Re: [Rails] Re: Re: STI and nested object on subclass
Hi Daniel Thanks for helping :-) This is exactly how I was thinking it should work. But I just tried using set_table_name and I still got the same result, for example, using your code (which is exactly what I'd love to do), I get this: w = Worker.create(:name => "WorkerName") # ok p = Person.create(:name => "PersonName") # ok ac = AnotherClass.create # ok ac.worker = w # here i got the error! like: # ActiveRecord::StatementInvalid: Mysql::Error: Unknown column 'person.another_class_id' in 'where clause': SELECT * FROM `person` WHERE (`person`.another_class_id = 1) LIMIT 1 It still goes to the parent class to search for the relational id. "set_table_name" works for you in this particular case? could it be the activerecord version I use? My gems are: actionmailer (2.3.9) actionpack (2.3.9) activerecord (2.3.9) activeresource (2.3.9) activesupport (2.3.9) builder (2.1.2) capistrano (2.5.19) highline (1.6.1) i18n (0.4.1, 0.3.7) json (1.4.6) json_pure (1.4.6) multi_json (0.0.4) mysql (2.8.1) net-scp (1.0.3) net-sftp (2.0.5) net-ssh (2.0.23) net-ssh-gateway (1.0.1) pg (0.9.0) racc (1.4.6) rack (1.1.0) rails (2.3.9) rake (0.8.7) rspec (1.3.0) text-format (1.0.0) text-hyphen (1.0.0) tmail (1.2.7.1) tzinfo (0.3.23) will_paginate (2.3.14) And the trace when I get the error: from /usr/lib64/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activerecord-2.3.9/lib/active_record/connection_adapters/abstract_adapter.rb:227:in `log' from /usr/lib64/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activerecord-2.3.9/lib/active_record/connection_adapters/mysql_adapter.rb:324:in `execute' from /usr/lib64/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activerecord-2.3.9/lib/active_record/connection_adapters/mysql_adapter.rb:639:in `select' from /usr/lib64/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activerecord-2.3.9/lib/active_record/connection_adapters/abstract/database_statements.rb:7:in `select_all_without_query_cache' from /usr/lib64/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activerecord-2.3.9/lib/active_record/connection_adapters/abstract/query_cache.rb:62:in `select_all' from /usr/lib64/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activerecord-2.3.9/lib/active_record/base.rb:665:in `find_by_sql' from /usr/lib64/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activerecord-2.3.9/lib/active_record/base.rb:1582:in `find_every' from /usr/lib64/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activerecord-2.3.9/lib/active_record/base.rb:1539:in `find_initial' from /usr/lib64/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activerecord-2.3.9/lib/active_record/base.rb:617:in `find' from /usr/lib64/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activerecord-2.3.9/lib/active_record/associations/has_one_association.rb:81:in `find_target' from /usr/lib64/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activerecord-2.3.9/lib/active_record/associations/association_proxy.rb:236:in `load_target' from /usr/lib64/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activerecord-2.3.9/lib/active_record/associations/association_proxy.rb:113:in `reload' from /usr/lib64/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activerecord-2.3.9/lib/active_record/associations.rb:1256:in `worker' from (irb):2 Regards, Javi Ruiz On Mon, 2010-09-13 at 14:30 -0500, Daniel Gaytán wrote: > Hello Javier, > > I was just checking the set_table_name class method of ActiveRecord > and I think that could work for you: > > class AnotherClass < ActiveRecord::Base > has_one :worker > end > > class Person < ActiveRecord::Base > def something > self.name > end > end > > class Worker < Person > set_table_name "workers" > end > > w = Worker.create(:name => "WorkerName") > p = Person.create(:name => "PersonName") > ac = AnotherClass.create > > ac.worker = w > ac.save > > ac.worker.something # => "WorkerName" > > > I hope that would be helpful > > Daniel Gaytán > > 2010/9/13 Marnen Laibow-Koser > [Please quote when replying. Otherwise the discussion is > impossible to > follow.] > > Javier Ruiz wrote: > > Yep that's finally how I will have to do it... but this is > not what I > > wanted. A has_one relation means that I have to access > things like: > > > > Anotherclass.property > > Anotherclass.childclass.specific_property > > Anotherclass.childclass.parentclass.common_property > > > That makes sense from a relational point of view. If you > don't like it, > then use STI. > > > > > And more important... I need to manually manage related > objects (or > > create hooks os similar). I mean I need for example to do > something > > like: > > > > a = Anotherclass.new > > b = Childclass.new > > a.childclass = b > > > > ... and so on... > > > You'd need to do that regardless of whether your original idea > worked. > > > > > I was thinking "rails' magic" was really magic ;-) > > > I suppose it is, but it doesn't extend to spreading one class > across > multiple tables. > > If you were ambitiou
[Rails] Re: View and Controllers association
radhames brito wrote: > Post (singular with capital) is the model that's true, but here instead of Post.module, i.module is called. and to know it's class when i put i.class it said Post, and in app/models/post.rb no module function is there.. :( -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
[Rails] Re: View and Controllers association
Felix Schäfer wrote: > Am 13.09.2010 um 14:58 schrieb Awijeet Mr.: > >> if I write i.class it returns Post, so I thought module will be a >> method in post_controller.rb. But it's not > > If i is of the type Post, i.module will call the method module from the > Post object in app/models/post.rb, not from a PostsController object as > you seem to think it will. > > Felix I have checked the code in app/models/post.rb there are no module method, but at lot of space self.module function has been called, and a defined method is def set_module -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
[Rails] pdf.table
Hi,
i have a table inside Prawn file like
grandtot...@sql_query.size
total=[""],[""]
pdf.table total,
:width => 768,
:headers => ["Grand Total : #{grandtotal} "],
:header_color => 'e5e5e5',
:border_style => :underline_header
there are other data above them. what happens is, when the grandtotal
prints on the last line of a page,(in some cases only), they are
printing it twice ..like, on the last line on page 1 and first line of
page 2.
Is it any property of pdf.table to print it on the next line ALSO, if
there is not much space on the previous page?
please advice
~Jeff
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby
on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
[Rails] Roles that are User<>Project Based
Hello... Currently I'm using Devise & CanCan which allows me to create Users with Roles using a (Roles_Users) table. That's nice, but what I want is to Have Projects in my app and for each project for a user to possibly have a role like (Admin, Viewer, etc) What kind of Model would work for this? Models Users has_many: projects Projects ? Roles ? Users_Roles_Projects (user_id, project_id, role_id) What do you think? I'm a newbie and could use the understanding and thinking from you fine experienced folks. Thanks! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
Re: [Rails] req: Method executed in link_to
Reference on link_to here:
http://api.rubyonrails.org/classes/ActionView/Helpers/UrlHelper.html#method-i-link_to
:method is used for specifying HTTP method such as POST, GET, etc.
The parameter that you are passing (method_to_run) is not a valid value for
:method.
I suggest you define a controller and invoke one of its methods through the
link.
Example:
link_to "Feature", :controller => "mycontroller", :action => "method_to_run"
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 9:29 AM, Jason N wrote:
> Group,
>
> This might very well be Rails 102 stuff, but it's doing my little head
> in.
>
> Simple request - I want to create a link within my View to fire off a
> system call to run an external program.
>
> In this example it's pretty easy - run a Windows system command that
> simply starts something (it's not what I'm trying to achieve but it's
> an easy debug method):
>
> def method_to_run
>system('start dir > test.txt')
> end
>
> How the *heck* do I link to this method within my View?
>
> A simple <%= link_to feature, :method => method_to_run %> results in
> the following error:
>
>
> undefined local variable or method `method_to_run' for #<# 0x46c3248>:0x46c1808>
>
>
>
> Jason
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
> To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> .
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
>
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby
on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
Re: [Rails] Re: Re: Re: Re: Authlogic Rails 3
Quoting Paul Mr : > Paul Mr wrote: > > Rick R wrote: > >> On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 10:14 PM, Paul Mr wrote: > > > > thats what Im betting on. > > Pretty much.. that one creates all the models/scaffolds/controllers the > usual way...not even caring about Authlogic::Session::Base > > though I assume possibly, manually editing the one item to reflect that > instead of activerecord (or whatever it was). > -- IIRC, AuthLogic works w/ Rails 3, but doesn't have the new generator structure. Generate it in Rail 2.x and copy the files over. Jeffrey -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
[Rails] req: Method executed in link_to
Group,
This might very well be Rails 102 stuff, but it's doing my little head
in.
Simple request - I want to create a link within my View to fire off a
system call to run an external program.
In this example it's pretty easy - run a Windows system command that
simply starts something (it's not what I'm trying to achieve but it's
an easy debug method):
def method_to_run
system('start dir > test.txt')
end
How the *heck* do I link to this method within my View?
A simple <%= link_to feature, :method => method_to_run %> results in
the following error:
undefined local variable or method `method_to_run' for #<#:0x46c1808>
Jason
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby
on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
[Rails] Re: Deprecation warning with form_tag
Thanks! On Sep 13, 7:48 pm, radhames brito wrote: > watch this > > http://railscasts.com/episodes/208-erb-blocks-in-rails-3 > > > > On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 4:09 PM, rodrigo3n wrote: > > Thanks for the reply but this didn't work. Instead, I wrote this: > > > <%= form_tag '/sessions' do -%> > > <%= image_submit_tag 'login.png', :class => 'login' %> > > <% end -%> > > > And it works and the deprecation method is gone. > > > Thanks! > > > On Sep 13, 3:53 pm, Greg Donald wrote: > > > On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 1:47 PM, rodrigo3n wrote: > > > > Hello everyone, I am using Rails 3 and receiving an deprecation > > > > warning when running the specs of my app. The warning: > > > > > ..*F.DEPRECATION WARNING: <% %> style block helpers are > > > > deprecated. Please use <%= %>. (called from > > > > <% form_tag 'sessions' do %> > > > > <%= form_tag do %> > > > > <% end %> > > > > -- > > > Greg Donald > > > destiney.com | gregdonald.com > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. > > To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > e...@googlegroups.com> > > . > > For more options, visit this group at > >http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
[Rails] Re: Problems with the money gem
Jon Seidel wrote: > I've done all that; Done all what? You failed to quote what you were referring to. > but since this is an ActiveRecord object, I was > hoping there was a way to do this in one spot, There is. Use the constructor as I already suggested. Do you not know how to do this? > through a Rails hook, > rather than having to remember to code this each time. Right. That's what constructors do. > > The way I encapsulated all this was to create an initialize_to_zeros > method and now I call that each time after doing a model.new Unnecessary. Just put that in the constructor. > > ...jon -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
[Rails] Re: Paperclip - helppppp
If you're getting the original image then you have ImageMagic setup
correctly.
On Windows there is a bug in the current paperclip gem where the
ImageMagick arguments are surrounded by single quotes, which windows
doesn't like.
Take a look at the console output to see the errors, try the commands
that paperclip log outputs. If you have the single quote problem then
update the paperclip.rb file:
def quote_command_options(*options)
options.map do |option|
option.split("'").map{|m| "#{m}" }.join("\\'") #removed single
quotes around #{m}
end
Also note that in current version of ImageMagic the size in the styles
hash no longer takes a final character, only the dimensions. So if you
have :medium =>'300x300>', it now has to be just '300x300'
Hope this helps
On Sep 13, 8:44 pm, daze wrote:
> I keep seeing this error when I try to upload an image:
> --
> 2 errors prohibited this panel from being saved
>
> There were problems with the following fields:
>
> Image C:/Users/Family/AppData/Local/Temp/stream,10032,0.png is not
> recognized by the 'identify' command.
> Image C:/Users/Family/AppData/Local/Temp/stream,10032,0.png is not
> recognized by the 'identify' command.
> --
>
> If I have my model Panel (which needs an image attachment) look like
> this, with the 'whiny' option set to false...
>
> class Panel < ActiveRecord::Base
> belongs_to :section
> acts_as_list
>
> has_attached_file :image, :styles => { :medium => "300x300>",:thumb
> => "100x100>" }, :whiny => false
>
> validates_attachment_content_type :image, :content_type=>['image/
> jpeg', 'image/jpg', 'image/png', 'image/gif'],
> :message => 'can only be jpeg, jpg, png, or gif',
> :unless => Proc.new { |photo| photo[:image].nil? }
>
> end
>
> then I can upload an image. BUT I find that the following doesn't
> work:
>
> <%= image_tag panel.image.url(:medium) %>
> <%= image_tag panel.image.url(:thumb) %>
>
> ...while the regular, <%= image_tag panel.image.url %> works fine. I
> have a feeling that the reason these two don't work is somehow tied to
> my first problem, when :whiny was not set to false. Maybe the first
> error might somehow be responsible for the directory not getting made
> for the :medium and :thumb...each images in the 'systems/images'
> directory only has 'original' - no 'thumb' or 'medium.'
> But I don't know! All I know is that the directory for thumb and
> medium don't get made, so those 2 lines of code won't work!
>
> Please helppp...this has been very frustrating
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby
on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
Re: [Rails] Re: Installation and versioning issues
go with RVM is clean and easy -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
Re: [Rails] Re: Deprecation warning with form_tag
watch this http://railscasts.com/episodes/208-erb-blocks-in-rails-3 On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 4:09 PM, rodrigo3n wrote: > Thanks for the reply but this didn't work. Instead, I wrote this: > > <%= form_tag '/sessions' do -%> > <%= image_submit_tag 'login.png', :class => 'login' %> > <% end -%> > > And it works and the deprecation method is gone. > > Thanks! > > On Sep 13, 3:53 pm, Greg Donald wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 1:47 PM, rodrigo3n wrote: > > > Hello everyone, I am using Rails 3 and receiving an deprecation > > > warning when running the specs of my app. The warning: > > > > > ..*F.DEPRECATION WARNING: <% %> style block helpers are > > > deprecated. Please use <%= %>. (called from > > > <% form_tag 'sessions' do %> > > > > <%= form_tag do %> > > > > <% end %> > > > > -- > > Greg Donald > > destiney.com | gregdonald.com > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. > To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
Re: [Rails] Indexing feature
you can trigger a rake task On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 1:05 PM, Awijeet Mr. wrote: > How can I enable my admin to index the tables, just after he/she makes > change into database. > -- > Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. > To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
[Rails] Paperclip - helppppp
I keep seeing this error when I try to upload an image:
--
2 errors prohibited this panel from being saved
There were problems with the following fields:
Image C:/Users/Family/AppData/Local/Temp/stream,10032,0.png is not
recognized by the 'identify' command.
Image C:/Users/Family/AppData/Local/Temp/stream,10032,0.png is not
recognized by the 'identify' command.
--
If I have my model Panel (which needs an image attachment) look like
this, with the 'whiny' option set to false...
class Panel < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :section
acts_as_list
has_attached_file :image, :styles => { :medium => "300x300>",:thumb
=> "100x100>" }, :whiny => false
validates_attachment_content_type :image, :content_type=>['image/
jpeg', 'image/jpg', 'image/png', 'image/gif'],
:message => 'can only be jpeg, jpg, png, or gif',
:unless => Proc.new { |photo| photo[:image].nil? }
end
then I can upload an image. BUT I find that the following doesn't
work:
<%= image_tag panel.image.url(:medium) %>
<%= image_tag panel.image.url(:thumb) %>
...while the regular, <%= image_tag panel.image.url %> works fine. I
have a feeling that the reason these two don't work is somehow tied to
my first problem, when :whiny was not set to false. Maybe the first
error might somehow be responsible for the directory not getting made
for the :medium and :thumb...each images in the 'systems/images'
directory only has 'original' - no 'thumb' or 'medium.'
But I don't know! All I know is that the directory for thumb and
medium don't get made, so those 2 lines of code won't work!
Please helppp...this has been very frustrating
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby
on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
[Rails] Re: Problems with the money gem
I've done all that; but since this is an ActiveRecord object, I was hoping there was a way to do this in one spot, through a Rails hook, rather than having to remember to code this each time. The way I encapsulated all this was to create an initialize_to_zeros method and now I call that each time after doing a model.new ...jon On Sep 13, 8:56 am, Marnen Laibow-Koser wrote: > Please quote when replying, otherwise the discussion becomes impossible > to follow. > > Jon Seidel wrote: > > I do have default values specified, but these only take effect when > > writing to the database, now when the new object is created. > > Yes, of course. If you need them before that, put them in the > constructor. > > (In other words: use Ruby's object model to your advantage! :) ) > > Best, > -- > Marnen Laibow-Koserhttp://www.marnen.org > mar...@marnen.org > -- > Posted viahttp://www.ruby-forum.com/. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
[Rails] Re: Installation and versioning issues
Nick Dr wrote: > Ok, I'm new to Rails, and I was hoping to get some advice on how to > get started. > > I'm coming from a .NET background, and from what I've seen of Rails, > it looks perfect for a little web idea I had. So I got a book from the > library and sat down to install it on my Ubuntu box. Immediately I hit > versioning issues. > > - I installed ruby with apt-get and it gave me 1.8.7. I'm cool with > this as I'm new to Ruby as well, and am ignorant to the differences > between versions. > > - Installed rubygems and I got 1.3.5. Again, I don't know the > difference I highly recommend RVM (Ruby EnVironment Manager). RVM is really simple to install and it makes installing Ruby and RubyGems drop-dead simple. You get to have as many different rubies and gemsets as you want. http://rvm.beginrescueend.com/ > - I ran 'sudo gem install rails', and it blew up on me, saying that I > needed rubygems 1.3.6 or higher. When I do a gem list, it shows > rails(3.0.0), which I hear just came out a week or two ago. Again, I > don't know the difference so that's why I'm here. The book I got from > the library is older(2007) and using Rails 1.2.3. Again RVM solves this problem beautifully. > So my question is: what's the easiest way to get this setup? Is there > a major difference between the versions of Rails, and if so, what is > it? I just need a plain vanilla setup so I can learn about MVC and > such. This web app is pretty basic, I was just wanting some basic > ActiveRecord, a few Erb templates and a few dozen lines of ruby > business logic. 1. Install RVM http://rvm.beginrescueend.com/rvm/install/ 2. rvm install ruby-1.9.2 3. gem install rails 4. rails new my_project 5. Add what you need to Gemfile in your Rails project (like sqlite3-ruby, etc.) 6. bundle install 7. Read up on all the other cool stuff RVM gives you. -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
Re: [Rails] Installation and versioning issues
> library and sat down to install it on my Ubuntu box. Immediately I hit > versioning issues. > > - I installed ruby with apt-get and it gave me 1.8.7. I'm cool with > this as I'm new to Ruby as well, and am ignorant to the differences > between versions. 1.8.7 is fine. > - Installed rubygems and I got 1.3.5. Again, I don't know the > difference Ubuntu (and Debian) have some issues with rubygems... try installing it directly... http://rubygems.org/ > - I ran 'sudo gem install rails', and it blew up on me, saying that I > needed rubygems 1.3.6 or higher. When I do a gem list, it shows > rails(3.0.0), which I hear just came out a week or two ago. Again, I > don't know the difference so that's why I'm here. The book I got from > the library is older(2007) and using Rails 1.2.3. Take the book back to the library. Things have changed enough that that book is just going to mess you up. > So my question is: what's the easiest way to get this setup? http://guides.rubyonrails.org/ > Is there a major difference between the versions of Rails, and if so, what is > it? Yes. Anything prior to 2.3.9 is old. Your choice right now is whether to go with 2.3.9 or 3.0.0. If you're just starting out on a small project, I'd probably go with 3.0.0 as that's where the future is going and enough has changed that you might as well start there. The only drawback is I don't think any books are out yet for 3.0, but there should be plenty of online articles... > Can someone point me in the right direction? I'd start with these two sites... http://guides.rubyonrails.org/ http://railscasts.com/ (look for 3.0 specific stuff) -philip -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
[Rails] Installation and versioning issues
Ok, I'm new to Rails, and I was hoping to get some advice on how to get started. I'm coming from a .NET background, and from what I've seen of Rails, it looks perfect for a little web idea I had. So I got a book from the library and sat down to install it on my Ubuntu box. Immediately I hit versioning issues. - I installed ruby with apt-get and it gave me 1.8.7. I'm cool with this as I'm new to Ruby as well, and am ignorant to the differences between versions. - Installed rubygems and I got 1.3.5. Again, I don't know the difference - I ran 'sudo gem install rails', and it blew up on me, saying that I needed rubygems 1.3.6 or higher. When I do a gem list, it shows rails(3.0.0), which I hear just came out a week or two ago. Again, I don't know the difference so that's why I'm here. The book I got from the library is older(2007) and using Rails 1.2.3. So my question is: what's the easiest way to get this setup? Is there a major difference between the versions of Rails, and if so, what is it? I just need a plain vanilla setup so I can learn about MVC and such. This web app is pretty basic, I was just wanting some basic ActiveRecord, a few Erb templates and a few dozen lines of ruby business logic. Can someone point me in the right direction? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
[Rails] Routing question
Hello
Given the following rules
MyApp::Application.routes.draw do |map|
resources :accounts do
resources :comments
end
match '*path' => redirect("/accounts/%{path}")
end
Can we get ActionDispatch to, rather than redirect, re-run the routes?
