Re: [qmailtoaster] Is it getting Blocked?
Jim Shupert wrote:
I take that as good advice - i appreciate it.
I reckon i could do that.
from your earlier wisdom
might i be correct in think that i need to customize
# echo "{submission.server.com}:587 {user:passwd}" \
to something like
# echo "{smtp.fuse.net}:587 {myFuseUser:myFuseUserPasswd}" \
Yes, but without the brackets (curly braces).
and
relayhost = {submission.server.com}:587
to
relayhost = {smtp.fuse.net}:587
Yes, but without the brackets (curly braces).
where smtp.fuse.net = the (dsl) isp mailServer - Not my local machine
taster.local
and
myFuseUser:myFuseUserPasswd = a valid user /psswd on that server
Instead of using smtp.fuse.net, you might be able to send it straight to
your server by substituting your mail server's url/user/password,
providing that fuse.net doesn't block port 587.
Thanks!
jims
Eric Shubert wrote:
Postfix lets you easily control this on the sender's end. See the
myorigin parameter. That's where the proper fix is.
FWIW, sendmail is terribly antiquated. Reminds me of assembler macros.
If you would have implemented postfix (days ago), you'd be done with
this by now.
Jim Shupert wrote:
Friends,
here is the result of a qmlog smtp -t 100 ( i sifted through that
for a reference to the 'other' machine )
09-02 12:35:46 CHKUSER rejected sender: from
remote
216.68.8.171> rcpt <> : invalid sender MX domain
09-02 12:35:58 CHKUSER rejected sender: from
remote
216.68.8.171> rcpt <> : invalid sender MX domain
so my Q might be ::: can I make CHKUSER allow the sender of
r...@taster.local.
maybe if I recompile CHKUSER ( i am thinking much like I recompiled
it to allow blackberriness (\) )
might that work? -- do you think? and what would i 'say' when i
recompile chckuser?
what i am doing : I have a simple machine on a DSL ( fuse is ma bell
here ) on that machine I am croning a perl that monitors several
websites ( from *outside* my 2-T1 connections ) and that machine
(taster) is running sendMail that sends -- upon alarm an email to the
fuse mail server
and of course. My QMT does the chckuser and sees a conflict between
o...@taster.local from mail-out2.fuse.net ... or that is what i
*think is happening. note changing my domain (hosts file) on taster
to taster.fuse.net didn't work.
thanks
Eric Shubert wrote:
In a typical configuration, it would be hitting your smtp server
port 25, which you would see in your smtp log:
# qmlog -lc fuse\.net
Jim Shupert wrote:
Friends, :: an update ::
I have retained the postfix how to in case i need it
I got my thing working via sendmail ( 'cause i was close ) and
using the providers mailserver.( smtp.fuse.net )
basically i am able to monitor our servers ( like I am outside the
network ) via this dsl
and I can send an email that I can get on my mobile device
so i can get to my fuse account ( the dsl Ma Bell folks here in
cincy )
and I have THAT account set to forward mail to my pps account (
that uses a qmail toaster mail server )
I reckon -- qmail sees that as , well ... i do not know -- but it
never gets to my inside
( but , i am basically happy - cause I can have my desk clinet also
looking at my fuse and --it also rings in my pocketso..it is
workable )
I was wondering what logs I might look at to see if this 'fuse
relay ' is hitting my qmail toaster server?
I reckon I will never get the messages to - just come through.
Thanks
Eric Shubert wrote:
Hey Jim,
I just happened to be doing this today, so here are my notes on
how to set up postfix to send mail out from a generic server, like
for logwatch output and such (that would otherwise go to
r...@localhost).
{replace what's in braces, and remove braces}
# yum install postfix
# yum remove sendmail
# cd /etc/pki/tls/certs
# make postcert.pem
# echo "{submission.server.com}:587 {user:passwd}" \
> /etc/postfix/sasl_passwd
# chmod 600 /etc/postfix/sasl_passwd
# chown root:root /etc/postfix/sasl_passwd
# postmap /etc/postfix/sasl_passwd
Edit /etc/aliases if desired, then do newaliases command:
root:sysadmin
# newaliases
Edit /etc/postfix/main.cf, changing these from the default values
(this was CentOS5.3):
myorigin = $mydomain
#mydestination =
mynetworks_style = host
relayhost = {submission.server.com}:587
smtp_sasl_auth_enable = yes
smtp_sasl_password_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/sasl_passwd
smtp_sasl_security_options =
smtp_use_tls = yes
smtp_tls_CAfile = /etc/pki/tls/certs/postcert.pem
smtp_tls_session_cache_database =
btree:/var/run/smtp_tls_session/cache
# service postfix start
# chkconfig postfix on
That should do it.
Note, this configuration relies on hostname being set correctly
for your domain. If it's not, you'll need to change the myorigin
variable appropriately.
Please let us know whether or not this works for you.
Eric Shubert wrote:
That's not telling us much. I sure don't know, and don't care to
know sendmail. If you'd try using postfix again we might be of
more
Re: [qmailtoaster] Is it getting Blocked?
I take that as good advice - i appreciate it.
I reckon i could do that.
from your earlier wisdom
might i be correct in think that i need to customize
# echo "{submission.server.com}:587 {user:passwd}" \
to something like
# echo "{smtp.fuse.net}:587 {myFuseUser:myFuseUserPasswd}" \
and
relayhost = {submission.server.com}:587
to
relayhost = {smtp.fuse.net}:587
where smtp.fuse.net = the (dsl) isp mailServer - Not my local machine
taster.local
and
myFuseUser:myFuseUserPasswd = a valid user /psswd on that server
Thanks!
jims
Eric Shubert wrote:
Postfix lets you easily control this on the sender's end. See the
myorigin parameter. That's where the proper fix is.
FWIW, sendmail is terribly antiquated. Reminds me of assembler macros.
If you would have implemented postfix (days ago), you'd be done with
this by now.
Jim Shupert wrote:
Friends,
here is the result of a qmlog smtp -t 100 ( i sifted through that
for a reference to the 'other' machine )
09-02 12:35:46 CHKUSER rejected sender: from
remote
216.68.8.171> rcpt <> : invalid sender MX domain
09-02 12:35:58 CHKUSER rejected sender: from
remote
216.68.8.171> rcpt <> : invalid sender MX domain
so my Q might be ::: can I make CHKUSER allow the sender of
r...@taster.local.
maybe if I recompile CHKUSER ( i am thinking much like I recompiled
it to allow blackberriness (\) )
might that work? -- do you think? and what would i 'say' when i
recompile chckuser?
what i am doing : I have a simple machine on a DSL ( fuse is ma bell
here ) on that machine I am croning a perl that monitors several
websites ( from *outside* my 2-T1 connections ) and that machine
(taster) is running sendMail that sends -- upon alarm an email to the
fuse mail server
and of course. My QMT does the chckuser and sees a conflict between
o...@taster.local from mail-out2.fuse.net ... or that is what i
*think is happening. note changing my domain (hosts file) on taster
to taster.fuse.net didn't work.
thanks
Eric Shubert wrote:
In a typical configuration, it would be hitting your smtp server
port 25, which you would see in your smtp log:
# qmlog -lc fuse\.net
Jim Shupert wrote:
Friends, :: an update ::
I have retained the postfix how to in case i need it
I got my thing working via sendmail ( 'cause i was close ) and
using the providers mailserver.( smtp.fuse.net )
basically i am able to monitor our servers ( like I am outside the
network ) via this dsl
and I can send an email that I can get on my mobile device
so i can get to my fuse account ( the dsl Ma Bell folks here in
cincy )
and I have THAT account set to forward mail to my pps account (
that uses a qmail toaster mail server )
I reckon -- qmail sees that as , well ... i do not know -- but it
never gets to my inside
( but , i am basically happy - cause I can have my desk clinet also
looking at my fuse and --it also rings in my pocketso..it is
workable )
I was wondering what logs I might look at to see if this 'fuse
relay ' is hitting my qmail toaster server?
I reckon I will never get the messages to - just come through.
Thanks
Eric Shubert wrote:
Hey Jim,
I just happened to be doing this today, so here are my notes on
how to set up postfix to send mail out from a generic server, like
for logwatch output and such (that would otherwise go to
r...@localhost).
{replace what's in braces, and remove braces}
# yum install postfix
# yum remove sendmail
# cd /etc/pki/tls/certs
# make postcert.pem
# echo "{submission.server.com}:587 {user:passwd}" \
> /etc/postfix/sasl_passwd
# chmod 600 /etc/postfix/sasl_passwd
# chown root:root /etc/postfix/sasl_passwd
# postmap /etc/postfix/sasl_passwd
Edit /etc/aliases if desired, then do newaliases command:
root:sysadmin
# newaliases
Edit /etc/postfix/main.cf, changing these from the default values
(this was CentOS5.3):
myorigin = $mydomain
#mydestination =
mynetworks_style = host
relayhost = {submission.server.com}:587
smtp_sasl_auth_enable = yes
smtp_sasl_password_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/sasl_passwd
smtp_sasl_security_options =
smtp_use_tls = yes
smtp_tls_CAfile = /etc/pki/tls/certs/postcert.pem
smtp_tls_session_cache_database =
btree:/var/run/smtp_tls_session/cache
# service postfix start
# chkconfig postfix on
That should do it.
Note, this configuration relies on hostname being set correctly
for your domain. If it's not, you'll need to change the myorigin
variable appropriately.
Please let us know whether or not this works for you.
Eric Shubert wrote:
That's not telling us much. I sure don't know, and don't care to
know sendmail. If you'd try using postfix again we might be of
more help. For what you need, postfix isn't a bad choice.
Certainly better than sendmail.
Jim Shupert wrote:
it is centos 4.7 running sendmail ( what came with it ) I
started to install postfix because I am a bit more farmilur with
that than send mail.
Postfix was what i was using before i found -- the bes
Re: [qmailtoaster] Is it getting Blocked?
Jim Shupert wrote: Friends, here is the result of a qmlog smtp -t 100 ( i sifted through that for a reference to the 'other' machine ) 09-02 12:35:46 CHKUSER rejected sender: from remote 216.68.8.171> rcpt <> : invalid sender MX domain 09-02 12:35:58 CHKUSER rejected sender: from remote 216.68.8.171> rcpt <> : invalid sender MX domain so my Q might be ::: can I make CHKUSER allow the sender of r...@taster.local. maybe if I recompile CHKUSER ( i am thinking much like I recompiled it to allow blackberriness (\) ) might that work? -- do you think? and what would i 'say' when i recompile chckuser? You are correct there. chkuser has an option to check for the sending domain's MX record and deny if the sending domain does not have an MX record. Seems logical since if there is an error you need somewhere to send that error message to and if there is no MX record there is nowhere to send it (also acts as a spam check). You can go in and recompile chkuser to turn this option off (*CHKUSER_RCPT_MX*) by undefining it. It is undefined in later versions of chkuser but I plan to leave it on when I update chkuser - it makes more sense to keep it because of what it does rather than remove it and force 98% of our users to then turn it back on. You may also be able to turn it off in your tcp.smtp file for specific IP addresses, much like SENDER_NOCHECK, but I have not tried this and no one else has posted back as to the validity of this. You can also add that domain to your DNS so it does have a valid MX record. Hope that helps some.
Re: [qmailtoaster] Is it getting Blocked?
Postfix lets you easily control this on the sender's end. See the
myorigin parameter. That's where the proper fix is.
FWIW, sendmail is terribly antiquated. Reminds me of assembler macros.
If you would have implemented postfix (days ago), you'd be done with
this by now.
Jim Shupert wrote:
Friends,
here is the result of a qmlog smtp -t 100 ( i sifted through that for a
reference to the 'other' machine )
09-02 12:35:46 CHKUSER rejected sender: from
remote
216.68.8.171> rcpt <> : invalid sender MX domain
09-02 12:35:58 CHKUSER rejected sender: from
remote
216.68.8.171> rcpt <> : invalid sender MX domain
so my Q might be ::: can I make CHKUSER allow the sender of
r...@taster.local.
maybe if I recompile CHKUSER ( i am thinking much like I recompiled it
to allow blackberriness (\) )
might that work? -- do you think? and what would i 'say' when i
recompile chckuser?
what i am doing : I have a simple machine on a DSL ( fuse is ma bell
here ) on that machine I am croning a perl that monitors several
websites ( from *outside* my 2-T1 connections ) and that machine
(taster) is running sendMail that sends -- upon alarm an email to the
fuse mail server
and of course. My QMT does the chckuser and sees a conflict between
o...@taster.local from mail-out2.fuse.net ... or that is what i *think
is happening. note changing my domain (hosts file) on taster to
taster.fuse.net didn't work.
thanks
Eric Shubert wrote:
In a typical configuration, it would be hitting your smtp server port
25, which you would see in your smtp log:
# qmlog -lc fuse\.net
Jim Shupert wrote:
Friends, :: an update ::
I have retained the postfix how to in case i need it
I got my thing working via sendmail ( 'cause i was close ) and using
the providers mailserver.( smtp.fuse.net )
basically i am able to monitor our servers ( like I am outside the
network ) via this dsl
and I can send an email that I can get on my mobile device
so i can get to my fuse account ( the dsl Ma Bell folks here in cincy )
and I have THAT account set to forward mail to my pps account ( that
uses a qmail toaster mail server )
I reckon -- qmail sees that as , well ... i do not know -- but it
never gets to my inside
( but , i am basically happy - cause I can have my desk clinet also
looking at my fuse and --it also rings in my pocketso..it is
workable )
I was wondering what logs I might look at to see if this 'fuse relay
' is hitting my qmail toaster server?
I reckon I will never get the messages to - just come through.
Thanks
Eric Shubert wrote:
Hey Jim,
I just happened to be doing this today, so here are my notes on how
to set up postfix to send mail out from a generic server, like for
logwatch output and such (that would otherwise go to r...@localhost).
{replace what's in braces, and remove braces}
# yum install postfix
# yum remove sendmail
# cd /etc/pki/tls/certs
# make postcert.pem
# echo "{submission.server.com}:587 {user:passwd}" \
> /etc/postfix/sasl_passwd
# chmod 600 /etc/postfix/sasl_passwd
# chown root:root /etc/postfix/sasl_passwd
# postmap /etc/postfix/sasl_passwd
Edit /etc/aliases if desired, then do newaliases command:
root:sysadmin
# newaliases
Edit /etc/postfix/main.cf, changing these from the default values
(this was CentOS5.3):
myorigin = $mydomain
#mydestination =
mynetworks_style = host
relayhost = {submission.server.com}:587
smtp_sasl_auth_enable = yes
smtp_sasl_password_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/sasl_passwd
smtp_sasl_security_options =
smtp_use_tls = yes
smtp_tls_CAfile = /etc/pki/tls/certs/postcert.pem
smtp_tls_session_cache_database = btree:/var/run/smtp_tls_session/cache
# service postfix start
# chkconfig postfix on
That should do it.
Note, this configuration relies on hostname being set correctly for
your domain. If it's not, you'll need to change the myorigin
variable appropriately.
Please let us know whether or not this works for you.
Eric Shubert wrote:
That's not telling us much. I sure don't know, and don't care to
know sendmail. If you'd try using postfix again we might be of more
help. For what you need, postfix isn't a bad choice. Certainly
better than sendmail.
Jim Shupert wrote:
it is centos 4.7 running sendmail ( what came with it ) I
started to install postfix because I am a bit more farmilur with
that than send mail.
Postfix was what i was using before i found -- the best mailserver
solution of qmailtoaster...
anyways
I can email with a client ( evolution ) and that does come through
even though I am using sendmail. the smtp server is one from the
isp - a dsl modem etc.
I can command line send mail ( sendmail ) to a gmail account -
but not mu internal domain
I was wondering about MX or Reverse DNS -
here is the full header of the client ( evolution ) email that
does come through
X-Account-Key: account2
X-UIDL: 1251407849.13380.sifter.pps-inc.com,S=1797
X-Mozilla-Status: 0001
X-Mozilla-Status2:
X-Mozi
Re: [qmailtoaster] Is it getting Blocked?
Friends,
here is the result of a qmlog smtp -t 100 ( i sifted through that for a
reference to the 'other' machine )
09-02 12:35:46 CHKUSER rejected sender: from
remote
216.68.8.171> rcpt <> : invalid sender MX domain
09-02 12:35:58 CHKUSER rejected sender: from
remote
216.68.8.171> rcpt <> : invalid sender MX domain
so my Q might be ::: can I make CHKUSER allow the sender of
r...@taster.local.
maybe if I recompile CHKUSER ( i am thinking much like I recompiled it
to allow blackberriness (\) )
might that work? -- do you think? and what would i 'say' when i
recompile chckuser?
what i am doing : I have a simple machine on a DSL ( fuse is ma bell
here ) on that machine I am croning a perl that monitors several
websites ( from *outside* my 2-T1 connections ) and that machine
(taster) is running sendMail that sends -- upon alarm an email to the
fuse mail server
and of course. My QMT does the chckuser and sees a conflict between
o...@taster.local from mail-out2.fuse.net ... or that is what i *think
is happening. note changing my domain (hosts file) on taster to
taster.fuse.net didn't work.
thanks
Eric Shubert wrote:
In a typical configuration, it would be hitting your smtp server port
25, which you would see in your smtp log:
# qmlog -lc fuse\.net
Jim Shupert wrote:
Friends, :: an update ::
I have retained the postfix how to in case i need it
I got my thing working via sendmail ( 'cause i was close ) and using
the providers mailserver.( smtp.fuse.net )
basically i am able to monitor our servers ( like I am outside the
network ) via this dsl
and I can send an email that I can get on my mobile device
so i can get to my fuse account ( the dsl Ma Bell folks here in cincy )
and I have THAT account set to forward mail to my pps account ( that
uses a qmail toaster mail server )
I reckon -- qmail sees that as , well ... i do not know -- but it
never gets to my inside
( but , i am basically happy - cause I can have my desk clinet also
looking at my fuse and --it also rings in my pocketso..it is
workable )
I was wondering what logs I might look at to see if this 'fuse relay
' is hitting my qmail toaster server?
I reckon I will never get the messages to - just come through.
Thanks
Eric Shubert wrote:
Hey Jim,
I just happened to be doing this today, so here are my notes on how
to set up postfix to send mail out from a generic server, like for
logwatch output and such (that would otherwise go to r...@localhost).
{replace what's in braces, and remove braces}
# yum install postfix
# yum remove sendmail
# cd /etc/pki/tls/certs
# make postcert.pem
# echo "{submission.server.com}:587 {user:passwd}" \
> /etc/postfix/sasl_passwd
# chmod 600 /etc/postfix/sasl_passwd
# chown root:root /etc/postfix/sasl_passwd
# postmap /etc/postfix/sasl_passwd
Edit /etc/aliases if desired, then do newaliases command:
root:sysadmin
# newaliases
Edit /etc/postfix/main.cf, changing these from the default values
(this was CentOS5.3):
myorigin = $mydomain
#mydestination =
mynetworks_style = host
relayhost = {submission.server.com}:587
smtp_sasl_auth_enable = yes
smtp_sasl_password_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/sasl_passwd
smtp_sasl_security_options =
smtp_use_tls = yes
smtp_tls_CAfile = /etc/pki/tls/certs/postcert.pem
smtp_tls_session_cache_database = btree:/var/run/smtp_tls_session/cache
# service postfix start
# chkconfig postfix on
That should do it.
Note, this configuration relies on hostname being set correctly for
your domain. If it's not, you'll need to change the myorigin
variable appropriately.
Please let us know whether or not this works for you.
Eric Shubert wrote:
That's not telling us much. I sure don't know, and don't care to
know sendmail. If you'd try using postfix again we might be of more
help. For what you need, postfix isn't a bad choice. Certainly
better than sendmail.
Jim Shupert wrote:
it is centos 4.7 running sendmail ( what came with it ) I
started to install postfix because I am a bit more farmilur with
that than send mail.
Postfix was what i was using before i found -- the best mailserver
solution of qmailtoaster...
anyways
I can email with a client ( evolution ) and that does come through
even though I am using sendmail. the smtp server is one from the
isp - a dsl modem etc.
I can command line send mail ( sendmail ) to a gmail account -
but not mu internal domain
I was wondering about MX or Reverse DNS -
here is the full header of the client ( evolution ) email that
does come through
X-Account-Key: account2
X-UIDL: 1251407849.13380.sifter.pps-inc.com,S=1797
X-Mozilla-Status: 0001
X-Mozilla-Status2:
X-Mozilla-Keys:
Return-Path:
Delivered-To: jshup...@theppsgroup.com
Received: (qmail 13378 invoked by uid 89); 27 Aug 2009 21:17:29 -
Received: by simscan 1.3.1 ppid: 13371, pid: 13373, t: 0.1506s
scanners:
Re: [qmailtoaster] Is it getting Blocked?
thanks! -- i cannot wait to see!
Eric Shubert wrote:
In a typical configuration, it would be hitting your smtp server port
25, which you would see in your smtp log:
# qmlog -lc fuse\.net
Jim Shupert wrote:
Friends, :: an update ::
I have retained the postfix how to in case i need it
I got my thing working via sendmail ( 'cause i was close ) and using
the providers mailserver.( smtp.fuse.net )
basically i am able to monitor our servers ( like I am outside the
network ) via this dsl
and I can send an email that I can get on my mobile device
so i can get to my fuse account ( the dsl Ma Bell folks here in cincy )
and I have THAT account set to forward mail to my pps account ( that
uses a qmail toaster mail server )
I reckon -- qmail sees that as , well ... i do not know -- but it
never gets to my inside
( but , i am basically happy - cause I can have my desk clinet also
looking at my fuse and --it also rings in my pocketso..it is
workable )
I was wondering what logs I might look at to see if this 'fuse relay
' is hitting my qmail toaster server?
I reckon I will never get the messages to - just come through.
Thanks
Eric Shubert wrote:
Hey Jim,
I just happened to be doing this today, so here are my notes on how
to set up postfix to send mail out from a generic server, like for
logwatch output and such (that would otherwise go to r...@localhost).
{replace what's in braces, and remove braces}
# yum install postfix
# yum remove sendmail
# cd /etc/pki/tls/certs
# make postcert.pem
# echo "{submission.server.com}:587 {user:passwd}" \
> /etc/postfix/sasl_passwd
# chmod 600 /etc/postfix/sasl_passwd
# chown root:root /etc/postfix/sasl_passwd
# postmap /etc/postfix/sasl_passwd
Edit /etc/aliases if desired, then do newaliases command:
root:sysadmin
# newaliases
Edit /etc/postfix/main.cf, changing these from the default values
(this was CentOS5.3):
myorigin = $mydomain
#mydestination =
mynetworks_style = host
relayhost = {submission.server.com}:587
smtp_sasl_auth_enable = yes
smtp_sasl_password_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/sasl_passwd
smtp_sasl_security_options =
smtp_use_tls = yes
smtp_tls_CAfile = /etc/pki/tls/certs/postcert.pem
smtp_tls_session_cache_database = btree:/var/run/smtp_tls_session/cache
# service postfix start
# chkconfig postfix on
That should do it.
Note, this configuration relies on hostname being set correctly for
your domain. If it's not, you'll need to change the myorigin
variable appropriately.
Please let us know whether or not this works for you.
Eric Shubert wrote:
That's not telling us much. I sure don't know, and don't care to
know sendmail. If you'd try using postfix again we might be of more
help. For what you need, postfix isn't a bad choice. Certainly
better than sendmail.
Jim Shupert wrote:
it is centos 4.7 running sendmail ( what came with it ) I
started to install postfix because I am a bit more farmilur with
that than send mail.
Postfix was what i was using before i found -- the best mailserver
solution of qmailtoaster...
anyways
I can email with a client ( evolution ) and that does come through
even though I am using sendmail. the smtp server is one from the
isp - a dsl modem etc.
I can command line send mail ( sendmail ) to a gmail account -
but not mu internal domain
I was wondering about MX or Reverse DNS -
here is the full header of the client ( evolution ) email that
does come through
X-Account-Key: account2
X-UIDL: 1251407849.13380.sifter.pps-inc.com,S=1797
X-Mozilla-Status: 0001
X-Mozilla-Status2:
X-Mozilla-Keys:
Return-Path:
Delivered-To: jshup...@theppsgroup.com
Received: (qmail 13378 invoked by uid 89); 27 Aug 2009 21:17:29 -
Received: by simscan 1.3.1 ppid: 13371, pid: 13373, t: 0.1506s
scanners: attach: 1.3.1 clamav: 0.95.2
/m:51/d:9450 spam: 3.2.5
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on
sifter.pps-inc.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_50,RDNS_NONE
autolearn=no version=3.2.5
Received: from unknown (HELO mail-out1.fuse.net) (216.68.8.175)
by sifter.pps-inc.com with SMTP; 27 Aug 2009 21:17:29 -
Received-SPF: pass (sifter.pps-inc.com: SPF record at zoomtown.com
designates 216.68.8.175 as permitted sender)
Return-Path:
X-CNFS-Analysis: v=1.0 c=1 a=_0eaEcvx3pEA:10
a=Qu4MKinT0AcdTVkTjP4A:9 a=Er_04BcmBtQYP8STtf3EGQ6vdGwA:4
X-CM-Score: 0
X-Scanned-by: Cloudmark Authority Engine
Authentication-Results: ecout1 smtp.mail=ppsgr...@zoomtown.com;
spf=unknown
Authentication-Results: ecout1 smtp.user=ppsgr...@zoomtown.com;
auth=pass (LOGIN)
Received-SPF: error (ecout1: 208.102.118.162 is neither permitted
nor denied by domain of zoomtown.com
Received: from [208.102.118.162] ([208.102.118.162:50880]
helo=[172.17.0.10])
by ecout1 (envelope-from )
(ecelerity 2.2.2.43 r()) with ESMTPA
id C1/DC-11180-8E7F69A4; Thu, 27
Re: [qmailtoaster] Is it getting Blocked?
In a typical configuration, it would be hitting your smtp server port
25, which you would see in your smtp log:
# qmlog -lc fuse\.net
Jim Shupert wrote:
Friends, :: an update ::
I have retained the postfix how to in case i need it
I got my thing working via sendmail ( 'cause i was close ) and using
the providers mailserver.( smtp.fuse.net )
basically i am able to monitor our servers ( like I am outside the
network ) via this dsl
and I can send an email that I can get on my mobile device
so i can get to my fuse account ( the dsl Ma Bell folks here in cincy )
and I have THAT account set to forward mail to my pps account ( that
uses a qmail toaster mail server )
I reckon -- qmail sees that as , well ... i do not know -- but it never
gets to my inside
( but , i am basically happy - cause I can have my desk clinet also
looking at my fuse and --it also rings in my pocketso..it is workable )
I was wondering what logs I might look at to see if this 'fuse relay '
is hitting my qmail toaster server?
I reckon I will never get the messages to - just come through.
Thanks
Eric Shubert wrote:
Hey Jim,
I just happened to be doing this today, so here are my notes on how to
set up postfix to send mail out from a generic server, like for
logwatch output and such (that would otherwise go to r...@localhost).
{replace what's in braces, and remove braces}
# yum install postfix
# yum remove sendmail
# cd /etc/pki/tls/certs
# make postcert.pem
# echo "{submission.server.com}:587 {user:passwd}" \
> /etc/postfix/sasl_passwd
# chmod 600 /etc/postfix/sasl_passwd
# chown root:root /etc/postfix/sasl_passwd
# postmap /etc/postfix/sasl_passwd
Edit /etc/aliases if desired, then do newaliases command:
root:sysadmin
# newaliases
Edit /etc/postfix/main.cf, changing these from the default values
(this was CentOS5.3):
myorigin = $mydomain
#mydestination =
mynetworks_style = host
relayhost = {submission.server.com}:587
smtp_sasl_auth_enable = yes
smtp_sasl_password_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/sasl_passwd
smtp_sasl_security_options =
smtp_use_tls = yes
smtp_tls_CAfile = /etc/pki/tls/certs/postcert.pem
smtp_tls_session_cache_database = btree:/var/run/smtp_tls_session/cache
# service postfix start
# chkconfig postfix on
That should do it.
Note, this configuration relies on hostname being set correctly for
your domain. If it's not, you'll need to change the myorigin variable
appropriately.
Please let us know whether or not this works for you.
Eric Shubert wrote:
That's not telling us much. I sure don't know, and don't care to know
sendmail. If you'd try using postfix again we might be of more help.
For what you need, postfix isn't a bad choice. Certainly better than
sendmail.
Jim Shupert wrote:
it is centos 4.7 running sendmail ( what came with it ) I started
to install postfix because I am a bit more farmilur with that than
send mail.
Postfix was what i was using before i found -- the best mailserver
solution of qmailtoaster...
anyways
I can email with a client ( evolution ) and that does come through
even though I am using sendmail. the smtp server is one from the isp
- a dsl modem etc.
I can command line send mail ( sendmail ) to a gmail account - but
not mu internal domain
I was wondering about MX or Reverse DNS -
here is the full header of the client ( evolution ) email that does
come through
X-Account-Key: account2
X-UIDL: 1251407849.13380.sifter.pps-inc.com,S=1797
X-Mozilla-Status: 0001
X-Mozilla-Status2:
X-Mozilla-Keys:
Return-Path:
Delivered-To: jshup...@theppsgroup.com
Received: (qmail 13378 invoked by uid 89); 27 Aug 2009 21:17:29 -
Received: by simscan 1.3.1 ppid: 13371, pid: 13373, t: 0.1506s
scanners: attach: 1.3.1 clamav: 0.95.2
/m:51/d:9450 spam: 3.2.5
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on
sifter.pps-inc.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_50,RDNS_NONE
autolearn=no version=3.2.5
Received: from unknown (HELO mail-out1.fuse.net) (216.68.8.175)
by sifter.pps-inc.com with SMTP; 27 Aug 2009 21:17:29 -
Received-SPF: pass (sifter.pps-inc.com: SPF record at zoomtown.com
designates 216.68.8.175 as permitted sender)
Return-Path:
X-CNFS-Analysis: v=1.0 c=1 a=_0eaEcvx3pEA:10
a=Qu4MKinT0AcdTVkTjP4A:9 a=Er_04BcmBtQYP8STtf3EGQ6vdGwA:4
X-CM-Score: 0
X-Scanned-by: Cloudmark Authority Engine
Authentication-Results: ecout1 smtp.mail=ppsgr...@zoomtown.com;
spf=unknown
Authentication-Results: ecout1 smtp.user=ppsgr...@zoomtown.com;
auth=pass (LOGIN)
Received-SPF: error (ecout1: 208.102.118.162 is neither permitted
nor denied by domain of zoomtown.com
Received: from [208.102.118.162] ([208.102.118.162:50880]
helo=[172.17.0.10])
by ecout1 (envelope-from )
(ecelerity 2.2.2.43 r()) with ESMTPA
id C1/DC-11180-8E7F69A4; Thu, 27 Aug 2009 17:17:29 -0400
Subject: jupiter999
From: ppsBnet
Re: [qmailtoaster] Is it getting Blocked?
Friends, :: an update ::
I have retained the postfix how to in case i need it
I got my thing working via sendmail ( 'cause i was close ) and using
the providers mailserver.( smtp.fuse.net )
basically i am able to monitor our servers ( like I am outside the
network ) via this dsl
and I can send an email that I can get on my mobile device
so i can get to my fuse account ( the dsl Ma Bell folks here in cincy )
and I have THAT account set to forward mail to my pps account ( that
uses a qmail toaster mail server )
I reckon -- qmail sees that as , well ... i do not know -- but it never
gets to my inside
( but , i am basically happy - cause I can have my desk clinet also
looking at my fuse and --it also rings in my pocketso..it is workable )
I was wondering what logs I might look at to see if this 'fuse relay '
is hitting my qmail toaster server?
I reckon I will never get the messages to - just come through.
Thanks
Eric Shubert wrote:
Hey Jim,
I just happened to be doing this today, so here are my notes on how to
set up postfix to send mail out from a generic server, like for
logwatch output and such (that would otherwise go to r...@localhost).
{replace what's in braces, and remove braces}
# yum install postfix
# yum remove sendmail
# cd /etc/pki/tls/certs
# make postcert.pem
# echo "{submission.server.com}:587 {user:passwd}" \
> /etc/postfix/sasl_passwd
# chmod 600 /etc/postfix/sasl_passwd
# chown root:root /etc/postfix/sasl_passwd
# postmap /etc/postfix/sasl_passwd
Edit /etc/aliases if desired, then do newaliases command:
root:sysadmin
# newaliases
Edit /etc/postfix/main.cf, changing these from the default values
(this was CentOS5.3):
myorigin = $mydomain
#mydestination =
mynetworks_style = host
relayhost = {submission.server.com}:587
smtp_sasl_auth_enable = yes
smtp_sasl_password_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/sasl_passwd
smtp_sasl_security_options =
smtp_use_tls = yes
smtp_tls_CAfile = /etc/pki/tls/certs/postcert.pem
smtp_tls_session_cache_database = btree:/var/run/smtp_tls_session/cache
# service postfix start
# chkconfig postfix on
That should do it.
Note, this configuration relies on hostname being set correctly for
your domain. If it's not, you'll need to change the myorigin variable
appropriately.
Please let us know whether or not this works for you.
Eric Shubert wrote:
That's not telling us much. I sure don't know, and don't care to know
sendmail. If you'd try using postfix again we might be of more help.
For what you need, postfix isn't a bad choice. Certainly better than
sendmail.
Jim Shupert wrote:
it is centos 4.7 running sendmail ( what came with it ) I started
to install postfix because I am a bit more farmilur with that than
send mail.
Postfix was what i was using before i found -- the best mailserver
solution of qmailtoaster...
anyways
I can email with a client ( evolution ) and that does come through
even though I am using sendmail. the smtp server is one from the isp
- a dsl modem etc.
I can command line send mail ( sendmail ) to a gmail account - but
not mu internal domain
I was wondering about MX or Reverse DNS -
here is the full header of the client ( evolution ) email that does
come through
X-Account-Key: account2
X-UIDL: 1251407849.13380.sifter.pps-inc.com,S=1797
X-Mozilla-Status: 0001
X-Mozilla-Status2:
X-Mozilla-Keys:
Return-Path:
Delivered-To: jshup...@theppsgroup.com
Received: (qmail 13378 invoked by uid 89); 27 Aug 2009 21:17:29 -
Received: by simscan 1.3.1 ppid: 13371, pid: 13373, t: 0.1506s
scanners: attach: 1.3.1 clamav: 0.95.2
/m:51/d:9450 spam: 3.2.5
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on
sifter.pps-inc.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_50,RDNS_NONE
autolearn=no version=3.2.5
Received: from unknown (HELO mail-out1.fuse.net) (216.68.8.175)
by sifter.pps-inc.com with SMTP; 27 Aug 2009 21:17:29 -
Received-SPF: pass (sifter.pps-inc.com: SPF record at zoomtown.com
designates 216.68.8.175 as permitted sender)
Return-Path:
X-CNFS-Analysis: v=1.0 c=1 a=_0eaEcvx3pEA:10
a=Qu4MKinT0AcdTVkTjP4A:9 a=Er_04BcmBtQYP8STtf3EGQ6vdGwA:4
X-CM-Score: 0
X-Scanned-by: Cloudmark Authority Engine
Authentication-Results: ecout1 smtp.mail=ppsgr...@zoomtown.com;
spf=unknown
Authentication-Results: ecout1 smtp.user=ppsgr...@zoomtown.com;
auth=pass (LOGIN)
Received-SPF: error (ecout1: 208.102.118.162 is neither permitted
nor denied by domain of zoomtown.com
Received: from [208.102.118.162] ([208.102.118.162:50880]
helo=[172.17.0.10])
by ecout1 (envelope-from )
(ecelerity 2.2.2.43 r()) with ESMTPA
id C1/DC-11180-8E7F69A4; Thu, 27 Aug 2009 17:17:29 -0400
Subject: jupiter999
From: ppsBnet
Reply-To: ppsgr...@zoomtown.com
To: jshup...@theppsgroup.com
Organization: theppsgroup
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 17:13:02 -0400
Message-Id: <1251407582.3253.
Re: [qmailtoaster] Is it getting Blocked?
Jim Shupert wrote:
hey eric
Thanks for this I will try it today -- one thing though
regarding :" hostname being set correctly for your domain "
currently I have the hostname as : taster.local
this machine is sitting off of a router connected to a DSL -- I do not
have a domain like
pps-inc.com --- so is that OK
basically i think you are saying 2 things should 'match' I wonder if I
am clear on that...
I am not doing DNS or a MX for this particular dude.
myorigin is the domain that you want postfix to appear to be sending
from. In your case, I think you'd want to use:
myorigin = pps-inc.com
also I am using my isp smpt.fuse.net
That shouldn't come into play (unless they're blocking port 587 outbound
from your remote/postfix server).
also also _ I have never done a yum remove of sendmail ( or anything
like that before...)
I might like to copy the sendmail.cf some where to see the alterations
I made
things like the SEND_AUTH stuff.
Suit yourself. You shouldn't really need it any more though.
thanks again!
Sure.
Eric Shubert wrote:
Hey Jim,
I just happened to be doing this today, so here are my notes on how to
set up postfix to send mail out from a generic server, like for
logwatch output and such (that would otherwise go to r...@localhost).
{replace what's in braces, and remove braces}
# yum install postfix
# yum remove sendmail
# cd /etc/pki/tls/certs
# make postcert.pem
# echo "{submission.server.com}:587 {user:passwd}" \
> /etc/postfix/sasl_passwd
# chmod 600 /etc/postfix/sasl_passwd
# chown root:root /etc/postfix/sasl_passwd
# postmap /etc/postfix/sasl_passwd
Edit /etc/aliases if desired, then do newaliases command:
root:sysadmin
# newaliases
Edit /etc/postfix/main.cf, changing these from the default values
(this was CentOS5.3):
myorigin = $mydomain
#mydestination =
mynetworks_style = host
relayhost = {submission.server.com}:587
smtp_sasl_auth_enable = yes
smtp_sasl_password_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/sasl_passwd
smtp_sasl_security_options =
smtp_use_tls = yes
smtp_tls_CAfile = /etc/pki/tls/certs/postcert.pem
smtp_tls_session_cache_database = btree:/var/run/smtp_tls_session/cache
# service postfix start
# chkconfig postfix on
That should do it.
Note, this configuration relies on hostname being set correctly for
your domain. If it's not, you'll need to change the myorigin variable
appropriately.
Please let us know whether or not this works for you.
Eric Shubert wrote:
That's not telling us much. I sure don't know, and don't care to know
sendmail. If you'd try using postfix again we might be of more help.
For what you need, postfix isn't a bad choice. Certainly better than
sendmail.
Jim Shupert wrote:
it is centos 4.7 running sendmail ( what came with it ) I started
to install postfix because I am a bit more farmilur with that than
send mail.
Postfix was what i was using before i found -- the best mailserver
solution of qmailtoaster...
anyways
I can email with a client ( evolution ) and that does come through
even though I am using sendmail. the smtp server is one from the isp
- a dsl modem etc.
I can command line send mail ( sendmail ) to a gmail account - but
not mu internal domain
I was wondering about MX or Reverse DNS -
here is the full header of the client ( evolution ) email that does
come through
X-Account-Key: account2
X-UIDL: 1251407849.13380.sifter.pps-inc.com,S=1797
X-Mozilla-Status: 0001
X-Mozilla-Status2:
X-Mozilla-Keys:
Return-Path:
Delivered-To: jshup...@theppsgroup.com
Received: (qmail 13378 invoked by uid 89); 27 Aug 2009 21:17:29 -
Received: by simscan 1.3.1 ppid: 13371, pid: 13373, t: 0.1506s
scanners: attach: 1.3.1 clamav: 0.95.2
/m:51/d:9450 spam: 3.2.5
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on
sifter.pps-inc.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_50,RDNS_NONE
autolearn=no version=3.2.5
Received: from unknown (HELO mail-out1.fuse.net) (216.68.8.175)
by sifter.pps-inc.com with SMTP; 27 Aug 2009 21:17:29 -
Received-SPF: pass (sifter.pps-inc.com: SPF record at zoomtown.com
designates 216.68.8.175 as permitted sender)
Return-Path:
X-CNFS-Analysis: v=1.0 c=1 a=_0eaEcvx3pEA:10
a=Qu4MKinT0AcdTVkTjP4A:9 a=Er_04BcmBtQYP8STtf3EGQ6vdGwA:4
X-CM-Score: 0
X-Scanned-by: Cloudmark Authority Engine
Authentication-Results: ecout1 smtp.mail=ppsgr...@zoomtown.com;
spf=unknown
Authentication-Results: ecout1 smtp.user=ppsgr...@zoomtown.com;
auth=pass (LOGIN)
Received-SPF: error (ecout1: 208.102.118.162 is neither permitted
nor denied by domain of zoomtown.com
Received: from [208.102.118.162] ([208.102.118.162:50880]
helo=[172.17.0.10])
by ecout1 (envelope-from )
(ecelerity 2.2.2.43 r()) with ESMTPA
id C1/DC-11180-8E7F69A4; Thu, 27 Aug 2009 17:17:29 -0400
Subject: jupiter999
From: ppsBnet
Reply-To: ppsgr...@zoomtown.com
To: jshup...@
Re: [qmailtoaster] Is it getting Blocked?
hey eric
Thanks for this I will try it today -- one thing though
regarding :" hostname being set correctly for your domain "
currently I have the hostname as : taster.local
this machine is sitting off of a router connected to a DSL -- I do not
have a domain like
pps-inc.com --- so is that OK
basically i think you are saying 2 things should 'match' I wonder if I
am clear on that...
I am not doing DNS or a MX for this particular dude.
also I am using my isp smpt.fuse.net
also also _ I have never done a yum remove of sendmail ( or anything
like that before...)
I might like to copy the sendmail.cf some where to see the alterations
I made
things like the SEND_AUTH stuff.
thanks again!
Eric Shubert wrote:
Hey Jim,
I just happened to be doing this today, so here are my notes on how to
set up postfix to send mail out from a generic server, like for
logwatch output and such (that would otherwise go to r...@localhost).
{replace what's in braces, and remove braces}
# yum install postfix
# yum remove sendmail
# cd /etc/pki/tls/certs
# make postcert.pem
# echo "{submission.server.com}:587 {user:passwd}" \
> /etc/postfix/sasl_passwd
# chmod 600 /etc/postfix/sasl_passwd
# chown root:root /etc/postfix/sasl_passwd
# postmap /etc/postfix/sasl_passwd
Edit /etc/aliases if desired, then do newaliases command:
root:sysadmin
# newaliases
Edit /etc/postfix/main.cf, changing these from the default values
(this was CentOS5.3):
myorigin = $mydomain
#mydestination =
mynetworks_style = host
relayhost = {submission.server.com}:587
smtp_sasl_auth_enable = yes
smtp_sasl_password_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/sasl_passwd
smtp_sasl_security_options =
smtp_use_tls = yes
smtp_tls_CAfile = /etc/pki/tls/certs/postcert.pem
smtp_tls_session_cache_database = btree:/var/run/smtp_tls_session/cache
# service postfix start
# chkconfig postfix on
That should do it.
Note, this configuration relies on hostname being set correctly for
your domain. If it's not, you'll need to change the myorigin variable
appropriately.
Please let us know whether or not this works for you.
Eric Shubert wrote:
That's not telling us much. I sure don't know, and don't care to know
sendmail. If you'd try using postfix again we might be of more help.
For what you need, postfix isn't a bad choice. Certainly better than
sendmail.
Jim Shupert wrote:
it is centos 4.7 running sendmail ( what came with it ) I started
to install postfix because I am a bit more farmilur with that than
send mail.
Postfix was what i was using before i found -- the best mailserver
solution of qmailtoaster...
anyways
I can email with a client ( evolution ) and that does come through
even though I am using sendmail. the smtp server is one from the isp
- a dsl modem etc.
I can command line send mail ( sendmail ) to a gmail account - but
not mu internal domain
I was wondering about MX or Reverse DNS -
here is the full header of the client ( evolution ) email that does
come through
X-Account-Key: account2
X-UIDL: 1251407849.13380.sifter.pps-inc.com,S=1797
X-Mozilla-Status: 0001
X-Mozilla-Status2:
X-Mozilla-Keys:
Return-Path:
Delivered-To: jshup...@theppsgroup.com
Received: (qmail 13378 invoked by uid 89); 27 Aug 2009 21:17:29 -
Received: by simscan 1.3.1 ppid: 13371, pid: 13373, t: 0.1506s
scanners: attach: 1.3.1 clamav: 0.95.2
/m:51/d:9450 spam: 3.2.5
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on
sifter.pps-inc.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_50,RDNS_NONE
autolearn=no version=3.2.5
Received: from unknown (HELO mail-out1.fuse.net) (216.68.8.175)
by sifter.pps-inc.com with SMTP; 27 Aug 2009 21:17:29 -
Received-SPF: pass (sifter.pps-inc.com: SPF record at zoomtown.com
designates 216.68.8.175 as permitted sender)
Return-Path:
X-CNFS-Analysis: v=1.0 c=1 a=_0eaEcvx3pEA:10
a=Qu4MKinT0AcdTVkTjP4A:9 a=Er_04BcmBtQYP8STtf3EGQ6vdGwA:4
X-CM-Score: 0
X-Scanned-by: Cloudmark Authority Engine
Authentication-Results: ecout1 smtp.mail=ppsgr...@zoomtown.com;
spf=unknown
Authentication-Results: ecout1 smtp.user=ppsgr...@zoomtown.com;
auth=pass (LOGIN)
Received-SPF: error (ecout1: 208.102.118.162 is neither permitted
nor denied by domain of zoomtown.com
Received: from [208.102.118.162] ([208.102.118.162:50880]
helo=[172.17.0.10])
by ecout1 (envelope-from )
(ecelerity 2.2.2.43 r()) with ESMTPA
id C1/DC-11180-8E7F69A4; Thu, 27 Aug 2009 17:17:29 -0400
Subject: jupiter999
From: ppsBnet
Reply-To: ppsgr...@zoomtown.com
To: jshup...@theppsgroup.com
Organization: theppsgroup
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 17:13:02 -0400
Message-Id: <1251407582.3253.0.ca...@taster.local>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.3 (2.12.3-8.el5_2.3)
thanks
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.
Re: [qmailtoaster] Is it getting Blocked?
Figures there'd be a type-o or two.
smtp_tls_session/cache should be smtp_tls_session_cache
Eric Shubert wrote:
Hey Jim,
I just happened to be doing this today, so here are my notes on how to
set up postfix to send mail out from a generic server, like for logwatch
output and such (that would otherwise go to r...@localhost).
{replace what's in braces, and remove braces}
# yum install postfix
# yum remove sendmail
# cd /etc/pki/tls/certs
# make postcert.pem
# echo "{submission.server.com}:587 {user:passwd}" \
> /etc/postfix/sasl_passwd
# chmod 600 /etc/postfix/sasl_passwd
# chown root:root /etc/postfix/sasl_passwd
# postmap /etc/postfix/sasl_passwd
Edit /etc/aliases if desired, then do newaliases command:
root:sysadmin
# newaliases
Edit /etc/postfix/main.cf, changing these from the default values (this
was CentOS5.3):
myorigin = $mydomain
#mydestination =
mynetworks_style = host
relayhost = {submission.server.com}:587
smtp_sasl_auth_enable = yes
smtp_sasl_password_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/sasl_passwd
smtp_sasl_security_options =
smtp_use_tls = yes
smtp_tls_CAfile = /etc/pki/tls/certs/postcert.pem
smtp_tls_session_cache_database = btree:/var/run/smtp_tls_session/cache
# service postfix start
# chkconfig postfix on
That should do it.
Note, this configuration relies on hostname being set correctly for your
domain. If it's not, you'll need to change the myorigin variable
appropriately.
Please let us know whether or not this works for you.
Eric Shubert wrote:
That's not telling us much. I sure don't know, and don't care to know
sendmail. If you'd try using postfix again we might be of more help.
For what you need, postfix isn't a bad choice. Certainly better than
sendmail.
Jim Shupert wrote:
it is centos 4.7 running sendmail ( what came with it ) I started
to install postfix because I am a bit more farmilur with that than
send mail.
Postfix was what i was using before i found -- the best mailserver
solution of qmailtoaster...
anyways
I can email with a client ( evolution ) and that does come through
even though I am using sendmail. the smtp server is one from the isp
- a dsl modem etc.
I can command line send mail ( sendmail ) to a gmail account - but
not mu internal domain
I was wondering about MX or Reverse DNS -
here is the full header of the client ( evolution ) email that does
come through
X-Account-Key: account2
X-UIDL: 1251407849.13380.sifter.pps-inc.com,S=1797
X-Mozilla-Status: 0001
X-Mozilla-Status2:
X-Mozilla-Keys:
Return-Path:
Delivered-To: jshup...@theppsgroup.com
Received: (qmail 13378 invoked by uid 89); 27 Aug 2009 21:17:29 -
Received: by simscan 1.3.1 ppid: 13371, pid: 13373, t: 0.1506s
scanners: attach: 1.3.1 clamav: 0.95.2
/m:51/d:9450 spam: 3.2.5
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on
sifter.pps-inc.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_50,RDNS_NONE
autolearn=no version=3.2.5
Received: from unknown (HELO mail-out1.fuse.net) (216.68.8.175)
by sifter.pps-inc.com with SMTP; 27 Aug 2009 21:17:29 -
Received-SPF: pass (sifter.pps-inc.com: SPF record at zoomtown.com
designates 216.68.8.175 as permitted sender)
Return-Path:
X-CNFS-Analysis: v=1.0 c=1 a=_0eaEcvx3pEA:10 a=Qu4MKinT0AcdTVkTjP4A:9
a=Er_04BcmBtQYP8STtf3EGQ6vdGwA:4
X-CM-Score: 0
X-Scanned-by: Cloudmark Authority Engine
Authentication-Results: ecout1 smtp.mail=ppsgr...@zoomtown.com;
spf=unknown
Authentication-Results: ecout1 smtp.user=ppsgr...@zoomtown.com;
auth=pass (LOGIN)
Received-SPF: error (ecout1: 208.102.118.162 is neither permitted nor
denied by domain of zoomtown.com
Received: from [208.102.118.162] ([208.102.118.162:50880]
helo=[172.17.0.10])
by ecout1 (envelope-from )
(ecelerity 2.2.2.43 r()) with ESMTPA
id C1/DC-11180-8E7F69A4; Thu, 27 Aug 2009 17:17:29 -0400
Subject: jupiter999
From: ppsBnet
Reply-To: ppsgr...@zoomtown.com
To: jshup...@theppsgroup.com
Organization: theppsgroup
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 17:13:02 -0400
Message-Id: <1251407582.3253.0.ca...@taster.local>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.3 (2.12.3-8.el5_2.3)
thanks
--
-Eric 'shubes'
-
Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group
(www.vickersconsulting.com)
Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations.
If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today!
-
Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com
For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com
Re: [qmailtoaster] Is it getting Blocked?
Hey Jim,
I just happened to be doing this today, so here are my notes on how to
set up postfix to send mail out from a generic server, like for logwatch
output and such (that would otherwise go to r...@localhost).
{replace what's in braces, and remove braces}
# yum install postfix
# yum remove sendmail
# cd /etc/pki/tls/certs
# make postcert.pem
# echo "{submission.server.com}:587 {user:passwd}" \
> /etc/postfix/sasl_passwd
# chmod 600 /etc/postfix/sasl_passwd
# chown root:root /etc/postfix/sasl_passwd
# postmap /etc/postfix/sasl_passwd
Edit /etc/aliases if desired, then do newaliases command:
root: sysadmin
# newaliases
Edit /etc/postfix/main.cf, changing these from the default values (this
was CentOS5.3):
myorigin = $mydomain
#mydestination =
mynetworks_style = host
relayhost = {submission.server.com}:587
smtp_sasl_auth_enable = yes
smtp_sasl_password_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/sasl_passwd
smtp_sasl_security_options =
smtp_use_tls = yes
smtp_tls_CAfile = /etc/pki/tls/certs/postcert.pem
smtp_tls_session_cache_database = btree:/var/run/smtp_tls_session/cache
# service postfix start
# chkconfig postfix on
That should do it.
Note, this configuration relies on hostname being set correctly for your
domain. If it's not, you'll need to change the myorigin variable
appropriately.
Please let us know whether or not this works for you.
Eric Shubert wrote:
That's not telling us much. I sure don't know, and don't care to know
sendmail. If you'd try using postfix again we might be of more help. For
what you need, postfix isn't a bad choice. Certainly better than sendmail.
Jim Shupert wrote:
it is centos 4.7 running sendmail ( what came with it ) I started to
install postfix because I am a bit more farmilur with that than send
mail.
Postfix was what i was using before i found -- the best mailserver
solution of qmailtoaster...
anyways
I can email with a client ( evolution ) and that does come through
even though I am using sendmail. the smtp server is one from the isp -
a dsl modem etc.
I can command line send mail ( sendmail ) to a gmail account - but
not mu internal domain
I was wondering about MX or Reverse DNS -
here is the full header of the client ( evolution ) email that does
come through
X-Account-Key: account2
X-UIDL: 1251407849.13380.sifter.pps-inc.com,S=1797
X-Mozilla-Status: 0001
X-Mozilla-Status2:
X-Mozilla-Keys:
Return-Path:
Delivered-To: jshup...@theppsgroup.com
Received: (qmail 13378 invoked by uid 89); 27 Aug 2009 21:17:29 -
Received: by simscan 1.3.1 ppid: 13371, pid: 13373, t: 0.1506s
scanners: attach: 1.3.1 clamav: 0.95.2
/m:51/d:9450 spam: 3.2.5
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on
sifter.pps-inc.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_50,RDNS_NONE
autolearn=no version=3.2.5
Received: from unknown (HELO mail-out1.fuse.net) (216.68.8.175)
by sifter.pps-inc.com with SMTP; 27 Aug 2009 21:17:29 -
Received-SPF: pass (sifter.pps-inc.com: SPF record at zoomtown.com
designates 216.68.8.175 as permitted sender)
Return-Path:
X-CNFS-Analysis: v=1.0 c=1 a=_0eaEcvx3pEA:10 a=Qu4MKinT0AcdTVkTjP4A:9
a=Er_04BcmBtQYP8STtf3EGQ6vdGwA:4
X-CM-Score: 0
X-Scanned-by: Cloudmark Authority Engine
Authentication-Results: ecout1 smtp.mail=ppsgr...@zoomtown.com;
spf=unknown
Authentication-Results: ecout1 smtp.user=ppsgr...@zoomtown.com;
auth=pass (LOGIN)
Received-SPF: error (ecout1: 208.102.118.162 is neither permitted nor
denied by domain of zoomtown.com
Received: from [208.102.118.162] ([208.102.118.162:50880]
helo=[172.17.0.10])
by ecout1 (envelope-from )
(ecelerity 2.2.2.43 r()) with ESMTPA
id C1/DC-11180-8E7F69A4; Thu, 27 Aug 2009 17:17:29 -0400
Subject: jupiter999
From: ppsBnet
Reply-To: ppsgr...@zoomtown.com
To: jshup...@theppsgroup.com
Organization: theppsgroup
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 17:13:02 -0400
Message-Id: <1251407582.3253.0.ca...@taster.local>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.3 (2.12.3-8.el5_2.3)
thanks
--
-Eric 'shubes'
-
Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group
(www.vickersconsulting.com)
Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations.
If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today!
-
Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com
For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com
Re: [qmailtoaster] Is it getting Blocked?
That's not telling us much. I sure don't know, and don't care to know sendmail. If you'd try using postfix again we might be of more help. For what you need, postfix isn't a bad choice. Certainly better than sendmail. Jim Shupert wrote: it is centos 4.7 running sendmail ( what came with it ) I started to install postfix because I am a bit more farmilur with that than send mail. Postfix was what i was using before i found -- the best mailserver solution of qmailtoaster... anyways I can email with a client ( evolution ) and that does come through even though I am using sendmail. the smtp server is one from the isp - a dsl modem etc. I can command line send mail ( sendmail ) to a gmail account - but not mu internal domain I was wondering about MX or Reverse DNS - here is the full header of the client ( evolution ) email that does come through X-Account-Key: account2 X-UIDL: 1251407849.13380.sifter.pps-inc.com,S=1797 X-Mozilla-Status: 0001 X-Mozilla-Status2: X-Mozilla-Keys: Return-Path: Delivered-To: jshup...@theppsgroup.com Received: (qmail 13378 invoked by uid 89); 27 Aug 2009 21:17:29 - Received: by simscan 1.3.1 ppid: 13371, pid: 13373, t: 0.1506s scanners: attach: 1.3.1 clamav: 0.95.2 /m:51/d:9450 spam: 3.2.5 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on sifter.pps-inc.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_50,RDNS_NONE autolearn=no version=3.2.5 Received: from unknown (HELO mail-out1.fuse.net) (216.68.8.175) by sifter.pps-inc.com with SMTP; 27 Aug 2009 21:17:29 - Received-SPF: pass (sifter.pps-inc.com: SPF record at zoomtown.com designates 216.68.8.175 as permitted sender) Return-Path: X-CNFS-Analysis: v=1.0 c=1 a=_0eaEcvx3pEA:10 a=Qu4MKinT0AcdTVkTjP4A:9 a=Er_04BcmBtQYP8STtf3EGQ6vdGwA:4 X-CM-Score: 0 X-Scanned-by: Cloudmark Authority Engine Authentication-Results: ecout1 smtp.mail=ppsgr...@zoomtown.com; spf=unknown Authentication-Results: ecout1 smtp.user=ppsgr...@zoomtown.com; auth=pass (LOGIN) Received-SPF: error (ecout1: 208.102.118.162 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of zoomtown.com Received: from [208.102.118.162] ([208.102.118.162:50880] helo=[172.17.0.10]) by ecout1 (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 2.2.2.43 r()) with ESMTPA id C1/DC-11180-8E7F69A4; Thu, 27 Aug 2009 17:17:29 -0400 Subject: jupiter999 From: ppsBnet Reply-To: ppsgr...@zoomtown.com To: jshup...@theppsgroup.com Organization: theppsgroup Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 17:13:02 -0400 Message-Id: <1251407582.3253.0.ca...@taster.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.3 (2.12.3-8.el5_2.3) thanks Eric Shubert wrote: Good idea. What distro/ver and MTA are you running on the external host? Phil Leinhauser wrote: I suspect it's some RDNS or MX that's getting you. You might try a telnet mail from that server or even a regular mail client. It may reveal the problem quickly. Use the same addresses th perl uses. From: Jim Shupert Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2009 4:11 PM To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: [qmailtoaster] Is it getting Blocked? I am not even sure how to ask this question... but here goes. I have a server that is outside my domain , outside my netwrok that i am running a perl script on to monitor my websites -- from the outside. ok the perl works - but it is to send an email to me -- inside my network the emails come from r...@taster.local. I suspect that qmail is rejecting the mail. where in the logs might i see that? what log - and in var\log\qmail\--smtp or what? and if I find it being -rejected- if that is the right way to say it... can i white list anything from " r...@taster.local " thanks! js No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 8.5.409 / Virus Database: 270.13.70/2329 - Release Date: 08/27/09 08:11:00 -- -Eric 'shubes' - Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group (www.vickersconsulting.com) Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations. If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today! - Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages. To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com
Re: [qmailtoaster] Is it getting Blocked?
it is centos 4.7 running sendmail ( what came with it ) I started to install postfix because I am a bit more farmilur with that than send mail. Postfix was what i was using before i found -- the best mailserver solution of qmailtoaster... anyways I can email with a client ( evolution ) and that does come through even though I am using sendmail. the smtp server is one from the isp - a dsl modem etc. I can command line send mail ( sendmail ) to a gmail account - but not mu internal domain I was wondering about MX or Reverse DNS - here is the full header of the client ( evolution ) email that does come through X-Account-Key: account2 X-UIDL: 1251407849.13380.sifter.pps-inc.com,S=1797 X-Mozilla-Status: 0001 X-Mozilla-Status2: X-Mozilla-Keys: Return-Path: Delivered-To: jshup...@theppsgroup.com Received: (qmail 13378 invoked by uid 89); 27 Aug 2009 21:17:29 - Received: by simscan 1.3.1 ppid: 13371, pid: 13373, t: 0.1506s scanners: attach: 1.3.1 clamav: 0.95.2 /m:51/d:9450 spam: 3.2.5 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on sifter.pps-inc.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_50,RDNS_NONE autolearn=no version=3.2.5 Received: from unknown (HELO mail-out1.fuse.net) (216.68.8.175) by sifter.pps-inc.com with SMTP; 27 Aug 2009 21:17:29 - Received-SPF: pass (sifter.pps-inc.com: SPF record at zoomtown.com designates 216.68.8.175 as permitted sender) Return-Path: X-CNFS-Analysis: v=1.0 c=1 a=_0eaEcvx3pEA:10 a=Qu4MKinT0AcdTVkTjP4A:9 a=Er_04BcmBtQYP8STtf3EGQ6vdGwA:4 X-CM-Score: 0 X-Scanned-by: Cloudmark Authority Engine Authentication-Results: ecout1 smtp.mail=ppsgr...@zoomtown.com; spf=unknown Authentication-Results: ecout1 smtp.user=ppsgr...@zoomtown.com; auth=pass (LOGIN) Received-SPF: error (ecout1: 208.102.118.162 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of zoomtown.com Received: from [208.102.118.162] ([208.102.118.162:50880] helo=[172.17.0.10]) by ecout1 (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 2.2.2.43 r()) with ESMTPA id C1/DC-11180-8E7F69A4; Thu, 27 Aug 2009 17:17:29 -0400 Subject: jupiter999 From: ppsBnet Reply-To: ppsgr...@zoomtown.com To: jshup...@theppsgroup.com Organization: theppsgroup Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 17:13:02 -0400 Message-Id: <1251407582.3253.0.ca...@taster.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.3 (2.12.3-8.el5_2.3) thanks Eric Shubert wrote: Good idea. What distro/ver and MTA are you running on the external host? Phil Leinhauser wrote: I suspect it's some RDNS or MX that's getting you. You might try a telnet mail from that server or even a regular mail client. It may reveal the problem quickly. Use the same addresses th perl uses. From: Jim Shupert Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2009 4:11 PM To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: [qmailtoaster] Is it getting Blocked? I am not even sure how to ask this question... but here goes. I have a server that is outside my domain , outside my netwrok that i am running a perl script on to monitor my websites -- from the outside. ok the perl works - but it is to send an email to me -- inside my network the emails come from r...@taster.local. I suspect that qmail is rejecting the mail. where in the logs might i see that? what log - and in var\log\qmail\--smtp or what? and if I find it being -rejected- if that is the right way to say it... can i white list anything from " r...@taster.local " thanks! js No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 8.5.409 / Virus Database: 270.13.70/2329 - Release Date: 08/27/09 08:11:00
Re: [qmailtoaster] Is it getting Blocked?
Good idea. What distro/ver and MTA are you running on the external host? Phil Leinhauser wrote: I suspect it's some RDNS or MX that's getting you. You might try a telnet mail from that server or even a regular mail client. It may reveal the problem quickly. Use the same addresses th perl uses. From: Jim Shupert Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2009 4:11 PM To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: [qmailtoaster] Is it getting Blocked? I am not even sure how to ask this question... but here goes. I have a server that is outside my domain , outside my netwrok that i am running a perl script on to monitor my websites -- from the outside. ok the perl works - but it is to send an email to me -- inside my network the emails come from r...@taster.local. I suspect that qmail is rejecting the mail. where in the logs might i see that? what log - and in var\log\qmail\--smtp or what? and if I find it being -rejected- if that is the right way to say it... can i white list anything from " r...@taster.local " thanks! js -- -Eric 'shubes' - Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group (www.vickersconsulting.com) Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations. If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today! - Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages. To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com
RE: [qmailtoaster] Is it getting Blocked?
I suspect it's some RDNS or MX that's getting you. You might try a telnet mail from that server or even a regular mail client. It may reveal the problem quickly. Use the same addresses th perl uses. -Original Message- From: Jim Shupert Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2009 4:11 PM To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: [qmailtoaster] Is it getting Blocked? I am not even sure how to ask this question... but here goes. I have a server that is outside my domain , outside my netwrok that i am running a perl script on to monitor my websites -- from the outside. ok the perl works - but it is to send an email to me -- inside my network the emails come from r...@taster.local. I suspect that qmail is rejecting the mail. where in the logs might i see that? what log - and in var\log\qmail\--smtp or what? and if I find it being -rejected- if that is the right way to say it... can i white list anything from " r...@taster.local " thanks! js
