Re: [RCSE] CONTESTS and LSF LEVELS

2000-12-15 Thread Scrollsander

So you want to have more challenging Thermal flights with some recognition,
then whay not go after national and world records?  From my undertsnading
they wil count as a contest win for any of the LSF levels, at least way back
when I thought I heard that question and answer.


And BTW,  I have understand completely the pain one has trying to get
contest wins for Level 5.  Back when Baxter (#1) and Work (#2) finished they
wee battleing me since they did not know who was going for the first one,
rather that someone was making the effort.  I FINISHED the goal and return 2
weeks before they did, and had I not been missing 2 contest wins, well,
that's another story.  I then went away to college for 3 years, grad school
in Wyoming, way away from contests and enough people, did not have the funds
to travel, so had to wait.  Returned to LA and won the first 2 contests I
entered to finally cinch the level, #11.

LSF is what YOU make of it and nobody owes you anything,  It has been one of
the best programs for over 30 years!  And I should know, I have sat for 3-4
8 hours sessions for those who followed.

Thermals,

Chris Adams
LSF 348 LvL V #11


-Original Message-
From: Paul  Rickie Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Monday, December 11, 2000 11:36 PM
Subject: [RCSE] CONTESTS and LSF LEVELS


Paul Ferguson posted to Jim Thomas in regards to 'Contests and LSF Levels,'
"Perhaps we need to leave the existing levels alone and add parallel
'non-contest' levels with more challenging tasks."

SOUNDS LIKE!!  LSF AWARDS with a nasty " * " attached to me :-) !!  Maybe,
Paul, as a disinterested party you could help the judges somewhere USA come
up with a scientific way to divine dimples :-) !

Sorry! I couldn't resist :-) !!  I plan to compete in one international and
two national or regional contests in a busman's holiday to my Homeland
U.S.A. next summer.  Is this language lost on you!?  It means having FUN
while you are on business!  What is the difference between what I will be
engaged in and Gordy!?  With Gordy the FUN comes first :-) !!  God is MY
boss!!  My criteria for participation is similarly expressed as a principle
through the use of reiteration as is the laws of investing in real
estate  (1. Location; 2) Location; 3) Location!!!).  Expressly, "1) FUN; 2)
FUN; 3) FUN; 4) FUN !", the first LAW of RC Soaring instituted and
established by JW!  I don't expect to win a thing this summer but new
friends--I will try harder, flying in the Eagle Class at the IHLGF, but
RCHLG pilots are getting older (fortunately Joe is still too young to
compete against me) and the competition is gett'n tougher at my (age) level
:-) !  Not that it didn't start out that way, the first year of the Eagle
Class ('98) I had to fly against the TPG's Scharck and Don Richmond.  Still
as the AWAY Champ, GRACIOUS Ron (not to be confused with Don) awarded the
First Place Plaque to me which I proudly display; the NEAREST I will
probably EVER get to anything like it!?  My third place the same year at
the MidSouths in HL Golf against the likes of Jim Bacus-Bruce Davidson 
Company didn't get me a thing besides hearing my name blared out with a
bullhorn--and I ran the whole course; I think they mentioned that--I
thought I at least deserved a JR or Futaba decal!!  Go figure :-) !!

It has been a long while since this thread has made the round--so be
it!  As one who had hoped for a career in aviation and passed from true HL
gliders (NOT to be confused with RCHLG) and hand tow gliders with
dethermalizers to full scale while in college, I of course became
acquainted with the FAI international soaring awards.  When I was drawn
into RC Soaring I soon became acquainted with the LSF program and
recognized the value of it for the RC Soaring enthusiast.  I began my own
effort to bring it to Japan and later was ready to help one of our Japanese
glider-guiders (a better idea) establish it here.  Except for the initial
phases, however, it is not a realistic program for Japan!  None the less,
any changing of the rules would tarnish its metal!

As Rob Glover posted:

"The LSF is Not going to change it's program.
The LSF is Not going to change it's program.
The LSF is Not going to change it's program."

"Got it? Good."  AMEN :-) and "Congratulations!!" to all the Level fives
out there!!
Paul Clark, SKY PILOT ONE, Osaka, Japan(AMA # 53 777 1)
http://www.kcat.zaq.ne.jp/skypilot/
SKY PILOT'S HANGAR--RCHLG AFICIONADO

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and 
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[RCSE] Contests and LSF Levels (2nd try)

2000-12-15 Thread WB6ZHD

At the beginning of this thread someone wrote:

 Why does the LSF not just have the level V.  It is such a waste to promote
 the sport at those lower levels.  I am sure there would still be several
 members and couple of level V's anyway.  Who needs the level ones, two's and
 threes.

I'd like to address that.

The early levels of the LSF program are pretty easy for an experienced pilot but they 
do require participation. This is a place where the experienced pilot can get together 
with less experienced flyers and together work on the lower levels. 

I was still pretty new to rc and soaring when I started LSF and the lower levels 
generated enthusiasm for the sport and helped me to become a better flyer. The most 
active period my club ever had was when a group of about ten of us were all working on 
LSF.

After a few years I made Level IV and began working on Level V. The first entry on my 
Level V voucher was dated 1977, the last, 1997. During the next "few" years I worked 
on Level V tasks. I considered them all "doable" except the contest requirements.

For twenty years I flew in as few as 10 and as many as 20 contests a year. In almost 
all of those contests I competed against 2 or 3 Level V's, and a bunch of people who 
could/should have been Level V's. I had nearly given up hope of ever making it. A 
little determination, slightly above average flying skills, help from other LSFers and 
some good luck got me that last win. 

I was a little luckier than some of my other friends who, because of their age and 
participation levels, probably will neven make Level V but they are proud of their 
Level IV's and the parts of V that they have done. Other friends are close and still 
trying--and might yet make it.

None of these people would like to see the rules change.

Huzzah to them!

Mike Clancy
LSF 926 Level V #92
 

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and 
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [RCSE] Contests and LSF Levels (2nd try)

2000-12-15 Thread Rick Brown and Jill Wiest

This statement was made by Tom Broeski and it was made as a SARCASTIC
remark and he of course did not mean it. It was a remark made to try to
make his point about having more than two classes (sport and expert) in
the ESL contests. He is for more levels so he made the comment about
why  the need for 5 levels in LSF. Why don't we just have level V of
LSF? 

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 At the beginning of this thread someone wrote:
 
  Why does the LSF not just have the level V.  It is such a waste to promote
  the sport at those lower levels.  I am sure there would still be several
  members and couple of level V's anyway.  Who needs the level ones, two's and
  threes.
 
 I'd like to address that.
 
 The early levels of the LSF program are pretty easy for an experienced pilot but 
they do require participation. This is a place where the experienced pilot can get 
together with less experienced flyers and together work on the lower levels.
 
 I was still pretty new to rc and soaring when I started LSF and the lower levels 
generated enthusiasm for the sport and helped me to become a better flyer. The most 
active period my club ever had was when a group of about ten of us were all working 
on LSF.
 
 After a few years I made Level IV and began working on Level V. The first entry on 
my Level V voucher was dated 1977, the last, 1997. During the next "few" years I 
worked on Level V tasks. I considered them all "doable" except the contest 
requirements.
 
 For twenty years I flew in as few as 10 and as many as 20 contests a year. In almost 
all of those contests I competed against 2 or 3 Level V's, and a bunch of people who 
could/should have been Level V's. I had nearly given up hope of ever making it. A 
little determination, slightly above average flying skills, help from other LSFers 
and some good luck got me that last win.
 
 I was a little luckier than some of my other friends who, because of their age and 
participation levels, probably will neven make Level V but they are proud of their 
Level IV's and the parts of V that they have done. Other friends are close and still 
trying--and might yet make it.
 
 None of these people would like to see the rules change.
 
 Huzzah to them!
 
 Mike Clancy
 LSF 926 Level V #92
 
 
 RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and 
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and 
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[RCSE] Contests and LSF Levels

2000-12-11 Thread Jim Thomas

Gents,

To all those that either don't see the point of having competition goals
as part of LSF, or don't think they should have to compete and SUCCEED
in competition as part of the LSF program, I have something to say.

Don't get involved in LSF in the first place if you aren't willing to
play by the same
set of rules as the thousands of others that are willing to challenge
themselves by those rules.

Don't expect it to be easy, because it isn't, never was, and never will
be.  If you want to aspire to be as good as you can be, then learn from
the experience.  If you are afraid to fail, this program probably isn't
for you, you have nothing to learn because you are already the best you
ever will be.

Don't expect the majority of fliers testing themselves against the LSF
levels to sympathize with your need to succeed the easy way.  Just go
find a sheet of LSF decals and put the level number you think you rate
on your plane (then go to one of the mail order universities and get
yourself the degree you think you deserve, but won't work for).

Jim Thomas
LSF 4629, Level V #68
PhD Oregon State University 1979



RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and 
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: [RCSE] Contests and LSF Levels

2000-12-11 Thread Paul Ferguson

We are not saying that we expect it to be easy. By all means make it harder.
I am sure that the Level 5's would like another challenge (just ask Mal
Pring who is doing it all again)!

It can be made harder without the need for contests.

Perhapes we need to leave the existing levels alone and add parallel
"non-contest" levels with more challenging tasks.

Paul Ferguson
Adelaide, Australia 

 -Original Message-
 From: Jim Thomas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2000 10:38 AM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: [RCSE] Contests and LSF Levels
 
 
 Gents,
 
 To all those that either don't see the point of having 
 competition goals
 as part of LSF, or don't think they should have to compete and SUCCEED
 in competition as part of the LSF program, I have something to say.
 
 Don't get involved in LSF in the first place if you aren't willing to
 play by the same
 set of rules as the thousands of others that are willing to challenge
 themselves by those rules.
 
 Don't expect it to be easy, because it isn't, never was, and 
 never will
 be.  If you want to aspire to be as good as you can be, then 
 learn from
 the experience.  If you are afraid to fail, this program 
 probably isn't
 for you, you have nothing to learn because you are already 
 the best you
 ever will be.
 
 Don't expect the majority of fliers testing themselves against the LSF
 levels to sympathize with your need to succeed the easy way.  Just go
 find a sheet of LSF decals and put the level number you think you rate
 on your plane (then go to one of the mail order universities and get
 yourself the degree you think you deserve, but won't work for).
 
 Jim Thomas
 LSF 4629, Level V #68
 PhD Oregon State University 1979
 
 
 
 RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send 
 "subscribe" and "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and 
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[RCSE] CONTESTS and LSF LEVELS

2000-12-11 Thread Paul Rickie Clark

Paul Ferguson posted to Jim Thomas in regards to 'Contests and LSF Levels,' 
"Perhaps we need to leave the existing levels alone and add parallel 
'non-contest' levels with more challenging tasks."

SOUNDS LIKE!!  LSF AWARDS with a nasty " * " attached to me :-) !!  Maybe, 
Paul, as a disinterested party you could help the judges somewhere USA come 
up with a scientific way to divine dimples :-) !

Sorry! I couldn't resist :-) !!  I plan to compete in one international and 
two national or regional contests in a busman's holiday to my Homeland 
U.S.A. next summer.  Is this language lost on you!?  It means having FUN 
while you are on business!  What is the difference between what I will be 
engaged in and Gordy!?  With Gordy the FUN comes first :-) !!  God is MY 
boss!!  My criteria for participation is similarly expressed as a principle 
through the use of reiteration as is the laws of investing in real 
estate  (1. Location; 2) Location; 3) Location!!!).  Expressly, "1) FUN; 2) 
FUN; 3) FUN; 4) FUN !", the first LAW of RC Soaring instituted and 
established by JW!  I don't expect to win a thing this summer but new 
friends--I will try harder, flying in the Eagle Class at the IHLGF, but 
RCHLG pilots are getting older (fortunately Joe is still too young to 
compete against me) and the competition is gett'n tougher at my (age) level 
:-) !  Not that it didn't start out that way, the first year of the Eagle 
Class ('98) I had to fly against the TPG's Scharck and Don Richmond.  Still 
as the AWAY Champ, GRACIOUS Ron (not to be confused with Don) awarded the 
First Place Plaque to me which I proudly display; the NEAREST I will 
probably EVER get to anything like it!?  My third place the same year at 
the MidSouths in HL Golf against the likes of Jim Bacus-Bruce Davidson  
Company didn't get me a thing besides hearing my name blared out with a 
bullhorn--and I ran the whole course; I think they mentioned that--I 
thought I at least deserved a JR or Futaba decal!!  Go figure :-) !!

It has been a long while since this thread has made the round--so be 
it!  As one who had hoped for a career in aviation and passed from true HL 
gliders (NOT to be confused with RCHLG) and hand tow gliders with 
dethermalizers to full scale while in college, I of course became 
acquainted with the FAI international soaring awards.  When I was drawn 
into RC Soaring I soon became acquainted with the LSF program and 
recognized the value of it for the RC Soaring enthusiast.  I began my own 
effort to bring it to Japan and later was ready to help one of our Japanese 
glider-guiders (a better idea) establish it here.  Except for the initial 
phases, however, it is not a realistic program for Japan!  None the less, 
any changing of the rules would tarnish its metal!

As Rob Glover posted:

"The LSF is Not going to change it's program.
The LSF is Not going to change it's program.
The LSF is Not going to change it's program."

"Got it? Good."  AMEN :-) and "Congratulations!!" to all the Level fives 
out there!!
Paul Clark, SKY PILOT ONE, Osaka, Japan(AMA # 53 777 1)
http://www.kcat.zaq.ne.jp/skypilot/
SKY PILOT'S HANGAR--RCHLG AFICIONADO

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and 
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]