[Repeater-Builder] micor / mitrek stuff for sale (make offer!)
all of this stuff is offered to defray the costs of our new stationmaster antenna ($640.00). i have a 110w mitrek, xtal'd on 147.000 rx and 146.4 tx (nice shape!) i have a 110w micor xtal'd 145.71 simplex (REALLY nice shape - CLEAN) neither have control heads tho... i have cables and speakers for the micor... and maybe a control head and cable for the mitrek - have to look. i have a maxar 80 VHF (low power - 20w?) clean (bare radio only) and a MOXY VHF - high power (40w?) clean (mic, no power connx) i have about 10 micor mobile audio and squelch boards, TRN 4310 (?) - all are pulls from mobiles and are in decent shape - just need some circuit cleaner on them (no water damage) -- make offer and i have the 10 mobile chassis i pulled the AS boards out of if you want/need micor parts, speak up NOW with part numbers you have until tomorrow morning before they go away... i have one UHF and about 9 VHF chassis in varying conditions but most are complete (tx and rx strips, etc) - EMAIL ME PLEASE I WILL *NOT* SEE YOUR REPLY ON THIS LIST UNTIL TOMORROW PM doug kc5bmj Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[Repeater-Builder] UHF link
I've never had experience on UHF. any experience how far would a 50 watts UHF link (440 MHz) can get? Antennas would be line of sight and no obstruction. we planning to link 2m repeaters. Do you have schematics on how to link repeaters? thanks Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [Repeater-Builder] Duplexer Cable Legnth
Jim, There is no single, universal formula for calculating the cable length, simply because the cables are only part of the circuit. The lengths of the loops or probes that are inside the cavities must be included, and it does make a difference whether loops or probes are used. Also, many duplexer manufacturers use different lengths of loops or probes in different band splits. One quick and dirty method that seems to work in many cases is to first determine what frequencies the duplexer is currently tuned to. Then calculate the electrical wavelength at that frequency, and determine what fraction of that wavelength the existing cables represent, after considering the cable velocity factor. Now, calculate the length of the new cables, based on the same fraction but at the lower Ham frequencies. Make up new interconnecting cables and try them out- you might luck out and have a good match. The precise method requires a network analyzer, or a spectrum analyzer with tracking generator and return loss bridge. Each cavity is first tuned to the exact pass and notch frequencies, with identical return loss on both ports. The loops or probes are carefully adjusted for the optimum return loss at the specified insertion loss, which will probably be around 0.7 dB per cavity. Here's the critical part: If the interconnecting cables are exactly the right length, the series insertion loss of a pair or trio of cavities will be the sum of the individual losses, plus the small losses of the cables. If the cables are not the correct length, either the total insertion loss will be excessive, or the notches will be insufficient, or both. I am always amazed that relatively crude tuning practices can result in a duplexer that is very close to being perfect. It's that last 5 percent that calls for a network analyzer- and when you're running a lot of solid-state power with a very sensitive receiver, sometimes you need every bit of performance you can get! 73, Eric Lemmon WB6FLY Jim Cicirello wrote: Is there a formula to calculate the cable length between duplexer cans?... Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
RE: [Repeater-Builder] UHF link
-Original Message- From: dy3lmk143_13mhz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, March 28, 2004 5:39 PM To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Subject: [Repeater-Builder] UHF link I've never had experience on UHF. any experience how far would a 50 watts UHF link (440 MHz) can get? Antennas would be line of sight and no obstruction. we planning to link 2m repeaters. Do you have schematics on how to link repeaters? thanks Yahoo! Groups Links Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[Repeater-Builder] Low Band Noise Blanker Question
Does anyone know where I can find tuning instructions for a GE Mastr II Low Band receiver noise blanker? I have looked in service manuals and have found no information. Has anyone used a noise blanking receiver as a repeater receiver on 6M or 10M ? The noise blanker seems to help in a mobile environment, but I am not sure if it would work with a duplexer or bandpass cavitiy inline with the antenna. The sampling frequency will not pass through Alex Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [Repeater-Builder] Low Band Noise Blanker Question
kq2h wrote: Does anyone know where I can find tuning instructions for a GE Mastr II Low Band receiver noise blanker? I have looked in service manuals and have found no information. Sorry, can't help there, but Has anyone used a noise blanking receiver as a repeater receiver on 6M or 10M ? The noise blanker seems to help in a mobile environment, but I am not sure if it would work with a duplexer or bandpass cavitiy inline with the antenna. The sampling frequency will not pass through Alex A noise blanker won't work in a duplex situation because the blanker front end won't be in the pass area of the duplexer, and more importantly, transmitter side-band noise will wipe out the AM detector rendering the receiver near useless. Kevin Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
RE: [Repeater-Builder] UHF link
