Re: Funding and Bug Fixes....
Jens Hatlak wrote: Daniel wrote: O.K., been to http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/seamonkey/nightly/2.18b1-candidates/build1/ but no x86_64 builds or even WOW64 builds showing. First of all, the directory you cited is wrong. That's for old SM 2.18 Beta 1 builds. The correct directory for current SM trunk nightlies is: http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/seamonkey/nightly/latest-comm-central-trunk/ Second, x86_64 builds are only provided for Linux. But as I already said, there are currently no recent Linux nightly builds available whatsoever. Third, AFAIK WOW64 refers to the layer that provides the ability to run 32-bit software on 64-Windows. On 64-bit Windows versions you can just run normal 32-bit SM versions. HTH Jens Jens, the reason I was looking for SM 2.18B1 was that I was not experiencing this problem when I was on one of the 2.18Betas, so figured I'd go back there and work my way up through the Betas/Nightlies until the problem did occur!! Jens, do you mean that the nightly release isn't one, continuing, ever evolving, codebase, with regular (six weekly) Alpha-Beta-Final releases off-shoots?? -- Daniel User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:25.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/25.0 SeaMonkey/2.22 Build identifier: 20131023190953 or User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:25.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/25.0 SeaMonkey/2.22 Build identifier: 20131023190942 ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Funding and Bug Fixes....
Rufus wrote: Daniel wrote: Rufus wrote: Philip Chee wrote: On 26/11/2013 05:55, Rufus wrote: Ed Mullen wrote: Frankly, it seems the issue could be resolved simply by remembering the last window position instead of pegging the window in the upper left corner of the screen. Thus, if, as I usually do when annoyed by such window positioning, I move the window to a more pleasing position, it would forever be not a problem. And, yes, I get that some dev decided that shoving the window up there would keep it out of the way of the compose window that is being spell-checked. I disagree. My visual focus needs to be on the spell-check window: That's where the info is that I need to deal with, not in the compose window. If I need to refer to the compose window I am smart enough to be able to move the spell-check window if it is (doubtful in my config) obscuring the compose window. The truth is rather more mundane. Back in 2002 someone noticed that the spellcheck sub-window was always stuck in the upper left corner of the screen. So he fixed it. Or rather he attempted to fix it but didn't check if his fix worked or not. See line 47 of the folllowing link: http://bonsai.mozilla.org/cvsblame.cgi?file=mozilla/editor/ui/dialogs/content/EdSpellCheck.xulrev=1.63mark=47#40 I'm in the process of fixing this as part of Bug 942548. See the second half of Bug 942548 Comment #2 for more details. https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=942548#c2 Phil How did it come to pass that this is a Window on the Win version and a drop-dialog on the Mac version? I'm not seeing a problem with the Spell Check drop on the Mac version. Given that we're talking about Mac v Windows and Drop=down v window, it would be interesting to find out if the Mac Download Manager problem is with a Drop-down or window and if the Windows Spell Checker problem is with a Drop-down or window?? I don't regularly use the Download Manager, but I took a quick look and don't see any particular issue there...are others seeing a problem? One thing I can add though, is that when I encounter the random Master Password dialog and it comes up in a window like the Download Progress dialog vise a drop, is is still drawn short. I'm not sure how this is all implemented, but the error appears to stick with the drop/window it's encountered in no matter how it's presented. Sorry, my mistake, I meant Master Password sub-screen rather than Download Manager!! -- Daniel User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:25.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/25.0 SeaMonkey/2.22 Build identifier: 20131023190953 or User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:25.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/25.0 SeaMonkey/2.22 Build identifier: 20131023190942 ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Funding and Bug Fixes....
Trane Francks wrote: On 11/28/13 6:23 PM +0900, Daniel wrote: Rufus wrote: Philip Chee wrote: On 26/11/2013 05:55, Rufus wrote: Ed Mullen wrote: Frankly, it seems the issue could be resolved simply by remembering the last window position instead of pegging the window in the upper left corner of the screen. Thus, if, as I usually do when annoyed by such window positioning, I move the window to a more pleasing position, it would forever be not a problem. And, yes, I get that some dev decided that shoving the window up there would keep it out of the way of the compose window that is being spell-checked. I disagree. My visual focus needs to be on the spell-check window: That's where the info is that I need to deal with, not in the compose window. If I need to refer to the compose window I am smart enough to be able to move the spell-check window if it is (doubtful in my config) obscuring the compose window. The truth is rather more mundane. Back in 2002 someone noticed that the spellcheck sub-window was always stuck in the upper left corner of the screen. So he fixed it. Or rather he attempted to fix it but didn't check if his fix worked or not. See line 47 of the folllowing link: http://bonsai.mozilla.org/cvsblame.cgi?file=mozilla/editor/ui/dialogs/content/EdSpellCheck.xulrev=1.63mark=47#40 I'm in the process of fixing this as part of Bug 942548. See the second half of Bug 942548 Comment #2 for more details. https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=942548#c2 Phil How did it come to pass that this is a Window on the Win version and a drop-dialog on the Mac version? I'm not seeing a problem with the Spell Check drop on the Mac version. Given that we're talking about Mac v Windows and Drop=down v window, it would be interesting to find out if the Mac Download Manager problem is with a Drop-down or window and if the Windows Spell Checker problem is with a Drop-down or window?? What is the problem with the Download Manager on OS X? I have seen no issue with it. FWIW, the Download Manager is a window, not a drop-down dialogue box. See my response to Rufus. -- Daniel User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:25.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/25.0 SeaMonkey/2.22 Build identifier: 20131023190953 or User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:25.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/25.0 SeaMonkey/2.22 Build identifier: 20131023190942 ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Funding and Bug Fixes....
On 11/29/13 7:27 PM +0900, Daniel wrote: Trane Francks wrote: On 11/28/13 6:23 PM +0900, Daniel wrote: Rufus wrote: Philip Chee wrote: On 26/11/2013 05:55, Rufus wrote: Ed Mullen wrote: Frankly, it seems the issue could be resolved simply by remembering the last window position instead of pegging the window in the upper left corner of the screen. Thus, if, as I usually do when annoyed by such window positioning, I move the window to a more pleasing position, it would forever be not a problem. And, yes, I get that some dev decided that shoving the window up there would keep it out of the way of the compose window that is being spell-checked. I disagree. My visual focus needs to be on the spell-check window: That's where the info is that I need to deal with, not in the compose window. If I need to refer to the compose window I am smart enough to be able to move the spell-check window if it is (doubtful in my config) obscuring the compose window. The truth is rather more mundane. Back in 2002 someone noticed that the spellcheck sub-window was always stuck in the upper left corner of the screen. So he fixed it. Or rather he attempted to fix it but didn't check if his fix worked or not. See line 47 of the folllowing link: http://bonsai.mozilla.org/cvsblame.cgi?file=mozilla/editor/ui/dialogs/content/EdSpellCheck.xulrev=1.63mark=47#40 I'm in the process of fixing this as part of Bug 942548. See the second half of Bug 942548 Comment #2 for more details. https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=942548#c2 Phil How did it come to pass that this is a Window on the Win version and a drop-dialog on the Mac version? I'm not seeing a problem with the Spell Check drop on the Mac version. Given that we're talking about Mac v Windows and Drop=down v window, it would be interesting to find out if the Mac Download Manager problem is with a Drop-down or window and if the Windows Spell Checker problem is with a Drop-down or window?? What is the problem with the Download Manager on OS X? I have seen no issue with it. FWIW, the Download Manager is a window, not a drop-down dialogue box. See my response to Rufus. Gotcha. -- / // Trane Franckstr...@gol.comTokyo, Japan // Practice random kindness and senseless acts of beauty. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: 2.22.1 Install nag: Did not install.....!!
azed13 wrote: Daniel wrote: azed13 wrote: David E. Ross wrote: Snip That is what I have been seeing, not with installs but generally. It is sporadic, about 1/4 of the time. See the thread SeaMonkey Shutdown (started 25 Nov 2013) in this newsgroup. Thanks David: I read the thread but I'm not sure it is of any help. My system has been shut down for almost 24 hours yet after booting up for a new session, I still got the nag when I opened Seamonkey. I'm not a programmer or code wise but it seems improbable that Seamonkey was running while everything was shut down without power. And, I'm not much for creating new profiles. It's been years since the last time I did that and it was a horrible experience including recovering all my mail and bookmark files. Why that happened I don't know but at this stage I'm really much too old to risk what works well for everything else. I'll keep an eye on that thread to see if anything else pops up. azed13 O.K., azed, is it possibly that just before you did the update/install, you had a problem with Windows/SeaMonkey which caused Windows to shutdown?? If so, it is possible that the previously running SeaMonkey process had written a file to your disk drive to stop you starting another (second) instance of SeaMonkey. If SM had closed normally, this file would have been erased. The file is called something like parent.lock. With SM completely closed (including the quickstart function if you have it set up), do a Windows Find File or Folder looking for parent.*, then in Windows Explorer (making sure you ha Windows Explorer set up to display hidden folders), go to that location and delete parent.lock. Report back. Daniel: I can't recall ever having a Windows shutdown while using Seamonkey. BTW, I apologize for not stating that I am on Windows 7 Pro, X64 service pack 1. I did a search anyway and found 43 files with some variation of parent buried in them. None were in any Seamonkey folder and the newest one is dated January 2013. This is long before the problem started. I still get the nag at each start of Seamonkey and the message seems to indicate that the auto-update install file is somewhere in my system and still trying to install 2.22.1 which I have done manually. Oops! I missed the instruction to search with Seamonkey closed. I will search again and report back if the results are any different. Per my original query, I would still be interested in where that auto install file is located. azed13 azed, I think the auto-install files having an ending something like .mac, so if someone were to post the correct ending, you could do a Windows search for it and delete it. -- Daniel User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:25.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/25.0 SeaMonkey/2.22 Build identifier: 20131023190953 or User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:25.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/25.0 SeaMonkey/2.22 Build identifier: 20131023190942 ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Cannot E-mail pictures from Picasa with newest S.M. update. How to fix?
Mort wrote: Daniel wrote: Mort wrote: Jens Hatlak wrote: Mort wrote: Since updating to the newest S.M., I cannot e-mail pictures from Picasa. When I try, the S.M. home page comes up, instead of the compose page. All the settings are correct in Picasa. That's likely the MAPI regression introduced in SM 2.22. This might be fixed in SM 2.23, but we will only know for sure once SM 2.23 Beta 1 is released and receives some testing. HTH Jens Hi Jens, Thanks for your reply. How can I go about getting the most recent older version of S/M. back, without losing any of my data? I have literally thousands of edited and corrected photos in Picasa on that P.C., and not being able to e-mail them is a big problem. Thanks again, Mort Linder --- This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active. http://www.avast.com Mort, on a different take, when you start SeaMonkey, have you set it up to just open the browser or is the e-mail screen opened as well?? Hi Daniel, When SeaMonkey starts, it opens just the browser. If I need the e-mail screen, then I click onto the mail icon. My problem is that heretofore I could e-mail pix from Picasa with no problems,as clicking on that Picasa e-mail icon resulted in a compose screen appearing with the pic as an attachment. Now, with the newest S.M., I do not get that compose screen, only the S.M. home page. On my older P.C. with the superseded S.M., it works well, but that P.C. has very few of my pix. I really need to fix my newer P.C. to once more send pix. Thanks . Mort --- This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active. http://www.avast.com Mort, I see you are posting these news post with SM 2.22 Is this from the new computer or the old?? -- Daniel User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:25.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/25.0 SeaMonkey/2.22 Build identifier: 20131023190953 or User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:25.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/25.0 SeaMonkey/2.22 Build identifier: 20131023190942 ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: What theme do you use?
On 11/28/2013 8:49 PM PT, Rufus typed: ... slow your mouse/trackpad down. I view text only for the buttons and have no problem GW ...and screw up how everything else that works just fine on my machine works? No thanks...I'd like real buttons back. I wonder if there is a way to slow the pointer down only for SeaMonkey software. -- ... Something wrong with the gun, he said. But what if there is? They'll get it right again. And even if there's a delay, how can it alter the end? It's just men and ants. There's the ants builds their cities, live their lives, have wars, revolutions, until the men want them out of the way, and then they go out of the way. That's what we are now -- just ants. Only -- Yes, We're eatable ants... --H.G. Wells' The War of the Worlds /\___/\ Ant(Dude) @ http://antfarm.ma.cx (Personal Web Site) / /\ /\ \Ant's Quality Foraged Links: http://aqfl.net | |o o| | \ _ /If crediting, then use Ant nickname and AQFL URL/link. ( ) If e-mailing, then axe ANT from its address if needed. Ant is currently not listening to any songs on this computer. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: What theme do you use?
Rufus wrote: Geoff Welsh wrote: Rufus wrote: Geoff Welsh wrote: I do miss the windows themselves having a (drawn) border like the olden days but that's not just a SM thing. GW I miss the dialog buttons being big enough to target. slow your mouse/trackpad down. I view text only for the buttons and have no problem GW ...and screw up how everything else that works just fine on my machine works? No thanks...I'd like real buttons back. How is clicking on the p in Reply harder than clicking the center of a rectangle? GW ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: plugin finder for Flash - failed
EE wrote: David E. Ross wrote: On 11/27/2013 10:35 AM, Rick Merrill wrote: And the manual install did not succeed either. What do I check to solve this little problem? If you have an older version of Flash installed, use the Windows Add/Remove capability to delete it. Then try again to install the new version. If you are looking for an up-to-date Flash plugin, you can get one here: http://www.adobe.com/products/flashplayer/distribution3.html THAT worked! (And it did not try to piggy back mcafee!) Thank you. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Funding and Bug Fixes....
Daniel wrote: Rufus wrote: Daniel wrote: Rufus wrote: Philip Chee wrote: On 26/11/2013 05:55, Rufus wrote: Ed Mullen wrote: Frankly, it seems the issue could be resolved simply by remembering the last window position instead of pegging the window in the upper left corner of the screen. Thus, if, as I usually do when annoyed by such window positioning, I move the window to a more pleasing position, it would forever be not a problem. And, yes, I get that some dev decided that shoving the window up there would keep it out of the way of the compose window that is being spell-checked. I disagree. My visual focus needs to be on the spell-check window: That's where the info is that I need to deal with, not in the compose window. If I need to refer to the compose window I am smart enough to be able to move the spell-check window if it is (doubtful in my config) obscuring the compose window. The truth is rather more mundane. Back in 2002 someone noticed that the spellcheck sub-window was always stuck in the upper left corner of the screen. So he fixed it. Or rather he attempted to fix it but didn't check if his fix worked or not. See line 47 of the folllowing link: http://bonsai.mozilla.org/cvsblame.cgi?file=mozilla/editor/ui/dialogs/content/EdSpellCheck.xulrev=1.63mark=47#40 I'm in the process of fixing this as part of Bug 942548. See the second half of Bug 942548 Comment #2 for more details. https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=942548#c2 Phil How did it come to pass that this is a Window on the Win version and a drop-dialog on the Mac version? I'm not seeing a problem with the Spell Check drop on the Mac version. Given that we're talking about Mac v Windows and Drop=down v window, it would be interesting to find out if the Mac Download Manager problem is with a Drop-down or window and if the Windows Spell Checker problem is with a Drop-down or window?? I don't regularly use the Download Manager, but I took a quick look and don't see any particular issue there...are others seeing a problem? One thing I can add though, is that when I encounter the random Master Password dialog and it comes up in a window like the Download Progress dialog vise a drop, is is still drawn short. I'm not sure how this is all implemented, but the error appears to stick with the drop/window it's encountered in no matter how it's presented. Sorry, my mistake, I meant Master Password sub-screen rather than Download Manager!! Ok - I *am* seeing that one, and it was the observation that started this whole thing! -- - Rufus ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: What theme do you use?
Ant wrote: On 11/28/2013 8:49 PM PT, Rufus typed: ... slow your mouse/trackpad down. I view text only for the buttons and have no problem GW ...and screw up how everything else that works just fine on my machine works? No thanks...I'd like real buttons back. I wonder if there is a way to slow the pointer down only for SeaMonkey software. ...hmmnn...I'm probably hallucinating, but I do seem to recall some sort of utility that can provide app-specific mouse behavior. I may be thinking of my Griffin iMate, though. But that's not really the problem - the problem is that the buttons are simply too damn small - very near the size of the pointer itself, and the pointer can obscure the buttons. For someone with limited vision (that might want to use a larger cursor) or problems with motor control this can be a genuine accessibility issue. On top of that it graphically doesn't match anything in any other dialog in the Theme, and just plain looks like another problem. -- - Rufus ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: What theme do you use?
Geoff Welsh wrote: Rufus wrote: Geoff Welsh wrote: Rufus wrote: Geoff Welsh wrote: I do miss the windows themselves having a (drawn) border like the olden days but that's not just a SM thing. GW I miss the dialog buttons being big enough to target. slow your mouse/trackpad down. I view text only for the buttons and have no problem GW ...and screw up how everything else that works just fine on my machine works? No thanks...I'd like real buttons back. How is clicking on the p in Reply harder than clicking the center of a rectangle? GW I don't click the p, I click a nice, large, iconic Reply button. If the button is only the size of the cursor (no matter what it's shape) it's *not* as easy. And I'm not thinking specifically about myself - I'm thinking from the standpoint of general accessibility; for impaired users. -- - Rufus ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: What theme do you use?
rob wrote: On Wed, 27 Nov 2013 02:33:07 -0500, Ed Mullen e...@edmullen.net wrote: What theme do you use? Default? Modern? Or some add-on? Is it time for your medication or mine? Orbit 3+1. That's what I was using until I switched the SeaMonkey 2.2.2 series The the author would fix it so it works. It works great on FireFox. -- Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. If it's Fixed, Don't Break it http://www.phillipmjones.netmailto:pjones...@comcast.net ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Funding and Bug Fixes....
Daniel wrote: Jens, the reason I was looking for SM 2.18B1 was that I was not experiencing this problem when I was on one of the 2.18Betas, so figured I'd go back there and work my way up through the Betas/Nightlies until the problem did occur!! There's no need. The regression was only introduced in SM 2.22. Jens, do you mean that the nightly release isn't one, continuing, ever evolving, codebase, with regular (six weekly) Alpha-Beta-Final releases off-shoots?? There is no nightly release. Nightlies are just that, nightly builds built from whatever code the trunk contained at the time. HTH Jens -- Jens Hatlak http://jens.hatlak.de/ SeaMonkey Trunk Tracker http://smtt.blogspot.com/ ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Random crash in SM Mail on Win32 only with recent builds
Greetings, I was able to visit this computer today. The Mozilla crash detection had absolutely NO crashes reported. I saw that their mail settings WERE set to auto compact when it would save more than 1MB of space. Clearly, however, it was not auto compacting. I adjusted the setting to 5MB. Suggestions otherwise? Blessings, -- Michael Lueck Lueck Data Systems http://www.lueckdatasystems.com/ ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: What theme do you use?
Rufus wrote: Geoff Welsh wrote: Rufus wrote: Geoff Welsh wrote: Rufus wrote: Geoff Welsh wrote: I do miss the windows themselves having a (drawn) border like the olden days but that's not just a SM thing. GW I miss the dialog buttons being big enough to target. slow your mouse/trackpad down. I view text only for the buttons and have no problem GW ...and screw up how everything else that works just fine on my machine works? No thanks...I'd like real buttons back. How is clicking on the p in Reply harder than clicking the center of a rectangle? GW I don't click the p, I click a nice, large, iconic Reply button. If the button is only the size of the cursor (no matter what it's shape) it's *not* as easy. well somethings weird there then because on every Mac I have the pointer is far smaller than the word Reply so I have no problem clicking any letter in the word without missing. Maybe one of those custom themes has the giant buttons you require. GW ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: What theme do you use?
Geoff Welsh wrote: well somethings weird there then because on every Mac I have the pointer is far smaller than the word Reply so I have no problem clicking any letter in the word without missing. Maybe one of those custom themes has the giant buttons you require. OK, have a look at this. With the toolbar showing, right-click in an empty area of the toolbar and choose Customize. See if the option Use small icons is checked. If so, try unchecking it and see if the larger icons suit you. -- War doesn't determine who's right, just who's left. -- Paul B. Gallagher ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: What theme do you use?
Geoff Welsh wrote: Rufus wrote: Geoff Welsh wrote: Rufus wrote: Geoff Welsh wrote: Rufus wrote: Geoff Welsh wrote: I do miss the windows themselves having a (drawn) border like the olden days but that's not just a SM thing. GW I miss the dialog buttons being big enough to target. slow your mouse/trackpad down. I view text only for the buttons and have no problem GW ...and screw up how everything else that works just fine on my machine works? No thanks...I'd like real buttons back. How is clicking on the p in Reply harder than clicking the center of a rectangle? GW I don't click the p, I click a nice, large, iconic Reply button. If the button is only the size of the cursor (no matter what it's shape) it's *not* as easy. well somethings weird there then because on every Mac I have the pointer is far smaller than the word Reply so I have no problem clicking any letter in the word without missing. Maybe one of those custom themes has the giant buttons you require. GW Do you use buttons, or just text? I set to display both, and I click the button not the text. The only place where it's an issue is in the Download Progress dialog...why they'd screw up just one dialog and leave everything else passable is still beyond me... -- - Rufus ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: What theme do you use?
Paul B. Gallagher wrote: Geoff Welsh wrote: well somethings weird there then because on every Mac I have the pointer is far smaller than the word Reply so I have no problem clicking any letter in the word without missing. Maybe one of those custom themes has the giant buttons you require. OK, have a look at this. With the toolbar showing, right-click in an empty area of the toolbar and choose Customize. See if the option Use small icons is checked. If so, try unchecking it and see if the larger icons suit you. Not the problem...I'm talking about the stupid too-small stop/cancel/close buttons in the Download Progress dialog. Those are not customizable, and they are too small - and they don't even match up with any other presentation in the Theme, like they did before they were reduced in size. -- - Rufus ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Cannot E-mail pictures from Picasa with newest S.M. update. How to fix?
Daniel wrote: Mort, I see you are posting these news post with SM 2.22 Is this from the new computer or the old?? Hi Daniel, These posts are from the old computer, where the Picasa stopped e-mailing pix. The new computer still has a previous S.M. version,and still sends Picasa pix by e-mail. The problem is that most of my thousands of edited pix are on the old computer's hard drive. Thanks . Mort --- This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active. http://www.avast.com ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Cannot E-mail pictures from Picasa with newest S.M. update. How to fix? P.S.
Mort wrote: Daniel wrote: Mort, I see you are posting these news post with SM 2.22 Is this from the new computer or the old?? Hi Daniel, These posts are from the old computer, where the Picasa stopped e-mailing pix. The new computer still has a previous S.M. version,and still sends Picasa pix by e-mail. The problem is that most of my thousands of edited pix are on the old computer's hard drive. Thanks . Mort --- This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active. http://www.avast.com P.S. Not only do drag and drop not work here, but copy and paste also do not work. I am stuck. Thanks. Mort --- This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active. http://www.avast.com ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: What theme do you use?
Rufus: Not the problem...I'm talking about the stupid too-small stop/cancel/close buttons in the Download Progress dialog. These ones? http://www.triffids.de/pub/screenshot/do131130.png Those are not customizable, and they are too small They are. I remember a thread in the past with strong complaints. Maybe, there is even a bug about this. Luckily i am not affected by this, because i am using wget. :) Hartmut ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Focus goes away from web page
When I bring up Seamonkey Mail and Newsgroups and then view an incoming message and click on a link in that message, it displays the referred page on top of the Mail and Newsgroups page for a moment and then the referred page goes behind the Mail and Newsgroups page. Subsequent lookups stay on top of the Mail and Newsgroups page. This would not be a problem, except that sometimes the first referred to page is smaller than the Mail and Newsgroups page and disappears completely behind the Mail and Newsgroups page. I would like lookups to always take the focus and stay on top of the page from which I click on a link. I suspect I have something configured wrong, I would like some help. Please? Thanks, Jay O'Brien Folsom, CA ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Focus goes away from web page
Jay O'Brien wrote: When I bring up Seamonkey Mail and Newsgroups and then view an incoming message and click on a link in that message, it displays the referred page on top of the Mail and Newsgroups page for a moment and then the referred page goes behind the Mail and Newsgroups page. Subsequent lookups stay on top of the Mail and Newsgroups page. This would not be a problem, except that sometimes the first referred to page is smaller than the Mail and Newsgroups page and disappears completely behind the Mail and Newsgroups page. I would like lookups to always take the focus and stay on top of the page from which I click on a link. I suspect I have something configured wrong, I would like some help. Please? Thanks, Jay O'Brien Folsom, CA Please state: Vesion of SeaMonky OS/platform and version We are mind readers here but all of our crystal ball batteries have died. -- Ed Mullen http://edmullen.net/ The hilarious thing about self-important self-righteous people is that they are so easily baited. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey Shutdown
On 11/25/2013 10:41 AM, David E. Ross wrote: Windows 7 (x64) SeaMonkey 2.22.1 Very often, the seamonkey.exe process fails to die when I shutdown SeaMonkey. I usually shut it down by selecting the X in the upper-right corner of the window. Several minutes later, I cannot relaunch SeaMonkey without first using Ctrl-Alt-Delete and terminating the seamonkey.exe process. Is this a SeaMonkey problem or a Windows 7 problem? FWIW, this has been happening quite alot on my wife's SM 2.22.1 Win7 since upgrading from 2.22.0. Drives *me* crazy becuase I have to go and clear it for her. When she gets back I plan to downgrade her SeaMonkey to 2.22.0. I've not noticed it on my linux version as I can't run 2.22.1 until the lightning bug (no pun intended) is fixed. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: [Resolved] Re: Flash (Linux) again...
On 11/23/2013 11:19 AM, Geoff Welsh wrote: NoOp wrote: ... Found the problem filed a bug report: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=942356 Both Firefox and Seamonkey put incorrect plugin information in the pluginreg.dat file. Note that the version information in both files incorrectly places commas, instead of periods, between the version number: SeaMonkey 2.2.0/1: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:25.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/25.0 SeaMonkey/2.22 Shockwave Flash File: libflashplayer.so Path: /usr/lib/adobe-flashplugin/libflashplayer.so Version: 11,2,202,327 wow, good find! guess someone was feeling European that day. GW Ah, nice catch. I didn't even think of that. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decimal_mark As Rob mentioned, perhaps an incorrect localization/locale setting? ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: What theme do you use?
On 11/27/2013 05:58 AM, Pololo wrote: On 27/11/13 08:33, Ed Mullen wrote: What theme do you use? Default? Modern? Or some add-on? GNOMErunner/GTK Revived on Xubuntu 12.04LTS 32-bits I like that theme. Unfortunately I ran into this issue: http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic.php?f=5t=2743823 quote I've noticed since SM 2.20 that a small white box was appearing in the top-left of my screen and staying there, on top of everything else. I didn't think it was anything to do with SeaMonkey until one day I tried to track it down and after closing all programs, I checked the Task Manager and noticed that SM was still running. When I killed it, the white box disappeared. I've tracked it down to the new mail notification box. I no longer get the little box in the bottom-right of the screen nor do I get a tray notification icon. /quote At first I thought it was libnotify/libindicatior/etc or some other system issue, but after removing the theme and restarting with the default SeaMonkey theme, everything is back to normal. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: 2.22.1 Install nag: Did not install.....!!
Daniel wrote: azed13 wrote: Daniel wrote: azed13 wrote: David E. Ross wrote: Snip That is what I have been seeing, not with installs but generally. It is sporadic, about 1/4 of the time. See the thread SeaMonkey Shutdown (started 25 Nov 2013) in this newsgroup. Thanks David: I read the thread but I'm not sure it is of any help. My system has been shut down for almost 24 hours yet after booting up for a new session, I still got the nag when I opened Seamonkey. I'm not a programmer or code wise but it seems improbable that Seamonkey was running while everything was shut down without power. And, I'm not much for creating new profiles. It's been years since the last time I did that and it was a horrible experience including recovering all my mail and bookmark files. Why that happened I don't know but at this stage I'm really much too old to risk what works well for everything else. I'll keep an eye on that thread to see if anything else pops up. azed13 O.K., azed, is it possibly that just before you did the update/install, you had a problem with Windows/SeaMonkey which caused Windows to shutdown?? If so, it is possible that the previously running SeaMonkey process had written a file to your disk drive to stop you starting another (second) instance of SeaMonkey. If SM had closed normally, this file would have been erased. The file is called something like parent.lock. With SM completely closed (including the quickstart function if you have it set up), do a Windows Find File or Folder looking for parent.*, then in Windows Explorer (making sure you ha Windows Explorer set up to display hidden folders), go to that location and delete parent.lock. Report back. Daniel: I can't recall ever having a Windows shutdown while using Seamonkey. BTW, I apologize for not stating that I am on Windows 7 Pro, X64 service pack 1. I did a search anyway and found 43 files with some variation of parent buried in them. None were in any Seamonkey folder and the newest one is dated January 2013. This is long before the problem started. I still get the nag at each start of Seamonkey and the message seems to indicate that the auto-update install file is somewhere in my system and still trying to install 2.22.1 which I have done manually. Oops! I missed the instruction to search with Seamonkey closed. I will search again and report back if the results are any different. Per my original query, I would still be interested in where that auto install file is located. azed13 azed, I think the auto-install files having an ending something like .mac, so if someone were to post the correct ending, you could do a Windows search for it and delete it. Daniel: Thanks again. Since I last posted, while working a different program (no Seamonkey session open and off line) suddenly a dialogue box popped up stating that the Seamonkey update failed for some reason I don't recall asking to download the full or complete file. I clicked OK and the dialogue box changed to connecting to server and downloading. I don't remember the full details. I do know that after about 15 minutes nothing happened and I cancelled the operation. My mystery problem appears to have been solved by another mystery. I no longer get the nag message. However, Seamonkey seems to take much longer to open. I'm not sure if that is because of Seamonkey or something on my system. I will watch what happens for a period of time to see if this is a persistent problem. Meanwhile, my thanks to all who offered assistance. azed13 ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
