[Bug 5370] Review request: plex-media-player - Plex Media Player
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5370 FeRD (Frank Dana) changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ferd...@gmail.com --- Comment #2 from FeRD (Frank Dana) --- (In reply to Richard from comment #1) > > Spec file looks pretty clean but aren't the icon cache, mime database, and > desktop database's updated automatically by file triggers now? Correct, but DAMN is that information hard to track down concretely now! (For all the nice things about the new Fedora Docs site, it's really missing a full-text site search.) The only official documentation I could find anywhere is this offhand mention in the _EPEL_ packaging guidelines, Scriptlets section: "Fedora has been moving towards the use of file triggers and away from requiring that packagers cut and paste scriptlets into loads of packages. These scriptlets would still be needed for EPEL, and as scriptlets are no longer needed in any Fedora release, they're moved here." –Src: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL:Packaging#Scriptlets -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
[Bug 5370] Review request: plex-media-player - Plex Media Player
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5370 Richard changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hobbes1...@gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Richard --- I'll take this if I can find some spare cycles soon. Spec file looks pretty clean but aren't the icon cache, mime database, and desktop database's updated automatically by file triggers now? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
[Bug 5115] Review Request: cinelerra-gg - A non linear video editor and effects processor
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5115 --- Comment #8 from FeRD (Frank Dana) --- (In reply to Nicolas Chauvet from comment #7) > This package was approved by never went created in pkgdb. > Done the pkgdb creation, please apply for ACLS if needed. Eep! I _completely_ forgot about this package, sorry. ACLs requested, initial check-in commit ready to be pushed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
[Bug 5079] Review request: wiringpi - PIN based GPIO access library for BCM283x SoC devices
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5079 --- Comment #12 from FeRD (Frank Dana) --- (In reply to Nicolas Chauvet from comment #11) > (In reply to Andrew Bauer from comment #10) > > > > For the past couple months, all messages from RPMFusion started going > > straight to my junk folder. This has undoubtedly caused me to miss much > > communications. > > Unfortunately microsoft smtp are blacklisting our IP address of the host > provider with no reason.( I need to use another personal IP in the case of > microsoft services). I'll open a new rpmfusion-infrastructure bug about that, there may be things that can be done to improve the mail-service situation and appease Redmond. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
[Bug 5079] Review request: wiringpi - PIN based GPIO access library for BCM283x SoC devices
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5079 --- Comment #11 from Nicolas Chauvet --- (In reply to Andrew Bauer from comment #10) > I'll make the changes time permitting. > > For the past couple months, all messages from RPMFusion started going > straight to my junk folder. This has undoubtedly caused me to miss much > communications. Can you try to understand why this ? - Is it with bugzilla notifications ? - Is it with mailing list notifications ? Unfortunately microsoft smtp are blacklisting our IP address of the host provider with no reason.( I need to use another personal IP in the case of microsoft services). Best would be to switch from email provider... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
[Bug 5079] Review request: wiringpi - PIN based GPIO access library for BCM283x SoC devices
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5079 --- Comment #10 from Andrew Bauer --- I'll make the changes time permitting. For the past couple months, all messages from RPMFusion started going straight to my junk folder. This has undoubtedly caused me to miss much communications. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
[Bug 5079] Review request: wiringpi - PIN based GPIO access library for BCM283x SoC devices
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5079
FeRD (Frank Dana) changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ferd...@gmail.com
--- Comment #9 from FeRD (Frank Dana) ---
(In reply to Nicolas Chauvet from comment #8)
> Please avoid the conflicts on libs and uses instead:
> Obsoletes: %{name}-libs < %{name}-%{version}
> Provides: %{name}-libs = %{name}-%{version}
You meant this, right?
Obsoletes: %{name}-libs < %{version}-%{release}
Provides: %{name}-libs = %{version}-%{release}
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
[Bug 5114] Review request: ungoogled-chromium - Chromium, sans integration with Google
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5114 --- Comment #8 from Nicolas Chauvet --- (In reply to Akarshan Biswas from comment #7) ... > > I'm suggesting to use "chromium-browser-privacy" > > Let's wait for a day, if we receive no response then we can close it I guess. It's usually expected to wait for at least one week. But anyway this can always be re-opened at some point. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
[Bug 5114] Review request: ungoogled-chromium - Chromium, sans integration with Google
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5114 --- Comment #7 from Akarshan Biswas --- (In reply to Nicolas Chauvet from comment #6) > Is there original submitter still interested in this package ? > > Seems like it was not updated since the review request. Please reminds that > we are not a housekeeping team for packages that maintainers can drop and > forget. If you don't maintain this package, it will be removed from the repo > at some point. (if ever it is introduced in in the first step). > > I would also like to have the "name issue" sorted. Despite using the name of > the patchset as a base helps it's also unclear what you want out from > google. Using a "positive" wording would be more helpful. > I'm suggesting to use "chromium-browser-privacy" Let's wait for a day, if we receive no response then we can close it I guess. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
[Bug 5103] New Package: kodi-vfs-libarchive
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5103
--- Comment #7 from FeRD (Frank Dana) ---
Couple of other notes about the spec file:
Source0:https://github.com/xbmc/%{aname}/archive/%{version}-Leia.tar.gz
#https://github.com/xbmc/vfs.libarchive/archive/1.0.4-Leia.tar.gz
That commented URL line is unnecessary and could potentially cause confusion,
especially in the future when newer versions are released and built. (I assume
it was just used as a reference template for building the Source0 line — which
works fine, as a successful spectool run demonstrates.)
ExcludeArch:%{power64} ppc64le
The "ppc64le" is redundant, %power64 already includes ppc64le.
"Excludearch: %{power64}" would also match the current kodi.spec.
%cmake -DADDONS_TO_BUILD=vfs.libarchive -DADDON_SRC_PREFIX=.
-DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release
It would be better to use -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=RelWithDebInfo, to facilitate
extraction of debugging symbols and creation of a -debuginfo package. (Again,
this would match what's used in the current kodi.spec.)
%description
%{summary}.
Meh. I know that's not _technically_ prohibited. (It's a favorite of the wine
packagers, for one, in (not-)describing many subpackages.) I personally find it
kind of lazy, though.
And in this specific case, I feel like there's plenty more that COULD be said
to describe the package. What the heck is a "VFS libarchive addon"? Why would
someone want to install it into Kodi? What extra features or functionality does
it add? How are they accessed?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
[Bug 5103] New Package: kodi-vfs-libarchive
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5103 --- Comment #6 from FeRD (Frank Dana) --- (In reply to FeRD (Frank Dana) from comment #5) > > mock -r fedora-30-x86_64-rpmfusion_free --rebuild > ~/rpmbuild/SRPMS/kodi-vfs.libarchive-1.0.4-1.ferd30.src.rpm Crap, I forgot about my custom %dist tag. So make that: $ mock -r fedora-30-x86_64-rpmfusion_free --rebuild ~/rpmbuild/SRPMS/kodi-vfs.libarchive-1.0.4-1.fc30.src.rpm (Or whatever dist tag is attached, if you're not running Fedora 30.) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
[Bug 5103] New Package: kodi-vfs-libarchive
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5103 FeRD (Frank Dana) changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ferd...@gmail.com --- Comment #5 from FeRD (Frank Dana) --- In spec-requires speak, those extra requirements would be (not too many surprises): BuildRequires: libarchive-devel BuildRequires: xz-devel BuildRequires: bzip2-devel BuildRequires: zlib-devel BuildRequires: lz4-devel BuildRequires: lzo-devel BuildRequires: openssl-devel > - Is this package can build in mock ? @Klaas: You can find out by installing mock and mock-rpmfusion-free. Then you just create an SRPM, and use it to build the binary RPM in the mock sandbox (you'll need close to a gigabyte of space available in /var): $ spectool -g -R kodi-vfs-libarchive.spec $ rpmbuild -bs kodi-vfs-libarchive.spec mock -r fedora-30-x86_64-rpmfusion_free --rebuild ~/rpmbuild/SRPMS/kodi-vfs.libarchive-1.0.4-1.ferd30.src.rpm The first command downloads the source file(s) to ~/rpmbuild/SOURCES, the second builds the SRPM from the spec file, and the third takes the SRPM into the sandbox and runs the build process isolated from your locally-installed packages, same as the rpmfusion build servers would. (Meaning that it will fail hard, without the extra BuildRequires, because none of those packages are installed by default.) WITH the extra BuildRequires, you'll find that it builds just fine. >> - Please do not redefine camke make (you can audit what are used by default >> using rpm -E %cmake ) > >I am not sure what you mean here, it's been a whlie since I made that spec >file but I think that was the only way I could get it to build properly :) I'm... actually not sure either? The %build contains just: %cmake -DADDONS_TO_BUILD=vfs.libarchive -DADDON_SRC_PREFIX=. -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release %make_build Which is all pretty standard. Not sure what the objection is there. Nicolas? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
[Bug 5103] New Package: kodi-vfs-libarchive
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5103 --- Comment #4 from Michael Cronenworth --- Upstream defines these requirements: find_package(Kodi REQUIRED) find_package(LibArchive REQUIRED) find_package(LibLZMA REQUIRED) find_package(BZip2 REQUIRED) find_package(ZLIB REQUIRED) find_package(LZ4 REQUIRED) find_package(LZO2 REQUIRED) find_package(OpenSSL REQUIRED) You've only defined the first one in your spec. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
Re: [deepin-screen-recorder] Update to 5.0.0
Hi Nicolas,
Thanks for the remind. Yes, I still remember this. I was looking for the
previous discussion just now :-)
You probably noticed that I haven't update these packages for a while.
In fact I was just too busy for the past time. I'll file a PR within
resonable time (probably today or tomorrow).
(Copy deepin-daemon-owner@fp.o to make other maintainers aware)
On 8/26/19 9:03 PM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> Hello Zamir,
>
>
> Some time ago, we've have discussed the possibility to extend the
> deepin fedora groups in comps.xml with a rpmfusion one
> https://github.com/rpmfusion-infra/rpmfusion-free-comps
>
> Can you make the needed PR ? (either using a same group or a dedicated
> one as you prefer).
> It will be easier to complement the Deeping desktop with RPM Fusion content.
>
> Thx in advance.
>
>
> Le lun. 26 août 2019 à 14:43, Zamir SUN a écrit :
>>
>> commit ada63253b2a5fefd656aca8af8efb13792a2909d
>> Author: Zamir SUN
>> Date: Mon Aug 26 20:42:49 2019 +0800
>>
>> Update to 5.0.0
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Zamir SUN
>>
>> .gitignore | 1 +
>> deepin-screen-recorder.spec | 7 +--
>> sources | 2 +-
>> 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>> ---
>> diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
>> index b2a02f6..76dc3c1 100644
>> --- a/.gitignore
>> +++ b/.gitignore
>> @@ -1 +1,2 @@
>> /deepin-screen-recorder-2.7.6.tar.gz
>> +/deepin-screen-recorder-5.0.0.tar.gz
>> diff --git a/deepin-screen-recorder.spec b/deepin-screen-recorder.spec
>> index a659819..2cefd36 100644
>> --- a/deepin-screen-recorder.spec
>> +++ b/deepin-screen-recorder.spec
>> @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
>> Name: deepin-screen-recorder
>> -Version:2.7.6
>> -Release:3%{?dist}
>> +Version:5.0.0
>> +Release:1%{?dist}
>> Summary:Deepin Screen Recorder
>> License:GPLv3+
>> URL:https://github.com/linuxdeepin/deepin-screen-recorder
>> @@ -62,6 +62,9 @@ appstream-util validate-relax --nonet
>> %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/appdata/%{name}.ap
>> %{_datadir}/dbus-1/services/com.deepin.ScreenRecorder.service
>>
>> %changelog
>> +* Mon Aug 26 2019 Zamir SUN - 5.0.0-1
>> +- Update to 5.0.0
>> +
>> * Fri Aug 09 2019 RPM Fusion Release Engineering
>> - 2.7.6-3
>> - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_31_Mass_Rebuild
>>
>> diff --git a/sources b/sources
>> index 24bdccb..9d6ce38 100644
>> --- a/sources
>> +++ b/sources
>> @@ -1 +1 @@
>> -c94ca5d9801cb02ec5ccb923d4bc700f deepin-screen-recorder-2.7.6.tar.gz
>> +958f1a63cd13da56687b06451c590b3d deepin-screen-recorder-5.0.0.tar.gz
>> ___
>> rpmfusion-commits mailing list -- rpmfusion-comm...@lists.rpmfusion.org
>> To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-commits-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
>
>
>
--
Zamir SUN
Fedora user
GPG : 1D86 6D4A 49CE 4BBD 72CF FCF5 D856 6E11 F2A0 525E
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
[Bug 5103] New Package: kodi-vfs-libarchive
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5103 --- Comment #3 from Klaas Demter --- (In reply to Nicolas Chauvet from comment #2) > Also do you have a fedora/rpmfusion FAS account yes, fedora FAS username is klaas (In reply to Nicolas Chauvet from comment #1) > Thx for the package submission. > > Try to be more verbose about this review, also a presentation on > rpmfusion-devel mailing list would be welcomed. > > Also have a look on the "required" formalism for review request. > https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5366 I'll have a look at that > > Few comments. > - Is this package can build in mock ? I only build it with rpmbuild locally > - Is there a missing build requires (libarchive-devel ?) that could very well be the case :) > - Please do not redefine camke make (you can audit what are used by default > using rpm -E %cmake ) I am not sure what you mean here, it's been a whlie since I made that spec file but I think that was the only way I could get it to build properly :) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
Re: [deepin-screen-recorder] Update to 5.0.0
Hello Zamir,
Some time ago, we've have discussed the possibility to extend the
deepin fedora groups in comps.xml with a rpmfusion one
https://github.com/rpmfusion-infra/rpmfusion-free-comps
Can you make the needed PR ? (either using a same group or a dedicated
one as you prefer).
It will be easier to complement the Deeping desktop with RPM Fusion content.
Thx in advance.
Le lun. 26 août 2019 à 14:43, Zamir SUN a écrit :
>
> commit ada63253b2a5fefd656aca8af8efb13792a2909d
> Author: Zamir SUN
> Date: Mon Aug 26 20:42:49 2019 +0800
>
> Update to 5.0.0
>
> Signed-off-by: Zamir SUN
>
> .gitignore | 1 +
> deepin-screen-recorder.spec | 7 +--
> sources | 2 +-
> 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> ---
> diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
> index b2a02f6..76dc3c1 100644
> --- a/.gitignore
> +++ b/.gitignore
> @@ -1 +1,2 @@
> /deepin-screen-recorder-2.7.6.tar.gz
> +/deepin-screen-recorder-5.0.0.tar.gz
> diff --git a/deepin-screen-recorder.spec b/deepin-screen-recorder.spec
> index a659819..2cefd36 100644
> --- a/deepin-screen-recorder.spec
> +++ b/deepin-screen-recorder.spec
> @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
> Name: deepin-screen-recorder
> -Version:2.7.6
> -Release:3%{?dist}
> +Version:5.0.0
> +Release:1%{?dist}
> Summary:Deepin Screen Recorder
> License:GPLv3+
> URL:https://github.com/linuxdeepin/deepin-screen-recorder
> @@ -62,6 +62,9 @@ appstream-util validate-relax --nonet
> %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/appdata/%{name}.ap
> %{_datadir}/dbus-1/services/com.deepin.ScreenRecorder.service
>
> %changelog
> +* Mon Aug 26 2019 Zamir SUN - 5.0.0-1
> +- Update to 5.0.0
> +
> * Fri Aug 09 2019 RPM Fusion Release Engineering -
> 2.7.6-3
> - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_31_Mass_Rebuild
>
> diff --git a/sources b/sources
> index 24bdccb..9d6ce38 100644
> --- a/sources
> +++ b/sources
> @@ -1 +1 @@
> -c94ca5d9801cb02ec5ccb923d4bc700f deepin-screen-recorder-2.7.6.tar.gz
> +958f1a63cd13da56687b06451c590b3d deepin-screen-recorder-5.0.0.tar.gz
> ___
> rpmfusion-commits mailing list -- rpmfusion-comm...@lists.rpmfusion.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-commits-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
--
-
Nicolas (kwizart)
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
[Bug 5370] Review request: plex-media-player - Plex Media Player
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5370 Nicolas Chauvet changed: What|Removed |Added Group|Package Reviews | CC list accessible|1 |0 Reporter|1 |0 accessible|| -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
[Bug 5370] New: Review request: plex-media-player - Plex Media Player
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5370 Bug ID: 5370 Summary: Review request: plex-media-player - Plex Media Player Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Hardware: x86_64 OS: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P1 Component: Review Request Assignee: rpmfusion-package-rev...@rpmfusion.org Reporter: kwiz...@gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-rev...@rpmfusion.org Group: Package Reviews namespace: free SPEC: http://dl.kwizart.net/review/plex-media-player.spec SRPM: http://dl.kwizart.net/review/plex-media-player-2.40.0-1.fc29.src.rpm Summary: Plex Media Player This package depends on mpv-devel , so it's made for the free section. Koji scratch build for f32-free: http://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=352309 (arm/arm64 build still on-going). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
[Bug 5164] Review request: stansoft - A text-based financial accounting system
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5164 Nicolas Chauvet changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review request: Stansoft - |Review request: stansoft - |A text-based financial |A text-based financial |accounting system |accounting system --- Comment #19 from Nicolas Chauvet --- Hello Is there any issue with this review ? The spec file and src.rpm are 404. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
[Bug 5278] Review Request: mpc-qt - A clone of Media Player Classic reimplemented in Qt
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5278 Nicolas Chauvet changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #13 from Nicolas Chauvet --- Seems imported. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
[Bug 30] Tracker : Sponsorship Request
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30 Nicolas Chauvet changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||5103 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5103 [Bug 5103] New Package: kodi-vfs-libarchive -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
[Bug 5103] New Package: kodi-vfs-libarchive
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5103 Nicolas Chauvet changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||2, 30 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Chauvet --- Also do you have a fedora/rpmfusion FAS account ? Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2 [Bug 2] Tracker: New packages awaiting review https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30 [Bug 30] Tracker : Sponsorship Request -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
[Bug 5114] Review request: ungoogled-chromium - Chromium, sans integration with Google
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5114 --- Comment #6 from Nicolas Chauvet --- Is there original submitter still interested in this package ? Seems like it was not updated since the review request. Please reminds that we are not a housekeeping team for packages that maintainers can drop and forget. If you don't maintain this package, it will be removed from the repo at some point. (if ever it is introduced in in the first step). I would also like to have the "name issue" sorted. Despite using the name of the patchset as a base helps it's also unclear what you want out from google. Using a "positive" wording would be more helpful. I'm suggesting to use "chromium-browser-privacy" -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
[Bug 5103] New Package: kodi-vfs-libarchive
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5103 --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Chauvet --- Thx for the package submission. Try to be more verbose about this review, also a presentation on rpmfusion-devel mailing list would be welcomed. Also have a look on the "required" formalism for review request. https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5366 Few comments. - Is this package can build in mock ? - Is there a missing build requires (libarchive-devel ?) - Please do not redefine camke make (you can audit what are used by default using rpm -E %cmake ) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
[Bug 5115] Review Request: cinelerra-gg - A non linear video editor and effects processor
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5115 --- Comment #7 from Nicolas Chauvet --- This package was approved by never went created in pkgdb. Done the pkgdb creation, please apply for ACLS if needed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
[Bug 5079] Review request: wiringpi - PIN based GPIO access library for BCM283x SoC devices
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5079
Nicolas Chauvet changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|rpmfusion-package-review@rp |kwiz...@gmail.com
|mfusion.org |
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #8 from Nicolas Chauvet ---
Please avoid the conflicts on libs and uses instead:
Obsoletes: %{name}-libs < %{name}-%{version}
Provides: %{name}-libs = %{name}-%{version}
Also use
ExclusiveArch: armv7hl armv7hnl
With that changes, the package is APPROVED for the rpi namespace.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
[Bug 5269] Scaling, colorspace conversion, and dithering library
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5269 Nicolas Chauvet changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |MOVED --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Chauvet --- Moved to fedora -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
[Bug 5366] Review request: vlc-bittorrent - Bittorrent plugin for VLC
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5366 Nicolas Chauvet changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Chauvet --- imported, thx for the review. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
Re: gnustep-base 1.26.0
Yes, sorry. I mixed up `unar` with `unrar`. On 25/08/19 21:43, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Antonio Trande wrote: >> 'gnustep-base' 1.26.0 will be pushed on Fedora Rawhide in 10 days. >> >> Package involved: unrar > > Nope. As was already pointed out on the Fedora devel mailing list, there is > a confusion here: unrar is in RPM Fusion and does not use gnustep-base. > unar, the Unarchiver, which has reverse engineered RAR uncompression support > as its main feature, is in Fedora and uses gnustep-base. (It was originally > developed for macOS and ported to GNUstep.) > > Kevin Kofler > ___ > rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org > To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org > -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org' GPG key: 0x6e0331dd1699e4d7 GPG key server: https://keys.openpgp.org/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
Improves the quick-docs/howto infra task
Hi there, There is an recent discussion to improve the documentation using generated docs from git (same as fedora quick-docs or others). I would like to open this infra task to anyone with the possibility to hand-over a test vm with admin access to setup the whole process. The idea is to use the vm to setup the wiki from github remote (or something else so we can have access easily to post-commit or else). Ideally I'd like to have From my side, I'd like to have theses features: - Using a staging instance/url to have preview (which search engine indexing disabled in robots.txt). - RPM Fusion CSS/Skin - Generation with post-commit or cron (either way) I have a preference with the Fedora setup of quick-docs (using ansible already exists). This wiki should be able to be translated into others languages. (default to en_US or whatever the browser). A nice to have feature would be to fetch the existing content in our wiki to have a mean for automatic conversion. -- - Nicolas (kwizart) ___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
RPM Fusion update report 2019-08-26
RPM Fusion update report Section free: - Fedora 29 - Pushed to testing: mock-rpmfusion-free-31.0-1.fc29 xvst-3.0-7.20180822git3ae2797.fc29 Pushed to stable: mpd-0.21.14-1.fc29 telegram-desktop-1.8.2-2.fc29 Fedora 30 - Pushed to testing: deepin-movie-3.2.24.3-1.fc30 deepin-music-5.0.1-2.fc30 mock-rpmfusion-free-31.0-1.fc30 xvst-3.0-7.20180822git3ae2797.fc30 Pushed to stable: mpd-0.21.14-1.fc30 telegram-desktop-1.8.2-2.fc30 Fedora 31 - Pushed to testing: deepin-movie-3.2.24.3-1.fc31 deepin-music-5.0.1-2.fc31 mock-rpmfusion-free-31.0-1.fc31 rpmfusion-free-obsolete-packages-31-2.fc31 xvst-3.0-7.20180822git3ae2797.fc31 Pushed to stable: mpd-0.21.14-1.fc31 rpmfusion-free-obsolete-packages-31-1.fc31 telegram-desktop-1.8.2-2.fc31 EL 6 - Pushed to testing: Pushed to stable: EL 7 - Pushed to testing: mock-rpmfusion-free-31.0-1.el7 Pushed to stable: EL 8 - Pushed to testing: Pushed to stable: Section nonfree: - Fedora 29 - Pushed to testing: mock-rpmfusion-nonfree-31.0-1.fc29 Pushed to stable: megasync-4.2.3-1.fc29 nautilus-dropbox-2019.02.14-1.fc29 Fedora 30 - Pushed to testing: mock-rpmfusion-nonfree-31.0-1.fc30 Pushed to stable: megasync-4.2.3-1.fc30 nautilus-dropbox-2019.02.14-1.fc30 Fedora 31 - Pushed to testing: mock-rpmfusion-nonfree-31.0-1.fc31 Pushed to stable: megasync-4.2.3-1.fc31 nautilus-dropbox-2019.02.14-1.fc31 rpmfusion-nonfree-obsolete-packages-31-1.fc31 EL 6 - Pushed to testing: Pushed to stable: EL 7 - Pushed to testing: mock-rpmfusion-nonfree-31.0-1.el7 Pushed to stable: EL 8 - Pushed to testing: Pushed to stable: Theses packages will be available in main mirror in few minutes. Wait for local mirrors to sync Please report any issue to https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org ___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