I can't help you much with the connection method, but I can give you an example of how much power is needed to link repeaters. My IRLP node, located at my house, is linked to the repeater using small beam antennas over a distance of about 12 miles. Even with an intervening hill, it is done using only seven watts! Richard, N7TGB -Original Message- From: dy3lmk143_13mhz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, March 28, 2004 5:39 PM To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Subject: [Repeater-Builder] UHF link I've never had experience on UHF. any experience how far would a 50 watts UHF link (440 MHz) can get? Antennas would be line of sight and no obstruction. we planning to link 2m repeaters. Do you have schematics on how to link repeaters? thanks Yahoo! Groups Links Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [Repeater-Builder] Low Band Noise Blanker Question
Hey Alex Go Away looking for some 6 meter duplexers For almost nothing... know where I can get some? LOL How are you? Hows the family? Hows the Great white north of NY..? kq2h wrote: Does anyone know where I can find tuning instructions for a GE Mastr II Low Band receiver noise blanker? I have looked in service manuals and have found no information. Has anyone used a noise blanking receiver as a repeater receiver on 6M or 10M ? The noise blanker seems to help in a mobile environment, but I am not sure if it would work with a duplexer or bandpass cavitiy inline with the antenna. The sampling frequency will not pass through Alex Yahoo! Groups Links Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [Repeater-Builder] UHF link
Line of sight should give you 100 miles with only 5-10 watts. I've done 65 miles with one watt. Chuck WB2EDV - Original Message - From: Richard [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Sent: Sunday, March 28, 2004 9:31 PM Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] UHF link I can't help you much with the connection method, but I can give you an example of how much power is needed to link repeaters. My IRLP node, located at my house, is linked to the repeater using small beam antennas over a distance of about 12 miles. Even with an intervening hill, it is done using only seven watts! Richard, N7TGB -Original Message- From: dy3lmk143_13mhz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, March 28, 2004 5:39 PM To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Subject: [Repeater-Builder] UHF link I've never had experience on UHF. any experience how far would a 50 watts UHF link (440 MHz) can get? Antennas would be line of sight and no obstruction. we planning to link 2m repeaters. Do you have schematics on how to link repeaters? thanks Yahoo! Groups Links Yahoo! Groups Links Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [Repeater-Builder] UHF link
Well I don't know how far one can link with 440. However I have a link of 50 miles with 10 watts. Fred KF4QZN - Original Message - From: dy3lmk143_13mhz Sent: Sunday, March 28, 2004 7:39 PM To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Subject: [Repeater-Builder] UHF link I've never had experience on UHF. any experience how far would a 50 watts UHF link (440 MHz) can get? Antennas would be line of sight and no obstruction. we planning to link 2m repeaters. Do you have schematics on how to link repeaters? thanksYahoo! Groups Links* To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ Yahoo! Groups Links To visit your group on the web, go to:http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/ To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Re: [Repeater-Builder] Low Band Noise Blanker Question
I don't use a blanker on my 6 meter machine, but I've heard that some have had success connecting the blanker to a separate RX antenna. Another approach is to use a Delta with the blanker board installed. This blanker does its job at I.F. frequencies instead of a separate front end. It worked great on the mobile I used to have installed. Chuck WB2EDV - Original Message - From: kq2h [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Sent: Sunday, March 28, 2004 9:39 PM Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Low Band Noise Blanker Question Does anyone know where I can find tuning instructions for a GE Mastr II Low Band receiver noise blanker? I have looked in service manuals and have found no information. Has anyone used a noise blanking receiver as a repeater receiver on 6M or 10M ? The noise blanker seems to help in a mobile environment, but I am not sure if it would work with a duplexer or bandpass cavitiy inline with the antenna. The sampling frequency will not pass through Alex Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [Repeater-Builder] UHF link
Here in Southern California the surrounding border-areas, there are several systems with long paths on 420MHz (the same as 440MHz path behavior). One of the longest is ~165 miles @ 13W before duplexer/feedline losses. 10-20W is quite typical for links, and 50W is overkill for most. Most of the systems I deal with run fully-duplexed links, and flatpak duplexers are quite common for them. Running 50W is at the edge of what they'll take of raw power and not likely to be free of desense. If it's half-duplex and you can make the radios live with the talk-time at that power level, go for it. 73, -Matt W6KGB At 09:58 PM 3/28/2004 -0500, you wrote: Line of sight should give you 100 miles with only 5-10 watts. I've done 65 miles with one watt. Chuck WB2EDV Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [Repeater-Builder] Duplexer Cable Legnth
