Re: View Source

2012-05-21 Thread Ray_Net 

Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote, On 22/05/2012 00:49:

Ray_Net wrote:


Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote, On 20/05/2012 22:58:

Ray_Net wrote:

More infos about html free editors ->
http://webdesign.about.com/od/windowshtmleditors/tp/free-windows-

editors.htm

Sorry, those are all for Windows...


Sorry those are not for windows only ->  *Operating System(s):* Windows
Macintosh Linux or UNIX

Then why, pray tell, does your link say "windowshtmleditors", and "free-
windows-editors" and the page say:

"The 10 Best Free Web Editors for Windows
Free HTML Editors for Windows"

"The following editors are the 10 best free HTML editors for Windows,
both WYSIWYG and text editors, in order from best to worst. "

I am not responsible of the choice of words inside links and/or in a web 
page written by someone else.

May i just mention that your preferred editor

Bluefish is present in the position 4. A not so bad position :-)

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: How do I import SeaMonkey v2.0.14's addressbooks into SeaMonkey v2.9.1's addresbooks?

2012-05-21 Thread Ant 

On 5/21/2012 4:10 AM PT, Daniel typed:


I did a clean installation of v2.9.1 and manually copied over my old SM
v2.0.14 addressbooks, bookmarks, and e-mails to my Linux/Debian box. I
got my bookmarks imported manually, but I can't seem to import my old
addresssbooks from *.mab files. Do I really have to export them to non
.mab formats and then import from them?


Hey, Ant, on my SM 2.9.1, my e-mail addressbook, abook.mab, is located
in my profile, one level up from the mail and Local Folders folders,
i.e. at the same level as my places.sqlite, which I think is the new,
improved, bookmarks file.


Oh SM v2.9.1 can reuse the old SM v2.0.14 *.mab files for addressbooks? 
I didn't know that! I will have to try that! :)

--
"The ants are a people not strong, yet they prepare their meat in the 
summer." --Proverbs 30:25 (Bible)

   /\___/\ Ant(Dude) @ http://antfarm.ma.cx (Personal Web Site)
  / /\ /\ \Ant's Quality Foraged Links: http://aqfl.net
 | |o   o| |
\ _ /If crediting, then use Ant nickname and AQFL URL/link.
 ( ) If e-mailing, then axe ANT from its address if needed.
Ant is currently not listening to any songs on this computer.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Is motogp.com secure or not

2012-05-21 Thread NoOp 
On 05/21/2012 06:55 AM, Daniel wrote:
> Cruz, Jaime wrote:
>> Daniel wrote:
>>> I'm sitting here watching the French Moto Gp and thought I check out
>>> something at the web site motogp.com. I've never been there before, and
>>> I got a security warning, informing me that the security certificate
>>> offered was not for motogp.com, but for three other sites.
>>>
>>> Figuring that simply meant that the motogp.com site is hosted by one or
>>> other of the three sites, in much the same way that news.Mozilla.org
>>> server is hosted by giganews.com, I accepted the situation.
>>>
>>> When I clicked "I Accept" or whatever the security notification page
>>> offers, I went to www.motogp.com, the padlock in the bottom right was
>>> closed, but I got a virtually blank page, except for an error message:-
>>>
>>> Quote
>>> An error occurred while processing your request.
>>>
>>> Reference #97.7f8ffe3c.1337515288.639cd956
>>> End Quote.
>>>
>>> What is this telling me??
>>>
>>> Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686 on x86_64; rv:12.0)
>>> Gecko/20120429 SeaMonkey/2.9.1
>>>
>>
>> Interesting... I go to that site on a daily basis and never saw this
>> behavior... using the same version of Seamonkey, but on WindowsXP SP3.
>>
>>
> 
> Thanks for checking, Jamie.
> 
> For some reason, when I entered www.motogp.com last night, I was taken 
> to https://www.motogp.com which is where I got the error above.
> 
> Tonight, I deleted the "s" in the address above, so I went to 
> https://www.motogp.com, and all was well.
> 
> Don't know where the s came from last night!!
> 

The https uses akamai servers:

www.motogp.com uses an invalid security certificate.

