Seamonkey hangups

2011-10-20 Thread Peter
I use three computers regularly, and all have the hangup problem where 
Seamonkey stops responding for up to 30 seconds at a time for no 
apparent reason.  I've actually had to stop using Seamonkey on one of 
the computers now, because the frozen to usable ratio is too high to get 
anything done.


I believe that Seamonkey is busy doing something that it thinks is too 
important to give up CPU cycles to the user.


I've seen lots of people reporting similar problems - is there anything 
that we can do to help find a solution?  Perhaps some way of us 
determining what Seamonkey is actually doing when it hangs?


Peter
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Seamonkey hangups

2011-10-20 Thread Paul B. Gallagher

Peter wrote:

I use three computers regularly, and all have the hangup problem where
Seamonkey stops responding for up to 30 seconds at a time for no
apparent reason. I've actually had to stop using Seamonkey on one of the
computers now, because the frozen to usable ratio is too high to get
anything done.

I believe that Seamonkey is busy doing something that it thinks is too
important to give up CPU cycles to the user.

I've seen lots of people reporting similar problems - is there anything
that we can do to help find a solution? Perhaps some way of us
determining what Seamonkey is actually doing when it hangs?


Seconded.

I see this most often in the mail composition window -- I'm happily 
typing along and then the thing suddenly becomes completely unresponsive 
for anywhere from 20 seconds to a minute. It really messes with my train 
of thought, not to mention what's left of my hair.


--
War doesn't determine who's right, just who's left.
--
Paul B. Gallagher

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Seamonkey hangups

2011-10-20 Thread cmcadams

Peter wrote:

I use three computers regularly, and all have the hangup problem where Seamonkey
stops responding for up to 30 seconds at a time for no apparent reason. I've 
actually
had to stop using Seamonkey on one of the computers now, because the frozen to 
usable
ratio is too high to get anything done.

I believe that Seamonkey is busy doing something that it thinks is too 
important to
give up CPU cycles to the user.

I've seen lots of people reporting similar problems - is there anything that we 
can
do to help find a solution? Perhaps some way of us determining what Seamonkey is
actually doing when it hangs?

Peter


Thirded? Several 'types' of hangups in my experience.

Sometimes the browser simply stops responding for an indefinite time within a 
website. Killing SM and restarting makes things move again.


Another is when you are already in certain sites and you click on a different link 
within Bookmarks Manager and...zip. But if you RIGHT click on the new link and then 
click on Open in a New Tab, it works. Some sites seem to 'seed' this behavior, among 
them http://slashdot.org/ and http://lifehacker.com/. You can left-click your way 
back and forth BETWEEN them, through Bookmarks Manager, but all of a sudden can't go 
anywhere else without right-click/New Tab.


An add-on named CheckPlaces seems to've tamed a third kind lockup where the symptom 
is 100% cpu. It maintains the bookmarks database at times of your own choosing. I 
also now nuke the History once a week (not really sure how important a role that plays).

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: I wanted to verify something

2011-10-20 Thread MitchellCLAIRE28
Following my investigation, billions of people on our planet receive the a 
href=http://goodfinance-blog.com/topics/mortgage-loans;mortgage loans/a 
from different banks. Thus, there's great possibilities to receive a bank loan 
in any country. 


___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Seamonkey hangups

2011-10-20 Thread Philip TAYLOR (Webmaster, Ret'd)



cmcadams wrote:

Peter wrote:

I use three computers regularly, and all have the hangup problem where Seamonkey
stops responding for up to 30 seconds at a time for no apparent reason. I've 
actually
had to stop using Seamonkey on one of the computers now, because the frozen to 
usable
ratio is too high to get anything done.

I believe that Seamonkey is busy doing something that it thinks is too 
important to
give up CPU cycles to the user.

I've seen lots of people reporting similar problems - is there anything that we 
can
do to help find a solution? Perhaps some way of us determining what Seamonkey is
actually doing when it hangs?

Peter


Also here, when the Seamonkey IMAP client sees (or is told) that
a new message has arrived and starts downloading it.  Typing can
completely freeze for several seconds, if not longer.

Philip Taylor
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Digital support for SM

2011-10-20 Thread BushLora21
I propose not to hold back until you get enough amount of cash to order goods! 
You can get the a 
href=http://goodfinance-blog.com/topics/business-loans;business loans/a or 
just car loan and feel fine 


___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: I wanted to verify something

2011-10-20 Thread David E. Ross
On 10/20/11 4:00 AM, MitchellCLAIRE28 wrote:
 Following my investigation, billions of people on our planet receive
 the a
 href=http://goodfinance-blog.com/topics/mortgage-loans;mortgage
 loans/a from different banks. Thus, there's great possibilities to
 receive a bank loan in any country.
 
 

Spam from Russia.

-- 

David E. Ross
http://www.rossde.com/.

Anyone who thinks government owns a monopoly on inefficient, obstructive
bureaucracy has obviously never worked for a large corporation.
© 1997 by David E. Ross
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: I wanted to verify something

2011-10-20 Thread Philip TAYLOR (Webmaster, Ret'd)

No, /re-circulated/ spam from Russia.
One copy was unavoidable, two were not.

David E. Ross wrote:


Spam from Russia.


___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Embedding an Audio File in E-mail

2011-10-20 Thread ESTRADA23Kathrine
Following my own investigation, millions of persons in the world get the a 
href=http://goodfinance-blog.com/topics/home-loans;home loans/a from good 
creditors. Thus, there's a good possibility to get a collateral loan in every 
country. 


___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: More on unexplained SM 'hangs'?

2011-10-20 Thread Bob Fleischer

Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote:

Rickles wrote:

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20110928 Firefox/7.0.1
SeaMonkey/2.4.1.

Others have complained about SM appearing to hang, or at least take a
ridiculously long time to do something as simple as delete an email. I'd
never seen it before, until today.

Normally the PC's been on most of the day while I've been at work, but
today the house was empty all day  I was the first home. Turned PC on
and left it un-logged in for approx. an hour.

Logged in, waited for systray icons to all appear showing all 'run' apps
completed, and opened SM Mail. It opened, downloaded 3 short text
messages. The wife read one message over my shoulder, said that message
could be deleted. So I did, or thought so, anyway.

Pressed delete key but message stayed in Inbox. Checked Deleted folder,
empty. Went back to Inbox, but only Folder pane showed any
content--thread  message panes were both blank. Assumed some background
process was taking up processor time, but Task Manager showed 99% system
idle time, and there was no network traffic.

No background CPU takeover, no scheduled tasks running, no busy network.
I left it ticking over for a full 5 minutes without change, then closed
the SM Mail window (browser never open). Verified seamonkey.exe process
was absent from Task Manager and re-opened Mail--deleted same message
again and it worked perfectly, and for everything after that.

Suggestions?


You must allow your hard working SM program to take a coffee break.
As you know that since the start of the rapid release policy
the program hasn't had a chance to stop to draw a decent breath.



I've had hangs with 2.4.1 where my only recourse (I've waited as much as 
an hour) is to kill the process.  Many of them, but by no means all of 
them, seem to be associated with downloads.


(Before 2.4.1, I've almost never had a hang or crash with SeaMonkey. 
Now it is once every day or two.)


(This is on Windows 7 64 bit.)

Bob
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: problems with some php web sites

2011-10-20 Thread LMH
Any suggestions on this? I need to post in some of these forums and have 
no idea what to do since I can't contact the site admin.


It would be helpful to know if this is a problem on the webpage or a 
problem with my browser/local settings. I have posted in these forums 
before with no issue, so I need to figure out what has changed.


LMH



LMH wrote:

Lately I have had a number of problems with websites and I have no way
of telling if the issue is with the site or browser.

With this forum,
http://www.unix.com/programming/

I am able to log into my account, but when I go to a page to create a
post, none of the php tools work (text color, bold, etc). When I move
the mouse over the different buttons, I get tool tips saying what the
button does, but it acts like it is not there when I try to click on it.
Also, if I type in a message and click on preview or submit, the new
screen that comes up says the message I entered is too short and all of
the text I entered is gone.

Is there some keyboard shortcut I could have hit by accident to togel
between plain text and php mode, or something like that. I have cleared
my cache, cookies, and such, run CCleaner, restated and all that.

I have a similar problem with this site,
http://www.daniweb.com/software-development/shell-scripting/113

When I make a post there, all of the php tools also don't work, but I
can preview and submit the post. I can't think of anything that would
cause an issue like this that would not be resolved by clearing cache
and cookies.

I am running a firewall (ZoneAlarm ISS), but nothing changes if I turn
it off. Any suggestions as to what to do. Because the problem is with
creating a post, I am not able to contact the site admin to see what
they know about this.

LMH

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: problems with some php web sites

2011-10-20 Thread WLS

LMH wrote:

Any suggestions on this? I need to post in some of these forums and have
no idea what to do since I can't contact the site admin.

It would be helpful to know if this is a problem on the webpage or a
problem with my browser/local settings. I have posted in these forums
before with no issue, so I need to figure out what has changed.

LMH




I wasn't aware the PHP had text color, bold, etc functions(?). I always 
thought that was HTML. But then again, it has been awhile since I played 
around with PHP.


Maybe someone who is a member of those sites will come along and help you.


--

SeaMonkey - openSUSE 11.3 Linux - 1.8GHz CPU - 2GB RAM
Firefox Support http://support.mozilla.com and 
http://kb.mozillazine.org/Standard_diagnostic_%28Firefox%29

SeaMonkey Support http://www.seamonkey-project.org/community
Stand Alone Profile Manager https://developer.mozilla.org/en/Profile_Manager
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: problems with some php web sites

2011-10-20 Thread Beauregard T. Shagnasty

WLS wrote:


I wasn't aware the PHP had text color, bold, etc functions(?). I always
thought that was HTML. But then again, it has been awhile since I played
around with PHP.


It doesn't. PHP can, of course, be made to output HTML, but that is a 
server-side process.


Aside:  the aforementioned link to unix.com/programming tries to 
redirect me:

http://www.unix.com/advertisement.php ...
Not very friendly.

--
   -bts
   -This space for rent, but the price is high
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Seamonkey hangups

2011-10-20 Thread Rickles

Philip TAYLOR (Webmaster, Ret'd) wrote:



cmcadams wrote:

Peter wrote:

I use three computers regularly, and all have the hangup problem
where Seamonkey
stops responding for up to 30 seconds at a time for no apparent
reason. I've actually
had to stop using Seamonkey on one of the computers now, because the
frozen to usable
ratio is too high to get anything done.

I believe that Seamonkey is busy doing something that it thinks is
too important to
give up CPU cycles to the user.

I've seen lots of people reporting similar problems - is there
anything that we can
do to help find a solution? Perhaps some way of us determining what
Seamonkey is
actually doing when it hangs?

Peter


Also here, when the Seamonkey IMAP client sees (or is told) that
a new message has arrived and starts downloading it. Typing can
completely freeze for several seconds, if not longer.

Philip Taylor
See also my thread, 
news://news.mozilla.org:119/-vkdnwtcnl3_vqltnz2dnuvz_oydn...@mozilla.org, which 
calls out a complete freeze of Mail, without Composition or actively 
downloading messages.  And the CPU shows no usage.

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Seamonkey hangups

2011-10-20 Thread Sandy



See also my thread,
news://news.mozilla.org:119/-vkdnwtcnl3_vqltnz2dnuvz_oydn...@mozilla.org, which
calls out a complete freeze of Mail, without Composition or actively
downloading messages. And the CPU shows no usage.


I am happy to say that SM works faultlessly here - 1 XP machine and 2 32 
bit 7 machines.


___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Seamonkey hangups

2011-10-20 Thread Philip TAYLOR (Webmaster, Ret'd)



Rickles wrote:


See also my thread, 
news://news.mozilla.org:119/-vkdnwtcnl3_vqltnz2dnuvz_oydn...@mozilla.org, which 
calls out a complete freeze of Mail, without Composition or actively 
downloading messages. And the CPU shows no usage.


My Seamonkey (2.3.3) believes such links should be opened with Filzip :-(
Philip Taylor
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: problems with some php web sites

2011-10-20 Thread NoOp
On 10/20/2011 11:16 AM, Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
 WLS wrote:
 
 I wasn't aware the PHP had text color, bold, etc functions(?). I always
 thought that was HTML. But then again, it has been awhile since I played
 around with PHP.
 
 It doesn't. PHP can, of course, be made to output HTML, but that is a 
 server-side process.
 
 Aside:  the aforementioned link to unix.com/programming tries to 
 redirect me:
 http://www.unix.com/advertisement.php ...
 Not very friendly.
 

They require cookies. If you have cookies off you'll get the redirect loop.



___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: More on unexplained SM 'hangs'?

2011-10-20 Thread Rickles

Bob Fleischer wrote:

Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote:

Rickles wrote:

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20110928 Firefox/7.0.1
SeaMonkey/2.4.1.

Others have complained about SM appearing to hang, or at least take a
ridiculously long time to do something as simple as delete an email. I'd
never seen it before, until today.

Normally the PC's been on most of the day while I've been at work, but
today the house was empty all day  I was the first home. Turned PC on
and left it un-logged in for approx. an hour.

Logged in, waited for systray icons to all appear showing all 'run' apps
completed, and opened SM Mail. It opened, downloaded 3 short text
messages. The wife read one message over my shoulder, said that message
could be deleted. So I did, or thought so, anyway.

Pressed delete key but message stayed in Inbox. Checked Deleted folder,
empty. Went back to Inbox, but only Folder pane showed any
content--thread  message panes were both blank. Assumed some background
process was taking up processor time, but Task Manager showed 99% system
idle time, and there was no network traffic.

No background CPU takeover, no scheduled tasks running, no busy network.
I left it ticking over for a full 5 minutes without change, then closed
the SM Mail window (browser never open). Verified seamonkey.exe process
was absent from Task Manager and re-opened Mail--deleted same message
again and it worked perfectly, and for everything after that.

Suggestions?


You must allow your hard working SM program to take a coffee break.
As you know that since the start of the rapid release policy
the program hasn't had a chance to stop to draw a decent breath.



I've had hangs with 2.4.1 where my only recourse (I've waited as much as
an hour) is to kill the process. Many of them, but by no means all of
them, seem to be associated with downloads.

(Before 2.4.1, I've almost never had a hang or crash with SeaMonkey. Now
it is once every day or two.)

(This is on Windows 7 64 bit.)

Bob
I think I've sorted this one.  My only known issue is with deleting 
messages.  Killing all SM processes, I've gone into my profile directory 
and deleted the Mail\Trash.msf file, then restarted SM.  Prior to this, 
anytime anything was selected for deletion, that's when SM stops playing 
nice.  The clue this time was that I could click on any folder/subfolder 
in my folder pane with instant results, but clicking on 'Deleted' gave 
me a blank message thread pane and a cursor with an hourglass.  Soon as 
I clicked on something else the hourglass disappeared and everything 
worked normally.


First tried to go through SM email account prefs to change the pointer 
for Deleted, but there's no GUI option to change that one folder 
destination.  So I did it the hard way.  For now, SM seems to be happy.


We'll see.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Seamonkey hangups

2011-10-20 Thread Rickles

Rickles wrote:

Philip TAYLOR (Webmaster, Ret'd) wrote:



cmcadams wrote:

Peter wrote:

I use three computers regularly, and all have the hangup problem
where Seamonkey
stops responding for up to 30 seconds at a time for no apparent
reason. I've actually
had to stop using Seamonkey on one of the computers now, because the
frozen to usable
ratio is too high to get anything done.

I believe that Seamonkey is busy doing something that it thinks is
too important to
give up CPU cycles to the user.

I've seen lots of people reporting similar problems - is there
anything that we can
do to help find a solution? Perhaps some way of us determining what
Seamonkey is
actually doing when it hangs?

Peter


Also here, when the Seamonkey IMAP client sees (or is told) that
a new message has arrived and starts downloading it. Typing can
completely freeze for several seconds, if not longer.

Philip Taylor

See also my thread,
news://news.mozilla.org:119/-vkdnwtcnl3_vqltnz2dnuvz_oydn...@mozilla.org, which
calls out a complete freeze of Mail, without Composition or actively
downloading messages. And the CPU shows no usage.
I think I've sorted this one.  My only known issue is with deleting 
messages.  Killing all SM processes, I've gone into my profile directory 
and deleted the Mail\Trash.msf file, then restarted SM.  Prior to this, 
anytime anything was selected for deletion, that's when SM stops playing 
nice.  The clue this time was that I could click on any folder/subfolder 
in my folder pane with instant results, but clicking on 'Deleted' gave 
me a blank message thread pane and a cursor with an hourglass.  Soon as 
I clicked on something else the hourglass disappeared and everything 
worked normally.


First tried to go through SM email account prefs to change the pointer 
for Deleted, but there's no GUI option to change that one folder 
destination.  So I did it the hard way.  For now, SM seems to be happy.


We'll see.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: problems with some php web sites

2011-10-20 Thread Beauregard T. Shagnasty

NoOp wrote:

Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:

Aside:  the aforementioned link to unix.com/programming tries to
redirect me:
http://www.unix.com/advertisement.php ...
Not very friendly.


They require cookies. If you have cookies off you'll get the redirect loop.


You're probably right. I think I didn't accept them.  Oh well.

--
   -bts
   -This space for rent, but the price is high
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: No Accept-Charset in current betas

2011-10-20 Thread Jochen Roderburg
On 2011-10-19, Jens Hatlak j...@junetz.de wrote:

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=572652


I have read this now and see a lot discussion about what has to changed to
get rid of the Accept-Charset header, but not much about why they did this.

Only the person who requested the change had some reasons, mainly:
It is no longer needed, because every browser understands utf-8 nowadays.
And a funny compatibilty argument: Internet Explorer does not send this
header so there is no need for Mozilla to send it. 
OTOH, nothing about losing compatibility with their own older releases.

I don't know if all web sites/applications follow the same logic and
automatically use utf-8 when they get no other information, at least
the one that I mentioned (Horde/IMP webmail) does not do this and
needs an individual little hack for Mozilla browsers now.   :-(

Regards,
Jochen Roderburg
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Where is icon Show Remote Content?

2011-10-20 Thread Philipp van Hüllen

Arnie Goetchius schrieb:

Turned off AVG but no help. Upon further investigation, the emails in
question don't even display in HTML, just straight text with many URL's.
In 2.0.14, the emails display in HTML and the Allow Remote Content
icon does show up. In 2.5, all I see is text, no HTML so I figure I have
to get that fixed first. Any ideas?


Please check the setting in:

View - Message Body - HTML / Text

When viewed as text only, you neither get HTML, nor does it make sense 
to load any pictures, which is why loading remote content is not an 
option here.


BR/Philipp
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: No Accept-Charset in current betas

2011-10-20 Thread NoOp
On 10/19/2011 02:00 PM, NoOp wrote:
...
 Interesting results from different browsers (linux):
 http://www.delorie.com:81/some/url.txt
 
 SeaMonkey:
 GET /some/url.txt HTTP/1.1
 Host: www.delorie.com:81
 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111012
 Firefox/8.0 SeaMonkey/2.5 Lightning/1.0b8pre
 Accept: text/html,application/xhtml+xml,application/xml;q=0.9,*/*;q=0.8
 Accept-Language: en-us,en;q=0.5
 Accept-Encoding: gzip, deflate
 DNT: 1
 Connection: keep-alive
 
 Chromium:
 GET /some/url.txt HTTP/1.1
 Host: www.delorie.com:81
 Connection: keep-alive
 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686) AppleWebKit/535.1 (KHTML, like
 Gecko) Ubuntu/10.10 Chromium/14.0.835.202 Chrome/14.0.835.202 Safari/535.1
 Accept: text/html,application/xhtml+xml,application/xml;q=0.9,*/*;q=0.8
 Accept-Encoding: gzip,deflate,sdch
 Accept-Language: en-US,en;q=0.8
 Accept-Charset: ISO-8859-1,utf-8;q=0.7,*;q=0.3
 
 Google Chrome:
 GET /some/url.txt HTTP/1.1
 Host: www.delorie.com:81
 Connection: keep-alive
 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686) AppleWebKit/535.1 (KHTML, like
 Gecko) Chrome/14.0.835.202 Safari/535.1
 Accept: text/html,application/xhtml+xml,application/xml;q=0.9,*/*;q=0.8
 Accept-Encoding: gzip,deflate,sdch
 Accept-Language: en-US,en;q=0.8
 Accept-Charset: UTF-8,*;q=0.5
 
