer independent of this message. ...when was the last time you did a backup?...
Re: [qmailtoaster] nutsmail
yes, I use nutsmail on my QMT-ISO its simple, just copy paste, done :D On 08/02/2008, Robert S Galloway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've had a nutsmail install on my toaster since forever. The only problem/issue I have with it is having to keep paying for updates as squirrelmail security updates come out. I originally thought that you would receive security patches as long as the major version didn't change. I don't plan to install it on my new server. Thanks, Robert On Feb 7, 2008, at 6:18 PM, Ben Mills wrote: Andrew Niemantsverdriet wrote: Unless my experience with Nutsmail was a deviation from the norm, save your sanity (and money) and avoid those people. It managed to charge my cc, but never provided a download link. Its sales people even contacted me, but never provided a link. This had gone on for a full week until I demanded the charge be reversed. And so it was eventually reversed. Ben I have looked at it twice. Both times I found something else that worked a little better for me. It was easier to do myself in the end. I would be interested in hearing experiences from people who have actually used it. On Feb 7, 2008 5:37 PM, Eric Shubes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Has anyone implemented nutsmail (http://www.nutsmail.org) on a toaster? Looks like it would be fairly easy. Any advice? -- -Eric 'shubes' - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- David Campbell E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] W: http://www.bigbighuge.com The information in this E-mail and any attachments is confidential. It is intended solely for the attention and use of the named addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, or person responsible for delivering this information to the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately. Unless you are the intended recipient or his/her representative you are not authorised to, and must not read, copy, distribute, use or retain this message or any part of it. Opinions, conclusions and other information expressed in this message are not given or endorsed by the sender unless otherwise indicated by an authorised officer independent of this message. ...when was the last time you did a backup?...
[qmailtoaster] problems sending to 1 exchange server
I have a feeling this is the exchange servers problem, but I was wondering if anyone could help me with some insight into this issue Whenever I try and send mail to it, I get this error Hi. This is the qmail-send program at ###MY_QMAILTOASTER!!!http://mta2.lan2go.net.au/ I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses. This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out. [EMAIL PROTECTED]: TLS connect failed; connected to ###BAD_EXCHANGE_SERVERS_IP### I'm not going to try again; this message has been in the queue too long. and ideas? this qmailtoaster is a completely standard Centos 4.3 install as per qmailtoaster instruction guide -- David Campbell E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] W: http://www.bigbighuge.com The information in this E-mail and any attachments is confidential. It is intended solely for the attention and use of the named addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, or person responsible for delivering this information to the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately. Unless you are the intended recipient or his/her representative you are not authorised to, and must not read, copy, distribute, use or retain this message or any part of it. Opinions, conclusions and other information expressed in this message are not given or endorsed by the sender unless otherwise indicated by an authorised officer independent of this message. ...when was the last time you did a backup?...
Re: [qmailtoaster] problems sending to 1 exchange server
yeah thats what I dont understand, this is the only server it has issues with, I have access to the server via mstsc and I have checked its smtp server and it definitely does not require TLS and doesn't even have a cert installed, they are however running GFI mailessentials and that does something with the smtp service utilizing, as far as I can tell, BLACK MAGIC I checked the smtp log on the qmailtoaster and nothing is really standing out @400047aa25b30e6bbbfc tcpserver: pid 23200 from 218.185.4.140 @400047aa25b30e6beadc tcpserver: ok 23200 mta2.lan2go.net.au:218.185.6.102:25 :218.185.4.140::2769 @400047aa25b31cb83dd4 CHKUSER accepted sender: from [EMAIL PROTECTED]:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: remote rmshp:unknown:218.185.4.140 rcpt : sender accepted @400047aa25b404e6a18c CHKUSER relaying rcpt: from [EMAIL PROTECTED]:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: remote rmshp:unknown:218.185.4.140 rcpt [EMAIL PROTECTED] : client allowed to relay @400047aa25b40a8bda1c CHKUSER accepted rcpt: from [EMAIL PROTECTED]:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: remote rmshp:unknown:218.185.4.140 rcpt [EMAIL PROTECTED] : found existing recipient @400047aa25b412168bec CHKUSER relaying rcpt: from [EMAIL PROTECTED]:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: remote rmshp:unknown:218.185.4.140 rcpt [EMAIL PROTECTED] : client allowed to relay @400047aa25b41992d63c CHKUSER relaying rcpt: from [EMAIL PROTECTED]:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: remote rmshp:unknown:218.185.4.140 rcpt [EMAIL PROTECTED] : client allowed to relay the client got identical TLS bouncebacks for all addresses @lancare.com.au(the exchange server) On 07/02/2008, Eric Shubes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: David Campbell wrote: I have a feeling this is the exchange servers problem, but I was wondering if anyone