[Samba] MS Access and RAID
Hi, We have been having a few problems with a M$ Access DB held on a Samba server Samba version: samba-2.2.4-2N1 We have rebuilt a new server, and transferred the database over to the new box, along with word/excel docs etc. Everything is working fine, except the access database, which is running very very slowly (can be over a minute to open a record). Details are a little sketchy, but it would seem that when the new server is being used, one workstation has reasonable access speeds, but subsequent workstations are slow - although this could be a 'user diagnosis syndrome' ;) The access binary is held locally on the workstations. If you transfer the database back to the old samba server, it runs fine. The two servers are running the same version of samba, same Kernel (2.4.18). The workstations are Windows98, doing domain logons to the Samba server. The only difference I can see between the old and new servers, is the new server has two raided (mirror) IDE drives, the old server is a single drive box. There are no errors on the NICS, oplocks are off for *.mdb and *.ldb and tcpdump shosw data flowing consistently between the server and the workstation. The Load Ave on the box is near enough 0.0. For the moment, I have put them back on the old server. Any help would be gratefully received - bit stumped on this one! -- Harry MillsDDI:01749 812100 Educational Development ManagerFax:01749 812749 Navaho TechnologiesMain Office: 0870 7034015 http://www.navaho.co.uk/ -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] AD Question
On Sunday 27 October 2002 16:37, Jay Ts wrote: Samba as a PDC. Samba has no limitation (AFAIK) to the number of clients. There are no licensing fees - this isn't Microsoft, you know? ;) I know, but I thought Microsoft would mess the thing up with the 5 CALs on the AD server. :) You might have some trouble with multiple domains, though, since Samba doesn't support Windows NT trust relationships. There may be some workarounds to that, and maybe someone else can comment on it. According to the roadmap, NT 4.0 trust relationships are already supported. But perhaps I should shut up and test it on my own... ;) -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] 2.2.6 error
Am Montag, 28. Oktober 2002 10:27 schrieb Elliot: guys .. when i run ./configure for my samba 2.2.6 .. i get this error checking for test routines... configure: error: cant find test code. Aborting config Your downloaded source archive may be incomplete... You should post the relevant parts of your config.log to the list. greetings Florian Rauh -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Failed to find real path for mount point
Hello! I try to mount an smb share with: smbmount //filer/$USER ~/filer -o username=$USER and I get following error message: Failed to find real path for mount point What does it mean? The mount point is accessible and the owner of the mount point is USER. Whith an earlier version of samba I can mount the share with this command. Regards and thank for advice. Please cc an answer directly to my adress, I am not a member of the list. Michael Wisse -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] cipsaddsmb UNSUCCESSFUL
Hi, I have a linux box on RH7.3 with samba 2.2.5-1 and cups-1.1.14-15. I create a cups printer on to this machine with success, It called lptest? and apparently, when I send a page test it works fine. But now I want to share It via Samba then I putted the different setting in smb.conf . I extracted the different files from the ADOBE POSTSCRIPT DRIVER and I put them in /usr/share/cups/drivers . After , I ran cupsaddsmb : # cupsaddsmb -v lptest Password for root required to access localhost via SAMBA: Running command: smbclient //localhost/print\$ -N -U'root%secret' -c 'mkdir W32X86;put /var/spool/cups/tmp/3dbd0c8f9e398 W32X86/lptest.PPD;put /usr/share/cups/drivers/ADOBEPS5.DLL W32X86/ADOBEPS5.DLL;put /usr/share/cups/drivers/ADOBEPSU.DLL W32X86/ADOBEPSU.DLL;put /usr/share/cups/drivers/ADOBEPSU.HLP W32X86/ADOBEPSU.HLP' added interface ip=172.25.4.64 bcast=172.25.255.255 nmask=255.255.0.0 Domain=[ARTE] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 2.2.5] NT_STATUS_OBJECT_NAME_COLLISION making remote directory \W32X86 putting file /var/spool/cups/tmp/3dbd0c8f9e398 as \W32X86/lptest.PPD (1797.7 kb/s) (average 1797.7 kb/s) putting file /usr/share/cups/drivers/ADOBEPS5.DLL as \W32X86/ADOBEPS5.DLL (18619.7 kb/s) (average 11410.3 kb/s) putting file /usr/share/cups/drivers/ADOBEPSU.DLL as \W32X86/ADOBEPSU.DLL (17863.5 kb/s) (average 12749.7 kb/s) putting file /usr/share/cups/drivers/ADOBEPSU.HLP as \W32X86/ADOBEPSU.HLP (9575.2 kb/s) (average 12634.3 kb/s) Running command: smbclient //localhost/print\$ -N -U'root%secret' -c 'mkdir WIN40;put /var/spool/cups/tmp/3dbd0c8f9e398 WIN40/lptest.PPD;put /usr/share/cups/drivers/ADFONTS.MFM WIN40/ADFONTS.MFM;put /usr/share/cups/drivers/ADOBEPS4.DRV WIN40/ADOBEPS4.DRV;put /usr/share/cups/drivers/ADOBEPS4.HLP WIN40/ADOBEPS4.HLP;put /usr/share/cups/drivers/DEFPRTR2.PPD WIN40/DEFPRTR2.PPD;put /usr/share/cups/drivers/ICONLIB.DLL WIN40/ICONLIB.DLL;put /usr/share/cups/drivers/PSMON.DLL WIN40/PSMON.DLL;' added interface ip=172.25.4.64 bcast=172.25.255.255 nmask=255.255.0.0 Domain=[ARTE] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 2.2.5] NT_STATUS_OBJECT_NAME_COLLISION making remote directory \WIN40 putting file /var/spool/cups/tmp/3dbd0c8f9e398 as \WIN40/lptest.PPD (1198.5 kb/s) (average 1198.5 kb/s) putting file /usr/share/cups/drivers/ADFONTS.MFM as \WIN40/ADFONTS.MFM (18736.0 kb/s) (average 10428.8 kb/s) putting file /usr/share/cups/drivers/ADOBEPS4.DRV as \WIN40/ADOBEPS4.DRV (17604.6 kb/s) (average 14433.9 kb/s) putting file /usr/share/cups/drivers/ADOBEPS4.HLP as \WIN40/ADOBEPS4.HLP (12698.5 kb/s) (average 14231.8 kb/s) putting file /usr/share/cups/drivers/DEFPRTR2.PPD as \WIN40/DEFPRTR2.PPD (13153.0 kb/s) (average 14224.5 kb/s) putting file /usr/share/cups/drivers/ICONLIB.DLL as \WIN40/ICONLIB.DLL (19226.2 kb/s) (average 14420.7 kb/s) putting file /usr/share/cups/drivers/PSMON.DLL as \WIN40/PSMON.DLL (13999.3 kb/s) (average 14415.2 kb/s) Running command: rpcclient localhost -N -U'root%secret' -c 'adddriver Windows NT x86 lptest:ADOBEPS5.DLL:lptest.PPD:ADOBEPSU.DLL:ADOBEPSU.HLP:NULL:RAW:NULL' cmd = adddriver Windows NT x86 lptest:ADOBEPS5.DLL:lptest.PPD:ADOBEPSU.DLL:ADOBEPSU.HLP:NULL:RAW:NULL result was NT_STATUS_UNSUCCESSFUL Running command: rpcclient localhost -N -U'root%secret' -c 'addprinter lptest lptest lptest ' cmd = addprinter lptest lptest lptest result was NT_STATUS_UNSUCCESSFUL Running command: rpcclient localhost -N -U'root%secret' -c 'adddriver Windows 4.0 lptest:ADOBEPS4.DRV:lptest.PPD:NULL:ADOBEPS4.HLP:PSMON.DLL:RAW:ADFONTS.MFM, DEFPRTR2.PPD,ICONLIB.DLL' cmd = adddriver Windows 4.0 lptest:ADOBEPS4.DRV:lptest.PPD:NULL:ADOBEPS4.HLP:PSMON.DLL:RAW:ADFONTS.MFM, DEFPRTR2.PPD,ICONLIB.DLL result was NT_STATUS_UNSUCCESSFUL # Why adddriver doesn' work ? Someone can help me? Thanks in advance. PS: I don't use Sources of CUPS drivers / PPDs like ESP PrintPro or I had To use it absolutely to work it fine -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] 2.2.6 error
Am Montag, 28. Oktober 2002 10:48 schrieb Elliot: I cannot seem to find config.log .. Ran updatedb but nothing. I downloaded the tar.gz file twice ...but both times I get this error Post the config.log file in your build directory (where you ran configure). What are your configure parameters? greetings Florian Rauh -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Another GUI
atom wrote: Well i agree that hiding the special $ is a good idea. I don't understand how can I parse the smbclient Output wihout the Disk word smbclient -L atomix | sed s/' Disk '// Also I noticed you don't care about possible spaces in the share names and theys are being passed to the web form without webalization (replacing with %20). One more potential problem with smbclient - it will cut share names that are longer than 14 characters. So you may want to find another way of getting list of shares. I'm sure there is a Perl module for it. Well they are actually, everywhere in the functions.php file you will find urlencode functions when passing parameters like dirs or files also shares as variables. Why is it confusing since the software only operates on files. Also maybe Beecause it does not carry useful information since all the shares we are interested in marked as Disk. I'll look for some perl modules for smbclient output parsing. Maybe that will help. you have an old version of Thor (see fresmeat.net for the latest version). No, I grabbed it from your site. It si v0.5p1. And the auth utility well it work, look at http://212.160.15.90 and click the Thor Demo, then click the yellow key and you will be prompted for a Login and Password. It's just a simple link so it should work to that level at least. I don't know. In my case it does not happen. I don't get any login prompts. I have to look into that since it's a simple a href to a file, Thank you again for interestng in this. Atom atom wrote: What word Disk. Could you be more specific. As far as I understand you parse smbclient output and put Sharename and Type columns as label for a link to the share - ShareName Disk. I don't think the word Disk carries much useful info. It is rather confuses. And the printers youre right, i'll work on it (i forgot about that, there are no shared printers in my network). There is also such shares as IPC$ and ADMIN$ that should be hidden. Could you tell me to what kind of server you were trying to log in (when the auth failed). I'm working on that now too, i have some Samba 2.2.6. I don't see any passwords prompts at all when try to click on the auth button. At the same time I watch that it spits word Password: in the Apache error log. problems with encrypted passwords so that might be a problem. Thank you for your help. Any time. Actually the interface you are making is something that many people need. As you probably know there was smb2www script that is very outdated and has some major issues (such as running away processes consuming 100% CPU). So it would be good to have something that work with new versions of Samba. Keep up your work ! Atom -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Winbind with samba PDC
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Message: 4 Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 15:51:50 -0300 From: cyroreal [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: samba [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: samba-nt-domain [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Samba] Winbind with samba PDC Is it possible to use winbind to authenticate my Mandrake 9.0 (samba 2.2.6) machine on my windows domain (controled by a Mandrake 8.2 (samba 2.2.6) server??? I tryed and the users are working fine, but the groups that i use to my windows shares are not, where do i set on the samba server wich groups are my domain groups, is it possible?? This isn't possible, AFAIK there are issues both with samba's groups handling (you should notice you can't use domain groups on ACLs on client machines) and winbind's group support (even against Windows DCs) in 2.2.x. It could be possible with samba3, but samba3 is not recommended for production yet. I have RPMs of samba-3alpha20 that will parallel install with samba-2.2.x (well, currently built for 9.0, but I can build on 8.2 if necessary). The problem though (with any samba-winbind solution) is that you won't have consistent uid's between machines, so you won't be able to use things like NFS. The better solution is probably to setup LDAP. This will allow you to use group permissions on samba servers, and NFS between machines. You can find a tutorial for setting up LDAP on Mandrake at http://www.mandrakesecure.net You can then also setup samba to store it's passwords in LDAP, and there are LDAP-enabled RPMs of samba-2.2.6 at http://ranger.dnsalias.com/mandrake/samba (soon to be on ftp.samba.org). Shout if you want some pointers on setting up samba for LDAP on Mandrake, most work is done for you, you can take a look at the /etc/samba/smbldap_conf.pm (I think) and the import script in /usr/share/samba/scripts. Also be sure to look at the new configuration options in the default smb.conf (will be installed as smb.conf.rpmnew). Regards, Buchan P.S. The samba-ntdom list doesn't exist any more. - -- |Registered Linux User #182071-| Buchan MilneMechanical Engineer, Network Manager Cellphone * Work+27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 8828820x121 Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering http://www.cae.co.za GPG Key http://ranger.dnsalias.com/bgmilne.asc 1024D/60D204A7 2919 E232 5610 A038 87B1 72D6 AC92 BA50 60D2 04A7 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQE9vRrVrJK6UGDSBKcRAhpxAJ93HCNg9VxZiJW0dYMtpF3MVrOuQQCfQzBc z9NYHgBHbZxCA7bDHeTkyo4= =m1MX -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Failed to find real path for mount point
Yes, I tried it with the same result. Michael I try to mount an smb share with: smbmount //filer/$USER ~/filer -o username=$USER and I get following error message: Failed to find real path for mount point What does it mean? The mount point is accessible and the owner of the mount point is USER. Whith an earlier version of samba I can mount the share with this command. Regards and thank for advice. Please cc an answer directly to my adress, I am not a member of the list. Michael Wisse Have you tried it with an explicit path name for the mount location instead of the tilde? Just a guess. mark -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Failed to find real path for mount point
On Mon, 2002-10-28 at 06:24, Michael Wisse wrote: Yes, I tried it with the same result. Michael I try to mount an smb share with: smbmount //filer/$USER ~/filer -o username=$USER and I get following error message: Failed to find real path for mount point What does it mean? The mount point is accessible and the owner of the mount point is USER. Whith an earlier version of samba I can mount the share with this command. Regards and thank for advice. Please cc an answer directly to my adress, I am not a member of the list. Michael Wisse Have you tried it with an explicit path name for the mount location instead of the tilde? Just a guess. mark -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba did you try smbmount //filer/homes -o username=$USER I know that typing \\server\homes in the run box produces my home dir, but have not tried mounting it. Good luck. C -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] AD Question
Harald Kümmerle wrote: Jay Ts wrote: Samba as a PDC. Samba has no limitation (AFAIK) to the number of clients. There are no licensing fees - this isn't Microsoft, you know? ;) I know, but I thought Microsoft would mess the thing up with the 5 CALs on the AD server. :) Oops, I thought you were considering dropping Win 2000 and just using Samba. I'm not sure how it works if you are accessing the Win 2000 server for data, while authenticating through Samba. Anyone? According to the roadmap, NT 4.0 trust relationships are already supported. But perhaps I should shut up and test it on my own... ;) I think the support is somewhat new in the Samba 3.0 alpha releases. Good luck with it! Jay Ts -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Windows cannot see Samba Server
Matt Gilliam wrote: I have a small problem... All of my windows machines, XP Pro and 98 cannot see my samba server running on RH 7.3 i can do a smbclient -Llocalhost and see all my computers on the network, also windows is telling me that it is unable to browse the network, but if i unplug the samba server from the router the windows machines can see each other fine.. Just a quick suggestion: check your NetBIOS name on the Samba server. I misconfigured once, and had a duplicate NetBIOS name, and it acted just as you describe. Jay Ts -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] oplocks and share modes
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Frank_K=FCster_geb=2E_F=FCrst?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Samba] oplocks and share modes Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2002 17:49:50 + On Fri, Oct 25, 2002 at 07:51:13PM +0200, Frank Küster geb. Fürst wrote: Yes, thanks. Just one more question: For which versions does this apply? All IRIX 6.5.x versions I assume? And as for Linux, any 2.4.x kernel, or does it depend on the configuration? I think it's IRIX 6.5.2f - Herb can you confirm ? For Linux, it's the 2.4.x kernels - but many of the earlier kernels had bugs. Ensure you're at 2.4.18 or above I think. The copy of the 'Samba for IRIX' sales sheet that I have from SGI (dated 12/98) agrees with you. IRIX 6.5.2f or later for kernel oplock support. Mac Assistant Systems Adminstrator @nibsc.ac.uk [EMAIL PROTECTED] Work: +44 1707 641000 x285 Everything else: +44 7956 237670 (anytime) -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Samba Performance
Any ideas where i can get a things to check list for performace tuning of Samba Currently copying 300mb of data since 09:00am this morning and still going ...now 12:20! 100mb full duplex nic on a IBM x232 series dual proc Piii-1.2ghz, 512mb ram, raid 5 - 18.2gb drives samba -- mandrake 8.2 with 2.2.5pre1 according to smbstatus - locks are exclusive+batch Locked files: Pid DenyMode Access R/WOplock Name -- 2276 DENY_ALL 0x30196 WRONLY EXCLUSIVE+BATCH /var/apps/opera/data/s_aentry.cdx Mon Oct 28 12:28:27 2000 any tips would be appreciated kind regards rod
[Samba] RE: smb.conf - user access
if !helpful == samba list then get the fuck off the list good luck with your lil windows boxes and Linux servers. I need to allow a REMOTE server user access to his /home/user files. I realize allowing REMOTE clients is incredibly insecure, but I am firewalling samba so that only his STATIC ip has access to the server. The remote user is using win 98 and I am using FreeBSD 4.7. I'm confused as to what I need to add to the [globals] section so that the user only has to enter his UNIX passwd ( /etc/passwd ) to get his /home/user shares. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RE: [Samba] Samba Performance
Try an ifconfig and see if you are getting errors on the NIC first. Noel -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 28 October 2002 12:38To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: [Samba] Samba PerformanceAny ideas where i can get a "things to check" list for performace tuning of Samba Currently copying 300mb of data since 09:00am this morning and still going ...now 12:20! 100mb full duplex nic on a IBM x232 series dual proc Piii-1.2ghz, 512mb ram, raid 5 - 18.2gb drives samba -- mandrake 8.2 with 2.2.5pre1 according to smbstatus - locks are exclusive+batch Locked files: Pid DenyMode Access R/WOplock Name -- 2276 DENY_ALL 0x30196 WRONLY EXCLUSIVE+BATCH /var/apps/opera/data/s_aentry.cdx Mon Oct 28 12:28:27 2000 any tips would be appreciated kind regards rod ---Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).Version: 6.0.404 / Virus Database: 228 - Release Date: 15/10/2002 --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.404 / Virus Database: 228 - Release Date: 15/10/2002
Re: [Samba] Samba Performance
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Any ideas where i can get a things to check list for performace tuning of Samba Currently copying 300mb of data since 09:00am this morning and still going ...now 12:20! 100mb full duplex nic on a IBM x232 series dual proc Piii-1.2ghz, 512mb ram, raid 5 - 18.2gb drives Have you read the Speed.txt and Speed2.txt files that come with Samba? Also, double check that the nic is in fact running full duplex. It's best just to force both sides to full duplex since auto-negotiation is so unreliable. Matt -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RE: [Samba] auth to two diff PDCs? (success, sort of)
Hi All: Excuse me for butting in here, but I'm planning a migration from WinNT 4 to Samba in the near future and this thread has caused me to worry a little. Take the case that I'm planning: 3 Domains each to its own LAN (connected via 128k Frame Relay lines to form a WAN) Each domain currently has a NT 4 PDC and each domain trusts each other. How do I accomplish these trusts only using Samba PDCs? Meaning: If I rip out the NT Domains, replace the PDCs with Samba PDCs and rebuild new domains (new Domain Names, new NetBIOS names for the PDCs, etc.) How do I get the three domains to once again trust each other? Is there a Samba command to do this? Thanks, Kevin L. Collins, MCSE Systems Manager Nesbitt Engineering, Inc. -Original Message- From: Mathew McKernan [mailto:mathewmckernan;optushome.com.au] Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 2:39 AM To: Matthew Hannigan; Andrew Bartlett Cc: Matthew Hannigan; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Samba] auth to two diff PDCs? (success, sort of) Hi Matthew, Andrew is talking about domain trusts here. When the client asks for a connection to a share or the samba server itself, the samba daemon will check if the user is valid to the PDC. Domain trusts enable 2 domains to know each others users. However in some cases this is dangerous, in my situation at work, we have 2 LANs (physically seperate) and have seperate NT Domains for that reason. However we wanted to allow staff to logon to either domain but have access to their home drive. To solve this we ran 2 copies of samba (installed to different locations) and each copy is a member of the domain they are to serve. Then using the interfaces config option in smb.conf we force each copy of samba to bind to the LAN it serves. In your case it sounds as if you are running one LAN but with 2 domains that don't trust each other. Either establish a trust between the two LANs, or use the method above. You will need to set the name differently for each copy of Samba, using netbios name in smb.conf, or you will get conflicts. Thanks Mathew - Original Message - From: Matthew Hannigan [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Andrew Bartlett [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Matthew Hannigan [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 5:25 PM Subject: Re: [Samba] auth to two diff PDCs? (success, sort of) On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 04:56:03PM +1100, Andrew Bartlett wrote: Andrew Bartlett wrote: Matthew Hannigan wrote: With a single server, settings security = server and password server = pdc1 pdc2', I can successfully authenticate against two entirely different PDCs depending on which order I put the two machines in the 'password server' list. Is there someway of forcing clients from either domain to authenticate against the 'right' pdc, regardless of the order in the 'password server' config? What is the algo for choosing auth server out of a list, anyway? If so it'd be a nice cheap way of getting what we would otherwise have to wait for trust relationship support for. The reason we don't support this already is that while the auth works, a *lot* of other things break. But if one PDC trusts the other, then secrutiy=domain will do this stuff Except that the users would have to be on the server, right? Since (according to the docs (smb.conf)) the network logon comes from the server, not the workstation. What precisely does 'on the server' mean anyway? In the smbpasswd file? We don't use that; we just have the unix user (/etc/passwd) Matt -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba smime.p7s Description: application/pkcs7-signature
[Samba] Is 2.2.6 Final?
Just tought I'd follow up and see if 2.2.6 is truly the last release of samba_2_2 CVS branch. We've got six systems running it with no visible issues. I'm currently testing CVS from Sunday's pull of 3.0...is this the direction I should be heading? Bill -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Slow transfer file between Windows and Samba PDC (2.2 .3a)
On Fri, Oct 18, 2002 at 04:18:07PM +0100, Noel Kelly wrote: I think you definitely have a problem with your NIC on the Samba machine. I would swap it out and/or change the cable and see if that cures things. By the sound of that explanation above it could also be something like a PCI driver problem or a negotiation mismatch? You're right, Noel. We changed the PCI ethernet card and all run smooth. No overrun, correct transfer rate: Sound good :) Many thanks for your help -- Guillaume Estival -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] intermitent domain logon failures
Robert, Suggest you update to the latest stable release 2.2.6, you may find this problem will go away. - John T. On 28 Oct 2002, Robert Stanford wrote: I have an issue where at odd times, maybe after 3 days, maybe after a week, people suddenly cant do domain logons. Unfortunately the machine is 50km away so i'm sure theres more details I can glean once I can interogate the users a bit more. Things I have noticed: Anyone currently logged in can still work fine. A restart of samba fixes the issue (till it hapens next). ps ax shows smbd and nmbd still running. I forgot to run netstat so unfortunately can't comment if they were listening. However I did manage to grab a snapshots of the logs up to the point samba was restarted. Heres a couple of snippets tail nmbd.log [2002/10/28 08:23:17, 1] nmbd/nmbd_processlogon.c:process_logon_packet(69) process_logon_packet: Logon from 10.0.0.113: code = 0x12 [2002/10/28 08:32:28, 1] nmbd/nmbd_processlogon.c:process_logon_packet(69) process_logon_packet: Logon from 10.0.0.110: code = 0x12 [2002/10/28 08:32:28, 1] nmbd/nmbd_processlogon.c:process_logon_packet(69) process_logon_packet: Logon from 10.0.0.110: code = 0x12 [2002/10/28 08:34:02, 1] nmbd/nmbd_processlogon.c:process_logon_packet(69) process_logon_packet: Logon from 10.0.0.109: code = 0x0 [2002/10/28 08:34:34, 0] nmbd/nmbd.c:sig_term(63) Got SIGTERM: going down... tail smbd.log [2002/10/21 21:30:57, 3] smbd/connection.c:yield_connection(48) Yielding connection to [2002/10/21 21:30:57, 3] smbd/server.c:exit_server(492) Server exit (caught signal) [2002/10/27 06:25:34, 0] smbd/server.c:sig_hup(384) Got SIGHUP [2002/10/27 06:25:34, 1] smbd/server.c:open_sockets(220) Reloading services after SIGHUP [2002/10/27 06:25:35, 1] lib/debug.c:debug_message(250) INFO: Debug class all level = 1 (pid 18438 from pid 18438) We are running Debian woody with samba 2.2.3a-6 and Linux 2.4.19 i686 ---smb.conf--- [global] workgroup = diggers server string = %h server (Samba %v) load printers = yes netbios name = admin domain logons = yes security = user os level = 34 local master = yes preferred master = yes domain master = yes time server = yes wins support = yes name resolve order = wins bcast lmhosts socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 encrypt passwords = yes unix password sync = yes passwd program = /usr/bin/passwd %u passwd chat = *Enter\snew\sUNIX\spassword:* %n\n *Retype\snew\sUNIX\spassword:* %n\n . #use spnego = no domain admin group = lynj log level = 1 log file = /var/log/samba/%m.log load printers = yes printcap name = /etc/printcap.cups printing = cups logon script = logon.bat [homes] comment = Home Directories read only = No create mask = 0770 directory mask = 0770 browseable = No writeable = yes [netlogon] comment = Domain logon services path = /home/netlogon public = no writeable = no browseable = no other shares... ---end smb.conf--- --- ¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤ Robert Stanford º¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤º -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- John H Terpstra Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] ENC: utilizing smbpasswd with two user #######URGENT#######
Title: ENC: utilizing smbpasswd with two user ###URGENT### Hi, I have a user in Windows (user_windows = eng.calculo). I would like that this user_windows acess the unix (solairs2.6) as a valid user unix (user_unix=cs02929) (this problem is because the admintool only create user with 8 caractheres. How I can resolve this problem ? Atenciosamente Alexandre Salomé Comau System _ Sistemas Engenharia tel: 0055 031 9944 8646 fax:0055 031 3529 6533
[Samba] samba and oplocks and office applications
I'm using samba version 2.2.1a on a linux RH7.2 kernel 2.4.7-10. I'm having a lot of oplock problems, specially when using office applications like word. I would like to know: 1. what is the recommended configuration in version 2.2.1a (oplocks = yes/no , level2 oplocks = yes/no , kernel oplocks = yes/no) 2. what is considered to be a stable version for oplocks usage Thanks, Nir -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] cipsaddsmb UNSUCCESSFUL
Do you have the 'addprinter command' parameter set in smb.conf? If so, remove it On Mon, 2002-10-28 at 05:18, Kalkoul Morad wrote: Hi, I have a linux box on RH7.3 with samba 2.2.5-1 and cups-1.1.14-15. I create a cups printer on to this machine with success, It called lptest? and apparently, when I send a page test it works fine. But now I want to share It via Samba then I putted the different setting in smb.conf . I extracted the different files from the ADOBE POSTSCRIPT DRIVER and I put them in /usr/share/cups/drivers . After , I ran cupsaddsmb : # cupsaddsmb -v lptest Password for root required to access localhost via SAMBA: Running command: smbclient //localhost/print\$ -N -U'root%secret' -c 'mkdir W32X86;put /var/spool/cups/tmp/3dbd0c8f9e398 W32X86/lptest.PPD;put /usr/share/cups/drivers/ADOBEPS5.DLL W32X86/ADOBEPS5.DLL;put /usr/share/cups/drivers/ADOBEPSU.DLL W32X86/ADOBEPSU.DLL;put /usr/share/cups/drivers/ADOBEPSU.HLP W32X86/ADOBEPSU.HLP' added interface ip=172.25.4.64 bcast=172.25.255.255 nmask=255.255.0.0 Domain=[ARTE] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 2.2.5] NT_STATUS_OBJECT_NAME_COLLISION making remote directory \W32X86 putting file /var/spool/cups/tmp/3dbd0c8f9e398 as \W32X86/lptest.PPD (1797.7 kb/s) (average 1797.7 kb/s) putting file /usr/share/cups/drivers/ADOBEPS5.DLL as \W32X86/ADOBEPS5.DLL (18619.7 kb/s) (average 11410.3 kb/s) putting file /usr/share/cups/drivers/ADOBEPSU.DLL as \W32X86/ADOBEPSU.DLL (17863.5 kb/s) (average 12749.7 kb/s) putting file /usr/share/cups/drivers/ADOBEPSU.HLP as \W32X86/ADOBEPSU.HLP (9575.2 kb/s) (average 12634.3 kb/s) Running command: smbclient //localhost/print\$ -N -U'root%secret' -c 'mkdir WIN40;put /var/spool/cups/tmp/3dbd0c8f9e398 WIN40/lptest.PPD;put /usr/share/cups/drivers/ADFONTS.MFM WIN40/ADFONTS.MFM;put /usr/share/cups/drivers/ADOBEPS4.DRV WIN40/ADOBEPS4.DRV;put /usr/share/cups/drivers/ADOBEPS4.HLP WIN40/ADOBEPS4.HLP;put /usr/share/cups/drivers/DEFPRTR2.PPD WIN40/DEFPRTR2.PPD;put /usr/share/cups/drivers/ICONLIB.DLL WIN40/ICONLIB.DLL;put /usr/share/cups/drivers/PSMON.DLL WIN40/PSMON.DLL;' added interface ip=172.25.4.64 bcast=172.25.255.255 nmask=255.255.0.0 Domain=[ARTE] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 2.2.5] NT_STATUS_OBJECT_NAME_COLLISION making remote directory \WIN40 putting file /var/spool/cups/tmp/3dbd0c8f9e398 as \WIN40/lptest.PPD (1198.5 kb/s) (average 1198.5 kb/s) putting file /usr/share/cups/drivers/ADFONTS.MFM as \WIN40/ADFONTS.MFM (18736.0 kb/s) (average 10428.8 kb/s) putting file /usr/share/cups/drivers/ADOBEPS4.DRV as \WIN40/ADOBEPS4.DRV (17604.6 kb/s) (average 14433.9 kb/s) putting file /usr/share/cups/drivers/ADOBEPS4.HLP as \WIN40/ADOBEPS4.HLP (12698.5 kb/s) (average 14231.8 kb/s) putting file /usr/share/cups/drivers/DEFPRTR2.PPD as \WIN40/DEFPRTR2.PPD (13153.0 kb/s) (average 14224.5 kb/s) putting file /usr/share/cups/drivers/ICONLIB.DLL as \WIN40/ICONLIB.DLL (19226.2 kb/s) (average 14420.7 kb/s) putting file /usr/share/cups/drivers/PSMON.DLL as \WIN40/PSMON.DLL (13999.3 kb/s) (average 14415.2 kb/s) Running command: rpcclient localhost -N -U'root%secret' -c 'adddriver Windows NT x86 lptest:ADOBEPS5.DLL:lptest.PPD:ADOBEPSU.DLL:ADOBEPSU.HLP:NULL:RAW:NULL' cmd = adddriver Windows NT x86 lptest:ADOBEPS5.DLL:lptest.PPD:ADOBEPSU.DLL:ADOBEPSU.HLP:NULL:RAW:NULL result was NT_STATUS_UNSUCCESSFUL Running command: rpcclient localhost -N -U'root%secret' -c 'addprinter lptest lptest lptest ' cmd = addprinter lptest lptest lptest result was NT_STATUS_UNSUCCESSFUL Running command: rpcclient localhost -N -U'root%secret' -c 'adddriver Windows 4.0 lptest:ADOBEPS4.DRV:lptest.PPD:NULL:ADOBEPS4.HLP:PSMON.DLL:RAW:ADFONTS.MFM, DEFPRTR2.PPD,ICONLIB.DLL' cmd = adddriver Windows 4.0 lptest:ADOBEPS4.DRV:lptest.PPD:NULL:ADOBEPS4.HLP:PSMON.DLL:RAW:ADFONTS.MFM, DEFPRTR2.PPD,ICONLIB.DLL result was NT_STATUS_UNSUCCESSFUL # Why adddriver doesn' work ? Someone can help me? Thanks in advance. PS: I don't use Sources of CUPS drivers / PPDs like ESP PrintPro or I had To use it absolutely to work it fine -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- --- Daniel T. Gynn RHCE #806200978201621 Essential Systems, Inc. 412-931-5403 ext. 1 fax: 412-931-5425 [EMAIL PROTECTED] GnuPG Key http://www.essensys.com/~dan/gpgring.asc Fingerprint: 1341 3132 FDAC C415 8F5F 03D7 FD4E 166B FA90 58E1 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [Samba] root prexec/postexec login scripts
On Mon, 28 Oct 2002 10:44 pm, Mike Rambo wrote: [SNIP] scripts run fine on the workstations at login. I'm using a netlogon script I found at http://www.0x0a.com/netlogon.php that I've modified to handle multiple groups based upon group membership in /etc/group as I need. If I run the script from a command line supplying just a username it works ok. ./netlogon.pl mrambo #This results in a good script. Okay, it appears that you have XML-Twig installed and the script is functioning from the command line as it should be. I have this script working in production environments on samba 2.2.2 (machine needs to be upgraded..client is stalling ;)) and 2.2.6 configurations without any trouble. [netlogon] comment = Network Logon Service path = /home/netlogon guest ok = yes read only = yes browseable = no printable = no write list = @adm share modes = no root prexec = /home/netlogon/netlogon.pl %U root postexec = rm -f /home/netlogon/%U.bat Looks good to me..quite similar to what I normally use. Perhaps someone else can shed some light on the issue..though I think the log level should probably be a bit higher. -- Regards, Deryk Robosson Robosson Business Services 22 Flemington Street Albany, WA 6330 ABN: 56 728 377 499 Phone: +61 4 0842 9835 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RE: [Samba] samba and winbind issues
Are you talking about access rights (like write list = @group) ? I found a few interesting things with groups and security=domain with winbind: 1. the @group syntax applies to the UNIX group names. To give access to an NT group, you need to use something like this: write list = @WALNETNT_Domain Users @DomainnameWinbindseparatorNTgroupname 2. If I specified an NT user, it seemed that I had to prefix it with the domain name and my winbind separator to get it to work correctly write list = WALNETNT_jmacs 3. If you want to grant access to more than one user/group, separate the entries with commas: write list = WALNETNT_jmacs, @WALNETNT_Domain Users 4. If you are using a username map file to make the user's UID assignment match when he access files from either side, it seems to cause his membership to other NT groups to go un-noticed. Example: I had a read-only share that was writable by @WALNETNT_Domain Users , but user karen (NT) was being assigned the UNIX karen account UID and GID by the username mapping mechanism, and was no longer recognized as a member of the NT Domain Users group ... I was going to play with adding other UNIX groups to the write list to see if I could fix this problem. Hope this answers your question. -Original Message- From: Jennifer Fountain [mailto:JFountain;rbinc.com] Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 5:22 PM To: 'Wieprecht, Karen M.' Subject: RE: [Samba] samba and winbind issues Thanks for the email. I finally got samba to work but now I am having issues with groups. When I do a groups jfountain, i get domain admins but no other groups. when i do a groups user1, i get nothing - and the user is in a couple groups. Any thoughts or ideas? what am i missing? -Original Message- From: Wieprecht, Karen M. [mailto:Karen.Wieprecht;jhuapl.edu] Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 9:04 AM To: 'Jennifer Fountain'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: [Samba] samba and winbind issues 1. Run ~samba/bin/wbinfo -u and make sure you are actually talking to your domain controller 2. Do you have winbind entries in your nsswitch.conf file? Have you made your system re-read this info (the command is nsadmin restart on irix, don't know about other platforms). 3. The windows box isn't caching any old login data is it? (I've had problems testing samba configuration changes because windows 2000 caches some of the login stuff ... I'm not great on windows admin, don't know how to force the cache to clear without a reboot, so I've had to reboot the windows client to test... 4. One of the samba guys said that the winbind use default domain parameter might not do what I originally hoped (help me match NT username with UNIX username without having to use a username map). Recent tests seem to show that my UID's only match if I turn that parameter off and use a username map. Of course, testing has been very frustrating because I keep fighting with windows caching ... Have you tried using a username map? Karen Wieprecht -Original Message- From: Jennifer Fountain [mailto:JFountain;rbinc.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 9:39 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Samba] samba and winbind issues I know winbind (i think) is working fine. i can log into a unix box with my NT userid but when i try to access shares on my samba server, i get these errors: [2002/10/23 08:47:01, 0] lib/util_sec.c:(111) Failed to set gid privileges to (-1,-2) now set to (0,0) uid=(0,0) [2002/10/23 08:47:01, 0] lib/util.c:(1092) PANIC: failed to set gid [2002/10/23 09:17:08, 0] lib/util_sec.c:(111) Failed to set gid privileges to (-1,-2) now set to (0,0) uid=(0,0) [2002/10/23 09:17:08, 0] lib/util.c:(1092) PANIC: failed to set gid log.smbd: END Here is a copy of my smb.conf # Samba config file created using SWAT # from ws09573.rb.net (10.27.52.177) # Date: 2002/10/23 08:16:35 # Global parameters [global] workgroup = domain1 netbios name = ARES server string = ARES_SAMBA interfaces = lan4 127.0.0.1 bind interfaces only = Yes security = DOMAIN encrypt passwords = Yes password server = dc1 wins server = 10.1.14.25 winbind uid = 4-4 winbind gid = 5-5 template shell = /usr/bin/ksh winbind use default domain = Yes [jf] path = /tmp/jfountain username = jfountain valid users = jfountain admin users = domain admins read only = No what am i doing wrong? any info would be greatly appreciated! thanks! -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RE: [Samba] samba and oplocks and office applications
General consensus is to disable oplocks for a hassle free existence especially with Office apps: Oplocks = no Kernel Oplocks = no Level2 Oplocks = no HTH Noel Also, something Jeremy posted to the list a few days ago: Ok, as promised, a brief explaination of oplocks, share modes and locking. When a client opens a file it can request an oplock or file lease. This is (to simplify a bit) a guarentee that no one else has the file open simultaneously. It allows the client to not send any updates on the file to the server, thus reducing a network file access to local access (once the file is in client cache). An oplock break is when the server sends a request to the client to flush all its changes back to the server, so the file is in a consistent state for other opens to succeed. If a client fails to respond to this asynchronous request then the file can be corrupted. Hence the turn off oplocks answer if people are having multi-user file access problems. Unless the kernel is oplock aware (SGI IRIX and Linux are the only two UNIXes that are at the moment) then if a local UNIX process accesses the file simultaneously then Samba has no way of telling this is occuring, so the guarentee to the client is broken. This can corrupt the file. Short answer - it you have UNIX clients accessing the same file as smbd locally or via NFS and you're not running Linux or IRIX then turn off oplocks for that file or share. Share modes. These are modes of opening a file, that guarentee an invarient - such as DENY_WRITE - which means that if any other opens are requested with write access after this current open has succeeded then they should be denied with a sharing violation error message. Samba handles these internally inside smbd. UNIX clients accessing the same file ignore these invarients. Just proving that if you need simultaneous file access from a Windows and UNIX client you *must* have an application that is written to lock records correctly on both sides. Few applications are written like this, and even fewer are cross platform (UNIX and Windows) so in practice this isn't much of a problem. Locking. This really means byte range locking - such as lock 10 bytes at file offset 24 for write access. This is the area in which well written UNIX and Windows apps will cooperate. Windows locks (at least from NT or above) are 64-bit unsigned offsets. UNIX locks are either 31 bit or 63 bit and are signed (the top bit is used for the sign). Samba handles these by first ensuring that all the Windows locks don't conflict (ie. if other Windows clients have competing locks then just reject immediately) - this allows us to support 64-bit Windows locks on 32-bit filesystems. Secondly any locks that are valid are then mapped onto UNIX fcntl byte range locks. These are the locks that will be seen by UNIX processes. If there is a conflict here the lock is rejected. Note that if a client has an oplock then it knows that no other client can have the file open so usually doesn't bother to send to lock request to the server - this means once again if you need to share files between UNIX and Windows processes either use IRIX or Linux, or turn off oplocks for these files/shares. Hope this is clear :-). Jeremy. -Original Message- From: Nir Livni [mailto:nirl;cyber-ark.com] Sent: 28 October 2002 14:13 To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: [Samba] samba and oplocks and office applications I'm using samba version 2.2.1a on a linux RH7.2 kernel 2.4.7-10. I'm having a lot of oplock problems, specially when using office applications like word. I would like to know: 1. what is the recommended configuration in version 2.2.1a (oplocks = yes/no , level2 oplocks = yes/no , kernel oplocks = yes/no) 2. what is considered to be a stable version for oplocks usage Thanks, Nir -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba --- Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.404 / Virus Database: 228 - Release Date: 15/10/2002 --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.404 / Virus Database: 228 - Release Date: 15/10/2002 -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] root prexec/postexec login scripts
I have a perl script that I'd like to use to create windows 9x login scripts at login time but I cannot get the process to work right. I have RedHat 7.3 (actually the k12ltsp v2.1.0 which is a modified RH7.3) set up as a domain controller which is working well. Manually created login scripts run fine on the workstations at login. I'm using a netlogon script I found at http://www.0x0a.com/netlogon.php that I've modified to handle multiple groups based upon group membership in /etc/group as I need. If I run the script from a command line supplying just a username it works ok. ./netlogon.pl mrambo #This results in a good script. When I put in a root preexec like... [netlogon] comment = Network Logon Service path = /home/netlogon guest ok = yes read only = yes browseable = no printable = no write list = @adm share modes = no root prexec = /home/netlogon/netlogon.pl %U root postexec = rm -f /home/netlogon/%U.bat it fails to run. My box was running samba 2.2.3a as distributed w/RH7.3. When I inserting the root preexec statement in smb.conf the domain logons would no longer function. I received a no domain controller error message. I could still manually map drives after clicking ok at the error message though. I could not see anything in the logs related to preexec or domain logon problems at log level 2. I couldn't get log level 3 to work for some reason on the RH supplied samba so I upgraded to the 2.2.6 samba binaries on samba.org. I still get the same no domain controller error on the workstation but now with the added 'feature' that it also seems to hang an nmbd process on the server. Help!!! I worked on this almost all day Saturday including searching the samba archives on marc.theaimsgroup.com and I'm out of ideas. Thanks. -- Mike Rambo [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Run smbclient in Unix shell script
Title: Run smbclient in Unix shell script Hi, I can run smbclient on Sun Solaris Korn shell command line to access a NT server from an Unix worksation without problem but always got session setup failed: NT_STATUS_LOGON_FAILURE when run it from a Korn shell script. Any help or suggestion will be appreciated. C.C. Liu
Re: [Samba] PDC Problems
When do you get this problem and what are your client settings. Are you moving an existing account to another machine or the same machine with a new os? Nick Michele Santucci wrote: This's my conf file I still have problems but the error message is different this time, it sounds like (translating it from italian): It's impossible to join this machine to the domain. There's a conflict between the supllied credential and pre existent ones P.S. When v3.0 will be released? bye by(t)e[S]...TuX! # Samba config file created using SWAT # from 0.0.0.0 (0.0.0.0) # Date: 2002/10/25 17:42:26 # Global parameters [global] coding system = client code page = 850 code page directory = /var/lib/samba/codepages workgroup = CCGM netbios name = SERVER-CCGM netbios aliases = netbios scope = server string = CCGM Samba Server interfaces = eth0 bind interfaces only = No security = USER encrypt passwords = Yes update encrypted = No allow trusted domains = Yes hosts equiv = min passwd length = 5 map to guest = Never null passwords = No obey pam restrictions = No password server = smb passwd file = /etc/samba/smbpasswd root directory = pam password change = No passwd program = /usr/bin/passwd passwd chat = *new*password* %n\n *new*password* %n\n *changed* passwd chat debug = No username map = password level = 0 username level = 0 unix password sync = Yes restrict anonymous = No lanman auth = Yes use rhosts = No admin log = No log level = 0 syslog = 1 syslog only = No log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m max log size = 50 timestamp logs = Yes debug hires timestamp = No debug pid = No debug uid = No protocol = NT1 large readwrite = No max protocol = NT1 min protocol = CORE read bmpx = No read raw = Yes write raw = Yes nt smb support = Yes nt pipe support = Yes nt status support = Yes announce version = 4.5 announce as = NT max mux = 50 max xmit = 65535 name resolve order = lmhosts host wins bcast max packet = 65535 max ttl = 259200 max wins ttl = 518400 min wins ttl = 21600 time server = No unix extensions = No change notify timeout = 60 deadtime = 0 getwd cache = Yes keepalive = 300 lpq cache time = 10 max smbd processes = 0 max disk size = 0 max open files = 1 read size = 16384 socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 stat cache size = 50 use mmap = Yes total print jobs = 0 load printers = Yes printcap name = lpstat disable spoolss = No enumports command = addprinter command = deleteprinter command = show add printer wizard = Yes os2 driver map = strip dot = No mangling method = hash character set = mangled stack = 50 stat cache = Yes domain admin group = ccgm-admin domain guest group = machine password timeout = 604800 add user script = delete user script = logon script = logon path = \\%N\%U\profile logon drive = logon home = \\%N\%U domain logons = Yes os level = 65 lm announce = Auto lm interval = 60 preferred master = True local master = Yes domain master = True browse list = Yes enhanced browsing = Yes dns proxy = Yes wins proxy = Yes wins server = wins support = Yes wins hook = kernel oplocks = Yes lock spin count = 3 lock spin time = 10 oplock break wait time = 0 add share command = change share command = delete share command = config file = preload = lock dir = /var/cache/samba pid directory = /var/run/samba utmp directory = wtmp directory = utmp = No default service = message command = dfree command = valid chars = remote announce = remote browse sync = socket address = 0.0.0.0 homedir map = auto.home time offset = 0 NIS homedir = No source environment = panic action = hide local users = No host msdfs = No winbind uid = winbind gid = template homedir = /home/%D/%U template shell = /bin/false winbind separator = \ winbind cache time = 15 winbind enum users = Yes winbind enum groups = Yes winbind use default domain = Yes comment = path = alternate permissions = No username = guest guest account = guest invalid users = valid users = ccgm-admin, ccgm, satya admin users = ccgm-admin read list = write list = printer admin = force user = force group = read only = Yes create mask = 0744 force create mode = 00 security mask = 0777 force security mode = 00 directory mask = 0755 force directory mode = 00 directory security mask = 0777 force directory security mode = 00 force unknown acl user = 00 inherit permissions = No inherit acls = No guest only = No guest ok = No only user = No hosts allow = hosts deny = status = Yes nt acl support = Yes block size = 1024 max connections = 0 min print space = 0 strict allocate = No strict sync = No sync always = No write cache size = 0 max print jobs = 1000 printable = No postscript = No printing = cups print command = lpr -r -P%p %s lpq command =
[Samba] Help: configure error with cvs download samba 3.x
Hello, I used cvs to download and build samba, but it failed to build with error message: checking configure summary... configure: error: summary failure. Aborting config I used the following download and build process: (solaris 7 11/99 gcc 3.2 automake 1.7, libtool 1.4.3, gnu make 3.80, binutils 2.13) !/usr/bin/ksh #cd /usr/local/samba cd /usr/local echo \npassword: anoncvs\n cvs -d :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvsroot login if [ ! -d /usr/local/samba/source ]; then echo Creating new samba install #mkdir -p /usr/local/samba/source cvs -z5 -d :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvsroot co samba if [ $! ]; then echo error fi else echo Updating old samba install /usr/bin/rm /usr/local/samba/bin/* /usr/bin/rm /usr/local/samba/sbin/* cvs -d :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvsroot update -d -P fi # Configure and build samba cd /usr/local/samba/source #/usr/local/bin/gmake realclean #/usr/bin/rm config.cache ltmain.sh configure #aclocal #libtoolize --force #/usr/local/bin/autoheader #/usr/local/bin/autoconf cd /usr/local/samba/source env CFLAGS=-Wall -m32 -g ./configure \ --with-winbind \ --without-sendfile-support \ --with-pam \ --with-pam_smbpass \ --with-included-popt \ --with-smbwrapper # /usr/local/bin/gmake proto /usr/local/bin/gmake /usr/local/bin/gmake install /usr/local/bin/gmake nsswitch/libnss_winbind.so /usr/local/bin/gmake nsswitch/libnss_wins.so ln -s /usr/local/samba/source/nsswitch/libnss_winbind.so /usr/lib/libnss_winbind.so.1 ln -s /usr/local/samba/source/nsswitch/libnss_winbind.so /usr/lib/libnss_winbind.so.2 ln -s /usr/local/samba/source/nsswitch/libnss_winbind.so /usr/lib/nss_winbind.so.1 ln -s /usr/local/samba/source/nsswitch/libnss_winbind.so /usr/lib/nss_winbind.so.2 echo If not already done, you need to modify pam.conf for samba pam support. echo See /usr/local/samba/docs/textdocs/Sol* for information. ~ -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Is 2.2.6 Final?
On Mon, 28 Oct 2002, William Jojo wrote: Just tought I'd follow up and see if 2.2.6 is truly the last release of samba_2_2 CVS branch. Yes, 2.2.6 is the latest stable release. We hope that this will be our last update. All samba-team resources are now focussing on getting 3.0.0 readt for release. Right now 3.0.0 is still changing significantly and we would not recommend it's use in a production environment. We've got six systems running it with no visible issues. If it is not broken then why fix it? I'm currently testing CVS from Sunday's pull of 3.0...is this the direction I should be heading? Yes. But do your home work. Test, test, test, and give us feedback. - John T. -- John H Terpstra Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] PDC Problems
When do you get this problem and what are your client settings. Are you moving an existing account to another machine or the same machine with a new os? Nick Michele Santucci wrote: This's my conf file I still have problems but the error message is different this time, it sounds like (translating it from italian): It's impossible to join this machine to the domain. There's a conflict between the supllied credential and pre existent ones P.S. When v3.0 will be released? bye by(t)e[S]...TuX! # Samba config file created using SWAT # from 0.0.0.0 (0.0.0.0) # Date: 2002/10/25 17:42:26 # Global parameters [global] coding system = client code page = 850 code page directory = /var/lib/samba/codepages workgroup = CCGM netbios name = SERVER-CCGM netbios aliases = netbios scope = server string = CCGM Samba Server interfaces = eth0 bind interfaces only = No security = USER encrypt passwords = Yes update encrypted = No allow trusted domains = Yes hosts equiv = min passwd length = 5 map to guest = Never null passwords = No obey pam restrictions = No password server = smb passwd file = /etc/samba/smbpasswd root directory = pam password change = No passwd program = /usr/bin/passwd passwd chat = *new*password* %n\n *new*password* %n\n *changed* passwd chat debug = No username map = password level = 0 username level = 0 unix password sync = Yes restrict anonymous = No lanman auth = Yes use rhosts = No admin log = No log level = 0 syslog = 1 syslog only = No log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m max log size = 50 timestamp logs = Yes debug hires timestamp = No debug pid = No debug uid = No protocol = NT1 large readwrite = No max protocol = NT1 min protocol = CORE read bmpx = No read raw = Yes write raw = Yes nt smb support = Yes nt pipe support = Yes nt status support = Yes announce version = 4.5 announce as = NT max mux = 50 max xmit = 65535 name resolve order = lmhosts host wins bcast max packet = 65535 max ttl = 259200 max wins ttl = 518400 min wins ttl = 21600 time server = No unix extensions = No change notify timeout = 60 deadtime = 0 getwd cache = Yes keepalive = 300 lpq cache time = 10 max smbd processes = 0 max disk size = 0 max open files = 1 read size = 16384 socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 stat cache size = 50 use mmap = Yes total print jobs = 0 load printers = Yes printcap name = lpstat disable spoolss = No enumports command = addprinter command = deleteprinter command = show add printer wizard = Yes os2 driver map = strip dot = No mangling method = hash character set = mangled stack = 50 stat cache = Yes domain admin group = ccgm-admin domain guest group = machine password timeout = 604800 add user script = delete user script = logon script = logon path = \\%N\%U\profile logon drive = logon home = \\%N\%U domain logons = Yes os level = 65 lm announce = Auto lm interval = 60 preferred master = True local master = Yes domain master = True browse list = Yes enhanced browsing = Yes dns proxy = Yes wins proxy = Yes wins server = wins support = Yes wins hook = kernel oplocks = Yes lock spin count = 3 lock spin time = 10 oplock break wait time = 0 add share command = change share command = delete share command = config file = preload = lock dir = /var/cache/samba pid directory = /var/run/samba utmp directory = wtmp directory = utmp = No default service = message command = dfree command = valid chars = remote announce = remote browse sync = socket address = 0.0.0.0 homedir map = auto.home time offset = 0 NIS homedir = No source environment = panic action = hide local users = No host msdfs = No winbind uid = winbind gid = template homedir = /home/%D/%U template shell = /bin/false winbind separator = \ winbind cache time = 15 winbind enum users = Yes winbind enum groups = Yes winbind use default domain = Yes comment = path = alternate permissions = No username = guest guest account = guest invalid users = valid users = ccgm-admin, ccgm, satya admin users = ccgm-admin read list = write list = printer admin = force user = force group = read only = Yes create mask = 0744 force create mode = 00 security mask = 0777 force security mode = 00 directory mask = 0755 force directory mode = 00 directory security mask = 0777 force directory security mode = 00 force unknown acl user = 00 inherit permissions = No inherit acls = No guest only = No guest ok = No only user = No hosts allow = hosts deny = status = Yes nt acl support = Yes block size = 1024 max connections = 0 min print space = 0 strict allocate = No strict sync = No sync always = No write cache size = 0 max print jobs = 1000 printable = No postscript = No printing = cups print command = lpr -r -P%p %s lpq command = lpq -P%p lprm command = lprm -P%p %j lppause
[Samba] New Error with smbgroupedit
I updated from the newest cvs (HEAD) today, and now am unable to make changes to the group mapping database using smbgroupedit. It has worked successfully in the past. Using OpenLdap as passdb backend. The command smbgroupedit -v works as advertised and lists all the built in groups, however the command smbgroupedit -c Domain Admins -u DOMADMIN generates the error message Count not update the group database -- (actual text, probably should be Could.) If I specify and invalid group for either parameter the system recognizes the bad group so it appears is getting to the LDAP backend, and the group database. I also tried deleting group_mapping.tdb and letting it recreate - still issues the error. What is causing this problem? Ray Raszka Partners Healthcare 70 Jackson Drive Cranford, New Jersey (908) 931-9111 Ext. 2716 -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Windows 2000 server and Samba PDC
Hi, I have a network that runs samba 2.2.5 on a Linux box that acts as the primary server on the network. It is the PDC, WINS, etc.. The Windows 2000 server is nothing more then a box that runs Terminal Services for Remote Access. Anyway, I know that in Samba any member of the domain admin group is an admin on a windows 2000 box, or at least thats how it appears to me when I access the Windows 2000 server box. My question is this, is there any comparable (group/feature) like this for Power users, standard users, etc? I can't seem to figure out for the life of me how to add a Network user, a member in my LDAP tree and in my samba domain as a power user to a windows 2000 server. The only thing I can seem to do is to add a user as a power user on the LOCAL machine only. In windows 2000 Pro this is really easy to do but I can't figure out if it is a windows issue or a samba one. Thanks for your help in advance, Peter Shull -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] samba and oplocks and office applications
On Mon, 28 Oct 2002, Nir Livni wrote: I'm using samba version 2.2.1a on a linux RH7.2 kernel 2.4.7-10. Suggest you update to samba-2.2.6. There have been several patches to locking code in samba since 2.2.1a. The other reply you received is also good information. - John T. I'm having a lot of oplock problems, specially when using office applications like word. I would like to know: 1. what is the recommended configuration in version 2.2.1a (oplocks = yes/no , level2 oplocks = yes/no , kernel oplocks = yes/no) 2. what is considered to be a stable version for oplocks usage Thanks, Nir -- John H Terpstra Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Is 2.2.6 Final?
