Re: Virus protection

2003-10-11 Thread Rodolfo J. Paiz
At 10:52 10/9/2003, you wrote:
On Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 11:59:30AM -0400, Michael Gargiullo wrote:
 
 To add fuel to Christians fire.  When Melissa came out, everything on a
 samba share got hosed as well.
Samba is a bastard protocol only necessary on mixed networks and only
due to MS's dominance, and anyone who can, is better off avoiding it,
and its inherent MS-type problems altogether.
--
Hal Burgiss
Hal, from everything I've ever read, NFS is a security nightmare. If you 
eliminate Samba, how exactly do you plan to easily share, read/write, 
export, and mount filesystems or folders across a network?

--
Rodolfo J. Paiz
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


Virus protection

2003-10-09 Thread rbragg
Hi,

I'm looking around for open source virus protection software, I saw 
MailScanner-4.23-11 but it seams that it needs additional 3rd party 
software to eliminate the viruses. Anybody know of others?

Thanks
rick
--
Rick Bragg
Green Mountain Network
http://www.gmnet.net
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


RE: Virus protection

2003-10-09 Thread Jason Staudenmayer
Just plug-in clamav

-Original Message-
From: rbragg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2003 10:56 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Virus protection


Hi,

I'm looking around for open source virus protection software, I saw 
MailScanner-4.23-11 but it seams that it needs additional 3rd party 
software to eliminate the viruses. Anybody know of others?

Thanks
rick

-- 
Rick Bragg
Green Mountain Network
http://www.gmnet.net


-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


Re: Virus protection

2003-10-09 Thread Bill Tangren
rbragg wrote:
Hi,

I'm looking around for open source virus protection software, I saw 
MailScanner-4.23-11 but it seams that it needs additional 3rd party 
software to eliminate the viruses. Anybody know of others?

Thanks
rick
There is quite a bit about this in the archives:

http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=redhat-listw=2r=1s=virus+protection+softwareq=b

HTH,

Bill

--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


Re: Virus protection

2003-10-09 Thread rh
On Thu, 9 Oct 2003, rbragg wrote:

 Hi,
 
 I'm looking around for open source virus protection software, I saw 
 MailScanner-4.23-11 but it seams that it needs additional 3rd party 
 software to eliminate the viruses. Anybody know of others?
 

ClamAV - http://clamav.sourceforge.net/

--jeremy


-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


Re: Virus protection

2003-10-09 Thread Hal Burgiss
On Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 10:55:53AM -0400, rbragg wrote:
 
 I'm looking around for open source virus protection software, I saw
 MailScanner-4.23-11 but it seams that it needs additional 3rd party
 software to eliminate the viruses. Anybody know of others?

Linux does not need virus protection, really. That's an MS specific
problem.

That being said, procmail can do wonders. 

   Week to Date Spam and Virus Summary 
Sun Oct 5 04:09:40 thru Thu Oct 9 11:25:36 EDT 2003
 Postfix Rejected:  837
 Bogofied:  193
 Procmail Filtered:  37
 Spams missed:1
 Total Spams:  1068
 Spams Blocked:1067
 Percent Blocked: 99.90%  
 Viruses Stopped:   262 --

That's 262 for procmail - /dev/null, zero for my mailboxes. Very
simple, really, at least with the mail I tend to get.

-- 
Hal Burgiss
 


-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


RE: Virus protection

2003-10-09 Thread Christian Campbell
  I'm looking around for open source virus protection software, I saw
  MailScanner-4.23-11 but it seams that it needs additional 3rd party
  software to eliminate the viruses. Anybody know of others?
 
 Linux does not need virus protection, really. That's an MS specific
 problem.

Aren't Li0n, Linux.Vit.4096, Linux.Diesel, OSF.8759, Slapper, Scalper,
Linux.Svat, BoxPoison, Ramen and even Klez all *nix based or cross-platform
viruses?  Viruses are NOT a MS specific problem...

Christian


Christian Campbell
Systems Engineer
Information Technology Department - Systems Group
Bruegger's Enterprises
Desk:  (802) 652-9270
Cell:  (802) 734-5023
Email:  ccampbell at brueggers dot com

PGP public key available via PGP keyservers
or http://www2.brueggers.com/pgp/ccampbell.html

We all know Linux is great...it does infinite loops
in 5 seconds. -- Linus Torvalds





-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


Re: Virus protection

2003-10-09 Thread Benjamin J. Weiss
  I'm looking around for open source virus protection software, I saw
  MailScanner-4.23-11 but it seams that it needs additional 3rd party
  software to eliminate the viruses. Anybody know of others?