could help me with some insight into this issue Whenever I try and send mail to it, I get this error Hi. This is the qmail-send program at ###MY_QMAILTOASTER!!! http://mta2.lan2go.net.au/ I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses. This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out. [EMAIL PROTECTED]: TLS connect failed; connected to ###BAD_EXCHANGE_SERVERS_IP### I'm not going to try again; this message has been in the queue too long. and ideas? this qmailtoaster is a completely standard Centos 4.3 install as per qmailtoaster instruction guide -- David Campbell Any hints in the send log? qmail-send appears to be unable to establish a TLS connection with the exchange server (am I stating the obvious?). Why is it attempting to establish a TLS (secure) connection? -- -Eric 'shubes' - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- David Campbell E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] W: http://www.bigbighuge.com The information in this E-mail and any attachments is confidential. It is intended solely for the attention and use of the named addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, or person responsible for delivering this information to the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately. Unless you are the intended recipient or his/her representative you are not authorised to, and must not read, copy, distribute, use or retain this message or any part of it. Opinions, conclusions and other information expressed in this message are not given or endorsed by the sender unless otherwise indicated by an authorised officer independent of this message. ...when was the last time you did a backup?...
Re: [qmailtoaster] Problem with alias
if its going to two users, shouldn't it be a mailing list? I thought aliases only worked for single accounts... try removing the alias and adding them to a mailing list instead. On 01/02/2008, Tracktest [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, i have just created a fine working alias. It is called: sales and it points to two users. By entering again qmailadmin web panel, i cannot see the alias, even though in the vpopmail dir there is the .qmail-sales file. Could you please help me' Thank you in advance for your kind interest, regards! Francesco -- David Campbell E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] W: http://www.bigbighuge.com The information in this E-mail and any attachments is confidential. It is intended solely for the attention and use of the named addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, or person responsible for delivering this information to the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately. Unless you are the intended recipient or his/her representative you are not authorised to, and must not read, copy, distribute, use or retain this message or any part of it. Opinions, conclusions and other information expressed in this message are not given or endorsed by the sender unless otherwise indicated by an authorised officer independent of this message. ...when was the last time you did a backup?...
Re: [qmailtoaster] /var/qmail/control/blacklists
thank you, all is well, i can now sleep :D On 29/01/2008, Johannes Weberhofer, Weberhofer GmbH [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I suggest using the same lines for 121. and 124. as for 127. Johannes David Campbell schrieb: actually, this isn't working for me at all, the only thing that works is the submission port this is my tcp.smtp 127.:allow,RELAYCLIENT=,DKSIGN=/var/qmail/control/domainkeys/%/private,RBLSMTPD=,NOP0FCHECK=1 121.:allow 124.:allow :allow,BADMIMETYPE=,BADLOADERTYPE=M,CHKUSER_RCPTLIMIT=50,CHKUSER_WRONGRCPTLIMIT=10,QMAILQUEUE=/var/qmail/bin/simscan,DKSIGN=/var/qmail/control/domainkeys/%/private,NOP0FCHECK=1 and I'm connecting via a dialup over 124.254.64.227 http://124.254.64.227 so it should work fine, but it doesn't, and my boss is unimpressed D: I just wish the blacklist check happened after the auth so that authorized people didn't need to get checked On 29/01/2008, *Eric Shubes* [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Always. ;) Glad it's working for you. David Campbell wrote: yes, I have actually added them into that file now, havn;t had any more complaints... I guess thats a good thing :D On 29/01/2008, *Eric Shubes* [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: David Campbell wrote: if this file is edited, is it automatically updated, or does something need to be restarted before this will update? thanks This file is pulled into each smtp session when it's started, so nothing needs to be done for these. If it's feasible though, I'd make an effort to try using the solution Jake suggested by disabling RBLs in the /etc/tcprules.d/tcp.smtp file (in which case you'd need to 'qmailctl cdb' as Ben mentioned to make the change effective). That way you won't lose the effectiveness of spamhaus entirely. RBLs are a powerful and effective tool against spam, and they use minimal toaster resources because rejected messages aren't even accepted, let alone scanned. -- -Eric 'shubes' - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- David Campbell E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] W: http://www.bigbighuge.com The information in this E-mail and any attachments is confidential. It is intended solely for the attention and use of the named addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, or person responsible for delivering this information to the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately. Unless you are the intended recipient or his/her representative you are not authorised to, and must not read, copy, distribute, use or retain this message or any part of it. Opinions, conclusions and other information expressed in this message are not given or endorsed by the sender unless otherwise indicated by an authorised officer independent of this message. ...when was the last time you did a backup?... -- -Eric 'shubes' - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- David Campbell E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] W: http://www.bigbighuge.com The information in this E-mail and any attachments is confidential. It is intended solely for the attention and use of the named addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, or person responsible for delivering this information to the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately. Unless you are the intended recipient or his/her representative you
Re: [qmailtoaster] Cannot send local email
OMG I didn't know that, luckily I created all my domains via a shell script of users from my old windows server haha, is there an equivalent to vqadmin that can be used to create domains? My boss is a windows user, and I want him to be able to add new domains without going anywhere near the bash prompt... On 30/01/2008, Eric Shubes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Delivery error: Sorry. Although I'm listed as a best-preference MX or A for that host, it isn't in my control/locals file, so I don't treat it as local. (#5.4.6) Did you by chance use vqadmin to create one of the domains? vqadmin is broken. You need to create the domains using /home/vpopmail/bin/vadddomain. Yes, I did but then, all of my other domains were also. It's broken? I don't recall seeing anything about that. I hope that doesn't mean I have to re-create all of the domains and email accounts? That would be nuts. Mike Sorry about that, Mike. There has been talk about it on the list, for instance: http://www.mail-archive.com/qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com/msg16552.html The wiki faqs does say that vqadmin is ok for adding and deleting domains, but I don't believe that's accurate any more. There are flaky things that happen when it's used. It'd be nice if someone were to fix it, but I doubt that'll happen since inter7 has deprecated it. I think it would be best to remove it from the toaster disto. I personally don't even install it. -- -Eric 'shubes' - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- David Campbell E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] W: http://www.bigbighuge.com The information in this E-mail and any attachments is confidential. It is intended solely for the attention and use of the named addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, or person responsible for delivering this information to the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately. Unless you are the intended recipient or his/her representative you are not authorised to, and must not read, copy, distribute, use or retain this message or any part of it. Opinions, conclusions and other information expressed in this message are not given or endorsed by the sender unless otherwise indicated by an authorised officer independent of this message. ...when was the last time you did a backup?...
Re: [qmailtoaster] /var/qmail/control/blacklists
yeah, that sounds like a bad thing, heh, thanks for the tip, I had a look at that and thought hmm, I will correct it now, thanks again On 30/01/2008, Tim Mancour [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You probably should remove RELAYCLIENT= from lines 121 and 124. Otherwise your toaster will relay Email for anybody on the 121.0.0.0/24 and 124.0.0.0/24 networks. -Original Message- From: Johannes Weberhofer, Weberhofer GmbH [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2008 4:08 AM To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] /var/qmail/control/blacklists I suggest using the same lines for 121. and 124. as for 127. Johannes David Campbell schrieb: actually, this isn't working for me at all, the only thing that works is the submission port this is my tcp.smtp 127.:allow,RELAYCLIENT=,DKSIGN=/var/qmail/control/domainkeys/%/private,R BLSMTPD=,NOP0FCHECK=1 121.:allow 124.:allow :allow,BADMIMETYPE=,BADLOADERTYPE=M,CHKUSER_RCPTLIMIT=50,CHKUSER_WRONG RCPTLIMIT=10,QMAILQUEUE=/var/qmail/bin/simscan,DKSIGN=/var/qmail/contro l/domainkeys/%/private,NOP0FCHECK=1 and I'm connecting via a dialup over 124.254.64.227 http://124.254.64.227 so it should work fine, but it doesn't, and my boss is unimpressed D: I just wish the blacklist check happened after the auth so that authorized people didn't need to get checked On 29/01/2008, *Eric Shubes* [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Always. ;) Glad it's working for you. David Campbell wrote: yes, I have actually added them into that file now, havn;t had any more complaints... I guess thats a good thing :D On 29/01/2008, *Eric Shubes* [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: David Campbell wrote: if this file is edited, is it automatically updated, or does something need to be restarted before this will update? thanks This file is pulled into each smtp session when it's started, so nothing needs to be done for these. If it's feasible though, I'd make an effort to try using the solution Jake suggested by disabling RBLs in the /etc/tcprules.d/tcp.smtp file (in which case you'd need to 'qmailctl cdb' as Ben mentioned to make the change effective). That way you won't lose the effectiveness of spamhaus entirely. RBLs are a powerful and effective tool against spam, and they use minimal toaster resources because rejected messages aren't even accepted, let alone scanned. -- -Eric 'shubes' - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- David Campbell E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] W: http://www.bigbighuge.com The information in this E-mail and any attachments is confidential. It is intended solely for the attention and use of the named addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, or person responsible for delivering this information to the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately. Unless you are the intended recipient or his/her representative you are not authorised to, and must not read, copy, distribute, use or retain this message or any part of it. Opinions, conclusions and other information expressed in this message are not given or endorsed by the sender unless otherwise indicated by an authorised officer independent of this message. ...when was the last time you did a backup?... -- -Eric 'shubes' - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
Re: [qmailtoaster] - Outgoing Authentication for ISP mail
spam dyke sounds nice, I may play with it later, but as a noob to linux, I think I will leave it for now, its working currently and its doing an AMAZING job at getting rid of spam (users have commented on their spam volume going from 20 a day down to 1 a day) so I will leave it for now untill I am sure I wont much it up, then I can take a look at other solutions thank you very much for your help though, and it would be nice to skip RBL for my authed users because I have alot of road warriors that use our service from all over the place On 30/01/2008, Sam Clippinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You should consider replacing rblsmtpd with spamdyke. It will filter incoming connections based on RBLs and much more (including graylisting). It also bypasses all filters for authenticated users. http://www.spamdyke.org/ -- Sam Clippinger David Campbell wrote: yes, it was an RBL error they got, but I am loving the RBL protection for antispam, is there anyway to allow authenticated users to bypass RBL checking? - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- David Campbell E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] W: http://www.bigbighuge.com The information in this E-mail and any attachments is confidential. It is intended solely for the attention and use of the named addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, or person responsible for delivering this information to the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately. Unless you are the intended recipient or his/her representative you are not authorised to, and must not read, copy, distribute, use or retain this message or any part of it. Opinions, conclusions and other information expressed in this message are not given or endorsed by the sender unless otherwise indicated by an authorised officer independent of this message. ...when was the last time you did a backup?...
[qmailtoaster] - Outgoing Authentication for ISP mail
I'm running qmailtaoster for an ISP mail system, we just switched over from another mail server that was running in windows (hmailserver.com) which uses the same [EMAIL PROTECTED] for username and password, and it worked fine with my outgoing mailserver requires authentication ticked in outlook or equivalent settings in other programs, but I have an issue with about 20% of my customers, with exactly the same settings we transfered the usernames and passwords so they matched on the new server, then switched over the A and MX records, all of a sudden they cannot send email, they can receive fine, just not send, they get an SMTP auth failure, I was wondering if anyone else has experience in using qmailtaoster for an isp and could offer any tips, we resell our connections from a wholesaler so we dont control their IP's thus cannot just allow relaying from a particular ip range, we need authentication. thank you
Re: [qmailtoaster] - Outgoing Authentication for ISP mail
yes, it was an RBL error they got, but I am loving the RBL protection for antispam, is there anyway to allow authenticated users to bypass RBL checking? On 29/01/2008, Jake Vickers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: David Campbell wrote: I'm running qmailtaoster for an ISP mail system, we just switched over from another mail server that was running in windows (hmailserver.com) which uses the same [EMAIL PROTECTED] for username and password, and it worked fine with my outgoing mailserver requires authentication ticked in outlook or equivalent settings in other programs, but I have an issue with about 20% of my customers, with exactly the same settings we transfered the usernames and passwords so they matched on the new server, then switched over the A and MX records, all of a sudden they cannot send email, they can receive fine, just not send, they get an SMTP auth failure, I was wondering if anyone else has experience in using qmailtaoster for an isp and could offer any tips, we resell our connections from a wholesaler so we dont control their IP's thus cannot just allow relaying from a particular ip range, we need authentication. Are they receiving an error about the RBL check? If so, you can either remove spamhaus from the blacklists, connect them to 587 istead of 25, or some other type of workaround. -- David Campbell E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] W: http://www.bigbighuge.com The information in this E-mail and any attachments is confidential. It is intended solely for the attention and use of the named addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, or person responsible for delivering this information to the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately. Unless you are the intended recipient or his/her representative you are not authorised to, and must not read, copy, distribute, use or retain this message or any part of it. Opinions, conclusions and other information expressed in this message are not given or endorsed by the sender unless otherwise indicated by an authorised officer independent of this message. ...when was the last time you did a backup?...
