[Qt-creator] New Outline added to sidebar (master branch)
Hi, I just added a new sidebar pane to the qtcreator master branch (5439ce976eaa and onwards). The 'Ouline' shows the structure of the (C++/qml) document you're currently editing. It's the same tree that you get when clicking on the combo box in the editor toolbar, just easier to access :) Right now it's only a navigation helper: Clicking on method in the outline will move the cursor to it's definition in text, moving the cursor in text updates the selection in the outline ... But I'll plan to e.g. also let you rearrange stuff in the outline, at least for a Qml document. Feedback is of course highly appreciated :) Regards Kai -- Kai Koehne Software Engineer Nokia, Qt Development Frameworks Nokia gate5 GmbH Firmensitz: Invalidenstr. 117, 10115 Berlin, Germany Registergericht: Amtsgericht Charlottenburg, Berlin: HRB 106443 B Umsatzsteueridentifikationsnummer: DE 812 845 193 Geschäftsführer: Dr. Michael Halbherr, Karim Tähtivuori ___ Qt-creator mailing list Qt-creator@trolltech.com http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-creator
Re: [Qt-creator] Plugin to display compile errors warnings etc. inline
I introduced a *TaskHub* which essentially emits all the task related signals the buildmanager had, and also the new signals you need. Hi Daniel, I am using your new TaskHub now to create tasks for //todo comments as well. The TaskHub has the interface to add new categories of tasks, but it seems to me that there is no way to add new Icons for the categories as well. Is it possible for you to extend that a bit? It would be great to have a possibility to use own icons for new task categories. Best regards, Markus ___ Qt-creator mailing list Qt-creator@trolltech.com http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-creator
Re: [Qt-creator] Plugin to display compile errors warnings etc. inline
Hi Markus! On 08.07.2010 15:07, ext Liebe Markus (RtP2/TEF72) wrote: I am using your new TaskHub now to create tasks for //todo comments as well. The TaskHub has the interface to add new categories of tasks, but it seems to me that there is no way to add new Icons for the categories as well. Categories are the strings seen in the build issues view when clicking on that little funnel icon (rightmost one). Is it possible for you to extend that a bit? So far there is only a string used. What do you want in addition to that? It would be great to have a possibility to use own icons for new task categories. Icons are only used for the task types (Warning, Error and Unknown). These types can not get extended at this time (and actually I do not consider that a good idea to extend them;-), so we have not seen any need to add icons at this time. PS: Just curious: How are you parsing for the FIXMEs/TODOs? Are you hooking into the C++ parser framework? -- Tobias Hunger Software Engineer Nokia, Qt Development Frameworks Nokia gate5 GmbH Firmensitz: Invalidenstr. 117, 10115 Berlin, Germany Registergericht: Amtsgericht Charlottenburg, Berlin: HRB 106443 B Umsatzsteueridentifikationsnummer: DE 812 845 193 Geschäftsführer: Dr. Michael Halbherr, Karim Tähtivuori ___ Qt-creator mailing list Qt-creator@trolltech.com http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-creator
Re: [Qt-creator] Creator from git crashes when opening files
On Thursday 10 June 2010 15:59:10 ext Liebe Markus (RtP2/TEF72) wrote: If that works, I'd be interested in that line. That worked for me! Thanks. The line is in the attached file. After looking at the code in some detail, the only changes to the restore/saving code was back in the Qt 4.3/ Qt 4.4 time frame. To me that change back then looks potentially incorrect, but I'd guess that's likely not the case. :) From what I can see 32bit vs 64bit should have no effect on the restoring, but if you upgraded your qt from 32 bit to 64 bit, that might have been the reason. If so please comment QTCREATORBUG-1758. So I'm out of ideas for now. daniel ___ Qt-creator mailing list Qt-creator@trolltech.com http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-creator
Re: [Qt-creator] New Outline added to sidebar (master branch)
Too bad we don't get master binary snapshots. What would it take to get them? On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 5:07 AM, kai.koe...@nokia.com wrote: Hi, I just added a new sidebar pane to the qtcreator master branch (5439ce976eaa and onwards). The 'Ouline' shows the structure of the (C++/qml) document you're currently editing. It's the same tree that you get when clicking on the combo box in the editor toolbar, just easier to access :) Right now it's only a navigation helper: Clicking on method in the outline will move the cursor to it's definition in text, moving the cursor in text updates the selection in the outline ... But I'll plan to e.g. also let you rearrange stuff in the outline, at least for a Qml document. Feedback is of course highly appreciated :) Regards Kai -- Kai Koehne Software Engineer Nokia, Qt Development Frameworks Nokia gate5 GmbH Firmensitz: Invalidenstr. 117, 10115 Berlin, Germany Registergericht: Amtsgericht Charlottenburg, Berlin: HRB 106443 B Umsatzsteueridentifikationsnummer: DE 812 845 193 Geschäftsführer: Dr. Michael Halbherr, Karim Tähtivuori ___ Qt-creator mailing list Qt-creator@trolltech.com http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-creator -- Bryce Schober ___ Qt-creator mailing list Qt-creator@trolltech.com http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-creator
[Qt-creator] Qt Creator 2.0 displays additional warning information as errors
Hello, I recently switched from Qt-Creator 1.3 to 2.0. I noticed a strange behavior in the Build Issues-tab: When compiling with gcc, I get a warning that looks like this in the Compiler Output-tab foo.h: In member function `void FooT::bar(const T) [with T = int]': foo.h:137: instantiated from XYZ foo.h:52: instantiated from XY foo.cpp:18: instantiated from here foo.h:60: warning: converting to `int' from `double' This warning is displayed in the Build issues-tab as (no symbol) In member function... (red exclamation mark) instantiated from XYZ (red exclamation mark) instantiated from XY (red exclamation mark) instantiated from here (yellow triangle) converting to `int' from `double' and causes the red error exlamation mark and number 3 to be displayed beneath the build progress bar on the left, which fills with all green, since the compile succeeds. Apparantly, the instantiated from is interpreted as a compile error instead as an additional information to the compile warning. It is pretty astonishing to see compile errors where there are none, but additional warning information. IIRC, this issue was not there in Qt-Creator 1.3 Regards, Philipp ___ Qt-creator mailing list Qt-creator@trolltech.com http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-creator
Re: [Qt-creator] new C++ indenter: request for feedback
Hours? It only needs about 30 minutes to build on an (by now) old Core 2 Duo. I even got it to 20 minutes if I disable stuff I don't need. It's really fast and easy to build your own binaries. I highly recommend it :) On 07/08/2010 09:30 PM, Coda Highland wrote: Seriously, if you've got reasonably modern hardware the whole rebuild process should only take a couple hours (unless you're building four-way universal binaries or something, but that's just silly if you're not intending to distribute). /s/ Adam On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 1:14 PM,kai.koe...@nokia.com wrote: Bryce Schober wrote on Thursday, July 08, 2010 6:51 PM: Too bad we don't get master binary snapshots. Maybe I should repeat this mantra indefinitely. ;-) I think we got the point now :) We have some dedicated machines here for the nightly builds. They are however building from the 2.0 branch, because that's were the next release will come from (see e-mail from Eike a while ago). And we AFAIK don't have the resources to build two in configurations in parallel. Anyhow, out of curiosity: Why do you push so much for nightly builds, in contrast to compiling yourself? It's true that you might have to compile Qt yourself then once, but then updating / recompiling creator afterwards isn't really a big hassle. Kai ___ Qt-creator mailing list Qt-creator@trolltech.com http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-creator ___ Qt-creator mailing list Qt-creator@trolltech.com http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-creator
Re: [Qt-creator] new C++ indenter: request for feedback
You can build QtWebKit that fast? *blink* I'd believe the 20 minute figure if you disable QtWebKit but I think Creator needs it. /s/ Adam On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 1:36 PM, Nikos Chantziaras rea...@arcor.de wrote: Hours? It only needs about 30 minutes to build on an (by now) old Core 2 Duo. I even got it to 20 minutes if I disable stuff I don't need. It's really fast and easy to build your own binaries. I highly recommend it :) On 07/08/2010 09:30 PM, Coda Highland wrote: Seriously, if you've got reasonably modern hardware the whole rebuild process should only take a couple hours (unless you're building four-way universal binaries or something, but that's just silly if you're not intending to distribute). /s/ Adam On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 1:14 PM,kai.koe...@nokia.com wrote: Bryce Schober wrote on Thursday, July 08, 2010 6:51 PM: Too bad we don't get master binary snapshots. Maybe I should repeat this mantra indefinitely. ;-) I think we got the point now :) We have some dedicated machines here for the nightly builds. They are however building from the 2.0 branch, because that's were the next release will come from (see e-mail from Eike a while ago). And we AFAIK don't have the resources to build two in configurations in parallel. Anyhow, out of curiosity: Why do you push so much for nightly builds, in contrast to compiling yourself? It's true that you might have to compile Qt yourself then once, but then updating / recompiling creator afterwards isn't really a big hassle. Kai ___ Qt-creator mailing list Qt-creator@trolltech.com http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-creator ___ Qt-creator mailing list Qt-creator@trolltech.com http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-creator ___ Qt-creator mailing list Qt-creator@trolltech.com http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-creator
Re: [Qt-creator] new C++ indenter: request for feedback
30 Minutes? For all of Qt? What hardware are you building on? I have an 8 way Xeon Nehalem using GCC with 16 threads and it takes at least an hour or so to build with WebKit disabled... Mike Jackson On 7/8/10 3:00 PM, in article aanlktilfeinaqca9_lm9iw5ezkepn_nyoysgeds7x...@mail.gmail.com, Coda Highland wrote: You can build QtWebKit that fast? *blink* I'd believe the 20 minute figure if you disable QtWebKit but I think Creator needs it. /s/ Adam On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 1:36 PM, Nikos Chantziaras rea...@arcor.de wrote: Hours? It only needs about 30 minutes to build on an (by now) old Core 2 Duo. I even got it to 20 minutes if I disable stuff I don't need. It's really fast and easy to build your own binaries. I highly recommend it :) On 07/08/2010 09:30 PM, Coda Highland wrote: Seriously, if you've got reasonably modern hardware the whole rebuild process should only take a couple hours (unless you're building four-way universal binaries or something, but that's just silly if you're not intending to distribute). /s/ Adam On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 1:14 PM,kai.koe...@nokia.com wrote: Bryce Schober wrote on Thursday, July 08, 2010 6:51 PM: Too bad we don't get master binary snapshots. Maybe I should repeat this mantra indefinitely. ;-) I think we got the point now :) We have some dedicated machines here for the nightly builds. They are however building from the 2.0 branch, because that's were the next release will come from (see e-mail from Eike a while ago). And we AFAIK don't have the resources to build two in configurations in parallel. Anyhow, out of curiosity: Why do you push so much for nightly builds, in contrast to compiling yourself? It's true that you might have to compile Qt yourself then once, but then updating / recompiling creator afterwards isn't really a big hassle. Kai ___ Qt-creator mailing list Qt-creator@trolltech.com http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-creator ___ Qt-creator mailing list Qt-creator@trolltech.com http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-creator ___ Qt-creator mailing list Qt-creator@trolltech.com http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-creator
Re: [Qt-creator] new C++ indenter: request for feedback
I have two dual-core Xeon 2.66GHz and build with five threads and it only takes me ~45 minutes to build Qt without WebKit; did you forget to disable demos and examples? /s/ Adam On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 2:32 PM, Michael Jackson mike.jack...@bluequartz.net wrote: 30 Minutes? For all of Qt? What hardware are you building on? I have an 8 way Xeon Nehalem using GCC with 16 threads and it takes at least an hour or so to build with WebKit disabled... Mike Jackson On 7/8/10 3:00 PM, in article aanlktilfeinaqca9_lm9iw5ezkepn_nyoysgeds7x...@mail.gmail.com, Coda Highland wrote: You can build QtWebKit that fast? *blink* I'd believe the 20 minute figure if you disable QtWebKit but I think Creator needs it. /s/ Adam On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 1:36 PM, Nikos Chantziaras rea...@arcor.de wrote: Hours? It only needs about 30 minutes to build on an (by now) old Core 2 Duo. I even got it to 20 minutes if I disable stuff I don't need. It's really fast and easy to build your own binaries. I highly recommend it :) On 07/08/2010 09:30 PM, Coda Highland wrote: Seriously, if you've got reasonably modern hardware the whole rebuild process should only take a couple hours (unless you're building four-way universal binaries or something, but that's just silly if you're not intending to distribute). /s/ Adam On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 1:14 PM,kai.koe...@nokia.com wrote: Bryce Schober wrote on Thursday, July 08, 2010 6:51 PM: Too bad we don't get master binary snapshots. Maybe I should repeat this mantra indefinitely. ;-) I think we got the point now :) We have some dedicated machines here for the nightly builds. They are however building from the 2.0 branch, because that's were the next release will come from (see e-mail from Eike a while ago). And we AFAIK don't have the resources to build two in configurations in parallel. Anyhow, out of curiosity: Why do you push so much for nightly builds, in contrast to compiling yourself? It's true that you might have to compile Qt yourself then once, but then updating / recompiling creator afterwards isn't really a big hassle. Kai ___ Qt-creator mailing list Qt-creator@trolltech.com http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-creator ___ Qt-creator mailing list Qt-creator@trolltech.com http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-creator ___ Qt-creator mailing list Qt-creator@trolltech.com http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-creator ___ Qt-creator mailing list Qt-creator@trolltech.com http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-creator
Re: [Qt-creator] Qt Creator 2.0 displays additional warning information as errors
Hello, I have to confirm this problem, see my mail titled QtCreator 2.0: Line in warning is interpreted as error as of jun 26. Martin Am Donnerstag, 8. Juli 2010 schrieb m...@philippmuenzel.de: Hello, I recently switched from Qt-Creator 1.3 to 2.0. I noticed a strange behavior in the Build Issues-tab: When compiling with gcc, I get a warning that looks like this in the Compiler Output-tab foo.h: In member function `void FooT::bar(const T) [with T = int]': foo.h:137: instantiated from XYZ foo.h:52: instantiated from XY foo.cpp:18: instantiated from here foo.h:60: warning: converting to `int' from `double' This warning is displayed in the Build issues-tab as (no symbol) In member function... (red exclamation mark) instantiated from XYZ (red exclamation mark) instantiated from XY (red exclamation mark) instantiated from here (yellow triangle) converting to `int' from `double' and causes the red error exlamation mark and number 3 to be displayed beneath the build progress bar on the left, which fills with all green, since the compile succeeds. Apparantly, the instantiated from is interpreted as a compile error instead as an additional information to the compile warning. It is pretty astonishing to see compile errors where there are none, but additional warning information. IIRC, this issue was not there in Qt-Creator 1.3 Regards, Philipp ___ Qt-creator mailing list Qt-creator@trolltech.com http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-creator ___ Qt-creator mailing list Qt-creator@trolltech.com http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-creator
Re: [Qt-creator] new C++ indenter: request for feedback
It'd be nice if at least Nokia would release Qt 4.7 binary pre-releases for Linux, like the other platforms. That would make the process of getting to building Qt Creator a lot shorter. On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 11:14 AM, kai.koe...@nokia.com wrote: Bryce Schober wrote on Thursday, July 08, 2010 6:51 PM: Too bad we don't get master binary snapshots. Maybe I should repeat this mantra indefinitely. ;-) I think we got the point now :) We have some dedicated machines here for the nightly builds. They are however building from the 2.0 branch, because that's were the next release will come from (see e-mail from Eike a while ago). And we AFAIK don't have the resources to build two in configurations in parallel. Anyhow, out of curiosity: Why do you push so much for nightly builds, in contrast to compiling yourself? It's true that you might have to compile Qt yourself then once, but then updating / recompiling creator afterwards isn't really a big hassle. Kai ___ Qt-creator mailing list Qt-creator@trolltech.com http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-creator -- Bryce Schober ___ Qt-creator mailing list Qt-creator@trolltech.com http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-creator
Re: [Qt-creator] new C++ indenter: request for feedback
Yes, ~30 minutes. That's without demos and examples; I've never built those and I don't know how much it would need with those. This is on Linux. I once tried on Windows, but after about two hours of compiling I gave up and aborted the build :-/ On 07/08/2010 10:32 PM, Michael Jackson wrote: 30 Minutes? For all of Qt? What hardware are you building on? I have an 8 way Xeon Nehalem using GCC with 16 threads and it takes at least an hour or so to build with WebKit disabled... Mike Jackson On 7/8/10 3:00 PM, in article aanlktilfeinaqca9_lm9iw5ezkepn_nyoysgeds7x...@mail.gmail.com, Coda Highland wrote: You can build QtWebKit that fast? *blink* I'd believe the 20 minute figure if you disable QtWebKit but I think Creator needs it. /s/ Adam On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 1:36 PM, Nikos Chantziarasrea...@arcor.de wrote: Hours? It only needs about 30 minutes to build on an (by now) old Core 2 Duo. I even got it to 20 minutes if I disable stuff I don't need. It's really fast and easy to build your own binaries. I highly recommend it :) On 07/08/2010 09:30 PM, Coda Highland wrote: Seriously, if you've got reasonably modern hardware the whole rebuild process should only take a couple hours (unless you're building four-way universal binaries or something, but that's just silly if you're not intending to distribute). /s/ Adam On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 1:14 PM,kai.koe...@nokia.comwrote: Bryce Schober wrote on Thursday, July 08, 2010 6:51 PM: Too bad we don't get master binary snapshots. Maybe I should repeat this mantra indefinitely. ;-) I think we got the point now :) We have some dedicated machines here for the nightly builds. They are however building from the 2.0 branch, because that's were the next release will come from (see e-mail from Eike a while ago). And we AFAIK don't have the resources to build two in configurations in parallel. Anyhow, out of curiosity: Why do you push so much for nightly builds, in contrast to compiling yourself? It's true that you might have to compile Qt yourself then once, but then updating / recompiling creator afterwards isn't really a big hassle. Kai ___ Qt-creator mailing list Qt-creator@trolltech.com http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-creator ___ Qt-creator mailing list Qt-creator@trolltech.com http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-creator ___ Qt-creator mailing list Qt-creator@trolltech.com http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-creator
