Re: RAID

2001-04-25 Thread tcurl

I want to set up a RAID using udma drives.  I don't think soft RAID is a 
good solution from a performance standpoint.  I searched all the hardware 
RAID vendors to find one providing a udma hardware RAID controller that 
would work with Linux.  None, so far as I could find, do.  The two closest 
seemed to be Promise and Adaptec.  Promise says they will be able to do it 
in 6 months.  I have not yet gotten and answer from Adaptec. 





"Rodolfo J. Paiz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
04/25/01 05:44 PM
Please respond to redhat-list

 
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: 
Subject:Re: RAID


At 4/25/01 02:11 PM -0400, you wrote:
>Within six months Introducing Linux when the SupeTrak SX 6 is introduced.
>
>
>The question, to Promise Technology, was "When do you expect to have 
Linux
>compatible drivers for the SuperTrak RAID 5 controller?"

I'm very interested in RAID and the Promise SuperTrak controllers. 
However, 
I just can't make head or tail of this post. What does it mean?


--
Rodolfo J. Paiz
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list





___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



RAID

2001-04-25 Thread tcurl

Within six months Introducing Linux when the SupeTrak SX 6 is introduced.


The question, to Promise Technology, was "When do you expect to have Linux 
compatible drivers for the SuperTrak RAID 5 controller?"



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



Turn off X window startup

2001-04-04 Thread tcurl

I should know this off the top of my head, but can't remember.  I need to 
tell an RH 7.0 system not to start  X Windows on the boot up.



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



Most Compelling OS

2001-04-01 Thread tcurl

Sunbelt Software sells add-ins for Windows OS' e.g. Quota Managers, 
Defraggers, etc.  They are conducting a poll to determine which OS you 
think will be the most compelling over the next five years.  The vote 
selection is in the frame on the left hand side of the page.

Don't forget to vote, at http://www.sunbelt-software.com/index.htm



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



Re: Is stronghold the only way to my own CA ???

2001-03-26 Thread tcurl

Issuing CA's is pretty easy.  If you were using Lotus' Domino, you'd find 
that it does this out of the box.  And the CA's issued are great for your 
own use in recognizing the people to whom you granted a CA.  You can 
almost look at them as really secure cookies.

On the other hand issuing CAs that other people will recognize is an 
entirely different story.  That's more akin to printing money, that is 
issuing a paper certificate that can be used in the conduct of trade. When 
you issue that kind of CA, someone asks to be trusted in a transaction, 
pointing to you as the agent certifying that they are who they claim to 
be.  Well, for that, you need to have stature, e.g., a government, or a 
government certified operator, like a major bank, etc.  It is certainly 
unlikely that a CA issued by an individual, or small, non-regulated 
enterprise would carry any weight at all.  Except with itself, of course.



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



Re: My Linux server takes time to reply

2001-03-14 Thread tcurl

I've been watching this thread as I've noticed the same issue on the local 
LAN here, (no local BIND). Local ftp connections are slow to establish, 
but I'd always been connecting via IP addresses rather than using the host 
 name so it didn't appear the thread was germain to mu situation.

Nevertheless I built a hosts file with local LAN IP addresses and host 
names and copied it to the several local machines.  Now ftp connections 
come up in an instant.

Thanks for the tip.

Tom 



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



RedHat Bundles

2001-03-12 Thread tcurl

Why do the "Bundles", e.g., Lotus Domino, IBM Small Business Server, etc., 
all include RH 6.2 rather than RH 7.0?



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



Re: OT(Sort of) : RTFM questions

2001-02-04 Thread tcurl

On Sun, 4 Feb 2001, M. Neidorff wrote:

> At 02:13 PM 2/1/01 -0400, you wrote:
> >Maybe I am getting more observant in my old age but does it seem to 
anyone
> >else that there has been a tremendous pile of RTFM type questions over 
the
> >last few weeks.
> >It is a problem I have dealt with for years, trying to get end-users to
> >read at least the intro before calling tech support.
> >Does anyone have a brilliant thought on how Redhat could encourage it.

The answer is easy, unfortunately.  Most rational people seek the easiest 
solution, it's easier to ask than it is to look it up.  That's why people 
call information rather than open the phone book which might be sitting 
right on the table.  The answer, charge for the service, or don't provide 
it.

The problem is that you really do want people to get the answers they 
need, and it's not easy for you to know if the reason for the question is 
the inability of the asker to find or perhaps understand the material 
available, or if it really is laziness.  Certainly one approach might be 
to simply state, "The answer to your question can be found in  .  .   ". 
If they still need help they'll ask again.  If they find the answer 
themselves they'll be so proud of their newfound ability that they will, 
hopefully, continue to employ it in the future.

Tom Curl
Enertex Systems



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



Re: Re: RH 7 and linuxconf-web

2001-01-29 Thread tcurl

I tried it again, with all of the settings as advised by Red Hat.  It does 
not work.  I got the file recommended by Jacques Gelinas.  It now works fine.

Thank you Jacques

Tom Curl
Enertex Systems






Jacques Gelinas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
01/29/01 11:12 AM
Please respond to redhat-list

 
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject:Re: Re: RH 7 and linuxconf-web


>[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

>> As far as I can tell, from experience, and searching around the web,
>> linuxconf-web is still broken on RH 7.0, even using
>xinetd-2.1.8.9pre11-1.

> It worked with the errata release... we specifically tested that, you
> probably haven't turned it on in xinetd or inside linuxconf.

No it does not. It only work once. xinetd starts linuxconf only once (this
is a service of type wait). This linuxconf instance will serve all request
until a 10 minute timeout. When linuxconf end, xinetd will never restart
it again.

A fixed version is available at ftp.solucorp.qc.ca/pub/misc. It is based
on the redhat errata.

-- 
-
Jacques Gelinas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
nt2linux: NT to Linux migration kit
http://www.solucorp.qc.ca/





___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list





___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



RH 7 and linuxconf-web

2001-01-29 Thread tcurl

As far as I can tell, from experience, and searching around the web, 
linuxconf-web is still broken on RH 7.0, even using xinetd-2.1.8.9pre11-1. 
 If this is untrue, or if someone has a fix I will appreciate knowing.

Thanks,

Tom Curl
Enertex Systems



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



Re: Groupware anybody?

2001-01-20 Thread tcurl

Anybody want to comment on 3rsoft's MailStudio?

>>a Web-based e-mail messaging server solution, with
 features that include task scheduling, personal files storage, address 
book,
 security, calendar scheduling, anti-spam, POP3 mail access, and an 
individualized
 BBS system. It provides stability, security, reliability, scalability, 
and ease of use
 with minimum maintenance for superior performance. >>


Tom Curl
Enertex Systems



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



Re: Is this a joke????

2001-01-05 Thread tcurl

I don't think it's a joke.  I ordered it last week and it arrived the next 
morning.  After I got it installed, just two mouse clicks were all that 
was required, do I agree with the license, and what language, I found it 
to be at least 200% faster than any other distribution.  The most amazing 
thing was that I was able to run the MS version with the CPU removed from 
the motherboard.  There are a lot of other great features as well.  With 
the MS version of Linux running, the PCs power supply works backwards and 
actually puts power back into the wiring, so you can run your refrigerator 
off of your PC.  And all the open source people are always talking about 
"free beer", well MS offers an option on MSLinux to install a spigot as a 
peripheral device to actually get the free beer.  MS may make Linux a 
truly world class monopoly.  Wow!

Tom Curl
Enertex Systems





Mike Burger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
01/05/01 07:30 AM
Please respond to redhat-list

 
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc: 
Subject:Re: Is this a joke


It is a joke.  It's been around for a while (the site, that is) and I
believe there's a disclaimer at the bottom of the web page.

On Fri, 5 Jan 2001, Luke C Gavel wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Check out the insanity at:
>
> http://www.mslinux.org/
>
> I will never ever ever buy this product.
>
> -- Generated Signature --
> The wonderful thing about a dancing
> bear is not how well he dances,
> but that he dances at all.
> -- End Sig --
>
>
>
> ___
> Redhat-list mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
>



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list





___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



Re: Anybody heard ...

2001-01-04 Thread tcurl

 ...just like the ".0" releases are alpha, I suppose... 

Are we talking about RH or MS? ;<)

Tom Curl
Enertex Systems



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



Re: Anybody heard ...

2001-01-03 Thread tcurl

Yeah everybody's right, I've lost my mind!  Sorry.

Tom Curl
Enertex Systems




Jeremiah Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
01/03/01 05:02 PM
Please respond to redhat-list

 
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: 
Subject:Re: Anybody heard ...


They are?  Gee.. I thought the beta team handled beta stuff.  Last I 
checked you could certainly *purchase* redhat 6.1, and 5.1..

-miah

On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 04:52:09PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> True but the "odd" numbered point releases are beta, some folks prefer 
> production code.
> 
> Tom Curl
> Enertex Systems



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list





___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



Re: Anybody heard ...

2001-01-03 Thread tcurl

True but the "odd" numbered point releases are beta, some folks prefer 
production code.

Tom Curl
Enertex Systems




Jeremiah Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
01/03/01 04:46 PM
Please respond to redhat-list

 
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: 
Subject:Re: Anybody heard ...


I think redhat 7.1 will be available far before 7.2.

-miah

On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 04:39:45PM -0500, Jerry Human wrote:
> Anybody heard if/when Red Hat 7.2 might be available? Given all the
> problems I've seen on this list with RH 7.0 I think I'd rather wait for
> it.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> 
> 
> ___
> Redhat-list mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list





___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



RE: Whole word substitution with sed [Solved]

2001-01-03 Thread tcurl

O'Reilly publishes a book called "Mastering Regular Expressions".  It 
claims to be for people who have never used them before.  Even so, while I 
don't consider myself any better than the average bear, I also don't feel 
I quite fall into the dummy category either.  Nevertheless I find the 
subject difficult.

Tom Curl
Enertex Systems





<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
01/03/01 11:22 AM
Please respond to redhat-list

 
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc: 
Subject:RE: Whole word substitution with sed [Solved]


And the winner is... :-)

> echo $flist | sed -e "s/ $fn / /"

Although Luke's solution also works, yours is simpler (after changing 
flist
from "abcde bc de" to ". abcde bc de ." -- see my reply to Luke for
details).

And this begs the question -- how does one know when single quotes, double
quotes or no quotes are appropriate?  Is there a "regexp for Dummies"
document out there (the man page is a bit thick)?

> You could also use 'awk'.

Any chance you can provide an example?

Thanks for your help!

bd


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Dave Ihnat
Sent: Wednesday, January 03, 2001 5:21 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Whole word substitution with sed


On Tue, Jan 02, 2001 at 09:55:23PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I have a list of space delimited  filenames in a variable 'flist', and I
> want to remove one of them which is in a variable 'fn'.  ...
> ...

Do
 echo $flist | sed -e "s/ $fn / /"

Note the included delimiters on either side of the variable, and the
retention
of one delimiter in the substitution string.

You could also use 'awk'.

Cheers,
--
 Dave Ihnat
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list





___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



Re: WINE (Re: Trouble)

2000-12-28 Thread tcurl


Bret, I am running it on a "clean" RH 7.0 without a problem.  I loaded and
ran the version 1 eval on a RH 6.2 without problem, but later had a good
deal of difficulty with the 2.0 eval that even their tech support people
couldn't figure out.  After that I downloaded non-free package, it is
supposed to be the same code base as the eval, but with a different
license.  In any case, it loaded and is running fine.  In fact I am writing
this using a Notes client on Win '95 in Win4Lin 2.o running on top of RH 7
with the standard kernel (2.2.16-22).  Try calling, or e-mailing their tech
support, they may be able to assist.

Tom Curl
Enertex Systems



   
  
Bret Hughes
  
 cc:  
  
Sent by:  Subject: Re: WINE (Re: Trouble)  
  
redhat-list-admin@ 
  
redhat.com 
  
   
  
   
  
12/28/00 12:36 AM  
  
Please respond to  
  
redhat-list
  
   
  
   
  




[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> Actually I did try VMware.  After that I went back to dual boot.  I found
> VMware too slow, even on an AMD 600 with 256Meg RAM.  When Win4Lin came
> along I tried that, and was impressed, no significant performance
> degradation.
>
> I am currently running dual boot (NT4.0/RH6.2) on a Toshiba Portege' with
> 94Mbytes RAM (max it will support).  I will try Win4Lin on the Notebook
as
> well.  If it works there, I'm sold.

I signed up for the eval for win4lin but having problems getting the
kernelt worked
out.  I am currently running a self-compiled 2.2.16 and there is no patch
for it
evidently.  I used the patch for 2.2.14 and I think the only problem was
the
Makefile version and I made that change myself  I made modules and
install-modules
but the kernel won't boot.  The machine just reboots when I try it.

I have never seen this before anyone have any ideas?

Bret



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list






___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



Re: OT Question Re: VMware (Was: WINE)

2000-12-27 Thread tcurl


At this point in it's life I'd only sell ME to people I didn't care about.

Tom Curl
Enertex Systems



   
   
"Edward Dekkers"   
   
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   
et.net.au> cc: 
   
Sent by:   Subject: OT Question Re: VMware 
(Was: WINE)
redhat-list-admin@r
   
edhat.com  
   
   
   
   
   
12/27/00 09:44 PM  
   
Please respond to  
   
redhat-list
   
   
   
   
   




> AFAIK Windows 95/98/Me won't use any memory past 128Mb but Windows
NT/2000

I know off-topic, but can anyone confirm/deny whether Windows 9x/ME will
use
past 128Mb? If the above statement is true, I need to seriously re-think
some of my RAM theories in regards to sales of PCs.

--
Edward Dekkers (Director)
Triple D Computer Services Pty. Ltd.
822 Rowley Road
Oakford W.A. 6121
+61 8 9397-1040
ABN: 33 635 238 024



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list






___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



Re: WINE (Re: Trouble)

2000-12-27 Thread tcurl


Actually I did try VMware.  After that I went back to dual boot.  I found
VMware too slow, even on an AMD 600 with 256Meg RAM.  When Win4Lin came
along I tried that, and was impressed, no significant performance
degradation.

I am currently running dual boot (NT4.0/RH6.2) on a Toshiba Portege' with
94Mbytes RAM (max it will support).  I will try Win4Lin on the Notebook as
well.  If it works there, I'm sold.

Tom Curl
Enertex Systems



   
  
Peter Kiem 
  
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]   
  
> cc:  
  
Sent by:  Subject: Re: WINE (Re: Trouble)  
  
redhat-list-admin@ 
  
redhat.com 
  
   
  
   
  
12/27/00 05:12 PM  
  
Please respond to  
  
redhat-list
  
   
  
   
  




Hi Tom,

> In the meantime I still need to run pure Windows applications on Linux.
> So, I am testing Win4Lin.  Yes, the purists among you can argue this is

Why not try VMware?  I run a Linux desktop and use VMware for Linux to run
Windows in a virtual machine for all my must-have-windows-only software I
need to run.

Sure it costs more than Win4Lin but I feel it is well worth the extra.  You

get things like:
- 100% Windows compatibility, you even get a BIOS!!!
- Support for bi-directional parallel devices like printers
- Support for Sound
- Networking (which is lacking in Win4Lin IIRC)
- Undoable disks (discard changes you have made to the virtual computer)
- The ability to run other OSes rather than just Windows.  This is
excellent
for testing Linux upgrades etc
- You can run Windows that has been installed into a partition, not just
virtual ones...

--
Regards,
+---+-+
| Peter Kiem| E-Mail: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> |
| Zordah IT | Mobile: +61 0414 724 766|
|   IT Consultancy &| WWW   : www.zordah.net  |
|   Internet Hosting| ICQ   : "Zordah" 81 |
+---+-+





___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list






___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



Re: WINE (Re: Trouble)

2000-12-27 Thread tcurl

I tried WINE without success. I believe this to be more my fault than that 
of the software.  I found that getting it working was much more 
complicated and detailed than I believe reasonable for what I am trying to 
accomplish.  Those, with Windows experience, who have tried to move a 
running system from one Windows box to another can relate to the problems 
of finding and moving all the required DLLs.  This is basically the same 
problem a WINE user has.  Depending on the software you are trying to run, 
the experience can be a relatively easy, excruciating, or a completely 
frustrating waste of time.

My goal is to migrate business clients to Linux.  The server part is easy, 
substitute SAMBA for NT, and I've done a lot of that.  The desktop is more 
difficult as there are cases, accounting is certainly one, where no good 
replacement products, open or proprietary, that run on the Linux platform 
are yet viable.  For example if a customer is already using Peachtree 
Accounting, DeLorme's mapping software, or Lotus' Notes Client, what do 
you do?  WINE could be an answer, but is simply not, in my opinion, a 
practical one, in a commercial environment, given the difficulty of 
getting a particular piece of Windows software running, and even then not 
knowing if all of the functionalty is really going to work.  99.9% may not 
be good enough in a commecial environment.

These issues will pehaps get resolved, somehow, although I don't see an 
easy answer.  Using the installation included with most Windows products 
which takes care of the DLL placement is unlikely to ever work on a 
Linux/WINE platform.  The QA issue is the more important one, and it's 
really only the software author who can do that effectively.  When an 
author ports to WINE and certifies his product on the Linux/WINE platform, 
the problem will be somewhat resolved.  The problem here as I see it is 
that the author will only be able to certify his product on a particular 
distribution or set of distributions of Linux with only a particular 
version of WINE. 

In the meantime I still need to run pure Windows applications on Linux. 
So, I am testing Win4Lin.  Yes, the purists among you can argue this is 
still Windows and still requires Win' 95 or Win '98 licenses, but so what, 
the client already has these,  Step 1, get them to Linux, Step 2, replace 
the Windows only software with suitable substitutes, when they become 
available or the author ports them to Linux.

Why move the desktops to Linux at all you might ask.  Because Linux is 
better, for all the reasons we already know, people want it, and it helps 
ensure the freedom of choice, which Microsoft continues to try to 
eliminate.  PLEASE understand, I am not suggesting Microsoft's behavior is 
"bad".  On the contrary, the behavior is perfectly normall, kill off all 
the competition and maximize the probability of your survival and the 
survival of your progeny.  Microsoft is particularly good at this.  It's 
just that I don't want to live in a world populated by a single species, 
and in this regard WINE is already helping.Tom Curl
Enertex Systems




Micah Yoder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
12/26/00 09:16 PM
Please respond to redhat-list

 
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: 
Subject:WINE (was Re: Trouble downloading Moneydance.)


I'd be interested in knowing what other mainstream apps people have
successfully run under Wine recently.  I know, there's the winehq
database, but vague comments, old records, and inflated ratings make it
rather useless.

Personally, I've been playing Stardock's Entrepreneur game, and it runs
pretty much PERFECTLY!  It did crash once, but I've played it for
several hours so that's not TOO bad.  I have no native 'Doze DLLs.  I'm
using Codeweaver Wine on Redhat 6.2.

I tried downloading a few Windows shareware programs, but the installs
generally failed, needing some kind of MSxxx.dll.



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list





___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



Re: Netscape 6 follies

2000-12-18 Thread tcurl

They have fallen prey to the " .  .   .   . and for my next act  .   . ." 
syndrome.  That in my mind is one of the biggest advantages Open Source 
has over commercial closed source.  Open Source developers quit developing 
when the product is finished.  Commercial producers need to sell an 
upgrade to stay in business, so they are never finished.

. .  . And the BLOAT goes on .  .   .   please contact Microsoft for 
details. ;<)

Tom Curl
Enertex Systems




lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
12/18/00 12:20 AM
Please respond to redhat-list

 
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: 
Subject:Re: Netscape 6 follies


Romain Kang wrote:

> OK, I have loaded Netscape 6 for Linux.  It's got some nice polish,
> but NS6's problems leave me give doubts whether I should even bother
> writing up all the problems and hope someone will address them.  I
> recall some browser discussion on redhat-list a while back, but I
> don't see any reliable archives to search.
>

i gave up on it LONG ago as being WAY too buggy and slow...that and on my
PII450/128ram/13.6HD/16mbrivatnt..which has always been more than enough 
for any
task i've given it yetso it went out the door :)LOL

lee




___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list





___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



Re: Samba and NT4 WS

2000-12-11 Thread tcurl

Right, I missed that, sorry.

Tom Curl
Enertex Systems




Matt Housh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
12/11/00 09:53 AM
Please respond to redhat-list

 
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: 
Subject:Re: Samba and NT4 WS


> I hate to ask this, but did you start the server?  (smbd, nmbd)

Without nmbd running at the least, the machine would not show up in the
network neighborhood. :)

Matt

-
Matt Housh ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Academic System Administrator
-



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list





___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



Re: Samba and NT4 WS

2000-12-11 Thread tcurl

I hate to ask this, but did you start the server?  (smbd, nmbd)

Tom Curl
Enertex Systems




"Ragnar Wiencke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
12/11/00 06:43 AM
Please respond to redhat-list

 
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: 
Subject:Samba and NT4 WS


Hi there.

I installed samba on the linux box, used swat to configur it. Now I can 
see 
the linux box in the NT Network Neighborhood but when I try to explore it 
I 
get a message saying  is not accessible, The network path was not 
found.

If this is a password problem then the message is stupid. But can anyone 
tell me what my problem is here?

TIA
Ragnar W.
_
Get more from the Web.  FREE MSN Explorer download : http://explorer.msn.com



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list





___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



Re: Good PDA to use with Linux.

2000-12-08 Thread tcurl

ipaq runs Linux and X windows in sunlight readable color, no keyboard 
though.

Look here   http://www.ipaqlinux.com/

Tom Curl
Enertex Systems



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



Re: Anyone know how to find I2O devices

2000-12-05 Thread tcurl

try http://www.i2osig.org/

Tom Curl
Enertex Systems



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



Re: Understanding DNS to set it up

2000-11-02 Thread tcurl


Get the O'Reilly book on Bind 8 (DNS and Bind edition 3)



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



Re: Kind of OT: (Redhat) Linux vs NetWare?

2000-10-31 Thread tcurl


Dan,

I'll not spend a lot of time on this, but here are some thoughts.

1.  You want to avoid, as should your client/employer, a multiplicity of
OSs unless there is a compelling reason for the diversity, e.g., they are
used for testing multiplatform software.

2.  Having said that, you need to decide what should remain.  In most shops
you will find Windows to be the predominate desktop OS, so as a minimum you
will need to be very conversent with the Windows products in order to
provide end-user support.

3.  Given your need to be familiar with Windows desktops, you will have a
definate headstart on the admin of NT/Win2000.  So that's a good bet for
your servers.  But Linux running Samba provides better stability, and you
seem to be comfortable in that realm.  So, unless they are running NLM.
client/server stuff that required Novel, that's the one to dump.  If it's
just file/print servers, that's a no-brainer.

4.  I'd be inclined to migrate all of the NT/Win2000 stuff to Linux/Samba
that I could, except, again, for stuff that only runs on those platforms,
maybe a FAX server, Exchange, whatever.  Get a good book(s) on NT/Win200o
system admin and go for it.  (O'Reilly has some decent stuff.)

Good luck,

Tom



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



RE: ipchains question

2000-10-26 Thread tcurl


look in usr/sbin
 such as;

/usr/sbin/ipmasqadm portfw -a -P tcp -L 61.16.44.22 80  -R
192.168.0.200 80






"Burke, Thomas G." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@redhat.com on
10/26/2000 03:05:44 PM

Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Sent by:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


To:   "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
Subject:  RE: ipchains question

I think it's ipportfw, but I wouldn't swear to that.

> -Original Message-
> From: Ed Lazor [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2000 2:11 PM
> To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject:   ipchains question
>
> I setup an ipchains based firewall and set it up to masq everything from
> the internal network.  I don't have an extra machine to setup in a DMZ,
so
>
> I'm going to have to run a web server on the internal network.  I asked a

> friend ( who isn't available at the moment) and he said to use the
> following command:
>
> ipmasqadm portfw -A  80  80
>
> I haven't found the ipmasqadm command.  Is there an ipchains command
> equivalent?
>
> Thanks =)
>
> -Ed
>
>
>
> ___
> Redhat-list mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list






___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



etho speed

2000-10-15 Thread tcurl


I have a RedHat 6.2 server running the seawall firewall.  One ethernet port
(etho) is connected to a dsl router.  I would like to know in real time the
speed at which data is flowing throught that interface.  Is there a command
I can type to get this?

Thanks,

Tom



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



Re: Trying to figure out why the numbers on the keypad don't work in VIwhile in X-Windows

2000-10-13 Thread tcurl


If you do, tell us.  (They don't work here either, strange.)



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



Re: solaris or linux

2000-10-13 Thread tcurl


How do you define better?








"Martin A. Marques" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@redhat.com on 10/13/2000
10:25:51 AM

Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Sent by:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:  solaris or linux

I've ask this in the SPARC list, but as the discussion could have taken
place
here, I'll ask:

How does Solaris work internally, and why should I think that Linux is
better
(on SPARC or INTEL).

Thanks


--
"And I'm happy, because you make me feel good, about me." - Melvin Udall
-
Martín Marquésemail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Santa Fe - Argentina  http://math.unl.edu.ar/~martin/
Administrador de sistemas en math.unl.edu.ar
-



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list






___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



Re: Network cabling

2000-10-08 Thread tcurl


Hi Gustav,

Re; established standards, sure.  First the key is not the wire color,
while that's more a less a standard, there are certainly cables using
different trace colors than the ones I provided.  The real issue is
pinouts, and how they are interconnected.  Each end of connection has a
transmitter and a reciever.  One uses pins 1 & 2, the other uses pins 3 &
6.  Transmitters must connect to recievers and visa versa.  So, if you were
to connect two NIC to each other pins 1 & 2 on NIC A would have to connect
to pins 3 & 6 of NIC B, and pins 3 & 6 of NIC A would connect to pins 1 & 2
of NIC B.

There are cables connected exactly like this.

  NIC A
NIC B

 1 -- 3
Xmitter {
}Rcvr.
 2 -- 6


 3 -  1
Rcvr.{
} Xmitter.
 6 -- 2


However:

Rather than use crossover cables as shown above, the convention is for NICs
to be wired as shown and Hub to be reversed: ala'

  NIC
HUB

 1 -- 1
Xmitter {
}Rcvr.
 2 -- 2


 3 -  3
Rcvr.{
} Xmitter.
 6 -- 6

The connections between a Transmitter must be "balanced".  Balence is
provided by twisting the two wires so that each wire in the pair picks up
"approximately" the same amout of ambient electrical noise from the
environment.  That way the noise arriving at a the reciever, know as the
Common Mode Signal can be rejected, and only the "real" signal is received.

So you need two pairs of wires.  A second benefit of twisting the wires is
that the impedence of the pair is controlled, about 100 ohms in CAT5.  By
matching the output impedence of the transmitter to the cable and the input
impedance of the cable to the receiver, the deliverery of signal power from
transmitter to receiver is maximized.

The signal is without polarity, so while it might seem that pin 1, of a
pair, should go to pin 2 on the opposite end and pin 2 to pin 1, this is
not neccessary and allows cables to be wires "straight through.  1 to 1, 2
to 2, 3 to 3 and so on.

You may find some networks wired with two pair cable, it's cheaper than 4
pair CAT5.  It works, but it does violate the media standard for Eithernet,
(802.3).

You may also find systems wired using the telecommunications (telephone)
industry color codes, (EIA/TIA-568).


Pair 1TipWhite/blue
Ring Blue

Pair 2TipWhite/orange
Ring Orange

Pair 3TipWhite/green
Ring Green

Pair 4TipWhite/Brown
Ring Brown

This will also work fine, just ensure that you have pairs between pin sets
and are using appropriatly certified wire for thespeed at which you want
the circuit to operate.  Buy CAT5, and you will be doing that.  In other
words don't accept UTP-3, UTP-4, UTP-5, or STP-5.

Of course, while installing the cables, you will want to ensure you do not
exceed the "recommend" pull force of 110 Newtons, per standard SP 2840A.
Please recognize 110 Newtons (about 25 foot pounds) is only a
recommendation as it has not yet be accepted as a "standard".   :<))

Hope this helps,

Tom






Gustav Schaffter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@redhat.com on 10/07/2000 11:07:55
AM

Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Sent by:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:  Re: Network cabling

Tom,

I have been doing my own cables for a while. My primary reason is that I
get them in the lengths that I prefer. I don't need to use a twenty feet
cable where a twelve feet cable would do.

I have always been following the instructions in a users guide I
received when I bought a hub from Linksys. That's so far been my only
reference.

I noticed that in the guide I have, they have inverted the use of pins 4
and 5 compared to your explication. This shouldn't be of any importance
as long as I'm consistent.

But can you confirm that your explanation adheres to established
standards and that there is a bug in the Linksys guide?

Regards
Gustav

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> What are we talking about, installing a networkk, or making cables?
Making
> cables is a waste of time, you can buy 10' cables with RJ45s on each end
> for less than three bucks.  If you are talking about stringing CAT5 thru
> walls and ceilings, a book won't help a lot.  What you need is a roll of
> cable, a 24" long 3/8" drill bit, and a step ladder.  Or you can call an
> electrician and tell her/him where you want the wires to terminate.
>
> The electrician can also put the connectors on.  But if you want to do
that
> yourself put OG/WT on pin 1, OG on pin 2, GN/WT on p

Re: Network cabling

2000-10-06 Thread tcurl


What are we talking about, installing a networkk, or making cables?  Making
cables is a waste of time, you can buy 10' cables with RJ45s on each end
for less than three bucks.  If you are talking about stringing CAT5 thru
walls and ceilings, a book won't help a lot.  What you need is a roll of
cable, a 24" long 3/8" drill bit, and a step ladder.  Or you can call an
electrician and tell her/him where you want the wires to terminate.

The electrician can also put the connectors on.  But if you want to do that
yourself put OG/WT on pin 1, OG on pin 2, GN/WT on pin 3, BU/WT on pin 4,
BU on pin 5, GN on pin 6, BN/WT on pin 7, BN on pin 8.  You can buy a tool
for installing the RJ45 connectors for about $22.00.  The wall plates have
punch down strips in them, tool about $3.00

Have fun!

Tom





Bret Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@redhat.com on 10/06/2000 12:46:19 PM

Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Sent by:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:  Re: Network cabling

Frank Reichenbacher wrote:

> Anybody know a good site or book for do-it-yourself twisted pair cabling
> written for nitwits like me? I cannot wire a clip to save my life.
>
> Frank Reichenbacher
>

There are probably real books, but I learned the little that I know from
talking with an eletronics distributor and getting some catalogs from him
that have LOTS of info in them about various wireing configs.  I don't have
them at hand right now but seems like the Black Box catalog also has some
stuff in it.  The ethernet howto has wiring diagrams for common ehternet
scenarios, including a crossover ethernet cable.

HTH

Bret



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list






___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



Re: One NIC - Two IPs (Possible?)

2000-10-04 Thread tcurl


No Problem.  Get the Mini HOW-TO on Setting up IP Aliasing On A Linux
Machine

e.g.  /sbin/ifconfig eth0:0 10.0.1.1
 /sbin/ifconfig eth0:1 192.168.0.1


Tom






"Angel L. Mateo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@redhat.com on 10/04/2000 03:07:16 AM

Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Sent by:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:  Re: One NIC - Two IPs (Possible?)

George Lenzer escribió:
>
> I am in the following predicament:
>
> I have a machine with one NIC and only one line run from a wiring closet
to that machine.  The machine NOW needs to be accessible to two separate
logical networks: 10.0.1.0 and 192.168.1.0   Is it possible to assign two
IP addresses to eth0?  One of my associates wants to convert this machine
from a Linux box running Apache to a Win98 machine running Xitami.  He said
he can configure NICs in Win98 to have two IPs simulataneously.  Can Linux
do this as well?
>
   Of course. The only thing you have to do is to configure an
alias for
eth0 interface. You can do this with linuxconf.

--

Salu2,  Angel





___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



Re: Network Design

2000-10-03 Thread tcurl


Try seawall it allows DMZ (3rdNIC).  Put www,smtp, whatever in the DMZ






Jason Costomiris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@redhat.com on 10/03/2000 07:58:13 PM

Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Sent by:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:  Re: Network Design

On Tue, Oct 03, 2000 at 11:37:51PM +0200, Tobias Roppelt wrote:
:  Internet
:  |
:  Router
:  |
:  eth0
:  Firewall1
:  eth1
:  |
:   ---hub-
:  |   |   |
:  eth0eth0eth0
:  Firewall2   {www}   {ftp, mail, telnet}
:  eth1
:  |
:  priv_net
:
: Looks quite okay to me.

Agreed, a classing two-firewall approach.  Anything in particular that
would
keep him from using 3 NICs in his "Firewall1", thus obviating the need for
the second firewall?  Most firewalls that I work with (Checkpoint, PIX,
etc)
don't care about the extra i/f's.  Does IPchains not like that?

: Plugging Firewall2 directly to the hub to protect the private network
: should put you on the save site, too.
: Maybe you will substitute telnet service with ssh.

Agreed, dump telnet, use ssh.

--
Jason Costomiris <><   |  Technologist, geek, human.
jcostom {at} jasons {dot} org  |  http://www.jasons.org/
  Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum viditur.



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list






___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



Re: pc anywhere...

2000-08-10 Thread tcurl


Thanks Matt, looking at it now.

Tom






Matt Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@redhat.com on 08/10/2000 06:06:32 PM

Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Sent by:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:  Re: pc anywhere...

Try using VNC (http://www.uk.research.att.com/vnc/) - it should allow you
to do just what you want.  It's very slick, and it's free, too.

-matt

-

Matthew Nelson
Dynamics Technology, Inc.
21311 Hawthorne Blvd., Suite 300, Torrance, CA 90503-5610
Voice: (310) 543-5433   FAX: (310) 543-2117   Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

On Thu, 10 Aug 2000, robsmith wrote:

> Is there a linux version of pc anywhere??  or a program similiar??  I am
> thinking about installing ssh but wanted to check first...
>
>
>
>
> ___
> Redhat-list mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
>



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list






___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



Re: pc anywhere...

2000-08-10 Thread tcurl


Rob,

I'm guessing your next question might be "how?".  I don't know.  I
downloaded an X Windows server to an NT workstation and I can get it to
connect, but so far no luck in running a Linux X session.  It might be
easier from a Linux box, I don't know haven't had time to try.  If I were
you though I'd try to get it running on a LAN connected machine before
trying a remote connnection, that way you can see what's going on at each
end.

Good Luck!

Tom





robsmith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@redhat.com on 08/10/2000 05:41:52 PM

Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Sent by:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:  Re: pc anywhere...

I was just interested in remote access.  I would like to get into my
computer at
home from work.  I was under the impression that ssh and telnet only gave
you a
terminal window, I did not know you could run X as well...thanks


On Thu, 10 Aug 2000 18:08:59 you wrote:
>
> There are several products that do things similar to PC anywhere, But
this
> really has noting at all to do with ssh, other than you might want to run
> one within an ssh shell.  The big question is whether you want to
evesdrop
> on other user's terminal or X sessions, or if you are just interested in
> remote access.  If the later you don't really need a PC Anywhere kind of
> tool at all, telnet or ssh will both get you a remote terminal session,
and
> you can run X windows remotely with or without ssh.
>
> Tom
>
>
>
>
>
> robsmith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@redhat.com on 08/10/2000 05:01:34 PM
>
> Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Sent by:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> cc:
> Subject:  pc anywhere...
>
> Is there a linux version of pc anywhere??  or a program similiar??  I am
> thinking about installing ssh but wanted to check first...
>
>
>
>
> ___
> Redhat-list mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ___
> Redhat-list mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
>




___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list






___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



Re: pc anywhere...

2000-08-10 Thread tcurl


There are several products that do things similar to PC anywhere, But this
really has noting at all to do with ssh, other than you might want to run
one within an ssh shell.  The big question is whether you want to evesdrop
on other user's terminal or X sessions, or if you are just interested in
remote access.  If the later you don't really need a PC Anywhere kind of
tool at all, telnet or ssh will both get you a remote terminal session, and
you can run X windows remotely with or without ssh.

Tom





robsmith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@redhat.com on 08/10/2000 05:01:34 PM

Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Sent by:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:  pc anywhere...

Is there a linux version of pc anywhere??  or a program similiar??  I am
thinking about installing ssh but wanted to check first...




___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list






___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



Re: SSH

2000-08-06 Thread tcurl


I initially used SSH 1, then found BSDSSH, a V2 version that is free.





RTS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@redhat.com on 08/06/2000 12:15:08 AM

Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Sent by:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:  SSH

I just set up a new RedHat 6.2 system.

What is everyone using today for SSH services on a system??

Randy
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list






___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



Re: burned up

2000-07-29 Thread tcurl


Bill,

Athlon should be fine.  Recommend FDIC SD11 mb to use with it.  Out of
curiosity though, why didn't you ask for advice before you ordered?

Tom





"william lewis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 07/29/2000 09:41:23 AM

Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To:   <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
Subject:  burned up

Hi.  Last week I took a lightning discharge to my computer system via an
interfaced radio.  It fried my motherboard and radio.  I ordered another
computer with the Athlon 800mhz AMD chip.  Are there any problems running
Linux with this chip? Is the AMD chip supported with RedHat and Linux?  I
have always used Intel Inside..Trying something new...Any input is
thankful...







-- 
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the Subject.




Re: Lack of updates of common packages

2000-07-27 Thread tcurl


So now I'm feeling really stupid;

went to rawhide - got perl 5.6 rpm

did rpm -ivh perl-5.6*

message "only packages with major numbers <= 3 are supported by this
version of RPM"  (The distribution on this system is RH 6.2)

checked rpm version (rpm --version) 3.0.4 returned

 no matter, went back to rawhide got rpm version 4.0

did rpm --ivh rpm-4.0*

message "only packages with major numbers <= 3 are supported by this
version of RPM"

duh?

Tom


-- 
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the Subject.




Re: PCMCIA Video Capture

2000-07-19 Thread tcurl


In case anybody is folling this thread it looks like the discontinued IBM
Smart Video Capture Card will do the job.  Now all I have to do is find
one.


-- 
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the Subject.




Re: PCMCIA Video Capture

2000-07-19 Thread tcurl


Thanks Michael,

I am looking to use it in a notebook.  That's why I need PCMCIA.  Any
thoughts?

Tom






"Michael H. Warfield" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 07/19/2000 12:09:00 PM

Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:  Re: PCMCIA Video Capture

On Wed, Jul 19, 2000 at 12:05:40PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> Does anyone know of a Linux compatible PC Card that will do frame
grabbing
> from a standard composite video souce (RCA input)

   Any of the BT-848 style cards should work fine.  I'm running an
STB TV-Tuner card (which is a BT-848) with xawtv.

   Go here for more information on the Video4Linux project:

   http://roadrunner.swansea.uk.linux.org/v4l.shtml

>
> --
> To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
> as the Subject.

--
 Michael H. Warfield|  (770) 985-6132   |  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  (The Mad Wizard)  |  (770) 331-2437   |  http://www.wittsend.com/mhw/
  NIC whois:  MHW9  |  An optimist believes we live in the best of all
 PGP Key: 0xDF1DD471|  possible worlds.  A pessimist is sure of it!


--
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the Subject.









-- 
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the Subject.




PCMCIA Video Capture

2000-07-19 Thread tcurl


Does anyone know of a Linux compatible PC Card that will do frame grabbing
from a standard composite video souce (RCA input)


-- 
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the Subject.




Re: minimal install

2000-07-18 Thread tcurl


Linda,

Another option is a "real" terminal.  As these get replaced with Windows
PC's running terminal emulators, they become more and more available, often
for no cost.  Check with municipalities in particular, I've seen a lot of
good ones just thrown in the dumpster.  You'll need a serial connection of
course but that's no big deal.

Tom





"Mikkel L. Ellertson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 07/18/2000 06:12:22 PM

Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:  Re: minimal install

On Mon, 17 Jul 2000, linda hanigan wrote:

> Hi All,
> I would really like to use an old 386 as an editional
> terminal. It would only need to be able to have
> networking setup so it could use telnet to log on
> to the server and run console (text based) applications.
> Does anyone know what the real minimum memory
> requirement is.
>Thanks
> Linda
>
4M is about as low as you will want to go if you are installing RedHat.
You can get a working system with only 2M, but I don't think the RedHat
install will work with that little memory.  I did have a working system
with only 1M, but that was with a 1.0.X kernel, if I remember right.
(Back when I was running Slackware, and installing from floppies!)

You probably know this alreadys, but make sure you don't run any
services on this box.  For a terminal, you don't even need cron or
syslog.  You probably don't even need inetd running.

Mikkel
--

Do not meddle in the affairs of dragons,
 for you are crunchy and taste good with ketchup.


--
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the Subject.









-- 
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the Subject.




Re: Hardware Watchdogs / Alternatives

2000-07-15 Thread tcurl


There are many of these.  I use boxes from Teleboot.  Another company,
located in FL, called Weeder Technologies makes one for about $50 that can
control/examine the status of 7 channels and also has a mic input so you
can listen to what is happening in the room where the unit is located.

Tom






Dan Kronstadt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 07/15/2000 11:55:43 AM

Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:  Re: Hardware Watchdogs / Alternatives


At 08:39 AM 7/14/00 -0500, Alan Mead wrote:
>I don't know if it's still being made but we have a set of devices called,
>I think, X10 or X11 that are designed for this

I've used a device similar to this, but its just controlled by a phone
connection - you plug a phone line into the box, then you can call it,
enter a secret code, and it cuts off power from the PC for a few minutes.
Sorry - I dont remember the manufacturer.


Dan Kronstadt
Sunland, Ca
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

If you got the words it does not mean you got the knowledge.




--
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the Subject.








-- 
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the Subject.




Re: Hardware Watchdogs / Alternatives

2000-07-14 Thread tcurl


Looks good, I have used similar for monitoring remote, network connected
systems but, and I quote;

"The first thing you'll need is two computers.  You need not have identical
hardware in both machines (or amount of memory, etc.), but if you did, it
would make your life that much easier when a component fails."

For bigger installations heartbeat would be fine, but for the single system
user who need an alert if/when the system becomes non-functional it;s a bit
overkill.  I think the request was for a board to be put in the box which
could send a signal if the box died.  Obviously this couldn't work if the
board depends on the system power to do it's job, and that happens to be
the failure mode.  So a "board" mounted outside the box, with independent
power is what's called for.  I suppose to be really safe the system could
also watch the "board" to make sure it has not failed.  But that's why I
suggested the picked relay, a failure would cause a dropout.  But you can,
of course. go on and on with, this, maybe two bells with independent power,
etc, etc.  Maybe even the heartbeat package and two complete systems.

There was a guy once who said the only reason he would fly on airplanes
with four engines was because no one had one with five.





Alan Mead <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 07/14/2000 10:04:52 AM

Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:  Re: Hardware Watchdogs / Alternatives


At 08:53 AM 7/14/00 , you wrote:

>Most software doesn't run very well if the sytem board hangs, or the power
>supply dies.  To be effective a watchdog need to be outside of the box
>being monitored, and looking for a periodic signal that the box is still
>working.  A typical, far from perfect, but nevertheless easy method is to

Yeah, maybe you should take a look at the heartbeat package.

-Alan


--
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the Subject.








-- 
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the Subject.




Re: Hardware Watchdogs / Alternatives

2000-07-14 Thread tcurl


Most software doesn't run very well if the sytem board hangs, or the power
supply dies.  To be effective a watchdog need to be outside of the box
being monitored, and looking for a periodic signal that the box is still
working.  A typical, far from perfect, but nevertheless easy method is to
have a box with a bell, light, or whatever that is turned on by a relay
dropping out.  The relay is held picked by a re-settable one shot, e.g.,
555.  If the one shot is not reset within a pre-set interval, say 1 second,
it drops the relay and the bell goes off.  What's the reset?  Well it might
be a program, running on the system that brings one pin on a parallel port
high for a millisecond once every 1/2 second.  As long as the program is
running the bell is quiet.





Alan Mead <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 07/14/2000 09:39:52 AM

Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:  Re: Hardware Watchdogs / Alternatives


At 03:55 AM 7/14/00 , you wrote:
>All,
>
>I'm looking for a good watchdog card for Linux and am coming-up short.
>Any pointers?

I don't know what a 'watchdog card' is.  There are software packages like
'heartbeat' that monitor something and raise an alarm if that something
stops.

>Another thing I'd like to try out is some sort of device which will
>reboot a Linux server remotely if need-be.  Sometimes you get into a
>situation where the kernel hasn't crashed, and still answers pings, etc.
>and would probably look to a hardware watchdog like everything's okay,
>but the machine is still unreponsive and you can't telnet to it.

I don't know if it's still being made but we have a set of devices called,
I think, X10 or X11 that are designed for this.  There are client devices
that mediate between the computer and the wall socket and another device on
the controlling computer's serial port (and also plugged into the wall
socket).  You have to write serial port software to control the client
computers.  I've seen similar units sold for home automation.  IIRC, they
don't work across circuit boundaries and they require that the controlled
devices actually get plugged into the wall (as opposed to, say, a UPS).

All that said, the only times I've ever had to reset a Linux box was when I
was screwing around with the hardware.  (We bought these X10 units for
controlling a multi-computer DOS-based homegrown C process for processing
faxed test scores into psychological reports.)  So I don't know whether I
would bother.

-Alan


--
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the Subject.








-- 
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the Subject.




Re: FW: samba?????

2000-07-14 Thread tcurl


Perhaps the smb-client?

Try typing mountsmb, you'll either get instructions, or command not found.
If the latter, install smb-client.

Tom





"Steven Pierce" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 07/13/2000 11:54:22 PM

Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:  Re: FW: samba?


Linda,

I have tried to mount the drive. so that it looks like a drive on my
windoze box.
To have no luck.  What am I missing??

Steven

*** REPLY SEPARATOR  ***

On 7/13/2000 at 10:33 PM linda hanigan wrote:

>Samba allows a windows machine to easily access a linux machines files and
>printers.
>If you are dual booting you can mount your windows partitions with Linux.
I
>have
>never needed to mount a windows harddrive partition but I  mount windows
zip
>drives
>and floppies all the time.
>Linda Hanigan
>
>
>--
>To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
>as the Subject.




--
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the Subject.








-- 
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the Subject.




Re: Stupid question about winmodems NOT

2000-07-06 Thread tcurl


This describes Plug 'n Play not "soft" modems

Linux supports Plug 'n Play






Jake McHenry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 07/06/2000 03:23:27 PM

Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:  Re: Stupid question about winmodems




A regular modem has hard set com ports and IRQ's, usually set by jumpers
or not adjustable at all. A winmodem rely's on the windows operating
system to determine what com port it uses when you install the modem, and
it get's set temporaroly in a type of flash memory on the modem. This is
why winmodem's don't work in linux, or any other type of non-windows
operating system.

Jake


On Thu, 6 Jul 2000, Stephen King wrote:

> Could someone define for me the difference between a winmodem and a
regular
> modem?
> SK
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
> as the Subject.
>
>

Jake McHenry
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


--
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the Subject.








-- 
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the Subject.




Re: Stupid question about winmodems (for rday)

2000-07-06 Thread tcurl


How about the WinPC?  It would have no hardware at all, just software that
emulates all the hardware.  Now wouldn't that upset Intel?  And that might
lead to WinMicrosoft ..   .





rpjday <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 07/06/2000 02:54:54 PM

Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:  Re: Stupid question about winmodems


On Thu, 6 Jul 2000, John Aldrich wrote:

> On Thu, 06 Jul 2000, Stephen King wrote:
> > Could someone define for me the difference between a winmodem and a
regular
> > modem?
> >
> WinModem is missing most of the hardware that makes a modem. It's
> replaced by software that EMULATES the missing hardware, thus making
> the processor do all the work that used to be done by the missing
> hardware.
>John

one wonders what the next world's dumbest invention will be.  winmonitors?
winkeyboards?  wincd-roms?  winhard-drives?  god, i wish i was being
facetious.  sigh.

rday


--
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the Subject.








-- 
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the Subject.




Re: Stupid question about winmodems

2000-07-06 Thread tcurl


The real question you want to ask is the difference between "hardware"
modems and "software" modems.  Modems, were always "hardware", yes they
used firmware burnt into proms to control their functions but they were
what is commonly referred to has "hardware devices.

Then someone got the idea for cost reduction by eliminating the proms and
firmware, replacing them with a software module running in the system CPU
under control of the OS.  The OS was usually, at least that was what the
software was written for, some variant of Windows, hence Winmodem.






"Stephen King" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 07/06/2000 11:04:35 AM

Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To:   <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
Subject:  Stupid question about winmodems


Could someone define for me the difference between a winmodem and a regular
modem?
SK


--
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the Subject.








-- 
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the Subject.




RE: I've Been Framed

2000-07-05 Thread tcurl


Yeah, I know how it is.  I was framed once too.  They claimed I'd stolen
the car that was used in a Banque robbery.  But as soon as I demonstrated
that I didn't spell Bank as Banque they let me go.  Sometimes these guy's
aren't too smart.  Don't let them intimidate you.


-- 
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the Subject.




Re: ipportfw - where find it?

2000-07-05 Thread tcurl


Jerry,

It's part of masquerade you will need to install that.

Tom





Jerry Winegarden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 07/05/2000 03:34:16 PM

Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:  ipportfw - where find it?


I'm looking for ipportfw to port forward with ipchains firewall script.
However, I cannot find it any where on any machine that I've installed on.
Red Hat 6.2.  ipchains installed.  Have /sbin/ipchains and /sbin/ipfwadm
but no ipportfw.

TGIA

Jerry WinegardenDuke Univ/OIT  Technical Support
[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www-jerry.oit.duke.edu


--
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the Subject.








-- 
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the Subject.




Re: How to disable ping echo?

2000-06-23 Thread tcurl


go here

http://seawall.sourceforge.net/


-- 
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the Subject.




Need PC Video Capture Card

2000-06-22 Thread tcurl


Let's try that again with a good subject line





[EMAIL PROTECTED] on 06/22/2000 01:54:35 PM

Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:  Re: ftp not working




I'd like to capture video images an a notebook running RH 6.2 using a
little security type video camea.  I think I need a PCMCIA Video Capture
Card to do this.  I need a pointer to a supplier with cards with Linux
compatible drivers.

Thanks,

Tom


--
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the Subject.








-- 
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the Subject.




Re: ftp not working

2000-06-22 Thread tcurl



I'd like to capture video images an a notebook running RH 6.2 using a
little security type video camea.  I think I need a PCMCIA Video Capture
Card to do this.  I need a pointer to a supplier with cards with Linux
compatible drivers.

Thanks,

Tom


-- 
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the Subject.




Re: Very EXCITED!! LinNeighborhood program for SAMBA browsing.

2000-06-20 Thread tcurl


I got it!  Major Kool!  It's now at V 0.6. This is exactly what's needed to
help wean the winweenies.





"jack wallen, jr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 06/20/2000 02:55:48 PM

Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To:   Red Hat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
Subject:  Re: Very EXCITED!! LinNeighborhood program for SAMBA browsing.


found this on freshmeat.

see what you said!

 :Stop the presses!
 :
 :I would like to share some of my excitement after having
 :found this jewel of a program on the intranet site of a company I'm
 :consulting at. It's called LinNeighborhood-0_4_2-1_i386.rpm and it's
all
 :that Linux is about: Small, ingenious software provoking a real
 :"WOW" when you use it.
 :
 :It's for SAMBA users. It's based on the Windows Network Neighborhood
idea
 :allowing you to browse network shares by double-clicking them. It can
 :mount and unmount them with a single click, it takes 3 minutes to
install
 :and understand. It's 85K and it's a beautiful piece of software.
 :
 :Especially when you know it's still in beta stadium. Trying means
adopting
 :it. I don't know if it's available on one of the standard Linux FTP
sites,
 :but if somebody could do a search and keep us informed? Otherwise I'm
 :ready to upload it to somebodies FTP site.
 :
 :Mind you, It's not mine and I don't even know who the creator is, as
he
 :didn't even put his name in the "About" menu.
 :
 :LinNeighborhood is released under GNU.
 :
 :Cheers!
 :   _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/
 :  _/ Zoran GRBIC   _/  Linux user & advocate  _/
 : _/ UNIX Sys Analyst  _/  Both Micro$oft's clean _/
 :_/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/
 :Mailed with Linux & Pine...
 :
 :
 :

--
Jack Wallen's Key fingerprint
B0 0B 4A 4E A0 BD 60 FC  0A FE 0C 88 5D 4A 77 38  D4 3A 63 E6
-
giles' uptime
  8:49am  up 2 days, 23:03,  2 users,  load average: 0.00, 0.04, 0.06


--
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the Subject.








-- 
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the Subject.




Re: Leaving the computer on

2000-06-16 Thread tcurl


Fans are required when convection/radiation cooling are inadequate.

Using lower voltage chips, the power dissapation drops, e.g., 5 volts at 5
amps dissipates 25 watts, whereas 2.5 volts at 5 amps is 12.5 watts.

Yes, by eliminating the fan, there is a cost savings, but there is also a
noise reduction and reliability improvement.

Tom






"Christopher Northrop" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 06/16/2000
09:34:24 AM

Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To:   <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
Subject:  Re: Leaving the computer on


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-

> get yourself an imac - the current models are fan-less and
> silent...
I believe the fan-not-included was more of a cost-factor rather then
an engineering break through. Lets see the fan displaces heat thus
keeping the thermo movement to a minimum. Also lets not forget that
old electrical physics thing, something about heat and resistance..
You know as heat increases so does resistance..  hhuuu? go figure
..

> but then again the c64 didn't come with a Harman Kardon sound
> system built in!
Sounds more like like the Packard Bell syndrome..  Not very
upgradable..

> you could install connectix virtual PC on your new imac and run
> yourself the funkiest linux server on your block!
Sounds real efficient.



>
> 
>
> :)
>
> At 9:26 AM +0100 15/6/00, Thomas Ribbrock wrote:
> >Though the day I'm able to get my hands on a PC with the noise
> >level of a C64 (i.e. none), I might leave the dial-up machine
> >on... ;-)
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
> "unsubscribe" as the Subject.
>

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGPfreeware 6.5.3 for non-commercial use 

iQCVAwUBOUos3zF8ni28kkNrAQFzhgP+NeG5mWdHSfZ/oqbDg1IAA0rbHEw34jFI
QYxHmsd+O4jDqUclcT//XFfONECKU8tbtavyM5GEQF/dPVvP5+M4pg35LQN9GD9b
JdeRQ36aGel/e6X81ZSX3Kp2+IpyC5QIID7VHh+Qcdzj4zzkt3f7u9bTh+w/HyH8
NVVCO3Jn46o=
=0D+G
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



--
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the Subject.








-- 
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the Subject.




Re: Leaving the computer on

2000-06-14 Thread tcurl


It's easy.  When does a light bulb fail?  When you turn it on.  Why?  All
those cold, low resistance circuits draw a lot of current at turn on, there
are mechanical as well as electrical stresses on all those junctions, to
say nothing of the trauma to capacitors.

The monitor is the power hungry beast in the configuration, but if you have
a "green" monitor and take advantage of all the power saving features, you
don't need to turn it off, it will do that by itself.

Tom





Hyung Kim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 06/14/2000 07:10:25 PM

Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:  Leaving the computer on


Can anyone please tell me what the benefits are to
leaving your computers on at all time.  I understand
that there are benefits, however, I would like to be
able to provide a more specific answer when other ask
me whether they should leave their system on.  Thanks.

OhWhat about turning just the monitor on and off?

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Photos -- now, 100 FREE prints!
http://photos.yahoo.com


--
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the Subject.








-- 
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the Subject.




Re: motherbroad.

2000-06-02 Thread tcurl


Can't say that any one in particular is the absolute best, but I've found
the FIC SD-11 with the AMD Athlon CPU has worked well for me in the last
few servers I've put up.






Mark Lo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 06/02/2000 01:20:23 PM

Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To:   "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
  redhat user list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
Subject:  motherbroad.


Hi,

 Which type of motherborad is most stable for linux.??  or which
brand ??

Thank you

Mark


--
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the Subject.








-- 
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the Subject.




Re: IPChains..

2000-06-02 Thread tcurl


I don't think this is necessarily so.  IPchains sets up the filter
independently on each interface, so you could, if you wanted allow stuff in
that you later deep six, e.g, you let it come in the front door but deny it
passage out the back, to you internal LAN.  In the meantime, you tripwire,
etc, it catching and logging all those port scans and their ilk.

Tom






Alan Mead <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 06/02/2000 01:00:20 PM

Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:  Re: IPChains..


At 11:09 AM 6/2/00 , Gordon Messmer wrote:
>Duncan Hill wrote:
> > The PIX on the network does this for me :)  I just need a way to
> > protect my system so it cannot be used as an entrance point.
> > Portsentry is up and running already :>
>
>Once you firewall your machine properly, portsentry will be next to
>useless.  It will only warn you about errant connection attempts from
>inside your own network, because those are the only connections it will
>receive :)  The kernel will drop connections from the outside world
>before portsentry see's them.

I don't know what a PIX is... but if I understood Duncan correctly, his
internal LAN was using the an IP address space that he doesn't own (Duncan,
is this correct?  this the crux, yes?).  These machines were being serviced
by an IP Masq firewall that translated from their IP addresses to one
legitimate IP address.  His machine is a web server and (whatever port 22
services) and the firewall is configured to expose his machine.  I'm
curious about the details of this but I assume that he has a single
interface that is connected to his LAN.

Anyway, he asked how to use IP chains to block all outside traffic except
ports 22 and 80 and allow all internal traffic.

Duncan, if this is correct, I don't think you can distinguish internal and
external traffic on your machine.  This has to be done at the border
between your LAN and the outside world (I think this is what Gordon is
saying).

Or, you could just trust all traffic from the IP space of your internal LAN
and hope no one who really owns that space attacks.  Actually, doubts creep
in as I write this... how would your routing return packets correctly to
internal machines?  If the packets are being routed correctly to your LAN
peers then I guess you have little to worry about the legitimate users of
this IP space because they'll never see responses to the packets they send?

-Alan


--
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the Subject.








-- 
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the Subject.




I-Gear / Mail-Gear

2000-05-29 Thread tcurl


Both of these products are included on the 3rd party Server Applications
disk included in the RH 6.2 distribution.  Reviews on the net are sparse.
I will appreciate any comments/recommendations regarding them.

Thanks, Tom


-- 
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the Subject.




Re: glibc Vs. LinuxThreads

2000-05-25 Thread tcurl


I am curious when I read these kinds of messages.  "I've got this really
old thing, that I want to use with the latest whatever.  But I don't want
to upgrade my old thing, just screw on some sort of adapter so it will work
with the new gadget."  And I always wonder, why?  A full system upgrade is
usually pretty painless, and probably a whole less time consuming than
modifying an old cassette player for CDs.





"Nitebirdz<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>"  Hi:
>
> I have a redhat 4.2 system and don't really want to
> upgrade to 6.2 if I can help it, but wish to install
> MySQL (latest, which reportedly requires Linux 2.0+
> with LinuxThreads 0.7.1 or glibc 2.0.7). Does anybody
> know if I can just add this new glibc and if it will
> coexist with libc-5.3.12-18.5, or must I upgrade? How
> about just going with LinuxThreads. Any MySQL folks
> who know if this will do it?
>

I never did it, but it certainly is possible.  You can install the new
glibc libraries, and they will coexist with the old ones no problem.


-
Nitebirdz: http://www.linuxnovice.org
"Open source tries to move software from a witchcraft to a science.  People
start discussing ideas and suddenly you don't have shamanistic companies
telling you how it is."  (Linus Torvalds)



--
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the Subject.








-- 
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the Subject.




Re: Duplicating Hard Disk...

2000-05-23 Thread tcurl


Thanks for the tip Adam.  freshmeat's search engine seems to be having a
problem right now.  I'll see if I can find it in a while.

Tom





"Adam Sleight" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 05/23/2000 02:40:48 PM

Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:  Re: Duplicating Hard Disk...


check out a program called "mondo"  on freshmeat.net...it's like DriveImage
Pro
for Windows.

On Tue, 23 May 2000 13:08:34 -0400
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
#
#Ahbaid,
#
#I'd use a product called Ghost.  Boot it from a diskette.  It will clone
#any HDD to another so long as the second is larger than the first.  One
#problem, I think, with your approach is that it does not consider the
#partitioning of the second HDD.
#
#Tom

#Ahbaid Gaffoor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 05/23/2000 12:49:34 PM

#Subject:  Duplicating Hard Disk...
#
#
#Hi all,
#
#I have a RH box with an ide drive on /dev/hda
#
#I'd like to clone this drive...
#
#Question:
#
#Can I plug in another IDE drive as say /dev/hdb and run the following
#command to do the trick?
#
#dd if=/dev/hda of=/dev/hdb bs=512 count=1
#If not, what's the best way? Assume the person doing this is an end user
#in another country (really is)... :)
#
#thanks,
#
#Ahbaid.


--
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the Subject.








-- 
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the Subject.




Re: Duplicating Hard Disk...

2000-05-23 Thread tcurl


Ahbaid,

I'd use a product called Ghost.  Boot it from a diskette.  It will clone
any HDD to another so long as the second is larger than the first.  One
problem, I think, with your approach is that it does not consider the
partitioning of the second HDD.

Tom





Ahbaid Gaffoor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 05/23/2000 12:49:34 PM

Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To:   redhat list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
Subject:  Duplicating Hard Disk...


Hi all,

I have a RH box with an ide drive on /dev/hda

I'd like to clone this drive...

Question:

Can I plug in another IDE drive as say /dev/hdb and run the following
command to do the trick?

dd if=/dev/hda of=/dev/hdb bs=512 count=1
If not, what's the best way? Assume the person doing this is an end user
in another country (really is)... :)

thanks,

Ahbaid.


--
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the Subject.








-- 
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the Subject.




Re: US West DSL service

2000-05-19 Thread tcurl


Bob,

The ISP provides the connection.  What you attach is your business.  If you
have a coke machine with an ethernet adapter that can talk IP to your
inventory dispatching system a generic DSL connection from US West will
support it.  US West, the support organization, however probably won't,
when you call for support.  When you tell the help desk person your coke
machine can't connect to your AS400 you probably will find the US West
support person pretty clueless and probably useless in helping to resolve
the problem.

So putting that in a Linux perspective, the US West DSL connection will
work with Linux, or any other operating system you choose to use provided
it uses TCP/IP.  But most, if not all consumer level ISP support desks,
don't even know that there are any OSs other than Windows '95/'98.  Some
may have heard of NT, but even then the answer is NT?, our system doesn't
work with NT.  Nonsense of course, but expect it.

Tom






Bob Hartung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@mail.redhat.com on 05/09/2000 09:56:08 PM

Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Sent by:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


To:   "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
Subject:  US West DSL service


Okay, I have learned that US West is now offering DSL service in my area
and my line qualifies for always on, fixed IP address service at 256 K
for US 29.95/month or 2 hour at a crack limit for US $19.95/month.  Does
anyone have any issues with US West regarding their acceptance of
Linux?  If so let me know before I jump in.

Thanks



Bob


--
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the Subject.





-- 
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the Subject.




Re: win modems

2000-05-08 Thread tcurl


Robert,

You should wait for the New "Bob" modem.  It only dials MSN, but hey if you
are not dialing MSN you've probably got a serious problem anyway.  So wait
for Bob.  :<))

Take nothing I say as serious, nobody else does.

Tom






Robert Vazquez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 05/08/2000 09:44:48 PM

Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To:   redhat-list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
Subject:  win modems


I'm very new to linux and pc. I have a 56k zoom modem and im not sure if
rehat can use it. how can i tell if it is a win modem?


--
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the Subject.








-- 
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the Subject.




Re: Commercial BACKUP software

2000-04-27 Thread tcurl


My take;

 Arkeia - nice looking interface but very complex to setup and use.  For an
enterprise level back-up with a full time backup operator it will be great.
They should have made an abbreviated setup for the smaller site.

ArcServe - should be in some other business.  Their products occasionally
don't work as advertized and their customer service is abominable.

BRU - don't have strong opinion either way, but it seems to be an adequate
system.

Look at Lone-Tar

http://199.72.66.91/ibapps/products.nsf/AK/9A090C5E9127CFE78525670E007C7DCF

Good luck,

Tom





"Adam Sleight" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 04/27/2000 12:53:34 PM

Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:  Commercial BACKUP software


I plan on getting a new 2U rackmount with one 9G and two 36GB SCSI's for a
SAMBA server.
I use tar currently for my mail server and it works fine.  However, for
this SAMBA server
I'd prefer a "commercial" solution. I need to *remotely* backup/restore
this server...no
monitor or keyboard will be hooked up to this server. Any advice or
recommends (as they
say in Japanese music stores) will be appreciated.

In addition planning to get a external DLT 40/80GB tape drive $4500 (ouch).
Tapes around
$80 a pop this ain't gonna be cheap.  I wish we could go with a DDS-4
20/40GB tape drive
but it probably won't be big enough.  Or is it cheaper to get a DLT tape
library of a few
DLT 35/70GB tape drives?

Commercial Backup Options(any others?)

--BRU 16.0beta  downloaded it and it was easy to get working.  However, the
promised web
based administration wasn't available yet but should be soon for testing.
Kinda like
SWAT:901 for samba. http://www.estinc.com $299 (I think that is the price)

--Arkeia 4.2 30-day demo.  Going to try this once again.  Don't like the
interface all
that much but will reinstall and try to get the Web-based JAVA interface up
and going and
see what that is like. http://www.arkeia.com

these prices are from http://elinux.com
#57879 Arkeia Interactive Backup System $164
#57880 Arkeia Basic Linux Offering $289 (is this all I need?)
#57881 Arkeia Mini-LAN $479
#57882 Arkeia Enterprise-LAN $839
"Arkeia Linux as a Backup Solution" classI wish I could have gone today
but couldn't
get away from work.  They had a free class at the La Jolla
Marriott...shucks would have
been a good overview I'm sure.

--ArcServeIT for Linux 6.61beta relased Jan 6th.  I wish I could login or
give this a test
drive.  Anyone have any luck? I guess to get support the email address is
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  that's what the tech support phone dude told me to
try.
http://www.cai.com $695 Workgroup (think this is all I need) or $1395 for
Advanced
edition.

I've tried it on Redhat 6.2 English and got the web interface to come up
but wasn't able
to sucessfully login.  So I installed a fresh copy of Redhat 6.2 Japanese
and the
directory "ja" doesn't exist..thus the symbolic links aren't correct.  Yes
it supports
Japanese cuz I looked at the web interface images which have kanji, etc.
The "nls"
directory does exist just not the "ja" directory.

lrwxrwxrwx1 root root   33 Apr 27 08:39 asetup ->
/opt/ARCserveIT/lib/nls/ja/asetup
-rwxr-xr-x1 bin  bin  4579 Jan  6 07:08 aslang_setup
-r-xr-xr-x1 bin  ARCserve  3257408 Jan  6 07:08 asloggerd
-r-xr-xr-x1 bin  ARCserve  4556282 Jan  6 07:08 asmediad
-rwxr-xr-x1 bin  bin  8434 Jan  6 07:08 asmediad.pre
-rwxr-xr-x1 bin  bin   718 Jan  6 07:08 asmediad.restart
-r-xr-xr-x1 bin  ARCserve  3985368 Jan  6 07:08 asqd
lrwxrwxrwx1 root root   33 Apr 27 08:39 astart ->
/opt/ARCserveIT/lib/nls/ja/astart
lrwxrwxrwx1 root root   34 Apr 27 08:39 astatus ->
/opt/ARCserveIT/lib/nls/ja/astatus
lrwxrwxrwx1 root root   32 Apr 27 08:39 astop ->
/opt/ARCserveIT/lib/nls/ja/astop

--adam http://www.myhq.com/public/m/r/mrbass/


--
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the Subject.








-- 
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the Subject.




Re: Best Book ever?

2000-04-21 Thread tcurl


Not so much a "good book" thing as it is the author's perspective.  I must
have 30 or so volumes. some are outdated, but not yet trash, as they
sometime provide clues newer books assume.  One book I like is Red Hat
Linux 6 Server - Kabir - M&T Books.  More or less complete for a new
sysadmin on Linux.  But very sparse on some points.  And of course you
always want to look on the net for HOWTOs.  They generally, if found,
provide good step be step for accomplishing what you want to do.

Tom





Michael McLeod <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 04/21/2000 10:01:03 AM

Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:  Best Book ever?


I am a "Newbie" and am enjoying the new adventure.  I like to use books
to instruct me in new things.  I have purchased several books on Linux,
however, even though I have gotten some good information from them it is
not enough.  I would like to find a VERY complete book on all Linux
commands which is more indepth than "man" or LDP.  These seem to lose me
quickly because, although, they give the commands that's about all.  I
need an instruction manual which gives step by step instructions with
the reasons and expected results (and problems).  So, if any has some
suggestions which would help me out I would appreciate it.
Michael


--
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the Subject.








-- 
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the Subject.