Re: [qmailtoaster] - Outgoing Authentication for ISP mail
aw, thats a shame, I mean its good and they do a great job...I dont really want to add ANOTHER layer of complication to the setup of our email accounts to home users who can barely figure out how to open outlook :( is it possible to whitelist IP addresses from certain ranges against the blacklist? this would require me to whitelist all of out wholesalers dynamic IP range, but they have a fairly strict anti-spam system On 29/01/2008, Jake Vickers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: David Campbell wrote: yes, it was an RBL error they got, but I am loving the RBL protection for antispam, is there anyway to allow authenticated users to bypass RBL checking? Not unless you use port 587. RBLs are checked the first thing, before any type of authentication is even processed. - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- David Campbell E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] W: http://www.bigbighuge.com The information in this E-mail and any attachments is confidential. It is intended solely for the attention and use of the named addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, or person responsible for delivering this information to the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately. Unless you are the intended recipient or his/her representative you are not authorised to, and must not read, copy, distribute, use or retain this message or any part of it. Opinions, conclusions and other information expressed in this message are not given or endorsed by the sender unless otherwise indicated by an authorised officer independent of this message. ...when was the last time you did a backup?...
Re: [qmailtoaster] - Outgoing Authentication for ISP mail
so for example I wanted to skip rbl for 10.10.*.* I would open up /etc/tcprules.d/tcp.smtp and add the entry on a new line so it looked like 10.10.:allow what would be the exact line I would need to put in there, to allow people on that range to skip RBL sorry, I'm a total noob at this :D Also would this require a restart of the server or networking in order to start working? On 29/01/2008, Jake Vickers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: David Campbell wrote: aw, thats a shame, I mean its good and they do a great job...I dont really want to add ANOTHER layer of complication to the setup of our email accounts to home users who can barely figure out how to open outlook :( is it possible to whitelist IP addresses from certain ranges against the blacklist? this would require me to whitelist all of out wholesalers dynamic IP range, but they have a fairly strict anti-spam system You can create your own RBL whitelist if you want - just add that entry before the spamhaus entry. You can also add their IP ranges in your tcp.smtp file to skip the RBL checks. - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- David Campbell E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] W: http://www.bigbighuge.com The information in this E-mail and any attachments is confidential. It is intended solely for the attention and use of the named addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, or person responsible for delivering this information to the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately. Unless you are the intended recipient or his/her representative you are not authorised to, and must not read, copy, distribute, use or retain this message or any part of it. Opinions, conclusions and other information expressed in this message are not given or endorsed by the sender unless otherwise indicated by an authorised officer independent of this message. ...when was the last time you did a backup?...
Re: [qmailtoaster] - Outgoing Authentication for ISP mail
is spamhaus the only one that rejects dynamic ips or should I remove any others like spamcop ( I checked and the customers ip that had been rejected was not listed at spamcop) but are there others I should remove? currently I have the following in my control/blacklists file -r bl.spamcop.net -r list.dsbl.org -r cbl.abuseat.org are there any others that could be recommended for extra protection, without killing dynamic IP addresses (ie, addresses only blacklisted for sending spam, not just for being a dynamic ip) On 29/01/2008, David Campbell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: so for example I wanted to skip rbl for 10.10.*.* I would open up /etc/tcprules.d/tcp.smtp and add the entry on a new line so it looked like 10.10.:allow what would be the exact line I would need to put in there, to allow people on that range to skip RBL sorry, I'm a total noob at this :D Also would this require a restart of the server or networking in order to start working? On 29/01/2008, Jake Vickers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: David Campbell wrote: aw, thats a shame, I mean its good and they do a great job...I dont really want to add ANOTHER layer of complication to the setup of our email accounts to home users who can barely figure out how to open outlook :( is it possible to whitelist IP addresses from certain ranges against the blacklist? this would require me to whitelist all of out wholesalers dynamic IP range, but they have a fairly strict anti-spam system You can create your own RBL whitelist if you want - just add that entry before the spamhaus entry. You can also add their IP ranges in your tcp.smtp file to skip the RBL checks. - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- David Campbell E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] W: http://www.bigbighuge.com The information in this E-mail and any attachments is confidential. It is intended solely for the attention and use of the named addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, or person responsible for delivering this information to the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately. Unless you are the intended recipient or his/her representative you are not authorised to, and must not read, copy, distribute, use or retain this message or any part of it. Opinions, conclusions and other information expressed in this message are not given or endorsed by the sender unless otherwise indicated by an authorised officer independent of this message. ...when was the last time you did a backup?... -- David Campbell E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] W: http://www.bigbighuge.com The information in this E-mail and any attachments is confidential. It is intended solely for the attention and use of the named addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, or person responsible for delivering this information to the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately. Unless you are the intended recipient or his/her representative you are not authorised to, and must not read, copy, distribute, use or retain this message or any part of it. Opinions, conclusions and other information expressed in this message are not given or endorsed by the sender unless otherwise indicated by an authorised officer independent of this message. ...when was the last time you did a backup?...
Re: [qmailtoaster] /var/qmail/control/blacklists
yes, I have actually added them into that file now, havn;t had any more complaints... I guess thats a good thing :D On 29/01/2008, Eric Shubes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: David Campbell wrote: if this file is edited, is it automatically updated, or does something need to be restarted before this will update? thanks This file is pulled into each smtp session when it's started, so nothing needs to be done for these. If it's feasible though, I'd make an effort to try using the solution Jake suggested by disabling RBLs in the /etc/tcprules.d/tcp.smtp file (in which case you'd need to 'qmailctl cdb' as Ben mentioned to make the change effective). That way you won't lose the effectiveness of spamhaus entirely. RBLs are a powerful and effective tool against spam, and they use minimal toaster resources because rejected messages aren't even accepted, let alone scanned. -- -Eric 'shubes' - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- David Campbell E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] W: http://www.bigbighuge.com The information in this E-mail and any attachments is confidential. It is intended solely for the attention and use of the named addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, or person responsible for delivering this information to the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately. Unless you are the intended recipient or his/her representative you are not authorised to, and must not read, copy, distribute, use or retain this message or any part of it. Opinions, conclusions and other information expressed in this message are not given or endorsed by the sender unless otherwise indicated by an authorised officer independent of this message. ...when was the last time you did a backup?...
