Sent subfolder regenerates by itself

[Lou]

I have 3 E-Mail accounts plus my Local Folder.  After I upgraded to SM2, 
an empty Sent subfolder appeared inside the regular Sent folder in my 
Local Folders.  If I delete it, it goes away, but reappears the next 
time I run SM.  Is there any way that I can get rid of it for good.  Can 
I also get rid of the Sent folder inside the Local Folders, since I 
don't use it (the 3 E-mail accounts have their own Sent folder).


Local Folders
  |
  --- Sent
  | |
  | --- Sent  << This is the one that bugs me.


Any help would be appreciated,
Lou
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100205 
SeaMonkey/2.0.3

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Seamonkey has quit working with Google Maps!

[J. Weaver Jr.]

Devil's_Advocate wrote:


I'm still using XP.

Is XP no longer workable with Seamonkey?


Worked fine here using XP SP3. Cookie problem, perhaps?  -JW
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Adobe Flash Player

[Rufus]

Cruz, Jaime wrote:

Has anyone been able to get the new Flash Player to install on Windows?
Instead of just downloading an executable to run, they've decided to get
fancy and use Mozilla's "XPI" package instead.

The only problem is, when you try to install it, you get a message
telling you it isn't compatible with Seamonkey 2.0.3!! WTF??

Has anyone gotten this to work?
http://get.adobe.com/flashplayer/



Installed just fine for me, and works...SM 2.0.3, on a MacBook Pro.

--
 - Rufus
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Adobe Flash Player

[David E. Ross]

On 26-Feb-10 6:56 PM, Cruz, Jaime wrote:
> Has anyone been able to get the new Flash Player to install on Windows? 
>   Instead of just downloading an executable to run, they've decided to 
> get fancy and use Mozilla's "XPI" package instead.
> 
> The only problem is, when you try to install it, you get a message 
> telling you it isn't compatible with Seamonkey 2.0.3!!  WTF??
> 
> Has anyone gotten this to work?
> http://get.adobe.com/flashplayer/
> 

I downloaded from that site and installed version 10.0.45.2 (10.0 r45)
almost two weeks ago.  Right after installing, I disabled the FlashBlock
extension I have and tested the installation at
.  It tested okay.

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.8)
Gecko/20100205 SeaMonkey/2.0.3

Windows XP Home Edition 5.1.2600 Service Pack 2 Build 2600
(Build 2600.xpsp_sp2_gdr.091208-2028)

-- 
David E. Ross


Go to Mozdev at  for quick access to
extensions for Firefox, Thunderbird, SeaMonkey, and other
Mozilla-related applications.  You can access Mozdev much
more quickly than you can Mozilla Add-Ons.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Adobe Flash Player

[Mark Hansen]

On 2/26/2010 7:38 PM, William Morrison wrote:
> 
> Cruz, Jaime wrote:
>> Has anyone been able to get the new Flash Player to install on 
>> Windows?  Instead of just downloading an executable to run, they've 
>> decided to get fancy and use Mozilla's "XPI" package instead.
>>
>> The only problem is, when you try to install it, you get a message 
>> telling you it isn't compatible with Seamonkey 2.0.3!!  WTF??
>>
>> Has anyone gotten this to work?
>> http://get.adobe.com/flashplayer/
>>
> 
> I just got it to install very nicely with no problem on XP sp3 Seamonkey 
> 2.0.3 no spoofing of any kind.
> 

Is it possible you have the config setting to ignore version mismatches,
whatever that is called?
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Adobe Flash Player

[William Morrison]

Cruz, Jaime wrote:
Has anyone been able to get the new Flash Player to install on 
Windows?  Instead of just downloading an executable to run, they've 
decided to get fancy and use Mozilla's "XPI" package instead.


The only problem is, when you try to install it, you get a message 
telling you it isn't compatible with Seamonkey 2.0.3!!  WTF??


Has anyone gotten this to work?
http://get.adobe.com/flashplayer/



I just got it to install very nicely with no problem on XP sp3 Seamonkey 
2.0.3 no spoofing of any kind.


--
Big Bill


___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Adobe Flash Player

[Cruz, Jaime]

Has anyone been able to get the new Flash Player to install on Windows? 
 Instead of just downloading an executable to run, they've decided to 
get fancy and use Mozilla's "XPI" package instead.


The only problem is, when you try to install it, you get a message 
telling you it isn't compatible with Seamonkey 2.0.3!!  WTF??


Has anyone gotten this to work?
http://get.adobe.com/flashplayer/

--
Jaime A. Cruz
President
Nassau Wings Motorcycle Club
http://www.nassauwings.org/

AMA District 34
http://www.AMADistrict34.com/
Pop's Run
http://www.popsrun.org/
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Seamonkey has quit working with Google Maps!

[David E. Ross]

On 26-Feb-10 4:19 PM, Devil's_Advocate wrote:
> "S. Beaulieu"   wrote :
> 
>> Devil's_Advocate a écrit :
>>> A couple of days ago, both versions 1.18 and 2.x of Seamonkey quit 
> working
>>> with Google Maps and it's a REAL PAIN.
>>>
>>> Does anyone know why??
>>>
>>> I put in an address and click on it and it comes up on the left side of
>>> Google Maps but NOT in the map area and clicking on the left side does
>>> nothing.
>>>
>>> I cant keep using this browser if it quits working.
>>>
>>
>>
>> Google Maps is working perfectly fine in my SM2.0.3 running on Win7 Pro. 
>> I don't think SM is to blame.
> 
> I'm still using XP.
> 
> Is XP no longer workable with Seamonkey?
> 
> 
> 

It works for me.
*   No spoofing.
*   Images for originating server only

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.8)
Gecko/20100205 SeaMonkey/2.0.3
 (with Windows XP SP2)

-- 
David E. Ross


Go to Mozdev at  for quick access to
extensions for Firefox, Thunderbird, SeaMonkey, and other
Mozilla-related applications.  You can access Mozdev much
more quickly than you can Mozilla Add-Ons.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Seamonkey has quit working with Google Maps!