The certificate is only valid for the following names:
  a248.e.akamai.net , *.akamaihd.net , *.akamaihd-staging.net

(Error code: ssl_error_bad_cert_domain)

$ host www.motogp.com
www.motogp.com is an alias for motogp.com.edgesuite.net.
motogp.com.edgesuite.net is an alias for a1661.g.akamai.net.
a1661.g.akamai.net has address 204.2.133.66
a1661.g.akamai.net has address 204.2.133.81

So when you attempt to use ssl, the cert is for akamai instead of
motogp.com.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: View Source

2012-05-21 Thread Beauregard T. Shagnasty 
Ray_Net wrote:

> Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote, On 20/05/2012 22:58:
>> Ray_Net wrote:
>>> More infos about html free editors ->
>>> http://webdesign.about.com/od/windowshtmleditors/tp/free-windows-
>> editors.htm
>>
>> Sorry, those are all for Windows...
>>
> Sorry those are not for windows only -> *Operating System(s):* Windows
> Macintosh Linux or UNIX

Then why, pray tell, does your link say "windowshtmleditors", and "free-
windows-editors" and the page say:

"The 10 Best Free Web Editors for Windows
Free HTML Editors for Windows"

"The following editors are the 10 best free HTML editors for Windows, 
both WYSIWYG and text editors, in order from best to worst. "

-- 
   -bts
   -This space for rent, but the price is high
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: View Source

2012-05-21 Thread Ray_Net 

Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote, On 20/05/2012 22:58:

Ray_Net wrote:


Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:

Ray_Net wrote:

I prefer a more neutral editor like notepad or notepad+

I prefer a real web authoring tool. I use Bluefish.   :-)

That's another way of doing things, but if you want to see the real
source without any modifications permitting to see
 ,& per example, a neutral editor is always a reference.

Hmmm? You don't think I see  when I type it?  Bluefish is not a
WYSIWYG editor. Are you familiar with it?





More infos about html free editors ->
http://webdesign.about.com/od/windowshtmleditors/tp/free-windows-

editors.htm

Sorry, those are all for Windows...

Sorry those are not for windows only -> *Operating System(s):* Windows 
Macintosh Linux or UNIX


___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Lost Mail

2012-05-21 Thread Test 

Ed Mullen wrote, On 5/10/2012 2:52 PM:

Test wrote:

Daniel wrote, On 5/10/2012 6:20 AM:

Test wrote:

Larry wrote, On 5/8/2012 10:02 PM:

Just upgraded from 2.8 to 2.9.1. I'm using the same profile I had
before
the change, and all seems well except that I was forced to set up new
mail and news accounts, even though the mail folders are right
there in
my profile but apparently aren't recognized. Consequently, I have no
mail history including a few important archives.

So, how did that happen? What can I do about it?

All advice will be gratefully received!


I also had an issue with emails not appearing when I upgraded to
2.9.1 I
have done a restore and reinstalled 2.33 and most emails are back but a
few are still not there or are a mess.


Test, have a look at Tools->Switch Profiles. Do you see any profiles
there that you didn't know you had?? If so, switch to them and see if
they contain your missing e-mails.

If not, report back for more advice!!


Deleting the msf file and letting Seamonkey remake it seem to have fixed
my lost email problem.


That's one way. The other is to right-click the folder and choose
Properties. Then click the Repair Folder button.


I will try that next time I have a problem.  Thanks.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Massive RAM usage

2012-05-21 Thread Rufus 

Paul B. Gallagher wrote:

MCBastos wrote:

Interviewed by CNN on 21/05/2012 12:32, Paul B. Gallagher told the world:

Daniel wrote:

Libertarian Lilly wrote:

Daniel wrote :

Yes, it's grown to horrible proportions, about 3.6 megs. Shame on me.


My bookmarks file, places.sqlite, is 10 MB and not causing me
problems!!


Mine's over 20 MB, no problems.


My places.sqlite is 71 Mb. But...

... exporting it to HTML format yields a file just 1.7 Mb in size, for
2152 bookmarks. And that's including a lot of encoded favicon images...


Sure. And mine shrinks to 205 KB. The rest is probably history.


So, if Daniel has a bookmarks.html file over 3.6 megs, particularly one
without many favicons, well, it probably contains an humongous number of
links.


Hard to tell until we know we're comparing apples to apples.



My places.sqlite is 10.5 Mb...

--
 - Rufus
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Massive RAM usage

2012-05-21 Thread Paul B. Gallagher 

MCBastos wrote:

Interviewed by CNN on 21/05/2012 12:32, Paul B. Gallagher told the world:

Daniel wrote:

Libertarian Lilly wrote:

Daniel  wrote :

Yes, it's grown to horrible proportions, about 3.6 megs. Shame on me.


My bookmarks file, places.sqlite, is 10 MB and not causing me problems!!


Mine's over 20 MB, no problems.


My places.sqlite is 71 Mb. But...

... exporting it to HTML format yields a file just 1.7 Mb in size, for
2152 bookmarks. And that's including a lot of encoded favicon images...


Sure. And mine shrinks to 205 KB. The rest is probably history.


So, if Daniel has a bookmarks.html file over 3.6 megs, particularly one
without many favicons, well, it probably contains an humongous number of
links.


Hard to tell until we know we're comparing apples to apples.

--
War doesn't determine who's right, just who's left.
--
Paul B. Gallagher

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Massive RAM usage

2012-05-21 Thread MCBastos 
Interviewed by CNN on 21/05/2012 12:32, Paul B. Gallagher told the world:
> Daniel wrote:
>> Libertarian Lilly wrote:
>>> Daniel wrote :
>>>
>>> Yes, it's grown to horrible proportions, about 3.6 megs. Shame on me.
>>
>> My bookmarks file, places.sqlite, is 10 MB and not causing me problems!!
> 
> Mine's over 20 MB, no problems.
> 
My places.sqlite is 71 Mb. But...

... exporting it to HTML format yields a file just 1.7 Mb in size, for
2152 bookmarks. And that's including a lot of encoded favicon images...

So, if Daniel has a bookmarks.html file over 3.6 megs, particularly one
without many favicons, well, it probably contains an humongous number of
links.

-- 
MCBastos

This message has been protected with the 2ROT13 algorithm. Unauthorized
use will be prosecuted under the DMCA.

-=-=-
... Sent from my Death Star.
* Added by TagZilla 0.7a1 running on Seamonkey 2.9 *
Get it at http://xsidebar.mozdev.org/modifiedmailnews.html#tagzilla
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Massive RAM usage

2012-05-21 Thread Paul B. Gallagher 

Daniel wrote:

Libertarian Lilly wrote:

Daniel wrote :

Yes, it's grown to horrible proportions, about 3.6 megs. Shame on me.


My bookmarks file, places.sqlite, is 10 MB and not causing me problems!!


Mine's over 20 MB, no problems.

--
War doesn't determine who's right, just who's left.
--
Paul B. Gallagher

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Is motogp.com secure or not

2012-05-21 Thread Daniel 

Cruz, Jaime wrote:

Daniel wrote:

I'm sitting here watching the French Moto Gp and thought I check out
something at the web site motogp.com. I've never been there before, and
I got a security warning, informing me that the security certificate
offered was not for motogp.com, but for three other sites.

Figuring that simply meant that the motogp.com site is hosted by one or
other of the three sites, in much the same way that news.Mozilla.org
server is hosted by giganews.com, I accepted the situation.

When I clicked "I Accept" or whatever the security notification page
offers, I went to www.motogp.com, the padlock in the bottom right was
closed, but I got a virtually blank page, except for an error message:-

Quote
An error occurred while processing your request.

Reference #97.7f8ffe3c.1337515288.639cd956
End Quote.

What is this telling me??

Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686 on x86_64; rv:12.0)
Gecko/20120429 SeaMonkey/2.9.1



Interesting... I go to that site on a daily basis and never saw this
behavior... using the same version of Seamonkey, but on WindowsXP SP3.




Thanks for checking, Jamie.

For some reason, when I entered www.motogp.com last night, I was taken 
to https://www.motogp.com which is where I got the error above.


Tonight, I deleted the "s" in the address above, so I went to 
https://www.motogp.com, and all was well.


Don't know where the s came from last night!!

--
Daniel
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Is motogp.com secure or not

2012-05-21 Thread Cruz, Jaime 

Daniel wrote:

I'm sitting here watching the French Moto Gp and thought I check out
something at the web site motogp.com. I've never been there before, and
I got a security warning, informing me that the security certificate
offered was not for motogp.com, but for three other sites.

Figuring that simply meant that the motogp.com site is hosted by one or
other of the three sites, in much the same way that news.Mozilla.org
server is hosted by giganews.com, I accepted the situation.

When I clicked "I Accept" or whatever the security notification page
offers, I went to www.motogp.com, the padlock in the bottom right was
closed, but I got a virtually blank page, except for an error message:-

Quote
An error occurred while processing your request.

Reference #97.7f8ffe3c.1337515288.639cd956
End Quote.

What is this telling me??

Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686 on x86_64; rv:12.0)
Gecko/20120429 SeaMonkey/2.9.1



Interesting... I go to that site on a daily basis and never saw this 
behavior... using the same version of Seamonkey, but on WindowsXP SP3.



--
Jaime A. Cruz
Secretary
Nassau Wings Motorcycle Club
http://www.nassauwings.org/

AMA District 34
http://www.AMADistrict34.com/
Pop's Run
http://www.popsrun.org/
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: How do I import SeaMonkey v2.0.14's addressbooks into SeaMonkey v2.9.1's addresbooks?

2012-05-21 Thread Daniel 

Ant wrote:

No answers? :(


On 5/18/2012 9:04 AM PT, Ant typed:


Hello!

I did a clean installation of v2.9.1 and manually copied over my old SM
v2.0.14 addressbooks, bookmarks, and e-mails to my Linux/Debian box. I
got my bookmarks imported manually, but I can't seem to import my old
addresssbooks from *.mab files. Do I really have to export them to non
.mab formats and then import from them?

Thank you in advance. :)


Hey, Ant, on my SM 2.9.1, my e-mail addressbook, abook.mab, is located 
in my profile, one level up from the mail and Local Folders folders, 
i.e. at the same level as my places.sqlite, which I think is the new, 
improved, bookmarks file.


--
Daniel
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Massive RAM usage

2012-05-21 Thread Daniel 

Libertarian Lilly wrote:

Daniel   wrote :


Libertarian Lilly wrote:

gjikklwrote :


Jean Zebloski wrote:

Why would Seamonkey be chewing up 430 megs of RAM all the time?


Because it makes ineficient use of cache, but works toward that has
been initiated and they say will continue to improve over time, for
now he have to settle for a FAT SEAMONKEY, that's getting thiner VERY
SLOWLY.



People keep saying to just give it up and use Firefox.

With the interminably slow bookmarks loading in SM, I'm getting to
agree with them.



*YOU* (and others) may experience "interminably slow bookmarks loading
in SM", but I (and others) do not, so the problem may be with your
bookmarks file!



Yes, it's grown to horrible proportions, about 3.6 megs. Shame on me.



My bookmarks file, places.sqlite, is 10 MB and not causing me problems!!

--
Daniel
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey