[Spooks] V07 for August, 2017
Visit http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks to unsubscribe from this list It appears that V07 is using the same schedule and callup for August, 2017, as it did for July, 2017. Normally V07 changes freqs and times, moving forward 2 hours to 0500/0520/0540z in August, but this month it has stayed on the 0700/0720/0740z schedule. For the last two weeks it has been active at 0700z on 13563 kHz, USB, at 0720z on 12163 kHz, USB, and at 0740z on 10263 kHz, USB, on its regular Sunday morning. Token Mojave Desert, California, USA __ Spooks mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Spooks@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Re: [Spooks] Arecibo Observatory ionospheric heating signal or XMWhales?
Visit http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks to unsubscribe from this list I agree the signal in question is not Arecibo, and is XM. However Arecibo DID transmit in AM during the last round of tests. Not only did they have audio tones, fixed, stepping, and sweeping, but they also transmitted (and announced on Twitter they would be) SSTV as their last signals at 0815z and 0818z on July 31. And rumor has it, but no one at Arecibo will confirm, they transmitted other audio, including Brother Stair and WWV. Token Mojave Desert, California, USA -Original Message- From: Zack Widup Sent: Friday, August 11, 2017 8:25 PM To: Shortwave Spy Numbers Stations Subject: Re: [Spooks] Arecibo Observatory ionospheric heating signal or XMWhales? Visit http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks to unsubscribe from this list I am guessing that is the "whales" station. Regarding the Arecibo experiments, "To the best of my knowledge, all experiments will be CW with no amplitude or frequency modulation." So you'd just hear a carrier with typical propagation QSB. Also, the end of the recent experiments was supposed to be July 31, as nothed bu others. 73, Zack W9SZ On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 2:06 PM, Utility Planet (Hugh Stegman) <utilitywo...@ominous-valve.com> wrote: > Visit http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks to unsubscribe from > this list > > I don't know about that one, but I heard loud AM whales yesterday. I > discovered that it was Brother Stair on WRMI. His voice would cut in and > out with whales on the same carrier when he wasn't audible. I did get > that > he thinks the eclipse is the Second Coming. Maybe I should send him an > air > check and really convince him the end is at hand. > > -hugh > > > > On 8/10/2017 8:39 AM, Curt Rowlett wrote: >> >> Visit http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks to unsubscribe from >> this list >> >> I recorded this <https://youtu.be/8L6lV4IReCk> while monitoring 5125 kHz, >> the known frequency for the Arecibo Observatory ionospheric heating >> signal. >> However, after I posted the video on my YouTube channel, a comment was >> posted by a person who informed me that the Arecibo campaign was only >> active during the period of July 24th through July 31st. (I recorded this >> last night. The time and date can be seen in the UTC widget running at >> the >> top right of the screen). The person who supplied that information >> believes >> that this signal actually might be XM Whales transmitting on the Arecibo >> frequency. >> >> Here is a link to the video <https://youtu.be/8L6lV4IReCk> that I >> recorded. >> >> Anyone have any thoughts on this? >> >> Curt Rowlett / W9SPY >> __ >> Spooks mailing list >> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks >> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >> Post: mailto:Spooks@mailman.qth.net >> >> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html >> >> > __ > Spooks mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Spooks@mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html __ Spooks mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Spooks@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html --- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. http://www.avg.com __ Spooks mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Spooks@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Re: [Spooks] Does anyone know the frequencies for HAARP?
Visit http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks to unsubscribe from this list If it was 1937 Pacific time on Feb 20, 2017 (0237 UTC, Feb 21, 2017) I don't think it could be HAARP alternating on 2800 and 3300 kHz. At that time HAARP was on 4440 kHz in O mode, twisted beam, possibly with a probe on 9500 kHz. While it is possible HAARP can be on multiple frequencies at once (such as the 9500 kHz probe while on 4440 kHz, or the later Luxembourg test on 2800 and 3300 kHz simultaneous) they do not appear to have been on 2800 or 3300 kHz at that time, I have spectrum recordings covering those freqs for that time period and there is nothing there, and the real time updates on Twitter did not mention any transmissions on those freqs at that time. 22 minutes later when 2800 / 3300 kHz operation did start they were strong on my recordings. The first alternating 2800 / 3300 kHz operation on my recordings (or announced) after 1933 Pacific (0233 UTC) was at 1959 Pacific (0259 UTC) and lasted less than 2 minutes total (two short transmissions of less than 20 seconds each on each freq), off to another frequency (2750 kHz) before 0302 UTC. Token Mojave Desert, California, USA -Original Message- From: KD7JYK DM09 Sent: Sunday, February 26, 2017 3:42 AM To: Shortwave Spy Numbers Stations Subject: Re: [Spooks] Does anyone know the frequencies for HAARP? Visit http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks to unsubscribe from this list : It is possible, maybe, that you heard someone trying to spoof HAARP. Email has a time of 1933h, I want to say I tuned to 2800 and 3300 KHz around 1937h. Carriers did not appear to be on both frequencies simultaneously and could be spoofed, but I suspected HAARP due to the stability, incredibly precise with no varying in strength, rock solid and strong, typical of their signals. Could have also been a very stable transmitter with problems relatively close. Next time, I hope to be better prepared and get captures and recordings. Kurt __ Spooks mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Spooks@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html __ Spooks mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Spooks@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Re: [Spooks] Does anyone know the frequencies for HAARP?
Visit http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks to unsubscribe from this list I don't think so. The site was funded by Air Force and Navy funding. The Navy was always involved in some way. However I am pretty sure it was the Air Force that was in charge of day-to-day operations at the time it was deactivated. The Air Force for sure ran the show into 2015, and was the DOD agency directing the disassembly before it was decided to halt it. Token Mojave Desert, California, USA -Original Message- From: W4JDY EM79wu Sent: Saturday, February 25, 2017 6:03 PM To: Shortwave Spy Numbers Stations Subject: Re: [Spooks] Does anyone know the frequencies for HAARP? Visit http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks to unsubscribe from this list The USAF turned the site over to the Navy awhile back before its deactivation Sent from my iPhone 6 > On Feb 25, 2017, at 12:53, Token Original <t_o_k_e...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > Visit http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks to unsubscribe from > this list > > HAARP was partially disassembled when the Air Force deactivated it. > Particularly the transmitter tubes were removed. However now University > of > Alaska, Fairbanks, has been given use of the facility. They spent the > last > year or so putting things back together. The last I heard, just before > this > series of tests started, they had a bit over half the transmitter working. > So they may not be up to their full 3.6 MW power level, but they were able > to use 2 MW during the recent test series. > > Now it is available for use to people scheduling the research and willing > to > pay the bill for operation, which, I have been told, is a bit over $5000 > per > hour. > > Token > Mojave Desert, California, USA > > > > -Original Message- > From: W4JDY EM79wu > Sent: Saturday, February 25, 2017 5:09 PM > To: Shortwave Spy Numbers Stations > Subject: Re: [Spooks] Does anyone know the frequencies for HAARP? > > Visit http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks to unsubscribe from > this list > > HAARP was disassembled some time ago. > > Sent from my iPhone 6 > >> On Feb 25, 2017, at 10:04, Token Original <t_o_k_e...@hotmail.com> wrote: >> >> Visit http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks to unsubscribe from >> this list >> >> That might explain it then. You might have been receiving something >> else, >> there were several other transmitters on the air at various times trying >> to >> pass themselves off as HAARP, including one on 2800 that sent, in CW "V V >> V >> V V V DE HAARP" several times. Or it is possible you heard them, HAARP, >> during transmitter testing. >> >> Why do I say you might have heard something else or heard transmitter >> testing? >> >> All times rounded to the nearest minute. >> >> 1933 Pacific time, on 20 Feb, 2017, would be 0233 UTC, 21 February, >> 2017. >> At that time HAARP was on 4440 kHz in O mode twisted beam with CW. It >> remained on that frequency until 0259 UTC, at which time it went to about >> 2 >> minutes of transmitter testing, alternating between 2800 and 3300, >> changing >> modes, and making transmitter adjustments or measurements, there were two >> short transmissions on each freq during this time, under 20 seconds each. >> At 0302 UTC they went to 2750 kHz. At 0303 UTC they started the >> Luxembourg >> test, they stayed in that mode and transmitting on both 2800 and 3300 >> simultaneously until about 0343 UTC. From about 0344 until about 0434 >> UTC >> they were doing the artificial aurora testing, and that involved >> sequenced >> transmissions on 2800, 2820, and 2840 kHz, the 3300 kHz freq was not >> involved. >> >> So, if the email was sent at 1933 Pacific time, and you turned on at that >> time, or within the next 27 minutes, HAARP was not on 2800 or 3300 kHz, >> but >> rather on 4440 kHz. If you tuned in during this time, and based on your >> frequencies, you could not have been hearing HAARP. >> >> From about 0259 UTC until about 0301 UTC HAARP made two short >> transmissions >> each, alternating, on 2800 and 3300 kHz, not more than 40 seconds total >> on >> each freq. This apparently was transmitter testing. This is a candidate >> for your description, however in my recordings I hear no noise as you >> describe, so I don't think this is the time you are discussing. >> >> 0302 until 0303 HAARP was on other frequencies, not 2800 or 3300 kHz. >> >> And at 0303 UTC they started the Luxembourg test, simultaneous >> transmission
Re: [Spooks] Does anyone know the frequencies for HAARP?
Visit http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks to unsubscribe from this list HAARP was partially disassembled when the Air Force deactivated it. Particularly the transmitter tubes were removed. However now University of Alaska, Fairbanks, has been given use of the facility. They spent the last year or so putting things back together. The last I heard, just before this series of tests started, they had a bit over half the transmitter working. So they may not be up to their full 3.6 MW power level, but they were able to use 2 MW during the recent test series. Now it is available for use to people scheduling the research and willing to pay the bill for operation, which, I have been told, is a bit over $5000 per hour. Token Mojave Desert, California, USA -Original Message- From: W4JDY EM79wu Sent: Saturday, February 25, 2017 5:09 PM To: Shortwave Spy Numbers Stations Subject: Re: [Spooks] Does anyone know the frequencies for HAARP? Visit http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks to unsubscribe from this list HAARP was disassembled some time ago. Sent from my iPhone 6 > On Feb 25, 2017, at 10:04, Token Original <t_o_k_e...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > Visit http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks to unsubscribe from > this list > > That might explain it then. You might have been receiving something else, > there were several other transmitters on the air at various times trying > to > pass themselves off as HAARP, including one on 2800 that sent, in CW "V V > V > V V V DE HAARP" several times. Or it is possible you heard them, HAARP, > during transmitter testing. > > Why do I say you might have heard something else or heard transmitter > testing? > > All times rounded to the nearest minute. > > 1933 Pacific time, on 20 Feb, 2017, would be 0233 UTC, 21 February, 2017. > At that time HAARP was on 4440 kHz in O mode twisted beam with CW. It > remained on that frequency until 0259 UTC, at which time it went to about > 2 > minutes of transmitter testing, alternating between 2800 and 3300, > changing > modes, and making transmitter adjustments or measurements, there were two > short transmissions on each freq during this time, under 20 seconds each. > At 0302 UTC they went to 2750 kHz. At 0303 UTC they started the > Luxembourg > test, they stayed in that mode and transmitting on both 2800 and 3300 > simultaneously until about 0343 UTC. From about 0344 until about 0434 UTC > they were doing the artificial aurora testing, and that involved sequenced > transmissions on 2800, 2820, and 2840 kHz, the 3300 kHz freq was not > involved. > > So, if the email was sent at 1933 Pacific time, and you turned on at that > time, or within the next 27 minutes, HAARP was not on 2800 or 3300 kHz, > but > rather on 4440 kHz. If you tuned in during this time, and based on your > frequencies, you could not have been hearing HAARP. > > From about 0259 UTC until about 0301 UTC HAARP made two short > transmissions > each, alternating, on 2800 and 3300 kHz, not more than 40 seconds total on > each freq. This apparently was transmitter testing. This is a candidate > for your description, however in my recordings I hear no noise as you > describe, so I don't think this is the time you are discussing. > > 0302 until 0303 HAARP was on other frequencies, not 2800 or 3300 kHz. > > And at 0303 UTC they started the Luxembourg test, simultaneous > transmissions > on 2800 and 3300 kHz, no alternating between freqs as you describe. > > I think you said you did about 10 minutes of listening and hearing the > alternating between 2800 and 3300 kHz. There was no time that night that > HAARP was alternating between those freqs for that length of time, they > only > alternated between those two freqs for slightly less than 2 minutes. > > It is possible, maybe, that you heard someone trying to spoof HAARP. > > Token > Mojave Desert, California, USA > > > > -Original Message- > From: KD7JYK DM09 > Sent: Saturday, February 25, 2017 7:11 AM > To: Shortwave Spy Numbers Stations > Subject: Re: [Spooks] Does anyone know the frequencies for HAARP? > > Visit http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks to unsubscribe from > this list > > : Ae we talking about the first evening or ? during the Luxembourg tests > I > : assume since you mention the two frequencies. If you can pin the date > and > : time down - I have 800 khz Perseus recordings of the first and last > : evenings and most of the 2nd but only during the Luxembourg portion. I > : certainly didn't notice any anomalies but am curious > > I received an e-mail regarding HAARP activities around: > > Sent: Monday, February 20, 2017 19:33 (US
Re: [Spooks] Does anyone know the frequencies for HAARP?
Visit http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks to unsubscribe from this list That might explain it then. You might have been receiving something else, there were several other transmitters on the air at various times trying to pass themselves off as HAARP, including one on 2800 that sent, in CW "V V V V V V DE HAARP" several times. Or it is possible you heard them, HAARP, during transmitter testing. Why do I say you might have heard something else or heard transmitter testing? All times rounded to the nearest minute. 1933 Pacific time, on 20 Feb, 2017, would be 0233 UTC, 21 February, 2017. At that time HAARP was on 4440 kHz in O mode twisted beam with CW. It remained on that frequency until 0259 UTC, at which time it went to about 2 minutes of transmitter testing, alternating between 2800 and 3300, changing modes, and making transmitter adjustments or measurements, there were two short transmissions on each freq during this time, under 20 seconds each. At 0302 UTC they went to 2750 kHz. At 0303 UTC they started the Luxembourg test, they stayed in that mode and transmitting on both 2800 and 3300 simultaneously until about 0343 UTC. From about 0344 until about 0434 UTC they were doing the artificial aurora testing, and that involved sequenced transmissions on 2800, 2820, and 2840 kHz, the 3300 kHz freq was not involved. So, if the email was sent at 1933 Pacific time, and you turned on at that time, or within the next 27 minutes, HAARP was not on 2800 or 3300 kHz, but rather on 4440 kHz. If you tuned in during this time, and based on your frequencies, you could not have been hearing HAARP. >From about 0259 UTC until about 0301 UTC HAARP made two short transmissions each, alternating, on 2800 and 3300 kHz, not more than 40 seconds total on each freq. This apparently was transmitter testing. This is a candidate for your description, however in my recordings I hear no noise as you describe, so I don't think this is the time you are discussing. 0302 until 0303 HAARP was on other frequencies, not 2800 or 3300 kHz. And at 0303 UTC they started the Luxembourg test, simultaneous transmissions on 2800 and 3300 kHz, no alternating between freqs as you describe. I think you said you did about 10 minutes of listening and hearing the alternating between 2800 and 3300 kHz. There was no time that night that HAARP was alternating between those freqs for that length of time, they only alternated between those two freqs for slightly less than 2 minutes. It is possible, maybe, that you heard someone trying to spoof HAARP. Token Mojave Desert, California, USA -Original Message- From: KD7JYK DM09 Sent: Saturday, February 25, 2017 7:11 AM To: Shortwave Spy Numbers Stations Subject: Re: [Spooks] Does anyone know the frequencies for HAARP? Visit http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks to unsubscribe from this list : Ae we talking about the first evening or ? during the Luxembourg tests I : assume since you mention the two frequencies. If you can pin the date and : time down - I have 800 khz Perseus recordings of the first and last : evenings and most of the 2nd but only during the Luxembourg portion. I : certainly didn't notice any anomalies but am curious I received an e-mail regarding HAARP activities around: Sent: Monday, February 20, 2017 19:33 (US West Coast Time) Subject: [HCDX] HAARP tests At which time I entered the two frequencies into my receiver and switched betwen them as one frequency stopped and the other started. 2800 was quite strong, 3300 very weak at my location in Central Nevada. Kurt __ Spooks mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Spooks@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html __ Spooks mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Spooks@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Re: [Spooks] Does anyone know the frequencies for HAARP?
Visit http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks to unsubscribe from this list That is really odd. I have hours and hours of recordings of HAARP over the last week of operations including every minute of the Luxembourg testing, on both 2800 and 3300 kHz. I never saw that kind of thing. 2800 was also used during other testing, outside the Luxembourg experiment. And then they did do some different things with the carrier, but other than some 120 Hz hum (probably actually 60 Hz), I never really saw the carrier widen out. I'll re-run some of the segments and see if I can detect anything like that, but I did not catch it first time around, and I was looking pretty close. Token Mojave Desert, California, USA -Original Message- From: KD7JYK DM09 Sent: Saturday, February 25, 2017 1:14 AM To: Shortwave Spy Numbers Stations Subject: Re: [Spooks] Does anyone know the frequencies for HAARP? Visit http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks to unsubscribe from this list : Can you explain what you mean by "Horrible filthy gliychy signal, worse than : many butchered CB radios I've : seen over the decades"? Listening and watching it in Argo on 2800 KHz, at random times ranging from fractions of a second to a few seconds apart, hissing and popping on their carrier both seen and heard with simultaneous white noise and near instantaneous spreading of the carrier of several KHz as though there was some major arcing within their equipment. I would compare it to the what you see and hear in a broadcast transmitter, telephone circuit or badly butchered homebrew radio when experiencing issues with dirt, debris, water, bugs, et cetera. Having been using my equipment before, during and after observing this, it was unique to the HAARP signal only. Regretfully, I did not get an audio recording or a screen capture of the issue. Kurt __ Spooks mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Spooks@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html __ Spooks mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Spooks@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Re: [Spooks] Does anyone know the frequencies for HAARP?
Visit http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks to unsubscribe from this list On 20 and 21 February about 40 minutes of the transmission was attempting to induce and observe the Luxembourg effect. On 22 Feb no Luxembourg test was transmitted. On 23 Feb about 20 minutes of transmission was dedicated to the Luxembourg effect. Outside those time slots the transmissions were doing other things, and no music or frequency specific audio was transmitted. Here is a video of my reception of the second set (of two sets that night) sent on the 23rd of February. This is in the O mode, the first set was in the X mode and over 10 dB weaker. Each set was about 9 minutes and 30 seconds long. A 30 second pause between each resulted in a transmission every 10 minutes. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uQThVcaQvOc=79s Token Mojave Desert, California, USA -Original Message- From: Zack Widup Sent: Friday, February 24, 2017 2:52 PM To: Shortwave Spy Numbers Stations Subject: Re: [Spooks] Does anyone know the frequencies for HAARP? Visit http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks to unsubscribe from this list I know they have actually been transmitting music as a part of their experiments recently (Luxembourg Effect). Perhaps what was being heard was an ionospheric distortion that is due to the Luxembourg Effect? I haven't heard them; I have been without an HF antenna since I moved to a new home over a year ago. My yard is full of trees and criss-crossing wires and I still haven't figured out how to put up an antenna. :-( 73, Zack On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 8:36 AM, Token Original <t_o_k_e...@hotmail.com> wrote: > Visit http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks to unsubscribe from > this list > > Can you explain what you mean by "Horrible filthy gliychy signal, worse > than > many butchered CB radios I've > seen over the decades"? > > I monitored and recorded the transmissions each night it was active and > noticed no unintentional glitches or saw a dirty signal in any way, so I > am > wondering what you mean. True, particularly on the night of the 22nd, the > signal was sometimes not strong, but that was conditions, not a factor of > the transmitter. > > For me, and for most recordings I have seen, the X mode was the weaker of > the 2, with the O mode consistently producing signal levels at least 10 dB > higher. > > T! > Mojave Desert, California, USA > > > > -Original Message- > From: KD7JYK DM09 > Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2017 4:24 AM > To: Shortwave Spy Numbers Stations > Subject: Re: [Spooks] Does anyone know the frequencies for HAARP? > > Visit http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks to unsubscribe from > this list > > I monitored last night on 2800 and 3300 KHz in CW, 6 KHz bandwidth. > > Horrible filthy gliychy signal, worse than many butchered CB radios I've > seen over the decades, but it was something at least... > > No SDR here yet. > > Kurt > > __ > Spooks mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Spooks@mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > > __ > Spooks mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Spooks@mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > __ Spooks mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Spooks@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html __ Spooks mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Spooks@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Re: [Spooks] Does anyone know the frequencies for HAARP?
Visit http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks to unsubscribe from this list Can you explain what you mean by "Horrible filthy gliychy signal, worse than many butchered CB radios I've seen over the decades"? I monitored and recorded the transmissions each night it was active and noticed no unintentional glitches or saw a dirty signal in any way, so I am wondering what you mean. True, particularly on the night of the 22nd, the signal was sometimes not strong, but that was conditions, not a factor of the transmitter. For me, and for most recordings I have seen, the X mode was the weaker of the 2, with the O mode consistently producing signal levels at least 10 dB higher. T! Mojave Desert, California, USA -Original Message- From: KD7JYK DM09 Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2017 4:24 AM To: Shortwave Spy Numbers Stations Subject: Re: [Spooks] Does anyone know the frequencies for HAARP? Visit http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks to unsubscribe from this list I monitored last night on 2800 and 3300 KHz in CW, 6 KHz bandwidth. Horrible filthy gliychy signal, worse than many butchered CB radios I've seen over the decades, but it was something at least... No SDR here yet. Kurt __ Spooks mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Spooks@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html __ Spooks mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Spooks@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Re: [Spooks] Does anyone know the frequencies for HAARP?
Visit http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks to unsubscribe from this list Also, I might add, right now (0155 UTC, 22 Feb, 2017) they are up on 4600 kHz and 9500 kHz both with unmodulated carriers. Token Mojave Desert, California, USA -Original Message- From: Token Original Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2017 1:53 AM To: spooks@mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [Spooks] Does anyone know the frequencies for HAARP? Visit http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks to unsubscribe from this list It depends on which experiment they are doing. They have sent an uninterrupted carrier on 4440 kHz. Example here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=414idhqxieg For the pre-Luxembourg testing they were using 2800 and 3350 kHz one at a time. These transmissions consisted of a 4 second burst of pulses every 30 seconds. Examples here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cv0g7HmVeM0=1s https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FTP47MePqDI=3s During the Luxembourg test they used 2800 and 3300 kHz simultaneously in 9 minute and 30 second sets, every 10 minutes. Example here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-JTca3ZZOow=1s During the Artificial Aurora test they were using 2800, 2820, and 2840 kHz transmitted sequentially. This was 90 seconds of transmit, 30 seconds of off air, then cycle to the next frequency. Example here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Ws1RJ7QHus=6s Tonight (as of 0130 UTC Feb 22 2017) they have been on 2750 to 2850 in 10 kHz steps. Token Mojave Desert, California, USA -Original Message- From: Chris Malboeuf Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2017 5:12 PM To: spooks@mailman.qth.net Subject: [Spooks] Does anyone know the frequencies for HAARP? Visit http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks to unsubscribe from this list Hi all. Does anyone knows the frequencies for HAARP? Thanks! Chris. Sent from my iPad __ Spooks mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Spooks@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html __ Spooks mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Spooks@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html __ Spooks mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Spooks@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Re: [Spooks] Does anyone know the frequencies for HAARP?
Visit http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks to unsubscribe from this list It depends on which experiment they are doing. They have sent an uninterrupted carrier on 4440 kHz. Example here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=414idhqxieg For the pre-Luxembourg testing they were using 2800 and 3350 kHz one at a time. These transmissions consisted of a 4 second burst of pulses every 30 seconds. Examples here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cv0g7HmVeM0=1s https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FTP47MePqDI=3s During the Luxembourg test they used 2800 and 3300 kHz simultaneously in 9 minute and 30 second sets, every 10 minutes. Example here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-JTca3ZZOow=1s During the Artificial Aurora test they were using 2800, 2820, and 2840 kHz transmitted sequentially. This was 90 seconds of transmit, 30 seconds of off air, then cycle to the next frequency. Example here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Ws1RJ7QHus=6s Tonight (as of 0130 UTC Feb 22 2017) they have been on 2750 to 2850 in 10 kHz steps. Token Mojave Desert, California, USA -Original Message- From: Chris Malboeuf Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2017 5:12 PM To: spooks@mailman.qth.net Subject: [Spooks] Does anyone know the frequencies for HAARP? Visit http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks to unsubscribe from this list Hi all. Does anyone knows the frequencies for HAARP? Thanks! Chris. Sent from my iPad __ Spooks mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Spooks@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html __ Spooks mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Spooks@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Re: [Spooks] N. Korea resumes encrypted number broadcasting
Visit http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks to unsubscribe from this list And yet the daily operations of North Korean V28 for the last 9 months has not been discussed at all. T! Mojave Desert, California, USA -Original Message- From: E.J. Caylor Sent: Friday, July 22, 2016 7:52 PM To: Shortwave Spy Numbers Stations Subject: Re: [Spooks] N. Korea resumes encrypted number broadcasting Visit http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks to unsubscribe from this list Interesting that this has even made Defense News http://www.defensenews.com/story/defense/international/asia-pacific/2016/07/22/north-korea-spy-numbers-radio-message/87429280/ -- E.J. Caylor, KK9EJ http://www.flickr.com/photos/90520235@N03/ http://caylorman.rrpicturearchives.net __ Spooks mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Spooks@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html __ Spooks mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Spooks@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Re: [Spooks] HM01
Visit http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks to unsubscribe from this list Your description is not specific enough, there are many signals that can sound like that, from digital modems to radars. At least a frequency and mode you used should be included in any such report, however since many radars move around in frequency that might be of limited help. At a guess I would first look at the PLUTO II British radar or the Russian 29B6 radar, they both can sound very much like propeller driven aircraft to some people. Example of PLUTO here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tU6UTZUCvsc T! Mojave Desert, California, USA -Original Message- From: Ashley Dugan Sent: Friday, August 15, 2014 8:02 PM To: spooks@mailman.qth.net Subject: [Spooks] HM01 Visit http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks to unsubscribe from this list 08/15/14 HM01 9333 kHz 08:00 UTC Tuned in to open carrier then it started at 8. Newbie question: I always hear a sound like a plane engine running (like a propeller plane) on one or two frequencies at night. I've checked sound clips on NO and UDXF, but I can't find it. Can someone tell me what this is? Thanks! Ashley Dugan Sapulpa, OK __ Spooks mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Spooks@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html __ Spooks mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Spooks@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Re: [Spooks] 'number stations' on youtube?
Visit http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks to unsubscribe from this list Yes, while it is tempting to say hide it in plain site, or in something innocuous that thousands of people view, once the cat is out of the bag and the fact that data is contained is known by an investigating agency, then the potential exist for them to know everyone who viewed the video/page/file. Once that is done the potential pool of suspects becomes much smaller and manageable. Looking at the number of views for each one of those videos reveals some pretty small numbers. Sure, the latest ones have thousands, after that story hit and the suggestion something mysterious was up. But the early ones often have less than 10 views each. If it is a message it would not be hard for an intelligence agency to find common viewers to narrow prospects, or even investigate all of the viewers, with that low number. You can't do that with a short wave over the air numbers station. Unless you already have a pretty good idea of the location or identity of the asset in the field you are not going to narrow down the potential suspects appreciably. T! Mojave Desert, California, USA -- From: Rick rickhamp...@comcast.net Sent: Monday, April 28, 2014 8:32 PM To: Shortwave Spy Numbers Stations spooks@mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [Spooks] 'number stations' on youtube? Visit http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks to unsubscribe from this list Because people watching cat videos can be tracked and logged via trivial methods. Rick Sent from a secure and undisclosed location by my Cray XC30... On Apr 28, 2014, at 15:16, Lucien Van Elsen lucie...@gmail.com wrote: Perhaps of interest, although occam's razor suggests that they have a much more boring explanation. http://boingboing.net/2014/04/25/the-numbers-station-of-you.html But an interesting concept in any case - why both with a surely-suspicious shortwave radio these days, when you can hide it amongst cat videos? __ Spooks mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Spooks@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html __ Spooks mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Spooks@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Re: [Spooks] HM01 Emergency(?) Transmission 01/17/2014
Visit http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks to unsubscribe from this list Why do you suspect an emergency transmission? Since it was on schedule and with the regular format I am failing to see anything unique about the transmission. Why do you say may be a live transmission? While I do not really follow HM01 all that closely I did happen to catch several minutes of the 0500 and 0600 transmissions. Both were S9 or better here. I heard nothing in the voice or data that would indicate to me it was any different from normal, if there had been I would have certainly grabbed a recording and uploaded it. It was the same voice, with the same cadence, and same timing, as normal. If this was a live transmission they got the same YL to do it who recorded their original number sound files so many years ago. Re the one-time V02a earlier this year, I have seen the logging of it, and heard about it from several people...does anyone have a recording, or even a transcription, of the transmission? Since V02a seems to be retired I would suspect there might be (just maybe) a misinterpretation of the signal without more detail than just V02a transmitted. Note that I am not saying anyone is lying or anything, or even wrong, I am only looking for more detail. Lacking a recording or transcription there is a possibility that there was an error in reporting, it would not be the first time. A couple of possibilities that come to mind (that either a recording or transcription would clear up): Several times I have heard HM01 stuck in the voice loop and repeating number group after number group, sounding like V02a and even miss-identified as V02a on chats and forums, but if someone is actually transcribing the number groups it soon becomes clear that it is not V02a. There has been a suggestion in the past that the same machine generates both M08a CW and the V02a / HM01 voice. There is some indication that M08a is still active, although at a greatly reduced level. Could this one-time event have been an incorrect selection from the operator, an intended M08a that ended up being sent I the V02a voice? T! Mojave Desert, California, USA -- From: shawn fahrer ssfah...@yahoo.com Sent: Friday, January 17, 2014 6:21 PM To: spooks@mailman.qth.net Subject: [Spooks] HM01 Emergency(?) Transmission 01/17/2014 Visit http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks to unsubscribe from this list This may be a live transmission from “The Cuban Lady”, so let’s put on our thinking caps about this one. After two days of inactivity (numbers not changing from 01/15 through 01/16), our “favorite” numbers station pulled out something somewhat unexpected: an entirely new bunch of numbers (and, presumably, data files as well) earlier today – January 17, 2014. As (barely) heard on 5855 kHz @ 05 UT, but confirmed (with much clearer signals) on both 11435 kHz @ 06 UT and 9330 kHz @ 07 UT, those new numbers are: 81817 // 14855 // 81785 // 82461 // 65525 // 61073 It’s time to pull out those “one-time pads” (which may have been the purpose of the ‘one-time’ V02 transmission earlier this year which put out a whole bunch of numbers all at once) and try to figure out what they’re saying this time…. Until the “secret” is revealed, this is your intrepid reporter… Shawn From Flushing NY (for whom having merely a $ 20 SW radio and no ability to link it to a computer doesn’t stop him from getting the word out to those who want and need to know) __ Spooks mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Spooks@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html __ Spooks mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Spooks@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Re: [Spooks] HM01 response to kc2...@gmail.com and Tokent_o_k_e...@hotmail.com