[Phillip Jones]

S. Beaulieu wrote:

Devil's_Advocate a écrit :

A couple of days ago, both versions 1.18 and 2.x of Seamonkey quit working
with Google Maps and it's a REAL PAIN.

Does anyone know why??

I put in an address and click on it and it comes up on the left side of
Google Maps but NOT in the map area and clicking on the left side does
nothing.

I cant keep using this browser if it quits working.




Google Maps is working perfectly fine in my SM2.0.3 running on Win7 Pro.
I don't think SM is to blame.

S.


Works for me Mac OSX.4.11 Powerbook 17"  (1.67GB PowerPC Processor , 2GB 
Ram)


--
Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T."If it's Fixed, Don't Break it"
http://www.phillipmjones.net   http://www.vpea.org
mailto:pjon...@kimbanet.com
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Seamonkey has quit working with Google Maps!

[Phillip Jones]

Phillip Jones wrote:

S. Beaulieu wrote:

Devil's_Advocate a écrit :

A couple of days ago, both versions 1.18 and 2.x of Seamonkey quit working
with Google Maps and it's a REAL PAIN.

Does anyone know why??

I put in an address and click on it and it comes up on the left side of
Google Maps but NOT in the map area and clicking on the left side does
nothing.

I cant keep using this browser if it quits working.




Google Maps is working perfectly fine in my SM2.0.3 running on Win7 Pro.
I don't think SM is to blame.

S.


Works for me Mac OSX.4.11 Powerbook 17"  (1.67GB PowerPC Processor , 2GB
Ram)


Left off using SM 2.0.3

--
Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T."If it's Fixed, Don't Break it"
http://www.phillipmjones.net   http://www.vpea.org
mailto:pjon...@kimbanet.com
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Seamonkey has quit working with Google Maps!

[Devil's_Advocate]

BL   wrote :

> Devil's_Advocate wrote:
>> A couple of days ago, both versions 1.18 and 2.x of Seamonkey quit working
>> with Google Maps and it's a REAL PAIN.
>>
>> Does anyone know why??
>>
>> I put in an address and click on it and it comes up on the left side of
>> Google Maps but NOT in the map area and clicking on the left side does
>> nothing.
>>
>> I cant keep using this browser if it quits working.
>>
> Does it work with IE?

Yes.

I'm using XP by the way.


___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Seamonkey has quit working with Google Maps!

[Devil's_Advocate]

"S. Beaulieu"   wrote :

> Devil's_Advocate a écrit :
>> A couple of days ago, both versions 1.18 and 2.x of Seamonkey quit 
working
>> with Google Maps and it's a REAL PAIN.
>>
>> Does anyone know why??
>>
>> I put in an address and click on it and it comes up on the left side of
>> Google Maps but NOT in the map area and clicking on the left side does
>> nothing.
>>
>> I cant keep using this browser if it quits working.
>>
> 
> 
> Google Maps is working perfectly fine in my SM2.0.3 running on Win7 Pro. 
> I don't think SM is to blame.

I'm still using XP.

Is XP no longer workable with Seamonkey?



___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Seamonkey has quit working with Google Maps!

[BL]

Devil's_Advocate wrote:

A couple of days ago, both versions 1.18 and 2.x of Seamonkey quit working
with Google Maps and it's a REAL PAIN.

Does anyone know why??

I put in an address and click on it and it comes up on the left side of
Google Maps but NOT in the map area and clicking on the left side does
nothing.

I cant keep using this browser if it quits working.


Does it work with IE?
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Seamonkey has quit working with Google Maps!

[Mark Hansen]

On 2/26/2010 3:16 PM, Rick Merrill wrote:
> Devil's_Advocate wrote:
>> A couple of days ago, both versions 1.18 and 2.x of Seamonkey quit working
>> with Google Maps and it's a REAL PAIN.
>>
>> Does anyone know why??
>>
>> I put in an address and click on it and it comes up on the left side of
>> Google Maps but NOT in the map area and clicking on the left side does
>> nothing.
>>
>> I cant keep using this browser if it quits working.
>>
> 
> maps.google seems to stutter: first map is ok, but it won't zoom etc.
> earth.google is fine.
> 
> Win xp sp3 with SM 2.0.3

I've been using maps.google.com and it zooms just fine. No stuttering
that I can see (but perhaps I don't know what you mean by that).

I've zoomed-in on the main US map that is shown when first visiting
the page, as well as maps shown for specific addresses. I've even
used the street view. All works as expected.

I'm using SM 1.1.16 on Windows XP SP3.

FYI.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Seamonkey has quit working with Google Maps!

[Rick Merrill]

Devil's_Advocate wrote:

A couple of days ago, both versions 1.18 and 2.x of Seamonkey quit working
with Google Maps and it's a REAL PAIN.

Does anyone know why??

I put in an address and click on it and it comes up on the left side of
Google Maps but NOT in the map area and clicking on the left side does
nothing.

I cant keep using this browser if it quits working.



maps.google seems to stutter: first map is ok, but it won't zoom etc.
earth.google is fine.

Win xp sp3 with SM 2.0.3
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Turn Composer into a full-fledged word processor?

[JeffM]

>JeffM wrote:
>>If you are going to put something on a Port 80 location,
>>make it **REAL** HTML.
>>
Rick Merrill wrote:
>"Real?"
>Have you ever tried to get google/yahoo/cnn html code to "validate"?!
>
I have said here MANY times that
there is a great number of people trying to pass themselves off
as qualified Web developers who have no clue what they are doing.
Large corporations do not have immunity from the scourge.

>There is no agreement on the meaning of "real".
>
Of course there is.
Just because Ebonics was pushed as legit by misguided people
doesn't mean there isn't a standard for spoken and written English.

