[rtl] Re: PC104 A/D boards
On Mon, Jun 05, 2000 at 03:55:04PM +0200, Vasili Goutas wrote: > I'm looking for a PC104 A/D board supported by comedi with following > properties > 4 analog input, > 4 analog output decoupled, > 4 digital input, > 4 digital output decoupled, > hardware timer. > > It could also be two boards with these properties in sum. > If you know such a board, please send me an email ? > ComputerBoards (www.computerboards.com) makes several PC104 boards that are supposed to be identical to their ISA counterparts. Unfortunately, Comedi support for these boards is a bit sketchy, with a few individual boards in the DAS series being supported, while the others are supported if you can guess the magic to fit it all together. I've only recently been learning of details of all the DAS boards, and I'm strongly considering rewriting the DAS drivers in the near future. The other well-supported manufacturers, DT and NatInst, do not seem to manufacture PC104 boards. dave... -- [rtl] --- To unsubscribe: echo "unsubscribe rtl" | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] OR echo "unsubscribe rtl " | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- For more information on Real-Time Linux see: http://www.rtlinux.org/rtlinux/
[rtl] Let's continue to write RT Manual
Hello, We all know that RT Manual at http://www.rtlinux.org/rtlinux.new/documents/documentation/RTLManual/RTLManual.html has not been updated . Would RT Linux community be interested in submitting some documentation ? Sincerely, Olga Mill __ Olga Mill ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Eastern Washington University Voice Mail : (509) 359-6907 __ -- [rtl] --- To unsubscribe: echo "unsubscribe rtl" | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] OR echo "unsubscribe rtl " | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- For more information on Real-Time Linux see: http://www.rtlinux.org/rtlinux/
Re: [rtl] Which Linux?
Basically the only rule I know of is make sure you have the correct RTL patch for your kernel source. You can get the Linux kernels from http://www.kernel.org. Either that or download a pre-patched kernel. Mark In message, Heinicke, Eric <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes >From a newbie: > Is there a preferred flavor of Linux to use with RTLinux? > >Thank You. > >Eric O. Heinicke [EMAIL PROTECTED] >BAE SYSTEMS Voice:631.262.8644 > Fax: 631.262.8657 > One Hazeltine Way, MS 1-78 > Greenlawn, NY 11740-1606 > >-- [rtl] --- >To unsubscribe: >echo "unsubscribe rtl" | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] OR >echo "unsubscribe rtl " | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] >--- >For more information on Real-Time Linux see: >http://www.rtlinux.org/rtlinux/ > -- Mark -- [rtl] --- To unsubscribe: echo "unsubscribe rtl" | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] OR echo "unsubscribe rtl " | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- For more information on Real-Time Linux see: http://www.rtlinux.org/rtlinux/
[rtl] Which Linux?
>From a newbie: Is there a preferred flavor of Linux to use with RTLinux? Thank You. Eric O. Heinicke [EMAIL PROTECTED] BAE SYSTEMS Voice:631.262.8644 Fax: 631.262.8657 One Hazeltine Way, MS 1-78 Greenlawn, NY 11740-1606 -- [rtl] --- To unsubscribe: echo "unsubscribe rtl" | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] OR echo "unsubscribe rtl " | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- For more information on Real-Time Linux see: http://www.rtlinux.org/rtlinux/
No Subject
Hi guys, I have a question about the RTLinux architecture. I know that both RTAI and RTL turn Linux as a task running when no other RT task need the processor. The thing is that I understand quite well the concept of RTHAL used by RTAI but how RTL works ? regards Jean-Denis ROUX __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Photos -- now, 100 FREE prints! http://photos.yahoo.com -- [rtl] --- To unsubscribe: echo "unsubscribe rtl" | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] OR echo "unsubscribe rtl " | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- For more information on Real-Time Linux see: http://www.rtlinux.org/rtlinux/
[rtl] Assembler Warnings?
Howdy- After a string of earth shattering crashes, I was forced to reinstall my distribution (a modified Red Hat.) I'm running the same kernel I was before, 2.2.14-rtl-2.2, but my rt process, which compiled warning free before the distribution reinstall, is compiling with the following warnings>> /tmp/ccrHgF4h.s: Assembler messages: /tmp/ccrHgF4h.s:580: Warning: translating to 'fst %st(1)' /tmp/ccrHgF4h.s:609: Warning: translating to 'fst %st(1)' /tmp/ccrHgF4h.s:632: Warning: translating to 'fst %st(1)' ...and so on The rt module insmods and runs fine, as far as I can tell. Does anyone know what these warnings are about? Chuck -- [rtl] --- To unsubscribe: echo "unsubscribe rtl" | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] OR echo "unsubscribe rtl " | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- For more information on Real-Time Linux see: http://www.rtlinux.org/rtlinux/
Re: [rtl] APM alert !!!!
On Mon, Jun 05, 2000 at 12:34:45PM +0400, Michael Barabanov wrote: > Linux 2.3.xx kernels allow APM support to be built as a module. > This feature solves the problem for at least RTL 3.0. > > Michael. > How does compiling as a module help? dave... -- [rtl] --- To unsubscribe: echo "unsubscribe rtl" | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] OR echo "unsubscribe rtl " | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- For more information on Real-Time Linux see: http://www.rtlinux.org/rtlinux/
[rtl] PC104 A/D boards
I'm looking for a PC104 A/D board supported by comedi with following properties 4 analog input, 4 analog output decoupled, 4 digital input, 4 digital output decoupled, hardware timer. It could also be two boards with these properties in sum. If you know such a board, please send me an email ? TIA Vasili -- -- SensoLogic GmbHvoice: +49 40 529567-40 Dipl. Ing. technische Informatik Vasili Goutasfax: +49 40 529567-99 - Software Developer - internet: www.sensologic.de Hummelsbütteler Steindamm 78a 22851 Norderstedt, Germany Software + Sensor Systems e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] internet: http://www.sensologic.de/ -- -- [rtl] --- To unsubscribe: echo "unsubscribe rtl" | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] OR echo "unsubscribe rtl " | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- For more information on Real-Time Linux see: http://www.rtlinux.org/rtlinux/
[rtl] PC104 A/D boards
I'm looking for a PC104 A/D board supported by comedi with following properties 4 analog input, 4 analog output decoupled, 4 digital input, 4 digital output decoupled, hardware timer. It could also be two boards with these properties in sum. If you know such a board, please send me an email ? TIA Vasili -- -- SensoLogic GmbHvoice: +49 40 529567-40 Dipl. Ing. technische Informatik Vasili Goutasfax: +49 40 529567-99 - Software Developer - internet: www.sensologic.de Hummelsbütteler Steindamm 78a 22851 Norderstedt, Germany Software + Sensor Systems e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] internet: http://www.sensologic.de/ -- -- [rtl] --- To unsubscribe: echo "unsubscribe rtl" | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] OR echo "unsubscribe rtl " | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- For more information on Real-Time Linux see: http://www.rtlinux.org/rtlinux/
Re: [rtl] APM alert !!!!
Michael Barabanov wrote: > > Linux 2.3.xx kernels allow APM support to be built as a module. > This feature solves the problem for at least RTL 3.0. > > Michael. > > David Schleef ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 01, 2000 at 04:37:35PM +0100, Stuart Hughes wrote: > > > Hi Victor, > > > > > > Tried it on RTLinux 2.3/Linux 2.2.14. Exactly the same effect. If you > > > cat /proc/apm, the jitter jumps out to ~ 7 miliseconds. > > > > > > Regards, Stuart. > > > > > I see that you also discovered the missing safe_halt() in acpi.c, while that macro, defined in system.h, was used in apm.c. Since you are likely in contact with plain linux "kernellers" that count, can you tell them that to keep it simple the same macro must be used wherever is needed, instead of repeating the inlining of the related __asm__ __volatile__. RTAI and RTL users must know that this is one of those cases in which inlined hard "sti"s can do a lot of harm once the kernel is patched for real time. Just mate a __cli() to a __asm__ __volatile ("sti") and you are screwed up. So if you are using __cli(), for disabling interrupts in Linux, always mate it with its brother __sti(). Never inline "sti". Ciao, Paolo. -- [rtl] --- To unsubscribe: echo "unsubscribe rtl" | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] OR echo "unsubscribe rtl " | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- For more information on Real-Time Linux see: http://www.rtlinux.org/rtlinux/
[rtl] Log rtl_printf calls?
Tobias Klotz writes: > are the outputs made by rtl_printf written to a logfile somewhere? I > cannot find them in the usual places but I would need them to do a post > mortem analyze of my system after a crash... Don't they go to /var/log/messages ? Probably you need to edit /etc/syslog.conf. But anyway you won't get the last log's before an crash, I assume :-O Jochen -- Heinrich-Heine-Universität, Institut für Physikalische Chemie I Universitätsstr. 1, Geb. 26.43 Raum 02.29 40225 Düsseldorf, Germanyphone ++49-211-8113681 http://www.Jochen-Kuepper.de fax ++49-211-8115195 -- [rtl] --- To unsubscribe: echo "unsubscribe rtl" | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] OR echo "unsubscribe rtl " | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- For more information on Real-Time Linux see: http://www.rtlinux.org/rtlinux/
Re: [rtl] rtllinux-2.0 support NE2000 compatiable NIC?
dickleey wrote: > > hi,everybody! > After I compile my Kernel with rtlinux-2.0, > I found I lose my NIC,and in with common linux kernel 2.2.10,the card can be found. > > I wonder rtllinux-2.0 support NE2000 compatiable NIC? > Hi, I'm not sure if this is your problem, but on RedHat 6.0 (and possibly others), after a rebuild, network cards don't work if the driver is modular. My fix to this (and it's a hack) is to edit /sbin/ifup, find the lines: # is this device available? (this catches PCMCIA devices for us) /sbin/ifconfig ${REALDEVICE} 2>&1 | grep -s "not found" > /dev/null if [ "$?" = "0" ]; then and change it to: # hack to modprobe the ethxx device /sbin/modprobe ${REALDEVICE} # is this device available? (this catches PCMCIA devices for us) /sbin/ifconfig ${REALDEVICE} 2>&1 | grep -s "not found" > /dev/null if [ "$?" = "0" ]; then Also, make sure that you have the appropriate entry in /etc/conf.modules, for an ne2000 it should be (from memory) alias eth0 ne Regards, Stuart -- [rtl] --- To unsubscribe: echo "unsubscribe rtl" | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] OR echo "unsubscribe rtl " | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- For more information on Real-Time Linux see: http://www.rtlinux.org/rtlinux/
Re: [rtl] APM alert !!!!
Linux 2.3.xx kernels allow APM support to be built as a module. This feature solves the problem for at least RTL 3.0. Michael. David Schleef ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > On Thu, Jun 01, 2000 at 04:37:35PM +0100, Stuart Hughes wrote: > > Hi Victor, > > > > Tried it on RTLinux 2.3/Linux 2.2.14. Exactly the same effect. If you > > cat /proc/apm, the jitter jumps out to ~ 7 miliseconds. > > > > Regards, Stuart. > > > > > Every so often, a thread comes up in the Linux kernel mailing list about > modifying the kernel to run APM inside a virtual machine, since APM also > causes problems with SMP. There is already other code doing this, such > as (I think) the VESA framebuffer code and BIOS calls on other > architectures. Usually, the thread erupts into a flamewar about the > stupidities involved with running something inside a virtual machine > _inside_ the kernel. > > Supposedly, ACPI will solve these problems, except that a) ACPI doesn't > work on my machine, and b) the user-space ACPI code was developed > independently from the APM code, and thus is incompatible. Go figure. > > > > dave... > > -- [rtl] --- > To unsubscribe: > echo "unsubscribe rtl" | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] OR > echo "unsubscribe rtl " | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --- > For more information on Real-Time Linux see: > http://www.rtlinux.org/rtlinux/ -- [rtl] --- To unsubscribe: echo "unsubscribe rtl" | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] OR echo "unsubscribe rtl " | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- For more information on Real-Time Linux see: http://www.rtlinux.org/rtlinux/
Re: [rtl] SEMAPHORE MODULE DON´T COMPILE
Hi Victor, That's correct, the portable fifos/semaphores/mailboxes can be found at http://www.zentropix.com/products/download.html by selecting rtai_rtl_fifos-04.tar.gz Please note that I have not tested this since RTLinux 2.0 or RTAI 1.0. Please let me know if you have any changes you want to go in. Regards, Stuart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Stuart: > According to Steve, the Zentropix fifos/semaphore package works on > RTL as well. Or is my memory failing? > > On Sun, Jun 04, 2000 at 10:40:51AM +0100, Stuart Hughes wrote: > > Hi Gus, > > > > RTAI has support for POSIX mutexes (pthread_mutex_xx including priority > > inheritance) as well as non-POSIX mutexes and semaphores and mailboxes. > > This can be downloaded > > from http://www.rtai.org/ > > > > RTLinux has support for POSIX mutexes. AFAIK the non-POSIX IPC package > > is not yet available. > > > > Regards, Stuart. > > > > > > Gusa wrote: > > > > > > Hi people > > > > > > I need the use of semaphores inside the RT kernel to do some tests. > > > > > > 1) First I would know if there is some primitives done?? I didn´t find > > > any. > > > > > > 2) Can I implement a semaphore in a simple way? Have you got an idea? > > > > > > 3) I´m trying to compile the semaphore module that comes with the > > > rtlinux distribution. > > > I´ve done make and ... > > > I´ve lot of errors, that´s imposible to put it all in the message. > > > Can anybody tell me if have experience in compiling/using this module?? > > > Do i have to do something undocumented? > > > I was trying to contact Jerry Epplin, the author of the module, but his > > > site on the web is not responding. > > > > > > I´m using RT kernel 2.0 and linux kernel 2.2.14. > > > I have compiled various of the examples that come with the distribution > > > and i didn´t have any problems. I thougth that compile this module was a > > > simple thing. > > > > > > Best regards for everybody. > > > > > > Gus > > > > > > I´m not going to say in all my messages "Sorry for my poor english". > > > It´s a waste of time.So everybody must know that I´m Uruguayan (You can > > > find Uruguay in South America, behind Argentina and Brasil), and i´m > > > doing my best effort so you can understand my e-mails. > > > Thanks everybody. > > > > > > -- [rtl] --- > > To unsubscribe: > > echo "unsubscribe rtl" | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] OR > > echo "unsubscribe rtl " | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --- > > For more information on Real-Time Linux see: > > http://www.rtlinux.org/rtlinux/ > > -- > - > Victor Yodaiken > FSMLabs: www.fsmlabs.com www.rtlinux.com > FSMLabs is a servicemark and a service of > VJY Associates L.L.C, New Mexico. -- [rtl] --- To unsubscribe: echo "unsubscribe rtl" | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] OR echo "unsubscribe rtl " | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- For more information on Real-Time Linux see: http://www.rtlinux.org/rtlinux/
[rtl] Log rtl_printf calls?
Hello, are the outputs made by rtl_printf written to a logfile somewhere? I cannot find them in the usual places but I would need them to do a post mortem analyze of my system after a crash... thanks! tobias -- [rtl] --- To unsubscribe: echo "unsubscribe rtl" | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] OR echo "unsubscribe rtl " | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- For more information on Real-Time Linux see: http://www.rtlinux.org/rtlinux/
Re: [rtl] RTAI and Semaphores timing (2) !
Hi, Karim got better than I could explain it myself. Take into account that also the global cli/sti stuff is mostly taken from ideas found in Linux irq.c However the big difference between scheduling on the same and on another CPU is due to the need of sending an InterProcessorInterrupt (IPI) to the other CPU to have it schedule the task that could not be scheduled on the CPU that made it ready, because other, higher or equal, priority could be scheduled on it. The IPI bus is not a kind of lightning, open drain two wires max 16 Mhz, and can take a few us on its own, just to send the IPI. The SMP scheduler is aimed at max flexibility, if you can statically bound your task to a CPU it is likely you can get better performances with the MUP scheduler. Ciao, Paolo. -- [rtl] --- To unsubscribe: echo "unsubscribe rtl" | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] OR echo "unsubscribe rtl " | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- For more information on Real-Time Linux see: http://www.rtlinux.org/rtlinux/