John H Terpstra wrote: On Mon, 28 Oct 2002, William Jojo wrote: Just tought I'd follow up and see if 2.2.6 is truly the last release of samba_2_2 CVS branch. Yes, 2.2.6 is the latest stable release. So there will never be a stable samba again? ;) We hope that this will be our last update. All samba-team resources are now focussing on getting 3.0.0 readt for release. Right now 3.0.0 is still changing significantly and we would not recommend it's use in a production environment. We've got six systems running it with no visible issues. If it is not broken then why fix it? the last version I had problems with was 2.2.3a (on a SuSE system) and 2.2.4 (there were problems with LDAP, all solved since 2.2.5) I'm currently testing CVS from Sunday's pull of 3.0...is this the direction I should be heading? Yes. But do your home work. Test, test, test, and give us feedback. I'm currently working on a PDC for about 300 LDAP-based users, I guess with LDAP there is no problem when migrating to 3.0? Probably I'll run the actual CVS parallel regards -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] root prexec/postexec login scripts
Hi Deryk, thanks for the personal response. I forgot to mention in the original post that part of my reason for upgrading to 2.2.6 was to get away from the redhat rpms in the hope that I could get the log level boosted up some. That part was successful. I set the log level to 3 (I saw that in man smb.conf but it didn't indicate whether it could go any higher) but didn't see anything in either the system or samba logs that seemed to relate to the problem. Not knowing what to expect, I was just looking for something either domain related, something which referred to netlogon or preexec, or something which referred to a script failure in general. I didn't see any of those. I'm glad you hear that you still use this on 2.2.6 though because it would indicate that at least root preexec still works in the new version the same as in the old. This isn't related to my use of win9x (as opposed to NT/2000) clients is it? Deryk Robosson wrote: On Mon, 28 Oct 2002 10:44 pm, Mike Rambo wrote: [SNIP] scripts run fine on the workstations at login. I'm using a netlogon script I found at http://www.0x0a.com/netlogon.php that I've modified to handle multiple groups based upon group membership in /etc/group as I need. If I run the script from a command line supplying just a username it works ok. ./netlogon.pl mrambo #This results in a good script. Okay, it appears that you have XML-Twig installed and the script is functioning from the command line as it should be. I have this script working in production environments on samba 2.2.2 (machine needs to be upgraded..client is stalling ;)) and 2.2.6 configurations without any trouble. [netlogon] comment = Network Logon Service path = /home/netlogon guest ok = yes read only = yes browseable = no printable = no write list = @adm share modes = no root prexec = /home/netlogon/netlogon.pl %U root postexec = rm -f /home/netlogon/%U.bat Looks good to me..quite similar to what I normally use. Perhaps someone else can shed some light on the issue..though I think the log level should probably be a bit higher. -- Regards, Deryk Robosson Robosson Business Services 22 Flemington Street Albany, WA 6330 ABN: 56 728 377 499 Phone: +61 4 0842 9835 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Mike Rambo [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RE: [Samba] samba and winbind issues
Yes and No When i get a getent groups or groups, I only get domain admins. I am a member of about 10 groups and they aren't being listed. Does this matter: winbind uid = 4-4 winbind gid = 5-5 for some reason i am not getting a list of the correct groups but when i type wbinfo -g i get them all. I have AD in mixed mode if that helps. Thanks! -Original Message- From: Wieprecht, Karen M. [mailto:Karen.Wieprecht;jhuapl.edu] Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 11:13 AM To: 'Jennifer Fountain'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: [Samba] samba and winbind issues Are you talking about access rights (like write list = @group) ? I found a few interesting things with groups and security=domain with winbind: 1. the @group syntax applies to the UNIX group names. To give access to an NT group, you need to use something like this: write list = @WALNETNT_Domain Users @DomainnameWinbindseparatorNTgroupname 2. If I specified an NT user, it seemed that I had to prefix it with the domain name and my winbind separator to get it to work correctly write list = WALNETNT_jmacs 3. If you want to grant access to more than one user/group, separate the entries with commas: write list = WALNETNT_jmacs, @WALNETNT_Domain Users 4. If you are using a username map file to make the user's UID assignment match when he access files from either side, it seems to cause his membership to other NT groups to go un-noticed. Example: I had a read-only share that was writable by @WALNETNT_Domain Users , but user karen (NT) was being assigned the UNIX karen account UID and GID by the username mapping mechanism, and was no longer recognized as a member of the NT Domain Users group ... I was going to play with adding other UNIX groups to the write list to see if I could fix this problem. Hope this answers your question. -Original Message- From: Jennifer Fountain [mailto:JFountain;rbinc.com] Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 5:22 PM To: 'Wieprecht, Karen M.' Subject: RE: [Samba] samba and winbind issues Thanks for the email. I finally got samba to work but now I am having issues with groups. When I do a groups jfountain, i get domain admins but no other groups. when i do a groups user1, i get nothing - and the user is in a couple groups. Any thoughts or ideas? what am i missing? -Original Message- From: Wieprecht, Karen M. [mailto:Karen.Wieprecht;jhuapl.edu] Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 9:04 AM To: 'Jennifer Fountain'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: [Samba] samba and winbind issues 1. Run ~samba/bin/wbinfo -u and make sure you are actually talking to your domain controller 2. Do you have winbind entries in your nsswitch.conf file? Have you made your system re-read this info (the command is nsadmin restart on irix, don't know about other platforms). 3. The windows box isn't caching any old login data is it? (I've had problems testing samba configuration changes because windows 2000 caches some of the login stuff ... I'm not great on windows admin, don't know how to force the cache to clear without a reboot, so I've had to reboot the windows client to test... 4. One of the samba guys said that the winbind use default domain parameter might not do what I originally hoped (help me match NT username with UNIX username without having to use a username map). Recent tests seem to show that my UID's only match if I turn that parameter off and use a username map. Of course, testing has been very frustrating because I keep fighting with windows caching ... Have you tried using a username map? Karen Wieprecht -Original Message- From: Jennifer Fountain [mailto:JFountain;rbinc.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 9:39 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Samba] samba and winbind issues I know winbind (i think) is working fine. i can log into a unix box with my NT userid but when i try to access shares on my samba server, i get these errors: [2002/10/23 08:47:01, 0] lib/util_sec.c:(111) Failed to set gid privileges to (-1,-2) now set to (0,0) uid=(0,0) [2002/10/23 08:47:01, 0] lib/util.c:(1092) PANIC: failed to set gid [2002/10/23 09:17:08, 0] lib/util_sec.c:(111) Failed to set gid privileges to (-1,-2) now set to (0,0) uid=(0,0) [2002/10/23 09:17:08, 0] lib/util.c:(1092) PANIC: failed to set gid log.smbd: END Here is a copy of my smb.conf # Samba config file created using SWAT # from ws09573.rb.net (10.27.52.177) # Date: 2002/10/23 08:16:35 # Global parameters [global] workgroup = domain1 netbios name = ARES server string = ARES_SAMBA interfaces = lan4 127.0.0.1 bind interfaces only = Yes security = DOMAIN encrypt passwords = Yes password server = dc1 wins server = 10.1.14.25 winbind uid = 4-4 winbind gid = 5-5 template shell = /usr/bin/ksh
Re: [Samba] Is 2.2.6 Final?
On Mon, 2002-10-28 at 09:17, Markus Schabel wrote: John H Terpstra wrote: On Mon, 28 Oct 2002, William Jojo wrote: Just tought I'd follow up and see if 2.2.6 is truly the last release of samba_2_2 CVS branch. Yes, 2.2.6 is the latest stable release. So there will never be a stable samba again? ;) Note the te in that word? Hopefully 3.X will be stable. We hope that this will be our last update. All samba-team resources are now focussing on getting 3.0.0 readt for release. Right now 3.0.0 is still changing significantly and we would not recommend it's use in a production environment. Hooray! We've got six systems running it with no visible issues. If it is not broken then why fix it? the last version I had problems with was 2.2.3a (on a SuSE system) and 2.2.4 (there were problems with LDAP, all solved since 2.2.5) I'm currently testing CVS from Sunday's pull of 3.0...is this the direction I should be heading? Yes. But do your home work. Test, test, test, and give us feedback. I'm currently working on a PDC for about 300 LDAP-based users, I guess with LDAP there is no problem when migrating to 3.0? Probably I'll run the actual CVS parallel regards -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RE: [Samba] samba and winbind issues
Sorry, I don't know any more, hopefully one of the samba gurus might have an explanation for the behavior. Karen Wieprecht -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] printing
I have following configuration : [global] workgroup = testing server string = Samba-Server security = SHARE encrypt passwords = Yes map to guest = Bad User socket options = SO_KEEPALIVE IPTOS_LOWDELAY TCP_NODELAY character set = ISO8859-15 kernel oplocks = No [printers] comment = All Printers path = /var/spool/samba hosts allow = 192.168.0.20 browseable = no public = yes writeable = no printable = yes 1.) My Client has the IP 192.168.0.4, but there is no problem for the client to print on my samba server. If I add the line hosts deny = 192.168.0.4, my client can still printing. Is this normal a normal behaviour of the samba ? Or is my configuration file wrong ? 2.) If I change the line public = yes to public = no, I can print with the client without a password ? Is this normal, too ? (System : Debian stable/testing, Samba 2.2.3a-6, kernel 2.4.19) I hope somebody can help! Nils -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] NT4 chaning machine passwords
I am having an issue with NT4 workstations changing their passwords on a regular basis. I am getting the following error: Description: Changing machine account password for account WS10$ failed with the following error: The handle is invalid. This does not happen on all the NT4 workstations and is occuring on a W2KPro as well. Has anyone found a solution for this? Thanks, Guy -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Samba, Cups, printer driver download problems
I have Samba 2.2.6 complied against Cups 1.1.16 on a Sparc system running Solaris 9. Cups has replaced the stock system V lp spooler on this system (original packages removed.) Cups working from UNIX command line is A-OK. I have been working on setting up Samba to play nice with cups. I have followed the instructions from both the Cups and Samba websites to set up downloading of the generic Adobe postscript drivers to MS Windows PCs and use CUPS as a RIP. So far I have been unable to get the Windows 98 drivers to download to the client PC - when adding the printer the client ends up asking the user what type of printer is being added. Driver downloads for W2K work OK. The relevant lines from a Samba log file seem to be: - [2002/10/28 14:17:46, 9] printing/nt_printing.c:get_a_printer_2(2702) Unpacked printer [ur10] name [\\techops\ur10] running driver [ur10] [2002/10/28 14:17:46, 10] printing/nt_printing.c:get_a_printer(3302) get_a_printer: [ur10] level 2 returning WERR_OK [2002/10/28 14:17:46, 10] printing/nt_printing.c:get_a_printer_driver_9x_compatible(1825) driver key: [DRIVERS/WIN40/0/ur10] [2002/10/28 14:17:46, 8] printing/nt_printing.c:get_a_printer_driver_3(1758) get_a_printer_driver_3: [DRIVERS/WIN40/0/ur10] info3-name[ur10] info3-datafile[\print$\WIN40\0\ur10.PPD] info3-helpfile[\print$\WIN40\0\ADOBEPS4.HLP] info3-monitorname [PSMON.DLL] info3-defaultdatatype [RAW] info3-environment [Windows 4.0] info3-driverpath [\print$\WIN40\0\ADOBEPS4.DRV] info3-configfile [] [2002/10/28 14:17:46, 10] smbd/lanman.c:get_printerdrivernumber(799) 9x compatable driver line for [ur10]: [ADOBEPS4.DRV:ur10.PPD:ADOBEPS4.HLP:PSMON.DLL:RAW:] [2002/10/28 14:17:46, 3] smbd/lanman.c:get_printerdrivernumber(836) Can't determine number of printer driver files [2002/10/28 14:17:46, 3] smbd/lanman.c:api_DosPrintQGetInfo(918) api_DosPrintQGetInfo: Driver files count: 0 [2002/10/28 14:17:46, 10] printing/nt_printing.c:get_a_printer(3277) get_a_printer: [ur10] level 2 [2002/10/28 14:17:46, 6] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_debug(60) 00 sec_io_desc_buf nt_printing_getsec --- Cupsaddsmb ran without errors and the WIN40 subdirectory is populated with files. Can anyone offer any advice? Thanks, Bob Martel ** Speaking only for myself - CSU pays better people than me to speak for them. Bob Martel - System Administrator | I met someone who looks Maxine Goodman Levin College of Urban Affairs |a lot like you Cleveland State University | She does the things you do (216) 687-2214 |But she is an IBM [EMAIL PROTECTED] | -Jeff Lynne ** -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] security bug or misconfiguration ?
Dear list, We are experiencing users unexpectedly accessing each others files. It happens when they try to access files that are called the same and which is located in an equal file structure under their login drive. Two other conditions need to be fulfilled: one of the users needs to have the file locked and both users needs to be logged into the same Citrix server(windows-2000). For instance if userA uses Outlook to open a PST file located here: L:\user.pst and userB tries to open L:\user.pst, it fails for userB even though the file L:\user.pst are different files since L: is the login drive for the user. The login drive is defined in smb.conf as: [user$] comment = Users home directory (L:) path = /pcstorage/%G/users/%U read only = No inherit permissions = Yes create mask = 0600 directory mask = 0700 user$ is referred to in the user profile on the NT PDC(\\pcserver\user$). %G resolves to the primary UNIX group that the user belongs to and %U resolves to the UNIX user ID. The file structure on the UNIX server is layed out as this: /storage1/department1/users/user1 /storage1/department1/users/user2 /storage1/department1/users/user3 . . /storage1/department2/users/user1 /storage1/department2/users/user2 /storage1/department2/users/user3 etc. This setup has been working fine for some time now, but suddenly we found out that some files in the users personal area were overwritten by other users. The Outlook example above will not overwrite, but is an easy test to prove the described functionality. The question is: Is this a bug or is our Samba setup misconfigured ? We run Samba-2.2.5 with ACL support and winbind on Solaris-8. Below is our smb.conf file: [global] workgroup = DOMAIN1 netbios name = storage1 netbios aliases = pcstorage interfaces = ge0 79.0.0.0/255.0.0.0 193.167.89.0/255.255.255.0 security = DOMAIN encrypt passwords = Yes password server = dc01, dc02, mailsrv wins server = 79.17.7.1 # # User that have all rights on all shares regardless of the permissions: # admin users = DOMAIN1+hbr,DOMAIN1+rbh log file = /usr/local/samba/var/log.%m max log size = 100 local master = No deadtime = 180 username map = /usr/local/samba/lib/users.map # separate domain and username with '+', like DOMAIN+username winbind separator = + winbind cache time = 3600 # use uids from 1 to 2 for domain users winbind uid = 1-2 # use gids from 1 to 2 for domain groups winbind gid = 1-2 # allow enumeration of winbind users and groups winbind enum users = yes winbind enum groups = yes client code page = 850 character set = ISO8859-1 valid chars = ø:Ø [user$] comment = Users home directory (L:) path = /pcstorage/%G/users/%U read only = No inherit permissions = Yes create mask = 0600 directory mask = 0700 . . . Rest of the drives... I hope some of you have been in the same situation or can tell me what is wrong. Thanks very much in advance. Kind regards, Hans. ** This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If you have received this e-mail in error please notify the system manager at [EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail and its contents do not constitute and shall not be considered as a financial commitment of Maersk Olie og Gas AS and its affiliates. Maersk Olie og Gas AS expressly disclaims any responsibility as to the accuracy and use of this e-mail and its contents. ** -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] solaris 7 and cvs samba 3.x build - No locking available. RunningSamba would be unsafe solaris
Hello, Getting during configure the infamous error: No locking available. Running Samba would be unsafe solaris I went into tests folder and tried summary.c. It fails with the above error. I tried to make the fcntl_lock manually like it tries and got the following: rootraven:/usr/local/samba/source/tests #gcc -m32 -o fcntl_lock fcntl_lock.c fcntl_lock.c: In function `main': fcntl_lock.c:43: storage size of `lock' isn't known fcntl_lock.c:55: `O_RDONLY' undeclared (first use in this function) fcntl_lock.c:55: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once fcntl_lock.c:55: for each function it appears in.) fcntl_lock.c:63: `F_WRLCK' undeclared (first use in this function) fcntl_lock.c:72: `F_GETLK' undeclared (first use in this function) fcntl_lock.c:75: `F_UNLCK' undeclared (first use in this function) fcntl_lock.c:84: `O_RDWR' undeclared (first use in this function) fcntl_lock.c:84: `O_CREAT' undeclared (first use in this function) fcntl_lock.c:84: `O_EXCL' undeclared (first use in this function) fcntl_lock.c:99: `F_SETLK' undeclared (first use in this function) Any thoughts on how to fix this? I tried --with-spinlocks, but configure fails anyway trying to do the fcntl locking. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Daylight savings
I'm running 2.2.6 When daylight savings time changed this weekend I had to reset all samba sessions as the sessions didn't pick up the time change. Copying file from a Windows client to the server made the filetime off by one hour. Killing all the same sessions (also restarted smbd -- not sure if that was needed) fixed the problem. Michael D. Black [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.csi-inc.com/http://www.csi-inc.com/~mike321-676-2923, x203Melbourne FL
Re: [Samba] auth to two diff PDCs? (success, sort of)
Collins, Kevin wrote: Hi All: Excuse me for butting in here, but I'm planning a migration from WinNT 4 to Samba in the near future and this thread has caused me to worry a little. Take the case that I'm planning: 3 Domains each to its own LAN (connected via 128k Frame Relay lines to form a WAN) Each domain currently has a NT 4 PDC and each domain trusts each other. How do I accomplish these trusts only using Samba PDCs? Meaning: If I rip out the NT Domains, replace the PDCs with Samba PDCs and rebuild new domains (new Domain Names, new NetBIOS names for the PDCs, etc.) How do I get the three domains to once again trust each other? Is there a Samba command to do this? Domain trusts (in terms of us being a PDC trusting other DCs) are currenetly a work in progress. We hope to have it finished for Samba 3.0. However, why do you need domain trusts? (There are lots of good answers to this question, but make sure you do have one of the answers). Samba 2.2 has always supported being a member server in a domain with domain trusts, for the record. Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartlett [EMAIL PROTECTED] Manager, Authentication Subsystems, Samba Team [EMAIL PROTECTED] Student Network Administrator, Hawker College [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://samba.org http://build.samba.org http://hawkerc.net -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RE: [Samba] samba and winbind issues
Thanks for your help though! :) -Original Message- From: Wieprecht, Karen M. [mailto:Karen.Wieprecht;jhuapl.edu] Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 1:19 PM To: 'Jennifer Fountain'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: [Samba] samba and winbind issues Sorry, I don't know any more, hopefully one of the samba gurus might have an explanation for the behavior. Karen Wieprecht -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] SMBFS files receiving incorrect timestamps
Hello all. Our system consists of two linux machines, each running Red Hat 7.1 (kernel 2.4.9-34), using SMB to mount multiple shares hosted by a Windows 2000 Advance Server. smbclient from Samba 2.2.5 is used to do the actual mounting. Over the weekend, a number of files on these SMBFS shares were created with incorrect timestamps (modification times). In some cases, the timestamps were off by as much as four days! Today, every file created by the linux machines, even those created by touch called without any extra arguments, received timestamps that were one hour ahead. When I discovered this was happening, I unmounted all SMBFS shares, and remounted them. This fixed the problem; all files created now have the correct timestamp. The Windows host and the linux clients all have their system clocks set correctly, and their system clocks were updated automatically during the switch from daylight savings time. I suspect the 1-hour discrepancy I saw today has something to do with the daylight savings switch, but if that is the case, what caused some files created on Saturday (26 October) to receive timestamps for this coming Wednesday (30 October)? Most importantly, how do I keep this from happening again? Please let me know if more information is needed. Thank you. ---Kris Kelley -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] PDC Problems
On the client machine; Control Panel Administration Tools Local Security Policy Local Policy Security Options Send unencrypted password to third-party SMB servers = enabled Michele Santucci wrote: Are the user and machine$ added to your /etc/passwd and smbpasswd files? all the user already added, I'm trying to add machine$ automatically (via adduser) Also do you have send unencrypted passwd to third party smb servers enabled in you local security policy settings? How? Something like that? encrypt passwords = Yes bye by(t)e[S]...TuX! -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] ENC: utilizing smbpasswd with two user #######URGENT#######
On Mon, 28 Oct 2002, SALOME Alexandre wrote: Hi, I have a user in Windows (user_windows = eng.calculo). I would like that this user_windows acess the unix (solairs2.6) as a valid user unix (user_unix=cs02929) (this problem is because the admintool only create user with 8 caractheres. How I can resolve this problem ? In your smb.conf [globals] add: username map = /etc/smbusers In your /etc/smbusers put: cs02929 = eng.calculo - John T. Atenciosamente Alexandre Salomé Comau System _ Sistemas Engenharia tel: 0055 031 9944 8646 fax:0055 031 3529 6533 -- John H Terpstra Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Another GUI
Well i checked the www.cpan.org for any samba perl modules and found one: http://search.cpan.org/author/ALIAN/Filesys-SmbClientParser-2.3/SmbClientPar ser.pm than looked at the source and found this line: if ( $line =~ /^\s+([\S ]*\S)\s+(Disk)\s+([\S ]*)/ ) This module also uses the Disk word. Also the author of this module writes: SmbClientParser is adapted from SMB.pm make by Remco van Mook [EMAIL PROTECTED] on smb2www project. So i think that this is a good idea after all. Perhaps you could be more specific on what is worng with that kind of parsing. I added a hide special shares (those with $) in the conf file as you proposed. The next release will contain that fix. Atomix -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Is 2.2.6 Final?
Markus Schabel wrote: John H Terpstra wrote: On Mon, 28 Oct 2002, William Jojo wrote: Just tought I'd follow up and see if 2.2.6 is truly the last release of samba_2_2 CVS branch. Yes, 2.2.6 is the latest stable release. So there will never be a stable samba again? ;) :-) We hope that this will be our last update. All samba-team resources are now focussing on getting 3.0.0 readt for release. Right now 3.0.0 is still changing significantly and we would not recommend it's use in a production environment. We've got six systems running it with no visible issues. If it is not broken then why fix it? the last version I had problems with was 2.2.3a (on a SuSE system) and 2.2.4 (there were problems with LDAP, all solved since 2.2.5) I'm currently testing CVS from Sunday's pull of 3.0...is this the direction I should be heading? Yes. But do your home work. Test, test, test, and give us feedback. I'm currently working on a PDC for about 300 LDAP-based users, I guess with LDAP there is no problem when migrating to 3.0? Probably I'll run the actual CVS parallel Depending on how you also use LDAP, there are some good reasons to move to 3.0. In HEAD, pdb_ldap now has connection caching, and does not modify unchanged attributes (these benefits provided by metze, who has the significant advantage of using samba on a large and complex ldap infrastructure). We hope to move this stuff into the next 3.0 alpha. Samba 3.0 also adds 'ldap passwd sync', to help keep the LDAP and SMB passwords in sync. Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartlett [EMAIL PROTECTED] Manager, Authentication Subsystems, Samba Team [EMAIL PROTECTED] Student Network Administrator, Hawker College [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://samba.org http://build.samba.org http://hawkerc.net -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Website Safety Test Results
Hello, My name is Delisa, I have used the website testing technologies here at the Safe Shopping Network (http://www.safeshoppingnetwork.com) to test your site (samba.anu.edu.au) for security, usability and performance. You will be pleased to know that it did quite well. The reason I did the test is because we are currently searching for sites with high scores to add to our very popular (over two million shoppers per month) directory of tested safest shopping websites. I am not sure if I have the right email address but maybe you could lead me to the right person. If you would please forward this to the appropriate marketing manager, I would be grateful. Safe Shopping Network uses sophisticated testing technologies to test web sites for quality, security and usability. We also have the ability to deliver thousands of targeted, and more importantly, confident consumers proven to be eight times more likely to buy. Listing your site in the Safe Shopping Network is very effective due to the fact that the two million + users who visit each month are shoppers who prefer not to guess at whether they can trust a website. As we reveal your scores to them, they gain confidence in your company increasing the chance that they will make a purchase. The average click-to-purchase rate is 5.4% for our advertisers, far above the average .07% you get from other sources. We provide many high-value pricing packages (http://www.safeshoppingnetwork.com/pricing.cfm) starting at just $350/yr and that includes a 15,000 click guarantee. The different pricing packages include sub-category listings, category listings, full vulnerability/security reports (with solutions), 24/7 website monitoring, and click guarantee for each listing. Our packages are simply the most unique and effective ways to promote your website available. Since it looks like your site fits well into multiple categories, I would be happy to list samba.anu.edu.au in the section of your choice free when you purchase two or more listings. To discuss my proposal further, please feel free to give me a call on my direct line: (818) 344-1622 or call our toll free number (866) 29-TRUST (9-5 Pacific Standard Time) or sign up online at http://www.safeshoppingnetwork.com/pricing.cfm. Thank You, Delisa Foreman - Senior Account Manager Safe Shopping Network Guide to the safest web sites! Web: Http://www.SafeShoppingNetwork.com Toll Free: (866) 29-TRUST Direct Line: (818) 344-1622 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Here are some useful links: Homepage: http://www.safeshoppingnetwork.com Corporate Info: http://www.safeshoppingnetwork.com/aboutus.cfm Slide Show: http://www.safeshoppingnetwork.com/merchantzone.cfm Pricing: http://www.safeshoppingnetwork.com/pricing.cfm The content of this e-mail is strictly confidential, and is intended for the above listed recipient company only. If you received this email in error, I apologize for the inconvenience. Please reply back with the word Remove in the subject line and I will not email you again. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] SMBFS files receiving incorrect timestamps
On Mon, 28 Oct 2002, Kris Kelley wrote: When I discovered this was happening, I unmounted all SMBFS shares, and remounted them. This fixed the problem; all files created now have the correct timestamp. smbfs sets the mtimes itself. Not really sure why it was done like that, but some comments claim that NT4 doesn't set mtime properly otherwise. It would be better to just let the server handle time. The 1-hour diff is probably the daylight savings change. smbfs is told by smbmount what the server timezone is, as minutes from GMT. Of course this changes with the daylight savings ... switch from daylight savings time. I suspect the 1-hour discrepancy I saw today has something to do with the daylight savings switch, but if that is the case, what caused some files created on Saturday (26 October) to receive timestamps for this coming Wednesday (30 October)? No idea. Never heard anything like it before and would guess that the client time actually was wrong (at that particular time). /Urban -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Samba 2.2.6 leaks file descriptions!
On Sun, Oct 27, 2002 at 06:47:33PM +0100, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
Been running with this change since friday and it looks good. I can not
find any leaking FDs anymore. The usage of the server has been very low
so I won't know for sure until Monday afternoon.
Does this mean it's a RH kernel bug?
It could either (a) be a bug in the linux kernel, necessarily specific to
RedHat, or (b) a bug in the way we use the kernel change notify mechanism
on linux. Will take some more investigation to find out which.
Found one more, this file(MTP_UP_PA12.doc) has been open for 6 hours:
Ok, I've found and fixed the problems with 2.2.6 leaking file descriptors
when kernel change notify is turned on. Unfortunately (or fortunately as
we can fix this :-) it's a Samba bug, not a Linux kernel bug.
I've committed this to all CVS branches.
Jeremy.
Here is the patch :
Index: smbd/notify_kernel.c
===
RCS file: /data/cvs/samba/source/smbd/notify_kernel.c,v
retrieving revision 1.6.4.15
diff -u -r1.6.4.15 notify_kernel.c
--- smbd/notify_kernel.c11 Jun 2002 03:25:50 - 1.6.4.15
+++ smbd/notify_kernel.c28 Oct 2002 22:01:19 -
-127,7 +127,6
BlockSignals(True, RT_SIGNAL_NOTIFY);
for (i = 0; i signals_received; i++) {
if (fd == (int)fd_pending_array[i]) {
- close(fd);
fd_pending_array[i] = (SIG_ATOMIC_T)-1;
if (signals_received - i - 1) {
memmove((void *)fd_pending_array[i], (void
*)fd_pending_array[i+1],
-138,6 +137,7
break;
}
}
+ close(fd);
BlockSignals(False, RT_SIGNAL_NOTIFY);
}
SAFE_FREE(data);
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Re: How Samba let us down
--- Keith G. Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think he's referring to the phenomenon that I've seen on way too many technical mailing lists: be a complete asshole and you'll get the complete and undivided attention of multiple developers and power users, all of of whom assert, while helping, that that's not a good way to get help. :-) Best way to do it is to impugn the quality of the product, and threaten to switch to another. (By the way, the OP's subject line was a work of art along these lines. The 'us', rather than 'me', raising the prospect of a huge group of people disappointed in Samba, was particularly nice. I take my hat off.) I'm pretty sure a lot of posters have noticed this and use it to their advantage. You do have to be kind of unprincipled first... :-) Ack! I didn't mean to imply as much as it looks like I did about the OP and his motives. I was more focused on a social phenomenon that I'd noticed. The subject line *was* a work of art, but that's not quite saying the poster is a (con) artist. For the record, I do not believe he is an asshole, or unprincipled. I am an agnostic on the subject. Thanks! * I used the word us because it was everybody in my IT department, the printing departement, the DP department... some 100+ people who heavily depend on Samba. It let _us_ down. Didn't think about the implications of us vs. me. * It is always important to know the context. The very first paragraph of the subject went something like: I'm sharing my sad experience so that the Samba community can learn and grow. Never would I impugn the quality of Samba; After all, it could have been something we were doing wrong. We use Samba elsewhere and really like sticking it to Bill. Of course we don't overlook the stability, speed, cost, security, open source, flexibility, etc... * We actually were in the process of switching; No threats! (-: At that point, I was only sharing to help enlighten the community; Turning back was not an option. * I don't believe I'm an asshole, either (-: I always attempt to have this attitude: I could be completely wrong. The story had a happy ending. The NT server's new hard drive died, so we kept hobbling along on Samba. When we disabled all OpLocks, all was well. We are coming up on a week of constant stability, no corruption, and no interruptions in browsing the server's hard drive. Samba is looking gd. /dev/idal __ Do you Yahoo!? Y! Web Hosting - Let the expert host your web site http://webhosting.yahoo.com/ -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Access Problem connecting from windows 2000 client to Samba UNIXserver Share
On friday we changed our smb.conf file to test the security model that uses DOMAIN authenticacion. It worked fine testing two seperate usernames from Multiple Workstations connecting to a WORLD access share on the SAMBA server. I have to say nothing has changed at all since friday, apart from the weekend :) and we now get this MS error message when trying to connect the same share again from WINDOWS: "The account is not authorized to log in from this station" Just to confirm that on both WorkStations no network shares existed when we tried again today? I did find this and tried it also, it didn't make any difference: ++ Errors Codes and Misc. Information : Windows Specific Issues : Account is Not Authorized to Log In to This StationPrintable VersionAccount is Not Authorized to Log In to This Station Problem: When trying to login to a Windows 2000 machine, client gets the following error message: Account is Not Authorized to Log In to this Station Solution: Double click on My Computer Double click on Control Panel Double click on Administrative Tools Select Local Security Policy Select Local Policy Select Security Options FindSend Unencrypted Password to Connect to 3rd Party SMB Servers Right click on Send Unencrypted Password to Connect to 3rd Party SMB Servers Select Security Select Enabled Click OK Close all open windows ++ This is an example of our smb.conf file: ++ Our Version = Samba 2.2.0 # BROWSING workgroup = VTC server string = mn01m0008.agere.com announce as = NT local master = no preferred master = no domain master = no os level = 33 wins server = 135.149.49.50 remote announce = 135.149.49.50 # AUTHENTICATION password server = * # security=server security = domain # encrypt passwords = yes ++ Any help would be truly GREAT, even the NT boyz are stumped?? Jon J agere systems Office 651-675-3064( 1230 Northland DriveF Cell Phone 651-253-3703 Mendota, MN 55120 mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *
Re: [Samba] solaris 7 and cvs samba 3.x build - No locking available. Running Samba would be unsafe solaris
On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 02:55:05PM -0500, David Shapiro wrote: Hello, Getting during configure the infamous error: No locking available. Running Samba would be unsafe solaris Dunno why you would get this, solaris works fine of course. Maybe something screwy with your gcc installation? [problems compiling fcntl_lock] Find the lines #ifdef HAVE_FCNTL_H #include fcntl.h #endif and remove the #ifdef and #endif lines. Matt -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] FW: Access Problem connecting from windows 2000 client to Samba UNIX server Share
-Original Message-From: Rend, Jon (Jon) % Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 4:23 PMTo: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'Subject: Access Problem connecting from windows 2000 client to Samba UNIX server Share On friday we changed our smb.conf file to test the security model that uses DOMAIN authenticacion. It worked fine testing two seperate usernames from Multiple Workstations connecting to a WORLD access share on the SAMBA server. I have to say nothing has changed at all since friday, apart from the weekend :) and we now get this MS error message when trying to connect the same share again from WINDOWS: "The account is not authorized to log in from this station" Just to confirm that on both WorkStations no network shares existed when we tried again today? I did find this and tried it also, it didn't make any difference: ++ Errors Codes and Misc. Information : Windows Specific Issues : Account is Not Authorized to Log In to This StationPrintable VersionAccount is Not Authorized to Log In to This Station Problem: When trying to login to a Windows 2000 machine, client gets the following error message: Account is Not Authorized to Log In to this Station Solution: Double click on My Computer Double click on Control Panel Double click on Administrative Tools Select Local Security Policy Select Local Policy Select Security Options FindSend Unencrypted Password to Connect to 3rd Party SMB Servers Right click on Send Unencrypted Password to Connect to 3rd Party SMB Servers Select Security Select Enabled Click OK Close all open windows ++ This is an example of our smb.conf file: ++ Our Version = Samba 2.2.0 # BROWSING workgroup = VTC server string = mn01m0008.agere.com announce as = NT local master = no preferred master = no domain master = no os level = 33 wins server = 135.149.49.50 remote announce = 135.149.49.50 # AUTHENTICATION password server = * # security=server security = domain # encrypt passwords = yes ++ Any help would be truly GREAT, even the NT boyz are stumped?? Jon J agere systems Office 651-675-3064( 1230 Northland DriveF Cell Phone 651-253-3703 Mendota, MN 55120 mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *
Re: [Samba] Older Mac to SAMBA copy
On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 02:13:17PM -0600, Matt Nelson wrote: Since I posted this over the weekend, I thought I'd throw it out one more time to see if anyone else might see it and has any ideas on this. I didn't know samba could serve macs. Does the mac speak SMB? (Long time since I used macs) If you're only serving macs, you could use CAP or netatalk instead. Matt -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Winbind!
Hello, I amrunning Red Hat 7.3 Samba 2.26 and winbind. I have been able to join the domain and test all of the followingwith these commands. All works great. winbind -u winbind -g getent passwd getent group But when I set up a share to test with one domain user account it just presents me with a password dialog box and does not accept anything. It should not prompt me but if it does it should authenticate. I have tried it with the username map = /etc/samba/smbusers and that did not work either. I have the winbind separator as + but if I run testparm I get the following: [root@gtdns root]# testparmLoad smb config files from /etc/samba/smb.confProcessing section "[TESTIT]"Loaded services file OK.'winbind separator = +' might cause problems with group membership.Press enter to see a dump of your service definitions If I change the separator to \andrun testparm I get the following: [root@gtdns root]# testparmLoad smb config files from /etc/samba/smb.confProcessing section "[TESTIT]"Loaded services file OK.ERROR: the 'winbind separator' parameter must be a single character.Press enter to see a dump of your service definitions Here is my information: #=== Global Settings = [global] workgroup = GTESS1.COM netbios name = GTDNS server string = Linux 7.3 Samba Server log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m security = domain password server = * wins server = 192.168.2.1 ;username map = /etc/samba/smbusers encrypt passwords = yes winbind separator = + winbind uid = 1-2 winbind gid = 1-2 winbind enum users = yes winbind enum groups = yes template shell = /bin/bash winbind use default domain = yes socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 remote announce = 192.168.1.255 192.168.2.44 192.168.4.255 [TESTIT] comment = TESTIT path = /usr/stuff valid users = GTESS1.COM+jcrusade read only = No create mask = 0777 directory mask = 0777 Thanks, Jennifer Crusade GTESS Corp. CCNA, MCSE W2k\NT 4.0, MCP +I
[Samba] smbd is the source of usually high CPU usage
We have installed Samba 2.2.5 under SuSE Linux (kernel 2.4.7) on a z/800 (IBM mainframe) and are witnessing usually high processor usage. The high usage is associated with one of the clients. The client runs a script on an OS/2 machine that continuously works its way through a long list of small files one by one. The list of files is so long that the script may run for 5 or 6 hours. The script copies a small file from the server to workstation, updates the file on the workstation, writes the revised file back to the server from the workstation. When this script runs, we see processor utilization soar to values above 75%. Is there a penalty incurred when Samba is used in batch for intensive file transfer? Does anyone has a good reference to tuning Samba performance? regards.. Sean Angley, P.Eng. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Host Server Support ISM Canada IBM Global Services One Research Drive Regina, CANADA S4S 7H1 PHONE: (306) 790-5199 FAX:(306) 790-5070 -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] root prexec/postexec login scripts
On Tue, 29 Oct 2002 01:48 am, you wrote: Hi Deryk, thanks for the personal response. I forgot to mention in the original post that part of my reason for upgrading to 2.2.6 was to get away from the redhat rpms in the hope that I could get the log level boosted up some. That part was successful. I set the log level to 3 (I saw that in man smb.conf but it didn't indicate whether it could go any higher) but didn't see anything in Try 5. I don't recall right off the top of my head how high it goes but I do remember 5 spitting out a wealth of info. [SNIP] I'm glad you hear that you still use this on 2.2.6 though because it would indicate that at least root preexec still works in the new version the same as in the old. This isn't related to my use of win9x (as opposed to NT/2000) clients is it? I've used it in mixed environments of 9x and nt and nt/2k and 2k/xp. -- Regards, Deryk Robosson Robosson Business Services 22 Flemington Street Albany, WA 6330 ABN: 56 728 377 499 Phone: +61 4 0842 9835 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] smbd is the source of usually high CPU usage
We have installed Samba 2.2.5 under SuSE Linux (kernel 2.4.7) on a z/800 (IBM mainframe) and are witnessing usually high processor usage. The high usage is associated with one of the clients. The client runs a script on an OS/2 machine that continuously works its way through a long list of small files one by one. The list of files is so long that the script may run for 5 or 6 hours. The script copies a small file from the server to workstation, updates the file on the workstation, writes the revised file back to the server from the workstation. When this script runs, we see processor utilization soar to values above 75%. Is there a penalty incurred when Samba is used in batch for intensive file transfer? Does anyone has a good reference to tuning Samba performance? regards.. Sean Angley, P.Eng. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Host Server Support ISM Canada IBM Global Services One Research Drive Regina, CANADA S4S 7H1 PHONE: (306) 790-5199 FAX:(306) 790-5070 -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] NT Administrator account changes permissions when logging onto samba server
Hello, all I have a problem with my administrator accounts on WinNT with Samba. When I log in locally as the Administrator, it works as expected - I *am* the administrator for the machine. When I log into the domain as Administrator, it works as expected - I log in as root. The prolem comes when I try to do anything on the local machine as Administrator (logged into the Samba server). The problem is that any NT permissions that I've put onto the Administrator account are not there when I'm logged in on the domain. When I go back to logging in locally, permissions are all fine. What I'm trying to do is to run Veritas' BackupExec on an NT server and be able to backup files on the linux box (main server). When I try to run the front end I get a permissions error - that the account must be an administrator or a backup operator. I go into the Administrator account (local) and set the backup account to Administrator *and* backup operator. Log back in. Locally, it's fine. Log into the domain - those permissions are not set, so I cannot run the backup program. This issue seems to be the same for each account, so I'm guessing that I missed something in the config. I looked, but couldn't figure it out. Any help from anyone? :) main server: Mandrake 9.0 running Samba 2.2.6pre2 backup server: WinNT 4.0 Server with SP 6 -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Samba 2.2.6 leaks file descriptions!
Found one more, this file(MTP_UP_PA12.doc) has been open for 6 hours: Ok, I've found and fixed the problems with 2.2.6 leaking file descriptors when kernel change notify is turned on. Unfortunately (or fortunately as we can fix this :-) it's a Samba bug, not a Linux kernel bug. Great! I will update from CVS ASAP. I hope I will have the chance to install it too. Question: The Found one more, this file(MTP_UP_PA12.doc) has been open for 6 hours I posted earlier. That was with the change notify turned off. Should Samba do this? Seems strange to me Samba needs more than one fd for one file. Jocke I've committed this to all CVS branches. Jeremy. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Is 2.2.6 Final?
On Mon, 28 Oct 2002, Markus Schabel wrote: John H Terpstra wrote: On Mon, 28 Oct 2002, William Jojo wrote: Just tought I'd follow up and see if 2.2.6 is truly the last release of samba_2_2 CVS branch. Yes, 2.2.6 is the latest stable release. ^^ latest != last ;) So there will never be a stable samba again? ;) We hope that this will be our last update. All samba-team resources are now focussing on getting 3.0.0 readt for release. Right now 3.0.0 is still changing significantly and we would not recommend it's use in a production environment. We've got six systems running it with no visible issues. If it is not broken then why fix it? the last version I had problems with was 2.2.3a (on a SuSE system) and 2.2.4 (there were problems with LDAP, all solved since 2.2.5) I'm currently testing CVS from Sunday's pull of 3.0...is this the direction I should be heading? Yes. But do your home work. Test, test, test, and give us feedback. I'm currently working on a PDC for about 300 LDAP-based users, I guess with LDAP there is no problem when migrating to 3.0? Probably I'll run the actual CVS parallel regards -- John H Terpstra Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Re: workgroups not recognized in virtual server conf files
You might want to upgrade to a newer version of samba. This works for me with samba 2.2.4 and 2.2.6 D. Joe Anderson wrote: Hi, The documentation I've read indicates that I should be able to get Samba to honor the value of the 'workgroup' variable as set from within an included virtual server configuration file. Given the configuration files below, if I comment out the workgroup = testwg line from the main configuration file (smb.conf), then a query of the Samba server (with smbclient -L test4 -U%) shows the server as being in the WORKGROUP workgroup, rather than the TESTWG workgroup that I specify in conf.test4. The server still responds, however, to the TEST4 netbios name as specified in the included conf.test4 file. The only thing I can see that might be amiss is the line Can't find include file /etc/samba/conf. When I run smbclient. I would appreciate any pointers as to how I might get the workgroup setting within the included file to be recognized. --Joe (If anyone is wondering why I bother with the 'netbios alias' line for just one netbios name, I tried this with three netbios aliases, expecting it to Just Work. This is a simplified example. If we can get this to work, I'll work my way back up ;-) $uname -a Linux xxx.xxx.iastate.edu 2.2.19-7.0.1 #1 Tue Apr 10 00:55:03 EDT 2001 i686 unknown # rpm -q samba samba-2.2.2-20011013 # cat smb.conf # Global parameters [global] workgroup = testwg netbios aliases = test4 include = /etc/samba/conf.%L # cat conf.test4 [global] workgroup = TESTWG netbios name = TEST4 os level = 128 domain master = yes local master = yes preferred master = yes security = user status = yes encrypt passwords = Yes update encrypted = Yes password level = 8 smb passwd file = /etc/samba/smbpasswd log file = /var/log/samba/%L log level = 4 max log size = 50 dns proxy = No wins server = xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx wins proxy = yes guest account = ftp From the test4 log: 135 [2001/12/06 17:42:50, 3] param/params.c:pm_process(579) 136 params.c:pm_process() - Processing configuration file /etc/samba/smb 136 .conf 137 [2001/12/06 17:42:50, 3] param/loadparm.c:do_section(2884) 138 Processing section [global] 139 doing parameter netbios aliases = webtest4 140 doing parameter include = /etc/samba/conf.%L 141 [2001/12/06 17:42:50, 3] param/params.c:pm_process(579) 142 params.c:pm_process() - Processing configuration file /etc/samba/con 142 f.webtest4 143 [2001/12/06 17:42:50, 3] param/loadparm.c:do_section(2884) 144 Processing section [global] 145 doing parameter workgroup = WEBTESTWG 146 doing parameter netbios name = WEBTEST4 147 [2001/12/06 17:42:50, 4] param/loadparm.c:handle_netbios_name(2251) 148 handle_netbios_name: set global_myname to: WEBTEST4 149 doing parameter os level = 128 150 doing parameter domain master = yes # smbclient -L test4 -U% | less Can't find include file /etc/samba/conf. added interface ip=129.186.xxx.6 bcast=129.186.xxx.255 nmask=255.255.255.0 added interface ip=129.186.yyy.138 bcast=129.186.yyy.255 nmask=255.255.255.0 Got a positive name query response from 129.186.xxx.6 ( 129.186.xxx.6 ) Domain=[WORKGROUP] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 2.2.2] Sharename Type Comment - --- IPC$ IPC IPC Service (Samba 2.2.2) ADMIN$ Disk IPC Service (Samba 2.2.2) Server Comment ---- TEST4Samba 2.2.2 ANOTHERHOST Samba 2.2.2 WorkgroupMaster ---- WORKGROUP -- == Herb Lewis Silicon Graphics Networking Engineer 1600 Amphitheatre Pkwy MS-510 Strategic Software Organization Mountain View, CA 94043-1351 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tel: 650-933-2177 http://www.sgi.com Fax: 650-932-2177 PGP Key: 0x8408D65D == -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Winbind!
On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 05:33:22PM -0600, Jennifer Crusade wrote: Hello, I am running Red Hat 7.3 Samba 2.26 and winbind. I have been able to join the domain and test all of the following with these commands. All works great. But when I set up a share to test with one domain user account it just presents me with a password dialog box and does not accept anything. It should not prompt me but if it does it should authenticate. I suggest configuring PAM to allow shell logins for domain users. If you can get them to login at a Linux login: prompt, then it should work also through Samba. It's just one thing you can do to check. I have the winbind separator as + but if I run testparm I get the following: [root@gtdns root]# testparm Load smb config files from /etc/samba/smb.conf Processing section [TESTIT] Loaded services file OK. 'winbind separator = +' might cause problems with group membership. Press enter to see a dump of your service definitions Looks like a warning rather than an error. IIRC, the examples in the Samba docs use a +, so it seems like it should be ok. If I change the separator to \ and run testparm I get the following: [root@gtdns root]# testparm Load smb config files from /etc/samba/smb.conf Processing section [TESTIT] Loaded services file OK. ERROR: the 'winbind separator' parameter must be a single character. Press enter to see a dump of your service definitions Maybe you need to specify the backslash as \\ instead of a single \. ? I don't remember just offhand exactly how I did it, but I had things configured here to use \ as the winbind separator. If you don't get it working pretty quickly ... coincidentally, I am currently working on the section on winbind for Using Samba, 2nd edition. I might be able to send you a copy of that, and see if the directions work for you. Hopefully, you can also provide some pre-publication user feedback. Email me privately if you'd like to do this. Jay Ts [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] smbd is the source of usually high CPU usage
Sean Angley wrote: Does anyone has a good reference to tuning Samba performance? It used to be that you could tune some Samba configuration file (smb.conf) parameters to get better performance, but AFAIK, all those are now the defaults. The important thing is to not mess with them. If there are any exceptions to this, I'd sure like to know about them! You can look through the manual page for smb.conf(5) and see if anything applies to your network and might conceivably gain some performance. Try searching the manual page for performance: this will get you off to a good start. Also, you can check the first edition of Using Samba for the appendix on Samba Performance Tuning (I think it was Appendix A). http://samba.he.net, or look in the docs/ directory in the Samba source distribution. Aside from that, it seems that nowadays the issue is more about getting your network hardware working right, the network configuration on the Unix host system, and the performance level of the system you are running Samba on. Jay Ts -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Samba 2.2.6 leaks file descriptions!
On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 01:10:26AM +0100, Joakim Tjernlund wrote: Found one more, this file(MTP_UP_PA12.doc) has been open for 6 hours: Ok, I've found and fixed the problems with 2.2.6 leaking file descriptors when kernel change notify is turned on. Unfortunately (or fortunately as we can fix this :-) it's a Samba bug, not a Linux kernel bug. Great! I will update from CVS ASAP. I hope I will have the chance to install it too. Question: The Found one more, this file(MTP_UP_PA12.doc) has been open for 6 hours I posted earlier. That was with the change notify turned off. Should Samba do this? Seems strange to me Samba needs more than one fd for one file. This depends on the client - smbd only opens what the client requests. Jeremy. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Re: root prexec/postexec login scripts
Mike,
In case you still need a configurable login script ...
Add to [netlogon] share:
root preexec = perl /usr/local/samba/lib/genlogon.pl %u %g %m
root postexec = perl /usr/local/samba/lib/genlogoff.pl %u
Good luck,
Uli
---
#!/usr/bin/perl
#
# genlogon.pl
# smb.conf:
# root preexec = genlogon.pl %u %g %m
#
use Time::localtime;
($username, $groupname, $pcname) = ARGV;
$server = SERVER_NETBIOSNAME;
my $tm = localtime();
$datestring = sprintf %02d.%02d.%04d,$tm-mday, $tm-mon + 1,
$tm-year + 1900;
$logdateiname = sprintf /usr/local/samba/var/netlogon.log;
open (logfile, $logdateiname);
printf logfile %s - %02d:%02d:%02d : User \%s\ \t group \%s\
logs in %s \n, $datestring, $tm-hour, $tm-min
, $tm-sec, $username, $groupname, $pcname;
close logfile;
# Start login script:
open LOGON, /usr/local/samba/netlogon/$username.bat;
print LOGON \ECHO OFF\r\n;
# Home shares
print LOGON NET USE Z: $server\\$username /persistent:no\r\n;
# Shares for individual groups
if ($groupname eq GROUP || $groupname eq group)
{
print LOGON NET USE X: $server\\SHARE1 /persistent:no\r\n;
print LOGON NET USE Y: $server\\SHARE2 /persistent:no\r\n;
}
# Close output file
close LOGON;
#!/usr/bin/perl
#
# genlogoff.pl
system(rm /usr/local/samba/netlogon/$ARGV[0].bat);
-
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Machine can login, Machine(s) cant.
Here is my scenario; I have a FreeBSD 4.7 Release running Samba 2.2.6. I am using samba as a PDC. I have installed everything need including the Win XP Sign or seal registry patch. I added a one XP machine account for one machine, and it works fine. Logging in and mounting network drives with a netlogon script. As soon as I add another machine in the same subnet, different machine name, etc. I am not able to log into either of the two machines now. Here is the windows error that pops up. Windows cannot connect to the domain, either because the domain controller is down, or otherwise unavailable, or because your computer account was not found, Please try again later. If this message continues to appear, contact your system administrator for assistance. I have looked at the logs nothing unusual as far as I can see. I have included my smb.conf file if this would help anyone. Any suggestions?? [global] workgroup = DOMAINLOGON netbios name = GRUMPY server string = PDC encrypt passwords = Yes passwd program = /usr/bin/passwd %u passwd chat = *New*UNIX*password* %n\n *ReType*new*UNIX*password* %n\n unix password sync = Yes log level = 2 log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m max log size = 1000 add user script = /usr/sbin/adduser -home /dev/null -group machines -shell /bin/false logon script = %U.bat logon path = \\%L\profiles\%U logon drive = h: domain logons = Yes os level = 64 preferred master = True domain master = True wins server = 129.186.142.179 [netlogon] browseable = no path = /raid/samba/netlogon write list = @admin, flint, root [homes] comment = Home Directories read only = No browseable = No [profiles] path = /raid/samba/profiles browseable = no writable = yes read only = No create mask = 0600 directory mask = 0700 browseable = No [raid] path = /raid browseable = No read only = No vfs object = /usr/local/lib/samba/recycle.so vfs options = recycle=.recycle [private] path = /raid/samba/storage/private security= user browseable = No read only = no directory mask = 0700 valid users = test, flint, root, zack vfs object = /usr/local/lib/samba/recycle.so vfs options = recycle=.recycle [public] path = /raid/samba/storage/public browseable = No read only = no create mask = 0600 directory mask = 0700 valid users = test, flint, root, zack vfs object = /usr/local/lib/samba/recycle.so vfs options = recycle=.recycle
[Samba] what GCC and GAS version needed for samba 2.2.5
Can anyone tell me what version of GCC and GAS are needed to compile samba v2.2.5 on a linux machine? Thanks
[Samba] Winbind help
Hello, When I put 'wbinfo -u' always give me an error, can any one help me ?? == Error looking up domain users Thank you so much ! Agus = Ikuti polling TELKOM Memo 166 di www.plasa.com dan menangkan hadiah masing-masing Rp 250.000 tunai. = -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Problem Uploading Printer Drivers from XP
I am having problems uploading printer drivers from my WinXP workstation. I can use my Win2K workstation just fine, but when I try to use the exact same user ID and access the exact same printer, the New Driver... button on the XP printer dialog is disabled. The only thing I can think of is permissions on the client side (since it is the same user ID being used). I tried granting my user ID full access to the printer, but it still wouldn't allow me to access the New Driver... button. I have attached my smb.conf below. Any help would be appreciated. Samba 2.2.5 as PDC on RedHat 6.2 Thanks. Chad Edwards # Samba config file created using SWAT # from UNKNOWN (192.168.0.102) # Date: 2002/10/28 19:19:21 # Global parameters [global] workgroup = REDWOOD netbios name = MACDONALD server string = Samba %v encrypt passwords = Yes passwd program = /usr/bin/passwd %u passwd chat = *ew*password* %n\n *ew*password* %n\n password level = 8 unix password sync = Yes log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m max log size = 50 time server = Yes deadtime = 15 socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 show add printer wizard = No domain admin group = samba_admin logon script = logon.bat logon path = logon drive = H: logon home = \\%L\%U domain logons = Yes os level = 64 preferred master = True domain master = True wins support = Yes admin users = samba_admin hosts allow = 127.0.0.1, 192.168.0. print command = lpr -r -P%p %s; csh -c 'echo \%J has started printing on %S\ | /usr/bin/smbclient -U %L -M %m -I %I' [homes] comment = Home Directories path = /samba/homes/%u read only = No browseable = No [Superior] comment = Lexmark 5700 path = /var/spool/samba printer admin = samba_admin printable = Yes printer name = lp_lexmark [Shared] comment = Shared Files for Everyone path = /samba/shared read only = No inherit permissions = Yes [print$] comment = Print Drivers path = /samba/printers write list = samba_admin guest ok = Yes -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Problem running ./configure
guys .. when i run ./configure for my samba 2.2.6 .. i get this error $ checking for test routines... configure: error: cant find test code. Aborting config I am not sure how to resolve it. I have posted my error log file at http://www.mutualinterest.com.sg/config.log hope someone can help me out here.. And this is my output. Sorry if it is kinda long. [rootgatecrasher source]# ./configure loading cache ./config.cache checking for gcc... gcc checking whether the C compiler (gcc -O ) works... yes checking whether the C compiler (gcc -O ) is a cross-compiler... no checking whether we are using GNU C... yes checking whether gcc accepts -g... yes checking for a BSD compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c checking for gawk... gawk checking if the linker (ld) is GNU ld... yes checking for passwd... /usr/bin/passwd checking whether gcc and cc understand -c and -o together... yes checking that the C compiler understands volatile... yes checking host system type... i686-pc-linux-gnu checking target system type... i686-pc-linux-gnu checking build system type... i686-pc-linux-gnu checking config.cache system type... same checking for LFS support... yes checking for inline... inline checking how to run the C preprocessor... gcc -E checking for ANSI C header files... yes checking for dirent.h that defines DIR... yes checking for opendir in -ldir... no checking whether time.h and sys/time.h may both be included... yes checking for sys/wait.h that is POSIX.1 compatible... yes checking for arpa/inet.h... yes checking for sys/fcntl.h... yes checking for sys/select.h... yes checking for fcntl.h... yes checking for sys/time.h... yes checking for sys/unistd.h... yes checking for unistd.h... yes checking for utime.h... yes checking for grp.h... yes checking for sys/id.h... no checking for limits.h... yes checking for memory.h... yes checking for net/if.h... yes checking for compat.h... no checking for rpc/rpc.h... yes checking for rpcsvc/nis.h... yes checking for rpcsvc/yp_prot.h... yes checking for rpcsvc/ypclnt.h... yes checking for stdlib.h... yes checking for string.h... yes checking for strings.h... yes checking for syslog.h... yes checking for sys/file.h... yes checking for sys/param.h... yes checking for ctype.h... yes checking for sys/wait.h... (cached) yes checking for sys/resource.h... yes checking for sys/ioctl.h... yes checking for sys/ipc.h... yes checking for sys/mode.h... no checking for sys/mman.h... yes checking for sys/filio.h... no checking for sys/priv.h... no checking for sys/shm.h... yes checking for sys/socket.h... yes checking for syslog.h... (cached) yes checking for sys/syslog.h... yes checking for sys/mount.h... yes checking for sys/vfs.h... yes checking for sys/fs/s5param.h... no checking for sys/filsys.h... no checking for termios.h... yes checking for termio.h... yes checking for sys/termio.h... no checking for sys/statfs.h... yes checking for sys/dustat.h... no checking for sys/statvfs.h... yes checking for stdarg.h... yes checking for sys/sockio.h... no checking for security/pam_modules.h... no checking for security/_pam_macros.h... no checking for dlfcn.h... yes checking for synch.h... no checking for pthread.h... yes checking for nsswitch.h... no checking for shadow.h... yes checking for netinet/ip.h... yes checking for netinet/tcp.h... yes checking for netinet/in_systm.h... yes checking for netinet/in_ip.h... no checking for nss.h... yes checking for nss_common.h... no checking for ns_api.h... no checking for sys/security.h... no checking for security/pam_appl.h... no checking for security/pam_modules.h... (cached) no checking for stropts.h... yes checking for poll.h... yes checking for sys/capability.h... no checking for syscall.h... yes checking for sys/syscall.h... yes checking for sys/acl.h... no checking for sys/cdefs.h... yes checking for glob.h... yes checking for utmp.h... yes checking for utmpx.h... yes checking for lastlog.h... yes checking for sys/fs/vx_quota.h... no checking for linux/xqm.h... yes checking size of int... 4 checking size of long... 4 checking size of short... 2 checking for working const... yes checking for inline... (cached) inline checking whether byte ordering is bigendian... no checking whether char is unsigned... no checking return type of signal handlers... void checking for uid_t in sys/types.h... yes checking for mode_t... yes checking for off_t... yes checking for size_t... yes checking for pid_t... yes checking for st_rdev in struct stat... yes checking for d_off in dirent... yes checking for ino_t... yes checking for loff_t... yes checking for offset_t... no checking for ssize_t... yes checking for wchar_t... yes checking for cups-config... /usr/bin/cups-config checking for dlopen... no checking for dlopen in -ldl... no checking for immediate structures... yes checking for unix domain sockets... yes checking for socklen_t type... yes checking for sig_atomic_t type... yes checking for errno declaration... yes checking for setresuid
[Samba] samba compiling error
Hello,
I have error on compiling time
I tried on HP-UX 11.00 system with gcc version 3.1 to compile samba source
Samba latest version source was dowloaded from www.us1.samba.org/samba/ftp
I attached log file with this error
thank you.
