RE: [RCSE] RES what's in a name?

2002-01-09 Thread Andy Roberts



How 
old is the Spirit Kit

  -Original Message-From: John Roe 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 
  12:18 PMTo: rcseSubject: [RCSE] RES what's in a 
  name?
   The Harbor Soaring Society like many clubs has a 
  group of pilots who like to fly "low tech" planes, i.e. Rudder Elevator 
  Spoiler only. Thisquestion was debated; "As a competition 
  class, what other restrictions should apply?"
   The majoritywere happywith the AMA 
  definition of RES, which allows any typeof construction 
  materials/methods and allows skegs.
   The other options discussed were:
  1.Nostalgia rules, meaning designs kitted during or before 1980.
  2. TPG rules, meaning AMA rules but no skegs
  3."Local rules", in this case meaning RES controls, no skegs, and 
  wood built up film covered wings,preferably constructed by the 
  builder.
   The argument for AMA rules was that it is the most 
  popular, most common and recognized. That it allows beginners or kids to 
  buy a foamy or a complete plane and use it without trying to build a built-up 
  model. And that theuse of landing skegs makes landings much safer and 
  especially for kids or beginners less likely to damage the plane or injure 
  spectators.
   The argument for TPG rules was that "Real men can 
  land in a circle without skegs."
   The argument for nostalgia rules is that it is an 
  established "wood built-up wing class."
   The argument for "Local Rules" was that to achieve 
  the goal of having only built up wood planes by using Nostalgia rules was too 
  restrictive, as it doesn't allow for some popular designs after 1980. 
  Also some members have their own design/modifications etc. that would not be 
  allowed under nostalgia rules.
  Any thoughts?
  JR
  
  John RoeLaguna Hills, Ca
  www.MartialArtsAcademy.org
  
  
  
  
  Do You Yahoo!?Send FREE video 
  emails in Yahoo! 
Mail.


Re: [RCSE] Re: D J Aerotech

2002-01-09 Thread Ed Jett

My 2 cents - The high quality and lower cost (to the consumer) of the DJ
wood kits is very important to soaring and the hobby in general.  Newbies
cannot afford to go from the beginner level kits right to the latest
state-of-the-art composite contest ships.  Plus, there are a fair number of
us sport fliers that need and appreciate the types of planes they will be
offering.

Besides, some of us still like wood anyway.

Ed Jett
- Original Message -
From: Jack Iafret [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Ed Jett [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Don Stackhouse @ DJ Aerotech
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: RCSE [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 10:40 AM
Subject: Re: [RCSE] Re: D J Aerotech


 It's just not small business guy's, it's all business. Getting out prior
to
 total failure of the product or the product makers is better than average
 intelligence.

 Sounds like Ray Hays and DJ will be producing Woodies for some time
 great.

 BTW Ray's Woody contest could be the start of something good for the
 industry and modeling in general. Lots of low cost kits that fill both the
 fun flyer bill as well as competition if you so desire.

 Not all contests need to be high cost, any two planes of the same ilk can
 have a great contest.



 Jack Iafret
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Keeper of the Nostalgia Rules
 - Original Message -
 From: Ed Jett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Don Stackhouse @ DJ Aerotech [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Cc: RCSE [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 7:05 AM
 Subject: Re: [RCSE] Re: D J Aerotech


  Thanks for the post Don.  I will mourn the passing of your composite
kits,
  but fully understand the situation you face.  The problems you face with
  composite sailplane manufacture are the same as faced by any other
  manufacturing business and if it doesnt sell well enough, you just
cannot
  afford to produce it.
 
  Regards - Ed Jett
  - Original Message -
  From: Don Stackhouse @ DJ Aerotech [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Cc: Norman H. Donnelly [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 10:38 PM
  Subject: [RCSE] Re: D J Aerotech
 
 
   Norman H. Donnelly asks:
  
  
   Just went to thier (DJ Aerotech) page and they no longer sell thier
   sailplanes!?
   Anyone know what happened ?
  
   First of all, for the record, the recent unpleasantness on this forum
 was
   directly responsible for Joe Hahn's unsubscribing from this e-mail
list
   last week, and I'm still debating my own decision on that issue.
  
   However, our decision to end production of our composite kits had been
  made
   some time before this last batch of flame wars, so that we could give
   enough advance notice to the employees involved to give them plenty of
  time
   to find work elsewhere. Other than as noted below, it was largely a
   coincidence that the final cutoff just happened to occur at the same
 time
   as the recent round of vendor bashing.
  
