Re: [RCSE] 2.4 install how to?

2008-03-05 Thread clarence

For what it is worth,

In the latest Model Airplane News (May), page84, the President of Sanwa
states Stylus users will be rewarded for their loyalty with a 2.4GHz
module receiver option

Clarence

Albert E. Wedworth wrote:

Hi guys
I find it kinda silly that all of you converts using 2.4 need 
instructions to install a receiver in a plane Can't have 
Carbon/Kevlar in your fuse, drilling holes in a fuse so the silly 
little antennas wiskers stick out just to find it didn't work, data 
loggers. ( just pure silliness )
 
Also while all of you folks are wasting you cash on some radio that 
doesn't compare to the Stylus in any way shape or form or can't do the 
things that sailplanes need to do. I'm buying planes and flying!  Not 
wondering where to put the silly little whisker antennas or if 
the install gona work in my TOY sailplane.
 
The Best part is I won't have to worry about all you guys on my 
channel (; = !
I fly on 72 meg's and I don't need instructions. Also I WON'T be using 
2.4 in the future either!  I like my Airtronics Stylus radio and see 
no need to change EVER!
 
Loving 72 meg on ch 51

Al
 
In a time of deceit

telling the truth is a
revolutionary act.
-George Orwell-


Re: [RCSE] 2.4 install how to?

2008-03-04 Thread Arne Ansper



On Mon, 3 Mar 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


The obvious good location would be in the fin since they are usually
fiberglass above the stab. There is a limit to how long the aux reciever 
extension


There was a thread in RCGroups recently that showed how sattellite 
receivers were mounted at fin and at the wingtips.


It would be nice to have a plane with sattellite receivers preinstalled 
during manufacturing. Like in some high-end planes the wing servos are 
installed during the molding process.


regards,
Arne
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe 
messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email 
such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format


Re: [RCSE] 2.4 install how to?

2008-03-04 Thread Albert E. Wedworth
Hi guys 
I find it kinda silly that all of you converts using 2.4 need instructions to 
install a receiver in a plane Can't have Carbon/Kevlar in your fuse, 
drilling holes in a fuse so the silly little antennas wiskers stick out just to 
find it didn't work, data loggers. ( just pure silliness )

Also while all of you folks are wasting you cash on some radio that doesn't 
compare to the Stylus in any way shape or form or can't do the things that 
sailplanes need to do. I'm buying planes and flying!  Not wondering where to 
put the silly little whisker antennas or if the install gona work in my TOY 
sailplane.

The Best part is I won't have to worry about all you guys on my channel (; = !
I fly on 72 meg's and I don't need instructions. Also I WON'T be using 2.4 in 
the future either!  I like my Airtronics Stylus radio and see no need to change 
EVER!

Loving 72 meg on ch 51
Al

In a time of deceit 
telling the truth is a 
revolutionary act.
-George Orwell-

Re: [RCSE] 2.4 install how to?

2008-03-04 Thread Bill Swingle

Quiet Al!

Let them go! We'll be better off with out them. Well, that is until we join 
them.


Bill Swingle
Janesville, CA


RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe 
messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email 
such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format


Re: [RCSE] 2.4 install how to?

2008-03-04 Thread David Webb
Wow that's a silly post and I fly with a stylus as well. Besides the
cool feature of anyone on channel 51 being able to take you out nice
and quick what features are you thinking you get that someone on a JR
or Futaba 2.4 does not? I flew a friends 9303 last year. He had
everything I needed. Laucnh, reflex, camber, delay, full mixingall
this and his radio did not weight 14 pounds like my stylus...Not an
issue unless yo also fly DLG's like I do as well.

I like the right and left sliders for camber and reflex on my stylus
thats unique... no wait i think i see a tab on the back of the Futaba
faast system...what am I missing?










On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 3:53 PM, Bill Swingle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Quiet Al!

 Let them go! We'll be better off with out them. Well, that is until we join
 them.

 Bill Swingle
 Janesville, CA


 RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
 unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
 unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  
 Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in 
 text format

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  
Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in 
text format


Re: [RCSE] 2.4 install how to?