Where did you find (what is) the formula for jumpers from the duplexer to the transmitter and receiver? N7HQR http://www.repeater-builder.com/ge/duptuning.html I have been told that this formula, explained in Paragraph 4 of the above site, also works for the electrical length from the duplexer to the TX-RX. Others say that only the TX is SOMETIMES critical and a Z-Matcher will also work. If anyone feels I have misunderstood this information, please let me know. When inserting any in-line devices in to your repeater's feed line, be sure any added feed line(s) used to connect the device (like a watt meter) are at least one half wave length of your transmit frequency. You can calculate the electrical length required by dividing your frequency in to 5904 and multiplying the result by the velocity factor of your feed line. This will yield the 1/2 electrical wave length in inches, tip to tip including the RF connector. An example, 5904/442.275 = 13.35, now multiply 13.35 by the velocity factor of the feed line, I'll use 66%, 13.35 * .66 = 8.81 inches. You can use any multiple of the result 8.81, 17.6, 26.43, 35.24. Also try to use a good watt meter like the Bird, the less expensive watt meters are not a true power measuring device but a glorified voltage meter which can be easily fooled by hi Q as found in a duplexer. JIM KA2AJH - Original Message - From: Daron J. Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Sent: Sunday, March 28, 2004 6:38 PM Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Duplexer Cable Legnth Where did you find (what is) the formula for jumpers from the duplexer to the transmitter and receiver? N7HQR Yahoo! Groups Links Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [Repeater-Builder] desktrac
With the service monitor that goes in the kit. Not part of my concern - they just want a portable UHF repeater with autopatch and a connector that can be plugged into a vehicle cigarette lighter to keep the internal battery charged. At 05:41 PM 3/28/04 -0500, you wrote: How did they intend to address tuning of the duplexer? Maybe I missed something. Good LuckJIM KA2AJH - Original Message - From: Mike Morris WA6ILQ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Sent: Sunday, March 28, 2004 3:10 PM Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] desktrac At 03:41 PM 3/28/04 +, you wrote: Is there any PDF's on the controls of a desktrac? Not at www.repeater-builder.com just yet. I've been contacted by a group that is looking at taking a Desktrac UHF repeater and building it up in a metal suitcase for use as a rapid deployment repeater... Toss it, a 486 laptop, a short stationmaster and some feedline on an airplane and have a functioning repeater on any 460mhz pair anywhere in the country in a few hours. If the project gets the green light - which may take as long as six months - I'll have a Desktrac and a manual set in hand here for a few weeks. Once i have everything sorted out I'll do an Interfacing article similar to my Mitrek article at http://www.repeater-builder.com/mitrek/mitrek-interfacing.html. Or if someone wants to loan me a Desktrac (it can be a high band or UHF simplex or duplex model) and a manual I'll get to it a lot faster. Or a Spectra version of the Desktrac. Mike WA6ILQ Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
RE: [Repeater-Builder] Please help me with Kenwood 840's
Seems like Kenwood has a KCT-19 cable that plugs into the radio and brings a 15 pin molex connector out of the radio. This has all the PTT, COR, Mic IN, etc needed to interface. Also seems line JB Enterprises has a $70 controller with CWID (whole controller abt the cost of an ID8) that programs with hyper term and a com cable. The KCT-19s are a little over $20 each. You will need to buy a couple of male 15 pin molex connectors, another $10 and do some soldering to connect to the controller board. I am going from memory here, and not certain the KCT-19 fits the 840. It does fit the 880. Also you will need to program the 840's. Put the same send and receive in each radio, and use the alignment software to TURN DOWN THE TRANSMIT TO AROUND 10 WATTS. With a couple of boxer fans on the PA you may go for a while. With both programmed the same you can swap TX/RX when the PA fails. If it is going to get serious work out you may consider 5 Watts out - this is a match for most 4 Watt talkies, and with GOOD DUPLEXER, CABLE and ANTENNA can make up for not so hot power on transmit. I will double check the KCT-19 on the 840 in the morning. 73, Steve NU5D Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
RE: [Repeater-Builder] Please help me with Kenwood 840's
The controller was NOT JB Enterprises. It was BD Enterprises - Perhaps a Freudian slip concerning a bottle of Scotch Whiskey. The url is: http://www.bdenterprises.com/products/ [Steve S. Bosshard (NU5D)] Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [Repeater-Builder] Duplexer Cable Legnth
The need for the specific length is to keep from seeing a false reading on the power measuring device. If the duplexer is tuned properly and the transceiver is tuned properly, the length of the cable makes no difference. The requirement for a specific length of cable is because some people insist on using a wrong range PA (ie not tuned to the frequency that it is being used on) and do not understand the complexities of assembling a system with mistuned components. By selecting a length of feedline, I can coverup an impedance problem between the transmitter and the duplexer. The use of the tuned line is to makeup for the inability to properly tune the RF components. In a properly tuned system the feedline length does not matter. The feedline is 50 Ohms, the transmitter is 50 Ohms and the duplexer is 50 Ohms. Everyone is happy. 