[pfSense Support] Trying to rebrand pfsense
I'm trying to get the HEAD version of pfSense, so I added the HEAD to PFSENSETAG in pfsense_local.sh. It worked but the resulting iso did not contain php and the initialization scripts failed to start. So, I tried to get from git after restoring PFSENSETAG to RELENG_1_2 by uncommenting the USE_GIT , GIT_REPO, GIT_REPO_BSDINSTALLER and GIT_REPO_FREESBIE2 . It built the iso but when I booted it had alot of errors, so I found out that the directory /usr/loca/lib/php/20060613 is empty please anyone help me with a way to build the latest pfSense -- Ahmed Abdalla --Systems Engineer Linux-Plus Information Systems L.L.C Tel : +20 2 2527 6616 EXT : 806 Fax : +20 2 2526 1055 Mobile : +20 10 688 9009 email : [EMAIL PROTECTED] website : http://www.linux-plus.com
Re: [pfSense Support] Trying to rebrand pfsense
You realize that HEAD is the most distant and non-functional of the branches and is probably the worst possible candidate for re-branding and release, right? Ahmed Abdallah wrote: I'm trying to get the HEAD version of pfSense, so I added the HEAD to PFSENSETAG in pfsense_local.sh. It worked but the resulting iso did not contain php and the initialization scripts failed to start. So, I tried to get from git after restoring PFSENSETAG to RELENG_1_2 by uncommenting the USE_GIT , GIT_REPO, GIT_REPO_BSDINSTALLER and GIT_REPO_FREESBIE2 . It built the iso but when I booted it had alot of errors, so I found out that the directory /usr/loca/lib/php/20060613 is empty please anyone help me with a way to build the latest pfSense -- Ahmed Abdalla --Systems Engineer Linux-Plus Information Systems L.L.C Tel : +20 2 2527 6616 EXT : 806 Fax : +20 2 2526 1055 Mobile : +20 10 688 9009 email : [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] website : http://www.linux-plus.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [pfSense Support] Trying to rebrand pfsense
On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 2:54 AM, Ahmed Abdallah [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm trying to get the HEAD version of pfSense, so I added the HEAD to PFSENSETAG in pfsense_local.sh. It worked but the resulting iso did not contain php and the initialization scripts failed to start. We killed HEAD, it was in too much of a mess and wasn't worth fixing. So, I tried to get from git after restoring PFSENSETAG to RELENG_1_2 by uncommenting the USE_GIT , GIT_REPO, GIT_REPO_BSDINSTALLER and GIT_REPO_FREESBIE2 . It built the iso but when I booted it had alot of errors, so I found out that the directory /usr/loca/lib/php/20060613 is empty please anyone help me with a way to build the latest pfSense I would be extremely surprised if you had access to git. You made too many changes to your build environment in one step, go back to using cvs. We'll announce when it's safe and OK to use the git repo (which I reserve the right to wipe at any point in time and re-initialize right now). --Bill - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [pfSense Support] Trying to rebrand pfsense
I would be extremely surprised if you had access to git. Yeah, unless you're an existing committer, you have no access to git just yet. It's firewalled off from the world until it's less of a test case and more production ready. Not so shockingly, there also won't be many too keen on providing free help with the creation of something you're going to sell (a rebranded version) unless you've contributed extensively in the past, so I wouldn't expect much aside from the basic guidance you've gotten to date. If you need in depth build support, contact Scott ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and you can get it, for a fee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[pfSense Support] Traffic shaper queues.
Hi there, I have just ran the Traffic shaper wizard and I have a doubt about the queues generated and the bandwidth assigned to the different queues. Considering the wan queues and the bandwidth assigned to them, qwandef(1%), qwanacks(25%), qPenaltyUp(1%), qOthersUpH(25%) and qOthersUpL(1%), I don't understand how the whole bandwidth available is used as adding up the percentages (53%) doesn't cover the 100% of the bandwidth available. The only explanation I can think of is if the 1% bandwidth means as much bandwidth as left by the other queues, is this the case? If not, could someone please, explain a bit to me how does this work? Best regards, Jose Hernandez The contents of this e-mail and any attachments/inserts are strictly confidential and sent for the attention of the addressee/s only. This e-mail might contain confidential and/or privileged material therefore if you are not the addressee/s, any distribution, review, disclosure, copying or other use of this e-mail and any attachments/inserts is prohibited without written provision. If received in error, please advise the sender and delete it from your system immediately. Statements and opinions expressed may not represent those of Rants Ltd and any representations or commitments in this email are subject to contract. Rants Ltd (trading as VidZone)
Re: [pfSense Support] Traffic shaper queues.
Hi Jose, As what I understand, 1% is the minimum allocated bandwidth. If the remaining 99% is not used by other queues, this queue may still use up all 100% of the bandwidth. In the implementation, if no queues are defined with upper limit, all 100% bandwidth may still be used up. On the other hand, if all queues are defined with upper limits, and the total of upper limit is not 100%, you will then have unused or unallocated bandwidth. Kelvin Jose Hernandez wrote: Hi there, I have just ran the Traffic shaper wizard and I have a doubt about the queues generated and the bandwidth assigned to the different queues. Considering the wan queues and the bandwidth assigned to them, qwandef(1%), qwanacks(25%), qPenaltyUp(1%), qOthersUpH(25%) and qOthersUpL(1%), I don’t understand how the whole bandwidth available is used as adding up the percentages (53%) doesn’t cover the 100% of the bandwidth available. The only explanation I can think of is if the 1% bandwidth means as much bandwidth as left by the other queues, is this the case? If not, could someone please, explain a bit to me how does this work? Best regards, Jose Hernandez The contents of this e-mail and any attachments/inserts are strictly confidential and sent for the attention of the addressee/s only. This e-mail might contain confidential and/or privileged material therefore if you are not the addressee/s, any distribution, review, disclosure, copying or other use of this e-mail and any attachments/inserts is prohibited without written provision. If received in error, please advise the sender and delete it from your system immediately. Statements and opinions expressed may not represent those of Rants Ltd and any representations or commitments in this email are subject to contract. Rants Ltd (trading as VidZone) No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG. Version: 7.5.526 / Virus Database: 270.4.7/1541 - Release Date: 7/8/2008 7:50 PM - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[pfSense Support] More than 1 VPN Cient at the same time
I have 1 VPN client configured and working right. But when I want to setup other VPN Cliente to run at the same time, I get the following error and doesn't work: TCP/UDP: Socket bind failed on local address [undef]:1194: Address already in use Exiting Somebody can help me? Thanks! -- Diego.- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [pfSense Support] Trying to rebrand pfsense
Ok guys, thanks so much for your help so far. And I'm doing that for the company I work in now, but anyway, Why don't you guys start talking about having authorized partners and resellers if so, I guess my company can be your first reseller :) On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 6:32 PM, Chris Buechler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I would be extremely surprised if you had access to git. Yeah, unless you're an existing committer, you have no access to git just yet. It's firewalled off from the world until it's less of a test case and more production ready. Not so shockingly, there also won't be many too keen on providing free help with the creation of something you're going to sell (a rebranded version) unless you've contributed extensively in the past, so I wouldn't expect much aside from the basic guidance you've gotten to date. If you need in depth build support, contact Scott ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and you can get it, for a fee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Ahmed Abdalla --Systems Engineer Linux-Plus Information Systems L.L.C Tel : +20 2 2527 6616 EXT : 806 Fax : +20 2 2526 1055 Mobile : +20 10 688 9009 email : [EMAIL PROTECTED] website : http://www.linux-plus.com
RE: [pfSense Support] Trying to rebrand pfsense
Are you just trying to change the look of pfsense? If so you can do this in the current build with themes. Youll want to SFTP over to the server and browse to /usr/local/www/themes (your SFTP login is root - your password is the password you set in the GUI ) Just download one of the existing themes and then upload your changes under a new folder. You can switch the theme in your SYSTEM GENERAL SETUP You can then Brand it for the property you are working for. I may be totally off on what you were looking for, but thought I'd pass the info on anyways - maybe someone else here would need it ;) -Tim -- From: Ahmed Abdallah [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2008 12:54 PM To: support@pfsense.com Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Trying to rebrand pfsense Ok guys, thanks so much for your help so far. And I'm doing that for the company I work in now, but anyway, Why don't you guys start talking about having authorized partners and resellers if so, I guess my company can be your first reseller :) On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 6:32 PM, Chris Buechler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I would be extremely surprised if you had access to git. Yeah, unless you're an existing committer, you have no access to git just yet. It's firewalled off from the world until it's less of a test case and more production ready. Not so shockingly, there also won't be many too keen on providing free help with the creation of something you're going to sell (a rebranded version) unless you've contributed extensively in the past, so I wouldn't expect much aside from the basic guidance you've gotten to date. If you need in depth build support, contact Scott ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and you can get it, for a fee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Ahmed Abdalla --Systems Engineer Linux-Plus Information Systems L.L.C Tel : +20 2 2527 6616 EXT : 806 Fax : +20 2 2526 1055 Mobile : +20 10 688 9009 email : [EMAIL PROTECTED] website : http://www.linux-plus.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [pfSense Support] Re: blocked by many rules?
nothing wrong. just different. it may have side effects, which needs some thinking. sai On 7/7/08, Ermal Luçi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 7:47 AM, sai [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I tested this and it looks like this is a side effect of the new shaper. What's the wrong side of it? Ermal sai On 6/19/08, sai [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is this normal? I just opened my log files and clicked on one of the red icons. I seem to remember that blocked packets only had one associated rule. I get this: 10.10.10.10 The rule that triggered this action is: @2 block drop in log all label Default deny rule @20 block drop in on ! rl1 inet from 192.168.10.0/24 to any @21 block drop in inet from 192.168.10.10 to any @22 block drop in on ! rl2 inet from 11.22.33.0/24 to any @23 block drop in inet from 11.22.33.215 to any @24 block drop in on rl0 inet6 from fe80::xx:xx:xx:b767 to any @25 block drop in on rl1 inet6 from fe80::xx:xx:xx:b766 to any @26 block drop in on rl2 inet6 from fe80::xx:xx:xx:b765 to any @27 anchor spoofing all @28 anchor spoofing all @29 block drop in on vr0 inet6 from fe80::xx:xx:xx:ca70 to any I had Ermals shaper installed and in use but due to isp problems got rid of it. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Ermal - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
