Re: [SLUG] Case Study Speaker

2002-12-16 Thread Bruce Badger
Robert Collins wrote:


On Mon, 2002-12-16 at 18:06, Bruce Badger wrote:
 

Does anyone know of an open source system deployment within Australia, 
that would be a potential source of a speaker?

The ideal would be finding someone who was on a project from evaluation 
through to deployment who could tell the tale.  It would be even better 
if it were a happy tale.

Any ideas?
   


Depends on what 'system' you are looking for a speaker on. I could
certainly put toghether a presentation on squid-in-a-commercial-setting.
A probably a few different things (ie samba, mail-servers, IDS, mysql,
...) , if I put my mind to it.

Could you be a little more specific on what you are trying to achieve
with the presentation? (i.e. 'show my peers that it is possible for a
business to take a thought out, risk-managing approach to a project, and
still end up with an open-source tool/environment/package as part of the
projects solution').


The ideal would be a speaker from some rather conservative type company 
(e.g. bank, insurance company).  An employee who was there while a 
project happened, but who could not be accused of being an evangelist, 
or a vendor with a vested interest.  It would be good, though, if the 
speaker knows how to give an interesting presentation :-)

Stories like:

"How we replaced all our web-edge system with OSS"
"What benefits we saw in moving to a standards + OSS based mail solution"

would be good.

Does this help, Rob?

Thanks,
   Bruce


--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug


Re: [SLUG] Case Study Speaker

2002-12-16 Thread Robert Collins
On Mon, 2002-12-16 at 19:30, Bruce Badger wrote:
> Robert Collins wrote:
> >Could you be a little more specific on what you are trying to achieve
> >with the presentation? (i.e. 'show my peers that it is possible for a
> >business to take a thought out, risk-managing approach to a project, and
> >still end up with an open-source tool/environment/package as part of the
> >projects solution').
> >
> The ideal would be a speaker from some rather conservative type company 
> (e.g. bank, insurance company).

Ah. I know a few of those :}. I'm not sure if I know someone who is not
an evangelist, and saw such a project go ahead though.

> An employee who was there while a 
> project happened, but who could not be accused of being an evangelist, 
> or a vendor with a vested interest.  It would be good, though, if the 
> speaker knows how to give an interesting presentation :-)

Rules me out :[. It'd be very easy to accuse me of evangelical behaviour
:}.

> Stories like:
> 
> "How we replaced all our web-edge system with OSS"
> "What benefits we saw in moving to a standards + OSS based mail solution"
> 
> would be good.
> 
> Does this help, Rob?

Yep :}. Hopefully someone on the list will meet both requirements :}
(not evangelist, has seen such projects happen).

Rob



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


[SLUG] prism2.5 pci wireless

2002-12-16 Thread Adam Hewitt
Hi All,

I have installed wireless cards in two of my servers and have them working 
with the orinoco_pci drivers with the 2.4.19 kernel. The problem is that I 
am getting the "Error -110 writing Tx descriptor to BAP" error, which from 
what I have read is caused by the orinoco drivers not working properly.

This is ok, and I have read that the linux-wlan-ng drivers are better 
anyways, so I am attempting to get these working. I have installed the 
debian package, however from what I can see I still need to download the 
kernel source and compile the drivers with the linux-wlan-ng source?? Am I 
missing something?? I don't understand the point of the debian package if 
have to compile from source anyways?

Any hints or directions would be greatly appreciated.

Adam.


--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug


Re: [SLUG] prism2.5 pci wireless

2002-12-16 Thread evilbunny
Hello Adam,

Depending what you wish to do, you could always use the hostap drivers
and put the card into AP mode... iirc the wlan-ng drivers use a set of
non-standard API's and HostAP drivers can put prism2/2.5/3 devices
into client and ad hoc modes as well as AP mode...

-- 
Best regards,
 evilbunnymailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Hey... it's me.

http://www.cacert.org - Free Security Certificates
http://www.nodedb.com - Think globally, network locally
http://www.sydneywireless.com - Telecommunications Freedom

Monday, December 16, 2002, 8:43:42 PM, you wrote:

AH> Hi All,

AH> I have installed wireless cards in two of my servers and have them working 
AH> with the orinoco_pci drivers with the 2.4.19 kernel. The problem is that I 
AH> am getting the "Error -110 writing Tx descriptor to BAP" error, which from 
AH> what I have read is caused by the orinoco drivers not working properly.

AH> This is ok, and I have read that the linux-wlan-ng drivers are better 
AH> anyways, so I am attempting to get these working. I have installed the 
AH> debian package, however from what I can see I still need to download the 
AH> kernel source and compile the drivers with the linux-wlan-ng source?? Am I 
AH> missing something?? I don't understand the point of the debian package if 
AH> have to compile from source anyways?

AH> Any hints or directions would be greatly appreciated.

AH> Adam.



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature


[SLUG] RH7.3 + Gnome = X crashing

2002-12-16 Thread Terry Collins
Does anyone have any clue as to what is wrong with my system?
Or tips on further things to try.

It is a new install on RH7.3 (standard disk) and X has been locking up
suddenly (everything running on X seems to stop). I can ssh in from
anoher machine. Top shows nothing doing anything (wget, rhn, etc were
active). Forced to shutdown to recover the machine.


-- 
   Terry Collins {:-)}}} Ph(02) 4627 2186 Fax(02) 4628 7861  
   email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]  www: http://www.woa.com.au  
   Wombat Outdoor Adventures 

 "People without trees are like fish without clean water"
-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug



[SLUG] YOUR DEARLY ASSISTANCE

2002-12-16 Thread MR. PAUL ABIOLA.

Dear Sir,


RE: YOUR ASSISTANCE

I am the manager of bill and exchange at the foreign remittance department
of the ECO BANK PLC LAGOS, NIGERIA. I am writing following the
impressive information about you. I have the assurance that you are capable
and reliable enough to champion an impending transaction.