2008-03-04 Thread Craig Allen
Al,

You had me right up tell you said Stylus I thought your parents raised you 
better Al  :-) 

Now if you had said Futaba 9C... One. I would of made $1 and two, you would 
of shown how smart you are :-  A Stylus up against a Futaba is kind of like 
Dos up against Mac  Very Ugly :- 



Craig. Long Live 72 :-) 42 years of using it and no problems yet

The financial crisis is kind of like people swimming nude in the ocean... You 
don't know how ugly it is tell the tides gone out... And then its very very 
ugly... Warren Buffet



Albert E. Wedworth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:   Hi guys 
 I find it kinda silly that all of you converts  using 2.4 need instructions to 
install a receiver in a plane Can't have  Carbon/Kevlar in your fuse, 
drilling holes in a fuse so the silly little  antennas wiskers stick out just 
to find it didn't work, data loggers. ( just  pure silliness )
  
 Also while all of you folks are wasting you cash on  some radio that doesn't 
compare to the Stylus in any way shape or form or can't  do the things that 
sailplanes need to do. I'm buying planes and flying!   Not wondering where to 
put the silly little whisker antennas or if  the install gona work in my TOY 
sailplane.
  
 The Best part is I won't have to worry about all  you guys on my channel (; = !
 I fly on 72 meg's and I don't need instructions.  Also I WON'T be using 2.4 in 
the future either!  I like my Airtronics  Stylus radio and see no need to 
change EVER!
  
 Loving 72 meg on ch 51
 Al
  
 In a time of deceit 
telling the truth is a  
revolutionary act.
-George Orwell-



[RCSE] 2.4 install how to?

2008-03-03 Thread Robert Samuels

Ben Clerx and others have gone all 2.4.  I'd certainly appreciate it if he 
(they) would share the specifics of their installations.  For me, particularly, 
in the Organic and in a TabooGt, if possible.  

Larry Jolly showed me his installation in a Blaster2.  

Anyone else out there with successful real life installations who will share 
the information?

Robert Samuels . St. Louis

_
Shed those extra pounds with MSN and The Biggest Loser!
http://biggestloser.msn.com/

[RCSE] 2.4 install how to?

2008-03-03 Thread BCLERX
Hi Robert,

Installation is pretty simple, but ground range testing is important. Follow 
the instructions. My tips below are for JR systems with aux receivers 
(satelite receivers).

In a DLG with a CF fuselage, simply poke the antenna through the sides of the 
fuselage. You mentioned Larry Jolly described his Blaster installation. I'm 
assuming he did something similar.

For sailplanes with slip-on nose cones: Most, if not all nose cones are 
fiberglass (as is the fuselage forward of the aft edge of the nose cone). Put 
your 
receiver and aux receiver in the nose. Range check while walking a complete 
circle around the plane, looking for loss of signal. A logger is useful.

For CF fuselages: Poke the main receiver antenna through the sides. Even if 
only half of each antenna protrudes, that should be fine. If you have a CF 
D-tube wing, you can place the aux receiver near the flap servo. I did this 
install with Joe Rodriguez's plane and it worked great (with good logger 
numbers).

With a full CF wing: You can put the aux receiver in the nose and poke the 
antenna out. You can also mount it to the underside of the canopy and poke the 
antenna outside. I've heard you might still be able to place the aux receiver 
in the flap servo pocket since the CF is pretty thin, but I've never done this 
and don't have any info to back up this claim. Likewise, you might be able to 
mount the aux receiver in the fuselage, behind the tow hook, if the fuselage 
is a CF/kevlar weave (lots of RF holes). But again, I haven't tried this or 
taken any measurements or data points. In both these cases, the main receiver 
should still have its antenna poked out the sides of the fuselage.

Keep in mind that the aux receiver usually does 75% of the work since the 
main receiver is often blocked in between the battery and servos. This becomes 
more of a factor for a fiberglass nose since the antenna will tend to be 
enclosed in the fuselage. A CF nose would have the antenna poked outside and be 
more 
visible to the transmitter from a nose-on or tail-on postion. I crammed 
everything into the nose on my Zenith and Eraser (both have FG nose cones and 
CF 
aft of the nose), and have had no problems.

Small changes in antenna position can make a big difference in reception. 
Thats why it's important to do a good initial ground range check. Having a 
logger 
in place for the first few flights is helpful to confirm your range checks. 
Larry moved an aux receiver in his Danny by about an inch (it was in an 
obviously poor, but convenient, location) and that small move improved 
reception 
dramatically.

The obvious good location would be in the fin since they are usually 
fiberglass above the stab. There is a limit to how long the aux reciever 
extension 
lead can be (I think its around 36 inches) which might preclude placing it in 
the 
fin. I believe the limit is due to voltage drop considerations. I might try a 
longer than recommended lead and see if there are any problems associated 
with that.

Its not magic---just a little common sense and range checking. Hope this 
helps.

Ben Clerx


**
It's Tax Time! Get tips, forms, and advice on AOL 
Money amp; Finance.
  (http://money.aol.com/tax?NCID=aolprf000301)


RE: [RCSE] 2.4 install how to?

2008-03-03 Thread Joe Nave
Robert,

 

Indeed, it is common sense and testing that makes a successful 2.4 GHz
implementation.  I converted my first plane into 2.4GHz last Saturday and
flew it on Sunday without any problems.

 

I installed a JR AR9000 and a remote receiver in the pod of my Arrow DLG.
Although, the installation was simple since I had a fiberglass pod to work
with, I still used the glitch counter after the initial setup and the
first few flights to ensure all was well.  After that I stopped worrying
about it and flew for the rest of the day.

 

After spending three hours flying pretty much non-stop to extreme altitudes
and distances (really wanted to know if it worked!), I had a few fades, tons
of fun and the confidence that I would not be taken down by someone on the
same channel if I were on my standard 72MHz frequency.

 

Try it - you just may like it! ;)

 

Regards,

 

Joe

 

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, March 03, 2008 6:33 PM
To: soaring@airage.com
Subject: [RCSE] 2.4 install how to?

 

Hi Robert,

Installation is pretty simple, but ground range testing is important. Follow
the instructions. My tips below are for JR systems with aux receivers
(satelite receivers).

In a DLG with a CF fuselage, simply poke the antenna through the sides of
the fuselage. You mentioned Larry Jolly described his Blaster installation.
I'm assuming he did something similar.

For sailplanes with slip-on nose cones: Most, if not all nose cones are
fiberglass (as is the fuselage forward of the aft edge of the nose cone).
Put your receiver and aux receiver in the nose. Range check while walking a
complete circle around the plane, looking for loss of signal. A logger is
useful.

For CF fuselages: Poke the main receiver antenna through the sides. Even if
only half of each antenna protrudes, that should be fine. If you have a CF
D-tube wing, you can place the aux receiver near the flap servo. I did this
install with Joe Rodriguez's plane and it worked great (with good logger
numbers).

With a full CF wing: You can put the aux receiver in the nose and poke the
antenna out. You can also mount it to the underside of the canopy and poke
the antenna outside. I've heard you might still be able to place the aux
receiver in the flap servo pocket since the CF is pretty thin, but I've
never done this and don't have any info to back up this claim. Likewise, you
might be able to mount the aux receiver in the fuselage, behind the tow
hook, if the fuselage is a CF/kevlar weave (lots of RF holes). But again,
I haven't tried this or taken any measurements or data points. In both these
cases, the main receiver should still have its antenna poked out the sides
of the fuselage.

Keep in mind that the aux receiver usually does 75% of the work since the
main receiver is often blocked in between the battery and servos. This
becomes more of a factor for a fiberglass nose since the antenna will tend
to be enclosed in the fuselage. A CF nose would have the antenna poked
outside and be more visible to the transmitter from a nose-on or tail-on
postion. I crammed everything into the nose on my Zenith and Eraser (both
have FG nose cones and CF aft of the nose), and have had no problems.

Small changes in antenna position can make a big difference in reception.
Thats why it's important to do a good initial ground range check. Having a
logger in place for the first few flights is helpful to confirm your range
checks. Larry moved an aux receiver in his Danny by about an inch (it was in
an obviously poor, but convenient, location) and that small move improved
reception dramatically.

The obvious good location would be in the fin since they are usually
fiberglass above the stab. There is a limit to how long the aux reciever
extension lead can be (I think its around 36 inches) which might preclude
placing it in the fin. I believe the limit is due to voltage drop
considerations. I might try a longer than recommended lead and see if there
are any problems associated with that.

Its not magic---just a little common sense and range checking. Hope this
helps.

Ben Clerx


**
It's Tax Time! Get tips, forms, and advice on AOL Money  Finance.
(http://money.aol.com/tax?NCID=aolprf000301)