W3C==WorldWide Web Consortium.
*Those* are the folks who maintain the Web standards
and who get to say what is proper Web coding
and what is a steaming pile of broken code.
Their tools are readily available and they are free.
You can even select what levels of the standards you use.
There is no excuse for publishing crap code.
The reasons you encounter it are sloth and ignorance.

In some diciplines, standards are enforced
(think: National Electrical Code).  In others, charlatans abound.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Seamonkey has quit working with Google Maps!

[BeeNeR]

On or about 2/26/2010 5:12 PM, J. Weaver Jr. typed the following:
> Devil's_Advocate wrote:
>> A couple of days ago, both versions 1.18 and 2.x of Seamonkey quit
>> working
>> with Google Maps and it's a REAL PAIN.
>>
>> Does anyone know why??
>>
>> I put in an address and click on it and it comes up on the left side of
>> Google Maps but NOT in the map area and clicking on the left side does
>> nothing.
>>
>> I cant keep using this browser if it quits working.
> 
> Working fine here, with "Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
> rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100205 NOT Firefox/3.0 SeaMonkey/2.0.3".  -JW

Apparently we don't know why it's not working for you, but from the
responses it would appear it is NOT a SM problem.  Works fine for me
with SM 2.0.4pre and Windows XP Pro SE3 Up to date.

-- 
Ed

Experience is what causes a person to
make new mistakes instead of old ones.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Seamonkey has quit working with Google Maps!

[J. Weaver Jr.]

Devil's_Advocate wrote:

A couple of days ago, both versions 1.18 and 2.x of Seamonkey quit working
with Google Maps and it's a REAL PAIN.

Does anyone know why??

I put in an address and click on it and it comes up on the left side of
Google Maps but NOT in the map area and clicking on the left side does
nothing.

I cant keep using this browser if it quits working.


Working fine here, with "Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; 
rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100205 NOT Firefox/3.0 SeaMonkey/2.0.3".  -JW

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

View Message Body As Bug

[David Wilkinson]

In SM2/TB3, if I save a message as a .eml file and then open it from the File
menu, it opens in a new window in which the "View Message Body As" feature does
not work. The selection button moves, but the view does not change.

This only happens with a saved file. If a regular message is displayed in a
separate window, the "View Message Body As" feature works correctly.

-- 
David Wilkinson
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Migration help needed 1.1.18 to 2.0.3

[JD]

Thanks for posting back with your solution.

hawker wrote:

I didn't see the other posts, sorry.

What did work was to uninstall 2.0.3, delete the profile from my user
profile by hand then reinstall 2.0.3. On the second go around it
properly imported everything.

Hawker

On 2/26/2010 1:40 PM, hawker wrote:

So today I decided to update my last 1.1.18 hold out to 2.0.3 and I have
some issues, most likely from an improperly performed upgrade (my
fault). Can I get some help fixing this.

I installed the 2.0.3 into the 1.1.18 directory, bad mistake. At that
point I could not get Seamonkey to work at all. I uninstalled 2.0.3 and
then reinstalled into the default directory, which was different for 2.x
than 1.1.x. At this point 2.0.3 works fine and I was able to import most
of my settings. I was not able to import mail or news though.

I then reinstalled 1.1.8 and am using that to compose this.

So my guess is the only question is, without using MozBackup or some
other third party tool (or copying profiles over by hand)how do I get
2.0.3 to import my 1.1.18 mail and news?

Thanx

Hawker







--
 JD..
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Seamonkey has quit working with Google Maps!

[Mark Hansen]

On 2/26/2010 12:05 PM, Devil's_Advocate wrote:
> A couple of days ago, both versions 1.18 and 2.x of Seamonkey quit working 
> with Google Maps and it's a REAL PAIN.
> 
> Does anyone know why??
> 
> I put in an address and click on it and it comes up on the left side of 
> Google Maps but NOT in the map area and clicking on the left side does 
> nothing.
> 
> I cant keep using this browser if it quits working.
> 

I'm using SM 1.1.16 and having no problems with Google maps at all.
FYI.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Seamonkey has quit working with Google Maps!

[S. Beaulieu]

Devil's_Advocate a écrit :

A couple of days ago, both versions 1.18 and 2.x of Seamonkey quit working
with Google Maps and it's a REAL PAIN.

Does anyone know why??

I put in an address and click on it and it comes up on the left side of
Google Maps but NOT in the map area and clicking on the left side does
nothing.

I cant keep using this browser if it quits working.




Google Maps is working perfectly fine in my SM2.0.3 running on Win7 Pro. 
I don't think SM is to blame.


S.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Seamonkey has quit working with Google Maps!

[Devil's_Advocate]

A couple of days ago, both versions 1.18 and 2.x of Seamonkey quit working 
with Google Maps and it's a REAL PAIN.

Does anyone know why??

I put in an address and click on it and it comes up on the left side of 
Google Maps but NOT in the map area and clicking on the left side does 
nothing.

I cant keep using this browser if it quits working.

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Migration help needed 1.1.18 to 2.0.3

[hawker]

I didn't see the other posts, sorry.

What did work was to uninstall 2.0.3, delete the profile from my user 
profile by hand then reinstall 2.0.3. On the second go around it 
properly imported everything.


Hawker

On 2/26/2010 1:40 PM, hawker wrote:

So today I decided to update my last 1.1.18 hold out to 2.0.3 and I have
some issues, most likely from an improperly performed upgrade (my
fault). Can I get some help fixing this.

I installed the 2.0.3 into the 1.1.18 directory, bad mistake. At that
point I could not get Seamonkey to work at all. I uninstalled 2.0.3 and
then reinstalled into the default directory, which was different for 2.x
than 1.1.x. At this point 2.0.3 works fine and I was able to import most
of my settings. I was not able to import mail or news though.

I then reinstalled 1.1.8 and am using that to compose this.

So my guess is the only question is, without using MozBackup or some
other third party tool (or copying profiles over by hand)how do I get
2.0.3 to import my 1.1.18 mail and news?

Thanx

Hawker


___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Repaired Re: Cancel Re: Bad certificate for Pay Pal

[question]

question wrote:

question wrote:

Rick Merrill wrote:

question wrote:

Rick Merrill wrote:

question wrote:

question wrote:

question wrote:

David E. Ross wrote:

On 24-Feb-10 12:02 PM, question wrote:

Error says Pay pal has a bad certificate . Paypal support
directed me
to Verisign to update the Certificate .. Suposivly did it But
Still
ger
lots od Certificate Errors.

Pay pal support Now says MY certificate is no good
I look in certificates and I HAVE NONE .

I am using seamonkey 2.03 win 7 pro Pay pal support says to go to
microsoft web site and get a New ROOT certificate . My
Question is
How?
When I use control panel to check For updates It only tells me
that
I am
all updated.. Win 7 Has never taken me to a Microsoft Update site
Like
XP did .

www.paypalobjects.com:443 uses an invalid Security Certificate

Certificate Is not trusted because the issuer is not Trusted

( error code:sec_error_untrustered issuer)



akamai suborinate Ca 3

akamai technologies inc

The Certificat expires 12 /31/ 2010


This sounds very much the same as the problem that I had with the
Federal Trade Commission site. See the thread "Bad Certificate"
started
yesterday in this same newsgroup.

I have submitted bug report #548380 to provide a better user
interface
for dealing with this situation. See
. At the
end of
that report, I describe my workaround, which requires a separate
profile.


I now know it is a seamonkey problem.. IE access the site with no
problems


Seamonkey 1.1.18 Gives the same error Jusy ONE time and then
lets me
into the site.

Paypal support sent me the link to Verisign to renewel the
Certificate .
I ran the install Then went to preference / Security/certificates

Verisign has nothing to do with the site. Akamai technology is the
certificate issuer for Paypal Per Seamonkey .



I use win 7 pro , my wife uses winxp...
I just tried paypal with her computer and seamonkey 2.03. NO
CERTIFICATE errors.

I concede that the problem lies in my computer and Not a pay pal com
problem






Forgot to mention. paypal page comes up in TEXT form ( no Graphics)
The newest version of Firefox gives the same errors


Are you uptodate on Win xp updates? I thought I saw one regarding
certificate validation or some such (those are just a blur).



As stated I am using Windows 7 Pro


sorry - confuzed by your spouse's win xp!

Did you go the new profile route?


Great suggestion
Will try it

I make a new profile and Paypal site Works. No errors

Now any suggestion on What I change or Delete in order to Keep my
profile? ?


Created a new profile
Renamed cert8.db in the bad profile to cert8.db1

Copied cert8.db from the Test profile to the Bad profile.

Now the Bad profile is a Good profile



___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Migration help needed 1.1.18 to 2.0.3

[Bernard Mercier]

hawker avait écrit le 2/26/2010 :
> So today I decided to update my last 1.1.18 hold out to 2.0.3 and I have 
> some issues, most likely from an improperly performed upgrade (my 
> fault). Can I get some help fixing this.

> I installed the 2.0.3 into the 1.1.18 directory, bad mistake. At that 
> point I could not get Seamonkey to work at all. I uninstalled 2.0.3 and 
> then reinstalled into the default directory, which was different for 2.x 
> than 1.1.x.  At this point 2.0.3 works fine and I was able to import 
> most of my settings.  I was not able to import mail or news though.

> I then reinstalled 1.1.8 and am using that to compose this.

> So my guess is the only question is, without using MozBackup or some 
> other third party tool (or copying profiles over by hand)how do I get 
> 2.0.3 to import my 1.1.18 mail and news?

> Thanx

> Hawker
The last week and half this has been raised and answered a couple of times.

-- 
[URL=http://users.kbc.skynet.be/fi001005] *Belgische Ardennen - Ardennes Belge
[/URL]
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Migration help needed 1.1.18 to 2.0.3

[hawker]

So today I decided to update my last 1.1.18 hold out to 2.0.3 and I have 
some issues, most likely from an improperly performed upgrade (my 
fault). Can I get some help fixing this.


I installed the 2.0.3 into the 1.1.18 directory, bad mistake. At that 
point I could not get Seamonkey to work at all. I uninstalled 2.0.3 and 
then reinstalled into the default directory, which was different for 2.x 
than 1.1.x.  At this point 2.0.3 works fine and I was able to import 
most of my settings.  I was not able to import mail or news though.


I then reinstalled 1.1.8 and am using that to compose this.

So my guess is the only question is, without using MozBackup or some 
other third party tool (or copying profiles over by hand)how do I get 
2.0.3 to import my 1.1.18 mail and news?


Thanx

Hawker
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: new form manager is great

[Rob Steinmetz]

I didn't use the old form manager and I don't really miss it. After a 
little getting used to it, I find the current system perfectly adequate 
for my needs. I imagine I'm a pretty average user.



Phillip Jones wrote:

»Q« wrote:

In,
Bill Davidsen wrote:


Well this is the very first and only person I have every met who
actually /likes/ the new crippled forms manager.


People who don't like it don't come to a support forum about it;
they're just happily using their browsers. I find the current behavior
*much* preferable to the old.


Not I. I've manged to put a couple of extensions in to mitigate the
damages. Still not as it should be.




The only reason they don't, is that they don't know about support
groups, They just suck it in and stew in silence.




___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Progress Window Mockups

[Justin Wood (Callek)]

On 2/26/2010 11:58 AM, Phillip Jones wrote:

Benoit Renard wrote:

Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:

Ok Here is the deal:

A vocal minority of people who USE the progress windows don't like them
as they stand.

These people wish to have changes made.

KaiRo, the original owner of this area has abandoned it due to "stop
energy" when he tried to make improvements.

*I* Am willing to pickup work, however I am self-proclaimed "not good at
UI".


I spearheaded some work myself, through a patch to get the buttons back,
before KaiRo cancelled my patch when he started working on it. Neil
contributed a patch of his own at the end, so I wonder how the window
looks like at the moment.

Most people seem to just want the old progress window back instead of
reinventing the wheel.

we want the *style* of the progress windows as in SM 1.1.18, not the
code. That includes for download manager and for page loading Progress
bar in status menu when downloading mail or new and BTW: I have a Bug
where the progress window stays up even after its uploaded an item even
after a copy is made and filed in sent folder. In fact I've let it sit
for 5 minutes or more just to see if it would dismiss on its own. Its
supposed to dismiss the millisecond everything is complete the message
sent and copying is completed. Never had that happen in SM1.1.18



And yet discussion of "what you want" it is not what I asked for

Provide me with details! ("A picture is worth a thousand words")

--
~Justin Wood (Callek)
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Archive feature additional question

[Rob Steinmetz]

I was going to post almost the exact same question.

Can anyone tell me if there is any difference in behavior in Seamonkey 
regarding the Archive folder. One thing I have noticed  in the SeaMonkey 
2,x is that it periodically re indexes mail folder and if you have a lot 
of mail that can take a long time. I was wondering if the Archive 
folders are normally skipped in that process. It would seem that they 
would not need to be maintained at the same level as the main folders.



Jens Hatlak wrote:

Am 10.02.2010 15:54 schrieb David Wilkinson:

I see there is a new Mail Archive feature in SM2. I don't find a
description of it in the SM2 Help


Even worse, there hasn't even been a bug report for that. My bad. Now
there is:




"The new Archive feature (inspired by Gmail) automatically moves a
message to an archive folder when you hit "A" with a message open or
select Message | Archive.


In SeaMonkey it's Shift+A. And there's a context menu item as well.


The archives folder layout sorts messages by year, with subfolders
for each month."


That's the default. You can change the behavior using the
mail.server.serverX.archive_granularity pref.

 From the source:

"This attribute and constants control the granularity of sub-folders of
the Archives folder - either messages go in the single archive folder,
or a yearly archive folder, or in a monthly archive folder with a yearly
parent folder. If the server doesn't support folders that both contain
messages and have sub-folders, we will ignore this setting."

Single Archive Folder = 0
Per-Year Archive Folders = 1
Per-Month Archive Folders = 2

As I wrote above the default is 1.

Note that AFAIK sub folders are not created automatically currently. You
need to do that manually once for each year/month. Or maybe I'm wrong
and only the subscribing doesn't work. Or not always. Anyway, once the
correct folder hierarchy is visible in MailNews the Archive
functionality works as expected.


Does this work with an IMAP server?


Yes.


If so, presumably the Archive folder is on the IMAP server.


By default it's the same server if it supports it, yes. You can set the
Archive folder per server under Account Settings, Copies&  Folders. I
for example always set it to Local Folders for all accounts. YMMV.


What happens if you have an IMAP server that does not support
sub-folders?


Then flat archiving is used automatically.

HTH

Jens



___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Cancel Re: Bad certificate for Pay Pal

[question]

question wrote:

Rick Merrill wrote:

question wrote:

Rick Merrill wrote:

question wrote:

question wrote:

question wrote:

David E. Ross wrote:

On 24-Feb-10 12:02 PM, question wrote:

Error says Pay pal has a bad certificate . Paypal support
directed me
to Verisign to update the Certificate .. Suposivly did it But
Still
ger
lots od Certificate Errors.

Pay pal support Now says MY certificate is no good
I look in certificates and I HAVE NONE .

I am using seamonkey 2.03 win 7 pro Pay pal support says to go to
microsoft web site and get a New ROOT certificate . My Question is
How?
When I use control panel to check For updates It only tells me
that
I am
all updated.. Win 7 Has never taken me to a Microsoft Update site
Like
XP did .

www.paypalobjects.com:443 uses an invalid Security Certificate

Certificate Is not trusted because the issuer is not Trusted

( error code:sec_error_untrustered issuer)



akamai suborinate Ca 3

akamai technologies inc

The Certificat expires 12 /31/ 2010


This sounds very much the same as the problem that I had with the
Federal Trade Commission site. See the thread "Bad Certificate"
started
yesterday in this same newsgroup.

I have submitted bug report #548380 to provide a better user
interface
for dealing with this situation. See
. At the
end of
that report, I describe my workaround, which requires a separate
profile.


I now know it is a seamonkey problem.. IE access the site with no
problems


Seamonkey 1.1.18 Gives the same error Jusy ONE time and then lets me
into the site.

Paypal support sent me the link to Verisign to renewel the
Certificate .
I ran the install Then went to preference / Security/certificates

Verisign has nothing to do with the site. Akamai technology is the
certificate issuer for Paypal Per Seamonkey .



I use win 7 pro , my wife uses winxp...
I just tried paypal with her computer and seamonkey 2.03. NO
CERTIFICATE errors.

I concede that the problem lies in my computer and Not a pay pal com
problem






Forgot to mention. paypal page comes up in TEXT form ( no Graphics)
The newest version of Firefox gives the same errors


Are you uptodate on Win xp updates? I thought I saw one regarding
certificate validation or some such (those are just a blur).



As stated I am using Windows 7 Pro


sorry - confuzed by your spouse's win xp!

Did you go the new profile route?


Great suggestion
Will try it

I make a new profile and Paypal site Works. No errors

Now any suggestion on What I change or Delete in order to Keep my profile? ?

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Cancel Re: Bad certificate for Pay Pal

[question]

Rick Merrill wrote:

question wrote:

Rick Merrill wrote:

question wrote:

question wrote:

question wrote:

David E. Ross wrote:

On 24-Feb-10 12:02 PM, question wrote:

Error says Pay pal has a bad certificate . Paypal support
directed me
to Verisign to update the Certificate .. Suposivly did it But Still
ger
lots od Certificate Errors.

Pay pal support Now says MY certificate is no good
I look in certificates and I HAVE NONE .

I am using seamonkey 2.03 win 7 pro Pay pal support says to go to
microsoft web site and get a New ROOT certificate . My Question is
How?
When I use control panel to check For updates It only tells me that
I am
all updated.. Win 7 Has never taken me to a Microsoft Update site
Like
XP did .

www.paypalobjects.com:443 uses an invalid Security Certificate

Certificate Is not trusted because the issuer is not Trusted

( error code:sec_error_untrustered issuer)



akamai suborinate Ca 3

akamai technologies inc

The Certificat expires 12 /31/ 2010


This sounds very much the same as the problem that I had with the
Federal Trade Commission site. See the thread "Bad Certificate"
started
yesterday in this same newsgroup.

I have submitted bug report #548380 to provide a better user
interface
for dealing with this situation. See
. At the end of
that report, I describe my workaround, which requires a separate
profile.


I now know it is a seamonkey problem.. IE access the site with no
problems


Seamonkey 1.1.18 Gives the same error Jusy ONE time and then lets me
into the site.

Paypal support sent me the link to Verisign to renewel the
Certificate .
I ran the install Then went to preference / Security/certificates

Verisign has nothing to do with the site. Akamai technology is the
certificate issuer for Paypal Per Seamonkey .



I use win 7 pro , my wife uses winxp...
I just tried paypal with her computer and seamonkey 2.03. NO
CERTIFICATE errors.

I concede that the problem lies in my computer and Not a pay pal com
problem






Forgot to mention. paypal page comes up in TEXT form ( no Graphics)
The newest version of Firefox gives the same errors


Are you uptodate on Win xp updates? I thought I saw one regarding
certificate validation or some such (those are just a blur).



As stated I am using Windows 7 Pro


sorry - confuzed by your spouse's win xp!

Did you go the new profile route?


Great suggestion
Will try it
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Progress Window Mockups

[Phillip Jones]

Benoit Renard wrote:

Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:

Ok Here is the deal:

A vocal minority of people who USE the progress windows don't like them
as they stand.

These people wish to have changes made.

KaiRo, the original owner of this area has abandoned it due to "stop
energy" when he tried to make improvements.

*I* Am willing to pickup work, however I am self-proclaimed "not good at
UI".


I spearheaded some work myself, through a patch to get the buttons back,
before KaiRo cancelled my patch when he started working on it. Neil
contributed a patch of his own at the end, so I wonder how the window
looks like at the moment.

Most people seem to just want the old progress window back instead of
reinventing the wheel.
we want the *style* of the progress windows as in SM 1.1.18, not the 
code. That includes for download manager and for page loading Progress 
bar in status menu when downloading mail or new and BTW: I have a Bug 
where the progress window stays up even after its uploaded an item even 
after a copy is made and filed in sent folder. In fact I've let it sit 
for 5 minutes or more just to see if it would dismiss on its own. Its 
supposed to dismiss the millisecond everything is complete the message 
sent and copying is completed. Never had that happen in SM1.1.18


--
Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T."If it's Fixed, Don't Break it"
http://www.phillipmjones.net   http://www.vpea.org
mailto:pjon...@kimbanet.com
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Turn Composer into a full-fledged word processor?

[Rick Merrill]

JeffM wrote:

Ray_Net wrote:

Is OpenOffice able to save a "word" page into an html file(s) ?


OOo isn't even able to save an HTML page as HTML.
Try this:
Take a page that passes the W3C Validator,
open it with OOo, and do a Save on it.
Now run *that* thru the Validator.

DO NOT USE A WORD PROCESSOR TO MAKE HTML PAGES.



You've been burned by that, I can tell - but haven't we all!

Use my "new word processor" to compose html pages.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Turn Composer into a full-fledged word processor?

[Rick Merrill]

Phillip Jones wrote:

Rick Merrill wrote:

Bernard Mercier wrote:

James Greenidge avait soumis l'idée :

Greetings:



A clueless non-techie just asking you mavens out there; Is it possible
via special plug-ins to turn Composer into a full-fledged word
processor?



Thanks for any remarks.



Jim

I suppose you are aware that composer's goal is to produce web pages.
The code to involved for this isn't the same as for word processing.

Drive a 4 wheel driven jeep when in heavy accidented terrain.
Drive a sedan while on a smooth motorway.



Bernard, I'm not convinced that your metaphor is correct. For the OP a
page-is-a-page; in fact lots of people use MS Word to compose web pages
since it can output html code. Lots of people love to "publish" via web
pages. More and more people "read" web pages ;-)


Ahh yes but to put it mildly, Word makes absolutely lousy html Code.
Don't believe it. Borrow a Copy of DreamWeaver and go to Tools menu and
choose Fix MS Word HTML. The html in word is used more for embellishing
text with bold, italic. underline They only place it renders properly is
to dowload it and open again in Office.


If your document is going to "live" as a web page, your word processor
should produce it.

I think the OP's question makes a lot of sense, especially in terms of
cloud computing and assuming that resources (e.g. speed) are not a
concern.

Which is more of a kludge: putting "links" into word processors (as we
know them) or putting Table Of Contents into Composer?

I see the OP's question as correctly portending the merger of word
processing and web page composition until there is no longer a
distinction.


sorry sorry sorry - my use of "ms word" is a red herring! pls ignore.



In an ideal world word processor should produce validatable html code.



___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Turn Composer into a full-fledged word processor?

[Rick Merrill]

JeffM wrote:

James Greenidge wrote:

Is it possible via special plug-ins
to turn Composer into a full-fledged word processor?


Just use your browser:
http://docs.google.com/

Rick Merrill wrote:

lots of people use MS Word to compose web pages
since it can output html code[...]


Run some of that "HTML" thru the W3C Validator.


I have indeed done that as I do for my own pages (www.batco.tv)
and found exactly as you say:


It is the most crapped-up junk you will ever see
trying to pass itself off as valid HTML markup.
**NEVER** use M$ tools to create Web pages.


But for pity sake I was just saying "other people" do this.



If your document is going to "live" as a web page,
your word processor should produce it.


NO. NO. NO.
If you are going to put something on a Port 80 location,
make it **REAL** HTML.


"Real?"  Have you ever tried to get google/yahoo/cnn html code
to "validate"?!  There is no agreement on the meaning of "real".




If you have other stuff to upload, do that via Port 21 (FTP).


I think the OP's question makes a lot of sense,


I don't think you could be more wrong.


Well HE brought it up!-)



I see the OP's question as correctly portending
the merger of word processing and web page composition
until there is no longer a distinction.


Your business address is in Redmond, Washington isn't it?


Not a ghost of a chance!

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Cancel Re: Bad certificate for Pay Pal

[Rick Merrill]

question wrote:

Rick Merrill wrote:

question wrote:

question wrote:

question wrote:

David E. Ross wrote:

On 24-Feb-10 12:02 PM, question wrote:

Error says Pay pal has a bad certificate . Paypal support
directed me
to Verisign to update the Certificate .. Suposivly did it But Still
ger
lots od Certificate Errors.

Pay pal support Now says MY certificate is no good
I look in certificates and I HAVE NONE .

I am using seamonkey 2.03 win 7 pro Pay pal support says to go to
microsoft web site and get a New ROOT certificate . My Question is
How?
When I use control panel to check For updates It only tells me that
I am
all updated.. Win 7 Has never taken me to a Microsoft Update site
Like
XP did .

www.paypalobjects.com:443 uses an invalid Security Certificate

Certificate Is not trusted because the issuer is not Trusted

( error code:sec_error_untrustered issuer)



akamai suborinate Ca 3

akamai technologies inc

The Certificat expires 12 /31/ 2010


This sounds very much the same as the problem that I had with the
Federal Trade Commission site. See the thread "Bad Certificate"
started
yesterday in this same newsgroup.

I have submitted bug report #548380 to provide a better user
interface
for dealing with this situation. See
. At the end of
that report, I describe my workaround, which requires a separate
profile.


I now know it is a seamonkey problem.. IE access the site with no
problems


Seamonkey 1.1.18 Gives the same error Jusy ONE time and then lets me
into the site.

Paypal support sent me the link to Verisign to renewel the
Certificate .
I ran the install Then went to preference / Security/certificates

Verisign has nothing to do with the site. Akamai technology is the
certificate issuer for Paypal Per Seamonkey .



I use win 7 pro , my wife uses winxp...
I just tried paypal with her computer and seamonkey 2.03. NO
CERTIFICATE errors.

I concede that the problem lies in my computer and Not a pay pal com
problem






Forgot to mention. paypal page comes up in TEXT form ( no Graphics)
The newest version of Firefox gives the same errors


Are you uptodate on Win xp updates? I thought I saw one regarding
certificate validation or some such (those are just a blur).



As stated I am using Windows 7 Pro


sorry - confuzed by your spouse's win xp!

Did you go the new profile route?

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Progress Window Mockups

[Benoit Renard]

Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:

Ok Here is the deal:

A vocal minority of people who USE the progress windows don't like them 
as they stand.


These people wish to have changes made.

KaiRo, the original owner of this area has abandoned it due to "stop 
energy" when he tried to make improvements.


*I* Am willing to pickup work, however I am self-proclaimed "not good at 
UI".


I spearheaded some work myself, through a patch to get the buttons back, 
before KaiRo cancelled my patch when he started working on it. Neil 
contributed a patch of his own at the end, so I wonder how the window 
looks like at the moment.


Most people seem to just want the old progress window back instead of 
reinventing the wheel.

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

another one search engine

[4625]

I would like to have nigma.ru instead of or both with google. Please,
tell me the way how to add nigma there.

-- 
/4625   () кампания ascii ribbon - против писем в html формате
/\ www.asciiribbon.org   - против проприетарных вложений

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Progress Window Mockups

[Dean Scott]

Ah HAA!  So THAT's where the old "launch or run" button that appeared after download completed hid itself!  I was so 
missing that feature.  Yes, I understand the need for "security" for the more naive in not presenting them with a big, 
fat "run" button out in the open like it was previously, BUT this seasoned veteran had absolutely NO visual indication 
that you could click on the filename in this dialog box and access these two "open" and "open containing 
folder" options.  I was just about to write a complaint to have this option brought back.

So, back to this thread, Yes, I like the slightly more clear indication (via the tiny 
triangle arrows) that the filename can be clicked (oh, AND the 'From' location just 
below it), but it still would have pass me by if I hadn't known such was the case.  
So, maybe make these two items look like buttons, but only slightly, if that makes 
sense, like making the background color just a shade lighter and surrounded by a 
slightly darker 1 pixel stroke.  OR, just add an actual small button the size of the 
window min, max, close gadgets at the end of each line. 


Dean Scott
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Odd Characters in Sidebar Search

[Dean Scott]

 

when you actually do the search, does it return millions of pages
that have "some" in them, millions of pages that have "thing" in them,
etc, etc or just the pages that have "some thing with spaces" in them??

In other words, is the % a magic "connecting" character??

Daniel


That test didn't use quotes to contain the phrase so no pages with those words 
in that exact order were returned, so yes, lots-o-pages with individual words 
highlighted (bolded).

Upon the second search using the string that had the spaces replaced with %, 
the results were identical, so Google ignored the %.

If I put a search phrase within quotes, such as "walt disney world", the same thing happens.  After 
clicking the search button in the sidebar (or hitting Enter key), the spaces are replaced with %, per 
"walt%disney%world", and of course, the webpage returns hits with the highlighted phrase "Walt 
Disney World".  etc. etc.

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: SM2: Imap folder syncronisation

[Phillip Jones]

cyberzen wrote:

Matthias Kahlert a écrit :

Hi!

I'm looking into migrating several users from 1.1.18 to SM 2.

On a test-run I realised that folder synchronisation seems to be on as a
default in SM 2. (This spilled 15GB of junk into my test-profile.)

I see that it can be turned off manually in the settings, but I would
prefer to turn it off once and for all, because mail shoud stay on the
imap-server only anyway.

Is there a user-pref to turn off synchronisation completely?

--
Matthias


15 GB is a lot , did you tried folder compaction ?

there is a pref in mail account , disk space and synchro (if I translate
correctly)
Compacting Files automatically is on by default as well You do have to 
set size limit I have mine set to 500k


--
Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T."If it's Fixed, Don't Break it"
http://www.phillipmjones.net   http://www.vpea.org
mailto:pjon...@kimbanet.com
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: SM2: Imap folder syncronisation

[cyberzen]

Matthias Kahlert a écrit :

Hi!

I'm looking into migrating several users from 1.1.18 to SM 2.

On a test-run I realised that folder synchronisation seems to be on as a
default in SM 2. (This spilled 15GB of junk into my test-profile.)

I see that it can be turned off manually in the settings, but I would
prefer to turn it off once and for all, because mail shoud stay on the
imap-server only anyway.

Is there a user-pref to turn off synchronisation completely?

--
Matthias


15 GB is a lot , did you tried folder compaction ?

there is a pref in mail account , disk space and synchro (if I translate 
correctly)

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Turn Composer into a full-fledged word processor?

[James Greenidge]

Greetings:

I didn't intend to cause any heated discussion with this topic. I merely 
wanted to know whether a Composer "word-processor enhancement" plug-in 
was technically possible via a third party or hacker. I wasn't demanding 
it, though it'd be awfully fun to have in your quiver, especially since 
"cloud"-type word processors like Zoho have given exclusive attention to 
plugging in their features into MS Office and Word.


Jim in Queens NY


___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Odd Characters in Sidebar Search

[Daniel]

Dean Scott wrote:


Ever since 2.x, the sidebar search entry field turns spaces into %
symbols after a search is performed.

For instance, I have Google as the default, and when I type in "some
thing with spaces" and hit return, the entry line becomes
"some%thing%with%spaces" (that was a direct copy/paste) while the actual
Google website page search field contains "some thing with spaces" UNTIL
I click the sidebar search button again, then the web page field is
populated with "some%thing%with%spaces"

Any idea why?

Character encoding is the default western (ISO-8859-1).

Running SM 2.0.3 on Windows 7 Ultimate x64.


d.a.scott


Dean, when you actually do the search, does it return millions of pages 
that have "some" in them, millions of pages that have "thing" in them, 
etc, etc or just the pages that have "some thing with spaces" in them??


In other words, is the % a magic "connecting" character??

Daniel
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Warning to upgrade

[Daniel]

Bill Davidsen wrote:

Daniel wrote:

Bill Davidsen wrote:

Why is 2.0.3 telling me there's a new version available and I should
download 2.0.3? Is it looking at the version of the default SM in
/usr/bin instead of what I'm running which is 2.0.3 (not pre on this
machine)?

I leave the distribution default in /usr/bin and run the latest stable
or pre out of /usr/local/ instead.

This is not an error report, I'd just like to know why in case I set up
a user this way.



Bill, don't know if it matters but your header indicates you're using
SM 1.1.16!!


Different machine, this one is used only for a few groups and filling
out forms. Until the last few days the forms capability in 2.0.x has
been less than I need, although the add-on from Phil Chee seems to have
fixed that and I plan to migrate. Of course the forms will not migrate
and I will have to do them all over, so I'm being hesitant about it.

Thanks for taking the time to check, but I really was on a 2.0.3 machine
when I saw the problem.



O.K., Bill how aboutWhen you were on SM 2.0.2, you had it set to 
check for updates each week, and, just a couple of days after SM 2.0.2 
did a check you heard here that 2.0.3 was out so you, manually, 
downloaded and installed the update, then several days later SM (that 
was 2.0.2) was doing its weekly check and found the update to 2.0.3 was 
available!


i.e. before actually doing the update, SM did not check to see what 
version it (itself) was.


Could this fit with your situation, Bill??

Daniel
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: SM2: Imap folder syncronisation

[David Wilkinson]

Matthias Kahlert wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> I'm looking into migrating several users from 1.1.18 to SM 2.
> 
> On a test-run I realised that folder synchronisation seems to be on as a
> default in SM 2. (This spilled 15GB of junk into my test-profile.)
> 
> I see that it can be turned off manually in the settings, but I would
> prefer to turn it off once and for all, because mail shoud stay on the
> imap-server only anyway.
> 
> Is there a user-pref to turn off synchronisation completely?
> 
> --
> Matthias

Do you mean that every mail folder has the "Select this folder for offline use"
checked? This does not happen for me (either for Imap or News).

BTW, in your signature, the "--" line should have a space at the end, That is
what indicates to the reader that what follows is the signature. In SM the
signature is then displayed in a greyed font, and is stripped from the quote in
a reply (see how your sig is not stripped above).

-- 
David Wilkinson
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

SM2: Imap folder syncronisation

[Matthias Kahlert]

Hi!

I'm looking into migrating several users from 1.1.18 to SM 2.

On a test-run I realised that folder synchronisation seems to be on as a
default in SM 2. (This spilled 15GB of junk into my test-profile.)

I see that it can be turned off manually in the settings, but I would
prefer to turn it off once and for all, because mail shoud stay on the
imap-server only anyway.

Is there a user-pref to turn off synchronisation completely?

--
Matthias
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey