Re: [Fwd: Red Hat Linux 9 | Get the latest Linux early]

2003-03-25 Thread T. Ribbrock
On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 08:37:41AM +0800, Edward Dekkers wrote:
 Other users - seriously - let's not debate over the number hey? Who cares
 what it's called as long as it works?

But that's the point, from my view. I *always* skipped the x.0's (in
fact, I skipped the x.1's as well) and reading about them on redhat-list
usually comfirmed that decision. Up until now, the x.0 was followed up
with *very* stable, compatible versions as point release - most of the
time that were the x.2's, with the exception of 7.x - 7.3. 4.2, 5.2,
6.2 and 7.3 were very good, the lot of them. That's why I'm waiting
for a stable 8.x, not for another x.0 release, which again has new
major problems to be shaken out.

Cheerio,

Thomas
-- 
== RH List Archive: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=redhat-listr=1w=2 ==
-
Thomas Ribbrockhttp://www.ribbrock.org 
  You have to live on the edge of reality - to make your dreams come true!



-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


RE: [Fwd: Red Hat Linux 9 | Get the latest Linux early]

2003-03-25 Thread Roger
Some people may argue they are worthless to start off with.


On Mon, 24 Mar 2003, Billy wrote:

 Its not the version number that people care about...the RHCE cert is based
 on version numbers. So the big jump in version numbers makes the cert
 worthless a lot faster!





-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


Re: [Fwd: Red Hat Linux 9 | Get the latest Linux early]

2003-03-25 Thread Rick Johnson
Roger wrote:
Some people may argue they are worthless to start off with.

On Mon, 24 Mar 2003, Billy wrote:


Its not the version number that people care about...the RHCE cert is based
on version numbers. So the big jump in version numbers makes the cert
worthless a lot faster!


Those people haven't taken the 6 hour exam (mostly labs), and then compared 
the people who passed to the book-smart people who passed their MCSEs :-)

There is *some* value to it if you're framiliar with it.

-Rick
--
Rick Johnson, RHCE #807302311706007 - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux/Network Administrator - Medata, Inc. (from home)
PGP Public Key: https://mail.medata.com/pgp/rjohnson.asc


--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


RE: [Fwd: Red Hat Linux 9 | Get the latest Linux early]

2003-03-24 Thread Daevid Vincent
I was just thinking the exact same thing!? 

As John Stewart says on the daily show Whhh?


 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Nichel
 Sent: Monday, March 24, 2003 11:48 AM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: [Fwd: Red Hat Linux 9 | Get the latest Linux early]
 
 
 Red Hat 9  What happened to 8.1?
 
  Original Message 
 Subject: Red Hat Linux 9 | Get the latest Linux early
 Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2003 19:18:21 -
 From: Red Hat [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Reply-To: Red Hat 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Dear John:
 
 You may know that Red Hat Network is the best way to keep your
 systems running the latest errata and always up to date. What you
 might not know is that Red Hat Network passed the one million users
 mark earlier this year. We've listened to valuable feedback and have
 added two items of interest to keep those users happy - early release
 of Red Hat Linux 9 ISOs and improved technical support.
 
 Beginning March 31, 2003, paid subscribers to Red Hat Network will
 have access to Red Hat Linux 9 ISOs - a full week before retail store
 and Red Hat FTP availability. Also, Red Hat Network subscribers will
 receive dedicated Red Hat Network Technical Support.
 
 Learn more about the benefits of being a Red Hat Network Subscriber:
 
 To purchase a Red Hat Network subscription:
 Thanks again for using Red Hat Linux. We appreciate all feedback
 from our users and hope you enjoy Red Hat Linux 9.
 
 Sincerely,
 
 Red Hat
 
 
 
 
 -- 
 redhat-list mailing list
 unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
 



-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


Re: [Fwd: Red Hat Linux 9 | Get the latest Linux early]

2003-03-24 Thread Ric Tibbetts
It has to be a typo.

Ric

On Mon, Mar 24, 2003 at 01:48:24PM -0600, John Nichel wrote:
 Red Hat 9  What happened to 8.1?
 
  Original Message 
 Subject: Red Hat Linux 9 | Get the latest Linux early
 Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2003 19:18:21 -
 From: Red Hat [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Reply-To: Red Hat 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Dear John:
 
 You may know that Red Hat Network is the best way to keep your
 systems running the latest errata and always up to date. What you
 might not know is that Red Hat Network passed the one million users
 mark earlier this year. We've listened to valuable feedback and have
 added two items of interest to keep those users happy - early release
 of Red Hat Linux 9 ISOs and improved technical support.
 
 Beginning March 31, 2003, paid subscribers to Red Hat Network will
 have access to Red Hat Linux 9 ISOs - a full week before retail store
 and Red Hat FTP availability. Also, Red Hat Network subscribers will
 receive dedicated Red Hat Network Technical Support.
 
 Learn more about the benefits of being a Red Hat Network Subscriber:
 
 To purchase a Red Hat Network subscription:
 Thanks again for using Red Hat Linux. We appreciate all feedback
 from our users and hope you enjoy Red Hat Linux 9.
 
 Sincerely,
 
 Red Hat
 
 
 
 
 -- 
 redhat-list mailing list
 unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

-- 
Ric Tibbetts

Linux registration number: 55684
If you want to help advertise Linux - point your friends to
http://counter.li.org/



-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


RE: [Fwd: Red Hat Linux 9 | Get the latest Linux early]

2003-03-24 Thread Daevid Vincent
I doubt it...

http://www.redhat.com/mktg/rh9iso/

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ric Tibbetts
 Sent: Monday, March 24, 2003 11:39 AM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [Fwd: Red Hat Linux 9 | Get the latest Linux early]
 
 
 It has to be a typo.
 
 Ric
 
 On Mon, Mar 24, 2003 at 01:48:24PM -0600, John Nichel wrote:
  Red Hat 9  What happened to 8.1?
  
   Original Message 
  Subject: Red Hat Linux 9 | Get the latest Linux early
  Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2003 19:18:21 -
  From: Red Hat [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Reply-To: Red Hat 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  Dear John:
  
  You may know that Red Hat Network is the best way to keep your
  systems running the latest errata and always up to date. What you
  might not know is that Red Hat Network passed the one million users
  mark earlier this year. We've listened to valuable feedback and have
  added two items of interest to keep those users happy - 
 early release
  of Red Hat Linux 9 ISOs and improved technical support.
  
  Beginning March 31, 2003, paid subscribers to Red Hat Network will
  have access to Red Hat Linux 9 ISOs - a full week before 
 retail store
  and Red Hat FTP availability. Also, Red Hat Network subscribers will
  receive dedicated Red Hat Network Technical Support.
  
  Learn more about the benefits of being a Red Hat Network Subscriber:
  
  To purchase a Red Hat Network subscription:
  Thanks again for using Red Hat Linux. We appreciate all feedback
  from our users and hope you enjoy Red Hat Linux 9.
  
  Sincerely,
  
  Red Hat
  
  
  
  
  -- 
  redhat-list mailing list
  unsubscribe 
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] subject=unsubscribe
  
 
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

-- 
Ric Tibbetts

Linux registration number: 55684
If you want to help advertise Linux - point your friends to
http://counter.li.org/



-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


Re: [Fwd: Red Hat Linux 9 | Get the latest Linux early]

2003-03-24 Thread DuSTiN KRySaK
On 3/24/03 11:39 AM, Ric Tibbetts [EMAIL PROTECTED] spit this out onto my
computer screen:

 It has to be a typo.
 
 Ric
 
And if it is not a typo - are these release ISO's? Or a beta of some kind?

Dustin



-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


RE: [Fwd: Red Hat Linux 9 | Get the latest Linux early]

2003-03-24 Thread Jody Cleveland
 I doubt it...
 
 http://www.redhat.com/mktg/rh9iso/

So, does anyone know what's new/ improved/ changed from 8?

Jody



-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


RE: [Fwd: Red Hat Linux 9 | Get the latest Linux early]

2003-03-24 Thread Daevid Vincent
Or more specifically from 8.1 ??

I can't see there being 0.9 versions worth of changes since 8.1 (which
wasn't even released). 

This reeks of marketing spin. *sigh* That really makes me sad to see RH
pulling a slimey microsoft move. I remember when they (m$) released Visual J
and it STARTED at v6.0 so they could release it as part of their Visual
Studio environment. This was at best a v1.0 product. Didn't they do that
with Word as well? Make it version 6 to compete with WordPerfect 6??

 -Original Message-
 From: Jody Cleveland
 
  I doubt it...
  
  http://www.redhat.com/mktg/rh9iso/
 
 So, does anyone know what's new/ improved/ changed from 8?
 
 Jody



-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


Re: [Fwd: Red Hat Linux 9 | Get the latest Linux early]

2003-03-24 Thread Ed Wilts
On Mon, Mar 24, 2003 at 01:48:24PM -0600, John Nichel wrote:
 Red Hat 9  What happened to 8.1?

Who says there should have been an 8.1?  Just because a whole bunch of
people assumed the next version number was going to be 8.1 doesn't make
it so.  Red Hat doesn't pre-announce version numbers, and you just found
out why.

Version numbers are for marketing.  

-- 
Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Member #1, Red Hat Community Ambassador Program



-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


RE: [Fwd: Red Hat Linux 9 | Get the latest Linux early]

2003-03-24 Thread Nicholas Marsh
 So, does anyone know what's new/ improved/ changed from 8?

If it like the beta (8.0.94), here are the release notes: 

http://rpmfind.net/linux/redhat/beta/phoebe/en/os/i386/RELEASE-NOTES



From: Jody Cleveland [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Fwd: Red Hat Linux 9 | Get the latest Linux early]
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2003 14:01:50 -0600
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 I doubt it...

 http://www.redhat.com/mktg/rh9iso/

So, does anyone know what's new/ improved/ changed from 8?

Jody 



-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


RE: [Fwd: Red Hat Linux 9 | Get the latest Linux early]

2003-03-24 Thread Billy
Its not the version number that people care about...the RHCE cert is based
on version numbers. So the big jump in version numbers makes the cert
worthless a lot faster!

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Ed Wilts
Sent: Monday, March 24, 2003 3:26 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Fwd: Red Hat Linux 9 | Get the latest Linux early]


On Mon, Mar 24, 2003 at 01:48:24PM -0600, John Nichel wrote:
 Red Hat 9  What happened to 8.1?

Who says there should have been an 8.1?  Just because a whole bunch of
people assumed the next version number was going to be 8.1 doesn't make
it so.  Red Hat doesn't pre-announce version numbers, and you just found
out why.

Version numbers are for marketing.

--
Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Member #1, Red Hat Community Ambassador Program



--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list




-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


Re: [Fwd: Red Hat Linux 9 | Get the latest Linux early]

2003-03-24 Thread John Nichel
Ed Wilts wrote:
On Mon, Mar 24, 2003 at 01:48:24PM -0600, John Nichel wrote:

Red Hat 9  What happened to 8.1?


Who says there should have been an 8.1?  Just because a whole bunch of
people assumed the next version number was going to be 8.1 doesn't make
it so.  Red Hat doesn't pre-announce version numbers, and you just found
out why.
I'm pretty sure they released a beta for 8.1, did they not?

Version numbers are for marketing.  

Maybe from a sales department prespective, but not from a coding / 
development standpoint.





--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


Re: [Fwd: Red Hat Linux 9 | Get the latest Linux early]

2003-03-24 Thread Bill Anderson
On Mon, 2003-03-24 at 13:26, Ed Wilts wrote:
 On Mon, Mar 24, 2003 at 01:48:24PM -0600, John Nichel wrote:
  Red Hat 9  What happened to 8.1?
 
 Who says there should have been an 8.1?  Just because a whole bunch of
 people assumed the next version number was going to be 8.1 doesn't make
 it so.  Red Hat doesn't pre-announce version numbers, and you just found
 out why.
 
 Version numbers are for marketing.  

Actually, they are advertising for a customer service person that will
be supporting the rollout of 8.1. So I guess RH said so. :)

-- 
Bill Anderson
RHCE #807302597505773
[EMAIL PROTECTED]





-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


Re: [Fwd: Red Hat Linux 9 | Get the latest Linux early]

2003-03-24 Thread Ed Wilts
On Mon, Mar 24, 2003 at 03:10:35PM -0600, John Nichel wrote:
 Ed Wilts wrote:
  On Mon, Mar 24, 2003 at 01:48:24PM -0600, John Nichel wrote:
  
 Red Hat 9  What happened to 8.1?
  
  Who says there should have been an 8.1?  Just because a whole bunch of
  people assumed the next version number was going to be 8.1 doesn't make
  it so.  Red Hat doesn't pre-announce version numbers, and you just found
  out why.
 
 I'm pretty sure they released a beta for 8.1, did they not?

I'm even more sure you're wrong :-).  There was a release called Phoebe.
Nobody from Red Hat said it was a beta of 8.1.

-- 
Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Member #1, Red Hat Community Ambassador Program



-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


Re: [Fwd: Red Hat Linux 9 | Get the latest Linux early]

2003-03-24 Thread Tim Willis
Didn't they do something similar with RH7.3?  I mean, didn't it jump
from 7.3 to 8.0?  I seem to remember a jump of a few ordinals to 8.0. 
But I could be wrong, can someone correct me?
-- 
J. Tim Willis
A Computer without Windows is like a chocolate cake without mustard.



-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


Re: [Fwd: Red Hat Linux 9 | Get the latest Linux early]

2003-03-24 Thread Bill Anderson
On Mon, 2003-03-24 at 14:31, Ed Wilts wrote:
 On Mon, Mar 24, 2003 at 03:10:35PM -0600, John Nichel wrote:
  Ed Wilts wrote:
   On Mon, Mar 24, 2003 at 01:48:24PM -0600, John Nichel wrote:
   
  Red Hat 9  What happened to 8.1?
   
   Who says there should have been an 8.1?  Just because a whole bunch of
   people assumed the next version number was going to be 8.1 doesn't make
   it so.  Red Hat doesn't pre-announce version numbers, and you just found
   out why.
  
  I'm pretty sure they released a beta for 8.1, did they not?
 
 I'm even more sure you're wrong :-).  There was a release called Phoebe.
 Nobody from Red Hat said it was a beta of 8.1.

Nonetheless, announcing an open position for someone that will be
supporting the release of 8.1 says they were at least at some point
planning on an 8.1. Given that as of a few minutes ago anyway, the
position is still listed, it gets very confusing. 8.1 and 9.0??

-- 
Bill Anderson
RHCE #807302597505773
[EMAIL PROTECTED]





-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


Re: [Fwd: Red Hat Linux 9 | Get the latest Linux early]

2003-03-24 Thread James_Martin
Red Hat generally only bumps up the main version number due to binary
icompatibilities.  That being said, they could do this on a whim if they
like.  It is merely a ploy to get people to go use their Advanced line of
products if they want product stability.  A great way to aggrevate their
RHCE's too!  They will probably a) come out with an RHASCE (Red Hat
Advanced Server Certified Engineer) or b) they will have to fix their RHCE
program.  I certified on 7.2, and was told it would be good for the next 2
major versions, being 8 and 9.  I should be good 'till RH10.

James



-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


Re: [Fwd: Red Hat Linux 9 | Get the latest Linux early]

2003-03-24 Thread Bill Anderson
On Mon, 2003-03-24 at 15:00, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Red Hat generally only bumps up the main version number due to binary
 icompatibilities.  That being said, they could do this on a whim if they
 like.  It is merely a ploy to get people to go use their Advanced line of
 products if they want product stability.  A great way to aggrevate their
 RHCE's too!  They will probably a) come out with an RHASCE (Red Hat
 Advanced Server Certified Engineer) or b) they will have to fix their RHCE
 program.  I certified on 7.2, and was told it would be good for the next 2
 major versions, being 8 and 9.  I should be good 'till RH10.

Which at the new rate would be this fall 

-- 
Bill Anderson
RHCE #807302597505773
[EMAIL PROTECTED]





-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


Re: [Fwd: Red Hat Linux 9 | Get the latest Linux early]

2003-03-24 Thread Edward Dekkers
 Didn't they do something similar with RH7.3?  I mean, didn't it jump
 from 7.3 to 8.0?  I seem to remember a jump of a few ordinals to 8.0.
 But I could be wrong, can someone correct me?

Yes, that is correct. It usually happend that way though. I remember 5.0,
5.1, 5.2 then jump to 6.0, 6.1, 6.2, then jump to 7.0, 7.1, 7.2, 7.3 then
jump to 8.0. What everybody's on about Tim, is the fact we did a major
version jump 8 to 9, without a few point releases (no 8.1, or 8.2).

I can understand RHCE people will be fairly pissed off.

Other users - seriously - let's not debate over the number hey? Who cares
what it's called as long as it works?

Regards,

---
Edward Dekkers (Director)
Triple D Computer Services P/L




-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list