This would come in handy for using account handles, as in
http://mymusicwebsite.com/metallica
http://mymusicwebsite.com/metallica/comments
http://mymusicwebsite.com/metallica/comments/2
rather than
http://mymusicwebsite.com/accounts/metallica
http://mymusicwebsite.com/accounts/metallica/comments
http://mymusicwebsite.com/accounts/metallica/comments/2
Any help appreciated.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby
on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
[Rails] Re: Rails 3: finding a record by name in multilingual app
On Monday 13 September 2010, Heinz Strunk wrote:
> > This is completely fishy. Rails is not supposed to translate
> > strings behind your back. Are you any extensions (gems, plugins)
> > that may try to be helpful in the wrong way?
>
> Well, I used globalize2 when I used Rails 2.3.8 and everything worked
> perfectly fine but no new gems or anything eversince. Must be
> globalize3 or something...
>
> > Out of the box, #find_by_name behaves exactly the same as
> > #find_by_foobar, which is to say, it executes an SQL statement
> > containing a comparison of column "name" with the string you
> > provide. It looks like a call to I18n.translate has been slipped
> > in somewhere.
> >
> > Do you get the same result for Page.where(:name =>
> > 'Welcome').first?
>
> where doesn't work because it's in a different table:
> Page.where(:name => 'Willkommen')
> ActiveRecord::StatementInvalid: Mysql::BadFieldError: Unknown column
> 'pages.name' in 'where clause': SELECT `pages`.* FROM `pages` WHERE
> (`pages`.`name` = 'Willkommen')
Well, after looking at the globalize3 code (specifically
lib/globalize/active_record/class_methods.rb), I see *why* you get the
result you do. The code is actually quite ingenious (or flabberghastly,
depending on how you look at it).
Anyway, I think(!) you get what you want, if you simply write
with_locale(:en) {
Page.find_by_name('Welcome')
}
For more details, have a look at the tests that come with globalize3.
Michael
--
Michael Schuerig
mailto:mich...@schuerig.de
http://www.schuerig.de/michael/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby
on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
Re: [Rails] what I've missed in routes.rb?
no, that his is a way to build the route resources :something, :except => :destroy do delete :destroy, :on => :collection, :as => :destroy end On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 4:03 PM, Greg Donald wrote: > On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 3:00 PM, radhames brito wrote: > > > > yes i agree > > That you don't know how to trim a post? > > > -- > Greg Donald > destiney.com | gregdonald.com > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. > To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
[Rails] Re: Deprecation warning with form_tag
Thanks for the reply but this didn't work. Instead, I wrote this: <%= form_tag '/sessions' do -%> <%= image_submit_tag 'login.png', :class => 'login' %> <% end -%> And it works and the deprecation method is gone. Thanks! On Sep 13, 3:53 pm, Greg Donald wrote: > On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 1:47 PM, rodrigo3n wrote: > > Hello everyone, I am using Rails 3 and receiving an deprecation > > warning when running the specs of my app. The warning: > > > ..*F.DEPRECATION WARNING: <% %> style block helpers are > > deprecated. Please use <%= %>. (called from > > <% form_tag 'sessions' do %> > > <%= form_tag do %> > > <% end %> > > -- > Greg Donald > destiney.com | gregdonald.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
Re: [Rails] Re: Re: formtastic options
sorry i meant to say you can put normal tags in it i have and is works. On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 4:07 PM, radhames brito wrote: > you can out nor mas tags in it i have and is works. > > this in the view > > check_box_tag :thing > > > in the controller > > > item.thing = params[:thing] > > > On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 3:59 PM, Jamal Soueidan wrote: > >> radhames brito wrote: >> > sorry i thought you wanted to add some html options , but now that i >> > read >> > again i see you want to add more html to the output. >> >> >> Nobody knows how to create custom input field with formtastic. >> >> I thought this plugin was known around. >> -- >> Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. >> To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com >> . >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en. >> >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
Re: [Rails] Re: Re: formtastic options
you can out nor mas tags in it i have and is works. this in the view check_box_tag :thing in the controller item.thing = params[:thing] On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 3:59 PM, Jamal Soueidan wrote: > radhames brito wrote: > > sorry i thought you wanted to add some html options , but now that i > > read > > again i see you want to add more html to the output. > > > Nobody knows how to create custom input field with formtastic. > > I thought this plugin was known around. > -- > Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. > To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
[Rails] Re: Re: Re: after_create not being called in seeds.rb?
Ah, I see. Yeah, after_create seems better after all. -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
[Rails] Re: Re: Re: Rails 3: finding a record by name in multilingual app
Nope not yet but you said you'll try to help and appreciate it. -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
Re: [Rails] what I've missed in routes.rb?
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 3:00 PM, radhames brito wrote: > > yes i agree That you don't know how to trim a post? -- Greg Donald destiney.com | gregdonald.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
Re: [Rails] what I've missed in routes.rb?
yes i agree
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 3:57 PM, Daniel Gaytán wrote:
> Then it may be set as resource instead of resources
>
> or maybe
>
> resources :something, :except => :destroy do
> delete :destroy, :on => :collection, :as => :destroy
> end
>
> Daniel Gaytán
>
>
> 2010/9/13 radhames brito
>
>> @Daniel Gaytán
>> but the default destroy route will still wait for an id, and he doesnt
>> needs if since the user is in the session
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 3:38 PM, Daniel Gaytán <
>> daniel.gaytan.n...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I think you are missing the rails javascript file, which is who actually
>>> handles the special links.
>>>
>>> When you click on the link, the method is GET, so you don't hace any
>>> toute related to the action destroy in that method.
>>>
>>> Daniel Gaytán
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> 2010/9/13 radhames brito
>>>
i think you should,
resources user, :except => :destroy
then
match you path here
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 11:55 AM, Mauro wrote:
> On 13 September 2010 16:02, radhames brito wrote:
> > the default destroy route is
> > /controller/id , :method=> delete
> > {:action=>"destroy", :controller=>"sessions", :id=>"name.surname"}
> >
> > but your destroy action does not need an id really,
>
> So I've to change the default destroy route for sessions resource?
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
> To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com
> .
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> .
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
>
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
>>>
>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>>> "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
>>> To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>> rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
>>> .
>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
>>>
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com.
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
>> .
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
>>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
> To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> .
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby
on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
[Rails] Re: Re: formtastic options
radhames brito wrote: > sorry i thought you wanted to add some html options , but now that i > read > again i see you want to add more html to the output. Nobody knows how to create custom input field with formtastic. I thought this plugin was known around. -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
Re: [Rails] what I've missed in routes.rb?
Then it may be set as resource instead of resources
or maybe
resources :something, :except => :destroy do
delete :destroy, :on => :collection, :as => :destroy
end
Daniel Gaytán
2010/9/13 radhames brito
> @Daniel Gaytán
> but the default destroy route will still wait for an id, and he doesnt
> needs if since the user is in the session
>
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 3:38 PM, Daniel Gaytán <
> daniel.gaytan.n...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I think you are missing the rails javascript file, which is who actually
>> handles the special links.
>>
>> When you click on the link, the method is GET, so you don't hace any toute
>> related to the action destroy in that method.
>>
>> Daniel Gaytán
>>
>>
>>
>> 2010/9/13 radhames brito
>>
>>> i think you should,
>>>
>>> resources user, :except => :destroy
>>> then
>>> match you path here
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 11:55 AM, Mauro wrote:
>>>
On 13 September 2010 16:02, radhames brito wrote:
> the default destroy route is
> /controller/id , :method=> delete
> {:action=>"destroy", :controller=>"sessions", :id=>"name.surname"}
>
> but your destroy action does not need an id really,
So I've to change the default destroy route for sessions resource?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>>> "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
>>> To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>> rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
>>> .
>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
>>>
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com.
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
>> .
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
>>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
> To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> .
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby
on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
Re: [Rails] Re: Re: after_create not being called in seeds.rb?
sorry now i see it makes no sense, i understood that this is all in your seed.rb and both functions will only be used once and i was suggesting this 100.times do user = User.new user.username = Faker::Name.first_name user.email = user.username+"@example.com" user.save! write_comments(user) <=== this could be in your controller create action end protected def write_comments(user) comment = Comment.new comment.text = "some text" comment.user = user comment.save! end After paying more attention to your comment i notice you want the write_comments to be in your model in production, and my suggestion made no sense. On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 3:47 PM, Heinz Strunk wrote: > > put the function in the loop after the user.save ? > What exactly do you mean by put it in the loop after .save? > -- > Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. > To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
[Rails] Re: Re: after_create not being called in seeds.rb?
> put the function in the loop after the user.save ? What exactly do you mean by put it in the loop after .save? -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
Re: [Rails] Re: Re: Rails 3: finding a record by name in multilingual app
so is it working? On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 3:43 PM, Heinz Strunk wrote: > > yes i understand what you say now, but it seems that is a problem with > > the > > gem. I dont know globalize2 ill read on it and try to help. > > Thanks in advance I do appreciate but I'm using globalize3 and not 2 > anymore :) > -- > Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. > To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
[Rails] Re: Re: Rails 3: finding a record by name in multilingual app
> yes i understand what you say now, but it seems that is a problem with > the > gem. I dont know globalize2 ill read on it and try to help. Thanks in advance I do appreciate but I'm using globalize3 and not 2 anymore :) -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
[Rails] ri-cal mysql table
Which columns should a ri-cal calendar table in mysql have? -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
Re: [Rails] what I've missed in routes.rb?
@Daniel Gaytán
but the default destroy route will still wait for an id, and he doesnt needs
if since the user is in the session
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 3:38 PM, Daniel Gaytán wrote:
> I think you are missing the rails javascript file, which is who actually
> handles the special links.
>
> When you click on the link, the method is GET, so you don't hace any toute
> related to the action destroy in that method.
>
> Daniel Gaytán
>
>
>
> 2010/9/13 radhames brito
>
>> i think you should,
>>
>> resources user, :except => :destroy
>> then
>> match you path here
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 11:55 AM, Mauro wrote:
>>
>>> On 13 September 2010 16:02, radhames brito wrote:
>>> > the default destroy route is
>>> > /controller/id , :method=> delete
>>> > {:action=>"destroy", :controller=>"sessions", :id=>"name.surname"}
>>> >
>>> > but your destroy action does not need an id really,
>>>
>>> So I've to change the default destroy route for sessions resource?
>>>
>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>>> "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
>>> To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>> rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
>>> .
>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
>>>
>>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com.
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
>> .
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
>>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
> To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> .
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby
on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
Re: [Rails] Re: Rails Commenting, Plugins?
On 13 September 2010 20:36, radhames brito wrote: > By instant update i mean, displaying the comment without the need for > approval I agree - that's a crazy thing to do! (AJAX or not ;-) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
Re: [Rails] what I've missed in routes.rb?
I think you are missing the rails javascript file, which is who actually
handles the special links.
When you click on the link, the method is GET, so you don't hace any toute
related to the action destroy in that method.
Daniel Gaytán
2010/9/13 radhames brito
> i think you should,
>
> resources user, :except => :destroy
> then
> match you path here
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 11:55 AM, Mauro wrote:
>
>> On 13 September 2010 16:02, radhames brito wrote:
>> > the default destroy route is
>> > /controller/id , :method=> delete
>> > {:action=>"destroy", :controller=>"sessions", :id=>"name.surname"}
>> >
>> > but your destroy action does not need an id really,
>>
>> So I've to change the default destroy route for sessions resource?
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com.
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
>> .
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
>>
>>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
> To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> .
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby
on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
Re: [Rails] Re: Rails Commenting, Plugins?
By instant update i mean, displaying the comment without the need for approval On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 3:35 PM, radhames brito wrote: > yes , think there is a language barrier and some of my ideas dont get > through the way i want them to. > > I for example use ajax to update comments that i publish/approve, but not > for instant update. > > > On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 3:27 PM, Michael Pavling wrote: > >> On 13 September 2010 20:14, radhames brito wrote: >> > my point was that is you have a °publishing/approval" page there is no >> use >> > for ajax. >> > >> >> Unless the comment form is a small component of the page, and you >> don't want to reload the whole page when the user makes a comment, and >> you do want to pop up a nice transitional effect and notification when >> they do you know, the stuff AJAX makes all pretty... >> >> Your original reply implied that there was something inherently >> insecure about using AJAX methods - this is *not* the case. They're as >> secure or insecure as you make them. >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. >> To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com >> . >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en. >> >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
Re: [Rails] Re: Rails Commenting, Plugins?
yes , think there is a language barrier and some of my ideas dont get through the way i want them to. I for example use ajax to update comments that i publish/approve, but not for instant update. On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 3:27 PM, Michael Pavling wrote: > On 13 September 2010 20:14, radhames brito wrote: > > my point was that is you have a °publishing/approval" page there is no > use > > for ajax. > > > > Unless the comment form is a small component of the page, and you > don't want to reload the whole page when the user makes a comment, and > you do want to pop up a nice transitional effect and notification when > they do you know, the stuff AJAX makes all pretty... > > Your original reply implied that there was something inherently > insecure about using AJAX methods - this is *not* the case. They're as > secure or insecure as you make them. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. > To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
Re: [Rails] Re: after_create not being called in seeds.rb?
jojo, now i see what you are doing, is just that i didnt saw the after create the first time, you are using the self reserved word indeed to refer to the created user in the after create, have you tried that before? why not put the function in the loop after the user.save ? i imagine that that it fail quietly? On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 12:03 PM, Heinz Strunk wrote: > @brito: self always worked cause it's the instance of the current object > which I wanna use so that should be fine. > > @Marnen: Actually they're not really users but NPCs which I need for > various things and I need a lot of them to populate the world. > > Therefore it's not for test but to populate and I don't think factories > are good for so many objects, right? > -- > Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. > To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
Re: [Rails] Re: Re: STI and nested object on subclass
Hello Javier, I was just checking the set_table_name class method of ActiveRecord and I think that could work for you: class AnotherClass < ActiveRecord::Base has_one :worker end class Person < ActiveRecord::Base def something self.name end end class Worker < Person set_table_name "workers" end w = Worker.create(:name => "WorkerName") p = Person.create(:name => "PersonName") ac = AnotherClass.create ac.worker = w ac.save ac.worker.something # => "WorkerName" I hope that would be helpful Daniel Gaytán 2010/9/13 Marnen Laibow-Koser > [Please quote when replying. Otherwise the discussion is impossible to > follow.] > > Javier Ruiz wrote: > > Yep that's finally how I will have to do it... but this is not what I > > wanted. A has_one relation means that I have to access things like: > > > > Anotherclass.property > > Anotherclass.childclass.specific_property > > Anotherclass.childclass.parentclass.common_property > > That makes sense from a relational point of view. If you don't like it, > then use STI. > > > > > And more important... I need to manually manage related objects (or > > create hooks os similar). I mean I need for example to do something > > like: > > > > a = Anotherclass.new > > b = Childclass.new > > a.childclass = b > > > > ... and so on... > > You'd need to do that regardless of whether your original idea worked. > > > > > I was thinking "rails' magic" was really magic ;-) > > I suppose it is, but it doesn't extend to spreading one class across > multiple tables. > > If you were ambitious, you probably *could* extend ActiveRecord to do > that, but I'm not sure it's a good idea -- it's trying to impose too > much of an OO approach on a relational DB. Alternatively, you could try > an OODB like GemStone/MagLev. > > Best, > -- > Marnen Laibow-Koser > http://www.marnen.org > mar...@marnen.org > > -- > Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. > To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
Re: [Rails] Re: Rails Commenting, Plugins?
On 13 September 2010 20:14, radhames brito wrote: > my point was that is you have a °publishing/approval" page there is no use > for ajax. > Unless the comment form is a small component of the page, and you don't want to reload the whole page when the user makes a comment, and you do want to pop up a nice transitional effect and notification when they do you know, the stuff AJAX makes all pretty... Your original reply implied that there was something inherently insecure about using AJAX methods - this is *not* the case. They're as secure or insecure as you make them. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
Re: [Rails] Re: Rails 3: finding a record by name in multilingual app
sorry for not answering busy.
yes i understand what you say now, but it seems that is a problem with the
gem. I dont know globalize2 ill read on it and try to help.
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 2:40 PM, Heinz Strunk wrote:
> > This is completely fishy. Rails is not supposed to translate strings
> > behind your back. Are you any extensions (gems, plugins) that may try to
> > be helpful in the wrong way?
> Well, I used globalize2 when I used Rails 2.3.8 and everything worked
> perfectly fine but no new gems or anything eversince. Must be globalize3
> or something...
> >
> > Out of the box, #find_by_name behaves exactly the same as
> > #find_by_foobar, which is to say, it executes an SQL statement
> > containing a comparison of column "name" with the string you provide. It
> > looks like a call to I18n.translate has been slipped in somewhere.
> >
> > Do you get the same result for Page.where(:name => 'Welcome').first?
> where doesn't work because it's in a different table:
> Page.where(:name => 'Willkommen')
> ActiveRecord::StatementInvalid: Mysql::BadFieldError: Unknown column
> 'pages.name' in 'where clause': SELECT `pages`.* FROM `pages` WHERE
> (`pages`.`name` = 'Willkommen')
> >
> > In order to find the real cause, your best bet is to use the debugger
> > and step into the misbehaving statement.
> I guess I have no other choice...
>
> Just to make my problem a bit more clear:
> irb(main):030:0> I18n.locale = :de
> => :de
> irb(main):031:0> Page.find_by_name("Welcome")
> => []
> irb(main):032:0> Page.find_by_name("Willkommen")
> => [# 12:55:41", updated_at: "2010-09-12 12:55:41">]
> irb(main):033:0> I18n.locale = :en
> => :en
> irb(main):034:0> Page.find_by_name("Welcome")
> => [# 12:55:41", updated_at: "2010-09-12 12:55:41">]
> irb(main):035:0> Page.find_by_name("Willkommen")
> => []
>
> Before I upgraded to Rails 3 all four queries returned the same result.
> --
> Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
> To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> .
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
>
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby
on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
[Rails] Problem with attr_accessor
I pass a value from controller to model with attr_accessor. before_save
works fine but not after_find. What could be wrong?
This is what I use in index
@test = Test.find(:all)
@test.each {|a| a.key = cookies[:thekey]}
and this in create, show, edit:
@test.key = cookies[:thekey]
This is my model:
attr_accessor :key
after_find :decrypt_data
define_method(:after_find) { }
before_save :crypt_data
private
def crypt_data
self.name = Crypto.encrypt(self.name,key)
end
def decrypt_data
self.name = Crypto.decrypt(self.name,key)
end
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby
on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
Re: [Rails] what I've missed in routes.rb?
i think you should,
resources user, :except => :destroy
then
match you path here
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 11:55 AM, Mauro wrote:
> On 13 September 2010 16:02, radhames brito wrote:
> > the default destroy route is
> > /controller/id , :method=> delete
> > {:action=>"destroy", :controller=>"sessions", :id=>"name.surname"}
> >
> > but your destroy action does not need an id really,
>
> So I've to change the default destroy route for sessions resource?
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
> To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> .
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
>
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby
on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
Re: [Rails] Re: Rails Commenting, Plugins?
my point was that is you have a °publishing/approval" page there is no use for ajax. On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 11:46 AM, Michael Pavling wrote: > On 13 September 2010 13:36, radhames brito wrote: > > "What does using AJAX or not have to do with whether or not you use a > > CAPTCHA process?" > > > > because some bots will bypass the captcha, and he will need a publishing > > page where he can delete those spams that get through because captcha > alone > > is not enough so at the end captcha is only an aid to stop most of the > spam > > but not all. > > Any bots that can bypass an AJAX captcha could bypass the same captcha > on a non-AJAX submission. > And AJAX or not, the choice is up to you whether to have a > "publishing/approval" page. > > Again - There's nothing special about AJAX that makes any > implementation of a "commentable" feature inherently less secure. It's > *exactly* the same as a normal form submission/process procedure, just > performed by Javascript and in the background to the user. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. > To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
[Rails] Re: after_create not being called in seeds.rb?
For some stupid reason it's working now. My guess is a Windows reboot did the magic ;) It is indeed much nicher! Thanks everybody! -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
Re: [Rails] Deprecation warning with form_tag
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 1:47 PM, rodrigo3n wrote: > Hello everyone, I am using Rails 3 and receiving an deprecation > warning when running the specs of my app. The warning: > > > ..*F.DEPRECATION WARNING: <% %> style block helpers are > deprecated. Please use <%= %>. (called from > <% form_tag 'sessions' do %> <%= form_tag do %> <% end %> -- Greg Donald destiney.com | gregdonald.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
[Rails] Deprecation warning with form_tag
Hello everyone, I am using Rails 3 and receiving an deprecation warning when running the specs of my app. The warning: ..*F.DEPRECATION WARNING: <% %> style block helpers are deprecated. Please use <%= %>. (called from _app_views_sessions_new_html_erb___526016660_85924870_644960759 at / home/orygens/code/narciso/app/views/sessions/new.html.erb:9) .F.F..*. This message is about the following code: <% form_tag 'sessions' do %> <%= image_submit_tag 'login.png', :class => 'login' %> <% end %> This logs in the user who remains at the same path after the login. Do you know how to correct the code so I can ensure this code won't break my app in the future? Thanks! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
Re: [Rails] Re: How to disable a select?
Try
f.select :attr, @choices, {:include_blank => true}, { :disabled =>
!...@condition }
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 11:44 PM, Fritz Trapper wrote:
> Marnen Laibow-Koser wrote:
> > Are you sure !...@condition is true when you expect it to be?
>
> Yes, I checked it in the debugger.
> --
> Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
> To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> .
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
>
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby
on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
[Rails] Re: Rails 3: finding a record by name in multilingual app
> This is completely fishy. Rails is not supposed to translate strings
> behind your back. Are you any extensions (gems, plugins) that may try to
> be helpful in the wrong way?
Well, I used globalize2 when I used Rails 2.3.8 and everything worked
perfectly fine but no new gems or anything eversince. Must be globalize3
or something...
>
> Out of the box, #find_by_name behaves exactly the same as
> #find_by_foobar, which is to say, it executes an SQL statement
> containing a comparison of column "name" with the string you provide. It
> looks like a call to I18n.translate has been slipped in somewhere.
>
> Do you get the same result for Page.where(:name => 'Welcome').first?
where doesn't work because it's in a different table:
Page.where(:name => 'Willkommen')
ActiveRecord::StatementInvalid: Mysql::BadFieldError: Unknown column
'pages.name' in 'where clause': SELECT `pages`.* FROM `pages` WHERE
(`pages`.`name` = 'Willkommen')
>
> In order to find the real cause, your best bet is to use the debugger
> and step into the misbehaving statement.
I guess I have no other choice...
Just to make my problem a bit more clear:
irb(main):030:0> I18n.locale = :de
=> :de
irb(main):031:0> Page.find_by_name("Welcome")
=> []
irb(main):032:0> Page.find_by_name("Willkommen")
=> [#]
irb(main):033:0> I18n.locale = :en
=> :en
irb(main):034:0> Page.find_by_name("Welcome")
=> [#]
irb(main):035:0> Page.find_by_name("Willkommen")
=> []
Before I upgraded to Rails 3 all four queries returned the same result.
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby
on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
[Rails] Re: How to disable a select?
Marnen Laibow-Koser wrote: > Are you sure !...@condition is true when you expect it to be? Yes, I checked it in the debugger. -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
Re: [Rails] Re: ruby-debug does not invoke from rspec (rails 3 rspec beta 22)
> > > Perhaps auto-eval is turned off in the debugger. Try typing "p > @user_session" instead of "@user_session". > Thanks -- worked perfectly. > > And why are you using RSpec specs for your controllers, anyway? > Cucumber stories are better for that. RSpec is better for model logic. > > Well, I was hoping to cap new things on this project with Rails 3, ruby 1.9.2, rspec, factory girl. is getting cucumber up and running is pretty incidental? > > > > > > So, how does one go about debugging their tests, or rather specs, in > > rspec? > > Best, > -- > Marnen Laibow-Koser > http://www.marnen.org > mar...@marnen.org > -- > Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. > To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
[Rails] Re: Query Multiple tables
On Sep 13, 6:10 am, Frederick Cheung wrote: > On Sep 13, 11:59 am, PalaniKannan K wrote:> Hi, > > > select * from table1 inner join table2 on table1.foreign_key = > > table2.foreign_key > > > select * from table1 inner join table2 on table1.foreign_key = > > table2.foreign_key join table3 on table2.foreign_key=table3.foreign_key > > > These are the SQL commands, I need to apply it in Rails. Kindly tell me the > > syntax in Rails to apply these SQL commands instead of sql_query. > > Take a look at the :joins option to find (or the joins scope > modifiying thing in rails 3) > > Fred > I think has_many :through might also be what you're looking for. You can avoid writing SQL 99% of the time if you learn how to use the various flavors of ActiveRecord associations. Jeff -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
[Rails] Re: ruby-debug does not invoke from rspec (rails 3 rspec beta 22)
David Kahn wrote: > Ok, now I found if I add *require 'ruby-debug'* in the spec itself > the > debugger invokes. However > > It is useless. I get a breakpoint in my controller but have no access to > anything I want: > > ../Users/DK/Documents/ror/projects/wavelineup3/app/controllers/user_sessions_controller.rb:14 > respond_to do |format| > (rdb:1) @user_session > *** Unknown command: "@user_session". Try "help". > (rdb:1) self > *** Unknown command: "self". Try "help". > (rdb:1) params > *** Unknown command: "params". Try "help". > (rdb:1) Perhaps auto-eval is turned off in the debugger. Try typing "p @user_session" instead of "@user_session". And why are you using RSpec specs for your controllers, anyway? Cucumber stories are better for that. RSpec is better for model logic. > > > So, how does one go about debugging their tests, or rather specs, in > rspec? Best, -- Marnen Laibow-Koser http://www.marnen.org mar...@marnen.org -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
[Rails] Re: Re: Re: Re: Authlogic Rails 3
Paul Mr wrote: > Rick R wrote: >> On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 10:14 PM, Paul Mr wrote: > > thats what Im betting on. Pretty much.. that one creates all the models/scaffolds/controllers the usual way...not even caring about Authlogic::Session::Base though I assume possibly, manually editing the one item to reflect that instead of activerecord (or whatever it was). -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
[Rails] Re: after_create not being called in seeds.rb?
On Sunday 12 September 2010, Heinz Strunk wrote: > after_create :write_comments > > protected > def write_comments > comment = Comment.new > comment.text = "some text" > comment.user = self > comment.save! > end > > There's not one single comment in the database but when I create a > user using the console the comment is created after I save the user. Is the after_create callback ever executed? Add a puts to make sure. > Anyone knows what's wrong here? I wouldn't write code like that to begin with. This is much nicer: def write_comments user.comments.create!(:text => 'some text') end Michael -- Michael Schuerig mailto:mich...@schuerig.de http://www.schuerig.de/michael/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
[Rails] Re: ruby-debug does not invoke from rspec (rails 3 rspec beta 22)
Ok, now I found if I add *require 'ruby-debug'* in the spec itself the debugger invokes. However It is useless. I get a breakpoint in my controller but have no access to anything I want: ../Users/DK/Documents/ror/projects/wavelineup3/app/controllers/user_sessions_controller.rb:14 respond_to do |format| (rdb:1) @user_session *** Unknown command: "@user_session". Try "help". (rdb:1) self *** Unknown command: "self". Try "help". (rdb:1) params *** Unknown command: "params". Try "help". (rdb:1) So, how does one go about debugging their tests, or rather specs, in rspec? On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 5:17 PM, David Kahn wrote: > Anyone know how to get ruby-debug (ruby-debug19) to invoke when running my > specs? When I place 'debugger' in my controller and run the spec, it just > skips over it. > > I have require 'ruby-debug' in spec_helper.rb > > Rails 3, ruby 1.9.2, ruby-debug19, rspec 2.0.0.beta.22 > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
[Rails] Re: after_create not being called in seeds.rb?
Marnen Laibow-Koser wrote: > Please quote when replying; otherwise, it gets difficult to follow the > discussion. > > > So this is actual production data? Yes, it is. > > It's not appropriate to use an after_create for this sort of thing, I > think. In your 100.times block, just create a comment when you create > each user. Makes sense for comments but there but there's stuff like attributes etc. which needs to be created even when a user is created from the web interface. Do you know why the code above doesn't work? -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
[Rails] Re: Rails 3: finding a record by name in multilingual app
On Monday 13 September 2010, Heinz Strunk wrote:
> Well, I have been using Page.find_by_name("Welcome") in my code all
> the time when I was on Rails 2 (and globalize2, of course) and no
> matter what language was selected by the user it was always possible
> to load the welcome page with this command:
> Page.find_by_name("Welcome")
>
> Eversince I switched to Rails 3 Page.find_by_name("Welcome") doesn't
> work anymore if there's another language selected but English which
> sucks cause I'd need to wrap an if clause checking for the language
> and then do one of these:
This is completely fishy. Rails is not supposed to translate strings
behind your back. Are you any extensions (gems, plugins) that may try to
be helpful in the wrong way?
Out of the box, #find_by_name behaves exactly the same as
#find_by_foobar, which is to say, it executes an SQL statement
containing a comparison of column "name" with the string you provide. It
looks like a call to I18n.translate has been slipped in somewhere.
Do you get the same result for Page.where(:name => 'Welcome').first?
In order to find the real cause, your best bet is to use the debugger
and step into the misbehaving statement.
Michael
--
Michael Schuerig
mailto:mich...@schuerig.de
http://www.schuerig.de/michael/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby
on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
[Rails] ruby-debug does not invoke from rspec (rails 3 rspec beta 22)
Anyone know how to get ruby-debug (ruby-debug19) to invoke when running my specs? When I place 'debugger' in my controller and run the spec, it just skips over it. I have require 'ruby-debug' in spec_helper.rb Rails 3, ruby 1.9.2, ruby-debug19, rspec 2.0.0.beta.22 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
[Rails] Indexing feature
How can I enable my admin to index the tables, just after he/she makes change into database. -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
[Rails] Re: How to disable a select?
Fritz Trapper wrote:
> I want to use form template to render data for show.
Generally not a good idea from a UI point of view. Just use plain text
for display, unless you want to allow editing.
>
> My idea is, to readonly/disable formelements. This works fine, except
> with selects. The following three variants of render code do not emit
> the keyword disabled to the html text:
>
>f.select :attr, @choices, :include_blank => true,
> :disabled => !...@condition
>f.select :attr, @choices, {:include_blank => true},
> :disabled => !...@condition
>f.select :attr, @choices, {:include_blank => true},
> {:disabled => !...@condition}
>
> Writing readonly instead if disabled (which seems to be undefined for
> select) also doesn't have any effects.
>
> What is going wrong?
Are you sure !...@condition is true when you expect it to be?
Best,
--
Marnen Laibow-Koser
http://www.marnen.org
mar...@marnen.org
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby
on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
[Rails] Re: Rails 3: finding a record by name in multilingual app
What that not specific enough? I really don't know how to proceed right now cause there's no proper way to avoid name. This is my latest approach which I don't like at all but well... Page.find(Fixtures.identify(:welcome)) Works for every language but not so nice. Anyone else got a better solution? -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
[Rails] Re: after_create not being called in seeds.rb?
Please quote when replying; otherwise, it gets difficult to follow the discussion. Heinz Strunk wrote: > @Marnen: Actually they're not really users but NPCs which I need for > various things and I need a lot of them to populate the world. > > Therefore it's not for test but to populate So this is actual production data? > and I don't think factories > are good for so many objects, right? Factories should be fine for creating so many objects -- but they're not for creating production data. If it's production data, create it all and use seeds. If it's test data, create only the few records you need and use factories. [and, from earlier post] > This works just fine and the users have been created after I ran > db:seeds but what's not working is: > > after_create :write_comments > > protected > def write_comments > comment = Comment.new > comment.text = "some text" > comment.user = self > comment.save! > end It's not appropriate to use an after_create for this sort of thing, I think. In your 100.times block, just create a comment when you create each user. Best, -- Marnen Laibow-Koser http://www.marnen.org mar...@marnen.org -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
[Rails] Re: Re: onload and .html.erb
Thanks a lot everyone. -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
[Rails] How to disable a select?
I want to use form template to render data for show.
My idea is, to readonly/disable formelements. This works fine, except
with selects. The following three variants of render code do not emit
the keyword disabled to the html text:
f.select :attr, @choices, :include_blank => true,
:disabled => !...@condition
f.select :attr, @choices, {:include_blank => true},
:disabled => !...@condition
f.select :attr, @choices, {:include_blank => true},
{:disabled => !...@condition}
Writing readonly instead if disabled (which seems to be undefined for
select) also doesn't have any effects.
What is going wrong?
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby
on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
[Rails] Re: after_create not being called in seeds.rb?
@brito: self always worked cause it's the instance of the current object which I wanna use so that should be fine. @Marnen: Actually they're not really users but NPCs which I need for various things and I need a lot of them to populate the world. Therefore it's not for test but to populate and I don't think factories are good for so many objects, right? -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
[Rails] Re: what I've missed in routes.rb?
Msan Msan wrote:
> On 13 September 2010 16:02, radhames brito wrote:
>> the default destroy route is
>> /controller/id , :method=> delete
>> {:action=>"destroy", :controller=>"sessions", :id=>"name.surname"}
>>
>> but your destroy action does not need an id really,
>
> So I've to change the default destroy route for sessions resource?
Perhaps you should be using a singleton resource for sessions the way
Authlogic does?
Best,
--
Marnen Laibow-Koser
http://www.marnen.org
mar...@marnen.org
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby
on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
[Rails] Re: Problems with the money gem
Please quote when replying, otherwise the discussion becomes impossible to follow. Jon Seidel wrote: > I do have default values specified, but these only take effect when > writing to the database, now when the new object is created. Yes, of course. If you need them before that, put them in the constructor. (In other words: use Ruby's object model to your advantage! :) ) Best, -- Marnen Laibow-Koser http://www.marnen.org mar...@marnen.org -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
Re: [Rails] what I've missed in routes.rb?
On 13 September 2010 16:02, radhames brito wrote:
> the default destroy route is
> /controller/id , :method=> delete
> {:action=>"destroy", :controller=>"sessions", :id=>"name.surname"}
>
> but your destroy action does not need an id really,
So I've to change the default destroy route for sessions resource?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby
on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
[Rails] redirect_to kills my session variable
Hi, I'm trying to set a session variable in one action of application_controller.rb, which is then accessed in a second action of the same controller following a redirect. Here's the code. def cookie_test if cookies["cookie_test"].blank? render :template => "shared/cookies_required" else #redirect back to where the user came from end end protected def cookies_required return true unless cookies["cookie_test"].blank? session[:return_to] = request.request_uri cookies["cookie_test"] = Time.now redirect_to :action => "cookie_test" and return false end The method 'cookies_required' is called first, which sets the session variable 'session[:return_to]'. I would like to be able to access this variable in the method 'cookie_test' following the redirect. However, when I try to do so, it shows up as nil. I tried replacing the session variable with a global variable and that worked fine. I also tried sending the 'request.request_uri' variable as a parameter to the second action and that worked too. But why is my session variable dying following the redirect?? Thanks in advance -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
Re: [Rails] Re: Rails Commenting, Plugins?
On 13 September 2010 13:36, radhames brito wrote: > "What does using AJAX or not have to do with whether or not you use a > CAPTCHA process?" > > because some bots will bypass the captcha, and he will need a publishing > page where he can delete those spams that get through because captcha alone > is not enough so at the end captcha is only an aid to stop most of the spam > but not all. Any bots that can bypass an AJAX captcha could bypass the same captcha on a non-AJAX submission. And AJAX or not, the choice is up to you whether to have a "publishing/approval" page. Again - There's nothing special about AJAX that makes any implementation of a "commentable" feature inherently less secure. It's *exactly* the same as a normal form submission/process procedure, just performed by Javascript and in the background to the user. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
[Rails] Re: Problems with the money gem
I do have default values specified, but these only take effect when writing to the database, now when the new object is created. On Sep 13, 8:28 am, Marnen Laibow-Koser wrote: > Jon Seidel wrote: > > I have a new app (Rails 2.3.8) that uses lots of money fields. I'm > > using the money gem (3.0.5) and the acts_as_money plugin. I've written > > a number of rspec model examples and everything seems to be working > > fine there. > > > My problem is in defining forms for new & edit. As I've done in past > > projects for complex layouts, I extracted the basic form to a partial > > and include it in the new & edit views. > > > However, the model object is created and left with nulls in the > > fields, and causes the money gem to complain with: > > "undefined method `subunit_to_unit' for nil:NilClass". > > > I thought I could use something like after_initialize() to hook into > > the creation of a new object in Rails and set all the money attributes > > to zero, but that didn't work (and several posts recommended against > > that for performance reasons)... > > > Any suggestions on a clean way to hook my model object and make sure > > it's got zeros for all the money values when the new object is > > instantiated? > > Why not define a default value for the field on the DB side? This has > the added advantage of ensuring that there is no way to accidentally > create a record without these values even if the Rails app is bypassed. > > Best, > -- > Marnen Laibow-Koserhttp://www.maren.org > mar...@marnen.org > -- > Posted viahttp://www.ruby-forum.com/. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
[Rails] Re: after_create not being called in seeds.rb?
Heinz Strunk wrote: > Hello, > > I'm using the seeds.rb to create some user records: > 100.times do > user = User.new > user.username = Faker::Name.first_name > user.email = user.username+"@example.com" > user.save! > end This isn't directly a solution to your problem, but... Is this for testing? If so, I recommend using factories, not seeds. seeds.rb is for application seed data (such as tables of countries or shipping rates), not what you're apparently doing here. ...but why do your tests need 100 records to begin with? Normally, you should just call the factory within each test to create the (1 or 2) records you need for that test. Best, -- Marnen Laibow-Koser http://www.marnen.org mar...@marnen.org -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
[Rails] Re: Problems with the money gem
Jon Seidel wrote: > I have a new app (Rails 2.3.8) that uses lots of money fields. I'm > using the money gem (3.0.5) and the acts_as_money plugin. I've written > a number of rspec model examples and everything seems to be working > fine there. > > My problem is in defining forms for new & edit. As I've done in past > projects for complex layouts, I extracted the basic form to a partial > and include it in the new & edit views. > > However, the model object is created and left with nulls in the > fields, and causes the money gem to complain with: > "undefined method `subunit_to_unit' for nil:NilClass". > > I thought I could use something like after_initialize() to hook into > the creation of a new object in Rails and set all the money attributes > to zero, but that didn't work (and several posts recommended against > that for performance reasons)... > > Any suggestions on a clean way to hook my model object and make sure > it's got zeros for all the money values when the new object is > instantiated? Why not define a default value for the field on the DB side? This has the added advantage of ensuring that there is no way to accidentally create a record without these values even if the Rails app is bypassed. Best, -- Marnen Laibow-Koser http://www.maren.org mar...@marnen.org -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
[Rails] Re: REST perhaps I don't undestand it.
On Sep 10, 1:58 pm, Marnen Laibow-Koser wrote: > Msan Msan wrote: > > On 10 September 2010 15:40, Sandy wrote: > >>> > session[:user = nil > > >> There appear to be several typos: > > >> session[:user = nil > >> should be: > >> session[:user = nil] (missing ]) > > > Or should be session[:user] = nil > > Is that the same? > > No, Sandy was in error. Marmen was correct. The missing ] belonged where he showed it. Sorry about any confusion. > > Best, > -- > Marnen Laibow-Koserhttp://www.marnen.org > mar...@marnen.org > -- > Posted viahttp://www.ruby-forum.com/. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
[Rails] Problems with the money gem
I have a new app (Rails 2.3.8) that uses lots of money fields. I'm using the money gem (3.0.5) and the acts_as_money plugin. I've written a number of rspec model examples and everything seems to be working fine there. My problem is in defining forms for new & edit. As I've done in past projects for complex layouts, I extracted the basic form to a partial and include it in the new & edit views. However, the model object is created and left with nulls in the fields, and causes the money gem to complain with: "undefined method `subunit_to_unit' for nil:NilClass". I thought I could use something like after_initialize() to hook into the creation of a new object in Rails and set all the money attributes to zero, but that didn't work (and several posts recommended against that for performance reasons)... Any suggestions on a clean way to hook my model object and make sure it's got zeros for all the money values when the new object is instantiated? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
[Rails] Re: X Modek object into Y controller
Awijeet Mr. wrote: > How to use x.new() in y_controller.rb where x is model and y is > controller? > > Thanks Thanks got the solution. -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
Re: [Rails] X Modek object into Y controller
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 10:01 AM, Awijeet Mr. wrote: > How to use x.new() in y_controller.rb where x is model and y is > controller? > > Thanks Nothing to it, just type > X.new like you said. What trouble are you having? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
[Rails] X Modek object into Y controller
How to use x.new() in y_controller.rb where x is model and y is controller? Thanks -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
Re: [Rails] Re: Re: Re: Rails 3 render partial
change this
render :partial =>'sth',:object => @sth
to this , and call the array in the controller like this @sths
then create a partial with the singular , _sth.html.erb
render :partial =>@sths
i always do it that way and works perfectly
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 10:23 AM, Zhuhao Wang wrote:
> radhames brito wrote:
> > What was the problem? how did you solve it?
>
> render :partial =>'sth',:object => @sth
>
> is not working in rails 3,it pass the first element of the array
> @sth(I'm not sure what would happen if @sth is not an array),thus you
> can't call each in the template.You have to use :locals =>{:sth
> =>@sth}.Seems a little complicated,is it a bug or some change not
> mentioned in the changelog?
>
> Before I realize this I changed the view a little,added <%= Tutor.each
> .%>,and got that text.
> --
> Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
> To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> .
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
>
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby
on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
[Rails] Re: Re: STI and nested object on subclass
[Please quote when replying. Otherwise the discussion is impossible to follow.] Javier Ruiz wrote: > Yep that's finally how I will have to do it... but this is not what I > wanted. A has_one relation means that I have to access things like: > > Anotherclass.property > Anotherclass.childclass.specific_property > Anotherclass.childclass.parentclass.common_property That makes sense from a relational point of view. If you don't like it, then use STI. > > And more important... I need to manually manage related objects (or > create hooks os similar). I mean I need for example to do something > like: > > a = Anotherclass.new > b = Childclass.new > a.childclass = b > > ... and so on... You'd need to do that regardless of whether your original idea worked. > > I was thinking "rails' magic" was really magic ;-) I suppose it is, but it doesn't extend to spreading one class across multiple tables. If you were ambitious, you probably *could* extend ActiveRecord to do that, but I'm not sure it's a good idea -- it's trying to impose too much of an OO approach on a relational DB. Alternatively, you could try an OODB like GemStone/MagLev. Best, -- Marnen Laibow-Koser http://www.marnen.org mar...@marnen.org -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
Re: [Rails] Re: onload and .html.erb
You should use s javascript librery other wise it will take you ages to make
something practical and even more time to make your code work on all
browsers.
javascript libreries lets you do thigns like client side validation, date
picker, inline editing, autocomplete, slider, drag and drop, sorting
tooltips, progress bar
ajax. In other words make your site fell like a desktop application
http://jqueryui.com/
http://mootools.net/
http://www.dojotoolkit.org/
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 9:38 AM, Marnen Laibow-Koser
wrote:
> Frederick Cheung wrote:
> > On Sep 12, 11:48�pm, Abder-Rahman Ali wrote:
> >
> >> As you know, if I want to run the Javascript code on loading the page, I
> >> use
> >>
> >> How can I do that in my "show.html.erb" file? Since I don't have a body
> >> tag?
> >>
> >
> > If I were you I'd have a separate js file with something like
> > document.observe('dom:loaded', ...) or $(document).ready that invokes
> > your javascript
> >
>
> Agreed. is risky as well as not being unobtrusive.
>
> > Fred
>
> Best,
> --
> Marnen Laibow-Koser
> http://www.marnen.org
> mar...@marnen.org
> --
> Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
> To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> .
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
>
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby
on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
[Rails] Intelligent Searchform
Hi there,
i wrote an intelligent searchform, which is divided into categories.
Just a short overview of the workflow. For every keyword, which is
entered in the searchform the matches are checked. So we've got a rank
in a hash.
[key of entry, relevance match]
For example:
@hash = [123 => 5, 124 =>2, 125 => 5, 126 => 1, etc...]
I ordered the Hash "by relevance" simply by ordering by the hash values:
@hash.sort_by {|a,b| b})
@hash = [123 => 5, 125 => 5, 124 =>2, 126 => 1, etc...]
No I want to find my entries by the key values of the hash.
Thats not the problem:
@entries = Entry.find(@hash)
or
@entries = Entry.find(@hash.keys)
The problem is, that the entries are (by standard) ordered by ID and not
in order by the Hash-Keys I passed.
Is there a possibility to order by my "relevance system" (even if there
isn't a coloumn in the Entries-Table.
Thank you 'till now
Hans
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby
on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
[Rails] Re: Re: Re: Rails 3 render partial
radhames brito wrote:
> What was the problem? how did you solve it?
render :partial =>'sth',:object => @sth
is not working in rails 3,it pass the first element of the array
@sth(I'm not sure what would happen if @sth is not an array),thus you
can't call each in the template.You have to use :locals =>{:sth
=>@sth}.Seems a little complicated,is it a bug or some change not
mentioned in the changelog?
Before I realize this I changed the view a little,added <%= Tutor.each
.%>,and got that text.
