[RCSE] Re: Model Aviation

2006-03-02 Thread David Register
Darwin, Jim, Dave, Gordy and anyone who has contributed to any mag or 
periodical on a soaring topic:


THANK YOU!

Having been a newsletter editor for too long and having written monthly 
for RCSD for about 6 years, putting together a column, even on a topic 
you really enjoy, is tough work. The hours aren't great and the only pay 
you get is the occasional comment or feedback from the readers. You guys 
have done, and continue to do, a great job.


That said, I'd love to see more in MA about soaring but that's not where 
the majority of the readers are going. So be it. The monthly 
(bi-monthly) soaring columns are great, NATS coverage is very much 
appreciated and the occasional articles on soaring are a way to keep our 
side of the hobby in front of the rest of the community.


RCSD is one outlet for soaring specific interests. Forums like RCSE and 
RCGroups are other ways to get information and ideas. But the bottom 
line is that no one should complain about lack of coverage if they've 
never written an article for their newsletter or submitted something to 
RCSD or some other mag. Every one has some knowledge or experience worth 
sharing. Write it up!


I can't tell you how many times someone has sent an e-mail noting a 
favorite topic they'd like to have covered. In most cases my response 
was - 'great idea, how about you write it and you can have the column 
space this month'. Judy Slates was always agreeable to that. Only two 
folks ever took me up on the offer (Harley Michaelis  with an early 
release on the RDS system and Greg Ciurpita with several articles on 
lift distribution and circling flight).


Gentlemen, start your word processors. This 'problem' goes away if we 
all share the load a bit.

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe 
messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email 
such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format


[RCSE] Re: Model Aviation

2006-03-02 Thread Jeff Carr
I think we would get more coverage if someone would just learn how to
hover a DLG with a nuclear powered Battery pack powering a micro
processor that would use brain power to transmit what you wanted. 8-)

I think the 2 guys doing the column now do a great job.  I wish they
could both be in the Mag at the same time.  Lets face it though.  If
they ask for help who would step up to the plate.  I covered F3J as
much as I could on the RCGroups site.  I thought everyone would want
to know what was happening.  I just wait on pins and needles for event
coverage.  Gordy is pretty fast on this.  Jim Bacus another.  We are a
quiet bunch.  Write AMA.  Ill be in Toledo during the show and plan on
asking why or how do we get more coverage.  We have a great bunch of
guys some recognition would be good.

OK now practice your 3D

Jeff
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  
Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in 
text format


RE: [RCSE] RE: Model Aviation Soaring Column

2002-10-31 Thread Howard Mark
If you go to hell - then you have to fly control line speed and nothing else
all day - every day.
OVER and OVER and OVER and OVER 

:-)



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Nostalgiaflyer;aol.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2002 6:08 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [RCSE] RE: Model Aviation Soaring Column


Regarding soaring and AMA our greater number of entries in most of the
recent NATS has not really acknowledged by AMA. RC pattern and Pylon seem to
be the sweetheart events. Possibly because they spend a lot more money with
the advertisers in Model Aviation. 

We have always had to do most of the work in our events--even before LSF
took over. In defense of Model Aviation and Bob Hunt and control line I have
a couple of comments. Unlike soaring where we all fly multiple events the
control line events are radically different from one to another and most
control line flyers fly only their specific event. Generally speed flyers
only fly speed (and the several classes within it), precision acrobatic
flyers only fly PA (and the three major classes within it), etc. Therefore
coverage is given to each cl discipline. Soaring has always been soaring,
that's it,  even though we fly different classes and events. Free flight and
indoor and treated the same as we are.

Remember that LSF is a special interest group and AMA is a political
organization. Since I joined AMA in 1955 there have always been complaints
about some aspect of the organization but all modelers are much better off
with AMA than without it and we should support it and change it from within
if necessary.

Mike Clancy
AMA 1510
LSF 926 V
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that
subscribe and unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with
MIME turned off.



This message is intended only for the use of the Addressee and may
contain information that is PRIVILEGED and CONFIDENTIAL.

If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
dissemination of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
received this communication in error, please erase all copies of the
message and its attachments and notify Space Imaging immediately.


RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.



RE: [RCSE] RE: Model Aviation Soaring Column

2002-10-31 Thread Rense Lange


Of course, CL afficionados would say the same about HLG: throw it, catch
it, throw it, catch it, , oops pick it up, throw it, ... 
Or, perhaps that only shows that I still have a lot to learn when it comes
to flying my new Polecat XP 3.

Rense Lange


 [Original Message]
 From: Howard Mark [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Date: 10/31/2002 11:54:52 AM
 Subject: RE: [RCSE] RE: Model Aviation Soaring Column

 If you go to hell - then you have to fly control line speed and nothing
else
 all day - every day.
 OVER and OVER and OVER and OVER 
 
 :-)
 
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Nostalgiaflyer;aol.com]
 Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2002 6:08 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [RCSE] RE: Model Aviation Soaring Column
 
 
 Regarding soaring and AMA our greater number of entries in most of the
 recent NATS has not really acknowledged by AMA. RC pattern and Pylon seem
to
 be the sweetheart events. Possibly because they spend a lot more money
with
 the advertisers in Model Aviation. 
 
 We have always had to do most of the work in our events--even before LSF
 took over. In defense of Model Aviation and Bob Hunt and control line I
have
 a couple of comments. Unlike soaring where we all fly multiple events the
 control line events are radically different from one to another and most
 control line flyers fly only their specific event. Generally speed flyers
 only fly speed (and the several classes within it), precision acrobatic
 flyers only fly PA (and the three major classes within it), etc. Therefore
 coverage is given to each cl discipline. Soaring has always been
soaring,
 that's it,  even though we fly different classes and events. Free flight
and
 indoor and treated the same as we are.
 
 Remember that LSF is a special interest group and AMA is a political
 organization. Since I joined AMA in 1955 there have always been complaints
 about some aspect of the organization but all modelers are much better off
 with AMA than without it and we should support it and change it from
within
 if necessary.
 
 Mike Clancy
 AMA 1510
 LSF 926 V
 RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe
and
 unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that
 subscribe and unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with
 MIME turned off.
 
 



 This message is intended only for the use of the Addressee and may
 contain information that is PRIVILEGED and CONFIDENTIAL.
 
 If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
 dissemination of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
 received this communication in error, please erase all copies of the
 message and its attachments and notify Space Imaging immediately.



 
 RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe
and unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that
subscribe and unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with
MIME turned off.


--- Rense Lange
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.



RE: [RCSE] RE: Model Aviation Soaring Column

2002-10-31 Thread Howard Mark
Throw it, catch it - well I'd guess that hell has better thermals than that!
I've done both HLG and control line. 
I'm sure many of us old farts here got started in CL. 
No two HLG flights are the same.
Hard to say that about CL speed.
If hell holds in store days full of HLG - I'm ready!

Mark

-Original Message-
From: Rense Lange [mailto:renselange;earthlink.net]
Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 12:01 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
Howard Mark
Subject: RE: [RCSE] RE: Model Aviation Soaring Column




Of course, CL afficionados would say the same about HLG: throw it, catch
it, throw it, catch it, , oops pick it up, throw it, ... 
Or, perhaps that only shows that I still have a lot to learn when it comes
to flying my new Polecat XP 3.

Rense Lange




This message is intended only for the use of the Addressee and may
contain information that is PRIVILEGED and CONFIDENTIAL.

If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
dissemination of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
received this communication in error, please erase all copies of the
message and its attachments and notify Space Imaging immediately.


RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.



Re: [RCSE] RE: Model Aviation Soaring Column

2002-10-31 Thread Iflyicrash
In a message dated 10/31/02 1:03:29 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:


Of course, CL afficionados would say the same about HLG: throw it, catch
it, throw it, catch it, , oops pick it up, throw it, ... 



Am I missing the word FLY in there somewhere? :-) Bill G.


Re: [RCSE] RE: Model Aviation Soaring Column

2002-10-30 Thread Bill Harris
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Mike Garton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 The abundance of CL in Model Aviation can be explained.
 Content editor, Bob Hunt, is a hardcore CL guy.
 The unbalanced space allotments bother me.
 I have exchanged emails with Bob and he honestly 
 believes that CL is at least as popular as soaring.
 From the NATS issue, you would guess that CL is
 5 times more popular than soaring.
 
 In August Bob Hunt sent a letter to the columnists
 stating that column space and frequency were being
 changed... 
snips

This _is_ somewhat distressing.  But from my perspective, AMA has
gotten into an arbitrary and capricious mode that does not seem to
represent me or anyone I fly with.  I'm continue my AMA membership
simply because it is a prerequisite to membership in local clubs and
it does generally represent model aviation.  The organization that
supports my interest is LSF and I'll continue to support it.

I'd suggest that folks write Bob Hunt about the unbalanced content,
but I suspect that would be an exercise in futility.

--Bill Harris
LSF#7652

AMA 607983 and embarrassed.

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.



[RCSE] RE: Model Aviation Soaring Column

2002-10-29 Thread Mike Garton
Jim, you did a great job on the Nats coverage.
There are not too many people who can both
write well AND take good pictures.
It gave the readers a fresh perspective and
put the vacation back in my vacation. :-)

The abundance of CL in Model Aviation can be explained.
Content editor, Bob Hunt, is a hardcore CL guy.
The unbalanced space allotments bother me.
I have exchanged emails with Bob and he honestly 
believes that CL is at least as popular as soaring.
From the NATS issue, you would guess that CL is
5 times more popular than soaring.

In August Bob Hunt sent a letter to the columnists
stating that column space and frequency were being
changed to better reflect their relative popularity.
The same letter said that my column would stay at
1500 words with half the frequency (changing to every 
other month).  Apparently the data being used is 
based on which box people checked on their AMA
renewal forms.

I emailed Bob and asked for a list of the new sizes 
and frequencies.  Here is his response:
I do not intend to supply a list of all the 
topics for which there are columns in Model Aviation
or their frequency. That will become apparent as
the new alignment is implemented.

He went on to add that Dave Garwood would now be 
writing a slope soaring column on the months opposite mine.

I was initially pissed off at Bob Hunt's reply
and the change that could be considered a demotion.
Then I started to weigh the pros and cons.
In the past I had often wished that the deadlines
came half as often.  It is easier to find 6 good topics
a year than 12.  There is twice as much time to
research each topic. Also, I agree that Garwood's slope
stuff would be a good addition to the magazine.
Garwood goes to more slope events than I do.
On the downside, the readers get less thermal soaring coverage.
Inserting timely stuff in the thermal soaring column 
would be even more difficult. Deadline to delivery lag 
time was 4 months before the frequency restriction. 
In the end I decided to sit tight and see how things 
look after a few months.  

I AM very interested to see the new space/frequency allotments.
If the other columns changed at then same time Soaring did,
we should see the results in the next issue.
Maybe the frequency of some of those CL events 
will go to once a year ;-)

Mike Garton





RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.