Re: [SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS] yumex failed to update SL7x to current

2017-09-18 Thread Konstantin Olchanski
On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 11:53:38AM -0500, Pat Riehecky wrote:
> Please run 'yum downgrade libgpod'

"yum erase libgpod" works for me. (also removes rythmbox, ok for what we do).

-- 
Konstantin Olchanski
Data Acquisition Systems: The Bytes Must Flow!
Email: olchansk-at-triumf-dot-ca
Snail mail: 4004 Wesbrook Mall, TRIUMF, Vancouver, B.C., V6T 2A3, Canada


Re: [SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS] yumex failed to update SL7x to current

2017-09-18 Thread Yasha Karant
4 44/44
  Verifying  : 
libblkid-2.23.2-33.el7_3.2.i686 1/44
  Verifying  : 
gvfs-fuse-1.30.4-3.el7.x86_64   2/44
  Verifying  : 
gvfs-goa-1.30.4-3.el7.x86_643/44
  Verifying  : 
libplist-1.12-3.el7.x86_64  4/44
  Verifying  : 
libusbmuxd-1.0.10-5.el7.x86_64  5/44
  Verifying  : 
upower-0.99.4-2.el7.x86_64  6/44
  Verifying  : 
libmount-2.23.2-33.el7_3.2.i686 7/44
  Verifying  : 
libgpod-0.8.2-12.el7.x86_64 8/44
  Verifying  : 
gvfs-archive-1.30.4-3.el7.x86_649/44
  Verifying  : 
glib2-2.50.3-3.el7.i68610/44
  Verifying  : 
libimobiledevice-1.2.0-1.el7.x86_6411/44
  Verifying  : 
gvfs-client-1.30.4-3.el7.x86_6412/44
  Verifying  : 
libgdata-0.17.8-1.el7.x86_64   13/44
  Verifying  : 
gvfs-1.30.4-3.el7.x86_64   14/44
  Verifying  : 
usbmuxd-1.1.0-1.el7.x86_64 15/44
  Verifying  : 
gvfs-smb-1.30.4-3.el7.x86_64   16/44
  Verifying  : 
gvfs-gphoto2-1.30.4-3.el7.x86_64   17/44
  Verifying  : 
libgdata-devel-0.17.8-1.el7.x86_64 18/44
  Verifying  : 
gvfs-mtp-1.30.4-3.el7.x86_64   19/44
  Verifying  : 
gvfs-afp-1.30.4-3.el7.x86_64   20/44
  Verifying  : 
glib2-2.50.3-3.el7.x86_64  21/44
  Verifying  : 
gvfs-devel-1.30.4-3.el7.x86_64 22/44
  Verifying  : 
glib2-devel-2.50.3-3.el7.x86_6423/44
  Verifying  : 
gvfs-afc-1.30.4-3.el7.x86_64   24/44
  Verifying  : 
libgpod-0.8.3-14.el7.x86_6425/44
  Verifying  : 
glib2-2.46.2-4.el7.i68626/44
  Verifying  : 
glib2-2.46.2-4.el7.x86_64  27/44
  Verifying  : 
upower-0.99.2-1.el7.x86_64 28/44
  Verifying  : 
libgdata-devel-0.17.1-1.el7.x86_64 29/44
  Verifying  : 
libgdata-0.17.1-1.el7.x86_64   30/44
  Verifying  : 
gvfs-mtp-1.22.4-8.el7.x86_64   31/44
  Verifying  : 
gvfs-afc-1.22.4-8.el7.x86_64   32/44
  Verifying  : 
gvfs-archive-1.22.4-8.el7.x86_64   33/44
  Verifying  : 
gvfs-smb-1.22.4-8.el7.x86_64   34/44
  Verifying  : 
gvfs-devel-1.22.4-8.el7.x86_64 35/44
  Verifying  : 
libplist-1.10-4.el7.x86_64 36/44
  Verifying  : 
gvfs-gphoto2-1.22.4-8.el7.x86_64   37/44
  Verifying  : 
gvfs-goa-1.22.4-8.el7.x86_64   38/44
  Verifying  : 
libimobiledevice-1.1.5-6.el7.x86_6439/44
  Verifying  : 
gvfs-fuse-1.22.4-8.el7.x86_64  40/44
  Verifying  : 
usbmuxd-1.0.8-11.el7.x86_6441/44
  Verifying  : 
usbmuxd-1.0.8-11.el7.x86_6442/44
  Verifying  : 
glib2-devel-2.46.2-4.el7.x86_6443/44
  Verifying  : 
gvfs-1.22.4-8.el7.x86_64   44/44
  Verifying  : 
gvfs-afp-1.22.4-8.el7.x86_64   45/44


Removed:
  libgpod.x86_64 0:0.8.3-14.el7

Installed:
  libgpod.x86_64 0:0.8.2-12.el7   usbmuxd.x86_64 0:1.1.0-1.el7

Dependency Installed:
  gvfs-client.x86_64 0:1.30.4-3.el7  libblkid.i686 0:2.23.2-33.el7_3.2
  libmount.i686 0:2.23.2-33.el7_3.2  libusbmuxd.x86_64 0:1.0.10-5.el7

Dependency Updated:
  glib2.i686 0:2.50.3-3.el7  glib2.x86_64 0:2.50.3-3.el7
  glib2-devel.x86_64 0:2.50.3-3.el7  gvfs.x86_64 0:1.30.4-3.el7
  gvfs-afc.x86_64 0:1.30.4-3.el7 gvfs-afp.x86_64 0:1.30.4-3.el7
  gvfs-archive.x86_64 0:1.30.4-3.el7 gvfs-devel.x86_64 0:1.30.4-3.el7
  gvfs-fuse.x86_64 0:1.30.4-3.el7gvfs-goa.x86_64 0:1.30.4-3.el7
  gvfs-gphoto2.x86_64 0:1.30.4-3.el7 gvfs-mtp.x86_64 0:1.30.4-3.el7
  gvfs-smb.x86_64 0:1.30.4-3.el7 libgdata.x86_64 0:0.17.8-1.el7
  libgdata-devel.x86_64 0:0.17.8-1.el7   libimobiledevice.x86_64 
0:1.2.0-1.el7

  libplist.x86_64 0:1.12-3.el7       upower.x86_64 0:0.99.4-2.el7

Replaced:
  usbmuxd.x86_64 0:1.0.8-11.el7

Complete!
[root@jb344 ykarant]#

On 09/18/2017 09:53 AM, Pat Riehecky wrote:

Please run 'yum downgrade libgpod'

On 09/18/2017 11:51 AM, Yasha Karant wrote:
I used yumex to update SL7 production to current SL7production 
release. The update failed with the following diagnostics:


Dependency Resolution Error

Re: [SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS] yumex failed to update SL7x to current

2017-09-18 Thread Pat Riehecky

Please run 'yum downgrade libgpod'

On 09/18/2017 11:51 AM, Yasha Karant wrote:
I used yumex to update SL7 production to current SL7production 
release. The update failed with the following diagnostics:


Dependency Resolution Errors:

Package: libgpod-0.8.3-14.el7.x86_64 (@epel)
    Requires: libimobiledevice.so.4()(64bit)
    Removing: libimobiledevice-1.1.5-6.el7.x86_64 (@anaconda)
    libimobiledevice.so.4()(64bit)
    Updated By: libimobiledevice-1.2.0-1.el7.x86_64 (sl-security)
   ~libimobiledevice.so.6()(64bit)Package: 
libgpod-0.8.3-14.el7.x86_64 (@epel)

    Requires: libusbmuxd.so.2()(64bit)
    Removing: usbmuxd-1.0.8-11.el7.x86_64 (@anaconda)
    libusbmuxd.so.2()(64bit)
    Obsoleted By: usbmuxd-1.1.0-1.el7.x86_64 (sl-security)
    Not found
    Updated By: usbmuxd-1.1.0-1.el7.x86_64 (sl-security)
    Not foundPackage: libgpod-0.8.3-14.el7.x86_64 (@epel)
    Requires: libplist.so.1()(64bit)
    Removing: libplist-1.10-4.el7.x86_64 (@anaconda)
    libplist.so.1()(64bit)
    Updated By: libplist-1.12-3.el7.x86_64 (sl-security)
   ~libplist.so.3()(64bit)

Where does one find the "Not found" packages, and/or what changes need 
to be made to configuration files (e.g., simply not updating which 
packages from the yumex list)?  I understand that epel is not part of 
the FNAL SL base, but I know that persons with epel knowledge do read 
this list.  sl-security should be an SL issue; it appears: Obsoleted 
By: usbmuxd-1.1.0-1.el7.x86_64 (sl-security)

    Not found

Yasha Karant



--
Pat Riehecky

Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory
www.fnal.gov
www.scientificlinux.org


yumex failed to update SL7x to current

2017-09-18 Thread Yasha Karant
I used yumex to update SL7 production to current SL7production release.  
The update failed with the following diagnostics:


Dependency Resolution Errors:

Package: libgpod-0.8.3-14.el7.x86_64 (@epel)
Requires: libimobiledevice.so.4()(64bit)
Removing: libimobiledevice-1.1.5-6.el7.x86_64 (@anaconda)
libimobiledevice.so.4()(64bit)
Updated By: libimobiledevice-1.2.0-1.el7.x86_64 (sl-security)
   ~libimobiledevice.so.6()(64bit)Package: 
libgpod-0.8.3-14.el7.x86_64 (@epel)

Requires: libusbmuxd.so.2()(64bit)
Removing: usbmuxd-1.0.8-11.el7.x86_64 (@anaconda)
libusbmuxd.so.2()(64bit)
Obsoleted By: usbmuxd-1.1.0-1.el7.x86_64 (sl-security)
Not found
Updated By: usbmuxd-1.1.0-1.el7.x86_64 (sl-security)
Not foundPackage: libgpod-0.8.3-14.el7.x86_64 (@epel)
Requires: libplist.so.1()(64bit)
Removing: libplist-1.10-4.el7.x86_64 (@anaconda)
libplist.so.1()(64bit)
Updated By: libplist-1.12-3.el7.x86_64 (sl-security)
   ~libplist.so.3()(64bit)

Where does one find the "Not found" packages, and/or what changes need 
to be made to configuration files (e.g., simply not updating which 
packages from the yumex list)?  I understand that epel is not part of 
the FNAL SL base, but I know that persons with epel knowledge do read 
this list.  sl-security should be an SL issue; it appears: Obsoleted By: 
usbmuxd-1.1.0-1.el7.x86_64 (sl-security)

Not found

Yasha Karant

<>

Re: successful 7.3 update through yumex

2017-01-27 Thread Maarten
I'm fine with nux-desktop also, wasn't planning on switching. Was just 
wondering if they were mixable, but seems can't be sure.




On 2017-01-27 14:49, James M. Pulver wrote:

Why would you want to use rpmfusion over nux? I've had great success
anyway with nux.

James Pulver
CLASSE Computer Group
Cornell University

On 01/26/2017 03:59 PM, John Pilkington wrote:

On 26/01/17 20:42, Maarten wrote:

Great, didn't know that about rpmfusion now doing el7. Anyone know if
nux-desktop repo and rpmfusion can be mixed together? It's not 
mentioned

on their FAQ.


Quote from the announcement on the rpmfusion list - I forget how to 
get

a link:

"While bootstrapping the EL7 repo, we've tried to look at existing
work, specially from the nux repo. Unfortunately we haven't received
any direct help from this contributor."

I ought to say that the nux packages have worked well for me.

.. and back on topic - if Yasha had his local repo enabled he should
already have the packages he wants.  I didn't/don't.





On 2017-01-26 21:32, John Pilkington wrote:

On 26/01/17 20:02, Yasha Karant wrote:
Yesterday afternoon, I did a successful update from production 7.2 
to

production 7.3 through yumex.  In addition to the SL production
repositories, I use the epel, elrepo, and google-chrome 
repositories

for
specific add-ons, including nvidia support.  I only use kernels 
from
SL.  Although the update was slow, it taking a very long time for 
the
nvidia portion to complete cleanup (I left after a 5 minute wait), 
when
I came back this morning, everything appears to be working, 
including
applications that have not been touched since I first installed SL 
7
(e.g., UCSF chimera, Weizmann grace).  The machine to which this 
was

done has a 802.3 wired connection to a USA university research
backbone.  The next thing to update is my laptop that has a 802.11
connection to a production network, significantly lower data rate.  
Is

there any way to get a list of the required RPMs, download and burn
these to a DVD, and then have yumex use the DVDs, only going to the
network to get additional RPMs that turn out to be needed?

Yasha Karant


# cat /var/log/yum.log ?

yumex History shows I had 453 packages initially, then 86 more
security packages after a reboot.  I also had 1 auto and one manual
update of the same google-chrome-stable package earlier today.  
Seems

strange.

rpmfusion announced support for el7 today.  Switching from nux looks
as if it could be 'interesting'

John P




Re: successful 7.3 update through yumex

2017-01-27 Thread James M. Pulver
Why would you want to use rpmfusion over nux? I've had great success 
anyway with nux.


James Pulver
CLASSE Computer Group
Cornell University

On 01/26/2017 03:59 PM, John Pilkington wrote:

On 26/01/17 20:42, Maarten wrote:

Great, didn't know that about rpmfusion now doing el7. Anyone know if
nux-desktop repo and rpmfusion can be mixed together? It's not mentioned
on their FAQ.


Quote from the announcement on the rpmfusion list - I forget how to get
a link:

"While bootstrapping the EL7 repo, we've tried to look at existing
work, specially from the nux repo. Unfortunately we haven't received
any direct help from this contributor."

I ought to say that the nux packages have worked well for me.

.. and back on topic - if Yasha had his local repo enabled he should
already have the packages he wants.  I didn't/don't.





On 2017-01-26 21:32, John Pilkington wrote:

On 26/01/17 20:02, Yasha Karant wrote:

Yesterday afternoon, I did a successful update from production 7.2 to
production 7.3 through yumex.  In addition to the SL production
repositories, I use the epel, elrepo, and google-chrome repositories
for
specific add-ons, including nvidia support.  I only use kernels from
SL.  Although the update was slow, it taking a very long time for the
nvidia portion to complete cleanup (I left after a 5 minute wait), when
I came back this morning, everything appears to be working, including
applications that have not been touched since I first installed SL 7
(e.g., UCSF chimera, Weizmann grace).  The machine to which this was
done has a 802.3 wired connection to a USA university research
backbone.  The next thing to update is my laptop that has a 802.11
connection to a production network, significantly lower data rate.  Is
there any way to get a list of the required RPMs, download and burn
these to a DVD, and then have yumex use the DVDs, only going to the
network to get additional RPMs that turn out to be needed?

Yasha Karant


# cat /var/log/yum.log ?

yumex History shows I had 453 packages initially, then 86 more
security packages after a reboot.  I also had 1 auto and one manual
update of the same google-chrome-stable package earlier today.  Seems
strange.

rpmfusion announced support for el7 today.  Switching from nux looks
as if it could be 'interesting'

John P




Re: successful 7.3 update through yumex

2017-01-26 Thread John Pilkington

On 26/01/17 20:42, Maarten wrote:

Great, didn't know that about rpmfusion now doing el7. Anyone know if
nux-desktop repo and rpmfusion can be mixed together? It's not mentioned
on their FAQ.


Quote from the announcement on the rpmfusion list - I forget how to get 
a link:


"While bootstrapping the EL7 repo, we've tried to look at existing
work, specially from the nux repo. Unfortunately we haven't received
any direct help from this contributor."

I ought to say that the nux packages have worked well for me.

.. and back on topic - if Yasha had his local repo enabled he should 
already have the packages he wants.  I didn't/don't.






On 2017-01-26 21:32, John Pilkington wrote:

On 26/01/17 20:02, Yasha Karant wrote:

Yesterday afternoon, I did a successful update from production 7.2 to
production 7.3 through yumex.  In addition to the SL production
repositories, I use the epel, elrepo, and google-chrome repositories for
specific add-ons, including nvidia support.  I only use kernels from
SL.  Although the update was slow, it taking a very long time for the
nvidia portion to complete cleanup (I left after a 5 minute wait), when
I came back this morning, everything appears to be working, including
applications that have not been touched since I first installed SL 7
(e.g., UCSF chimera, Weizmann grace).  The machine to which this was
done has a 802.3 wired connection to a USA university research
backbone.  The next thing to update is my laptop that has a 802.11
connection to a production network, significantly lower data rate.  Is
there any way to get a list of the required RPMs, download and burn
these to a DVD, and then have yumex use the DVDs, only going to the
network to get additional RPMs that turn out to be needed?

Yasha Karant


# cat /var/log/yum.log ?

yumex History shows I had 453 packages initially, then 86 more
security packages after a reboot.  I also had 1 auto and one manual
update of the same google-chrome-stable package earlier today.  Seems
strange.

rpmfusion announced support for el7 today.  Switching from nux looks
as if it could be 'interesting'

John P




Re: successful 7.3 update through yumex

2017-01-26 Thread Maarten
Great, didn't know that about rpmfusion now doing el7. Anyone know if 
nux-desktop repo and rpmfusion can be mixed together? It's not mentioned 
on their FAQ.




On 2017-01-26 21:32, John Pilkington wrote:

On 26/01/17 20:02, Yasha Karant wrote:

Yesterday afternoon, I did a successful update from production 7.2 to
production 7.3 through yumex.  In addition to the SL production
repositories, I use the epel, elrepo, and google-chrome repositories 
for

specific add-ons, including nvidia support.  I only use kernels from
SL.  Although the update was slow, it taking a very long time for the
nvidia portion to complete cleanup (I left after a 5 minute wait), 
when

I came back this morning, everything appears to be working, including
applications that have not been touched since I first installed SL 7
(e.g., UCSF chimera, Weizmann grace).  The machine to which this was
done has a 802.3 wired connection to a USA university research
backbone.  The next thing to update is my laptop that has a 802.11
connection to a production network, significantly lower data rate.  Is
there any way to get a list of the required RPMs, download and burn
these to a DVD, and then have yumex use the DVDs, only going to the
network to get additional RPMs that turn out to be needed?

Yasha Karant


# cat /var/log/yum.log ?

yumex History shows I had 453 packages initially, then 86 more
security packages after a reboot.  I also had 1 auto and one manual
update of the same google-chrome-stable package earlier today.  Seems
strange.

rpmfusion announced support for el7 today.  Switching from nux looks
as if it could be 'interesting'

John P


Re: successful 7.3 update through yumex

2017-01-26 Thread John Pilkington

On 26/01/17 20:02, Yasha Karant wrote:

Yesterday afternoon, I did a successful update from production 7.2 to
production 7.3 through yumex.  In addition to the SL production
repositories, I use the epel, elrepo, and google-chrome repositories for
specific add-ons, including nvidia support.  I only use kernels from
SL.  Although the update was slow, it taking a very long time for the
nvidia portion to complete cleanup (I left after a 5 minute wait), when
I came back this morning, everything appears to be working, including
applications that have not been touched since I first installed SL 7
(e.g., UCSF chimera, Weizmann grace).  The machine to which this was
done has a 802.3 wired connection to a USA university research
backbone.  The next thing to update is my laptop that has a 802.11
connection to a production network, significantly lower data rate.  Is
there any way to get a list of the required RPMs, download and burn
these to a DVD, and then have yumex use the DVDs, only going to the
network to get additional RPMs that turn out to be needed?

Yasha Karant


# cat /var/log/yum.log ?

yumex History shows I had 453 packages initially, then 86 more security 
packages after a reboot.  I also had 1 auto and one manual update of the 
same google-chrome-stable package earlier today.  Seems strange.


rpmfusion announced support for el7 today.  Switching from nux looks as 
if it could be 'interesting'


John P


successful 7.3 update through yumex

2017-01-26 Thread Yasha Karant
Yesterday afternoon, I did a successful update from production 7.2 to 
production 7.3 through yumex.  In addition to the SL production 
repositories, I use the epel, elrepo, and google-chrome repositories for 
specific add-ons, including nvidia support.  I only use kernels from 
SL.  Although the update was slow, it taking a very long time for the 
nvidia portion to complete cleanup (I left after a 5 minute wait), when 
I came back this morning, everything appears to be working, including 
applications that have not been touched since I first installed SL 7 
(e.g., UCSF chimera, Weizmann grace).  The machine to which this was 
done has a 802.3 wired connection to a USA university research 
backbone.  The next thing to update is my laptop that has a 802.11 
connection to a production network, significantly lower data rate.  Is 
there any way to get a list of the required RPMs, download and burn 
these to a DVD, and then have yumex use the DVDs, only going to the 
network to get additional RPMs that turn out to be needed?


Yasha Karant

<>

Re: yumex

2013-04-18 Thread John Pilkington

On 18/04/13 08:28, g wrote:

greetings.

with yumex not in sl6.3, is there another gui available to look for a
package content, other than yum provides?

my fingers get tired with a lot of typing, which i am not very good at. :-)

tia.



yumex is available from EPEL.  smart-gui, at ATrpms, gives similar 
information and I've used it a lot, recently in the 1.4.1 version which 
I had to build myself.  I'm now running 6.4 with kde-unstable and 
haven't yet managed to rebuild smart-gui for that.


John P


Re: yumex

2013-04-18 Thread John Pilkington

On 18/04/13 11:49, g wrote:

On 04/18/2013 03:31 AM, John Pilkington wrote:



yumex is available from EPEL.  smart-gui, at ATrpms, gives similar
information and I've used it a lot, recently in the 1.4.1 version which
I had to build myself.  I'm now running 6.4 with kde-unstable and
haven't yet managed to rebuild smart-gui for that.


that drove the nail in real good. i installed this system from a live
cd and failed to set up the rest of the repos. i knew things where a
little on the thin side, but i had not realize why.

thank you very much.

Coming new(ish) to yumex after smart, I find its control of 
repo-selection unreliable; but smart can get bogged down in dependency 
resolution with eg the Fedora repos and prefers to sort out a few 
packages at a time.  Otherwise kill -9 :-(


Re: yumex

2013-04-18 Thread g

On 04/18/2013 06:10 AM, John Pilkington wrote:



Coming new(ish) to yumex after smart, I find its control of
repo-selection unreliable; but smart can get bogged down in dependency
resolution with eg the Fedora repos and prefers to sort out a few
packages at a time.  Otherwise kill -9 :-(


interesting. i have not had problems. at least not that i am aware of.

i am not familiar with 'smart' so i can not comment about it.

i am currently using a friends system, setting it up for him.

i erred in installing from a 6.3 live cd that i made for another purpose,
as i did not give thought to how lacking it would be for a working
system.

seems like nothing is every easy when i try a quick way. :-)

sure as God made little green apples, i found out just how lacking
it is when i started setting up for new repos.

i am pulling in the 6.4 boot iso now. after, i will put it on a 256m0
memory stick that has been collecting dust. then i will wipe this
installation, reformat and install a fresh system.

currently, i have 6.3 on a memory stick that i have show some folks
how easy it is to use linux. 2 want it as a second boot, 4 want it
to replace oos.

i do believe the 2 dual booter's will end up moving on into linux
once i set them up and show them how easy it can be to play their
games under vm.

i noticed that download is finished, so i am off to the races.

thanks again for waking me up.

later.

--

in a world with out fences, who needs gates.

tc. hago.

g
.