begin 600 samba_make.log.doc
M(R!M86ME#0HO=7-R+VQO8V%L+W-A;6)A+V)I;B(@+410241$25(](B]UW(O
M;]C86POV%M8F$O=F%R+VQO8VMS(B M1$Q)0D1)4CTB+W5SB]L;V-A;]S
M86UB82]L:6(B(U$2$%615])3D-,541%4U]((U$4$%34U=$7U!23T=204T]
M(B]UW(O8FEN+W!AW-W9(@+41334)?4$%34U=$7T9)3$4](B]UW(O;]C
M86POV%M8F$O')I=F%T92]S;6)P87-S=V0B(U$5$17U!!4U-71%]24Q%
M/2(O=7-R+VQO8V%L+W-A;6)A+W!R:79A=4OVUB%SW=D+G1D8B(-CTB
M+W5SB]L;V-A;]S86UB82]B:6XB(U$4$E$1$E2/2(O=7-R+VQO8V%L+W-A
M;6)A+W9AB]L;V-KR(@+41,24)$25(](B]UW(O;]C86POV%M8F$O;EB
M(B M1$A!5D5?24Y#3%5$15-?2 M1%!!4U-71%]04D]'4D%-/2(O=7-R+V)I
M;B]P87-S=V0B(U$4TU7U!!4U-71%]24Q%/2(O=7-R+VQO8V%L+W-A;6)A
M+W!R:79A=4OVUB%SW=D(B M1%1$0E]005-35T1?1DE,13TB+W5SB]L
M;V-A;]S86UB82]PFEV871E+W-M8G!AW-W9YT9(B#0I5VEN9R!,24)3
M(#T@+6QG96X@+6QS96,@(UL;G-L#0I#;VUP:6QI;F@VUB9]S97)V97(N
M8PT*VUB9]S97)V97(N8SH@26X@9G5N8W1I;VX@8]P96Y?V]C:V5TRZ
M#0IS;6)D+W-EG9EBYC.C(V.#H@=V%R;FEN9SH@%SVEN9R!AF@,R!O
M9B!@86-C97!T)R!FF]M(EN8V]M%T:6)L92!P;VEN=5R('1Y4-D-O
M;7!I;EN9R!S;6)D+V9I;5S+F,-D-O;7!I;EN9R!S;6)D+V-H9W!AW-W
M9YC#0I#;VUP:6QI;F@VUB9]C;VYN96-T:6]N+F,-D-O;7!I;EN9R!S
M;6)D+W5T;7 N8PT*0V]MEL:6YG('-M8F0OV5SVEO;BYC#0I#;VUP:6QI
M;F@VUB9]D9G)E92YC#0I#;VUP:6QI;F@VUB9]D:7(N8PT*0V]MEL
M:6YG('-M8F0O%SW=OF0N8PT*0V]MEL:6YG('-M8F0O8V]N;BYC#0I#
M;VUP:6QI;F@VUB9]F:6QE:6\N8PT*0V]MEL:6YG('-M8F0O:7!C+F,-
MD-O;7!I;EN9R!S;6)D+VQA;FUA;BYC#0I#;VUP:6QI;F@VUB9]M86YG
M;4N8PT*0V]MEL:6YG('-M8F0O;6%N9VQE7VAAV@R+F,-D-O;7!I;EN
M9R!S;6)D+VUA;F=L95]H87-H+F,-D-O;7!I;EN9R!S;6)D+VUA;F=L95]M
M87 N8PT*0V]MEL:6YG('-M8F0O;F5G')O=YC#0I#;VUP:6QI;F@VUB
M9]M97-S86=E+F,-D-O;7!I;EN9R!S;6)D+VYT=')A;G,N8PT*0V]MEL
M:6YG('-M8F0OEP97,N8PT*0V]MEL:6YG('-M8F0OF5P;'DN8PT*0V]M
MEL:6YG('-M8F0O=')A;G,R+F,-D-O;7!I;EN9R!S;6)D+W5I9YC#0I#
M;VUP:6QI;F@VUB9]D;W-M;V1E+F,-D-O;7!I;EN9R!S;6)D+V9I;5N
M86UE+F,-D-O;7!I;EN9R!S;6)D+V]P96XN8PT*0V]MEL:6YG('-M8F0O
M8VQOV4N8PT*0V]MEL:6YG('-M8F0O8FQO8VMI;FN8PT*0V]MEL:6YG
M('-M8F0OV5C7V-TYC#0I#;VUP:6QI;F@VUB9]V9G,N8PT*0V]MEL
M:6YG('-M8F0O=F9S+7=R87 N8PT*0V]MEL:6YG('-M8F0OW1A=-A8VAE
M+F,-D-O;7!I;EN9R!S;6)D+W!OVEX7V%C;',N8PT*0V]MEL:6YG(QI
M8B]S7-A8VQS+F,-D-O;7!I;EN9R!S;6)D+W!R;V-EW,N8PT*0V]MEL
M:6YG('-M8F0OV5R=FEC92YC#0I#;VUP:6QI;F@VUB9]EG)OBYC#0I#
M;VUP:6QI;F@')I;G1I;FO')I;G1FW N8PT*0V]MEL:6YG(QI8B]U
M=EL7W-E86-C97-S+F,-D-O;7!I;EN9R!L:6)S;6(O8VQI7W!I5?=71I
M;YC#0I#;VUP:6QI;F@;7-D9G,O;7-D9G,N8PT*0V]MEL:6YG('!AF%M
M+VQO861P87)M+F,-D-O;7!I;EN9R!P87)A;2]P87)A;7,N8PT*0V]MEL
M:6YG(QI8G-M8B]C;EE;G1G96XN8PT*0V]MEL:6YG(QI8G-M8B]C;EC
M;VYN96-T+F,-D-O;7!I;EN9R!L:6)S;6(O8VQI9FEL92YC#0I#;VUP:6QI
M;F@;EBVUB+V-L:7)AYC#0I#;VUP:6QI;F@;EBVUB+V-L:65RF]R
M+F,-D-O;7!I;EN9R!L:6)S;6(O8VQI;65SV%G92YC#0I#;VUP:6QI;F@
M;EBVUB+V-L:7)E861WFET92YC#0I#;VUP:6QI;F@;EBVUB+V-L:6QI
MW0N8PT*0V]MEL:6YG(QI8G-M8B]C;EPFEN=YC#0I#;VUP:6QI;F@
M;EBVUB+V-L:71R86YS+F,-D-O;7!I;EN9R!L:6)S;6(O8VQIV5C95S
M8RYC#0I#;VUP:6QI;F@;EBVUB+V-L:61GF%M+F,-FQI8G-M8B]C;ED
M9W)A;2YC.B!);B!F=6YC=EO;B!@8VQI7V=E=%]B86-K=7!?;ES=Z#0IL
M:6)S;6(O8VQI9=R86TN8SHR,3 Z('=AFYI;FZ('!AW-I;F@87)G(#,@
M;V8@8=E='-O8VMN86UE)R!FF]M(EN8V]M%T:6)L92!P;VEN=5R('1Y
M4-D-O;7!I;EN9R!L:6)S;6(O;F%M97%U97)Y+F,-D-O;7!I;EN9R!L
M:6)S;6(O;FUB;EB+F,-D-O;7!I;EN9R!L:6)S;6(O8VQIW1R+F,-D-O
M;7!I;EN9R!L:6)S;6(O;G1EG(N8PT*0V]MEL:6YG(QI8G-M8B]S;6)D
M97,N8PT*0V]MEL:6YG(QI8G-M8B]S;6)E;F-R7!T+F,-D-O;7!I;EN
M9R!L:6)S;6(OVUB97)R+F,-D-O;7!I;EN9R!L:6)S;6(O8W)E95N=EA
M;',N8PT*0V]MEL:6YG(QI8G-M8B]P=V1?8V%C:4N8PT*0V]MEL:6YG
M(QI8G-M8B]C;EOQO8VLN8PT*0V]MEL:6YG(QI8G-M8B]EG)OFUA
MYC#0I#;VUP:6QI;F@;EBVUB+V1OV5RBYC#0I#;VUP:6QI;F@;EB
MVUB+W!AW-C:%N9V4N8PT*0V]MEL:6YG(QI8G-M8B]U;F5X5C=5D
M+F,-D-O;7!I;EN9R!R-?%RV4O%RV5?')S+F,-D-O;7!I;EN
M9R!R-?%RV4O%RV5?V5C+F,-D-O;7!I;EN9R!R-?%RV4O
M%RV5?;6ES8RYC#0I#;VUP:6QI;F@;EBVUB+VYA;65C86-H92YC#0I#
M;VUP:6QI;F@=6)I7@O=6)I7T)I;E1R964N8PT*0V]MEL:6YG('5B:7%X
M+W5B:5]#86-H92YC#0I#;VUP:6QI;F@=6)I7@O=6)I7U-P;%Y5')E92YC
M#0I#;VUP:6QI;F@=6)I7@O=6)I7V1,:6YK3ES=YC#0I#;VUP:6QI;F@
M=6)I7@O=6)I7W-,:6YK3ES=YC#0I#;VUP:6QI;F@=6)I7@O95B=6=P
M87)S92YC#0I#;VUP:6QI;F@G!C7W-EG9EB]SG9?;'-A+F,-D-O;7!I
M;EN9R!R-?V5R=F5R+W-R=E]LV%?;G0N8PT*0V]MEL:6YG(')P8U]S
M97)V97(OW)V7VQS85]H;F0N8PT*0V]MEL:6YG(')P8U]S97)V97(OW)V
M7VYE=QO9RYC#0I#;VUP:6QI;F@G!C7W-EG9EB]SG9?;F5T;]G7VYT
M+F,-D-O;7!I;EN9R!R-?V5R=F5R+W-R=E]P:7!E7VAN9YC#0I#;VUP
M:6QI;F@G!C7W-EG9EB]SG9?F5G+F,-D-O;7!I;EN9R!R-?V5R
M=F5R+W-R=E]R96=?;G0N8PT*0V]MEL:6YG(')P8U]S97)V97(OW)V7W-A
M;7(N8PT*0V]MEL:6YG(')P8U]S97)V97(OW)V7W-A;7)?;G0N8PT*0V]M
MEL:6YG(')P8U]S97)V97(OW)V7W-R=G-V8RYC#0I#;VUP:6QI;F@G!C
M7W-EG9EB]SG9?W)VW9C7VYT+F,-D-O;7!I;EN9R!R-?V5R=F5R
M+W-R=E]U=EL+F,-D-O;7!I;EN9R!R-?V5R=F5R+W-R=E]W:W-S=F,N
M8PT*0V]MEL:6YG(')P8U]S97)V97(OW)V7W=KW-V8U]N=YC#0I#;VUP
M:6QI;F@G!C7W-EG9EB]SG9?EP92YC#0I#;VUP:6QI;F@G!C7W-E
MG9EB]SG9?99S+F,-D-O;7!I;EN9R!R-?V5R=F5R+W-R=E]D9G-?
M;G0N8PT*0V]MEL:6YG(')P8U]S97)V97(OW)V7W-P;V]LW,N8PT*0V]M
MEL:6YG(')P8U]S97)V97(OW)V7W-P;V]LW-?;G0N8PT*0V]MEL:6YG
Re: [Samba] what GCC and GAS version needed for samba 2.2.5
Am Dienstag, 29. Oktober 2002 03:56 schrieb Martin Dube: Can anyone tell me what version of GCC and GAS are needed to compile samba v2.2.5 on a linux machine? You should use the C-Compiler which is installed on your distribution if it is not older then 2.95.2 or 3.2. greetings Florian Rauh -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] NT Administrator account changes permissions when logging onto samba server
On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 03:46:53PM -0800, Michael J. Luevane wrote: Hello, all I have a problem with my administrator accounts on WinNT with Samba. When I log in locally as the Administrator, it works as expected - I *am* the administrator for the machine. When I log into the domain as Administrator, it works as expected - I log in as root. Is the windows domain user root in your local Administrator group? -- Frank Matthieß[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] samba compiling error
Am Dienstag, 29. Oktober 2002 06:58 schrieb Lora:
Hello,
I have error on compiling time
I tried on HP-UX 11.00 system with gcc version 3.1 to compile samba source
Samba latest version source was dowloaded from www.us1.samba.org/samba/ftp
I attached log file with this error
thank you.
begin 600 samba_make.log.doc
M(R!M86ME#0HO=7-R+VQO8V%L+W-A;6)A+V)I;B(@+410241$25(](B]UW(O
M;]C86POV%M8F$O=F%R+VQO8VMS(B M1$Q)0D1)4CTB+W5SB]L;V-A;]S
M86UB82]L:6(B(U$2$%615])3D-,541%4U]((U$4$%34U=$7U!23T=204T]
M(B]UW(O8FEN+W!AW-W9(@+41334)?4$%34U=$7T9)3$4](B]UW(O;]C
M86POV%M8F$O')I=F%T92]S;6)P87-S=V0B(U$5$17U!!4U-71%]24Q%
M/2(O=7-R+VQO8V%L+W-A;6)A+W!R:79A=4OVUB%SW=D+G1D8B(-CTB
M+W5SB]L;V-A;]S86UB82]B:6XB(U$4$E$1$E2/2(O=7-R+VQO8V%L+W-A
M;6)A+W9AB]L;V-KR(@+41,24)$25(](B]UW(O;]C86POV%M8F$O;EB
M(B M1$A!5D5?24Y#3%5$15-?2 M1%!!4U-71%]04D]'4D%-/2(O=7-R+V)I
M;B]P87-S=V0B(U$4TU7U!!4U-71%]24Q%/2(O=7-R+VQO8V%L+W-A;6)A
M+W!R:79A=4OVUB%SW=D(B M1%1$0E]005-35T1?1DE,13TB+W5SB]L
M;V-A;]S86UB82]PFEV871E+W-M8G!AW-W9YT9(B#0I5VEN9R!,24)3
M(#T@+6QG96X@+6QS96,@(UL;G-L#0I#;VUP:6QI;F@VUB9]S97)V97(N
M8PT*VUB9]S97)V97(N8SH@26X@9G5N8W1I;VX@8]P96Y?V]C:V5TRZ
M#0IS;6)D+W-EG9EBYC.C(V.#H@=V%R;FEN9SH@%SVEN9R!AF@,R!O
M9B!@86-C97!T)R!FF]M(EN8V]M%T:6)L92!P;VEN=5R('1Y4-D-O
M;7!I;EN9R!S;6)D+V9I;5S+F,-D-O;7!I;EN9R!S;6)D+V-H9W!AW-W
M9YC#0I#;VUP:6QI;F@VUB9]C;VYN96-T:6]N+F,-D-O;7!I;EN9R!S
M;6)D+W5T;7 N8PT*0V]MEL:6YG('-M8F0OV5SVEO;BYC#0I#;VUP:6QI
M;F@VUB9]D9G)E92YC#0I#;VUP:6QI;F@VUB9]D:7(N8PT*0V]MEL
M:6YG('-M8F0O%SW=OF0N8PT*0V]MEL:6YG('-M8F0O8V]N;BYC#0I#
M;VUP:6QI;F@VUB9]F:6QE:6\N8PT*0V]MEL:6YG('-M8F0O:7!C+F,-
MD-O;7!I;EN9R!S;6)D+VQA;FUA;BYC#0I#;VUP:6QI;F@VUB9]M86YG
M;4N8PT*0V]MEL:6YG('-M8F0O;6%N9VQE7VAAV@R+F,-D-O;7!I;EN
M9R!S;6)D+VUA;F=L95]H87-H+F,-D-O;7!I;EN9R!S;6)D+VUA;F=L95]M
M87 N8PT*0V]MEL:6YG('-M8F0O;F5G')O=YC#0I#;VUP:6QI;F@VUB
M9]M97-S86=E+F,-D-O;7!I;EN9R!S;6)D+VYT=')A;G,N8PT*0V]MEL
M:6YG('-M8F0OEP97,N8PT*0V]MEL:6YG('-M8F0OF5P;'DN8PT*0V]M
MEL:6YG('-M8F0O=')A;G,R+F,-D-O;7!I;EN9R!S;6)D+W5I9YC#0I#
M;VUP:6QI;F@VUB9]D;W-M;V1E+F,-D-O;7!I;EN9R!S;6)D+V9I;5N
M86UE+F,-D-O;7!I;EN9R!S;6)D+V]P96XN8PT*0V]MEL:6YG('-M8F0O
M8VQOV4N8PT*0V]MEL:6YG('-M8F0O8FQO8VMI;FN8PT*0V]MEL:6YG
M('-M8F0OV5C7V-TYC#0I#;VUP:6QI;F@VUB9]V9G,N8PT*0V]MEL
M:6YG('-M8F0O=F9S+7=R87 N8PT*0V]MEL:6YG('-M8F0OW1A=-A8VAE
M+F,-D-O;7!I;EN9R!S;6)D+W!OVEX7V%C;',N8PT*0V]MEL:6YG(QI
M8B]S7-A8VQS+F,-D-O;7!I;EN9R!S;6)D+W!R;V-EW,N8PT*0V]MEL
M:6YG('-M8F0OV5R=FEC92YC#0I#;VUP:6QI;F@VUB9]EG)OBYC#0I#
M;VUP:6QI;F@')I;G1I;FO')I;G1FW N8PT*0V]MEL:6YG(QI8B]U
M=EL7W-E86-C97-S+F,-D-O;7!I;EN9R!L:6)S;6(O8VQI7W!I5?=71I
M;YC#0I#;VUP:6QI;F@;7-D9G,O;7-D9G,N8PT*0V]MEL:6YG('!AF%M
M+VQO861P87)M+F,-D-O;7!I;EN9R!P87)A;2]P87)A;7,N8PT*0V]MEL
M:6YG(QI8G-M8B]C;EE;G1G96XN8PT*0V]MEL:6YG(QI8G-M8B]C;EC
M;VYN96-T+F,-D-O;7!I;EN9R!L:6)S;6(O8VQI9FEL92YC#0I#;VUP:6QI
M;F@;EBVUB+V-L:7)AYC#0I#;VUP:6QI;F@;EBVUB+V-L:65RF]R
M+F,-D-O;7!I;EN9R!L:6)S;6(O8VQI;65SV%G92YC#0I#;VUP:6QI;F@
M;EBVUB+V-L:7)E861WFET92YC#0I#;VUP:6QI;F@;EBVUB+V-L:6QI
MW0N8PT*0V]MEL:6YG(QI8G-M8B]C;EPFEN=YC#0I#;VUP:6QI;F@
M;EBVUB+V-L:71R86YS+F,-D-O;7!I;EN9R!L:6)S;6(O8VQIV5C95S
M8RYC#0I#;VUP:6QI;F@;EBVUB+V-L:61GF%M+F,-FQI8G-M8B]C;ED
M9W)A;2YC.B!);B!F=6YC=EO;B!@8VQI7V=E=%]B86-K=7!?;ES=Z#0IL
M:6)S;6(O8VQI9=R86TN8SHR,3 Z('=AFYI;FZ('!AW-I;F@87)G(#,@
M;V8@8=E='-O8VMN86UE)R!FF]M(EN8V]M%T:6)L92!P;VEN=5R('1Y
M4-D-O;7!I;EN9R!L:6)S;6(O;F%M97%U97)Y+F,-D-O;7!I;EN9R!L
M:6)S;6(O;FUB;EB+F,-D-O;7!I;EN9R!L:6)S;6(O8VQIW1R+F,-D-O
M;7!I;EN9R!L:6)S;6(O;G1EG(N8PT*0V]MEL:6YG(QI8G-M8B]S;6)D
M97,N8PT*0V]MEL:6YG(QI8G-M8B]S;6)E;F-R7!T+F,-D-O;7!I;EN
M9R!L:6)S;6(OVUB97)R+F,-D-O;7!I;EN9R!L:6)S;6(O8W)E95N=EA
M;',N8PT*0V]MEL:6YG(QI8G-M8B]P=V1?8V%C:4N8PT*0V]MEL:6YG
M(QI8G-M8B]C;EOQO8VLN8PT*0V]MEL:6YG(QI8G-M8B]EG)OFUA
MYC#0I#;VUP:6QI;F@;EBVUB+V1OV5RBYC#0I#;VUP:6QI;F@;EB
MVUB+W!AW-C:%N9V4N8PT*0V]MEL:6YG(QI8G-M8B]U;F5X5C=5D
M+F,-D-O;7!I;EN9R!R-?%RV4O%RV5?')S+F,-D-O;7!I;EN
M9R!R-?%RV4O%RV5?V5C+F,-D-O;7!I;EN9R!R-?%RV4O
M%RV5?;6ES8RYC#0I#;VUP:6QI;F@;EBVUB+VYA;65C86-H92YC#0I#
M;VUP:6QI;F@=6)I7@O=6)I7T)I;E1R964N8PT*0V]MEL:6YG('5B:7%X
M+W5B:5]#86-H92YC#0I#;VUP:6QI;F@=6)I7@O=6)I7U-P;%Y5')E92YC
M#0I#;VUP:6QI;F@=6)I7@O=6)I7V1,:6YK3ES=YC#0I#;VUP:6QI;F@
M=6)I7@O=6)I7W-,:6YK3ES=YC#0I#;VUP:6QI;F@=6)I7@O95B=6=P
M87)S92YC#0I#;VUP:6QI;F@G!C7W-EG9EB]SG9?;'-A+F,-D-O;7!I
M;EN9R!R-?V5R=F5R+W-R=E]LV%?;G0N8PT*0V]MEL:6YG(')P8U]S
M97)V97(OW)V7VQS85]H;F0N8PT*0V]MEL:6YG(')P8U]S97)V97(OW)V
M7VYE=QO9RYC#0I#;VUP:6QI;F@G!C7W-EG9EB]SG9?;F5T;]G7VYT
M+F,-D-O;7!I;EN9R!R-?V5R=F5R+W-R=E]P:7!E7VAN9YC#0I#;VUP
M:6QI;F@G!C7W-EG9EB]SG9?F5G+F,-D-O;7!I;EN9R!R-?V5R
M=F5R+W-R=E]R96=?;G0N8PT*0V]MEL:6YG(')P8U]S97)V97(OW)V7W-A
M;7(N8PT*0V]MEL:6YG(')P8U]S97)V97(OW)V7W-A;7)?;G0N8PT*0V]M
MEL:6YG(')P8U]S97)V97(OW)V7W-R=G-V8RYC#0I#;VUP:6QI;F@G!C
M7W-EG9EB]SG9?W)VW9C7VYT+F,-D-O;7!I;EN9R!R-?V5R=F5R
M+W-R=E]U=EL+F,-D-O;7!I;EN9R!R-?V5R=F5R+W-R=E]W:W-S=F,N
M8PT*0V]MEL:6YG(')P8U]S97)V97(OW)V7W=KW-V8U]N=YC#0I#;VUP
M:6QI;F@G!C7W-EG9EB]SG9?EP92YC#0I#;VUP:6QI;F@G!C7W-E
Re: [Samba] Is 2.2.6 Final?
Andrew Bartlett wrote: Markus Schabel wrote: John H Terpstra wrote: On Mon, 28 Oct 2002, William Jojo wrote: Just tought I'd follow up and see if 2.2.6 is truly the last release of samba_2_2 CVS branch. Yes, 2.2.6 is the latest stable release. So there will never be a stable samba again? ;) :-) great, at least one realized that this was a joke ;) We hope that this will be our last update. All samba-team resources are now focussing on getting 3.0.0 readt for release. Right now 3.0.0 is still changing significantly and we would not recommend it's use in a production environment. We've got six systems running it with no visible issues. If it is not broken then why fix it? the last version I had problems with was 2.2.3a (on a SuSE system) and 2.2.4 (there were problems with LDAP, all solved since 2.2.5) I'm currently testing CVS from Sunday's pull of 3.0...is this the direction I should be heading? Yes. But do your home work. Test, test, test, and give us feedback. I'm currently working on a PDC for about 300 LDAP-based users, I guess with LDAP there is no problem when migrating to 3.0? Probably I'll run the actual CVS parallel Depending on how you also use LDAP, there are some good reasons to move to 3.0. In HEAD, pdb_ldap now has connection caching, and does not modify unchanged attributes (these benefits provided by metze, who has the significant advantage of using samba on a large and complex ldap infrastructure). I'm not sure if this is helpful when replicating the complete Directory to the Samba-Server, but at least it sounds good. We hope to move this stuff into the next 3.0 alpha. Samba 3.0 also adds 'ldap passwd sync', to help keep the LDAP and SMB passwords in sync. I guess that's really helpful for us. Do the computer accounts still need to be full posix users? It would simplify things a bit if not. regards Markus -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Re: strange locks
On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 06:17:20PM +1100, Matthew Hannigan wrote: so I could see some locks from the unix level. It worked sorta, I see the locks for big files (but not the locks I was expecting), but for little files it shows nothing: # ./lock_list /opt/testsambashare/mattest.doc # ./lock_list /opt/testsambashare/contents.doc 0 22086 W 21474835391 0 22086 W 21474835591 0 22086 W 21474835991 (the output is l_sysid, l_pid, l_start, l_len of struct flock) (lock_list.c source given below) The only difference I can see is that the contents.doc is much bigger: # ls -l /opt/testsambashare total 5210 -rwxrw-r-- 1 matt other1460736 Oct 29 15:24 contents.doc -rw-r--r-- 1 matt other1176738 Oct 29 15:23 contents.txt -rwxrw-r-- 1 matt other 2168 Oct 29 16:19 mattest.doc -rwxrw-r-- 1 matt other 54 Oct 29 16:52 ~$attest.doc -rwxrw-r-- 1 matt other 54 Oct 29 16:47 ~$ntents.doc Why is there 3 1 byte locks at some position way beyond the end of the file? The locks you see here are used by MS Office as semaphores. No one really knows why (well the MS Office programmers do, but they're not telling :-). Jeremy. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] RE: Running smb without nmb? (Linux Suse 8.1 feature)
[sorry - bit of a belated reply - I have a bit of a backlog to read] On 23rd.Oct.2002, Linda Walsh asked : I recently upgraded my Linux distro to SuSE 8.1 which came w/samba 2.2.5. A feature of the upgrade was that it 'split' the startup script for samba from 1 script for _smb_ _nmb_ to 2 scripts. So how/why would splitting these scripts be a good thing? I can think of one good reason why a sysadmin might want to *re*start nmb without restarting smb - loss of WINS registration. For us, that happens periodically to the registration of our Samba boxen with our corporate Windows WINS servers, and I _think_ the underlying cause is that the WINS servers get rebooted. The first we notice is that calls start coming in from people who can no longer map network drives to the Sambas, or can no longer contact development webservers on the same boxes by NetBIOS name alone. A simple restart of nmb solves the problem, and restarting smb at the same time would be both unnecessary and undesirable. Nick Boyce EDS Southwest Solution Centre, Bristol, UK -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Re: OpLock+flat DB corruption (Was: How Samba let us down)
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 04:43:53AM -0700, Chris de Vidal wrote: OpLocks were indeed causing corruption; we only turned them off, made no other changes, and have no more corruption, as I reported yesterday. Wouldn't that be a priority 1, drop everything bug? Other experience was confirmed by doing a Google, by 2 Samba authors, and by the results of our one simple change. If you'd like, I can submit an official bug report. Is it completely reproducible ? Problems cuased by clients not responding to oplock breaks are notoriously dependent on network hardware and client issues (network drivers etc). Sorry for the late reply; I was out all weekend. We can't reproduce the problem because we don't have another Oce' and Opus setup ($$) to test it on, but in essence: No corruption on Netware, no oplocks. Corruption on Samba with oplocks. No corruption on Samba, no oplocks. Yes, turning off all oplocks was the only change made. 2 Samba authors and a Google search confirmed this kind of corruption. We drive the client differently than a Windows TCP stack, and remember Microsoft don't test with anything than their own stack. Problems like this come under the oplock break problems, not generic corruption. Still, it's corruption, and the user ought to be made aware. I would like (at least) to submit a documentation patch. It might have saved us grief. /dev/idal __ Do you Yahoo!? Y! Web Hosting - Let the expert host your web site http://webhosting.yahoo.com/ -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] strange locks
Hi,
I added these lines to smb.conf:
kernel op locks = false
op locks = false
strict locking = true
so I could see some locks from the unix level.
It worked sorta, I see the locks for big files
(but not the locks I was expecting), but for little
files it shows nothing:
# ./lock_list /opt/testsambashare/mattest.doc
# ./lock_list /opt/testsambashare/contents.doc
0 22086 W 21474835391
0 22086 W 21474835591
0 22086 W 21474835991
(the output is l_sysid, l_pid, l_start, l_len of struct flock)
(lock_list.c source given below)
The only difference I can see is that the contents.doc is
much bigger:
# ls -l /opt/testsambashare
total 5210
-rwxrw-r-- 1 matt other1460736 Oct 29 15:24 contents.doc
-rw-r--r-- 1 matt other1176738 Oct 29 15:23 contents.txt
-rwxrw-r-- 1 matt other 2168 Oct 29 16:19 mattest.doc
-rwxrw-r-- 1 matt other 54 Oct 29 16:52 ~$attest.doc
-rwxrw-r-- 1 matt other 54 Oct 29 16:47 ~$ntents.doc
Why is there 3 1 byte locks at some position
way beyond the end of the file?
This is Samba 2.2.6 on Solaris 2.6.
Regards,
Matt
Here's the source. NOTE: you will have to change it for
Linux as Linux doesn't have l_sysid in struct flock.
#include stdlib.h
#include stdio.h
#include sys/types.h
#include unistd.h
#include fcntl.h
int
main (int argc, char **argv)
{
char c;
int fd;
int debug = 1;
struct flock lck;
lck.l_whence = 0;
lck.l_start = 0L;
lck.l_len = 0L;
if (-1 == (fd = open(argv[1], O_RDONLY)))
{
perror(argv[1]);
exit(1);
}
do {
lck.l_type = F_WRLCK;
if(-1 == fcntl(fd, F_GETLK, lck))
{
perror(fcntl getlk);
exit(1);
};
if (lck.l_type != F_UNLCK) {
printf(%d %d %c %8ld %8ld\n, lck.l_sysid, lck.l_pid,
(lck.l_type == F_WRLCK) ? 'W' : 'R', lck.l_start,
lck.l_len);
/* If this lock goes to the end of the address space, no
* need to look further, so break out. */
if (lck.l_len == 0) {
break;
}
else {
/* else, look for new lock after the one just found. */
lck.l_start += lck.l_len;
lck.l_len = 0;
/* printf(looking at start %d len %d\n, lck.l_start,
lck.l_len); */
}
}
} while (lck.l_type != F_UNLCK);
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: Winbind doesnt enumerate more than one group from an AD domain
Yeh it's not local group as in local machine domain groups, it's local as in AD groups.. There are 3 types. Local, Global and Universal.. The most basic type of group suitable for networking is the global group, used to control access to resources that exist anywhere on the network. The primary limitation to global groups is that they can only contain members from a single domain. You'd use a global group for users within a single domain that need access to a common group of files or directories. Domain local groups are essentially the opposite of global groups. Where a global group is limited to having members from a single domain, a domain local group can have members from every domain in your network. However, unlike global groups, domain local groups can only be applied to resources within a single domain, hence the name domain local group. Universal groups, as the name implies, can contain members from any domain on the network and can control access to resources existing in any of the network's domains. http://www.microsoft.com/technet/treeview/default.asp?url=/technet/prodtechn ol/ad/windows2000/maintain/adusers.asp Shaolin - IT Systems WB Ltd. .: http://www.security-forums.com :. - Original Message - From: Simo Sorce [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Jean Francois Micouleau [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Gerald (Jerry) Carter [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Gareth Davies [EMAIL PROTECTED]; James Braid [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 7:26 PM Subject: Re: Winbind doesnt enumerate more than one group from an AD domain
Re: multiple PDCs on one machine?
Don Hayward wrote: No, it doesn't -- it returns null. I also tried a line of perl that uses getpwnam and it failed in the same way. So how does /etc/nsswitch.conf look like (in the chroot)? -- Roland Bauerschmidt
Re: multiple PDCs on one machine?
On Mon, 28 Oct 2002, Roland Bauerschmidt wrote: So how does /etc/nsswitch.conf look like (in the chroot)? -- The etc/nsswitch.conf in the chroot is: passwd: compat group: compat shadow: compat hosts: files dns networks: files protocols: db files services: db files ethers: db files rpc:db files netgroup: nis I also tried it with: passwd: files nis and: passwd: files with the same result. Thanks. Don Hayward [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mote Marine Laboratory Office: 941.388.4441 Cell: 941.302.4982 1600 Ken Thompson Parkway Fax: 941.388.4312 Sarasota, FL 34236 See: http://www.mote.org Independent, non-profit, marine and estuarine research and education facility. For PGP public key do: http://www.mote.org/~don/donpgp.asc use DISCLAIMER; # We run Linux,Apache/mod_perl/mod_ssl/eperl,Mysql,DBI/DBD Taxes feed the starving and clothe the naked.
Re: multiple PDCs on one machine?
On Mon, 28 Oct 2002, Roland Bauerschmidt wrote: So how does /etc/nsswitch.conf look like (in the chroot)? I was missing the libnss_*s to make it work. Thanks again. Don Hayward [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mote Marine Laboratory Office: 941.388.4441 Cell: 941.302.4982 1600 Ken Thompson Parkway Fax: 941.388.4312 Sarasota, FL 34236 See: http://www.mote.org Independent, non-profit, marine and estuarine research and education facility. For PGP public key do: http://www.mote.org/~don/donpgp.asc use DISCLAIMER; # We run Debian Linux Taxes feed the starving and clothe the naked.
RE: Winbind doesnt enumerate more than one group from an AD domain
I had the same problem aswell.. I found it was due to the fact the groups weren't 'Global' groups only 'Local' groups... Apparently they need to be Global or Universal to be shown by Winbind. I have tried using Global and Universal groups on the AD server and neither type seems to work. Local groups don't show up in wbinfo at all, and Global/Universal groups don't get enumerated by wbinfo -r $user, EXCEPT for the Domain Users group. Any ideas? Cheers, James
Re: Fixed: OpLocks caused the corruptions/slowness (Was: How Samba let us down)
--- Neil Hoggarth [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Thu, 24 Oct 2002, Chris de Vidal wrote:
I'd be happy to let the group know. I'm not
positive
we'll reenable anything but kernel oplocks,
though.
We have work to do.
The kernel oplocks parameter affects how Unix
processes accessing the
file interact with SMB oplocks. Enabling kernel
oplocks on a share which
doesn't have SMB oplocks turned on shouldn't make
any difference, I'd
have thought.
If I understand your description correctly you don't
have Unix processes
interacting with the stored files; your Linux box is
acting purely as an
SMB file server for Windows clients? All the file
accesses come in from
the net, via Samba?
Yes.
In this case you probably want
to leave kernel
oplocks off ('cos they buy you nothing,
functionally, and there have
been suggestions that Linux kernel bugs causing
problems with them). The
interesting test is whether either of:
oplocks = yes
level2 oplocks = no
or
oplocks = yes
level2 oplocks = yes
work.
If your corruption returns *and you can show that
your network and
clients are working properly* (ie. no oplock break
messages are getting
lost or being ignored by client machines - which
probably requires
Ethernet packet captures) then it's probably Red
Alert time.
I'll keep these guidelines in mind.
Also: don't think that if you establish the
existence of a priority 1
bug then it is all over - if you're experiencing a
bug that the team
can't reproduce themselves then it doesn't mean that
there isn't a bug,
but it does mean that they're going to need a lot of
help characterizing
and finding it.
The team probably would have to install Elixir's Opus
and process large flat db files (Fox Pro, I think)
with multiple processes on multiple servers... in
other words, it probably isn't going to happen. The
corruption will remain possible with other users.
On the other hand, several people have confirmed it to
be a problem with multiple clients accessing Microsoft
Access, which is a relatively cheap test.
Anyway, for us it is working fine, so I really have
little motivation for fixing the problem other than to
give back to the contributions given. We are probably
going to run the checks as you mentioned above,
probably going to submit a bug report if we find
something, and probably going to submit a
documentation patch, but can't do much more (can't
spend much more time on it.. life goes on here).
/dev/idal
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Y! Web Hosting - Let the expert host your web site
http://webhosting.yahoo.com/
Re: Fixed: OpLocks caused the corruptions/slowness (Was: How Samba let us down)
On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 02:36:00PM -0800, Chris de Vidal wrote: The team probably would have to install Elixir's Opus and process large flat db files (Fox Pro, I think) with multiple processes on multiple servers... in other words, it probably isn't going to happen. The corruption will remain possible with other users. The oplock code in Samba has been *heavily* tested. The one thing we cannot fix is clients ignoring oplock break requests. If you can show a problem occurring when clients are *not* ignoring oplock break requests then it's a Samba logic bug and we'll jump on it asap. Clients commonly ignore oplock breaks because of network problems (borderline hubs etc.). Many people are suffering from network hardware that performs adequately in light use situations and fails under heavy load. I myself have ended up junking hubs with this problem. On the other hand, several people have confirmed it to be a problem with multiple clients accessing Microsoft Access, which is a relatively cheap test. Yes, that's why we test it :-). Many people who have problems with multi-user access db's are running into access bugs. Jeremy.
Re: Fixed: OpLocks caused the corruptions/slowness (Was: How Samba let us down)
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The oplock code in Samba has been *heavily* tested. The one thing we cannot fix is clients ignoring oplock break requests. If you can show a problem occurring when clients are *not* ignoring oplock break requests then it's a Samba logic bug and we'll jump on it asap. (Fog lifting) OK, you have a great point here, which you made before, but I didn't see. Neil gave some guidelines for seeing if it is the client doing so, and I'll submit a bug report if I find it to be so (if we even get a change to test it!). I have a good feeling that we won't find it to be a Samba problem. Still, wouldn't you welcome documentation advising people of potential corruption? I think we both agree that there is no guarantee that everyone's network is 100% on and the danger of corruption appears to be greater when there are large files read and written to a record at a time (namely, flat databases). /dev/idal __ Do you Yahoo!? Y! Web Hosting - Let the expert host your web site http://webhosting.yahoo.com/
RPC message service?
A curious article: http://www.wired.com/news/technology/0,1282,55795,00.html It says that the Messenger Service Spammers are using port 135, which means that they're not using regular WinPOPUP stuff (the 03 names on port 139). I do, in fact, see connect attempts to port 135 in my home firewall logs. (I think they should be called slimewalls.) I'm guessing that they're doing something RPC-related that has, basically, the same effect. I'm just curious to know what it is... Chris -)- -- Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)- Christopher R. Hertel jCIFS Team -- http://jcifs.samba.org/ -)- ubiqx development, uninq. ubiqx Team -- http://www.ubiqx.org/ -)- [EMAIL PROTECTED] OnLineBook -- http://ubiqx.org/cifs/-)- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Win2K as domain member to a Samba-head PDC decides it can't loadyour profiles?
Yes I have, this morning as a matter a fact. I don't know what caused it (maybe daylight savings). I fixed it by stopping then starting Samba (not restarting) the first time it happend. The second time it happened starting and stopping (not restarting) didn't work so I unplugged (cutting off the power supply to) the client machine for 5 + seconds clearing memory and booted up into my profile just fine. btw this happend on RH 2.4.18-10smp kernel samba 2.2.3a Windows XP Serv Pack 1/2000 Serv Pack 3 clients. Nick Richard Sharpe wrote: Hi, Has anyone experienced this? I will investigate that tonight. Regards - Richard Sharpe, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.richardsharpe.com
Re: Win2K as domain member to a Samba-head PDC decides it can't loadyour profiles?
On Tue, 29 Oct 2002, Nick Schuetz wrote: Yes I have, this morning as a matter a fact. I don't know what caused it (maybe daylight savings). I fixed it by stopping then starting Samba (not restarting) the first time it happend. The second time it happened starting and stopping (not restarting) didn't work so I unplugged (cutting off the power supply to) the client machine for 5 + seconds clearing memory and booted up into my profile just fine. Hmmm, this is interesting. If it happens again, it would be interesting if you can grab a trace of the packets exchanged when you try to log on. I solved my problem by deleting my profiles up on the server, and then logging off, which wrote a new (old) set of profiles, and the next time I logged back on, everything seemed OK. I suspect that my problem was due to the SID of my Samba server changing and not matching the SID stored in NTUSER.DAT, which controls access. Wish I had a tool that could read registry files under UNIX. Regards - Richard Sharpe, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.richardsharpe.com
Re: Win2K as domain member to a Samba-head PDC decides it can't loadyour profiles?
I had no choice but to cold reset the computer once it started to hang. I would type in my user name and password, the loading your profile window would pop up and just hang forever (at least it seemed like forever). If the SID was confilicting I would not have even got to the point of loading the profile; would I have? Does Samba handle such exceptions? Nick Richard Sharpe wrote: On Tue, 29 Oct 2002, Nick Schuetz wrote: Yes I have, this morning as a matter a fact. I don't know what caused it (maybe daylight savings). I fixed it by stopping then starting Samba (not restarting) the first time it happend. The second time it happened starting and stopping (not restarting) didn't work so I unplugged (cutting off the power supply to) the client machine for 5 + seconds clearing memory and booted up into my profile just fine. Hmmm, this is interesting. If it happens again, it would be interesting if you can grab a trace of the packets exchanged when you try to log on. I solved my problem by deleting my profiles up on the server, and then logging off, which wrote a new (old) set of profiles, and the next time I logged back on, everything seemed OK. I suspect that my problem was due to the SID of my Samba server changing and not matching the SID stored in NTUSER.DAT, which controls access. Wish I had a tool that could read registry files under UNIX. Regards - Richard Sharpe, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.richardsharpe.com
