[qmailtoaster] tcp.smtp

[Postmaster]

Hello all


I am trying to put a hostname in the tcp.smtp file, but it does not work

=delivery.rdns_hostname.com:allow

Any idea why? DNS issue?


Cheers
Alex

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com
For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com

Re: [qmailtoaster] tcp.smtp

[Postmaster]

I found the answer - 
http://wiki.qmailtoaster.com/index.php/Tcpserver_options/flags

The correct $TCPREMOTEHOST variable has to be set!


Rgds
Alex


On 25/10/2012 10:16, Postmaster wrote:

Hello all


I am trying to put a hostname in the tcp.smtp file, but it does not work

=delivery.rdns_hostname.com:allow

Any idea why? DNS issue?


Cheers
Alex

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com
For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com

Re: [qmailtoaster] Spamdyke

[Postmaster]

Please post /var/qmail/queue permissions here



On 29/10/2012 20:24, Dave MacDonald wrote:


Also client getting error 451 qq trouble creating files in queue (
#4.3.0 )

Re: [qmailtoaster] Spamdyke

[Postmaster]

Are you sure this is the correct queue folder?

Normally queue is in /var/qmail with the following permissions:
drwxr-x--- 11 qmailq qmail 4096 Apr 22  2012 queue

By the way, the maildir is:
-rw--- 1 vpopmail vchkpw



On 29/10/2012 20:55, Dave MacDonald wrote:

See permission in var queue and user maildir

/var/queue 777 qmail:qmails
Maildir 700 vchkpw:vpopmail 700

Thanks





-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com
For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com

Fwd: Re: [qmailtoaster] Spamdyke

[Postmaster]

The permission in /var/qmail/queue look alright to me


Check /var/qmail/bin/ permissions:
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 16 Apr 1 20:22 qmail-queue ->qmail-queue.orig
-rws--x--x 1 qmailq qmail 24776 Mar 29 10:19 qmail-queue.orig


Check the user/group id problem please.
Vpopmail  ->89
vchkuser  -> 89


Let us know.
Rgds
Alex



On 29/10/2012 20:40, Dave MacDonald wrote:



On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 12:37 PM, Postmaster 
<mailto:postmas...@seawise-chartering.co.uk>> wrote:


Please post /var/qmail/queue permissions here

 ls -al /var/qmail

drwxrwxrwx 11 qmailq qmail 4096 Oct 26 10:39 queue

and inside: ls -al  /var/qmail/queue

drwxr-xr-x 12 root   qmail 4096 Oct 26 10:52 ..
drwx--  2 qmails qmail 4096 Oct 29 12:51 bounce
drwx-- 25 qmails qmail 4096 Oct 26 10:39 info
drwx--  2 qmailq qmail 4096 Oct 29 12:08 intd
drwx-- 25 qmails qmail 4096 Oct 26 10:39 local
drwxr-x---  2 qmailq qmail 4096 Oct 26 10:57 lock
drwxr-x--- 25 qmailq qmail 4096 Oct 26 10:39 mess
drwx--  2 qmailq qmail 4096 Oct 29 12:08 pid
drwx-- 25 qmails qmail 4096 Oct 26 10:39 remote
drwxr-x---  2 qmailq qmail 4096 Oct 29 12:08 todo


On 29/10/2012 20:24, Dave MacDonald wrote:


Also client getting error 451 qq trouble creating files in
queue ( #4.3.0 )

[qmailtoaster] Search or indexing

[postmaster]

Hello all


I wonder what over people use to improve the search. I have around 15Gb of
mail across several domains and would like to use something like
cloudmagic app on my ipad (instant search), but it only supports gmail and
exchange.

Basically I need to have a body search rather than from/to/subject one. I
know squirrelmail has it but I do not want to use web interface all the
time I need to do a search.


Many thanks
Alex


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com
For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Search or indexing

[Postmaster]

Eric,


Thanks.
Yes, I am running Dovecot - I was sick of Courier dropping all the time 
on a full body search.
Unfortunately, I have become a victim of Apple - iPhone and iPad. There 
is no full body search
capability in either device. However, what I am looking at is a program 
pulling several e-mails and indexing them

so that I can do the searching, say, on the plane.

For the iPad I found a program called CloudMagic, but it works with 
Gmail and Exchange and not Qmailtoaster.

I am still experimenting and trying to find the Holly Grail.

Rgds
ALex






On 04/11/2012 16:55, Eric Shubert wrote:

On 11/04/2012 07:00 AM, postmas...@seawise-chartering.co.uk wrote:

Hello all


I wonder what over people use to improve the search. I have around 
15Gb of

mail across several domains and would like to use something like
cloudmagic app on my ipad (instant search), but it only supports 
gmail and

exchange.

Basically I need to have a body search rather than from/to/subject 
one. I

know squirrelmail has it but I do not want to use web interface all the
time I need to do a search.


Many thanks
Alex


-


I guess it somewhat depends on what type of device you need to search 
with. Using Thunderbird/IMAP on a computer allows you a good deal of 
searching flexibility. I'm not certain, but I hear that the stock 
android mail app does a fair job of searching, at least better than k9 
mail.


I hope you're running dovecot on your server with that amount of email.





-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com
For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Search or indexing

[Postmaster]

I would not be THAT enthusiastic.
I am not a fan of Google and that includes Android

On 05/11/2012 21:27, Eric Shubert wrote:

On 11/05/2012 12:27 PM, Postmaster wrote:

I am still experimenting and trying to find the Holly Grail.


It's called Android. ;)




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com
For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com

Re: [qmailtoaster] re: attacks

[Postmaster]

On 07/11/2012 19:54, Cecil Yother, Jr. wrote:
I am seeing a pronounced increase in attacks on one of my servers. Is 
anyone else experiencing this too?





-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com
For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com



fail2ban and hakuna-matata

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com
For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com

Re: [qmailtoaster] re: attacks

[Postmaster]

On 07/11/2012 20:27, Cecil Yother, Jr. wrote:

On 11/07/2012 11:25 AM, Postmaster wrote:

On 07/11/2012 19:54, Cecil Yother, Jr. wrote:
I am seeing a pronounced increase in attacks on one of my servers. 
Is anyone else experiencing this too?





-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com
For additional commands, e-mail: 
qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com




fail2ban and hakuna-matata

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com
For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com



I use fail2ban and it works wonderfully.  I was just curious if it was 
just me or everybody experiencing an uptick in these type of intrusions.



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com
For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com


I have loads too unfortunately

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com
For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com

Re: [qmailtoaster] Qmailtoaster - CentOS 5 - php53

[Postmaster]

Sebastian,


What I did, I upgraded to php53 after installation of qmailtoaster with 
-nodeps
Php53 does not influence the performance of qmailtoaster. This is only 
the control panel which was coded in php. m


Rgds
Alex


On 09/11/2012 14:38, Sebastian Grewe wrote:

Hey List,

Regarding this issue:

http://www.mail-archive.com/qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com/msg34419.html

Is there a solution for this? I am running into the same issues right now with 
a new CentOS 5 installation that is running php53 packages. I also looked up 
the RPM Build 'Requires' settings but apparently you are not able to simply use 
something like 'php || php53' in order to allow both versions to be used.

I would think this is actually an issue with the php53 packages. I would think 
they should supply a virtual package php via provides to ensure that php53 
installations are also recognized.

In the end I am focusing on CentOS 6 but I would like to allow backwards 
compatability for CentOS 5.

Cheers,
Sebastian

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com
For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com
For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: strange display error in qmailadmin

[Postmaster]

On 12/11/2012 16:43, Giuseppe Perna wrote:

2012/11/12 Eric Shubert :

On 11/12/2012 06:44 AM, Giuseppe Perna wrote:

goodmorning,
my sistem qmailtoaster is update.
i have this strange error dispaly in qmailadmin:
mailboxes ->
address,  full name,  used,  quota (mb),  edit box,   clear box,   box
default

under used, I have this number busted  17592186043641.26. the
share/quota is set to Noquota, or unlimited

Thanks

--

-


This is not a correct figure of course, but it's not unusual for QMT either.

Quotas in QMT have been broken for years. With the recent release of
vpopmail-toaster-5.4.33-1.4.0 they are allegedly fixed. I haven't heard any
reports verifying this though.

One piece I think we're missing is fixing erroneous quota data that's left
over in the vpopmail database. Does anyone have any info on this?

(I'm sorry that I haven't had time to look into this, and as I don't use
quotas myself, it's not anywhere close to the front burner).

Bottom Line is that this isn't anything that would cause a malfunction in
this case (Noquota being used).

Thanks for bringing this to light Giuseppe. It'd be nice to get this fixed.

--
-Eric 'shubes'

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com
For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com


hy Eric thanks for you repaly,
I found that did not work either panel "admin-toaster" for the domain
with the share busted.

If I do I access http://ipserver/admin-toaster -> vqadmin ---> view
domain, insert the name of the domain I get blank page
hello

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com
For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com


I had a similar problem.
I discovered that in my MySQL in the database vpopmail (qmailtoaster 
DB), table dir_control had some values (I think it was cur_users) set to 
unusually high number.

When I manually corrected that the problem has been fixed.



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com
For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: strange display error in qmailadmin

[Postmaster]

On 12/11/2012 21:02, Cecil Yother, Jr. wrote:

On 11/12/2012 11:15 AM, Postmaster wrote:

On 12/11/2012 16:43, Giuseppe Perna wrote:

2012/11/12 Eric Shubert :

On 11/12/2012 06:44 AM, Giuseppe Perna wrote:

goodmorning,
my sistem qmailtoaster is update.
i have this strange error dispaly in qmailadmin:
mailboxes ->
address,  full name,  used,  quota (mb),  edit box, clear box,   box
default

under used, I have this number busted  17592186043641.26. the
share/quota is set to Noquota, or unlimited

Thanks

--

-


This is not a correct figure of course, but it's not unusual for 
QMT either.


Quotas in QMT have been broken for years. With the recent release of
vpopmail-toaster-5.4.33-1.4.0 they are allegedly fixed. I haven't 
heard any

reports verifying this though.

One piece I think we're missing is fixing erroneous quota data 
that's left

over in the vpopmail database. Does anyone have any info on this?

(I'm sorry that I haven't had time to look into this, and as I 
don't use

quotas myself, it's not anywhere close to the front burner).

Bottom Line is that this isn't anything that would cause a 
malfunction in

this case (Noquota being used).

Thanks for bringing this to light Giuseppe. It'd be nice to get 
this fixed.


--
-Eric 'shubes'

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com
For additional commands, e-mail: 
qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com



hy Eric thanks for you repaly,
I found that did not work either panel "admin-toaster" for the domain
with the share busted.

If I do I access http://ipserver/admin-toaster -> vqadmin ---> view
domain, insert the name of the domain I get blank page
hello

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com
For additional commands, e-mail: 
qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com



I had a similar problem.
I discovered that in my MySQL in the database vpopmail (qmailtoaster 
DB), table dir_control had some values (I think it was cur_users) set 
to unusually high number.

When I manually corrected that the problem has been fixed.



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com
For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com

I have tried this fix and while it works sometimes, it doesn't always 
work.





-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com
For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com



It worked for me 100%.
The only other issue I had with admin-toaster was with php53

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com
For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Qmailtoaster - CentOS 5 - php53

[postmaster]

The issue with php53 admin-toaster can be easily corrected by changing
tags in the relevant admin-toaster files.




> On 11/13/2012 06:04 AM, Eric Shubert wrote:
>> On 11/12/2012 06:12 PM, Eric Shubert wrote:
>>> I would seem to me that the php53 package/spec would have a
>>> "Provides: php" line in it. Does it not?
>>
>> It does not.
>>
>>> While I don't think that rpm can handle a "Requires: A or B" type
>>> thing,
>>> I should think there's a way to code the spec file(s) such that either
>>> one would do.
>>>
>>> Would someone care to dig a little deeper into this?
>>
>> Ok, so I woke up a little early this morning, and decided to look into
>> this.
>>
>> I found this thread, which covers the topic pretty well:
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=717158
>>
>> The cnt40-deps.sh script (it's been that long since I built my QMT) I
>> have lists php, php-ldap (why? - don't need it), php-mysql and php-pear.
>>
>> Both php and php-pear provide only their 5.1 counterpart. However
>> php-mysql is provided by both php-mysql and php53-mysql. So it looks
>> as though if the *-toaster packages were changed to require php-mysql
>> (whether they actually require it or not) instead of simply php, the
>> dependency would be satisfied by either php or php53 (along with its
>> -mysql counterpart).
>>
>> Does anyone see a problem with this?
>> How have you php53 users on Cos5 gotten around this?
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
> I am running php53u on a server with QMTISO updated to 5.8.  I don't
> have any issues other than the admin-toaster.  It's my understanding
> that the issue is because of strict tagging in php53  You must start and
> end your php doc with ?php ... /php?  where some flexibility was allowed
> before.  I have not chased this down as I don't need or use it on this
> server.
>
> Here is what I have installed.
>
> php53u.i386 5.3.16-1.ius.el5  installed
> php53u-cli.i386 5.3.16-1.ius.el5  installed
> php53u-common.i386 5.3.16-1.ius.el5  installed
> php53u-devel.i386 5.3.16-1.ius.el5  installed
> php53u-gd.i386 5.3.16-1.ius.el5  installed
> php53u-ldap.i386 5.3.16-1.ius.el5  installed
> php53u-mbstring.i386 5.3.16-1.ius.el5  installed
> php53u-mcrypt.i386 5.3.16-1.ius.el5  installed
> php53u-mysql.i386 5.3.16-1.ius.el5  installed
> php53u-pdo.i386 5.3.16-1.ius.el5  installed
> php53u-pear.noarch 1:1.9.4-3.ius.el5 installed
> php53u-process.i386 5.3.16-1.ius.el5  installed
> php53u-pspell.i386 5.3.16-1.ius.el5  installed
>
>
>
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com
> For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com
>
>


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com
For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com

[qmailtoaster] Qmailtoaster-plus

[postmaster]

Anyone knows what's going on with http://qtp.qmailtoaster.com?

--2012-11-19 20:19:45--  (try: 1) 
http://qtp.qmailtoaster.com/repos/SRPMS/dovecot-2.0.11-2.qtp.src.rpm
Connecting to qtp.qmailtoaster.com|184.183.27.236|:80... failed:
Connection timed out.
Retrying.

--2012-11-19 20:20:50--  (try: 2) 
http://qtp.qmailtoaster.com/repos/SRPMS/dovecot-2.0.11-2.qtp.src.rpm
Connecting to qtp.qmailtoaster.com|184.183.27.236|:80... failed:
Connection timed out.
Retrying.

So on and so forth...

Regards
Alex


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com
For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com

[qmailtoaster] clean up a mailbox

[Postmaster]

Hello all,


How do I clean up the inbox? I have a department account which is 
getting about 2000-4000 legitimate emails.
The problem is that if the account is not checked for a few days, there 
is a huge number of e-mails.
How do I automate an automatic deletion of all email in the inbox older 
than say 1 or 2 days please?



Any help is appreciated.


Regards
Alex

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com
For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com

[qmailtoaster] Re: Common Email signature with all mails

[Postmaster]

Eric,

 

 

Just really wonder - what makes you say that? In all mid to large
enterprises, the disclaimer is added at the server and not by an
e-mail client. The email client sets contact details/names/positions
etc. in the footer.

 

I believe back in 2009, Jake wanted to implement it in QT 2.0

 

 

Regards
Alex

At Friday, 22/11/2013 on 15:16 Eric Shubert wrote:

On 11/21/2013 11:08 PM, Linux wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> I want to set common email signature/disclaimer in my mail server.
>
> This signature must attach with all outgoing mail.
>
> Is it possible? If yes then how to do it.
>
> Thanks in Advance
>
> Regards,
>
> Vivek Patil
>
> system admin
>

This cannot (and arguably should not) be done in the server. It needs
to 
be set up in each client.

-- 
-Eric 'shubes'

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com
For additional commands, e-mail:
qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Common Email signature with all mails

[Postmaster]

I guess we can debate about how useful or useless those disclaimers are. 
However, just my 2p on this issue:


- Let define it: A disclaimer is generally _any statement_ intended to 
specify or delimit the scope of rights and obligations _that may be 
exercised and enforced_ by parties in a legally recognized relationship :))

- a legal opinion contains a huge disclaimer as well :)
- in several countries there is certain requirement towards how 
communication can/cannot be conducted:
   1. In Germany every bank is putting information about the Board 
members and names (the same as on every headed paper)
   2. In the UK, the FSA regulated companies are putting their FSA 
registered number and other information in the footer section (the same 
as on headed paper)
- I am a little bit surprised to learn that somebody thought that 
disclaimer are legally binding.


I am not going to discuss the disclaimer on McDonald coffee: "Carefully, 
very hot!". No way.



Regards
Alex




On 25/11/2013 19:24, Dan McAllister wrote:

On 11/25/2013 1:11 PM, Eric Shubert wrote:
The problem has to do with electronic signatures. Any sort of signing 
that's done needs to happen after the footer is added. Having the 
server add a footer would break gpg that's implemented by the client.


There might be a suitable way to add a footer on the server for 
submitted (authenticated) messages that are otherwise unsigned, 
before adding a DKIM signature. We can certainly look into this at 
some point, but it's not a priority in my view. Of course, anyone can 
make it their own priority and write some code to do it. This is 
after all a community project.


P.S. I'd beg to differ that "all" enterprises implement this at the 
server, although many of them do. Many of them also run Exchange, 
which I do not recommend in most cases. ;)


P.P.S. There is also some disagreement as to the effectiveness of 
these disclaimers. Personally, I think they're rather silly (although 
IANAL). I wonder if there's ever been a case in court where a 
disclaimer had any effect.



To Eric's point:

I have a number of financial advisors and insurance agencies that seem 
to think that these "signatures" are a requirement (e.g.: "requests to 
bind insurance cannot be made via email", etc.) However, recent legal 
opinions in several states have held that these "signatures" cannot be 
legally binding -- in part because they're being delivered via e-mail, 
which makes them every bit as unenforceable as the typed of email 
they're warning against.


Never the less, the *professional organizations* still suggest that 
these disclaimers be present.


Kind of reminds me of the warning on the back of the *peanut butter* 
jar that reads: "*WARNING: This product is manufactured in a plant 
that may use peanuts.*"

Really?

Dan

--

PLEASE TAKE NOTE OF OUR NEW ADDRESS
===
IT4SOHO, LLC
33 - 4th Street N, Suite 211
St. Petersburg, FL 33701-3806

CALL TOLL FREE:
   877-IT4SOHO

877-484-7646 Phone
727-647-7646 Local
727-490-4394 Fax

We have support plans for QMail!

Re: [qmailtoaster] Failure notice for CNAME Look up failed

[Postmaster]

This is an external issue most likely - Either (1) the glue record is 
the cause of the problem or (2) DNS records are wrong or not set up 
correctly or inaccessible. Gmail used to have it.




On 18/02/2014 05:28, Chandran Manikandan wrote:

CNAME lookup failed temporarily. (#4.4.3)

Re: [qmailtoaster] Virtualizing a QMT server!

[Postmaster]

Hi Tony,


There is no issues running QMT in the virtual environment as is.
I have been running QMT in the virtual environment for probably 5-6 
years now. Only potential issue is memory (if the server is handling 
many domains + MySQL + ClamAV)
You have to choose a good provider providing CentOS image. I am using 
linode and can only recommend them.



Regards
Alex


On 01/03/2014 13:49, Tony White wrote:

Hi folks,
  Has anyone tried to virtualize a QMT server yet?
Has it worked? If so can you tell me how you did it
so I can do it for my server please?
  Need to move to VM fairly soon as my server is having
issues.




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com
For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com

[qmailtoaster] CentOS 6.4 64 bit and QMT

[postmaster]

Hello all,


As I am currently going through an upgrade from CentOS 5 to 6, can anyone
please point out to the right place in terms of backup/restore (is it
simple or requires any bolt-on?) as well as installation of QMT on the
CentOS 6.4 please (I recall some scripts were not working under CentOS
6?)? Your experience as well as any links would be very much appreciated.


Regards
Alex


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com
For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com

[qmailtoaster] SSL Certs and multiple domains

[Postmaster]

Hello all,


I browsed all past e-mail in the list, but was not able to see how this 
is done.
I need to have several certificates (servercert.pem) for every different 
domain name, say

mail.domain1.com and mail.domain2.com. Is there any way to set it up?
I know there was a qmail patch 
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94257, but it

is very outdated now.


Regards
Alex

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com
For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: SSL Certs and multiple domains

[Postmaster]

On 18/03/2014 19:54, Eric Shubert wrote:

On 03/18/2014 11:32 AM, Postmaster wrote:

Hello all,


I browsed all past e-mail in the list, but was not able to see how this
is done.
I need to have several certificates (servercert.pem) for every different
domain name, say
mail.domain1.com and mail.domain2.com. Is there any way to set it up?
I know there was a qmail patch
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94257, but it
is very outdated now.


Regards
Alex

-


I don't understand how this patch would be implemented. What basis 
would be used to set the $TCPLOCALHOST or $TCPLOCALIP variables?





My understanding is that it allows usage of different certificates 
depending on the environmental variables ($TCPLOCALHOST or $TCPLOCALIP).
However, any other ideas how the self-signed certs can be used with 
multiple domains are appreciated.

[qmailtoaster] Installing QMT on CentOS 6.4

[Postmaster]

Hello all,


I have had the following problem on the testing CentOS 6.4:


sh qt-bootstrap-2
qt-bootstrap-2 -
qt-bootstrap-2 - installing yum-priorities (plugin) ...
Loaded plugins: priorities, security
3 packages excluded due to repository priority protections
Setting up Install Process
Package yum-plugin-priorities-1.1.30-17.el6_5.noarch already installed 
and latest version

Nothing to do
qt-bootstrap-2 - installing 
qmailtoaster-release-2.0-1.qt.nodist.noarch.rpm (repo) ...
Retrieving 
http://mirrors.qmailtoaster.com/current/nodist/qmailtoaster-release-2.0-1.qt.nodist.noarch.rpm

curl: (22) The requested URL returned error: 404 Not Found
error: skipping 
http://mirrors.qmailtoaster.com/current/nodist/qmailtoaster-release-2.0-1.qt.nodist.noarch.rpm 
- transfer failed

qt-bootstrap-2 - installing qmailtoaster-util (scripts) ...
Loaded plugins: priorities, security
3 packages excluded due to repository priority protections
Setting up Install Process
No package qmailtoaster-util available.
Error: Nothing to do
qt-bootstrap-2 - completed



Any ideas please?



Regards
Alex

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com
For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Installing QMT on CentOS 6.4

[Postmaster]

On 01/04/2014 01:33, Eric Shubert wrote:

The packages are still in /testing/.

edit qt-bootstrap-2:
s/current/testing/
s/yum -y/yum -y --enablerepo=qmailtoaster-testing/

Then rerun it.

You might want to enable the testing repo by changing the setting in 
/etc/yum.repos.d/qmailtoaster-dist.repo temporarily.


I hope to have the qmailtoaster-util package completed and packages 
promoted to /current/ in the next couple weeks.


Thanks.

P.S. Any reason this isn't COS6.5?


Yes. On linode.com, the only CentOS 6 available is 6.4 :)
This is a VM.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com
For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Installing QMT on CentOS 6.4

[Postmaster]

Eric,



i still have the same issue after changing qt-bootstrap-2:

sh qt-bootstrap-2
qt-bootstrap-2 - qt-bootstrap-2 - installing yum-priorities (plugin) ...
Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, priorities
Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile
 * base: mirrors.clouvider.net
 * extras: mirrors.clouvider.net
 * qmailtoaster-current: mirror6.qmailtoaster.com
 * qmailtoaster-current-nodist: mirror6.qmailtoaster.com
 * qmailtoaster-testing: mirror6.qmailtoaster.com
 * updates: mirrors.clouvider.net
3 packages excluded due to repository priority protections
Setting up Install Process
Package yum-plugin-priorities-1.1.30-17.el6_5.noarch already installed 
and latest version

Nothing to do
qt-bootstrap-2 - installing 
qmailtoaster-release-2.0-1.qt.nodist.noarch.rpm (repo) ...
Retrieving 
http://mirrors.qmailtoaster.com/testing/nodist/qmailtoaster-release-2.0-1.qt.nodist.noarch.rpm

Preparing... ### [100%]
package qmailtoaster-release-2.0-1.qt.nodist.noarch is already 
installed

qt-bootstrap-2 - installing qmailtoaster-util (scripts) ...
Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, priorities
Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile
 * base: mirrors.clouvider.net
 * extras: mirrors.clouvider.net
 * qmailtoaster-current: mirror6.qmailtoaster.com
 * qmailtoaster-current-nodist: mirror6.qmailtoaster.com
 * qmailtoaster-testing: mirror6.qmailtoaster.com
 * updates: mirrors.clouvider.net
3 packages excluded due to repository priority protections
Setting up Install Process
No package qmailtoaster-util available.
Error: Nothing to do
qt-bootstrap-2 - completed


Regards
Alex


On 01/04/2014 01:33, Eric Shubert wrote:

The packages are still in /testing/.

edit qt-bootstrap-2:
s/current/testing/
s/yum -y/yum -y --enablerepo=qmailtoaster-testing/

Then rerun it.

You might want to enable the testing repo by changing the setting in 
/etc/yum.repos.d/qmailtoaster-dist.repo temporarily.


I hope to have the qmailtoaster-util package completed and packages 
promoted to /current/ in the next couple weeks.


Thanks.

P.S. Any reason this isn't COS6.5?







-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com
For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Installing QMT on CentOS 6.4

[Postmaster]

om/webmail
login with your full email address and your password
Send yourself an email - should show right away
Send an email to yourself if you have another address
Go to your other email account and reply to the message you sent

If Isoqlog doesn't show right away, do this:
sh /usr/share/toaster/isoqlog/bin/cron.sh


On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 12:40 AM, Eric Shubert <mailto:e...@shubes.net>> wrote:


You need to enable the qmailtoaster-testing-nodist to pick up
qmailtoaster-util package.

Sorry, I missed that one.

-- 
-Eric 'shubes'



On 04/01/2014 01:16 AM, Postmaster wrote:

Eric,



i still have the same issue after changing qt-bootstrap-2:

sh qt-bootstrap-2
qt-bootstrap-2 - qt-bootstrap-2 - installing yum-priorities
(plugin) ...
Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, priorities
Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile
  * base: mirrors.clouvider.net <http://mirrors.clouvider.net>
  * extras: mirrors.clouvider.net <http://mirrors.clouvider.net>
  * qmailtoaster-current: mirror6.qmailtoaster.com
<http://mirror6.qmailtoaster.com>
  * qmailtoaster-current-nodist: mirror6.qmailtoaster.com
<http://mirror6.qmailtoaster.com>
  * qmailtoaster-testing: mirror6.qmailtoaster.com
<http://mirror6.qmailtoaster.com>
  * updates: mirrors.clouvider.net <http://mirrors.clouvider.net>
3 packages excluded due to repository priority protections
Setting up Install Process
Package yum-plugin-priorities-1.1.30-17.el6_5.noarch already
installed
and latest version
Nothing to do
qt-bootstrap-2 - installing
qmailtoaster-release-2.0-1.qt.nodist.noarch.rpm (repo) ...
Retrieving

http://mirrors.qmailtoaster.com/testing/nodist/qmailtoaster-release-2.0-1.qt.nodist.noarch.rpm

Preparing... ### [100%]
 package qmailtoaster-release-2.0-1.qt.nodist.noarch is
already
installed
qt-bootstrap-2 - installing qmailtoaster-util (scripts) ...
Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, priorities
Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile
  * base: mirrors.clouvider.net <http://mirrors.clouvider.net>
  * extras: mirrors.clouvider.net <http://mirrors.clouvider.net>
  * qmailtoaster-current: mirror6.qmailtoaster.com
<http://mirror6.qmailtoaster.com>
  * qmailtoaster-current-nodist: mirror6.qmailtoaster.com
<http://mirror6.qmailtoaster.com>
  * qmailtoaster-testing: mirror6.qmailtoaster.com
<http://mirror6.qmailtoaster.com>
  * updates: mirrors.clouvider.net <http://mirrors.clouvider.net>
3 packages excluded due to repository priority protections
Setting up Install Process
No package qmailtoaster-util available.
Error: Nothing to do
qt-bootstrap-2 - completed


Regards
Alex


On 01/04/2014 01:33, Eric Shubert wrote:

The packages are still in /testing/.

edit qt-bootstrap-2:
s/current/testing/
s/yum -y/yum -y --enablerepo=qmailtoaster-testing/

Then rerun it.

You might want to enable the testing repo by changing the
setting in
/etc/yum.repos.d/qmailtoaster-dist.repo temporarily.

I hope to have the qmailtoaster-util package completed and
packages
promoted to /current/ in the next couple weeks.

Thanks.

P.S. Any reason this isn't COS6.5?






-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com
<mailto:qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com>
For additional commands, e-mail:
qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com
<mailto:qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com>






-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com
<mailto:qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com>
For additional commands, e-mail:
qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com
<mailto:qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com>




--
*/Thanks & Best Regards,
Manikandan.C
/*

Re: [qmailtoaster] Roundcube Survey

[Postmaster]

My answer is no to both.


Rgds
Alex


On 28/05/2014 04:28, Eric Shubert wrote:
For those using Roundcube, please be so gracious as to answer a couple 
questions.


Do you use it with nginx? (I expect mostly no answers)

If not, have you used nginx for anything else?

Thank you for your participation. I'm contemplating adding Roundcube 
to the 'stock' QMT. It's been long overdue.





-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com
For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com

Re: [qmailtoaster] to catch all or no

[Postmaster]

I set "Catch-all" to delete all emails for the following reasons:

1) There is no need to get "catch-all" as it does increase spam - anyone 
can send e-mail(s) to %$£%£%£"@whateveryourdomain.com
2) There is no need to bounce back e-mails caught by "Catch-all" as (a) 
it increases the traffic for no reason (2) spam e-mails are disguised so 
you never get through to the true sender



Regards
Alex

On 19/05/2014 15:15, Jim Shupert wrote:

Friends,

1st let me say that i have asked this forum for advice on my battele 
with spam and I can say that I am enjoying success from the wisdom.

thank you.

a related matter.

I [ the postmaster ] personnally get a lot of spam because I am the 
ctach all account.
this means I get spam for ' people who do not exist" - this is 2 
catagories.
1- accounts that did exist in the past but no longer. ie billiebob 
left - so no billie...@mydom.com anymore

2- accounts that have never existed . ie unic...@mydom.com

as you might suspect these are largely spam.

My q - what is a suggested means of doing this?
my thoughts are
1. a account is made named d...@mydom.com as catch all and assign it a 
quota of 5 MB

2 make s...@mydom.com the catch all.
or
3. no change - meaning leave it so it goes to my mailbox as catch all.

thanks

[qmailtoaster] Sending and copying to sent folder in 1 go

[Postmaster]

Currently, qmailtoaster/Thunderbird is setup in the following way.
Firstly, it sends the e-mail and then the message is copied to sent folder.
This is not a problem for a small messages without attachments.

If there is a 5mb attachment, then this is a pain in the neck to wait
for the message to be sent and then wait for the same time for the 
message to be copied to sent folder.


Is there any way to combine these functions, i.e. to send the message 
and at the same time copy the message to sent folder

so that on the client side there is only one function performed.

Many thanks

-
Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group 
(www.vickersconsulting.com)
   Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations.
 If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today!
-
Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages.

 To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com

For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Sending and copying to sent folder in 1 go

[Postmaster]

Thanks Eric,

Yes, I am using Courier and the "copying messge into Sent folder" is 
basically an IMAP sync.
The thing is that often I have a number of complains from users that 
they have to wait (do not ask me why)
(1) when the message is sent (2) when its copied into sent folder. I 
understand these are two different processes.

Also they generate more traffic.

Regards
Alex


On 29/03/2010 16:17, Eric Shubert wrote:

Postmaster wrote:

Currently, qmailtoaster/Thunderbird is setup in the following way.
Firstly, it sends the e-mail and then the message is copied to sent 
folder.

This is not a problem for a small messages without attachments.

If there is a 5mb attachment, then this is a pain in the neck to wait
for the message to be sent and then wait for the same time for the 
message to be copied to sent folder.


Is there any way to combine these functions, i.e. to send the message 
and at the same time copy the message to sent folder

so that on the client side there is only one function performed.

Many thanks

- 



Short answer: no.

This is largely a client side function, and has little to do with the 
server. Regarding the little that is done by the server, the sending 
process is totally separate (goes to different program on a different 
port) from the saving a copy function. Bringing them together would be 
a huge undertaking.


If you're using TBird with pop, the sent folder resides on the client, 
and the server doesn't even come into play. If you're using TBird with 
imap and need to speed up the copy to sent folder, you might try using 
Dovecot in place of Courier. Dovecot performs generally better than 
Courier, but I'm not sure how much improvement (if any) you'd see in 
that area.


I'm wondering, why are you waiting for the message to be sent and 
copied? Can't you simply proceed to do something else in the meantime?







-
Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group 
(www.vickersconsulting.com)
   Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations.
 If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today!
-
Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages.

 To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com

For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Sending and copying to sent folder in 1 go

[Postmaster]

True, you have to wait before you can power down your T'bird.
It is true for both POP and IMAP connections.


On 29/03/2010 16:25, Maxwell Smart wrote:

While you can proceed to do other things with Thunderbird open.  If you
are using IMAP and close the client it will drop the connection and fail
to write to the sent folder.  I don't know for POP, but I am guessing
the same holds true if you close the app, you'll disrupt the copy to the
sent folder.

On 03/29/2010 08:17 AM, Eric Shubert wrote:
   

Postmaster wrote:
 

Currently, qmailtoaster/Thunderbird is setup in the following way.
Firstly, it sends the e-mail and then the message is copied to sent
folder.
This is not a problem for a small messages without attachments.

If there is a 5mb attachment, then this is a pain in the neck to wait
for the message to be sent and then wait for the same time for the
message to be copied to sent folder.

Is there any way to combine these functions, i.e. to send the message
and at the same time copy the message to sent folder
so that on the client side there is only one function performed.

Many thanks

-
   


Short answer: no.

This is largely a client side function, and has little to do with the
server. Regarding the little that is done by the server, the sending
process is totally separate (goes to different program on a different
port) from the saving a copy function. Bringing them together would be
a huge undertaking.

If you're using TBird with pop, the sent folder resides on the client,
and the server doesn't even come into play. If you're using TBird with
imap and need to speed up the copy to sent folder, you might try using
Dovecot in place of Courier. Dovecot performs generally better than
Courier, but I'm not sure how much improvement (if any) you'd see in
that area.

I'm wondering, why are you waiting for the message to be sent and
copied? Can't you simply proceed to do something else in the meantime?

 
   



-
Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group 
(www.vickersconsulting.com)
   Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations.
 If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today!
-
Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages.

 To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com

For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com

Re: [qmailtoaster] Sending and copying to sent folder in 1 go

[Postmaster]

Thanks Jake

This is not an option, I am afraid. The archive of all sent messages is 
a must.


Regards
Alex


On 29/03/2010 16:44, Jake Vickers wrote:

On 03/29/2010 08:48 AM, Postmaster wrote:

Currently, qmailtoaster/Thunderbird is setup in the following way.
Firstly, it sends the e-mail and then the message is copied to sent 
folder.

This is not a problem for a small messages without attachments.

If there is a 5mb attachment, then this is a pain in the neck to wait
for the message to be sent and then wait for the same time for the 
message to be copied to sent folder.


Is there any way to combine these functions, i.e. to send the message 
and at the same time copy the message to sent folder

so that on the client side there is only one function performed.


As it has been said, this is a client side function.
There is a check box in Thunderbird where you can elect to not have a 
copy of the message copied to the Sent folder.



- 

Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group 
(www.vickersconsulting.com)
   Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and 
installations.

 If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today!
- 

Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and 
packages.
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: 
qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com
For additional commands, e-mail: 
qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com






-
Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group 
(www.vickersconsulting.com)
   Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations.
 If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today!
-
Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages.

 To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com

For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Sending and copying to sent folder in 1 go

[Postmaster]

Absolutely spot on!
I have a problem with users leaving files on their local machines, and 
now I have a central backup system.
Now can you imagine sync e-mails of every individual user from a local 
hdd onto the server?


Regards
Alex


On 29/03/2010 16:57, Eric Shubert wrote:
The sent folder doesn't necessarily need to be the one on the server 
even with imap, in case a local sent folder would suffice. That might 
introduce other 'problems' (backups?) though.


Postmaster wrote:

Thanks Jake

This is not an option, I am afraid. The archive of all sent messages 
is a must.


Regards
Alex


On 29/03/2010 16:44, Jake Vickers wrote:

On 03/29/2010 08:48 AM, Postmaster wrote:

Currently, qmailtoaster/Thunderbird is setup in the following way.
Firstly, it sends the e-mail and then the message is copied to sent 
folder.

This is not a problem for a small messages without attachments.

If there is a 5mb attachment, then this is a pain in the neck to wait
for the message to be sent and then wait for the same time for the 
message to be copied to sent folder.


Is there any way to combine these functions, i.e. to send the 
message and at the same time copy the message to sent folder

so that on the client side there is only one function performed.


As it has been said, this is a client side function.
There is a check box in Thunderbird where you can elect to not have 
a copy of the message copied to the Sent folder.



- 

Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group 
(www.vickersconsulting.com)
   Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and 
installations.

 If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today!
- 

Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and 
packages.
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: 
qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com
For additional commands, e-mail: 
qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com






- 

Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group 
(www.vickersconsulting.com)
   Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and 
installations.

 If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today!






-
Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group 
(www.vickersconsulting.com)
   Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations.
 If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today!
-
Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages.

 To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com

For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com

Re: [qmailtoaster] X-SPAM Headers missing from emails

[Postmaster]

Have you tried

spamassassin -D --lint

Also see if you have all necessary plugins uncommented/perl dependencies.

Regards
Alex



On 29/03/2010 19:16, George Alexander wrote:
I recently moved my mailserver from an old qmailtoaster install to the 
newest (as of right now).  The only things that stayed from the old 
server were the contents of /home/vpopmail/domains/mydomain.tld
The server is setup on CentOS 5.4 64bit from scratch following the 
guide on the wiki.


We're still getting email, and everything is working fine on the new 
server, except some spam keeps coming in.  Normally I would now go 
adjust scores in 50_scores.cf  to ensure it 
doesn't come in anymore, but there are no spam headers on the email 
for me to look at the tests that the spam passed.  What do I need to 
do to make sure they're there?


Here's my /etc/tcprules.d/tcp.smtp


127.:allow,RELAYCLIENT="",DKSIGN="/var/qmail/control/domainkeys/%/private",RBLSMTPD="",NOP0FCHECK="1"

:allow,BADMIMETYPE="",BADLOADERTYPE="M",CHKUSER_RCPTLIMIT="50",CHKUSER_WRONGRCPTLIMIT="10",QMAILQUEUE="/var/qmail/bin/simscan",DKSIGN="/var/qmail/control/domainkeys/%/private",NOP0FCHECK="1"


Here's my /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf 

ok_locales all
skip_rbl_checks 1

required_score 5
report_safe 0
rewrite_header Subject ***SPAM***

use_pyzor 1

use_auto_whitelist 1

use_bayes 1
use_bayes_rules 1
bayes_auto_learn 1


Anybody else have any ideas? thanks

Re: [qmailtoaster] qmailadmin

[Postmaster]

Did you try using a different browser?


On 30/03/2010 02:52, Kyle Quillen wrote:

hello all

I have a bit of an issue I am hoping that someone can help me out with.

We just put up a new server and everything is working great with the 
exception of when we login into http://domain.com/qmailadmin


Then we try to create a new user fill out the form properly and this 
is where the issue happens


When we hit create we get


Email Account testingu...@domain.com
 (user new user) could not be added

Everything works fine from the command line I have checked all 
permissions etc..


I did find this link but not sure if this helps at all.

http://www.mail-archive.com/qmailad...@inter7.com/msg06818.html

Thanks for all your help

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: qmailadmin

[Postmaster]

Ok, try the following:
In your database vpopmail.dir_control, column cur_users what value do 
you have against domain you are trying to modify?

if this is 2147483647, then change it for 0 (zero) and see if it helps.

Regards
Alex



On 30/03/2010 21:03, Kyle Quillen wrote:

Any address



On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 2:14 PM, Eric Shubert <mailto:e...@shubes.net>> wrote:


Any address, or only particular one(s)?

Kyle Quillen wrote:

None what so ever.


On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 1:55 PM, Eric Shubert mailto:e...@shubes.net> <mailto:e...@shubes.net
<mailto:e...@shubes.net>>> wrote:

   Any messages in apache error logs?

   Kyle Quillen wrote:

   I have tried all of the above..

   Eric I created the domain via command line but then had
to rsync
   back in about 20 gigs of data for that domain all perms
seem to
   be correct.
   Kyle


   On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 10:14 PM, Sergio Enrique Vidal
Velasquez
mailto:sergio.vi...@economiayfinanzas.gov.bo>
<mailto:sergio.vi...@economiayfinanzas.gov.bo
<mailto:sergio.vi...@economiayfinanzas.gov.bo>>
<mailto:sergio.vi...@economiayfinanzas.gov.bo
<mailto:sergio.vi...@economiayfinanzas.gov.bo>
<mailto:sergio.vi...@economiayfinanzas.gov.bo
<mailto:sergio.vi...@economiayfinanzas.gov.bo>>>> wrote:

  may be is the number of caracters in the password,
did you try a
  less number o characters??


  Postmaster escribió:

  Did you try using a different browser?


  On 30/03/2010 02:52, Kyle Quillen wrote:

  hello all
  I have a bit of an issue I am hoping that
someone can
   help me out
  with.
  We just put up a new server and everything
is working
   great with
  the exception of when we login into
http://domain.com/qmailadmin
  Then we try to create a new user fill out
the form
   properly and
  this is where the issue happens
  When we hit create we get

  Email Account testingu...@domain.com
<mailto:testingu...@domain.com>
<mailto:testingu...@domain.com <mailto:testingu...@domain.com>>
<mailto:testingu...@domain.com <mailto:testingu...@domain.com>

<mailto:testingu...@domain.com
<mailto:testingu...@domain.com>>> (user new user) could
   not be

  added

  Everything works fine from the command line
I have
   checked all
  permissions etc..
  I did find this link but not sure if this
helps at all.

http://www.mail-archive.com/qmailad...@inter7.com/msg06818.html

  Thanks for all your help








   -- -Eric 'shubes'


 
 -

   Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group
   (www.vickersconsulting.com
<http://www.vickersconsulting.com>
<http://www.vickersconsulting.com>)

 Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and
   installations.
   If you need professional help with your setup, contact
them today!
 
 -

  Please visit qmailtoaster.com <http://qmailtoaster.com>
<http://qmailtoaster.com> for the

   latest news, updates, and packages.
   To unsubscribe, e-mail:
qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com
<mailto:qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com>
<mailto:qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com
<mailto:qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com>>

  For additional commands, e-mail:
qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com
<mailto:qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com>
<mailto:qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com
<mailto:qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com>>





-- 
-Eric 'shubes'




-
Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group
(www.vickersconsulting.com 

[qmailtoaster] Duplicate e-mails

[Postmaster]

Hi,


I recently can see an increase amount of duplicate e-mails on my 
qmailtoaster, which is very annoying.
After searching through the archive, I found out that 
SpamAssassin/ClamAV are to blame.

SpamAssassin - 3.2.5 and ClamAV - 0.95.3
Is there any ready to go script to monitor spamassassin/ClamAV to know 
which is causing the problem?
I do have DNBL checks which may network time out problems as well. What 
is the standard time out and

where do I change it? Any advice on time-out please?

I am also running Qmailtoaster at a Linode VPS (360Mb) so memory is my 
issue.


Any recommendation/tuning advice/ideas welcome!

Regards
Alex

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Duplicate e-mails

[Postmaster]

On 01/04/2010 16:35, Eric Shubert wrote:

Postmaster wrote:

Hi,


I recently can see an increase amount of duplicate e-mails on my 
qmailtoaster, which is very annoying.
After searching through the archive, I found out that 
SpamAssassin/ClamAV are to blame.

SpamAssassin - 3.2.5 and ClamAV - 0.95.3
Is there any ready to go script to monitor spamassassin/ClamAV to 
know which is causing the problem?
I do have DNBL checks which may network time out problems as well. 
What is the standard time out and

where do I change it? Any advice on time-out please?


Not really anything you can do with timeout, as it's the sender who is 
timing out because your QMT is taking too long to scan.


What are your scan times looking like?
How many messages are being scanned concurrently?
A sampling of your spamd log would help to answer these questions.



Smapdyke is in the debug mode:

2010-04-01 17:47:27.617663500 tcpserver: pid 28804 from 212.113.23.140
2010-04-01 17:47:27.617812500 tcpserver: ok 28804 
xxx.uk:109.74.205.xx:25 :212.113.23.140::26123
2010-04-01 17:47:27.623569500 spamdyke[28804]: 
DEBUG(filter_rdns_missing()@filter.c:848): checking for missing rDNS; rdns: 
listservc.advfn.com
2010-04-01 17:47:27.623650500 spamdyke[28804]: 
DEBUG(filter_rdns_whitelist_file()@filter.c:956): searching rDNS whitelist 
file(s); rdns: listservc.advfn.com
2010-04-01 17:47:27.623742500 spamdyke[28804]: 
DEBUG(filter_rdns_blacklist_file()@filter.c:1059): searching rDNS blacklist 
file(s); rdns: listservc.advfn.com
2010-04-01 17:47:27.623822500 spamdyke[28804]: 
DEBUG(filter_ip_whitelist()@filter.c:1127): searching IP whitelist file(s); ip: 
212.113.23.140
2010-04-01 17:47:27.623929500 spamdyke[28804]: 
DEBUG(filter_ip_blacklist()@filter.c:1177): searching IP blacklist file(s); ip: 
212.113.23.140
2010-04-01 17:47:27.624148500 spamdyke[28804]: 
DEBUG(filter_ip_in_rdns_whitelist()@filter.c:1272): checking for IP in rDNS 
+keyword(s) in whitelist file; ip: 212.113.23.140 rdns: listservc.advfn.com
2010-04-01 17:47:27.624262500 spamdyke[28804]: 
DEBUG(filter_ip_in_rdns_blacklist()@filter.c:1226): checking for IP in rDNS 
+keyword(s) in blacklist file; ip: 212.113.23.140 rdns: listservc.advfn.com
2010-04-01 17:47:27.624347500 spamdyke[28804]: 
DEBUG(filter_rdns_resolve()@filter.c:1318): checking rDNS resolution; rdns: 
listservc.advfn.com
2010-04-01 17:47:27.626867500 spamdyke[28804]: 
DEBUG(filter_dns_rbl()@filter.c:1527): checking DNS RBL(s); ip: 212.113.23.140
2010-04-01 17:47:27.664906500 spamdyke[28804]: 
DEBUG(filter_earlytalker()@filter.c:1695): checking for earlytalker; delay: 5
2010-04-01 17:47:32.891226500 spamdyke[28804]: 
DEBUG(filter_sender_whitelist()@filter.c:1747): searching sender whitelist(s); 
sender: bounceadvfn-alexander=...@listserv.advfn.com
2010-04-01 17:47:32.901638500 spamdyke[28804]: 
DEBUG(filter_sender_blacklist()@filter.c:1881): searching sender blacklist(s); 
sender: bounceadvfn-alexander=...@listserv.advfn.com
2010-04-01 17:47:32.901764500 spamdyke[28804]: 
DEBUG(filter_sender_no_mx()@filter.c:2080): checking for sender domain MX 
record; domain: listserv.advfn.com
2010-04-01 17:47:32.903432500 CHKUSER accepted sender: 
from  
remote  rcpt<>  : sender accepted
2010-04-01 17:47:32.906144500 spamdyke[28804]: 
DEBUG(filter_recipient_whitelist()@filter.c:2113): searching recipient 
whitelist(s); recipient: alexan...@xxx.uk
2010-04-01 17:47:32.906271500 spamdyke[28804]: 
DEBUG(filter_recipient_relay()@filter.c:2183): checking relaying; relay-level: 
0 recipient: alexan...@xx.uk ip: 212.113.23.140 rdns: 
listservc.advfn.com local_recipient: true relaying_allowed: false
2010-04-01 17:47:32.906395500 spamdyke[28804]: 
DEBUG(filter_recipient_local()@filter.c:2154): checking for unqualified 
recipient; recipient: alexan...@x.uk
2010-04-01 17:47:32.906497500 spamdyke[28804]: 
DEBUG(filter_recipient_max()@filter.c:2244): checking maximum recipients; 
maximum: 50 current: 0
2010-04-01 17:47:32.906583500 spamdyke[28804]: 
DEBUG(filter_recipient_blacklist()@filter.c:2278): searching recipient 
blacklist(s); recipient: alexan...@.uk
2010-04-01 17:47:32.911919500 spamdyke[28804]: 
DEBUG(filter_recipient_graylist()@filter.c:2342): checking graylist; recipient: 
alexan...@xxx.uk sender: 
bounceadvfn-alexander=xx...@listserv.advfn.com
2010-04-01 17:47:33.031832500 CHKUSER accepted rcpt: 
from  
remote  rcpt  
: found existing recipient
2010-04-01 17:47:33.031892500 policy_check: remote 
bounceadvfn-alexander=...@listserv.advfn.com ->  local 
alexan...@.uk (UNAUTHENTICATED SENDER)
2010-04-01 17:47:33.031980500 policy_check: policy allows transmission
2010-04-01 17:47:33.032161500 spamdyke[28804]: ALLOWED from: 
bounceadvfn-alexander=x...@listserv.advfn.com to: 
alexan...@xxx.uk origin_ip: 212.113.23.140 origin_rdns: 
listservc.advfn.com auth: (unknown)
20

Re: [qmailtoaster] openvz

[Postmaster]

I have not tested it myself, but I am positive you can run it under openvz.
I tested qmailtoaster under Zen and UML.


Regards
Alex


On 01/04/2010 20:56, mattias wrote:

can i run qmailtoaster on a vps running under openvz?


-
Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group 
(www.vickersconsulting.com)
 Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations.
   If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today!
-
  Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages.

   To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com
  For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com


   



-
Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group 
(www.vickersconsulting.com)
   Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations.
 If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today!
-
Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages.

 To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com

For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com

Re: [qmailtoaster] Sending and copying to sent folder in 1 go

[Postmaster]

You are right, but I was thinking about automating it on the server 
rather than on the user side.
Once the e-mail is sent to the server, it gets automatically archived to 
the sent folder.


I can live with if the message sending fails, it's not archived.
The point being is if the message sent, it will be 100% in the send 
folder, i.e. all outgoing correspondence is saved.



Regards
Alex


On 01/04/2010 21:25, Janno Sannik wrote:
Not too easy to do i think since mail will be sent out using SMTP (it 
might not even be qmailtoaster, but ISP mail SMTP)

Message copying is done using IMAP. Two different channels.

Besides if you relay on SMTP to achive the message to the SENT box 
then if SMTP fails it will not have archive of the mail in SENT folder.


So it would be design wise wrong anyways.

Janno

On 29.03.2010 15:48, Postmaster wrote:

Currently, qmailtoaster/Thunderbird is setup in the following way.
Firstly, it sends the e-mail and then the message is copied to sent 
folder.

This is not a problem for a small messages without attachments.

If there is a 5mb attachment, then this is a pain in the neck to wait
for the message to be sent and then wait for the same time for the 
message to be copied to sent folder.


Is there any way to combine these functions, i.e. to send the message 
and at the same time copy the message to sent folder

so that on the client side there is only one function performed.

Many thanks

- 

Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group 
(www.vickersconsulting.com)
   Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and 
installations.

 If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today!
- 

Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and 
packages.
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: 
qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com
For additional commands, e-mail: 
qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com






- 

Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group 
(www.vickersconsulting.com)
   Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and 
installations.

 If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today!
- 

Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and 
packages.
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: 
qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com
For additional commands, e-mail: 
qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com






-
Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group 
(www.vickersconsulting.com)
   Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations.
 If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today!
-
Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages.

 To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com

For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Sending and copying to sent folder in 1 go

[Postmaster]

Thanks Eric

This could be an option, but there is a need to have another e-mail 
account - a bit of a hassle for users to search thru the archive.

I am trying to see if there any simple way...like taps but

/var/qmail/control/taps :

u...@domain.com:u...@example.com:/Sent


What do you think?


Regards
Alex


On 01/04/2010 21:55, Eric Shubert wrote:
If you really want to save sent things on the server side, check out 
taps.


Postmaster wrote:
You are right, but I was thinking about automating it on the server 
rather than on the user side.
Once the e-mail is sent to the server, it gets automatically archived 
to the sent folder.


I can live with if the message sending fails, it's not archived.
The point being is if the message sent, it will be 100% in the send 
folder, i.e. all outgoing correspondence is saved.



Regards
Alex


On 01/04/2010 21:25, Janno Sannik wrote:
Not too easy to do i think since mail will be sent out using SMTP 
(it might not even be qmailtoaster, but ISP mail SMTP)

Message copying is done using IMAP. Two different channels.

Besides if you relay on SMTP to achive the message to the SENT box 
then if SMTP fails it will not have archive of the mail in SENT folder.


So it would be design wise wrong anyways.

Janno

On 29.03.2010 15:48, Postmaster wrote:

Currently, qmailtoaster/Thunderbird is setup in the following way.
Firstly, it sends the e-mail and then the message is copied to sent 
folder.

This is not a problem for a small messages without attachments.

If there is a 5mb attachment, then this is a pain in the neck to wait
for the message to be sent and then wait for the same time for the 
message to be copied to sent folder.


Is there any way to combine these functions, i.e. to send the 
message and at the same time copy the message to sent folder

so that on the client side there is only one function performed.

Many thanks

- 

Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group 
(www.vickersconsulting.com)
   Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and 
installations.
 If you need professional help with your setup, contact them 
today!
- 

Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and 
packages.
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: 
qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com
For additional commands, e-mail: 
qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com






- 

Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group 
(www.vickersconsulting.com)
   Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and 
installations.

 If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today!
- 

Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and 
packages.
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: 
qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com
For additional commands, e-mail: 
qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com






- 

Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group 
(www.vickersconsulting.com)
   Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and 
installations.

 If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today!

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Duplicate e-mails

[Postmaster]

On 02/04/2010 16:57, Eric Shubert wrote:

Postmaster wrote:

On 01/04/2010 20:03, Eric Shubert wrote:


Can you find the smtp log messages that correspond to the first 
receipt of a duplicated message?


Will you post a bit of your spamd log? That might give some sort of 
indication.


Given that this is a virtual host, it's a bit hard to make a 
knowledgeable recommendation for improving performance. Is your host 
paging at all? I'm not familiar at all with Linode VPS. Can you fill 
us in on that environment? (what type of virtualization, etc)



Ok, another duplicated message today, from the header:

Received: by simscan 1.4.0 ppid: 32077, pid: 32078, t: 64.1936s
 scanners: attach: 1.4.0 clamav: 0.95.3/m:52/d:10688 spam: 3.2.5


64.19 seconds to scan - sounds very long to me.


Yeah, that one's long. Can you find out how big this message was?


The message was very small - several KB.




 From SMTP log:
The first receipt of a message

2010-04-02 15:46:24.801712500 tcpserver: pid 32076 from 195.222.187.12
2010-04-02 15:46:24.801837500 tcpserver: ok 32076 
xx.uk:109.74.205.xx:25 :195.222.187.12::33377
2010-04-02 15:46:24.882010500 spamdyke[32076]: 
DEBUG(filter_rdns_missing()@filter.c:848): checking for missing rDNS; 
rdns: mail07.odnoklassniki.ru
2010-04-02 15:46:24.882109500 spamdyke[32076]: 
DEBUG(filter_rdns_whitelist_file()@filter.c:956): searching rDNS 
whitelist file(s); rdns: mail07.odnoklassniki.ru
2010-04-02 15:46:24.882253500 spamdyke[32076]: 
DEBUG(filter_rdns_blacklist_file()@filter.c:1059): searching rDNS 
blacklist file(s); rdns: mail07.odnoklassniki.ru
2010-04-02 15:46:24.882391500 spamdyke[32076]: 
DEBUG(filter_ip_whitelist()@filter.c:1127): searching IP whitelist 
file(s); ip: 195.222.187.12
2010-04-02 15:46:24.882573500 spamdyke[32076]: 
DEBUG(filter_ip_blacklist()@filter.c:1177): searching IP blacklist 
file(s); ip: 195.222.187.12
2010-04-02 15:46:24.882702500 spamdyke[32076]: 
DEBUG(filter_ip_in_rdns_whitelist()@filter.c:1272): checking for IP 
in rDNS +keyword(s) in whitelist file; ip: 195.222.187.12 rdns: 
mail07.odnoklassniki.ru
2010-04-02 15:46:24.882796500 spamdyke[32076]: 
DEBUG(filter_ip_in_rdns_blacklist()@filter.c:1226): checking for IP 
in rDNS +keyword(s) in blacklist file; ip: 195.222.187.12 rdns: 
mail07.odnoklassniki.ru
2010-04-02 15:46:24.882852500 spamdyke[32076]: 
DEBUG(filter_rdns_resolve()@filter.c:1318): checking rDNS resolution; 
rdns: mail07.odnoklassniki.ru
2010-04-02 15:46:24.951669500 spamdyke[32076]: 
DEBUG(filter_dns_rbl()@filter.c:1527): checking DNS RBL(s); ip: 
195.222.187.12
2010-04-02 15:46:24.965085500 spamdyke[32076]: 
DEBUG(filter_earlytalker()@filter.c:1695): checking for earlytalker; 
delay: 5
2010-04-02 15:46:30.216776500 spamdyke[32076]: 
DEBUG(filter_sender_whitelist()@filter.c:1747): searching sender 
whitelist(s); sender: bezotv...@odnoklassniki.ru
2010-04-02 15:46:30.217293500 spamdyke[32076]: 
DEBUG(filter_sender_blacklist()@filter.c:1881): searching sender 
blacklist(s); sender: bezotv...@odnoklassniki.ru
2010-04-02 15:46:30.227601500 spamdyke[32076]: 
DEBUG(filter_sender_no_mx()@filter.c:2080): checking for sender 
domain MX record; domain: odnoklassniki.ru
2010-04-02 15:46:30.288520500 CHKUSER accepted sender: from 
 remote 
 rcpt <> : sender 
accepted
2010-04-02 15:46:30.342820500 spamdyke[32076]: 
DEBUG(filter_recipient_whitelist()@filter.c:2113): searching 
recipient whitelist(s); recipient: alexan...@xx.uk
2010-04-02 15:46:30.342937500 spamdyke[32076]: 
DEBUG(filter_recipient_relay()@filter.c:2183): checking relaying; 
relay-level: 0 recipient: alexan...@xx.uk ip: 195.222.187.12 
rdns: mail07.odnoklassniki.ru local_recipient: true relaying_allowed: 
false
2010-04-02 15:46:30.343023500 spamdyke[32076]: 
DEBUG(filter_recipient_local()@filter.c:2154): checking for 
unqualified recipient; recipient: alexan...@xx.uk
2010-04-02 15:46:30.343107500 spamdyke[32076]: 
DEBUG(filter_recipient_max()@filter.c:2244): checking maximum 
recipients; maximum: 50 current: 0
2010-04-02 15:46:30.343190500 spamdyke[32076]: 
DEBUG(filter_recipient_blacklist()@filter.c:2278): searching 
recipient blacklist(s); recipient: alexan...@xx.uk
2010-04-02 15:46:30.357374500 spamdyke[32076]: 
DEBUG(filter_recipient_graylist()@filter.c:2342): checking graylist; 
recipient: alexan...@xx.uk sender: bezotv...@odnoklassniki.ru
2010-04-02 15:46:30.404446500 CHKUSER accepted rcpt: from 
 remote 
 rcpt 
 : found existing recipient
2010-04-02 15:46:30.404449500 policy_check: remote 
bezotv...@odnoklassniki.ru -> local alexan...@xx.uk 
(UNAUTHENTICATED SENDER)

2010-04-02 15:46:30.404451500 policy_check: policy allows transmission
2010-04-02 15:46:30.404452500 spamdyke[32076]: ALLOWED from: 
bezotv...@odnoklassniki.ru to: alexan...@xx.uk origin_ip: 
195.222.187.12 origin_rdns: mail07.odnoklassniki.ru auth: (unknown)


2010-04-02 15:47:21.317362500 tcpserver: ok 32112 
xx.uk

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: qmailadmin

[Postmaster]

Can you try manually list/view a domain and/or users?
(/home/vpopmail/bin/)

Also do you have Qcontrol installed? Can you try to add/delete users via 
Qcontrol?


Do you have your MySQL backup? As a last resort you can delete your 
vpopmail database and import it from your sql file.



Regards
Alex


On 02/04/2010 18:24, Kyle Quillen wrote:

That setting was the same but changed it to 0 and that did not help

Thanks



On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 4:36 AM, Postmaster 
<mailto:postmas...@seawise-chartering.co.uk>> wrote:


Ok, try the following:
In your database vpopmail.dir_control, column cur_users what value
do you have against domain you are trying to modify?
if this is 2147483647, then change it for 0 (zero) and see if it
helps.

Regards
Alex




On 30/03/2010 21:03, Kyle Quillen wrote:

Any address



On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 2:14 PM, Eric Shubert mailto:e...@shubes.net>> wrote:

Any address, or only particular one(s)?

Kyle Quillen wrote:

None what so ever.


On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 1:55 PM, Eric Shubert
mailto:e...@shubes.net>
<mailto:e...@shubes.net <mailto:e...@shubes.net>>> wrote:

   Any messages in apache error logs?

   Kyle Quillen wrote:

   I have tried all of the above..

   Eric I created the domain via command line but
then had to rsync
   back in about 20 gigs of data for that domain all
perms seem to
   be correct.
   Kyle


   On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 10:14 PM, Sergio Enrique
Vidal Velasquez
mailto:sergio.vi...@economiayfinanzas.gov.bo>
<mailto:sergio.vi...@economiayfinanzas.gov.bo
<mailto:sergio.vi...@economiayfinanzas.gov.bo>>
<mailto:sergio.vi...@economiayfinanzas.gov.bo
<mailto:sergio.vi...@economiayfinanzas.gov.bo>
<mailto:sergio.vi...@economiayfinanzas.gov.bo
<mailto:sergio.vi...@economiayfinanzas.gov.bo>>>> wrote:

  may be is the number of caracters in the
password, did you try a
  less number o characters??


  Postmaster escribió:

  Did you try using a different browser?


  On 30/03/2010 02:52, Kyle Quillen wrote:

  hello all
  I have a bit of an issue I am hoping
that someone can
   help me out
  with.
  We just put up a new server and
everything is working
   great with
  the exception of when we login into
http://domain.com/qmailadmin
  Then we try to create a new user fill
out the form
   properly and
  this is where the issue happens
  When we hit create we get

  Email Account
testingu...@domain.com <mailto:testingu...@domain.com>
<mailto:testingu...@domain.com
<mailto:testingu...@domain.com>>
<mailto:testingu...@domain.com
<mailto:testingu...@domain.com>

<mailto:testingu...@domain.com
<mailto:testingu...@domain.com>>> (user new user) could
   not be

  added

  Everything works fine from the command
line I have
   checked all
  permissions etc..
  I did find this link but not sure if
this helps at all.

http://www.mail-archive.com/qmailad...@inter7.com/msg06818.html

  Thanks for all your help








   -- -Eric 'shubes'


 
 -

   Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group
   (www.vickersconsulting.com
<http://www.vickersconsulting.com>
<http://www.vickersconsulting.com>)

 Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and
   installations.
   If you need professional help with your setup,
contact them today!
 
 -

  Please visit qmailtoaster.com
<http://qmailtoaster.com> <http://qmailtoaster.com> for the

 

Re: [qmailtoaster] New ClamAV and Squirrelmail

[Postmaster]

If this topic has come up, I'd like to ask what the difference is 
between RHEL ClamAV rpm - http://packages.sw.be/clamav/
and qmail-toaster ClamAV rpm package? Can we update qmailtoaster-clamav 
with a normal clamav.rpm?


Regards
Alex


On 02/04/2010 19:50, George Alexander wrote:

2 packages are now out of date on the toaster:
http://www.clamav.net/lang/en/2010/04/02/announcing-clamav-0-96/
http://squirrelmail.org/index.php

Just thought I'd give y'all the heads up
Thanks



-
Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group 
(www.vickersconsulting.com)
   Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations.
 If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today!
-
Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages.

 To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com

For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: New ClamAV and Squirrelmail

[Postmaster]

Good news, Eric, this would help you guys as well as you do not have to 
recompile the original clamav/spamassassin rpm's.

Also the upgrade would be more smooth in my view.

Any idea when QMT v2 is out roughly?

Rgds
Alex


On 02/04/2010 23:13, Eric Shubert wrote:

Not in this release. There are configuration differences.
The plan is that QMT v2 that Jake's working on will be able to use the 
base distro packages.


Postmaster wrote:
If this topic has come up, I'd like to ask what the difference is 
between RHEL ClamAV rpm - http://packages.sw.be/clamav/
and qmail-toaster ClamAV rpm package? Can we update 
qmailtoaster-clamav with a normal clamav.rpm?


Regards
Alex


On 02/04/2010 19:50, George Alexander wrote:

2 packages are now out of date on the toaster:
http://www.clamav.net/lang/en/2010/04/02/announcing-clamav-0-96/
http://squirrelmail.org/index.php

Just thought I'd give y'all the heads up
Thanks



- 







-
Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group 
(www.vickersconsulting.com)
   Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations.
 If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today!
-
Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages.

 To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com

For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Mails getting bounced

[Postmaster]

Is it your server rejecting mail or is it your domain got rejected?
Let's check - http://domainkeys.sourceforge.net/policycheck.html


   Testing private._domainkey.vanaz.com

New test 

No _domainkey TXT record found for private._domainkey.vanaz.com


and


   Testing _domainkey.vanaz.com

New test 

No _domainkey TXT record found for _domainkey.vanaz.com


So there is no policy for vanaz.com, hence this domain would fail 
domainkey policy on other servers.

You need to insert 2 TXT records in vanaz.com DNS.


Regards
Alex





On 05/04/2010 07:21, Amit Dalia wrote:

Hi Eric/Jake,

I had removed Domain Key from my server but I'm still getting below error:

mailto:pnq.fitd...@orbit-star.com>>:
202.46.201.27 failed after I sent the message.
Remote host said: 550 Message does not pass DomainKeys requirements 
for domain vanaz.com 


Any help since this is creating problem to me know.

Regards,

Amit


At Monday, 29-03-2010 on 21:53 Eric Shubert wrote:

Not at all.

Amit Dalia wrote:
> Eric/Jake,
>
> Will re-installing qmail toaster package can solve the problem?
>
> Amit
>
> At Monday, 29-03-2010 on 21:18 Eric Shubert wrote:
>
> Amit,
>
> No way to repair qmail-dk, until someone steps up and fixes the
code.
>
> Check out Jake's videos for a way to use DKIM.
>
> In order to disable DK entirely, do:
> # cd /var/qmail/bin
> # ln -sf qmail-queue.orig qmail-queue
>
> --
> -Eric 'shubes'
>
> Amit Dalia wrote:
> >
> > Dear Eric,
> >
> > This was outgoing mail from server and occurred first time
only. If
> > qmail-dk is broken then is there any way to repair this? Is there
> any
> > other way to use Domain Key or DKIM with my server? Else how to
> remove
> > Domain Key from my server.
> >
> > Thanks and regards,
> >
> > Amit
> >
> > At Monday, 29-03-2010 on 20:50 Eric Shubert wrote:
> >
> > Amit Dalia wrote:
> > > Dear Team,
> > >
> > > I have been using Domain Key for one of my domain without any
> > problem
> > > from long time. But today 1 server bounced it back
mentioning the
> > below
> > > error:
> > >
> > > [<02>] The reason of the delivery failure was:
> > > >
> > > > 550 Message does not pass DomainKeys requirements for domain
> > vanaz.com
> > >
> > > Is my domain key break?
> > >
> > > Thanks and regards,
> > >
> > > Amit
> >
> > Perhaps. The qmail-dk program included with QMT is broken in some
> > areas,
> > particularly inbound. While we've been under the impression that
> > signing
> > was working ok, it's entirely possible that there's a bug in
> there. The
> > safest bet is to simply not use it at all.
> >
> > --
> > -Eric 'shubes'
> >
>
>
>

-
> Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group
> (www.vickersconsulting.com)
> Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and
installations.
> If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today!
>

-
> Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and
> packages.
>
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com
> For additional commands, e-mail:
qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com
>


-- 
-Eric 'shubes'




-
Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group
(www.vickersconsulting.com)
Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and
installations.
If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today!

-
Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and
packages.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com
For additional commands, e-mail:
qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Mails getting bounced

[Postmaster]

This may not help. You do not have control over the other server and 
your domain may be rejected if the other server has
a strict Domainkey policy. I would recommend to keep qmail-dk and DNS 
entries unless you have serious problems (qmail-dk is completely broken).


Personally, I have not had any issues with Domainkey.

Regards
Alex



On 05/04/2010 10:21, Amit Dalia wrote:
It is my domain which got rejected. And I had now removed domain key 
for signing my out going emails. Also I had deleted domain key entries 
from my DNS Server.


Amit

At Monday, 05-04-2010 on 14:48 Postmaster wrote:

Is it your server rejecting mail or is it your domain got rejected?
Let's check - http://domainkeys.sourceforge.net/policycheck.html


Testing private._domainkey.vanaz.com

New test <http://domainkeys.sourceforge.net/policycheck.html>

No _domainkey TXT record found for private._domainkey.vanaz.com


and


Testing _domainkey.vanaz.com

New test <http://domainkeys.sourceforge.net/policycheck.html>

No _domainkey TXT record found for _domainkey.vanaz.com


So there is no policy for vanaz.com, hence this domain would fail
domainkey policy on other servers.
You need to insert 2 TXT records in vanaz.com DNS.


Regards
Alex





On 05/04/2010 07:21, Amit Dalia wrote:

Hi Eric/Jake,

I had removed Domain Key from my server but I'm still getting
below error:

mailto:pnq.fitd...@orbit-star.com>>:
202.46.201.27 failed after I sent the message.
Remote host said: 550 Message does not pass DomainKeys
requirements for domain vanaz.com <http://vanaz.com/>

Any help since this is creating problem to me know.

Regards,

Amit


At Monday, 29-03-2010 on 21:53 Eric Shubert wrote:

Not at all.

Amit Dalia wrote:
> Eric/Jake,
>
> Will re-installing qmail toaster package can solve the problem?
>
> Amit
>
> At Monday, 29-03-2010 on 21:18 Eric Shubert wrote:
>
> Amit,
>
> No way to repair qmail-dk, until someone steps up and fixes
the code.
>
> Check out Jake's videos for a way to use DKIM.
>
> In order to disable DK entirely, do:
> # cd /var/qmail/bin
> # ln -sf qmail-queue.orig qmail-queue
>
> --
> -Eric 'shubes'
>
> Amit Dalia wrote:
> >
> > Dear Eric,
> >
> > This was outgoing mail from server and occurred first
time only. If
> > qmail-dk is broken then is there any way to repair this?
Is there
> any
> > other way to use Domain Key or DKIM with my server? Else
how to
> remove
> > Domain Key from my server.
> >
> > Thanks and regards,
> >
> > Amit
> >
> > At Monday, 29-03-2010 on 20:50 Eric Shubert wrote:
> >
> > Amit Dalia wrote:
> > > Dear Team,
> > >
> > > I have been using Domain Key for one of my domain
without any
> > problem
> > > from long time. But today 1 server bounced it back
mentioning the
> > below
> > > error:
> > >
> > > [<02>] The reason of the delivery failure was:
> > > >
> > > > 550 Message does not pass DomainKeys requirements for
domain
> > vanaz.com
> > >
> > > Is my domain key break?
> > >
> > > Thanks and regards,
> > >
> > > Amit
> >
> > Perhaps. The qmail-dk program included with QMT is broken
in some
> > areas,
> > particularly inbound. While we've been under the
impression that
> > signing
> > was working ok, it's entirely possible that there's a bug in
> there. The
> > safest bet is to simply not use it at all.
> >
> > --
> > -Eric 'shubes'
> >
>
>
>

-
> Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group
> (www.vickersconsulting.com)
> Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and
installations.
> If you need pr

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Mails getting bounced

[Postmaster]

Issue the following command:

ln -sf qmail-dk qmail-queue

Restart qmail

and do not forget to insert two TXT records into your DNS and make sure 
you have done it in a right way.

This would help you to test it:


http://domainkeys.sourceforge.net/policycheck.html
http://domainkeys.sourceforge.net


Also refer to qmailtoaster wiki.

Regards
Alex




On 05/04/2010 10:57, Amit Dalia wrote:

I had removed qmail-dk from my server using
ln -sf qmail-queue.orig qmail-queue

Now how do re-enable qmail-dk for my server.

Regards,

Amit

At Monday, 05-04-2010 on 15:08 Postmaster wrote:

This may not help. You do not have control over the other server
and your domain may be rejected if the other server has
a strict Domainkey policy. I would recommend to keep qmail-dk and
DNS entries unless you have serious problems (qmail-dk is
completely broken).

Personally, I have not had any issues with Domainkey.

Regards
Alex



On 05/04/2010 10:21, Amit Dalia wrote:

It is my domain which got rejected. And I had now removed domain
key for signing my out going emails. Also I had deleted domain
key entries from my DNS Server.

Amit

At Monday, 05-04-2010 on 14:48 Postmaster wrote:

Is it your server rejecting mail or is it your domain got
rejected?
Let's check - http://domainkeys.sourceforge.net/policycheck.html


Testing private._domainkey.vanaz.com

New test <http://domainkeys.sourceforge.net/policycheck.html>

No _domainkey TXT record found for private._domainkey.vanaz.com


and


Testing _domainkey.vanaz.com

New test <http://domainkeys.sourceforge.net/policycheck.html>

No _domainkey TXT record found for _domainkey.vanaz.com


So there is no policy for vanaz.com, hence this domain would
fail domainkey policy on other servers.
You need to insert 2 TXT records in vanaz.com DNS.


Regards
Alex





On 05/04/2010 07:21, Amit Dalia wrote:

Hi Eric/Jake,

I had removed Domain Key from my server but I'm still
getting below error:

mailto:pnq.fitd...@orbit-star.com>>:
202.46.201.27 failed after I sent the message.
Remote host said: 550 Message does not pass DomainKeys
requirements for domain vanaz.com <http://vanaz.com/>

Any help since this is creating problem to me know.

Regards,

Amit


At Monday, 29-03-2010 on 21:53 Eric Shubert wrote:

Not at all.

Amit Dalia wrote:
> Eric/Jake,
>
> Will re-installing qmail toaster package can solve the
problem?
>
> Amit
>
> At Monday, 29-03-2010 on 21:18 Eric Shubert wrote:
>
> Amit,
>
> No way to repair qmail-dk, until someone steps up and
fixes the code.
>
> Check out Jake's videos for a way to use DKIM.
>
> In order to disable DK entirely, do:
> # cd /var/qmail/bin
> # ln -sf qmail-queue.orig qmail-queue
>
> --
> -Eric 'shubes'
>
> Amit Dalia wrote:
> >
> > Dear Eric,
> >
> > This was outgoing mail from server and occurred
first time only. If
> > qmail-dk is broken then is there any way to repair
this? Is there
> any
> > other way to use Domain Key or DKIM with my server?
Else how to
> remove
> > Domain Key from my server.
> >
> > Thanks and regards,
> >
> > Amit
> >
> > At Monday, 29-03-2010 on 20:50 Eric Shubert wrote:
> >
> > Amit Dalia wrote:
> > > Dear Team,
> > >
> > > I have been using Domain Key for one of my domain
without any
> > problem
> > > from long time. But today 1 server bounced it back
mentioning the
> > below
> > > error:
> > >
> > > [<02>] The reason of the delivery failure was:
> > > >
> > > > 550 Message does not pass DomainKeys
requirements for domain
> > vanaz.com
> > >
> > > Is my domain key break?
> > >
> > > Thanks and regards,
> >

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Mails getting bounced

[Postmaster]

There is another problem.

You should have two entries for Domainkeys and one entry for DKIM:

Domainkey:
- _domainkey.vanaz.com
- private._domainkey.vanaz.com

Please refer to http://wiki.qmailtoaster.com/index.php/Domainkeys

DKIM:
- dkim1._domainkey.vanaz.com

Please refer to video.qmailtoaster.com

One of your TXT records is for vanaz.com rather than 
_domainkey.vanaz.com - please correct it.

Once again see the above link about Domiankeys on how to setup your DNS.


Regards
Alex





On 05/04/2010 12:34, Anil Aliyan wrote:


Dear Amit,

Your DNS entry has one problem. You have k=rsa;   twice in you DNS 
entry please remove one k=rsa; from the DNS entry.



private._domainkey.vanaz.com



New test <http://domainkeys.sourceforge.net/selectorcheck.html>

TXT Record length = 120

*k=rsa; k=rsa;* 
p=MEwwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQADOwAwOAIxAMOyyYU7C8EPAq5QMKFXWuaEbtS/uCSB


...aKlCU8bNlpTcIyVZxDvoQJra6um3v9mc5QIDAQAB

*This selector is in error: TagValue# 2, Tag 'k': Duplicate token at 
position 1*


Regards,

Anil Aliyan

*From:* Amit Dalia [mailto:a...@ikf.co.in]
*Sent:* Monday, April 05, 2010 4:20 PM
*To:* qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
*Subject:* Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Mails getting bounced

Dear Anil/Alex,

Please check the link below:
http://domainkeys.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/check_policy?domain=vanaz.com&Submit=Submit
http://domainkeys.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/check_selector?selector=private._domainkey.vanaz.com&Submit=Submit

Anyway I will proceed for DKIM installation now.

Thanks and regards,

Amit

At Monday, 05-04-2010 on 15:34 Postmaster wrote:

Issue the following command:

ln -sf qmail-dk qmail-queue

Restart qmail

and do not forget to insert two TXT records into your DNS and make 
sure you have done it in a right way.

This would help you to test it:


http://domainkeys.sourceforge.net/policycheck.html
http://domainkeys.sourceforge.net 
<http://domainkeys.sourceforge.net/policycheck.html>



Also refer to qmailtoaster wiki.

Regards
Alex




On 05/04/2010 10:57, Amit Dalia wrote:

I had removed qmail-dk from my server using
ln -sf qmail-queue.orig qmail-queue

Now how do re-enable qmail-dk for my server.

Regards,

Amit

At Monday, 05-04-2010 on 15:08 Postmaster wrote:

This may not help. You do not have control over the other server and 
your domain may be rejected if the other server has
a strict Domainkey policy. I would recommend to keep qmail-dk and DNS 
entries unless you have serious problems (qmail-dk is completely broken).


Personally, I have not had any issues with Domainkey.

Regards
Alex



On 05/04/2010 10:21, Amit Dalia wrote:

It is my domain which got rejected. And I had now removed domain key 
for signing my out going emails. Also I had deleted domain key entries 
from my DNS Server.


Amit

At Monday, 05-04-2010 on 14:48 Postmaster wrote:

Is it your server rejecting mail or is it your domain got rejected?
Let's check - http://domainkeys.sourceforge.net/policycheck.html


Testing private._domainkey.vanaz.com



New test <http://domainkeys.sourceforge.net/policycheck.html>

No _domainkey TXT record found for private._domainkey.vanaz.com


and


Testing _domainkey.vanaz.com



New test <http://domainkeys.sourceforge.net/policycheck.html>

No _domainkey TXT record found for _domainkey.vanaz.com


So there is no policy for vanaz.com, hence this domain would fail 
domainkey policy on other servers.

You need to insert 2 TXT records in vanaz.com DNS.


Regards
Alex





On 05/04/2010 07:21, Amit Dalia wrote:

Hi Eric/Jake,

I had removed Domain Key from my server but I'm still getting below error:

mailto:pnq.fitd...@orbit-star.com>>:
202.46.201.27 failed after I sent the message.
Remote host said: 550 Message does not pass DomainKeys requirements 
for domain vanaz.com <http://vanaz.com/>


Any help since this is creating problem to me know.

Regards,

Amit


At Monday, 29-03-2010 on 21:53 Eric Shubert wrote:

Not at all.

Amit Dalia wrote:
> Eric/Jake,
>
> Will re-installing qmail toaster package can solve the problem?
>
> Amit
>
> At Monday, 29-03-2010 on 21:18 Eric Shubert wrote:
>
> Amit,
>
> No way to repair qmail-dk, until someone steps up and fixes the code.
>
> Check out Jake's videos for a way to use DKIM.
>
> In order to disable DK entirely, do:
> # cd /var/qmail/bin
> # ln -sf qmail-queue.orig qmail-queue
>
> --
> -Eric 'shubes'
>
> Amit Dalia wrote:
> >
> > Dear Eric,
> >
> > This was outgoing mail from server and occurred first time only. If
> > qmail-dk is broken then is there any way to repair this? Is there
> any
> > other way to use Domain Key or DKIM with my server? Else how to
> remove
> > Domain Key from my server.
> >
> > Thanks and regards,
> >
> > Amit
> >
> > At Monday, 29-03-2010 on 20:50 E

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Mails getting bounced

[Postmaster]

It may take a while for the DNS entries to propagate.
Send an e-mail with test in the subject line to sa-t...@sendmail.net

and you should have a reply with output like this shortly:

sendmail.net Sender Authentication Auto-Responder $Revision: 1.19 $

This service runs at  and allows remote users
to perform a simple, automated test to see if different Sender
Authentication schemes are working.  Mail sent to this service
is checked by our Sender Authentication filters for any valid
credentials or signatures.  A script receives the message, checks
for a special header with the results of the tests, and composes
this response message based on what it finds.  This response is also
signed with DomainKeys and DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM).

Please note that the DKIM filter signing this reply message conforms
to the latest IETF draft version, and thus may not be successfully
verified by older implementations.  If you are using dkim-filter from
Sendmail, Inc., upgrade to at least version 1.0.0 to be compatible
with the most recent version of DKIM.

We hope this service has been helpful to you.

Authentication System:   DomainKeys Identified Mail
   Result:   DKIM signature confirmed GOOD
   Description:  Signature verified, message arrived intact
   Reporting host:   sendmail.net
   More information:http://mipassoc.org/dkim/
   Sendmail milter:https://sourceforge.net/projects/dkim-milter/

Authentication System:   Domain Keys
   Result:   DK signature confirmed GOOD
   Description:  Signature verified, message arrived intact
   Reporting host:   sendmail.net
   More information:http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys
   Sendmail milter:https://sourceforge.net/projects/domainkeys-milter/

Authentication System:   Sender ID
   Result:   SID data confirmed GOOD
   Description:  Sending host is authorized for sending domain
   Reporting host:   sendmail.net
   More information:http://www.microsoft.com/senderid
   Sendmail milter:https://sourceforge.net/projects/sid-milter/

Authentication System:   Sender Permitted From (SPF)
   Result:   SPF data confirmed GOOD
   Description:  Sending host is authorized for sending domain
   Reporting host:   sendmail.net
   More information:http://spf.pobox.com/

Regards
Alex


On 05/04/2010 12:46, Amit Dalia wrote:

Dear Anil,

Yes I saw that and modified it on my DNS server. Also I had setup DKIM 
for my server as per Jake Video on settuping up DKIM.


I think, I have to check it know whether its working or not, so how 
can I check it?


Regards,

Amit

At Monday, 05-04-2010 on 17:04 Anil Aliyan wrote:

Dear Amit,

Your DNS entry has one problem. You have k=rsa;   twice in you DNS
entry please remove one k=rsa; from the DNS entry.


private._domainkey.vanaz.com



New test <http://domainkeys.sourceforge.net/selectorcheck.html>

TXT Record length = 120

*k=rsa; k=rsa;*
p=MEwwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQADOwAwOAIxAMOyyYU7C8EPAq5QMKFXWuaEbtS/uCSB

...aKlCU8bNlpTcIyVZxDvoQJra6um3v9mc5QIDAQAB

*This selector is in error: TagValue# 2, Tag 'k': Duplicate token
at position 1*

Regards,

Anil Aliyan

*From:* Amit Dalia [mailto:a...@ikf.co.in]
*Sent:* Monday, April 05, 2010 4:20 PM
*To:* qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
*Subject:* Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Mails getting bounced

Dear Anil/Alex,

Please check the link below:

http://domainkeys.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/check_policy?domain=vanaz.com&Submit=Submit

http://domainkeys.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/check_selector?selector=private._domainkey.vanaz.com&Submit=Submit

Anyway I will proceed for DKIM installation now.

Thanks and regards,

Amit

At Monday, 05-04-2010 on 15:34 Postmaster wrote:

Issue the following command:

ln -sf qmail-dk qmail-queue

Restart qmail

and do not forget to insert two TXT records into your DNS and make
sure you have done it in a right way.
This would help you to test it:


http://domainkeys.sourceforge.net/policycheck.html
http://domainkeys.sourceforge.net
<http://domainkeys.sourceforge.net/policycheck.html>


Also refer to qmailtoaster wiki.

Regards
Alex




On 05/04/2010 10:57, Amit Dalia wrote:

I had removed qmail-dk from my server using
ln -sf qmail-queue.orig qmail-queue

Now how do re-enable qmail-dk for my server.

Regards,

Amit

At Monday, 05-04-2010 on 15:08 Postmaster wrote:

This may not help. You do not have control over the other server
and your domain may be rejected if the other server has
a strict Domainkey policy. I would recommend to keep qmail-dk and
DNS entries unless you have serious problems (qmail-dk is
completely broken).

Personally, I have not had any issues with Domainkey.

Regards
A

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Mails getting bounced

[Postmaster]

No, you should not have any problems with Domainkey/DKIM using a smart 
host. However, you need to redefine your SPF in your DNS to allow relay 
from the smart host.


Regards
Alex


On 05/04/2010 12:52, Amit Dalia wrote:
Sorry but 1 important thing which I forgot to mention is I'm using 
Smarthost on server for sending emails. Can this be the reason for 
fail of Domain Key and DKIM?


Regards,

Amit

At Monday, 05-04-2010 on 17:04 Anil Aliyan wrote:

Dear Amit,

Your DNS entry has one problem. You have k=rsa;   twice in you DNS
entry please remove one k=rsa; from the DNS entry.


private._domainkey.vanaz.com



New test <http://domainkeys.sourceforge.net/selectorcheck.html>

TXT Record length = 120

*k=rsa; k=rsa;*
p=MEwwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQADOwAwOAIxAMOyyYU7C8EPAq5QMKFXWuaEbtS/uCSB

...aKlCU8bNlpTcIyVZxDvoQJra6um3v9mc5QIDAQAB

*This selector is in error: TagValue# 2, Tag 'k': Duplicate token
at position 1*

Regards,

Anil Aliyan

*From:* Amit Dalia [mailto:a...@ikf.co.in]
*Sent:* Monday, April 05, 2010 4:20 PM
*To:* qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
*Subject:* Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Mails getting bounced

Dear Anil/Alex,

Please check the link below:

http://domainkeys.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/check_policy?domain=vanaz.com&Submit=Submit

http://domainkeys.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/check_selector?selector=private._domainkey.vanaz.com&Submit=Submit

Anyway I will proceed for DKIM installation now.

Thanks and regards,

Amit

At Monday, 05-04-2010 on 15:34 Postmaster wrote:

Issue the following command:

ln -sf qmail-dk qmail-queue

Restart qmail

and do not forget to insert two TXT records into your DNS and make
sure you have done it in a right way.
This would help you to test it:


http://domainkeys.sourceforge.net/policycheck.html
http://domainkeys.sourceforge.net
<http://domainkeys.sourceforge.net/policycheck.html>


Also refer to qmailtoaster wiki.

Regards
Alex




On 05/04/2010 10:57, Amit Dalia wrote:

I had removed qmail-dk from my server using
ln -sf qmail-queue.orig qmail-queue

Now how do re-enable qmail-dk for my server.

Regards,

Amit

At Monday, 05-04-2010 on 15:08 Postmaster wrote:

This may not help. You do not have control over the other server
and your domain may be rejected if the other server has
a strict Domainkey policy. I would recommend to keep qmail-dk and
DNS entries unless you have serious problems (qmail-dk is
completely broken).

Personally, I have not had any issues with Domainkey.

Regards
Alex



On 05/04/2010 10:21, Amit Dalia wrote:

It is my domain which got rejected. And I had now removed domain
key for signing my out going emails. Also I had deleted domain key
entries from my DNS Server.

Amit

At Monday, 05-04-2010 on 14:48 Postmaster wrote:

Is it your server rejecting mail or is it your domain got rejected?
Let's check - http://domainkeys.sourceforge.net/policycheck.html


Testing private._domainkey.vanaz.com



New test <http://domainkeys.sourceforge.net/policycheck.html>

No _domainkey TXT record found for private._domainkey.vanaz.com


and


Testing _domainkey.vanaz.com



New test <http://domainkeys.sourceforge.net/policycheck.html>

No _domainkey TXT record found for _domainkey.vanaz.com


So there is no policy for vanaz.com, hence this domain would fail
domainkey policy on other servers.
You need to insert 2 TXT records in vanaz.com DNS.


Regards
Alex





On 05/04/2010 07:21, Amit Dalia wrote:

Hi Eric/Jake,

I had removed Domain Key from my server but I'm still getting
below error:

mailto:pnq.fitd...@orbit-star.com>>:
202.46.201.27 failed after I sent the message.
Remote host said: 550 Message does not pass DomainKeys
requirements for domain vanaz.com <http://vanaz.com/>

Any help since this is creating problem to me know.

Regards,

Amit


At Monday, 29-03-2010 on 21:53 Eric Shubert wrote:

Not at all.

Amit Dalia wrote:
> Eric/Jake,
>
> Will re-installing qmail toaster package can solve the problem?
>
> Amit
>
> At Monday, 29-03-2010 on 21:18 Eric Shubert wrote:
>
> Amit,
>
> No way to repair qmail-dk, until someone steps up and fixes the code.
>
> Check out Jake's videos for a way to use DKIM.
>
> In order to disable DK entirely, do:
> # cd /var/qmail/bin
> # ln -sf qmail-queue.orig qmail-queue
>
> --
> -Eric 'shubes'
>
> Amit Dalia wrote:
> >
> > Dear Eric,
> >
> > This was outgoing mail from server and occ

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Mails getting bounced

[Postmaster]

There is no reason why different keys cannot be used for Domainkey and DKIM.
I am using different keys and have had no problems so far.



Regards
Alex


On 05/04/2010 13:01, Anil Aliyan wrote:


I have checked both the entries exists but not updated globally yet. 
BUT BOTH KEYS ARE DIFFERENT, please use one single key for both DKIM 
and DomainKeys


If you run dig command from your server you can see these records:

*dig txt _domainkey.vanza.com(Answers as Below)*

[r...@ncode-imss ~]# dig txt dkim1._domainkey.vanaz.com

; <<>> DiG 9.3.6-P1-RedHat-9.3.6-4.P1.el5 <<>> txt 
dkim1._domainkey.vanaz.com


;; global options:  printcmd

;; Got answer:

;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 27481

;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 2, ADDITIONAL: 0

;; QUESTION SECTION:

;dkim1._domainkey.vanaz.com.IN  TXT

;; ANSWER SECTION:

dkim1._domainkey.vanaz.com. 3600 IN TXT "k=rsa\; 
p=MEwwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQADOwAwOAIxAMr0cG1KMKOsR3sNt69ZuqdCPts+mUfBappgKc0qvB+6+X1cXYln9Eq6sikdiIzV4QIDAQAB"


;; AUTHORITY SECTION:

vanaz.com.  172368  IN  NS  ns2.iknowledgefactory.com.

vanaz.com.  172368  IN  NS  ns.iknowledgefactory.com.

[r...@ncode-imss ~]# dig txt private._domainkey.vanaz.com

; <<>> DiG 9.3.6-P1-RedHat-9.3.6-4.P1.el5 <<>> txt 
private._domainkey.vanaz.com


;; global options:  printcmd

;; Got answer:

;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 54065

;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 0

;; QUESTION SECTION:

;private._domainkey.vanaz.com.  IN  TXT

;; ANSWER SECTION:

private._domainkey.vanaz.com. 2753 IN   TXT "k=rsa\; 
p=MEwwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQADOwAwOAIxAMOyyYU7C8EPAq5QMKFXWuaEbtS/uCSBaKlCU8bNlpTcIyVZxDvoQJra6um3v9mc5QIDAQAB"


Regards,

Anil Aliyan

*From:* Postmaster [mailto:postmas...@seawise-chartering.co.uk]
*Sent:* Monday, April 05, 2010 5:23 PM
*To:* qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
*Subject:* Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Mails getting bounced

There is another problem.

You should have two entries for Domainkeys and one entry for DKIM:

Domainkey:
- _domainkey.vanaz.com
- private._domainkey.vanaz.com

Please refer to http://wiki.qmailtoaster.com/index.php/Domainkeys

DKIM:
- dkim1._domainkey.vanaz.com

Please refer to video.qmailtoaster.com

One of your TXT records is for vanaz.com rather than 
_domainkey.vanaz.com - please correct it.

Once again see the above link about Domiankeys on how to setup your DNS.


Regards
Alex





On 05/04/2010 12:34, Anil Aliyan wrote:

Dear Amit,

Your DNS entry has one problem. You have k=rsa;   twice in you DNS 
entry please remove one k=rsa; from the DNS entry.



private._domainkey.vanaz.com



New test <http://domainkeys.sourceforge.net/selectorcheck.html>

TXT Record length = 120

*k=rsa; k=rsa;* 
p=MEwwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQADOwAwOAIxAMOyyYU7C8EPAq5QMKFXWuaEbtS/uCSB


...aKlCU8bNlpTcIyVZxDvoQJra6um3v9mc5QIDAQAB

*This selector is in error: TagValue# 2, Tag 'k': Duplicate token at 
position 1*


Regards,

Anil Aliyan

*From:* Amit Dalia [mailto:a...@ikf.co.in]
*Sent:* Monday, April 05, 2010 4:20 PM
*To:* qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com 
<mailto:qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com>

*Subject:* Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Mails getting bounced

Dear Anil/Alex,

Please check the link below:
http://domainkeys.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/check_policy?domain=vanaz.com&Submit=Submit 
<http://domainkeys.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/check_policy?domain=vanaz.com&Submit=Submit>
http://domainkeys.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/check_selector?selector=private._domainkey.vanaz.com&Submit=Submit 
<http://domainkeys.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/check_selector?selector=private._domainkey.vanaz.com&Submit=Submit>


Anyway I will proceed for DKIM installation now.

Thanks and regards,

Amit

At Monday, 05-04-2010 on 15:34 Postmaster wrote:


Issue the following command:

ln -sf qmail-dk qmail-queue

Restart qmail

and do not forget to insert two TXT records into your DNS and make 
sure you have done it in a right way.

This would help you to test it:


http://domainkeys.sourceforge.net/policycheck.html
http://domainkeys.sourceforge.net 
<http://domainkeys.sourceforge.net/policycheck.html>



Also refer to qmailtoaster wiki.

Regards
Alex




On 05/04/2010 10:57, Amit Dalia wrote:

I had removed qmail-dk from my server using
ln -sf qmail-queue.orig qmail-queue

Now how do re-enable qmail-dk for my server.

Regards,

Amit

At Monday, 05-04-2010 on 15:08 Postmaster wrote:


This may not help. You do not have control over the other server and 
your domain may be rejected if the other server has
a strict Domainkey policy. I would recommend to keep qmail-dk and DNS 
entries unless you have serious problems (qmail-dk is completely broken).


Personally, I have not had any issues with Domainkey.

Regards
Alex



On 05/04/2010

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Mails getting bounced

[Postmaster]

Anil

The file below you are referring is for DKIM and not for Domainkey.

For Domainkey tcp.smtp  should have the following in order for the 
outgoing email to be signed:


 DKSIGN="/var/qmail/control/domainkeys/%//private/"


and

DKVERIFY=""
 


if you have to accept incoming e-mail failing Domainkey


Regards
Alex


On 05/04/2010 13:09, Anil Aliyan wrote:


Dear Amit,

Please ignore my last mail about smarthost. Your mail signed by you 
main mail server should work actually.


I have checked your test message and it is signed by DKIM but doesn’t 
singed for Domainkeys. You need to entry for both in your signconf.xml 
file:  Your file should look like below mentioned example:


**

* *

* keyfile="/var/qmail/control/dkim/global.key" method="simple" 
selector="dkim1">*


* *

* *

* *

* *

* *

* *

* *

* *

**

*From:* Amit Dalia [mailto:a...@ikf.co.in]
*Sent:* Monday, April 05, 2010 5:30 PM
*To:* qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
*Subject:* Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Mails getting bounced

Dear Anil,

Please check I had send test mail on your email id.

Regards,

Amit

At Monday, 05-04-2010 on 17:26 Postmaster wrote:

It may take a while for the DNS entries to propagate.
Send an e-mail with test in the subject line to sa-t...@sendmail.net 
<mailto:sa-t...@sendmail.net>


and you should have a reply with output like this shortly:


sendmail.net Sender Authentication Auto-Responder $Revision: 1.19 $



This service runs at  <mailto:sa-t...@sendmail.net>  and 
allows remote users

to perform a simple, automated test to see if different Sender

Authentication schemes are working.  Mail sent to this service

is checked by our Sender Authentication filters for any valid

credentials or signatures.  A script receives the message, checks

for a special header with the results of the tests, and composes

this response message based on what it finds.  This response is also

signed with DomainKeys and DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM).



Please note that the DKIM filter signing this reply message conforms

to the latest IETF draft version, and thus may not be successfully

verified by older implementations.  If you are using dkim-filter from

Sendmail, Inc., upgrade to at least version 1.0.0 to be compatible

with the most recent version of DKIM.



We hope this service has been helpful to you.



Authentication System:   DomainKeys Identified Mail

Result:   DKIM signature confirmed GOOD

Description:  Signature verified, message arrived intact

Reporting host:   sendmail.net   


More information:http://mipassoc.org/dkim/

Sendmail milter:https://sourceforge.net/projects/dkim-milter/



Authentication System:   Domain Keys


Result:   DK signature confirmed GOOD

Description:  Signature verified, message arrived intact

Reporting host:   sendmail.net   


More information:http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys

Sendmail milter:https://sourceforge.net/projects/domainkeys-milter/



Authentication System:   Sender ID  


Result:   SID data confirmed GOOD

Description:  Sending host is authorized for sending domain

Reporting host:   sendmail.net   


More information:http://www.microsoft.com/senderid

Sendmail milter:https://sourceforge.net/projects/sid-milter/



Authentication System:   Sender Permitted From (SPF)

Result:   SPF data confirmed GOOD

Description:  Sending host is authorized for sending domain

Reporting host:   sendmail.net   


More information:http://spf.pobox.com/

Regards
Alex


On 05/04/2010 12:46, Amit Dalia wrote:

Dear Anil,

Yes I saw that and modified it on my DNS server. Also I had setup DKIM 
for my server as per Jake Video on settuping up DKIM.


I think, I have to check it know whether its working or not, so how 
can I check it?


Regards,

Amit

At Monday, 05-04-2010 on 17:04 Anil Aliyan wrote:

Dear Amit,

Your DNS entry has one problem. You have k=rsa;   twice in you DNS 
entry please remove one k=rsa; from the DNS entry.



private._domainkey.vanaz.com



New test <http://domainkeys.sourceforge.net/selectorcheck.html>

TXT Record length = 120

*k=rsa; k=rsa;* 
p=MEwwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQADOwAwOAIxAMOyyYU7C8EPAq5QMKFXWuaEbtS/uCSB


...aKlCU8bNlpTcIyVZxDvoQJra6um3v9mc5QIDAQAB

*This selector is in error: TagValue# 2, Tag 'k': Duplicate token at 
position 1*


Regards,

Anil Aliyan

*From:* Amit Dalia [mailto:a...@ikf.co.in]
*Sent:* Monday, April 05, 2010 4:20 PM
*To:* qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com 
<mailto:qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com>

*Subject:* Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Mails getting bounced

Dear Anil/Alex,

Please check the link below:
http://domainkeys.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/check_policy?domain=vanaz.com&

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Mails getting bounced

[Postmaster]

I have not looked into possibility of have Domainkey and DKIM signed by 
DKIM as
I installed qmailtoaster with Domainkey first and then added DKIM 
functionality and for this

reason I'd keep them separate.

Regards
Alex


On 05/04/2010 13:15, Anil Aliyan wrote:


Dear Alex,

I do agree with you and we can use two different keys but them you 
will have to use both DKIM and Domainkeys separately and need to 
configure them separately. But when DKIM alone can handle both DKIM 
and Domainkeys with single key its not required to configure serparately.


Regards,

Anil Aliyan

*From:* Postmaster [mailto:postmas...@seawise-chartering.co.uk]
*Sent:* Monday, April 05, 2010 5:41 PM
*To:* qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
*Subject:* Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Mails getting bounced

There is no reason why different keys cannot be used for Domainkey and 
DKIM.

I am using different keys and have had no problems so far.



Regards
Alex


On 05/04/2010 13:01, Anil Aliyan wrote:

I have checked both the entries exists but not updated globally yet. 
BUT BOTH KEYS ARE DIFFERENT, please use one single key for both DKIM 
and DomainKeys


If you run dig command from your server you can see these records:

*dig txt _domainkey.vanza.com(Answers as Below)*

[r...@ncode-imss ~]# dig txt dkim1._domainkey.vanaz.com

; <<>> DiG 9.3.6-P1-RedHat-9.3.6-4.P1.el5 <<>> txt 
dkim1._domainkey.vanaz.com


;; global options:  printcmd

;; Got answer:

;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 27481

;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 2, ADDITIONAL: 0

;; QUESTION SECTION:

;dkim1._domainkey.vanaz.com.IN  TXT

;; ANSWER SECTION:

dkim1._domainkey.vanaz.com. 3600 IN TXT "k=rsa\; 
p=MEwwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQADOwAwOAIxAMr0cG1KMKOsR3sNt69ZuqdCPts+mUfBappgKc0qvB+6+X1cXYln9Eq6sikdiIzV4QIDAQAB"


;; AUTHORITY SECTION:

vanaz.com.  172368  IN  NS  ns2.iknowledgefactory.com.

vanaz.com.  172368  IN  NS  ns.iknowledgefactory.com.

[r...@ncode-imss ~]# dig txt private._domainkey.vanaz.com

; <<>> DiG 9.3.6-P1-RedHat-9.3.6-4.P1.el5 <<>> txt 
private._domainkey.vanaz.com


;; global options:  printcmd

;; Got answer:

;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 54065

;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 0

;; QUESTION SECTION:

;private._domainkey.vanaz.com.  IN  TXT

;; ANSWER SECTION:

private._domainkey.vanaz.com. 2753 IN   TXT "k=rsa\; 
p=MEwwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQADOwAwOAIxAMOyyYU7C8EPAq5QMKFXWuaEbtS/uCSBaKlCU8bNlpTcIyVZxDvoQJra6um3v9mc5QIDAQAB"


Regards,

Anil Aliyan

*From:* Postmaster [mailto:postmas...@seawise-chartering.co.uk]
*Sent:* Monday, April 05, 2010 5:23 PM
*To:* qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com 
<mailto:qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com>

*Subject:* Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Mails getting bounced

There is another problem.

You should have two entries for Domainkeys and one entry for DKIM:

Domainkey:
- _domainkey.vanaz.com
- private._domainkey.vanaz.com

Please refer to http://wiki.qmailtoaster.com/index.php/Domainkeys

DKIM:
- dkim1._domainkey.vanaz.com

Please refer to video.qmailtoaster.com

One of your TXT records is for vanaz.com rather than 
_domainkey.vanaz.com - please correct it.

Once again see the above link about Domiankeys on how to setup your DNS.


Regards
Alex





On 05/04/2010 12:34, Anil Aliyan wrote:

Dear Amit,

Your DNS entry has one problem. You have k=rsa;   twice in you DNS 
entry please remove one k=rsa; from the DNS entry.



private._domainkey.vanaz.com



New test <http://domainkeys.sourceforge.net/selectorcheck.html>

TXT Record length = 120

*k=rsa; k=rsa;* 
p=MEwwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQADOwAwOAIxAMOyyYU7C8EPAq5QMKFXWuaEbtS/uCSB


...aKlCU8bNlpTcIyVZxDvoQJra6um3v9mc5QIDAQAB

*This selector is in error: TagValue# 2, Tag 'k': Duplicate token at 
position 1*


Regards,

Anil Aliyan

*From:* Amit Dalia [mailto:a...@ikf.co.in]
*Sent:* Monday, April 05, 2010 4:20 PM
*To:* qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com 
<mailto:qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com>

*Subject:* Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Mails getting bounced

Dear Anil/Alex,

Please check the link below:
http://domainkeys.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/check_policy?domain=vanaz.com&Submit=Submit 
<http://domainkeys.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/check_policy?domain=vanaz.com&Submit=Submit>
http://domainkeys.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/check_selector?selector=private._domainkey.vanaz.com&Submit=Submit 
<http://domainkeys.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/check_selector?selector=private._domainkey.vanaz.com&Submit=Submit>


Anyway I will proceed for DKIM installation now.

Thanks and regards,

Amit

At Monday, 05-04-2010 on 15:34 Postmaster wrote:



Issue the following command:

ln -sf qmail-dk qmail-queue

Restart qmail

and do not forget to insert two TXT records into your DNS and make 
sure you ha

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Mails getting bounced

[Postmaster]

I have not looked into possibility of having Domainkey and DKIM signed 
by DKIM as
I installed qmailtoaster with Domainkey first and then added DKIM 
functionality and for this

reason I'd keep them separate.

Regards
Alex


On 05/04/2010 13:15, Anil Aliyan wrote:


Dear Alex,

I do agree with you and we can use two different keys but them you 
will have to use both DKIM and Domainkeys separately and need to 
configure them separately. But when DKIM alone can handle both DKIM 
and Domainkeys with single key its not required to configure serparately.


Regards,

Anil Aliyan

*From:* Postmaster [mailto:postmas...@seawise-chartering.co.uk]
*Sent:* Monday, April 05, 2010 5:41 PM
*To:* qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
*Subject:* Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Mails getting bounced

There is no reason why different keys cannot be used for Domainkey and 
DKIM.

I am using different keys and have had no problems so far.



Regards
Alex


On 05/04/2010 13:01, Anil Aliyan wrote:

I have checked both the entries exists but not updated globally yet. 
BUT BOTH KEYS ARE DIFFERENT, please use one single key for both DKIM 
and DomainKeys


If you run dig command from your server you can see these records:

*dig txt _domainkey.vanza.com(Answers as Below)*

[r...@ncode-imss ~]# dig txt dkim1._domainkey.vanaz.com

; <<>> DiG 9.3.6-P1-RedHat-9.3.6-4.P1.el5 <<>> txt 
dkim1._domainkey.vanaz.com


;; global options:  printcmd

;; Got answer:

;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 27481

;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 2, ADDITIONAL: 0

;; QUESTION SECTION:

;dkim1._domainkey.vanaz.com.IN  TXT

;; ANSWER SECTION:

dkim1._domainkey.vanaz.com. 3600 IN TXT "k=rsa\; 
p=MEwwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQADOwAwOAIxAMr0cG1KMKOsR3sNt69ZuqdCPts+mUfBappgKc0qvB+6+X1cXYln9Eq6sikdiIzV4QIDAQAB"


;; AUTHORITY SECTION:

vanaz.com.  172368  IN  NS  ns2.iknowledgefactory.com.

vanaz.com.  172368  IN  NS  ns.iknowledgefactory.com.

[r...@ncode-imss ~]# dig txt private._domainkey.vanaz.com

; <<>> DiG 9.3.6-P1-RedHat-9.3.6-4.P1.el5 <<>> txt 
private._domainkey.vanaz.com


;; global options:  printcmd

;; Got answer:

;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 54065

;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 0

;; QUESTION SECTION:

;private._domainkey.vanaz.com.  IN  TXT

;; ANSWER SECTION:

private._domainkey.vanaz.com. 2753 IN   TXT "k=rsa\; 
p=MEwwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQADOwAwOAIxAMOyyYU7C8EPAq5QMKFXWuaEbtS/uCSBaKlCU8bNlpTcIyVZxDvoQJra6um3v9mc5QIDAQAB"


Regards,

Anil Aliyan

*From:* Postmaster [mailto:postmas...@seawise-chartering.co.uk]
*Sent:* Monday, April 05, 2010 5:23 PM
*To:* qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com 
<mailto:qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com>

*Subject:* Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Mails getting bounced

There is another problem.

You should have two entries for Domainkeys and one entry for DKIM:

Domainkey:
- _domainkey.vanaz.com
- private._domainkey.vanaz.com

Please refer to http://wiki.qmailtoaster.com/index.php/Domainkeys

DKIM:
- dkim1._domainkey.vanaz.com

Please refer to video.qmailtoaster.com

One of your TXT records is for vanaz.com rather than 
_domainkey.vanaz.com - please correct it.

Once again see the above link about Domiankeys on how to setup your DNS.


Regards
Alex





On 05/04/2010 12:34, Anil Aliyan wrote:

Dear Amit,

Your DNS entry has one problem. You have k=rsa;   twice in you DNS 
entry please remove one k=rsa; from the DNS entry.



private._domainkey.vanaz.com



New test <http://domainkeys.sourceforge.net/selectorcheck.html>

TXT Record length = 120

*k=rsa; k=rsa;* 
p=MEwwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQADOwAwOAIxAMOyyYU7C8EPAq5QMKFXWuaEbtS/uCSB


...aKlCU8bNlpTcIyVZxDvoQJra6um3v9mc5QIDAQAB

*This selector is in error: TagValue# 2, Tag 'k': Duplicate token at 
position 1*


Regards,

Anil Aliyan

*From:* Amit Dalia [mailto:a...@ikf.co.in]
*Sent:* Monday, April 05, 2010 4:20 PM
*To:* qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com 
<mailto:qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com>

*Subject:* Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Mails getting bounced

Dear Anil/Alex,

Please check the link below:
http://domainkeys.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/check_policy?domain=vanaz.com&Submit=Submit 
<http://domainkeys.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/check_policy?domain=vanaz.com&Submit=Submit>
http://domainkeys.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/check_selector?selector=private._domainkey.vanaz.com&Submit=Submit 
<http://domainkeys.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/check_selector?selector=private._domainkey.vanaz.com&Submit=Submit>


Anyway I will proceed for DKIM installation now.

Thanks and regards,

Amit

At Monday, 05-04-2010 on 15:34 Postmaster wrote:



Issue the following command:

ln -sf qmail-dk qmail-queue

Restart qmail

and do not forget to insert two TXT records into your DNS and make 
sure you ha

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Mails getting bounced

[Postmaster]

Perhaps you are right, as I said I never looked into having DKIM signing 
for both domainkey and DKIM.

I have both setup seperately and they work alright.

Regards
Alex

On 05/04/2010 13:26, Anil Aliyan wrote:


Dear Alex,

That’s what I am saying that with DKIM you can sign your mail for both 
DKIM as well as for DomainKeys.


I am using dkim and I don’t have any folder like  
/var/qmail/control/domainkey  instead I have /var/qmail/control/dkim


Please look at the last section of the qmail-remote file which 
replaced by the DKIM installation. It also signs mails for Domainkeys 
as well:


  # generate signatures

  my $sigdone = 0;

  foreach my $type (keys(%{$conf->{'types'}}))

  {

my $sigconf = $conf->{'types'}->{$type};

*if ($type eq 'dkim')*

{

  $signer->add_signature(

new Mail::DKIM::Signature(

  Algorithm  => $sigconf->{'algorithm'}  || 
$conf->{'algorithm'} || $signer->algorithm,


  Method => $sigconf->{'method'} || 
$conf->{'method'}|| $signer->method,


  Headers=> $sigconf->{'headers'}|| 
$conf->{'headers'}   || $signer->headers,


  Domain => $sigconf->{'domain'} || 
$conf->{'domain'}|| $signer->domain,


  Selector   => $sigconf->{'selector'}   || 
$conf->{'selector'}  || $signer->selector,


  Query  => $sigconf->{'query'}  || $conf->{'query'},

  Identity   => $sigconf->{'identity'}   || $conf->{'identity'},

  Expiration => $sigconf->{'expiration'} || $conf->{'expiration'}

)

  );

  $sigdone = 1;

}

*elsif ($type eq 'domainkey')*

{

  $signer->add_signature(

new Mail::DKIM::DkSignature(

  Algorithm  => 'rsa-sha1', # only rsa-sha1 supported

  Method => $sigconf->{'method'}   || $conf->{'method'}   
|| $signer->method,


  Headers=> $sigconf->{'selector'} || $conf->{'headers'}  
|| $signer->headers,


  Domain => $sigconf->{'domain'}   || $conf->{'domain'}   
|| $signer->domain,


  Selector   => $sigconf->{'selector'} || $conf->{'selector'} 
|| $signer->selector,


  Query  => $sigconf->{'query'}|| $conf->{'query'}

)

  );

  $sigdone = 1;

}

  }

  return $sigdone;

}

Regards,

Anil Aliyan

*From:* Postmaster [mailto:postmas...@seawise-chartering.co.uk]
*Sent:* Monday, April 05, 2010 5:48 PM
*To:* qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
*Subject:* Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Mails getting bounced

Anil

The file below you are referring is for DKIM and not for Domainkey.

For Domainkey tcp.smtp  should have the following in order for the 
outgoing email to be signed:


  DKSIGN="/var/qmail/control/domainkeys/%//private/"


and

DKVERIFY=""
  


if you have to accept incoming e-mail failing Domainkey


Regards
Alex


On 05/04/2010 13:09, Anil Aliyan wrote:

Dear Amit,

Please ignore my last mail about smarthost. Your mail signed by you 
main mail server should work actually.


I have checked your test message and it is signed by DKIM but doesn’t 
singed for Domainkeys. You need to entry for both in your signconf.xml 
file:  Your file should look like below mentioned example:


**

* *

* keyfile="/var/qmail/control/dkim/global.key" method="simple" 
selector="dkim1">*


* *

* *

* *

* *

* *

* *

* *

* *

**

*From:* Amit Dalia [mailto:a...@ikf.co.in]
*Sent:* Monday, April 05, 2010 5:30 PM
*To:* qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com 
<mailto:qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com>

*Subject:* Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Mails getting bounced

Dear Anil,

Please check I had send test mail on your email id.

Regards,

Amit

At Monday, 05-04-2010 on 17:26 Postmaster wrote:


It may take a while for the DNS entries to propagate.
Send an e-mail with test in the subject line to sa-t...@sendmail.net 
<mailto:sa-t...@sendmail.net>


and you should have a reply with output like this shortly:



sendmail.net Sender Authentication Auto-Responder $Revision: 1.19 $
  
  
  
This service runs at  <mailto:sa-t...@sendmail.net>  and allows remote users
  
to perform a simple, automated test to see if different Sender
  
Authentication schemes are working.  Mail sent to this service
  
is checked by our Sender Authentication filters for any valid
  
credentials or signatures.  A script receives the message, checks
  
for a special header with the results of the tests, and composes
  
this response message based on what it fin

Re: [qmailtoaster] disable mx check in chkuser

[Postmaster]

The other way of looking at this problem is using an alternative SMTP 
server (smart host?).
If you use the SMTP server (ISP's one) then all e-mails are accepted and 
after some time

you have those e-mails which were mistyped bounced back.

I find MX check very useful which saves my time if I have a typo in the 
email address.

Also I would not disable Chkuser function.


Regards
Alex




On 06/04/2010 09:34, Anil Aliyan wrote:

By commenting #define CHKUSER_SENDER_MX the desired purpose can be achieved.
Suppose you send mail to 10 recipients and out of those 2 are not valid or
are wrong email addresses, then mail to the rest 8 recipients will be
delivered and for rest 2 email addresses you will receive message something
like example given below:

Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients.

   Subject: Report
   Sent:4/6/2010 2:00 PM

The following recipient(s) cannot be reached:

   'acal...@gnvfc.net' on 4/6/2010 2:00 PM
 511 sorry, no mailbox here by that name (#5.1.1 - chkuser)


Regards,

Anil Aliyan


-Original Message-
From: Lucian Cristian [mailto:l...@createc.ro]
Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2010 1:43 PM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] disable mx check in chkuser

You will have to modify the CHKUSER_SENDER_FORMAT too
like this
//#define CHKUSER_RCPT_FORMAT
and for outgoing
//#define CHKUSER_SENDER_MX
//#define CHKUSER_SENDER_FORMAT

Regards
Lucian

Rajesh M wrote:
   

hi

sorry but your reply does not solve my problem.

people add email addresses to their address book and some times there are
errors which are bound to come up.

let us say my customer is sending to around 100 users and one of the id's
are incorrect -- the way i need to handle is either point out where the
error ie which email id is wrong, or alternatively let all the emails go
and the bad one to bounce. i don't want the customer to go thru every
single email id and try to figure out which one is wrong.

chkuser can definitely be disabled if required -- but what i need to do is
disable only mx check and that too only for a specific ip address those
emails that originate from within my server

thanks
rajesh




 

Rajesh,

Maybe your customers should be more careful entering the address they
are sending to?  You can't make everything stupid proof.

I don't think you can disable CHKUSER nor do I think you'd want to.
This occurs not only in Squirrelmail, but in Thunderbird and other e
mail clients when the recipient is addressed incorrectly.

CJ

On 04/05/2010 07:35 PM, Rajesh M wrote:

   

hi

i use squirrelmail

when customers send emails to a number of people from webmail then if
there is one address that is wrong the message that is shown is

#5.1.1 chkuser - can't find valid MX for rcpt domain

however the exact domain name where the problem exists is not shown

here i see two ways out

a) either i get the exact email id which has the problem, but i am not
sure whether squirrelmail needs to be modified or chkuser --- this would
be ideal.

b) the easy way -- disable chkuser MX checks for webmail users so that
the
bad email id bounces back after some time. could you please guide me on
how to do this ?

thanks
rajesh







 


-
   

Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group
(www.vickersconsulting.com)
 Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and
installations.
   If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today!

 


-
   

  Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and
packages.

   To unsubscribe, e-mail:
qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com
  For additional commands, e-mail:
qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com




 

--
Cecil Yother, Jr. "cj"
cj's
2318 Clement Ave
Alameda, CA  94501

tel 510.865.2787 | fax 510.864.7300
http://yother.com



   


-
   

Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group
(www.vickersconsulting.com)
 Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and
installations.
   If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today!

   


-
   

  Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and
packages.

   To unsubscribe, e-mail:
qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com
  For additional commands, e-mail:
qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com




   







 


-
   

Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group
 

(www.vickersconsulting.com)
   

 Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support

Re: [qmailtoaster] disable mx check in chkuser

[Postmaster]

I do not think this is doable though Eric or Jake probably can correct 
me if I am wrong.

I think you can disable chkuser only for entire server.

Regards
Alex

On 06/04/2010 11:20, Rajesh M wrote:

hi

i find that everybody feels that i want to disable CHKUSR or MX CHECK for
the entire server .. which is not what i want.

i am talking about disabling mx check for single ip address using tcp.smtp
file and not for the entire server.

is there a solution for this ?

rajesh



   

The other way of looking at this problem is using an alternative SMTP
server (smart host?).
If you use the SMTP server (ISP's one) then all e-mails are accepted and
after some time
you have those e-mails which were mistyped bounced back.

I find MX check very useful which saves my time if I have a typo in the
email address.
Also I would not disable Chkuser function.


Regards
Alex




On 06/04/2010 09:34, Anil Aliyan wrote:
 

By commenting #define CHKUSER_SENDER_MX the desired purpose can be
achieved.
Suppose you send mail to 10 recipients and out of those 2 are not valid
or
are wrong email addresses, then mail to the rest 8 recipients will be
delivered and for rest 2 email addresses you will receive message
something
like example given below:

Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients.

Subject:Report
Sent:   4/6/2010 2:00 PM

The following recipient(s) cannot be reached:

'acal...@gnvfc.net' on 4/6/2010 2:00 PM
  511 sorry, no mailbox here by that name (#5.1.1 - chkuser)


Regards,

Anil Aliyan


-Original Message-
From: Lucian Cristian [mailto:l...@createc.ro]
Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2010 1:43 PM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] disable mx check in chkuser

You will have to modify the CHKUSER_SENDER_FORMAT too
like this
//#define CHKUSER_RCPT_FORMAT
and for outgoing
//#define CHKUSER_SENDER_MX
//#define CHKUSER_SENDER_FORMAT

Regards
Lucian

Rajesh M wrote:

   

hi

sorry but your reply does not solve my problem.

people add email addresses to their address book and some times there
are
errors which are bound to come up.

let us say my customer is sending to around 100 users and one of the
id's
are incorrect -- the way i need to handle is either point out where the
error ie which email id is wrong, or alternatively let all the emails
go
and the bad one to bounce. i don't want the customer to go thru every
single email id and try to figure out which one is wrong.

chkuser can definitely be disabled if required -- but what i need to do
is
disable only mx check and that too only for a specific ip address those
emails that originate from within my server

thanks
rajesh





 

Rajesh,

Maybe your customers should be more careful entering the address they
are sending to?  You can't make everything stupid proof.

I don't think you can disable CHKUSER nor do I think you'd want to.
This occurs not only in Squirrelmail, but in Thunderbird and other e
mail clients when the recipient is addressed incorrectly.

CJ

On 04/05/2010 07:35 PM, Rajesh M wrote:


   

hi

i use squirrelmail

when customers send emails to a number of people from webmail then if
there is one address that is wrong the message that is shown is

#5.1.1 chkuser - can't find valid MX for rcpt domain

however the exact domain name where the problem exists is not shown

here i see two ways out

a) either i get the exact email id which has the problem, but i am
not
sure whether squirrelmail needs to be modified or chkuser --- this
would
be ideal.

b) the easy way -- disable chkuser MX checks for webmail users so
that
the
bad email id bounces back after some time. could you please guide me
on
how to do this ?

thanks
rajesh








 


-

   

Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group
(www.vickersconsulting.com)
  Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and
installations.
If you need professional help with your setup, contact them
today!


 


-

   

   Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and
packages.

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com
   For additional commands, e-mail:
qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com





 

--
Cecil Yother, Jr. "cj"
cj's
2318 Clement Ave
Alameda, CA  94501

tel 510.865.2787 | fax 510.864.7300
http://yother.com




   


-

   

Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group
(www.vickersconsulting.com)
  Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and
installations.
If you need professional help with your setup, contact them
today!


   

---

Re: [qmailtoaster] disable mx check in chkuser

[Postmaster]

Regardless Jake's answer, I would suggest you do it on a test server/VPS 
first.


Regards
Alex


On 06/04/2010 16:18, Rajesh M wrote:

hi jake

i have a running toaster machine with around 5000 email users on it ie a
very very busy server.

one of the group members advised me to recompile qmail toaster and enable
CHKUSER_STARTING_VARIABLE "CHKUSER_START" as per the guideline given below

http://wiki.qmailtoaster.org/index.php/Chkuser

my question is that will this totally remove the /var/qmail directory and
reinstall the entire qmail ?

any special care that needs to be taken ?

thanks
rajesh


   

On 04/06/2010
 

  06:23 AM, Postmaster wrote:
   

I do not think this is doable though Eric or Jake probably can correct
me if I am wrong.
I think you can disable chkuser only for entire server.

Regards
Alex
   

If it's enabled during compilation, then it's enabled for chkuser in all
instances.
You can either leave it on, or turn it off for the entire server by
modifying the code during compilation.
There has been some talk of overrides in the tcp.smtp file for options
such as this, but I have not dug into the chkuser code nor tried this
myself, so I cannot say for sure it will not work

-
Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group
(www.vickersconsulting.com)
 Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and
installations.
   If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today!
-
  Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and
packages.

   To unsubscribe, e-mail:
qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com
  For additional commands, e-mail:
qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com



 






-
Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group 
(www.vickersconsulting.com)
 Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations.
   If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today!
-
  Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages.

   To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com
  For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com


   



-
Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group 
(www.vickersconsulting.com)
   Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations.
 If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today!
-
Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages.

 To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com

For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com

Re: [qmailtoaster] Domainkeys

[Postmaster]

Are you sending this e-mail from your intranet? What is 12.169.159.250?
Can you send a test e-mail to sa-t...@sendmail.net from your 
qmailtoaster server?


Your tcp.smtp:

127.:allow,RELAYCLIENT=""

12.169.159.250:allow,RELAYCLIENT=""

DKSIGN="/var/qmail/control/domainkeys/%/private",:allow,BADMIMETYPE="",BADLOADERTYPE="M",CHKUSER_RCPTLI   
MIT="15",CHKUSER_WRONGRCPTLIMIT="3",DKVERIFY="DEGIJKfh",QMAILQUEUE="/var/qmail/bin/simscan",DKQUEUE="/var/qmail/bin/qmail-queue.orig",DKSIGN="/var/qmail/control/domainkeys/%/private",RBLSMTPD="",NOP0FCHECK=   
"1"



In my tcp.smtp I also have 
DKSIGN="/var/qmail/control/domainkeys/%/private in 127.:allow section



Regards
Alex


On 06/04/2010 15:55, MagicWISP Sales wrote:


I am trying to figure out my domainkeys signature.  Here is an header 
of an email I sent myself at another address:


Received: from f10bb8-10 (10.1.116.201) by 
idc1embx0004.corp.global.level3.com


 (10.1.9.79) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 8.1.375.2; Tue, 6 Apr 2010 
08:46:06


 -0600

Received: from mail28.messagelabs.com (mail28.messagelabs.com

 [216.82.249.131])(using TLSv1 with cipher 
EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA (168/168


 bits))(No client certificate requested)   by 
f10bb8-10 (Postfix) with ESMTP id


 54E6E4514  for ; Tue,  6 Apr 2010 
14:45:06 + (GMT)


X-VirusChecked: Checked

X-Env-Sender: jack.d.mar...@magicwisp.com

X-Msg-Ref: server-13.tower-28.messagelabs.com!1270565097!68063129!1

X-StarScan-Version: 6.2.4; banners=-,-,-

X-Originating-IP: [12.169.159.242]

X-SpamReason: No, hits=1.5 required=7.0 tests=HTML_90_100,HTML_MESSAGE,

  MIME_QP_LONG_LINE,MSGID_MULTIPLE_AT

Received: (qmail 1107 invoked from network); 6 Apr 2010 14:44:58 -

Received: from mail.magicwisp.com (HELO mail.magicwisp.com) 
(12.169.159.242)


  by server-13.tower-28.messagelabs.com with DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted

 SMTP; 6 Apr 2010 14:44:58 -

DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=simple; d=mail.magicwisp.com; h=from

:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; 
s=dkim1;


 bh=2Pf8+Cl2bwZzgJS4YUMawkUEYtk=; 
b=nzXC4kGH0Udf2vpiley2Uj2WDkhk


x62TMkYHXsyLmReG5+Ke458ZaYVsDmF8GoJa

Received: (qmail 25783 invoked by uid 89); 6 Apr 2010 14:44:55 -

Received: from unknown (HELO magicwisba8dea)

 (jack.d.mar...@magicwisp.com@12.169.159.128)  by mail.magicwisp.com with

 ESMTPA; 6 Apr 2010 14:44:55 -

Received: from 127.0.0.1 (AVG SMTP 9.0.800 [271.1.1/2793]); Tue, 06 
Apr 2010


 09:43:51 -0500

From: Jack Martin 

To: 

Subject: DomainKeys Test

Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2010 09:43:33 -0500

Message-ID: <001b01cad597$9b77fb30$d267f1...@d.martin@magicwisp.com>

MIME-Version: 1.0

X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0

Thread-Index: AcrVl2qV/qD/L8X9RTq6FhTorqTw4Q==

Content-Language: en-us

Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===AVGMAIL-6ED26C84==="

Return-Path: jack.d.mar...@magicwisp.com 



As you can see there is no signature, but my DNS has it in there.  If 
I do a dig on the private key I get this:


dig private._domainkey.magicwisp.com TXT

; <<>> DiG 9.3.6-P1-RedHat-9.3.6-4.P1.el5_4.2 <<>> 
private._domainkey.magicwisp.   com TXT


;; global options:  printcmd

;; Got answer:

;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 17030

;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 0

;; QUESTION SECTION:

;private._domainkey.magicwisp.com. IN   TXT

;; ANSWER SECTION:

private._domainkey.magicwisp.com. 1800 IN TXT   "k=rsa\; 
p=MEwwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBB   
QADOwAwOAIxAOwAw0NImAYGcyqJdmVKN2biJzYMzq8TbxfXJcF9F9KnbbDpzB/FHuJiCs7rBkOAsQIDA   
QAB"


;; Query time: 203 msec

;; SERVER: 12.127.17.83#53(12.127.17.83)

;; WHEN: Tue Apr  6 09:52:13 2010

;; MSG SIZE  rcvd: 176

My tcp.smtp says I am signing:

127.:allow,RELAYCLIENT=""

12.169.159.250:allow,RELAYCLIENT=""

DKSIGN="/var/qmail/control/domainkeys/%/private",:allow,BADMIMETYPE="",BADLOADERTYPE="M",CHKUSER_RCPTLI   
MIT="15",CHKUSER_WRONGRCPTLIMIT="3",DKVERIFY="DEGIJKfh",QMAILQUEUE="/var/qmail/bin/simscan",DKQUEUE="/v   
ar/qmail/bin/qmail-queue.orig",DKSIGN="/var/qmail/control/domainkeys/%/private",RBLSMTPD="",NOP0FCHECK=   
"1"


Anybody have any ideas where to look for an answer?



No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 9.0.800 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2794 - Release Date: 04/06/10 
01:32:00

   



-
Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group 
(www.vickersconsulting.com)
 Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations.
   If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today!
-
  Please visit qm

Re: [qmailtoaster] Domainkeys

[Postmaster]

Jake,

I was thinking that the following wrappers are used:
For Domainkeys - qmail-dk
For DKIM - qmail-remote

Therefore, If you install DKIM (your video) on top of Domainkey 
installation described on the wiki,
they can both work without any issues. This is what I have on my 
qmailtoaster - both Domainkey and DKIM are

signing even though DKIM has not been setup to sign both.

Regards
Alex

On 06/04/2010 16:43, Jake Vickers wrote:

On 04/06/2010 11:22 AM, MagicWISP Sales wrote:


Of course it is a qmailtoaster machine -- LOL.  Yes I have DKIM setup 
and working.  I am trying to have both setup.





The DKIM script (assuming you're using the one from the video) - if 
you followed the video - only signs for DKIM. It replaces the qmail-dk 
handler, so messages will not be signed with domainkeys (you can 
actually leave all those directives out of your tcp.smtp file). If you 
wish to sign with both DKIM and DomainKeys, then you need to edit the 
config file for the dkim module to tell it to also sign for DomainKeys.
I believe I provided some links for subscribers in the DKIM video for 
more documentation, which will show you how to sign for DomainKeys as 
well.

Re: [qmailtoaster] Error 554

[Postmaster]

Hi,

Is it your e-mail host (ip 212.80.169.25) rejecting e-mails?
I tried to telnet it:

# telnet 212.80.169.25 25
Trying 212.80.169.25...
Connected to mail.ficosa.com (212.80.169.25).
Escape character is '^]'.
554-mail.ficosa.com
554 Your access to this mail system has been rejected due to the sending 
MTA's poor reputation. If you believe that this failure is in error, 
please contact the intended recipient via alternate means.

Connection closed by foreign host.

very strange...

Regards
Alex


On 06/04/2010 18:49, Thiago - TI - Realeza wrote:


Hello list!

Does anybody get this error ?

@40004bbb708a1c6b7d64 delivery 243: deferral: 
Connected_to_212.80.169.25_but_greeting_failed./Remote_host_said:_554-mail.ficosa.com/554_Your_access_to_this_mail_system_has_been_rejected_due_to_the_sending_MTA's_poor_reputation.


_If_you_believe_that_this_failure_is_in_error,_please_contact_the_intended_recipient_via_alternate_means./

I´m looking how to fix this up, but I don't get

Any help ?

Thanks

Thiago

Re: [qmailtoaster] Error 554

[Postmaster]

Excellent suggestion Amit

Have also a look over here:
http://forums.contribs.org/index.php?topic=42261.0

Rgds
Alex

On 06/04/2010 18:57, Amit Dalia wrote:
Had you checked your server IP address for blacklist? This happens 
when your server is blacklisted on some RBL and recipient is using 
that RBL.


Regards,

Amit

At Tuesday, 06-04-2010 on 23:19 Thiago - TI - Realeza wrote:

Hello list!

Does anybody get this error ?

@40004bbb708a1c6b7d64 delivery 243: deferral:

Connected_to_212.80.169.25_but_greeting_failed./Remote_host_said:_554-mail.ficosa.com/554_Your_access_to_this_mail_system_has_been_rejected_due_to_the_sending_MTA's_poor_reputation.


_If_you_believe_that_this_failure_is_in_error,_please_contact_the_intended_recipient_via_alternate_means./

I´m looking how to fix this up, but I don’t get….

Any help ?

Thanks

Thiago

Re: [qmailtoaster] Domainkeys

[Postmaster]

I can confirm it does work this way as well - this is my setup and both 
DKIM abd Domainkey are signed independently ok.



On 06/04/2010 20:33, Jake Vickers wrote:

On 04/06/2010 12:03 PM, Postmaster wrote:

Jake,

I was thinking that the following wrappers are used:
For Domainkeys - qmail-dk
For DKIM - qmail-remote

Therefore, If you install DKIM (your video) on top of Domainkey 
installation described on the wiki,
they can both work without any issues. This is what I have on my 
qmailtoaster - both Domainkey and DKIM are

signing even though DKIM has not been setup to sign both.


You can do it that way - I do not recall if I worked it that way in 
the video though, since the dkim module can sign for both, IIRC.

Re: [qmailtoaster] Images Being removed from email messages

[Postmaster]

Are you sure this is qmail removing images and not outlook/thunderbird?
I do not think qmail-toaster is removing anything apart from virus 
/marking spam.


Regards
Alex


On 08/04/2010 20:55, Paul W. Ostrander Jr wrote:


I have just installed 2 qmail toasters for a client and they are 
removing images from the email they receive. How do I turn that off so 
that the images are not removed?


Thanks

Paul

Re: [qmailtoaster] Images Being removed from email messages

[Postmaster]

Squirrelmail is not displaying images by default.


On 08/04/2010 21:05, Paul W. Ostrander Jr wrote:


Yes they do not appear in squirrel mail either. I have tested this and 
if I send a message to the qmail box the image gets removed.


*From:* Postmaster [mailto:postmas...@seawise-chartering.co.uk]
*Sent:* Thursday, April 08, 2010 4:01 PM
*To:* qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
*Subject:* Re: [qmailtoaster] Images Being removed from email messages

Are you sure this is qmail removing images and not outlook/thunderbird?
I do not think qmail-toaster is removing anything apart from virus 
/marking spam.


Regards
Alex


On 08/04/2010 20:55, Paul W. Ostrander Jr wrote:

I have just installed 2 qmail toasters for a client and they are 
removing images from the email they receive. How do I turn that off so 
that the images are not removed?


Thanks

Paul

Re: [qmailtoaster] Images Being removed from email messages

[Postmaster]

Are you sure you do not have any antivirus/filtering software removing 
images?

Did you check headers?

Regards
Alex

On 08/04/2010 21:14, Paul W. Ostrander Jr wrote:


But the images are not there if I use outlook either and outlook is 
set to download all images.


*From:* Postmaster [mailto:postmas...@seawise-chartering.co.uk]
*Sent:* Thursday, April 08, 2010 4:09 PM
*To:* qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
*Subject:* Re: [qmailtoaster] Images Being removed from email messages

Squirrelmail is not displaying images by default.


On 08/04/2010 21:05, Paul W. Ostrander Jr wrote:

Yes they do not appear in squirrel mail either. I have tested this and 
if I send a message to the qmail box the image gets removed.


*From:* Postmaster [mailto:postmas...@seawise-chartering.co.uk]
*Sent:* Thursday, April 08, 2010 4:01 PM
*To:* qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com 
<mailto:qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com>

*Subject:* Re: [qmailtoaster] Images Being removed from email messages

Are you sure this is qmail removing images and not outlook/thunderbird?
I do not think qmail-toaster is removing anything apart from virus 
/marking spam.


Regards
Alex


On 08/04/2010 20:55, Paul W. Ostrander Jr wrote:

I have just installed 2 qmail toasters for a client and they are 
removing images from the email they receive. How do I turn that off so 
that the images are not removed?


Thanks

Paul

Re: [qmailtoaster] spam

[Postmaster]

This could have been a key logger trojan or something.
Any server has got an "Achilles heel".

The jump from 5829 msgs to 9580 in about 1 hour is not normal even for
"marketing orientated" e-mail servers.
Personally, I would re-install the server changing ssh port and all
passwords etc.

Regards
Alex

On 08/04/2010 21:21, madmac wrote:

  
  

  
  Well anyone that can guess my
passwords must be amazing.
  Let alone get through the elaborate
firewall system.
  ssh port is " non standard "
   
  But I agree, this box is compromised
" some how "
   
  File count now at 9580 and counting
   
   
  
-
Original Message - 
From:
Michael Colvin 
To:
qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com

Sent:
Thursday, April 08, 2010 1:39 PM
Subject:
RE: [qmailtoaster] spam



I mean…It’s
a wild guess, but it sure sounds like your box has been hacked…  The
spamming can have several causes, but why is your box trying to connect
to other servers via SSH?  Have you changed your passwords?  Although,
at this point, it’s probably too late and changing them wouldn’t do
much…
 
Sound’s like
you’ve been owned.
 



 
Michael J. Colvin
NorCal Internet Services
www.norcalisp.com
 




 



 
From: madmac
[mailto:sysad...@tricubemedia.com] 
Sent: Thursday,
April 08, 2010 12:23 PM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re:
[qmailtoaster] spam

 

Now at 5829 , still
counting.


 


madmac


  
  - Original Message
- 
  
  
  From: test 
  
  
  To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
  
  
  
  Sent: Thursday, April 08, 2010
1:05 PM
  
  
  Subject: [qmailtoaster] spam
  
  
   
  
  
  I received reports today
that my qmail server was spaamming, and trying to get into others ssh
ports.
  
  
  Many complaints and
emails from ab...@otherdomain.com ( eg )
  
  
   
  
  
  Loggin in to the box ,
mostly unresonsive, sen a whole bunch of entries that looked dodgy
  
  
   
  
  
  eg: ./brk ***
  
  
  could not kill the
process, so did a reboot.
  
  
  stopped qmail, stopped
named, stopped mysql etc.
  
  
   
  
  
  created a " catch "
directory
  
  
  mkdir -p
/var/clamav/unwanted
  
  
  cd /var
  
  
  chown -R clamav:clamav
clamav/
  
  
  Then decided to manually
run a complete clamav system scan ( after getting freshclam update ) 
  
  
  cd /
  
  
  /usr/bin/clamscan
-r -i --move=/var/log/clamav/unwanted/ -l /var/log/clamav/clamscan.log
  
  
   
  
  
  Currently found 2270
infected files , mostly users email with :
Sanesecurity.Junk.27236.UNOFFICIAL FOUND ( the 27236 numbers vary )
  
  
  And still scanning.
  
  
   
  
  
   
  
  
  So my question would be ,
why, is the server not stopping this when it come in to the email?
  
  
   
  
  
  What should I check in
the configs.
  
  
   
  
  
  Thanks all
  
  
  madmac
  



  

Re: [qmailtoaster] Images Being removed from email messages

[Postmaster]

Unfortunately, I am not that familiar with the Exchange, but sounds like 
images may be removed at the Exchange level.

Let's see some logs.

Regards
Alex



On 08/04/2010 21:28, Paul W. Ostrander Jr wrote:


Here is how the mail flows. They are a marketing company and they have 
a in house system that generates the marketing emails for their 
clients. I can receive the email just fine on our exchange server at 
the office but if there system send a email to the qmail box the 
images is removed. I will setup a test email account and have the 
system send a message and get you the headers. The system also uses 
the qmail box to send its messages.


*From:* Postmaster [mailto:postmas...@seawise-chartering.co.uk]
*Sent:* Thursday, April 08, 2010 4:24 PM
*To:* qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
*Subject:* Re: [qmailtoaster] Images Being removed from email messages

Are you sure you do not have any antivirus/filtering software removing 
images?

Did you check headers?

Regards
Alex

On 08/04/2010 21:14, Paul W. Ostrander Jr wrote:

But the images are not there if I use outlook either and outlook is 
set to download all images.


*From:* Postmaster [mailto:postmas...@seawise-chartering.co.uk]
*Sent:* Thursday, April 08, 2010 4:09 PM
*To:* qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com 
<mailto:qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com>

*Subject:* Re: [qmailtoaster] Images Being removed from email messages

Squirrelmail is not displaying images by default.


On 08/04/2010 21:05, Paul W. Ostrander Jr wrote:

Yes they do not appear in squirrel mail either. I have tested this and 
if I send a message to the qmail box the image gets removed.


*From:* Postmaster [mailto:postmas...@seawise-chartering.co.uk]
*Sent:* Thursday, April 08, 2010 4:01 PM
*To:* qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com 
<mailto:qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com>

*Subject:* Re: [qmailtoaster] Images Being removed from email messages

Are you sure this is qmail removing images and not outlook/thunderbird?
I do not think qmail-toaster is removing anything apart from virus 
/marking spam.


Regards
Alex


On 08/04/2010 20:55, Paul W. Ostrander Jr wrote:

I have just installed 2 qmail toasters for a client and they are 
removing images from the email they receive. How do I turn that off so 
that the images are not removed?


Thanks

Paul

Re: [qmailtoaster] Images Being removed from email messages

[Postmaster]

Do you have another e-mail server? Can you use another server as a 
substitute for the qmail-toaster?




On 08/04/2010 21:37, Paul W. Ostrander Jr wrote:


The email comes through fine on exchange but not on the toaster. What 
log files do you need?


*From:* Postmaster [mailto:postmas...@seawise-chartering.co.uk]
*Sent:* Thursday, April 08, 2010 4:34 PM
*To:* qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
*Subject:* Re: [qmailtoaster] Images Being removed from email messages

Unfortunately, I am not that familiar with the Exchange, but sounds 
like images may be removed at the Exchange level.

Let's see some logs.

Regards
Alex



On 08/04/2010 21:28, Paul W. Ostrander Jr wrote:

Here is how the mail flows. They are a marketing company and they have 
a in house system that generates the marketing emails for their 
clients. I can receive the email just fine on our exchange server at 
the office but if there system send a email to the qmail box the 
images is removed. I will setup a test email account and have the 
system send a message and get you the headers. The system also uses 
the qmail box to send its messages.


*From:* Postmaster [mailto:postmas...@seawise-chartering.co.uk]
*Sent:* Thursday, April 08, 2010 4:24 PM
*To:* qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com 
<mailto:qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com>

*Subject:* Re: [qmailtoaster] Images Being removed from email messages

Are you sure you do not have any antivirus/filtering software removing 
images?

Did you check headers?

Regards
Alex

On 08/04/2010 21:14, Paul W. Ostrander Jr wrote:

But the images are not there if I use outlook either and outlook is 
set to download all images.


*From:* Postmaster [mailto:postmas...@seawise-chartering.co.uk]
*Sent:* Thursday, April 08, 2010 4:09 PM
*To:* qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com 
<mailto:qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com>

*Subject:* Re: [qmailtoaster] Images Being removed from email messages

Squirrelmail is not displaying images by default.


On 08/04/2010 21:05, Paul W. Ostrander Jr wrote:

Yes they do not appear in squirrel mail either. I have tested this and 
if I send a message to the qmail box the image gets removed.


*From:* Postmaster [mailto:postmas...@seawise-chartering.co.uk]
*Sent:* Thursday, April 08, 2010 4:01 PM
*To:* qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com 
<mailto:qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com>

*Subject:* Re: [qmailtoaster] Images Being removed from email messages

Are you sure this is qmail removing images and not outlook/thunderbird?
I do not think qmail-toaster is removing anything apart from virus 
/marking spam.


Regards
Alex


On 08/04/2010 20:55, Paul W. Ostrander Jr wrote:

I have just installed 2 qmail toasters for a client and they are 
removing images from the email they receive. How do I turn that off so 
that the images are not removed?


Thanks

Paul

Re: [qmailtoaster] Images Being removed from email messages

[Postmaster]

What's your network setup?
Are both qmail-toaster and Exchange servers on the local network?
Do you have any firewall?

On 08/04/2010 21:28, Paul W. Ostrander Jr wrote:


Here is how the mail flows. They are a marketing company and they have 
a in house system that generates the marketing emails for their 
clients. I can receive the email just fine on our exchange server at 
the office but if there system send a email to the qmail box the 
images is removed. I will setup a test email account and have the 
system send a message and get you the headers. The system also uses 
the qmail box to send its messages.


*From:* Postmaster [mailto:postmas...@seawise-chartering.co.uk]
*Sent:* Thursday, April 08, 2010 4:24 PM
*To:* qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
*Subject:* Re: [qmailtoaster] Images Being removed from email messages

Are you sure you do not have any antivirus/filtering software removing 
images?

Did you check headers?

Regards
Alex

On 08/04/2010 21:14, Paul W. Ostrander Jr wrote:

But the images are not there if I use outlook either and outlook is 
set to download all images.


*From:* Postmaster [mailto:postmas...@seawise-chartering.co.uk]
*Sent:* Thursday, April 08, 2010 4:09 PM
*To:* qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com 
<mailto:qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com>

*Subject:* Re: [qmailtoaster] Images Being removed from email messages

Squirrelmail is not displaying images by default.


On 08/04/2010 21:05, Paul W. Ostrander Jr wrote:

Yes they do not appear in squirrel mail either. I have tested this and 
if I send a message to the qmail box the image gets removed.


*From:* Postmaster [mailto:postmas...@seawise-chartering.co.uk]
*Sent:* Thursday, April 08, 2010 4:01 PM
*To:* qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com 
<mailto:qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com>

*Subject:* Re: [qmailtoaster] Images Being removed from email messages

Are you sure this is qmail removing images and not outlook/thunderbird?
I do not think qmail-toaster is removing anything apart from virus 
/marking spam.


Regards
Alex


On 08/04/2010 20:55, Paul W. Ostrander Jr wrote:

I have just installed 2 qmail toasters for a client and they are 
removing images from the email they receive. How do I turn that off so 
that the images are not removed?


Thanks

Paul

Re: [qmailtoaster] Images Being removed from email messages

[Postmaster]

Ok before analysing logs and to eliminate the qmail-toaster, I can send 
you a test account at my server (qmail-toaster) and you can send a 
message to your e-mail and cc to mine.


Regards
Alex

On 08/04/2010 21:53, Paul W. Ostrander Jr wrote:


No the exchange server is at our office and the 2 qmail boxes are at 
the clients location. 2 different networks. There is a cisco asa5505 
firewall at the clients site. But everything is behind the firewall. 
The marketing system uses the qmail box to send out email. Their email 
is hosted on the same  qmail box so nothing leaves the building. They 
get the message but no images are in it. If the marketing system send 
to me at my office I get the message fine.


*From:* Postmaster [mailto:postmas...@seawise-chartering.co.uk]
*Sent:* Thursday, April 08, 2010 4:47 PM
*To:* qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
*Subject:* Re: [qmailtoaster] Images Being removed from email messages

What's your network setup?
Are both qmail-toaster and Exchange servers on the local network?
Do you have any firewall?

On 08/04/2010 21:28, Paul W. Ostrander Jr wrote:

Here is how the mail flows. They are a marketing company and they have 
a in house system that generates the marketing emails for their 
clients. I can receive the email just fine on our exchange server at 
the office but if there system send a email to the qmail box the 
images is removed. I will setup a test email account and have the 
system send a message and get you the headers. The system also uses 
the qmail box to send its messages.


*From:* Postmaster [mailto:postmas...@seawise-chartering.co.uk]
*Sent:* Thursday, April 08, 2010 4:24 PM
*To:* qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com 
<mailto:qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com>

*Subject:* Re: [qmailtoaster] Images Being removed from email messages

Are you sure you do not have any antivirus/filtering software removing 
images?

Did you check headers?

Regards
Alex

On 08/04/2010 21:14, Paul W. Ostrander Jr wrote:

But the images are not there if I use outlook either and outlook is 
set to download all images.


*From:* Postmaster [mailto:postmas...@seawise-chartering.co.uk]
*Sent:* Thursday, April 08, 2010 4:09 PM
*To:* qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com 
<mailto:qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com>

*Subject:* Re: [qmailtoaster] Images Being removed from email messages

Squirrelmail is not displaying images by default.


On 08/04/2010 21:05, Paul W. Ostrander Jr wrote:

Yes they do not appear in squirrel mail either. I have tested this and 
if I send a message to the qmail box the image gets removed.


*From:* Postmaster [mailto:postmas...@seawise-chartering.co.uk]
*Sent:* Thursday, April 08, 2010 4:01 PM
*To:* qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com 
<mailto:qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com>

*Subject:* Re: [qmailtoaster] Images Being removed from email messages

Are you sure this is qmail removing images and not outlook/thunderbird?
I do not think qmail-toaster is removing anything apart from virus 
/marking spam.


Regards
Alex


On 08/04/2010 20:55, Paul W. Ostrander Jr wrote:

I have just installed 2 qmail toasters for a client and they are 
removing images from the email they receive. How do I turn that off so 
that the images are not removed?


Thanks

Paul

Re: [qmailtoaster] fresh installation smtp slow

[Postmaster]

My qmail-toaster is rejecting any e-mail with no reverse DNS record.
Suggest you set it up ASAP.

Regards
Alex

On 11/04/2010 10:20, Istvan Köpe wrote:
The reverse DNS is not set yet. Can this be a reason for the slow 
response?


I.

On 11.04.2010 11:33, Istvan Köpe wrote:

Hello,

Yesterday I installed a fresh Qmail Toaster box on Centos 5.4 
according to wiki.
The box works fine, but the SMTP is very slow. You have to wait about 
30sec to send a blank message, no matter if you connect from LAN or 
from the internet.
I have the same response if I telnet on port 25. Even if I telnet 
127.0.0.1 25
I setup bind as caching-nameserver, no change. I tried with djbdns, 
no change.

The server is behind an ADSL router with ports 22, 25 and 80 forwarded.
I also tried putting the server in DMZ, no change.

I out of ideas. I don't know where to look for the problem.

Please give me a clue.

Thanks!

Istvan

- 

Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group 
(www.vickersconsulting.com)
   Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and 
installations.

 If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today!
- 

Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and 
packages.
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: 
qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com
For additional commands, e-mail: 
qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com







- 

Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group 
(www.vickersconsulting.com)
   Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and 
installations.

 If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today!
- 

Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and 
packages.
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: 
qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com
For additional commands, e-mail: 
qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com






-
Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group 
(www.vickersconsulting.com)
   Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations.
 If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today!
-
Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages.

 To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com

For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com

Re: [qmailtoaster] fresh installation smtp slow

[Postmaster]

You have given very little information.
Did you install spamdyke? - this is a delay variable in the config file
Have you looked into logs?

Regards
Alex


On 11/04/2010 10:58, Istvan Köpe wrote:
Sending mail takes long. Connecting from telnet(from anywhere) takes 
long. Receiving mail(POP3) is fast.
After hitting enter after telnet, I have the prompt instantly, but it 
takes about 30 sec to get the welcome message.


I.

On 11.04.2010 12:44, Martin Waschbuesch wrote:
Just to get this clear, it is not sending or receiving that takes so 
long, but your actual connection attempt via telnet takes that long?
E.g. from hitting enter after 'telnet 127.0.0.1 25' to the prompt 
coming on?


Martin

Am 11.04.2010 um 11:41 schrieb Istvan Köpe:


The reverse DNS will be set in the next few days.
I also removed everything form blacklists. Even if I change in the 
simcontrol clam=no,spam=no and I do "telnet 127.0.0.1 25" it takes 30s


What does telnet 127.0.0.1 25 has to do with DNS or reverse DNS?

I.

On 11.04.2010 12:29, Martin Waschbuesch wrote:

Hi there,

Reverse lookup on your IP is not possible yet?
That would be a VERY bad idea for any mail server.
It is highly likely that in addition to slow performance, a lot of 
recipients would block your outgoing mails as phishing or spam.


Martin

Am 11.04.2010 um 11:20 schrieb Istvan Köpe:


The reverse DNS is not set yet. Can this be a reason for the slow 
response?


I.

On 11.04.2010 11:33, Istvan Köpe wrote:


Hello,

Yesterday I installed a fresh Qmail Toaster box on Centos 5.4 
according to wiki.
The box works fine, but the SMTP is very slow. You have to wait 
about 30sec to send a blank message, no matter if you connect 
from LAN or from the internet.
I have the same response if I telnet on port 25. Even if I telnet 
127.0.0.1 25
I setup bind as caching-nameserver, no change. I tried with 
djbdns, no change.
The server is behind an ADSL router with ports 22, 25 and 80 
forwarded.

I also tried putting the server in DMZ, no change.

I out of ideas. I don't know where to look for the problem.

Please give me a clue.

Thanks!

Istvan

- 

Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group 
(www.vickersconsulting.com)
   Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and 
installations.
 If you need professional help with your setup, contact them 
today!
- 

Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, 
and packages.
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: 
qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com
For additional commands, e-mail: 
qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com





- 

Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group 
(www.vickersconsulting.com)
   Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and 
installations.
 If you need professional help with your setup, contact them 
today!
- 

Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, 
and packages.
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: 
qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com
For additional commands, e-mail: 
qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com





--
"However beautiful the strategy, you should occasionally look at 
the results."


Winston Churchill


- 

Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group 
(www.vickersconsulting.com)
 Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and 
installations.
   If you need professional help with your setup, contact them 
today!
- 

  Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, 
and packages.


   To unsubscribe, e-mail: 
qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com
  For additional commands, e-mail: 
qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com







- 

Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group 
(www.vickersconsulting.com)
   Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and 
installations.

 If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today!
- 

Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and 
packages.
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: 
qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com
For additional commands, e-mail: 
qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com





--
"One may understand the cosmos, but never the ego; the self is more 
distant than any star."


Gilbert K. Chesterton

Re: [qmailtoaster] RDNS rejecting on a domain

[Postmaster]

The answer is no or at least not that I am aware of.
rDNS has to be setup. My e-mail server is rejecting any incoming e-mail 
if the e-mail server does not have rDNS as in 99% cases this is spam.


Regards
Alex

On 14/04/2010 15:19, John Raley wrote:


I have a problem with email being rejected from one of our customers. 
They do not have reverse DNS setup for their mail server. I have 
explained to them why they need that and they are looking into getting 
it fixed. Until then, is there a way to whitelist mail coming form 
them so it passes through the rDNS check?

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: RDNS rejecting on a domain

[Postmaster]

Sorry, I was thinking more about the client side server
In fact, I am surprised your client is not complaining about other 
e-mails being rejected.


Regards
Alex

On 14/04/2010 16:03, Eric Shubert wrote:
(I presume you're using spamdyke here. If not, I've no idea how your 
QMT is checking rDNS.)


It's the later, Alex. ;)

There are several types of whitelists with spamdyke. There are 
/etc/spamdyke/whitelist_* files already set up for you by the 
qtp-install-spamdyke script. Simply add the rDNS name in the 
whitelist_rdns file, and you should be good to go. Alternatively, if 
you want to whitelist the sending server's IP address, you can add 
that IP address to the whitelist_ip file. Or you could whitelist the 
sender's domain by adding @senderdomain.com to the whitelist_senders 
file. So many choices. :)


See http://www.spamdyke.org/documentation/README.html#WHITELISTS for 
details.






-
Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group 
(www.vickersconsulting.com)
   Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations.
 If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today!
-
Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages.

 To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com

For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com

Re: [qmailtoaster] Error sending Mail

[Postmaster]

No error message attached, please re-send it!

Regards
Alex

On 16/04/2010 11:34, Amit Dalia wrote:

Dear All,

From today morning I'm getting the below error while sending out-going 
email.

Re: [qmailtoaster] Error Sending Email

[Postmaster]

Can you please provide more information?
SMTP log would be useful. What kind of load do you have on the server?
I have had this message once sending e-mails whiling having 3G mobile 
internet connection.


Regards
Alex



On 16/04/2010 11:36, Amit Dalia wrote:Dear All,

From morning onwards I'm getting below error:

*ERROR:*Message not sent. Server replied: Service not available, closing 
channel

421 Timeout. Talk faster next time.

Any update on why this is occuring?

Thanks and regards,

Amit

Re: [qmailtoaster] Website slow

[Postmaster]

Yes, the server (or network problems?) was down for a while

Regards
Alex

On 16/04/2010 17:28, Sven Geschke wrote:

Hi there

Is there something wrong with qmailtoaster.com?
The website is unbelievably slow and downbloads are virtually
impossible...


[...@mail ~]# rpm -Uvh http://qtp.qmailtoaster.com/trac/downloads/1
Retrieving http://qtp.qmailtoaster.com/trac/downloads/1
error: skipping http://qtp.qmailtoaster.com/trac/downloads/1 - transfer
failed - Unknown or unexpected error



-
Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group 
(www.vickersconsulting.com)
 Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations.
   If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today!
-
  Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages.

   To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com
  For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com


   



-
Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group 
(www.vickersconsulting.com)
   Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations.
 If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today!
-
Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages.

 To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com

For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: 110 Can't open SMTP stream

[Postmaster]

Try to generate a new certificate.

Howto is here - http://wiki.qmailtoaster.com/index.php/Certificate

Regards
Alex


On 21/04/2010 11:47, qmailtoaster wrote:

How can I check that?
and how to solve it?
Thx,

Aleksander Podsiadły writes:

Dnia 2010-04-21, śro o godzinie 12:20 +0200, qmailtoaster pisze:

any news about this patch?
Does it solves the problem? 


Maybe there is the solution, your mailserver certificate is expired :(
depth=0 C = AU, ST = Some-State, O = Internet Widgits Pty Ltd
verify error:num=18:self signed certificate
verify return:1
depth=0 C = AU, ST = Some-State, O = Internet Widgits Pty Ltd
verify error:num=10:certificate has expired
notAfter=Jun  7 15:18:41 2007 GMT
verify return:1
depth=0 C = AU, ST = Some-State, O = Internet Widgits Pty Ltd
notAfter=Jun  7 15:18:41 2007 GMT
verify return:1

--
Pozdrawiam / Regards,
Aleksander Podsiadły
mail: a...@westside.kielce.pl
jid: a...@jabber.westside.kielce.pl
ICQ: 201121279
gg: 9150578

- 

Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group 
(www.vickersconsulting.com)
Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and 
installations.

  If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today!
- 

 Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and 
packages.
   To unsubscribe, e-mail: 
qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com
 For additional commands, e-mail: 
qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com






--
Thx,
Christian Clemmen

- 

Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group 
(www.vickersconsulting.com)
   Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and 
installations.

 If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today!
- 

Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and 
packages.
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: 
qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com
For additional commands, e-mail: 
qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com






-
Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group 
(www.vickersconsulting.com)
   Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations.
 If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today!
-
Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages.

 To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com

For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Clarification.

[Postmaster]

 Whitelist a Sender or Domain in SpamAssassin

To whitelist individual addresses or domains in SpamAssassin:

   * Open //etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf/ in your favorite editor for
 system-wide whitelisting.
 o To whitelist only for yourself, open
   /~/.spamassassin/user_prefs/.
   * Append "whitelist_from_rcvd {address or domain you want to
 whitelist preceded by "*@"} {domain name which must be present in
 the Received: headers}".
 o To whitelist all About newsletters, for example, type
   "whitelist_from_rcvd *...@about.com about.com".

The second parameter of /whitelist_from_rcvd/, a domain name which must 
be present in the /Received:/ header lines, is some prevention against 
spammers easily getting past SpamAssassin by using an email address at a 
commonly whitelisted domain.



Regards
Alex

On 21/04/2010 18:42, madmac wrote:

Thanks eric.

another dumb question for all

with spamassassin set to :
use_auto_whitelist = 1

where is the " whitelist " stored ?


- Original Message - From: "Eric Shubert" 
To: 
Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2010 11:14 AM
Subject: [qmailtoaster] Re: Clarification.



madmac wrote:

Can anyone help me : what does this command do
skip_rbl_checks 1
 do i set it to skip_rbl_checks 0
To forece rbl check?
 Thanks


1 is true
0 is false

skip_rbl_checks = 1
skips them.

skip_rbl_checks = 0
activates them.

--
-Eric 'shubes'


- 

Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group 
(www.vickersconsulting.com)
   Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and 
installations.

 If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today!
- 

Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and 
packages.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: 
qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com
For additional commands, e-mail: 
qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com







- 

Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group 
(www.vickersconsulting.com)
   Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and 
installations.

 If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today!
- 

Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and 
packages.
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: 
qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com
For additional commands, e-mail: 
qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Clarification.

[Postmaster]

It depends what you want to to archive.

You can either edit ~/.spamassassin/user_prefs or global 
/etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf and add


whitelist_from or
blacklist_from

Have a look at
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/ManualWhitelist


Regards
Alex



On 21/04/2010 21:10, madmac wrote:

there is not much in the local.cf,

ok_locales all
skip_rbl_checks 0
required_score 3.7
report_safe 0
rewrite_header Subject ***Possible-SPAM***
use_pyzor 1
use_auto_whitelist 1
use_bayes 1
use_bayes_rules 1
bayes_auto_learn 1
So does spammassasin add the use_auto_whitelist , to a different 
specific file ? ie where is the generated whitelist

Thanks

*From:* Postmaster <mailto:postmas...@seawise-chartering.co.uk>
*To:* qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
<mailto:qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com>
*Cc:* madmac <mailto:sysad...@tricubemedia.com>
*Sent:* Wednesday, April 21, 2010 1:59 PM
*Subject:* Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Clarification.


  Whitelist a Sender or Domain in SpamAssassin

To whitelist individual addresses or domains in SpamAssassin:

* Open //etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf/ in your favorite
  editor for system-wide whitelisting.
  o To whitelist only for yourself, open
/~/.spamassassin/user_prefs/.
* Append "whitelist_from_rcvd {address or domain you want to
  whitelist preceded by "*@"} {domain name which must be
  present in the Received: headers}".
  o To whitelist all About newsletters, for example, type
"whitelist_from_rcvd *...@about.com about.com".

The second parameter of /whitelist_from_rcvd/, a domain name which
must be present in the /Received:/ header lines, is some
prevention against spammers easily getting past SpamAssassin by
using an email address at a commonly whitelisted domain.


Regards
Alex

On 21/04/2010 18:42, madmac wrote:

Thanks eric.

another dumb question for all

with spamassassin set to :
use_auto_whitelist = 1

where is the " whitelist " stored ?


- Original Message - From: "Eric Shubert" 
To: 
Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2010 11:14 AM
Subject: [qmailtoaster] Re: Clarification.



madmac wrote:

Can anyone help me : what does this command do
skip_rbl_checks 1
 do i set it to skip_rbl_checks 0
To forece rbl check?
 Thanks


1 is true
0 is false

skip_rbl_checks = 1
skips them.

skip_rbl_checks = 0
activates them.

-- 
-Eric 'shubes'




-

Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group
(www.vickersconsulting.com)
   Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and
installations.
 If you need professional help with your setup, contact them
today!

-

Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates,
and packages.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com
For additional commands, e-mail:
qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com







-

Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group
(www.vickersconsulting.com)
   Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and
installations.
 If you need professional help with your setup, contact them
today!

-

Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates,
and packages.
 To unsubscribe, e-mail:
qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com
For additional commands, e-mail:
qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com

Re: [qmailtoaster] spamassassin whitelist

[Postmaster]

Did you install spamdyke?
Spamdyke checks the reserve dns.

Check-out qmailtoaster-plus

Rgds
Alex


On 29/04/2010 12:20, George Varagas wrote:

Thanks Philip.
I had added it to /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf and have restarted
spamassassin.
I wanted to check the reverse DNS as opposed to the email domain name
only (whitelist_from).
I guess I could compromise if I can't get whitelist_from_rcvd to work.
I'll wait to see if anyone else has any suggestions before trying it.
George

On 4/29/2010 7:53 PM, Philip wrote:
   

Hello
where did you add it ?

Try this :
add
whitelist_from *...@domainname.com
to /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf

and restart spamassassin
It should work

-P


On 4/29/2010 6:07 AM, George Varagas wrote:
 

Hi,
I have installed qmailtoaster and am trying to get whitelist working in
spamassassin.
I have had it working on an old qmailrocks installation but can't seem
to get it going with qmailtoaster.

My issue is that if an address is in the whitelist it should subtract
100 from the spam score. An example of what I am using:
whitelist_from_rcvd * domainname.com

Now when the server receives an email from domainname.com (reverse dns)
it does not subtract 100.

What am I missing.
Thanks,
George

-

Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group
(www.vickersconsulting.com)
  Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and
installations.
If you need professional help with your setup, contact them
today!
-

   Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and
packages.

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com
   For additional commands, e-mail:
qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com




   

-

Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group
(www.vickersconsulting.com)
Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and
installations.
  If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today!
-

 Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and
packages.
  To unsubscribe, e-mail:
qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com
 For additional commands, e-mail:
qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com



 

-
Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group 
(www.vickersconsulting.com)
 Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations.
   If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today!
-
  Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages.

   To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com
  For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com


   



-
Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group 
(www.vickersconsulting.com)
   Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations.
 If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today!
-
Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages.

 To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com

For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com

Re: [qmailtoaster] Best Spam Practices

[Postmaster]

What I did personally was going through /opt/spamdyke/etc/spamdyke.conf 
as well as

other settings like blacklist_recipients adding your own e-mail(s)
and read www.spamdyke.org fine tuning some settings. This has eliminated 
almost 95-99% of all spam.


You can also fine tune SpamAssassin by lowering score and/or changing 
other settings.


Rgds
Alex


On 21/05/2010 20:10, Scott Hughes wrote:
For those that have been using Qmail and QMT longer than I have, I was 
wonder how I can maximize the servers spam catch rate.  I already 
use:  SpamDyke, SpamAssassin, RBLs, Pyzor, Razor, Spam boxes with the 
qtp-clean-spam script running hourly.


Thanks,

Scott

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Newmodel build issues

[Postmaster]

Linux version - 'cat /etc/issue'

Linux arch - 'uname -a'

Rgds
Alex


On 08/06/2010 23:31, Scott Hughes wrote:

CentOS 5 as well. How do I check the exact version?

Scott




On Jun 8, 2010, at 4:13 PM, Eric Shubert  wrote:


Scott Hughes wrote:
I am attempting to update a new QMT server.  When running the 
newmodel script, I am getting the following:

qtp-build-rpms - rpmbuild failed for clamav-toaster-0.96.1-1.3.36
qtp-build-rpms - here are the last 10 messages from the log:
+ '[' 0 -ne 0 ']'
+ cd clamav-0.96.1
++ /usr/bin/id -u
+ '[' 0 = 0 ']'
+ /bin/chown -Rhf root .
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.10862 (%prep)
RPM build errors:
   Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.10862 (%prep)

qtp-build-rpms - see 
/mnt/qtp-sandbox/usr/src/qtp-upgrade/log/build-recent.log for more 
details

Build failed, Exiting.
--- Hit ENTER to return to menu ---
All other packages appeared to build without any problems.  This 
system has had all of it's yum updates and has been rebooted.

Ideas, please?
Scott


I've recreated this error on CentOS 5.5. Which distro/version are you 
getting this with?


--
-Eric 'shubes'


- 

Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group 
(www.vickersconsulting.com)
  Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and 
installations.

If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today!
- 

   Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and 
packages.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: 
qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com
   For additional commands, e-mail: 
qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com





- 

Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group 
(www.vickersconsulting.com)
   Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and 
installations.

 If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today!
- 

Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and 
packages.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: 
qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com
For additional commands, e-mail: 
qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Newmodel build issues

[Postmaster]

On 09/06/2010 22:40, Eric Shubert wrote:

Eric Shubert wrote:

Eric Shubert wrote:

Eric Shubert wrote:

Eric Shubert wrote:

Scott Hughes wrote:
I am attempting to update a new QMT server.  When running the 
newmodel script, I am getting the following:


qtp-build-rpms - rpmbuild failed for clamav-toaster-0.96.1-1.3.36
qtp-build-rpms - here are the last 10 messages from the log:
+ '[' 0 -ne 0 ']'
+ cd clamav-0.96.1
++ /usr/bin/id -u
+ '[' 0 = 0 ']'
+ /bin/chown -Rhf root .
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.10862 (%prep)


RPM build errors:
Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.10862 (%prep)


qtp-build-rpms - see 
/mnt/qtp-sandbox/usr/src/qtp-upgrade/log/build-recent.log for 
more details


Build failed, Exiting.

 --- Hit ENTER to return to menu ---


All other packages appeared to build without any problems.  This 
system has had all of it's yum updates and has been rebooted.


Ideas, please?

Scott



You know? Not that I look a bit closer, this error is from a 
no-brainer sort of command (chown). I wonder if fuse-unionfs isn't 
having a problem with COS5.5.




Strangeness. When I do the commands manually (in a chroot 
environment, same as qtp-build-rpms does) I get no error. However, 
when I run the "/bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.80211" command, same as 
rpmbuild does, it ends prematurely in the same spot (chown command) 
with return code 1.


Very peculiar. I'm going to try with a linked sandbox, which I 
expect will succeed.




Linked sandbox works. So the problem is with fuse-unionfs and CentOS 
5.5. This is a fairly low priority, but I'll continue to test to 
pinpoint the problem, and persue a fix.




Hey Steve,

I have a COS5.4 QMT with an updated kernel that I got this failure 
with as well. I did

# yum remove fuse dkms
which removed these packages with their dependencies, then reran 
qtp-newmodel, which reinstalled them, and it appears that 
qtp-newmodel has gotten past the problem part.


I'll try this a little later on my test QMT 5.5 that was failing. 
Thought you might want to give it a try and see what you get.




Well, reinstalling fuse,dkms didn't fix the problem for me on COS 5.5.
I'm pretty confident that's where the problem lies though.
I wonder if rebuilding them on a COS5.5 host will make it work. Doubtful.
Need to ponder this some more...




I have similar issue on my VPS CentOS 5.4 64 bit:

Starting to build the binary rpms ...(pizza anyone?)

If you want to view compile messages, you can open another terminal and:
# tail -f /mnt/qtp-sandbox/usr/src/qtp-upgrade/log/build-recent.log

qtp-build-rpms v0.3.5
qtp-remove-pkgs v0.3.1
Building clamav-toaster-0.96.1-1.3.36 ...
qtp-build-rpms - rpmbuild failed for clamav-toaster-0.96.1-1.3.36
qtp-build-rpms - here are the last 10 messages from the log:
+ '[' 0 -ne 0 ']'
+ cd clamav-0.96.1
++ /usr/bin/id -u
+ '[' 0 = 0 ']'
+ /bin/chown -Rhf root .
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.72759 (%prep)


RPM build errors:
Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.72759 (%prep)


qtp-build-rpms - see 
/mnt/qtp-sandbox/usr/src/qtp-upgrade/log/build-recent.log for more details


Build failed, Exiting.


-
Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group 
(www.vickersconsulting.com)
   Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations.
 If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today!
-
Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages.

 To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com

For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Newmodel build issues

[Postmaster]

On 09/06/2010 23:11, Eric Shubert wrote:

Postmaster wrote:



On 09/06/2010 22:40, Eric Shubert wrote:

Eric Shubert wrote:

Eric Shubert wrote:

Eric Shubert wrote:

Eric Shubert wrote:

Scott Hughes wrote:
I am attempting to update a new QMT server.  When running the 
newmodel script, I am getting the following:


qtp-build-rpms - rpmbuild failed for clamav-toaster-0.96.1-1.3.36
qtp-build-rpms - here are the last 10 messages from the log:
+ '[' 0 -ne 0 ']'
+ cd clamav-0.96.1
++ /usr/bin/id -u
+ '[' 0 = 0 ']'
+ /bin/chown -Rhf root .
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.10862 (%prep)


RPM build errors:
Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.10862 (%prep)


qtp-build-rpms - see 
/mnt/qtp-sandbox/usr/src/qtp-upgrade/log/build-recent.log for 
more details


Build failed, Exiting.

 --- Hit ENTER to return to menu ---


All other packages appeared to build without any problems.  
This system has had all of it's yum updates and has been rebooted.


Ideas, please?

Scott



You know? Not that I look a bit closer, this error is from a 
no-brainer sort of command (chown). I wonder if fuse-unionfs 
isn't having a problem with COS5.5.




Strangeness. When I do the commands manually (in a chroot 
environment, same as qtp-build-rpms does) I get no error. 
However, when I run the "/bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.80211" 
command, same as rpmbuild does, it ends prematurely in the same 
spot (chown command) with return code 1.


Very peculiar. I'm going to try with a linked sandbox, which I 
expect will succeed.




Linked sandbox works. So the problem is with fuse-unionfs and 
CentOS 5.5. This is a fairly low priority, but I'll continue to 
test to pinpoint the problem, and persue a fix.




Hey Steve,

I have a COS5.4 QMT with an updated kernel that I got this failure 
with as well. I did

# yum remove fuse dkms
which removed these packages with their dependencies, then reran 
qtp-newmodel, which reinstalled them, and it appears that 
qtp-newmodel has gotten past the problem part.


I'll try this a little later on my test QMT 5.5 that was failing. 
Thought you might want to give it a try and see what you get.




Well, reinstalling fuse,dkms didn't fix the problem for me on COS 5.5.
I'm pretty confident that's where the problem lies though.
I wonder if rebuilding them on a COS5.5 host will make it work. 
Doubtful.

Need to ponder this some more...




I have similar issue on my VPS CentOS 5.4 64 bit:

Starting to build the binary rpms ...(pizza anyone?)

If you want to view compile messages, you can open another terminal and:
# tail -f /mnt/qtp-sandbox/usr/src/qtp-upgrade/log/build-recent.log

qtp-build-rpms v0.3.5
qtp-remove-pkgs v0.3.1
Building clamav-toaster-0.96.1-1.3.36 ...
qtp-build-rpms - rpmbuild failed for clamav-toaster-0.96.1-1.3.36
qtp-build-rpms - here are the last 10 messages from the log:
+ '[' 0 -ne 0 ']'
+ cd clamav-0.96.1
++ /usr/bin/id -u
+ '[' 0 = 0 ']'
+ /bin/chown -Rhf root .
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.72759 (%prep)


RPM build errors:
Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.72759 (%prep)


qtp-build-rpms - see 
/mnt/qtp-sandbox/usr/src/qtp-upgrade/log/build-recent.log for more 
details


Build failed, Exiting.


- 



That's so similar, it's the same! ;)
I'm guessing that you're using the unionfs for sandbox?
What's your kernel version?


qtp-newmodel v0.3.15 starting Wed Jun  9 22:11:28 BST 2010
qtp-whatami v0.3.6
DISTRO=CentOS
OSVER=5.4
QTARCH=x86_64
QTKERN=2.6.32.12-x86_64-linode12
BUILD_DIST=cnt5064
BUILD_DIR=/usr/src/redhat
This machine's OS is supported and has been tested

-
Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group 
(www.vickersconsulting.com)
   Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations.
 If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today!
-
Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages.

 To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com

For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Newmodel build issues

[Postmaster]

On 09/06/2010 23:11, Eric Shubert wrote:

Postmaster wrote:



On 09/06/2010 22:40, Eric Shubert wrote:

Eric Shubert wrote:

Eric Shubert wrote:

Eric Shubert wrote:

Eric Shubert wrote:

Scott Hughes wrote:
I am attempting to update a new QMT server.  When running the 
newmodel script, I am getting the following:


qtp-build-rpms - rpmbuild failed for clamav-toaster-0.96.1-1.3.36
qtp-build-rpms - here are the last 10 messages from the log:
+ '[' 0 -ne 0 ']'
+ cd clamav-0.96.1
++ /usr/bin/id -u
+ '[' 0 = 0 ']'
+ /bin/chown -Rhf root .
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.10862 (%prep)


RPM build errors:
Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.10862 (%prep)


qtp-build-rpms - see 
/mnt/qtp-sandbox/usr/src/qtp-upgrade/log/build-recent.log for 
more details


Build failed, Exiting.

 --- Hit ENTER to return to menu ---


All other packages appeared to build without any problems.  
This system has had all of it's yum updates and has been rebooted.


Ideas, please?

Scott



You know? Not that I look a bit closer, this error is from a 
no-brainer sort of command (chown). I wonder if fuse-unionfs 
isn't having a problem with COS5.5.




Strangeness. When I do the commands manually (in a chroot 
environment, same as qtp-build-rpms does) I get no error. 
However, when I run the "/bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.80211" 
command, same as rpmbuild does, it ends prematurely in the same 
spot (chown command) with return code 1.


Very peculiar. I'm going to try with a linked sandbox, which I 
expect will succeed.




Linked sandbox works. So the problem is with fuse-unionfs and 
CentOS 5.5. This is a fairly low priority, but I'll continue to 
test to pinpoint the problem, and persue a fix.




Hey Steve,

I have a COS5.4 QMT with an updated kernel that I got this failure 
with as well. I did

# yum remove fuse dkms
which removed these packages with their dependencies, then reran 
qtp-newmodel, which reinstalled them, and it appears that 
qtp-newmodel has gotten past the problem part.


I'll try this a little later on my test QMT 5.5 that was failing. 
Thought you might want to give it a try and see what you get.




Well, reinstalling fuse,dkms didn't fix the problem for me on COS 5.5.
I'm pretty confident that's where the problem lies though.
I wonder if rebuilding them on a COS5.5 host will make it work. 
Doubtful.

Need to ponder this some more...




I have similar issue on my VPS CentOS 5.4 64 bit:

Starting to build the binary rpms ...(pizza anyone?)

If you want to view compile messages, you can open another terminal and:
# tail -f /mnt/qtp-sandbox/usr/src/qtp-upgrade/log/build-recent.log

qtp-build-rpms v0.3.5
qtp-remove-pkgs v0.3.1
Building clamav-toaster-0.96.1-1.3.36 ...
qtp-build-rpms - rpmbuild failed for clamav-toaster-0.96.1-1.3.36
qtp-build-rpms - here are the last 10 messages from the log:
+ '[' 0 -ne 0 ']'
+ cd clamav-0.96.1
++ /usr/bin/id -u
+ '[' 0 = 0 ']'
+ /bin/chown -Rhf root .
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.72759 (%prep)


RPM build errors:
Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.72759 (%prep)


qtp-build-rpms - see 
/mnt/qtp-sandbox/usr/src/qtp-upgrade/log/build-recent.log for more 
details


Build failed, Exiting.


- 



That's so similar, it's the same! ;)
I'm guessing that you're using the unionfs for sandbox?
What's your kernel version?

BTW, I tried to build it with rpmbuild and it failed. I also removed all 
fuse packaged and re-run qmt-newmodel.

Still the same error.

-
Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group 
(www.vickersconsulting.com)
   Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations.
 If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today!
-
Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages.

 To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com

For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Newmodel build issues

[Postmaster]

On 09/06/2010 23:25, Eric Shubert wrote:

Postmaster wrote:

On 09/06/2010 23:11, Eric Shubert wrote:

Postmaster wrote:



On 09/06/2010 22:40, Eric Shubert wrote:

Eric Shubert wrote:

Eric Shubert wrote:

Eric Shubert wrote:

Eric Shubert wrote:

Scott Hughes wrote:
I am attempting to update a new QMT server.  When running the 
newmodel script, I am getting the following:


qtp-build-rpms - rpmbuild failed for 
clamav-toaster-0.96.1-1.3.36

qtp-build-rpms - here are the last 10 messages from the log:
+ '[' 0 -ne 0 ']'
+ cd clamav-0.96.1
++ /usr/bin/id -u
+ '[' 0 = 0 ']'
+ /bin/chown -Rhf root .
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.10862 (%prep)


RPM build errors:
Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.10862 (%prep)


qtp-build-rpms - see 
/mnt/qtp-sandbox/usr/src/qtp-upgrade/log/build-recent.log for 
more details


Build failed, Exiting.

 --- Hit ENTER to return to menu ---


All other packages appeared to build without any problems.  
This system has had all of it's yum updates and has been 
rebooted.


Ideas, please?

Scott



You know? Not that I look a bit closer, this error is from a 
no-brainer sort of command (chown). I wonder if fuse-unionfs 
isn't having a problem with COS5.5.




Strangeness. When I do the commands manually (in a chroot 
environment, same as qtp-build-rpms does) I get no error. 
However, when I run the "/bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.80211" 
command, same as rpmbuild does, it ends prematurely in the same 
spot (chown command) with return code 1.


Very peculiar. I'm going to try with a linked sandbox, which I 
expect will succeed.




Linked sandbox works. So the problem is with fuse-unionfs and 
CentOS 5.5. This is a fairly low priority, but I'll continue to 
test to pinpoint the problem, and persue a fix.




Hey Steve,

I have a COS5.4 QMT with an updated kernel that I got this 
failure with as well. I did

# yum remove fuse dkms
which removed these packages with their dependencies, then reran 
qtp-newmodel, which reinstalled them, and it appears that 
qtp-newmodel has gotten past the problem part.


I'll try this a little later on my test QMT 5.5 that was failing. 
Thought you might want to give it a try and see what you get.




Well, reinstalling fuse,dkms didn't fix the problem for me on COS 
5.5.

I'm pretty confident that's where the problem lies though.
I wonder if rebuilding them on a COS5.5 host will make it work. 
Doubtful.

Need to ponder this some more...




I have similar issue on my VPS CentOS 5.4 64 bit:

Starting to build the binary rpms ...(pizza anyone?)

If you want to view compile messages, you can open another terminal 
and:

# tail -f /mnt/qtp-sandbox/usr/src/qtp-upgrade/log/build-recent.log

qtp-build-rpms v0.3.5
qtp-remove-pkgs v0.3.1
Building clamav-toaster-0.96.1-1.3.36 ...
qtp-build-rpms - rpmbuild failed for clamav-toaster-0.96.1-1.3.36
qtp-build-rpms - here are the last 10 messages from the log:
+ '[' 0 -ne 0 ']'
+ cd clamav-0.96.1
++ /usr/bin/id -u
+ '[' 0 = 0 ']'
+ /bin/chown -Rhf root .
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.72759 (%prep)


RPM build errors:
Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.72759 (%prep)


qtp-build-rpms - see 
/mnt/qtp-sandbox/usr/src/qtp-upgrade/log/build-recent.log for more 
details


Build failed, Exiting.


- 



That's so similar, it's the same! ;)
I'm guessing that you're using the unionfs for sandbox?
What's your kernel version?


qtp-newmodel v0.3.15 starting Wed Jun  9 22:11:28 BST 2010
qtp-whatami v0.3.6
DISTRO=CentOS
OSVER=5.4
QTARCH=x86_64
QTKERN=2.6.32.12-x86_64-linode12
BUILD_DIST=cnt5064
BUILD_DIR=/usr/src/redhat
This machine's OS is supported and has been tested

- 



That's a pretty new kernel.
How'd you end up with that kernel on a COS 5.4 host?

Yeah, this is a VPS server (Xen virtualisation). I can chose and run 
pretty much any kernel in a matter of seconds.

Have a look at http://www.linode.com/features.cfm - Configuration profile

-
Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group 
(www.vickersconsulting.com)
   Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations.
 If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today!
-
Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages.

 To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com

For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Newmodel build issues

[Postmaster]

On 10/06/2010 20:09, Eric Shubert wrote:

Postmaster wrote:

On 09/06/2010 23:25, Eric Shubert wrote:

Postmaster wrote:

On 09/06/2010 23:11, Eric Shubert wrote:

Postmaster wrote:



On 09/06/2010 22:40, Eric Shubert wrote:

Eric Shubert wrote:

Eric Shubert wrote:

Eric Shubert wrote:

Eric Shubert wrote:

Scott Hughes wrote:
I am attempting to update a new QMT server.  When running 
the newmodel script, I am getting the following:


qtp-build-rpms - rpmbuild failed for 
clamav-toaster-0.96.1-1.3.36

qtp-build-rpms - here are the last 10 messages from the log:
+ '[' 0 -ne 0 ']'
+ cd clamav-0.96.1
++ /usr/bin/id -u
+ '[' 0 = 0 ']'
+ /bin/chown -Rhf root .
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.10862 (%prep)


RPM build errors:
Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.10862 (%prep)


qtp-build-rpms - see 
/mnt/qtp-sandbox/usr/src/qtp-upgrade/log/build-recent.log 
for more details


Build failed, Exiting.

 --- Hit ENTER to return to menu ---


All other packages appeared to build without any problems.  
This system has had all of it's yum updates and has been 
rebooted.


Ideas, please?

Scott



You know? Not that I look a bit closer, this error is from a 
no-brainer sort of command (chown). I wonder if fuse-unionfs 
isn't having a problem with COS5.5.




Strangeness. When I do the commands manually (in a chroot 
environment, same as qtp-build-rpms does) I get no error. 
However, when I run the "/bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.80211" 
command, same as rpmbuild does, it ends prematurely in the 
same spot (chown command) with return code 1.


Very peculiar. I'm going to try with a linked sandbox, which 
I expect will succeed.




Linked sandbox works. So the problem is with fuse-unionfs and 
CentOS 5.5. This is a fairly low priority, but I'll continue 
to test to pinpoint the problem, and persue a fix.




Hey Steve,

I have a COS5.4 QMT with an updated kernel that I got this 
failure with as well. I did

# yum remove fuse dkms
which removed these packages with their dependencies, then 
reran qtp-newmodel, which reinstalled them, and it appears that 
qtp-newmodel has gotten past the problem part.


I'll try this a little later on my test QMT 5.5 that was 
failing. Thought you might want to give it a try and see what 
you get.




Well, reinstalling fuse,dkms didn't fix the problem for me on 
COS 5.5.

I'm pretty confident that's where the problem lies though.
I wonder if rebuilding them on a COS5.5 host will make it work. 
Doubtful.

Need to ponder this some more...




I have similar issue on my VPS CentOS 5.4 64 bit:

Starting to build the binary rpms ...(pizza anyone?)

If you want to view compile messages, you can open another 
terminal and:

# tail -f /mnt/qtp-sandbox/usr/src/qtp-upgrade/log/build-recent.log

qtp-build-rpms v0.3.5
qtp-remove-pkgs v0.3.1
Building clamav-toaster-0.96.1-1.3.36 ...
qtp-build-rpms - rpmbuild failed for clamav-toaster-0.96.1-1.3.36
qtp-build-rpms - here are the last 10 messages from the log:
+ '[' 0 -ne 0 ']'
+ cd clamav-0.96.1
++ /usr/bin/id -u
+ '[' 0 = 0 ']'
+ /bin/chown -Rhf root .
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.72759 (%prep)


RPM build errors:
Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.72759 (%prep)


qtp-build-rpms - see 
/mnt/qtp-sandbox/usr/src/qtp-upgrade/log/build-recent.log for 
more details


Build failed, Exiting.


- 



That's so similar, it's the same! ;)
I'm guessing that you're using the unionfs for sandbox?
What's your kernel version?


qtp-newmodel v0.3.15 starting Wed Jun  9 22:11:28 BST 2010
qtp-whatami v0.3.6
DISTRO=CentOS
OSVER=5.4
QTARCH=x86_64
QTKERN=2.6.32.12-x86_64-linode12
BUILD_DIST=cnt5064
BUILD_DIR=/usr/src/redhat
This machine's OS is supported and has been tested

- 





That's a pretty new kernel.
How'd you end up with that kernel on a COS 5.4 host?

Yeah, this is a VPS server (Xen virtualisation). I can chose and run 
pretty much any kernel in a matter of seconds.
Have a look at http://www.linode.com/features.cfm - Configuration 
profile


- 


Postmaster,

Your VPS might come in very handy here. :)

Have you changed the kernel after having run qtp-newmodel with the 
unionfs sandbox on a previous kernel?


Do you have a way to go back to the kernel that was used when you last 
ran qtp-newmodel successfully? (if you remember which kernel you were 
running then?) If so, please do so, then run qtp-newmodel test.


Do you get the failure when you use the most recent COS5.5 stock 
kernel? (2.6.18-194.3.1.el5)


Will you try:
.) using 2.6.18-194.3.1.el5 kernel
.) yum remove dkms fuse
.) test qtp-newmodel again
?


Eri

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Newmodel build issues

[Postmaster]

On 10/06/2010 20:09, Eric Shubert wrote:

Postmaster wrote:

On 09/06/2010 23:25, Eric Shubert wrote:

Postmaster wrote:

On 09/06/2010 23:11, Eric Shubert wrote:

Postmaster wrote:



On 09/06/2010 22:40, Eric Shubert wrote:

Eric Shubert wrote:

Eric Shubert wrote:

Eric Shubert wrote:

Eric Shubert wrote:

Scott Hughes wrote:
I am attempting to update a new QMT server.  When running 
the newmodel script, I am getting the following:


qtp-build-rpms - rpmbuild failed for 
clamav-toaster-0.96.1-1.3.36

qtp-build-rpms - here are the last 10 messages from the log:
+ '[' 0 -ne 0 ']'
+ cd clamav-0.96.1
++ /usr/bin/id -u
+ '[' 0 = 0 ']'
+ /bin/chown -Rhf root .
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.10862 (%prep)


RPM build errors:
Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.10862 (%prep)


qtp-build-rpms - see 
/mnt/qtp-sandbox/usr/src/qtp-upgrade/log/build-recent.log 
for more details


Build failed, Exiting.

 --- Hit ENTER to return to menu ---


All other packages appeared to build without any problems.  
This system has had all of it's yum updates and has been 
rebooted.


Ideas, please?

Scott



You know? Not that I look a bit closer, this error is from a 
no-brainer sort of command (chown). I wonder if fuse-unionfs 
isn't having a problem with COS5.5.




Strangeness. When I do the commands manually (in a chroot 
environment, same as qtp-build-rpms does) I get no error. 
However, when I run the "/bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.80211" 
command, same as rpmbuild does, it ends prematurely in the 
same spot (chown command) with return code 1.


Very peculiar. I'm going to try with a linked sandbox, which 
I expect will succeed.




Linked sandbox works. So the problem is with fuse-unionfs and 
CentOS 5.5. This is a fairly low priority, but I'll continue 
to test to pinpoint the problem, and persue a fix.




Hey Steve,

I have a COS5.4 QMT with an updated kernel that I got this 
failure with as well. I did

# yum remove fuse dkms
which removed these packages with their dependencies, then 
reran qtp-newmodel, which reinstalled them, and it appears that 
qtp-newmodel has gotten past the problem part.


I'll try this a little later on my test QMT 5.5 that was 
failing. Thought you might want to give it a try and see what 
you get.




Well, reinstalling fuse,dkms didn't fix the problem for me on 
COS 5.5.

I'm pretty confident that's where the problem lies though.
I wonder if rebuilding them on a COS5.5 host will make it work. 
Doubtful.

Need to ponder this some more...




I have similar issue on my VPS CentOS 5.4 64 bit:

Starting to build the binary rpms ...(pizza anyone?)

If you want to view compile messages, you can open another 
terminal and:

# tail -f /mnt/qtp-sandbox/usr/src/qtp-upgrade/log/build-recent.log

qtp-build-rpms v0.3.5
qtp-remove-pkgs v0.3.1
Building clamav-toaster-0.96.1-1.3.36 ...
qtp-build-rpms - rpmbuild failed for clamav-toaster-0.96.1-1.3.36
qtp-build-rpms - here are the last 10 messages from the log:
+ '[' 0 -ne 0 ']'
+ cd clamav-0.96.1
++ /usr/bin/id -u
+ '[' 0 = 0 ']'
+ /bin/chown -Rhf root .
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.72759 (%prep)


RPM build errors:
Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.72759 (%prep)


qtp-build-rpms - see 
/mnt/qtp-sandbox/usr/src/qtp-upgrade/log/build-recent.log for 
more details


Build failed, Exiting.


- 



That's so similar, it's the same! ;)
I'm guessing that you're using the unionfs for sandbox?
What's your kernel version?


qtp-newmodel v0.3.15 starting Wed Jun  9 22:11:28 BST 2010
qtp-whatami v0.3.6
DISTRO=CentOS
OSVER=5.4
QTARCH=x86_64
QTKERN=2.6.32.12-x86_64-linode12
BUILD_DIST=cnt5064
BUILD_DIR=/usr/src/redhat
This machine's OS is supported and has been tested

- 





That's a pretty new kernel.
How'd you end up with that kernel on a COS 5.4 host?

Yeah, this is a VPS server (Xen virtualisation). I can chose and run 
pretty much any kernel in a matter of seconds.
Have a look at http://www.linode.com/features.cfm - Configuration 
profile


- 


Postmaster,

Your VPS might come in very handy here. :)

Have you changed the kernel after having run qtp-newmodel with the 
unionfs sandbox on a previous kernel?


Do you have a way to go back to the kernel that was used when you last 
ran qtp-newmodel successfully? (if you remember which kernel you were 
running then?) If so, please do so, then run qtp-newmodel test.


Do you get the failure when you use the most recent COS5.5 stock 
kernel? (2.6.18-194.3.1.el5)


Will you try:
.) using 2.6.18-194.3.1.el5 kernel
.) yum remove dkm

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Newmodel build issues

[Postmaster]

On 10/06/2010 21:53, Eric Shubert wrote:

Postmaster wrote:

On 10/06/2010 20:09, Eric Shubert wrote:

Postmaster wrote:

On 09/06/2010 23:25, Eric Shubert wrote:

Postmaster wrote:

On 09/06/2010 23:11, Eric Shubert wrote:

Postmaster wrote:



On 09/06/2010 22:40, Eric Shubert wrote:

Eric Shubert wrote:

Eric Shubert wrote:

Eric Shubert wrote:

Eric Shubert wrote:

Scott Hughes wrote:
I am attempting to update a new QMT server.  When running 
the newmodel script, I am getting the following:


qtp-build-rpms - rpmbuild failed for 
clamav-toaster-0.96.1-1.3.36

qtp-build-rpms - here are the last 10 messages from the log:
+ '[' 0 -ne 0 ']'
+ cd clamav-0.96.1
++ /usr/bin/id -u
+ '[' 0 = 0 ']'
+ /bin/chown -Rhf root .
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.10862 (%prep)


RPM build errors:
Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.10862 (%prep)


qtp-build-rpms - see 
/mnt/qtp-sandbox/usr/src/qtp-upgrade/log/build-recent.log 
for more details


Build failed, Exiting.

 --- Hit ENTER to return to menu ---


All other packages appeared to build without any 
problems.  This system has had all of it's yum updates 
and has been rebooted.


Ideas, please?

Scott



You know? Not that I look a bit closer, this error is from 
a no-brainer sort of command (chown). I wonder if 
fuse-unionfs isn't having a problem with COS5.5.




Strangeness. When I do the commands manually (in a chroot 
environment, same as qtp-build-rpms does) I get no error. 
However, when I run the "/bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.80211" 
command, same as rpmbuild does, it ends prematurely in the 
same spot (chown command) with return code 1.


Very peculiar. I'm going to try with a linked sandbox, 
which I expect will succeed.




Linked sandbox works. So the problem is with fuse-unionfs 
and CentOS 5.5. This is a fairly low priority, but I'll 
continue to test to pinpoint the problem, and persue a fix.




Hey Steve,

I have a COS5.4 QMT with an updated kernel that I got this 
failure with as well. I did

# yum remove fuse dkms
which removed these packages with their dependencies, then 
reran qtp-newmodel, which reinstalled them, and it appears 
that qtp-newmodel has gotten past the problem part.


I'll try this a little later on my test QMT 5.5 that was 
failing. Thought you might want to give it a try and see what 
you get.




Well, reinstalling fuse,dkms didn't fix the problem for me on 
COS 5.5.

I'm pretty confident that's where the problem lies though.
I wonder if rebuilding them on a COS5.5 host will make it 
work. Doubtful.

Need to ponder this some more...




I have similar issue on my VPS CentOS 5.4 64 bit:

Starting to build the binary rpms ...(pizza anyone?)

If you want to view compile messages, you can open another 
terminal and:
# tail -f 
/mnt/qtp-sandbox/usr/src/qtp-upgrade/log/build-recent.log


qtp-build-rpms v0.3.5
qtp-remove-pkgs v0.3.1
Building clamav-toaster-0.96.1-1.3.36 ...
qtp-build-rpms - rpmbuild failed for clamav-toaster-0.96.1-1.3.36
qtp-build-rpms - here are the last 10 messages from the log:
+ '[' 0 -ne 0 ']'
+ cd clamav-0.96.1
++ /usr/bin/id -u
+ '[' 0 = 0 ']'
+ /bin/chown -Rhf root .
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.72759 (%prep)


RPM build errors:
Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.72759 (%prep)


qtp-build-rpms - see 
/mnt/qtp-sandbox/usr/src/qtp-upgrade/log/build-recent.log for 
more details


Build failed, Exiting.


- 



That's so similar, it's the same! ;)
I'm guessing that you're using the unionfs for sandbox?
What's your kernel version?


qtp-newmodel v0.3.15 starting Wed Jun  9 22:11:28 BST 2010
qtp-whatami v0.3.6
DISTRO=CentOS
OSVER=5.4
QTARCH=x86_64
QTKERN=2.6.32.12-x86_64-linode12
BUILD_DIST=cnt5064
BUILD_DIR=/usr/src/redhat
This machine's OS is supported and has been tested

- 







That's a pretty new kernel.
How'd you end up with that kernel on a COS 5.4 host?

Yeah, this is a VPS server (Xen virtualisation). I can chose and 
run pretty much any kernel in a matter of seconds.
Have a look at http://www.linode.com/features.cfm - Configuration 
profile


- 


Postmaster,

Your VPS might come in very handy here. :)

Have you changed the kernel after having run qtp-newmodel with the 
unionfs sandbox on a previous kernel?


Do you have a way to go back to the kernel that was used when you 
last ran qtp-newmodel successfully? (if you remember which kernel 
you were running then?) If so, please do so, then run qtp-newmodel 
test.


Do you get the failure when you use the most recent COS5.5 stock 
kernel? (2.6.18-194.3.1.el5)


Will you try:
.) using 2.6.18-194.3.1.el5 k

Re: [qmailtoaster] QMT on Xen? (I hope not)

[Postmaster]

Eric,

I am running QMT on Xen (CentOS 5.5)
Not sure about RHEL6


Rgds
Alex



On 05/08/2010 00:40, Eric Shubert wrote:

Is anyone running QMT on Xen?
I just noticed that RHEL6 will not contain Xen, in favor of KVM.



-
Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group 
(www.vickersconsulting.com)
   Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations.
 If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today!
-
Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages.

 To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com

For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: QMT on Xen? (I hope not)

[Postmaster]

I used to have qmail (not QMT) under OpenVZ and now I have had it under 
XEN on the Linode for several years (www.linode.com). I have both 32bit 
and 64bit version running very smoothly.


I tried running QMT under VMware and all seems to be good, but I have 
not tested it extensively (VMware was running

on my Macbook).

Regards
Alex


On 05/08/2010 17:09, Eric Shubert wrote:

Alex,

I only know what I've read.
http://go.techtarget.com/r/12145227/6005177
Looks to me like Xen is on its way out.



-
Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group 
(www.vickersconsulting.com)
   Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations.
 If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today!
-
Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages.

 To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com

For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com

Re: [qmailtoaster] POP3SSL and SMTP-SSL

[Postmaster]

 I do use it as my e-mail server is located remotely, therefore have to 
connect to it via internet as supposed to LAN.

So sending the password in clear text is not a good security policy IMHO.


Rgds
Alex

On 31/08/2010 12:10, Mahesh Bhat wrote:


Hi all,

Is it important to use pop3ssl(995) and smtpssl(465) instead of 
pop3(110) and smtp(25). How does it help.?


/-Regards

Mahesh Bhat

/

Re: [qmailtoaster] New to List and Qmail-Toaster

[Postmaster]

 Hello and welcome,


Yes, definitely qmail-toaster is the way you wanna go!
You need to control at least MX record of your DNS or give instruction 
to your data centre to change it for you.



Rgds
Alex



On 09/12/2010 20:31, keith smith wrote:

Hello!

I am looking into installing qmail toaster so I can manage a mail 
server for several domains.


Making interfaces for mail.Domain1.tld, mail.Domain2.tld. 
mail.DomainN.tld, where each has its own user name and password.  That 
way each domain owner can manage their own email accounts.


I'm running CentOS 5.5 and RHEL 6 .

Is Qmail Toaster the way I want to go?

Also I noticed there is a requirement to interface with DNS.  I do not 
control the DNS, the data center does that for us.  Will that be a 
problem?


Thank you in advance for your help!


Keith Smith

[qmailtoaster] Increased spam recently

[Postmaster]

Hello all,


During the beginning 2011, I can see an increased amount of spam getting 
through. All spam e-mails are sent from yahoo/hotmail account with

more or less similar text as follows:

-
A couple of weeks ago I tried to figure out day trading, and long term 
trading in the market. I saw alot of places that notified me if 
somethings a strong buy most of them are totally bogus, till i found 
this one and I was showing atleast 150% returns on all the Symbols they 
reco'd in just 2 days! Here check it out and let me know> Penny Picks1 


-

The spamassassin is not detecting spam scoring only 2.5 out of 4.

Any idea how to battle it? Would envoking 
ip-in-rdns-keyword-blacklist-file option help it?


Many thanks
Alex

[qmailtoaster] Increased spam recently

[Postmaster]

Hello all,


During the beginning 2011, I can see an increased amount of spam getting 
through. All spam e-mails are sent from yahoo/hotmail account with

more or less similar text as follows:

-
A couple of weeks ago I tried to figure out day trading, and long term 
trading in the market. I saw alot of places that notified me if 
somethings a strong buy most of them are totally bogus, till i found 
this one and I was showing atleast 150% returns on all the Symbols they 
reco'd in just 2 days! Here check it out and let me know> Penny Picks1 


-

The spamassassin is not detecting spam scoring only 2.5 out of 4.

Any idea how to battle it? Would envoking 
ip-in-rdns-keyword-blacklist-file option help it?


Many thanks
Alex

Re: [qmailtoaster] Running in a vm

[Postmaster]

I have 2 accounts at Linode.com running on both qmail-toaster under XEN.
I have been running qmail-toaster under VMWare without any issues.

Regards
Alex

On 13/02/2011 02:31, Dnk wrote:

Hey guys,

Are there any pitfalls to running a toaster in a vm? Any gotchas on install?

Thanks!

---
D


-
Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group 
(www.vickersconsulting.com)
 Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations.
   If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today!
-
  Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages.

   To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com
  For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com





-
Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group 
(www.vickersconsulting.com)
   Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations.
 If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today!
-
Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages.

 To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com

For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com