 Linux does not need virus protection, really. That's an MS specific
 problem.

Absolutely incorrect.  From my box, when I check out the number of virii
that I am protected from by f-prot:

[EMAIL PROTECTED] benjamin]$ f-prot -virno
SIGN.DEF created 9 October 2003
SIGN2.DEF created 9 October 2003
MACRO.DEF created 6 October 2003
DOS/Windows: 25681 viruses and 40737 Trojans
Word/Excel: 7961 viruses and Trojans
Java: 2 viruses and 124 Trojans
BAT: 2070 viruses and Trojans
IRC INI: 1176 viruses and Trojans
Script: 3662 viruses and Trojans
INF: 5 viruses and Trojans
Unix shell: 242 viruses and Trojans
Ami: 2 viruses and Trojans
WinBat: 4 viruses and Trojans
PIF: 19 viruses and Trojans
PalmOS: 4 viruses and Trojans
PHP: 11 viruses and Trojans
Unix: 266 viruses and Trojans
In addition, over 15750 viruses are identified using
generic identification, so the total number of viruses
and Trojans known to F-PROT is somewhere over 97700.

Notice the word Unix above...

Ben


-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


Re: Virus protection

2003-10-09 Thread Eucke Warren
- Original Message - 
From: rbragg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2003 7:55 AM
Subject: Virus protection


 Hi,

 I'm looking around for open source virus protection software, I saw
 MailScanner-4.23-11 but it seams that it needs additional 3rd party
 software to eliminate the viruses. Anybody know of others?

 Thanks
 rick

 -- 
 Rick Bragg
 Green Mountain Network
 http://www.gmnet.net

I use Vexira's vamilter plugin for Sendmail.  I believe they also have full
Qmail and Postfix functionality too.  Fee for use but it works well and the
Resources overhead is minute...

Best of Luck!

Eucke Warren

Today's quote: The software package said 'REQUIRES WINDOWS 9X OR BETTER' so
I installed Linux



-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


RE: Virus protection

2003-10-09 Thread Michael Gargiullo
On Thu, 2003-10-09 at 11:43, Christian Campbell wrote:
   I'm looking around for open source virus protection software, I saw
   MailScanner-4.23-11 but it seams that it needs additional 3rd party
   software to eliminate the viruses. Anybody know of others?
  
  Linux does not need virus protection, really. That's an MS specific
  problem.
 
 Aren't Li0n, Linux.Vit.4096, Linux.Diesel, OSF.8759, Slapper, Scalper,
 Linux.Svat, BoxPoison, Ramen and even Klez all *nix based or cross-platform
 viruses?  Viruses are NOT a MS specific problem...
 
 Christian
 
To add fuel to Christians fire.  When Melissa came out, everything on a
samba share got hosed as well.

Yes it's true that virii and worms are more rare on linux platform, and
it's usually an exploit in an associated program (ie... openssl,
apache...) Linux will be targeted more and more now that it's user base
is expanding.

Is Linux more secure, probably.  It's depends if the user is a root
whore. That doesn't take into account exploits in running services.

We're using spamassassin, exim, clamav, and amavis to check incoming
mail.  It doesn't hurt that everyone here also runs the evolution mail
client, which as a side note...rocks!

-- 
Michael Gargiullo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Warp Drive Networks


-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


Re: Virus protection

2003-10-09 Thread System Administrator
On Thursday 09 October 2003 11:27, Hal Burgiss wrote:
 On Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 10:55:53AM -0400, rbragg wrote:
  I'm looking around for open source virus protection software, I saw
  MailScanner-4.23-11 but it seams that it needs additional 3rd party
  software to eliminate the viruses. Anybody know of others?

 Linux does not need virus protection, really. That's an MS specific
 problem.


I think what we are dealing with is a difference in in terminology.  
PC's running MS products - Virus or Trojans
Mac's - Virus or Trojans
*UX - exploits or security vulnerabilities 

They are ALL flaws in the installed software or code designed to do 
undesirable (understated I know) things on our computer systems.
-- 
Leon Sonntag
Systems Administrator


-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


Re: Virus protection

2003-10-09 Thread Hal Burgiss
On Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 10:57:47AM -0500, Benjamin J. Weiss wrote:
 
 Notice the word Unix above...

/yawn ... find me someone -- anyone -- who has had a system infected
via email+attached virus on a *nix system. A live person please, and
not theories or reports from vendors with vested interests protecting
an entire industry built around really shoddily designed software.
Over and above that, I don't beleive the inherent MS design flaw of
auto-executing binary email attachments is even possible on Nix (is
it?). 

-- 
Hal Burgiss
 


-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


Re: Virus protection

2003-10-09 Thread Hal Burgiss
On Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 11:59:30AM -0400, Michael Gargiullo wrote:
  
 To add fuel to Christians fire.  When Melissa came out, everything on a
 samba share got hosed as well.

Samba is a bastard protocol only necessary on mixed networks and only
due to MS's dominance, and anyone who can, is better off avoiding it,
and its inherent MS-type problems altogether. 

-- 
Hal Burgiss
 


-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


Re: Virus protection

2003-10-09 Thread Jonathan Bartlett
 via email+attached virus on a *nix system. A live person please, and
 not theories or reports from vendors with vested interests protecting
 an entire industry built around really shoddily designed software.
 Over and above that, I don't beleive the inherent MS design flaw of
 auto-executing binary email attachments is even possible on Nix (is
 it?).


It's possible, but the current market of stupid users on Unix is not large
enough to attract the number of stupid developers Windows has.

Jon



 --
 Hal Burgiss



 --
 redhat-list mailing list
 unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


Re: Virus protection

2003-10-09 Thread Benjamin J. Weiss
 On Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 10:57:47AM -0500, Benjamin J. Weiss wrote:
 
  Notice the word Unix above...

 /yawn ... find me someone -- anyone -- who has had a system infected
 via email+attached virus on a *nix system. A live person please, and
 not theories or reports from vendors with vested interests protecting
 an entire industry built around really shoddily designed software.
 Over and above that, I don't beleive the inherent MS design flaw of
 auto-executing binary email attachments is even possible on Nix (is
 it?).

Wow, Hal, guess've just slept the last year or so.  Ever heard of Slapper?
At one point it had infected at least 13,000 distinct machines:

http://www.cert.org/advisories/CA-2002-27.html
http://www.f-secure.com/slapper/

I didn't have time to dig any deeper for other worms, but I'm sure that you
can find more in Google.

Don't get me wrong, one reason I love linux is because it's more secure.
But that does NOT equate to bullet proof.

Ben


-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


Re: Virus protection

2003-10-09 Thread Richard Crawford

Benjamin J. Weiss said:

 Wow, Hal, guess've just slept the last year or so.  Ever heard of
 Slapper? At one point it had infected at least 13,000 distinct machines:

I've missed most of this thread, but it seemed to me that the point is
that viruses don't spread on Linux via e-mail/attachments, the way that,
say, Klez or Blaster do.  The mechanism of Slapper's spread (and the very
few other worms that infect Linux/Unix hosts) is very, very different. 
Outlook is built to support the spread of worms and viruses, but there is
no equivalent function in Linux -- unless it's supported by a heavy dose
of social engineering (I promise, when you save this attachment and
change its permissions to executable and log in a root and run this
program, it'll be really really cool!  I promise!).  :)

Having said that, it's a good idea to have at least *some* degree of virus
protection on your *nix system.  Most infections have to be cleaned out by
hand, but if you run a mail server (or even a little mailhost in your
house like I do), it can be a startlingly good idea to put some sort of
virus protection tool on it, if only to prevent any viruses from spreading
among your networked computers that are infected with Outlook -- er, I
mean, with worms.


Sliante,
Richard S. Crawford

http://www.mossroot.com   http://www.stonegoose.com/catseyeview
AIM: Buffalo2K ICQ: 11646404 Y!: rscrawford
MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Howard Dean for America:  http://www.deanforamerica.com
It is only with the heart that we see rightly; what is essential is
invisible to the eye. --Antoine de Saint Exupéry



-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


Re: Virus protection

2003-10-09 Thread Benjamin J. Weiss

 Benjamin J. Weiss said:

  Wow, Hal, guess've just slept the last year or so.  Ever heard of
  Slapper? At one point it had infected at least 13,000 distinct machines:

 I've missed most of this thread, but it seemed to me that the point is
 that viruses don't spread on Linux via e-mail/attachments, the way that,
 say, Klez or Blaster do.  The mechanism of Slapper's spread (and the very
 few other worms that infect Linux/Unix hosts) is very, very different.
 Outlook is built to support the spread of worms and viruses, but there is
 no equivalent function in Linux -- unless it's supported by a heavy dose
 of social engineering (I promise, when you save this attachment and
 change its permissions to executable and log in a root and run this
 program, it'll be really really cool!  I promise!).  :)

 Having said that, it's a good idea to have at least *some* degree of virus
 protection on your *nix system.  Most infections have to be cleaned out by
 hand, but if you run a mail server (or even a little mailhost in your
 house like I do), it can be a startlingly good idea to put some sort of
 virus protection tool on it, if only to prevent any viruses from spreading
 among your networked computers that are infected with Outlook -- er, I
 mean, with worms.

My argument wasn't the method of propagation or the difference between a
virus and a worm.  My response was to his assertion that you didn't need
virus protection on a linux machine.

In my experience, complacency leads inevitably to disaster.

Ben


-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


Re: Virus protection

2003-10-09 Thread Hal Burgiss
On Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 03:03:41PM -0500, Benjamin J. Weiss wrote:
  it?).
 
 Wow, Hal, guess've just slept the last year or so.  Ever heard of Slapper?
 At one point it had infected at least 13,000 distinct machines:
 
 http://www.cert.org/advisories/CA-2002-27.html

$ dog http://www.cert.org/advisories/CA-2002-27.html |grep -i virus
$ 
$ dog http://www.cert.org/advisories/CA-2002-27.html |grep -i mail 
send mail to ahref=mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED]/awith the following 
text included in the subject line: a href=mailto:[EMAIL 
PROTECTED][CERT#23820]/a./p href=mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]AllenHouseholder/a
bEmail:/b a href=mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED]/abr
email.  Our public PGP key is available from To subscribe to the CERT mailing list for 
advisories and bulletins,send email to A HREF=mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL 
PROTECTED]/A. Please include in the body of your
$ 

That page does not seem to reference either viruses or email
attachments. So  

-- 
Hal Burgiss
 


-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


Re: Virus protection

2003-10-09 Thread Hal Burgiss
On Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 01:11:27PM -0700, Richard Crawford wrote:
 
 I've missed most of this thread, but it seemed to me that the point is
 that viruses don't spread on Linux via e-mail/attachments, the way that,
 say, Klez or Blaster do.  The mechanism of Slapper's spread (and the very
 few other worms that infect Linux/Unix hosts) is very, very different. 

Precisely, and the means to combat slapper is not with ClamAV (or is
it?). 

The OP was not clear what his ultimate objective was...

If he is protecting a standalone Linux system or *nix only network, he
probably does not need to worry about *viruses* ala the MS variety
infecting his *nix systems via email attachments. There are things to
worry about, but this is not one of them. 

If he has a mixed network, and mail is moving through the Linux system
to MS systems, and he wants to protect MS systems, there are many,
many ways to do this. Procmail works fine, in fact. It is quite easy
to take an all or none approach with it and just delete mail as one
wishes. It is not so easy to discriminate legit exe type attachments
(is there such a thing?), from malicious such attachments. If that is
the need, then one of the AV packages might be in order. There are
procmail recipes around that ID the more common viruses: 

## Microsoft support virus, W32/Gibe-F I think, 18/9/03
:0 B
* ^AGiEo0AAZKEAUGSJJQBRUbhQFAAA6FSUAABTVleJZegz24ld/It9DIgfjYWs6///UGgA$
  { LOG=Virus W32/Gibe-F: 

   :0
   /dev/null
  }

That one grabs some other viruses as well, apparently with borrowed code. 

-- 
Hal Burgiss
 


-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


Re: Virus protection

2003-10-09 Thread Hal Burgiss
On Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 03:29:16PM -0500, Benjamin J. Weiss wrote:
 
 My argument wasn't the method of propagation or the difference between a
 virus and a worm.  My response was to his assertion that you didn't need
 virus protection on a linux machine.

You don't! Plain and simple. I do it just to keep the noise volume
down in my mailbox[es]. The second week of W32/Gibe-F, procmail
deleted ~6600 infected mails from my personal mailbox. Its not that I
worry about infection, but its easier than manually deleting the
bugges. 
 
 In my experience, complacency leads inevitably to disaster.

Probably..but knowledge eventually leads to wisdom. 

-- 
Hal Burgiss
 


-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


Re: Virus protection

2003-10-09 Thread Hal Burgiss
On Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 11:43:00AM -0400, Christian Campbell wrote:
   I'm looking around for open source virus protection software, I saw
   MailScanner-4.23-11 but it seams that it needs additional 3rd party
   software to eliminate the viruses. Anybody know of others?
  
  Linux does not need virus protection, really. That's an MS specific
  problem.
 
 Aren't Li0n, Linux.Vit.4096, Linux.Diesel, OSF.8759, Slapper, Scalper,
 Linux.Svat, BoxPoison, Ramen and even Klez all *nix based or cross-platform
 viruses?  Viruses are NOT a MS specific problem...

Yes, they are!!! Some of those listed aren't even viruses (eg
slapper). Some that are, are supiciously only found by AV vendors (ie
did they write them in order to sell a product...h). The others
can't be spread via email attachments (as is the case that started
this thread). 

So the email/virus thing, is purely an MS one, and one that could
easily be prevented. But that would hurt a certain revenue stream. We
must maintain some illusions for the masses, lest they though go
blitheringly mad, and forget to fork out that dough to MS and Assoc.

-- 
Hal Burgiss
 


-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


Re: Virus protection again.

2002-09-05 Thread Kevin Myers

There are many people out there that use one of the amavis variants with a
scan engine to do this sort of work. I use amavisd with sendmail-milter and
Trophie, this combination with a decent machine could easily handle 50k+
emails per day.

On Wed, 28 Aug 2002 12:23:24 -0500 (CDT), you wrote:

I know that there are products out there that I can use to protect the 
server and one or two email accounts but I am using my mail server to 
serve 2000 customers.  I need virus protection that will protect all of 
them incoming and outgoing.

Any good suggestions.??

-- 
Scott Skrogstad
Computer Integration Inc,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
800-522-3475 Phone
http://race.coiinc.com




-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



Re: Virus protection again.

2002-08-29 Thread ramakrishna

hi,

* Scott Skrogstad ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
 I know that there are products out there that I can use to protect the 
 server and one or two email accounts but I am using my mail server to 
 serve 2000 customers.  I need virus protection that will protect all of 
 them incoming and outgoing.
 
 Any good suggestions.??

   Checkout this combination 
postfix - amavisd - fprot

rk
--
-
Ramakrishna | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exocore Consulting  | http://www.exocore.com
Bangalore, India| +91 (80) 344-0397 
-



-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



Re: Virus protection again.

2002-08-29 Thread Francisco Neira

ramakrishna wrote:
 hi,
 
 * Scott Skrogstad ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
 
I know that there are products out there that I can use to protect the 
server and one or two email accounts but I am using my mail server to 
serve 2000 customers.  I need virus protection that will protect all of 
them incoming and outgoing.

Any good suggestions.??
 
 
Checkout this combination 
   postfix - amavisd - fprot
 
 rk
 --
 -
 Ramakrishna | [EMAIL PROTECTED]  
 Exocore Consulting  | http://www.exocore.com  
 Bangalore, India| +91 (80) 344-0397   
 -
 
 
 

I use the same combo with 400 accounts on a small server and works like 
a breeze.

HTH

-- 
Francisco Neira B.
Administrador de Red
Defensoria del Pueblo
Lima, Peru, -05:00 UTC




-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



Re: Virus protection again.

2002-08-29 Thread juaid

From: Francisco Neira [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 I use the same combo with 400 accounts on a small server and works like a
breeze.

me too, Postfix + Amavisd, but with Mc Affee's uvscan as antivirus
and at my prevoius job the mail server run the same with  1500 accounts

regards,

juan





-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



Virus protection again.

2002-08-28 Thread Scott Skrogstad

I know that there are products out there that I can use to protect the 
server and one or two email accounts but I am using my mail server to 
serve 2000 customers.  I need virus protection that will protect all of 
them incoming and outgoing.

Any good suggestions.??

-- 
Scott Skrogstad
Computer Integration Inc,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
800-522-3475 Phone
http://race.coiinc.com



-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



Re: Virus protection again.

2002-08-28 Thread juaid

From: Scott Skrogstad [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 I know that there are products out there that I can use to protect the
 server and one or two email accounts but I am using my mail server to
 serve 2000 customers.  I need virus protection that will protect all of
 them incoming and outgoing.

 Any good suggestions.??

I'm using Postfix as MTA (www.postfix.org), which I've found being much more
faster, secure and configurable than sendmail, it never falls down..

for virus scanning I'm using amavisd (www.amavis.org) as content filter with
Mc Affee's uvscan antivirus for Linux
Amavisd supports lots of antivirus programs, check on their webpage..
it can also be used with sendmail, exim and maybe others, check the page
too..

if not, on Postfix's page in the section Add-on Software  there are
others...
Panda Antivirus has also a mail virus scanner for Postfix which you can
download from their page..

Regards,

Juaid



-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



Re: What are you doing for virus protection

2002-05-21 Thread Alan Peery

Scott Skrogstad wrote:

I run a small ISP and of course my customers have asked me to put up some 
virus protection on my server.  I was just trying to get some info from 
the list what everyone is using.  I am not a linux guru so something RPM 
would be nice and that has regular updates.

  

I was talking over this topic with a friend a couple of days ago and he 
is doing all his virus scanning on the Unix server, as it make sense to 
scan the files directly on the file server.  (They're running SAMBA on a 
Solaris box.)Virus file updates for Sophos are retrieved by wget, 
and used by the scanning engine when it runs via cron.  At present they 
are relying on the virus software running on the PCs to intercept any 
viruses in newly arriving email.

This is not an RPM level of ease, but it seems to be working reasonably 
well for them.

Alan
--
Alan Peery
Unix sysadmin since 1987
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



What are you doing for virus protection

2002-05-16 Thread Scott Skrogstad

I run a small ISP and of course my customers have asked me to put up some 
virus protection on my server.  I was just trying to get some info from 
the list what everyone is using.  I am not a linux guru so something RPM 
would be nice and that has regular updates.

-- 
Scott Skrogstad
Computer Integration Inc,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
800-522-3475 Phone
http://www.mysteryelephant.com



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



RE: What are you doing for virus protection

2002-05-16 Thread Ismael Touama

Hi,

the few I know:
- Don't go over the internet as root.
- Put an IDS (as tripwire) on your linux machine
  (against trojans)
- Be aware of patchs, new releases and then upgrade.
- Linux don't fear a lot of virus 3 or 6 I believe.
  If infected, the only touched will be the one who's 
  logged on. 
- Worm can also disturb bandwith (and probably other
  task) but they're not critical.
- Put a firewall

The more dangerous is TROJAN and CRACKERS.
(By the way, where can I find a guru ? 
_Matrix's_Smiley_ )

So, OMHO,
bbsc,
ism

-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]De la part de Scott Skrogstad
Envoye : jeudi 16 mai 2002 14:40
A : Red Hat Mailing list
Objet : What are you doing for virus protection


I run a small ISP and of course my customers have asked me to put up some 
virus protection on my server.  I was just trying to get some info from 
the list what everyone is using.  I am not a linux guru so something RPM 
would be nice and that has regular updates.

-- 
Scott Skrogstad
Computer Integration Inc,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
800-522-3475 Phone
http://www.mysteryelephant.com



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



RE: What are you doing for virus protection

2002-05-16 Thread Scott Skrogstad

I should be a little clearer on what I am trying to protect.  I am really 
trying to protect the incoming and out going email of my users.  Not so 
much the Linux box it self.

Sorry for the confusion.

On Thu, 16 May 2002, Ismael Touama wrote:

 Hi,
 
 the few I know:
 - Don't go over the internet as root.
 - Put an IDS (as tripwire) on your linux machine
   (against trojans)
 - Be aware of patchs, new releases and then upgrade.
 - Linux don't fear a lot of virus 3 or 6 I believe.
   If infected, the only touched will be the one who's 
   logged on. 
 - Worm can also disturb bandwith (and probably other
   task) but they're not critical.
 - Put a firewall
 
 The more dangerous is TROJAN and CRACKERS.
 (By the way, where can I find a guru ? 
 _Matrix's_Smiley_ )
 
 So, OMHO,
 bbsc,
 ism
 
 -Message d'origine-
 De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]De la part de Scott Skrogstad
 Envoye : jeudi 16 mai 2002 14:40
 A : Red Hat Mailing list
 Objet : What are you doing for virus protection
 
 
 I run a small ISP and of course my customers have asked me to put up some 
 virus protection on my server.  I was just trying to get some info from 
 the list what everyone is using.  I am not a linux guru so something RPM 
 would be nice and that has regular updates.
 
 

-- 
Scott Skrogstad
Computer Integration Inc,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
800-522-3475 Phone
http://www.mysteryelephant.com



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



RE: What are you doing for virus protection

2002-05-16 Thread Duncan Hill

On Thu, 16 May 2002, Scott Skrogstad wrote:

 I should be a little clearer on what I am trying to protect.  I am really 
 trying to protect the incoming and out going email of my users.  Not so 
 much the Linux box it self.

I've used InoculateIT in the past, works well.  But it depends on the mail 
engine you use as to how you tie the AV engine in.  I'm currently using Inoc 
4.x + Amavis + Postfix.  Works a charm.  I've also used Trend Microscan in 
the past, but InoculateIT impresses me more.

I've also heard from the Postfix list that Sophos + Sophie is decent.

-- 

Sapere aude
My mind not only wanders, it sometimes leaves completely.
Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity.



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



Re: What are you doing for virus protection

2002-05-16 Thread Dave Ihnat

On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 10:18:07AM -0500, Scott Skrogstad wrote:
 I should be a little clearer on what I am trying to protect.  I am really 
 trying to protect the incoming and out going email of my users.  Not so 
 much the Linux box it self.

MailScanner has worked well for me.  I've also contacted a sales type at
Sophos who's very interested in working out reasonable deals with Linux
users, if you're interested.  (Nothing in it for me, BTW.)

Cheers,
-- 
Dave Ihnat
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



Server Virus Protection

2001-03-07 Thread Jeff Graves

Hey list,

I was wondering if there is any software (preferably free) that you can run
on a linux server (our mail server actually) that can detect and remove
Windows-based virii before a user checks their mail? I have to believe that
some company has something like that by now. Thanks,

Jeff Graves
Customer Support Engineer
Image Source, Inc.
10 Mill Street
Bellingham, MA 02019

Phone - (508) 966-5200 #31
Fax   - (508) 966-5170
Email - [EMAIL PROTECTED]



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



Re: Server Virus Protection

2001-03-07 Thread eric clover

http://www.hbedv.com/

eric

- Original Message - 
Hey list,

I was wondering if there is any software (preferably free) that you can run
on a linux server (our mail server actually) that can detect and remove
Windows-based virii before a user checks their mail? I have to believe that
some company has something like that by now. Thanks,

Jeff Graves
Customer Support Engineer
Image Source, Inc.
10 Mill Street
Bellingham, MA 02019

Phone - (508) 966-5200 #31
Fax   - (508) 966-5170
Email - [EMAIL PROTECTED]



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



Re: Server Virus Protection

2001-03-07 Thread Enrico Payne

Hi,

You could use Amavis (www.amavis.org). You will need an antiviral package
such as Mcaffee for Linux, or try the one from www.hbedv.com. HBEDV also
have a gateway that will scan incoming/outgoing mail from your server. It is
not difficult to install, and works well. Their update files are few and far
between though, so I run both Mcafee and the HBEDV offering.

Regards
Enrico

- Original Message -
From: "Jeff Graves" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "Redhat" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2001 5:16 PM
Subject: Server Virus Protection


 Hey list,

 I was wondering if there is any software (preferably free) that you can
run
 on a linux server (our mail server actually) that can detect and remove
 Windows-based virii before a user checks their mail? I have to believe
that
 some company has something like that by now. Thanks,

 Jeff Graves
 Customer Support Engineer
 Image Source, Inc.
 10 Mill Street
 Bellingham, MA 02019

 Phone - (508) 966-5200 #31
 Fax   - (508) 966-5170
 Email - [EMAIL PROTECTED]



 ___
 Redhat-list mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list