[qmailtoaster] SSL3_GET_RECORD:wrong version number (#4.4.2)
I got this error about 24 hours after I originally send the message that never showed up, what can be done to solve this? Hi. This is the qmail-send program at mta2.##.net.au. I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses. This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.dinkum.net.au/webmail/src/compose.php?send_to=david.campbell%40lancare.com.au: Connected to 218.185.XXX.XXX but connection died. error:1408F10B:SSL routines:SSL3_GET_RECORD:wrong version number (#4.4.2) I'm not going to try again; this message has been in the queue too long. --- Below this line is a copy of the message. Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.dinkum.net.au/webmail/src/compose.php?send_to=dave%40dinkum.net.au Received: (qmail 5445 invoked by uid 89); 26 Jan 2008 03:07:25 - Received: from unknown (HELO mail.##) (127.0.0.1) by mta2.##.net.au with SMTP; 26 Jan 2008 03:07:25 - Received: from 218.185.XXX.YYY (SquirrelMail authenticated user [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.dinkum.net.au/webmail/src/compose.php?send_to=dave%40dinkum.net.au) by mail.## with HTTP; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 14:07:25 +1100 (EST) Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.dinkum.net.au/webmail/src/compose.php?send_to=4893.218.185.6.21.1201316845.squirrel%40mail.dinkum.net.au Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 14:07:25 +1100 (EST) Subject: test From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.dinkum.net.au/webmail/src/compose.php?send_to=dave%40dinkum.net.au To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.dinkum.net.au/webmail/src/compose.php?send_to=david.campbell%40lancare.com.au User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.13 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative;boundary==_20080126140725_25090 X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal --=_20080126140725_25090 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit test --=_20080126140725_25090 Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit test --=_20080126140725_25090--
[qmailtoaster] Qmail Toaster Plus
Maybe I'm blind/stupid but I have no idea where the documentation on how to use/install qmt is, the wiki just has a link to a place where I can download it, and it has all this wizzbang stuff in it, but wheres the user manual? I would really like to RTFM for qtp but I can't find it :(
Re: [qmailtoaster] ISOQLOG2.1 Issue
Thanks for that advice casper, I have been looking at the logs and after i put the accoutns in and left it alone all night, it went back to its normal 4 mails instead of 1100 mails, so it does look like a logging thing, but I cannot for the life of me find the root mailbox... can anyone help me out with finding these messages, here is my system, its a strait install of the CentOS 4.3 guide onto CentOS4.3 *CentOS 4.3 qmailtoaster the easy way*http://www.qmailtoaster.com/centos/cnt40/EZ-QmailToaster-CentOS-4.3.txt- Mail Server Only Sorry, I'm a total windows noob (I came from hmailserver.com, which was nice, but I need something faster) On 22/01/2008, cas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Well, looks like your toaster is bouncing messages. Check for that in the qmail manuals (double bounces in fact). The bounced mail is probably from a crontab line, where some program like mrtg or your mailing list wants to mail a log file every hour or so. The bounced mail you can find in the mailbox of root. Hope this helps... Greetings, Casper On Tue, 2008-01-22 at 15:30 +1100, David Campbell wrote: ugh, sorry guys, this is my first mailing list and I managed to screw up my very first post, so sorry, I suck, it was just a copy/paste of the log page from qlog of the qmailtoaster server straight into gmail, dont click on the stuff, as I said, I'm a noob, I'm just really concerned about the log there seems to be massive amounts of email coming from people called [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED] whatever that address is supposed to be, can anyone tell me if this is normal? they must have been images that are linking from that page that are behind the authentication of the isoqlog, very sorry for any confusion/malice On 22/01/2008, Harry Zink [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This message of yours contains something that points to a server at 218.185.6.102:80 and appears to require loggin in with admin credentials in order to proceed - if this is an attempt at phishing, it's a poor one. On Jan 21, 2008, at 7:16 PM, David Campbell wrote: ISOQLOG2.1 Issue This server has been running for 4 days, and it currently has no domain records pointed to it (wanted to make sure I got it right before I put it into production, it does however have a public IP, now When I click on General under isoqlog it gives me general Jan, 2008 Statistics Creation Time: Jan 22, 2008 / 13:58 Day Sent Received Total Size 18 25 31 56 36.52 KBytes 19 4 4 8 19.16 KBytes 20 4 4 8 973.07 KBytes 21 4 4 8 6.96 KBytes 22 234 234 468 851.88 KBytes Total 271 277 548 1.84 MBytes Average 54 55 109 377.52 KBytes and if I click on the 22'd of January Top 100 Sender Mail Number 1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 116 2 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 57 3 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2 4 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1 Top 100 Receiver Mail Number 1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 59 2 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 58 3 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 58 4 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 57 5 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1 6 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1 Should I find this alarming or is it logging some kind of internal emailing that I don't know about because I'm a bit of a noob? the only emails I have sent (to test it out) were via the webmail (squirelmail) as [EMAIL PROTECTED] and they were sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED], but I have no idea about the rest of them, and they seem to be increasing, though today I did import via a shellscript
Re: [qmailtoaster] hand mail off to exchange
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] hand mail off to exchange Tim Mancour wrote: I haven't tried this but couldn't you remove the domain from the control/virtualdomains file and setup an smtproute from your toaster to the exchange server? Removing the domain from the virtualdomains file should cause qmail-send to deliver any message for the domain remotely and then qmail-remote, using the smtproute, will forward to the exchange server. Hmm. Are you thinking the message would be delivered locally and also remotely that way? (side note: I already know which route I'm going to use - I'm just fishing to see what other methods people may have come up with. The tap idea was an interesting one I had thought of, and wanted to see if anyone had tried it or any other method that I was not aware of) Thanks! - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- David Campbell E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] W: http://www.bigbighuge.com The information in this E-mail and any attachments is confidential. It is intended solely for the attention and use of the named addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, or person responsible for delivering this information to the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately. Unless you are the intended recipient or his/her representative you are not authorised to, and must not read, copy, distribute, use or retain this message or any part of it. Opinions, conclusions and other information expressed in this message are not given or endorsed by the sender unless otherwise indicated by an authorised officer independent of this message. ...when was the last time you did a backup?...