Visit http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks to unsubscribe from this list [QUOTE shawn fahrer] Does propagation change THAT MUCH in 24 hours to have a signal go from S9 to virtually zero in your part of the world from one day to the next (assuming no change at the transmitting end)? [QUOTE shawn fahrer] Yes, absolutely that is possible, in fact not at all uncommon, particularly when the receive system is a portable with a small antenna. I have seen propagation change in minutes so that a 20 over S9 signal becomes unreadable even on a full sized resonant antenna. What worked today at a given time and frequency will probably work tomorrow at the same time and frequency, but it is far from a sure thing. [QUOTE shawn fahrer] Why I believed it to be very special was that this transmission was made during a period of nearly two weeks from December 31, 2013 - at least January 8, 2014 (if not later), when none of the number groups were otherwise changed (both prior to this V02 transmission AND AFTER it), Since it came so early in the new year, I assumed that it was a preview of the numbers to come for the next few months or so (especially if there were 150 of them to choose from). [QUOTE shawn fahrer] As for this one-time V02a being a possible preview of future numbers I find this very unlikely. Remember V02a used the 150 group format long before HM01 existed, there is little or no reason to suspect they would return to it to send callup numbers for HM01. If they wanted to send such a list of numbers it would be far easier to send it as one of the data files in a regular HM01 transmission. And since the data files appear encrypted this would not transmit the numbers to the rest of the world. Also, there is no indication V02a ever did such a thing during V02a operations, why would it start now? If they did do such a thing (unlikely to me) I would suspect an entirely new format that fit the information structure they needed to send. If it was not the same kind of data as in V02a, why limit themselves to the V02a format? T! Mojave Desert, California, USA -- From: shawn fahrer ssfah...@yahoo.com Sent: Saturday, January 18, 2014 2:33 AM To: spooks@mailman.qth.net Subject: [Spooks] HM01 response to kc2...@gmail.com and Tokent_o_k_e...@hotmail.com Visit http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks to unsubscribe from this list Regarding the possible V02 (a) transmission: I got many more numbers than six on a transmission on a frequency of 13435 kHz @ 07 UT on 01/04/2014. Alas, I couldn't write fast enough to keep up with the voice; but some of the numbers I did get were: 53037 // 60052 // 10730 // 21366 // 77061 // 04810 // 66206 // 31226 // 04162 // 78441 // 28778 // 11830 // 74674 // 71733 // 64355 // 07278 // 88480, etc., etc., etc. At the time I suspected it was a V02(a) transmission simply because a) it was NOT in the HM01 format (6 numbers, data files, etc.) and b) I read about such a thing while researching Cuban Numbers Stations as part of my ongoing reporting about said subject-- 150 different number groups, no data tones,etc. If that was actually an M08 transmission in the voice format, you could have fooled me -- I wasn't aware that such an error could be made, even by the apparently error-prone Cubans, who've done some unusual things in my approximately six weeks of intensive recording of what ever numbers, patterns, etc. came my way. Why I believed it to be very special was that this transmission was made during a period of nearly two weeks from December 31, 2013 - at least January 8, 2014 (if not later), when none of the number groups were otherwise changed (both prior to this V02 transmission AND AFTER it), Since it came so early in the new year, I assumed that it was a preview of the numbers to come for the next few months or so (especially if there were 150 of them to choose from). As to yesterday's (05 - 07 UT + on January 17) transmission, the term live refers to it potentially not being a dummy transmission (especially since for the two previous days, the transmission was unchanged) -- not that the voice itself was live. I know better than to assume that the voice is human -- I've seen the videos with the number generating machine (in Spanish and German). In other words, I was saying that if you are are a spy (or a counter-spy) looking for an encoded message, the numbers transmitted would be the place to start attempting to decode said message, as opposed to the numbers from the two transmissions before, since this transmission is apparently active (perhaps a better choice of words). I hope this clears the air on my comments Shawn From Flushing NY (sounding the call to action when things seem to go totally haywire with the Cuban Numbers Station) P.S. Perhaps Saturday's transmission (which may have already started earlier today, but for some
Re: [Spooks] beacons
Visit http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks to unsubscribe from this list Zack, You will find that the most active reporting of the pirate beacons is probably on hfunderground.com Yes, the TMP beacon is still up, as is the W. A few others in the 4096/4097 region are also still up, although several are starting to have issues. The owner of several of the better known ones has stated he intends to let them die. T! -- From: Zack Widup w9sz.z...@gmail.com Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2014 10:12 PM To: Shortwave Spy Numbers Stations spooks@mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [Spooks] beacons Visit http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks to unsubscribe from this list Hi, I'm curious if anyone has been monitoring the Mystery CW Beacons in the southwest desert area of the USA. Which ones have been heard recently? Which ones seem to be inactive? I thought I heard a couple blips from the Temperature beacon on 4079.60 the other night but I wasn't sure. 73, Zack __ Spooks mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Spooks@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html __ Spooks mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Spooks@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Re: [Spooks] UNID(?) at 10430kHz 2024Z in progress
Visit http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks to unsubscribe from this list 10430 kHz c/f is a regular 75 bd, 850 Hz shift, FSK. STANAG 4481 FSK. Without a recording my guess is you are hearing that and periodically another transmission with the voice in it on the same freq or near freq. T! -- From: Max R.D. Parmer m...@trystero.is Sent: Friday, November 29, 2013 8:29 PM To: spooks@mailman.qth.net Subject: [Spooks] UNID(?) at 10430kHz 2024Z in progress Visit http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks to unsubscribe from this list Been going an hour or two now. I've heard this a couple times this week during the day and in the evening. Does anyone have a name or ID for this state? FSK (I think) with what sounds like distorted voice beneath it periodically. __ Spooks mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Spooks@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html __ Spooks mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Spooks@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Re: [Spooks] V13
Visit http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks to unsubscribe from this list I have been hearing V13 on 8300 at 1200 and 1300 for the past week (first logged November 1, 2013 here on that freq). T! -- From: Ary Boender a...@luna.nl Sent: Friday, November 08, 2013 6:13 AM To: UDXF mailing list u...@yahoogroups.com; Spooks Spooks@mailman.qth.net Subject: [Spooks] V13 Visit http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks to unsubscribe from this list Because of the strong BC station on 13750 kHz I haven't heard V13 lately. I think that they will move freq shortly like they did in the past. Check the following freqs and you may have a good chance to hear it there. Nothing heard so far though. Please let us know when you have heard V13 8300 0500 8300 0600 9522 0700 9522 0800 8300 1200 8300 1300 73, Ary __ Spooks mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Spooks@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html __ Spooks mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Spooks@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Re: [Spooks] HM01
Visit http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks to unsubscribe from this list Since the HM01 voice and V02a voice are the same (as is probably the V07 voice, for that matter), and it is normal during HM01 for a single number group to be sent between data groups, I was not sure why he was differentiating the V02a voice part. I was wondering if, other than the pause he indicated, there had been other oddities in format that might be indicative of V02a instead of HM01. He has since indicated that he refers to the voice itself as V02a number lady from habit, and that is understandable. By the way Chris, what frequency was this on? T! -- From: Radionut R ranger2...@gmail.com Sent: Sunday, October 13, 2013 3:47 PM To: Shortwave Spy Numbers Stations spooks@mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [Spooks] HM01 Visit http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks to unsubscribe from this list I don't understand what you are saying. That they are the same IS what he is saying Ernie On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 11:39 AM, Token t_o_k_e...@hotmail.com wrote: Visit http://mailman.qth.net/**mailman/listinfo/spookshttp://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooksto unsubscribe from this list Not sure I understand this comment. The V02a number lady is the same voice used for the voice number part of HM01. One group sent would be part of the HM01 format, not the V02a format. T! --** From: Christopher Friesen cfriesen...@yahoo.ca Sent: Sunday, October 13, 2013 6:04 AM To: Spooks@mailman.qth.net Subject: [Spooks] HM01 Visit http://mailman.qth.net/**mailman/listinfo/spookshttp://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooksto unsubscribe from this list HM01 was on schedule today, 13 October 2013 at 0500z with a strong carrier, then VO2a number lady with one group followed by dead air carrier and eventually into HM01 transmission. Here's a link to the Audio: http://snd.sc/1gbadEi Chris __**__**__ Spooks mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/**mailman/listinfo/spookshttp://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.**htmhttp://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Spooks@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html __**__**__ Spooks mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/**mailman/listinfo/spookshttp://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.**htmhttp://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Spooks@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html -- Remember that when you think you have it all figured out... you wake up to start all over again! Trust yourself and MOST times you will not be disappointed __ Spooks mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Spooks@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html __ Spooks mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Spooks@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Re: [Spooks] HM01
Visit http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks to unsubscribe from this list Pedro is at the helm, almost anything can be normal ;) Pauses or gaps in the audio are common, although not really part of the normal format except between segments. T! -- From: Christopher Friesen cfriesen...@yahoo.ca Sent: Sunday, October 13, 2013 4:21 PM To: Shortwave Spy Numbers Stations spooks@mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [Spooks] HM01 Visit http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks to unsubscribe from this list I did not mean to imply the transmission was following the V02a format, just that the V02a number lady - as I used to refer to her - started into her thing then stopped. I'm not sure if that's normal or an anomaly. Chris On Sunday, October 13, 2013 10:55:32 AM, Radionut R ranger2...@gmail.com wrote: Visit http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks to unsubscribe from this list I don't understand what you are saying. That they are the same IS what he is saying Ernie On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 11:39 AM, Token t_o_k_e...@hotmail.com wrote: Visit http://mailman.qth.net/**mailman/listinfo/spookshttp://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooksto unsubscribe from this list Not sure I understand this comment. The V02a number lady is the same voice used for the voice number part of HM01. One group sent would be part of the HM01 format, not the V02a format. T! --** From: Christopher Friesen cfriesen...@yahoo.ca Sent: Sunday, October 13, 2013 6:04 AM To: Spooks@mailman.qth.net Subject: [Spooks] HM01 Visit http://mailman.qth.net/**mailman/listinfo/spookshttp://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooksto unsubscribe from this list HM01 was on schedule today, 13 October 2013 at 0500z with a strong carrier, then VO2a number lady with one group followed by dead air carrier and eventually into HM01 transmission. Here's a link to the Audio: http://snd.sc/1gbadEi Chris __**__**__ Spooks mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/**mailman/listinfo/spookshttp://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.**htmhttp://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Spooks@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html __**__**__ Spooks mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/**mailman/listinfo/spookshttp://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.**htmhttp://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Spooks@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html -- Remember that when you think you have it all figured out... you wake up to start all over again! Trust yourself and MOST times you will not be disappointed __ Spooks mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Spooks@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html __ Spooks mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Spooks@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html __ Spooks mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Spooks@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Re: [Spooks] HAM Stuff [was: Re: Lincolnshire poacher]
Visit http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks to unsubscribe from this list Important to note that in the USA it is not illegal to own ham gear without a license, that might not apply to other nations. This mailing list is, after all, an international forum. T! -- From: Tom Sevart tmsev...@gmail.com Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2013 12:59 AM To: spooks@mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [Spooks] HAM Stuff [was: Re: Lincolnshire poacher] Visit http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks to unsubscribe from this list On 10/07/2013 13:18, Parrish S. Knight wrote: Visit http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks to unsubscribe from this list Is it lawful to own HAM radio gear without a license so long as you don’t use it to transmit, only to receive? Yes. There's absolutely no prohibition on owning ham gear without a license as long as you're not transmitting with it. -- Tom Sevart N2UHC St. Paul, KS __ Spooks mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Spooks@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html __ Spooks mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Spooks@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Re: [Spooks] Lincolnshire poacher
Visit http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks to unsubscribe from this list This HF phone app, it is not Hamsphere, is it? T! -- From: robertlewis2000 robertlewis2...@hotmail.com Sent: Sunday, October 06, 2013 10:38 PM To: spooks@mailman.qth.net Subject: [Spooks] Lincolnshire poacher Visit http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks to unsubscribe from this list Using HF phone appt to pick up Lincolnshire poacher 73 Sent from Samsung Mobile __ Spooks mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Spooks@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html __ Spooks mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Spooks@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Re: [Spooks] Lincolnshire poacher
