Re: [pfSense Support] FreeBSD Lost Track of Drive During Upgrade [WAS: Re: pfSense Support] Re: List Posting Etiquette [WAS: Re: [pfSense Support] Re: Intel Gigabit - em0: Watchdog Timeout]
I have issue with the same board with centos and ubuntu! On 11-03-10 02:33 PM, Chris Buechler wrote: On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 12:14 AM, Mehma Sarja wrote: The - Motherboard is "Super X7SPA-HF" I switched the TORQX SSD with a regular drive - they both get stuck at the same point, see screenshot. "Root mount" fails is a "panic" Here is a link to what I think is the cause: http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=17331 Based on your screenshot, that has no relevance. The screenshot shows you're booting from CD, likely a USB CD drive, which is slow initializing and you need to pick the "boot from USB" option at the first boot menu. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org
Re: [pfSense Support] openvpn: client side uses address pool ip rather than subnet ip
did you specified remote client subnet in the client CCD ? (with iroute?) On 11-01-20 01:05 PM, mayak-cq wrote: hi all, i wrote about this issue in late december, and now having downloaded the latest snapshot, it still persists: i have an issue with 2 pfsense machines each running 2.0 beta 5: all of the x509 stuff is fine, and i have a two-way tunnel between two distant subnets [client=172.16.32.0/24<-> server=172.16.8.0/24]. this problem that i'm facing is the client side -- it insists on using the ip address from the address pool rather than the than the subnet ip. when a server side machine pings a client side machine it uses its address of 172.16.8.1 as expected. when a client side machine (172.16.32.1) pings a server side machine, it uses the 10.8.0.2 address. if i use a 1.23 client (ceteris paribus), all works as expected. i've just no clue -- i've tried everything. anyone have some hints? thanks m - To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org -- ---- *Francois-Alexandre St-Onge Aubut* *IDS* micronet Téléphonie IP pour les affaires. Téléphone : (418) 725-4425 #205 Sans frais : 1 888 581 VoIP (8647) Télécopieur : (418) 725-2568 Courriel : fst-o...@idsmicronet.com Visitez notre site Web : www.idsmicronet.com <http://www.idsmicronet.com> Suivez-nous sur Twitter <http://www.twitter.com/idsmicronet> !
Re: [pfSense Support] Is it possible to Port Forward same PORT to TWO servers? pfsense + TWO Asterisk servers and NAT
doing that SIP will broke On 11-01-14 04:18 PM, Jason C. Taylor wrote: I have not worked with Asterisk or SIP at all, but it sounds like what you need is a combination of sipproxd to get past the NAT issues and some sort of load balancer like SER or Ultra Monkey to round-robin (or whatever) the two Asterisk servers. So that you'd wind up with: asterisk1 -* +- SER -- sipproxd -- pfSense asterisk2 -* On the pfSense box you'd do a 1:1 NAT of your public IP to the internal IP of the sipproxd server. I'm not sure how it'd work exactly if sipproxd was on the pfSense box. - Original Message - From: "Chris Buechler" To: support@pfsense.com Sent: Friday, January 14, 2011 12:36:39 PM Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Is it possible to Port Forward same PORT to TWO servers? pfsense + TWO Asterisk servers and NAT On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 3:34 PM, David Burgess wrote: On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 11:55 AM, Bruce B wrote: Hi Everyone, I am facing a dilemma here. If I port forward 1-2 to my first Asterisk server which sets behind pfSense v1.2.3 then I have two way audio. If I remove it I don't have any audio but call establishes. Now, I have a second server, so I am stuck with what to do on the NAT. I tried to set NAT destination to network subnet like 192.168.0.0/24 but it doesn't accept that. Can you please tell me what I need to do? ***I have only 1 IP address so adding more IPs is not an option. Would I have to take advantage of 1:1 NAT? I am not sure what it is and how to set it up if at all. Please guide. http://doc.pfsense.org/index.php/VoIP_Configuration My money is on #3. Not for servers, can't forward the traffic inbound that you have to have without two public IPs. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org
Re: [pfSense Support] autorollback?
would be easy, before applying changes make a local xml backup, and add an option to revert back to previous XML On 11-01-13 04:00 PM, Charles N Wyble wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 The feature on cisco/juniper is a two phase application process. Phase one applies the configuration. Phase two rolls it back if you don't confirm it. So if you did something that blocked you out of the device for example, it would auto roll back. I miss this feature on pfsense. It's on Juniper and Cisco devices and would be useful on pfsense. On 01/13/2011 12:26 PM, Francois-Alexandre St-Onge Aubut wrote: dont apply changes? On 11-01-13 03:11 PM, Charles N Wyble wrote: Does pfsense have a feature like cisco/juniper where if you don't confirm the change it rolls it back? How difficult would something like this be to implement? Any estimates of the developer time/cost to implement it? -- Charles N Wyble (char...@knownelement.com) Systems craftsman for the stars http://www.knownelement.com Mobile: 626 539 4344 Office: 310 929 8793 - - To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org - -- Charles N Wyble (char...@knownelement.com) Systems craftsman for the stars http://www.knownelement.com Mobile: 626 539 4344 Office: 310 929 8793 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJNL2fSAAoJEMvvG/TyLEAtTJwQAL4BVGNo24abXG+XQfekeX6q pV28fEapTxkUELhrWTQzc+/vIUxF40uf6J/tmD/X4jS+zZUzcKouhn4CwkOAsGKq 50qkyv0ktROBP8wRginIMGU/XhgOc7/GuAZGqOItB4A56OYb8rqV0xLJAIMNJ9gc kE7aTx6SqAdtR594P3YRAqbspJ9/7HGcyYoeicc3/TuA/DVjZDoSGVd3zhkRmbwO 706j3fwkVzTBDDEieEABs8W/uFydFsgeeXuFQkprFIz0IHyMoz9fwwKd9lgsi7yI bAMMuLfV3rO7i7J/vDz+kXGUkaVrAviKicHAk/JXkD2KCxeIzeqpJpziyYunhr/Q byUltKtsTzm+pIZCFQCr9DGDxQrmAgMqvmk7K3ZzmZwifZJXu0lHFsQZwbTf+g2g 6G5iTbMh++ZRJvp2Y4uKZEGWb0owkfpVPat3lhajvQu/2Eusp4vcHkYKverjBhJn GGA6oTlkqrxVDFQiuOFst4H9N1+xgNH7NdEfYnqHjl3Q92sq5EcS3Z4Dqm8XIq1f fkXKoV383u1ZhpKosWfC4naTV+FXymQgd4Elmv6czc315zvQbbouO8JUsFqDSizH nHv/yvmSGBM6QM2Kn2lpipGtCHFETN9J24Aua9qocvrNoTbQk25FdB3meNAyy2jN PN+iHbw+q57jQ+PoyXGj =01Yv -END PGP SIGNATURE- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org
Re: [pfSense Support] autorollback?
dont apply changes? On 11-01-13 03:11 PM, Charles N Wyble wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Does pfsense have a feature like cisco/juniper where if you don't confirm the change it rolls it back? How difficult would something like this be to implement? Any estimates of the developer time/cost to implement it? - -- Charles N Wyble (char...@knownelement.com) Systems craftsman for the stars http://www.knownelement.com Mobile: 626 539 4344 Office: 310 929 8793 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJNL1xkAAoJEMvvG/TyLEAtvLMP/REFq++C3Wvzq1ANdJC9uGjN WqacjBMSvaESr1NpP6h9BSWdaOTcBOvfjh+bCNkItHWsVJhAc+IC7voZTWpd4W9G IM9l6cuEeNmB87IusV1ik4GUmTVbc6s+rOLu+xGMJk1LJlaNlaJbtcdfEEywMGxQ 1vfCecgPG/863UP6h3/RKZsfBC7996M78h4EXnkV+sLz3o9/sfh2GP3ykixWYYI7 +OMGZOJf6RhGtUxeSHqj9XfiTaTbvFf/usMvrnDjE8mDQJPtkVI1eLnz+r2QX8Cq +d7E+yJiCYuI4Sm2FltMRCPcUITXjnlcdmT+jWKKJhffNb64mbAn8gEu2zO1RubD JAOr6iK64fdBiL9vw3GnlfT+9tw043lNXgn2uMMaAOXWEHKKU+kwo738WVBCTHzv /iUw/6X08o45Dci55k0iyruNUsfOW86hOoZCZ23buWPimHprTcWMiTgMCBWzdzb1 8IgWv//eaOr4SENhUq7HTHDgQsxrEGBJ6Cl8fMP3oArHgCoxs3Y92eUvft4+PBtH morfUCLnlM1mw78ql/HGh+XWMdc3tuFDkg/+IAuXSutpYIMlVKJsNaN6a+dc/f9E ftg9nJwotMPd1w0U7RBitjyrSI6+TSb7DlPZLpWiDH+Vn7nayFyPZ+f6XzoMg9kw qdtbjippuYfoYpSADd3Z =zZPN -END PGP SIGNATURE- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org
Re: [pfSense Support] Alix VLANs
I have 300+ ALIX 2D3 and they work perfect with VLANs. I used it for VOIP with multiple vlan, multiple wan and VPN (Openvpn,IPEC) On Tue, 2010-08-17 at 12:23 +0100, Paul Cockings wrote: > Hi Pfsense folk, > > I am slightly confused about VLAN support on Alix board. I'm > considering an Alix 2D3 LX800 > (http://linitx.com/viewproduct.php?prodid=12647) + Pfsense for a small > project > > On one of the NICs i'd need VLAN support. Is the little Alix up for > the task - any used in the wild with VLANs? or should I go dust off an > old pc and stuff some Intel GT1000 card in it? > > Kindness regards to all and thanks to the pfsense developers for a great > firewall. > > Paul > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com > For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com > > Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org
Re: [pfSense Support] PPPoE gets disconnected on WAN port
BAD MTU tester wrote: Hello, sometimes PPPoE gets disconnected on WAN port of my pfSense's box and I have to click several times (at least twenty ones) on Reconnect button in 'webConfigurator-Status-Interfaces-WAN'. I want ask you two things are still unclear to me: 1- does pfSense automatically attempt to reconnect PPPoE itself? If not, is it possible to add auto-reconnect mechanism by using for example a script or tuning a config file? Because it is annoying when Internet connection drops and you are hundreds miles away and nobody can restart pfSense. 2- where I can read why PPPoE got disconnected? I saw no entry about it in System Logs and I'm curious to understand if there is a problem with my box or it is the ISP which renew my dynamic IP. I'm using 1.2RC4 on embedded platform. I didn't update to the final 1.2 yet, but if something related to PPPoE has been changed, tell me and I update the box, otherwise I'd prefer not to touch it at the moment. Thank you! ___ Yahoo! For Good helps you make a difference http://uk.promotions.yahoo.com/forgood/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
