Re: [qmailtoaster] Is it getting Blocked?

2009-09-02 Thread Jim Shupert

thanks!  -- i cannot wait to see!

Eric Shubert wrote:
In a typical configuration, it would be hitting your smtp server port 
25, which you would see in your smtp log:

# qmlog -lc fuse\.net

Jim Shupert wrote:

Friends,  :: an update ::

I have retained the postfix how to in case i need it
I got my thing working via sendmail ( 'cause i was close )  and using 
the providers mailserver.( smtp.fuse.net )


basically i am able to monitor our servers ( like I am outside the 
network )  via this dsl

and I can send an email that I can get on my mobile device

so i can get to my fuse account ( the dsl Ma Bell folks here in cincy )
and I have THAT account set to forward mail to my pps account ( that 
uses a qmail toaster mail server )


I reckon -- qmail sees that as , well ... i do not know -- but it 
never gets to my inside
( but , i am basically happy - cause I can have my desk clinet also 
looking at my fuse and --it also rings in my pocketso..it is 
workable )


I was wondering what logs I might look at to see if this 'fuse relay 
' is hitting my qmail toaster server?


I reckon I will never get the messages to - just come through.

Thanks

Eric Shubert wrote:

Hey Jim,

I just happened to be doing this today, so here are my notes on how 
to set up postfix to send mail out from a generic server, like for 
logwatch output and such (that would otherwise go to r...@localhost).


{replace what's in braces, and remove braces}

# yum install postfix
# yum remove sendmail

# cd /etc/pki/tls/certs
# make postcert.pem

# echo {submission.server.com}:587 {user:passwd} \
 /etc/postfix/sasl_passwd
# chmod 600 /etc/postfix/sasl_passwd
# chown root:root /etc/postfix/sasl_passwd
# postmap /etc/postfix/sasl_passwd

Edit /etc/aliases if desired, then do newaliases command:
root:sysadmin
# newaliases

Edit /etc/postfix/main.cf, changing these from the default values 
(this was CentOS5.3):

myorigin = $mydomain
#mydestination =
mynetworks_style = host
relayhost = {submission.server.com}:587
smtp_sasl_auth_enable = yes
smtp_sasl_password_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/sasl_passwd
smtp_sasl_security_options =
smtp_use_tls = yes
smtp_tls_CAfile = /etc/pki/tls/certs/postcert.pem
smtp_tls_session_cache_database = btree:/var/run/smtp_tls_session/cache

# service postfix start
# chkconfig postfix on

That should do it.
Note, this configuration relies on hostname being set correctly for 
your domain. If it's not, you'll need to change the myorigin 
variable appropriately.


Please let us know whether or not this works for you.

Eric Shubert wrote:
That's not telling us much. I sure don't know, and don't care to 
know sendmail. If you'd try using postfix again we might be of more 
help. For  what you need, postfix isn't a bad choice. Certainly 
better than sendmail.


Jim Shupert wrote:
it is centos 4.7  running sendmail ( what came with it )  I 
started to install postfix because I am a bit more farmilur with 
that than send mail.
Postfix was what i was using before i found -- the best mailserver 
solution of qmailtoaster...


anyways

I can email with a client ( evolution )  and that does come through

even though I am using sendmail. the smtp server is one from the 
isp - a dsl modem etc.


I can command line send mail ( sendmail )  to a gmail account  - 
but not mu internal domain


I was wondering about MX  or Reverse DNS -
here is the full header of the client ( evolution ) email that 
does come through


X-Account-Key: account2
X-UIDL: 1251407849.13380.sifter.pps-inc.com,S=1797
X-Mozilla-Status: 0001
X-Mozilla-Status2: 
X-Mozilla-Keys: 


Return-Path: ppsgr...@zoomtown.com
Delivered-To: jshup...@theppsgroup.com
Received: (qmail 13378 invoked by uid 89); 27 Aug 2009 21:17:29 -
Received: by simscan 1.3.1 ppid: 13371, pid: 13373, t: 0.1506s
 scanners: attach: 1.3.1 clamav: 0.95.2
/m:51/d:9450 spam: 3.2.5
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on 
sifter.pps-inc.com

X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_50,RDNS_NONE
autolearn=no version=3.2.5
Received: from unknown (HELO mail-out1.fuse.net) (216.68.8.175)
  by sifter.pps-inc.com with SMTP; 27 Aug 2009 21:17:29 -
Received-SPF: pass (sifter.pps-inc.com: SPF record at zoomtown.com 
designates 216.68.8.175 as permitted sender)

Return-Path: ppsgr...@zoomtown.com
X-CNFS-Analysis: v=1.0 c=1 a=_0eaEcvx3pEA:10 
a=Qu4MKinT0AcdTVkTjP4A:9 a=Er_04BcmBtQYP8STtf3EGQ6vdGwA:4

X-CM-Score: 0
X-Scanned-by: Cloudmark Authority Engine
Authentication-Results: ecout1 smtp.mail=ppsgr...@zoomtown.com; 
spf=unknown
Authentication-Results:  ecout1 smtp.user=ppsgr...@zoomtown.com; 
auth=pass (LOGIN)
Received-SPF: error (ecout1: 208.102.118.162 is neither permitted 
nor denied by domain of zoomtown.com
Received: from [208.102.118.162] ([208.102.118.162:50880] 
helo=[172.17.0.10])

by ecout1 (envelope-from ppsgr...@zoomtown.com)
(ecelerity 

Re: [qmailtoaster] Is it getting Blocked?

2009-09-02 Thread Jim Shupert

Friends,

here is the result of a qmlog smtp -t 100  ( i sifted through that for a 
reference to the 'other' machine )


09-02 12:35:46 CHKUSER rejected sender: from r...@taster.local:: 
remote mail-out2.fuse.net:unknown:

216.68.8.171 rcpt  : invalid sender MX domain

09-02 12:35:58 CHKUSER rejected sender: from r...@taster.local:: 
remote mail-out2.fuse.net:unknown:

216.68.8.171 rcpt  : invalid sender MX domain


so my Q might be ::: can I make CHKUSER allow the sender of   
r...@taster.local.
maybe if I recompile CHKUSER  ( i am thinking much like I recompiled it 
to allow blackberriness (\) )


might that work? -- do you think?  and what would i 'say' when i 
recompile chckuser?


what i am doing :  I have a simple machine on a DSL ( fuse is ma bell 
here ) on that machine I am croning a perl that monitors several 
websites ( from *outside* my 2-T1 connections )  and that machine 
(taster) is running sendMail that sends -- upon alarm an email to the 
fuse mail server
and of course.  My QMT  does the chckuser and sees a conflict between 
o...@taster.local   from mail-out2.fuse.net ... or that is what i *think 
is happening.   note changing my domain (hosts file) on taster to 
taster.fuse.net didn't work.


thanks

Eric Shubert wrote:
In a typical configuration, it would be hitting your smtp server port 
25, which you would see in your smtp log:

# qmlog -lc fuse\.net

Jim Shupert wrote:

Friends,  :: an update ::

I have retained the postfix how to in case i need it
I got my thing working via sendmail ( 'cause i was close )  and using 
the providers mailserver.( smtp.fuse.net )


basically i am able to monitor our servers ( like I am outside the 
network )  via this dsl

and I can send an email that I can get on my mobile device

so i can get to my fuse account ( the dsl Ma Bell folks here in cincy )
and I have THAT account set to forward mail to my pps account ( that 
uses a qmail toaster mail server )


I reckon -- qmail sees that as , well ... i do not know -- but it 
never gets to my inside
( but , i am basically happy - cause I can have my desk clinet also 
looking at my fuse and --it also rings in my pocketso..it is 
workable )


I was wondering what logs I might look at to see if this 'fuse relay 
' is hitting my qmail toaster server?


I reckon I will never get the messages to - just come through.

Thanks

Eric Shubert wrote:

Hey Jim,

I just happened to be doing this today, so here are my notes on how 
to set up postfix to send mail out from a generic server, like for 
logwatch output and such (that would otherwise go to r...@localhost).


{replace what's in braces, and remove braces}

# yum install postfix
# yum remove sendmail

# cd /etc/pki/tls/certs
# make postcert.pem

# echo {submission.server.com}:587 {user:passwd} \
 /etc/postfix/sasl_passwd
# chmod 600 /etc/postfix/sasl_passwd
# chown root:root /etc/postfix/sasl_passwd
# postmap /etc/postfix/sasl_passwd

Edit /etc/aliases if desired, then do newaliases command:
root:sysadmin
# newaliases

Edit /etc/postfix/main.cf, changing these from the default values 
(this was CentOS5.3):

myorigin = $mydomain
#mydestination =
mynetworks_style = host
relayhost = {submission.server.com}:587
smtp_sasl_auth_enable = yes
smtp_sasl_password_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/sasl_passwd
smtp_sasl_security_options =
smtp_use_tls = yes
smtp_tls_CAfile = /etc/pki/tls/certs/postcert.pem
smtp_tls_session_cache_database = btree:/var/run/smtp_tls_session/cache

# service postfix start
# chkconfig postfix on

That should do it.
Note, this configuration relies on hostname being set correctly for 
your domain. If it's not, you'll need to change the myorigin 
variable appropriately.


Please let us know whether or not this works for you.

Eric Shubert wrote:
That's not telling us much. I sure don't know, and don't care to 
know sendmail. If you'd try using postfix again we might be of more 
help. For  what you need, postfix isn't a bad choice. Certainly 
better than sendmail.


Jim Shupert wrote:
it is centos 4.7  running sendmail ( what came with it )  I 
started to install postfix because I am a bit more farmilur with 
that than send mail.
Postfix was what i was using before i found -- the best mailserver 
solution of qmailtoaster...


anyways

I can email with a client ( evolution )  and that does come through

even though I am using sendmail. the smtp server is one from the 
isp - a dsl modem etc.


I can command line send mail ( sendmail )  to a gmail account  - 
but not mu internal domain


I was wondering about MX  or Reverse DNS -
here is the full header of the client ( evolution ) email that 
does come through


X-Account-Key: account2
X-UIDL: 1251407849.13380.sifter.pps-inc.com,S=1797
X-Mozilla-Status: 0001
X-Mozilla-Status2: 
X-Mozilla-Keys: 


Return-Path: ppsgr...@zoomtown.com
Delivered-To: jshup...@theppsgroup.com
Received: (qmail 13378 invoked by uid 89); 

Re: [qmailtoaster] Is it getting Blocked?

2009-09-02 Thread Eric Shubert
Postfix lets you easily control this on the sender's end. See the 
myorigin parameter. That's where the proper fix is.


FWIW, sendmail is terribly antiquated. Reminds me of assembler macros.
If you would have implemented postfix (days ago), you'd be done with 
this by now.


Jim Shupert wrote:

Friends,

here is the result of a qmlog smtp -t 100  ( i sifted through that for a 
reference to the 'other' machine )


09-02 12:35:46 CHKUSER rejected sender: from r...@taster.local:: 
remote mail-out2.fuse.net:unknown:

216.68.8.171 rcpt  : invalid sender MX domain
 
09-02 12:35:58 CHKUSER rejected sender: from r...@taster.local:: 
remote mail-out2.fuse.net:unknown:

216.68.8.171 rcpt  : invalid sender MX domain


so my Q might be ::: can I make CHKUSER allow the sender of   
r...@taster.local.
maybe if I recompile CHKUSER  ( i am thinking much like I recompiled it 
to allow blackberriness (\) )


might that work? -- do you think?  and what would i 'say' when i 
recompile chckuser?


what i am doing :  I have a simple machine on a DSL ( fuse is ma bell 
here ) on that machine I am croning a perl that monitors several 
websites ( from *outside* my 2-T1 connections )  and that machine 
(taster) is running sendMail that sends -- upon alarm an email to the 
fuse mail server
and of course.  My QMT  does the chckuser and sees a conflict between 
o...@taster.local   from mail-out2.fuse.net ... or that is what i *think 
is happening.   note changing my domain (hosts file) on taster to 
taster.fuse.net didn't work.


thanks

Eric Shubert wrote:
In a typical configuration, it would be hitting your smtp server port 
25, which you would see in your smtp log:

# qmlog -lc fuse\.net

Jim Shupert wrote:

Friends,  :: an update ::

I have retained the postfix how to in case i need it
I got my thing working via sendmail ( 'cause i was close )  and using 
the providers mailserver.( smtp.fuse.net )


basically i am able to monitor our servers ( like I am outside the 
network )  via this dsl

and I can send an email that I can get on my mobile device

so i can get to my fuse account ( the dsl Ma Bell folks here in cincy )
and I have THAT account set to forward mail to my pps account ( that 
uses a qmail toaster mail server )


I reckon -- qmail sees that as , well ... i do not know -- but it 
never gets to my inside
( but , i am basically happy - cause I can have my desk clinet also 
looking at my fuse and --it also rings in my pocketso..it is 
workable )


I was wondering what logs I might look at to see if this 'fuse relay 
' is hitting my qmail toaster server?


I reckon I will never get the messages to - just come through.

Thanks

Eric Shubert wrote:

Hey Jim,

I just happened to be doing this today, so here are my notes on how 
to set up postfix to send mail out from a generic server, like for 
logwatch output and such (that would otherwise go to r...@localhost).


{replace what's in braces, and remove braces}

# yum install postfix
# yum remove sendmail

# cd /etc/pki/tls/certs
# make postcert.pem

# echo {submission.server.com}:587 {user:passwd} \
 /etc/postfix/sasl_passwd
# chmod 600 /etc/postfix/sasl_passwd
# chown root:root /etc/postfix/sasl_passwd
# postmap /etc/postfix/sasl_passwd

Edit /etc/aliases if desired, then do newaliases command:
root:sysadmin
# newaliases

Edit /etc/postfix/main.cf, changing these from the default values 
(this was CentOS5.3):

myorigin = $mydomain
#mydestination =
mynetworks_style = host
relayhost = {submission.server.com}:587
smtp_sasl_auth_enable = yes
smtp_sasl_password_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/sasl_passwd
smtp_sasl_security_options =
smtp_use_tls = yes
smtp_tls_CAfile = /etc/pki/tls/certs/postcert.pem
smtp_tls_session_cache_database = btree:/var/run/smtp_tls_session/cache

# service postfix start
# chkconfig postfix on

That should do it.
Note, this configuration relies on hostname being set correctly for 
your domain. If it's not, you'll need to change the myorigin 
variable appropriately.


Please let us know whether or not this works for you.

Eric Shubert wrote:
That's not telling us much. I sure don't know, and don't care to 
know sendmail. If you'd try using postfix again we might be of more 
help. For  what you need, postfix isn't a bad choice. Certainly 
better than sendmail.


Jim Shupert wrote:
it is centos 4.7  running sendmail ( what came with it )  I 
started to install postfix because I am a bit more farmilur with 
that than send mail.
Postfix was what i was using before i found -- the best mailserver 
solution of qmailtoaster...


anyways

I can email with a client ( evolution )  and that does come through

even though I am using sendmail. the smtp server is one from the 
isp - a dsl modem etc.


I can command line send mail ( sendmail )  to a gmail account  - 
but not mu internal domain


I was wondering about MX  or Reverse DNS -
here is the full header of the client ( evolution ) email that 
does come through


X-Account-Key: account2
X-UIDL: 

Re: [qmailtoaster] Is it getting Blocked?

2009-09-02 Thread Jake Vickers

Jim Shupert wrote:

Friends,

here is the result of a qmlog smtp -t 100  ( i sifted through that for 
a reference to the 'other' machine )


09-02 12:35:46 CHKUSER rejected sender: from r...@taster.local:: 
remote mail-out2.fuse.net:unknown:

216.68.8.171 rcpt  : invalid sender MX domain
 
09-02 12:35:58 CHKUSER rejected sender: from r...@taster.local:: 
remote mail-out2.fuse.net:unknown:

216.68.8.171 rcpt  : invalid sender MX domain


so my Q might be ::: can I make CHKUSER allow the sender of   
r...@taster.local.
maybe if I recompile CHKUSER  ( i am thinking much like I recompiled 
it to allow blackberriness (\) )


might that work? -- do you think?  and what would i 'say' when i 
recompile chckuser?




You are correct there. chkuser has an option to check for the sending 
domain's MX record and deny if the sending domain does not have an MX 
record. Seems logical since if there is an error you need somewhere to 
send that error message to and if there is no MX record there is nowhere 
to send it (also acts as a spam check).
You can go in and recompile chkuser to turn this option off 
(*CHKUSER_RCPT_MX*) by undefining it. It is undefined in later versions 
of chkuser but I plan to leave it on when I update chkuser - it makes 
more sense to keep it because of what it does rather than remove it and 
force 98% of our users to then turn it back on.
You may also be able to turn it off in your tcp.smtp file for specific 
IP addresses, much like SENDER_NOCHECK, but I have not tried this and no 
one else has posted back as to the validity of this.

You can also add that domain to your DNS so it does have a valid MX record.

Hope that helps some.



Re: [qmailtoaster] Is it getting Blocked?

2009-09-02 Thread Jim Shupert

I take that as good advice - i appreciate it.

I reckon  i could do that.

from your earlier wisdom

might i be correct in think that i need to customize
# echo {submission.server.com}:587 {user:passwd} \
to something like
# echo {smtp.fuse.net}:587 {myFuseUser:myFuseUserPasswd} \

and

relayhost = {submission.server.com}:587 
to

relayhost = {smtp.fuse.net}:587


where smtp.fuse.net = the (dsl) isp mailServer - Not my local machine 
taster.local

and
myFuseUser:myFuseUserPasswd = a valid user /psswd on that server

Thanks!

jims


Eric Shubert wrote:
Postfix lets you easily control this on the sender's end. See the 
myorigin parameter. That's where the proper fix is.


FWIW, sendmail is terribly antiquated. Reminds me of assembler macros.
If you would have implemented postfix (days ago), you'd be done with 
this by now.


Jim Shupert wrote:

Friends,

here is the result of a qmlog smtp -t 100  ( i sifted through that 
for a reference to the 'other' machine )


09-02 12:35:46 CHKUSER rejected sender: from r...@taster.local:: 
remote mail-out2.fuse.net:unknown:

216.68.8.171 rcpt  : invalid sender MX domain
 
09-02 12:35:58 CHKUSER rejected sender: from r...@taster.local:: 
remote mail-out2.fuse.net:unknown:

216.68.8.171 rcpt  : invalid sender MX domain


so my Q might be ::: can I make CHKUSER allow the sender of   
r...@taster.local.
maybe if I recompile CHKUSER  ( i am thinking much like I recompiled 
it to allow blackberriness (\) )


might that work? -- do you think?  and what would i 'say' when i 
recompile chckuser?


what i am doing :  I have a simple machine on a DSL ( fuse is ma bell 
here ) on that machine I am croning a perl that monitors several 
websites ( from *outside* my 2-T1 connections )  and that machine 
(taster) is running sendMail that sends -- upon alarm an email to the 
fuse mail server
and of course.  My QMT  does the chckuser and sees a conflict between 
o...@taster.local   from mail-out2.fuse.net ... or that is what i 
*think is happening.   note changing my domain (hosts file) on taster 
to taster.fuse.net didn't work.


thanks

Eric Shubert wrote:
In a typical configuration, it would be hitting your smtp server 
port 25, which you would see in your smtp log:

# qmlog -lc fuse\.net

Jim Shupert wrote:

Friends,  :: an update ::

I have retained the postfix how to in case i need it
I got my thing working via sendmail ( 'cause i was close )  and 
using the providers mailserver.( smtp.fuse.net )


basically i am able to monitor our servers ( like I am outside the 
network )  via this dsl

and I can send an email that I can get on my mobile device

so i can get to my fuse account ( the dsl Ma Bell folks here in 
cincy )
and I have THAT account set to forward mail to my pps account ( 
that uses a qmail toaster mail server )


I reckon -- qmail sees that as , well ... i do not know -- but it 
never gets to my inside
( but , i am basically happy - cause I can have my desk clinet also 
looking at my fuse and --it also rings in my pocketso..it is 
workable )


I was wondering what logs I might look at to see if this 'fuse 
relay ' is hitting my qmail toaster server?


I reckon I will never get the messages to - just come through.

Thanks

Eric Shubert wrote:

Hey Jim,

I just happened to be doing this today, so here are my notes on 
how to set up postfix to send mail out from a generic server, like 
for logwatch output and such (that would otherwise go to 
r...@localhost).


{replace what's in braces, and remove braces}

# yum install postfix
# yum remove sendmail

# cd /etc/pki/tls/certs
# make postcert.pem

# echo {submission.server.com}:587 {user:passwd} \
 /etc/postfix/sasl_passwd
# chmod 600 /etc/postfix/sasl_passwd
# chown root:root /etc/postfix/sasl_passwd
# postmap /etc/postfix/sasl_passwd

Edit /etc/aliases if desired, then do newaliases command:
root:sysadmin
# newaliases

Edit /etc/postfix/main.cf, changing these from the default values 
(this was CentOS5.3):

myorigin = $mydomain
#mydestination =
mynetworks_style = host
relayhost = {submission.server.com}:587
smtp_sasl_auth_enable = yes
smtp_sasl_password_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/sasl_passwd
smtp_sasl_security_options =
smtp_use_tls = yes
smtp_tls_CAfile = /etc/pki/tls/certs/postcert.pem
smtp_tls_session_cache_database = 
btree:/var/run/smtp_tls_session/cache


# service postfix start
# chkconfig postfix on

That should do it.
Note, this configuration relies on hostname being set correctly 
for your domain. If it's not, you'll need to change the myorigin 
variable appropriately.


Please let us know whether or not this works for you.

Eric Shubert wrote:
That's not telling us much. I sure don't know, and don't care to 
know sendmail. If you'd try using postfix again we might be of 
more help. For  what you need, postfix isn't a bad choice. 
Certainly better than sendmail.


Jim Shupert wrote:
it is centos 4.7  running sendmail ( what came with it )  I 
started to install postfix because I am a bit more farmilur 

Re: [qmailtoaster] Is it getting Blocked?

2009-09-02 Thread Eric Shubert

Jim Shupert wrote:

I take that as good advice - i appreciate it.

I reckon  i could do that.

from your earlier wisdom

might i be correct in think that i need to customize
# echo {submission.server.com}:587 {user:passwd} \
to something like
# echo {smtp.fuse.net}:587 {myFuseUser:myFuseUserPasswd} \


Yes, but without the brackets (curly braces).


and

relayhost = {submission.server.com}:587 
to

relayhost = {smtp.fuse.net}:587


Yes, but without the brackets (curly braces).



where smtp.fuse.net = the (dsl) isp mailServer - Not my local machine 
taster.local

and
myFuseUser:myFuseUserPasswd = a valid user /psswd on that server


Instead of using smtp.fuse.net, you might be able to send it straight to 
your server by substituting your mail server's url/user/password, 
providing that fuse.net doesn't block port 587.



Thanks!

jims


Eric Shubert wrote:
Postfix lets you easily control this on the sender's end. See the 
myorigin parameter. That's where the proper fix is.


FWIW, sendmail is terribly antiquated. Reminds me of assembler macros.
If you would have implemented postfix (days ago), you'd be done with 
this by now.


Jim Shupert wrote:

Friends,

here is the result of a qmlog smtp -t 100  ( i sifted through that 
for a reference to the 'other' machine )


09-02 12:35:46 CHKUSER rejected sender: from r...@taster.local:: 
remote mail-out2.fuse.net:unknown:

216.68.8.171 rcpt  : invalid sender MX domain
 
09-02 12:35:58 CHKUSER rejected sender: from r...@taster.local:: 
remote mail-out2.fuse.net:unknown:

216.68.8.171 rcpt  : invalid sender MX domain


so my Q might be ::: can I make CHKUSER allow the sender of   
r...@taster.local.
maybe if I recompile CHKUSER  ( i am thinking much like I recompiled 
it to allow blackberriness (\) )


might that work? -- do you think?  and what would i 'say' when i 
recompile chckuser?


what i am doing :  I have a simple machine on a DSL ( fuse is ma bell 
here ) on that machine I am croning a perl that monitors several 
websites ( from *outside* my 2-T1 connections )  and that machine 
(taster) is running sendMail that sends -- upon alarm an email to the 
fuse mail server
and of course.  My QMT  does the chckuser and sees a conflict between 
o...@taster.local   from mail-out2.fuse.net ... or that is what i 
*think is happening.   note changing my domain (hosts file) on taster 
to taster.fuse.net didn't work.


thanks

Eric Shubert wrote:
In a typical configuration, it would be hitting your smtp server 
port 25, which you would see in your smtp log:

# qmlog -lc fuse\.net

Jim Shupert wrote:

Friends,  :: an update ::

I have retained the postfix how to in case i need it
I got my thing working via sendmail ( 'cause i was close )  and 
using the providers mailserver.( smtp.fuse.net )


basically i am able to monitor our servers ( like I am outside the 
network )  via this dsl

and I can send an email that I can get on my mobile device

so i can get to my fuse account ( the dsl Ma Bell folks here in 
cincy )
and I have THAT account set to forward mail to my pps account ( 
that uses a qmail toaster mail server )


I reckon -- qmail sees that as , well ... i do not know -- but it 
never gets to my inside
( but , i am basically happy - cause I can have my desk clinet also 
looking at my fuse and --it also rings in my pocketso..it is 
workable )


I was wondering what logs I might look at to see if this 'fuse 
relay ' is hitting my qmail toaster server?


I reckon I will never get the messages to - just come through.

Thanks

Eric Shubert wrote:

Hey Jim,

I just happened to be doing this today, so here are my notes on 
how to set up postfix to send mail out from a generic server, like 
for logwatch output and such (that would otherwise go to 
r...@localhost).


{replace what's in braces, and remove braces}

# yum install postfix
# yum remove sendmail

# cd /etc/pki/tls/certs
# make postcert.pem

# echo {submission.server.com}:587 {user:passwd} \
 /etc/postfix/sasl_passwd
# chmod 600 /etc/postfix/sasl_passwd
# chown root:root /etc/postfix/sasl_passwd
# postmap /etc/postfix/sasl_passwd

Edit /etc/aliases if desired, then do newaliases command:
root:sysadmin
# newaliases

Edit /etc/postfix/main.cf, changing these from the default values 
(this was CentOS5.3):

myorigin = $mydomain
#mydestination =
mynetworks_style = host
relayhost = {submission.server.com}:587
smtp_sasl_auth_enable = yes
smtp_sasl_password_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/sasl_passwd
smtp_sasl_security_options =
smtp_use_tls = yes
smtp_tls_CAfile = /etc/pki/tls/certs/postcert.pem
smtp_tls_session_cache_database = 
btree:/var/run/smtp_tls_session/cache


# service postfix start
# chkconfig postfix on

That should do it.
Note, this configuration relies on hostname being set correctly 
for your domain. If it's not, you'll need to change the myorigin 
variable appropriately.


Please let us know whether or not this works for you.

Eric Shubert wrote:
That's not telling us much. I sure don't know, and 

Re: [qmailtoaster] Is it getting Blocked?

2009-09-01 Thread Jim Shupert

Friends,  :: an update ::

I have retained the postfix how to in case i need it
I got my thing working via sendmail ( 'cause i was close )  and using 
the providers mailserver.( smtp.fuse.net )


basically i am able to monitor our servers ( like I am outside the 
network )  via this dsl

and I can send an email that I can get on my mobile device

so i can get to my fuse account ( the dsl Ma Bell folks here in cincy )
and I have THAT account set to forward mail to my pps account ( that 
uses a qmail toaster mail server )


I reckon -- qmail sees that as , well ... i do not know -- but it never 
gets to my inside
( but , i am basically happy - cause I can have my desk clinet also 
looking at my fuse and --it also rings in my pocketso..it is workable )


I was wondering what logs I might look at to see if this 'fuse relay ' 
is hitting my qmail toaster server?


I reckon I will never get the messages to - just come through.

Thanks

Eric Shubert wrote:

Hey Jim,

I just happened to be doing this today, so here are my notes on how to 
set up postfix to send mail out from a generic server, like for 
logwatch output and such (that would otherwise go to r...@localhost).


{replace what's in braces, and remove braces}

# yum install postfix
# yum remove sendmail

# cd /etc/pki/tls/certs
# make postcert.pem

# echo {submission.server.com}:587 {user:passwd} \
 /etc/postfix/sasl_passwd
# chmod 600 /etc/postfix/sasl_passwd
# chown root:root /etc/postfix/sasl_passwd
# postmap /etc/postfix/sasl_passwd

Edit /etc/aliases if desired, then do newaliases command:
root:sysadmin
# newaliases

Edit /etc/postfix/main.cf, changing these from the default values 
(this was CentOS5.3):

myorigin = $mydomain
#mydestination =
mynetworks_style = host
relayhost = {submission.server.com}:587
smtp_sasl_auth_enable = yes
smtp_sasl_password_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/sasl_passwd
smtp_sasl_security_options =
smtp_use_tls = yes
smtp_tls_CAfile = /etc/pki/tls/certs/postcert.pem
smtp_tls_session_cache_database = btree:/var/run/smtp_tls_session/cache

# service postfix start
# chkconfig postfix on

That should do it.
Note, this configuration relies on hostname being set correctly for 
your domain. If it's not, you'll need to change the myorigin variable 
appropriately.


Please let us know whether or not this works for you.

Eric Shubert wrote:
That's not telling us much. I sure don't know, and don't care to know 
sendmail. If you'd try using postfix again we might be of more help. 
For  what you need, postfix isn't a bad choice. Certainly better than 
sendmail.


Jim Shupert wrote:
it is centos 4.7  running sendmail ( what came with it )  I started 
to install postfix because I am a bit more farmilur with that than 
send mail.
Postfix was what i was using before i found -- the best mailserver 
solution of qmailtoaster...


anyways

I can email with a client ( evolution )  and that does come through

even though I am using sendmail. the smtp server is one from the isp 
- a dsl modem etc.


I can command line send mail ( sendmail )  to a gmail account  - but 
not mu internal domain


I was wondering about MX  or Reverse DNS -
here is the full header of the client ( evolution ) email that does 
come through


X-Account-Key: account2
X-UIDL: 1251407849.13380.sifter.pps-inc.com,S=1797
X-Mozilla-Status: 0001
X-Mozilla-Status2: 
X-Mozilla-Keys: 


Return-Path: ppsgr...@zoomtown.com
Delivered-To: jshup...@theppsgroup.com
Received: (qmail 13378 invoked by uid 89); 27 Aug 2009 21:17:29 -
Received: by simscan 1.3.1 ppid: 13371, pid: 13373, t: 0.1506s
 scanners: attach: 1.3.1 clamav: 0.95.2
/m:51/d:9450 spam: 3.2.5
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on 
sifter.pps-inc.com

X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_50,RDNS_NONE
autolearn=no version=3.2.5
Received: from unknown (HELO mail-out1.fuse.net) (216.68.8.175)
  by sifter.pps-inc.com with SMTP; 27 Aug 2009 21:17:29 -
Received-SPF: pass (sifter.pps-inc.com: SPF record at zoomtown.com 
designates 216.68.8.175 as permitted sender)

Return-Path: ppsgr...@zoomtown.com
X-CNFS-Analysis: v=1.0 c=1 a=_0eaEcvx3pEA:10 
a=Qu4MKinT0AcdTVkTjP4A:9 a=Er_04BcmBtQYP8STtf3EGQ6vdGwA:4

X-CM-Score: 0
X-Scanned-by: Cloudmark Authority Engine
Authentication-Results: ecout1 smtp.mail=ppsgr...@zoomtown.com; 
spf=unknown
Authentication-Results:  ecout1 smtp.user=ppsgr...@zoomtown.com; 
auth=pass (LOGIN)
Received-SPF: error (ecout1: 208.102.118.162 is neither permitted 
nor denied by domain of zoomtown.com
Received: from [208.102.118.162] ([208.102.118.162:50880] 
helo=[172.17.0.10])

by ecout1 (envelope-from ppsgr...@zoomtown.com)
(ecelerity 2.2.2.43 r()) with ESMTPA
id C1/DC-11180-8E7F69A4; Thu, 27 Aug 2009 17:17:29 -0400
Subject: jupiter999
From: ppsBnet ppsgr...@zoomtown.com
Reply-To: ppsgr...@zoomtown.com
To: jshup...@theppsgroup.com

Re: [qmailtoaster] Is it getting Blocked?

2009-09-01 Thread Eric Shubert
In a typical configuration, it would be hitting your smtp server port 
25, which you would see in your smtp log:

# qmlog -lc fuse\.net

Jim Shupert wrote:

Friends,  :: an update ::

I have retained the postfix how to in case i need it
I got my thing working via sendmail ( 'cause i was close )  and using 
the providers mailserver.( smtp.fuse.net )


basically i am able to monitor our servers ( like I am outside the 
network )  via this dsl

and I can send an email that I can get on my mobile device

so i can get to my fuse account ( the dsl Ma Bell folks here in cincy )
and I have THAT account set to forward mail to my pps account ( that 
uses a qmail toaster mail server )


I reckon -- qmail sees that as , well ... i do not know -- but it never 
gets to my inside
( but , i am basically happy - cause I can have my desk clinet also 
looking at my fuse and --it also rings in my pocketso..it is workable )


I was wondering what logs I might look at to see if this 'fuse relay ' 
is hitting my qmail toaster server?


I reckon I will never get the messages to - just come through.

Thanks

Eric Shubert wrote:

Hey Jim,

I just happened to be doing this today, so here are my notes on how to 
set up postfix to send mail out from a generic server, like for 
logwatch output and such (that would otherwise go to r...@localhost).


{replace what's in braces, and remove braces}

# yum install postfix
# yum remove sendmail

# cd /etc/pki/tls/certs
# make postcert.pem

# echo {submission.server.com}:587 {user:passwd} \
 /etc/postfix/sasl_passwd
# chmod 600 /etc/postfix/sasl_passwd
# chown root:root /etc/postfix/sasl_passwd
# postmap /etc/postfix/sasl_passwd

Edit /etc/aliases if desired, then do newaliases command:
root:sysadmin
# newaliases

Edit /etc/postfix/main.cf, changing these from the default values 
(this was CentOS5.3):

myorigin = $mydomain
#mydestination =
mynetworks_style = host
relayhost = {submission.server.com}:587
smtp_sasl_auth_enable = yes
smtp_sasl_password_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/sasl_passwd
smtp_sasl_security_options =
smtp_use_tls = yes
smtp_tls_CAfile = /etc/pki/tls/certs/postcert.pem
smtp_tls_session_cache_database = btree:/var/run/smtp_tls_session/cache

# service postfix start
# chkconfig postfix on

That should do it.
Note, this configuration relies on hostname being set correctly for 
your domain. If it's not, you'll need to change the myorigin variable 
appropriately.


Please let us know whether or not this works for you.

Eric Shubert wrote:
That's not telling us much. I sure don't know, and don't care to know 
sendmail. If you'd try using postfix again we might be of more help. 
For  what you need, postfix isn't a bad choice. Certainly better than 
sendmail.


Jim Shupert wrote:
it is centos 4.7  running sendmail ( what came with it )  I started 
to install postfix because I am a bit more farmilur with that than 
send mail.
Postfix was what i was using before i found -- the best mailserver 
solution of qmailtoaster...


anyways

I can email with a client ( evolution )  and that does come through

even though I am using sendmail. the smtp server is one from the isp 
- a dsl modem etc.


I can command line send mail ( sendmail )  to a gmail account  - but 
not mu internal domain


I was wondering about MX  or Reverse DNS -
here is the full header of the client ( evolution ) email that does 
come through


X-Account-Key: account2
X-UIDL: 1251407849.13380.sifter.pps-inc.com,S=1797
X-Mozilla-Status: 0001
X-Mozilla-Status2: 
X-Mozilla-Keys: 


Return-Path: ppsgr...@zoomtown.com
Delivered-To: jshup...@theppsgroup.com
Received: (qmail 13378 invoked by uid 89); 27 Aug 2009 21:17:29 -
Received: by simscan 1.3.1 ppid: 13371, pid: 13373, t: 0.1506s
 scanners: attach: 1.3.1 clamav: 0.95.2
/m:51/d:9450 spam: 3.2.5
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on 
sifter.pps-inc.com

X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_50,RDNS_NONE
autolearn=no version=3.2.5
Received: from unknown (HELO mail-out1.fuse.net) (216.68.8.175)
  by sifter.pps-inc.com with SMTP; 27 Aug 2009 21:17:29 -
Received-SPF: pass (sifter.pps-inc.com: SPF record at zoomtown.com 
designates 216.68.8.175 as permitted sender)

Return-Path: ppsgr...@zoomtown.com
X-CNFS-Analysis: v=1.0 c=1 a=_0eaEcvx3pEA:10 
a=Qu4MKinT0AcdTVkTjP4A:9 a=Er_04BcmBtQYP8STtf3EGQ6vdGwA:4

X-CM-Score: 0
X-Scanned-by: Cloudmark Authority Engine
Authentication-Results: ecout1 smtp.mail=ppsgr...@zoomtown.com; 
spf=unknown
Authentication-Results:  ecout1 smtp.user=ppsgr...@zoomtown.com; 
auth=pass (LOGIN)
Received-SPF: error (ecout1: 208.102.118.162 is neither permitted 
nor denied by domain of zoomtown.com
Received: from [208.102.118.162] ([208.102.118.162:50880] 
helo=[172.17.0.10])

by ecout1 (envelope-from ppsgr...@zoomtown.com)
(ecelerity 2.2.2.43 r()) with ESMTPA
id C1/DC-11180-8E7F69A4; Thu, 

Re: [qmailtoaster] Is it getting Blocked?

2009-08-28 Thread Jim Shupert

hey eric
Thanks for this I will try it today -- one thing though

regarding :  hostname being set correctly for your domain 

currently I have the hostname as : taster.local
this machine is sitting off of a router connected to a DSL -- I do not 
have a domain like

pps-inc.com  --- so is that OK

basically i think you are saying 2 things should 'match'  I wonder if I 
am clear on that...

I am not doing DNS  or a MX for this particular dude.

also I am using my isp   smpt.fuse.net

also also _ I have never done a yum remove of sendmail ( or anything 
like that before...)
I might like to copy the sendmail.cf  some where to see the alterations 
I made

things like the SEND_AUTH  stuff.

thanks again!



Eric Shubert wrote:

Hey Jim,

I just happened to be doing this today, so here are my notes on how to 
set up postfix to send mail out from a generic server, like for 
logwatch output and such (that would otherwise go to r...@localhost).


{replace what's in braces, and remove braces}

# yum install postfix
# yum remove sendmail

# cd /etc/pki/tls/certs
# make postcert.pem

# echo {submission.server.com}:587 {user:passwd} \
 /etc/postfix/sasl_passwd
# chmod 600 /etc/postfix/sasl_passwd
# chown root:root /etc/postfix/sasl_passwd
# postmap /etc/postfix/sasl_passwd

Edit /etc/aliases if desired, then do newaliases command:
root:sysadmin
# newaliases

Edit /etc/postfix/main.cf, changing these from the default values 
(this was CentOS5.3):

myorigin = $mydomain
#mydestination =
mynetworks_style = host
relayhost = {submission.server.com}:587
smtp_sasl_auth_enable = yes
smtp_sasl_password_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/sasl_passwd
smtp_sasl_security_options =
smtp_use_tls = yes
smtp_tls_CAfile = /etc/pki/tls/certs/postcert.pem
smtp_tls_session_cache_database = btree:/var/run/smtp_tls_session/cache

# service postfix start
# chkconfig postfix on

That should do it.
Note, this configuration relies on hostname being set correctly for 
your domain. If it's not, you'll need to change the myorigin variable 
appropriately.


Please let us know whether or not this works for you.

Eric Shubert wrote:
That's not telling us much. I sure don't know, and don't care to know 
sendmail. If you'd try using postfix again we might be of more help. 
For  what you need, postfix isn't a bad choice. Certainly better than 
sendmail.


Jim Shupert wrote:
it is centos 4.7  running sendmail ( what came with it )  I started 
to install postfix because I am a bit more farmilur with that than 
send mail.
Postfix was what i was using before i found -- the best mailserver 
solution of qmailtoaster...


anyways

I can email with a client ( evolution )  and that does come through

even though I am using sendmail. the smtp server is one from the isp 
- a dsl modem etc.


I can command line send mail ( sendmail )  to a gmail account  - but 
not mu internal domain


I was wondering about MX  or Reverse DNS -
here is the full header of the client ( evolution ) email that does 
come through


X-Account-Key: account2
X-UIDL: 1251407849.13380.sifter.pps-inc.com,S=1797
X-Mozilla-Status: 0001
X-Mozilla-Status2: 
X-Mozilla-Keys: 


Return-Path: ppsgr...@zoomtown.com
Delivered-To: jshup...@theppsgroup.com
Received: (qmail 13378 invoked by uid 89); 27 Aug 2009 21:17:29 -
Received: by simscan 1.3.1 ppid: 13371, pid: 13373, t: 0.1506s
 scanners: attach: 1.3.1 clamav: 0.95.2
/m:51/d:9450 spam: 3.2.5
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on 
sifter.pps-inc.com

X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_50,RDNS_NONE
autolearn=no version=3.2.5
Received: from unknown (HELO mail-out1.fuse.net) (216.68.8.175)
  by sifter.pps-inc.com with SMTP; 27 Aug 2009 21:17:29 -
Received-SPF: pass (sifter.pps-inc.com: SPF record at zoomtown.com 
designates 216.68.8.175 as permitted sender)

Return-Path: ppsgr...@zoomtown.com
X-CNFS-Analysis: v=1.0 c=1 a=_0eaEcvx3pEA:10 
a=Qu4MKinT0AcdTVkTjP4A:9 a=Er_04BcmBtQYP8STtf3EGQ6vdGwA:4

X-CM-Score: 0
X-Scanned-by: Cloudmark Authority Engine
Authentication-Results: ecout1 smtp.mail=ppsgr...@zoomtown.com; 
spf=unknown
Authentication-Results:  ecout1 smtp.user=ppsgr...@zoomtown.com; 
auth=pass (LOGIN)
Received-SPF: error (ecout1: 208.102.118.162 is neither permitted 
nor denied by domain of zoomtown.com
Received: from [208.102.118.162] ([208.102.118.162:50880] 
helo=[172.17.0.10])

by ecout1 (envelope-from ppsgr...@zoomtown.com)
(ecelerity 2.2.2.43 r()) with ESMTPA
id C1/DC-11180-8E7F69A4; Thu, 27 Aug 2009 17:17:29 -0400
Subject: jupiter999
From: ppsBnet ppsgr...@zoomtown.com
Reply-To: ppsgr...@zoomtown.com
To: jshup...@theppsgroup.com
Organization: theppsgroup
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 17:13:02 -0400
Message-Id: 1251407582.3253.0.ca...@taster.local
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.3 (2.12.3-8.el5_2.3)



thanks







Re: [qmailtoaster] Is it getting Blocked?

2009-08-28 Thread Eric Shubert

Jim Shupert wrote:

hey eric
Thanks for this I will try it today -- one thing though

regarding :  hostname being set correctly for your domain 

currently I have the hostname as : taster.local
this machine is sitting off of a router connected to a DSL -- I do not 
have a domain like

pps-inc.com  --- so is that OK

basically i think you are saying 2 things should 'match'  I wonder if I 
am clear on that...

I am not doing DNS  or a MX for this particular dude.


myorigin is the domain that you want postfix to appear to be sending 
from. In your case, I think you'd want to use:

myorigin = pps-inc.com


also I am using my isp   smpt.fuse.net


That shouldn't come into play (unless they're blocking port 587 outbound 
from your remote/postfix server).


also also _ I have never done a yum remove of sendmail ( or anything 
like that before...)
I might like to copy the sendmail.cf  some where to see the alterations 
I made

things like the SEND_AUTH  stuff.


Suit yourself. You shouldn't really need it any more though.


thanks again!


Sure.




Eric Shubert wrote:

Hey Jim,

I just happened to be doing this today, so here are my notes on how to 
set up postfix to send mail out from a generic server, like for 
logwatch output and such (that would otherwise go to r...@localhost).


{replace what's in braces, and remove braces}

# yum install postfix
# yum remove sendmail

# cd /etc/pki/tls/certs
# make postcert.pem

# echo {submission.server.com}:587 {user:passwd} \
 /etc/postfix/sasl_passwd
# chmod 600 /etc/postfix/sasl_passwd
# chown root:root /etc/postfix/sasl_passwd
# postmap /etc/postfix/sasl_passwd

Edit /etc/aliases if desired, then do newaliases command:
root:sysadmin
# newaliases

Edit /etc/postfix/main.cf, changing these from the default values 
(this was CentOS5.3):

myorigin = $mydomain
#mydestination =
mynetworks_style = host
relayhost = {submission.server.com}:587
smtp_sasl_auth_enable = yes
smtp_sasl_password_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/sasl_passwd
smtp_sasl_security_options =
smtp_use_tls = yes
smtp_tls_CAfile = /etc/pki/tls/certs/postcert.pem
smtp_tls_session_cache_database = btree:/var/run/smtp_tls_session/cache

# service postfix start
# chkconfig postfix on

That should do it.
Note, this configuration relies on hostname being set correctly for 
your domain. If it's not, you'll need to change the myorigin variable 
appropriately.


Please let us know whether or not this works for you.

Eric Shubert wrote:
That's not telling us much. I sure don't know, and don't care to know 
sendmail. If you'd try using postfix again we might be of more help. 
For  what you need, postfix isn't a bad choice. Certainly better than 
sendmail.


Jim Shupert wrote:
it is centos 4.7  running sendmail ( what came with it )  I started 
to install postfix because I am a bit more farmilur with that than 
send mail.
Postfix was what i was using before i found -- the best mailserver 
solution of qmailtoaster...


anyways

I can email with a client ( evolution )  and that does come through

even though I am using sendmail. the smtp server is one from the isp 
- a dsl modem etc.


I can command line send mail ( sendmail )  to a gmail account  - but 
not mu internal domain


I was wondering about MX  or Reverse DNS -
here is the full header of the client ( evolution ) email that does 
come through


X-Account-Key: account2
X-UIDL: 1251407849.13380.sifter.pps-inc.com,S=1797
X-Mozilla-Status: 0001
X-Mozilla-Status2: 
X-Mozilla-Keys: 


Return-Path: ppsgr...@zoomtown.com
Delivered-To: jshup...@theppsgroup.com
Received: (qmail 13378 invoked by uid 89); 27 Aug 2009 21:17:29 -
Received: by simscan 1.3.1 ppid: 13371, pid: 13373, t: 0.1506s
 scanners: attach: 1.3.1 clamav: 0.95.2
/m:51/d:9450 spam: 3.2.5
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on 
sifter.pps-inc.com

X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_50,RDNS_NONE
autolearn=no version=3.2.5
Received: from unknown (HELO mail-out1.fuse.net) (216.68.8.175)
  by sifter.pps-inc.com with SMTP; 27 Aug 2009 21:17:29 -
Received-SPF: pass (sifter.pps-inc.com: SPF record at zoomtown.com 
designates 216.68.8.175 as permitted sender)

Return-Path: ppsgr...@zoomtown.com
X-CNFS-Analysis: v=1.0 c=1 a=_0eaEcvx3pEA:10 
a=Qu4MKinT0AcdTVkTjP4A:9 a=Er_04BcmBtQYP8STtf3EGQ6vdGwA:4

X-CM-Score: 0
X-Scanned-by: Cloudmark Authority Engine
Authentication-Results: ecout1 smtp.mail=ppsgr...@zoomtown.com; 
spf=unknown
Authentication-Results:  ecout1 smtp.user=ppsgr...@zoomtown.com; 
auth=pass (LOGIN)
Received-SPF: error (ecout1: 208.102.118.162 is neither permitted 
nor denied by domain of zoomtown.com
Received: from [208.102.118.162] ([208.102.118.162:50880] 
helo=[172.17.0.10])

by ecout1 (envelope-from ppsgr...@zoomtown.com)
(ecelerity 2.2.2.43 r()) with ESMTPA
id C1/DC-11180-8E7F69A4; Thu, 27 Aug 2009 17:17:29 -0400
Subject: jupiter999

[qmailtoaster] Is it getting Blocked?

2009-08-27 Thread Jim Shupert

I am not even sure how to ask this question... but here goes.

I have a server that is outside my domain , outside my netwrok that i am 
running a perl script on to monitor my websites -- from the outside.


ok the perl works - but it is to send an email to me -- inside my network

the emails come from r...@taster.local.  I suspect that qmail is 
rejecting the mail.


where in the logs might i see that? what log - and in 
var\log\qmail\--smtp or what?


and if I find it being -rejected- if that is the right way to say it...
can i white list anything fromr...@taster.local   

thanks!

js


RE: [qmailtoaster] Is it getting Blocked?

2009-08-27 Thread Phil Leinhauser
I suspect it's some RDNS or MX that's getting you.  You might try a telnet mail 
from that server or even a regular mail client.  It may reveal the problem 
quickly.  Use the same addresses th perl uses.

-Original Message-
From: Jim Shupert jshup...@pps-inc.com
Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2009 4:11 PM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: [qmailtoaster] Is it getting Blocked?

I am not even sure how to ask this question... but here goes.
 
 I have a server that is outside my domain , outside my netwrok that i am 
running a perl script on to monitor my websites -- from the outside.
 
 ok the perl works - but it is to send an email to me -- inside my network
 
 the emails come from r...@taster.local.  I suspect that qmail is rejecting the 
mail.
 
 where in the logs might i see that? what log - and in var\log\qmail\--smtp or 
what?
 
 and if I find it being -rejected- if that is the right way to say it...
 can i white list anything from    r...@taster.local   
 
 thanks!
 
 js
 

Re: [qmailtoaster] Is it getting Blocked?

2009-08-27 Thread Eric Shubert

Good idea.

What distro/ver and MTA are you running on the external host?

Phil Leinhauser wrote:
I suspect it's some RDNS or MX that's getting you. You might try a 
telnet mail from that server or even a regular mail client. It may 
reveal the problem quickly. Use the same addresses th perl uses.



From: Jim Shupert jshup...@pps-inc.com
Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2009 4:11 PM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: [qmailtoaster] Is it getting Blocked?

I am not even sure how to ask this question... but here goes.

I have a server that is outside my domain , outside my netwrok that i am 
running a perl script on to monitor my websites -- from the outside.


ok the perl works - but it is to send an email to me -- inside my network

the emails come from r...@taster.local.  I suspect that qmail is 
rejecting the mail.


where in the logs might i see that? what log - and in 
var\log\qmail\--smtp or what?


and if I find it being -rejected- if that is the right way to say it...
can i white list anything fromr...@taster.local   

thanks!

js



--
-Eric 'shubes'


-
Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group 
(www.vickersconsulting.com)
   Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations.
 If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today!
-
Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages.

 To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com

For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com




Re: [qmailtoaster] Is it getting Blocked?

2009-08-27 Thread Jim Shupert
it is centos 4.7  running sendmail ( what came with it )  I started to 
install postfix because I am a bit more farmilur with that than send mail.
Postfix was what i was using before i found -- the best mailserver 
solution of qmailtoaster...


anyways

I can email with a client ( evolution )  and that does come through

even though I am using sendmail. the smtp server is one from the isp - a 
dsl modem etc.


I can command line send mail ( sendmail )  to a gmail account  - but not 
mu internal domain


I was wondering about MX  or Reverse DNS -
here is the full header of the client ( evolution ) email that does come 
through


X-Account-Key: account2
X-UIDL: 1251407849.13380.sifter.pps-inc.com,S=1797
X-Mozilla-Status: 0001
X-Mozilla-Status2: 
X-Mozilla-Keys: 


Return-Path: ppsgr...@zoomtown.com
Delivered-To: jshup...@theppsgroup.com
Received: (qmail 13378 invoked by uid 89); 27 Aug 2009 21:17:29 -
Received: by simscan 1.3.1 ppid: 13371, pid: 13373, t: 0.1506s
scanners: attach: 1.3.1 clamav: 0.95.2
/m:51/d:9450 spam: 3.2.5
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on 
sifter.pps-inc.com

X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_50,RDNS_NONE
   autolearn=no version=3.2.5
Received: from unknown (HELO mail-out1.fuse.net) (216.68.8.175)
 by sifter.pps-inc.com with SMTP; 27 Aug 2009 21:17:29 -
Received-SPF: pass (sifter.pps-inc.com: SPF record at zoomtown.com 
designates 216.68.8.175 as permitted sender)

Return-Path: ppsgr...@zoomtown.com
X-CNFS-Analysis: v=1.0 c=1 a=_0eaEcvx3pEA:10 a=Qu4MKinT0AcdTVkTjP4A:9 
a=Er_04BcmBtQYP8STtf3EGQ6vdGwA:4

X-CM-Score: 0
X-Scanned-by: Cloudmark Authority Engine
Authentication-Results: ecout1 smtp.mail=ppsgr...@zoomtown.com; spf=unknown
Authentication-Results:  ecout1 smtp.user=ppsgr...@zoomtown.com; 
auth=pass (LOGIN)
Received-SPF: error (ecout1: 208.102.118.162 is neither permitted nor 
denied by domain of zoomtown.com
Received: from [208.102.118.162] ([208.102.118.162:50880] 
helo=[172.17.0.10])

   by ecout1 (envelope-from ppsgr...@zoomtown.com)
   (ecelerity 2.2.2.43 r()) with ESMTPA
   id C1/DC-11180-8E7F69A4; Thu, 27 Aug 2009 17:17:29 -0400
Subject: jupiter999
From: ppsBnet ppsgr...@zoomtown.com
Reply-To: ppsgr...@zoomtown.com
To: jshup...@theppsgroup.com
Organization: theppsgroup
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 17:13:02 -0400
Message-Id: 1251407582.3253.0.ca...@taster.local
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.3 (2.12.3-8.el5_2.3)



thanks



Eric Shubert wrote:

Good idea.

What distro/ver and MTA are you running on the external host?

Phil Leinhauser wrote:
I suspect it's some RDNS or MX that's getting you. You might try a 
telnet mail from that server or even a regular mail client. It may 
reveal the problem quickly. Use the same addresses th perl uses.



From: Jim Shupert jshup...@pps-inc.com
Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2009 4:11 PM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com 
qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com

Subject: [qmailtoaster] Is it getting Blocked?

I am not even sure how to ask this question... but here goes.

I have a server that is outside my domain , outside my netwrok that i 
am running a perl script on to monitor my websites -- from the outside.


ok the perl works - but it is to send an email to me -- inside my 
network


the emails come from r...@taster.local.  I suspect that qmail is 
rejecting the mail.


where in the logs might i see that? what log - and in 
var\log\qmail\--smtp or what?


and if I find it being -rejected- if that is the right way to say it...
can i white list anything fromr...@taster.local   

thanks!

js






No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com 
Version: 8.5.409 / Virus Database: 270.13.70/2329 - Release Date: 08/27/09 08:11:00


  


Re: [qmailtoaster] Is it getting Blocked?

2009-08-27 Thread Eric Shubert
That's not telling us much. I sure don't know, and don't care to know 
sendmail. If you'd try using postfix again we might be of more help. For 
 what you need, postfix isn't a bad choice. Certainly better than sendmail.


Jim Shupert wrote:
it is centos 4.7  running sendmail ( what came with it )  I started to 
install postfix because I am a bit more farmilur with that than send mail.
Postfix was what i was using before i found -- the best mailserver 
solution of qmailtoaster...


anyways

I can email with a client ( evolution )  and that does come through

even though I am using sendmail. the smtp server is one from the isp - a 
dsl modem etc.


I can command line send mail ( sendmail )  to a gmail account  - but not 
mu internal domain


I was wondering about MX  or Reverse DNS -
here is the full header of the client ( evolution ) email that does come 
through


X-Account-Key: account2
X-UIDL: 1251407849.13380.sifter.pps-inc.com,S=1797
X-Mozilla-Status: 0001
X-Mozilla-Status2: 
X-Mozilla-Keys: 


Return-Path: ppsgr...@zoomtown.com
Delivered-To: jshup...@theppsgroup.com
Received: (qmail 13378 invoked by uid 89); 27 Aug 2009 21:17:29 -
Received: by simscan 1.3.1 ppid: 13371, pid: 13373, t: 0.1506s
 scanners: attach: 1.3.1 clamav: 0.95.2
/m:51/d:9450 spam: 3.2.5
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on 
sifter.pps-inc.com

X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_50,RDNS_NONE
autolearn=no version=3.2.5
Received: from unknown (HELO mail-out1.fuse.net) (216.68.8.175)
  by sifter.pps-inc.com with SMTP; 27 Aug 2009 21:17:29 -
Received-SPF: pass (sifter.pps-inc.com: SPF record at zoomtown.com 
designates 216.68.8.175 as permitted sender)

Return-Path: ppsgr...@zoomtown.com
X-CNFS-Analysis: v=1.0 c=1 a=_0eaEcvx3pEA:10 a=Qu4MKinT0AcdTVkTjP4A:9 
a=Er_04BcmBtQYP8STtf3EGQ6vdGwA:4

X-CM-Score: 0
X-Scanned-by: Cloudmark Authority Engine
Authentication-Results: ecout1 smtp.mail=ppsgr...@zoomtown.com; spf=unknown
Authentication-Results:  ecout1 smtp.user=ppsgr...@zoomtown.com; 
auth=pass (LOGIN)
Received-SPF: error (ecout1: 208.102.118.162 is neither permitted nor 
denied by domain of zoomtown.com
Received: from [208.102.118.162] ([208.102.118.162:50880] 
helo=[172.17.0.10])

by ecout1 (envelope-from ppsgr...@zoomtown.com)
(ecelerity 2.2.2.43 r()) with ESMTPA
id C1/DC-11180-8E7F69A4; Thu, 27 Aug 2009 17:17:29 -0400
Subject: jupiter999
From: ppsBnet ppsgr...@zoomtown.com
Reply-To: ppsgr...@zoomtown.com
To: jshup...@theppsgroup.com
Organization: theppsgroup
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 17:13:02 -0400
Message-Id: 1251407582.3253.0.ca...@taster.local
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.3 (2.12.3-8.el5_2.3)



thanks



Eric Shubert wrote:

Good idea.

What distro/ver and MTA are you running on the external host?

Phil Leinhauser wrote:
I suspect it's some RDNS or MX that's getting you. You might try a 
telnet mail from that server or even a regular mail client. It may 
reveal the problem quickly. Use the same addresses th perl uses.



From: Jim Shupert jshup...@pps-inc.com
Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2009 4:11 PM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com 
qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com

Subject: [qmailtoaster] Is it getting Blocked?

I am not even sure how to ask this question... but here goes.

I have a server that is outside my domain , outside my netwrok that i 
am running a perl script on to monitor my websites -- from the outside.


ok the perl works - but it is to send an email to me -- inside my 
network


the emails come from r...@taster.local.  I suspect that qmail is 
rejecting the mail.


where in the logs might i see that? what log - and in 
var\log\qmail\--smtp or what?


and if I find it being -rejected- if that is the right way to say it...
can i white list anything fromr...@taster.local   

thanks!

js






No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com 
Version: 8.5.409 / Virus Database: 270.13.70/2329 - Release Date: 08/27/09 08:11:00


  



--
-Eric 'shubes'


-
Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group 
(www.vickersconsulting.com)
   Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations.
 If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today!
-
Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages.

 To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com

For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com




Re: [qmailtoaster] Is it getting Blocked?

2009-08-27 Thread Eric Shubert

Hey Jim,

I just happened to be doing this today, so here are my notes on how to 
set up postfix to send mail out from a generic server, like for logwatch 
output and such (that would otherwise go to r...@localhost).


{replace what's in braces, and remove braces}

# yum install postfix
# yum remove sendmail

# cd /etc/pki/tls/certs
# make postcert.pem

# echo {submission.server.com}:587 {user:passwd} \
 /etc/postfix/sasl_passwd
# chmod 600 /etc/postfix/sasl_passwd
# chown root:root /etc/postfix/sasl_passwd
# postmap /etc/postfix/sasl_passwd

Edit /etc/aliases if desired, then do newaliases command:
root:   sysadmin
# newaliases

Edit /etc/postfix/main.cf, changing these from the default values (this 
was CentOS5.3):

myorigin = $mydomain
#mydestination =
mynetworks_style = host
relayhost = {submission.server.com}:587
smtp_sasl_auth_enable = yes
smtp_sasl_password_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/sasl_passwd
smtp_sasl_security_options =
smtp_use_tls = yes
smtp_tls_CAfile = /etc/pki/tls/certs/postcert.pem
smtp_tls_session_cache_database = btree:/var/run/smtp_tls_session/cache

# service postfix start
# chkconfig postfix on

That should do it.
Note, this configuration relies on hostname being set correctly for your 
domain. If it's not, you'll need to change the myorigin variable 
appropriately.


Please let us know whether or not this works for you.

Eric Shubert wrote:
That's not telling us much. I sure don't know, and don't care to know 
sendmail. If you'd try using postfix again we might be of more help. For 
 what you need, postfix isn't a bad choice. Certainly better than sendmail.


Jim Shupert wrote:
it is centos 4.7  running sendmail ( what came with it )  I started to 
install postfix because I am a bit more farmilur with that than send 
mail.
Postfix was what i was using before i found -- the best mailserver 
solution of qmailtoaster...


anyways

I can email with a client ( evolution )  and that does come through

even though I am using sendmail. the smtp server is one from the isp - 
a dsl modem etc.


I can command line send mail ( sendmail )  to a gmail account  - but 
not mu internal domain


I was wondering about MX  or Reverse DNS -
here is the full header of the client ( evolution ) email that does 
come through


X-Account-Key: account2
X-UIDL: 1251407849.13380.sifter.pps-inc.com,S=1797
X-Mozilla-Status: 0001
X-Mozilla-Status2: 
X-Mozilla-Keys: 


Return-Path: ppsgr...@zoomtown.com
Delivered-To: jshup...@theppsgroup.com
Received: (qmail 13378 invoked by uid 89); 27 Aug 2009 21:17:29 -
Received: by simscan 1.3.1 ppid: 13371, pid: 13373, t: 0.1506s
 scanners: attach: 1.3.1 clamav: 0.95.2
/m:51/d:9450 spam: 3.2.5
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on 
sifter.pps-inc.com

X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_50,RDNS_NONE
autolearn=no version=3.2.5
Received: from unknown (HELO mail-out1.fuse.net) (216.68.8.175)
  by sifter.pps-inc.com with SMTP; 27 Aug 2009 21:17:29 -
Received-SPF: pass (sifter.pps-inc.com: SPF record at zoomtown.com 
designates 216.68.8.175 as permitted sender)

Return-Path: ppsgr...@zoomtown.com
X-CNFS-Analysis: v=1.0 c=1 a=_0eaEcvx3pEA:10 a=Qu4MKinT0AcdTVkTjP4A:9 
a=Er_04BcmBtQYP8STtf3EGQ6vdGwA:4

X-CM-Score: 0
X-Scanned-by: Cloudmark Authority Engine
Authentication-Results: ecout1 smtp.mail=ppsgr...@zoomtown.com; 
spf=unknown
Authentication-Results:  ecout1 smtp.user=ppsgr...@zoomtown.com; 
auth=pass (LOGIN)
Received-SPF: error (ecout1: 208.102.118.162 is neither permitted nor 
denied by domain of zoomtown.com
Received: from [208.102.118.162] ([208.102.118.162:50880] 
helo=[172.17.0.10])

by ecout1 (envelope-from ppsgr...@zoomtown.com)
(ecelerity 2.2.2.43 r()) with ESMTPA
id C1/DC-11180-8E7F69A4; Thu, 27 Aug 2009 17:17:29 -0400
Subject: jupiter999
From: ppsBnet ppsgr...@zoomtown.com
Reply-To: ppsgr...@zoomtown.com
To: jshup...@theppsgroup.com
Organization: theppsgroup
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 17:13:02 -0400
Message-Id: 1251407582.3253.0.ca...@taster.local
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.3 (2.12.3-8.el5_2.3)



thanks






--
-Eric 'shubes'


-
Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group 
(www.vickersconsulting.com)
   Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations.
 If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today!
-
Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages.

 To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com

For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com




Re: [qmailtoaster] Is it getting Blocked?

2009-08-27 Thread Eric Shubert

Figures there'd be a type-o or two.
smtp_tls_session/cache should be smtp_tls_session_cache

Eric Shubert wrote:

Hey Jim,

I just happened to be doing this today, so here are my notes on how to 
set up postfix to send mail out from a generic server, like for logwatch 
output and such (that would otherwise go to r...@localhost).


{replace what's in braces, and remove braces}

# yum install postfix
# yum remove sendmail

# cd /etc/pki/tls/certs
# make postcert.pem

# echo {submission.server.com}:587 {user:passwd} \
  /etc/postfix/sasl_passwd
# chmod 600 /etc/postfix/sasl_passwd
# chown root:root /etc/postfix/sasl_passwd
# postmap /etc/postfix/sasl_passwd

Edit /etc/aliases if desired, then do newaliases command:
root:sysadmin
# newaliases

Edit /etc/postfix/main.cf, changing these from the default values (this 
was CentOS5.3):

myorigin = $mydomain
#mydestination =
mynetworks_style = host
relayhost = {submission.server.com}:587
smtp_sasl_auth_enable = yes
smtp_sasl_password_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/sasl_passwd
smtp_sasl_security_options =
smtp_use_tls = yes
smtp_tls_CAfile = /etc/pki/tls/certs/postcert.pem
smtp_tls_session_cache_database = btree:/var/run/smtp_tls_session/cache

# service postfix start
# chkconfig postfix on

That should do it.
Note, this configuration relies on hostname being set correctly for your 
domain. If it's not, you'll need to change the myorigin variable 
appropriately.


Please let us know whether or not this works for you.

Eric Shubert wrote:
That's not telling us much. I sure don't know, and don't care to know 
sendmail. If you'd try using postfix again we might be of more help. 
For  what you need, postfix isn't a bad choice. Certainly better than 
sendmail.


Jim Shupert wrote:
it is centos 4.7  running sendmail ( what came with it )  I started 
to install postfix because I am a bit more farmilur with that than 
send mail.
Postfix was what i was using before i found -- the best mailserver 
solution of qmailtoaster...


anyways

I can email with a client ( evolution )  and that does come through

even though I am using sendmail. the smtp server is one from the isp 
- a dsl modem etc.


I can command line send mail ( sendmail )  to a gmail account  - but 
not mu internal domain


I was wondering about MX  or Reverse DNS -
here is the full header of the client ( evolution ) email that does 
come through


X-Account-Key: account2
X-UIDL: 1251407849.13380.sifter.pps-inc.com,S=1797
X-Mozilla-Status: 0001
X-Mozilla-Status2: 
X-Mozilla-Keys: 


Return-Path: ppsgr...@zoomtown.com
Delivered-To: jshup...@theppsgroup.com
Received: (qmail 13378 invoked by uid 89); 27 Aug 2009 21:17:29 -
Received: by simscan 1.3.1 ppid: 13371, pid: 13373, t: 0.1506s
 scanners: attach: 1.3.1 clamav: 0.95.2
/m:51/d:9450 spam: 3.2.5
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on 
sifter.pps-inc.com

X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_50,RDNS_NONE
autolearn=no version=3.2.5
Received: from unknown (HELO mail-out1.fuse.net) (216.68.8.175)
  by sifter.pps-inc.com with SMTP; 27 Aug 2009 21:17:29 -
Received-SPF: pass (sifter.pps-inc.com: SPF record at zoomtown.com 
designates 216.68.8.175 as permitted sender)

Return-Path: ppsgr...@zoomtown.com
X-CNFS-Analysis: v=1.0 c=1 a=_0eaEcvx3pEA:10 a=Qu4MKinT0AcdTVkTjP4A:9 
a=Er_04BcmBtQYP8STtf3EGQ6vdGwA:4

X-CM-Score: 0
X-Scanned-by: Cloudmark Authority Engine
Authentication-Results: ecout1 smtp.mail=ppsgr...@zoomtown.com; 
spf=unknown
Authentication-Results:  ecout1 smtp.user=ppsgr...@zoomtown.com; 
auth=pass (LOGIN)
Received-SPF: error (ecout1: 208.102.118.162 is neither permitted nor 
denied by domain of zoomtown.com
Received: from [208.102.118.162] ([208.102.118.162:50880] 
helo=[172.17.0.10])

by ecout1 (envelope-from ppsgr...@zoomtown.com)
(ecelerity 2.2.2.43 r()) with ESMTPA
id C1/DC-11180-8E7F69A4; Thu, 27 Aug 2009 17:17:29 -0400
Subject: jupiter999
From: ppsBnet ppsgr...@zoomtown.com
Reply-To: ppsgr...@zoomtown.com
To: jshup...@theppsgroup.com
Organization: theppsgroup
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 17:13:02 -0400
Message-Id: 1251407582.3253.0.ca...@taster.local
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.3 (2.12.3-8.el5_2.3)



thanks









--
-Eric 'shubes'


-
Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group 
(www.vickersconsulting.com)
   Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations.
 If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today!
-
Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages.

 To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com

For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com