In my department, we discovered an abandoned sum of US$28.5m (twenty
eight million and five hundred thousand US dollars), in an account that
belonged to one of our former customers who died along with his entire
family in a plane crash, in November, 1997.  Since we received the information
about his death, we have expected his next of kin to come forward and
claim his money, as enshrined in our banking laws and regulations. So
far nobody has come forward, and we cannot release the funds unless someone
applies as the next of kin as stipulated in our guidelines. Unfortunately,
we have discovered that all his supposed next of kin or relations died
alongside with him in the plane crash, and effectively leaving nobody
behind for the claim.

It is consequent upon this discovery that other officials and I in my
department decided to make this business proposal to you and release
the money to you as the next of kin or relation of the deceased person,
for safety and subsequent disbursement, since nobody is coming forward
for it, and the money is not reverted  into the bank’s treasury as unclaimed.
The bank’s regulation stipulates that if after five years, such money
remains unclaimed; the money will be reverted to the bank’s treasury
as unclaimed fund.

The request for a foreigner as the next of kin in this transaction is
predicated upon the fact that the said customer was a foreign national,
and no citizen of this country can claim to be the next of kin of a foreigner.
We agree that 30% of the total sum we be given to you for your assistance
in facilitating this transaction. My colleagues and I are going to retain
60% of the total sum, and 10% will be set aside for the expenses that
we may incur in facilitating the remittance.

To enable us effect this remittance, you must first apply as the next
of kin of the deceased. Your application will include your bank co-ordinates,
that is, your bank name, bank address and telex, your bank account.
You will include your private telephone no. and  fax no., for  easy and
effective communication during this process. My colleagues and I will
visit your country for disbursement according to the agreed ratio, when
this transaction is concluded.

Upon the receipt of your response, I will send to you by fax, the text
of the application. I must not fail to bring to your notice the fact
that this transaction is hitch free, and that you should not entertain
fear as you are adequately protected from any form of embarrassment

Do respond to this letter today through my email address to enable us proceed with the 
transaction.

Yours sincerely,

MR. PETER OGALI.







--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug



Re: [SLUG] prism2.5 pci wireless

2002-12-16 Thread Karl Bowden
> Hello Adam,
> 
> Depending what you wish to do, you could always use the hostap drivers
> and put the card into AP mode... iirc the wlan-ng drivers use a set of
> non-standard API's and HostAP drivers can put prism2/2.5/3 devices
> into client and ad hoc modes as well as AP mode...

>>prism2/2.5/3 devices
Does this include the dlink 22mbps gear?



-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug



Re[2]: [SLUG] prism2.5 pci wireless

2002-12-16 Thread evilbunny
Hello Karl,

>>>prism2/2.5/3 devices
KB> Does this include the dlink 22mbps gear?

No, the 22mbps or 11b+ gear is based on the TI ACX100 chipset... as
such no currently known working drivers for anything but windows...

-- 
Best regards,
 evilbunnymailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

ABORT,RETRY, GET THE SHOTGUN AND SHOOT THE DAMNED THING

http://www.cacert.org - Free Security Certificates
http://www.nodedb.com - Think globally, network locally
http://www.sydneywireless.com - Telecommunications Freedom



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature


Re: [SLUG] Question about text computer game from late seventies

2002-12-16 Thread Jim Hague
On 16-Dec-2002 John Clarke wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 16, 2002 at 04:47:19PM +1100, Ron Daniel wrote:
>> Does anybody remember the name of the game which people used to play on
>> their mainframes at university in the late seventies where you explored
> 
> Advent?  Also known as "Adventure" or "Colossal Cave".  "You are in a
> maze of twisty little passages, all alike".
> 
> Source should be available at:
> 
> ftp://ftp.wustl.edu/doc/misc/if-archive/games/source/advent.tar.Z

Debianites can apt-get install bsdgames and run /usr/games/adventure. This is
the 'classic' 350 point version.

There is also a larger Colossal Cave, extant to my personal knowledge on Xerox
mainframes in 1980, which has a different endgame, expanded dungeon and a 550
point maximum score. There was a Unix port of that around as well, probably
still sitting on a 5.25" floppy in my attic.

Level9 (remember them?) did a differently-extended version for 8 bit micros
(BBC, Spectrum etc.) in the later 80s.

And there's also Zork. Zork was clearly inspired by Crowther & Woods original
Colossal Cave, but went futher. If you're in a maze and some sod keeps nicking
the stuff you drop to disambiguate the rooms, that's Zork. Zork was
commercialised by Infocom, and with the aid of a z-code interpreter like Frotz
you can play Zork I - the z-code was published as a freebie a few years ago.

-- 
Jim Hague - [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Work), [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Play)
Never trust a computer you can't lift.
-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug



Re: [SLUG] Woody on Spac64

2002-12-16 Thread Jim Hague
On 12-Dec-2002 Colin Humphreys wrote:
> I have never installed woody onto a sparc box directly. I have allways 
> dist-upgrade from potato. I have an Ultra 2 lying round here, so I
> just tried booting a potato (2.2r3) cd on it:

Try checking the Debian-Sparc mailing list archives. There was a time not so
long ago when the Woody installer was known broken, and installing Potato first
and then upgrading was the recommended way to go.

You never know, but that may still be the case.

This 'ere Ultra5 is living dangerously on Sid.

-- 
Jim Hague - [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Work), [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Play)
Never trust a computer you can't lift.
-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug



[SLUG] problems with compiling htmldoc-1.8.23

2002-12-16 Thread Henry



Hi Craige,
 

I can't 
build "htmldoc-1.8.23". Some one said you can help me out. I got 
followingerr when I build it. what did I do 
wrong?f:\htmldoc-1.8.23\htmldoc\http.c(279): error C2065: 'SSL_CTX' : 
undeclaredidentifierf:\htmldoc-1.8.23\htmldoc\http.c(279): error C2065: 
'context' : undeclaredidentifierf:\htmldoc-1.8.23\htmldoc\http.c(279): 
warning C4552: '*' : operator has noeffect; expected operator with 
side-effectf:\htmldoc-1.8.23\htmldoc\http.c(280): error C2065: 'SSL' : 
undeclaredidentifierf:\htmldoc-1.8.23\htmldoc\http.c(280): error C2065: 
'conn' : undeclaredidentifierf:\htmldoc-1.8.23\htmldoc\http.c(280): 
warning C4552: '*' : operator has noeffect; expected operator with 
side-effectf:\htmldoc-1.8.23\htmldoc\http.c(290): error C2059: syntax error 
: ')'f:\htmldoc-1.8.23\htmldoc\http.c(315): error C2143: syntax error : 
missing'{' before '*'f:\htmldoc-1.8.23\htmldoc\http.c(318): error C2371: 
'httpConnect' :redefinition; different basic 
types    
f:\htmldoc-1.8.23\htmldoc\http.h(291) : see declaration 
of'httpConnect'f:\htmldoc-1.8.23\htmldoc\http.c(331): warning C4133: 
'return' :incompatible types - from 'http_t *' to 'int 
*'f:\htmldoc-1.8.23\htmldoc\http.c(463): warning C4552: '*' : operator has 
noeffect; expected operator with 
side-effectf:\htmldoc-1.8.23\htmldoc\http.c(464): warning C4552: '*' : 
operator has noeffect; expected operator with 
side-effectf:\htmldoc-1.8.23\htmldoc\http.c(469): error C2059: syntax error 
: ')'f:\htmldoc-1.8.23\htmldoc\http.c(579): warning C4047: '=' : 'void *' 
differsin levels of indirection from 
'int'f:\htmldoc-1.8.23\htmldoc\http.c(1137): error C2059: syntax error : 
')'Roman


[SLUG] OT orders from England

2002-12-16 Thread Kevin Saenz
Does anyone know how long it takes for packages to arrive from
England?

Thanks

Kevin



-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug



Re: [SLUG] problems with compiling htmldoc-1.8.23

2002-12-16 Thread mlh
On Mon, Dec 16, 2002 at 12:25:01PM -0800, Henry wrote:
> Hi Craige,
> 
> I can't build "htmldoc-1.8.23". Some one said you can help me out. I got following
> err when I build it. what did I do wrong?
> 
> f:\htmldoc-1.8.23\htmldoc\http.c(279): error C2065: 'SSL_CTX' : undeclared
> identifier

Hey, don't call me Craige!

Loks like you need the openssl headers.

Matt
-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug



Re: [SLUG] prism2.5 pci wireless

2002-12-16 Thread David Kempe
We had exactly the same problem.
2.4.20 fixed it.
We had to download and compile the kernel ourselves but it seemed to work
fine.

dave

- Original Message -
From: "Adam Hewitt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, December 16, 2002 8:43 PM
Subject: [SLUG] prism2.5 pci wireless


> Hi All,
>
> I have installed wireless cards in two of my servers and have them working
> with the orinoco_pci drivers with the 2.4.19 kernel. The problem is that I
> am getting the "Error -110 writing Tx descriptor to BAP" error, which from
> what I have read is caused by the orinoco drivers not working properly.
>
> This is ok, and I have read that the linux-wlan-ng drivers are better
> anyways, so I am attempting to get these working. I have installed the
> debian package, however from what I can see I still need to download the
> kernel source and compile the drivers with the linux-wlan-ng source?? Am I
> missing something?? I don't understand the point of the debian package if
> have to compile from source anyways?
>
> Any hints or directions would be greatly appreciated.
>
> Adam.
>
>
> --
> SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/
> More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug
>

-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug



RE: [SLUG] OT orders from England

2002-12-16 Thread Jon Biddell

Hmmm... Last time I ordered some radio gear from the UK, it took about 3
weeks by low-altitude carrier-pidgeon.. Depends on the size and how it
was sent, although this time of year it's likely to be longer...

I've had software from germany (ApplixWare) take 5 weeks, and I've had
stuff from Norway take 4 days... 

When was it sent and how ?

=> -Original Message-
=> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
=> On Behalf Of Kevin Saenz
=> Sent: Tuesday, 17 December 2002 7:33 AM
=> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
=> Subject: [SLUG] OT orders from England
=> 
=> 
=> Does anyone know how long it takes for packages to arrive 
=> from England?
=> 
=> Thanks
=> 
=> Kevin
=> 
=> 
=> 
=> -- 
=> SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/
=> More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug
=> 

--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug



Re: [SLUG] Question about text computer game from late seventies/eighties

2002-12-16 Thread russell . ashdown
On 16 Dec 2002 at 16:47, Ron Daniel wrote:

> Does anybody remember the name of the game which people used to play
> on their mainframes at university in the late seventies where you
> explored a labyrinth of caves and tunnels interactively on a teletype
> machine?
> 
Known variously as "rogue" or "hack"

-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug



Re: [SLUG] Question about text computer game from late seventies/eighties

2002-12-16 Thread mlh
On Tue, Dec 17, 2002 at 10:52:11AM +1000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On 16 Dec 2002 at 16:47, Ron Daniel wrote:
> 
> > Does anybody remember the name of the game which people used to play
> > on their mainframes at university in the late seventies where you
> > explored a labyrinth of caves and tunnels interactively on a teletype
> > machine?
> > 
> Known variously as "rogue" or "hack"

You'd have a tough time playing hack/rogue on
a real teletype.

The answer is, I believe, adventure aka colossal cave
aka advent aka dungeon, a direct linear ancestor
of the classic text game zork.

Takes me back!  I used to sneak in to the computer
labs at unsw late at night to play it on the pdp11's
using my brothers account.

Ah those were the days.  Amazing how engrossed you
can get with just text on a greenscreen accompanied 
by the occasional soft feep.

Matt

jargon file entries:

advent: http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/jargon/html/entry/ADVENT.html
pdp10: http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/jargon/html/entry/PDP-10.html
zork: http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/jargon/html/entry/Zork.html
feep: http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/jargon/html/entry/feep.html
-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug



Re: [SLUG] RH7.3 + Gnome = X crashing

2002-12-16 Thread Simon Wong
On Tue, 2002-12-17 at 18:57, Terry Collins wrote:
> It is a new install on RH7.3 (standard disk) and X has been locking up
> suddenly (everything running on X seems to stop). I can ssh in from
> anoher machine. Top shows nothing doing anything (wget, rhn, etc were
> active). Forced to shutdown to recover the machine.

Was X working before on this installation?

Have you looked through the X log in /var/log/XFree86.0.log?

That should contain some clues for you.

-- 
**
* Simon Wong *
**

-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug



Re: [SLUG] Learning about security.

2002-12-16 Thread Simon Wong
On Mon, 2002-12-16 at 13:47, Steve Downing wrote:
> Also, can anyone recommend any good 'across the board' security books,
> i.e covering the other major OS(es) as well?  Typical attacks, how 
> to avoid them and system design/implementation considerations?  "Hacking 
> Exposed" has been touted as one option.  Opinions?

I have the "Hacking Linux Exposed" book and found it good.

The only problem is that it makes you *paranoid* :-(


-- 
**
* Simon Wong *
**

-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug



Re: [SLUG] Woody on Spac64

2002-12-16 Thread Lance
Going to try this when I get my next 3G of bandwidth from Telstra next 
month.

- Original Message -
From: Jim Hague <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 3:47 am
Subject: Re: [SLUG] Woody on Spac64

> On 12-Dec-2002 Colin Humphreys wrote:
> > I have never installed woody onto a sparc box directly. I have 
> allways 
> > dist-upgrade from potato. I have an Ultra 2 lying round here, so I
> > just tried booting a potato (2.2r3) cd on it:
> 
> Try checking the Debian-Sparc mailing list archives. There was a 
> time not so
> long ago when the Woody installer was known broken, and installing 
> Potato first
> and then upgrading was the recommended way to go.
> 
> You never know, but that may still be the case.
> 
> This 'ere Ultra5 is living dangerously on Sid.
> 
> -- 
> Jim Hague - [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Work), [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Play)
> Never trust a computer you can't lift.
> -- 
> SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/
> More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug
> 
 

-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug



Re: [SLUG] cdroast track problem

2002-12-16 Thread Simon Wong
On Mon, 2002-12-16 at 12:49, David wrote:
> Is this a cd player problem or an x-cd-roast problem?
> 
> x-cd-roast 0.98alpha9 running on woody using a "liteon" 48 times burner
> running at 32 times. I've also tried it at 16 times, but that makes no
> difference.

The speed shouldn't be a problem.

Try using cdda2wav to retrieve the contents of the CD - then you can
look at whether it's reading that okay (man cdda2wav).




-- 
**
* Simon Wong *
**

-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug



[SLUG] SMS

2002-12-16 Thread Richard Rooke
hi is it possible to send sms messages to a phone off my home pc without
having to connect to the internet? I have an internal modem but no phone
line

pls reply because ive heard it is possible but i dont know how/where to
get it from cheers







_
STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE* 
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail

--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug


Re: [SLUG] SMS

2002-12-16 Thread evilbunny
Hello Richard,

There is a telstra number you can dial, and a vodaphone one, i think
the telstra number will deliver to all numbers...

-- 
Best regards,
 evilbunnymailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Sir,with the utmost respect,that is complete and utter shash. --Kryten

http://www.cacert.org - Free Security Certificates
http://www.nodedb.com - Think globally, network locally
http://www.sydneywireless.com - Telecommunications Freedom

Tuesday, December 17, 2002, 12:36:12 PM, you wrote:

>>hi is it possible to send sms messages to a phone off my home pc without
>>having to connect to the internet? I have an internal modem but no phone
>>line
>>
>>pls reply because ive heard it is possible but i dont know how/where to
>>get it from cheers






RR> _
RR> STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE* 
RR> http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature


Re: [SLUG] SMS

2002-12-16 Thread Bruce Badger
Richard Rooke wrote:


hi is it possible to send sms messages to a phone off my home pc without
having to connect to the internet? I have an internal modem but no phone
line

pls reply because ive heard it is possible but i dont know how/where to
get it from cheers 


Well, there is equipment that will let your PC appear as a phone on the 
mobile phone network.  They are like modems in many ways (I don't know 
if they modulate/demodulate over analog or just transmit digitally), but 
they are not cheap, and you'd still need an account with a phone company 
and a SIM.

--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug


Re: [SLUG] Question about text computer game from late seventies/eighties

2002-12-16 Thread Peter Chubb
> "russell" == russell ashdown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

russell> On 16 Dec 2002 at 16:47, Ron Daniel wrote:
>> Does anybody remember the name of the game which people used to
>> play on their mainframes at university in the late seventies where
>> you explored a labyrinth of caves and tunnels interactively on a
>> teletype machine?
>> 
russell> Known variously as "rogue" or "hack"

No  rogue and hack work only on glass ttys --- they use character
graphics and the curses package to draw the maze on-screen.

Peter C
-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug



Re: [SLUG] Question about text computer game from late seventies/eighties

2002-12-16 Thread Mark A. Bell
--- Ron Daniel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does anybody remember the name of the game which people used to play
> on
> their mainframes at university in the late seventies where you
> explored
> a labyrinth of caves and tunnels interactively on a teletype machine,
> usually resulting in demise by some foul or painful process often
> involving a creature that you were certain was not around that corner
> the first time you looked ?

If you're looking for 'Colossal Cave Adventure', try here:
http://www.rickadams.org/adventure/
(And watch out for the dwarf!)

> involving a creature that you were certain was not around that corner
> the first time you looked ?

That sounds like 'hunt the wumpus' to me, a much simpler game.
As already posted, if you're a Debian user then they're in the
wonderful 'bsdgames' package.

- mark



=
mark a. bell
http://www.users.bigpond.com/m487396

__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com
-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug



[SLUG] fustrations with mysql (TIMESTAMP)

2002-12-16 Thread Michael Fox
Afternoon,

I've been trying (keyword trying) to attempt to use a field in mysql to record 
the time at which a record is created in a table.

ie;

-- snip --
created TIMESTAMP(14) default NULL,
-- snip --

However when I submit my data into the table/fields, without success I can 
never get the field "created" to have the timestamp 'MMDDHHMMSS' at which 
it was entered.

ie.
-- snip --
INSERT INTO blah VALUES( 'blah','blah','');
-- snip --

I've tried '', '\n' and 'NOW()' all without success.

Can anyone put me out of my misery and solve this for me, as I've read and 
read yet still can't get something to work.

Thanks
-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug



Re: [SLUG] fustrations with mysql (TIMESTAMP)

2002-12-16 Thread Tony Green
On Tue, 2002-12-17 at 15:21, Michael Fox wrote:
> Afternoon,
> 
> I've been trying (keyword trying) to attempt to use a field in mysql to record 
> the time at which a record is created in a table.
> 


The TIMESTAMP column type provides a type that you can use to
automatically mark INSERT or UPDATE operations with the current date and
time. If you have multiple TIMESTAMP columns, only the first one is
updated automatically.

Automatic updating of the first TIMESTAMP column occurs under any of the
following conditions:

  * The column is not specified explicitly in an INSERT or LOAD DATA
INFILE statement.
  * The column is not specified explicitly in an UPDATE statement
and some other column changes value. (Note that an UPDATE that
sets a column to the value it already has will not cause the
TIMESTAMP column to be updated, because if you set a column to
its current value, MySQL ignores the update for efficiency.)
  * You explicitly set the TIMESTAMP column to NULL.


http://www.mysql.com/doc/en/DATETIME.html

Hopefully this should help in your quest.

Greeno

-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug



Re: [SLUG] fustrations with mysql (TIMESTAMP)

2002-12-16 Thread Michael Fox
Quoting Tony Green <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:


> 
> The TIMESTAMP column type provides a type that you can use to
> automatically mark INSERT or UPDATE operations with the current date
> and
> time. If you have multiple TIMESTAMP columns, only the first one is
> updated automatically.
> 
> Automatic updating of the first TIMESTAMP column occurs under any of
> the
> following conditions:
> 
>   * The column is not specified explicitly in an INSERT or LOAD
> DATA
> INFILE statement.
>   * The column is not specified explicitly in an UPDATE statement
> and some other column changes value. (Note that an UPDATE that
> sets a column to the value it already has will not cause the
> TIMESTAMP column to be updated, because if you set a column to
> its current value, MySQL ignores the update for efficiency.)
>   * You explicitly set the TIMESTAMP column to NULL.
> 
> 
> http://www.mysql.com/doc/en/DATETIME.html
> 
> Hopefully this should help in your quest.

Ahuh, and I've read it along with many other pages from /doc/en/

As I said, still having problems.

Might just drop this field, and figure it out another time. At the end of the 
day I am just writing something to learn from. Since I've wanted to do some 
more mysql/php mucking about.

Cheers
-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug



Re: [SLUG] fustrations with mysql (TIMESTAMP)

2002-12-16 Thread Tony Green
On Tue, 2002-12-17 at 15:32, Michael Fox wrote:
> 
> Ahuh, and I've read it along with many other pages from /doc/en/
> 
> As I said, still having problems.
> 
> Might just drop this field, and figure it out another time. At the end of the 
> day I am just writing something to learn from. Since I've wanted to do some 
> more mysql/php mucking about.


Your using 'INSERT INTO blah VALUES( 'blah','blah','');' and it doesn't
work.  Try 'INSERT INTO blah VALUES( 'blah','blah',NULL);' and see if
you get any better results.

Maybe way off, but I don't think '' and NULL are the same thing (but its
been a while since I played DBA - they wouldn't let me once they found
out my parents were married)

Greeno

/me runs

-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug



Re: [SLUG] fustrations with mysql (TIMESTAMP)

2002-12-16 Thread James Gregory
On Tue, 2002-12-17 at 04:21, Michael Fox wrote:
> Can anyone put me out of my misery and solve this for me, as I've read and 
> read yet still can't get something to work.

Unlike PostgreSQL, MySQL does not have this functionality. The keyword
you're looking for is probably CURRENT_DATE (or CURRENT_TIME or
something similar), but you can't set it as a default.

I have spent conclusively too much of my time attempting to wrap
database functionality in my code so it can run on MySQL. This was one
of the many problems. The best thing I could do was to get the wrapper
to set the value CURRENT_DATE if the field was called "createdate" and
no other value was set for that field (it's code which amongst other
things takes a hash of data and puts it in the database. It knows what
fields are in the table.).

note: there is probably a way to make it do it by building in one of the
many bizarro "options" that mysql has these days. That's not such a good
answer though, because it will make your code less portable.

HTH

James.


-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug



Re: [SLUG] fustrations with mysql (TIMESTAMP)

2002-12-16 Thread James Gregory
On Tue, 2002-12-17 at 04:41, Tony Green wrote:
> On Tue, 2002-12-17 at 15:32, Michael Fox wrote:
> > 
> > Ahuh, and I've read it along with many other pages from /doc/en/
> > 
> > As I said, still having problems.
> > 
> > Might just drop this field, and figure it out another time. At the end of the 
> > day I am just writing something to learn from. Since I've wanted to do some 
> > more mysql/php mucking about.
> 
> 
> Your using 'INSERT INTO blah VALUES( 'blah','blah','');' and it doesn't
> work.  Try 'INSERT INTO blah VALUES( 'blah','blah',NULL);' and see if
> you get any better results.

I've also had issues with it, but if you want it to try it then
specifying a value for it won't let it set it itself.

If it is going to work, the way to do it will be to not specify that
field at all in your list of fields to insert into. It's supposed to
operate like a default value essentially. If you specify something else
it will use that. both NULL and the empty string are "something".

James.


-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug



Re: [SLUG] fustrations with mysql (TIMESTAMP)

2002-12-16 Thread Michael Fox
Quoting Tony Green <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:


> 
> Your using 'INSERT INTO blah VALUES( 'blah','blah','');' and it
> doesn't
> work.  Try 'INSERT INTO blah VALUES( 'blah','blah',NULL);' and see if
> you get any better results.
> 
> Maybe way off, but I don't think '' and NULL are the same thing (but
> its
> been a while since I played DBA - they wouldn't let me once they found
> out my parents were married)

Yes, tried both previously. From what I read they are both NULL equal. I also 
read \n was too. But they all make no difference. Oh well I might implement it 
another way. No big deal after all.

Thanks
-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug



RE: [SLUG] fustrations with mysql (TIMESTAMP)

2002-12-16 Thread Rowling, Jill
I've found in general the default values are only applied if you attempt to
insert without even mentioning the things that you want to take on default
values. This is pretty much what James says.

eg (this is a table of engineering drawing issues):
  INSERT INTO dwg_issue (id, dwgissue) VALUES (NULL, "A01");

In this case I'm making a new record and only specifying one value. All
other column values in this record (if it has any) should take on default
values, if specified as such when the table was created.
BUT! Timestamp may be a special case.

Cheers,

Jill.

-- 
Jill Rowling, System Administrator
Eng. Systems Dept, Aristocrat Technologies Australia
Level 2, 55 Mentmore Ave Rosebery NSW 2018
Phone: (02) 9697-4484 Fax: (02) 9663-1412 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 


-Original Message-
From: James Gregory [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, 18 December 2002 2:51
To: Tony Green
Cc: Michael Fox; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [SLUG] fustrations with mysql (TIMESTAMP)


On Tue, 2002-12-17 at 04:41, Tony Green wrote:
> On Tue, 2002-12-17 at 15:32, Michael Fox wrote:
> > 
> > Ahuh, and I've read it along with many other pages from /doc/en/
> > 
> > As I said, still having problems.
> > 
> > Might just drop this field, and figure it out another time. At the end
of the 
> > day I am just writing something to learn from. Since I've wanted to do
some 
> > more mysql/php mucking about.
> 
> 
> Your using 'INSERT INTO blah VALUES( 'blah','blah','');' and it doesn't
> work.  Try 'INSERT INTO blah VALUES( 'blah','blah',NULL);' and see if
> you get any better results.

I've also had issues with it, but if you want it to try it then
specifying a value for it won't let it set it itself.

If it is going to work, the way to do it will be to not specify that
field at all in your list of fields to insert into. It's supposed to
operate like a default value essentially. If you specify something else
it will use that. both NULL and the empty string are "something".

James.


-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug

--
IMPORTANT NOTICES
This email (including any documents referred to in, or attached, to this
email) may contain information that is personal, confidential or the subject
of copyright or other proprietary rights in favour of Aristocrat, its
affiliates or third parties. This email is intended only for the named
addressee. Any privacy, confidence, copyright or other proprietary rights in
favour of Aristocrat, its affiliates or third parties, is not lost because
this email was sent to you by mistake.

If you received this email by mistake you should: (i) not copy, disclose,
distribute or otherwise use it, or its contents, without the consent of
Aristocrat or the owner of the relevant rights; (ii) let us know of the
mistake by reply email or by telephone (+61 2 9413 6300); and (iii) delete
it from your system and destroy all copies.

Any personal information contained in this email must be handled in
accordance with applicable privacy laws.

Electronic and internet communications can be interfered with or affected by
viruses and other defects. As a result, such communications may not be
successfully received or, if received, may cause interference with the
integrity of receiving, processing or related systems (including hardware,
software and data or information on, or using, that hardware or software).
Aristocrat gives no assurances in relation to these matters.

If you have any doubts about the veracity or integrity of any electronic
communication we appear to have sent you, please call +61 2 9413 6300 for
clarification.
-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug



Re: [SLUG] fustrations with mysql (TIMESTAMP)

2002-12-16 Thread mlh
On Tue, Dec 17, 2002 at 03:51:03PM +, James Gregory wrote:
> If it is going to work, the way to do it will be to not specify that
> field at all in your list of fields to insert into. It's supposed to
> operate like a default value essentially. If you specify something else
> it will use that. both NULL and the empty string are "something".

If I'm not completely mistaken, NULL is as close to nothing
that you're going to get.  The SQL standard doesn't really
allow missing values -- if you leave a value out of an insert
statement you will get NULL values, a user specified default,
or an error.

What this means for MySQL  ... I dunno.

Also FWIW, putting things like CURRENT_TIME in tables is 
fairly brittle -- think of what happens at daylight saving
time or when the time on your pc goes haywire. Bad things
happen to your data.

What you're usually after is a "guaranteed to be greater"
value.  With postgresql/oracle you'd use nextval().

http://www.au.postgresql.org/docs/faq-english.html#4.15.3

Again, I'm a little ignorant of mysql.  Does it have this?

Matt
-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug



Re: [SLUG] fustrations with mysql (TIMESTAMP)

2002-12-16 Thread Gavin Carr
On Tue, Dec 17, 2002 at 03:51:03PM +, James Gregory wrote:
> On Tue, 2002-12-17 at 04:41, Tony Green wrote:
> > Your using 'INSERT INTO blah VALUES( 'blah','blah','');' and it doesn't
> > work.  Try 'INSERT INTO blah VALUES( 'blah','blah',NULL);' and see if
> > you get any better results.
> 
> I've also had issues with it, but if you want it to try it then
> specifying a value for it won't let it set it itself.
> 
> If it is going to work, the way to do it will be to not specify that
> field at all in your list of fields to insert into. It's supposed to
> operate like a default value essentially. If you specify something else
> it will use that. both NULL and the empty string are "something".

Nope, that's wrong. Not inserting the field OR inserting NULL are
equivalent for timestamps - both set it to the current time. But '' and 
'\n' won't work - you have to use NULL proper.

I've never had any problems like this with timestamps. What version are
you using Michael? You're absolutely sure you're inserting null and not
a quoted 'null'?

Cheers,
Gavin

-- 
Open Fusion P/L - Open Source Business Solutions [ Linux - Perl - Apache ]
http://www.openfusion.com.au
- Fashion is a variable, but style is a constant - Programming Perl
-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug



Re: [SLUG] fustrations with mysql (TIMESTAMP)

2002-12-16 Thread Jeff Waugh


> Also FWIW, putting things like CURRENT_TIME in tables is fairly brittle --
> think of what happens at daylight saving time or when the time on your pc
> goes haywire. Bad things happen to your data.

Times are usually stored in UTC, so daylight savings and timezone won't come
into it. Having your clock working correctly is pretty fundamental to a lot
of things, so that *shoudn't* come into it. ;-)

> What you're usually after is a "guaranteed to be greater" value.  With
> postgresql/oracle you'd use nextval().

Only if it's a key of sorts (for which time/date fields are terrible
choices). If someone wants the actual time, they really do want the actual
time!

(I'd add myself to the "strongly recommend PostgreSQL" list, too.)

- Jeff

-- 
"How was the opera?"
 "The seats were very comfortable." 
-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug



RE: [SLUG] fustrations with mysql (TIMESTAMP)

2002-12-16 Thread Michael Fox
Quoting "Rowling, Jill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

> I've found in general the default values are only applied if you attempt
> to
> insert without even mentioning the things that you want to take on
> default
> values. This is pretty much what James says.
> 
> eg (this is a table of engineering drawing issues):
>   INSERT INTO dwg_issue (id, dwgissue) VALUES (NULL, "A01");
> 
> In this case I'm making a new record and only specifying one value.
> All
> other column values in this record (if it has any) should take on
> default
> values, if specified as such when the table was created.
> BUT! Timestamp may be a special case.
> 

Big Thanks to you Jill.

I tried your suggestion, by using similar syntax. And it worked. Many thanks 
once more.

By describing my fields first and then values... (excluding my created column) 
it inputs the creation timestamp as requested).

woohoo :)
-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug



Re: [SLUG] fustrations with mysql (TIMESTAMP)

2002-12-16 Thread mlh
On Tue, Dec 17, 2002 at 04:22:34PM +1100, Jeff Waugh wrote:
> Times are usually stored in UTC, so daylight savings and timezone won't come
> into it. Having your clock working correctly is pretty fundamental to a lot
> of things, so that *shoudn't* come into it. ;-)

Doesn't stop a surprisingly high number of, say,
messages to the slug list coming from the future!

> > What you're usually after is a "guaranteed to be greater" value.  With
> > postgresql/oracle you'd use nextval().
> 
> Only if it's a key of sorts (for which time/date fields are terrible
> choices). If someone wants the actual time, they really do want the actual
> time!

Yeah, fair enough.  You'd want to make sure it's UTC.  You
might add the sequential value anyway as a safety check.

> (I'd add myself to the "strongly recommend PostgreSQL" list, too.)

If only it was a little easier to set up and use...

Matt
-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug



Re: [SLUG] fustrations with mysql (TIMESTAMP)

2002-12-16 Thread Jeff Waugh


> > (I'd add myself to the "strongly recommend PostgreSQL" list, too.)
> 
> If only it was a little easier to set up and use...

I guess it depends on your distributor. My experience on Red Hat and Debian
has only been positive. It *really* helps if you're familiar with real RDBMS
systems too, especially Oracle (though curious and non-brain-lazy MSSQL
converts will feel pretty comfortable too).

- Jeff

-- 
   o/~ In spite of all those keystrokes, you're addicted to vim.
  *ka-ching!* o/~   
-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug



Re: [SLUG] Question about text computer game from late seventies

2002-12-16 Thread Andrew McNaughton
On Mon, 16 Dec 2002, Jim Hague wrote:

> On 16-Dec-2002 John Clarke wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 16, 2002 at 04:47:19PM +1100, Ron Daniel wrote:
> >> Does anybody remember the name of the game which people used to play on
> >> their mainframes at university in the late seventies where you explored
> >
> > Advent?  Also known as "Adventure" or "Colossal Cave".  "You are in a
> > maze of twisty little passages, all alike".
> >
> > Source should be available at:
> >
> > ftp://ftp.wustl.edu/doc/misc/if-archive/games/source/advent.tar.Z
>
> Debianites can apt-get install bsdgames and run /usr/games/adventure. This is
> the 'classic' 350 point version.

While present on bsd systems,  it might interest people to know that this
game pre-dates Unix.  It was written at Stanford in 1968.

Andrew

--
Andrew McNaughton   In Sydney and looking for work
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  http://staff.scoop.co.nz/andrew/cv.doc
Mobile: +61 422 753 792



-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug



Re: [SLUG] fustrations with mysql (TIMESTAMP)

2002-12-16 Thread Peter Faulks

My two cents:

1c) NULL is a state not a value. '' and NULL are _NOT_ the same. Hence you
have SELECT blah blah... WHERE  IS/IS NOT NULL instead of WHERE 
=/!= NULL.

2c) You might want to have a look at Firebird (Borland's Interbase
reincarnated as Open Source) http://www.firebirdsql.org. It is a more
complete RDMS than MySql, smaller and maybe easier to use than PostgreSql.

Regards
-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug



Re: Re: [SLUG] cdroast track problem

2002-12-16 Thread Bill
I don't have Debian "Woody" installed, but I've been using Knoppix (DEbian 
3.0 based) - bootable CD - and have had great success using the included 
CDBakeOven for burning iso's and copying CDs.

Bill
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug


RE: [SLUG] Question about text computer game from late seventies

2002-12-16 Thread Rowling, Jill
My understanding is it was originally written in FORTRAN.
The spring, dry creek and cave entrance area are based on the map of a real
cave up to about where you find the bird cage and the stairs, and
"degenerates" from there on into fantasy.
I used to play it on CP/M.

FWIW there are some real caves with mazes of twisty little passages all the
same. Fortunately, compasses work underground in limestone!

Cheers,

Jill.

-- 
Jill Rowling, System Administrator
Eng. Systems Dept, Aristocrat Technologies Australia
Level 2, 55 Mentmore Ave Rosebery NSW 2018
Phone: (02) 9697-4484 Fax: (02) 9663-1412 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 


-Original Message-
From: Andrew McNaughton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, 17 December 2002 18:14
To: Jim Hague
Cc: John Clarke; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [SLUG] Question about text computer game from late
seventies


On Mon, 16 Dec 2002, Jim Hague wrote:

> On 16-Dec-2002 John Clarke wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 16, 2002 at 04:47:19PM +1100, Ron Daniel wrote:
> >> Does anybody remember the name of the game which people used to play on
> >> their mainframes at university in the late seventies where you explored
> >
> > Advent?  Also known as "Adventure" or "Colossal Cave".  "You are in a
> > maze of twisty little passages, all alike".
> >
> > Source should be available at:
> >
> > ftp://ftp.wustl.edu/doc/misc/if-archive/games/source/advent.tar.Z
>
> Debianites can apt-get install bsdgames and run /usr/games/adventure. This
is
> the 'classic' 350 point version.

While present on bsd systems,  it might interest people to know that this
game pre-dates Unix.  It was written at Stanford in 1968.

Andrew

--
Andrew McNaughton   In Sydney and looking for work
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  http://staff.scoop.co.nz/andrew/cv.doc
Mobile: +61 422 753 792



-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug

--
IMPORTANT NOTICES
This email (including any documents referred to in, or attached, to this
email) may contain information that is personal, confidential or the subject
of copyright or other proprietary rights in favour of Aristocrat, its
affiliates or third parties. This email is intended only for the named
addressee. Any privacy, confidence, copyright or other proprietary rights in
favour of Aristocrat, its affiliates or third parties, is not lost because
this email was sent to you by mistake.

If you received this email by mistake you should: (i) not copy, disclose,
distribute or otherwise use it, or its contents, without the consent of
Aristocrat or the owner of the relevant rights; (ii) let us know of the
mistake by reply email or by telephone (+61 2 9413 6300); and (iii) delete
it from your system and destroy all copies.

Any personal information contained in this email must be handled in
accordance with applicable privacy laws.

Electronic and internet communications can be interfered with or affected by
viruses and other defects. As a result, such communications may not be
successfully received or, if received, may cause interference with the
integrity of receiving, processing or related systems (including hardware,
software and data or information on, or using, that hardware or software).
Aristocrat gives no assurances in relation to these matters.

If you have any doubts about the veracity or integrity of any electronic
communication we appear to have sent you, please call +61 2 9413 6300 for
clarification.
-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug



RE: [SLUG] fustrations with mysql (TIMESTAMP)

2002-12-16 Thread Michael Fox
Jeff Waugh said:

> 

> > (I'd add myself to the "strongly recommend PostgreSQL" list, too.)
>
> If only it was a little easier to set up and use...

> I guess it depends on your distributor. My experience on Red Hat and
Debian
> has only been positive. It *really* helps if you're familiar with real
RDBMS
> systems too, especially Oracle (though curious and non-brain-lazy MSSQL
> converts will feel pretty comfortable too).

I've never liked postgreSQL, always used mysql and I guess its stuck ever
since. As for oracle, use that most days at work, along with informix.

Cheers

-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug



RE: [SLUG] fustrations with mysql (TIMESTAMP)

2002-12-16 Thread Michael Fox
> My two cents:
>
> 1c) NULL is a state not a value. '' and NULL are _NOT_ the
> same. Hence you
> have SELECT blah blah... WHERE  IS/IS NOT NULL instead
> of WHERE 
> =/!= NULL.
>
> 2c) You might want to have a look at Firebird (Borland's Interbase
> reincarnated as Open Source) http://www.firebirdsql.org. It is a more
> complete RDMS than MySql, smaller and maybe easier to use
> than PostgreSql.


Thanks for your 3 cents worth *smirks* Will check out borlands product,
however I suspect I'll be sticking with mysql for now.

Cheers

-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug



RE: Re: [SLUG] cdroast track problem

2002-12-16 Thread Michael Fox

> I don't have Debian "Woody" installed, but I've been using
> Knoppix (DEbian
> 3.0 based) - bootable CD - and have had great success using
> the included
> CDBakeOven for burning iso's and copying CDs.

Yeah the bootable knoppix cd is nice. Must remember to borrow it again from
my mate at work.

-
Michael

-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug