[Samba] ACL issues still unresolved
Hi all, The two problems I'm having with ACLs on a W2k domain are still no closer to a solution. To wit, they were: (a) Users accessing the ACL properties dialog on W2k can modify and remove existing ACLs on a given file, but they cannot add new ones (that can only be done with setfacl on the cmdline; the changes are then recognised); (b) In said ACL properties dialog, the usernames displayed are the UNIX ones, not the ones converted with the username map option. Does anyone have any more suggestions on these? I would have thought that the first problem particularly was quite critical. Should I take it to the samba-technical list? Any thoughts much appreciated. -- ANDREW FUREY [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Sysadmin/developer for Terminus. Providing online networks of Australian lawyers (http://www.ilaw.com.au) and Linux experts (http://www.linuxconsultants.com.au) for instant help! Disclaimer: http://www.terminus.net.au/disclaimer.html. GCS L+++ P++ t++ -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Debian Samba Versions
Hi Irving, One of the official Debian samba maintainers, Steve Langsek, has some packages on his debian homepage: http://people.debian.org/~vorlon/samba/ Wolfi On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 12:52:01PM -0500, Irving Carrion wrote: Hopefully a simple question. Does anyone know of .deb or .dsc files for Samba Version 2.2.4, 2.2.5, 2.2.6, or 2.2.7? The only packages available from Debian are: 1. Stable - Samba 2.2.3 2. Testing - Samba 2.2.3 3. Unstable - Samba 30alpha20-4 I've looked on the debian website and in google with no luck. Any help much appreciated? IRV -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Setting Trust Beetween NT and Samba
Hi Everybody, How i can tell to Samba Domain to trust in a NT Domain? How i can tell to NT Domain to trust in a Samba Doamin? Tks, Santhyago -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Strange logentries in samba
Hi, I'm getting thse strange errors in my nmbd log: [2002/12/05 13:19:28, 2] nmbd/nmbd_subnetdb.c:make_subnet(192) making subnet name:192.168.1.4 Broadcast address:192.168.1.255 Subnet mask:255.255.255.0 [2002/12/05 13:19:28, 2] nmbd/nmbd_subnetdb.c:make_subnet(192) making subnet name:UNICAST_SUBNET Broadcast address:0.0.0.0 Subnet mask:0.0.0.0 [2002/12/05 13:19:28, 2] nmbd/nmbd_subnetdb.c:make_subnet(192) making subnet name:REMOTE_BROADCAST_SUBNET Broadcast address:0.0.0.0 Subnet mask:0.0.0.0 [2002/12/05 13:19:32, 0] nmbd/nmbd_responserecordsdb.c:find_response_record(235) find_response_record: response packet id 16525 received with no matching record. [2002/12/05 13:19:32, 0] nmbd/nmbd_responserecordsdb.c:find_response_record(235) find_response_record: response packet id 16526 received with no matching record. The machine is running dual head with samba-tng and samba 2.2.7 (standard RH 8.0 version). The logs are from samba. Now, I've tried to search the web for any info on this, but I find nothing. Does anyone know what this is? Cheers, Tarjei -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Locking user accounts
Hello all, At this moment I am running a samba-ldap-pdc. This works really good. But what worries me is the following thing: user accounts never get locked. This is a problem cause anyone can guess or use bruteforce to enter password. Is there a solution/workaround for this? I want the following situation : when a user tries to logon for 4 times I want the account to lock out the account. Winnt disables the account for several minutes and then the account is locked out. Does anyone have a idea? Thanx in advance Martijn The Netherlands -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Won't %L work anymore?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Message: 6 Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2002 16:43:01 -0500 From: Gary Algier [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Samba] Won't %L work anymore? A followup to my own post: I went ahead and implemented a configuration with %L. It works great. One problem: Micro@!#$t broke Win2k with SP3. My test PC was running Win2k SP2. When it connected to the server it seems to have supplied the netbios name of my server. I went into my boss's office to show him how great this works and his Win2k SP3 did not show the same shares. They showed the shares that would show if the real host name is used. Here's my basic config: System OS: Solaris 2.6 Samba: 2.2.7 Hostname: tea IP addresses assigned: 172.25.0.13 (tea) 172.25.0.33 (cup) 172.25.0.34 (mug) Partial configs: /etc/samba/smb.conf: [global] interfaces = 127.0.0.1 172.25.0.13 172.25.0.33 172.25.0.34 #You probably want to try adding right here: netbios name = beverages netbios aliases = tea cup mug include = /etc/samba/smb.conf.host-%L /etc/samba/smb.conf.host-tea: [global] workgroup = MTLAUREL I don't think this will work if you have different workgroups listed here, I suspect you would have to run seperate smbd's with different config files if you want to do this. netbios name = TEA Unnecessary, use netbios aliases instead. ... [some-shares] ... /etc/samba/smb.conf.host-cup: [global] workgroup = MTLAUREL netbios name = Cup [other-shares] ... /etc/samba/smb.conf.host-mug: [global] workgroup = MTLAUREL netbios name = Cup [more-shares] ... So, am I crazy to think of using %L? Should I use another (hidden) % code? Should I hack in %s (for sockname) or %l (for alternate %L) as the result of getsockname()? Will this even work? Is this any different in samba 3? - -- |--Another happy Mandrake Club member--| Buchan MilneMechanical Engineer, Network Manager Cellphone * Work+27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 8828820x121 Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering http://www.cae.co.za GPG Key http://ranger.dnsalias.com/bgmilne.asc 1024D/60D204A7 2919 E232 5610 A038 87B1 72D6 AC92 BA50 60D2 04A7 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQE971hprJK6UGDSBKcRAoWwAJ9Cs3Nrj0Nt1CRpJ+KXg2F0H8AEQQCeKJKz O4KUgm7icTFgpol4tVHUqCQ= =Wu93 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Backup
I have a PDC samba, I want to save some files in case of crash, I just need to save passwd and /etc/samba directory ? __ Venha para a VilaBOL! O melhor lugar para você construir seu site. Fácil e grátis! http://vila.bol.com.br -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] tdb_reopen: open failed error
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 4 Dec 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Anyone know why I am getting this error in my logs: Dec 4 20:34:06 aslan smbd[17255]: [2002/12/04 20:34:06, 0] tdb/tdbutil.c:tdb_log(531) Dec 4 20:34:06 aslan smbd[17255]: tdb(/var/cache/samba/connections.tdb): tdb_reopen: open failed (No such file or directory) Dec 4 20:34:06 aslan smbd[17256]: [2002/12/04 20:34:06, 0] tdb/tdbutil.c:tdb_log(531) Dec 4 20:34:06 aslan smbd[17256]: tdb(/var/cache/samba/connections.tdb): tdb_reopen: open failed (No such file or directory) I am running samba-2.2.7-1 on RH 7.2 installed from the srpm. I only use winbind, not samba for shares at all... This tdb is created automatically when someon connects to a share. Since you are not providing any shares, it never gets created. It is bothersome, but not harmful. cheers, jerry -- Hewlett-Packard- http://www.hp.com SAMBA Team -- http://www.samba.org GnuPG Key http://www.plainjoe.org/gpg_public.asc ISBN 0-672-32269-2 SAMS Teach Yourself Samba in 24 Hours 2ed You can never go home again, Oatman, but I guess you can shop there. --John Cusack - Grosse Point Blank (1997) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://quantumlab.net/pine_privacy_guard/ iD8DBQE971x2IR7qMdg1EfYRAvixAJ0dVqLiEFzGT2AoFCXljRJ1ftqhcACfX7+r vdGnB1hcCtbGSnQbi/fx7eg= =8r1y -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] winbind + groups hogs CPU
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 4 Dec 2002, Daniel Wittenberg wrote: I've been using winbind successfully for awhile now for user info (nothing in /etc/passwd), but today I tried to use it to pull group info, so I updated /etc/nsswitch.conf (RH 7.3) and then tried to add: valid users = @DOMAIN+group_name and now whenever I click on any folder (share) to open the cpu util goes up, and the connection hangs for awhile, and then eventually it times-out on the client side, and the server logs initgroup errors. Anyone seen this? It is connecting to a rather large AD forest, and I'm told there are groups with 30+ users in them. When I do a winbind -g |wc -l I get about 63,210 entries before I geta 0c000233 error (I think that was it). I tried group enumeration on/off and that doesn't change anything. From include/nterr.h #define NT_STATUS_DOMAIN_CONTROLLER_NOT_FOUND NT_STATUS \ (0xC000 | 0x0233) This is probably from one of the trusted domains. Just curious, if you have 63k groups, how many users ? Samba 3.0 will deal with the better (using two processes...one to respond to queries and one to update the cache). cheers, jerry -- Hewlett-Packard- http://www.hp.com SAMBA Team -- http://www.samba.org GnuPG Key http://www.plainjoe.org/gpg_public.asc ISBN 0-672-32269-2 SAMS Teach Yourself Samba in 24 Hours 2ed You can never go home again, Oatman, but I guess you can shop there. --John Cusack - Grosse Point Blank (1997) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://quantumlab.net/pine_privacy_guard/ iD8DBQE9710PIR7qMdg1EfYRAhrhAKCuvPxe/EOxAxpYjmQPbWrNR/U6WQCgu+Qx pvytDzdYKNHS+Ox3ooduXUw= =9GNH -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RE: [Samba] Backup
Depending on version and operating system. But in Debian it's: /etc/samba /var/lib/samba /var/run/samba /var/cache/samba Although I'm not to sure about /var/cache/samba. This list does not include the binaries though, but I don't think you need to back up those. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of cantisan Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2002 8:52 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Samba] Backup I have a PDC samba, I want to save some files in case of crash, I just need to save passwd and /etc/samba directory ? __ Venha para a VilaBOL! O melhor lugar para você construir seu site. Fácil e grátis! http://vila.bol.com.br -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Locking user accounts
On Thursday, December 5, 2002, at 06:59 AM, Martijn van Brummelen wrote: At this moment I am running a samba-ldap-pdc. This works really good. But what worries me is the following thing: user accounts never get locked. This is a problem cause anyone can guess or use bruteforce to enter password. Is there a solution/workaround for this? I want the following situation : when a user tries to logon for 4 times I want the account to lock out the account. Winnt disables the account for several minutes and then the account is locked out. This subject has come up several times in the past couple of weeks. I just went down this road myself actually. Samba has no built in facility for accomplishing what you need. However, if you are familiar with PAM, there is a PAM module (pam_tally) that is specifically for locking out an account after a specified number of failed logon attempts. (A successful logon resets the count to zero any time before the limit is reached). If you have configured Samba with 'obey pam restrictions = yes' in the smb.conf file, Samba will fail the logon once pam_tally's retry limit is reached. However, the kicker is that if you are using encrypted passwords with Samba, the password lookup is not done via PAM - just the account verification. So a bad logon attempt via Samba does not increment the failed logon counter. The solution to this is in a 2 line patch to the Samba 2.2.7 source code, which I posted to the samba-technical mailing list this past Monday. This patch causes Samba to increment the failed logon count via pam_tally.so, when you are using PAM, and encrypted passwords for Samba. Here is the patch again, against the Samba 2.2.7 source tree: diff -r samba-2.2.7.orig/source/smbd/password.c samba-2.2.7/source/smbd/password.c 617a618,624 #if defined(WITH_PAM) // Jim Morris, 12/03/2002. UGLY HACK TO FORCE PAM_TALLY COUNTER TO // BE UPDATED WHEN LOGON FAILS USING SMBPASSWD FILE. if (lp_obey_pam_restrictions() (ret == FALSE)) smb_pam_passcheck( user, password ); #endif Basically, the trick is to call the PAM password check with a bad password after the encrypted Samba password verification fails. I have most PAM services setup to use the system-auth service, which is where I have configured pam_tally. Here's my /etc/pam.d/system-auth file: #%PAM-1.0 authrequired /lib/security/pam_env.so authsufficient/lib/security/pam_unix.so likeauth nullok authrequired /lib/security/pam_deny.so authrequired /lib/security/pam_tally.so no_magic_root deny=3 reset account required /lib/security/pam_unix.so account required /lib/security/pam_tally.so no_magic_root deny=3 reset passwordrequired /lib/security/pam_cracklib.so retry=3 type= passwordsufficient/lib/security/pam_unix.so nullok use_authtok md5 shadow passwordrequired /lib/security/pam_deny.so session required /lib/security/pam_limits.so session required /lib/security/pam_unix.so Yours may be different if the Unix accounts are authenticated against an LDAP server! Here's /etc/pam.d/samba: %PAM-1.0 auth required pam_nologin.so auth required pam_stack.so service=system-auth accountrequired pam_stack.so service=system-auth sessionrequired pam_stack.so service=system-auth password required pam_stack.so service=system-auth password required pam_smbpass.so use_authtok use_first_pass I hope this information helps! -- Jim Morris ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RE: [Samba] Backup
In the documentation that comes along with SWAT, there is a section entitled something along the lines of, Making a Samba BDC for a Samba PDC. I am in the process of learning LDAP before I build the other server to act as a BDC, but I will be building that quite soon. That section of the SWAT Documentation should answer some if not all of your questions. Good luck! Regards, Robert Adkins II IT Manager/Buyer Impel Industries, Inc. Ph. 586-254-5800 Fx. 586-254-5804 -Original Message- From: Irving Carrion [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2002 9:14 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; cantisan; Robert Adkins Subject: RE: [Samba] Backup Depending on version and operating system. But in Debian it's: /etc/samba /var/lib/samba /var/run/samba /var/cache/samba Although I'm not to sure about /var/cache/samba. This list does not include the binaries though, but I don't think you need to back up those. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of cantisan Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2002 8:52 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Samba] Backup I have a PDC samba, I want to save some files in case of crash, I just need to save passwd and /etc/samba directory ? __ Venha para a VilaBOL! O melhor lugar para você construir seu site. Fácil e grátis! http://vila.bol.com.br -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Cups..works on LM8.1, LM8.2 but not LM9
I've been trying every combination possible to get CUPS on LM9 to print to a shared printer on a windows machine. On setting up the printer in printerdrake, On LM8.1 it worked first time. On LM8.2 with the same settings it worked first time. On LM9 it just sits there and laughs at me, with the same settings as LM8.1 and LM8.2. And how do i remove a default printer it thinks it has but isn't there ? The printer on the remote windoz machine i'm trying to print to is a HP1100. The default printer it thinks it has is also a HP1100, but has it down as its own ip address, and not the ip address of the machine that actually has the printer. Last night i tried setting up an Epson 1160, also connected to a windows machine. LM8.1 set it up, and out pops a test page. LM8.2 set it up, and out pops a test page. On LM9nothing, again just sits there, says the printer is printing, says its ready. but prints bugger all. LM9.. Aaarh nothing. Anybody had this problem many thanks ps is it possible to set up a LM box so that students print from a windows machine to the samba box, and then the samba box sends it to another windows machine to actually be printed. I need only selected students to use the printer ( otherwise the little buggers sneak in and empty all the cartridges, then sneak out again ) Many thanks Mr Smiley -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] smbclient -L nameofserver
Hi everyone I have set up Samba and am running through diagnosis testing and when I enter the above command on my Linux box it automatically asks me for a password. If I return ie null password session setup fails If I enter 'the password that I am logged on as' i get setup session not started NT_STATUS_LOGON_FAILURE relevant lines in my smb.conf which i think may be affecting this are security = user encrypt passwords = Yes public = yes guest ok = yes hosts allow = 192.168. does anyone know where I'm going wrong thanks Howard
[Samba] New Italian samba support mailing list
Hello, I'm proud to announce the creation of a new samba support mailing list for italian users. This follows the creation of an italian samba web site at http://samba.xsec.it I invite all italian samba users that follow this list to also subscribe to the italian mailing list at http://lists.xsec.it/mailman/listinfo/samba-it Regards, Simo Sorce In italian: Salve, sono lieto di annunciare la creazione una nuova mailing list dedicata al supporto samba per gli utenti italiani. Essa segue la creazione del sito web italiano su samba http://samba.xsec.it Invito tutti gli utenti italiani di samba che seguono questa lista a iscriversi anche alla lista italiana al link http://lists.xsec.it/mailman/listinfo/samba-it Saluti, Simo Sorce -- Simo Sorce - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Samba Team - http://www.samba.org -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] smbclient -L nameofserver
On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 02:44:58PM -, Sales wrote: Hi everyone I have set up Samba and am running through diagnosis testing and when I enter the above command on my Linux box it automatically asks me for a password. If I return ie null password session setup fails If I enter 'the password that I am logged on as' i get setup session not started NT_STATUS_LOGON_FAILURE relevant lines in my smb.conf which i think may be affecting this are security = user encrypt passwords = Yes public = yes guest ok = yes hosts allow = 192.168. does anyone know where I'm going wrong If your unix username ist howard smbclient use this username to authenbticate against windows/samba. If you want to use another username for windows/samba you should use: smbclient -L nameofserver -U username and my favorite ...-W WorkgroupOrDomainName Dont forget, this user must exist in smbpasswd on samba server and! as unixuser with same name. -- Frank Matthieß[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RE: [Samba] Win2000 and Samba
... I would recommend checking to make sure that the Automatic Update (Pisses me off to all hell) Service is not running on your Windows 2000 Workstations. If it is, then they might have recently downloaded a nice little fix from MS that tosses your Samba server for a loop. In any case, you might be able to uninstall whatever fix was recently added to the machine. Wait, wait, Robert! Are you talking about a specific M$ fix, or was it just a general suspicion? The power to obstruct Samba by way of automatic fixes is in M$ hands. They experienced the same hostile treatment from AOL when they were warring over Instant Messenger. If you know of any disturbing fixes, please name them as an alert. Dragan _ Get 25MB, POP3, Spam Filtering with LYCOS MAIL PLUS for $19.95/year. http://login.mail.lycos.com/brandPage.shtml?pageId=plusref=lmtplus -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Locking user accounts
On Thu, 2002-12-05 at 08:52, Martijn van Brummelen wrote: If I apply the patch that you say I will have too use pam. But the whole idea of smb-ldap is not too use pam right? I think your solution works with pam but not with ldap I think. Cause all information is stored in ldap and pam does not get involved. I will wait for more replies for a while, if that does not work. I will try your solution. This is indeed the case. This solution only works when you are using PAM. If you are authenticating against an LDAP server, you will need to somehow cause the account information stored on the LDAP server to become disabled after a number of failed logon attempts. Unfortunately, I do not know of any method to do that with an LDAP server. From Samba's perspective (for user authentication), the LDAP server is just another way of storing the same information that we would store in the smbpasswd file. Think of it is a database that we use for looking up the username and password. The database (or directory in this case) is just a storage mechanism. It has no facilities for locking out an account. We are looking up data in the directory - we are not logging into the directory with the given username and password. Without major changes to Samba, I believe there is no way to achieve what you want with just LDAP as the Samba authentication mechanism. I would like to point out that there is a pam_ldap module available that allows a Linux system to do user authentication against an LDAP directory, rather than against a Unix password database. By doing that, you could have failed logons still use the pam_tally module to increment a failed logon attempt counter, while using LDAP for the backend password storage. In this case, both the Unix and Samba passwords would be stored in the LDAP directory I suppose. Can someone that is using LDAP for Samba authentication comment on this, especially if you are also using PAM? Thanks! -- /--- | Jim Morris | Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | |AIM: JFM2001 \--- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Samba 2.2.7 - client computer can NOT log IN.
Hello All! Any of our workstations who try and log into the domain receive the following Windows error: The system cannot log you on to this domain because the system's computer account in its primary domain is missing or the password on that account is incorrect. Ok, good enough... If I check the smbpasswd file I can see the machine account and it is also in passwd. So I decide to manually remove it using smbpasswd -x -m computer1 userdel computer1$ I verify that it is NOT in smbpasswd,passwd,shadow etcThen continue with useradd -d /dev/null -g 100 -s /bin/false -M computer1$ smbpasswd -a -m computer1$ I verify that it IS in smbpasswd,passwd,shadow etc Ok, this should work, right? Not. Try again. Same error message. Oh and by the way, these machine accounts were working perfectly before. I've googled and babbled and have read manuals, with no luck. Also, if it's not the computer account, is it a wrong machine password? The password should be null so I don't understand the logic? Also, is there some type of machine cache? Is samba 2.2.7 storing the machine info in some .tdb file as well? Debian3.0/Samba 2.2.7 Would be highly appreciative if someone could extend some knowledge my way? Thanks! IRV -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] ACL issues still unresolved
(b) In said ACL properties dialog, the usernames displayed are the UNIX ones, not the ones converted with the username map option. Why not use original Windows names and take users map out of the loop? While a blank in user's name is strictly a no-no and all lower case is preferable, most *nices can deal with names longer than 8 chars, although ls -l-listings may appear messy. As for your (a) question, should we chase back your previous mails to find out exactly what samba version on which platform you are using, or can you discretely include that info in a mail? _ Get 25MB, POP3, Spam Filtering with LYCOS MAIL PLUS for $19.95/year. http://login.mail.lycos.com/brandPage.shtml?pageId=plusref=lmtplus -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Administrator account samba-3.0alpha21 and LDAP
Hi! I am setting up a test bed for Samba PDC + LDAP. I used the 3.0alpha21 rpm for RH8 from samba.org. The setup is working. Win9x client can login no problem. I was wondering how I should setup an Administrator account for the domain. Right now, my plan is to have samba authenticate only to the ldap backend (passdb backend = ldapsam only). Does the administrator only need write access to the ldap tree or it also need to be root on the machine (uidnumber or gidnumber 0) ? What should I put in the rid and primaryGroupID field ? At the very least, I'd like to be able to add machine accounts to the domain with this account. Thanks for your input ! -- Etienne GoyerLinux Québec Technologies Inc. http://www.LinuxQuebec.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP Pub Key: http://www.LinuxQuebec.com/pubkeys/eg.key Fingerprint: F569 0394 098A FC70 B572 5D20 3129 3D86 8FD5 C853 -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Samba 2.2.7 - client computer can NOT log IN.
On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 10:16:48AM -0500, Irving Carrion wrote: Hello All! Any of our workstations who try and log into the domain receive the following Windows error: The system cannot log you on to this domain because the system's computer account in its primary domain is missing or the password on that account is incorrect. Ok, good enough... If I check the smbpasswd file I can see the machine account and it is also in passwd. So I decide to manually remove it using smbpasswd -x -m computer1 userdel computer1$ I verify that it is NOT in smbpasswd,passwd,shadow etcThen continue with useradd -d /dev/null -g 100 -s /bin/false -M computer1$ smbpasswd -a -m computer1$ ^ ? Should smbpasswd -a -m computer1 Your smbpasswd file must have a wrong computer1$$ entry. Try the smbpasswd command without the trailing $. -- Frank Matthieß[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RE: [Samba] Samba 2.2.7 - client computer can NOT log IN.
No that was a typo in the message. Sorry the command I meant was: smbpasswd -a -m computer1 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Frank Matthieß Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2002 10:46 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Samba] Samba 2.2.7 - client computer can NOT log IN. On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 10:16:48AM -0500, Irving Carrion wrote: Hello All! Any of our workstations who try and log into the domain receive the following Windows error: The system cannot log you on to this domain because the system's computer account in its primary domain is missing or the password on that account is incorrect. Ok, good enough... If I check the smbpasswd file I can see the machine account and it is also in passwd. So I decide to manually remove it using smbpasswd -x -m computer1 userdel computer1$ I verify that it is NOT in smbpasswd,passwd,shadow etcThen continue with useradd -d /dev/null -g 100 -s /bin/false -M computer1$ smbpasswd -a -m computer1$ ^ ? Should smbpasswd -a -m computer1 Your smbpasswd file must have a wrong computer1$$ entry. Try the smbpasswd command without the trailing $. -- Frank Matthieß [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Won't %L work anymore?
Thanks! That did the trick. BTW: The workgroup, and a bunch of other things, were identical between the different virtual servers. Only the shares differed. I did, however, move all the rest of the [global] parameters into the master smb.conf. Buchan Milne wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Message: 6 Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2002 16:43:01 -0500 From: Gary Algier [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Samba] Won't %L work anymore? A followup to my own post: I went ahead and implemented a configuration with %L. It works great. One problem: Micro@!#$t broke Win2k with SP3. My test PC was running Win2k SP2. When it connected to the server it seems to have supplied the netbios name of my server. I went into my boss's office to show him how great this works and his Win2k SP3 did not show the same shares. They showed the shares that would show if the real host name is used. Here's my basic config: System OS: Solaris 2.6 Samba: 2.2.7 Hostname: tea IP addresses assigned: 172.25.0.13 (tea) 172.25.0.33 (cup) 172.25.0.34 (mug) Partial configs: /etc/samba/smb.conf: [global] interfaces = 127.0.0.1 172.25.0.13 172.25.0.33 172.25.0.34 #You probably want to try adding right here: netbios name = beverages netbios aliases = tea cup mug include = /etc/samba/smb.conf.host-%L /etc/samba/smb.conf.host-tea: [global] workgroup = MTLAUREL I don't think this will work if you have different workgroups listed here, I suspect you would have to run seperate smbd's with different config files if you want to do this. netbios name = TEA Unnecessary, use netbios aliases instead. ... [some-shares] ... /etc/samba/smb.conf.host-cup: [global] workgroup = MTLAUREL netbios name = Cup [other-shares] ... /etc/samba/smb.conf.host-mug: [global] workgroup = MTLAUREL netbios name = Cup [more-shares] ... So, am I crazy to think of using %L? Should I use another (hidden) % code? Should I hack in %s (for sockname) or %l (for alternate %L) as the result of getsockname()? Will this even work? Is this any different in samba 3? - -- |--Another happy Mandrake Club member--| Buchan MilneMechanical Engineer, Network Manager Cellphone * Work+27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 8828820x121 Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering http://www.cae.co.za GPG Key http://ranger.dnsalias.com/bgmilne.asc 1024D/60D204A7 2919 E232 5610 A038 87B1 72D6 AC92 BA50 60D2 04A7 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQE971hprJK6UGDSBKcRAoWwAJ9Cs3Nrj0Nt1CRpJ+KXg2F0H8AEQQCeKJKz O4KUgm7icTFgpol4tVHUqCQ= =Wu93 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- Gary Algier, WB2FWZ gaa at ulticom.com +1 856 787 2758 Ulticom Inc., 1020 Briggs Rd, Mt. Laurel, NJ 08054 Fax:+1 856 866 2033 -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Authenticate Linux Session with NT Domain Acct.
Despite configuring winbind and my /etc/pam.d/files, I am still unable to actually log into a Linux session (ie, at the gdm login screen or text login prompt) using my NT domain account. Here is my /etc/pam.d/login file: auth required /lib/security/pam_securetty.so auth sufficient /lib/security/pam_winbind.so auth sufficient /lib/security/pam_unix.so use_first_pass auth required /lib/security/pam_stack.so service=system-auth auth required /lib/security/pam_nologin.so accountsufficient /lib/security/pam_winbind.so accountrequired /lib/security/pam_stack.so service=system-auth password required /lib/security/pam_stack.so service=system-auth sessionrequired /lib/security/pam_stack.so service=system-auth sessionoptional /lib/security/pam_console.so NOTE: I can access NT shares using my NT Domain credentials, but that's about it. I can also get group/user info. from the NT domain which tells me winbind is communicating with my PDC. Thanks for any help. -- Benjamin T. Krein Network Administrator PMC Technologies, Inc. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] swat not working this time
Hi again, I've just reinstalled RH 7.2 and Samba 2.2.7 for the unpteenth
time this time swat is not working !!! I have checked the etc/services
file and swat 901/tcp is in there and I have a text file named swat in
etc/xinetd.d directory containing the following...
service swat
{
port = 901
socket_type = stream
wait = no
user = root
server = /usr/local/samba/bin/swat
log_on_failure +=USERID
disable = no
}
I can't access is from either the browser on my PC or from KDE's Konqueror
Have I missed some vital step ? It all worked last week when I
first/second/third installed everything but I've been busy installing M$
Windoze 2000 for a few days and my brain is addled.
TVM
Mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Auto printer drivers download for RAW printers
Chapter 7.3 at http://ca.samba.org/samba/docs/Samba-HOWTO-Collection.html#CUPS breezes over using Samba and CUPS as a mere spooling print server -- 'raw' printing with vendor drivers download but doens't get into how to set up Samba to provide the Win drivers required by the Win client machines Subsequent chapters explain how to set up Samba for non-raw print drivers Can someone help me set up my system to provide client machines with the native Win9x drivers from my Linux server (Samba and CUPS) -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Samba and ACL problems.
Ive joined my smbcomputer to my AD-domain using samba 2.2.7 and smbpasswd -j domain -r pdc -Uadmuser. However, when I try to set file/dir permissions from one of the windows (xp,2k) clients I get this error in the smbd.log: smbd/posix_acls.c:create_canon_ace_lists(823) create_canon_ace_lists: unable to map SID S-1-5-21-1624733417-2918206790-2146600570-2560 to uid or gid.. I have mounted my ext2 fs with mnt -t ext2 -o acl -o user_xattr device mntpnt. Im using kernel 2.4.20 which ive patched for ext2/ext3 ACL support. Is there anyway to set domain permissions with the command setfacl just to try if it works? It works fine when using users on the smbcomputer but not at all when Im using users from the AD-domain. Im using debian 3 woody. regards, Jacob _ MSN 8 with e-mail virus protection service: 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] file corruption problem, HELP
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I am running Samba 2.2.2 with winbind authenticating to an NT 4.0 PDC. All of my clients are Windows XP Pro. This box has been running fine for several months. In fact my uptime was 185 days as of last night. However, for various reasons i upgraded the kernel from 2.4.18 to 2.4.19 and had to reboot last night. Everything appeared to come up fine, all daemons started up and connections could be made. However, this morning some people (note: not everyone) are complaining about MS Word corrupting some of their files upon saving (all these files are being served by Samba). Since we have not had any problems for months i am attributing this to something in my kernel upgrade or reboot. If anyone here has any input i would greatly appreciate it. Thanks, Kevin R. Marshall - -- keyserver: http://pgp.mit.edu/ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE97uK24pH/bZtToq0RAjrUAJ9T+sxnxwS10p0SW3kf/zUpuA0QYQCgny4G /yqCMW8mAWHt1wbpQhqn+3c= =BXZh -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] samba troubles
I am running samba on Rh 7.3 serving windows XP machines on a small network (fewer than 10 cpts). I am experiencing very long delays logging onto the network (2-5 minutes) my clients are assigned IP's via DHCP and I am using a DNS server not located in my building (not allowed to run my own) can anyone help me figure why my logins take so long? I also have trouble when I logout (not shutdown, just logout) and log back in my network drives are not restored, is this because I am using DHCP? Thanks in advance for the help, it's greatly appreciated. _ Protect your PC - get McAfee.com VirusScan Online http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963 -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] (no subject)
confirm 268000
[Samba] Setting Trust Beetween NT and Samba
Hi Everybody, How i can tell to Samba Domain to trust in a NT Domain? Tks, Santhyago -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RE: [Samba] swat not working this time
Is it listening? Does netstat -l |grep swat turn up anything?
If not, xinetd needs to listen for port 901, easiest was is a chkconfig
swat on or you could restart xinetd.
~ Daniel
-Original Message-
From: Mike Stewart
Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2002 11:32 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Samba] swat not working this time
Hi again, I've just reinstalled RH 7.2 and Samba 2.2.7 for the
unpteenth
time this time swat is not working !!! I have checked the
etc/services
file and swat 901/tcp is in there and I have a text file named swat in
etc/xinetd.d directory containing the following...
service swat
{
port = 901
socket_type = stream
wait = no
user = root
server = /usr/local/samba/bin/swat
log_on_failure +=USERID
disable = no
}
I can't access is from either the browser on my PC or from KDE's
Konqueror
Have I missed some vital step ? It all worked last week when I
first/second/third installed everything but I've been busy installing M$
Windoze 2000 for a few days and my brain is addled.
TVM
Mike
---
This message is the property of Time Inc. or its affiliates. It may be
legally privileged and/or confidential and is intended only for the use
of the addressee(s). No addressee should forward, print, copy, or
otherwise reproduce this message in any manner that would allow it to be
viewed by any individual not originally listed as a recipient. If the
reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby
notified that any unauthorized disclosure, dissemination, distribution,
copying or the taking of any action in reliance on the information
herein is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication
in error, please immediately notify the sender and delete this message.
Thank you.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] winbind log
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Why is it that there is never any info in the log.winbind file? I have started it using ./winbind -d 3 and still no data. Thanks, /KRM - -- keyserver: http://pgp.mit.edu/ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE97vP64pH/bZtToq0RAqkxAKCYO09iVVn134t/DPUfvqRFQ72hIQCeNGO+ cG6KlhrhO+RlqNpFRCTlAVM= =N8CD -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] change password
hello all Does anyone have any idea how to setup password expiration and/or change password at next logon in the samba server? I do find that to be really helpfull when you have users who are alergic to changing password from mummy etc.. Many thanks in advance Simon - This mail sent through IMP on Redhat 8.0 and Qmail with Ldap. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Where is this rid coming from?
Repeat background from previous posts: I'm using a Debian woody based system (partially upgraded to 'testing' in order to use tls with ldap), with samba_2.2.7 source built by debian/rules with LDAP turned on, using gcc 3.0.4, libldap2-tls_2.0.23-14, and libldap2_2.0.23-14. I'm setting up PDC service -- when I try to join a windows machine (this is XP) to the domain, I get 'specified user does not exist' on the windows system and the join fails. The admin username/password authenticates. The machine username lookup succeeds and the correct rid is returned. Then the following lines appear in log.smbd (with -d 10): [2002/12/05 12:42:19, 3, pid=27738] rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:api_rpcTNP(1180) api_rpcTNP: pipe 29607 rpc command: SAMR_OPEN_USER [2002/12/05 12:42:19, 5, pid=27738] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_debug(60) 00 samr_io_q_open_user [2002/12/05 12:42:19, 6, pid=27738] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_debug(60) 00 smb_io_pol_hnd domain_pol [2002/12/05 12:42:19, 5, pid=27738] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint32(588) data1: [2002/12/05 12:42:19, 5, pid=27738] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint32(588) 0004 data2: 0007 [2002/12/05 12:42:19, 5, pid=27738] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint16(559) 0008 data3: [2002/12/05 12:42:19, 5, pid=27738] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint16(559) 000a data4: [2002/12/05 12:42:19, 5, pid=27738] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint8s(675) 000c data5: fb 8f ef 3d 5a 6c 00 00 [2002/12/05 12:42:19, 5, pid=27738] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint32(588) 0014 access_mask: 0090 [2002/12/05 12:42:19, 5, pid=27738] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint32(588) 0018 user_rid : 1e22 [2002/12/05 12:42:19, 4, pid=27738] rpc_server/srv_lsa_hnd.c:find_policy_by_hnd_internal(168) Found policy hnd[0] [000] 00 00 00 00 07 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 FB 8F EF 3D ...= . . [2002/12/05 12:42:19, 0, pid=22667] passdb/pdb_ldap.c:pdb_getsampwrid(907) We don't find this rid [7714] count=0 Which user belongs to this rid? Is this coming from an smbd database or from the windows machine? Similar lookups returning 1e22 occur three or so times. Thanks for any help. Don Hayward [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mote Marine Laboratory Office: 941.388.4441 Cell: 941.302.4982 1600 Ken Thompson Parkway Fax: 941.388.4312 Sarasota, FL 34236 See: http://www.mote.org Independent, non-profit, marine and estuarine research and education facility. For PGP public key do: http://www.mote.org/~don/donpgp.asc use DISCLAIMER; # We run Debian Linux Taxes feed the starving and clothe the naked. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RE: [Samba] file corruption problem, HELP
Kevin, I have this problem also. Running 2.2.1a and Win XP machines. I cannot save my Word files that reside on the Samba server (they become corrupted) and if I have Outlook open (.pst files reside on the Samba server) I get a Delayed Write Fail error from Windows. I read that upgrading to 2.2.6 or above takes care of this problem. Have not upgraded yet so I am still no sure -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Kevin Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2002 12:23 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Samba] file corruption problem, HELP -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I am running Samba 2.2.2 with winbind authenticating to an NT 4.0 PDC. All of my clients are Windows XP Pro. This box has been running fine for several months. In fact my uptime was 185 days as of last night. However, for various reasons i upgraded the kernel from 2.4.18 to 2.4.19 and had to reboot last night. Everything appeared to come up fine, all daemons started up and connections could be made. However, this morning some people (note: not everyone) are complaining about MS Word corrupting some of their files upon saving (all these files are being served by Samba). Since we have not had any problems for months i am attributing this to something in my kernel upgrade or reboot. If anyone here has any input i would greatly appreciate it. Thanks, Kevin R. Marshall - -- keyserver: http://pgp.mit.edu/ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE97uK24pH/bZtToq0RAjrUAJ9T+sxnxwS10p0SW3kf/zUpuA0QYQCgny4G /yqCMW8mAWHt1wbpQhqn+3c= =BXZh -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Samba 2.2.7 - Domain SID
Hello! Is it possible to edit the secrets.tdb file and change the domain SID? Thanks! IRV -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Printing - lprm command not getting executed
I am attempting to get printing services for Windows 2000 clients working with Samba on a Red Hat 7.2 box. The problem is I can not cancel print jobs (either from a PC or the local smb client). File sharing, and printing other than this problem, work fine. Here is a listing of configuration and system info: 1) the samba packages installed, 2) output of uname -a, 3) the relevant parts of the smb.conf file, 4) printing capabilities which work, and 5) more detailed information about the problem. 1) SAMBA PACKAGES samba-2.2.1a-4 samba-common-2.2.1a-4 samba-client-2.2.1a-4 2) RED HAT LINUX Linux pegasus 2.4.7-10 #1 Thu Sep 6 17:27:27 EDT 2001 i686 unknown 3) EXCERPTS FROM SMB.CONF [global] # workgroup = NT-Domain-Name or Workgroup-Name workgroup = WIN # A W2K DOMAIN # server string is the equivalent of the NT Description field domain logons = yes # if you want to automatically load your printer list rather # than setting them up individually then you'll need this printcap name = /etc/printcap load printers = yes # It should not be necessary to spell out the print system type unless # yours is non-standard. Currently supported print systems include: # bsd, sysv, plp, lprng, aix, hpux, qnx printing = bsd ### I HAVE ALSO TRIED lprng, AND LEAVING THIS COMMENTED OUT. # Security mode. Most people will want user level security. See # security_level.txt for details. security = domain # You may wish to use password encryption. Please read # ENCRYPTION.txt, Win95.txt and WinNT.txt in the Samba documentation. # Do not enable this option unless you have read those documents encrypt passwords = yes smb passwd file = /etc/samba/smbpasswd printer admin = tiberius,dneilson,root print command = /usr/bin/lpr -r -P%p %s lpq command = /usr/bin/lpq -P%p %j lprm command = /usr/bin/lprm -P%p %j queuepause command = /usr/sbin/lpc stop %p queueresume command = /usr/sbin/lpc start %p # Share Definitions == [lp11] comment=David's Printer path=/var/spool/samba/public valid users=dneilson mellwein printer=lp11 printable=yes printer admin=tiberius,dneilson,root print command=/usr/bin/lpr -r -P%p %s lprm command=/usr/bin/lprm -P%p %j public=yes 4) PRINTING CAPABILITIES THAT WORK I can print from the local smbclient as well as any Windows 2000 client I choose. I am able to pause and unpause the print queue. I have not had any problem printing any kind of document in the correct format. 5) MORE DETAILS OF THE PROBLEM. When I try to delete a job, Samba gives the indication it deleted the job. On a Windows 2000 client, after I delete the job and hit Refresh, the job is gone. On the local smbclient, after I cancel the job and type queue, the job is gone. But in both cases, if I type lpstat -t from the server command line, the job is still out there. This problem can't be specific to Samba 2.2.1a, because I have tried it on a machine with 2.2.7, and have gotten the same results. In troubleshooting, I changed the lprm command line to read: lprm command=/tmp/lprm %p %j. The /tmp/lprm script consists of the following: START SCRIPT /tmp/lprm /usr/bin/id /tmp/lprm.out /usr/bin/lprm -P$1 $2 /tmp/lprm.out 21 END SCRIPT /tmp/lprm When I cancel jobs, this script should at least create an output file, but it doesn't - which indicates it doesn't get run. As a result, I think Samba is not paying any attention to the lprm command line in the smb.conf. Be aware that testparm will show the lprm command as having the correct parameters (/usr/bin/lprm -P%p %j). I have checked the samba log files, and they are not written to when I try to cancel jobs. I have tried running a trace of the smbd command when I try to cancel jobs, and here is the output. It is only one line long: ### START strace OUTPUT select(1024, [9 10], NULL, NULL, NULL unfinished ... ### END strace OUTPUT From the Unix command line, if I run the lprm command as myself (dneilson) lprm -Plp11 JOB_ID, I can delete the job without any problem. Thanks for any help you can provide. David Neilson -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Samba 2.2.7 - Domain SID
On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 02:48:30PM -0500, Irving Carrion wrote: Hello! Is it possible to edit the secrets.tdb file and change the domain SID? just delete or rename the secrets.tdb and copy a MACHINE.SID in the same directory. Greetings Klaus Thanks! IRV -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- Klaus Umbach| RapidSolution Software AG Administration | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.rapidsolution.de -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RE: [Samba] Samba 2.2.7 - Domain SID
Well that's part of the problem. I don't know what the SID is. How can I extract the domain SID from secret.tdb -Original Message- From: Klaus Umbach [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2002 3:49 PM To: Irving Carrion Cc: samba list Subject: Re: [Samba] Samba 2.2.7 - Domain SID On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 02:48:30PM -0500, Irving Carrion wrote: Hello! Is it possible to edit the secrets.tdb file and change the domain SID? just delete or rename the secrets.tdb and copy a MACHINE.SID in the same directory. Greetings Klaus Thanks! IRV -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- Klaus Umbach| RapidSolution Software AG Administration | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.rapidsolution.de -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Samba 2.2.7 login script processing
On Tuesday 03 December 2002 19:42, Randy Cox wrote: Hi All, I posted this earlier, but not sure if it showed up, so: samba 2.2.7 built with: ./configure make make install (That is, no special build options) in our smb.conf the line: logon script = %u.bat: ^ lowercase -- When trying to login (from Windows 9x,NT, 2K or Linux with winbindd), several (hundred) of these messages appear in the server logs: [the date shows up here] lib/util_str.c: string_sub (1217) ERROR: string overflow by 2 in string_sub(%u, 7) ^ and this number -- is the user name length + 2 The workstation trying to login eventually times out with an incorrect password message. On the server, smbd and nmbd stop responding to /etc/init.d/samba stop or other commands and need to be stopped with kill -9 if we change the line in smb.conf to logon script = %U.bat: ^ uppercase -- Then everything works fine. Is there a patch I missed somewhere? TIA Senior Technical Associate [EMAIL PROTECTED] just the same here at my network. if i use logon script = li-%u.bat and rename the batchfiles it works too. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] 2.2.7 RH 8.0 Binary RPM's
After installing these rpm's, no swat executable can be found... I've built it from the sources and gotten it working, but is this something that needs to be corrected in the rpm? Has anyone else noticed this, or did I do something silly that I haven't realized yet? -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RE: [Samba] Permissions problem
Did u set "encrypt passwords" smb.conf option to yes? Did you set the password using 'smbpasswd -a username command? Can you attach a levlel 10log file. - Ranjit -Original Message- -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Thabu PienaarSent: Thursday, December 05, 2002 2:07 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: [Samba] Permissions problem Help Please When I try to connect from Win XP Pro to my Samba Server, I get this error... "Samba is not accessible. You might not have permissiont o use this network resource." (attached error gif). I have a smbpasswd file created from /etc/passwd, configured exactly like my XP username and password. Thanks Thabu Pienaar*ComputerNetWitrivier / White RiverSuid-Afrika / South Africa+27 (0) 83 349-6588
[Samba] I want to get rid of user nobody
Where is this coming from, and what does it mean. Samba version 2.2.4 Service uid gid pid machine -- IPC$ nobody nobody 26705 learncom-55 (192.168.62.173) Thu Dec 5 15:35:07 2002 IPC$ nobody nobody 26709 te2228-05 (192.168.34.55) Thu Dec 5 15:35:11 2002 IPC$ nobody nobody 26704 ib1112-247 (192.168.62.100) Thu Dec 5 15:35:07 2002 IPC$ nobody nobody 26708 ib1112-357 (192.168.38.107) Thu Dec 5 15:35:11 2002 IPC$ nobody nobody 26702 learncom-11 (192.168.35.61) Thu Dec 5 15:35:06 2002 machines tomomi_ozaki student 26702 learncom-11 (192.168.35.61) Thu Dec 5 15:35:16 2002 IPC$ nobody nobody 26703 te2228-11 (192.168.34.61) Thu Dec 5 15:35:06 2002 This is causing me great problems Here is my config file. [global] workgroup = ACADEMIC netbios name = ACADEMIC-SERVER encrypt passwords = Yes log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m max log size = 50 socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 guest ok = No interfaces =172.20.1.127/16 os level = 64 preferred master = True domain master = True domain logons = Yes # add user script = /usr/sbin/useradd -d /dev/nuell -g 100 -s /bin/false -M %u logon path = \\ACADEMIC-SERVER\machines\%m\profile # local master = Yes dns proxy = No # wins proxy = Yes wins server = 172.20.1.19 # remote announce = 192.168.32.0 delete veto files = Yes veto files = /.AppleDouble/.AppleDesktop/Network Trash [netlogon] path = /usr/local/samba/lib/netlogon writeable = no guest ok = no write list = ntadmin [machines] comment = Profiles path = /home/machines valid users = @student @instructor @administrator @superuser @systemadmin writeable = yes create mask = 0775 directory mask = 0775 guest ok = No browseable = No locking = No Thanks in advance.
Re: [Samba] 2.2.7 RH 8.0 Binary RPM's
I couldn't get swat working with the binary 2.2.6 or 2.2.7 RPMs for RH 8. Never tried the source ones. As soon as I went back to RH's split out RPMs for (2.2.7) it worked first try. Not sure what the difference was. Peter LaComb wrote: After installing these rpm's, no swat executable can be found... I've built it from the sources and gotten it working, but is this something that needs to be corrected in the rpm? Has anyone else noticed this, or did I do something silly that I haven't realized yet? -- Justin Georgeson UnBound Technologies, Inc. http://www.unboundtech.com Main 713.329.9330 Fax713.460.4051 Mobile 512.789.1962 5295 Hollister Road Houston, TX 77040 Real Applications using Real Wireless Intelligence(tm) -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] I want to get rid of user nobody
On Thu, 5 Dec 2002, Mark E. Nuell wrote: Where is this coming from, and what does it mean. The nobody account is essential for all browsing functionality. Just can get rid of it if you want to break samba completely. The ICP$ share is used to allow a user to click on a machine in Windows Explorer and then to see the shares on that machine. What problems is this causing you? Please explain, we are not clairvoyant. If you can help us to understand your problem then maybe someone can help you find a solution. Cheers, John T. Samba version 2.2.4 Service uid gid pid machine -- IPC$ nobody nobody 26705 learncom-55 (192.168.62.173) Thu Dec 5 15:35:07 2002 IPC$ nobody nobody 26709 te2228-05 (192.168.34.55) Thu Dec 5 15:35:11 2002 IPC$ nobody nobody 26704 ib1112-247 (192.168.62.100) Thu Dec 5 15:35:07 2002 IPC$ nobody nobody 26708 ib1112-357 (192.168.38.107) Thu Dec 5 15:35:11 2002 IPC$ nobody nobody 26702 learncom-11 (192.168.35.61) Thu Dec 5 15:35:06 2002 machines tomomi_ozaki student 26702 learncom-11 (192.168.35.61) Thu Dec 5 15:35:16 2002 IPC$ nobody nobody 26703 te2228-11 (192.168.34.61) Thu Dec 5 15:35:06 2002 This is causing me great problems. Here is my config file.. [global] workgroup = ACADEMIC netbios name = ACADEMIC-SERVER encrypt passwords = Yes log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m max log size = 50 socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 guest ok = No interfaces =172.20.1.127/16 os level = 64 preferred master = True domain master = True domain logons = Yes #add user script = /usr/sbin/useradd -d /dev/nuell -g 100 -s /bin/false -M %u logon path = \\ACADEMIC-SERVER\machines\%m\profile # local master = Yes dns proxy = No # wins proxy = Yes wins server = 172.20.1.19 # remote announce = 192.168.32.0 delete veto files = Yes veto files = /.AppleDouble/.AppleDesktop/Network Trash [netlogon] path = /usr/local/samba/lib/netlogon writeable = no guest ok = no write list = ntadmin [machines] comment = Profiles path = /home/machines valid users = @student @instructor @administrator @superuser @systemadmin writeable = yes create mask = 0775 directory mask = 0775 guest ok = No browseable = No locking = No Thanks in advance.. -- John H Terpstra Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] 2.2.7 RH 8.0 Binary RPM's
On Thu, 5 Dec 2002, Peter LaComb wrote: After installing these rpm's, no swat executable can be found... I've built it from the sources and gotten it working, but is this something that needs to be corrected in the rpm? Has anyone else noticed this, or did I do something silly that I haven't realized yet? If you used Red Hat's samba packages then you need to make sure that you installed the package called 'samba-swat'. Red Hat choose to not install SWAT by default. If you used the samba-team package then it should be automatically installed. Please let us know which you used. - John T. -- John H Terpstra Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] write_socket_data(54) errors
I looked all over the archives to find an answer to this issue with Samba not loading on my RH7.0 machine. It turns out that I had deleted the server's name from my /etc/hosts file. I discovered that by tail -f /var/log/samba/log.smb when I saw the unknown host xxx, I checked /etc/hosts and volia! It wasn't there. I added the name back in, and restarted Samba. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Samba Performance question
Dear all, I have a difficult Problem with samba 2.2.5, I hope everyone can help me. My customer has samba 2.2.5 running on a HP Alpha Server ES40 Cluster with Tru64 V5.1. The share on this Server has 3.1 million files in 16000 directories. Some one this directories have 45000 files on it. The problem is: if we try a search a file from this big directory via an NT Client the response time is to large for the the customer. He has run an similar application on a NT File server. NT responded after 1 sec and samba need 6 sec. Can someone explain me what I can do to increase the performance, please? Kind Regards / Mit freundlichen Grüssen Wolfgang Belgardt Customer Support Consultant Hewlett-Packard GmbH Customer Support Bonsiepen 5 D-45136 Essen Phone: ++49 (0) 201 2663 258 Fax: ++49 (0) 201 2663 200 mobil: +49 (0171 3357 256) E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.hp.com/de __ Hewlett-Packard GmbH Geschäftsführer: Jörg Menno Harms (Vorsitzender), Jürgen Banhardt, Wolfram Fischer, Rainer Kaczmarczyk, Bärbel Schmidt, Fritz Schuller, Regine Stachelhaus Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Heribert Schmitz Sitz der Gesellschaft: Böblingen, Amtsgericht Böblingen HRB 4081
[Samba] Samba Tip´s
Hello all, I´m trying to implement samba on some lab´s. The networking enviroment is working ok, (my Domain is ok, the file config.pol is ok, the script´s are running, etc...). My question is... I have some classrooms and the students have all their personal login and home directory, but the student must to be created on booth sistems (linux -passwd and Samba system), is it right?? and i want to distribute the home directory of the students by their classess, doing that way the teacher can get access to his students jobs clean and easy. so how i do that? Sorry by my english thank´s ... --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.422 / Virus Database: 237 - Release Date: 20/11/2002 -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Problem with 95/98 and Outlook....
I've got a problem where when we have to restart the samba server, if everyone hasn't logged off, anyone running Outlook will have their files corrupted. Using a standard NT file server, this doesn't occur. Anyone have a clue as to a fix for this? Thanks BTW: Using Samba 2.2.7 -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] smbpasswd has password length problem with the 2.2.7 security patch
I am using samba 2.2.5, and the following patch Jerry outlined in his 2.2.7 release notes. I tested it against a W2k server (in mixed mode) which had a simple one char admin password, worked fine. Recently I found that if the password is longer than 1 char, using smbpasswd -j dom -r svr -U admin, and then input password, I get NT_STATUS_LOGON_FAILURE. If I remove the patch, or keep the password as just 1 char, smbpasswd works fine. I know the patch was originally for 2.2.6. But since Jerry outlined a simple one for older versions and 2.2.6, I only applied the simple patch as below. Can somebody tell me what other changes I need to make for 2.2.5? Anybody has a similar problem? The following is a snippet of Jerry's 2.2.7 release email: Patch for Samba versions 2.2.2 to 2.2.6 - --- The following patch applies cleanly to the above Samba versions and will fix the vulnerability for sites that do not wish to upgrade to 2.2.7 at this time. cut here- libsmb/smbencrypt.c.origTue Nov 19 17:21:57 2002 +++ libsmb/smbencrypt.c Tue Nov 19 17:22:12 2002 @@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ if(len 128) len = 128; /* Password must be converted to NT unicode - null terminated. */ - dos_struni2((char *)wpwd, (const char *)passwd, 256); + dos_struni2((char *)wpwd, (const char *)passwd, len); /* Calculate length in bytes */ len = strlen_w((const smb_ucs2_t *)wpwd) * sizeof(int16); - ---cut here- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] mapping drive in XP hangs
Hello list, I have been using samba (was last at 2.2.2) sucessfully for nearly two years on my solaris systems as the file server to my pcs. Recently (since last friday) my XP boxes cannot map a drive, and auto-mapped home dirs cause a huge timeout of over 15 minutes! Nothing has changed in my config file, nothing changed on the system. Just to try something, today I upgraded to 2.2.7, but still the same behavior. I am completely out of ideas as to what to check. I have looked at the log files, but found nothing of interest, presumably because It just hangs, not fails. Note that our Domain services are provided by separate NT Boxes, and so the registry mods make no difference. Please, any ideas would be greatly appreciated. -- Marc Wrubleski [EMAIL PROTECTED] University of Calgary, Math Stats Department smb.conf: [global] workgroup = MATH_DOMAIN guest account = log file = /usr/local/samba2.2.7/logs/log.%m hosts allow = xxx.xxx.61.0/255.255.255.0 hosts deny = 0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0 hide dot files = yes [homes] comment = Home Directories browseable = no read only = no create mode = 0640 directory mode = 0750 [public_html] comment = web published directory path = %H/public_html browseable = yes read only = no create mode = 0644 directory mode = 0751 -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] CLOSE YOUR NUMBER #1 SECURITY HOLE
www.passwordbouncer.com/stophackers After all the security measures taken to make your network impenetrable, there is one liability could undermine your entire operation. Allowing weak network logon password policies on your network is like giving a stranger the keys to the front door of your home. Strict logon password policy is your first line of defense. Password Bouncer delivers stronger password enforcement than Win2K/NT, by preventing users from selecting vulnerable passwords that can be easily guessed or cracked by hackers. Passwords are screened and validated against a 300,000-word English wordlist and a 4,000-word proper noun wordlist in addition to highly configurable password rules. START DEFEATING HACKERS TODAY, DOWNLOAD YOUR FREE TRIAL NOW: www.passwordbouncer.com/stophackers Remove yourself from our email list by: Sending a blank email to the following address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [Samba] Samba/LDAP Authentication and SSL Conflicts
My solution: That part about the Samba authentication was the most confusing bit, as others suggested: I completely agree with the replies I received that the SSL shouldn't have had anything to do with it. And, it turns out, it didn't. The machine in question had cached my account's authenticator. When it failed to contact the LDAP server (due to the SSL problem), it relied on its own cache. I incorrectly assumed I was authenticating - a deeper study of my logs revealed that SSL was completely unrelated. I didn't even think of this until one of my users tried to authenticate and it didn't work. My problem with the machine not authenticating had to do with the secret salt in /etc/samba/secrets.tdb - the new LDAP machine's account password hash was different. Very frustrating, but I wiped out the old one, rejoined the machine to the domain, and voilla - it's fixed. Thanks again for the responses. - Bill On Thu, 2002-12-05 at 13:55, Bill Alexander wrote: I'm having a problem with Samba/LDAP authentication for Windows boxen from my Samba PDC. I've diagnosed as much as I can and fiddled with the relevant settings I know of, but I'm not making any progress. REMAINDER DELETED Bill Alexander [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mission Research Corporation -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Samba Tip´s
On Thu, 2002-12-05 at 19:03, Roberto Lourenço wrote: Hello all, I´m trying to implement samba on some lab´s. The networking enviroment is working ok, (my Domain is ok, the file config.pol is ok, the script´s are running, etc...). My question is... I have some classrooms and the students have all their personal login and home directory, but the student must to be created on booth sistems (linux -passwd and Samba system), is it right?? yes that's right. and i want to distribute the home directory of the students by their classess, doing that way the teacher can get access to his students jobs clean and easy. so how i do that? i don't understand that last part... do you mean that you want all students in a class to have the same home directory? You could just write a small script to link all the student's files into one directory for the teacher's convenience. brad -- Bradley W. Langhorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Profile problem (samba+ldap)
Hi, I use samba-ldap-2.2.5-1rf.i386.rpm in redhat 8.0 as PDC.When I logon with win2000pro (SP2) I get a message in windows "Windows cannot locate the server copy of your roaming profile and is attemptingto log you on with your local profile. Changes to the profile will notbe copied to the server when you logoff. Possible causes of this errorinclude network problems or insufficient security rights. If thisproblem persists, contact your network administrator. DETAIL - Accessis denied. " It seems as if the windows machine is trying to write theprofile but its getting permission denied like its doesn't have theauthority to write. Please suggest me about solving this problem. Thank you.With Yahoo! Mail you can get a bigger mailbox -- choose a size that fits your needs
[Samba] Re: Permissions problem
Help Please When I try to connect from Win XP Pro to my Samba Server, I get this error... "Samba is not accessible. You might not have permissiont o use this network resource." (attached error gif). I have a smbpasswd file created from /etc/passwd, configured exactly like my XP username and password. Thanks Thabu Pienaar*ComputerNetWitrivier / White RiverSuid-Afrika / South Africa+27 (0) 83 349-6588
[Samba] smbclient stops getting files
Dear Lists, some weird problem: i use smbclient withhin a script that fetches the complete harddisks from some of our MS-Servers. When using 2.2.1a and also 2.2.7 only the first share is downloaded, then the script stops with smbclient on the prompt awaiting further instructions. Fortunately the whole scripts works fine when using 2.2.3a (havent tested any other version till now..) Anybody else encountered this problem ? kind regards Wolfgang Pesek net informationstechnologie mmc kommunikationstechnologie http://www.net-it.at http://www.mmc.at fon +43 2236 3903 fax +43 2236 3903-13 -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] ACL issues still unresolved
(b) In said ACL properties dialog, the usernames displayed are the UNIX ones, not the ones converted with the username map option. Why not use original Windows names and take users map out of the loop? While a blank in user's name is strictly a no-no and all lower case is preferable, most *nices can deal with names longer than 8 chars, although ls -l-listings may appear messy. As for your (a) question, should we chase back your previous mails to find out exactly what samba version on which platform you are using, or can you discretely include that info in a mail? Sorry, I should have specified - Samba 2.2.7 manually compiled with ACLs, on Debian unstable. However, I have just this morning worked out both of those problems. For all the future Googlers out there who are banging their heads against the wall as much as I have been: IF IN DOUBT, USE WINBIND. Setting up winbind with the nsswitch.conf stuff works perfectly (as far as those two problems go). Only problem I have now is working out how to preserve the ACLs on files I copy from the W2k to the Samba machine. xcopy /o seems to be it, but it comes up with access denied and the file is empty, as well as having the default permissions (copying person is owner, etc). More Googling needed... Thanks for your help, everyone. -- ANDREW FUREY [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Sysadmin/developer for Terminus. Providing online networks of Australian lawyers (http://www.ilaw.com.au) and Linux experts (http://www.linuxconsultants.com.au) for instant help! Disclaimer: http://www.terminus.net.au/disclaimer.html. GCS L+++ P++ t++ -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Security = domain groups
Hi, My Samba is include to my domain (security = domain) Today i use Valid user to auth my user but i want use a 2002 group. I don't find information about this Can you help me ? thanks -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Patch for 3_0 configure.in ??
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi! I've never done anything in configure.in. What about the following? Index: configure.in === RCS file: /kunden/vl/cvs/samba/source/configure.in,v retrieving revision 1.300.2.25 diff -u -r1.300.2.25 configure.in - --- configure.in2002/12/04 19:47:01 1.300.2.25 +++ configure.in2002/12/05 10:43:37 @@ -3054,8 +3054,8 @@ AC_MSG_RESULT(yes) AC_DEFINE(WITH_WINBIND,1,[Whether to build winbind]) - - EXTRA_BIN_PROGS=$EXTRA_BIN_PROGS bin/wbinfo$(EXEEXT) - - EXTRA_SBIN_PROGS=$EXTRA_SBIN_PROGS bin/winbindd$(EXEEXT) + EXTRA_BIN_PROGS=$EXTRA_BIN_PROGS bin/wbinfo$EXEEXT + EXTRA_SBIN_PROGS=$EXTRA_SBIN_PROGS bin/winbindd$EXEEXT if test x$BLDSHARED= xtrue; then SHLIB_PROGS=$SHLIB_PROGS nsswitch/libnss_winbind.so if test x$with_pam= xÿes; then Volker -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Key-ID D32186CF, Fingerprint available: phone +49 551 370 iD8DBQE97y4QOmSXH9Mhhs8RAomsAKCQ3xR+vezghJkmK21n9YRAZNUHHgCaApda 4LzIdUvzupIdYJaG/ga6k8Q= =zaJP -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: 3.0 requires an admin account to join samba to a domain?
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 06:38:49PM -0600, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, 5 Dec 2002, Rafal Szczesniak wrote: I found it. Who came up with the function names? They're horrible! Originally it was an attempt to follow underlying mechanism name. As 'net' gets general and therefore complicated tool, we getting farther from this intend. Perhaps synonyms could help, but only for a while. After that it would be a straight way to horrible mess. Maybe it's time to start 'net search key=...' ? ;-) I meant things like just_change_the_password() Oh, it's being changed now, by me. I recently renamed the file and put another trust-related function there. I'm also going to rename the just_change_the_password() and (possibly) give it more general shape to use it with domain trusts, as well. In summary: I'm working there, right now :) ... and agree -- the names have been horrible, so far. -- cheers, ++ |Rafal 'Mimir' Szczesniak [EMAIL PROTECTED] | |*BSD, GNU/Linux and Samba / |__/
Re: Patch for 3_0 configure.in ??
On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 11:44:36AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi! I've never done anything in configure.in. What about the following? This is correct. I'm also seeing these EXEEXT: no such file or directory responses. $(EXEEXT) in /bin/sh != $(EXEEXT) in Make. Index: configure.in === RCS file: /kunden/vl/cvs/samba/source/configure.in,v retrieving revision 1.300.2.25 diff -u -r1.300.2.25 configure.in - --- configure.in2002/12/04 19:47:01 1.300.2.25 +++ configure.in2002/12/05 10:43:37 @@ -3054,8 +3054,8 @@ AC_MSG_RESULT(yes) AC_DEFINE(WITH_WINBIND,1,[Whether to build winbind]) - - EXTRA_BIN_PROGS=$EXTRA_BIN_PROGS bin/wbinfo$(EXEEXT) - - EXTRA_SBIN_PROGS=$EXTRA_SBIN_PROGS bin/winbindd$(EXEEXT) + EXTRA_BIN_PROGS=$EXTRA_BIN_PROGS bin/wbinfo$EXEEXT + EXTRA_SBIN_PROGS=$EXTRA_SBIN_PROGS bin/winbindd$EXEEXT if test x$BLDSHARED= xtrue; then SHLIB_PROGS=$SHLIB_PROGS nsswitch/libnss_winbind.so if test x$with_pam= xÑes; then -- / Alexander Bokovoy --- Do not overtax your powers.
RE: Patch for 3_0 configure.in ??
Rats. Missed this in testing. (My fault). I think someone has fixed this already by escaping the $-sign. The issue is controlling when the $(EXEEXT) gets expanded. PG -Original Message- From: Alexander Bokovoy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2002 6:23 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Patch for 3_0 configure.in ?? On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 11:44:36AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi! I've never done anything in configure.in. What about the following? This is correct. I'm also seeing these EXEEXT: no such file or directory responses. $(EXEEXT) in /bin/sh != $(EXEEXT) in Make. Index: configure.in === RCS file: /kunden/vl/cvs/samba/source/configure.in,v retrieving revision 1.300.2.25 diff -u -r1.300.2.25 configure.in - --- configure.in2002/12/04 19:47:01 1.300.2.25 +++ configure.in2002/12/05 10:43:37 @@ -3054,8 +3054,8 @@ AC_MSG_RESULT(yes) AC_DEFINE(WITH_WINBIND,1,[Whether to build winbind]) - - EXTRA_BIN_PROGS=$EXTRA_BIN_PROGS bin/wbinfo$(EXEEXT) - - EXTRA_SBIN_PROGS=$EXTRA_SBIN_PROGS bin/winbindd$(EXEEXT) + EXTRA_BIN_PROGS=$EXTRA_BIN_PROGS bin/wbinfo$EXEEXT + EXTRA_SBIN_PROGS=$EXTRA_SBIN_PROGS bin/winbindd$EXEEXT if test x$BLDSHARED= xtrue; then SHLIB_PROGS=$SHLIB_PROGS nsswitch/libnss_winbind.so if test x$with_pam= xÑes; then -- / Alexander Bokovoy --- Do not overtax your powers.
Re: Clean up of spool files
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 4 Dec 2002, Zdenek Niederle wrote: I'm using Samba 2.2.5 and CUPS to handle printing on our network. Unfortunately, the smbprn.xx spool files are not being cleaned up and instead are quickly filling the spool directory. Is their a setting or option to ensure the files are cleaned up once sent to the printer? I am aware that using a cron job would work but this can't be the best solution. Known bug fixed in 2.2.6. Please check the archives (and better to use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for general admin questions). cheers, jerry -- Hewlett-Packard- http://www.hp.com SAMBA Team -- http://www.samba.org GnuPG Key http://www.plainjoe.org/gpg_public.asc ISBN 0-672-32269-2 SAMS Teach Yourself Samba in 24 Hours 2ed You can never go home again, Oatman, but I guess you can shop there. --John Cusack - Grosse Point Blank (1997) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://quantumlab.net/pine_privacy_guard/ iD8DBQE9712sIR7qMdg1EfYRAu4AAJ4/1Cj8xQDF4bXXyliFM9BgMSsMTQCg6pfv hSfR+0YHUlMLEUFknjkSLQw= =IR2v -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: 3.0 requires an admin account to join samba to a domain?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, 5 Dec 2002, Rafal Szczesniak wrote: Oh, it's being changed now, by me. I recently renamed the file and put another trust-related function there. I'm also going to rename the just_change_the_password() and (possibly) give it more general shape to use it with domain trusts, as well. In summary: I'm working there, right now :) ... and agree -- the names have been horrible, so far. It would be nice to settle on function names and change them as little as possible since people get used to grepping for certain strings to locate functionality. And why did I get 4 copies of this mail? I understand why I got 2, but 4? cheers, jerry -- Hewlett-Packard- http://www.hp.com SAMBA Team -- http://www.samba.org GnuPG Key http://www.plainjoe.org/gpg_public.asc ISBN 0-672-32269-2 SAMS Teach Yourself Samba in 24 Hours 2ed You can never go home again, Oatman, but I guess you can shop there. --John Cusack - Grosse Point Blank (1997) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://quantumlab.net/pine_privacy_guard/ iD8DBQE972GRIR7qMdg1EfYRAr4pAJ9w6+j4D+hQUcLEgByrFZXULJUjmACghmZO Kxtb8jsKxcs54dThqC4+FvU= =37Pj -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Clean up of spool files
Zdenek Niederle wrote on Samba-digest: Message: 1 From: Zdenek Niederle [EMAIL PROTECTED] Organization: Collicutt Hanover To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Clean up of spool files Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2002 15:13:15 -0700 I'm using Samba 2.2.5 and CUPS to handle printing on our network. Unfortunately, the smbprn.xx spool files are not being cleaned up and instead are quickly filling the spool directory. Is their a setting or option to ensure the files are cleaned up once sent to the printer? I am aware that using a cron job would work but this can't be the best solution. Thanks. Hi, Zdenek, you need to be aware, that the Samba print files pass thru 2 different spool directories. Once the incoming directory managed by Samba, (set f.e. in the path = /var/spool/samba directive in the [printers] section of smb.conf). Second is the spool directory of your UNIX print subsystem. For CUPS it is normally /var/spool/cups/, as set by the cupsd.conf directive RequestRoot /var/spool/cups. I am not sure, which one of your directories keeps the files. From what you say, it is most likely the Samba part. For the CUPS part, you may want to consult: http://localhost:631/sam.html#PreserveJobFiles and http://localhost:631/sam.html#PreserveJobHistory and http://localhost:631/sam.html#MaxJobs There are the settings described for your CUPS daemon, which could lead to completed job files not being deleted. PreserveJobHistory Yes -- keeps some details of jobs in cupsd's mind (well it keeps the c12345, c12346 etc. files in the CUPS spool directory, which do a similar job as the old-fashioned BSD-LPD control files). This is set to Yes as a default. PreserveJobFiles Yes -- keeps the job files themselves in cupsd's mind (well it keeps the d12345, d12346 etc. files in the CUPS spool directory...). This is set to No as the CUPS default. MaxJobs 500 -- this directive controls the maximum number of jobs that are kept in memory. Once the number of jobs reaches the limit, the oldest completed job is automatically purged from the system to make room for the new one. If all of the known jobs are still pending or active then the new job will be rejected. Setting the maximum to 0 disables this functionality. The default setting is 0. (There are also additional settings for MaxJobsPerUser and MaxJobsPerPrinter...) For everything to work as announced, you need to have three things: * a Samba-smbd which is compiled against libcups (Check on Linux by running ldd `which smbd`) * a Samba-smb.conf setting of printing = cups * another Samba-smb.conf setting of printcap = cups Note, that in this case all other manually set printing-related commands (like print command, lpq command, lprm command, lppause command or lpresume command) are ignored and they should normally have no influence what-so-ever on your printing. If you want to do things manually, replace the printing = cups by printing = bsd. Then your manually set commands may work (haven't tested this), and a print command = lp -d %P %s; rm %s may do what you need. You forgot to mention the CUPS version you're using. If you did set things up as described in the man pages, then the Samba spool files should be deleted. Otherwise it may be a bug. On the CUPS side, you can control the behaviour as described above. If you have more problems, post the output of these commands: grep -v ^# /etc/cups/cupsd.conf | grep -v ^$ grep -v ^# /etc/samba/smb.conf | grep -v ^$ | grep -v ^; (adapt paths as needed). These commands sanitize the files and cut out the empty lines and lines with comments, providing the naked settings in a compact way. Cheers, Kurt
Re: 3.0 requires an admin account to join samba to a domain?
On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 08:24:17AM -0600, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, 5 Dec 2002, Rafal Szczesniak wrote: Oh, it's being changed now, by me. I recently renamed the file and put another trust-related function there. I'm also going to rename the just_change_the_password() and (possibly) give it more general shape to use it with domain trusts, as well. In summary: I'm working there, right now :) ... and agree -- the names have been horrible, so far. It would be nice to settle on function names and change them as little as possible since people get used to grepping for certain strings to locate functionality. Maybe. I don't know yet how far it is possible. Perhaps putting former xyz() function in comments could be of some help for grepping the code ? I don't assume, I'll change the function names, for sure. It's just that they're quite specific. And why did I get 4 copies of this mail? I understand why I got 2, but 4? Huh ? That's a surprise. AFAIR it was addressed to you, Jim and the mailing list. -- cheers, ++ |Rafal 'Mimir' Szczesniak [EMAIL PROTECTED] | |*BSD, GNU/Linux and Samba / |__/
smbclient core dump
I can't reproduce that core dump I was having with today's code :-) Cheers, Patrick
[homes] share
The following used to work with several months old code.. # Share Definitions == [prlw1] comment = Windoze transfer path = /usr/windoze valid users = prlw1 browseable = no writable = yes guest ok = no [homes] comment = Home Directories browseable = no writable = yes Now when I smbclient //localhost/prlw1 I end up in my home directory /home/prlw1 rather than in /usr/windoze, so it seems the [prlw1] share isn't being matched, and as prlw1 is a valid userid it is then matched to [homes]. Any thoughts on how I could debug this? Cheers, Patrick
Re: [homes] share
On Thu, 5 Dec 2002, Patrick Welche wrote: The following used to work with several months old code.. # Share Definitions == [prlw1] comment = Windoze transfer path = /usr/windoze valid users = prlw1 browseable = no writable = yes guest ok = no [homes] comment = Home Directories browseable = no writable = yes Now when I smbclient //localhost/prlw1 I end up in my home directory /home/prlw1 rather than in /usr/windoze, so it seems the [prlw1] share isn't being matched, and as prlw1 is a valid userid it is then matched to [homes]. Any thoughts on how I could debug this? Which version of the code? Sounds like someone changed the order of the test. Previously, it used to check for a share of that name, and if not found, checked for [homes] and then [printers]. Regards - Richard Sharpe, rsharpe[at]ns.aus.com, rsharpe[at]samba.org, sharpe[at]ethereal.com, http://www.richardsharpe.com
Re: [homes] share
On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 12:39:02PM -0800, Richard Sharpe wrote: On Thu, 5 Dec 2002, Patrick Welche wrote: ... Now when I smbclient //localhost/prlw1 I end up in my home directory /home/prlw1 rather than in /usr/windoze, so it seems the [prlw1] share isn't being matched, and as prlw1 is a valid userid it is then matched to [homes]. Any thoughts on how I could debug this? Which version of the code? Sounds like someone changed the order of the test. Previously, it used to check for a share of that name, and if not found, checked for [homes] and then [printers]. CVS code from this evening (Dec 5 17:53 GMT) Cheers, Patrick
Re: Patch for 3_0 configure.in ??
On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 11:44:36AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've never done anything in configure.in. What about the following? I think I fixed this in head already. I'll have to do some janitorial merging when I get in to work. I'm surprised I haven't been busted already by Jeremy. (-: Now where was that mop and bucket??? Tim.
Win2K sp3 and Samba 3.0: status?
Hello, When I try to join a Win2K SP3 server to a Samba 3.0alpha21-controlled NT domain, I get the error 'The parameter is incorrect'. I understand that SP3 is known to suffer problems not present with SP2, and the usual suggestion seems to be to set 'use spnego = no' in smb.conf. However, this setting does not appear to have any effect, and attempting to join the domain gives the same error message. Does anyone have any insights into the status of SP3 compatibility in Samba? Would network traces or log files be of use to anyone? -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer msg04804/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Win2K sp3 and Samba 3.0: status?
On Thu, 5 Dec 2002, Steve Langasek wrote: Hello, When I try to join a Win2K SP3 server to a Samba 3.0alpha21-controlled NT domain, I get the error 'The parameter is incorrect'. I understand that SP3 is known to suffer problems not present with SP2, and the usual suggestion seems to be to set 'use spnego = no' in smb.conf. However, this setting does not appear to have any effect, and attempting to join the domain gives the same error message. Does anyone have any insights into the status of SP3 compatibility in Samba? Would network traces or log files be of use to anyone? These will be useful. Network traces, that is. However, you will want to turn off the two signseal registry entries, and reboot the client before joining. Regards - Richard Sharpe, rsharpe[at]ns.aus.com, rsharpe[at]samba.org, sharpe[at]ethereal.com, http://www.richardsharpe.com
Re: Win2K sp3 and Samba 3.0: status?
On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 02:26:08PM -0800, Richard Sharpe wrote: When I try to join a Win2K SP3 server to a Samba 3.0alpha21-controlled NT domain, I get the error 'The parameter is incorrect'. I understand that SP3 is known to suffer problems not present with SP2, and the usual suggestion seems to be to set 'use spnego = no' in smb.conf. However, this setting does not appear to have any effect, and attempting to join the domain gives the same error message. Does anyone have any insights into the status of SP3 compatibility in Samba? Would network traces or log files be of use to anyone? These will be useful. Network traces, that is. However, you will want to turn off the two signseal registry entries, and reboot the client before joining. Good news: I've gotten the server to join, and even have some idea of the source of the trouble. The server was joined to an AD realm initially, and we were trying to transition directly to the Samba domain. If I parted from the AD realm first and rebooted, I was then able to join the domain. When parting the AD realm, Win2K did give a warning that it failed to delete the machine account, but this was non-fatal. I'm wondering if this was the real cause of the failure before, in which case the network trace I sent you probably wouldn't be particularly useful. Is there any concerted effort to document such issues, where I might forward this hint? -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer msg04806/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Win2K sp3 and Samba 3.0: status?
Good news: I've gotten the server to join, and even have some idea of the source of the trouble. The server was joined to an AD realm initially, and we were trying to transition directly to the Samba domain. If I parted from the AD realm first and rebooted, I was then able to join the domain. When parting the AD realm, Win2K did give a warning that it failed to delete the machine account, but this was non-fatal. I'm wondering if this was the real cause of the failure before, in which case the network trace I sent you probably wouldn't be particularly useful. Is there any concerted effort to document such issues, where I might forward this hint? Very interesting. This was the same setup Andrew Bartlett was saying didn't work for him at the CIFS conference. Seems like you have to leave the domain first...which wasn't the case with NT. I wonder if there's something we're missing in this join that would enable us to do it without leaving first... Jim McDonough IBM Linux Technology Center Samba Team 6 Minuteman Drive Scarborough, ME 04074 USA [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone: (207) 885-5565 IBM tie-line: 776-9984
RE: Samba for OpenVMS 6.2-1H3
The performance problems with Samba VMS 1.19.x were so severe that they crashed the DEC IP stack on our Alpha VMS 7.2-1 system when I attempted to use Windows 2000 clients and servers against them. Mike Ober. -Original Message- From: John E. Malmberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2002 6:17 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Samba for OpenVMS 6.2-1H3 the http://www.samba.org site. Be aware that there is a protocol incompatability between Windows 2000 and later and SAMBA versions prior to 2.0.7. It sometimes causes severe performance delays. -John [EMAIL PROTECTED] Personal Opinion Only
Re: CVS update: samba/source/nmbd
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Could this possibly fix our problems with joining a domain from W2kSP3 without an explicit realm set? It should... Sorry, doesn't really. Volker -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Key-ID D32186CF, Fingerprint available: phone +49 551 370 iD8DBQE972SgOmSXH9Mhhs8RAsxXAJ9pT/wwezdgZlo3XI8kcI69BFecSgCfcaAf nFwMwp+l7KDSZjeNxy3Jk8A= =GAJ6 -END PGP SIGNATURE-
CVS update: samba/source/registry
Date: Thu Dec 5 19:11:40 2002 Author: jmcd Update of /home/cvs/samba/source/registry In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv12890/registry Modified Files: reg_objects.c Log Message: Add some const Revisions: reg_objects.c 1.2 = 1.3 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/registry/reg_objects.c?r1=1.2r2=1.3
CVS update: samba/source/registry
Date: Thu Dec 5 19:12:19 2002 Author: jmcd Update of /home/cvs/samba/source/registry In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv13141/registry Modified Files: Tag: SAMBA_3_0 reg_objects.c Log Message: Add some const Revisions: reg_objects.c 1.1.4.2 = 1.1.4.3 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/registry/reg_objects.c?r1=1.1.4.2r2=1.1.4.3
CVS update: samba/source/libads
Date: Thu Dec 5 19:13:20 2002 Author: jmcd Update of /home/cvs/samba/source/libads In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv13409/libads Modified Files: ldap_printer.c Log Message: More printer data to publish Revisions: ldap_printer.c 1.13 = 1.14 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/libads/ldap_printer.c?r1=1.13r2=1.14
CVS update: samba/source/printing
Date: Thu Dec 5 19:13:20 2002 Author: jmcd Update of /home/cvs/samba/source/printing In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv13409/printing Modified Files: nt_printing.c Log Message: More printer data to publish Revisions: nt_printing.c 1.237 = 1.238 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/printing/nt_printing.c?r1=1.237r2=1.238
CVS update: samba/source/include
Date: Thu Dec 5 19:13:40 2002 Author: jmcd Update of /home/cvs/samba/source/include In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv13505/include Modified Files: Tag: SAMBA_3_0 nt_printing.h Log Message: More printer data to publish Revisions: nt_printing.h 1.22.2.4 = 1.22.2.5 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/include/nt_printing.h?r1=1.22.2.4r2=1.22.2.5
CVS update: samba/source/libads
Date: Thu Dec 5 19:13:40 2002 Author: jmcd Update of /home/cvs/samba/source/libads In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv13505/libads Modified Files: Tag: SAMBA_3_0 ldap_printer.c Log Message: More printer data to publish Revisions: ldap_printer.c 1.7.2.6 = 1.7.2.7 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/libads/ldap_printer.c?r1=1.7.2.6r2=1.7.2.7
CVS update: samba/source/printing
Date: Thu Dec 5 19:13:40 2002 Author: jmcd Update of /home/cvs/samba/source/printing In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv13505/printing Modified Files: Tag: SAMBA_3_0 nt_printing.c Log Message: More printer data to publish Revisions: nt_printing.c 1.204.2.12 = 1.204.2.13 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/printing/nt_printing.c?r1=1.204.2.12r2=1.204.2.13
CVS update: samba/source/printing
Date: Thu Dec 5 22:32:15 2002 Author: jra Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/printing In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv26707/printing Modified Files: Tag: SAMBA_3_0 printfsp.c printing.c Log Message: Fix debugs for rap mapping. Delete job on map fail. Jeremy. Revisions: printfsp.c 1.17.2.3 = 1.17.2.4 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/printing/printfsp.c?r1=1.17.2.3r2=1.17.2.4 printing.c 1.139.2.17 = 1.139.2.18 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/printing/printing.c?r1=1.139.2.17r2=1.139.2.18
CVS update: samba/docs/textdocs
Date: Thu Dec 5 22:38:55 2002 Author: jht Update of /home/cvs/samba/docs/textdocs In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv28290 Modified Files: Tag: SAMBA_3_0 CUPS-PrintingInfo.txt Log Message: Added another email - this stuff needs to go into a new chapter in the Entire-HOWTO-Collection. Revisions: CUPS-PrintingInfo.txt 1.2.4.3 = 1.2.4.4 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/docs/textdocs/CUPS-PrintingInfo.txt?r1=1.2.4.3r2=1.2.4.4
CVS update: samba/source/printing
Date: Thu Dec 5 22:39:21 2002 Author: jra Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/printing In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv26713/printing Modified Files: Tag: APPLIANCE_HEAD printfsp.c printing.c Log Message: Fix debugs for rap mapping. Delete job on map fail. Final fixes for CR#1265. Jeremy. Revisions: printfsp.c 1.5.2.10 = 1.5.2.11 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/printing/printfsp.c?r1=1.5.2.10r2=1.5.2.11 printing.c 1.66.2.98 = 1.66.2.99 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/printing/printing.c?r1=1.66.2.98r2=1.66.2.99
CVS update: samba/source
Date: Thu Dec 5 22:56:25 2002 Author: tpot Update of /data/cvs/samba/source In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv32622 Modified Files: Tag: SAMBA_3_0 Makefile.in Log Message: Merge from appliance, Revision 1.223.2.41: Add -a flag to setup.py when making python_clean. This will delete the python compiled binaries and .so files rather than only the temporary compile directory. This fixes a PSA build bug. Merge from HEAD, Revision 1.587: Link less with smbmnt and smbumount. Also change from a pstrcpy() to a strncpy() to make it clear that we must operate on a PATH_MAX sized buffer. Andrew Bartlett Plus some bits from the AC_SUBST target cleanup that got missed last time I ran dirdiff. Revisions: Makefile.in 1.468.2.25 = 1.468.2.26 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/Makefile.in?r1=1.468.2.25r2=1.468.2.26
CVS update: samba/source
Date: Thu Dec 5 23:02:18 2002 Author: tpot Update of /data/cvs/samba/source In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv3631 Modified Files: Tag: SAMBA_3_0 configure.in Log Message: Merge from HEAD, Revision 1.379: Defaulting python breaks the clean target it python isn't installed. Merge from HEAD, Revision 1.378: Fixes for EXEEXT - must use \$ signs when you want an actual $ sign to be used. Revisions: configure.in1.300.2.25 = 1.300.2.26 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/configure.in?r1=1.300.2.25r2=1.300.2.26
CVS update: samba/source/python
Date: Thu Dec 5 23:05:28 2002 Author: tpot Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/python In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv4095 Modified Files: Tag: SAMBA_3_0 setup.py py_tdbpack.c Log Message: Merge from HEAD: FUNCTION_MACRO change broke the Python modules. Also fix up string pasting (I thought this should only be a warning?) Revisions: setup.py1.5.2.2 = 1.5.2.3 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/python/setup.py?r1=1.5.2.2r2=1.5.2.3 py_tdbpack.c1.1.2.6 = 1.1.2.7 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/python/py_tdbpack.c?r1=1.1.2.6r2=1.1.2.7
CVS update: samba/source/smbd
Date: Thu Dec 5 23:30:48 2002 Author: tpot Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/smbd In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv9207/smbd Modified Files: Tag: SAMBA_3_0 build_options.c Log Message: Merge from HEAD: Remove FILE_MACRO as __FILE__ is ANSI C. Revisions: build_options.c 1.9.2.2 = 1.9.2.3 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/smbd/build_options.c?r1=1.9.2.2r2=1.9.2.3
CVS update: samba/source/include
Date: Thu Dec 5 23:30:49 2002 Author: tpot Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/include In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv9207/include Modified Files: Tag: SAMBA_3_0 debug.h config.h.in Log Message: Merge from HEAD: Remove FILE_MACRO as __FILE__ is ANSI C. Revisions: debug.h 1.13.2.3 = 1.13.2.4 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/include/debug.h?r1=1.13.2.3r2=1.13.2.4 config.h.in 1.166.2.13 = 1.166.2.14 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/include/config.h.in?r1=1.166.2.13r2=1.166.2.14
CVS update: samba/source
Date: Thu Dec 5 23:30:49 2002 Author: tpot Update of /data/cvs/samba/source In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv9207 Modified Files: Tag: SAMBA_3_0 configure.in acconfig.h Log Message: Merge from HEAD: Remove FILE_MACRO as __FILE__ is ANSI C. Revisions: configure.in1.300.2.26 = 1.300.2.27 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/configure.in?r1=1.300.2.26r2=1.300.2.27 acconfig.h 1.83.2.8 = 1.83.2.9 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/acconfig.h?r1=1.83.2.8r2=1.83.2.9
