dial-up problems

2002-02-26 Thread Silviu Cojocaru


I am using RH 7.1. I have configured two dial-up accounts using
the dial-up config tool provided by redhat. If I use rp3 to dial
in into any account, host resolving works without any need for
me specify any nameserver. Now, I understand that rp3 is a
wrapper for wvdial. If I try to dial into those accounts by
using wvdial account_name the computer will make the
connection, it will authenticate but something like ping
mail.yahoo.com will return an error that the hostname does not
exist. Another part of the problem is that the second ISP says
nothing about the IP address of their namserver.

Any idea on how to make host resolving work without editing
/etc/resolv.conf ?
 
-- 
I can't hear you. There's a banana republic in my ear.
__



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



Re: Problems getting RH 7.2 to boot properly

2002-01-02 Thread Silviu Cojocaru

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

1 Jan 2002 at 01:39:04 ,
K Old wrote the following
on the Problems getting RH 7.2 to boot properly thread:

 All equipment is brand new and has been exchanged a few times cause certain
 components weren't working right, but now everything seems ok.

 I am having all kinds of (what seems to be) memory leaks or something like
 that, during bootup.  I am attaching all sorts of logs for those that can
 help.

 I don't know what to do from here.

Please pardon me, but when exactly did it seem to you like a
good idea to post a mail of about 1MB in size to this group ?

- --
Overcome by jealousy, Data dismembers the Energizer Bunny
__
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (MingW32)
Comment: Member of the PGP-Basics, Encryption Help Team

iD8DBQE8M5pd8WBGNj3ut+0RAmEsAKCKT/qmwxJp2pis1zZMlTQPZ+RasACfcd9W
uBRbbanvdO2WgdMwsyQGlKI=
=g7eX
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



Re[2]: syslogd problem

2001-05-05 Thread Silviu Cojocaru


Friday, May 04, 2001, 2:04:19 AM, Zoki wrote:

[cut]
...
[cut]

Zoki, please oh please, take off those HTML tags.


-- 
   If Bill Gates had a dime for every time a Windows box crashed...
...,Oh wait, he already does.




___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



Re[2]: how to boot to linux (floppy damaged)

2001-05-05 Thread Silviu Cojocaru


Friday, May 04, 2001, 2:04:18 AM, Zoki wrote:

 html
 At 13:45 10/04/01 -0500, you wrote:br
 blockquote type=cite class=cite citegt; i have a dual boot box with NT and linux 
fine. MBR isbr
 gt; controlled by NT. TO boot to linux i boot from floppy.br
 gt; however i have damaged my floppy.br
 gt; is there a way i can boot into linux ?? (other thanbr
 gt; from reinstall Linux again)/blockquote
 x-sigsepp/x-sigsep
 Just boot with your RH CD, choose quot;upgradequot; as install option and run it. 
Then create 2 floppies, one which will be a reserve.br
 br
 Then you should read the NT dual boot HOWTO.br
 --br
 Cheers,br
 Zoran.br
 nbsp; _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/br
 nbsp;_/ Zoran GRBIC _/nbsp; Linux user amp; advocatenbsp; _/br
 _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/br
 Registered Linux user #191208/html
^
|
This must be the ugliest HTML e-mail ever. My mailer
couldn't even see it as HTML, yuck! Please don't do that again.

-- 
   If Bill Gates had a dime for every time a Windows box crashed...
...,Oh wait, he already does.




___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



Re: Introduce New subs.

2001-04-28 Thread Silviu Cojocaru

HUH?! Don't mean to be rude, but do send mail to this list if
your OS gives ya head akes else, don't send mail. On the other
hand this is the coolest Test message I've ever seen on this
list.

- Original Message -
From: Alireza Saleh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: red [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, April 28, 2001 7:57 AM
Subject: Introduce New subs.


 Hi dear friends,
 I'm a new subscriber in this list, I'm new in LINUX RH  and I
need your help
 to be a professional like one of you.
 Thanx
 Alireza.




___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



Re[4]: Ximian Gnome 1.4 works with RedHat 7.1

2001-04-26 Thread Silviu Cojocaru


Thursday, April 26, 2001, 2:33:12 AM, Brian Wright wrote:

 This is where I get a bit confused.  I see that Qt-2.3.0 supports font
 anti-aliasing and KDE uses it, but it seems GNOME has to wait for mods to GTK+.
  Would it be possible to take advantage of Xrender without modifiying the GTK+
 library?

Hmm if it were, why would GTK need to be modified then ?

-- 
   If Bill Gates had a dime for every time a Windows box crashed...
...,Oh wait, he already does.




___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



Re[2]: Chasing the Dragon, Part Two

2001-04-25 Thread Silviu Cojocaru


Wednesday, April 25, 2001, 11:15:38 AM, Mike Harris wrote:

 On Tue, 24 Apr 2001, Ben Ocean wrote:

All the time?  Or just at certain times?

Dunno for the slocate problem. When the problem was in logrotate.status
(presumably before it got to slocate) it ran for *hours* then crashed.
Makes newbies skittish...

 The slocate/locate command searches for files on your hard disk
 by looking them up in a database created nightly at 4:05am by
 a cron job running updatedb.  This job will take a while
 depending on how large your disk is.

And depending on how fast your HDD is and depending on how fast
the contoller is, and depending on how fast your CPU is, and...


  So I d'l'd a new rpm for slocate and
  updated it. Now I get this error when I try to slocate something:
   
  fatal error: slocate: decode_db: 'pathlen == -1'! Corrupt Database!
  

Since updating slocate, have you run updatedb(1L)?

You mean updatedb without the (1L) I presume? It chokes. Gave it about 10
seconds then killed the command.

Is there any HDD activity ? There should be, and a lot too :)

tip: updatedb==slocate -u

-- 
   If Bill Gates had a dime for everytime a Windows box crashed...
...,Oh wait, he already does.




___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



Re[2]: Boot emergency

2001-04-25 Thread Silviu Cojocaru


Wednesday, April 25, 2001, 11:55:07 AM, Mike A. Harris wrote:

 On Wed, 25 Apr 2001, J.Akhramovich wrote:

Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2001 11:42:29 +0300
From: J.Akhramovich [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
List-Id: General Red Hat discussion list redhat-list.redhat.com
Subject: Boot emergency

Hi, all.
I'am not an expert as Linux Admin.  my problem is
to prevent to boot in the system Linux 5.2 in emegency or single
mode during LILO boot prompt without password. Somewhere I read that
the system should be propely configured so that starting in
a signle user mode it must ask a root passwd, but I can't find
where to set this option.
Does anybody can help me?

From man lilo.conf:

password=password
   Protect the image by a password.

restricted
   A password is only required to boot  the  image  if
   parameters  are specified on the command line (e.g.
   single).

 Hope this helps.

Wouln't it work if he only commented out the prompt entry in
/etc/lilo.conf

-- 
   If Bill Gates had a dime for everytime a Windows box crashed...
...,Oh wait, he already does.




___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



Re[2]: Ximian Gnome 1.4 works with RedHat 7.1

2001-04-25 Thread Silviu Cojocaru


Wednesday, April 25, 2001, 9:01:10 PM, Brian Wright wrote:

 I was able to d/l it last night as well.  Interesting... the Slashdot effect
 wasn't apparent. :-)

 I'm VERY impressed with it, and I'm hoping that the next GTK+ will have
 anti-alias support.  I was hoping that Gnome 1.4 would use the anti-aliasing
 that's available in Xfree86 4.0.2.

Wasn't Xfree86 4.0.3 that introduces antialiased font support ?

-- 
   If Bill Gates had a dime for every time a Windows box crashed...
...,Oh wait, he already does.




___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



Re[2]: Ximian Gnome 1.4 works with RedHat 7.1

2001-04-25 Thread Silviu Cojocaru


Wednesday, April 25, 2001, 8:57:43 PM, Michael R. Jinks wrote:

 Questions for Warren: what were you using before this?  If a previous
 GNOME, has the layout really changed significantly?  Or were you using a
 non-GNOME desktop?

 And, is Linuxconf really going away?  Never used it much myself but I
 can see the advantages for newbies; is it being replaced with something
 else?

There are _no_ advantages for newbies when it comes to using
Linuconf. This tool is very user unfriendly and has a bad habit
of modifying stuff even if the user didn't commit any changes.
So my point that from a newbie point of view, Linuxconf can be
quite scarry.

-- 
   If Bill Gates had a dime for every time a Windows box crashed...
...,Oh wait, he already does.




___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



Re: Re:Apachephp

2001-04-24 Thread Silviu Cojocaru

Now, I understand your joy but was it really necessary to send
this nice digest to all of us ?

- Original Message -
From: Szemerédy Gábor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2001 8:55 PM
Subject: Re:Apachephp


 Thanks a lot!
 It works now, after analyzing the httpd.conf and srm.conf!

 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  Send Redhat-list mailing list submissions to
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
  To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
 
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
  or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
  You can reach the person managing the list at
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
  When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more
specific
  than Re: Contents of Redhat-list digest...
 

  --
--
  Today's Topics:
 
 1. Apachephp (=?iso-8859-1?Q?Szemer=E9dy=20G=E1bor?=)
 2. Re: Apachephp (Brad Bonkoski)
 3. Re: Where are my kernel source files in RH 6.2 with
updated kernel? (add'l info) (Giulio Orsero)
 4. Re: how to disable this. (Richard Critz)
 5. Re: how to disable this. (Mitchell Henderson)
 6. Re: Yahoo Messenger (Tom Davis)
 7. Re: Yahoo Messenger (John Aldrich)
 8. Re: Yahoo Messenger (Trond Eivind
=?iso-8859-1?q?Glomsr=F8d?=)
 9. RE: [WAY OT] beep (Ward William E DLDN)
10. Re: Yahoo Messenger (John Aldrich)
11. RE: RE: Lost bootable floppy disk (Rajaram)
12. RE: how to disable this. (Ward William E DLDN)
13. RE: how to disable this. (Ward William E DLDN)




___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



Re: RedHat - Quo Vadis

2001-04-08 Thread Silviu Cojocaru

On Sun, 8 Apr 2001, at 01:36 (GMT -0500), Aage J. Skjolingstad wrote:

 I'm impressed ??

 About what - RedHat - no; - Mr. Young - I will get many against me
 tonight.

You seem to be your own enemy, you don't need more.

 How can somebody so similar to Bill Gates - (well he is missing some of
 the money) - selling for high "copy cost" so much BS that's not working;
 worst - he is not even prepared to do anything about it ???

 You buy any RH and it is full of something that's not working; --it's a
 sh..t ???

 RedHat has to wake up or it will not be around for much more time - as
 what I have experienced is more "service patches" that I had to upgrade
 from my NT during the whole time I were using it.

Hahaha, and you think your NT moves better than RH, LMAO, get your eyes
fixed pal. Btw, those patches fixed ALL known security issues that regard
the distro, NT and generally speaking Windoze still hasn't any fixes for
known issues (see the multiple file extension matter).


 Quo Vadis - Linux - but this is not the way to promote yourself - RH is
 launching a lot of stuff that is not readdy or is not working correct at
 all. Go fore the enterprises - this is not for the small guy.

Did you try using some other distro ? I don't think they release a samller
volume of fixes than RH.

 Should we continue to support something like this  ???

Yeah.

 I believe that the penguin was meant for something much different - The
 big ones get going being Microsoft or being RedHat - and we have to
 accept all ??

Oh, you poor strined little man, get a vacation, get some rest.

 I have had more problems to get the RH 7.0 working correct that I had
 with all MS programs during the last 5 years --- we need something
 better  Blue screen or RedHat core dumps does not make any
 difference to me.

Hmmm I've been using RH on my system from version 6.0 (2 years ago) and
I'm happily using 7.0 now, maybe you should go back to NT, seems that
clever setups are not for you... Core dumps, never had one, except xmms
on exiting but that was promptly fixed  with a glibc update ions ago.

Alas, go away, you bother me.

-- 

If Bill Gates had a dime for every time a Windows box crashed...
 ..., Oh wait, he already does.




___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



Re: RedHat - Quo Vadis

2001-04-08 Thread Silviu Cojocaru

On Sun, 8 Apr 2001, at 02:24 (GMT -0500), Aage J. Skjolingstad wrote:

 Dear Silviu,

 Thank you - my complete problem is that yes, - I need a rest - special
 from clappers like you -

Hah, we will always be there to mess you up.

 Wake up and be more selective - may be you will find out that there is a
 lot of "providers" here that's not much better than M$.

Ummm selective I am and as long as I'm happy with RH I won't spend my time
discovering something else. I'm trying to get my work done (which I am)
and not trying to discover the distro of the century. Like I said, if you
don't like it, be gone, and use something you like. That's the cool part
about Linux, there are choices... so choose.

I'm not wasting more bandwidth with you, say hello to the filters.

-- 

If Bill Gates had a dime for every time a Windows box crashed...
 ..., Oh wait, he already does.



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



Re: RedHat - Quo Vadis

2001-04-08 Thread Silviu Cojocaru

On Sun, 8 Apr 2001, at 02:34 (GMT -0500), Aage J. Skjolingstad wrote:

 Silviu Cojocaru wrote:

  You seem to be your own enemy, you don't need more

 Thank you so much for waking me up Portuguese

  Hahaha, and you think your NT moves better than RH, LMAO, get your eyes
  fixed pal. Btw, those patches fixed ALL known security issues that regard
  the distro, NT and generally speaking Windoze still hasn't any fixes for
  known issues (see the multiple file extension matter).

 You are real- aren't you 

Checked about 5 mins ago, and there I was.



 
  Did you try using some other distro ? I don't think they release a samller
  volume of fixes than RH.

 Problems though  - RH does it the M$ way - different from everybody to
 avoid mixing up with Susse and all the others - why, - they might get
 lost ( in the revenue)

Hahahaha, funny you should mention them, the icon of doing things their
own way, hahaha, whatta laugh.


 ??
 
  Oh, you poor strined little man, get a vacation, get some rest.

 Thank you - sure I will

 
  Hmmm I've been using RH on my system from version 6.0 (2 years ago) and
  I'm happily using 7.0 now, maybe you should go back to NT, seems that
  clever setups are not for you... Core dumps, never had one, except xmms
  on exiting but that was promptly fixed  with a glibc update ions ago.

 Have more experience than you as I go back to RH 5.1

Lemme guess, had trouble setting that up too eh.


 Sir, what a pissing contest - Are you used to making yellow circles in
 the snow - or you just talks about it?

  Alas, go away, you bother me.

 Short minded than :=)

Short minded or not, all I say is meet my Yahoo filters, if you will not
go away they will make sure you don't bother me again.

-- 

If Bill Gates had a dime for every time a Windows box crashed...
 ..., Oh wait, he already does.




___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



Re: SMTP error and NSLOOKUP

2001-04-07 Thread Silviu Cojocaru

On Sat, 7 Apr 2001, at 08:50 (GMT -0700), biniam sahlezghi wrote:

 I have a problem
 I can't send mail otside of my domain it says mail
 rejecyed error SMTP 550. But still I am recieving mail
 but not sending from workstation but I can send from
 the server.When I check the nslookup it says can't
 find server???
 Any quick solution guys
 Thank you

A single post to this list should suffice eh.
I unserstand you "desperation" but _chill_ and don't flood us with
multiple posts.

-- 

If Bill Gates had a dime for every time a Windows box crashed...
 ..., Oh wait, he already does.



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



Re: KDE Installer Is on the Way

2001-04-06 Thread Silviu Cojocaru

On Thu, 5 Apr 2001, at 06:20 (GMT -0500), Mike Chambers wrote:

 EMAZING Linux Tip of the Day - KDE Installer Is on the WayGot this in a
 daily email I get and this turned up this morning.  Thought I would forward
 the info to see if anyone that hasn't already heard of it might be
 interested.

 Here is the link for below..

 http://www.rox0rs.net/kdeinstaller.html

 Mike


I knew about this project for some long time now, but it's good that it's
almost there.

-- 

If Bill Gates had a dime for every time a Windows box crashed...
 ..., Oh wait, he already does.




___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



Re: apt like tool for Redhat

2001-04-04 Thread Silviu Cojocaru

On Tue, 3 Apr 2001, at 21:11 (GMT -0700), Tim wrote:

   The Ximian version of apt is called "Red carpet" it's supposed to handle
   deb's for debian machines and rpm's for redhat machines.  Whether this
   will handle the entire system or just gnome related stuff I don't know.
 
  Ugh, don't use Red Carpet, it's a big source of headakes. up2date is for
  you.

 Must disagree, the most recent revision of red carpet works well neigh
 unto flawlessly. It has seperate 'channels' one for gnome stuff, and one
 for redhat system, you can keep your system up to date that way...
 A check to make sure you got what you installed and where it was put is
 likely in order. It also has a channel for evolution a rockin' email
 client for gnome.

 Using the tools does kind of take the work out of sysadmining, which I'm
 not sure is a good thing.. ;)

Then I apologize. If you say it works I'll just take your word for it
:)... Until I get more feedback on it, I'll use my trusty up2date :)

-- 

If Bill Gates had a dime for every time a Windows box crashed...
 ..., Oh wait, he already does.




___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



Re: New worm to affect RH

2001-04-04 Thread Silviu Cojocaru

On Wed, 4 Apr 2001, at 11:49 (GMT -0400), Hal Burgiss wrote:

 On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 02:28:08PM -0500, Mitchell Henderson wrote:
  Hi,
  I don't know if you could call it new, it's really a combo of
  everything that we've seen as of late.

 Check this out:

 ==

 From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr  4 09:53:23 2001
 Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2001 18:38:49 +0800
 From: Leo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Newsgroups: 
alt.os.linux,comp.os.linux.misc,alt.linux,comp.os.linux.help,comp.os.linux
 Subject: PLEASE HELP!, MY LINUX have been HACKED~
 NNTP-Posting-Host: vp170207.nte.uac1.hknet.com

 Dear all,

  Today I turn on my linux and I recieved a mail from sendmail
 regarding a failed message posted to someone in @sina.com . SO i check
 it out and it basically it says the following:

 -- Forwarded message --
 Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2001 03:15:21 +0800
 From: Mail Delivery Subsystem [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Warning: could not send message for past 4 hours

 **
 **  THIS IS A WARNING MESSAGE ONLY  **
 **  YOU DO NOT NEED TO RESEND YOUR MESSAGE  **
 **

 The original message was received at Tue, 3 Apr 2001 21:57:12 +0800
 from root@localhost

- The following addresses had transient non-fatal errors -
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

- Transcript of session follows -
 451 4.4.1 timeout writing message to smtp.hknet.com
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Deferred
 Warning: message still undelivered after 4 hours
 Will keep trying until message is 5 days old

 After reading that message, I was curious because I never use ROOT to
 send message out and aparently, that
 "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" looks very unfamilar to me. So i am positive that I
 didn't send such message.  Inside the message
 I found two attachment, one dat file and the other text file,..
 Unfortunetly, when I read the text fileI see ALL the confidential
 information all my system all pasted in there. The format looks
 something like this:

 /**HOST IP*/
 and then i see the whole ifconfig pasted here. then..
 /**PS*/
 i see ps -aux, then
 /**HISTORY***/
 root's command history.. then
 /HOSTS*/
 host file, AND EVEN
 /PASSWD***/
 passwd file , with ROOTS and all users' password unecrypted


 I use redhat 7 and i'm sure i have shadow + md5 password enabled.

 If anyone have any idea what's going wrong , please let me know and
 how am i getting the file. I know that sina provide freemail service
 but it has an extension of sinaman.com or sinagirl.com, but NOT
 sina.com is that why i am getting the mail bounced back???


 Any help would be appreciated. Thank you very much !
  Leo

 =



 Unencrypted passwords
^

Total idiot here, but this should not be possible, should it ?

I'm very serious, was that email authentic, is what that guy discribed
possible ??


-- 

If Bill Gates had a dime for every time a Windows box crashed...
 ..., Oh wait, he already does.




___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



I think my HDD is dying

2001-04-04 Thread Silviu Cojocaru


I think my HDD may be off to some beautiful place in the sky, meanwhile, I
need some data, and everytime I try to access it it gives me some stuff
about not being able to read some inode and then it resets the hdd and so
on, it could go on forever. I want to know how I could get that data back,
and then mark the bad sector so it not used. The problem has developed
under the root partition, which is mounted.

I thought I could use e2fsck, but it complains that it could cause
problems on a mounted partition (root partition).

I tryied running it with -pc option.

Any suggestions ?

-- 

If Bill Gates had a dime for every time a Windows box crashed...
 ..., Oh wait, he already does.



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



Firewall utility

2001-04-03 Thread Silviu Cojocaru


Can someone recommend a good firewall utility for RH Linux 7.0. I'm a
newbie where firewalls are concerned, I'm just finishing reading about
ipchains  co.

It wouldn't hurt if the utility came in an rpm pack for RHL 7.0

I'm just trying to go about this firewall business one step at a time...
first the utility and off I go adding my own ipchains rules.

Thanks for reading my bableing.

-- 

If Bill Gates had a dime for every time a Windows box crashed...
 ..., Oh wait, he already does.



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



Re: apt like tool for Redhat

2001-04-03 Thread Silviu Cojocaru

On Tue, 3 Apr 2001, at 10:54 (GMT -0400), Jeffrey A Schoolcraft wrote:

 The Ximian version of apt is called "Red carpet" it's supposed to handle
 deb's for debian machines and rpm's for redhat machines.  Whether this
 will handle the entire system or just gnome related stuff I don't know.

Ugh, don't use Red Carpet, it's a big source of headakes. up2date is for
you.

-- 

If Bill Gates had a dime for every time a Windows box crashed...
 ..., Oh wait, he already does.




___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



Re: apt like tool for Redhat

2001-04-03 Thread Silviu Cojocaru

On Tue, 3 Apr 2001, at 09:35 (GMT -0500), Andrew D Dixon wrote:

 Hi All,
 I'm used to the debian environment and really like the way that apt
 handles dependancies.  I also like the ease of updateing my stystem with
 apt-get upgrade.

 I recently was given the task of administering two servers in our office
 that run RedHat and I was wondering if there were any tools like apt
 that handle dependancies, install needed packages, make upgrades easier
 . . .

 Any hints, tips, suggestions, pointers . . . would be greatly
 appreciated.

up2date should be able to to that.

-- 

If Bill Gates had a dime for every time a Windows box crashed...
 ..., Oh wait, he already does.




___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



Re: spruce mail reader

2001-04-03 Thread Silviu Cojocaru

On Mon, 2 Apr 2001, at 19:51 (GMT -0400), Anthony E . Greene wrote:

 On Mon, 02 Apr 2001 18:07:24 Rodolfo J. Paiz wrote:
 You didn't mention an OS, but Eudora runs on both Linux and Windows.

 You'll need WINE to run Eudora on Linux. I use Balsa instead. Netscape
 Messenger is actually fairly good, but I like the keyboard shortcuts in
 Balsa.

Pine is nice :-)

-- 

If Bill Gates had a dime for every time a Windows box crashed...
 ..., Oh wait, he already does.




___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



RE: Redhat-list digest, Vol 1 #1410 - 4 msgs

2001-04-02 Thread Silviu Cojocaru

On Sun, 1 Apr 2001, at 11:03 (GMT -0500), [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Dear [EMAIL PROTECTED],

 Thank you for your message regarding -- Redhat-list digest, Vol 1 #1410 - 4 msgs

 I am currently out of the office.  I will be at home assisting my wife
 with out first child until approximately Wed April 3, 2001.  I will try to
 address your message as soon as possible upon my return.  If this is a more
 urgent or pressing problem, please resend your message to
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Someone will help you as soon as possible.

 If you have any questions, please call us at (402)423-7851.

 For more information, please see our web page at:
 http://www.creativethinkinginc.com

 Thank you,
 Matt Shirel
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 --
 Creative Thinking, Inc
 3700 South 14th St.
 Lincoln, NE 68502
 (phone) 402.423.7851
 (fax)   402.423.8014


OMG and we're going to get this for every digest he gets ?! OH N!

-- 

If Bill Gates had a dime for every time a Windows box crashed...
 ..., Oh wait, he already does.




___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



Re: redhat 7 errata

2001-03-30 Thread Silviu Cojocaru

On Thu, 29 Mar 2001, at 08:45 (GMT -0800), lee wrote:


 doh! i think what happened is i neglected to consider that I must received those
 updates via the new red carpet updater..:(

 solved..:)
 lee

Pffft, Red Carpet probs again, figures... use up2date, it better this way.

-- 

If Bill Gates had a dime for every time a Windows box crashed...
 ..., Oh wait, he already does.




___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



RE: netscape is a pig

2001-03-30 Thread Silviu Cojocaru

On Fri, 30 Mar 2001, at 00:49 (GMT -0600), ABrady wrote:

 Galeon is getting to be workable. Missing a couple of things and still
 some infrequent crashes (for me). Requires Mozilla be installed (another
 memory hog) but, doesn't overload the system with bringing up gobs of
 useless stuff to go with it. Needs an external mail client.

 Konqueror works fine. But, doesn't (that I saw) allow an opening page
 other than your home directory. Also, the bookmarks are a bit unweildy and
 it brings up lots of k-processes that support it (like most of the other
 KDE stuff does when run). Doesn't close down cleanly (again, like much of
 the rest of KDE) because the programmers assumed if you wanted _anything_
 from KDE to run, you wanted all of it. So, useless processes are left
 behind after closing.

Maybe you don't understand the way KDE works. Let me shed some light here.
KDE 2.x doesn't start slower then GNOME, for intsance, and it brings up
enough processes to support whatever could possibly be loaded afterwards
from the KDE suite. All those processes, though memory consumers, are
intended to speed up app loading (only for ones that come with KDE).

Loading and unloading means lost time, so the processes are only fired up
once, on startup, and then "recycled".

Those processes become useless if, for example, Konqueror, si started from
say... twm or any other window manager and not from within the KDE
desktop.

 Opera had a free release if you can live with advertising. I haven't used
 it much, but it seemed to be stable in my limited testing.

Opera is a good little browser, and now it even supports Java. Try it.
It's also much faster then Netscape.


-- 

If Bill Gates had a dime for every time a Windows box crashed...
 ..., Oh wait, he already does.




___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



RE: netscape is a pig

2001-03-30 Thread Silviu Cojocaru

On Fri, 30 Mar 2001, at 00:02 (GMT -0500), Statux wrote:

  Have you given Opera a try yet? I have been quite pleased with it thus far.
  You can get at http://www.opera.com

 Opera is commercial.

Was.

-- 

If Bill Gates had a dime for every time a Windows box crashed...
 ..., Oh wait, he already does.




___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



Re: webmin

2001-03-27 Thread Silviu Cojocaru

On Mon, 26 Mar 2001, at 21:21 (GMT -0500), Mike Burger wrote:

 You really need to use it with a graphical browser.

 On Mon, 26 Mar 2001, doug piper wrote:

  I have been following the threads on  webmin and it sounds great but I
  am at a loss as to how to run the thing. I have installed it but cannot
  access it. It says to login as root to http://localhost.local
  domaine:1/. I tried it using lynx but get no satisfaction.
 
  I am a relative newbie and have also had to spend the last 5 months
  attending to my father's death and the administration of his estate.
  Thus, my learning curve has gone down quite a bit.
 
  Thanks,
  Doug

Actually I think webmin needs a browser that supports tables, and _links_
which comes with RH 7.0 does support those.

-- 

If Bill Gates had a dime for every time a Windows box crashed...
 ..., Oh wait, he already does.




___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



fetchmail problems...

2001-03-26 Thread Silviu Cojocaru


I'm using fetchmail 5.5.0-3 and I seem to have a problem when retrieving
mail from a POP3 server: the retrieved massges are not deleted from the
server, this made the mailbox on my ISPs server fill up quite fast. The
symptoms that made me think about that were that some friends of mine
complained that sometimes they received an error from the server where it
was stated that the mailbox was full, and the last one was that I could
get only one message at a time. I called my ISP and he too said that my
mailbox was full.

my .fetchmailrc looks like this:

poll ispsserver timeout 60 proto pop3 user "username" pass "my_paswwd"

Is there something wrong with it ?

I have switched to imap, I can live with the smaller speed of mail
retrieval if that saves my mailbox from getting full.

Any ideas on what the heck is going on with fetchmail ?

-- 

If Bill Gates had a dime for every time a Windows box crashed...
 ..., Oh wait, he already does.



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



Re: fetchmail problems...

2001-03-26 Thread Silviu Cojocaru

On Mon, 26 Mar 2001, at 14:34 (GMT +0300), Silviu Cojocaru wrote:

 I'm using fetchmail 5.5.0-3 and I seem to have a problem when retrieving
 mail from a POP3 server: the retrieved massges are not deleted from the
 server, this made the mailbox on my ISPs server fill up quite fast. The
 symptoms that made me think about that were that some friends of mine
 complained that sometimes they received an error from the server where it
 was stated that the mailbox was full, and the last one was that I could
 get only one message at a time. I called my ISP and he too said that my
 mailbox was full.

 my .fetchmailrc looks like this:

 poll ispsserver timeout 60 proto pop3 user "username" pass "my_paswwd"

 Is there something wrong with it ?

 I have switched to imap, I can live with the smaller speed of mail
 retrieval if that saves my mailbox from getting full.

 Any ideas on what the heck is going on with fetchmail ?

The no keep option aint working, so I'll be sticking with IMAP a bit
longer. POP3 is so broken anyways, and since my ISP installed some new
equipment, IMAP doesn't seem much slower then POP3.

Oh well, you win some you lose some...

-- 

If Bill Gates had a dime for every time a Windows box crashed...
 ..., Oh wait, he already does.



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



KDE KMail ...

2001-03-26 Thread Silviu Cojocaru


I just read on linuxtoday.com that 1.0.x versions of KMail will start
having date showing troubles from... ugh I forgot the exact date.

Will Red Hat release KDE updates for this ?
Because some people still useit (even I when PINE acts dorky)... and RH 7.0
comes with that sick version of KMail, 1.0.29 if I'm not mistaken.



-- 

If Bill Gates had a dime for every time a Windows box crashed...
 ..., Oh wait, he already does.



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



SGML documentation

2001-03-25 Thread Silviu Cojocaru


Does anyone know where I can find some documentation regarding SGML ?
The one that comes with the package is good but I need more then that, I
need to know how to make tables and stuff. The links mentioned in the docs
on my HDD seem to be all kinda dead.

-- 

If Bill Gates had a dime for every time a Windows box crashed...
 ..., Oh wait, he already does.



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



RE: [RHSA-2001:008-02] Updated vim packages available

2001-03-24 Thread Silviu Cojocaru

On Fri, 23 Mar 2001, at 21:13 (GMT +0100), NDSoftware wrote:

I believe he was asking _where_ the SRPM was not _what_ the SRPM was...

 It's the source of packages...

 Nicolas DEFFAYET, NDSoftware
 http://www.ndsoftware.net - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 France: Tel +33 671887502 - Fax N/A
 UK: Tel +44 8453348750 - Fax +44 8453348751
 USA: Tel N/A - Fax N/A
 ---
 Note: All HTML email sent to me can be deleted for security reasons.

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Liguo Song
 Sent: Friday, March 23, 2001 9:05 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [RHSA-2001:008-02] Updated vim packages available


 Where is SRPM package?

 Thanks.


 Liguo (Leo)



 ___
 Redhat-list mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



 ___
 Redhat-list mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


-- 

If Bill Gates had a dime for every time a Windows box crashed...
 ..., Oh wait, he already does.




___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



Ugghh

2001-03-24 Thread Silviu Cojocaru


I just read about the "Lion virus" on ZDNet, the thing that bothered me
were the talkbacks. And I think the fault is in a degree of 80% of the
article's author. He states that bind 8 has the vulnerability, but never
says that the cure was released about 2 months ago. This gave all these
Winbloze users a thing to say about Linux, they kinda trashed the penguin
and that got me mad.

-- 

If Bill Gates had a dime for every time a Windows box crashed...
 ..., Oh wait, he already does.



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



Re: Pine is not where it's supposed to be

2001-03-23 Thread Silviu Cojocaru

On Thu, 22 Mar 2001, at 20:51 (GMT -0500), Chuck Mead wrote:

 On Fri, 23 Mar 2001, Silviu Cojocaru blurted out:

 SC
 SCI just took a look at people.redhat.com/mharris and there is no Pine dir.
 SCHey Mike what gives ?!

 Well I just looked and there is... 4.33-6 was there and I nabbed it...
:-)

I found it after I posted this, it was weird though... Heh, sometimes thse
comps act like they're on their own :-)

-- 

If Bill Gates had a dime for every time a Windows box crashed...
 ..., Oh wait, he already does.




___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



Re: AOL is at it again!

2001-03-23 Thread Silviu Cojocaru

On Fri, 23 Mar 2001, at 11:44 (GMT -0500), [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  http://www.moongroup.com/stories.php?story=01/03/23/5398918

 rather than simply sit here and seethe that AOL has blocked non-AOL
 instant messaging, let me make a humble suggestion.  anyone in the
 linux community who is outraged by this should simply filter all
 AOL email into /dev/null.

 think about it.  the linux community, based on sheer size, now has
 considerable clout.  imagine the effect if a significant part of that
 community decided, en masse, to reject any AOL-related email.
 people can use procmail to junk it; web sites can drop AOL-origin
 requests; routers can toss AOL packets.  obviously, there may be
 legal or contractual issues, but people who put up web sites
 certainly have no obligation to service all requests.

 it's time to get over just being pissed about this, and do something
 about it.  if AOL wants to block traffic, perhaps it's time to
 play that same game, and see how long it takes AOL subscribers to
 start feeling the rejection.  let *them* complain to their own ISP.

 comments?

 rday


AOL, and it's users are known for the trouble they cause. This resulted in
no more then 2 bans in two years (1999 and recently in 2001) of the AOL
domain, on the IRC network of DALnet.

I find it as a good ideea to trash their mail. This should prove
interesting... The question is, will the linux community actually do it ?

They can, and they should, AOL has to learn manners.


-- 

If Bill Gates had a dime for every time a Windows box crashed...
 ..., Oh wait, he already does.




___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



RE: OT: Anybody else gettin' sick of Ballmer's BS?

2001-03-22 Thread Silviu Cojocaru

On Wed, 21 Mar 2001, at 16:19 (GMT -0500), jack wallen, jr. wrote:

 you can visit it with this page:

 http://uptime.netcraft.com/up/graph/

 which returns:

 The site www.hotmail.com is running Microsoft-IIS/5.0 on Windows 2000.


I have just made an account at hotmail to "testdrive" it, after telling me
that the account has been created and that everything is OK, I could not
login to see what options I had.

All I have to say is this, all it takes for things to stop functioning is
Micro$oft. People if you really have to, get web accounts at Yahoo, or
some Linux based sites that offer forwarding.

-- 

If Bill Gates had a dime for every time a Windows box crashed...
 ..., Oh wait, he already does.




___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



Re: OT: Anybody else gettin' sick of Ballmer's BS?

2001-03-22 Thread Silviu Cojocaru

On Wed, 21 Mar 2001, at 15:30 (GMT -0800), Thornton Prime wrote:

 On Wed, 21 Mar 2001, Chuck Mead wrote:

  Here's what Micro$oft said about the matter themselves:
 
  http://www.microsoft.com/ntserver/web/news/msnw/Hotmail.asp

 Ouch. That made my side hurt from laughing too much.

 thornton

Ok guys, I'm posting that page over there for those with only email

Laugh it up! I's to damn funny

"Solaris wasnt scalable enough"-- LMAO

-- 

If Bill Gates had a dime for every time a Windows box crashed...
 ..., Oh wait, he already does.

Title: Facts About Hotmail's Production OS Environment : [Microsoft Windows NT Server 4.0;  News about Hotmail; Solaris; email service; ISP; Unix]






















	











	

	

	

		

		

			All Products|

			Support|

			Search|

			microsoft.com Home

		

		





	

	





	

	

		

			Windows Home Pages|

			Downloads|

			Support|

			Sitemap|

		

	

















	

	

	

	

	

	

	

		

		

		

			

			

Enter a search phrase:





	

	







			

		

		

	

Advanced SearchHome Page

Windows NT Server 4.0

File & Print Services

Web Services

Application Services

Management Services

Security Services

Communication Services

Streaming Media Services

Windows NT Server Terminal Server Edition

Windows NT Server Enterprise Edition

Related Sites















	

	

	

		

	

		

	

		







	Web Services

|	News

	









	



		

Facts About Hotmail's Production OS Environment

Posted: May 1, 1998

	

















	

	

		

	

	

		Send this documentto a colleague

	

	

	

		

	

	

		Printer-friendlyversion

	

	

	

















Situation

Rumors have surfaced regarding Hotmail's utilization of Solaris to run the Hotmail web based e-mail service and a failed attempt to port Hotmail to Microsoft WindowsNT Server. These rumors are inaccurate and Microsoft and Hotmail would like to set the record straight by focusing on the facts.



Facts about Hotmail





Hotmail is the fastest growing e-mail service in the history of the industry. The service has 16 million members, and is growing by 80,000 per day, according to Steve Douty, Vice President of Sales and Marketing at Hotmail.

Solaris is one of several operating systems in use. So is WindowsNT Server.

Hotmail was designed to be a massively scalable Web site. Solaris is Hotmail's legacy production operating system, but Hotmail had to customize the filestore service as well as the IP stack because off the shelf Solaris could not scale to meet demanding performance requirements.

Long term, Hotmail is committed to moving to WindowsNT Server. However, wholesale migration to WindowsNT Server has not yet been attempted. The Hotmail team is currently focused on growing its services and integrating with The Microsoft Network.

Significant planning and preparation are required to migrate a 24X7 operation. Microsoft does not advise customers to rip and replace Unixbased systems because this is not the way to migrate missioncritical systems. Migrating to WindowsNT Server will be carefully planned so as to not disrupt services for Hotmail's huge and growing membership base.

Microsoft's e-mail servers offer scalable webbased e-mail solutions. For example, Microsoft Exchange provides a rich set of capabilities for Web users beyond e-mail, including calendaring, contacts (with 5.5 Service Pack 1), public folders and directory. The capabilities are core to our product offerings and will be enhanced in the future.

Microsoft Commercial Internet System is a highly scalable WindowsNT Server based platform for commercial Internet services. MCIS provides excellent messaging capabilities for commercial service providers and online communities.

WindowsNT Server is a true multipurpose operating system. Enterprise computing depends on scalability, manageability, and reliability, as well as low cost of ownership. WindowsNT Servers delivers on all three while providing builtin underlying services that today's distributed applications require.

 

 

 



			

		

		

			





		

		

		



			

			



Last Updated: Monday, March 01, 1999 2001 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. Terms of Use.



 

		

	





















Re: OT: Anybody else gettin' sick of Ballmer's BS?

2001-03-22 Thread Silviu Cojocaru

On Thu, 22 Mar 2001, at 17:50 (GMT -0800), Krikofer wrote:

 Yeah, like IBM way back then when they say we never need any more than 640k
 ram.

If I not err, I think that was our friend Bill Gates that said that... He
never said anything about the 8 meg of ram thingy...

-- 

If Bill Gates had a dime for every time a Windows box crashed...
 ..., Oh wait, he already does.



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



Pine is not where it's supposed to be

2001-03-22 Thread Silviu Cojocaru


I just took a look at people.redhat.com/mharris and there is no Pine dir.
Hey Mike what gives ?!

-- 

If Bill Gates had a dime for every time a Windows box crashed...
 ..., Oh wait, he already does.



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



Re: Little help requested.

2001-03-19 Thread Silviu Cojocaru

On Mon, 19 Mar 2001, at 15:16 (GMT +0200), Tepponen, Mikko wrote:

 What do I need to do in order to get my RedHat 7.0 to function 100 % in
 english?
 Some of error messages and man pages appear in "bullshit" (i.e. "%#Eo%").
 How am I supposed to figure them out?
 At the same time the KDE interface has some text in Japanese (i.e. the clock
 on the right hand lower corner).

Sounds to me like you burnt the jap. ISOs.

-- 

If Bill Gates had a dime for every time a Windows box crashed...
 ..., Oh wait, he already does.




___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



Re: up2date

2001-03-18 Thread Silviu Cojocaru

On Sat, 17 Mar 2001, at 23:50 (GMT -0600), Nitebirdz wrote:

 As far as I know, you can only run up2date from an X session.  Yes, you can
 pass certain options to the command but it will still rely on X to display.

All the above is FALSE. up2date can be run from pure console without a
hitch (you just have to be root). See man up2date for more details.

I just have to say that I like up2date much more in X. It's just way
cooler.

-- 

If Bill Gates had a dime for every time a Windows box crashed...
 ..., Oh wait, he already does.




___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



Re: Kernel recompile

2001-03-17 Thread Silviu Cojocaru

On Sat, 17 Mar 2001, at 19:58 (GMT -0500), omicron wrote:

 hi
   i installed kernel 2.4.1, and everything is ok, except for...

 1 pppd !

You need ppp-2.4.

-- 

If Bill Gates had a dime for every time a Windows box crashed...
 ..., Oh wait, he already does.




___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



Re: Problem with sendmail

2001-03-17 Thread Silviu Cojocaru

On Sat, 17 Mar 2001, at 11:26 (GMT +0100), Toms Garca Ferrari wrote:

 Hello,

 I'm having problems with sendmail: it gets frozen from time to time. As far
 as I can dive into this problem, it seems to be frozen with a lot of
 messages in the queue (specially repeating ones)

 I have this two kind of logs that seems to be related to it:

 Mar 12 13:04:48 www sendmail[18378]: NOQUEUE: Null connection from
 HSE-Kitchener-ppp78621.sympatico.ca [216.208.52.32]
 (Repeated many times)

 and
 Mar 11 04:18:29 www sendmail[8841]: AAA04416:
 to=[EMAIL PROTECTED], delay=1+03:21:13, xdelay=00:00:07, m
 ailer=esmtp, relay=terminator.soho-ar.com. [216.72.144.4], stat=Deferred: No
 route to host
 (Repeated a lot of times)

 From the first on, I do know nothing... is this a kind of attack?


I don't think so. I was talking the other day to a friend of mine about
MTAs and he told me that this may happen because sendmail, after making a
connection, it doesn't drop it until it sends that message. This causes
big mailqueues... I can't help, I can only state a reason for what may be
happening there.

-- 

If Bill Gates had a dime for every time a Windows box crashed...
 ..., Oh wait, he already does.




___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



Re: Malfunction of the address book....

2001-03-16 Thread Silviu Cojocaru

On Fri, 16 Mar 2001, at 09:51 (GMT -0400), Marcelo Pavez A. wrote:

 Quiu friends:

 while i open my address book and i select a address for send a email,
 the address book open the "new message", but it don't show destinatory.

What program whould that be ?

-- 

 \|/ _ \|/   *
 "@'/ , . \`@"   This mail is sent using 100% recyclable electrons
 /_| \___/ |_\   *
\___U_/  [EMAIL PROTECTED]



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



Re: netscape and downloads

2001-03-16 Thread Silviu Cojocaru

On Fri, 16 Mar 2001, at 08:12 (GMT -0500), Michael George wrote:

 I'm getting the rpm file for webmin...  When I click on the link to the page
 on my work machine, I get a "Netscape Download" window and it starts sucking
 the file down.  However, when I do it from Netscape at home, it seems to try
 to pull it down and display it in the browser windows.

 I thought both installations were about the same, but apparently not.  I have
 checked the preferences file, but don't see an option that would control that.
 If anyone could point me in the right direction, I'd appreciate it...

IIRC, you have to hold down [Shift] while clicking to download the file...

Cheers!

-- 

 \|/ _ \|/   *
 "@'/ , . \`@"   This mail is sent using 100% recyclable electrons
 /_| \___/ |_\   *
\___U_/  [EMAIL PROTECTED]



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



Strange problem with SMTP

2001-03-15 Thread Silviu Cojocaru


I woke up at 6 AM and as usual I tried to retrieve may e-mail. I ran
fetchmail, at it behaved starngely, I mean fro time to time it was
stalling for about 25 secs, while this, I tried to ping my ISP's server,
at all was OK, but fetchmail still stalled. VERY weird I have to say...

I also had problems sending mail with pine... it took about 41 secs to
send a message no mater how big it was

Any ideas guys?

I thought maybe someone was flooding ports 25, 110, 143 or 220...
Could this have been the cause for my problems ?

This is a dial-up machine, so I wasn't rootkited :-)

-- 

 \|/ _ \|/   *
 "@'/ , . \`@"   This mail is sent using 100% recyclable electrons
 /_| \___/ |_\   *
\___U_/  [EMAIL PROTECTED]



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



Re: KDE2.1 and Helix Gnome.

2001-03-15 Thread Silviu Cojocaru

On Thu, 15 Mar 2001, Dale Kosan wrote:
 Okay, I have a quick question.I want to run both the above on the same
 machine. My friend installed both and the switch desktop no longer works.He
 can only use Gnome.He tried making a .xinitrc file in his home directory and
 put the following in it: exec startkde and exec strat gnome-session.From a
 text promt on boot it still does not work, KDE 2.1 bombs.I am not sure of
 the error's.How can I run both so my wife can use her Gnome and I can use
 KDE? Thanks for your time.

That's because, the version of switchdesk knows how to manage a beta of KDE 2. 
The KDE team decided to change some of the files' locations for the final
release of KDE 2. And, as they haven't QA the 2.x series they haven't released
a "patched" version of switchdesk.

You may try the switchdesk that comes with Wolverine (the latest Red Hat 7.1
Beta release) but it's risky.

-- 
Silviu Cojocaru
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
The only "intuitive" interface is the nipple. After that, it's all 
learned.
(Bruce Ediger, [EMAIL PROTECTED], in comp.os.linux.misc, on X 
interfaces.)
--



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



Re:KDE2.1 and Helix Gnome.

2001-03-15 Thread Silviu Cojocaru

On Thu, 15 Mar 2001, at 16:23 (GMT -0500), Dale Kosan wrote:

 Thanks for replying.Okay, someone said it supports the 2.0 beta, I have the
 preview version on my Redhat cd, do you think the switch desk will work with
 that version? Yes my wife and I have our own accounts.I have not tried

It should work with the beta (yeah, the one on your CD). But keep in mind
that, that's the beta, and a lot of people weren't happy with the KDE 2.0
release. Including me... It looked ok, it was slick but KPPP on which I
depended at that time, would not work after the upgarde, no matter what I
tried, and boy o' boy I did try.

 installing it on my system, not after seeing my friends bomb.I believe he
 made the ..xinitrc file as root, so the permissions might be wrong.Any other
 thoughts before I fudge my system?

Yup. Wait for the next Red Hat release, which will hopefuly have KDE 2.1.
This is the most usable and stable KDE release. KDE 2.0 was good but it
still had a lot of glitches... If you can wait good. If not, that better
not be your priceless stable system, that yoy wanna do experiments on. I
did those before and I was one sorry user.

The choice is yours.

-- 

 \|/ _ \|/   *
 "@'/ , . \`@"   This mail is sent using 100% recyclable electrons
 /_| \___/ |_\   *
\___U_/  [EMAIL PROTECTED]



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



Re: Best User list?

2001-03-14 Thread Silviu Cojocaru

On Wed, 14 Mar 2001, at 07:07 -0500, Mike Burger wrote:

 Currently, Wolverine is the beta of RH7.1.  It has a 2.4.1 based kernel
 and XF 4.0.2.  Not sure what Nautilus is, though.

Nautilus is the "beast" that's gonna replace gmc in GNOME 1.4. I think it
sux... If someone care for "why ?" I'll be happy to tell him/her/them.

 There's also a Wolverine list, if you have specific questions, and I'm
 fairly sure that the Redhat site has a Wolverine section, at this point.

-- 
Seems a computer engineer, a systems analyst, and a programmer were
driving down a mountain when the brakes gave out.  They screamed down the
mountain, gaining speed, but finally managed to grind to a halt, more by
luck than anything else, just inches from a thousand foot drop to jagged
rocks.  They all got out of the car:
The computer engineer said, "I think I can fix it."
The systems analyst said, "No, no, I think we should take it
into town and have a specialist look at it."
The programmer said, "OK, but first I think we should get back
in and see if it does it again."

.-----.
|  Silviu Cojocaru  |  [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
`-'

Powered by
 Red Hat Linux 7.0




___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



Re: My Linux server takes time to reply

2001-03-14 Thread Silviu Cojocaru

On Wed, 14 Mar 2001, at 08:47 -0500, Mike Burger wrote:

 You're probably right...I really need to stop trying to reply to technical
 queries at 6AM.  Blarg.

Heh heh, at that hour I only retrieve mail, I answer them an hour later,
when my mind is clear :-)

-- 
Memory fault - where am I?

.-.
|  Silviu Cojocaru  |  [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
`-'

Powered by
 Red Hat Linux 7.0




___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



Re: When 7.1 out? Solved-Thanks

2001-03-14 Thread Silviu Cojocaru

On Wed, 14 Mar 2001, at 21:16 (GMT +0100), Jonathan Gift wrote:

 Ok. Sounds good. But it looks like 7.1 will be out within the next two
 months or so and I'll wait for that. Question, I guess... Did gimp 1.2
 make it on 7.0? I saw it on the 7.1 beta.

Nope, the 7.0 release has gimp 1.1.25

-- 
Usage: fortune -P [] -a [xsz] [Q: [file]] [rKe9] -v6[+] dataspec ... inputdir

.-.
|  Silviu Cojocaru  |  [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
`-'

Powered by
 Red Hat Linux 7.0





___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



Re: When 7.1 out? Solved-Thanks

2001-03-14 Thread Silviu Cojocaru

On Wed, 14 Mar 2001, at 20:16 (GMT +0100), Jonathan Gift wrote:

 I heard 7.0 had a lot of problems. I hope or should expect them to be
 fixed by 7.1. One was the compiler... I don't remember the details. Just
 that a lot of people were sort of p*ssed off.

A lot of problems means pushing it. It had some, with glibc and the
compiler. The one with the compiler was that this version had more strict
rules, and the kernel (2.2) wasn't exactly written by the book, but
compiled with earlier versions of gcc as they were more permissive.
Good code DID compile, even though sometimes, some idiotic warnings spew
out.

An example is xchat (the IRC app) that runs just fine compiled with either
2.95 or or 2.96.

-- 
UNIX Trix

For those of you in the reseller business, here is a helpful tip that will
save your support staff a few hours of precious time.  Before you send your
next machine out to an untrained client, change the permissions on /etc/passwd
to 666 and make sure there is a copy somewhere on the disk.  Now when they
forget the root password, you can easily login as an ordinary user and correct
the damage.  Having a bootable tape (for larger machines) is not a bad idea
either.  If you need some help, give us a call.
-- CommUNIXque 1:1, ASCAR Business Systems

.-.
|  Silviu Cojocaru  |  [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
`-'

Powered by
 Red Hat Linux 7.0







___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



Re: Redhat-list digest, Vol 1 #1272 - 14 msgs

2001-03-13 Thread Silviu Cojocaru



Umm, yeah, and why exactly did you send all the digest to the list ?

-- 
.-.
|   Silviu Cojocaru |  [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
`-'

Powered by
 Red Hat Linux 7.0



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



Re: Linux and viruses

2001-03-07 Thread Silviu Cojocaru

On Wed, 7 Mar 2001, 04:47 - Mike Burger wrote:

 Statux [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:

   That's why M$ win stinks...
 
  Well.. it's DOS. Windows runs under DOS. Even NT found much
 of its
  rooting in DOS. The emulation doesn't help much either :)

 Actually, NT has its roots in OS/2.  The very essence of the
 kernel is the OS/2 kernel.  At least they held on to
 something from their partnership with IBM in the 80s.

If I'm not mistaken, NTFS also derives from OS/2's HPFS.

-- 
Silviu Cojocaru
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (new email address)
__
Staff meeting in the conference room in %d minutes.
--




___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



Re: Pdf files with Linux

2001-03-06 Thread Silviu Cojocaru

On Mon, 5 Mar 2001, 13:47 -0800 Hidong Kim wrote:

 xpdf should be on the Red Hat 6.2 CD.  You can use it to read PDF
 files.  Also, there's a Linux version of Adobe Acrobat Reader you can
 download from the Adobe Web site http://www.adobe.com.  Good luck,

Yeah, go with the one on Adobe's site. It's free and works great. xpdf
kinda sux rocks. It failed on some pdfs I had :( even the one with that
came with RH 7.0

-- 
Silviu Cojocaru
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (new email address)
__
Trying to be happy is like trying to build a machine for which the only
specification is that it should run noiselessly.
--




___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



Re: Once Again, Have I Been Hacked?

2001-03-05 Thread Silviu Cojocaru

On Sun, 4 Mar 2001, 15:24 -0800 Ben Ocean wrote:

 Here's another one, this one not to *tty1* but rather *pts/1*. Have I been
 hacked?
 BenO

 Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2001 14:46:13 -0800
 From: bin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: portmap attempt on thor from 211.57.229.2 (211.57.229.2)
 
   [211.57.229.2]
   Login: operatorName: operator
   Directory: /root   Shell: /bin/sh
   On since Mon Mar  5 13:13 (KST) on pts/1 from 21dial234.xnet.ro
  19 seconds idle
   On since Mon Mar  5 13:23 (KST) on pts/2 from 21dial234.xnet.ro
  12 minutes 19 seconds idle
   Last login Mon Mar  5 13:23 (KST) on 2 from 21dial234.xnet.ro
   No mail.
   No Plan.

Oh yeah. That's a hack! The attacker is (sadly) a romanian.
Sadly because I'm too and I hate the fact that my homies find such
activity enjoyfull.

Further more. The ISP is Xnet, one of the bigest/best here. You could
contact them and try to resolve the problem. Well at least they will
cancel the guy's account, ISPs here don't have any policies against
hacking activities (well, mine does).

-- 
Silviu Cojocaru
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (new email address)
__
Disk crisis, please clean up!
--




___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



Re: Lilo - still 1024 limit?

2001-03-04 Thread Silviu Cojocaru

On Sun, 4 Mar 2001, 09:32 -0600 Bob Hartung wrote:

 Hi all,
  I am having to reinstall on a Laptop due to upgrade of HD
 to 30 GB to share with Win2000 and Linux (RH7 or
 Mandrake7.2).  I have always placed the Linux stuff in a
 high extended partition in the past.  I have been having a
 devil of a time but have the idea (source???) that lilo can
 go anywhere in its' newest incarnation.  Is this so or do I
 still have the 1024 limit?


I'll keep this short: DOH!! the limit never went away.

-- 
Silviu Cojocaru
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (new email address)
__
You're using a keyboard!  How quaint!
--



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



Re: unsuscribe

2001-03-02 Thread Silviu Cojocaru

On Fri, 2 Mar 2001, VX useless wrote:

 unsuscribe

And what if I refuse huh?!?



LOL, I couldn't resist :)

-- 
Silviu Cojocaru
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (new email address)
__
A programmer is a person who passes as an exacting expert on the basis of
being able to turn out, after innumerable punching, an infinite series of
incomprehensible answers calculated with micrometric precisions from vague
assumptions based on debatable figures taken from inconclusive documents
and carried out on instruments of problematical accuracy by persons of
dubious reliability and questionable mentality for the avowed purpose of
annoying and confounding a hopelessly defenseless department that was
unfortunate enough to ask for the information in the first place.
-- IEEE Grid newsmagazine
--




___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



Re: Access

2001-03-02 Thread Silviu Cojocaru

On Thu, 1 Mar 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I suggested to a friend that this maillist was an
 excellent resource and he should take full advantage of
 it. However, when he attempted to subscribe he hit a
 brick wall. How does one subscribe? (it's been eons
 since I subscribed and memory failos)

 He can send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 with the "Subject" line:
 subscribe passwd address=his_email_address

-- 
Silviu Cojocaru
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (new email address)
__
It appears that PL/I (and its dialects) is, or will be, the most widely
used higher level language for systems programming.
-- J. Sammet
--




___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



Where are is Security Tips doc

2001-03-01 Thread Silviu Cojocaru


The other day I was reading a doc from RedHat's site called "PPP Setup
Tips". The author mentions something about some other doc called
"Security Tips". I figured it was on the site also. Well it wasn't.

So, where are is "Security Tips" doc ?
Was there, ever, something like that on the site ?

-- 
Silviu Cojocaru
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (new email address)
__
Windows NT Beer: Comes in 32-oz. cans, but you can only buy it by the
truckload. This causes most people to have to go out and buy bigger
refrigerators. The can looks just like Windows 3.1 Beer's, but the
company promises to change the can to look just like Windows 95 Beer's --
after Windows 95 beer starts shipping. Touted as an "industrial strength"
beer, and suggested only for use in bars.
--



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



RE: rawhide

2001-02-27 Thread Silviu Cojocaru

On Tue, 27 Feb 2001, Warren Melnick wrote:

 7.1 will be Wolverine
 7.0 is Guinness
 6.2 was zoot (I think)
 6.1 was Cartman

and 6.0 was Hedwig

 5.2 was Apollo

 Rawhide is the current unreleased build, whatever it might be.
 Anyone remember the 5.1, 5.0, 4.x and 3.x releases?  I think 3.0.3 was the
 first one with a name.

-- 
Silviu Cojocaru
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (new email address)
__
Standards are crucial.  And the best thing about standards is: there are
so many to choose from!
--




___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



Re: Kernel updates

2001-02-26 Thread Silviu Cojocaru

On Mon, 26 Feb 2001, Burke, Thomas G. wrote:

 Hey gang,

   In the 8 Feb 2001 update message for the new kernel, the message
 points to one of the files does not appear to exist (kernel-headers)...
 What's up with that?

Well at least for RH 7.0 they were not needed. The ones supplied with that
distro are 2.4.0-0.26. They need not be changed as you can see...

Cheers!

-- 
Silviu Cojocaru
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (new email address)
__
The less time planning, the more time programming.
--




___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



How to use tar

2001-02-24 Thread Silviu Cojocaru


I want to make the tarball of dir using "tar" and "bzip2", could someone
tell me how to do that, the tar man page got me totally confused.

Thanks in advance for any help.

-- 
Silviu Cojocaru
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (new email address)
___
A Linux machine! because a 486 is a terrible thing to waste!
---



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



Re: Wolverine vs Fisher

2001-02-24 Thread Silviu Cojocaru

On Thu, 6 Jan 2000, Justin Zygmont wrote:

 pinstripe was 6.9, I thought I remember a high number of bugs in that,
 even when hedwig(7.0) came out there was a lot of noise about bugs still.

err
 7.0==guinness and 6.0==hedwig

-- 
Silviu Cojocaru
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (new email address)
__
"...Unix, MS-DOS, and Windows NT (also known as the Good, the Bad, and
the Ugly)."
--




___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



Question...

2001-02-22 Thread Silviu Cojocaru


When I polled my email this morning, I found in my INBOX a subscription
that was already made for [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Now, what I want to ask you folks is, what is "wolverine-list" and why the
heck did it auto-magicaly subscribe me? I never asked for a subscription
to the list...

Thank you in advance for any answers.

-- 
Silviu Cojocaru
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
I *knew* I had some reason for not logging you off... If I could just
remember what it was.
--




___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



Re: log files meaning

2001-02-18 Thread Silviu Cojocaru

On Sun, 18 Feb 2001, Ashley M. Kirchner wrote:

 Stop sending HTML messages to the list.

Oh yeah that helps... My good man if the HTML bothers you, filter it out.
That should help.

Have a peaceful life.

-- 
Microsoft Windows(tm). A thirty-two bit extension and graphical shell to
a sixteen bit patch to an eight bit operating system originally coded for
a four bit microprocessor which was written by a two-bit company that
can't stand one bit of competition.



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



RE: help me!

2001-02-13 Thread Silviu Cojocaru


Also you could do this:
-- send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with this in your
 Subject line: unsubscribe your_passwd_here your_email_address_here

I prefer doing it this way.

Cheers!

On Tue, 13 Feb 2001, Jeff Lane wrote:


 Obviously, you didnt read the page... did you?  Did you happen to read the
 Redhat-list Subscribers section?

 Since you are a subscriber, then dont ya think that this area would be
 important to you??

 heres what it says:

 Redhat-list Subscribers
  The subscribers list is only available to the list administrator.

  Enter your admin address and password to visit the subscribers list:

 To change your subscription (set options like digest and delivery modes,
 get a reminder of your password, or unsubscribe from Redhat-list), enter
 ^^^

 your subscription email address:


 Wow... and when you enter your email address and click on edit options,
 why what do you get???  lookee here!!!

 Unsubscribing from Redhat-list

   To unsubscribe, enter your password and hit
   the button. (If you've lost your password, see
   just below to have it emailed to you.)

 Hmmm what do ya know?  looks like there it is...

 Sorry man, I dont mean to bust anyones balls, as it were, however, I am
 really annoyed by people who dont take time to read the entire page, and
 just come back complaining that they cant unsubscribe to this or any other
 list, when the means to do it are right there.

 /RANT

 Maybe I will write a HOWTO on unsubscribing from the redhat-list.

 cheers


-- 
Silviu Cojocaru
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
The nice thing about Windows is it does not just crash, it dispays
a dialog box and lets you press [OK] first.
---



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



Re: Fw: ALL NRIs PAY ATTENTION

2001-02-09 Thread Silviu Cojocaru


Oh NO! Not this one again!!
sheesh!

-- 
Silviu Cojocaru
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
I've noticed several design suggestions in your code.
--




___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



Re: installing imp.tar.gz

2001-02-09 Thread Silviu Cojocaru

On Thu, 8 Feb 2001, Jerry Human wrote:

 Hi Gentlemen:

 Would it be possible to write a script that would do this automatically
 for any new package install?

 For instance, if the script was called "ump" you would type "ump
 package name and it would insert the package name into the command
 "tar -xzvf package name.tar.gz; cd package name; less README" in the
 appropriate places, execute and leave you in the README for that
 package. That would eliminate a lot of repetitivly typing long package
 names, eliminate typing mistakes, always use the same command
 eliminating the "I forgot to ..." and "I should have ..." mistakes, and
 always start the README file to be scanned before "corrupting" a new
 package with incorrect parameters.

 Thanks.


 You can alias the "tar -xzvf pack" command to something as "untargz
pack". You put this alias in .bashrc The line you put there is this
alias untargz="tar -xzvf"
As for that thing of typing the name of the package, bash has
autocompletion. You type some part of the name and then hit [Tab].

Cheers!

-- 
Silviu Cojocaru
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
MSDOS is not dead, it just smells that way.
-- Henry Spencer
--




___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



Address book type app

2001-02-08 Thread Silviu Cojocaru


  Is there any console app that acts like an addressbook? So far I didn't
have any luck in finding one. I use RHL 7.0, stock install.

-- 
Silviu Cojocaru
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
Whenever a system becomes completely defined, some damn fool discovers
something which either abolishes the system or expands it beyond recognition.
--



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



Re: older dell dimension - linux compatible?

2001-02-05 Thread Silviu Cojocaru

On Sun, 4 Feb 2001, Andy Bunn wrote:

 hi, i have a dell dimension pt1000. it is five  years old now. the hard
 drive recently failed so i thought i'd start over with linux. anybody know
 if i can? is the os compatible?

 thanks in advance

 -andy


Well it should. I mean it installed on my 4 year ol P90 machine. Be sure
you have at least 16MB of RAM, if you want X windows then 32, 40, 64 would
be nice.

-- 
Silviu Cojocaru
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
It's a naive, domestic operating system without any breeding, but I
think you'll be amused by its presumption.
--



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list