73 Glenn WB4UIV At 10:33 PM 03/28/04 -0500, you wrote: Where did you find (what is) the formula for jumpers from the duplexer to the transmitter and receiver? N7HQR http://www.repeater-builder.com/ge/duptuning.html I have been told that this formula, explained in Paragraph 4 of the above site, also works for the electrical length from the duplexer to the TX-RX. Others say that only the TX is SOMETIMES critical and a Z-Matcher will also work. If anyone feels I have misunderstood this information, please let me know. When inserting any in-line devices in to your repeater's feed line, be sure any added feed line(s) used to connect the device (like a watt meter) are at least one half wave length of your transmit frequency. You can calculate the electrical length required by dividing your frequency in to 5904 and multiplying the result by the velocity factor of your feed line. This will yield the 1/2 electrical wave length in inches, tip to tip including the RF connector. An example, 5904/442.275 = 13.35, now multiply 13.35 by the velocity factor of the feed line, I'll use 66%, 13.35 * .66 = 8.81 inches. You can use any multiple of the result 8.81, 17.6, 26.43, 35.24. Also try to use a good watt meter like the Bird, the less expensive watt meters are not a true power measuring device but a glorified voltage meter which can be easily fooled by hi Q as found in a duplexer. JIM KA2AJH - Original Message - From: Daron J. Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Sent: Sunday, March 28, 2004 6:38 PM Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Duplexer Cable Legnth Where did you find (what is) the formula for jumpers from the duplexer to the transmitter and receiver? N7HQR Yahoo! Groups Links Yahoo! Groups Links Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[Repeater-Builder] Please help me with Kenwood 840's
I have two Kenwood TK-840's and would like to make them into a repeater. Is there anyone willing to help me with very detailed instuctions to do so. I am putting this together for the first time and I don't know anything about repeaters. Also, my budget is very limited so I will need a cheap controller and wiring and wiring diagrams. I will look into an amp later to push about 50 or 60 watts. I am going to run as a test repeater for a few months on 5 watts. Thank you in advance for the help. Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[Repeater-Builder] M6709 vs. M7716
Kevin All, I have a Micor SpectraTac Audio Squelch Card with a blown up M7716 IC. I have the older version chip as a replacement, the M6709. Will I see a difference in squelch performance from the new chip to the old? It's the only replacement that I have. Thanks! Adam N2ACF Yahoo! Groups Links To visit your group on the web, go to:http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/ To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Re: [Repeater-Builder] M6709 vs. M7716
Adam C. Feuer wrote: Kevin All, I have a Micor SpectraTac Audio Squelch Card with a blown up M7716 IC. I have the older version chip as a replacement, the M6709. Will I see a difference in squelch performance from the new chip to the old? It's the only replacement that I have. No, they are exactly the same just a different part number. Kevin Yahoo! Groups Links To visit your group on the web, go to:http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/ To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
[Repeater-Builder] Re: M6709 vs. M7716
Thanks Kevin! Adam C. Feuer wrote: Kevin All, I have a Micor SpectraTac Audio Squelch Card with a blown up M7716 IC. I have the older version chip as a replacement, the M6709. Will I see a difference in squelch performance from the new chip to the old? It's the only replacement that I have. No, they are exactly the same just a different part number. Kevin Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [Repeater-Builder] a little help
Hey Eric, Give cook towers a call they have every thing from soap to nuts for 220 MHZ we buy lots of the stuff we use on Metro-Comm from then and they give a good discount to us Ham's they do sell RFS (Celwave) and DB and even Sinclair. They even sell repeaters and duplexers. Good Luck, 73 Russ, W3CH Trustee W3PS Metro-Comm repeater network. - Original Message - From: Eric Lemmon [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Sent: Sunday, March 28, 2004 2:50 PM Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] a little help Donnie, I view good to mean commercial-grade. Reliable, high-performance antennas are available for the 220 band from RFS/Celwave, Decibel Products, and Sinclair. They're not cheap, and a good antenna will cost between 500 and 800 bucks. Depending upon your repeater location relative to the desired coverage area, it might be wise to use an offset dipole antenna instead of a vertical omnidirectional fiberglass antenna. Whichever antenna design you choose, consider using a top support to keep it from waving in the wind. 73, Eric Lemmon WB6FLY Donnie Q wrote: I am putting a 220 machine on the air in Michigan... does anyone have any ideas of a good antenna...? Yahoo! Groups Links Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [Repeater-Builder] WTB: 440 Mhz Receiver with COR
Thanks Russ, will give them a call. Mathew russ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Try Maggiore Labs in West Chester PA.there phone number is 610-436-6051 they make a top notch reciver. Betterthen some of the older stuff for around the same price.Good luck and 73,Russ, W3CHTrustee W3PSMetro-Comm repeater network.- Original Message - From: "w9mwq" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To:Sent: Sunday, March 28, 2004 5:56 PMSubject: [Repeater-Builder] WTB: 440 Mhz Receiver with COR I am looking for a inexpensive 440 Mhz receiver with a COR output to replace the one that is with my 440 repeater. The receiver will be connected to an RLC2 contoller. Let me know what you have and price. Thanks. Mathew Yahoo! Groups LinksYahoo! Groups Links* To visit your group on the web, go to:http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Finance Tax Center - File online. File on time. Yahoo! Groups Links To visit your group on the web, go to:http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/ To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Re: [Repeater-Builder] WTB: 440 Mhz Receiver with COR
Try Maggiore Labs in West Chester PA. there phone number is 610-436-6051 they make a top notch reciver. Better then some of the older stuff for around the same price. Good luck and 73, Russ, W3CH Trustee W3PS Metro-Comm repeater network. - Original Message - From: w9mwq [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Sent: Sunday, March 28, 2004 5:56 PM Subject: [Repeater-Builder] WTB: 440 Mhz Receiver with COR I am looking for a inexpensive 440 Mhz receiver with a COR output to replace the one that is with my 440 repeater. The receiver will be connected to an RLC2 contoller. Let me know what you have and price. Thanks. Mathew Yahoo! Groups Links Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [Repeater-Builder] a little help
I FOR GOT THE PHONE NUMBER OR E-MAIL ADDRESS. Toll free number 877-992-2665 e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] Good luck! 73 Russ W3CH - Original Message - From: russ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 29, 2004 9:49 AM Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] a little help Hey Eric, Give cook towers a call they have every thing from soap to nuts for 220 MHZ we buy lots of the stuff we use on Metro-Comm from then and they give a good discount to us Ham's they do sell RFS (Celwave) and DB and even Sinclair. They even sell repeaters and duplexers. Good Luck, 73 Russ, W3CH Trustee W3PS Metro-Comm repeater network. - Original Message - From: Eric Lemmon [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Sent: Sunday, March 28, 2004 2:50 PM Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] a little help Donnie, I view good to mean commercial-grade. Reliable, high-performance antennas are available for the 220 band from RFS/Celwave, Decibel Products, and Sinclair. They're not cheap, and a good antenna will cost between 500 and 800 bucks. Depending upon your repeater location relative to the desired coverage area, it might be wise to use an offset dipole antenna instead of a vertical omnidirectional fiberglass antenna. Whichever antenna design you choose, consider using a top support to keep it from waving in the wind. 73, Eric Lemmon WB6FLY Donnie Q wrote: I am putting a 220 machine on the air in Michigan... does anyone have any ideas of a good antenna...? Yahoo! Groups Links Yahoo! Groups Links Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [Repeater-Builder] UHF link
For radio's on 927 we are useing Motorola Maxtrac's for our link repeaters we are using Kenwood and Hamtronic's. We are using 972.*** and 902.*** our tests have gone very well. We plan to install a pile of the stuff Sunday April 4th. We will keep every one posted as to how we make out the 927 repeaters and links. Very best of 73, Russ, W3CH - Original Message - From: Tedd Doda [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Sent: Monday, March 29, 2004 10:41 AM Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] UHF link On Mon, 29 Mar 2004 09:31:02 -0500, russ wrote: We are going to change it from 420 MHz to 927 MHz over the week end of April 4th. Hi Russ: What are you using for radios? Also, any foreseen problems from cordless phones? Thanks, Tedd Doda, VE3TJD Lazer Audio and Electronics Baden, Ontario, Canada Yahoo! Groups Links Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [Repeater-Builder] UHF link
On Mon, 29 Mar 2004 09:31:02 -0500, russ wrote: We are going to change it from 420 MHz to 927 MHz over the week end of April 4th. Hi Russ: What are you using for radios? Also, any foreseen problems from cordless phones? Thanks, Tedd Doda, VE3TJD Lazer Audio and Electronics Baden, Ontario, Canada Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [Repeater-Builder] UHF link
We have a 420 MHz link path that runs from Chester PA to Ocean City NJ that only runs 2 Watts. It works just fine. We are going to change it from 420 MHz to 927 MHz over the week end of April 4th. Not because it does not work well but because we have Hams get on one or the outher pairs and talk simplex. Big problem. We up graded most of our links to 1296 MHz but this path is shakie on 1296 in the summer so we are going with 927 as there are not many Hams there. We will report on how it makes out. Very best of 73, Russ, W3CH Trustee, W3PS Metro-Comm repeater Network. - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Sent: Sunday, March 28, 2004 10:31 PM Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] UHF link Here in Southern California the surrounding border-areas, there are several systems with long paths on 420MHz (the same as 440MHz path behavior). One of the longest is ~165 miles @ 13W before duplexer/feedline losses. 10-20W is quite typical for links, and 50W is overkill for most. Most of the systems I deal with run fully-duplexed links, and flatpak duplexers are quite common for them. Running 50W is at the edge of what they'll take of raw power and not likely to be free of desense. If it's half-duplex and you can make the radios live with the talk-time at that power level, go for it. 73, -Matt W6KGB At 09:58 PM 3/28/2004 -0500, you wrote: Line of sight should give you 100 miles with only 5-10 watts. I've done 65 miles with one watt. Chuck WB2EDV Yahoo! Groups Links Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [Repeater-Builder] Duplexer Cable Legnth
Daron J. Wilson wrote: Is there a formula to calculate the cable legnth between duplexer cans? I find reference to the formula for the cable legnth coming from the duplexer to the TX-RX, but not between the cans. Where did you find (what is) the formula for jumpers from the duplexer to the transmitter and receiver? N7HQR ...especially since those lengths aren't important. -- Jim Barbour WD8CHL Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[Repeater-Builder] Re: Please help me with Kenwood 840's
You need the kct-19 option cable, the standard software to program the radio and a basic repeater controller. I have the KCT-19 package (includes both the radio interface cable and matching plugs) in stock for $22 each plus actual shipping. I include photocopy of the specific radio to kct-19 interface. Wiring to your controller of choice is done by following the controller install information. The 840 does not provide as many tone panel options as the tk-880, but they do work well and they are often sold cheap on the internet. Boyd of BD Enterprises, sells a really nice basic controller that works very well. You can Email him direct or find his auctions on Ebay... typical controller pricing is about $69 These units work well with a tk-840 layout. Be carefull about running the 840 at full power repeater operation without some form of cooling fan. You don't want to overheat the PA (power amplifier) Section. cheers skipp www.radiowrench.com vol_fire964 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have two Kenwood TK-840's and would like to make them into a repeater. Is there anyone willing to help me with very detailed instuctions to do so. I am putting this together for the first time and I don't know anything about repeaters. Also, my budget is very limited so I will need a cheap controller and wiring and wiring diagrams. I will look into an amp later to push about 50 or 60 watts. I am going to run as a test repeater for a few months on 5 watts. Thank you in advance for the help. Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [Re: [Repeater-Builder] WTB: 440 Mhz Receiver with COR]
Am I confused, or haven't we all talked about Maggoire labs equipment before said they are crap? russ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Try Maggiore Labs in West Chester PA. there phone number is 610-436-6051 they make a top notch reciver. Better then some of the older stuff for around the same price. Good luck and 73, Russ, W3CH Trustee W3PS Metro-Comm repeater network. - Original Message - From: w9mwq [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Sent: Sunday, March 28, 2004 5:56 PM Subject: [Repeater-Builder] WTB: 440 Mhz Receiver with COR I am looking for a inexpensive 440 Mhz receiver with a COR output to replace the one that is with my 440 repeater. The receiver will be connected to an RLC2 contoller. Let me know what you have and price. Thanks. Mathew Yahoo! Groups Links Yahoo! Groups Links Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [Re: [Repeater-Builder] WTB: 440 Mhz Receiver with COR]
A lot of Maggoire repeater bashing has been mentioned. I must admit Russ, you have good things to say about Maggorie. A super secret 220 Mhz repeater was just installed on the tower I am on and where did they put the antenna? Right next to my 2 meter repeater antenna. Everytime the 220 machine keys up my 2 meter Micor repeater goes deaf. I replaced the Micor with my old 15 year old Maggoire home made repeater and it hears as well as the Micor does plus it don't stop playing when the 220 machine keys up. Move over Russ and let me join you. Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[Repeater-Builder] Noise Blankers UHF Links
The design of noise blankers were to eliminate the impulse noise of our wonderful automobiles. Most noise blankers use a separate RF front end on a frequency 5 or more Mhz removed from the main receiver frequency. When the noise reaches a predetermined design level of blanking the noise blanker ceases to blank the IF or audio signal in the main receiver. Noise blankers were never designed to function in a base station/repeater stationenvironment where you have very little impulse noise. If one is operational at a station site, it could be totally ineffective due to other signals causing interference on the noise blanker receive frequency. Some types of power line noise will be reduced, however most will overload the blanker. The best advise is do not use a noise blanker at a station site unless there is a very good reason to do so. UHF Links: Almost every link is different. I to have had low power links operate over 50 miles from high elevations to various sites that were line of site. I have had a UHF link that required 100 watts on both ends, mountain top to mountain top in Montana, 45 miles separation. There was another mountain top in the middle of the path obstructing the path. Get a copy of com-shop and put an effort into the path design that you want to have operational. Most reliable designs require better that a 90% reliability factor for year round and all weather operation. I have seen some poorly designed links that would only operate in the fall and winter when the trees did not have any foliage on them and the user would complain the other few months of the year and not spend any money to fix the problem. If your going to put in a UHF link - DO IT RIGHT! Yahoo! Groups Links To visit your group on the web, go to:http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/ To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
[Repeater-Builder] Re: Diversity RX 2 meters
Steve thanks for the links posted about diversity. Learned some stuff there. Laryn K8TVZ --- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, Steve S. Bosshard \(NU5D\) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://www.sigmawireless.ie/documents/Understnd%20Spc%20Dvrsty% 20Rev2.pdf In their paper Sigma Wireless discusses space diversity at 405 Mhz and three different combining techniques, Selective (voting) Equal Gain Additive, and weighted ratio combining, and the merits of each. Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [Repeater-Builder] M6709 vs. M7716
Kevin Custer wrote: Adam C. Feuer wrote: Kevin All, I have a Micor SpectraTac Audio Squelch Card with a blown up M7716 IC. I have the older version chip as a replacement, the M6709. Will I see a difference in squelch performance from the new chip to the old? It's the only replacement that I have. No, they are exactly the same just a different part number. Kevin In addition, the part number for this Motorola chip is 5183977M16, and the list price is $19.61 (Ouch) each. Therefore, be careful when you try to salvage one of these chips from the A S board. Motorola has approximately 1500 chips in stock. Ciao, Tony, K3WX Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [Re: [Repeater-Builder] WTB: 440 Mhz Receiver with COR]
THE BELOW IS SOMTHING THAT A LOT OF US KNOW AND SOME WILL NOT ADMITT. The way the mother M keeps down the desence is to not have a lot of sencitive but the Maggiore (new) is so clean I do not know how they do it. I have seen what you are talking about at some of our sites. Fell had a Micore and the receiver would shut. We lent him a maggiore on this pair and he loves it and his users love it. He fixed up a Mater Two and that (HE SAID) works better but the users like the sound and the range of the Maggiore. Very best of 73, Russ, W3CH Trustee W3PS/r - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Sent: Monday, March 29, 2004 2:08 PM Subject: Re: [Re: [Repeater-Builder] WTB: 440 Mhz Receiver with COR] A lot of Maggoire repeater bashing has been mentioned. I must admit Russ, you have good things to say about Maggorie. A super secret 220 Mhz repeater was just installed on the tower I am on and where did they put the antenna? Right next to my 2 meter repeater antenna. Everytime the 220 machine keys up my 2 meter Micor repeater goes deaf. I replaced the Micor with my old 15 year old Maggoire home made repeater and it hears as well as the Micor does plus it don't stop playing when the 220 machine keys up. Move over Russ and let me join you. Yahoo! Groups Links Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
RE: [Repeater-Builder] Duplexer Cable Legnth
I have been having a heck of a time getting my Q202G to tune to 146.xxx. It was originally set up for 163.xxx and, of course, the plunger rods were cut off to fit a cabinet. After lengthening the rods, I still couldn't get a proper notch. Asking around, I was told that I would have to change out the interconnecting cables between the cans and put in ones that were the right length electrically. I have some pretty rudimentary test equipment to tune this thing up so I'm wondering now if I should go ahead and replace the cables or simply try to get the tuning as accurate as possible with the equipment I have and leave the cables alone. What are the group's thoughts on this? Doug VA7DD Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [Re: [Repeater-Builder] WTB: 440 Mhz Receiver with COR]
If a Mastr II doesn't sound good, they don't have it set up right. Fred KF4QZN - Original Message - From: russ Sent: Monday, March 29, 2004 4:16 PM To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [Re: [Repeater-Builder] WTB: 440 Mhz Receiver with COR] THE BELOW IS SOMTHING THAT A LOT OF US KNOW AND SOME WILL NOT ADMITT.The way the mother "M" keeps down the desenceis to not have a lot of sencitive but the Maggiore (new) is so clean I donot know how they do it.I have seen what you are talking about at some of our sites. Fell had aMicore and the receiver would shut. We lent him a maggiore on this pair andhe loves it and his users love it. He fixed up a Mater Two and that (HESAID) works better but the users like the sound and the range of theMaggiore.Very best of 73,Russ, W3CHTrustee W3PS/r- Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.comSent: Monday, March 29, 2004 2:08 PMSubject: Re: [Re: [Repeater-Builder] WTB: 440 Mhz Receiver with COR] A lot of Maggoire repeater bashing has been mentioned. I must admit Russ,you have good things to say about Maggorie. A super secret 220 Mhz repeaterwas just installed on the tower I am on and where did they put the antenna?Right next to my 2 meter repeater antenna. Everytime the 220 machine keys up my2 meter Micor repeater goes deaf. I replaced the Micor with my old 15 yearold Maggoire home made repeater and it hears as well as the Micor does plus itdon't stop playing when the 220 machine keys up. Move over Russ and let me join you. Yahoo! Groups LinksYahoo! Groups Links* To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ Yahoo! Groups Links To visit your group on the web, go to:http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/ To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Re: [Re: [Repeater-Builder] WTB: 440 Mhz Receiver with COR]
No they are NOT crap! The old ones made out of a Clegg mobiles yes where true Crap. But his new stuff is gold! If you want to see one in a high RF area meet me in Philly. Want to see one hear better then a Micor running 110 watts? Your service monitor or mine. I have them on the air in PA, NJ., Del, NC. I will meet any one any where. These new Maggioe's are great. I sold off Micore and Master II's and replaced the with 18 Maggiore's. Gee we can buy any repeater and did try a pile off them. For what we paided for one Maggiore we could have had 4 or 5 of the Micores. We bought Maggiore for a reson. They work! You do not have to be going to the site. Binghamton I have not seen of 4 years. I would rather talk on them the fix them all the time. Chester PA went for 10 years with out a visit. Till we added two meters. I look at the sites with the Morotola 2800 and they are alway right dead on. I have repaced a few of the old receiver that they made years ago with some of the newer receiver on some voteing receiver and off site receivers they work well. so get your head out of the sand! Radio has come a long since the 70's when the Micore and Master II came out. Lots better stuff out there on the market and I agree there is some crap out there. But in all fairness the new Maggiore stuff is not one of the crap repeaters. Like a said befor I will meet any one at one of my 18 repeater sites and you can bring