   We did consider keeping the composite competition sailplane business
 going
   on an extremely limited basis using just Joe's and my own labor. The
   poisonous atmosphere on this list of late did have a significant
bearing
  on
   our ultimate decision not to do that, and to just plain end the making
 of
   composite sailplanes altogether. We have a couple of Spectre 120's we
 are
   finishing up (Tom, yours will be the last one made), and we will
handle
   replacement parts support for owners of existing composite models on a
   case-by-case basis (no, we will NOT sell enough spare parts for
someone
 to
   construct a complete airplane), but we've decided that for Joe and I
to
   keep the production lines open by ourselves even on an extremely
limited
   basis was just not worth the trouble.
  
   We still sell sailplanes, just not the composite ones. The Chrysalis
HLG
   and the Chrysalis 2-meter are still available, and I expect we'll be
 doing
   some more wooden sailplanes sooner or later. In fact, I just sent the
  parts
   files off to our laser vendor today for  a new and very different
  sailplane
   model. I'll announce it when the time comes, although if things go
well
  and
   Murphy's Law gives us a break, some of you might get to see it in
action
  at
   Ft. Wayne on the 16th.
  
   As far as the demise of our composite kits, it was a business
decision,
   although the general atmosphere of this forum made the decision a
little
   easier. There are some hard facts of business involved:
  
   1. Running a composites manufacturing shop involves a huge amount of
   overhead, much of it fixed. If sales are slow, then the cost of labor
 per
   hour goes literally out the roof, far exceeding the revenue from the
 sales
   of the kits produced. Learning curves for manufacturing employees
become
 a
   tougher nut to crack as well when production rates are low, and that
 tends
   to drive up scrap rates on complex parts. Also, some of the purchased
   materials have to be bought in very large quantities to get a

RE: [RCSE] Kevlar cutting

2002-01-09 Thread Monkey King

On Wed, 9 Jan 2002, Michael Imsic wrote:

 3M has a low tack blue masking tape which is designed for masking prior to
 painting.  Sounds like it would be perfect.

Ah, good advice.  I'll see if it's in the local art supply place.

-J

 
 Michael
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Monkey King [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Wednesday, 9 January 2002 12:11 PM
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Subject: Re: [RCSE] Kevlar cutting
 
 
  On Tue, 8 Jan 2002, Rick and Jill wrote:
 
   Doesn't this cause a fraying of the edges when you pull off the tape??
 
  A little.  I pull away from the body of the fabric, and it
  seems OKish.  I
  think the next experiment is to do it with drafting tape, which is a
  little less sticky.
 
  -J
 
   - Original Message -
   From: Monkey King [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 8:44 AM
   Subject: [RCSE] Kevlar cutting
  
  
I don't know if this is just the common technique for
  cutting aramid, or
if I've come across something good, but I do know that
  someone was asking
about good shears for cutting the stuff a week or so ago.
  Maybe this will
help the rest of us, as it doesn't require destroying your
  SO's favorite
shears:
   
Outline the cut your are going to make in masking tape on
  both sides.
Press the tape down hard so it's stuck firmly - no wrinkles
  or bulges on
either side.  Then cut down the tape longways.  This way,
  you can mark
your pattern on the cloth with the tape and cut through cleanly.
   
Am I making the newbie error of stating the known?  If
  there's more to
this technique than I've discovered, please let me in on the secret!
   
-J
   
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send
  subscribe
   and unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
 
  RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send
  subscribe and unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 _
 Do You Yahoo!?
 Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
 
 RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [RCSE] Oxnard Ca.

2002-01-09 Thread Brett Jaffee

The one site I know of in the Camarillo/Ventura/Oxnard area is The Cross, but I have 
know idea exactly where it is.  Perhaps someone else on RCSE knows?

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 Guys
 
I will be on a trip to Oxnard California on Feb 3-6.  I maybe able to
 bring a foamie with me.  Is there a place that I could possibly meet up with
 some people or a place to go fly?  Ill probably bring my Flying wing.  TIA
 Jeff
 Downeast Soaring
 RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-- 
_

Brett Jaffee
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

R/C Slope and Power Homepage
http://home.earthlink.net/~jaffee

The Unoffical Extra 300 Home Page
http://members.nbci.com/bjaffee/extra300/

OnTheWay Quake 3 Server Utility
http://www.planetquake.com/ontheway
_

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[RCSE] Airtronics Rx crystals $8

2002-01-09 Thread Flying High

I have the following Airtronics Rx crystals:

(1)- ch. 13
(1)- ch. 24
(1)- ch. 30
(1)- ch. 38
(1)- ch. 50
(2)- ch. 52
(1)- ch. 54
(1)- ch. 55

$8 each shipped to your door.  Thanks.

Edgar
The Soaring Junkie



__
Do You Yahoo!?
Send FREE video emails in Yahoo! Mail!
http://promo.yahoo.com/videomail/
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[RCSE] Airtronics Crystals are $8 each! shipped

2002-01-09 Thread Flying High

That's $8 each shipped to your door.
Edgar
The Soaring Junkie


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Send FREE video emails in Yahoo! Mail!
http://promo.yahoo.com/videomail/
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[RCSE] Uplinks for sail

2002-01-09 Thread Nowell

I'm selling my 2 Uplink HLG's Good condition less electronics
180 per plus shipping...


RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: [RCSE] RES what's in a name?

2002-01-09 Thread Tom Copp








2. TPG rules, meaning AMA rules but no
skegs.



Cool, I like that one. Like the good old
days! (Old for me anyway). Those
TPG guys are on the cutting edge!



Tom Copp

COMPOSITE
SPECIALTIES

www.F3X.com


ph/fax 949-645 7032



-Original
Message-
From: John Roe
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002
9:18 AM
To: rcse
Subject: [RCSE] RES what's in a
name?



 The Harbor Soaring
Society like many clubs has a group of pilots who like to fly low
tech planes, i.e. Rudder Elevator Spoiler only. Thisquestion
was debated; As a competition class, what other restrictions should
apply?

 The
majoritywere happywith the AMA definition of RES, which allows any
typeof construction materials/methods and allows skegs.

 The other options
discussed were:

1.Nostalgia rules, meaning designs
kitted during or before 1980.

2. TPG rules, meaning AMA rules but no
skegs

SNIP








RE: [RCSE] RES what's in a name?

2002-01-09 Thread Tom Copp








HI John,

I just
went through this drill a few months ago. What I found is there are pilots for
each sub category (big surprise)



Nostalgia
is not necessary all wood construction, its pre 1980. But spoilers are allowed
to be added and the structure i.e. carbon spars, spruce spars can replace balsa
etc. You cant make a wood wing a foam/glass wing though. Mixing radios are
allowed. Plastic and glass fuses are allowed if the kits had them.



Local HSS
rules are really a problem because one guy has the say as what is OK and what
is NOT. Nothing in writing and on the books and that is what I pushed for. 



The AMA
has gone through this and approved RES as Rudder, Elevator and top mounted
spoilers that move in unison, no other restrictions apply except for AMA safety
rules.



The big 3
west coast contests use the AMA RES rules.



A few
built up only contests are held. They were popular.



My vote is
for AMA RES. This will allow original designs, Nostalgia, balsa and foam to
fly. Some guys are worried about mega
buck models winning the class; they should be worried about who is at the
sticks. 



Tom Copp

COMPOSITE
SPECIALTIES

www.F3X.com


ph/fax 949-645 7032












[RCSE] elect sailplane FS NIB Swing NICE!

2002-01-09 Thread Fred Guilfoyle

I bought two of these, now I only want one because I
realize I'm buying too much stuff and need to cool my
jets.  Go Here for detailed pics.

http://www.evergo.net/~guil/electric_sailplane.htm

I havent built mine yet, but it is a great deal, nice
airplane.  It's called a Swing.  I never heard of it
before.  It's one of those European ARFs.
$130 + 10.00 shipping.  

Fred Guilfoyle


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Send FREE video emails in Yahoo! Mail!
http://promo.yahoo.com/videomail/
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [RCSE] RES what's in a name?

2002-01-09 Thread Jack Iafret

Bill and John,

A couple of small items to consider in this discussion. First, Nostalgia was
never meant to be an event for wood, open framework sailplanes. It allows
almost any construction so long as the original was done that way and that
includes FRP, foam or whatever. What makes Nostalgia work is that you can
not change the topology of the plane especially the airfoil and that is what
keeps the event in line with what we would now consider low tech, not the
materials.  Perhaps a case in point maybe if one took a Dole or one of
Dodgeson's designs and used some new computer tools to optimize the airfoils
for the planform, it probably could work fairly well in Unlimited today. It
is the airfoil that mostly limits performance.

Second, the RES event at the NATS had about 65 entrants (?) and I would not
consider that a low turnout for a one day event that was shared with
Nostalgia that had over 40 or 45 entrants (? did not go back and count). It
was still not an AMA event last year so this year should pick up a little.
There were not too many hi-tech planes last year at the NATS but look out
this year now that the rules are solid.

Where does that leave us? My thought only... RES will end up as another
Unlimited event with molded, high tech airfoil planes if the AMA rules are
followed (and they should be or changed through the formal process). I know
that's where I am headed. The Woodies may not be out of the running, but
they will still have modern airfoils and planforms and performance will be
close to the best molded ships of today.

Nostalgia will continue to grow little by little because the planes are in
fact much more limited to advancements so the people looking for less than
modern speed and cost will hang out there.Consistency usually works for
events over long periods of time.

In summary, if you want to invent and improve (most do) then keep to the RES
rules, if you want to limit performance, stay with Nostalgia.

Jack Iafret
Keeper of the Nostalgia Rules
- Original Message -
From: Bill Conkling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: John Roe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: rcse [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 12:37 PM
Subject: Re: [RCSE] RES what's in a name?


 TMSS is considering an RES contest again this year.  As so few
 contestants enetered the AMA RES class last year, we are leaning toward a
 local rule class requireing built up wood wings.  We had both last year
 since we were afraid that guys with new, high tech molded RES models would
 dominate the event and circumvent the intent of the event.  Didn't
 happen.  Only one high tech model showed up and it didn't really come on
 like 'gangbusters'.

 I'd suggest that you poll your market and see what the have to fly.  For
 us, the intent was to have a contest where you could bring the old stuff
 and have fun. Have a contest aimed at the people who you expect to attend.

 .bc([EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.widomaker.com/~conk
 Williamsburg, VA 23185


 On Wed, 9 Jan 2002, John Roe wrote:

 
   The Harbor Soaring Society like many clubs has a group of pilots
who like to fly low tech planes, i.e. Rudder Elevator Spoiler only.  This
question was debated;  As a competition class, what other restrictions
should apply?
 
   The majority were happy with the AMA definition of RES, which
allows any type of construction materials/methods and allows skegs.
 
   The other options discussed were:
 
  1. Nostalgia rules, meaning designs kitted during or before 1980.
 
  2. TPG rules, meaning AMA rules but no skegs
 
  3. Local rules, in this case meaning RES controls, no skegs, and wood
built up film covered  wings, preferably constructed by the builder.
 
   The argument for AMA rules was that it is the most popular, most
common and recognized.  That it allows beginners or kids to buy a foamy or a
complete plane and use it without trying to build a built-up model. And that
the use of landing skegs makes landings much safer and especially for kids
or beginners less likely to damage the plane or injure spectators.
 
   The argument for TPG rules was that Real men can land in a circle
without skegs.
 
   The argument for nostalgia rules is that it is an established wood
built-up wing class.
 
   The argument for Local Rules was that to achieve the goal of
having only built up wood planes by using Nostalgia rules was too
restrictive, as it doesn't allow for some popular designs after 1980.  Also
some members have their own design/modifications etc. that would not be
allowed under nostalgia rules.
 
  Any thoughts?
 
  JR
 
 
 
 
 
  John Roe
  Laguna Hills, Ca
 
  www.MartialArtsAcademy.org
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  -
  Do You Yahoo!?
  Send FREE video emails in Yahoo! Mail.

 RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe
and unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe 

Re: [RCSE] Hitec Servo for 2m RES?

2002-01-09 Thread George Joy

Bill,
  I believe your asking to lose a plane very early in it's life cycle. 
HS-50's only have 9 oz. in. of torque. A 3M ship with any airspeed will 
stall them. I wouldn't even attempt a dive test, I don't believe it would 
pull out, ever.
Good Luck
George
PS,
 Just read the second post, even HS-55's in my opinion would be too 
small for a 3M ship. they only have 11 oz.in. of torque.
At 09:43 AM 1/9/02 -0500, you wrote:
I am building V' tail 3 M bird and will use Hitec HS-50's buried in the
tails to operate the elevators.  I see no reason why this wouldn't work
with you 2M ship.



.bc([EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.widomaker.com/~conk
Williamsburg, VA 23185


On Wed, 9 Jan 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  Looking for suggestions for which Hitec servo to use for a 2m RES (V-tail).
  Trying to keep it light.
 
  Thanks,
  Randy
 

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe 
and unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[RCSE] Sam supporters?

2002-01-09 Thread Harley Michaelis

Well. . .just as I suspected, not *one* person on this list acknowledged he
was a supporter. . .or at least not willing to even privately admit it.

Just wanted to let you guys know. No need to clutter the list with
responses.

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[RCSE] F3J ships for sale

2002-01-09 Thread Paul Griebenow

Need to retire 2000 World's ships and get some new
ones.

For Sale:

Stratos SL, good cond. wrinkle in skin beyond spar on
right tip, patched.  4 Volz Zips for V's and ailerons,
Volz Micro-Maxxes for flaps.  Currently set up for
Duralite batteries, very easily modifiable for
NiCd's.  Was my primary ship at the World's.

V-Tail RnR Millenium, good cond.  White top, red
bottom, red tips. Volz servos throughout (2 Zips for
V's, 2 Micro-Maxxes for flaps,  2 Wing-Maxxes for
ailerons).  Set up for Duralite batteries, can be
moddified for NiCd's.

NSP Psycho, Like New.  White top, blue bottom, red
tips. Volz Zips for tail and ailerons, Micro-Maxxes 
or flaps. Set up for Duralite's or NiCd's.

FVK Graphite, used cond.  Slight damage to fuse,
repaired. Some aesthetic damage to center section. 
Slight tears in covering on tail and tips (nothing
that scotch tape can't fix). Extra right tip panel. 
Zip servos in fuse, Airtronics 141's in flaps set up
with the Rotary Driver System (works great, but if you
don't like it, it would be very easy to set up
normally).  Set up for NiCd's or Duralite's. Would
make a great first F3J ship or TD ship.

Best reasonable offer takes them!


=
Paul Griebenow
222456 Hwy 184
Lewis, CO

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Send FREE video emails in Yahoo! Mail!
http://promo.yahoo.com/videomail/
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[RCSE] Graupner servo data?

2002-01-09 Thread E. Wikran

Is there somwere I can find data for the Graupner servos and receivers?
-
Regards
Erik Wikran
Tromso, Norway



RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[RCSE] tooling costs

2002-01-09 Thread bcourtice

Let's say, hypothetically, that someone was considering jobbing out his
aircraft design to have a good fuselage mold and CNC mold for hollow wings
made.

Lets say, hypothetically, that the aircraft design would be a PSS warbird
similar in type to the popular Slope Scale Models PSS series.

Does anyone have any clue what kind of an investment this plan would
require?
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.313 / Virus Database: 174 - Release Date: 1/2/2002

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[RCSE] Paging Bill in Laguna CA

2002-01-09 Thread Nathan Woods

Bill, I lost your email address, can you please contact me?

BTW to the list:  Southern California Slope Racer's season opener is F3F
format this Saturday at Parker Mountain.  All AMA members are welcome.  AMA
memberships can also be granted at the slope if needed.

NOTE:  If you're coming, I encourage you to park at the trailbase and
carpool up.  Remember, first one up, is last one down.  Races generally
start around noon.
Directions:  http://www.sloperacing.com/Sites/Parker.htm

Nathan Woods
Contest Director
(949) 280-5710 cell

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[RCSE] Which GPS?

2002-01-09 Thread John Roe
 I've had several requests for the size/shape/model of GPS unit that might be suitable for sending up in a model to record data. Probably the best one readily available for this, and one that is very popular with the full-scale crowd is the Garmin E-trex. There are a couple of versions, you want the one that has barometric as well as GPS altitude capture, I believe it's the "Vista." The unit is about the size and shape of an 1800 series Nokia cell phone. Very useful in the car as well, or for boating, hiking or whatever...
JR.John RoeLaguna Hills, Ca
www.MartialArtsAcademy.org

Do You Yahoo!?
Send FREE video emails in Yahoo! Mail.

RE: [RCSE] Production Runs

2002-01-09 Thread jaffee

At 07:58 PM 1/9/02 -0800, tony estep wrote:

--- Bill  Bunny Kuhlman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 It's little wonder that 
 the manufacturers of full size sailplanes are reluctant to explore 
 planforms outside the realm of the conventional tailed variety. 

B^2 would love to see a full-size tailless sailplane, as would many
others, but anybody who manufactured one would be setting him(her)self
up for a lifetime of lawsuits and no upside...


I could swear there was a full size tailless design a few years ago.  I
think I saw it in Soaring.


Brett Jaffee: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Brett's Slope and Power Home Page: http://home.earthlink.net/~jaffee
OnTheWay Quake 3 server utility:   http://www.planetquake.com/ontheway
The Unoffical Extra 300 Home Page: http://bjaffee.tripod.com/extra300/

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]