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby
on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
[Rails] Re: Re: Rails 3 render partial
Hello, You are right about the object deprecation in Rails 3. I solved the problem the same way you did. Instead of passing the table name in object. I now pass it in the locals hash. Hope this helps. Bharat -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
Re: [Rails] Re: STI and nested object on subclass
Yep that's finally how I will have to do it... but this is not what I wanted. A has_one relation means that I have to access things like: Anotherclass.property Anotherclass.childclass.specific_property Anotherclass.childclass.parentclass.common_property And more important... I need to manually manage related objects (or create hooks os similar). I mean I need for example to do something like: a = Anotherclass.new b = Childclass.new a.childclass = b ... and so on... I was thinking "rails' magic" was really magic ;-) On Mon, 2010-09-13 at 16:06 +0200, Marnen Laibow-Koser wrote: > jruiz wrote: > > Well I really wanted to have inheritance on activerecord based classes > > (with db tables saving common data in base class and concrete data in > > subclasses). Sad to know rails can't do it. I'll try to do what I need > > with a different logic. > > You can do that with a has_one relationship. > > > > > Thanks a lot for your help Fred :-) > > Best, > -- > Marnen Laibow-Koser > http://www.marnen.org > mar...@marnen.org > -- > Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
Re: [Rails] Re: Re: Rails 3 render partial
What was the problem? how did you solve it? On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 10:12 AM, radhames brito wrote: > surely, got confused there. > > > On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 10:08 AM, Zhuhao Wang wrote: > >> radhames brito wrote: >> > those are the classes you are forgeting to call a property in the view, >> > >> > >> > seems like you are doing this >> > >> > <%= @tutors.each do |tutor|%> >> > <%= tutor%> >> > >> > it should be >> > >> > <%= @tutors.each do |tutor|%> >> > <%= tutor.name %> >> >> I tried, >> >> <%= @tutors.each do |tutor|%> >> >> this line should be >> >> <% @tutors.each do |tutor|%> >> >> fix this,thx >> >> >> I also find an artical >> http://darwinweb.net/articles/getting-up-to-speed-with-rails-3 says >> :object is removed,but you can find an offcial artical here >> http://edgeguides.rubyonrails.org/layouts_and_rendering.html which says >> :object is still what I expect... >> >> -- >> Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. >> To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com >> . >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en. >> >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
Re: [Rails] Re: Re: Rails 3 render partial
surely, got confused there. On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 10:08 AM, Zhuhao Wang wrote: > radhames brito wrote: > > those are the classes you are forgeting to call a property in the view, > > > > > > seems like you are doing this > > > > <%= @tutors.each do |tutor|%> > > <%= tutor%> > > > > it should be > > > > <%= @tutors.each do |tutor|%> > > <%= tutor.name %> > > I tried, > > <%= @tutors.each do |tutor|%> > > this line should be > > <% @tutors.each do |tutor|%> > > fix this,thx > > > I also find an artical > http://darwinweb.net/articles/getting-up-to-speed-with-rails-3 says > :object is removed,but you can find an offcial artical here > http://edgeguides.rubyonrails.org/layouts_and_rendering.html which says > :object is still what I expect... > > -- > Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. > To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
[Rails] Re: Read data in JSON format
Ahmed Abdelsalam wrote: > Hi, > > I have some data stored in file in JSON format. I'd like to read these > data and store them into database in rail application. Is there any > plugin to perform this? or direct code? > ActiveSupport has some JSON stuff built in. Check the docs for ActiveSupport::JSON. > Should I convert this data to csv or other format? Either leave it in JSON or use YAML (which is *almost* a superset of JSON). > > Thanks, > > Ahmed Best, -- Marnen Laibow-Koser http://www.marnen.org mar...@marnen.org -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
Re: [Rails] View and Controllers association
Post (singular with capital) is the model On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 9:02 AM, Felix Schäfer wrote: > > Am 13.09.2010 um 14:58 schrieb Awijeet Mr.: > > > if I write i.class it returns Post, so I thought module will be a > > method in post_controller.rb. But it's not > > If i is of the type Post, i.module will call the method module from the > Post object in app/models/post.rb, not from a PostsController object as you > seem to think it will. > > Felix > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. > To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
[Rails] Re: Re: Rails 3 render partial
radhames brito wrote: > those are the classes you are forgeting to call a property in the view, > > > seems like you are doing this > > <%= @tutors.each do |tutor|%> > <%= tutor%> > > it should be > > <%= @tutors.each do |tutor|%> > <%= tutor.name %> I tried, <%= @tutors.each do |tutor|%> this line should be <% @tutors.each do |tutor|%> fix this,thx I also find an artical http://darwinweb.net/articles/getting-up-to-speed-with-rails-3 says :object is removed,but you can find an offcial artical here http://edgeguides.rubyonrails.org/layouts_and_rendering.html which says :object is still what I expect... -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
[Rails] Re: STI and nested object on subclass
jruiz wrote: > Well I really wanted to have inheritance on activerecord based classes > (with db tables saving common data in base class and concrete data in > subclasses). Sad to know rails can't do it. I'll try to do what I need > with a different logic. You can do that with a has_one relationship. > > Thanks a lot for your help Fred :-) Best, -- Marnen Laibow-Koser http://www.marnen.org mar...@marnen.org -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
Re: [Rails] what I've missed in routes.rb?
the default destroy route is
/controller/id , :method=> delete
{:action=>"destroy", :controller=>"sessions", :id=>"name.surname"}
but your destroy action does not need an id really,
the other problem is that you dont need an id but pass
session_path(session[:cas_user])
and then not use it becuase you do this
session[:id] = nil
im not user if yo want to do this
session[:cas_user] = nil
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 9:54 AM, radhames brito wrote:
> you dont need to pass this session[:cas_user]
>
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 7:53 AM, Mauro wrote:
>
>> In routes.rb I've put:
>>
>> resources :sessions
>>
>> controller is:
>>
>> class SessionsController < ApplicationController
>>
>> def destroy
>> session[:id] = nil
>> session.delete(:casfilteruser)
>> CASClient::Frameworks::Rails::Filter.logout(self)
>> end
>>
>> end
>>
>> In application.html.erb I have:
>>
>> <%= link_to 'Logout', session_path(session[:cas_user]), :method => :delete
>> %>
>>
>> I think it's all but:
>>
>> No route matches {:action=>"destroy", :controller=>"sessions",
>> :id=>"name.surname"}
>>
>> What I've missed?
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com.
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
>> .
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
>>
>>
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby
on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
[Rails] Re: STI and nested object on subclass
Well I really wanted to have inheritance on activerecord based classes (with db tables saving common data in base class and concrete data in subclasses). Sad to know rails can't do it. I'll try to do what I need with a different logic. Thanks a lot for your help Fred :-) On Sep 13, 2:32 pm, Frederick Cheung wrote: > On Sep 13, 11:15 am, Javier Ruiz wrote: > > > Ok, then maybe I didn't ask properly... you are right it's not STI what > > I'm trying to do, but I'll try to explain it better. > > > What I need is just to extend a base class (wich is a model with its db > > table and all activerecord logic) with another class (a subclass with > > its own table and all activerecord logic, plus the parent methods, > > properties and so on). I tried to do it like I mentioned in my first > > email, but when the child class (the extended class) has a fk to another > > table, rails tries to find the fk in the parent class, not in the > > extended class, like the example I posted before: > > Rails doesn't do that - either the parent class is abstract (ie has no > table) or you get STI. You might have better look putting the common > functionality in a module, or having an abstract class which is the > parent of your 2 concrete classes. > > Fred -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
Re: [Rails] what I've missed in routes.rb?
you dont need to pass this session[:cas_user]
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 7:53 AM, Mauro wrote:
> In routes.rb I've put:
>
> resources :sessions
>
> controller is:
>
> class SessionsController < ApplicationController
>
> def destroy
> session[:id] = nil
> session.delete(:casfilteruser)
> CASClient::Frameworks::Rails::Filter.logout(self)
> end
>
> end
>
> In application.html.erb I have:
>
> <%= link_to 'Logout', session_path(session[:cas_user]), :method => :delete
> %>
>
> I think it's all but:
>
> No route matches {:action=>"destroy", :controller=>"sessions",
> :id=>"name.surname"}
>
> What I've missed?
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
> To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> .
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
>
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby
on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
Re: [Rails] Re: Rails 3 render partial
those are the classes you are forgeting to call a property in the view,
seems like you are doing this
<%= @tutors.each do |tutor|%>
<%= tutor%>
it should be
<%= @tutors.each do |tutor|%>
<%= tutor.name %>
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 6:14 AM, Zhuhao Wang wrote:
> Zhuhao Wang wrote:
> > Bharat Ruparel wrote:
> >> The following rails 2.3.x code is not working in rails 3 beta 4:
> >>
> >> def
> >>
> render_crud_table(obj,controller_name,columns,search_fields_array,status_array,actions)
> >> render :partial => 'shared/crud_maint_table', :object => obj,
> >> :locals => {:controller_name => controller_name, :columns =>
> >> columns, :search_fields_array => search_fields_array, :status_array =>
> >> status_array, :actions => actions}
> >> end
> >>
> >> The partial _crud_maint_table in the shared folder has this code
> >> snippet:
> >>
> >> ...
> >> - crud_maint_table.each do |a_rec|
> >> %tr{ :class => cycle("odd","even") }
> >> - columns.each_with_index do |col, i|
> >> %td{ :class => (i == 0 ? 'first' : nil) }
> >> ...
> >>
> >> See the crud_maint_table.each loop? That works in rails 2.3.x but not
> >> in rails 3.
> >> Please advise.
> >> thanks.
> >> Bharat
> >
> >
> > Well,I met the same problem.
> > I had some debug, it seems that rails treat :object as :collection, so
> > the crud_maint_table actually is the first element of the array obj.
> > I'm not sure it's a bug or sth changed since 3 and I haven't found any
> > solution
>
> When I tried to use :locals, there are some strange text:
>
>
> ###
>
> before the content of the partial ,seems like the ID of the elements of
> the array I passed in...can't get rid of it.
> --
> Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
> To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> .
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
>
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby
on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
