Re: [OT] Not spam...I swear--

2003-01-25 Thread Peter A. Pilgrim
Robert Leland wrote:

Try to remain civil if not professional.

If you can't be good, be careful.  I said Morning after the
night over tequila sunrise IV. Now where is that AlkaSeltzer? 
--
Pete


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: [OT] Not spam...I swear--

2003-01-24 Thread Peter A. Pilgrim
Chris Trawick wrote:

Hello World

What?


Actually not.

Perhaps your experience with job placement services is different from mine,
but even in the best of times they're brutal.  Downright brutal.  I hate
them.  They did good for me but they've screwed over several friends of


You must have some big balls, then?
--
Peter Pilgrim
   __ _ _ _
  / //__  // ___// ___/   +  Serverside Java
 / /___/ // /__ / /__ +  Struts
/ // ___// ___// ___/ +  Expresso Committer
 __/ // /__ / /__ / /__   +  Independent Contractor
/___///////   +  Intrinsic Motivation
On Line Resume
   ||
   \\===  `` http://www.xenonsoft.demon.co.uk/no-it-striker.html ''


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: [OT] Not spam...I swear--

2003-01-24 Thread Robert Leland
Peter A. Pilgrim wrote:
  You must have some big balls, then?
Try to remain civil if not professional.

-Rob


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: [OT] Not spam...I swear--

2003-01-21 Thread Mark Galbreath
So...what IS the difference?

-Original Message-
From: Peter A. Pilgrim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, January 20, 2003 8:47 PM

spontaneous recruitment, and that was back in the dotcom bubbling days.
Naivety and stupidity is even more prevalent now. People with write 4 1/2
years Java on their CV and then they cant tell me what is the different
between a `Vector' and `Hashtable'.



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: [OT] Not spam...I swear--

2003-01-21 Thread James Turner
 From: Mark Galbreath [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 11:29 AM
 To: 'Struts Users Mailing List'
 Subject: RE: [OT] Not spam...I swear--
 
 
 So...what IS the difference?

Well, for one thing, trying to do vectorInstance.put(key, value);
won't compile :-)

Vectors are ordered lists, Hashtables (or HashMaps as they are commonly
invoked in Java) are key/value association tables.

This concludes today's Java 101.

James Turner
Owner  Manager, Black Bear Software, LLC
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Author: 
MySQL  JSP Web Applications: 
Data Driven Programming Using Tomcat and MySQL
ISBN 0672323095; SAMS, 2002

Co-Author: 
Struts Kick Start
ISBN 0672324725; SAMS, 2002

Forthcoming:
Java Server Faces Kick Start 
SAMS, Fall 2003


 -Original Message-
 
 
 
 --
 To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
 mailto:struts-user- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For 
 additional commands, 
 e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: [OT] Not spam...I swear--

2003-01-21 Thread Chappell, Simon P
James  I think he was being sarcastic (for a change!) Oops, more sarcasm.

-Original Message-
From: James Turner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 10:49 AM
To: 'Struts Users Mailing List'
Subject: RE: [OT] Not spam...I swear--


 From: Mark Galbreath [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 11:29 AM
 To: 'Struts Users Mailing List'
 Subject: RE: [OT] Not spam...I swear--
 
 
 So...what IS the difference?

Well, for one thing, trying to do vectorInstance.put(key, value);
won't compile :-)

Vectors are ordered lists, Hashtables (or HashMaps as they are commonly
invoked in Java) are key/value association tables.

This concludes today's Java 101.

James Turner
Owner  Manager, Black Bear Software, LLC
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Author: 
MySQL  JSP Web Applications: 
Data Driven Programming Using Tomcat and MySQL
ISBN 0672323095; SAMS, 2002

Co-Author: 
Struts Kick Start
ISBN 0672324725; SAMS, 2002

Forthcoming:
Java Server Faces Kick Start 
SAMS, Fall 2003


 -Original Message-
 
 
 
 --
 To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
 mailto:struts-user- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For 
 additional commands, 
 e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
mailto:struts-user-[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For 
additional commands, 
e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: [OT] Not spam...I swear--

2003-01-21 Thread Attila Szegedi
Wrong. Hashtables are serializable just fine.

Attila.

- Original Message - 
From: NoSect [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 6:30 PM
Subject: RE: [OT] Not spam...I swear--


 Vectors are also serializedhashtables not.
  From: Mark Galbreath [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 
  Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 11:29 AM
 
  To: 'Struts Users Mailing List'
 
  Subject: RE: [OT] Not spam...I swear--
 
  
 
  
 
  So...what IS the difference?
 
 Well, for one thing, trying to do vectorInstance.put(key, value);
 
 won't compile :-)
 
 Vectors are ordered lists, Hashtables (or HashMaps as they are commonly
 
 invoked in Java) are key/value association tables.
 
 This concludes today's Java 101.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 -
 Do you Yahoo!?
 Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: [OT] Not spam...I swear--

2003-01-21 Thread Eric C. Hein
I think NoSect may have meant synchronized.
Unlike the new collection implementations, Vector is *synchronized*.


- Original Message -
From: Attila Szegedi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Struts Users Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 9:48 AM
Subject: Re: [OT] Not spam...I swear--


 Wrong. Hashtables are serializable just fine.

 Attila.

 - Original Message -
 From: NoSect [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 6:30 PM
 Subject: RE: [OT] Not spam...I swear--


  Vectors are also serializedhashtables not.
   From: Mark Galbreath [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 
   Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 11:29 AM
 
   To: 'Struts Users Mailing List'
 
   Subject: RE: [OT] Not spam...I swear--
 
  
 
  
 
   So...what IS the difference?
 
  Well, for one thing, trying to do vectorInstance.put(key, value);
 
  won't compile :-)
 
  Vectors are ordered lists, Hashtables (or HashMaps as they are commonly
 
  invoked in Java) are key/value association tables.
 
  This concludes today's Java 101.
 
 
 
 
 
 
  -
  Do you Yahoo!?
  Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now


 --
 To unsubscribe, e-mail:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: [OT] Not spam...I swear--

2003-01-21 Thread Eric C. Hein
Mark,

HashTables should never be worn after Labor day. 

- Original Message - 
From: NoSect [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 9:30 AM
Subject: RE: [OT] Not spam...I swear--


 Vectors are also serializedhashtables not.
  From: Mark Galbreath [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 
  Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 11:29 AM
 
  To: 'Struts Users Mailing List'
 
  Subject: RE: [OT] Not spam...I swear--
 
  
 
  
 
  So...what IS the difference?
 
 Well, for one thing, trying to do vectorInstance.put(key, value);
 
 won't compile :-)
 
 Vectors are ordered lists, Hashtables (or HashMaps as they are commonly
 
 invoked in Java) are key/value association tables.
 
 This concludes today's Java 101.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 -
 Do you Yahoo!?
 Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: [OT] Not spam...I swear--

2003-01-21 Thread NoSect

Ooops. That IS what I meant. I was thinking about the issue of accessing them...and 
got my sibilants mixed up.
 Eric C. Hein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:I think NoSect may have meant 
synchronized.
Unlike the new collection implementations, Vector is *synchronized*.


- Original Message -
From: Attila Szegedi 
To: Struts Users Mailing List ;

Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 9:48 AM
Subject: Re: [OT] Not spam...I swear--


 Wrong. Hashtables are serializable just fine.

 Attila.

 - Original Message -
 From: NoSect 
 To: 
 Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 6:30 PM
 Subject: RE: [OT] Not spam...I swear--


  Vectors are also serializedhashtables not.
   From: Mark Galbreath [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 
   Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 11:29 AM
 
   To: 'Struts Users Mailing List'
 
   Subject: RE: [OT] Not spam...I swear--
 
  
 
  
 
   So...what IS the difference?
 
  Well, for one thing, trying to do vectorInstance.put(key, value);
 
  won't compile :-)
 
  Vectors are ordered lists, Hashtables (or HashMaps as they are commonly
 
  invoked in Java) are key/value association tables.
 
  This concludes today's Java 101.
 
 
 
 
 
 
  -
  Do you Yahoo!?
  Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now


 --
 To unsubscribe, e-mail:

 For additional commands, e-mail:




--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: 
For additional commands, e-mail: 



-
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now


Re: [OT] Not spam...I swear--

2003-01-21 Thread Attila Szegedi
Even with substituting synchronized for serialized would he be wrong, as
both Vector and Hashtable are in fact synchronized (unlike ArrayList and
HashMap, respectively).

Attila.

- Original Message -
From: Eric C. Hein [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Struts Users Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 7:01 PM
Subject: Re: [OT] Not spam...I swear--


 I think NoSect may have meant synchronized.
 Unlike the new collection implementations, Vector is *synchronized*.


 - Original Message -
 From: Attila Szegedi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Struts Users Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED];
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 9:48 AM
 Subject: Re: [OT] Not spam...I swear--


  Wrong. Hashtables are serializable just fine.
 
  Attila.
 
  - Original Message -
  From: NoSect [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 6:30 PM
  Subject: RE: [OT] Not spam...I swear--
 
 
   Vectors are also serializedhashtables not.
From: Mark Galbreath [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  
Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 11:29 AM
  
To: 'Struts Users Mailing List'
  
Subject: RE: [OT] Not spam...I swear--
  
   
  
   
  
So...what IS the difference?
  
   Well, for one thing, trying to do vectorInstance.put(key, value);
  
   won't compile :-)
  
   Vectors are ordered lists, Hashtables (or HashMaps as they are
commonly
  
   invoked in Java) are key/value association tables.
  
   This concludes today's Java 101.
  
  
  
  
  
  
   -
   Do you Yahoo!?
   Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now
 
 
  --
  To unsubscribe, e-mail:
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  For additional commands, e-mail:
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 


 --
 To unsubscribe, e-mail:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]






--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: [OT] Not spam...I swear--

2003-01-21 Thread Mark Galbreath
Whoa!  Grab a beer and www.oddtodd.com, dude.  You are way too serious!

-Original Message-
From: James Turner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 11:49 AM

 So...what IS the difference?

Well, for one thing, trying to do vectorInstance.put(key, value); won't
compile :-)

Vectors are ordered lists, Hashtables (or HashMaps as they are commonly
invoked in Java) are key/value association tables.

This concludes today's Java 101.

James Turner



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: [OT] Not spam...I swear--

2003-01-21 Thread Mark Galbreath
He was probably confusing serializable with default synchronization.  Any
Java object can be serialized.

-Original Message-
From: Attila Szegedi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 12:49 PM

Wrong. Hashtables are serializable just fine.

Attila.

- Original Message - 
From: NoSect [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Vectors are also serializedhashtables not.



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: [OT] Not spam...I swear--

2003-01-21 Thread Attila Szegedi

- Original Message -
From: Mark Galbreath [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Struts Users Mailing List' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 8:30 PM
Subject: RE: [OT] Not spam...I swear--


 He was probably confusing serializable with default synchronization.  Any
 Java object can be serialized.


Yeah? Try serializing a java.lang.Thread. Or a plain java.lang.Object, for
that matter...
We're getting quite involved in this Java 101 trivia :-)

Attila.

 -Original Message-
 From: Attila Szegedi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 12:49 PM

 Wrong. Hashtables are serializable just fine.

 Attila.

 - Original Message -
 From: NoSect [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

  Vectors are also serializedhashtables not.



 --
 To unsubscribe, e-mail:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]






--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: [OT] Not spam...I swear--

2003-01-21 Thread Brian Lee
Only objects that implement java.io.Serializable should be serialized.

Although it might be possible to serialize a class that doesn't implement 
Serializable, the interface exists for a reason. Use it to flag that your 
class is safe to be serialized.

BAL

From: Mark Galbreath [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts Users Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Struts Users Mailing List' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [OT] Not spam...I swear--
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2003 14:30:30 -0500

He was probably confusing serializable with default synchronization.  Any
Java object can be serialized.

-Original Message-
From: Attila Szegedi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 12:49 PM

Wrong. Hashtables are serializable just fine.

Attila.

- Original Message -
From: NoSect [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Vectors are also serializedhashtables not.



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE* 
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: [OT] Not spam...I swear--

2003-01-21 Thread Mark Galbreath
It may be difficult and unpredictable, but you can do it.

-Original Message-
From: Attila Szegedi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 2:38 PM

- Original Message -
From: Mark Galbreath [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Struts Users Mailing List' [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 He was probably confusing serializable with default synchronization.  
 Any Java object can be serialized.


Yeah? Try serializing a java.lang.Thread. Or a plain java.lang.Object, for
that matter... We're getting quite involved in this Java 101 trivia :-)

Attila



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: [OT] Not spam...I swear--

2003-01-21 Thread Mark Galbreath
You can also use the Externalizable interface as well as place any object in
an array and serialize the array.

Mark

-Original Message-
From: Brian Lee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 2:44 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [OT] Not spam...I swear--


Only objects that implement java.io.Serializable should be serialized.

Although it might be possible to serialize a class that doesn't implement 
Serializable, the interface exists for a reason. Use it to flag that your 
class is safe to be serialized.

BAL

From: Mark Galbreath [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts Users Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Struts Users Mailing List' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [OT] Not spam...I swear--
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2003 14:30:30 -0500

He was probably confusing serializable with default synchronization.  
Any Java object can be serialized.

-Original Message-
From: Attila Szegedi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 12:49 PM

Wrong. Hashtables are serializable just fine.

Attila.

- Original Message -
From: NoSect [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

  Vectors are also serializedhashtables not.



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE* 
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: [OT] Not spam...I swear--

2003-01-21 Thread Brian Lee
You can use Externalizable as well as any other class that extends 
Serializable (hurrah for OO).

If you put a non-Serializable object into an array and try to serialize bad 
things will happen (same thing with Collections or if you define a class as 
Serializable and then create non-Serializable members).

Good rule of thumb: don't serialize anything that's isn't a Serializable 
object.

BAL

From: Mark Galbreath [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts Users Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Struts Users Mailing List' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [OT] Not spam...I swear--
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2003 15:49:13 -0500

You can also use the Externalizable interface as well as place any object 
in
an array and serialize the array.

Mark

-Original Message-
From: Brian Lee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 2:44 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [OT] Not spam...I swear--


Only objects that implement java.io.Serializable should be serialized.

Although it might be possible to serialize a class that doesn't implement
Serializable, the interface exists for a reason. Use it to flag that your
class is safe to be serialized.

BAL

From: Mark Galbreath [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts Users Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Struts Users Mailing List' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [OT] Not spam...I swear--
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2003 14:30:30 -0500

He was probably confusing serializable with default synchronization.
Any Java object can be serialized.

-Original Message-
From: Attila Szegedi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 12:49 PM

Wrong. Hashtables are serializable just fine.

Attila.

- Original Message -
From: NoSect [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

  Vectors are also serializedhashtables not.



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE*
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
The new MSN 8 is here: Try it free* for 2 months 
http://join.msn.com/?page=dept/dialup


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [OT] Not spam...I swear--

2003-01-21 Thread Attila Szegedi

- Original Message -
From: Mark Galbreath [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Struts Users Mailing List' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 9:49 PM
Subject: RE: [OT] Not spam...I swear--


 You can also use the Externalizable interface as well as place any object
in
 an array and serialize the array.

Ehh... Externalizable extends Serializable, so it still holds that only
objects of class that - directly or indirectly - implement Serializable can
be serialized.

As for placing an otherwise non-serializable object into an array, and then
serializing the array: you'll still get a java.io.NotSerializableException
as soon as the serialization machinery encounters the first component of the
array that isn't serializable. If objects of any class were serializable,
this exception class needn't exist.

Attila.


 Mark

 -Original Message-
 From: Brian Lee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 2:44 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: RE: [OT] Not spam...I swear--


 Only objects that implement java.io.Serializable should be serialized.

 Although it might be possible to serialize a class that doesn't implement
 Serializable, the interface exists for a reason. Use it to flag that your
 class is safe to be serialized.

 BAL

 From: Mark Galbreath [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Reply-To: Struts Users Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: 'Struts Users Mailing List' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: RE: [OT] Not spam...I swear--
 Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2003 14:30:30 -0500
 
 He was probably confusing serializable with default synchronization.
 Any Java object can be serialized.
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Attila Szegedi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 12:49 PM
 
 Wrong. Hashtables are serializable just fine.
 
 Attila.
 
 - Original Message -
 From: NoSect [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
   Vectors are also serializedhashtables not.
 
 
 
 --
 To unsubscribe, e-mail:
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail:
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


 _
 STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE*
 http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail


 --
 To unsubscribe, e-mail:
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail:
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



 --
 To unsubscribe, e-mail:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]






--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: [OT] Not spam...I swear--

2003-01-21 Thread Joel Rees
 Ehh... Externalizable extends Serializable, so it still holds that only
 objects of class that - directly or indirectly - implement Serializable can
 be serialized.

Darn. And here I thought I had a good excuse to waste an afternoon.

 As for placing an otherwise non-serializable object into an array, and then
 serializing the array: you'll still get a java.io.NotSerializableException
 as soon as the serialization machinery encounters the first component of the
 array that isn't serializable. If objects of any class were serializable,
 this exception class needn't exist.

Well, you do have to extend the class ... 

-- 
Joel Rees [EMAIL PROTECTED]


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: [OT] Not spam...I swear--

2003-01-20 Thread Peter A. Pilgrim
James Mitchell wrote:

I had six of them suckers going one time.had to stop when I started
yanking out furthey're not as cute with missing patches of hair.


--
James Mitchell

P.S.  I case anyone is wonder..I AM KIDDING



- Original Message -
From: Chappell, Simon P [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Struts Users Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 5:52 PM
Subject: RE: Not spam...I swear--


How many at once?



-Original Message-
From: James Mitchell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 4:48 PM
To: 'Struts Users Mailing List'
Subject: RE: Not spam...I swear--


What kind of talent do you want?

I'm pretty good at juggling cats.



Hello World

As some one who spent a several months out of work last year I am
wondering just what this guy did wrong? Perhaps he was a little
foolish and his prose was a tad bit contrite, but he did flag
the subject as out-of-topic [OT]. Maybe he should used a
different call sign [JOB] or something else for example.
A little of over a month ago his post would have been
up-lifting for me, a sign of the green shoots of recovery
even if the role was US of A.

I am wondering what is funny or comical about being out of work
or being forcibly placed out of work these day?

--
Peter Pilgrim
ServerSide Java Specialist / Contractor / Consultant

My on-line resume and for interview videos about myself, J2EE
Open Source, Struts and Expresso.
   ||
   \\===  `` http://www.xenonsoft.demon.co.uk/no-it-striker.html ''


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: [OT] Not spam...I swear--

2003-01-20 Thread Chris Trawick
 Hello World

 As some one who spent a several months out of work last year I am
 wondering just what this guy did wrong? Perhaps he was a little
 foolish and his prose was a tad bit contrite, but he did flag
 the subject as out-of-topic [OT]. Maybe he should used a
 different call sign [JOB] or something else for example.
 A little of over a month ago his post would have been
 up-lifting for me, a sign of the green shoots of recovery
 even if the role was US of A.

Actually not.

Subject: Not spam...I swear--

Perhaps your experience with job placement services is different from mine,
but even in the best of times they're brutal.  Downright brutal.  I hate
them.  They did good for me but they've screwed over several friends of
mine.  Badly.  Taking advantage of a respectable list for their sort of
marginal activities isn't exactly something that rates very high in my book.


 I am wondering what is funny or comical about being out of work
 or being forcibly placed out of work these day?

Perhaps you read something I didn't.  Or perhaps you're a cat lover.  Or
whatever.

chris


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: [OT] Not spam...I swear--

2003-01-20 Thread Joe Barefoot
snipped/
 
 Hello World
 
 As some one who spent a several months out of work last year I am
 wondering just what this guy did wrong? Perhaps he was a little
 foolish and his prose was a tad bit contrite, but he did flag
 the subject as out-of-topic [OT]. Maybe he should used a
 different call sign [JOB] or something else for example.
 A little of over a month ago his post would have been
 up-lifting for me, a sign of the green shoots of recovery
 even if the role was US of A.
 

 I am wondering what is funny or comical about being out of work
 or being forcibly placed out of work these day?

Nothing, unless you were formerly employed as a technical recruiter in silicon valley. 
 Then the irony is just too much for me and I bubble over with mirth.

In case you hadn't noticed, they were just giving the guy a little hell for recruiting 
on a user-list for open-source software.  I assume you feel smugly morally superior to 
them in labeling his post ..a little foolish.. and ..a tad bit contrite.., rather 
than just issuing a similar flippant response?


 
 -- 
 Peter Pilgrim
 ServerSide Java Specialist / Contractor / Consultant
 
 My on-line resume and for interview videos about myself, J2EE
 Open Source, Struts and Expresso.
 ||
 \\===  `` http://www.xenonsoft.demon.co.uk/no-it-striker.html ''
 
 
 --
 To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: [OT] Not spam...I swear--

2003-01-20 Thread Peter A. Pilgrim
Joe Barefoot wrote:

snipped/


Hello World

As some one who spent a several months out of work last year I am
wondering just what this guy did wrong? Perhaps he was a little
foolish and his prose was a tad bit contrite, but he did flag
the subject as out-of-topic [OT]. Maybe he should used a
different call sign [JOB] or something else for example.
A little of over a month ago his post would have been
up-lifting for me, a sign of the green shoots of recovery
even if the role was US of A.





I am wondering what is funny or comical about being out of work
or being forcibly placed out of work these day?



Nothing, unless you were formerly employed as a technical recruiter in silicon valley.  Then the irony is just too much for me and I bubble over with mirth.

In case you hadn't noticed, they were just giving the guy a little hell for recruiting on a user-list for open-source software.  I assume you feel smugly morally superior to them in labeling his post ..a little foolish.. and ..a tad bit contrite.., rather than just issuing a similar flippant response?

I have always been a developer. Recruitment is flipping hard and I have been on
both sides of the fence. I have been programming at my desk, when
suddenly my former manager comes over and says, we got to interview
a candidate now, I need your opinion and feedback, he's just away.
That sort of thing spontaneous recruitment, and that was back in
the dotcom bubbling days. Naivety and stupidity is even more
prevalent now. People with write 4 1/2 years Java on their CV
and then they cant tell me what is the different between
a `Vector' and `Hashtable'. So what you expect a foolish and tad bit
contrite recruiter to come up with as suitable candidates?

It just appears to me that althought they were pulling the apex
recruiter's leg, it could be interpreted that they are unsympathetic
to people who are staring depressing hard at the their very last
month of money left before the house gets repossessed by the
mortgage company and law courts.

( Yep points should be given to coming to the source of Struts)

I just wanted to bring balance to this. The ying and the yang,
you know what I mean?

--
Peter Pilgrim
ServerSide Java Specialist / Indepedent Contractor

Expresso committer -+
  |  `` http://www.xenonsoft.demon.co.uk/no-it-striker.html ''  |
  +-+


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: [OT] Not spam...I swear--

2003-01-20 Thread James Mitchell
snip/

 It just appears to me that althought they were pulling the apex
 recruiter's leg, it could be interpreted that they are unsympathetic
 to people who are staring depressing hard at the their very last
 month of money left before the house gets repossessed by the
 mortgage company and law courts.

Huh?  Where did you get that idea?  We are not unsympathetic.  Our joking
was more of friends having a little fun and was NOT meant as banter.

Hell, I was in that same boat just after the 9/11 disaster.  I've a wife and
3 kids (10, 7, and 3)my wife's career doesn't have incomeI came to
about 15 days from losing my home before getting a break, so stop acting
like you're the only one who's having problems dude!!!

 ( Yep points should be given to coming to the source of Struts)

 I just wanted to bring balance to this. The ying and the yang,
 you know what I mean?

 --
 Peter Pilgrim
 ServerSide Java Specialist / Indepedent Contractor



--
James Mitchell



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: [OT] Not spam...I swear--

2003-01-16 Thread Mark Galbreath
You're having baby goats???  The imagination explodes

-Original Message-
From: James Mitchell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 6:17 PM

P.S.  I case anyone is wonder..I AM KIDDING



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: [OT] Not spam...I swear--

2003-01-16 Thread Mark Galbreath
H...that's about 3 cases of good beer per referral.  Okay, count me in!
For every candidate you glean from
http://www.lincolntech.com/locations/columbia.html I expect 3 cases of
respectable English ale or Irish stout.  I had another URL, but I can't find
the matchbook.

Mark

-Original Message-
From: Aileen Cardenas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 5:44 PM

one of you has some friends and family out of work and it can't hurt for you
to ask them--if you refer the person to me who gets the contract, you
receive a $100 referral fee.



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: [OT] Not spam...I swear--

2003-01-15 Thread James Mitchell
I had six of them suckers going one time.had to stop when I started
yanking out furthey're not as cute with missing patches of hair.


--
James Mitchell

P.S.  I case anyone is wonder..I AM KIDDING



- Original Message -
From: Chappell, Simon P [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Struts Users Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 5:52 PM
Subject: RE: Not spam...I swear--


How many at once?

-Original Message-
From: James Mitchell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 4:48 PM
To: 'Struts Users Mailing List'
Subject: RE: Not spam...I swear--


What kind of talent do you want?

I'm pretty good at juggling cats.


--
James Mitchell






 -Original Message-
 From: Aileen Cardenas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 5:44 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Not spam...I swear--


 --just digging for TALENT!

 When I find the right person, I will unsubscribe--I promise!

 I HAD to ask the experts for referrals, you certainly can't
 blame me for
 trying!  Anyhow, I am sure that one of you has some friends
 and family out
 of work and it can't hurt for you to ask them--if you refer
 the person to me
 who gets the contract, you receive a $100 referral fee.

 It's a win-win-win!  Toll free 877-317-8700, or direct 650-583-3600.

 Thanks for your help!
 Ms. Aileen
 Aileen Cardenas
 Technical Recruiter
 Apex Systems, Inc.
 1250 Bayhill Drive, Suite 101
 San Bruno, CA  94066
 650-583-3600
 650-583-3668 Fax
 www.apexsystemsinc.com




--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]