request attributes and failed validation
In my Action I am populating an ActionForm with data from a database. I am also setting some additional request attributes with Lists of beans. The purpose of these Lists are to create various drop down boxes in the form. This works well, however when the form is submitted and validation fails these attributes are no longer in the request and the drop down boxes aren't created. What is the best way to have these Lists avaiable when the validation fails? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: request attributes and failed validation
One way is to put them temporarily in the session. But, why not just do it again? Is it too slow? At 11:28 PM 1/30/2004, you wrote: In my Action I am populating an ActionForm with data from a database. I am also setting some additional request attributes with Lists of beans. The purpose of these Lists are to create various drop down boxes in the form. This works well, however when the form is submitted and validation fails these attributes are no longer in the request and the drop down boxes aren't created. What is the best way to have these Lists avaiable when the validation fails? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: request attributes and failed validation
It's not slow, the lists are created from data from a database. I am assuming when you say 'do it again' you mean add these Lists to the request. Where should this be done at? >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 01/31/04 01:48 AM >>> One way is to put them temporarily in the session. But, why not just do it again? Is it too slow? At 11:28 PM 1/30/2004, you wrote: >In my Action I am populating an ActionForm with data from a database. I >am also setting some additional request attributes with Lists of >beans. The purpose of these Lists are to create various drop down boxes >in the form. This works well, however when the form is submitted and >validation fails these attributes are no longer in the request and the >drop down boxes aren't created. > >What is the best way to have these Lists avaiable when the validation fails? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: What does "do" stand for in .do files
Quoting "Gopalakrishnan, Jayesh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> The "do" is insignificant, its just what all the sample applications use and
> has somehow stayed on.
In the technical sense ("could I use "foo" instead of "do") you are absolutely
right ... there is no intrinsic meaning to "do". However, for native speakers
of English, "do" has a natural connotation of 'go DO something" that I wanted
to pick up on, so that was my choice for the "example" mappings for the Struts
controller servlet.
Craig McClanahan
PS: Being constructively lazy, it's also very easy to type :-).
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: request attributes and failed validation
I assume you want to do this after the validation fails, i.e. that timing (when) not placement (where) is the issue. Exactly how you want to do this depends on the details of your application. Not knowing these details makes it difficult, but just guessing would lead me to think that having something like a Composite Pattern in the session would make sense, to borrow some good ideas from the J2EE boys. There are just so many ways you could do this. The tracking and performance of the "cursor," as it were, is completely up to you. That is one of the nice things about Struts: with few exceptions, you have enough control at every stage to do whatever you want to do. You can, for example, make validation "fail" in numerous ways. You are not stuck with any particular paradigm. You can do it the usual way usually, but in your case, maybe you need to have it "fail" with a little more controller designed activity. Does this make sense to you when put this way? Michael McGrady At 12:01 AM 1/31/2004, you wrote: It's not slow, the lists are created from data from a database. I am assuming when you say 'do it again' you mean add these Lists to the request. Where should this be done at? >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 01/31/04 01:48 AM >>> One way is to put them temporarily in the session. But, why not just do it again? Is it too slow? At 11:28 PM 1/30/2004, you wrote: >In my Action I am populating an ActionForm with data from a database. I >am also setting some additional request attributes with Lists of >beans. The purpose of these Lists are to create various drop down boxes >in the form. This works well, however when the form is submitted and >validation fails these attributes are no longer in the request and the >drop down boxes aren't created. > >What is the best way to have these Lists avaiable when the validation fails? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: request attributes and failed validation
This is the reasons I sometimes have an action in my "input" action attribute. What I mean is: ... I sometimes (often?) use the Action that generated the form as my input because my form has controls that need to be initialized (like your drop downs). Using an Action as "input" sometimes takes more work. Your action should know that it's only redisplaying a form and not reset all form values (or else the user will have to reinput everything instead of just correct the validation error). You *can* avoid this by placing your list in session scope, like Mike suggested. If it's used often enough, you can put it in application scope, though you'd have to define when "often enough" is justified. Try the session scope approach first. hth, Hubert --- Ian Joyce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It's not slow, the lists are created from data from a database. I am > assuming when you say 'do it again' you mean add these Lists to the > request. Where should this be done at? > > >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 01/31/04 01:48 AM >>> > One way is to put them temporarily in the session. But, why not just do it > > again? Is it too slow? > > At 11:28 PM 1/30/2004, you wrote: > >In my Action I am populating an ActionForm with data from a database. I > >am also setting some additional request attributes with Lists of > >beans. The purpose of these Lists are to create various drop down boxes > >in the form. This works well, however when the form is submitted and > >validation fails these attributes are no longer in the request and the > >drop down boxes aren't created. > > > >What is the best way to have these Lists avaiable when the validation > fails? > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free web site building tool. Try it! http://webhosting.yahoo.com/ps/sb/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Populating a DynaActionForm with a complex object graph
Hi I'm trying to populate a DynaActionForm dynamically, using this how-to as a starting point: http://www.developer.com/java/other/article.php/2233591 Because the number of elements in my form can vary at runtime, I take the advice near the bottom of the article: """ You can even dynamically specify the size of the form (and prepopulate it) at run time [...] by using an Action instead of a forward to precreate the form-property value, and leaving the size parameter out. The actual can then create an array of the appropriate size and prepopulate values..""" So my Action instantiates the right number of beans in the form and then hands off to the JSP, no problem. However, my model isn't a simple array (as in all the examples I can find) - it's a complex object graph: I have one or more Flights, each of which can contain one or more Passengers, each of which has multiple properties (name, etc.) This means I need another level of iteration, a bit like this (if it worked!): Flight Passenger Name: This doesn't work - I just get HTML like this: Flight Passenger Name: Flight Passenger Name: Which obviously won't work I need to end up with something like Flight Passenger Name: Flight Passenger Name: Does anyone know if there is some way of doing this with DynaActionForms? Or am I going to have to do nasty manual indexing with Map or List backed ActionForms? Thanks for any help This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Business Exception and JSP
Title: Business Exception and JSP Hi all, I would want to display the business exception that are thrown to a separate jsp page. Please suggest some way in which i can approach this Thanks in advance, Sudhakar This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. Any unauthorised review, use, disclosure, dissemination, forwarding, printing or copying of this email or any action taken in reliance on this e-mail is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Visit us at http://www.cognizant.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
AW: SecurityFilter with Struts
thanks max. Now I have done it this way: I have a struts login form which submits to a LoginAction. There I check the user from a db and store the data in a session. The LoginAction forwards to the main page which is secured. SecurityFilter looks now for a file which I titled j_security_check.jsp. This file is an ordinary html form which submits automatically using javascript. the input types are therefore hidden. This works like a charm. However, I have a second application which uses frames. I tried to apply the above pattern the same way and surprisingly it only works the first time a user logs in. after that, if a user logs in (it does not matter if it is the same user or not) I get a NullPointerException caused by the RealmClass (which is extended from SimpleRealmBase...) in method isUserInRole. I traced it and found out that the username is null. But if you reload the page everything works... it is strange. I guess this has something to do with the second isUserInRole method were the principal is checked against null, and if it is not, the username gets populated. any idea max? thx, Dirk -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Max Cooper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Freitag, 30. Januar 2004 22:24 An: Struts Users Mailing List Betreff: Re: SecurityFilter with Struts Oops, this isn't entirely true: "There is no way to call an Action during the authentication process." You can have your login page be an action (/login.do) -- I just meant that you can't execute an action when that page is submitted. In other words, you can't process the login request with an Action, or have an Action do additional authentication-time processing when the login page is submitted. -Max - Original Message - From: "Max Cooper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Struts Users Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, January 30, 2004 1:19 PM Subject: Re: SecurityFilter with Struts > Use a regular form tag for the login page. The form will not be submitted to > a Struts action but rather it will be processed by the filter. There is no > way to call an Action during the authentication process. This is very > similar to how container-managed security works. > > One difference between container security and SecurityFilter is that you can > specify a "default" page to send the user to after they login, if they > arrive at the login page on their own. Normally, users are automatically > sent to the login page by the filter (just like container security) when > they try to access a page they need to be authenticated for. If that is the > case, SecurityFilter will redirect them to the page they were going to after > they are authenticated: > > SCENARIO 1: User goes directly to login page: > > GET /login.jsp > POST /j_security_check > (server redirects user to the configured "default" page -- /defaultPage.do > in this example) > GET /defaultPage.do > > SCENARIO 2: Filter sends user to login page > > GET /mustBeLoggedInToSeeThisPage.do > (server redirects to /login.jsp) > GET /login.jsp > POST /j_security_check > (server redirects to /mustBeLoggedInToSeeThisPage.do) > GET /mustBeLoggedInToSeeThisPage.do > > -Max > > - Original Message - > From: "Dirk Manske (Service Respond)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Friday, January 30, 2004 6:00 AM > Subject: SecurityFilter with Struts > > > > Hi, > > > > I try to integrate SecurityFilter 1.1 in my struts app. I understand that > I > > have to use "j_security_check" in my form action to setup SecurityFilter. > > But how does it work within a ? Because "j_security_check" > always > > gets populated to "j_security_check.do" the SecurityFilter will never be > > called!? So how should my login.jsp be designed to pass "j_security_check" > > and after this forward to an struts action class? > > > > any idea? > > > > thanks, > > > > Dirk > > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Using "bean:write" as a tag's value atrribute
Thank you very much Bean:define solved the problem -Original Message- From: Nicolas De Loof [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2004 3:45 PM To: Struts Users Mailing List Subject: Re: Using "bean:write" as a tag's value atrribute Nico. > > Dear All; > > Using works properly > in my jsp page body. But when I want to use it in a tag to fill its > attribute, it fails. > Actually I don't know the syntax of using bean:write, obviously the below > way is wrong: > > "> > > Using expression is wrong, too: > > value="<%=%>"> > > So how could I use bean:write in my tags?! > > Any help would be greatly appreciated > Nafise > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
list tag validation
Dear All; I wanna to validate a list box if it's empty or not. Obviously using javascript will solve the problem, but I want to do it via Validation Framework. Is there any way to validate a select box if it has any options or not in validation.xml? Thank you Nafise
Re: Response not XHTML-comliant when using
Thanks for the anwers so far.
But it is not working for me, because I still have this extra
tags included.
I have done the following xperiments:
<%@ include file="../includes/navigation.jsp" %>
All of them included extra
I simply do not get it!
Maybe some of you can put some light on this mystery :-)
Here is my code:
---
main.jsp
---
<%@ taglib uri="struts-html"prefix="html" %>
<%@ taglib uri="struts-tiles" prefix="tiles" %>
<%@ taglib uri="sitemesh-page" prefix="page" %>
<%@ taglib uri="sitemesh-decorator" prefix="decorator" %>
http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd";>
SomeName -
<%@ include file="../includes/navigation.jsp" %>
(printable version)
includes/navigation.jsp
<%@ taglib uri="struts-html" prefix="html" %>
Search
---
And this is the output:
---
http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd";>
SomeName - JSP counter
Search
The current count is... 2
(printable version)
---
validation results:
---
Document type does not permit element ââ
in content of element ââ.
Document type does not permit element ââ
in content of element ââ.
Value of attribute âmethodâ for element ââ is invalid;
Value must be one of {"get","post"}.
Document type does not permit element ââ
in content of element ââ.
Close tag for element ââ omitted
but document type doesn't permit it.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
indexed checkbox and set method
I want to use a form that looks like this :
..
I made my form bean with this get :
public class AddRACIForm extends ActionForm {
private List prop = new ArrayList();
..
public void setIndexProp(int key, Object myobject) {
this.prop.set(key, myobject);
}
}
But if I check both boxes "value1" and "value2" for, say, indexProp[1], the Object
myobject I get in setIndexProp() is the String "value1" only (and never "value2").
How can I do to get an array of string[] in my action form, instead of a string ?
Thanks in advance,
Emmanuel
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.560 / Virus Database: 352 - Release Date: 08/01/2004
Detect messages with Jstl
Hi everybody! I am experimenting with the tags of Struts 1.1. My problem is that I need to discover if there are any messages. Of course, there is the tag, but I am trying to avoid the logic tag library. So my question is: What would be the elegant way to discover the presence of messages using the jstl core taglib? Thanks in advance! Axel = Axel Wilhelm Berle e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tel: (office) +55 16 618.0090 (mobile) +55 16 9964.6343 Mit schönen Grüßen von Yahoo! Mail - http://mail.yahoo.de - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: request attributes and failed validation
Egg-zackly, Hubert. Nice work! Also, in an action we can go anywhere programmatically that we want, so there is no restriction by the input attribute, only a possibility. Wherever the "cursor" is in the course of the request's way to a response, we can go wherever we like and have whatever we want there. This is, for me, the beauty of MVC-like pattern in Struts and similar frameworks. No matter what the framework, we always have controls, but these make a lot more sense than fluffing up JSP pages, etc. Lord, this is WAY to philosophical, but hopefully it is helpful to the "question askeree". At 01:58 AM 1/31/2004, Hubert Rabago wrote: This is the reasons I sometimes have an action in my "input" action attribute. What I mean is: ... I sometimes (often?) use the Action that generated the form as my input because my form has controls that need to be initialized (like your drop downs). Using an Action as "input" sometimes takes more work. Your action should know that it's only redisplaying a form and not reset all form values (or else the user will have to reinput everything instead of just correct the validation error). You *can* avoid this by placing your list in session scope, like Mike suggested. If it's used often enough, you can put it in application scope, though you'd have to define when "often enough" is justified. Try the session scope approach first. hth, Hubert --- Ian Joyce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It's not slow, the lists are created from data from a database. I am > assuming when you say 'do it again' you mean add these Lists to the > request. Where should this be done at? > > >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 01/31/04 01:48 AM >>> > One way is to put them temporarily in the session. But, why not just do it > > again? Is it too slow? > > At 11:28 PM 1/30/2004, you wrote: > >In my Action I am populating an ActionForm with data from a database. I > >am also setting some additional request attributes with Lists of > >beans. The purpose of these Lists are to create various drop down boxes > >in the form. This works well, however when the form is submitted and > >validation fails these attributes are no longer in the request and the > >drop down boxes aren't created. > > > >What is the best way to have these Lists avaiable when the validation > fails? > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free web site building tool. Try it! http://webhosting.yahoo.com/ps/sb/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Response not XHTML-comliant when using
I have run into similar difficulties with Tiles and have just made do. I
welcome all insights in this area. Glad this issue is getting air.
At 07:59 AM 1/31/2004, you wrote:
Thanks for the anwers so far.
But it is not working for me, because I still have this extra
tags included.
I have done the following xperiments:
<%@ include file="../includes/navigation.jsp" %>
page="/WEB-INF/jsp/includes/navigation.jsp" />
All of them included extra
I simply do not get it!
Maybe some of you can put some light on this mystery :-)
Here is my code:
---
main.jsp
---
<%@ taglib uri="struts-html"prefix="html" %>
<%@ taglib uri="struts-tiles" prefix="tiles" %>
<%@ taglib uri="sitemesh-page" prefix="page" %>
<%@ taglib uri="sitemesh-decorator" prefix="decorator" %>
"http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd";>
<%@ include file="../includes/navigation.jsp" %>
(printable version)
includes/navigation.jsp <%@
taglib uri="struts-html" prefix="html" %>
[]
Search
--- And this is the output:
---
Search
The current count is... 2
(printable version)
---
validation results:
---
Document type does not permit element “”
in content of element “”.
Document type does not permit element “”
in content of element “”.
Value of attribute “method” for element “” is invalid;
Value must be one of {"get","post"}.
Document type does not permit element “”
in content of element “”.
Close tag for element “” omitted
but document type doesn't permit it.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing a large number of records
I am building a feature into my app that will allow users to generate printable results from data. The number of results is in the thousands and the problem I'm having is that the http request timeouts before the data processing is complete. The method I've adopted is to take a arrayList of data objects and then iterate through the list and generate an arrayList of result objects which I can either pass to a jsp page for rendering or convert to a pdf document. The problem I have is that when the list of data objects is small (a couple of hundred) it works fine, but when the list is large (3 or 4 thousand) the data processing isn't complete when the request times out. Is there a way to flush the response after each loop and keep the connection alive. Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated. Zoran - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: bug in latest validator-rules.xml ?
At 11:54 AM -0600 1/30/04, Matt Bathje wrote: Joe - this is working fine for me with the 1/13/2004 nightly build. I have tried with commons-validator-1.1.1.jar and with whatever version the commons-validator.jar in the 1/13 nightly build of struts is. Validation worked right out of the box - all I did to "install" the nightly build was copy over the jar, tld and xml files from the zip file. Based on that it seems like if there is a bug, it is in struts and probably in the newer nightly builds. (Doesn't seem like it would be in validator-rules.xml itself though, that hasn't been updated since december) Nah, the bug was in my commons-validator-1.1.1.jar Somehow I got a version which didn't have the javascript in it. Thanks for providing a "worksforme" though; it helped me look harder at my own install. Joe -- Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://blog.germuska.com "Imagine if every Thursday your shoes exploded if you tied them the usual way. This happens to us all the time with computers, and nobody thinks of complaining." -- Jef Raskin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: request attributes and failed validation
This was exactly what I was looking for. Thanks. If anyone is interested in details I'd be happy to share... >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 01/31/04 03:59 AM >>> This is the reasons I sometimes have an action in my "input" action attribute. What I mean is: ... I sometimes (often?) use the Action that generated the form as my input because my form has controls that need to be initialized (like your drop downs). Using an Action as "input" sometimes takes more work. Your action should know that it's only redisplaying a form and not reset all form values (or else the user will have to reinput everything instead of just correct the validation error). You *can* avoid this by placing your list in session scope, like Mike suggested. If it's used often enough, you can put it in application scope, though you'd have to define when "often enough" is justified. Try the session scope approach first. hth, Hubert --- Ian Joyce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It's not slow, the lists are created from data from a database. I am > assuming when you say 'do it again' you mean add these Lists to the > request. Where should this be done at? > > >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 01/31/04 01:48 AM >>> > One way is to put them temporarily in the session. But, why not just do it > > again? Is it too slow? > > At 11:28 PM 1/30/2004, you wrote: > >In my Action I am populating an ActionForm with data from a database. I > >am also setting some additional request attributes with Lists of > >beans. The purpose of these Lists are to create various drop down boxes > >in the form. This works well, however when the form is submitted and > >validation fails these attributes are no longer in the request and the > >drop down boxes aren't created. > > > >What is the best way to have these Lists avaiable when the validation > fails? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Parameter ???
Don't use the "ção" expression. Is that possible? HTH Otávio Augusto On Thu, 29 Jan 2004 19:42:51 -0200 "Mauricio T. Ferraz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > How can I compare a parameter in my URL (someAction.do?type=Alteração) with > the tag do something > > > The problem is the "ção" . How can I sove this ??? > > thanks > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: What does "do" stand for in .do files
So, just to complement the discussion, is it possible to use any other extension
rather than .do? Changing it in the web.xml file makes that possible?
Thanks
Otávio Augusto
On Sat, 31 Jan 2004 00:38:03 -0800
"Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Quoting "Gopalakrishnan, Jayesh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > The "do" is insignificant, its just what all the sample applications use and
> > has somehow stayed on.
>
> In the technical sense ("could I use "foo" instead of "do") you are absolutely
> right ... there is no intrinsic meaning to "do". However, for native speakers
> of English, "do" has a natural connotation of 'go DO something" that I wanted
> to pick up on, so that was my choice for the "example" mappings for the Struts
> controller servlet.
>
> Craig McClanahan
>
> PS: Being constructively lazy, it's also very easy to type :-).
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: What does "do" stand for in .do files
Yes, you can use any extension you like. I'm currently using .cfm to
integrate a Struts app into a Cold Fusion website.
Matt
On Jan 31, 2004, at 6:15 PM, Otávio Augusto wrote:
So, just to complement the discussion, is it possible to use any other
extension rather than .do? Changing it in the web.xml file makes that
possible?
Thanks
Otávio Augusto
On Sat, 31 Jan 2004 00:38:03 -0800
"Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Quoting "Gopalakrishnan, Jayesh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
The "do" is insignificant, its just what all the sample applications
use and
has somehow stayed on.
In the technical sense ("could I use "foo" instead of "do") you are
absolutely
right ... there is no intrinsic meaning to "do". However, for native
speakers
of English, "do" has a natural connotation of 'go DO something" that
I wanted
to pick up on, so that was my choice for the "example" mappings for
the Struts
controller servlet.
Craig McClanahan
PS: Being constructively lazy, it's also very easy to type :-).
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Multiple Action invokations in a single JSP / request via *include*?
Hello all, For long time now i am trying to make several invokations of Struts Actions whose outputs are to be rendered into one single JSP using JSTL's c:import or jsp:import. However, when the first Action called reaches a larger response length (bytes); the request gets cut; thus the page is not fully loaded. I think it has to do that a Action is intended to do a flush after the ActionForward has been returned to the master Struts servlet (i could not measure it, but i would not wonder if the request gets cut at exactly 8192 bytes). I think even for my problem there is a bugzilla entry, but i cannot find it again. But i wonder if one JSP called by an Action cannot call a subsequent Action of Struts as an imported page fragment. FYI i am using up to date JSTL, struts and Tomcat 5.0.18; same results w/ J2 SDKs 1.4.1_02 and 1.5 beta. I think i know that Tiles is intended for similar things, but porting to it is not an option in my current project. Is there any chance of doing that; meaning having several Actions making up one single request? Any help is very appreciated! Thanks you! -- greetings, | /"\ | \ / ASCII-Ribbon-Campaign Timo | X Against HTML Mail | / \ -- PUBLIC KEY: 52F3311A Timo Boewing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2003/10/30 Fingerprint = F743 E0AA A2F0 1B33 F6FA 417B 72BE 740D 52F3 311A signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: What does "do" stand for in .do files
Would you show a very simple description on how to do it? I thought I'd have problems
with the ActionServlet...but if you say it works fine, great!
Thanks ;)
Otávio Augusto
On Sat, 31 Jan 2004 19:04:58 -0700
Matt Raible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes, you can use any extension you like. I'm currently using .cfm to
> integrate a Struts app into a Cold Fusion website.
>
> Matt
>
> On Jan 31, 2004, at 6:15 PM, Otávio Augusto wrote:
>
> > So, just to complement the discussion, is it possible to use any other
> > extension rather than .do? Changing it in the web.xml file makes that
> > possible?
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Otávio Augusto
> >
> > On Sat, 31 Jan 2004 00:38:03 -0800
> > "Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> Quoting "Gopalakrishnan, Jayesh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >>
> >>> The "do" is insignificant, its just what all the sample applications
> >>> use and
> >>> has somehow stayed on.
> >>
> >> In the technical sense ("could I use "foo" instead of "do") you are
> >> absolutely
> >> right ... there is no intrinsic meaning to "do". However, for native
> >> speakers
> >> of English, "do" has a natural connotation of 'go DO something" that
> >> I wanted
> >> to pick up on, so that was my choice for the "example" mappings for
> >> the Struts
> >> controller servlet.
> >>
> >> Craig McClanahan
> >>
> >> PS: Being constructively lazy, it's also very easy to type :-).
> >>
> >>
> >> -
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date comparison
To start off, thank you who can help. I have looked through examples, docs, etc. The
forum "almost" helped.
The end problem is that I am doing a addLessThan on a datetime db field using the PB
and it is failing likely because of a type casting problem.
I am using Timestamp in my java code.
Using this for my mapping into a DATETIME field in MySql.
Data gets inserted correctly into MySQL or seems to, but when I do
crit.addLessThan("offerends", new Timestamp(System.currentTimeMillis());
When I print out the query, I get:
Query from class com.model.offer.OfferVO where [offerprice
> 0.0, isdisabled = false, offerends < 2004-01-31 21:59:07.89,
> offeredProducts.productid = 1000]
It is the time aspect on this which is failing.
The row should return back data, but is failing to do so.
Thank you again for your help.
John
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Checkbox problem
Hi Group, I am using Struts 1.1 version. I have a page in which i display a set of checkboxes(10 checkboxes to be specific). All the checkboxes have the same name and have different values. I have an ActionForm for this. In the ActionForm, i have a String[] checkBoxArr to represent these checkboxes. I have a condition that i have to check one particular checkbox out of the ten. Some said to set this in the constructor. Please suggest a way for doing this. Many Thanks, Janarthan S - Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free web site building tool. Try it!
