[sipx-users] New sipXecs User Forums Available This Week
http://www.sipfoundry.org/blog/1084285/new-sipxecs-user-forums-available-this-we-1 says as of 12/12/2012 SIPfoundry mailing lists will no longer be available or accessible (includes sipx-users, sipx-dev and sipx-infrastructure mailing lists) I'm confused... ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
[sipx-users] FreeSWITCH SIP Trunking Gateway
From http://wiki.sipfoundry.org/display/sipXecs/FreeSWITCH+SIP+Trunking+Gateway by way of the [SFwiki] list this morning: As of FreeSWITCH version 1.2.3, FreeSWITCH mod_sofia has become mature enough to handle all signalling demands from sipXecs, and can be used as a SIP trunking/call routing platform, amongst other things. sipXecs does not include a version this new, however the FreeSWITCH team now provides a yum repo that makes FreeSWITCH installation trivial. Do these instructions apply to 4.4, 4.6, or both? It's not clear from the wiki page. Also -- will this be included in 4.6.1? thanks, happy T-day all.___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
Re: [sipx-users] UserID and Extension( was: LDAP Functionality Questions)
This makes a lot of sense to me. On Aug 18, 2012, at 5:03 , Michael Picher wrote: The other option here, which is where I had hoped were were heading with 4.6, is to have a userID and an Extension field (not extension as an alias). This way, a userID is really a userID and an extension is really an extension (that gets displayed / programmed into a phone). Thanks, Mike ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
Re: [sipx-users] Bria 3.4.2
On Aug 14, 2012, at 2:36 , Mircea Carasel wrote: On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 11:01 PM, Burleigh, Matt matt.burle...@eiisolutions.net wrote: Anyone know what the changes are for Bria 3.4.2? There are no release notes or anything about it on Counterpath’s website. But all of over Bria users are being asked to upgrade today. One change that I know of is webdav support for provisioning. Currently, sipxecs implements bria specifications that apply for version 3.1.1. We postponed to 4.8 implementation for versions higher than 3.1.1. We would need information from them... we don't find enough documentation on their website That *might* explain the hangs I reported here http://forums.counterpath.com/viewtopic.php?f=29t=20764 As I understand it, 3.4.X on Mac added Mountain Lion support, but apparently they dropped Snow Leopard support in the same move. Still can't get the auto-upgrade prompt to go away now that I've downgraded to 3.3.4.1 but at least it registers with sipX again. ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
[sipx-users] NAT traversal ports on 4.4
Just noticed that my NAT Traversal page (static public IP) is set for ports 5060/5061. If I'm using sipXbridge, should this be 5080/5081? thanks~ ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
Re: [sipx-users] SSL cert not installed in latest 4.6 build
Fixed in latest 4.6.0-233 CentOS RPMs. thanks~ On Jul 30, 2012, at 14:11 , Kurt Albershardt wrote: Created http://track.sipfoundry.org/browse/XX-10340 Quite likely a release blocker, but not my call. ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
Re: [sipx-users] flying pigs
They did just that at CT Expo for awhile... On Jul 29, 2012, at 15:48 , Michael Scheidell wrote: And if wishes were horses my driveway would prolly be full of crap. P s, there is an rfc that says the pigs will fly given enough thrust. -:) ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
[sipx-users] freeswitch performance on Centos 5/6
From the freeswitch-users list Wondering if anyone has seen an effect on sipx media services in 4.6? Begin forwarded message: From: Ken Rice kr...@freeswitch.org Date: July 26, 2012 1:03:38 MDT To: FreeSWITCH Users Help freeswitch-us...@lists.freeswitch.org Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] What's better Unix ro Windows? LOL Reply-To: FreeSWITCH Users Help freeswitch-us...@lists.freeswitch.org On FS, centos5 actually greatly outperforms centos6... Somethings not right but I havnet been able to put my finger on it... Once of these days I'll oprofile this thing and see whats up On 7/26/12 1:50 AM, Chris Mylonas ch...@opencsta.org wrote: CentOS 6 should be avoided at all costs at the time of writing this. There are performance issues inside of it which Ken Rice hasn't had the time or energy to chase down. Interestingly some bsd folks warned me about CentOS 5 timing problems in the kernel when it was released. Is it a similar sort of thing with RedHat putting in their own kernel stuff? Are we talking a high load machine when mentioning performance problems? This is the first I've heard of CentOS 6 performance problems. Thanks for the heads up ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
Re: [sipx-users] SSL cert not installed in latest 4.6 build
Attached, and shows double quotes. I'm guessing this is also the cause of what I reported earlier: One more minor glitch at the end of the script - looks like extra quotes in the URL: In a few more minutes you will be able to access the administration interface from your web browser at the following URL: https://sipx.domain.com; sipxconfig.properties Description: Binary data On Jul 30, 2012, at 12:43 , Douglas Hubler wrote: Somehow you might have double quotes around your host name. When running sipxecs-setup, did you put double quotes around your host name? Can you send me /etc/sipxpbx/sipxconfig.properties? On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 2:27 PM, Kurt Albershardt k...@nv.net wrote: sipxconfig.log and tail of sipxagent.log (which was 2 MB) attached. Updated via yum this morning and invoked 'sipxecs-setup --reset-all' (with the same results.) Logs were grabbed before this step. On Jul 29, 2012, at 19:32 , Douglas Hubler wrote: check/send along sipxagent.log and sipxconfig.log On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 4:07 PM, Kurt Albershardt k...@nv.net wrote: Ran a 'yum update' on an unconfigured 4.6 (installed on 7/25, the one with the unmet Homer dependency) and got only a couple of OS updates. Running 'yum groupupgrade sipxecs' yielded 271 updates (now at 4.6.0.233) Did a 'yum clean all' and restarted, then ran sipxecs-setup. Five minutes later, no access via https:, so: [root@sipx ~]# /etc/init.d/httpd status httpd is stopped [root@sipx ~]# /etc/init.d/httpd start Starting httpd: Syntax error on line 18 of /etc/httpd/conf.d/ssl.conf: SSLCertificateFile: file '/etc/httpd/conf.d/ssl/ssl-web.crt' does not exist or is empty [FAILED] [root@sipx ~]# ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
Re: [sipx-users] SSL cert not installed in latest 4.6 build
did not add quotes -- and the URL at the end still has them: [root@sipx ~]# sipxecs-setup --reset-all This will wipe all configuration data from this server. Are you sure? [ enter 'y' or 'n' ] : y Network settings: IP address : 192.168.X.26 Would you like to configure your system's network settings? [ enter 'y' or 'n' ] : n Enter just the host name of this computer?. Example: myhost. [ press enter for 'sipx' ] : Enter just the domain name of your network? Example: mydomain.com [ press enter for 'domain.com' ] : Is this the first server in your cluster? [ enter 'y' or 'n' ] : y Configuring as the first server... Tip: Use 'sipx.domain.com' as your SIP domain if you are setting up for the first time or if you know you are only going to setup one server. This can make configuration easier. You can always change the value later. Enter SIP domain name [ press enter for 'domain.com' ] : sipx.domain.com Enter SIP realm [ press enter for 'sipx.domain.com' ] : Initial setup, this may take a few minutes... Finishing system configuration, almost done... done. In a few more minutes you will be able to access the administration interface from your web browser at the following URL: https://sipx.domain.com; On Jul 30, 2012, at 12:43 , Douglas Hubler wrote: Somehow you might have double quotes around your host name. When running sipxecs-setup, did you put double quotes around your host name? ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
Re: [sipx-users] SSL cert not installed in latest 4.6 build
Just tried a couple variants of that - first one left the host and domain at default and then I manually typed everything else -- that produced the same result at the end: https://sipx.domain.com; Note spurious double quotes show in the proposed defaults: Enter just the host name of this computer?. Example: myhost. [ press enter for 'sipx' ] : Enter just the domain name of your network? Example: mydomain.com [ press enter for 'domain.com' ] : Re- running but manually entering those produced the expected: https://sipx.murray-hotel.com at the end. thanks~ On Jul 30, 2012, at 13:01 , Tony Graziano wrote: perhaps re-run the script and manually input the host and sipdomain (instead of hitting enter) to see if it removes the quotes. On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 2:59 PM, Kurt Albershardt k...@nv.net wrote: did not add quotes -- and the URL at the end still has them: [root@sipx ~]# sipxecs-setup --reset-all This will wipe all configuration data from this server. Are you sure? [ enter 'y' or 'n' ] : y Network settings: IP address : 192.168.X.26 Would you like to configure your system's network settings? [ enter 'y' or 'n' ] : n Enter just the host name of this computer?. Example: myhost. [ press enter for 'sipx' ] : Enter just the domain name of your network? Example: mydomain.com [ press enter for 'domain.com' ] : Is this the first server in your cluster? [ enter 'y' or 'n' ] : y Configuring as the first server... Tip: Use 'sipx.domain.com' as your SIP domain if you are setting up for the first time or if you know you are only going to setup one server. This can make configuration easier. You can always change the value later. Enter SIP domain name [ press enter for 'domain.com' ] : sipx.domain.com Enter SIP realm [ press enter for 'sipx.domain.com' ] : Initial setup, this may take a few minutes... Finishing system configuration, almost done... done. In a few more minutes you will be able to access the administration interface from your web browser at the following URL: https://sipx.domain.com; On Jul 30, 2012, at 12:43 , Douglas Hubler wrote: Somehow you might have double quotes around your host name. When running sipxecs-setup, did you put double quotes around your host name? ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/ -- ~~ Tony Graziano, Manager Telephone: 434.984.8430 sip: tgrazi...@voice.myitdepartment.net Fax: 434.465.6833 ~~ Linked-In Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/pub/tony-graziano/14/4a6/7a4 Ask about our Internet Fax services! ~~ Using or developing for sipXecs from SIPFoundry? Ask me about sipX-CoLab 2013! LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems Helpdesk: Telephone: 434.984.8426 sip: helpd...@voice.myitdepartment.net Helpdesk Customers: http://myhelp.myitdepartment.net Blog: http://blog.myitdepartment.net ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/ ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
Re: [sipx-users] SSL cert not installed in latest 4.6 build
On Jul 30, 2012, at 13:22 , Douglas Hubler wrote: We scrape host and domain from /etc/sysconfig/network so it probably *was* wrong there too. That value comes from using the network config tool we launch from the setup-setup script. I say was because we in turn write it back if you change the values. Best we can do in this case is drop quotes if we find them Currently no quotes there, which is not standard syntax -- is it possible the scrape didn't strip quotes? [root@sipx ~]# cat /etc/sysconfig/network NETWORKING=yes GATEWAYDEV=venet0 NETWORKING_IPV6=yes IPV6_DEFAULTDEV=venet0 HOSTNAME=sipx.murray-hotel.com [root@sipx ~]# ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
Re: [sipx-users] SSL cert not installed in latest 4.6 build
Happened the first time I ran the script, FWIW. Install was updated 2-3x before I ran setup (due to dependency glitches) so it's not a good test case. I'll re-install on a clean VM and try again. On Jul 30, 2012, at 13:26 , Tony Graziano wrote: i might venture a guess that re-running the script and taking the defaults are doing this. if so, it would be incorrect and unwanted behavior. i think in order to open a jira, it needs to be tried against a fresh install and all patched up prior to running, then re-running the script. if it continues to happen a jira would be in order. On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 3:11 PM, Kurt Albershardt k...@nv.net wrote: Just tried a couple variants of that - first one left the host and domain at default and then I manually typed everything else -- that produced the same result at the end: https://sipx.domain.com; Note spurious double quotes show in the proposed defaults: Enter just the host name of this computer?. Example: myhost. [ press enter for 'sipx' ] : Enter just the domain name of your network? Example: mydomain.com [ press enter for 'domain.com' ] : Re- running but manually entering those produced the expected: https://sipx.murray-hotel.com at the end. thanks~ On Jul 30, 2012, at 13:01 , Tony Graziano wrote: perhaps re-run the script and manually input the host and sipdomain (instead of hitting enter) to see if it removes the quotes. On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 2:59 PM, Kurt Albershardt k...@nv.net wrote: did not add quotes -- and the URL at the end still has them: [root@sipx ~]# sipxecs-setup --reset-all This will wipe all configuration data from this server. Are you sure? [ enter 'y' or 'n' ] : y Network settings: IP address : 192.168.X.26 Would you like to configure your system's network settings? [ enter 'y' or 'n' ] : n Enter just the host name of this computer?. Example: myhost. [ press enter for 'sipx' ] : Enter just the domain name of your network? Example: mydomain.com [ press enter for 'domain.com' ] : Is this the first server in your cluster? [ enter 'y' or 'n' ] : y Configuring as the first server... Tip: Use 'sipx.domain.com' as your SIP domain if you are setting up for the first time or if you know you are only going to setup one server. This can make configuration easier. You can always change the value later. Enter SIP domain name [ press enter for 'domain.com' ] : sipx.domain.com Enter SIP realm [ press enter for 'sipx.domain.com' ] : Initial setup, this may take a few minutes... Finishing system configuration, almost done... done. In a few more minutes you will be able to access the administration interface from your web browser at the following URL: https://sipx.domain.com; On Jul 30, 2012, at 12:43 , Douglas Hubler wrote: Somehow you might have double quotes around your host name. When running sipxecs-setup, did you put double quotes around your host name? ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/ -- ~~ Tony Graziano, Manager Telephone: 434.984.8430 sip: tgrazi...@voice.myitdepartment.net Fax: 434.465.6833 ~~ Linked-In Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/pub/tony-graziano/14/4a6/7a4 Ask about our Internet Fax services! ~~ Using or developing for sipXecs from SIPFoundry? Ask me about sipX-CoLab 2013! LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems Helpdesk: Telephone: 434.984.8426 sip: helpd...@voice.myitdepartment.net Helpdesk Customers: http://myhelp.myitdepartment.net Blog: http://blog.myitdepartment.net ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/ ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/ -- ~~ Tony Graziano, Manager Telephone: 434.984.8430 sip: tgrazi...@voice.myitdepartment.net Fax: 434.465.6833 ~~ Linked-In Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/pub/tony-graziano/14/4a6/7a4 Ask about our Internet Fax services! ~~ Using or developing for sipXecs from SIPFoundry? Ask me about sipX-CoLab 2013! LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems Helpdesk: Telephone: 434.984.8426 sip: helpd...@voice.myitdepartment.net Helpdesk Customers: http://myhelp.myitdepartment.net Blog: http://blog.myitdepartment.net ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/ ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http
Re: [sipx-users] Snom 320 phones registering with 4.4 but not with 4.6
Diffs are below -- first two are expected but don't know much about the MOH URI. On Jul 30, 2012, at 13:45 , Tony Graziano wrote: I don't use snom's but if you could compare the two sipx generated config files to see what is different between them, if anything, it would be worth the look. On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 3:42 PM, Kurt Albershardt k...@nv.net wrote: Still no luck getting these to register with 4.6 Phones are showing network failure in the registration status and seeing timeouts reaching the sipx box. Network config (including DNS) in phones is the same as when they pull configs from 4.4 (seen via phone HTTP interface in both cases.) On Jul 15, 2012, at 23:27 , Kurt Albershardt wrote: On Jul 15, 2012, at 17:12 , Tony Graziano wrote: I think the thing you are leaving out is the phone config generated by sipx can load a different DNS setting than what you intended, which is why I suggested this deployment option to avoid a conflicting configuration on the UA itself. OK, that helps. I'll take another a look at the Snom XML configs. When I diffed them on Friday I found only these differences: ntp_server perm=R/ntp_server ntp_server perm=Rpool.ntp.org/ntp_server user_pass idx=1 perm=R123456789012/user_pass user_pass idx=1 perm=R12355678/user_pass user_moh idx=1 perm=Rsip:~~mh~u...@sipx.murray-hotel.com/user_moh user_moh idx=1 perm=Rsip:~~mh~@sipx.murray-hotel.com/user_moh ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
Re: [sipx-users] NTP configured as unmanaged in 4.6
Still seeing this in the latest builds, FYI. On Jul 17, 2012, at 17:22 , Kurt Albershardt wrote: On the fresh 4.6 install I just started up, the System / Date and Time menu still produces: An internal error has occurred. Click here to continue. The ntp package is installed on the system, but ntpd will not start due to the OpenVZ restrictions I mentioned a few days back. ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
Re: [sipx-users] SSL cert not installed in latest 4.6 build
First time running setup script on a freshly built Centos 6 VM: [root@sipx ~]# cat /etc/sysconfig/network NETWORKING=yes GATEWAYDEV=venet0 NETWORKING_IPV6=yes IPV6_DEFAULTDEV=venet0 HOSTNAME=sipx.domain.com [root@sipx ~]# sipxecs-setup Network settings: IP address : 192.168.X.26 Would you like to configure your system's network settings? [ enter 'y' or 'n' ] : n Enter just the host name of this computer?. Example: myhost. [ press enter for 'sipx' ] : Enter just the domain name of your network? Example: mydomain.com [ press enter for 'domain.com' ] : Is this the first server in your cluster? [ enter 'y' or 'n' ] : y Configuring as the first server... Tip: Use 'sipx.domain.com' as your SIP domain if you are setting up for the first time or if you know you are only going to setup one server. This can make configuration easier. You can always change the value later. Enter SIP domain name [ press enter for 'domain.com' ] : Enter SIP realm [ press enter for 'domain.com' ] : Initial setup, this may take a few minutes... Finishing system configuration, almost done... done. In a few more minutes you will be able to access the administration interface from your web browser at the following URL: https://sipx.domain.com; On Jul 30, 2012, at 13:31 , Kurt Albershardt wrote: Happened the first time I ran the script, FWIW. Install was updated 2-3x before I ran setup (due to dependency glitches) so it's not a good test case. I'll re-install on a clean VM and try again. On Jul 30, 2012, at 13:26 , Tony Graziano wrote: i might venture a guess that re-running the script and taking the defaults are doing this. if so, it would be incorrect and unwanted behavior. i think in order to open a jira, it needs to be tried against a fresh install and all patched up prior to running, then re-running the script. if it continues to happen a jira would be in order. On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 3:11 PM, Kurt Albershardt k...@nv.net wrote: Just tried a couple variants of that - first one left the host and domain at default and then I manually typed everything else -- that produced the same result at the end: https://sipx.domain.com; Note spurious double quotes show in the proposed defaults: Enter just the host name of this computer?. Example: myhost. [ press enter for 'sipx' ] : Enter just the domain name of your network? Example: mydomain.com [ press enter for 'domain.com' ] : Re- running but manually entering those produced the expected: https://sipx.murray-hotel.com at the end. thanks~ On Jul 30, 2012, at 13:01 , Tony Graziano wrote: perhaps re-run the script and manually input the host and sipdomain (instead of hitting enter) to see if it removes the quotes. On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 2:59 PM, Kurt Albershardt k...@nv.net wrote: did not add quotes -- and the URL at the end still has them: [root@sipx ~]# sipxecs-setup --reset-all This will wipe all configuration data from this server. Are you sure? [ enter 'y' or 'n' ] : y Network settings: IP address : 192.168.X.26 Would you like to configure your system's network settings? [ enter 'y' or 'n' ] : n Enter just the host name of this computer?. Example: myhost. [ press enter for 'sipx' ] : Enter just the domain name of your network? Example: mydomain.com [ press enter for 'domain.com' ] : Is this the first server in your cluster? [ enter 'y' or 'n' ] : y Configuring as the first server... Tip: Use 'sipx.domain.com' as your SIP domain if you are setting up for the first time or if you know you are only going to setup one server. This can make configuration easier. You can always change the value later. Enter SIP domain name [ press enter for 'domain.com' ] : sipx.domain.com Enter SIP realm [ press enter for 'sipx.domain.com' ] : Initial setup, this may take a few minutes... Finishing system configuration, almost done... done. In a few more minutes you will be able to access the administration interface from your web browser at the following URL: https://sipx.domain.com; On Jul 30, 2012, at 12:43 , Douglas Hubler wrote: Somehow you might have double quotes around your host name. When running sipxecs-setup, did you put double quotes around your host name? ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
Re: [sipx-users] SSL cert not installed in latest 4.6 build
Created http://track.sipfoundry.org/browse/XX-10340 Quite likely a release a blocker, but not my call. On Jul 30, 2012, at 14:05 , Kurt Albershardt wrote: First time running setup script on a freshly built Centos 6 VM: [root@sipx ~]# cat /etc/sysconfig/network NETWORKING=yes GATEWAYDEV=venet0 NETWORKING_IPV6=yes IPV6_DEFAULTDEV=venet0 HOSTNAME=sipx.domain.com [root@sipx ~]# sipxecs-setup Network settings: IP address : 192.168.X.26 Would you like to configure your system's network settings? [ enter 'y' or 'n' ] : n Enter just the host name of this computer?. Example: myhost. [ press enter for 'sipx' ] : Enter just the domain name of your network? Example: mydomain.com [ press enter for 'domain.com' ] : Is this the first server in your cluster? [ enter 'y' or 'n' ] : y Configuring as the first server... Tip: Use 'sipx.domain.com' as your SIP domain if you are setting up for the first time or if you know you are only going to setup one server. This can make configuration easier. You can always change the value later. Enter SIP domain name [ press enter for 'domain.com' ] : Enter SIP realm [ press enter for 'domain.com' ] : Initial setup, this may take a few minutes... Finishing system configuration, almost done... done. In a few more minutes you will be able to access the administration interface from your web browser at the following URL: https://sipx.domain.com; On Jul 30, 2012, at 13:31 , Kurt Albershardt wrote: Happened the first time I ran the script, FWIW. Install was updated 2-3x before I ran setup (due to dependency glitches) so it's not a good test case. I'll re-install on a clean VM and try again. On Jul 30, 2012, at 13:26 , Tony Graziano wrote: i might venture a guess that re-running the script and taking the defaults are doing this. if so, it would be incorrect and unwanted behavior. i think in order to open a jira, it needs to be tried against a fresh install and all patched up prior to running, then re-running the script. if it continues to happen a jira would be in order. On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 3:11 PM, Kurt Albershardt k...@nv.net wrote: Just tried a couple variants of that - first one left the host and domain at default and then I manually typed everything else -- that produced the same result at the end: https://sipx.domain.com; Note spurious double quotes show in the proposed defaults: Enter just the host name of this computer?. Example: myhost. [ press enter for 'sipx' ] : Enter just the domain name of your network? Example: mydomain.com [ press enter for 'domain.com' ] : Re- running but manually entering those produced the expected: https://sipx.murray-hotel.com at the end. thanks~ On Jul 30, 2012, at 13:01 , Tony Graziano wrote: perhaps re-run the script and manually input the host and sipdomain (instead of hitting enter) to see if it removes the quotes. On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 2:59 PM, Kurt Albershardt k...@nv.net wrote: did not add quotes -- and the URL at the end still has them: [root@sipx ~]# sipxecs-setup --reset-all This will wipe all configuration data from this server. Are you sure? [ enter 'y' or 'n' ] : y Network settings: IP address : 192.168.X.26 Would you like to configure your system's network settings? [ enter 'y' or 'n' ] : n Enter just the host name of this computer?. Example: myhost. [ press enter for 'sipx' ] : Enter just the domain name of your network? Example: mydomain.com [ press enter for 'domain.com' ] : Is this the first server in your cluster? [ enter 'y' or 'n' ] : y Configuring as the first server... Tip: Use 'sipx.domain.com' as your SIP domain if you are setting up for the first time or if you know you are only going to setup one server. This can make configuration easier. You can always change the value later. Enter SIP domain name [ press enter for 'domain.com' ] : sipx.domain.com Enter SIP realm [ press enter for 'sipx.domain.com' ] : Initial setup, this may take a few minutes... Finishing system configuration, almost done... done. In a few more minutes you will be able to access the administration interface from your web browser at the following URL: https://sipx.domain.com; On Jul 30, 2012, at 12:43 , Douglas Hubler wrote: Somehow you might have double quotes around your host name. When running sipxecs-setup, did you put double quotes around your host name? ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/ ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
Re: [sipx-users] Default password / pin policy
On Jul 28, 2012, at 6:32 , Mircea Carasel wrote: As long as sipxecs/openuc doesn't ship with a well known default password. Hackers would write scripts to test logins with those passwords. If the feature didn't work until an admin specified a default password, that would be fine. Yes, so when sipxecs is shipped, there won't be any default password set. The admin is the only that can specify the default password When sipxecs is shipped, the default policy will be blank password (admin will have to write passwords) Other thing that we can do is to drop default password thing, and the default password policy just to enable a rule of creating passwords, for example: extension followed by character 0 up to 4 characters for voicemail pin, up to 8 characters for password Rule-based defaults will still get hacked, even by casual users within the organization. As long as the admin can define either a static or rule-based system default I think this works. ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
Re: [sipx-users] Default password / pin policy
Would a 'user must change PIN at first login' option be appropriate here? On Jul 28, 2012, at 12:00 , Todd Hodgen wrote: I believe the rule based password is not a bad idea. I don’t believe you want a system configured with a rule base password, EXCEPT, at startup. If you are rolling out a system, you need a method to train end users, and a method of having them go back to their desk and log onto their new voicemail. It should be changed immediately by that end user. If a voicemail gets hacked because someone didn’t change their password – they own the consequences. There comes a point where reasonable implementation strategies and responsible stewardship of your own user account have to meet. From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org [mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Kurt Albershardt Sent: Saturday, July 28, 2012 10:11 AM To: Discussion list for users of sipXecs software Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Default password / pin policy On Jul 28, 2012, at 6:32 , Mircea Carasel wrote: As long as sipxecs/openuc doesn't ship with a well known default password. Hackers would write scripts to test logins with those passwords. If the feature didn't work until an admin specified a default password, that would be fine. Yes, so when sipxecs is shipped, there won't be any default password set. The admin is the only that can specify the default password When sipxecs is shipped, the default policy will be blank password (admin will have to write passwords) Other thing that we can do is to drop default password thing, and the default password policy just to enable a rule of creating passwords, for example: extension followed by character 0 up to 4 characters for voicemail pin, up to 8 characters for password Rule-based defaults will still get hacked, even by casual users within the organization. As long as the admin can define either a static or rule-based system default I think this works. ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
[sipx-users] 4.6 setup script
Is this the first server in your cluster? [ enter 'y' or 'n' ] : y Configuring as the first server... Tip: Use 'sipx.domain.com' as your SIP domain if you are setting up for the first time or if you know you are only going to setup one server. This can make configuration easier. You can always change the value later. Enter SIP domain name [ press enter for 'domain.com' ] : domain.com Is there a reason that 'sipx.domain.com' is recommended but not defaulted to? ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
Re: [sipx-users] 4.6 setup script
One more minor glitch at the end of the script - looks like extra quotes in the URL: In a few more minutes you will be able to access the administration interface from your web browser at the following URL: https://sipx.domain.com; On Jul 28, 2012, at 13:53 , Kurt Albershardt wrote: Is this the first server in your cluster? [ enter 'y' or 'n' ] : y Configuring as the first server... Tip: Use 'sipx.domain.com' as your SIP domain if you are setting up for the first time or if you know you are only going to setup one server. This can make configuration easier. You can always change the value later. Enter SIP domain name [ press enter for 'domain.com' ] : domain.com Is there a reason that 'sipx.domain.com' is recommended but not defaulted to? ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/ ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
[sipx-users] SSL cert not installed in latest 4.6 build
Ran a 'yum update' on an unconfigured 4.6 (installed on 7/25, the one with the unmet Homer dependency) and got only a couple of OS updates. Running 'yum groupupgrade sipxecs' yielded 271 updates (now at 4.6.0.233) Did a 'yum clean all' and restarted, then ran sipxecs-setup. Five minutes later, no access via https:, so: [root@sipx ~]# /etc/init.d/httpd status httpd is stopped [root@sipx ~]# /etc/init.d/httpd start Starting httpd: Syntax error on line 18 of /etc/httpd/conf.d/ssl.conf: SSLCertificateFile: file '/etc/httpd/conf.d/ssl/ssl-web.crt' does not exist or is empty [FAILED] [root@sipx ~]# ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
[sipx-users] numeric versus alpha usernames
In a mixed device deployment (hard and soft phones) I can see a couple of different ways to configure softphones and am wondering about the implications of each. I can assign a numeric extension to softphones just like we do for a hard phone. I can also assign an alpha username based on email addresses or initials, etc., then assign a numeric alias to allow PSTN or internal hard phone dialing. Thoughts? thanks... ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
Re: [sipx-users] 302 - 407 response to inbound ITSP calls
Anyone have insights from this trace? Thanks~ On Jul 24, 2012, at 14:32 , Kurt Albershardt wrote: Attached - thanks. merged.xml On Jul 23, 2012, at 19:29 , Tony Graziano wrote: A graphic won't help anyone troubleshoot it. Post the trace file. ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
Re: [sipx-users] 302 - 407 response to inbound ITSP calls
Thanks for the wake-up! Found a typo in the alias I setup for testing. Now inbound calls are working. Back to 4.6 for another round of testing... On Jul 25, 2012, at 12:51 , Tony Graziano wrote: Explain what user or service has a did or alias of 5755195606. That is what is. Being sent in the invite. Normally you would dial this 10 digit number internally to make sure the input is correct before trying against an itsp. ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
[sipx-users] 4.6.0 install - homer dependencies
Ran a 'yum update' on my 4.6 test VM today and saw this, so I built a clean VM and installed from scratch -- same errors at the end of the groupinstall: -- Finished Dependency Resolution Error: Package: sipxhomer-4.6.0-18.gf9da.x86_64 (sipXecs) Requires: libresip.so()(64bit) Error: Package: sipxhomer-4.6.0-18.gf9da.x86_64 (sipXecs) Requires: librutil.so()(64bit) You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem You could try running: rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
Re: [sipx-users] Alternatives to Audiocodes MP-124 analog gateway?
I'd ask for more detail on the lightning protection and associated grounding, especially if you are in a lightning-prone area. Sending a couple of the failed units to Audiocodes for a post-mortem might help. On Jul 24, 2012, at 13:29 , Hay, Nathan wrote: They are in two locations. Both on UPS and with excellent AC. Our phone guy tells me they have lighting protection on the analog lines. Often times the analog lines come from outside the building the gateways are in. They are grounded using the ground screw on the gateway. Nathan On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 3:23 PM, Todd Hodgen thod...@frontier.com wrote: Are these all failing in the same physical location? Are they on UPS? Heat issues considered, etc.? From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org [mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Hay, Nathan Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2012 12:04 PM To: Discussion list for users of sipXecs software Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Alternatives to Audiocodes MP-124 analog gateway? Typically we lose the analog side. Specifically I've seen the phone not able to call out, but you can still call the phone (but it doesn't ring). This last one doesn't boot at all, but the NIC activity light was slightly flashing (but no link lights on the switch). We haven't engaged Audiocodes support in detail, mostly because of a lack of manpower when the devices are already out of warranty already. It is faster just to replace them. Nathan On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 2:59 PM, Todd Hodgen thod...@frontier.com wrote: Nathan, I’m interested in the failures you are seeing on these. I’ve installed many without any failures yet. Is it a particular component that is failing on them? Has Audiocodes engineering been brought into a discussion on it? From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org [mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Hay, Nathan Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2012 11:42 AM To: Discussion list for users of sipXecs software Subject: [sipx-users] Alternatives to Audiocodes MP-124 analog gateway? Our Audiocodes MP-124 analog gateways are only lasting 1-2 years (always longer than the warranty) and then dying on us. We've replaced 3 or 4 out of the 6 we have. I've heard that Patton 4300 series is a good alternative, but that it isn't as easily configured as the Audiocodes. Anyone have documentation on using the Patton with SipXecs? Are they more reliable than the Audiocodes? Any thoughts would be appreciated. Nathan -- Nathan P. Hay Network Engineer | Information Technology Cedarville University | www.cedarville.edu 937-766-7905 twitter: @nathanphay ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/ -- Nathan P. Hay Network Engineer | Information Technology Cedarville University | www.cedarville.edu 937-766-7905 twitter: @nathanphay ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/ -- Nathan P. Hay Network Engineer | Information Technology Cedarville University | www.cedarville.edu 937-766-7905 twitter: @nathanphay ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/ ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
Re: [sipx-users] 302 - 407 response to inbound ITSP calls
Ack - sorry about the large attachment. On Jul 23, 2012, at 18:26 , Kurt Albershardt wrote: Getting closer - have AON configured (thanks, Tony) on pfSense and am receiving signaling on 5080. Now sipx is responding to invites with 302 first and then 407. There's obviously a lot of data here -- I can forward details of any message(s) or the entire XML file. PastedGraphic-2.tiff ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/ ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
Re: [sipx-users] not seeing inbound ITSP calls
Thanks. I read several mentions of port randomization and static NAT previously, but I didn't see it happening in the logs. Wondering about pfSense Webgui – I have it set for https on port 10443, change it to something you want, but remember stay away from: 80,8443, 5060-5080, 3-31000. Unless I plan on accessing the sipx box from outside the firewall, why should the webGUI port for pfSense matter? Also, can someone confirm that I'm seeing keepalives below, and whether I can or should disable them once I have a static NAT rule? On Jul 20, 2012, at 19:12 , Tony Graziano wrote: Read this http://blog.myitdepartment.net/?p=37 On Jul 20, 2012 9:06 PM, Tony Graziano tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net wrote: Your outbound Nat type needs to be set for static port before your Nat rules are created. On Jul 20, 2012 8:03 PM, Kurt Albershardt k...@nv.net wrote: Forgot to mention that it does not appear to be doing port randomization. Running tcpdump from the pfSense box itself shows source ports of 5080, which should effectively open the hole for their inbound UDP: 17:47:36.868729 IP sipx.domain.com.5080 66.241.X.X.5060: SIP, length: 4 17:47:56.875211 IP sipx.domain.com.5080 66.241.X.X.5060: SIP, length: 4 17:48:16.882387 IP sipx.domain.com.5080 66.241.X.X.5060: SIP, length: 4 17:48:36.889707 IP sipx.domain.com.5080 66.241.X.X.5060: SIP, length: 4 17:48:56.896991 IP sipx.domain.com.5080 66.241.X.X.5060: SIP, length: 4 ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
Re: [sipx-users] not seeing inbound ITSP calls
On Jul 21, 2012, at 11:08 , Tony Graziano wrote: The NAT rules have to be created AFTER the outbound Nat rule otherwise they stay randomized. I do understand that, and was planning to do it by choosing Manual (AON) and then rebuild my ruleset. Download the config file made available. Put in your Ethernet interface names/ip's and password by grabbing those from your backup, then upload and restart. I have a lot of work in my existing config - will need to diff them and see what is there that I don't already have. And I'm still wondering about these two: pfSense Webgui – I have it set for https on port 10443, change it to something you want, but remember stay away from: 80,8443, 5060-5080, 3-31000. Unless I plan on accessing the sipx box from outside the firewall, why should the webGUI port for pfSense matter? Also, can someone confirm that I'm seeing keepalives below, and whether I can or should disable them once I have a static NAT rule? Also make sure you don't have the stupid siproxd package erroneously installed. Never did install it. Was actually hoping a decent SBC package for pfSense would show up someday (there was a freeswitch module that looked promising for awhile.) ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
[sipx-users] 407 response to inbound ITSP calls
I'm seeing 407 (Proxy Authentication Required) returned to incoming invites from Vitelity. We have a no-registration (IP authentication) relationship with them so it's possible I've missed something in the setup that would allow unauthenticated invites from their IP. This is the response sent to sipxbridge: Time: 2012-07-20T16:48:16.097000Z Frame: 4 sipxbridge.xml:354 Source: 192.168.X.24:5060 Dest: sipx.domain.com-sipXbridge SIP/2.0 407 Proxy Authentication Required Record-Route: sip:192.168.X.24:5060;lr;sipXecs-CallDest=LD;x-sipX-done From: +15759565979 sip:5759565979@66.241.X.X;tag=2014970589 To: sip:5755195...@sipx.domain.com;tag=1R5cwk Call-ID: 5bc662f56ef1744e13185690683bfb11@66.241.X.X-0 CSeq: 102 INVITE Via: SIP/2.0/TCP 192.168.X.24:5090;branch=z9hG4bK11c84e5a79571525f8a761d6bcaf2a4c393639;sipxecs-id=3164ecee Proxy-Authenticate: Digest realm=sipx.domain.com,nonce=d98c3b153f9c64d522cd72f9a7c28fde50098bd0,qop=auth Server: sipXecs/4.4.0 sipXecs/sipXproxy (Linux) Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2012 16:48:16 GMT Content-Length: 0 ...which sends this to Vitelity: Time: 2012-07-20T16:48:16.103000Z Frame: 6 sipxbridge.xml:365 Source: sipx.domain.com-sipXbridge Dest: 66.241.X.X:5060 SIP/2.0 407 Proxy Authentication required Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 66.241.X.X:5060;branch=z9hG4bK17b48c37;rport=5060;received=66.241.X.X From: +15759565979 sip:5759565979@66.241.X.X;tag=as4b214e18 To: sip:5755195606@70.57.247.39:5060 Call-ID: 5bc662f56ef1744e13185690683bfb11@66.241.X.X CSeq: 102 INVITE Server: sipXecs/4.4.0 sipXecs/sipxbridge (Linux) Supported: replaces Record-Route: sip:192.168.X.24:5060;lr;sipXecs-CallDest=LD;x-sipX-done Proxy-Authenticate: Digest realm=sipx.domain.com,nonce=d98c3b153f9c64d522cd72f9a7c28fde50098bd0,qop=auth Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2012 16:48:16 GMT Contact: sip:70.57.247.39:5080 Content-Length: 0 ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
Re: [sipx-users] 407 response to inbound ITSP calls
Vitelity is sending to 5060 -- when I asked about 5080 they said: We could change it on our end but do not recommend this. In addition if we do you will be limited to 30 channels and this amount will not be able to be increased in the future. 30 channels should be more than adequate for the next year or so at this site anyway. I'm curious about the suggestion to use a sipxbridge instance (rather than an unmanaged gateway as was suggested yesterday) and choosing bandwidth.com instead of Vitelity as the template? thanks... On Jul 20, 2012, at 11:38 , Tony Graziano wrote: Then you would have set this up using a template in sipx as a trunk and choosing bandwidth.com as the template and changing the addresses to match vitelity. I do not think it will work unless vitelity is sending the inbound invite onport 5080, which I cannot see they are due to the limited information you have provided. If the invites are coming from vitelity on port 5060, it WOULD act as an unauthorized call. Change those two things. Use the bandwidth.com template and have vitelity send to port 5080. On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 1:22 PM, Kurt Albershardt k...@nv.net wrote: I'm seeing 407 (Proxy Authentication Required) returned to incoming invites from Vitelity. We have a no-registration (IP authentication) relationship with them so it's possible I've missed something in the setup that would allow unauthenticated invites from their IP. This is the response sent to sipxbridge: Time: 2012-07-20T16:48:16.097000Z Frame: 4 sipxbridge.xml:354 Source: 192.168.X.24:5060 Dest: sipx.domain.com-sipXbridge SIP/2.0 407 Proxy Authentication Required Record-Route: sip:192.168.X.24:5060;lr;sipXecs-CallDest=LD;x-sipX-done From: +15759565979 sip:5759565979@66.241.X.X;tag=2014970589 To: sip:5755195...@sipx.domain.com;tag=1R5cwk Call-ID: 5bc662f56ef1744e13185690683bfb11@66.241.X.X-0 CSeq: 102 INVITE Via: SIP/2.0/TCP 192.168.X.24:5090;branch=z9hG4bK11c84e5a79571525f8a761d6bcaf2a4c393639;sipxecs-id=3164ecee Proxy-Authenticate: Digest realm=sipx.domain.com,nonce=d98c3b153f9c64d522cd72f9a7c28fde50098bd0,qop=auth Server: sipXecs/4.4.0 sipXecs/sipXproxy (Linux) Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2012 16:48:16 GMT Content-Length: 0 ...which sends this to Vitelity: Time: 2012-07-20T16:48:16.103000Z Frame: 6 sipxbridge.xml:365 Source: sipx.domain.com-sipXbridge Dest: 66.241.X.X:5060 SIP/2.0 407 Proxy Authentication required Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 66.241.X.X:5060;branch=z9hG4bK17b48c37;rport=5060;received=66.241.X.X From: +15759565979 sip:5759565979@66.241.X.X;tag=as4b214e18 To: sip:5755195606@70.57.247.39:5060 Call-ID: 5bc662f56ef1744e13185690683bfb11@66.241.X.X CSeq: 102 INVITE Server: sipXecs/4.4.0 sipXecs/sipxbridge (Linux) Supported: replaces Record-Route: sip:192.168.X.24:5060;lr;sipXecs-CallDest=LD;x-sipX-done Proxy-Authenticate: Digest realm=sipx.domain.com,nonce=d98c3b153f9c64d522cd72f9a7c28fde50098bd0,qop=auth Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2012 16:48:16 GMT Contact: sip:70.57.247.39:5080 Content-Length: 0 ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/ -- ~~ Tony Graziano, Manager Telephone: 434.984.8430 sip: tgrazi...@voice.myitdepartment.net Fax: 434.465.6833 ~~ Linked-In Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/pub/tony-graziano/14/4a6/7a4 Ask about our Internet Fax services! ~~ Using or developing for sipXecs from SIPFoundry? Ask me about sipX-CoLab 2013! LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems Helpdesk: Telephone: 434.984.8426 sip: helpd...@voice.myitdepartment.net Helpdesk Customers: http://myhelp.myitdepartment.net Blog: http://blog.myitdepartment.net ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/ ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
Re: [sipx-users] TTY
TTY as in TDD? I spent quite a bit of time looking into this awhile back and the only thing I found was a mostly deprecated * module. TTY is dying anyway - most HOH people moved to IM and SMS a decade (or more) ago. The most promising development I've seen is http://www.realtimetext.org/ which is a client-side XMPP improvement (meaning the messages can pass through a standard XMPP server.) On Jul 20, 2012, at 11:23 , Bryan Anderson wrote: Are any of you using TTY with SipXecs if so, how? FXS, VOIP device, Something else? Thanks, -Bryan Anderson ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
Re: [sipx-users] 407 response to inbound ITSP calls
On Jul 20, 2012, at 12:01 , Tony Graziano wrote: I think if you listen to meL Assume you meant 'me' there, and I am! use sipxbridge to anchor the calls (otherwise you will not be able to transfer it) Aha, that makes sense. I was just curious about what in the bandwidth.com template made it more appropriate to use than the Vitelity template. Should I also choose the bandwidth.com template for outbound calls to Vitelity with this non-registering config? thanks! ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
Re: [sipx-users] 407 response to inbound ITSP calls
Gotcha - thanks. I did notice a whole lot of extraneous consumer-like config junk in the Vitelity template. On Jul 20, 2012, at 12:06 , Tony Graziano wrote: I refer to the bandwidth.com template because it has all the correct settings in there for non-registration (ip based only) and works fine in such cases. On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 2:05 PM, Kurt Albershardt k...@nv.net wrote: On Jul 20, 2012, at 12:01 , Tony Graziano wrote: I think if you listen to meL Assume you meant 'me' there, and I am! use sipxbridge to anchor the calls (otherwise you will not be able to transfer it) Aha, that makes sense. I was just curious about what in the bandwidth.com template made it more appropriate to use than the Vitelity template. Should I also choose the bandwidth.com template for outbound calls to Vitelity with this non-registering config? thanks! ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/ -- ~~ Tony Graziano, Manager Telephone: 434.984.8430 sip: tgrazi...@voice.myitdepartment.net Fax: 434.465.6833 ~~ Linked-In Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/pub/tony-graziano/14/4a6/7a4 Ask about our Internet Fax services! ~~ Using or developing for sipXecs from SIPFoundry? Ask me about sipX-CoLab 2013! LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems Helpdesk: Telephone: 434.984.8426 sip: helpd...@voice.myitdepartment.net Helpdesk Customers: http://myhelp.myitdepartment.net Blog: http://blog.myitdepartment.net ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/ ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
[sipx-users] external RTP port range for sipXbridge
Wiki mentions 3-31000 for sipXrelay but I've seen mentions of 15000-15500 in a number of forum posts. What do I need to allow for sipXbridge - ITSP behind NAT (with external static IP stated, not using a STUN server)? thanks~ ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
Re: [sipx-users] external RTP port range for sipXbridge
Thanks! On Jul 20, 2012, at 13:12 , Bryan Anderson wrote: I only bring through the 3-31000 range to our systems. Based of what is listed under System Server Server NAT Show Advanced Settings -Bryan Anderson On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 11:51 AM, Kurt Albershardt k...@nv.net wrote: Wiki mentions 3-31000 for sipXrelay but I've seen mentions of 15000-15500 in a number of forum posts. What do I need to allow for sipXbridge - ITSP behind NAT (with external static IP stated, not using a STUN server)? thanks~ ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/ ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/ ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
Re: [sipx-users] TTY
TDD/TTY uses an obscure 45.5/50 baud modem (with baudot encoding, no less) that is not part of the DSP stack on any gateway I have seen. What is the application? Do they have someone actually using a TTY or is this just for ADA compliance? On Jul 20, 2012, at 13:46 , Bryan Anderson wrote: Right, They are using a SIP ITSP, and I am on the fence leaning toward not working. The backup is this unit does support a regular line through either an FXS or a POTS line if we have to. I will be sure to let the list know the results. Question: what about using T.38? Isn't that modem tones? Remember I am a noob at telephony. -Bryan Anderson On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 12:28 PM, Todd Hodgen thod...@frontier.com wrote: BTW, if you are successful with this product, it would probably be good to let the list know, or add it to a wiki page. From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org [mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Bryan Anderson Sent: Friday, July 20, 2012 12:09 PM To: Discussion list for users of sipXecs software Subject: Re: [sipx-users] TTY Ok, after putting this out I called voipsupply.com and they recommended the Clarity Q90D which connects to the headset port of TTY compatible phones. We just had an office ask about it. I am not sure why yet but wanted to get the info as soon as I could. Thanks for the info. -Bryan Anderson On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 10:57 AM, Kurt Albershardt k...@nv.net wrote: TTY as in TDD? I spent quite a bit of time looking into this awhile back and the only thing I found was a mostly deprecated * module. TTY is dying anyway - most HOH people moved to IM and SMS a decade (or more) ago. The most promising development I've seen is http://www.realtimetext.org/ which is a client-side XMPP improvement (meaning the messages can pass through a standard XMPP server.) On Jul 20, 2012, at 11:23 , Bryan Anderson wrote: Are any of you using TTY with SipXecs if so, how? FXS, VOIP device, Something else? Thanks, -Bryan Anderson ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/ ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/ ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/ ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
Re: [sipx-users] external RTP port range for sipXbridge
Got it. I assume inbound RTSP gets negotiated during the SIP call setup and that sipXbridge sends a packet to dynamically open the needed port on a per-call basis? On Jul 20, 2012, at 14:21 , Tony Graziano wrote: this is what sipxbridge uses for outbound itsp calls and to support remote users. IF YOU ARE NOT SUPPORTING REMOTE USERS you do not typically have to NAT this OR port 5060. Outbound traffic is typically allowed or not allowd by firewalls, we are talking about inbound traffic here. On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 2:51 PM, Kurt Albershardt k...@nv.net wrote: Wiki mentions 3-31000 for sipXrelay but I've seen mentions of 15000-15500 in a number of forum posts. What do I need to allow for sipXbridge - ITSP behind NAT (with external static IP stated, not using a STUN server)? thanks~ ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
[sipx-users] not seeing inbound ITSP calls
Vitelity sending invites on 5080 now Firewall NAT/PAT reconfigured to forward 5080 to 5080 Firewall says it's sending packets to sipx: Jul 20 14:55:31 NG0 66.241.X.X:5060 192.168.X.24:5080 UDP Jul 20 14:55:29 NG0 66.241.X.X:5060 192.168.X.24:5080 UDP Jul 20 14:55:28 NG0 66.241.X.X:5060 192.168.X.24:5080 UDP Jul 20 14:55:27 NG0 66.241.X.X:5060 192.168.X.24:5080 UDP Nothing hitting the logs (both sipviewer and grepping for the external IP show nothing), and nothing showing in tcpdump other than what appear to be keepalives we are sending to them? root@sipx sipxpbx]# tcpdump host 66.241.X.X tcpdump: WARNING: arptype 65535 not supported by libpcap - falling back to cooked socket tcpdump: verbose output suppressed, use -v or -vv for full protocol decode listening on venet0, link-type LINUX_SLL (Linux cooked), capture size 96 bytes 15:00:34.923739 IP sipx.domain.com.5080 66.241.X.X.sip: SIP, length: 4 15:00:54.924269 IP sipx.domain.com.5080 66.241.X.X.sip: SIP, length: 4 15:01:14.923785 IP sipx.domain.com.5080 66.241.X.X.sip: SIP, length: 4 15:01:34.924285 IP sipx.domain.com.5080 66.241.X.X.sip: SIP, length: 4 15:01:54.923618 IP sipx.domain.com.5080 66.241.X.X.sip: SIP, length: 4 15:02:14.924102 IP sipx.domain.com.5080 66.241.X.X.sip: SIP, length: 4 15:02:34.923555 IP sipx.domain.com.5080 66.241.X.X.sip: SIP, length: 4 ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
Re: [sipx-users] not seeing inbound ITSP calls
Packets appear not to be making it out of the firewall, despite the fact that it is logging them. The sipx box does not receive the packets (at all.) Both tcpdump and sipXbridge.log show no packets coming from the ITSP gateway address (tcpdump does show keepalives we are sending to them every 20 seconds.) I can ping the sipx box from pfsense, and I can send UDP/5080 packets using netcat which get picked up both by sipxbridge.log and by tcpdump. I'm starting to suspect that the keepalives we're sending might be messing up the firewall state table. Is there some way to turn off the keepalives since we have a static NAT mapping to allow inbound? Or is there a good reason to leave them running? On Jul 20, 2012, at 15:46 , Tony Graziano wrote: You will need to make sure the DID call number format in sipx is the correct format +1npanxx 1npanxx npanxx etc. I would look through the sipXbridge log (tail -f) when the call comes in to see what is in the invite. On Jul 20, 2012 5:11 PM, Kurt Albershardt k...@nv.net wrote: Vitelity sending invites on 5080 now Firewall NAT/PAT reconfigured to forward 5080 to 5080 Firewall says it's sending packets to sipx: Jul 20 14:55:31 NG0 66.241.X.X:5060 192.168.X.24:5080 UDP Jul 20 14:55:29 NG0 66.241.X.X:5060 192.168.X.24:5080 UDP Jul 20 14:55:28 NG0 66.241.X.X:5060 192.168.X.24:5080 UDP Jul 20 14:55:27 NG0 66.241.X.X:5060 192.168.X.24:5080 UDP Nothing hitting the logs (both sipviewer and grepping for the external IP show nothing), and nothing showing in tcpdump other than what appear to be keepalives we are sending to them? root@sipx sipxpbx]# tcpdump host 66.241.X.X tcpdump: WARNING: arptype 65535 not supported by libpcap - falling back to cooked socket tcpdump: verbose output suppressed, use -v or -vv for full protocol decode listening on venet0, link-type LINUX_SLL (Linux cooked), capture size 96 bytes 15:00:34.923739 IP sipx.domain.com.5080 66.241.X.X.sip: SIP, length: 4 15:00:54.924269 IP sipx.domain.com.5080 66.241.X.X.sip: SIP, length: 4 15:01:14.923785 IP sipx.domain.com.5080 66.241.X.X.sip: SIP, length: 4 15:01:34.924285 IP sipx.domain.com.5080 66.241.X.X.sip: SIP, length: 4 15:01:54.923618 IP sipx.domain.com.5080 66.241.X.X.sip: SIP, length: 4 15:02:14.924102 IP sipx.domain.com.5080 66.241.X.X.sip: SIP, length: 4 15:02:34.923555 IP sipx.domain.com.5080 66.241.X.X.sip: SIP, length: 4 ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/ LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems Helpdesk: Telephone: 434.984.8426 sip: helpd...@voice.myitdepartment.net Helpdesk Customers: http://myhelp.myitdepartment.net Blog: http://blog.myitdepartment.net ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/ ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
Re: [sipx-users] not seeing inbound ITSP calls
pfSense 1.2.3 On Jul 20, 2012, at 17:36 , Tony Graziano wrote: What is the firewall? On Jul 20, 2012 7:22 PM, Kurt Albershardt k...@nv.net wrote: Packets appear not to be making it out of the firewall, despite the fact that it is logging them. The sipx box does not receive the packets (at all.) Both tcpdump and sipXbridge.log show no packets coming from the ITSP gateway address (tcpdump does show keepalives we are sending to them every 20 seconds.) I can ping the sipx box from pfsense, and I can send UDP/5080 packets using netcat which get picked up both by sipxbridge.log and by tcpdump. I'm starting to suspect that the keepalives we're sending might be messing up the firewall state table. Is there some way to turn off the keepalives since we have a static NAT mapping to allow inbound? Or is there a good reason to leave them running? On Jul 20, 2012, at 15:46 , Tony Graziano wrote: You will need to make sure the DID call number format in sipx is the correct format +1npanxx 1npanxx npanxx etc. I would look through the sipXbridge log (tail -f) when the call comes in to see what is in the invite. On Jul 20, 2012 5:11 PM, Kurt Albershardt k...@nv.net wrote: Vitelity sending invites on 5080 now Firewall NAT/PAT reconfigured to forward 5080 to 5080 Firewall says it's sending packets to sipx: Jul 20 14:55:31 NG0 66.241.X.X:5060 192.168.X.24:5080 UDP Jul 20 14:55:29 NG0 66.241.X.X:5060 192.168.X.24:5080 UDP Jul 20 14:55:28 NG0 66.241.X.X:5060 192.168.X.24:5080 UDP Jul 20 14:55:27 NG0 66.241.X.X:5060 192.168.X.24:5080 UDP Nothing hitting the logs (both sipviewer and grepping for the external IP show nothing), and nothing showing in tcpdump other than what appear to be keepalives we are sending to them? root@sipx sipxpbx]# tcpdump host 66.241.X.X tcpdump: WARNING: arptype 65535 not supported by libpcap - falling back to cooked socket tcpdump: verbose output suppressed, use -v or -vv for full protocol decode listening on venet0, link-type LINUX_SLL (Linux cooked), capture size 96 bytes 15:00:34.923739 IP sipx.domain.com.5080 66.241.X.X.sip: SIP, length: 4 15:00:54.924269 IP sipx.domain.com.5080 66.241.X.X.sip: SIP, length: 4 15:01:14.923785 IP sipx.domain.com.5080 66.241.X.X.sip: SIP, length: 4 15:01:34.924285 IP sipx.domain.com.5080 66.241.X.X.sip: SIP, length: 4 15:01:54.923618 IP sipx.domain.com.5080 66.241.X.X.sip: SIP, length: 4 15:02:14.924102 IP sipx.domain.com.5080 66.241.X.X.sip: SIP, length: 4 15:02:34.923555 IP sipx.domain.com.5080 66.241.X.X.sip: SIP, length: 4 ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/ LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems Helpdesk: Telephone: 434.984.8426 sip: helpd...@voice.myitdepartment.net Helpdesk Customers: http://myhelp.myitdepartment.net Blog: http://blog.myitdepartment.net ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/ ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/ LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems Helpdesk: Telephone: 434.984.8426 sip: helpd...@voice.myitdepartment.net Helpdesk Customers: http://myhelp.myitdepartment.net Blog: http://blog.myitdepartment.net ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/ ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
Re: [sipx-users] not seeing inbound ITSP calls
Forgot to mention that it does not appear to be doing port randomization. Running tcpdump from the pfSense box itself shows source ports of 5080, which should effectively open the hole for their inbound UDP: 17:47:36.868729 IP sipx.domain.com.5080 66.241.X.X.5060: SIP, length: 4 17:47:56.875211 IP sipx.domain.com.5080 66.241.X.X.5060: SIP, length: 4 17:48:16.882387 IP sipx.domain.com.5080 66.241.X.X.5060: SIP, length: 4 17:48:36.889707 IP sipx.domain.com.5080 66.241.X.X.5060: SIP, length: 4 17:48:56.896991 IP sipx.domain.com.5080 66.241.X.X.5060: SIP, length: 4 On Jul 20, 2012, at 17:36 , Tony Graziano wrote: What is the firewall? On Jul 20, 2012 7:22 PM, Kurt Albershardt k...@nv.net wrote: Packets appear not to be making it out of the firewall, despite the fact that it is logging them. The sipx box does not receive the packets (at all.) Both tcpdump and sipXbridge.log show no packets coming from the ITSP gateway address (tcpdump does show keepalives we are sending to them every 20 seconds.) I can ping the sipx box from pfsense, and I can send UDP/5080 packets using netcat which get picked up both by sipxbridge.log and by tcpdump. I'm starting to suspect that the keepalives we're sending might be messing up the firewall state table. Is there some way to turn off the keepalives since we have a static NAT mapping to allow inbound? Or is there a good reason to leave them running? On Jul 20, 2012, at 15:46 , Tony Graziano wrote: You will need to make sure the DID call number format in sipx is the correct format +1npanxx 1npanxx npanxx etc. I would look through the sipXbridge log (tail -f) when the call comes in to see what is in the invite. On Jul 20, 2012 5:11 PM, Kurt Albershardt k...@nv.net wrote: Vitelity sending invites on 5080 now Firewall NAT/PAT reconfigured to forward 5080 to 5080 Firewall says it's sending packets to sipx: Jul 20 14:55:31 NG0 66.241.X.X:5060 192.168.X.24:5080 UDP Jul 20 14:55:29 NG0 66.241.X.X:5060 192.168.X.24:5080 UDP Jul 20 14:55:28 NG0 66.241.X.X:5060 192.168.X.24:5080 UDP Jul 20 14:55:27 NG0 66.241.X.X:5060 192.168.X.24:5080 UDP Nothing hitting the logs (both sipviewer and grepping for the external IP show nothing), and nothing showing in tcpdump other than what appear to be keepalives we are sending to them? root@sipx sipxpbx]# tcpdump host 66.241.X.X tcpdump: WARNING: arptype 65535 not supported by libpcap - falling back to cooked socket tcpdump: verbose output suppressed, use -v or -vv for full protocol decode listening on venet0, link-type LINUX_SLL (Linux cooked), capture size 96 bytes 15:00:34.923739 IP sipx.domain.com.5080 66.241.X.X.sip: SIP, length: 4 15:00:54.924269 IP sipx.domain.com.5080 66.241.X.X.sip: SIP, length: 4 15:01:14.923785 IP sipx.domain.com.5080 66.241.X.X.sip: SIP, length: 4 15:01:34.924285 IP sipx.domain.com.5080 66.241.X.X.sip: SIP, length: 4 15:01:54.923618 IP sipx.domain.com.5080 66.241.X.X.sip: SIP, length: 4 15:02:14.924102 IP sipx.domain.com.5080 66.241.X.X.sip: SIP, length: 4 15:02:34.923555 IP sipx.domain.com.5080 66.241.X.X.sip: SIP, length: 4 ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/ LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems Helpdesk: Telephone: 434.984.8426 sip: helpd...@voice.myitdepartment.net Helpdesk Customers: http://myhelp.myitdepartment.net Blog: http://blog.myitdepartment.net ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/ ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/ LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems Helpdesk: Telephone: 434.984.8426 sip: helpd...@voice.myitdepartment.net Helpdesk Customers: http://myhelp.myitdepartment.net Blog: http://blog.myitdepartment.net ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/ ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
[sipx-users] sipXbridge instances
Do I need to configure a separate instance of sipXbridge if my provider sends inbound calls from a different IP than the one to which I send outbound calls? --thanks ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
Re: [sipx-users] sipXbridge instances
Thanks - in this case it's a carrier account that uses IP-based authorization so there is no registration. How would I associate the source IP with the gateway instance? The only place I see fields which *might* be relevant is under Advanced Settings in ITSP Account. Or should I configure another gateway using the inbound IP and just not route outbound calls to it? On Jul 19, 2012, at 16:27 , M. Ranganathan wrote: In general sipxbridge will allow inbound calls from any IP. However, it will not be able to identify the associated ITSP account unless you instruct it as to where to expect inbound signaling from. The implications of this are that when transfers occur, appropriate rewrite rules will not be applied (consider that some ITSPs want you to use private addresses in your signaling ). Some compromises and assumptions were made in order to avoid excessive numbers configuration settings: i.e. If your ITSP allows registration then the ITSP registrar address is also assumed to be the address from which inbound calls emanate. Thus use a different address for your ITSP registrar address than the ITSP proxy address. On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 6:10 PM, Michael Picher mpic...@ezuce.com wrote: Probably, yes... On Jul 19, 2012 5:33 PM, Kurt Albershardt k...@nv.net wrote: Do I need to configure a separate instance of sipXbridge if my provider sends inbound calls from a different IP than the one to which I send outbound calls? ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
Re: [sipx-users] 4.6 Passwords
On Jul 18, 2012, at 1:15 , Todd Hodgen wrote: Just for a point of discussion, setting these two password fields to random numbers doesn’t seem to provide any benefit to the administrator. I’m assuming these are required to be there rather than a blank space. It would be very beneficial to the administrator if something useable was put into that field, even if they were all the same. For example – maybe a specific number such as 5 + extension number. Or set them all to 1234 or something similar. This way, the end user can be instructed on what is there, and how to change it, rather than the administrator having to change all of them to something useable. With a random number, the end user can’t log into voicemail or the GUI to change it until after the administrator makes a change since it is random and hidden. Is there a require password change on next login option for the web portal and voicemail? If a default passwords is populated, it should select this option by default as well. ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
[sipx-users] sipxfreeswitch-4.6.0
Still seeing these warnings when I update: Updating : sipxfreeswitch-4.6.0-118.g86a83.x86_64 37/95 /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.171f06: line 1: freeswitch.sh: command not found ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
[sipx-users] set logging levels in 4.6
Can't seem to find the logging levels screen in the 4.6 GUI. No Logging Levels under the System menu like 4.4, but there's a Log Watcher under Diagnostics that looks like it might be similar. Unfortunately, it only lists one option: config Logging Level(Default: CRITICAL) [Apply] ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
Re: [sipx-users] Wiki seems to be down
Wiki has been returning 502 Proxy Errors for about an hour now. ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
Re: [sipx-users] Wiki seems to be down
Not sure whose proxy that was, but it seems to have recovered. On Jul 18, 2012, at 19:02 , Kurt Albershardt wrote: Wiki has been returning 502 Proxy Errors for about an hour now. ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
[sipx-users] DNS architecture for 4.6
On Jul 15, 2012, at 17:06 , Tony Graziano wrote: I would install sipx as a subdomain (I.e. uc.sipdomain.TLD). I would point the firewall DNS forwarder for both the host and subdomain to sipx and let sipx run its own DNS. Working towards that now, and I have been using sipx.domain.com as the subdomain from the beginning. Zone files for both sipx.domain.com and domain.com were created in /var/named/ by the system and I'm curious whether I should merge the domain.com info into the external authoritative NS for the domain, or keep the split horizon this effectively creates? On Jul 14, 2012, at 18:01 , Tony Graziano wrote: Please verify the DNS zone is running. It sounds like DNS is not working. There is a known issue with DNS in regard to the build. If it is not running please change the zone serial number to MMDDXX save the zone and ensure named is running then try again. named was indeed not running on the 4.6 box. It started up OK from the init script and is resolving properly. ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
[sipx-users] 4.6 repo
On Jul 14, 2012, at 11:22 , Kurt Albershardt wrote: On Jul 13, 2012, at 19:53 , Tony Graziano wrote: ensure you have the repo pointed to the correct location and do an update to make sure you have the latest. Ran an update yesterday PM and got nothing new - has the repo location changed since July 10th? Another yum update today, but no sipx packages were updated. Am I querying the wrong repo? ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
Re: [sipx-users] 4.6 repo
On Jul 17, 2012, at 14:17 , Kurt Albershardt wrote: On Jul 14, 2012, at 11:22 , Kurt Albershardt wrote: On Jul 13, 2012, at 19:53 , Tony Graziano wrote: ensure you have the repo pointed to the correct location and do an update to make sure you have the latest. Ran an update yesterday PM and got nothing new - has the repo location changed since July 10th? Another yum update today, but no sipx packages were updated. Am I querying the wrong repo? Apparently not - just updated a restored VM to test DNS config and saw a bunch of 4.6.0-99 and 4.6.0-100 packages. thanks~ ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
Re: [sipx-users] NTP configured as unmanaged in 4.6
Just an FYI -- after installing today's package updates on a 4.6 system which has NTP configured as an unmanaged service, I get: Running rpm_check_debug ERROR with rpm_check_debug vs depsolve: ntp is needed by sipxsupervisor-4.6.0-104.g90aeb.x86_64 ** Found 1 pre-existing rpmdb problem(s), 'yum check' output follows: sipxsupervisor-4.6.0-84.g2b8f3.x86_64 has missing requires of ntp Your transaction was saved, rerun it with: yum load-transaction /tmp/yum_save_tx-2012-07-17-16-518KU_x6.yumtx [root@sipx ~]# ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
Re: [sipx-users] DNS architecture for 4.6
4.6 install was done on a clean OS build and only ran the setup script once. I answered questions with sipx.domain.com only, other than the main domain. Just re-ran the setup script on a clean install of today's package release and it only created one (sipx.domain.com) zonefile. On Jul 17, 2012, at 14:22 , Tony Graziano wrote: if the default sipdomain is: sipx.domain.com then there should be no zone file for domain.com. Normally you would create a forward zone for domain.com and point it to its authoritative server. On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 4:13 PM, Kurt Albershardt k...@nv.net wrote: I have been using sipx.domain.com as the subdomain from the beginning. Zone files for both sipx.domain.com and domain.com were created in /var/named/ by the system and I'm curious whether I should merge the domain.com info into the external authoritative NS for the domain, or keep the split horizon this effectively creates? ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
Re: [sipx-users] Snom 320 phones registering with 4.4 but not with 4.6
On Jul 17, 2012, at 18:44 , Kurt Albershardt wrote: While sipXproxy.log (which appears to use UCT rather than localtime) has: 2012-07-18T00:35:02.725196Z:482:SIP:WARNING:sipx.murray-hotel.com:SipRouter-15:41C15940:SipXProxy:SipTransaction::recurseDnsSrvChildren no valid DNS records found for sendTo sip:'sipx.murray-hotel.com':5070 proto = 'TCP' 2012-07-18T00:35:02.725223Z:483:SIP:WARNING:sipx.murray-hotel.com:SipRouter-15:41C15940:SipXProxy:SipTransaction::recurseDnsSrvChildren Returning false: 0x7fae30021850 isrecursing False mIsServerTransaction = 0, mIsDnsSrvChild = 0, mpDnsDestinations = 0x7fae3002bff8, mpDnsDestinations[0].isValidServerT() = 0, mpRequest = 0x7fae3002da20 2012-07-18T00:35:02.725241Z:484:SIP:WARNING:sipx.murray-hotel.com:SipRouter-15:41C15940:SipXProxy:SipUserAgent::send returning false 2012-07-18T00:35:21.090073Z:485:SIP:WARNING:sipx.murray-hotel.com:SipRouter-15:41C15940:SipXProxy:SipTransaction::recurseDnsSrvChildren no valid DNS records found for sendTo sip:'sipx.murray-hotel.com':5070 proto = 'TCP' For the record, this was on 4.4, which was working before -- at least until I built a new server with a 'proper' resolv.conf file pointing at 127.0.0.1 Replacing 127.0.0.1 with 192.168.44.1 (which was the config from the default install) allows the phones to register. Guess I'll try this on 4.6 next, though it defaults to 127.0.0.1 ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
Re: [sipx-users] Snom 320 phones registering with 4.4 but not with 4.6
On Jul 15, 2012, at 2:38 , Michael Picher wrote: resolv.conf isn't going to help your phones any... it's just for that server itself. It tells the server where to go for DNS. For someone who is quite familiar with DNS, what is the issue I'm trying to solve? where are the phones getting DHCP from, and can you verify that the phones have proper addressing / options? A pfSense gateway (at 192.168.44.1) provides both DHCP and DNS for the segment. They are getting proper DHCP address assignments (on screen every time they boot.) The DHCP server does not properly handle options 66 67, so I've hard-coded the settings URL into their webUIs. All phones pick up their assigned DHCP address at boot and are resolving names (or they could not pull the config XML.) Try hardcoding a phone with the IP DNS and see what happens. Did that earlier while I was debugging. I can try again... ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
Re: [sipx-users] Snom 320 phones registering with 4.4 but not with 4.6
On Jul 15, 2012, at 3:08 , Tony Graziano wrote:I'd suggest putting the proxy and registrar log levels to debug and inspecting them when you try to register.I did quite a bit of that the other day and saw nothing in the logs other than a bunch of inter-cluster stuff -- nothing that I could associate with a phone booting while doing a tail -f on the logs one at a time. Ran a tcpdump and saw the config getting pulled, but no registration.The phone status page says "network failure" next to registration #1, but I was hoping someone could make something of the difference between the two logs (attached.) This is the same phone with the same MAC plugged into the same switch port, with both servers running on different IPs on the same VM host. The difference is that in one case the name 'sipx.murray-hotel.com' is mapped (forward and reverse) to the IP of the 4.4 and in the other it is mapped to the 4.6 server. Snom_320-4.6.log Description: Binary data Snom_320-4.4.log Description: Binary data ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
Re: [sipx-users] Snom 320 phones registering with 4.4 but not with 4.6
On Jul 15, 2012, at 16:44 , Todd Hodgen wrote: IF, you are going to put this into production, I would not be messing with 4.6. It’s not released to production yet, and will surely have some issues to work out over the first few weeks. 4.4 is a proven, stable release that installs just fine, and will support what you need, unless you are in need of an ACD. On Jul 13, 2012, at 14:51 , Kurt Albershardt wrote: On Jul 13, 2012, at 14:24 , Douglas Hubler wrote: On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 4:07 PM, Kurt Albershardt k...@nv.net wrote: How do I configure ntp to be an unmanaged service in 4.4? what happened to you efforts on 4.6? It's almost released, why go thru the effort on 4.4? I'm working them in parallel, actually. Wanted to test out my appliance-building skills on 4.4 first, then start tinkering with 4.6 once I get the build process down. These log files seem to be packet captures from diagnostics packet capture on PFSense. I would recommend turning on debug on sipXecs, and get merged log file from sipXecs. It will give you the details you need to troubleshoot this. The log files are from one of the Snom 320s. ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
Re: [sipx-users] Snom 320 phones registering with 4.4 but not with 4.6
On Jul 15, 2012, at 17:06 , Tony Graziano wrote: Pfsense has a plugin for version 1.2.3 to hand out tftp. Version 2.x can hand out boot server natively. Thanks . 1.2.3 has been so little trouble for so long, but 2.x is on a CF card waiting for a day to deploy. I'm not a snom fan and don't have one hear to test with otherwise I could provide better guidance. I've used mostly Cisco and Polycom in the past. Polycom was my initial choice for this, but Snom kept getting good marks from people I know and trust so I figured I'd get my feet wet. If it was me, and its not, I would approach this differently: I would install sipx as a subdomain (I.e. uc.sipdomain.TLD). I would point the firewall DNS forwarder for both the host and subdomain to sipx and let sipx run its own DNS. That was actually where I was originally headed. Somehow I did not manage to read enough clear documentation indicating that DNS was completely under the control of sipx. I would not hard code the phones AT ALL. Check. ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
Re: [sipx-users] Snom 320 phones registering with 4.4 but not with 4.6
On Jul 15, 2012, at 17:12 , Tony Graziano wrote: I think the thing you are leaving out is the phone config generated by sipx can load a different DNS setting than what you intended, which is why I suggested this deployment option to avoid a conflicting configuration on the UA itself. OK, that helps. I'll take another a look at the Snom XML configs. When I diffed them on Friday I found only these differences: ntp_server perm=R/ntp_server ntp_server perm=Rpool.ntp.org/ntp_server user_pass idx=1 perm=R123456789012/user_passuser_pass idx=1 perm=R12355678/user_pass user_moh idx=1 perm=Rsip:~~mh~u...@sipx.murray-hotel.com/user_moh user_moh idx=1 perm=Rsip:~~mh~@sipx.murray-hotel.com/user_moh ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
Re: [sipx-users] NTP configured as unmanaged in 4.6
On Jul 13, 2012, at 19:53 , Tony Graziano wrote: ensure you have the repo pointed to the correct location and do an update to make sure you have the latest. Ran an update yesterday PM and got nothing new - has the repo location changed since On Jul 10, 2012, at 21:23 , Douglas Hubler wrote: NOTE: I've starting pushing to yet another directory http://download.sipfoundry.org/pub/sipXecs/4.6.0 So please update your /etc/yum.repos/sipxecs.repo accordingly. I updated wiki page. ? ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
Re: [sipx-users] NTP configured as unmanaged in 4.6
On Jul 14, 2012, at 11:22 , Kurt Albershardt wrote: On Jul 13, 2012, at 19:53 , Tony Graziano wrote: ensure you have the repo pointed to the correct location and do an update to make sure you have the latest. Ran an update yesterday PM and got nothing new - has the repo location changed since Jul 10 ? Just built a new system and did a clean install of 4.6 per the wiki. Running rpm -qa | grep | sort and diffing the outputs between the two systems showed them to be the same. Reconfiguring from scratch, will see what turns up. ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
[sipx-users] Snom 320 phones registering with 4.4 but not with 4.6
After building, destroying and re-building nearly 20 VMs over the past few days, I now am confident that I have a reproducible failure getting Snom 320 phones to register with 4.6: 4.4 procedure: Build VM with Centos 5 Assign both A and in-addr records for VM IP to sipx.murray-hotel.com host yum update reboot wget -P /etc/yum.repos.d/ http://download.sipfoundry.org/pub/sipXecs/sipxecs-4.4.0-centos.repo yum install sipxecs sipxecs-setup login to web config create 3 new phones using Snom 320 template create 3 new users (111,112,113) assign one line to each Snom 320 phone change timezone on each phone to USA-7 generate configs for all phones unplug/replug 3 phones Result: phones all register Phone log snippet: [5] 23/12/2001 17:00:21:Opening TCP socket on port 5060 [3] 23/12/2001 17:00:22:Invalid Date: 23.12.2001 Time: 17:00 [2] 14/7/2012 17:23:08:start_dst(1331431200) end_dst(1351994400) offset_dst(3600) offset_utc(-25200) [2] 14/7/2012 17:23:08:start DST: 03/11/2012 02:00:00 (1331431200) [2] 14/7/2012 17:23:08:end DST: 11/04/2012 02:00:00 (1351994400) [5] 14/7/2012 17:23:10:timeout::callback: Registering with timeout of 0 ms [5] 14/7/2012 17:23:10:sip::process_auth:Match challenge for user=111, realm=sipx.murray-hotel.com [2] 14/7/2012 17:23:10:Registered at registrar as 1...@sipx.murray-hotel.com (Expires: 1805 secs) [5] 14/7/2012 17:23:10:timeout::callback: Registering with timeout of 0 ms [5] 14/7/2012 17:23:10:sip::process_auth:Match challenge for user=111, realm=sipx.murray-hotel.com [5] 14/7/2012 17:23:20:Applying Settings... [5] 14/7/2012 17:23:20:Settings applied! 4.6 procedure: Build VM with Centos 6 Assign both A and in-addr records for VM IP to sipx.murray-hotel.com host yum update reboot wget -P /etc/yum.repos.d http://download.sipfoundry.org/pub/sipXecs/sipxecs-4.6.0-centos.repo yum install epel-release yum groupinstall sipxecs sipxecs-setup login to web config create 3 new phones using Snom 320 template create 3 new users (111,112,113) assign one line to each Snom 320 phone change timezone on each phone to USA-7 generate configs for all phones unplug/replug 3 phones Result: no phones register Phone log snippet: [5] 23/12/2001 17:00:22:Opening TCP socket on port 5060 [3] 23/12/2001 17:00:23:Invalid Date: 23.12.2001 Time: 17:00 [2] 14/7/2012 17:31:03:start_dst(1331431200) end_dst(1351994400) offset_dst(3600) offset_utc(-25200) [2] 14/7/2012 17:31:03:start DST: 03/11/2012 02:00:00 (1331431200) [2] 14/7/2012 17:31:03:end DST: 11/04/2012 02:00:00 (1351994400) [5] 14/7/2012 17:31:04:timeout::callback: Registering with timeout of 0 ms [5] 14/7/2012 17:31:04:Add dirty host: udp/192.168.44.30/5060 [5] 14/7/2012 17:31:04:timeout::callback: Registering with timeout of 0 ms [2] 14/7/2012 17:31:04:Transport Error: Pending packet 100: generating fake [2] 14/7/2012 17:31:04:Registrar 1...@sipx.murray-hotel.com timed out [5] 14/7/2012 17:31:15:Applying Settings... [5] 14/7/2012 17:31:15:Settings applied! [5] 14/7/2012 17:32:05:timeout::callback: Registering with timeout of 0 ms [5] 14/7/2012 17:32:05:Add dirty host: udp/192.168.44.30/5060 [5] 14/7/2012 17:32:05:timeout::callback: Registering with timeout of 0 ms [2] 14/7/2012 17:32:05:Transport Error: Pending packet 102: generating fake [2] 14/7/2012 17:32:05:Registrar 1...@sipx.murray-hotel.com timed out [5] 14/7/2012 17:33:06:timeout::callback: Registering with timeout of 0 ms [5] 14/7/2012 17:33:06:Add dirty host: udp/192.168.44.30/5060 [5] 14/7/2012 17:33:06:timeout::callback: Registering with timeout of 0 ms [2] 14/7/2012 17:33:06:Transport Error: Pending packet 104: generating fake [2] 14/7/2012 17:33:06:Registrar 1...@sipx.murray-hotel.com timed out ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
Re: [sipx-users] Snom 320 phones registering with 4.4 but not with 4.6
DNS on the sipx box? I've not done anything there, just in pfSense (which is authoritative for the zone.) When I query the local resolver with the name, I get 127.0.0.1 Both forward and reverse lookups are checked from a workstation before I try to register phones. The phones resolve the name in order to pull the config file. On Jul 14, 2012, at 18:01 , Tony Graziano wrote: Please verify the DNS zone is running. It sounds like DNS is not working. There is a known issue with DNS in regard to the build. If it is not running please change the zone serial number to MMDDXX save the zone and ensure named is running then try again. On Jul 14, 2012 7:51 PM, Kurt Albershardt k...@nv.net wrote: After building, destroying and re-building nearly 20 VMs over the past few days, I now am confident that I have a reproducible failure getting Snom 320 phones to register with 4.6: ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
Re: [sipx-users] Snom 320 phones registering with 4.4 but not with 4.6
Problems in resolv.conf (search domain is wrong, and it overwrote the nameserver): 4.4: [root@sipx ~]# cat /etc/resolv.conf search murray-hotel.com nameserver 192.168.44.1 [root@sipx ~]# 4.6: # cat /etc/resolv.conf # Generated by sipXecs search sipx.murray-hotel.com nameserver 127.0.0.1 [root@sipx ~]# manually edited resolv.conf in 4.6 to match 4.4 verified forward and reverse lookups from command line, but phones still don't register with 4.6: [5] 23/12/2001 17:00:22:Opening TCP socket on port 5060 [3] 23/12/2001 17:00:22:Invalid Date: 23.12.2001 Time: 17:00 [2] 14/7/2012 18:46:05:start_dst(1331431200) end_dst(1351994400) offset_dst(3600) offset_utc(-25200) [2] 14/7/2012 18:46:05:start DST: 03/11/2012 02:00:00 (1331431200) [2] 14/7/2012 18:46:05:end DST: 11/04/2012 02:00:00 (1351994400) [5] 14/7/2012 18:46:06:timeout::callback: Registering with timeout of 0 ms [5] 14/7/2012 18:46:06:Add dirty host: udp/192.168.44.30/5060 [5] 14/7/2012 18:46:06:timeout::callback: Registering with timeout of 0 ms [2] 14/7/2012 18:46:06:Transport Error: Pending packet 100: generating fake [2] 14/7/2012 18:46:06:Registrar 1...@sipx.murray-hotel.com timed out [5] 14/7/2012 18:46:16:Applying Settings... [5] 14/7/2012 18:46:17:Settings applied! [5] 14/7/2012 18:47:07:timeout::callback: Registering with timeout of 0 ms [5] 14/7/2012 18:47:07:Add dirty host: udp/192.168.44.30/5060 [5] 14/7/2012 18:47:07:timeout::callback: Registering with timeout of 0 ms [2] 14/7/2012 18:47:07:Transport Error: Pending packet 102: generating fake [2] 14/7/2012 18:47:07:Registrar 1...@sipx.murray-hotel.com timed out On Jul 14, 2012, at 18:36 , Kurt Albershardt wrote: DNS on the sipx box? I've not done anything there, just in pfSense (which is authoritative for the zone.) When I query the local resolver with the name, I get 127.0.0.1 Both forward and reverse lookups are checked from a workstation before I try to register phones. The phones resolve the name in order to pull the config file. On Jul 14, 2012, at 18:01 , Tony Graziano wrote: Please verify the DNS zone is running. It sounds like DNS is not working. There is a known issue with DNS in regard to the build. If it is not running please change the zone serial number to MMDDXX save the zone and ensure named is running then try again. On Jul 14, 2012 7:51 PM, Kurt Albershardt k...@nv.net wrote: After building, destroying and re-building nearly 20 VMs over the past few days, I now am confident that I have a reproducible failure getting Snom 320 phones to register with 4.6: ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/ ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
[sipx-users] NTP unmanaged service in 4.4
I'm finishing up an OpenVZ template for sipx 4.4 and wondering how I should best address the lack of ntpd in the OS: root@sipx ~]# sipxecs-setup Executing: /sbin/service sipxecs start error reading information on service ntpd: No such file or directory ntpd: unrecognized service ntpd: unrecognized service Checking bootstrap setup: [ OK ] Checking TLS/SSL configuration:[ OK ] Checking Per-process file descriptor limits: [ OK ] Checking rpm configuration file updates: [ OK ] Checking SELinux is not enforcing: [ OK ] Checking Apache configuration: [ OK ] Checking hostname is fully qualified: [ OK ] Checking localhost address configured: [ OK ] Checking localhost name is not shared: [ OK ] Checking /tmp directory has correct permissions: [ OK ] Starting sipXpbx: Starting sipxsupervisor: [ OK ] Starting httpd:[ OK ] [root@sipx ~]# Everything appears to be working in the GUI, with the exception of the Date and Time menu item, which produces the familiar An internal error has occurred. Click here https://sipx.domain.com:8443/sipxconfig/restart.svc to continue. page. thanks~ ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
[sipx-users] Date and Time menu issue in 4.4
On Jul 13, 2012, at 9:55 , Kurt Albershardt wrote: Everything appears to be working in the GUI, with the exception of the Date and Time menu item, which produces the familiar An internal error has occurred. Click here https://sipx.domain.com:8443/sipxconfig/restart.svc to continue. Installing ntp and rebooting the server did not change this behavior. All of my phones (which I did finally manage to get registered) have USA-5 timezone set, and while I can manually update them I suspect that menu might allow me to set a system timezone? ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
Re: [sipx-users] NTP unmanaged service in 4.4
On Jul 13, 2012, at 12:32 , Gerald Drouillard wrote: older versions of ubuntu have the ntp.conf file in /var/lib/ntp/ntp.conf.dhcp, you may want to delete that one and use the one in /etc This is a Centos 5 install, but it will not run ntpd because the system is in an OpenVZ container: [root@sipx ~]# /etc/init.d/ntpd start Starting ntpd: [ OK ] [root@sipx ~]# /etc/init.d/ntpd status ntpd dead but pid file exists [root@sipx ~]# Which brings me back to my original question: How do I configure ntp to be an unmanaged service in 4.4? If this is not possible in the standard config, does anyone have suggestions for a work-around I can implement? Once I have this, I can release my OpenVZ appliance for testing. ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
[sipx-users] sipXbridge in 4.4
http://wiki.sipfoundry.org/display/sipXecs/SIP+Trunking does not seem to describe the 4.4 user experience. I an option found under Devices/Gateways to add a new gateway called SIP trunk which has an option to Use built-in SIP Trunk SBC Is this the method of managing sipXbridge in 4.4? --thanks ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
Re: [sipx-users] NTP unmanaged service in 4.4
On Jul 13, 2012, at 14:24 , Douglas Hubler wrote: On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 4:07 PM, Kurt Albershardt k...@nv.net wrote: How do I configure ntp to be an unmanaged service in 4.4? what happened to you efforts on 4.6? It's almost released, why go thru the effort on 4.4? I'm working them in parallel, actually. Wanted to test out my appliance-building skills on 4.4 first, then start tinkering with 4.6 once I get the build process down. ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
Re: [sipx-users] NTP unmanaged service in 4.4
On Jul 13, 2012, at 16:29 , Tony Graziano wrote: There is no built-in way to configure ntp as unmanaged service built-into sipxconfig in 4.4, which is why it was added to 4.6. The sipxecs startup script actually checks to see if it is running and may not likely play well if it is not. Gotcha - thanks. If I were you, and I'm not, I'd stick with 4.6 if you are insistent on using OpenVZ. Point taken - will keep updating and see how it goes. ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
Re: [sipx-users] NTP configured as unmanaged in 4.6
On Jul 11, 2012, at 9:09 , Kurt Albershardt wrote: On Jul 10, 2012, at 21:23 , Douglas Hubler wrote: On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 10:26 PM, Douglas Hubler dhub...@ezuce.com wrote: On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 9:47 PM, Kurt Albershardt k...@nv.net wrote: Choosing the Date/Time menu produced An internal error has occurred. Click here https://sipx.domain.com/sipxconfig/restart.svc to continue. I could reproduce this, i created http://track.sipfoundry.org/browse/XX-10262 I'll take a look I pushed a fix for centos 64 bit, page renders, but page still has some issues. You should be able to get to unmanaged setting though. Check - worked as expected here. Two days ago, but fails again today. Perhaps choosing 'unmanaged service' did something? ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
Re: [sipx-users] NTP configured as unmanaged in 4.6
On Jul 10, 2012, at 21:23 , Douglas Hubler wrote: On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 10:26 PM, Douglas Hubler dhub...@ezuce.com wrote: On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 9:47 PM, Kurt Albershardt k...@nv.net wrote: Choosing the Date/Time menu produced An internal error has occurred. Click here https://sipx.domain.com/sipxconfig/restart.svc to continue. I could reproduce this, i created http://track.sipfoundry.org/browse/XX-10262 I'll take a look I pushed a fix for centos 64 bit, page renders, but page still has some issues. You should be able to get to unmanaged setting though. Check - worked as expected here. Thanks~ ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
Re: [sipx-users] Snom 320 phones not pulling configs
On Jul 11, 2012, at 3:08 , Michael Picher wrote: And you poured over the snom info in the wiki? Yes - just fumblefingered the URL. On Jul 11, 2012, at 3:33 , Douglas Hubler wrote: Local file /var/sipxdata/configserver/phone/profile/... Thanks for the pointer - they are there: [root@sipx ~]# ls -l /var/sipxdata/configserver/phone/profile/docroot/ total 168 -rw-r--r-- 1 sipx sipx 51932 Jul 10 17:51 00041338400C.xml -rw-r--r-- 1 sipx sipx 51932 Jul 10 17:51 000413384285.xml -rw-r--r-- 1 sipx sipx 51932 Jul 10 17:51 0004133842E0.xml Try http://your-fqdn/phone/profile/... Works (on both port 80 and 8090) - somehow I doubled that d with one of my copy-and-paste operations. DHCP is not enabled by default, but even if you enabled it, I'm not sure if adds the correct option header to support snom. Good to know - I'm still wrapping my head around what should best be handled outside sipx and what it really wants to own. For this particular setup, there are so few IP phones it's easy enough to preconfigure them one by one over HTTP. ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
Re: [sipx-users] Changing phone MAC addresses (was: Snom 320 phones not pulling configs)
On Jul 11, 2012, at 9:31 , Kurt Albershardt wrote: [root@sipx ~]# ls -l /var/sipxdata/configserver/phone/profile/docroot/ total 168 -rw-r--r-- 1 sipx sipx 51932 Jul 10 17:51 00041338400C.xml -rw-r--r-- 1 sipx sipx 51932 Jul 10 17:51 000413384285.xml -rw-r--r-- 1 sipx sipx 51932 Jul 10 17:51 0004133842E0.xml As it turns out, I mis-read a B as an 8 when entering the MAC of the second phone above. Went into 'Phones in the GUI and changed the MAC to the correct 0004133842b5, then hit OK and Send Profiles Saw You are about to generate new configuration profiles for 1 device. Press OK to proceed. then 1 profile will be generated. Go to Job Status page to monitor operation progress. Job Status says: Projection for: 0004133842b5 7/11/12 3:31 PM 7/11/12 3:31 PM Failed Invocation of method 'getValue' in class org.sipfoundry.sipxconfig.setting.ConditionalSettingImpl threw exception java.lang.NullPointerException @ snom/snom.vm[17,63] Restarting: 0004133842b5 7/11/12 3:31 PM 7/11/12 3:31 PM Failed Timed out waiting for response I've manually renamed the file to the correct MAC for now, but something seems amiss with regard to changing MACs in the GUI. ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
Re: [sipx-users] Changing phone MAC addresses (was: Snom 320 phones not pulling configs)
On Jul 11, 2012, at 9:40 , Kurt Albershardt wrote: As it turns out, I mis-read a B as an 8 when entering the MAC of the second phone above. Went into 'Phones in the GUI and changed the MAC to the correct 0004133842b5, then hit OK and Send Profiles Saw You are about to generate new configuration profiles for 1 device. Press OK to proceed. then 1 profile will be generated. Go to Job Status page to monitor operation progress. Job Status says: Projection for: 0004133842b5 7/11/12 3:31 PM 7/11/12 3:31 PM Failed Invocation of method 'getValue' in class org.sipfoundry.sipxconfig.setting.ConditionalSettingImpl threw exception java.lang.NullPointerException @ snom/snom.vm[17,63] Restarting: 0004133842b5 7/11/12 3:31 PM 7/11/12 3:31 PM Failed Timed out waiting for response Left out the directory listing (after this and before I renamed the config file): root@sipx docroot]# ls -l total 168 -rw-r--r-- 1 sipx sipx 51932 Jul 10 17:51 00041338400C.xml -rw-r--r-- 1 sipx sipx 51932 Jul 10 17:51 000413384285.xml -rw-r--r-- 1 sipx sipx 0 Jul 11 09:37 0004133842B5.xml -rw-r--r-- 1 sipx sipx 51932 Jul 10 17:51 0004133842E0.xml ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
[sipx-users] Snom 320 phones not registering with 4.6
All three phones have pulled configs now, but none has successfully registered. Displays show NR at the top and the web interfaces show: Identity 1 Status: 1...@sipx.domain.com: Network Failure I can ping all three phones from the sipx server command line. Don't see a ping tool in the phone web UI, but they do pull configs from the same host, and do so on reboots now. Not sure where registration attempts get logged, but grepping for parts for the MAC address in /var/log/sipxpbx/* yields nothing. ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
[sipx-users] 4.6 webUI glitches
On Jul 10, 2012, at 19:47 , Kurt Albershardt wrote: Choosing the Date/Time menu produced An internal error has occurred. Click here https://sipx.domain.com/sipxconfig/restart.svc to continue. Got the same error page when choosing Basic Network from the lefthand side of a phone device page. No problem with any other items on the lefthand side of that page. Same behavior on other phone pages. Running sipxconfig-4.6.0-72.g5c7e4.x86_64 (is this the correct package to cite?) ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
Re: [sipx-users] Snom 320 phones not registering with 4.6
On Jul 11, 2012, at 9:55 , Kurt Albershardt wrote: they do pull configs from the same host, and do so on reboots now. Correction here - rebooting either from the webUI or by unplugging and replugging the PoE causes the phones to hang on DHCP requests. If I 'cancel out of that, I get a Provisioning Server Failed. Only by resetting the config and re-entering the provisioning URL in the phone's webUI can I get them to restart. I'm suspicious that something in that config might be borking the network settings. I've attached the config file. Here's the info form the phone webUI: System Information: Phone Type: snom320-SIP MAC-Address:00041338400C IP-Address: 192.168.44.180 Firmware-Version: snom320-SIP 7.3.30 6059 Firmware-URL: Production Information: Mac:00041338400C;Version:Standard;Hardware:snom320 (H: R5B);Date:14/11/11;Copyright(C) snom technology AG Uptime: 0 days, 15 hours, 2 minutes Memfree:3076 K Bootloader-Version: 1.1.3-u SIP Identity Status: Identity 1 Status: 1...@sipx.murray-hotel.com: Network Failure Identity 2 Status: Identity 3 Status: Identity 4 Status: Identity 5 Status: Identity 6 Status: Identity 7 Status: Identity 8 Status: Identity 9 Status: Identity 10 Status: Identity 11 Status: Identity 12 Status: Ethernet Status: Net Port: Connection Type: 100 Mbit Full Duplex Status: connected PC Port:Connection Type: Status: not connected 00041338400C.xml Description: XML document ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
Re: [sipx-users] Snom 320 phones not registering with 4.6
On Jul 11, 2012, at 10:28 , Kurt Albershardt wrote: Firmware-Version: snom320-SIP 7.3.30 6059 Updating to firmware 8.7.3.7 does not fix this, but does seem to indicate a problem with the generated config: Clear settings from phone menu after DHCP fails, triggers reboot. Unplug replug PoE to force a real restart. Grabs DHCP address and config, then display says New network policy - Reboot at which point phone restarts and hangs on Sending DHCP requests as with previous firmware. BTW, no VLANs have been configured yet - everything is in the default switch VLAN. ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
Re: [sipx-users] Changing phone MAC addresses
OK, will do. If this is the case, then might I suggest making the MAC field non-editable once the record is created? This would force a delete and re-create. On Jul 11, 2012, at 13:19 , Tony Graziano wrote: the system will project the config file with the mac address that was configured. Don't manipulate the file name. Delete the phone and create it with the proper mac address and project the file or you will never get updates. On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 11:47 AM, Kurt Albershardt k...@nv.net wrote: On Jul 11, 2012, at 9:40 , Kurt Albershardt wrote: As it turns out, I mis-read a B as an 8 when entering the MAC of the second phone above. Went into 'Phones in the GUI and changed the MAC to the correct 0004133842b5, then hit OK and Send Profiles Saw You are about to generate new configuration profiles for 1 device. Press OK to proceed. then 1 profile will be generated. Go to Job Status page to monitor operation progress. Job Status says: Projection for: 0004133842b5 7/11/12 3:31 PM 7/11/12 3:31 PM Failed Invocation of method 'getValue' in class org.sipfoundry.sipxconfig.setting.ConditionalSettingImpl threw exception java.lang.NullPointerException @ snom/snom.vm[17,63] Restarting: 0004133842b5 7/11/12 3:31 PM 7/11/12 3:31 PM Failed Timed out waiting for response Left out the directory listing (after this and before I renamed the config file): root@sipx docroot]# ls -l total 168 -rw-r--r-- 1 sipx sipx 51932 Jul 10 17:51 00041338400C.xml -rw-r--r-- 1 sipx sipx 51932 Jul 10 17:51 000413384285.xml -rw-r--r-- 1 sipx sipx 0 Jul 11 09:37 0004133842B5.xml -rw-r--r-- 1 sipx sipx 51932 Jul 10 17:51 0004133842E0.xml ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
Re: [sipx-users] Changing phone MAC addresses
On Jul 11, 2012, at 13:31 , Tony Graziano wrote: BTW - If the line is not registered, DO NOT check the box to restart it. It can't send a restart to a phone thats not registered. That's not a flaw its just how it should work. (Hey, that phone didnt restart. Hey, why isn't it registered. Check. Generating a new config still doesn't want to work. I deleted the phone and verified that it removed the file from disk: [root@sipx ~]# ls -l /var/sipxdata/configserver/phone/profile/docroot/ total 112 -rw-r--r-- 1 sipx sipx 51932 Jul 10 17:51 00041338400C.xml -rw-r--r-- 1 sipx sipx 51932 Jul 10 17:51 0004133842E0.xml then re-added using the correct MAC and generated (without sending) and got: Projection for: 0004133842b5 7/11/12 1:42 PM 7/11/12 1:42 PM Failed Invocation of method 'getValue' in class org.sipfoundry.sipxconfig.setting.ConditionalSettingImpl threw exception java.lang.NullPointerException @ snom/snom.vm[17,63] so: [root@sipx ~]# ls -l /var/sipxdata/configserver/phone/profile/docroot/ total 112 -rw-r--r-- 1 sipx sipx 51932 Jul 10 17:51 00041338400C.xml -rw-r--r-- 1 sipx sipx 0 Jul 11 13:42 0004133842B5.xml -rw-r--r-- 1 sipx sipx 51932 Jul 10 17:51 0004133842E0.xml ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
Re: [sipx-users] Even fresher install of 4.6
As usual, I did the system update first: Built another Centos 6 VM from scratch this afternoon: Allocated 3 CPUs and 4GB of RAM to the VM ran 'yum update' and restarted VM. Completed 4.6 install per wiki. Still trying to understand how a leap second issue might affect a system installed, updated, and restarted _after_ July 1st? On Jul 10, 2012, at 1:48 , Michael Picher wrote: You should always do a yum update to make sure the OS is up to date before a sipXecs install (if installing from RPM) or directly after install if installing from ISO. Also, fyi and just so folks remember, the ISO is not re-created with every build of the code, only when there is a release that the development team feels it's necessary. So a 'yum update' is very critical for ISO installs. Mike On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 12:15 AM, Kurt Albershardt k...@nv.net wrote: On Jul 9, 2012, at 18:52 , Tony Graziano wrote: I did the same install over the weekend without these kind of issues. Centos 6.2 minimal install. Set network info Yum install epel-release Yum update Reboot Yum groupinstall sipxecs I did use a vmware environment though. SINCE this is a Linux host, I think maybe you need a leap second fix for your kernel. Really, I think that's the problem. Waiting won't help. I didn't realize that a system built after July 1st and running ntp would have leap second vulnerabilities. I have experience with precision time broadcast television in the early 1980s and then a decade of working with SONET. Guess I don't understand some of the subtleties the *nix kernel brings to the table here. Could this be some kind of issue between clocks on the VM host and the child VM? ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/ -- Michael Picher, Director of Technical Services eZuce, Inc. 300 Brickstone Square Suite 201 Andover, MA. 01810 O.978-296-1005 X2015 M.207-956-0262 @mpicher http://twitter.com/mpicher linkedin www.ezuce.com There are 10 kinds of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't. ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/ ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
Re: [sipx-users] Leap Seconds (was: Even fresher install of 4.6)
On Jul 10, 2012, at 7:37 , George Niculae wrote: On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 4:34 PM, Kurt Albershardt k...@nv.net wrote: Still trying to understand how a leap second issue might affect a system installed, updated, and restarted _after_ July 1st? Was the VM created before July 1st? I think run into something similar when I reverted a snapshot / re installed 4.6.0. Check if ntpd up and running and time in sync VM created July 10th using an OpenVZ template (definitely created earlier.) System updated and restarted July 10th. The VM host (Proxmox) was created in April and has not been restarted recently. ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
Re: [sipx-users] Leap Seconds (was: Even fresher install of 4.6)
On Jul 9, 2012, at 18:52 , Tony Graziano wrote: SINCE this is a Linux host, I think maybe you need a leap second fix for your kernel. Really, I think that's the problem. Waiting won't help. There do seem to be a number of reports of Java processes hanging. https://lwn.net/Articles/504658/ has a good discussion. ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
Re: [sipx-users] Leap Seconds (was: Even fresher install of 4.6)
On Jul 10, 2012, at 8:18 , Tony Graziano wrote: Oh ye of little faith. http://forum.proxmox.com/threads/10165-problem-with-ntpd-(leap-second-day-bug) Re: problem with ntpd (leap second day bug) Originally Posted by hamed There seems be to a bug with ntpd service because of the leap second day. http://serverfault.com/questions/403732/anyone-else-experiencing-high-rates-of-linux-server-crashes-during-a-leap-second One of my nodes is affected by this bug. The above link suggested that we stop ntpd service for now. Does stopping ntpd service cause any issues for proxmox? Thanks No problems here but reports have stated that RHEL6 have had some issues regarding the leap second. Those reports also state that the following command sequence should solve the problem: date ; sudo date -s date -u ; date This may indeed be an issue between the VM host and the VM. I got to thinking about NTP architecture in a VM environment last night - wondering why run NTP on each individual VM when the host is providing the 'hardware clock' the VMs use. From http://forum.proxmox.com/threads/986-NTP-and-proxmox (by one of the Proxmox team): you do not need a ntp server in a container (and its not possible) - time comes from the host. The 'not possible' part concerns me a bit so I'm going to ask for more info. ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
Re: [sipx-users] Leap Seconds (was: Even fresher install of 4.6)
On Jul 10, 2012, at 8:29 , Kurt Albershardt wrote: There seems be to a bug with ntpd service because of the leap second day. http://serverfault.com/questions/403732/anyone-else-experiencing-high-rates-of-linux-server-crashes-during-a-leap-second This may indeed be an issue between the VM host and the VM. I got to thinking about NTP architecture in a VM environment last night - wondering why run NTP on each individual VM when the host is providing the 'hardware clock' the VMs use. From http://forum.proxmox.com/threads/986-NTP-and-proxmox (by one of the Proxmox team): you do not need a ntp server in a container (and its not possible) - time comes from the host. The 'not possible' part concerns me a bit so I'm going to ask for more info. Rebooting the host cleared the deadlock -- CPU usage is now minimal at rest. Turns out that OpenVZ (by design) prevents client VMs from changing system time. Their position is to enable this on one container only and not to run NTP on the host http://download.swsoft.com/virtuozzo/virtuozzo4.0/docs/en/lin/VzLinuxUG/330.htm explains the OpenVZ BUT Proxmox runs NTP on the host by default. SO Rebooting and allowing NTP to update the VM actually did nothing, since the CT was running on host time, which had not been rebooted. I can disable NTP on the CT, but if sipxecs (at least in the groupinstall) has a dependency on ntp, I'd prefer to configure around it so I don't get overwritten on a future update. Preferred method? --thanks ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
Re: [sipx-users] sipx on OpenVZ/Proxmox
I'm hoping to put together something just like that, which should apply to OpenVZ in general. Eventually, I'd like to see a sipxecs appliance available which I suspect has the potential to drive a LOT of adoption. The low overhead of OpenVZ (and template virtualization in general) is a good fit with VoIP. Now prepare for some newbie questions as I get the system actually running... On Jul 10, 2012, at 19:24 , Tony Graziano wrote: Maybe a brief wiki page on the dos and dont's with proxmox and state your user and media server load so people have the proper expectations if they try this also. On Jul 10, 2012 4:56 PM, Kurt Albershardt k...@nv.net wrote: On Jul 10, 2012, at 19:17 , Jeff Gilmore wrote: Kurt, I'm glad you got things working finally! I'm interested in the results of your testing, as I too use Proxmox for other servers and would love to host my modest 25 user Sipx there as well. If you would share your experiences that would be appreciated. Jeff Gilmore ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
Re: [sipx-users] Leap Seconds (was: Even fresher install of 4.6)
On Jul 10, 2012, at 15:29 , Douglas Hubler wrote: I can disable NTP on the CT, but if sipxecs (at least in the groupinstall) has a dependency on ntp, I'd prefer to configure around it so I don't get overwritten on a future update. Preferred method In ntp settings there's an option for unmanaged just for this case Choosing the Date/Time menu produced An internal error has occurred. Click here https://sipx.domain.com/sipxconfig/restart.svc to continue. ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
[sipx-users] Snom 320 phones not pulling configs
Plugged in three Snom 320 phones after configuring MAC addresses and extensions in sipx 4.6 sipx is not handling DHCP, so I entered the config URL via each phone's HTTP interface. Phones reboot, but no config gets loaded. When I do a wget on http://sipx.domain.com:8090/phone/profile/ddocroot/0004133842e0.xml I get a 404 Web UI shows MAC as 0004133842E0 so I tried http://sipx.domain.com:8090/phone/profile/ddocroot/0004133842E0.xml just in case, but same result. I presume these profiles are stored in the db and not in the filesystem. Where to look next? --thanks ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
Re: [sipx-users] Source code repository
+1 for that option from me. So much better to manage paths and routing at the application layer than to trust that BGP got it right. On Jul 9, 2012, at 7:23 , Matt White wrote: It would also be great if sixbridge and proxy can be assigned specfic listen IP'sthen they could live on a multi-homes server. ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
Re: [sipx-users] Fresh install of 4.6
Allocated 2 gbytes RAM and 4 gbytes of swap to the VM. Was using 32% of memory yesterday. Left it running all night and it's at 40% according to Proxmox. Top is still looking about the same: PID USERPR NI VIRTRES SHR S %CPU%MEM TIME+ COMMAND 1666 sipx 20 0 2505m 611m 13m S 230.4 29.9 2184:51 java On Jul 8, 2012, at 19:44 , Tony Graziano wrote: How much ram did you allot? On Jul 8, 2012 6:16 PM, Kurt Albershardt k...@nv.net wrote: On Jul 8, 2012, at 16:12 , Kurt Albershardt wrote: after a restart Java is munching ~95-99% of all available CPUs again. FYI -- I allocated another proc to the VM, and CPU jumped from 197% (2 CPUs) to 231% (3 CPUs.) ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
Re: [sipx-users] Fresh install of 4.6
No swap in use at all -- not much RAM either, just CPU. On Jul 9, 2012, at 9:46 , Tony Graziano wrote: realize with RAM, once you start using swap performance degrades quite a bit. So SWAP might be affecting the CPU issue in an adverse way. Are you using any swap? Ideally you should have enough ram to prevent using swap. On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 11:13 AM, Kurt Albershardt k...@nv.net wrote: Allocated 2 gbytes RAM and 4 gbytes of swap to the VM. Was using 32% of memory yesterday. Left it running all night and it's at 40% according to Proxmox. Top is still looking about the same: PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND 1666 sipx 20 0 2505m 611m 13m S 230.4 29.9 2184:51 java On Jul 8, 2012, at 19:44 , Tony Graziano wrote: How much ram did you allot? On Jul 8, 2012 6:16 PM, Kurt Albershardt k...@nv.net wrote: On Jul 8, 2012, at 16:12 , Kurt Albershardt wrote: after a restart Java is munching ~95-99% of all available CPUs again. FYI -- I allocated another proc to the VM, and CPU jumped from 197% (2 CPUs) to 231% (3 CPUs.) ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
Re: [sipx-users] Fresh install of 4.6
On Jul 9, 2012, at 9:43 , Douglas Hubler wrote: PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND 1666 sipx 20 0 2505m 611m 13m S 230.4 29.9 2184:51 java Can you find out what application 1666 is? ps aux -ww | grep 1666 [root@sipx ~]# ps aux -ww | grep 1666 sipx 1666 212 29.8 2566044 626408 ? Ssl Jul08 2576:06 /usr/bin/java -Dcom.ibm.tools.attach.enable=no -Dprocname=sipxconfig -XX:MaxPermSize=128M -Xmx1024m -Djava.io.tmpdir=/var/sipxdata/tmp -Djetty.lib.dir=/usr/share/java/sipXecs/sipXconfig -Djetty.conf.dir=/etc/sipxpbx -Djetty.log.dir=/var/log/sipxpbx -Dorg.apache.lucene.lockdir=/var/sipxdata/tmp/index -Dorg.apache.commons.loging.Log=org.apache.commons.logging.impl.Log4JLogger -Djava.awt.headless=true org.mortbay.jetty.Server /etc/sipxpbx/sipxconfig-jetty.xml root 16294 0.0 0.0 103228 844 pts/0R+ 12:15 0:00 grep 1666 ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
Re: [sipx-users] Fresh install of 4.6
Did that, RAM usage stays the same -- just represents a lower percentage of the system: 1666 sipx 20 0 2505m 611m 13m S 225.7 14.9 2581:37 java On Jul 9, 2012, at 9:41 , Michael Picher wrote: try giving the box 4 GB of RAM... On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 11:13 AM, Kurt Albershardt k...@nv.net wrote: Allocated 2 gbytes RAM and 4 gbytes of swap to the VM. Was using 32% of memory yesterday. Left it running all night and it's at 40% according to Proxmox. Top is still looking about the same: PID USERPR NI VIRTRES SHR S %CPU%MEM TIME+ COMMAND 1666 sipx 20 0 2505m 611m 13m S 230.4 29.9 2184:51 java ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
Re: [sipx-users] Fresh install of 4.6
On Jul 9, 2012, at 12:30 , Douglas Hubler wrote: Please run tail -f /var/log/sipxpbx/sipxconfig.log If the log keep growing and growing Nothing has been appended to that file since yesterday - output matches what I sent then: [root@sipx ~]# tail -f /var/log/sipxpbx/sipxconfig.log 2012-07-08T18:47:53.996000Z:1:JAVA:INFO:sipx.murray-hotel.com:main::DynamicSessionFactoryBean:Building new Hibernate SessionFactory 2012-07-08T18:48:03.429000Z:2:JAVA:INFO:sipx.murray-hotel.com:main::SetupManagerImpl:1 setup listeners will be called again 2012-07-08T18:48:03.439000Z:3:JAVA:INFO:sipx.murray-hotel.com:main::SetupManagerImpl:0 setup listeners will be called again 2012-07-08T18:48:03.44Z:4:JAVA:INFO:sipx.murray-hotel.com:main::ConfigManagerImpl:Configuration work to do. Notifying providers. 2012-07-08T18:58:53.625000Z:8:JAVA:INFO:sipx.murray-hotel.com:Shutdown::DynamicSessionFactoryBean:Closing Hibernate SessionFactory 2012-07-08T22:04:21.377000Z:1:JAVA:INFO:sipx.murray-hotel.com:main::DynamicSessionFactoryBean:Building new Hibernate SessionFactory 2012-07-08T22:04:27.946000Z:2:JAVA:INFO:sipx.murray-hotel.com:main::SetupManagerImpl:1 setup listeners will be called again 2012-07-08T22:04:27.947000Z:3:JAVA:INFO:sipx.murray-hotel.com:main::SetupManagerImpl:0 setup listeners will be called again 2012-07-08T22:04:44.626000Z:4:JAVA:INFO:sipx.murray-hotel.com:Replication worker thread::ConfigManagerImpl:Configuration work to do. Notifying providers. 2012-07-08T22:04:46.478000Z:5:JAVA:INFO:sipx.murray-hotel.com:Replication worker thread::AgentRunner:Starting agent run /usr/bin/sipxagent --host 127.0.0.1 ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
[sipx-users] Even fresher install of 4.6
Built another Centos 6 VM from scratch this afternoon: Allocated 3 CPUs and 4GB of RAM to the VM ran 'yum update' and restarted VM. Competed 4.6 install per wiki. ran sipxecs-setup, answered questions, got: Configuring system, this may take a few minutes... then for the next ~50 minutes, memory usage on the VM stayed at 2.76GB and CPU at 52-53% (of 3 CPUs.) then memory jumped to 3.99GB, java restarted several times with lower CPU and RAM numbers. after about 5 minutes, sipxecs-setup ended with the expected: done. Now I see a similar java CPU load as the previous VM install had: 5084 sipx 20 0 3014m 546m 13m S 227.0 13.3 9:07.83 java [root@sipx ~]# ps aux -ww | grep 5084 sipx 5084 211 13.3 3086832 559556 ? Ssl 17:41 11:44 /usr/bin/java -Dcom.ibm.tools.attach.enable=no -Dprocname=sipxconfig -XX:MaxPermSize=128M -Xmx1024m -Djava.io.tmpdir=/var/sipxdata/tmp -Djetty.lib.dir=/usr/share/java/sipXecs/sipXconfig -Djetty.conf.dir=/etc/sipxpbx -Djetty.log.dir=/var/log/sipxpbx -Dorg.apache.lucene.lockdir=/var/sipxdata/tmp/index -Dorg.apache.commons.loging.Log=org.apache.commons.logging.impl.Log4JLogger -Djava.awt.headless=true org.mortbay.jetty.Server /etc/sipxpbx/sipxconfig-jetty.xml root 6142 0.0 0.0 103240 864 pts/0S+ 17:47 0:00 grep 5084 [root@sipx ~]# Note that I have not connected to the machine via HTTP yet - no config has even begun. I'm going to let this one cook overnight as well... ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
Re: [sipx-users] Even fresher install of 4.6
On Jul 9, 2012, at 18:52 , Tony Graziano wrote: I did the same install over the weekend without these kind of issues. Centos 6.2 minimal install. Set network info Yum install epel-release Yum update Reboot Yum groupinstall sipxecs I did use a vmware environment though. SINCE this is a Linux host, I think maybe you need a leap second fix for your kernel. Really, I think that's the problem. Waiting won't help. I didn't realize that a system built after July 1st and running ntp would have leap second vulnerabilities. I have experience with precision time broadcast television in the early 1980s and then a decade of working with SONET. Guess I don't understand some of the subtleties the *nix kernel brings to the table here. Could this be some kind of issue between clocks on the VM host and the child VM? ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
Re: [sipx-users] Setup issues with 0.0.4.5.2
Thanks - I'll wipe it and start over! On Jul 7, 2012, at 19:02 , Douglas Hubler wrote: Here are the instructions for installing 4.6.0 (non-production release) http://wiki.sipfoundry.org/display/sipXecs/Installing+4.6.0 I should delete the 0.0.4.5.2 binaries just to remove confusion On Sat, Jul 7, 2012 at 8:52 PM, Tony Graziano tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net wrote: I think its fixed in the 4.6 in the staging area but 4.6 needs some cleanup still... On Jul 7, 2012 6:23 PM, Kurt Albershardt k...@nv.net wrote: Is there a dependency on mysql that's not being met by 'yum groupinstall sipxecs' ? The only mysql package I show is: mysql-libs-5.1.61-1.el6_2.1.x86_64 On Jul 7, 2012, at 16:03 , Kurt Albershardt wrote: Just ran sipxecs-setup on a fresh install of 0.0.4.5.2 and answered the basic questions. As expected, got: Configuring system, this may take a few minutes... After ~15 minutes, the java process owned by user sipx is _still_ using ~130% CPU. Wait for awhile, then see: error reading information on service mysqld: No such file or directory error reading information on service mysqld: No such file or directory error reading information on service mysqld: No such file or directory error reading information on service mysqld: No such file or directory error reading information on service mysqld: No such file or directory error reading information on service mysqld: No such file or directory done. [root@sipx ~]# in the original window. Suggestions? --thanks ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/ LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems Helpdesk: Telephone: 434.984.8426 sip: helpd...@voice.myitdepartment.net Helpdesk Customers: http://myhelp.myitdepartment.net Blog: http://blog.myitdepartment.net ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/ ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/ ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