Re: [qmailtoaster] ISOQLOG2.1 Issue
ugh, sorry guys, this is my first mailing list and I managed to screw up my very first post, so sorry, I suck, it was just a copy/paste of the log page from qlog of the qmailtoaster server straight into gmail, dont click on the stuff, as I said, I'm a noob, I'm just really concerned about the log there seems to be massive amounts of email coming from people called [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED] whatever that address is supposed to be, can anyone tell me if this is normal? they must have been images that are linking from that page that are behind the authentication of the isoqlog, very sorry for any confusion/malice On 22/01/2008, Harry Zink [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This message of yours contains something that points to a server at 218.185.6.102:80 and appears to require loggin in with admin credentials in order to proceed - if this is an attempt at phishing, it's a poor one. On Jan 21, 2008, at 7:16 PM, David Campbell wrote: ISOQLOG2.1 Issue This server has been running for 4 days, and it currently has no domain records pointed to it (wanted to make sure I got it right before I put it into production, it does however have a public IP, now When I click on General under isoqlog it gives me general Jan, 2008 Statistics Creation Time: Jan 22, 2008 / 13:58 Day SentReceivedTotal Size 18http://218.185.6.102/qlogs-toaster/general/2008/1/18.html25 315636.52 KBytes 19http://218.185.6.102/qlogs-toaster/general/2008/1/19.html4 4819.16 KBytes 20http://218.185.6.102/qlogs-toaster/general/2008/1/20.html4 48973.07 KBytes 21http://218.185.6.102/qlogs-toaster/general/2008/1/21.html4 486.96 KBytes 22http://218.185.6.102/qlogs-toaster/general/2008/1/22.html234 234468 851.88 KBytes *Total*271 2775481.84 MBytes *Average*54 55109377.52KBytes and if I click on the 22'd of January Top 100 Sender Mail Number 1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 116 2 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 57 3 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2 4 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1 Top 100 Receiver Mail Number 1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 59 2 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 58 3 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 58 4 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 57 5 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1 6 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1 Should I find this alarming or is it logging some kind of internal emailing that I don't know about because I'm a bit of a noob? the only emails I have sent (to test it out) were via the webmail (squirelmail) as [EMAIL PROTECTED] and they were sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED], but I have no idea about the rest of them, and they seem to be increasing, though today I did import via a shellscript about 400 users, would it possibly be internal system mails about that, and if it IS internal system mail, is there anyway for me to retrieve it, or forward it to a virtual account on the same machine? Thank You, and sorry if this is a stupid question, I tried searching google for [EMAIL PROTECTED] and it just gave me a blank look, haha -- David Campbell E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] W: http://www.bigbighuge.com -- David Campbell E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] W: http://www.bigbighuge.com The information in this E-mail and any attachments is confidential. It is intended solely for the attention and use of the named addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, or person responsible for delivering this information to the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately. Unless you are the intended recipient or his/her representative you are not authorised to, and must not read, copy, distribute, use or retain this message or any part of it. Opinions, conclusions and other information expressed in this message are not given or endorsed by the sender unless otherwise indicated by an authorised officer independent of this message. ...when was the last time you did a backup?...