Visit http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks to unsubscribe from this list Hamsphere is a ham radio simulator, not real radio at all. You are hearing old recordings of LP played on Hamsphere. I repeat, Hamspherre is not a real radio app, there are no signals being received. It is kind of like VOIP but with static and propagation simulation. The Lincolnshire Poacher has not returned to the air. T! -- From: robertlewis2000 robertlewis2...@hotmail.com Sent: Sunday, October 06, 2013 11:21 PM To: spooks@mailman.qth.net Subject: [Spooks] Lincolnshire poacher Visit http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks to unsubscribe from this list Yes..its ham sphere. Why.? Sent from Samsung Mobile __ Spooks mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Spooks@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html __ Spooks mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Spooks@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Re: [Spooks] Lincolnshire poacher
Visit http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks to unsubscribe from this list Yes, two way contacts are part of Hamsphere, you can talk to anyone you hear on it. Part of the Hamsphere server runs old recordings of numbers stations repeatedly. If you pay attention you can almost always find a numbers station running on one or more bands in Hamsphere. There is no could about it. If you are on Hamshpere it is a recording of an old LP transmission. I repeat, Hamsphere is not a real radio. There are no real radios attached to Hamsphere. There are no antennas that are part of Hamshpere. However, of interest, right after you posted this Lincolnshire Poacher did come up on 7524 kHz. I assume someone saw these posts and spoofed an old transmission recording. Don't they know they are supposed to do that on Pirate frequencies? Like 6300 or 6925 kHz? ;-) T! -- From: robertlewis2000 robertlewis2...@hotmail.com Sent: Sunday, October 06, 2013 11:28 PM To: spooks@mailman.qth.net Subject: [Spooks] Lincolnshire poacher Visit http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks to unsubscribe from this list I worked a guy on 6 meter on it to night. But you could be right...Any idea what this Lincolnshire poacher is any way.? Sent from Samsung Mobile __ Spooks mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Spooks@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html __ Spooks mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Spooks@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Re: [Spooks] Lincolnshire poacher
Visit http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks to unsubscribe from this list The explanation has been given. He was reporting a numbers station heard on Hamsphere. Not a real transmission, but a recording that is played on the ham radio simulation of Hamshpere. No actual radio transmitters, receivers, or antennas, are actually part of the Hamsphere simulation. To answer your question, it is the real thing in that it is a real recording of LP, however it is a recording made years ago, not a new signal actually transmitted over air today. You can hear it almost non-stop on one frequency or another on Hamsphere. T! -- From: Zack Widup w9sz.z...@gmail.com Sent: Monday, October 07, 2013 2:20 AM To: robertlewis2000 robertlewis2...@hotmail.com; Shortwave Spy Numbers Stations spooks@mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [Spooks] Lincolnshire poacher Visit http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks to unsubscribe from this list I wonder if it's the real thing or if someone is playing an old recording? Hard to say these days. Do you actually have an antenna capable of getting a bearing? Zack On 10/6/13, robertlewis2000 robertlewis2...@hotmail.com wrote: Visit http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks to unsubscribe from this list Using HF phone appt to pick up Lincolnshire poacher 73 Sent from Samsung Mobile __ Spooks mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Spooks@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html __ Spooks mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Spooks@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html __ Spooks mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Spooks@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Re: [Spooks] HM01 Logs for 22-07-13
Visit http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks to unsubscribe from this list HM01 is always YL. OM voice has not been used for many years by this family of stations. T! Mojave Desert, California, USA -- From: Ted Van Beurden tedvanbeur...@hotmail.com Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2013 10:47 AM To: Shortwave Spy Numbers Stations spooks@mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [Spooks] HM01 Logs for 22-07-13 Visit http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks to unsubscribe from this list Wade, was it Old Man or Young Lady, and what is your location ?? I'll be checking the 10715@2200Z one. I am in the eastern Med. Thanks. Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 18:32:12 -0400 From: 07code04stalker1...@gmail.com To: spooks@mailman.qth.net Subject: [Spooks] HM01 Logs for 22-07-13 Visit http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks to unsubscribe from this list All are voice only (I do not have RDFT equipment at this time) 10345 kHz - 0600z 63545 68122 64274 24447 41676 26145 9330 kHz - 0658z - 0755z 63545 68122 64274 24447 41676 26145 9330 kHz - 0756z - 0758z Same message with no data. (Spoof?) 9065 kHz - 0800z 63545 68122 64274 24447 41676 26145 10715 kHz - 2200z 63545 68122 64274 24447 41676 26145 Still currently in progress. __ Spooks mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Spooks@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html __ Spooks mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Spooks@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html __ Spooks mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Spooks@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Re: [Spooks] Chinese Robot
Visit http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks to unsubscribe from this list The Chinese Robot (VC01) uses no set frequencies and changes (changed?) frequency regularly. Typically it could be found anyplace from 3000 to 11000 kHz, with occasional excursions above that. Ary, that last entry I have in my log for VC01 was on May 8, 2013, on 4320 kHz, USB. I have looked specifically for it several times since then, and no joy. Normally when I go looking for it I can easily find it in a day or two. I suspect it is gone, or at least temporarily inactive. T! -- From: Ernie Rice ranger2...@gmail.com Sent: Saturday, July 06, 2013 11:46 AM To: Shortwave Spy Numbers Stations spooks@mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [Spooks] Chinese Robot Visit http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks to unsubscribe from this list What frequencies? Ernie Sent from my iPhone On Jul 6, 2013, at 1:52, Ary Boender a...@luna.nl wrote: Visit http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks to unsubscribe from this list Has anyone heard VC01 - Chinese Robot lately? I haven't heard it since 24 March nor have I seen a report since that day. Is it gone? 73, Ary __ Spooks mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Spooks@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html __ Spooks mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Spooks@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html __ Spooks mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Spooks@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Re: [Spooks] Ditter Network back
Visit http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks to unsubscribe from this list As Chris said, a ditter is a short burst of CW, making a dit sound, or a short beep if you are in CW or SSB mode to listen. Similar signals with longer beeps are sometimes called dashers. This particular network has been up a few times, similar networks, possibly even the same network using different dit length or combinations. Other networks of ditters and lone frequency versions have been seen. A recording form last year: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jBtMxRIcyFg T! Mojave Desert, California, USA -- From: Ernie Rice ranger2...@gmail.com Sent: Friday, March 22, 2013 4:52 PM To: Shortwave Spy Numbers Stations spooks@mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [Spooks] Ditter Network back Visit http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks to unsubscribe from this list What's a ditter? Ernie Sent from my iPhone On Mar 22, 2013, at 12:34, Chris Smolinski csmolin...@blackcatsystems.com wrote: Visit http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks to unsubscribe from this list I'm observing ditters on these frequencies so far (still checking for more), with about a 3 second period: 10670 10830 10990 11150 11830 Chris Smolinski Westminster, MD USA __ Spooks mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Spooks@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html __ Spooks mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Spooks@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html __ Spooks mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Spooks@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Re: [Spooks] New monitors help request.
Visit http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks to unsubscribe from this list Chris, Does your signal sound like either of these videos from my YouTube channel? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eJx-1TU3iHM http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fWYAdfts1cs If so you are hearing the XSL. T! -- From: Christopher Ayres cayres1...@aol.com Sent: Sunday, February 17, 2013 10:07 AM To: spooks@mailman.qth.net Subject: [Spooks] New monitors help request. Visit http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks to unsubscribe from this list Hello, I am very new to the search and monitoring of numbers station and of course new to this list. I am presently stationed in Japan and I have been listening from here with a humble set up to get started with : Current Location: Yokosuka, Japan Grid: 35.14.1N 139.40.5E Receiver: SONY ICF-SW7600GR Portable Antenna: Kaito KA-35 Active indoor On Saturday 16 Feb 2013 at 10:37 UTC I was checking frequencies which had been reported recieving Numbers Station transmitions on the Spy Numbers Data Base by TI in Japan on 5/3/2011. During my search of Frequency 6445 Khz USB I noted a signal which I could not identify. I could also recieve the same signal on 4219 and 6217 Khz but weaker. I am attaching a sound byte. Could anyone please tell me what this might be? Thanks, Chris __ Spooks mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Spooks@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html __ Spooks mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Spooks@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Re: [Spooks] HM01 16180 kHz again
Visit http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks to unsubscribe from this list Hugh, Are you sure it was V02a at the beginning? Since HM01 starts its message by sending 6 groups of five numbers repeatedly, for several minutes, it can sound like the beginning of V02a. In other words, HM01 starts by sounding similar to V02a until the first time the digital is sent, and then it falls into its 5fg / digital / 5fg /digital / etc format. The parallel frequency transmission of that HM01 (same time, different freq) on 17480 was normal HM01, however the transmitter set new standards of a bad signal and low audio, even by Cuban standards. It was over 400 kHz wide here, with spurs and harmonics of those spurs every 14.2 kHz on both sides. Picture of the wide signal here: http://www.pbase.com/token/image/148081539/original.jpg From there the station moved on to 17540 kHz with another HM01 transmission, and the same wide ugly transmitter. T! -- From: Utility World (Hugh Stegman) utilitywo...@ominous-valve.com Sent: Saturday, December 29, 2012 10:02 PM To: enigma2...@yahoogroups.com; Shortwave Spy Numbers Stations spooks@mailman.qth.net; u...@yahoogroups.com Subject: [Spooks] HM01 16180 kHz again Visit http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks to unsubscribe from this list HM01 16180.0 kHz 2147 29 Dec 2012 Found Cuban AM numbers (V02 style) in progress at 2145, continuous 5F groups with 9s, switched to HM01 format at 2147, continued until 2155, then stopped and dropped carrier. Nowhere near as loud as HM01 was at the same time/frequency on Christmas day (25 Dec 2012). (HS) __ Spooks mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Spooks@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html __ Spooks mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Spooks@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Re: [Spooks] Spooks Digest, Vol 107, Issue 13
Visit http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks to unsubscribe from this list The 4 MHz beacons are, for the most part, still there. In the past few weeks in the 4 MHz area I have heard: 4079.6 kHz, TMP temperature beacon 4086.7 kHz, dasher, no name, 1.7 sec dash each 6.9 sec 4094.5 kHz, X beacon 4096.3 kHz, Hexie beacon 4097.2 kHz, Inyo Whooper or Chips beacon (the 2nd harmonic of this is fun to chase) 4102.3 kHz, W Windy beacon Another beacon around 4096.2 is making occasional appearances. It is sending RHM or GVW from time to time, along with what might be telemetry. But, this one has been so sporadic I think someone is still playing with it, trying to get it working maybe. Coxie on 4095.9 and Kelsie on 4096.6 I have not seen for a while, I heard they had failures and have not been repaired yet. The 4089.25 dasher appears to be gone and has been for a while. CO was not on 3449 kHz (CO was 11002.7 kHz), 3449.8 kHz was the OK beacon and it appears to be gone, I heard it was busted by the FCC but that is only rumor, have not seen anything to prove that. Multiple beacons are up in the 5, 6, 8, and 11 MHz range. 3 new ones have been seen in the 2 MHz range (2008.4, 2018.3, and 2025.2 kHz), in addition to the A on 2097 kHz. T! -- From: Zack Widup w9sz.z...@gmail.com Sent: Sunday, December 30, 2012 2:57 PM To: Shortwave Spy Numbers Stations spooks@mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [Spooks] Spooks Digest, Vol 107, Issue 13 Visit http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks to unsubscribe from this list I don't think so. A CW net would be sending CW. All I heard was a few single dashes. Two of them were maybe a second apart and then the next one was 15 minutes later. Otherwise that frequency was quiet on that night. I have not been able to hear the usual mystery dashers at all this season so far. I can hear the L station well on 6668 kHz. but none of the dashers around 4080 kHz - I haven't heard the temperature beacon, Kelsie, Hexie, etc. The CO beacon on 3449 kHz seems to be gone now, too. When I put up a new 80 meter dipole a few months ago, I thought it might improve my reception of these beacons and dashers, too. But a new antenna does not improve propagation! I also had the chance to tune around for these during a lull in operating a ham radio contest superstation about 100 miles from home a month ago. I was using a foursquare antenna. I heard nothing then, either. 73, Zack W9SZ __ Spooks mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Spooks@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Re: [Spooks] WHY
Visit http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks to unsubscribe from this list -- From: KD7JYK DM09 kd7...@earthlink.net Sent: Sunday, November 11, 2012 10:18 PM To: Shortwave Spy Numbers Stations spooks@mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [Spooks] WHY Visit http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks to unsubscribe from this list : This is not correct, for sure not in the legal sense. Publication or public : knowledge does not denote declassification. You read far too much into my post. I was refering to the definition of the word, not the classification of a document. Kurt In which case there is almost no such thing as a secret in the real World. When is a secret not a secret? When one person not intended knows it? 10 people? 10,000 people? This group is a small splinter faction of the SWL hobby community. We chase unusual and out of the main stream signals, sometimes military or shadowy in nature. Without a doubt within our collective logbooks and memories are things other people consider secret, both as a classification and as a concept. Of course, a well maintained secret could be in our logs and we would never know it was a secret. T! __ Spooks mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Spooks@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Re: [Spooks] WHY
Visit http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks to unsubscribe from this list -- From: KD7JYK DM09 kd7...@earthlink.net Sent: Friday, November 09, 2012 5:25 AM To: Shortwave Spy Numbers Stations spooks@mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [Spooks] WHY Visit http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks to unsubscribe from this list Just don't give him information that could threaten national security and move on... If we have the information, it's not a secret. Kurt Kurt, This is not correct, for sure not in the legal sense. Publication or public knowledge does not denote declassification. Example, if a person with a security clearance has a classified document that says XYZZY is the magic word and someone publishes in Aviation Leak and Spy Technology XYZZY is the magic word, the person with authorized access still has to treat the information as classified, it is still officially classified. He / she can not confirm the information to anyone who does not have the proper level of clearance and the proper need to know, even though it might have been splashed on page one, above the fold, of a major newspaper. And depending on how Aviation Leak and Spy Technology acquired the information they may face prosecution for distributing it. If people who are not authorized to access a piece of classified information have knowledge of the information the information still may be classified. Often a leakage of classified information can be quantified, and the spread of that leak reduced or eliminated. Another example, and one that is real World. I rather strongly suspect that the military list certain frequencies and their usage as Classified. I mean, any official list you see that specific frequency and usage included on may carry some kind of classification, even if only For Official Use Only. We, as listeners, might hear the traffic and correctly deduce the usage / net / application of the communications. We now have legal access to classified, but unconfirmed, information. It can still be secret and known by others, this is, from a security consideration, an undesirable state, but not an impossible one. This raises some interesting questions. If you have what you suspect to be classified information are you in violation of any codes by distributing it? For sure this is going to vary from country to country. In some places yes and others no. I suspect that in the US as long as you do not know, for a fact, that the information is classified you are probably good to go. If you do suspect, or know, then it is a lot more questionable. T! __ Spooks mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Spooks@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Re: [Spooks] V2a and SK01 at 18MHz
Visit http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks to unsubscribe from this list This sounds right to me, I mean it sounds like it is probably real. Note that although atencion is missing there is a gap where it should be, almost like the machine dropped the ball on it. As for the tones on SK01 I have seen that a couple of times recently (last few weeks) and on known freqs and scheds. T! -- From: Brandon Longo palm...@aol.com Sent: Friday, June 29, 2012 18:04 To: spooks@mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [Spooks] V2a and SK01 at 18MHz Visit http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks to unsubscribe from this list I do think that these may possibly be fakes. The SK01 transmissions left the little burst of FSK that DIGTRX uses. It sounds like someone just button-mashed the tuning frequency generator button (the tones that are before SK01 data) and clicked transmit. However, I did notice the characteristic low modulation. As for V2a, I'm unsure about it for now. The callups seem right (ends in 1 or 2), but the lack of Atencion is peculiar. I may or may not recall hearing a V2a at 5883 with callups at the end of the transmission -- and no Atencion, and same format. I need to look around the band for those stations and check for consistency. Pedro seems to either be sleeping on the job, or the Cuban stations are changing schedule for the solar cycle (if it matters to them). -Original Message- From: Beaumont, Paul p.beaum...@imperial.ac.uk To: Shortwave Spy Numbers Stations spooks@mailman.qth.net Sent: Fri, Jun 29, 2012 2:46 pm Subject: Re: [Spooks] V2a and SK01 at 18MHz Visit http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks to unsubscribe from this list What is interesting that in the V02a call up : 73661 86181 00422, whilst it is repetitive there's no 'Atencion!' stated at the start of each round. Real or fake? I know Pedro makes mistakes but I don't think I've heard or seen comment on this one before. 73 Paul From: spooks-boun...@mailman.qth.net [spooks-boun...@mailman.qth.net] on behalf of Brandon Longo [palm...@aol.com] Sent: 29 June 2012 00:35 To: spooks@mailman.qth.net Subject: [Spooks] V2a and SK01 at 18MHz Visit http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks to unsubscribe from this list 21:53z -- caught SK01 at 18035 kHz Recording: http://youtu.be/qusjGC564ss 22:01z -- caught V2a at 18438 kHz Recording: http://youtu.be/bTnmLGuZ7jA Are these frequencies new, or did I not notice these earlier? de KJ6PSG __ Spooks mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Spooks@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html __ Spooks mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Spooks@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html __ Spooks mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Spooks@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Re: [Spooks] VC01
Visit http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks to unsubscribe from this list Ary, It is up on 4258 kHz USB right now (1257 UTC, May 26) and it has also been on 7351 kHz USB in the last few days. T! -- From: Ary Boender a...@luna.nl Sent: Saturday, May 26, 2012 05:20 To: UDXF mailing list u...@yahoogroups.com; Spooks Spooks@mailman.qth.net Subject: [Spooks] VC01 Visit http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks to unsubscribe from this list Hi all, Who can help me to the current freqs of VC01 - Chinese Robot. I lost them after the freq change 73, Ary __ Spooks mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Spooks@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html __ Spooks mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Spooks@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Re: [Spooks] Chinese slot machine
Visit http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks to unsubscribe from this list That is VC01, the Chinese Robot. The Slot Machine is Japanese, not Chinese ;) T! Mojave Desert, California, USA -- From: russell0...@yahoo.com.au Sent: Monday, April 30, 2012 10:42 AM To: spooks@mailman.qth.net Subject: [Spooks] Chinese slot machine Visit http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks to unsubscribe from this list Chinese slot machine 8.170mhz usb 10.40utc monday 30 april 2012 good sig in sydney au __ Spooks mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Spooks@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html __ Spooks mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Spooks@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Re: [Spooks] Spooks Digest, Vol 99, Issue 3
Visit http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks to unsubscribe from this list The source is certainly not in California, and not even in the United States, so Title 18 need not apply ;) However, this is also a computer generated voice, so sex probably is a moot point. It might, or might not, be synthesized. The female voice in question has tonal characteristics most commonly associated with a female human voice, while the male version is deeper and has tonal characteristics most commonly associated with a male human voice. T! Mojave Desert, California, USA -- From: Jeanne Pellegrino jpellegrino...@yahoo.com Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2012 5:15 PM To: spooks@mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [Spooks] Spooks Digest, Vol 99, Issue 3 Visit http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks to unsubscribe from this list Hi Spooks, In reply to the issue about distinguishing sex and gender of voices? The person could/can be Transgenderd, like under the Title 18 of the United States Code, Section 249. Bit of Civil, Criminal and Constitutional Rights laws updates for all. Gender is different than the sex of a human being. From: spooks-requ...@mailman.qth.net spooks-requ...@mailman.qth.net To: spooks@mailman.qth.net Sent: Thursday, April 5, 2012 12:01 PM Subject: Spooks Digest, Vol 99, Issue 3 Send Spooks mailing list submissions to spooks@mailman.qth.net To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to spooks-requ...@mailman.qth.net You can reach the person managing the list at spooks-ow...@mailman.qth.net When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than Re: Contents of Spooks digest... Today's Topics: 1. E7 like station (Chris Smolinski) 2. Re: E7 like station (Ary Boender) 3. Re: E7 like station (danix111) -- Message: 1 Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2012 10:15:48 -0400 From: Chris Smolinski csmolin...@blackcatsystems.com Subject: [Spooks] E7 like station To: enigma2...@yahoogroups.com Cc: Shortwave Spy Numbers Stations spooks@mailman.qth.net Message-ID: a2fd25bb-ee0b-4fc5-a9cf-e7f200a6d...@blackcatsystems.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Now heard on 16332 USB at 1410, but very weak. I'll try 14472 at 1420. Chris Smolinski Black Cat Systems http://www.blackcatsystems.com -- Message: 2 Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2012 17:24:40 +0200 From: Ary Boender a...@luna.nl Subject: Re: [Spooks] E7 like station To: 'Shortwave Spy Numbers Stations' spooks@mailman.qth.net Message-ID: 006601cd1340$381f4320$a85dc960$@luna.nl Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Chris, is that the one with the new female voice? Ary -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: spooks-boun...@mailman.qth.net [mailto:spooks-boun...@mailman.qth.net] Namens Chris Smolinski Verzonden: donderdag 5 april 2012 16:16 Aan: enigma2...@yahoogroups.com CC: Shortwave Spy Numbers Stations Onderwerp: [Spooks] E7 like station Visit http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks to unsubscribe from this list Now heard on 16332 USB at 1410, but very weak. I'll try 14472 at 1420. Chris Smolinski Black Cat Systems http://www.blackcatsystems.com __ Spooks mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Spooks@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html -- Message: 3 Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2012 17:29:07 +0200 From: danix111 danix...@gg.pl Subject: Re: [Spooks] E7 like station To: Shortwave Spy Numbers Stations spooks@mailman.qth.net Message-ID: a314e00400cf739493bd7cb831681...@gg.pl Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Chris, is that the one with the new female voice? It seemed male to me, but not that one E07 normally uses. 73 danix111 North Poland -- __ Spooks mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks Help: http://mailman.qth.net/faq.htm Post: mailto:Spooks@mailman.qth.net - Visit http://www.spynumbers.com/ for complete information about Spy Numbers Stations End of Spooks Digest, Vol 99, Issue 3 * __ Spooks mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Spooks@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Re: [Spooks] Automated Spy Numbers Loggings
Visit http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks to unsubscribe from this list Yes, this was V07. But the time is wrong. 0100 was 18368 kHz, USB. 0120 was 16268 kHz USB. 0140 was 13968 kHz USB. This was the first day of using the new frequencies, if they follow their past habits these frequencies and times should be in use for the next 2 months. After that they should shift frequency and times each month for the next 6 months. T! Mojave Desert, California, USA -- From: Ary Boender a...@luna.nl Sent: Sunday, February 05, 2012 8:28 AM To: 'Shortwave Spy Numbers Stations' spooks@mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [Spooks] Automated Spy Numbers Loggings Visit http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks to unsubscribe from this list Could have been V07, Brandon. They have a sked at 0100 UTC and used various 16 MHz freqs before 73, Ary -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: spooks-boun...@mailman.qth.net [mailto:spooks-boun...@mailman.qth.net] Namens Spy Numbers Robot Verzonden: zondag 5 februari 2012 7:40 Aan: spooks@mailman.qth.net Onderwerp: [Spooks] Automated Spy Numbers Loggings Visit http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks to unsubscribe from this list These loggings were submitted to the Spy Numbers Station Database on 2012-02-05 by Brandon Longo, Ventura, CA, USA. Freq ENIGMA Day MMDD UTC Mode Comments -- --- -- - 16268 UNID Sun 02052012 0100 USB SSYL Numbers ending with 000 000 The Spy Numbers Database is an effort to create as complete a record of Spy Numbers Station transmissions as possible. You can submit your loggings to the database, and search the database. Details are available at http://www.spynumbers.com/numbersDB __ Spooks mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Spooks@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html __ Spooks mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Spooks@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html __ Spooks mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Spooks@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Re: [Spooks] Chinese Robot
Visit http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks to unsubscribe from this list Ary, Right now, 1435 UTC on Dec 30, 2011, VC01/Chinese Robot is up on 3749 USB. T! Mojave Desert, California, USA -- From: Ary Boender a...@luna.nl Sent: Thursday, December 29, 2011 9:14 PM To: UDXF yahoogroups com (UDXF.yahoogroups.com)@mailman.qth.net; Spooks Spooks@mailman.qth.net Subject: [Spooks] Chinese Robot Visit http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks to unsubscribe from this list Hi, does anyone know the current frequency of the Chinese Robot? I haven't found it since 5 Dec. Ary __ Spooks mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Spooks@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html __ Spooks mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Spooks@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Re: [Spooks] Chinese Robot
Visit http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks to unsubscribe from this list Ary, I have not been at the radio in three days, but 4 or 5 days ago it was on 3749 USB and 7792 USB at different times of the day. T! -- From: Ary Boender a...@luna.nl Sent: Thursday, December 29, 2011 9:14 PM To: UDXF yahoogroups com (UDXF.yahoogroups.com)@mailman.qth.net; Spooks Spooks@mailman.qth.net Subject: [Spooks] Chinese Robot Visit http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks to unsubscribe from this list Hi, does anyone know the current frequency of the Chinese Robot? I haven't found it since 5 Dec. Ary __ Spooks mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Spooks@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html __ Spooks mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Spooks@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Re: [Spooks] V13
Visit http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks to unsubscribe from this list How sure are we on that 7553 kHz? About 1330 today (as many days) I heard V26 on 7553, but not V13. T! Mojave Desert, California, USA -- From: Ary Boender a...@luna.nl Sent: Friday, December 16, 2011 6:15 AM To: enigma2...@yahoogroups.com; spooks@mailman.qth.net; u...@yahoogroups.com Subject: [Spooks] V13 Visit http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks to unsubscribe from this list Hi all, Glenn Hauser reports V13 in his log via HCDX (dated 15/12/11) on 7580 kHz @ 0500, 0600, 1200, 1300 UTC. 7688 khz @ 0700, 0800 UTC. 9557 kHz @ 0200, 0300. 7553 kHz @ 0900, 1330 UTC. I have it right now (0610) on 7580 kHz Thanks to JM for forwarding this. Cheers, Ary __ Spooks mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Spooks@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html __ Spooks mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Spooks@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Re: [Spooks] V13
Visit http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks to unsubscribe from this list I was thinking the same thing, I have never seen a V13 at XX30. And the 0900 matches a known slot for V26 also, although I was not listening to make sure that it has been active in that slot for the last few days. I will record both tonight and for the next few nights to make sure though. T! -- From: Ary Boender a...@luna.nl Sent: Friday, December 16, 2011 11:01 PM To: 'Shortwave Spy Numbers Stations' spooks@mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [Spooks] V13 Visit http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks to unsubscribe from this list I don't know, T. V13 never had a .30 transmission as far as I know. Ary -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: spooks-boun...@mailman.qth.net [mailto:spooks-boun...@mailman.qth.net] Namens Token Verzonden: vrijdag 16 december 2011 23:37 Aan: enigma2...@yahoogroups.com; spooks@mailman.qth.net; u...@yahoogroups.com Onderwerp: Re: [Spooks] V13 Visit http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks to unsubscribe from this list How sure are we on that 7553 kHz? About 1330 today (as many days) I heard V26 on 7553, but not V13. T! Mojave Desert, California, USA -- From: Ary Boender a...@luna.nl Sent: Friday, December 16, 2011 6:15 AM To: enigma2...@yahoogroups.com; spooks@mailman.qth.net; u...@yahoogroups.com Subject: [Spooks] V13 Visit http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks to unsubscribe from this list Hi all, Glenn Hauser reports V13 in his log via HCDX (dated 15/12/11) on 7580 kHz @ 0500, 0600, 1200, 1300 UTC. 7688 khz @ 0700, 0800 UTC. 9557 kHz @ 0200, 0300. 7553 kHz @ 0900, 1330 UTC. I have it right now (0610) on 7580 kHz Thanks to JM for forwarding this. Cheers, Ary __ Spooks mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Spooks@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html __ Spooks mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Spooks@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html __ Spooks mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Spooks@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html __ Spooks mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Spooks@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Re: [Spooks] V13
Visit http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks to unsubscribe from this list Both of those time slots, about 0900 and about 1330, are known V26 slots and frequencies. V26 is variable on time though, plus or minus quite a bit. I would say it is very possible, even probable, that an error has been made and V13 was reported but V26 was what was heard. I did just look at the list and Aoki does indeed say random Chinese numbers for 7553. Odd, it does not list the parallel V26 frequencies of 4283 or 9153 kHz. T! -- From: J Murphy swl7...@yahoo.com Sent: Friday, December 16, 2011 10:41 PM To: Spooks@mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [Spooks] V13 Visit http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks to unsubscribe from this list Not sure, Glenn Hauser said that the frequency and time were per Aoki. JM __ Spooks mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Spooks@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html __ Spooks mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Spooks@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Re: [Spooks] Alphanumeric Station
Visit http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks to unsubscribe from this list There is no Enigma ID for this transmission because it is not a numbers station. This is an encoded transmission in the US military HF-GCS (High Frequency - Global Communications System, primarily an Air Force system but also used by other branches of the mil). These transmissions happen regularly and range from just a few characters to over 250. Although these are often called EAMs (Emergency Action Messages) there are many types of messages actually sent on these frequencies. Primary frequencies used would be 4724, 6739, 8992, 11175, 13200, and 15016 kHz, all in USB mode. Other frequencies can be used. You will likely notice an echo on the signal on any or all frequencies. This is mostly caused by multiple transmitters sending the same message, but network lag causing each to send at a slightly different time. However, there is a bit of propagation delay to your location for each specific transmitter, so this is also influencing the echo affect. Examples of traffic on these frequencies here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=euogMK-1ocg http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oF-DMhpJOAI http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FpgORcMhfq4 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M1yqWuLdBNA T! -- From: Ashley Dugan weab...@gmail.com Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 2011 6:51 AM To: spooks@mailman.qth.net Subject: [Spooks] Alphanumeric Station Visit http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks to unsubscribe from this list I am new to this, so please forgive mistakes. 0635 UTC 6.7375 Mhz Male voice Juliet, Foxtrot, Delta... Repeated after about 15 min., which I recorded. The voice was American. I will try to post recording on Soundcloud. Can anyone tell me which Enigma designation this station might be? Thanks, Ashley Dugan __ Spooks mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Spooks@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html __ Spooks mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Spooks@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Re: [Spooks] VTN
Visit http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks to unsubscribe from this list Ary, the VTN has been sending male read messages since May 15, 2011. The current message consist of 50 groups and is 3 minutes and 36 seconds form start to finish. My VTN page has a recording example. T! -- From: Ary Boender a...@luna.nl Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2011 4:06 PM To: UDXF mailing list u...@yahoogroups.com; Spooks Spooks@mailman.qth.net Subject: [Spooks] VTN Visit http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks to unsubscribe from this list Hi, The Vietnamese language numbers station on 10255 kHz was today on at 1607 UTC with a male operator. 73, Ary __ Spooks mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Spooks@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html __ Spooks mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Spooks@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Re: [Spooks] Chinese Robot
Visit http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks to unsubscribe from this list VC01, the Chinese Robot, has been making the shift from 7744 LSB to 7684 LSB about 1100 UTC, plus or minus a few minutes, for the last few days. The 7 MHz frequency and the 4 MHz frequency do not appear to be the same data, they appear to be separate transmissions. Also, I have been noting for the last few months that at least the 4 MHz transmission, and sometimes the 7 MHz, appears to shift transmitters ever 5 to 7 minutes. It is reasonably noticeable on the 4 MHz signal because the signal takes a slight drop in power when this happens, and there is a slight shift in frequency at the same time. It seems like maybe 2 transmitters are involved and it shifts back and forth between them. Naturally, I am not sure that is what is happening, but I do think it is a very strong possiblity. T! -- From: Ary Boender a...@luna.nl Sent: Monday, May 16, 2011 8:40 PM To: Spooks Spooks@mailman.qth.net; UDXF mailing list u...@yahoogroups.com Subject: [Spooks] Chinese Robot Visit http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks to unsubscribe from this list I copied the Chinese Robot today on 7744 kHz LSB, 16-05, 0517 UTC 4530 kHz USB, 16-05, 2037 UTC 7684 kHz LSB, 16-05, 2037 UTC not sure if it is //4530 kHz 73, Ary __ Spooks mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Spooks@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html __ Spooks mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Spooks@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Re: [Spooks] Automated Spy Numbers Loggings
Visit http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks to unsubscribe from this list Note the new frequency for V26. It shifted to this freq from the 4283 kHz frequency it has been using for the past 6+ months. At the same time the 7553 and 9153 kHz frequencies appear to have gone silent. There may be new other freqs in use, but I have not located them yet. T! -- From: Spy Numbers Robot csmolin...@erols.com Sent: Monday, May 16, 2011 10:04 PM To: spooks@mailman.qth.net Subject: [Spooks] Automated Spy Numbers Loggings Visit http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks to unsubscribe from this list These loggings were submitted to the Spy Numbers Station Database on 2011-05-16 by Token, California, USA. Freq ENIGMA Day MMDD UTC Mode Comments -- --- -- - 4243V26 Sat 05142011 1205 USB tuned to in progress, new frequency 4243V26 Mon 05162011 1155 USB tuned to in progress 7744 VC01 Sat 05142011 1045 LSB Chinese Robot, tuned to in progress, 1100 UTC switched frequency to 7684 kHz LSB 7684 VC01 Sat 05142011 1100 LSB Chinese Robot, switched to this frequency form 7744 kHz LSB 4530 VC01 Sat 05142011 1045 USB Chinese Robot, on at same time but not simulcast of 7684 kHz LSB and 7744 kHz LSB 4530 VC01 Sun 05152011 1130 USB Chinese Robot, changes transmitter every 5 to 7 minutes The Spy Numbers Database is an effort to create as complete a record of Spy Numbers Station transmissions as possible. You can submit your loggings to the database, and search the database. Details are available at http://www.spynumbers.com/numbersDB __ Spooks mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Spooks@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html __ Spooks mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Spooks@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Re: [Spooks] Automated Spy Numbers Loggings
Visit http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks to unsubscribe from this list Note the new time slots for V24. In the past three weeks new time slots of 1000, 1100, 1120, 1140, and 1220 have all been heard. Prior to this V24 had never been seen before 1200 UTC that I know of. The new time slots before 1200 raise the likely hood of people in the eastern parts of the USA of hearing this station, but will not help European listeners in the least. No new times past 1630 have yet been noted, however at this time of year my propagation is very poor to the region from 1500 on. If new time slots do exist after 1630 this would greatly help European listeners. T! -- From: Spy Numbers Robot csmolin...@erols.com Sent: Monday, May 16, 2011 9:57 PM To: spooks@mailman.qth.net Subject: [Spooks] Automated Spy Numbers Loggings Visit http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks to unsubscribe from this list These loggings were submitted to the Spy Numbers Station Database on 2011-05-16 by Token, California, USA. Freq ENIGMA Day MMDD UTC Mode Comments -- --- -- - 5715V24 Mon 05162011 1000AM 5f, new music, new time slot, 1st report of reception this time slot 5715V24 Mon 05162011 1100AM 5f, new time slot, 1st report of reception this time slot 6730V24 Mon 05162011 1430AM 5f The Spy Numbers Database is an effort to create as complete a record of Spy Numbers Station transmissions as possible. You can submit your loggings to the database, and search the database. Details are available at http://www.spynumbers.com/numbersDB __ Spooks mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Spooks@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html __ Spooks mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Spooks@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Re: [Spooks] What's that?
Visit http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks to unsubscribe from this list I first ran into this station about a month ago. No idea what it is but it is there quite often. I have never heard it direct in the western US, only with remote radios in Europe. T! -- From: David B. Scholz, DO1DBS do1...@gmx.de Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2011 2:36 AM To: spooks@mailman.qth.net Subject: [Spooks] What's that? Visit http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks to unsubscribe from this list Hello group! I just scrolled around the shortwave-bands and found a signal I never heared before. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3-4cNApiIgs The recording was made on 6208 kHz in the lower sideband. Does anyone have an idea what this could be and where it comes from? 73 from western germany, David __ Spooks mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Spooks@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html __ Spooks mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Spooks@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Re: [Spooks] V13
Visit http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks to unsubscribe from this list This would not be Vietnamese. This transmission, as all V13 transmissions, was in Chinese. T! -- From: Rich Ray saudog2...@yahoo.com Sent: Saturday, April 30, 2011 12:39 PM To: spooks@mailman.qth.net Subject: [Spooks] V13 Visit http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks to unsubscribe from this list Hello group desk, V13 9725khz 1200z 30/4/11 Flutes then YL in Vietnamese at 1201z SAT Decent copy here. Rich Burr Ridge, IL Watkins Johnson with Wellsbrook loop this log. __ Spooks mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Spooks@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html __ Spooks mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Spooks@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
[Spooks] Possible pre-S28/Buzzer message on different freq
Visit http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks to unsubscribe from this list Howdy all, I am not one for following the S28/Buzzer much, but today I noted something that might be interesting. Several times today the S28/Buzzer had voice messages. One of them was at 1430 UTC. About 1425 UTC I caught a message on another frequency in a very similar voice and format. Different message, different ID, naturally different frequency, but very similar format. 02/21/2011, 1425 UTC, 6409 USB, complete message sent twice. I did not get a complete recording of the first half, but I did of the second. Audio recording here: http://erick_cartman.home.mchsi.com/2011_02_21_1427_token_6409USB_S28_voice.mp3 T! Mohave Desert, California, USA __ Spooks mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Spooks@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Re: [Spooks] Korean Traffic
Visit http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks to unsubscribe from this list South Korean V24 and M94 traffic has had a very slight change in habits recently. The average message length has increased in the last week, not beyond the maximum that has been seen in the past but still longer on average. V24 has added a couple of new time slots and rearranged a couple of the old ones. For example in the last week or so there have been more 1630 slots than normal, but this could just be caused by errors in early slots. I can not prove but do believe that the 1630 slot is sometimes used to catch up or to correct for earlier errors in addition to hosting its regularly scheduled traffic. Other than this I have seen no changes to Korean or Chinese numbers traffic. T! Mohave Desert, California, USA -- From: Mike Tibor ti...@tibor.org Sent: Sunday, November 28, 2010 12:24 AM To: spooks@mailman.qth.net Subject: [Spooks] Korean Traffic Visit http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks to unsubscribe from this list I'm just getting started back into SWL after a 20+ year hiatus, but I was curious if anyone has noticed any changes in North or South Korean numbers station traffic patterns, particularly wrt the recent hostilities. I have yet to pick up any numbers stations that sound remotely Asian. Thanks, Mike __ Spooks mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Spooks@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html __ Spooks mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Spooks@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Re: [Spooks] Numbers c15MHz, 17:00Z, 10 Nov 2010 ???
Visit http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks to unsubscribe from this list Are you familiar with the Global High Frequency System? Although those transmissions are in English they can have a pronounced echo making them difficult to understand, particularly if you are tuned off frequency slightly. I bring this system up as a possible solution for several reasons. The GHFS system is often mistaken for a numbers station by listeners who have not heard it before. It does, after all, send a numbers encoded message, but is not generally considered to be included in the description numbers station. The GHFS system has two active frequencies between 15000 and 15200 kHz (15016 and 15038 kHz). The GHFS sends messages at scattered time throughout the day, however the two most likely times to hear a message from them is at the top of the hour and the bottom of the hour. There are not any active and reported numbers stations in the 15000 - 15200 kHz region. Of course that does not mean much by itself, there are many numbers transmissions that go unreported. But the majority of reported activity in that frequency range was from English language numbers station E22, and the last reported activity for that station was in 2006. English numbers station E10 was reported in that range occasionally in 2000 and before. I have two YouTube examples of messages that might be heard during a GHFS transmission, there are variations however. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=euogMK-1ocg http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oF-DMhpJOAI T! Mohave Desert, California, USA -- From: Nicholas Gessler, Ph.D. nick.gess...@duke.edu Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 2010 12:53 PM To: Spooks@mailman.qth.net Subject: [Spooks] Numbers c15MHz, 17:00Z, 10 Nov 2010 ??? Visit http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks to unsubscribe from this list I picked up the tail end of a broadcast at 17:30Z today, Wednesday, 10 November 2010. I heard about six numbers, in the cadence and tone of most numbers broadcasts, but in a language I didn't understand. The signal strength was good, the voice husky, but it ended abruptly as I tried to adjust my receiver. The frequency was just above 15MHz, probably around 15.2MHz. I'm used to hearing the Cuban lady, but this was not her. The time was 12:30 p.m. here at Duke University in North Carolina. I was attempting to find a spot on campus outside, with power, during the time in which I teach, so my students could hear a message first hand. Did anyone happen to confirm or log this broadcast? Thanks, Nick Nicholas Gessler, Ph.D. nick.gess...@duke.edumailto:nick.gess...@duke.edu http://isis.duke.edu/gessler Research Associate Information Science Information Studies Duke University, Durham, North Carolina Courses: Artificial Life, Culture and Evolutionary Computation. / Multiagent Simulation of Complex Systems Espionage, Cryptology Psychological Operations. / Networks of Trust Secrecy and Deception __ Spooks mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Spooks@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html __ Spooks mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Spooks@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Re: [Spooks] SK01, WYFR, and a sine wave
Visit http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks to unsubscribe from this list When two AM carriers fall within the passband of your receiver the carriers will mix (heterodyne), causing an audio tone equal to the difference in carrier frequencies (in this case 3 kHz, the difference between 5950 and 5947 kHz). The power relationship of the two carriers also plays into the picture. If your tuning and filter combination can not put one of the carriers outside the passband this is unavoidable and why notch filters exist. Why you are just now hearing this instead of having been hearing it all along is a bit more iffy to answer. If your filters and tuning combination normally puts one of the carriers outside the passband you might only hear the audio from the off freq station mixed with the audio of the station you are tuned to, and not hear the mixing of the two carriers. If, for some reason, you are now tuning so that both carriers are inside the passband, or the filter width has been increased, so that both carriers are inside the passband, that might explain why you are now hearing it for the first time. Without this phenomenon the BFO would not be possible. This problem used to be employed to the radio operators advantage. Before digital readouts or high precision mechanical frequency readouts you could inject a known frequency against your unknown (due to dial error) one, and either zero beat the known freq or determine the offset of the known to the unknown. Either approach resulted in confirming the frequency of the unknown signal. The BC-221 and LM series were developed to take advantage of heterodyning signals. http://home.mchsi.com/~token/BC221.htm T! Mohave Desert, California, USA -- From: KC2TTK kc2...@gmail.com Sent: Saturday, October 02, 2010 4:20 AM To: Shortwave Spy Numbers Stations spooks@mailman.qth.net Subject: [Spooks] SK01, WYFR, and a sine wave Visit http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks to unsubscribe from this list Two clarifications and a question re: Freq ENIGMA Day MMDD UTC Mode -- --- -- - 5947 SK01 Sat 10022010 0900 AM [08:59:15Z] High-pitched wail After doing a quick-n-dirty audio job, I've determined that it's a solid 3KHz sine wave. After a little research, I found that WYFR transmits on 5950KHz, so the frequency of the tone makes some sense. That said, *why* am I hearing this in the first place? When WWCR and V02a butt heads, all I hear is the overlapping crosstalk; with SK01 and WYFR, it's as they're doing a cheap and irritating Emergency Broadcast System imitation. If anyone could shed some light on this curiosity, I'd appreciate it. [09:11Z, 09:16Z, 09:22Z, 09:26Z] Possible SK01 Tx I see faint traces of SK01 transmissions in the spectrogram beginning at 08:59:50Z, 09:04:50Z, 09:09:50Z, 09:14:50Z, 09:19:51Z, and 09:24:51Z. What I probably heard was the closer/footer tone of RDFT instead of the header tone. ＫＣ２ＴＴＫ __ Spooks mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Spooks@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html __ Spooks mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Spooks@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Re: [Spooks] Automated Spy Numbers Loggings
Visit http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks to unsubscribe from this list Phoenix, do you have a recording of this? I am most interested in what you heard. However, I believe any numbers you heard not grouped in 5 figure groups were not the same Vietnamese numbers station that has been seen on this frequency. Today (August 01, 2010) the Vietnamese numbers station sent three messages. It sent the same 42 group message it has been sending since April 22, 2010. 1st message started at 1557:56 and ended at 1601:25 2nd message started at 1603:33 and ended at 1607:02 3rd message started at 1609:10 and ended at 1612:39 The messages were about S6, and very clear here. Nothing was heard here between the messages or for at least 20 minutes after the last message. Just a few minutes prior to the first message, and during much of the first message, there was (and often is on many days) unrelated communications slightly lower in frequency. That communication is weak enough (right at the noise level for me) at my location that I can not tell the language, or even exact frequency, I can only tell it was there. About 20 minutes before the first message there was a two way communication between an OM and a YL that lasted about 10 minutes, this was in Australian accented English and was directly on frequency, 10255 kHz, and in USB. T! Mohave Desert, California, USA -- From: Spy Numbers Robot csmolin...@erols.com Sent: Sunday, August 01, 2010 9:28 AM To: spooks@mailman.qth.net Subject: [Spooks] Automated Spy Numbers Loggings Visit http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks to unsubscribe from this list These loggings were submitted to the Spy Numbers Station Database on 2010-08-01 by phoenix, Hong Kong. Freq ENIGMA Day MMDD UTC Mode Comments -- --- -- - 10255--- Sun 08012010 1600 USB counting vietnamese numbers, today not bound into groups __ Spooks mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Spooks@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Re: [Spooks] North Korea/South Korea shortwave stations
Visit http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks to unsubscribe from this list V24 and M94 are the only still active that I know of. T! Mohave Desert, California, USA -- From: Stu o...@nc.rr.com Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2010 8:19 PM To: spooks@mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [Spooks] North Korea/South Korea shortwave stations Visit http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks to unsubscribe from this list It might be interesting to see if any new numbers stations pop up around the Koreas, or if jamming becomes more prominent in stations based out of those areas in light of the recent mounting tensions between the two countries. Are there any known North Korea/South Korea numbers stations? Voice of Korea might be something to monitor over the next couple of weeks, even though it is not a numbers station. - Zell __ Spooks mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Spooks@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