 Opera:
 GET /some/url.txt HTTP/1.1
 User-Agent: Opera/9.80 (X11; Linux i686; U; en) Presto/2.9.168 Version/11.52
 Host: www.delorie.com:81
 Accept: text/html, application/xml;q=0.9, application/xhtml+xml,
 image/png, image/webp, image/jpeg, image/gif, image/x-xbitmap, */*;q=0.1
 Accept-Language: en-US,en;q=0.9
 Accept-Encoding: gzip, deflate
 Connection: Keep-Alive
 
 Firefox:
 GET /some/url.txt HTTP/1.1
 Host: www.delorie.com:81
 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20100101
 Firefox/7.0.1
 Accept: text/html,application/xhtml+xml,application/xml;q=0.9,*/*;q=0.8
 Accept-Language: en-us,en;q=0.5
 Accept-Encoding: gzip, deflate
 Accept-Charset: ISO-8859-1,utf-8;q=0.7,*;q=0.7
 Connection: keep-alive
 

IE8:
GET /some/url.txt HTTP/1.1
Accept: image/gif, image/jpeg, image/pjpeg, image/pjpeg,
application/vnd.ms-excel, application/vnd.ms-powerpoint,
application/msword, application/x-shockwave-flash,
application/x-silverlight, application/x-ms-application,
application/x-ms-xbap, application/vnd.ms-xpsdocument,
application/xaml+xml, */*
Accept-Language: en-us
User-Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 5.1;
Trident/4.0; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR
3.0.4506.2152; .NET CLR 3.5.30729)
Accept-Encoding: gzip, deflate
Host: www.delorie.com:81
Connection: Keep-Alive

[Sorry for going OT]
I wondered why the:
User-Agent: Mozilla/4.0
part in that string.

http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms537503%28v=vs.85%29.aspx
Application name and version. For historical reasons, Internet Explorer
identifies itself as a Mozilla browser.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mozilla#Part_of_the_.22user_agent_string.22_of_many_browsers
quote
Because the Netscape browser initially implemented many features not
available in other browsers and quickly came to dominate the market, a
number of web sites were designed to work, or work fully, only when they
detected an appropriate version of Mozilla in the user agent string.
Thus, competing browsers began to emulate (cloak or spoof) this
string in order to also work with those sites. The earliest example of
this is Internet Explorer's use of a user agent string beginning
Mozilla/version (compatible; MSIE version..., in order to receive
content intended for Netscape, its main rival at the time of its
development. This format of user agent string has since been copied by
other user agents, and persisted even after Internet Explorer came to
dominate the browser market.
/quote

Amazing... yet we have to spoof as 'Firefox' these days:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111012
Firefox/8.0 SeaMonkey/2.5



___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Where is icon Show Remote Content?

2011-10-20 Thread Arnie Goetchius
Philipp van Hüllen wrote:
 Arnie Goetchius schrieb:
 Turned off AVG but no help. Upon further investigation, the emails in
 question don't even display in HTML, just straight text with many URL's.
 In 2.0.14, the emails display in HTML and the Allow Remote Content
 icon does show up. In 2.5, all I see is text, no HTML so I figure I have
 to get that fixed first. Any ideas?
 
 Please check the setting in:
 
 View - Message Body - HTML / Text
 
 When viewed as text only, you neither get HTML, nor does it make sense
 to load any pictures, which is why loading remote content is not an
 option here.
 
 BR/Philipp

Thank you so much. That was it. Sorry I took up so much bandwidth with
this question.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: problems with some php web sites

2011-10-20 Thread LMH
I accept session cookies from this site, which is a very reputable 
programming forum, possibly the top rated. Of course, I am going to log 
in, so a session cookie is anticipated. They have a short advertisement 
page that you are sent when you first go to the site. A banner ad from a 
supporter is displayed. After a few seconds you are re-directed to the 
main page. I find this annoying, but I guess someone needs to pay for 
the site. All in all I prefer that to third party tracking cookies.


You can still access the site if you reject cookies. Everyone gets the 
banner advertisement page whether or not you allow cookies. You don't go 
to the banner if you are logged in. If you do allow session cookies, you 
can skip the ad banner by clicking on the redirect link instead of 
waiting for the clock to run down.


I consider the underlying engine of these vBuiltin forums to be php 
driven, particularly the actions of the buttons like submit and preview, 
but I could be wrong about that I guess.


LMH



Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:

NoOp wrote:

Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:

Aside: the aforementioned link to unix.com/programming tries to
redirect me:
http://www.unix.com/advertisement.php ...
Not very friendly.


They require cookies. If you have cookies off you'll get the redirect
loop.


You're probably right. I think I didn't accept them. Oh well.


___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: More on unexplained SM 'hangs'?

2011-10-20 Thread Daniel

Rickles wrote:

Bob Fleischer wrote:

Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote:

Rickles wrote:

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20110928 Firefox/7.0.1
SeaMonkey/2.4.1.

Others have complained about SM appearing to hang, or at least take a
ridiculously long time to do something as simple as delete an email.
I'd
never seen it before, until today.

Normally the PC's been on most of the day while I've been at work, but
today the house was empty all day  I was the first home. Turned PC on
and left it un-logged in for approx. an hour.

Logged in, waited for systray icons to all appear showing all 'run'
apps
completed, and opened SM Mail. It opened, downloaded 3 short text
messages. The wife read one message over my shoulder, said that message
could be deleted. So I did, or thought so, anyway.

Pressed delete key but message stayed in Inbox. Checked Deleted folder,
empty. Went back to Inbox, but only Folder pane showed any
content--thread  message panes were both blank. Assumed some
background
process was taking up processor time, but Task Manager showed 99%
system
idle time, and there was no network traffic.

No background CPU takeover, no scheduled tasks running, no busy
network.
I left it ticking over for a full 5 minutes without change, then closed
the SM Mail window (browser never open). Verified seamonkey.exe process
was absent from Task Manager and re-opened Mail--deleted same message
again and it worked perfectly, and for everything after that.

Suggestions?


You must allow your hard working SM program to take a coffee break.
As you know that since the start of the rapid release policy
the program hasn't had a chance to stop to draw a decent breath.



I've had hangs with 2.4.1 where my only recourse (I've waited as much as
an hour) is to kill the process. Many of them, but by no means all of
them, seem to be associated with downloads.

(Before 2.4.1, I've almost never had a hang or crash with SeaMonkey. Now
it is once every day or two.)

(This is on Windows 7 64 bit.)

Bob

I think I've sorted this one. My only known issue is with deleting
messages. Killing all SM processes, I've gone into my profile directory
and deleted the Mail\Trash.msf file, then restarted SM. Prior to this,
anytime anything was selected for deletion, that's when SM stops playing
nice. The clue this time was that I could click on any folder/subfolder
in my folder pane with instant results, but clicking on 'Deleted' gave
me a blank message thread pane and a cursor with an hourglass. Soon as I
clicked on something else the hourglass disappeared and everything
worked normally.

First tried to go through SM email account prefs to change the pointer
for Deleted, but there's no GUI option to change that one folder
destination. So I did it the hard way. For now, SM seems to be happy.

We'll see.


Rickles, have you tried File-Empty Trash and then File-Compact Folders 
to reduce the size of your mail folders??


--
Daniel
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: problems with some php web sites

2011-10-20 Thread NoOp
On 10/20/2011 06:38 PM, LMH wrote:
 I accept session cookies from this site, which is a very reputable 
 programming forum, possibly the top rated. Of course, I am going to log 
 in, so a session cookie is anticipated. They have a short advertisement 
 page that you are sent when you first go to the site. A banner ad from a 
 supporter is displayed. After a few seconds you are re-directed to the 
 main page. I find this annoying, but I guess someone needs to pay for 
 the site. All in all I prefer that to third party tracking cookies.
 
 You can still access the site if you reject cookies. Everyone gets the 
 banner advertisement page whether or not you allow cookies. You don't go 
 to the banner if you are logged in. If you do allow session cookies, you 
 can skip the ad banner by clicking on the redirect link instead of 
 waiting for the clock to run down.

Sorry, but that's not correct.
Earlier today all I got was:
http://www.unix.com/advertisement.php?url=http://www.unix.com/forumdisplay.php?f=16

I may eventually get to:
http://www.unix.com/programming/
without cookies, but if I click on:
http://www.unix.com/programming/164429-access-e-mail-inbox-using-php.html
I get:
http://www.unix.com/advertisement.php?url=http://www.unix.com/showthread.php?t=164429
and it just keeps on looping for about 10 iterations and then finally
ends up on the forum post. (Earlier today it wouldn't even do that -
maybe they finally changed their advertisement link).

Either way I'd have to agree with Beauregard... it's an issue. But hey,
I realise some sites require cookies  turn them on for those particular
sites. I'm just telling you that the problem with the loop (at least
earlier today) is cookie related. Once I turned on cookies the
site/forum worked ok for viewing.


Please bottom post on this group.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: problems with some php web sites

2011-10-20 Thread LMH
The test I did was to clear my permission to accept session cookies and 
go to default. That means that SM asks me about every cookie. When I 
went to the site, I checked block and use for all cookies. After 
that, all I had to do is wait for the countdown to finish and I went to 
the forum. I guess you are saying that if I was to try to look at an 
individual post, I would go back to the loop? I just tried again and got 
stuck in the same loop you describe. I will send a message to the forum 
about that, if I can ever get it working again.


The add banner thing is pretty new. I don't really like it, but I think 
it is one of the more responsible ways to pay for a site.


Anyway, does anyone have any idea why I can't make a post on this forum 
even though I can log in? I have had a few issues before with the tools 
on a post screen not working (font, bold, etc), but I have always been 
able to correct it by clearing temp files and restarting the browser. I 
sort of assumed that there was some plain text version of the posting 
tool that I was into by an accidentally shortcut key, or something like 
that. This sort of thing is happening on a number of web sites, so I 
thought I should check and see if it is browser related.


I really need to be able to post in some of these forums, so this is not 
a minor inconvenience by any stretch.


LMH


NoOp wrote:

On 10/20/2011 06:38 PM, LMH wrote:

I accept session cookies from this site, which is a very reputable
programming forum, possibly the top rated. Of course, I am going to log
in, so a session cookie is anticipated. They have a short advertisement
page that you are sent when you first go to the site. A banner ad from a
supporter is displayed. After a few seconds you are re-directed to the
main page. I find this annoying, but I guess someone needs to pay for
the site. All in all I prefer that to third party tracking cookies.

You can still access the site if you reject cookies. Everyone gets the
banner advertisement page whether or not you allow cookies. You don't go
to the banner if you are logged in. If you do allow session cookies, you
can skip the ad banner by clicking on the redirect link instead of
waiting for the clock to run down.


Sorry, but that's not correct.
Earlier today all I got was:
http://www.unix.com/advertisement.php?url=http://www.unix.com/forumdisplay.php?f=16

I may eventually get to:
http://www.unix.com/programming/
without cookies, but if I click on:
http://www.unix.com/programming/164429-access-e-mail-inbox-using-php.html
I get:
http://www.unix.com/advertisement.php?url=http://www.unix.com/showthread.php?t=164429
and it just keeps on looping for about 10 iterations and then finally
ends up on the forum post. (Earlier today it wouldn't even do that -
maybe they finally changed their advertisement link).

Either way I'd have to agree with Beauregard... it's an issue. But hey,
I realise some sites require cookies  turn them on for those particular
sites. I'm just telling you that the problem with the loop (at least
earlier today) is cookie related. Once I turned on cookies the
site/forum worked ok for viewing.


Please bottom post on this group.

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Seamonkey hangups

2011-10-20 Thread sean nathan bean

Peter sent me the following::

I use three computers regularly, and all have the hangup problem where
Seamonkey stops responding for up to 30 seconds at a time for no
apparent reason. I've actually had to stop using Seamonkey on one of the
computers now, because the frozen to usable ratio is too high to get
anything done.

I believe that Seamonkey is busy doing something that it thinks is too
important to give up CPU cycles to the user.

I've seen lots of people reporting similar problems - is there anything
that we can do to help find a solution? Perhaps some way of us
determining what Seamonkey is actually doing when it hangs?

Peter


no hang up or freezes on my 6 year old laptop running the latest 
Seamonkey in linux...


sean


--
..duct tape is like the Force:
  It has a light side and a dark side,
and it holds the universe together.
 courtesy of TagZilla 0.066.2
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey