Re: [QUAD-L] No Threat
In a message dated 28/09/2004 00:51:07 GMT Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Getting the people that did this act, along with all the hits they've done to the rest of the world That was nicely said Dave, completely agree with you there! If we on Earth can't bring them to justice, they've got some serious worrying to start doing for when they reach the pearly gates and get turned away. One way or another life itself will show them just how far they have gone, and it will be much more powerfull than man's form of punishment. Love Smurf xxx
Re: [QUAD-L] No Threat
Title: Re: [QUAD-L] No Threat I appreciate you’re not taking offense at my kidding. It was less what day was referenced, than the date Smurf attributes to you: In a message dated 10/09/2004 23:10:29 GMT Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I honestly doubt that you or anyone in the world has sent an e-mail on a date not yet arrived. :-) Boyd 50 Years Post (No kidd’n) --- On 9/27/04 7:15 PM, "David K. Kelmer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Actually, the calendar was correct. It was I that was turned back by one day. :) With Love, CtrlAltDel aka Dave C4/5 Complete - 28 Years Post Texas, USA --- Boyd Jenkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Pardon me? Somebody turn their calendar a bit hasty? Boyd On 9/27/04 1:59 PM, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: In a message dated 10/09/2004 23:10:29 GMT Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Amen! Never forget what was done to America 3 years ago tomorrow! Never forget! With Love, CtrlAltDel aka Dave C4/5 Complete - 28 Year Post Texas, USA I don't think anyone could ever forget what happened on 9/11. It's going to be one of those events in which everyone will be able to remember what they were doing and where they were when they found out the towers had been hit. I was at home of sick from college when our TV programme had been cancelled with the news cutting in with the devastating images of the first tower smoking... God bless all the family and friends of the victims Love Smurf xxx
Re: [QUAD-L] No Threat
Actually, the calendar was correct. It was I that was turned back by one day. :) With Love, CtrlAltDel aka DaveC4/5 Complete - 28 Years PostTexas, USA Boyd Jenkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Pardon me? Somebody turn their calendar a bit hasty?BoydOn 9/27/04 1:59 PM, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: In a message dated 10/09/2004 23:10:29 GMT Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Amen! Never forget what was done to America 3 years ago tomorrow! Never forget! With Love,CtrlAltDel aka DaveC4/5 Complete - 28 Year PostTexas, USA I don't think anyone could ever forget what happened on 9/11. It's going to be one of those events in which everyone will be able to remember what they were doing and where they were when they found out the towers had been hit. I was at home of sick from college when our TV programme had been cancelled with the news cutting in with the devastating images of the first tower smoking... God bless all the family and friends of the victims Love Smurf xxx
Re: [QUAD-L] No Threat
Hi Smurf, Remembering will be easy for those touched by this evil. Getting the people that did this act, along with all the hits they've done to the rest of the world, will help me remember a lot better. God bless all those hurt by this evil. With Love, CtrlAltDel aka DaveC4/5 Complete - 28 Years PostTexas, USA [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In a message dated 10/09/2004 23:10:29 GMT Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Amen! Never forget what was done to America 3 years ago tomorrow! Never forget! With Love, CtrlAltDel aka DaveC4/5 Complete - 28 Year PostTexas, USA I don't think anyone could ever forget what happened on 9/11. It's going to be one of those events in which everyone will be able to remember what they were doing and where they were when they found out the towers had been hit. I was at home of sick from college when our TV programme had been cancelled with the news cutting in with the devastating images of the first tower smoking... God bless all the family and friends of the victims Love Smurf xxx
Re: [QUAD-L] No Threat
Title: Re: [QUAD-L] No Threat Pardon me? Somebody turn their calendar a bit hasty? Boyd On 9/27/04 1:59 PM, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: In a message dated 10/09/2004 23:10:29 GMT Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Amen! Never forget what was done to America 3 years ago tomorrow! Never forget! With Love, CtrlAltDel aka Dave C4/5 Complete - 28 Year Post Texas, USA I don't think anyone could ever forget what happened on 9/11. It's going to be one of those events in which everyone will be able to remember what they were doing and where they were when they found out the towers had been hit. I was at home of sick from college when our TV programme had been cancelled with the news cutting in with the devastating images of the first tower smoking... God bless all the family and friends of the victims Love Smurf xxx
Re: [QUAD-L] No Threat
In a message dated 10/09/2004 23:10:29 GMT Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Amen! Never forget what was done to America 3 years ago tomorrow! Never forget! With Love, CtrlAltDel aka DaveC4/5 Complete - 28 Year PostTexas, USA I don't think anyone could ever forget what happened on 9/11. It's going to be one of those events in which everyone will be able to remember what they were doing and where they were when they found out the towers had been hit. I was at home of sick from college when our TV programme had been cancelled with the news cutting in with the devastating images of the first tower smoking... God bless all the family and friends of the victims Love Smurf xxx
Re: [QUAD-L] No Threat
Amen! Never forget what was done to America 3 years ago tomorrow! Never forget! With Love, CtrlAltDel aka DaveC4/5 Complete - 28 Year PostTexas, USA QuadPirate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hey Smurf, Osama Bin Laden planned and executed the WTC with Al Queda and I'm not sure if his plan was for them to fall but I'm sure he was hoping they did. ---Original Message--- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wednesday, September 08, 2004 16:10:53 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [QUAD-L] No Threat In a message dated 24/08/2004 22:35:36 GMT Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I believe that's why we have prisons and the death penalty Wheel! But I hardly think Sadam was doing "Goofy" murders, this man cut off his 2 son in law's heads because they told what his WMD plans were, isn't that a threat? You know before 9/11 it was only a plan to knock down the WTC but this plan was executed. Sadam's son in law's told his many plans but these plans will never be executed now. Mark Hey Mark, You know what you was saying about it only being a plan for Sadam to take down the WTC, how comes it actually went ahead all of a sudden? I heard that they was only planning on crashing into the towers, and that they had no intentions of knocking them down is there any truth in that? Love Smurf xxx IncrediMail - Email has finally evolved - Click Here
Re: [QUAD-L] No Threat
Hey Smurf, Osama Bin Laden planned and executed the WTC with Al Queda and I'm not sure if his plan was for them to fall but I'm sure he was hoping they did. ---Original Message--- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wednesday, September 08, 2004 16:10:53 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [QUAD-L] No Threat In a message dated 24/08/2004 22:35:36 GMT Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I believe that's why we have prisons and the death penalty Wheel! But I hardly think Sadam was doing "Goofy" murders, this man cut off his 2 son in law's heads because they told what his WMD plans were, isn't that a threat? You know before 9/11 it was only a plan to knock down the WTC but this plan was executed. Sadam's son in law's told his many plans but these plans will never be executed now. Mark Hey Mark, You know what you was saying about it only being a plan for Sadam to take down the WTC, how comes it actually went ahead all of a sudden? I heard that they was only planning on crashing into the towers, and that they had no intentions of knocking them down is there any truth in that? Love Smurf xxx IncrediMail - Email has finally evolved - Click Here
Re: [QUAD-L] No Threat
In a message dated 24/08/2004 22:35:36 GMT Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I believe that's why we have prisons and the death penalty Wheel! But I hardly think Sadam was doing "Goofy" murders, this man cut off his 2 son in law's heads because they told what his WMD plans were, isn't that a threat? You know before 9/11 it was only a plan to knock down the WTC but this plan was executed. Sadam's son in law's told his many plans but these plans will never be executed now. Mark Hey Mark, You know what you was saying about it only being a plan for Sadam to take down the WTC, how comes it actually went ahead all of a sudden? I heard that they was only planning on crashing into the towers, and that they had no intentions of knocking them down is there any truth in that? Love Smurf xxx
Re: [QUAD-L] No Threat
Keith...i like the site that informs, i've been looking for a site that spells out issues unbiased thanks dudetony - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2004 7:44 AM Subject: Re: [QUAD-L] No Threat Tim writes: And I would just about bet that most people on this list who are for Bush, have money. All the people involved in this political wrangling just got my 2 cents worth. Well, I'm for Bush and I just have enough mammon to squeeze by. Besides... Why put two more Johns in the White House when there is enough crap in there already. Jus' kidding. But with this said, I do like the site www.vote-smart.org it gives you the good and the bad on both guys. Keith/c4c5/NJ
Re: [QUAD-L] No Threat
Tim writes: And I would just about bet that most people on this list who are for Bush, have money. All the people involved in this political wrangling just got my 2 cents worth. Well, I'm for Bush and I just have enough mammon to squeeze by. Besides... Why put two more Johns in the White House when there is enough crap in there already. Jus' kidding. But with this said, I do like the site www.vote-smart.org it gives you the good and the bad on both guys. Keith/c4c5/NJ
Re: [QUAD-L] No Threat, Rush L.
In a message dated 8/25/2004 12:11:09 PM US Mountain Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: SPEAKING of big jack, i just blew $300 on my van-lift 300 on mine too. the hangars were bent. i think this is going to be a constant pain, and not very dependable. i may switch to an inside lift. this under the van style is very fragile. dave
Re: [QUAD-L] No Threat, Rush L.
Wheelu bring up a great point about Rush, the druggie, not the band!! He had wa too much stuff for his own personal useyou couldn't take OC80s and do a talk show!! He might have done some, but he was spending BIG JACK on them...it was not ALL for personal use!! SPEAKING of big jack, i just blew $300 on my van-lifta cylinder was leaking hydralic fluid!! I want to thank the gods for the birthday presentlol peace outtony - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2004 9:01 AM Subject: [QUAD-L] No Threat, Rush L. > > In a message dated 8/25/04 7:46:51 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > << I do not recall Rush Limbaugh ever being "arrested," W. The State > Attorney (DA) in Palm Beach County has been investigating the case for months, but I > haven't read of any arrest to date. > > Jerry > >> > > Thanks for the update, but, isn't is kinda strange that someone has been > keeping a lid on Rush and all those meds. (He had enough RX Meds to be considered > a major distributor). Anyone else with a fraction of the meds would still be > sitting in the houzgow eating green balogna. > W >
Re: [QUAD-L] No Threat, Rush L.
> Russ Limbaugh was arrested and accused of purchasing load of RX, but I've > never heard of him actually going to trial. I do not recall Rush Limbaugh ever being "arrested," W. The State Attorney (DA) in Palm Beach County has been investigating the case for months, but I haven't read of any arrest to date. Jerry
Re: [QUAD-L] No Threat
Stuntman, Have you personally met George W. Bush? I have on two occasions and my impression is that in a one on one situation, he is a warm and even a caring person. I also think that President Bush is incapable of independent, critical thought and that he is unaware of his personal limitations. You are very critical of Michael Moore's movie Fahrenheit 911. Have you seen the movie? I thought that it was presented in a very negative manner for the Bush Family, the Saudi Royal Family, the current Bush Administration, and certain large corporations. However, I do not recall any significant factual errors and I am unaware of any egregious mistatements of fact. What "lies" are you referring to in Fahrenheit 911?Respectfully, Keith
Re: [QUAD-L] No Threat
Dead wrong, I'm for Bush and a Vet who served during Nam. I'm on SSI so you know that means I don't have extra cash lying around. Kerry WILL NOT be putting any money in your pocket. He is for higher taxes. He has more money than Bush. And has slung more mud than Bush. Iraq was a dangerous threat and France screwed us out of Full UN support. We liberated Afganistan almost decimating the Taliban while eliminating a lot of Al Queda and have bin hidden in a cave somewhere. Usay or Uday was friendly with al Queda and they had a training camp in Iraq. Sadamned has been sending money to terrorists for decades trying to kill Israelies. Krazy Gadafi saw what happened to Sadamned and gave up his WMD program (which included Iraqi nuke scientists) and shut down all links to Terrorists. While no "significant number" of WMD's have been found YET, there have been some found. The Democrats use meatheads like moore to spread lies and propaganda, but the momment the Swiftboat Captains questioned Kerrys claims they screamed bloody murder. So don't believe the propaganda that Bush is only representing the rich. Families with children got more of their own money still in their pocket. Small businesses had the biggest volume of growth, most are owned by people taxed like an individual, and Bush created special incentives for their investing in new equipment and hiring people. Don't believe the propaganda that Sadamned didn't pose a significant threat. His hero was Stalin. He wanted to be the ruler of the Arab Nations and thought he could acieve it by destroying Israel. We were declared war upon decades ago. 9/11 finally woke most people up to it. The world changed forever for Americans. Twerrorists will see any sign of wanting to negotiate as weakness that they will exploit. They don't want to negotiate. They want to kill us. So the question comes down to how far will we go to destroy them first? Kerry has stated he will wager a more "sensitive" war on Terror. He is living in the 60's. And don't believe the propaganda that the tax cuts only benefited the rich. http://www.scaryjohnkerry.com/taxes.htm > > I agree QP, but we all live w/threats on a daily basis. How to deal w/threats is the question. Was Saddam a threat, "yes", was he the reason for 911, "no", was 911 the reason for us going into Iraq, depends on who you ask. The bottom line is al-Qaida was responsible for 911, so we went to Iraq? what did they think Saddam would have weapons of mass destruction, "and Osama", come on. So many countries are a threat to the world community, should we jump into every country that poses a threat. If so, we better have more global support. Today, our leadership has walked away from more than a century of American leadership in the world to embrace a new, and dangerously ineffective, American disregard for the world. They bully instead of persuade. They act alone when they could assemble a team. They confuse leadership with going it alone. They fail to understand that real leadership means standing by your principles and rallying others to join you. The only way for the U.S. to r! > egain > respect in the world community is to change presidents. I am not anti-Bush nor am I pro-Kerry, a politician is a politician, most will screw you for they're own gain. I vote for who (I HOPE) will benefit me the most. And I would just about bet that most people on this list who are for Bush, have money. All the people involved in this political wrangling just got my 2 cents worth. > Tim > www.geocities.com/onemofortom > > > > QuadPirate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > FLAVOR00-NONE---3.0;You know I hate that our soldiers fighting this war and losing their lives but I hardly think that Iraq wasn't a threat. > In 1993 Sadam tried to take former President Bush with a car bomb in Kuwait and President Clinton sent a couple cruise missiles into Iraqi intelligence headquarters. > Sadam repeatedly kicked out UN inspectors and used the oil for food money like an ATM machine. > All he had to do was show them how he destroyed his biological weapons and refused to. > Like I said I hate this war but how can anyone honestly say there's no threat. > > Mark
Re: [QUAD-L] No Threat
h, you said it right Toddi'm not a Bush hater, nor a Kerry loverand ur right in the way that they are STILL politicians, which u gotta wonder what's the face they put on, and what's real but hey, i have two, ok, three, choices...gotta vote the policies you want to see just remember, all our presidents have been liars in some wayJFK, Johnson, Nixon, Reagan, Clint and the Bush family...lol tony - Original Message - From: t crook To: QuadPirate ; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 24, 2004 5:39 PM Subject: Re: [QUAD-L] No Threat I agree QP, but we all live w/threats on a daily basis. How to deal w/threats is the question. Was Saddam a threat, "yes", was he the reason for 911, "no", was 911 the reason for us going into Iraq, depends on who you ask. The bottom line is al-Qaida was responsible for 911, so we went to Iraq? what did they think Saddam would have weapons of mass destruction, "and Osama", come on. So many countries are a threat to the world community, should we jump into every country that poses a threat. If so, we better have more global support. Today, our leadership has walked away from more than a century of American leadership in the world to embrace a new, and dangerously ineffective, American disregard for the world. They bully instead of persuade. They act alone when they could assemble a team. They confuse leadership with going it alone. They fail to understand that real leadership means s! tanding by your principles and rallying others to join you. The only way for the U.S. to regain respect in the world community is to change presidents. I am not anti-Bush nor am I pro-Kerry, a politician is a politician, most will screw you for they're own gain. I vote for who (I HOPE) will benefit me the most. And I would just about bet that most people on this list who are for Bush, have money. All the people involved in this political wrangling just got my 2 cents worth. Tim www.geocities.com/onemofortom QuadPirate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: You know I hate that our soldiers fighting this war and losing their lives but I hardly think that Iraq wasn't a threat. In 1993 Sadam tried to take former President Bush with a car bomb in Kuwait and President Clinton sent a couple cruise missiles into Iraqi intelligence headquarters. Sadam repeatedly kicked out UN inspectors and used the oil for food money like an ATM machine. All he had to do was show them how he destroyed his biological weapons and refused to. Like I said I hate this war but how can anyone honestly say there's no threat. Mark IncrediMail - Email has finally evolved - Click Here Do you Yahoo!?New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - 100MB free storage!
Re: [QUAD-L] No Threat
an 45 days following adoption of this resolution and to update the C! ouncil 60 days thereafter; 6. Endorses the 8 October 2002 letter from the Executive Chairman of UNMOVIC and the Director General of the IAEA to General Al-Saadi of the Government of Iraq, which is annexed hereto, and decides that the contents of the letter shall be binding upon Iraq; 7. Decides further that, in view of the prolonged interruption by Iraq of the presence of UNMOVIC and the IAEA and in order for them to accomplish the tasks set forth in this resolution and all previous relevant resolutions and notwithstanding prior understandings, the Council hereby establishes the following revised or additional authorities, which shall be binding upon Iraq , to facilitate their work in Iraq: -- UNMOVIC and the IAEA shall determine the composition of their inspection teams and ensure that these teams are composed of the most qualified and experienced experts available; -- All UNMOVIC and IAEA personnel shall enjoy the privileges and immunities, corresponding to those of experts on mission, provided in the Convention on Privileges and Immunities of the United Nations and the Agreement on the Privileges and Immunities of the IAEA ; -- UNMOVIC and the IAEA shall have unrestricted rights of entry into and out of Iraq, the right to free, unrestricted, and immediate movement to and from inspection sites, and the right to inspect any sites and buildings, including immediate, unimpeded, unconditional, and unrestricted access to Presidential Sites equal to that at other sites, notwithstanding the provisions of resolution 1154 (1998); -- UNMOVIC and the IAEA shall have the right to be provided by Iraq the names of all personnel currently and formerly associated with Iraq's chemical, biological, nuclear, and ballistic missile programmes and the associated research, development, and production facilities; -- Security of UNMOVIC and IAEA facilities shall be ensured by sufficient UN security guards; -- UNMOVIC and the IAEA shall have the right to declare, for the purposes of freezing a site to be inspected, exclusion zones, including surrounding areas and transit corridors, in which Iraq will suspend ground and aerial movement so that nothing is changed in or taken out of a site being inspected; -- UNMOVIC and the IAEA shall have the free and unrestricted use and landing of fixed- and rotary-winged aircraft, including manned and unmanned reconnaissance vehicles; -- UNMOVIC and the IAEA shall have the right at their sole discretion verifiably to remove, destroy, or render harmless all prohibited weapons, subsystems, components, records, materials, and other related items, and the right to impound or close any facilities or equipment for the production thereof; and -- UNMOVIC and the IAEA shall have the right to free import and use of equipment or materials for inspections and to seize and export any equipment, materials, or documents taken during inspections, without search of UNMOVIC or IAEA personnel or official or personal baggage; 8. Decides further that Iraq shall not take or threaten hostile acts directed against any representative or personnel of the United Nations or the IAEA or of any Member State taking action to uphold any Council resolution; 9. Requests the Secretary General immediately to notify Iraq of this resolution, which is binding on Iraq; demands that Iraq confirm within seven days of that notification its intention to comply fully with this resolution; and demands further that Iraq cooperate immediately, unconditionally, and actively with UNMOVIC and the IAEA; 10. Requests all Member States to give full support to UNMOVIC and the IAEA in the discharge of their mandates, including by providing any information related to prohibited programmes or other aspects of their mandates, including on Iraqi attempts since 1998 to acquire prohibited items, and by recommending sites to be inspected, persons to be interviewed, conditions of such interviews, and data to be collected, the results of which shall be reported to the Council by UNMOVIC and the IAEA; 11. Directs the Executive Chairman of UNMOVIC and the Director General of the IAEA to report immediately to the Council any interference by Iraq with inspection activities, as well as any failure by Iraq to comply with its disarmament obligations, including its obligations regarding inspections under this resolution; 12. Decides to convene immediately upon receipt of a report in accordance with paragraphs 4 or 11 above, in order to consider the situation and the need for full compliance with all of the relevant Council resolutions in order to secure international peace and security; 13. Recalls, in that context, that the Council has repeatedly warned Iraq that it will face serious consequences as a result of its continued violations of its obligations; 14. Decides to remain seized of the matter. -------Original Message--- From: t crook Date: Tuesday, August 24, 20
Re: [QUAD-L] No Threat
I agree QP, but we all live w/threats on a daily basis. How to deal w/threats is the question. Was Saddam a threat, "yes", was he the reason for 911, "no", was 911 the reason for us going into Iraq, depends on who you ask. The bottom line is al-Qaida was responsible for 911, so we went to Iraq? what did they think Saddam would have weapons of mass destruction, "and Osama", come on. So many countries are a threat to the world community, should we jump into every country that poses a threat. If so, we better have more global support. Today, our leadership has walked away from more than a century of American leadership in the world to embrace a new, and dangerously ineffective, American disregard for the world. They bully instead of persuade. They act alone when they could assemble a team. They confuse leadership with going it alone. They fail to understand that real leadership means s! tanding by your principles and rallying others to join you. The only way for the U.S. to regain respect in the world community is to change presidents. I am not anti-Bush nor am I pro-Kerry, a politician is a politician, most will screw you for they're own gain. I vote for who (I HOPE) will benefit me the most. And I would just about bet that most people on this list who are for Bush, have money. All the people involved in this political wrangling just got my 2 cents worth. Tim www.geocities.com/onemofortom QuadPirate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: You know I hate that our soldiers fighting this war and losing their lives but I hardly think that Iraq wasn't a threat. In 1993 Sadam tried to take former President Bush with a car bomb in Kuwait and President Clinton sent a couple cruise missiles into Iraqi intelligence headquarters. Sadam repeatedly kicked out UN inspectors and used the oil for food money like an ATM machine. All he had to do was show them how he destroyed his biological weapons and refused to. Like I said I hate this war but how can anyone honestly say there's no threat. Mark IncrediMail - Email has finally evolved - Click Here Do you Yahoo!? New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - 100MB free storage!
Re: [QUAD-L] No Threat
I believe that's why we have prisons and the death penalty Wheel! But I hardly think Sadam was doing "Goofy" murders, this man cut off his 2 son in law's heads because they told what his WMD plans were, isn't that a threat? You know before 9/11 it was only a plan to knock down the WTC but this plan was executed. Sadam's son in law's told his many plans but these plans will never be executed now. Mark ---Original Message--- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tuesday, August 24, 2004 15:18:23 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [QUAD-L] No Threat In a message dated 8/24/04 2:58:32 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:<< Like I said I hate this war but how can anyone honestly say there's nothreat.Mark >>Threat has to be measured in percent and not gut feelings. Even our friends and neighbors pose some type of threat under the right conditions. Consider how many friends in the USA kill their friends, families and love ones under very goofy reasons.W. IncrediMail - Email has finally evolved - Click Here
Re: [QUAD-L] No Threat
In a message dated 8/24/04 2:58:32 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: << Like I said I hate this war but how can anyone honestly say there's no threat. Mark >> Threat has to be measured in percent and not gut feelings. Even our friends and neighbors pose some type of threat under the right conditions. Consider how many friends in the USA kill their friends, families and love ones under very goofy reasons. W