your monitor I I will bring my 2800 and you can see. I will be in Ocean City NJ this week. Removing 2 GMRS Master II that by the way are not longer type acepted for use on part 95 GMRS or part 90 business radio and installing a 927 repeat in the place of one and a 927 link radio where the outher Master two is. Any way I don't need flames but when some is wrong and takeing pot shots at a good repeater I just must speak up! So no flames un less you want to go to a site and prove me worng. Not not do flame me. I just meant you have no clue of how a new Maggiore works and you don't want to see for your self! It is a wonder you have a computer. Well go back to your black and white TV on rabbit ears and be happy how well it works. I my self will go watch the news in DTV. Very best of 73, Russ, W3CH Trustee Metro-Comm, INC W3PS/R - Original Message - From: JOHN MACKEY [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Sent: Monday, March 29, 2004 1:22 PM Subject: Re: [Re: [Repeater-Builder] WTB: 440 Mhz Receiver with COR] Am I confused, or haven't we all talked about Maggoire labs equipment before said they are crap? russ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Try Maggiore Labs in West Chester PA. there phone number is 610-436-6051 they make a top notch reciver. Better then some of the older stuff for around the same price. Good luck and 73, Russ, W3CH Trustee W3PS Metro-Comm repeater network. - Original Message - From: w9mwq [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Sent: Sunday, March 28, 2004 5:56 PM Subject: [Repeater-Builder] WTB: 440 Mhz Receiver with COR I am looking for a inexpensive 440 Mhz receiver with a COR output to replace the one that is with my 440 repeater. The receiver will be connected to an RLC2 contoller. Let me know what you have and price. Thanks. Mathew Yahoo! Groups Links Yahoo! Groups Links Yahoo! Groups Links Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [Re: [Repeater-Builder] WTB: 440 Mhz Receiver with COR]
russ wrote: THE BELOW IS SOMTHING THAT A LOT OF US KNOW AND SOME WILL NOT ADMITT. The way the mother M keeps down the desence is to not have a lot of sencitive but the Maggiore (new) is so clean I do not know how they do it. I have seen what you are talking about at some of our sites. Fell had a Micore and the receiver would shut. We lent him a maggiore on this pair and he loves it and his users love it. He fixed up a Mater Two and that (HE SAID) works better but the users like the sound and the range of the Maggiore. Very best of 73, Russ, W3CH Trustee W3PS/r This guys turning into a bit of a troll. Maggiore's are dirty, unreliable, broad as a barn, and if I saw one at a site I was at, I'd be demanding it be removed. If I was the owner/manager of the site, I'd unplug it and tell whoever put it in to pick it up outa the trash bin, and don't darken my door again. -- Jim Barbour WD8CHL Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [Repeater-Builder] Slightly off topic ...
i belive it is 58 watts and 100 watts on the PA300 - Original Message - From: Neil McKie [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Repeater Builder Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Sent: Monday, March 29, 2004 5:26 PM Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Slightly off topic ... I have Federal PA 300 Electronic Siren. There are two different power output levels depending on which output leads you connect to. Does anyone know what the rated output levels are according to a Specification Sheet or the service manual which I don't have? Thank you, Neil McKie - WA6KLA Yahoo! Groups Links --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses at TNWEB LLC] --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses at TNWEB LLC] Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
RE: [Repeater-Builder] Duplexer Cable Legnth
Are these Band pass, Band Reject? or Pass only? Changing the cables will help alot since you are 20 MHz off. You would have an easier time if your cans were in the 150-155 MHz range. But a good way to be sure is to just test one cavity by its self and see if you can make spec at your frequency. I know that some times the coupling loop capacitor needs to be increased to make the can notch correcty. If the cans have piston trimmer capaciors on the ends of the coupling loops you will need to change them for more capacitance. A good source for these is 2 meter GE MASTR-II ICOMs, Or you can try to solder a silver mica or NPO fixed capacitor across it (5 to 10 pF). If it uses plunger style capacitor you need to lengthen the center conductor. -- Original Message -- From: Davies, Doug A FOR:EX [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 13:17:35 -0800 I have been having a heck of a time getting my Q202G to tune to 146.xxx. It was originally set up for 163.xxx and, of course, the plunger rods were cut off to fit a cabinet. After lengthening the rods, I still couldn't get a proper notch. Asking around, I was told that I would have to change out the interconnecting cables between the cans and put in ones that were the right length electrically. I have some pretty rudimentary test equipment to tune this thing up so I'm wondering now if I should go ahead and replace the cables or simply try to get the tuning as accurate as possible with the equipment I have and leave the cables alone. What are the group's thoughts on this? Doug VA7DD Yahoo! Groups Links Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[Repeater-Builder] Slightly off topic ...
I have Federal PA 300 Electronic Siren. There are two different power output levels depending on which output leads you connect to. Does anyone know what the rated output levels are according to a Specification Sheet or the service manual which I don't have? Thank you, Neil McKie - WA6KLA Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/