Libertarian Lilly wrote:
Daniel<d...@albury.nospam.net.au> wrote :
Libertarian Lilly wrote:
gjikkl<saul...@netscape.net> wrote :
Jean Zebloski wrote:
Why would Seamonkey be chewing up 430 megs of RAM all the time?
Because it makes ineficient use of cache, but works toward that has
been initiated and they say will continue to improve over time, for
now he have to settle for a FAT SEAMONKEY, that's getting thiner VERY
SLOWLY.
People keep saying to just give it up and use Firefox.
With the interminably slow bookmarks loading in SM, I'm getting to
agree with them.
*YOU* (and others) may experience "interminably slow bookmarks loading
in SM", but I (and others) do not, so the problem may be with your
bookmarks file!
Yes, it's grown to horrible proportions, about 3.6 megs. Shame on me.
My bookmarks file, places.sqlite, is 10 MB and not causing me problems!!
--
Daniel
_______________________________________________
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
