Re: How to install version 2.0 so that it does NOT interfere with Version 1.1.18
On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 13:28:29 -0800, NoOp wrote: On 11/22/2009 01:25 PM, NoOp wrote: ... Actually, you might want to check again... '-no-noremote' works just fine for me on Win2KPro in both 1.1.18 2.0. That is how I test both in Windows via a VM (VirtualBox) at the same time so that I can easily compare. Sorry: should be '-no-remote' So here is a way to test: 1. Start SM 2.0 /without/ the -no-remote switch. 2. While 2.0 is running start 1.1 with a -no-remote switch. Does 1.1 open or just another 2.0 window? Phil -- Philip Chee phi...@aleytys.pc.my, philip.c...@gmail.com http://flashblock.mozdev.org/ http://xsidebar.mozdev.org Guard us from the she-wolf and the wolf, and guard us from the thief, oh Night, and so be good for us to pass. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: RoboForm adapter will not install in Seamonkey 2.0
Serge Popper wrote: John Doue wrote: Serge Popper wrote: When attempting to install the RoboForm adapter, which worked fine in 1.18, the following message was displayed - Incompatible Extension. AI RoboForm Toolbar for Seamonkey will not be installed because it does not provide secure up dadates. I went into EDITPREFERENCESADVANCEDSOFTWARE INSTALLATIONMANAGE SOFTWARE NSTALLATION AND UPDATESALLOWED SITES There I inserted Roboform.com and made it an allowed site. I attempted to install the Adapter again and again, the same message came up as is listed above. I went back into Software installations and RoboForm was no longer there. I went through the same procedure, re-inserted RoboForm.com, tried again and got the same denial message. I tried once more but the Software Installations wouldn't accept roboform.com at all this time. How do I get around this? Thanks, Serge Popper Roboforms does not work in SM 2.0. I contacted the company to see if and when they intended to have an extension for it, and go a terse answer saying in not so many words, if and when there is one, it will posted on our Web site. Wait and see. But until there is one, I use SM 2.0 for experimenting only, I miss too much its convenience. Thanks for your response. I did the same thing and got the same answer. I'm ging to roll back to 1.18 and wait for the adapter. Thanks, Serge This might also be a chance for you to play a little with FF 3.5x. Although I prefer SM, Roboform working perfectly with FF, I now use it as an alternate. One site I visit regularly does not work very well any more with SM 1.1.18 because of some elaborate scripts. Since I am the belt and suspender type, I also have TB installed, and with the right extension installed to kind of connect them, the duo FF and TB come close to the convenience of SM, which I still prefer, probably because it still has something I liked in Netscape's early versions. -- John Doue ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Website problems
On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 15:10:12 -0500, Paul B. Gallagher wrote: Benoit Renard wrote: Paul B. Gallagher wrote: Hard to know /what/ this is -- an embedded graphic in the XHTML code??? input type=hidden name=__VIEWSTATE id=__VIEWSTATE value= [51,256 characters of alphabet soup snipped] / Hell, it took IE four minutes just to /display/ all this crap in Notepad. It's ASP state information for the ASP server. Fifty K of it? Is this normal? Hello! This is Microsoft (Bloat'R'Us) we are talking about. Phil -- Philip Chee phi...@aleytys.pc.my, philip.c...@gmail.com http://flashblock.mozdev.org/ http://xsidebar.mozdev.org Guard us from the she-wolf and the wolf, and guard us from the thief, oh Night, and so be good for us to pass. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: RoboForm adapter will not install in Seamonkey 2.0
John Doue wrote: Serge Popper wrote: John Doue wrote: Serge Popper wrote: When attempting to install the RoboForm adapter, which worked fine in 1.18, the following message was displayed - Incompatible Extension. AI RoboForm Toolbar for Seamonkey will not be installed because it does not provide secure up dadates. I went into EDITPREFERENCESADVANCEDSOFTWARE INSTALLATIONMANAGE SOFTWARE NSTALLATION AND UPDATESALLOWED SITES There I inserted Roboform.com and made it an allowed site. I attempted to install the Adapter again and again, the same message came up as is listed above. I went back into Software installations and RoboForm was no longer there. I went through the same procedure, re-inserted RoboForm.com, tried again and got the same denial message. I tried once more but the Software Installations wouldn't accept roboform.com at all this time. How do I get around this? Thanks, Serge Popper Roboforms does not work in SM 2.0. I contacted the company to see if and when they intended to have an extension for it, and go a terse answer saying in not so many words, if and when there is one, it will posted on our Web site. Wait and see. But until there is one, I use SM 2.0 for experimenting only, I miss too much its convenience. Thanks for your response. I did the same thing and got the same answer. I'm ging to roll back to 1.18 and wait for the adapter. Thanks, Serge This might also be a chance for you to play a little with FF 3.5x. Although I prefer SM, Roboform working perfectly with FF, I now use it as an alternate. One site I visit regularly does not work very well any more with SM 1.1.18 because of some elaborate scripts. Since I am the belt and suspender type, I also have TB installed, and with the right extension installed to kind of connect them, the duo FF and TB come close to the convenience of SM, which I still prefer, probably because it still has something I liked in Netscape's early versions. I switched to FF and TB, and access TB from FF with a button on the FF toolbar, (I think this button was in the Custom Buttons add-on), or I access TB through Mailwasher Pro, as I did when I used SM. I am getting by not having the old SM Form Manager by using Form History and FireForm add-ons. I am not regretting my decision to using FF and TB. I did not really, need the SM Composer. MikeyG ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Where is the AdBlock Plus Mail Display Icon?
I posted this in an AdBlock Plus group and haven't received an answer: I'd like to modify the icon in my mail display in SeaMonkey 2 in XP. Can anyone tell me where the icon actually is? Thanks. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Where is the AdBlock Plus Mail Display Icon?
nr:
I'd like to modify the icon in my mail display in SeaMonkey 2 in XP.
Can anyone tell me where the icon actually is? Thanks.
extensions/{d10d0bf8-f5b5-c8b4-a8b2-2b9879e08c5d}/chrome/adblockplus.jar-/skin/
Hartmut
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Take my name
Please take my name off the list. Do not want all of these email. willy ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Take my name
On 23.11.2009 08:28, Willdksn wrote: --- Original Message --- Please take my name off the list. Do not want all of these email. willy This is something you have to do yourself. See: https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo Follow directions -- Jay Garcia - Netscape/Flock Champion www.ufaq.org Netscape - Flock - Firefox - Thunderbird - Seamonkey Support ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Anti-Virus Suites Compatibility
Hello all, I Am trying to figure out which anti-virus suites work well with SM. I Am currently using AVG, which settings are all geared towards IE and I cannot figure out how to change that. Then it came to mind to find out here, who uses what and a consensus is on the better suite. I was using Kaspersky, which was fine, I wanted to find if something else out there is just as good. TIA Bo1953 ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Browser Preferences - History
Paul B. Gallagher wrote: JD wrote: SM2. I have a question about the History Preference in the browser. What I was seeing was a very long list when I typed locations into the Location Bar. I want a shorter list there. There are three settings of interest to me: Always remember visited pages for at least [__] days I reset it to 7 days. Remember visited pages for up to [__] days I reset this to 3 days. What is the difference between the above two settings? I'm reading Help but maybe it's too early in the morning for me to see a difference? Remember up to [__] visited pages This is currently set for 40,000 pages. That seems a little high to me. It's default is to remember forty thousand visited pages? And what's the difference between this setting and the other two? I figure this all depends on my browsing habits. For example, I'll probably visit Amazon.com once a month and I like to type in is Amazon. I might go to TigerDirect.com every three months and all I need to type in is TigerDirect. Right now, when I type those in I'm seeing every TigerDirect web page I've visited in my lifetime and two previous lifetimes. I'm kidding about that previous lifetimes but I do get a very long list that drops down under the Location Bar. So what would be a better starting place for the above three settings? Can't answer your first few questions, but for frequently visited (favorite) sites you should be using bookmarks, not autocomplete. Maybe you could tell me what your settings are for the items I ask about? I know how to use bookmarks. 8-) -- JD.. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Att/Seamonkey/ssl
On 11/22/2009 1:35 PM, Bush wrote: But seriously... Your post were the only post that Were Blank in the message area . post from others were Fine . All the posts look fine here. SeaMonkey 1.1.X on Windows/XP SP3. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Cannot import passwords, etc. when installing 2.0
On 11/21/2009 3:47 PM, Serge Popper wrote: Fifteen minutes on the first attempt and over 30 minutes on the second attempt. As a matter of fact, when I clicked on the screen, after thirty minutes, a screen came up which said not responding. Think I should wait longer? Thanks I see that you got the issue resolved, but I just wanted to point out that getting a 'Not Responding' prompt from Windows doesn't necessarily mean the program is dead. The program could just be too busy to respond *at this time*. FYI. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Browser Preferences - History
JD wrote: Paul B. Gallagher wrote: JD wrote: SM2. I have a question about the History Preference in the browser. What I was seeing was a very long list when I typed locations into the Location Bar. I want a shorter list there. There are three settings of interest to me: Always remember visited pages for at least [__] days I reset it to 7 days. Remember visited pages for up to [__] days I reset this to 3 days. What is the difference between the above two settings? I'm reading Help but maybe it's too early in the morning for me to see a difference? Remember up to [__] visited pages This is currently set for 40,000 pages. That seems a little high to me. It's default is to remember forty thousand visited pages? And what's the difference between this setting and the other two? I figure this all depends on my browsing habits. For example, I'll probably visit Amazon.com once a month and I like to type in is Amazon. I might go to TigerDirect.com every three months and all I need to type in is TigerDirect. Right now, when I type those in I'm seeing every TigerDirect web page I've visited in my lifetime and two previous lifetimes. I'm kidding about that previous lifetimes but I do get a very long list that drops down under the Location Bar. So what would be a better starting place for the above three settings? Can't answer your first few questions, but for frequently visited (favorite) sites you should be using bookmarks, not autocomplete. Maybe you could tell me what your settings are for the items I ask about? I know how to use bookmarks. 8-) I could tell you, but then I'd have to kill you. ;-) Seriously, I don't have SM 2, so my answer probably won't be helpful. The only setting I have is: Remember visited pages for the last [999] days The remaining settings don't exist in version 1. -- War doesn't determine who's right, just who's left. -- Paul B. Gallagher ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Browser Preferences - History
On 11/23/2009 6:54 AM, JD wrote: SM2. I have a question about the History Preference in the browser. What I was seeing was a very long list when I typed locations into the Location Bar. I want a shorter list there. There are three settings of interest to me: Always remember visited pages for at least [__] days I reset it to 7 days. Remember visited pages for up to [__] days I reset this to 3 days. What is the difference between the above two settings? I'm reading Help but maybe it's too early in the morning for me to see a difference? Remember up to [__] visited pages This is currently set for 40,000 pages. That seems a little high to me. It's default is to remember forty thousand visited pages? And what's the difference between this setting and the other two? I figure this all depends on my browsing habits. For example, I'll probably visit Amazon.com once a month and I like to type in is Amazon. I might go to TigerDirect.com every three months and all I need to type in is TigerDirect. Right now, when I type those in I'm seeing every TigerDirect web page I've visited in my lifetime and two previous lifetimes. I'm kidding about that previous lifetimes but I do get a very long list that drops down under the Location Bar. So what would be a better starting place for the above three settings? When I read the Help information for these preferences, I get the following impressions. Always remember visited pages for at least [__] days This means that, even if you exceed the number of visited pages or you have pages older than the number of days in the next specification, none younger than the specified number of days will be deleted. Remember visited pages for up to [__] days This means that pages older than the specified number of days will be automatically deleted. This is overridden by the previous specification. To make sense of this -- if I am correct -- the number of days in the first specification should be equal to or less than the number of days in the second specification. SeaMonkey 1.1.18 did not have this confusion. It merely had the single preference Remember visited pages for the last [__] days There were no preferences for the count of pages or for at least or up to. -- David E. Ross http://www.rossde.com/ Go to Mozdev at http://www.mozdev.org/ for quick access to extensions for Firefox, Thunderbird, SeaMonkey, and other Mozilla-related applications. You can access Mozdev much more quickly than you can Mozilla Add-Ons. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Anti-Virus Suites Compatibility
On 11/23/2009 7:04 AM On a whim, Samuel S pounded out on the keyboard Hello all, I Am trying to figure out which anti-virus suites work well with SM. I Am currently using AVG, which settings are all geared towards IE and I cannot figure out how to change that. Then it came to mind to find out here, who uses what and a consensus is on the better suite. I was using Kaspersky, which was fine, I wanted to find if something else out there is just as good. TIA Bo1953 Hi Samuel, Avira's Antivir is a good one also. Terry R. -- Anti-spam measures are included in my email address. Delete NOSPAM from the email address after clicking Reply. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Anti-Virus Suites Compatibility
On 11/23/2009 7:04 AM, Samuel S wrote: Hello all, I Am trying to figure out which anti-virus suites work well with SM. I Am currently using AVG, which settings are all geared towards IE and I cannot figure out how to change that. Then it came to mind to find out here, who uses what and a consensus is on the better suite. I was using Kaspersky, which was fine, I wanted to find if something else out there is just as good. TIA Bo1953 As I stated in another thread, I'm using AVG 8.5 Free Edition. Its Link Scanner claims to be effective with Firefox, which means it might also be effective with SeaMonkey. I'm not using SeaMonkey or Thunderbird for E-mail. I'm using 12-year-old Eudora Lite 3.0.6. AVG 8.5 has successfully found virus attachments in my E-mail. -- David E. Ross http://www.rossde.com/ Go to Mozdev at http://www.mozdev.org/ for quick access to extensions for Firefox, Thunderbird, SeaMonkey, and other Mozilla-related applications. You can access Mozdev much more quickly than you can Mozilla Add-Ons. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Browser Preferences - History
JD wrote: Always remember visited pages for at least [__] days I reset it to 7 days. Remember visited pages for up to [__] days I reset this to 3 days. So you essentially told SM to keep a record of visited pages for at least seven days but no more than three. Well... Maybe you should swap those two values. ;-) What SM will actually do with the settings you provided is this: It will keep a record of at least seven days of history, and the second pref will be ignored because the first takes precedence. Check with Help, it says the same (well, of course it does, I wrote that part! :-)). What is the difference between the above two settings? I'm reading Help but maybe it's too early in the morning for me to see a difference? I tried really hard to make Help understandable there. Please read it again, maybe a little later during the day. ;-) Remember up to [__] visited pages This is currently set for 40,000 pages. That seems a little high to me. Of course SM doesn't store 40,000 pages, it just stores the information which pages (URLs) have been visited, when, and how often. The data is stored in a database that can easily handle that amount of data. Querying the data is no issue either. That's a major difference between SM 2 and its predecessors. It's default is to remember forty thousand visited pages? And what's the difference between this setting and the other two? Please check Help. Any summary I could come up with here would be less accurate than what's written there. I figure this all depends on my browsing habits. For example, I'll probably visit Amazon.com once a month and I like to type in is Amazon. I might go to TigerDirect.com every three months and all I need to type in is TigerDirect. Right now, when I type those in I'm seeing every TigerDirect web page I've visited in my lifetime and two previous lifetimes. I'm kidding about that previous lifetimes but I do get a very long list that drops down under the Location Bar. The location bar of SM 2 is capable of learning from which entries you choose. It takes some time (depending on your browsing habits days, weeks, or months) but it will get better every time you make a choice. So what would be a better starting place for the above three settings? Hmm, I had 90/30/40,000 here. Strange. Reset the middle one to 180. HTH Jens -- Jens Hatlak http://jens.hatlak.de/ SeaMonkey Trunk Tracker http://smtt.blogspot.com/ ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Anti-Virus Suites Compatibility
David E. Ross wrote: On 11/23/2009 7:04 AM, Samuel S wrote: Hello all, I Am trying to figure out which anti-virus suites work well with SM. I Am currently using AVG, which settings are all geared towards IE and I cannot figure out how to change that. Then it came to mind to find out here, who uses what and a consensus is on the better suite. I was using Kaspersky, which was fine, I wanted to find if something else out there is just as good. TIA Bo1953 As I stated in another thread, I'm using AVG 8.5 Free Edition. You should update to AVG 9.0 now! ;) Its Link Scanner claims to be effective with Firefox, which means it might also be effective with SeaMonkey. The Link Scanner does not work with SM, and I have posted a request about that in AVG Forum pointing out that both Firefox and SM are Gecko browsers! I'm not using SeaMonkey or Thunderbird for E-mail. I'm using 12-year-old Eudora Lite 3.0.6. AVG 8.5 has successfully found virus attachments in my E-mail. AVG works very well with SM, apart from the Link Scanner but that's not much to worry about. All the OP needs to think of when installing AVG is to choose the Personal E-mail Scanner as the plugin for scanning e-mails. -- /Arne ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Browser Preferences - History
Jens Hatlak wrote: JD wrote: Always remember visited pages for at least [__] days I reset it to 7 days. Remember visited pages for up to [__] days I reset this to 3 days. So you essentially told SM to keep a record of visited pages for at least seven days but no more than three. Well... Maybe you should swap those two values. ;-) What SM will actually do with the settings you provided is this: It will keep a record of at least seven days of history, and the second pref will be ignored because the first takes precedence. Check with Help, it says the same (well, of course it does, I wrote that part! :-)). What is the difference between the above two settings? I'm reading Help but maybe it's too early in the morning for me to see a difference? I tried really hard to make Help understandable there. Please read it again, maybe a little later during the day. ;-) Remember up to [__] visited pages This is currently set for 40,000 pages. That seems a little high to me. Of course SM doesn't store 40,000 pages, it just stores the information which pages (URLs) have been visited, when, and how often. The data is stored in a database that can easily handle that amount of data. Querying the data is no issue either. That's a major difference between SM 2 and its predecessors. It's default is to remember forty thousand visited pages? And what's the difference between this setting and the other two? Please check Help. Any summary I could come up with here would be less accurate than what's written there. I figure this all depends on my browsing habits. For example, I'll probably visit Amazon.com once a month and I like to type in is Amazon. I might go to TigerDirect.com every three months and all I need to type in is TigerDirect. Right now, when I type those in I'm seeing every TigerDirect web page I've visited in my lifetime and two previous lifetimes. I'm kidding about that previous lifetimes but I do get a very long list that drops down under the Location Bar. The location bar of SM 2 is capable of learning from which entries you choose. It takes some time (depending on your browsing habits days, weeks, or months) but it will get better every time you make a choice. So what would be a better starting place for the above three settings? Hmm, I had 90/30/40,000 here. Strange. Reset the middle one to 180. HTH Jens Thanks for the clarification. I'll check Help again but the first time through it didn't make sense to me but that's not uncommon. So I could go 45/90/40,000? The default was not set up that way; the first number was larger than the second one. -- JD.. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Importing multible identites in SM 2.X.
Leonidas Jones wrote: Nairda wrote: Hay gang. Nice work with SM 2.0. So how many versions of SM 2.X will it be before we can import multiple identities with out having to do the extra ones manually? If you planning on waiting, it will be a long wait. I don't think it will ever be available. It may be even worse than that, I think I remember R.K. saying that the whole 1.1.xx=2.0 was a hack and would be in 2.1.x versions. I am sure one of the developers said that, I'm less sure I remember who, and hopefully 2.1 is years down the road, because migration seems to get about as far as how do I use the forms manager and hang. My own current pet peeve is lack of a good way to move a small set of passwords from one profile to another. It seems that the concept of some global data shared by all profiles would be useful, at least to me and a few others who use profiles heavily. I can sort of get by it, but it would be nice to have a few bookmarks, mailing addresses, and passwords which are common to all profiles, for stuff I do all the time. -- Bill Davidsen david...@tmr.com We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from the machinations of the wicked. - from Slashdot ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: RoboForm adapter will not install in Seamonkey 2.0
John Doue wrote: Serge Popper wrote: John Doue wrote: Serge Popper wrote: When attempting to install the RoboForm adapter, which worked fine in 1.18, the following message was displayed - Incompatible Extension. AI RoboForm Toolbar for Seamonkey will not be installed because it does not provide secure up dadates. I went into EDITPREFERENCESADVANCEDSOFTWARE INSTALLATIONMANAGE SOFTWARE NSTALLATION AND UPDATESALLOWED SITES There I inserted Roboform.com and made it an allowed site. I attempted to install the Adapter again and again, the same message came up as is listed above. I went back into Software installations and RoboForm was no longer there. I went through the same procedure, re-inserted RoboForm.com, tried again and got the same denial message. I tried once more but the Software Installations wouldn't accept roboform.com at all this time. How do I get around this? Thanks, Serge Popper Roboforms does not work in SM 2.0. I contacted the company to see if and when they intended to have an extension for it, and go a terse answer saying in not so many words, if and when there is one, it will posted on our Web site. Wait and see. But until there is one, I use SM 2.0 for experimenting only, I miss too much its convenience. Thanks for your response. I did the same thing and got the same answer. I'm ging to roll back to 1.18 and wait for the adapter. Thanks, Serge This might also be a chance for you to play a little with FF 3.5x. Although I prefer SM, Roboform working perfectly with FF, I now use it as an alternate. One site I visit regularly does not work very well any more with SM 1.1.18 because of some elaborate scripts. Since I am the belt and suspender type, I also have TB installed, and with the right extension installed to kind of connect them, the duo FF and TB come close to the convenience of SM, which I still prefer, probably because it still has something I liked in Netscape's early versions. One thing that makes you like SM the best, is that when you click a Mailto: It doesn't open a Blank web page in FireFox and open a Blank email window with no address. In SM it simply switches email and the address is ready. Never has worked from day one in FF/TB. -- Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T.If it's Fixed, Don't Break it http://www.phillipmjones.net http://www.vpea.org mailto:pjon...@kimbanet.com ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Password migration to 2.0
Hartmut Figge wrote: Hartmut Figge: In SM1 is a file namednumbers.s in the profile. Copy it to the profile of SM2 and make sure, that signon.SignonFileName in prefs.js of SM2 points to this file. Also delete every file in the profile of SM2 which begins with signon. Also the file key3.db should be copied from the profile of SM1 to the profile of SM2. Hartmut Thank you. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: RoboForm adapter will not install in Seamonkey 2.0
Phillip Jones wrote: John Doue wrote: Serge Popper wrote: John Doue wrote: Serge Popper wrote: When attempting to install the RoboForm adapter, which worked fine in 1.18, the following message was displayed - Incompatible Extension. AI RoboForm Toolbar for Seamonkey will not be installed because it does not provide secure up dadates. I went into EDITPREFERENCESADVANCEDSOFTWARE INSTALLATIONMANAGE SOFTWARE NSTALLATION AND UPDATESALLOWED SITES There I inserted Roboform.com and made it an allowed site. I attempted to install the Adapter again and again, the same message came up as is listed above. I went back into Software installations and RoboForm was no longer there. I went through the same procedure, re-inserted RoboForm.com, tried again and got the same denial message. I tried once more but the Software Installations wouldn't accept roboform.com at all this time. How do I get around this? Thanks, Serge Popper Roboforms does not work in SM 2.0. I contacted the company to see if and when they intended to have an extension for it, and go a terse answer saying in not so many words, if and when there is one, it will posted on our Web site. Wait and see. But until there is one, I use SM 2.0 for experimenting only, I miss too much its convenience. Thanks for your response. I did the same thing and got the same answer. I'm ging to roll back to 1.18 and wait for the adapter. Thanks, Serge This might also be a chance for you to play a little with FF 3.5x. Although I prefer SM, Roboform working perfectly with FF, I now use it as an alternate. One site I visit regularly does not work very well any more with SM 1.1.18 because of some elaborate scripts. Since I am the belt and suspender type, I also have TB installed, and with the right extension installed to kind of connect them, the duo FF and TB come close to the convenience of SM, which I still prefer, probably because it still has something I liked in Netscape's early versions. One thing that makes you like SM the best, is that when you click a Mailto: It doesn't open a Blank web page in FireFox and open a Blank email window with no address. In SM it simply switches email and the address is ready. Never has worked from day one in FF/TB. It just, now, Worked for me; FF 3.5.5 / TB 2.0.0.23. MikeyG ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
SM 2.0, Google Desktop Search and Win7
On Jun 21, 3:34 pm, horst39 penroll1nos...@bluewin.ch wrote: Is there any way to force Google Desktop Search to scan SM emails? Thank you Horst 0. Exit SeaMonkey and Google Desktop Search 1. Open up C:\Program Files\Google\Google Desktop Search 2. Open up C:\Program Files\Mozilla.org\Seamonkey\components 3. Copy GoogleDesktopMozilla.dll, GoogleDesktopMozillaStub.js, and GoogleDesktopMozillaStub.xpt from #1 to #2 4. Run cmd.exe 5. Type: cd C:\Program Files\Mozilla.org\Seamonkey\components 6. Type: ..\regxpcom 7. Restart SeaMonkey Can someone post these instructions upgraded for SM 2.0 which installs in a different directory in Windows 7. I found and copied all the files to the right places, but what is the Win7 equivalent for regxpcom? Thanks, Steve ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Inbox messages history
Where do I find the inbox index (?) file? I have moved excess inbox messages to a separate folder (Old Inbox), and want to delete what shows up in my current Inbox. Make it empty, in other words. But, I forgot what the saved messages are (what suffix they carry (.msn?)) and where they're located. Thanks for all guidance. keith whaley ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: NNTP problems - FIX
Bill Davidsen wrote: I have put my full config up as screen shots: http://www.tmr.com/~davidsen/Private/E-S_post_bug_SM2/ Note that SeaMonkey sends *no packets* to the NNTP host, other than always offer auth my working server definitions, those without auth needed, are identical. I have Fails for me about 2:1 over Works for me, but obviously it works for someone. Linux, Fedora-11, updated a few days ago. It seems that a fix is available for this problem, assuming you are willing to build your own SeaMonkey from source. Bug #484656 seems to change the You have your config wrong to we were parsing your config wrong. In any case the problem is identified, and *maybe* this will be in 2.0.1 as a fix. I can find no reliable way to avoid this, creating a new account may work, or not. I think part of the problem is related to there being no machine by the name news.eternal-september.org, but instead that returns a list of IPs, all of which resolve to other names.And if you use SSL, the certificate is for news.eternal-september.org, so you can't just plug in the real name of the server you want, even for test. The other account I have which shows the same problems also has funky naming, all of which works perfectly in 1.1.18. Until/unless the patch is adopted it looks bad for the good guys. -- Bill Davidsen david...@tmr.com We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from the machinations of the wicked. - from Slashdot ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Anti-Virus Suites Compatibility
Samuel S wrote: Hello all, I Am trying to figure out which anti-virus suites work well with SM. I Am currently using AVG, which settings are all geared towards IE and I cannot figure out how to change that. Then it came to mind to find out here, who uses what and a consensus is on the better suite. I was using Kaspersky, which was fine, I wanted to find if something else out there is just as good. TIA Bo1953 I've been using Avast Anti-Virus [Free] for several years, and it has always worked well with all versions of SM I have used. If you're interested in trying it: http://www.avast.com/ bj ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
HTML validator for SM 2.0
Is there a version of Tidy or other HTML validator ready for Seamonkey 2.0? I tried Marc's version 0.858 which is supposed to run in Firefox but it would not install in SM 2.0 Steve ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: NNTP problems to authenticated hosts continue
Bill Davidsen wrote: NoOp wrote: I do notice in your http://www.tmr.com/~davidsen/Private/E-S_post_bug_SM2/SS-es-1.jpg that your outgoing server is: localhost (Default). Do you actually expect to post to news.ethernal-september.org via 'localhost (Default)'? NNTP= SMTP, SMTP is mail, used when you reply all or similar. If SM2 is trying to use that for the NNTP POST command it is sadly broken. However, since other news servers, authenticated and not, work just fine with that outgoing SMTP server setting, I assume the problem is elsewhere. In hopes of someone having a clue where 'elsewhere' might be I put up the screenshots. I think it points to an error inside SM2 that this happens only on this server which doesn't demand authentication, and one other similar (non-public) server which also allows access to small information without auth. Eternal-September is working for me on Port 119, but it DOES require authentication, so on the server settings page for that news account, I have checked the box to always request authentication. Are you saying you are using another port for ES which does not require authentication? It seems possible that the lack of a demand for auth: 480 authentication required may somehow confuse SM, although I don't quite see how. In any case, it never even tries to POST, suggesting that internally the connection has been identified as read-only. I have no idea what would cause that. Does this extra information give anyone a clue? I'm confused why your connections would not require authentication the same as mine. Maybe if we determine that, we'll stumble on the answer you need. :) bj ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: HTML validator for SM 2.0
Steve B. schrieb: Is there a version of Tidy or other HTML validator ready for Seamonkey 2.0? I tried Marc's version 0.858 which is supposed to run in Firefox but it would not install in SM 2.0 It used to be possible to open a page in Composer (SM can send a page to composer via the File-menu) and choose to validate the page under the Tools menu in Composer then. If this is not enough for you, there's Html Validator: https://addons.mozilla.org/de/seamonkey/addon/249 regards Martin -- () ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail /\ www.asciiribbon.org - http://www.gerstbach.at/2004/ascii ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Inbox messages history
Keith Whaley schrieb: Where do I find the inbox index (?) file? in your profile-directory. I have moved excess inbox messages to a separate folder (Old Inbox), and want to delete what shows up in my current Inbox. Make it empty, in other words. Mark all message and hit Del. Right-click on the folder and select to compact it afterwards. But, I forgot what the saved messages are (what suffix they carry (.msn?)) and where they're located. *.msf regards Martin -- () ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail /\ www.asciiribbon.org - http://www.gerstbach.at/2004/ascii ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Inbox messages history
Keith Whaley wrote: Where do I find the inbox index (?) file? I have moved excess inbox messages to a separate folder (Old Inbox), and want to delete what shows up in my current Inbox. Make it empty, in other words. But, I forgot what the saved messages are (what suffix they carry (.msn?)) and where they're located. Thanks for all guidance. Well, the messages should be named Inbox (no extension), and the corresponding index is Inbox.msf; if you have multiple accounts you should find one under each account. But the easy way to do this, having moved all desired messages out of Inbox, is to simply delete the remaining messages from inside the program and then compact folders. You don't need to go poking around in directories and be sure to get the right file. -- War doesn't determine who's right, just who's left. -- Paul B. Gallagher ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: NNTP problems - FIX
Bill Davidsen wrote: It seems that a fix is available for this problem, assuming you are willing to build your own SeaMonkey from source. Bug #484656 seems to change the You have your config wrong to we were parsing your config wrong. In any case the problem is identified, and *maybe* this will be in 2.0.1 as a fix. Since comm-1.9.1 (the base of 2.0.x releases) branched after the fix for that bug was checked in it already contains that fix. IOW, it's already fixed in 2.0.1pre nightlies (which you can get without building from source) and will be fixed in 2.0.1. :-) Which reminds me... I really need to catch up with recent development and prepare another SMTT post. Maybe next weekend. Greetings, Jens -- Jens Hatlak http://jens.hatlak.de/ SeaMonkey Trunk Tracker http://smtt.blogspot.com/ ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: How to install version 2.0 so that it does NOT interfere with Version 1.1.18
On 11/23/2009 12:24 AM, Philip Chee wrote: On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 13:28:29 -0800, NoOp wrote: On 11/22/2009 01:25 PM, NoOp wrote: ... Actually, you might want to check again... '-no-noremote' works just fine for me on Win2KPro in both 1.1.18 2.0. That is how I test both in Windows via a VM (VirtualBox) at the same time so that I can easily compare. Sorry: should be '-no-remote' So here is a way to test: 1. Start SM 2.0 /without/ the -no-remote switch. 2. While 2.0 is running start 1.1 with a -no-remote switch. Does 1.1 open or just another 2.0 window? Phil Of course it will open just another 2.0 window. My response perhaps wasn't clear; I use -no-remote on _both_ 1.1.18 and 2.0. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: RoboForm adapter will not install in Seamonkey 2.0
On 11/23/2009 10:28 AM, Phillip Jones wrote: One thing that makes you like SM the best, is that when you click a Mailto: It doesn't open a Blank web page in FireFox and open a Blank email window with no address. In SM it simply switches email and the address is ready. Never has worked from day one in FF/TB. Mailto links have been around for quite a while. Assuming the application handling the link knows how to deal with them, various bits of info should be filled-in automatically. I find it hard to believe that Thunderbird doesn't know how to handle these. For more information, see the following: http://www.outfront.net/tutorials_02/adv_tech/mailto.htm Perhaps the links you used with Thunderbird were not set up correctly? ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Website problems
On 11/23/2009 07:13 AM, David E. Ross wrote: On 11/22/2009 11:38 PM, Cedar wrote: Wow! You guys are fantastic! That actually workedI can even click on the e-mail newsletter links and get there now! Holy Cow! (haha) But now, should I leave this new string in about:config permanently? Are there any possible circumstance/websites where this change may cause problems? Thanks much. I would definitely NOT spoof permanently. Permanent spoofing tells the Web site developers that everything is okay when that is not true. Then, when someone complains that their site does not work with SeaMonkey, they say that no one uses SeaMonkey to access their site. Says David while using Thunderbird :-) The reason for the 'NOT Firefox/someversion' has been discussed quite a lot in the past. The conclusion was to add it in that manner so that SeaMonkey would be recongnized, while at the same time by passing the Fx sniffing issue. If someone is gathering stats on their site they will/should see the SeaMonkey in the UA string. Install an extension for spoofing. There are several. They have an editable list of browsers whose user agent strings you can select, including returning to your actual browser's string (turning off spoofing). They also automatically turn off spoofing when you terminate SeaMonkey. One popular extension for spoofing is User Agent Switcher at http://chrispederick.com/work/user-agent-switcher/. I prefer PrefBar at http://prefbar.mozdev.org/ because of its other features unrelated to spoofing. I very much recommend prefbar as well. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: How to install version 2.0 so that it does NOT interfere with Version 1.1.18
On 11/23/2009 1:34 PM, NoOp wrote: On 11/23/2009 12:24 AM, Philip Chee wrote: So here is a way to test: 1. Start SM 2.0 /without/ the -no-remote switch. 2. While 2.0 is running start 1.1 with a -no-remote switch. Does 1.1 open or just another 2.0 window? Phil Of course it will open just another 2.0 window. My response perhaps wasn't clear; I use -no-remote on _both_ 1.1.18 and 2.0. Are you sure? I thought if you launched 1.1.X with -no-remote, that it would start another 1.1.X window whether or not a 2.0 windows was open? ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
New Mail account does not appear in window on left
I have set up a New E-Mail account with a new server but it does not appear in the left window with my other (old) E-Mail and Newsgroups. What am I doing wrong? DoctorBill ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: RoboForm adapter will not install in Seamonkey 2.0
MikeyG wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: John Doue wrote: Serge Popper wrote: John Doue wrote: Serge Popper wrote: When attempting to install the RoboForm adapter, which worked fine in 1.18, the following message was displayed - Incompatible Extension. AI RoboForm Toolbar for Seamonkey will not be installed because it does not provide secure up dadates. I went into EDITPREFERENCESADVANCEDSOFTWARE INSTALLATIONMANAGE SOFTWARE NSTALLATION AND UPDATESALLOWED SITES There I inserted Roboform.com and made it an allowed site. I attempted to install the Adapter again and again, the same message came up as is listed above. I went back into Software installations and RoboForm was no longer there. I went through the same procedure, re-inserted RoboForm.com, tried again and got the same denial message. I tried once more but the Software Installations wouldn't accept roboform.com at all this time. How do I get around this? Thanks, Serge Popper Roboforms does not work in SM 2.0. I contacted the company to see if and when they intended to have an extension for it, and go a terse answer saying in not so many words, if and when there is one, it will posted on our Web site. Wait and see. But until there is one, I use SM 2.0 for experimenting only, I miss too much its convenience. Thanks for your response. I did the same thing and got the same answer. I'm ging to roll back to 1.18 and wait for the adapter. Thanks, Serge This might also be a chance for you to play a little with FF 3.5x. Although I prefer SM, Roboform working perfectly with FF, I now use it as an alternate. One site I visit regularly does not work very well any more with SM 1.1.18 because of some elaborate scripts. Since I am the belt and suspender type, I also have TB installed, and with the right extension installed to kind of connect them, the duo FF and TB come close to the convenience of SM, which I still prefer, probably because it still has something I liked in Netscape's early versions. One thing that makes you like SM the best, is that when you click a Mailto: It doesn't open a Blank web page in FireFox and open a Blank email window with no address. In SM it simply switches email and the address is ready. Never has worked from day one in FF/TB. It just, now, Worked for me; FF 3.5.5 / TB 2.0.0.23. MikeyG unless the finally fixed the problem in the 3.5 series I hadn't previously. I think I I even had an old Bugzilla Bug report on it in the past. I settle down to using SM of mail/news, and email. And using FireFox or Camino for web browser only when I want just go to a web page for a second or two. -- Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T.If it's Fixed, Don't Break it http://www.phillipmjones.net http://www.vpea.org mailto:pjon...@kimbanet.com ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: How to install version 2.0 so that it does NOT interfere with Version 1.1.18
On 11/23/2009 02:42 PM, Mark Hansen wrote: On 11/23/2009 1:34 PM, NoOp wrote: On 11/23/2009 12:24 AM, Philip Chee wrote: So here is a way to test: 1. Start SM 2.0 /without/ the -no-remote switch. 2. While 2.0 is running start 1.1 with a -no-remote switch. Does 1.1 open or just another 2.0 window? Phil Of course it will open just another 2.0 window. My response perhaps wasn't clear; I use -no-remote on _both_ 1.1.18 and 2.0. Are you sure? I thought if you launched 1.1.X with -no-remote, that it would start another 1.1.X window whether or not a 2.0 windows was open? OK, I'll type slowly :-) I use -no-remote to start *all* of my SM's: 1.1.18, 2.0, 2.01pre. By using that I can start one, bring up another, and another. 1.1.18 and 2.0 (or 2.01pre) run and work at the same time. *All* are currently running while typing this[1]: Linux: SM 1.1.18 SeaMonkey 1.1.18 Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.23) Gecko/20090823 SeaMonkey/1.1.18 Launch command: /home/username/seamonkey/seamonkey -no-remote -mail -browser SM 2.0 Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.4) Gecko/20091017 NOT Firefox/3.5 Lightning/1.0pre SeaMonkey/2.0 Launch command: /home/username/seamonkey2.0/seamonkey/seamonkey -no-remote -mail -browser Note: SM 2.0 doesn't respect the '-mail -browser' order due to other SM 2.0 issues. Win2KPro: SeaMonkey 1.1.18 Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.8.1.23) Gecko/20090825 SeaMonkey/1.1.18 Launch command: C:\Program Files\mozilla.org\SeaMonkey\seamonkey.exe -no-remote -mail -browser SM 2.0 Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.9.1.4) Gecko/20091017 SeaMonkey/2.0 Launch command: C:\Program Files\SeaMonkey\seamonkey.exe -no-remote -mail -browser [1] Win2KPro is running as a guest virtual machine via VirtualBox 3.0.12 on a linux (Ubuntu 9.10) host. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Quick Search on SM 2.0 vs. 1.1x
SM Community, Seems like the Quick Search feature has changed in SM 2.0. In SM 1.1x, the quick search would only find subjects or names (or email addresses) that a message was addressed To:. In SM 2.0, it appears that the quick search now includes names that are either To: or cc: which is a much larger list to search through. I somewhat prefer it the old way. Is there a preference setting that can give me the previous functionality? To exclude cc:'s on quick search or something? Thx, Antman. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Website problems
On 11/23/2009 1:45 PM, NoOp wrote [in part]: On 11/23/2009 07:13 AM, I previously wrote [also in part]: I would definitely NOT spoof permanently. Permanent spoofing tells the Web site developers that everything is okay when that is not true. Then, when someone complains that their site does not work with SeaMonkey, they say that no one uses SeaMonkey to access their site. Says David while using Thunderbird :-) I use Thunderbird as my newsgroup application because, when I switch SeaMonkey profiles, I don't want to lose my current newsgroup session. The reason for the 'NOT Firefox/someversion' has been discussed quite a lot in the past. The conclusion was to add it in that manner so that SeaMonkey would be recongnized, while at the same time by passing the Fx sniffing issue. If someone is gathering stats on their site they will/should see the SeaMonkey in the UA string. You assume that some human sees the logs. I'm only guessing, but I think that very rarely happens. When I spoof, I use the following UA string: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.4) Gecko/20091017 SeaMonkey/2.0, NOT Firefox/3.5.3 The processing that summarizes the logs for human use is very likely to be similar to the processing that makes a server think I'm using Firefox. -- David E. Ross http://www.rossde.com/ Go to Mozdev at http://www.mozdev.org/ for quick access to extensions for Firefox, Thunderbird, SeaMonkey, and other Mozilla-related applications. You can access Mozdev much more quickly than you can Mozilla Add-Ons. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: HTML validator for SM 2.0
On 11/23/2009 11:17 AM, Steve B. wrote: Is there a version of Tidy or other HTML validator ready for Seamonkey 2.0? I tried Marc's version 0.858 which is supposed to run in Firefox but it would not install in SM 2.0 Steve Why not use the W3C validator at http://validator.w3.org/? -- David E. Ross http://www.rossde.com/ Go to Mozdev at http://www.mozdev.org/ for quick access to extensions for Firefox, Thunderbird, SeaMonkey, and other Mozilla-related applications. You can access Mozdev much more quickly than you can Mozilla Add-Ons. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: How to install version 2.0 so that it does NOT interfere with Version 1.1.18
On 11/23/2009 4:06 PM, NoOp wrote: On 11/23/2009 02:42 PM, Mark Hansen wrote: On 11/23/2009 1:34 PM, NoOp wrote: On 11/23/2009 12:24 AM, Philip Chee wrote: So here is a way to test: 1. Start SM 2.0 /without/ the -no-remote switch. 2. While 2.0 is running start 1.1 with a -no-remote switch. Does 1.1 open or just another 2.0 window? Phil Of course it will open just another 2.0 window. My response perhaps wasn't clear; I use -no-remote on _both_ 1.1.18 and 2.0. Are you sure? I thought if you launched 1.1.X with -no-remote, that it would start another 1.1.X window whether or not a 2.0 windows was open? OK, I'll type slowly :-) U, go back and read what you wrote. The question was: While 2.0 is running, start 1.1 with a -no-remote switch. Does 1.1 open or just another 2.0 windows? To which you responded: Of course it will open just another 2.0 window... Am I reading too slowly? I use -no-remote to start *all* of my SM's: 1.1.18, 2.0, 2.01pre. By using that I can start one, bring up another, and another. 1.1.18 and 2.0 (or 2.01pre) run and work at the same time. *All* are currently running while typing this[1]: ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Anti-Virus Suites Compatibility
Samuel S wrote: Hello all, I Am trying to figure out which anti-virus suites work well with SM. I Am currently using AVG, which settings are all geared towards IE and I cannot figure out how to change that. Then it came to mind to find out here, who uses what and a consensus is on the better suite. I was using Kaspersky, which was fine, I wanted to find if something else out there is just as good. TIA Bo1953 I'm not a regular Windows user, but I do use ClamWin on my Windows machines. Lee ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: HTML validator for SM 2.0
Martin Freitag wrote: Steve B. schrieb: Is there a version of Tidy or other HTML validator ready for Seamonkey 2.0? I tried Marc's version 0.858 which is supposed to run in Firefox but it would not install in SM 2.0 It used to be possible to open a page in Composer (SM can send a page to composer via the File-menu) and choose to validate the page under the Tools menu in Composer then. If this is not enough for you, there's Html Validator: https://addons.mozilla.org/de/seamonkey/addon/249 regards Martin That's the one I tried, and it generates this message: Html Validator 0.8.5.8 could not be installed because it is not compatible with SeaMonkey 2.0 Steve ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: HTML validator for SM 2.0
David E. Ross wrote: Why not use the W3C validator athttp://validator.w3.org/? The Seamonkey accessory (plug-in?? is much more convenient since it gives me validation of any page it opens. Steve ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Anti-Virus Suites Compatibility
Samuel S wrote: Hello all, I Am trying to figure out which anti-virus suites work well with SM. I Am currently using AVG, which settings are all geared towards IE and I cannot figure out how to change that. Then it came to mind to find out here, who uses what and a consensus is on the better suite. I was using Kaspersky, which was fine, I wanted to find if something else out there is just as good. TIA Bo1953 Hello All - another quick thought, what about something with a firewall? I think that would somewhat important too. I do not see any of that with the free programs, unless I have missed it. Thanks for all input. Trying Avast next.. Bo1953 ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: How to install version 2.0 so that it does NOT interfere with Version 1.1.18
On 11/23/2009 05:23 PM, Mark Hansen wrote: On 11/23/2009 4:06 PM, NoOp wrote: On 11/23/2009 02:42 PM, Mark Hansen wrote: On 11/23/2009 1:34 PM, NoOp wrote: On 11/23/2009 12:24 AM, Philip Chee wrote: So here is a way to test: 1. Start SM 2.0 /without/ the -no-remote switch. 2. While 2.0 is running start 1.1 with a -no-remote switch. Does 1.1 open or just another 2.0 window? Phil Of course it will open just another 2.0 window. My response perhaps wasn't clear; I use -no-remote on _both_ 1.1.18 and 2.0. Are you sure? I thought if you launched 1.1.X with -no-remote, that it would start another 1.1.X window whether or not a 2.0 windows was open? OK, I'll type slowly :-) U, go back and read what you wrote. The question was: While 2.0 is running, start 1.1 with a -no-remote switch. Does 1.1 open or just another 2.0 windows? To which you responded: Of course it will open just another 2.0 window... Am I reading too slowly? Yes :-) Maybe a miscommunication... The question was: So here is a way to test: 1. Start SM 2.0 /without/ the -no-remote switch. 2. While 2.0 is running start 1.1 with a -no-remote switch. Does 1.1 open or just another 2.0 window? If I Start SM 2.0 /without/ the -no-remote switch and start 1.1 with a -no-remote switch I will only get another 2.0 window. If I: 1. Start SM 2.0 _with_ the -no-remote (or 1.1.18) 2. Then start SM 1.1.18 _with_ the -no-remote (or SM 2.0 if the above is reversed) then _both_ 2.0 _and_ 1.1.18 open independently. I use -no-remote to start *all* of my SM's: 1.1.18, 2.0, 2.01pre. By using that I can start one, bring up another, and another. 1.1.18 and 2.0 (or 2.01pre) run and work at the same time. *All* are currently running while typing this[1]: ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: How to install version 2.0 so that it does NOT interfere with Version 1.1.18
NoOp: If I Start SM 2.0 /without/ the -no-remote switch and start 1.1 with a -no-remote switch I will only get another 2.0 window. Well, on Linux i will get SM1 then. *g* Hartmut ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Anti-Virus Suites Compatibility
NO wrote: Samuel S wrote: Hello all, I Am trying to figure out which anti-virus suites work well with SM. I Am currently using AVG, which settings are all geared towards IE and I cannot figure out how to change that. Then it came to mind to find out here, who uses what and a consensus is on the better suite. I was using Kaspersky, which was fine, I wanted to find if something else out there is just as good. TIA Bo1953 Hello All - another quick thought, what about something with a firewall? I think that would somewhat important too. I do not see any of that with the free programs, unless I have missed it. Thanks for all input. Trying Avast next.. Bo1953 Haven't used this one, but many people on some sites I keep up with, use it, and it's been around for awhile. It has both, an AV and firewall program, which you can install together, or separately. http://personalfirewall.comodo.com/download_firewall.html ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: HTML validator for SM 2.0
Steve B. wrote: David E. Ross wrote: Why not use the W3C validator athttp://validator.w3.org/? The Seamonkey accessory (plug-in?? is much more convenient since it gives me validation of any page it opens. Steve Disable Compatibility Checking in the Addon manager and then install it - it worked for me. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SM 2.0, Google Desktop Search and Win7
On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 13:40:29 -0500, Steve B. wrote: Can someone post these instructions upgraded for SM 2.0 which installs in a different directory in Windows 7. I found and copied all the files to the right places, but what is the Win7 equivalent for regxpcom? The Win7 equivalent for regxpcom is to just skip that step. Phil -- Philip Chee phi...@aleytys.pc.my, philip.c...@gmail.com http://flashblock.mozdev.org/ http://xsidebar.mozdev.org Guard us from the she-wolf and the wolf, and guard us from the thief, oh Night, and so be good for us to pass. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: RoboForm adapter will not install in Seamonkey 2.0
MikeyG wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: John Doue wrote: Serge Popper wrote: John Doue wrote: Serge Popper wrote: When attempting to install the RoboForm adapter, which worked fine in 1.18, the following message was displayed - Incompatible Extension. AI RoboForm Toolbar for Seamonkey will not be installed because it does not provide secure up dadates. I went into EDITPREFERENCESADVANCEDSOFTWARE INSTALLATIONMANAGE SOFTWARE NSTALLATION AND UPDATESALLOWED SITES There I inserted Roboform.com and made it an allowed site. I attempted to install the Adapter again and again, the same message came up as is listed above. I went back into Software installations and RoboForm was no longer there. I went through the same procedure, re-inserted RoboForm.com, tried again and got the same denial message. I tried once more but the Software Installations wouldn't accept roboform.com at all this time. How do I get around this? Thanks, Serge Popper Roboforms does not work in SM 2.0. I contacted the company to see if and when they intended to have an extension for it, and go a terse answer saying in not so many words, if and when there is one, it will posted on our Web site. Wait and see. But until there is one, I use SM 2.0 for experimenting only, I miss too much its convenience. Thanks for your response. I did the same thing and got the same answer. I'm ging to roll back to 1.18 and wait for the adapter. Thanks, Serge This might also be a chance for you to play a little with FF 3.5x. Although I prefer SM, Roboform working perfectly with FF, I now use it as an alternate. One site I visit regularly does not work very well any more with SM 1.1.18 because of some elaborate scripts. Since I am the belt and suspender type, I also have TB installed, and with the right extension installed to kind of connect them, the duo FF and TB come close to the convenience of SM, which I still prefer, probably because it still has something I liked in Netscape's early versions. One thing that makes you like SM the best, is that when you click a Mailto: It doesn't open a Blank web page in FireFox and open a Blank email window with no address. In SM it simply switches email and the address is ready. Never has worked from day one in FF/TB. It just, now, Worked for me; FF 3.5.5 / TB 2.0.0.23. MikeyG And it does for me, never had that problem. -- John Doue ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
