Re: [biofuels-biz] Re: OT: Columbia Space Shuttle Lost

2003-02-04 Thread Steve Spence

The o ring problem was in the boosters. they are dropped on launch. this
vehicle was returning. there is some evidence that heat tiles broke off on
launch which may have damaged a seam near the landing gear. That would
explain the loss of air pressure in the tires right before loss of contact.
time will tell.



Steve Spence
Subscribe to the Renewable Energy Newsletter
 Discussion Boards. Read about Sustainable Technology:
http://www.green-trust.org
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: murdoch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: biofuel@yahoogroups.com
Cc: biofuels-biz@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 12:10 AM
Subject: [biofuels-biz] Re: OT: Columbia Space Shuttle Lost


 We'll see what happens.  My post was clear that the causes may be hard to
pin
 down, and that a weather-relation to any series of events could be also
hard to
 pin down.  My recollection of the Challenger investigation is that it
looked
 into weather aspects affecting O-Ring expansion or contraction.  Also, the
 weather is always a factor as regards various aspects of launch-pad
 decision-making.

 In this case, if ice, or something else, did break off a tank and fall
down and
 impact and damage some part of the shuttle during liftoff, as has been
surmised
 and-or videotaped, that doesn't necessarily make it weather-related (some
 ice-formation concerns being more based on the temperature of the fuel)
but
 anyway I'll be curious to follow the investigation.  If they did know of
 possible damage upon liftoff, then I tentatively don't agree with their
there's
 nothing we could have done attitude about their time in space.  I have to
 wonder if a second shuttle could have been readied and sent up as an
emergency
 measure, such as to take them down.

 Feynman's autobiographical annecdotal books are favorites of mine, and his
 account of being on the Challenger commission was interesting.  *Lots* of
 resistance to unbiased investigation there.

 Lastly, I am in the camp of people who think the import has been somewhat
 exaggerated.  It's happened before, and it is going to happen again, many
many
 more times.  We can reduce loss of life by changing our attitude, but
Space is
 dangerous and we are not as on top of it as we'd like to think.  Even with
a
 change of attitude and policies, we're still going to lose some people.




 Not much weather above 6 ft. Shuttle was in unpowered glide mode.
  I wonder if there are any weather-related lessons that can come from
the
 two
  shuttle crashes (Jan. 28, 1986(?)) and now February 1, 2003).  I think
 maybe
  with the first crash there were some on-the-launch-pad waiting issues
that
  occurred in fueling, but I don't know.  Ultimately, I don't mean to
imply
 the
  causes were easy to pin down, just that I wonder how the time-of-year
 might
  affect any existing weaknesses or accidents-waiting-to-happen in the
 design, if
  they were there.


 Biofuels at Journey to Forever
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
 Biofuel at WebConX
 http://webconx.green-trust.org/2000/biofuel/biofuel.htm
 List messages are archived at the Info-Archive at NNYTech:
 http://archive.nnytech.net/
 To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]



 Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/





Biofuels at Journey to Forever
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
Biofuel at WebConX
http://webconx.green-trust.org/2000/biofuel/biofuel.htm
List messages are archived at the Info-Archive at NNYTech:
http://archive.nnytech.net/
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




[biofuel] diesel furnace FS

2003-02-04 Thread Neoteric Biofuels Inc


FYI...

Armstrong diesel furnace, made by Lennox, 85,000 btu, brand new, $575 
obo. ÊTel: 780-476-9485 Edmonton.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://archive.nnytech.net/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




Re: [biofuel] Is Big Energy Hijacking Hydrogen?

2003-02-04 Thread Tricia Liu

Big energy owns patents on producing Hydrogen and has the muscles/capacity.
They are ready to move into the next killing field where they can master,
again!!
President Bush just promised us Hydrogen cars for the year 2015.
You think it's coincidental that the White House and the big energy see
something in common for the future,
that we can not foresee?  That we will be driven to drive Hydrogen cars and
still paying these big energy companies
their handsome reward in dominating the energy - Hydrogen supply?

Why are we here talking about BioFuel and Air cars/Electric cars?  Our
future had been chartered by the big energy
and politician.  Don't you know that?  They can dictate what kind of cars
that we can drive and when, and all we can do is
to buy from the menu for the limited choices we have!

Maybe the lessons that we had learned from being slaves to gasoline, had
finally paid off!
So we are searching on our future cars, not following their plan.  Do you
think we will be punished for being naughty?
If I got my hands on an aircar, takes some electricity to compress air.  So
what?  The air is free and once release, it's still air.  And put them back
in, compress then release!  Compress and release..Do it everyday and
nobody can charge me for using
the air.

Nobody can limit the use of air and that is a good thing.  The big energy
company probably had not found a way to stop
us from using Air as alternative ore renewable energy yet! And why the
energy company spares BioFuel?  Because it's expensive to produce Bio Fuels
or ethanol?

The big brother will try to control us again!!
Forcing us to use this dirty gasoline and it's by-products, causing wars and
ruining the earth!
The entire human population is now chained to the gasoline pumps, no way to
escape!
But hope!  God gives us hope!  We can still get biodiesel, air or even
Hydrogen cars.
However beware of the Hydrogen supply market,  unless they can control this
supply or else they won't let go the
gasoline.  Which they have total control, what kinds of cars do we drive or
how frequent that we have to visit gas
stations.  Do you not feel that we are all pre-programmed to buy a car and
then go to gas pumps, TV commercials,
car salesmen, auto shows!  We people here probably have 'defects' in our
programs, that is why we are seeking a
different solution.  Good luck! Watch your back!  Don't let them get you!





- Original Message -
From: Alan S. Petrillo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: biofuel@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 8:19 AM
Subject: Re: [biofuel] Is Big Energy Hijacking Hydrogen?


 Keith Addison wrote:
 
  http://www.alternet.org/story.html?StoryID=14959
 
  Is Big Energy Hijacking Hydrogen?

 Wrong tense.  Big Energy has hijacked hydrogen.


 AP
 --
 Aviation is more than a hobby.  It is more than a job.  It is more than
 a career.  Aviation is a way of life.
 A second language for the world:  www.esperanto.net
 Processor cycles are a terrible thing to waste: www.distributed.net

 Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

 Biofuels list archives:
 http://archive.nnytech.net/

 Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
 To unsubscribe, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/






Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://archive.nnytech.net/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




Re: [biofuel] Africa 'turns from leaded petrol' vs Air car factory in South Africa

2003-02-04 Thread Keith Addison

Tricia Liu wrote:

Air car in South Africa, check out this link

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/africa/988265.stm

This link was first posted to the list on 25 October 2000, the day 
following the story's dateline. There was a lot of discussion of it 
then.

Here's the link to the website (also previously posted):

http://www.e.volution.co.za/

The Air Car is coming - its taking longer than we hoped - but its coming !

Don't we just keep hearing this? Just around the corner, it only 
needs a few more million/billion...

The Air Car has been discussed a lot here in the past, maybe you 
should check out the archives and see what it says, there are about 
150 messages on it there.

Best

Keith Addison


Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://archive.nnytech.net/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




[biofuel] Re: diesel furnace FS

2003-02-04 Thread fremontjon [EMAIL PROTECTED]

--- In biofuel@yahoogroups.com, Neoteric Biofuels Inc [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:
 
 FYI...
 
 Armstrong diesel furnace, made by Lennox, 85,000 btu, brand new, 
$575 
 obo. ÊTel: 780-476-9485 Edmonton.
 
$CN??


Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://archive.nnytech.net/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




Re: [biofuel] Is Big Energy Hijacking Hydrogen?

2003-02-04 Thread Steve Spence

There would be hydrogen cars, if there was a cheap, clean source of
hydrogen. There is not. Hydrogen comes from fossil fuels, which keeps
President Bush and his oil buddies in the drivers seat, while making the
ignorant believe they have been saved.



Steve Spence
Subscribe to the Renewable Energy Newsletter
 Discussion Boards. Read about Sustainable Technology:
http://www.green-trust.org
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: Tricia Liu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: biofuel@yahoogroups.com
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 3:21 AM
Subject: Re: [biofuel] Is Big Energy Hijacking Hydrogen?


 Big energy owns patents on producing Hydrogen and has the
muscles/capacity.
 They are ready to move into the next killing field where they can master,
 again!!
 President Bush just promised us Hydrogen cars for the year 2015.
 You think it's coincidental that the White House and the big energy see
 something in common for the future,
 that we can not foresee?  That we will be driven to drive Hydrogen cars
and
 still paying these big energy companies
 their handsome reward in dominating the energy - Hydrogen supply?

 Why are we here talking about BioFuel and Air cars/Electric cars?  Our
 future had been chartered by the big energy
 and politician.  Don't you know that?  They can dictate what kind of cars
 that we can drive and when, and all we can do is
 to buy from the menu for the limited choices we have!

 Maybe the lessons that we had learned from being slaves to gasoline, had
 finally paid off!
 So we are searching on our future cars, not following their plan.  Do you
 think we will be punished for being naughty?
 If I got my hands on an aircar, takes some electricity to compress air.
So
 what?  The air is free and once release, it's still air.  And put them
back
 in, compress then release!  Compress and release..Do it everyday and
 nobody can charge me for using
 the air.

 Nobody can limit the use of air and that is a good thing.  The big energy
 company probably had not found a way to stop
 us from using Air as alternative ore renewable energy yet! And why the
 energy company spares BioFuel?  Because it's expensive to produce Bio
Fuels
 or ethanol?

 The big brother will try to control us again!!
 Forcing us to use this dirty gasoline and it's by-products, causing wars
and
 ruining the earth!
 The entire human population is now chained to the gasoline pumps, no way
to
 escape!
 But hope!  God gives us hope!  We can still get biodiesel, air or even
 Hydrogen cars.
 However beware of the Hydrogen supply market,  unless they can control
this
 supply or else they won't let go the
 gasoline.  Which they have total control, what kinds of cars do we drive
or
 how frequent that we have to visit gas
 stations.  Do you not feel that we are all pre-programmed to buy a car and
 then go to gas pumps, TV commercials,
 car salesmen, auto shows!  We people here probably have 'defects' in our
 programs, that is why we are seeking a
 different solution.  Good luck! Watch your back!  Don't let them get you!





 - Original Message -
 From: Alan S. Petrillo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: biofuel@yahoogroups.com
 Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 8:19 AM
 Subject: Re: [biofuel] Is Big Energy Hijacking Hydrogen?


  Keith Addison wrote:
  
   http://www.alternet.org/story.html?StoryID=14959
  
   Is Big Energy Hijacking Hydrogen?
 
  Wrong tense.  Big Energy has hijacked hydrogen.
 
 
  AP
  --
  Aviation is more than a hobby.  It is more than a job.  It is more than
  a career.  Aviation is a way of life.
  A second language for the world:  www.esperanto.net
  Processor cycles are a terrible thing to waste: www.distributed.net
 
  Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
  http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
 
  Biofuels list archives:
  http://archive.nnytech.net/
 
  Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
  To unsubscribe, send an email to:
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 
 




 Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

 Biofuels list archives:
 http://archive.nnytech.net/

 Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
 To unsubscribe, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/





Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://archive.nnytech.net/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




Re: [biofuel] $2.60 for recharging and the French aircar runs 120 miles

2003-02-04 Thread Steve Spence

Don't confuse the believers with science ;-)

Steve Spence
Subscribe to the Renewable Energy Newsletter
 Discussion Boards. Read about Sustainable Technology:
http://www.green-trust.org
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: MH [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: biofuel@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 12:19 AM
Subject: Re: [biofuel] $2.60 for recharging and the French aircar runs 120
miles


 Tricia Liu wrote:
  Suggested Retail $14,000(Euro 9500), runs 60MPH, range 120 miles.
  Charge at station $3 per charge and takes 3 minutes(If we had these
  infra-structure available)
  Charge at home with a small electric air compressor takes 4 hours, take
20
  KWH of electricity.
  S.C.Edison is charging 13 cents per KWH, then the cost to charge at home
  will be $2.60
  And spending $2.60 and I can run 120 miles???  This must be a dream?


  I'm finding the above hard to believe
  but what a dream.

  Listed above this air car is able to travel 120 miles
  or about 240 miles on the eqivelent of one US gallon
  of diesel fuel.

  20 kW = 68,240 Btu
  Diesel fuel is about 135,000 BTU/US gallon


  __

 Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

 Biofuels list archives:
 http://archive.nnytech.net/

 Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
 To unsubscribe, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/





Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://archive.nnytech.net/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




Re: [biofuel] Re: OT: Columbia Space Shuttle Lost

2003-02-04 Thread Greg and April

I don't think so, it takes aprox 3-4 months for turn around, and it's my
understanding that the other shuttles are still under evaluation for cracks
in the fuel lines.  I don't think that shuttles were ever ment to dock with
each other, and they only have a limited number of seats ( 7 ).  The limited
number of seats alone would have been a problem.

Greg H.

- Original Message -
From: murdoch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: biofuel@yahoogroups.com
Cc: biofuels-biz@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 22:10
Subject: [biofuel] Re: OT: Columbia Space Shuttle Lost



   I have to
 wonder if a second shuttle could have been readied and sent up as an
emergency
 measure, such as to take them down.





Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://archive.nnytech.net/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




RE: [biofuel]palm source

2003-02-04 Thread Crabb, David

Does anyone know what species produces the most oil?

how about maturity times?

thanks


Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://archive.nnytech.net/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




[biofuel] speaking of the air car, some lingering questions about Mexico City's clean air problems

2003-02-04 Thread murdoch

Thx, I had lost track of the air car because I also am skeptical of the
business-status of it.

Do you happen to know what ever became of the movement to get the air car to
Mexico City?  

So long as I'm at it, I think Mexico City continues to remain a sort of
clean-air-problem-in-wait-of-a-high-profile-solution.  If-when we brainstormers
and the companies we follow could come up with a solution, I think they really
seem to need one or more.  But I haven't seen any news coverage of this at all,
and, yes, I know, they're in a country which seriously needs its oil revenues.
But the clean air thin-air problems they have there are so daunting that I don't
think many conservative anti-environmentalists could really claim that it's not
a real challenge.  Better technology and planning might really help them, even
if much of the rest of the country must remain dependent on the Oil paradigm.

I keep wondering if some of the EVs that California supposedly doesn't need to
keep (EV1s, Thinks, EV+s), that the car companies are taking back off lease and
destroying, could be shipped to Mexico City to help out.  Then again, they'd
have to be reconditioned at considerable expense per vehicle, an act that the
car companies would doubtless get more argumentation capital out of than any
engineering coup or success.  This is not to suggest a myopic focus on any one
solution (nothing wrong with trying biofuels, more public transportation, slower
2 wheelers where appropriate, etc.)

Aside: a friend was recently traveling in Mexico (on the Baja Peninsula) and
paid $4-$6 per gallon in some isolated areas.



This link is a couple of years old and the factory is still not up 
and running.  There are a few air cars being tested in France as part 
of one of the EV demonstration projects and Spain has shown a lot of 
interest.  It looks quite likely that the first factory will actually 
be in Spain where they claim that they have about 16,000 orders 
already.  

The move from development to comercial production is the hardest 
thing about building any vehicle so I will get excited about the air 
car when I see it on sale and find out how it actaully performs in 
the real world.  It is a very interesting concept though.

Noel
evfinder.com


Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://archive.nnytech.net/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




Re: [biofuel]palm source

2003-02-04 Thread studio53

If you can't find the info online, there is a wonderful by Josh Tickel
called From the Fryer to the Fuel Tank which has charts with this data.
---
Jesse Parris  |  studio53  |  53 maitland rd  |  stamford, ct  06906
203.324.4371www.jesseparris.com/
- Original Message -
From: Crabb, David [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: biofuel@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 12:48 PM
Subject: RE: [biofuel]palm source


 Does anyone know what species produces the most oil?

 how about maturity times?

 thanks


 Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

 Biofuels list archives:
 http://archive.nnytech.net/

 Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
 To unsubscribe, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/




Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://archive.nnytech.net/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




RE: [biofuel]palm source

2003-02-04 Thread James Slayden

And on that note, I sent off some email a while back for some Jatropha
seeds and have still not received any information back from Reinhard.  I
am kinda miffed cause he was a poster quite often here and on
biofuels-biz.  Anyone know of a seed source?


James Slayden

On Tue, 4 Feb 2003, Crabb, David wrote:

 Does anyone know what species produces the most oil?
 
 how about maturity times?
 
 thanks
 
 
 Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
 
 Biofuels list archives:
 http://archive.nnytech.net/
 
 Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
 To unsubscribe, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
 


Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://archive.nnytech.net/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




Re: [biofuel] Re: OT: Columbia Space Shuttle Lost

2003-02-04 Thread vern_hendershott


If they had determined in space that the Shuttle was not safe to return to
earth the move would have been to send them to the Intl. Space Station
where they could have docked and just sat it out until we could send a
different shuttle to get most of them and if there were still two left up
there in the Intl. Space Station they could be brought back in one of the
Russian ships as they have three seats and can be flown by one person. They
may also have been able to stay until the second shuttle arrival if that
was determined to be the better solution. Keeping in mind that if the
Columbia had been determined to be unsafe in space we may not have felt
that it was required to ground the fleet until we have clear answers as to
what the cause is and we would know the problem and cause from the
information that was developed to determine that they should not try the
reentry in it.

Best regards,
Vern





 I don't think so, it takes aprox 3-4 months for turn around, and it's my
understanding that the other shuttles are still under evaluation for cracks
in the fuel lines.Ê I don't think that shuttles were ever ment to dock with
each other, and they only have a limited number of seats ( 7 ).Ê The
limited
number of seats alone would have been a problem.

Greg H.

- Original Message -
From: murdoch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: biofuel@yahoogroups.com
Cc: biofuels-biz@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 22:10
Subject: [biofuel] Re: OT: Columbia Space Shuttle Lost



ÊÊ I have to
 wonder if a second shuttle could have been readied and sent up as an
emergency
 measure, such as to take them down.





Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://archive.nnytech.net/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.







Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://archive.nnytech.net/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




Re: [biofuel]palm source

2003-02-04 Thread Keith Addison

If you can't find the info online, there is a wonderful by Josh Tickel
called From the Fryer to the Fuel Tank which has charts with this data.
---
Jesse Parris  |  studio53  |  53 maitland rd  |  stamford, ct  06906
203.324.4371www.jesseparris.com/

Vegetable oil yields
http://journeytoforever.org/biodiesel_yield.html

Keith

- Original Message -
From: Crabb, David [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: biofuel@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 12:48 PM
Subject: RE: [biofuel]palm source


  Does anyone know what species produces the most oil?
 
  how about maturity times?
 
  thanks


Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://archive.nnytech.net/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




RE: [biofuel]palm source

2003-02-04 Thread Myles Twete

David-

And the numbers in such tables can be widely disparate.
For example, Euphorbia Lathyris, in Tickell (see
http://attra.ncat.org/attra-pub/biodiesel.html ) is rated as the 2nd highest
non-tree plant source of oil at 1119kg-oil/hectare, while at
journeytoforever it is only rated at 440kg-oil/hectare (below pumpkinseed)
and in fact 11% higher yield than rapeseed.
Meanwhile, Oil Palm at 5000kg oil/hectare is rated in both places as the
highest yielding tree.

So for trees, the answer's clear: oil palm.
For bushes, castor bean.
For smaller plants, it's hard to tell---I contend it's euphorbia lathyris
(gopher plant), but that may still be a matter of disputemeanwhile it
grows better than anything else in our yard and nearly all year round here
in Portland, Oregon---very wild, free and productiveI just don't know a
cheap easy way to get oil from it safely (elements of the plant are
considered toxic or cancerous).

-Myles Twete, Portland

-Original Message-
From: Keith Addison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 11:30 AM
To: biofuel@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [biofuel]palm source


If you can't find the info online, there is a wonderful by Josh Tickel
called From the Fryer to the Fuel Tank which has charts with this data.
---
Jesse Parris  |  studio53  |  53 maitland rd  |  stamford, ct  06906
203.324.4371www.jesseparris.com/

Vegetable oil yields
http://journeytoforever.org/biodiesel_yield.html

Keith

- Original Message -
From: Crabb, David [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: biofuel@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 12:48 PM
Subject: RE: [biofuel]palm source


  Does anyone know what species produces the most oil?
 
  how about maturity times?
 
  thanks


Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://archive.nnytech.net/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/



Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://archive.nnytech.net/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




[biofuel] Land Rover diesel P/U - BC, Canada

2003-02-04 Thread Neoteric Biofuels Inc

Who wants it?

BC, Canada...

60 LANDROVER 2.25L diesel, 88 pastel grn, PU cab, lockers frnt  rear, 
twin tanks, batts, PTO winch, htd glass, D90 dr tops, tire carrier, 33 
BFG mud TA's, high ratio transf case, rf rack

email me off list if interested.


[EMAIL PROTECTED]



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://archive.nnytech.net/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




RE: [biofuel] $2.60 for recharging and the French aircar runs 120 miles

2003-02-04 Thread Ryan Morgan, Aerials Express

The following may interest you...

Excerpt from:
http://www.eru.uregina.ca/kybettbd/chem207/Chem%20207%20More%20efficient%20c
ars.html

Someone (A French racing car driver I believe) announced, at a conference in
South Africa in 1999, that he had designed a car ( the MDI-TOP) that ran on
pressurized air. Air tanks, like those used by scuba divers, were filled
with air under pressure, using an electric pump. The car, as I remember,
could then travel for up to 200 km and reasonable speeds and acceleration.
It would, of course, emit no CO2 or NOx during use. Polluting gases would
have been emitted to produce the electricity required to pump the air. I
have no further information, would be pleased if someone can correct my
rather vague recollections.

Martin, a student in Chem. 207 (2001)  has kindly given me a reference to a
web site with lots of information about this car:
http://globalstewards.org/aircar.htmThe news items on this web site say
that Mexico City is going to build 40,000 of them for use as taxi's,
starting in 2001. Plans are also underway to build them in the USA and
Europe. However there are skeptics who say that they cannot be safe and will
not have normal safety features in order to reduce weight (they are very
small and lightly built).  I think that we will have to wait and see what
happens.

The above web site says that the cars will use 300L of air at 300 bar ( 4500
psi, see Hydrogen Fuels for a comment of the safety aspects of high pressure
gas in cars)   My calculations show that this is 11,000 mol of air, which,
if all of the energy can be used as it expands to 1 bar pressure, will give
164,000 kJ. This is equivalent to the energy from the combustion of 4L of
gasoline( assuming 100% efficiency), or, allowing for the inefficiencies in
both the air and gasoline engine, 8L of gasoline. The electricity used to
pump the air into the storage tanks is 46 kWh, or, at say 80% efficiency for
pumping, 57 kWh.  This would cost about $5 at $0.09 cents per kWh,  for a
200 km trip.  A good compact gasoline engine car, at 4L per 100 km,  would
use 8L of gasoline, cost about $6.  So there is no great savings in cost
especially if one allows for the fact that the compact gasoline engine car
is larger and safer.  There would, of course, be a big saving in pollution
in the cities and an overall saving if the air was pumped using a renewable
source if energy rather than electricity from fossil fuel plants


-Original Message-
From: Tricia Liu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, February 02, 2003 3:57 AM
To: biofuel@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [biofuel] $2.60 for recharging and the French aircar runs
120 miles



Mexican government bought 40,000 French Air Taxi and going to be delivered
in couple years.
We will have to go to Mexico City to try out the Air Taxi.

Suggested Retail $14,000(Euro 9500), runs 60MPH, range 120 miles.
Charge at station $3 per charge and takes 3 minutes(If we had these
infra-structure available)
Charge at home with a small electric air compressor takes 4 hours, take 20
KWH of electricity.
S.C.Edison is charging 13 cents per KWH, then the cost to charge at home
will be $2.60
And spending $2.60 and I can run 120 miles???  This must be a dream?

Anyone who knows the price of the small home use air compressor?
The price for Air car already included an on-board 5.5KW compressor to
compress air into the tanks!

Happy to know there are about 50 companies want to buy franchises or
manufacturing facilities.
Hope more air cars will be available, personally I will like to take the
Family 6 seater!
Also will see how much they will tax for using AIR, if any!

It's not 100% green, unless the energy to compress air comes from
biomass/solar or wind.
Power plant still using 70% or so fossil oil to generate power!






Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://archive.nnytech.net/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/




Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://archive.nnytech.net/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




[biofuel] Re: Re: Democracy--Nazi Germany was Democratic!???

2003-02-04 Thread Thor Skov

Hakan, Curtis, and others who may have weighed in with
similar opinions,

First, let me apologize for a late response to this
thread—I was both lurking and busy with other matters.

Hakan, you asserted that the Nazi’s had democratic
support and that Fascist Germany and Italy held
elections until the outbreak of war.  But you offer no
facts or evidence to support your view.

In the November 1932 elections, the Nazi Party
garnered 37% of the votes, give or take, and seats in
the Reichstag, more than the combined total of the
next two largest parties, the Social Democrats and the
Communists.  Hardly an absolute majority, but
sufficient in the fragmented political scene of the
Weimar Republic for Hitler was to be appointed
Chancellor by Hindenburg.  After coming to power, he
swiftly dismantled all democratic organs of the state
that could challenge his power.  This is well
documented (see below for a few references).

It is much discussed, the degree to which Hitler had
the support of the German people.  Like Mussolini (and
Roosevelt) he did get the country moving economically,
and reinstilled a sense of national pride and purpose.
 Hitler promised a lot groups in Germany what they
wanted.  Hitler used the Jews and other sections of
society as scapegoats, blaming all the problems on
them.  To many Germans at the time Hitler made sense,
he united the bulk of the German populace by providing
explanations for Germany's problems.

But to say he did so “democratically” seems to me a
gross bastardization of the notion of democracy. 
Hitler may not have “forced himself on the German
people,” but he certainly forced himself on the German
State, rapidly and radically transforming all
governmental institutions to suit his will.  Hitler
quickly and brutally suppressed all opposition,
through the use of the secret police and court system.
 The Reichstag passed the enabling act in March 1933
to give Hitler dictatorial power for 4 years.  Is that
democratic?  The Nazis outlawed other political
parties.  Is that democratic?  The Nazi’s were blatant
and ruthless in their use of force to silence their
critics.  Hitler opened Dachau, the first
concentration camp, also in March 1933, into which
went communists, jews, criminals, and anyone else who
opposed or defied the Nazi Party and its ideology.  Is
that democratic?

Throughout the period of the Third Reich there was
active, clandestine opposition to Hitler within
Germany.  Some books on this topic that may prove
useful: M. Housden, Resistance and Conformity in the
Third Reich, Routledge, 1997. D. Peukert, Inside Nazi
Germany, Penguin, 1987. I. Kershaw, The Nazi
Dictatorship.  M. Burleigh  M. Wippermann, The Racial
State.

There is also disagreement among historians as to just
how much support Hitler had from German
industrialists.  It seems that they had a low opinion
of him at the beginning, but came around after he
crushed the trade unions and offered them lucrative
military contracts.  But industrialists certainly did
not bring Hitler into power.  I’d like to seem some
evidence to support your assertion that the
corporations “created” Hitler.

Also, I can’t imagine where you got the notion that
Germany fought in the Winter War against Finland.  The
Soviet Union and Germany had a non-aggression pact
during that time, in which the Soviets recognized
German’s right to all of Poland except the four
Eastern provinces, and Germany Russia’s right to the
Baltic States and parts of Finland (if Stalin could
take them).  But that is a far cry from Germany
participating in the war against Finland.  If you have
some evidence to the contrary, I’d love to see it.

Hakan, I completely agree with you about “the need to
research real history, instead of repeating the
popular propaganda.”  So show me some real history. 
Because I cannot think of a less democratic state than
Nazi Germany.

Best,

Thor

--
Message: 3
   Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2003 08:17:39 +0100
   From: Hakan Falk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Re: Democracy

I am sorry if you felt offended and did not realize
that until now that you did not realize the fact that
Nazi Germany was a democracy. I did not recognize that
you did belong to the indoctrinated part who believe
that Hitler more or less forced himself on the German
people and not by the more or less ruling corporations
in Germany. The Germans were victims of politics and
propaganda, but it is also important to realize that
this cannot succeed if they are aware of it and know
it.

Regarding Germany, I suggest that you read a little
bit more about history. My mother studied in Germany
37-38 and the Germans was not fully aware of what was
going on, but very supportive to the leaders. When she
came back to Sweden, nobody believed what she was
telling about the persecution of the Jews. She and my
family was active in helping them who made it to
Sweden during and after the war.

As a child, I often heard the 

Re: [biofuel] Land Rover diesel P/U - BC, Canada

2003-02-04 Thread Frederick Finch

How much?  Does it run?


At 02:35 PM 2/4/2003 -0800, you wrote:
Who wants it?

BC, Canada...

60 LANDROVER 2.25L diesel, 88 pastel grn, PU cab, lockers frnt  rear,
twin tanks, batts, PTO winch, htd glass, D90 dr tops, tire carrier, 33
BFG mud TA's, high ratio transf case, rf rack

email me off list if interested.


[EMAIL PROTECTED]



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://archive.nnytech.net/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/



Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://archive.nnytech.net/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




Re: [biofuel] Re: OT: Columbia Space Shuttle Lost

2003-02-04 Thread Greg and April

Comments mixed in below.

Greg H.

- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: biofuel@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 12:22
Subject: Re: [biofuel] Re: OT: Columbia Space Shuttle Lost



If they had determined in space that the Shuttle was not safe to return to
earth the move would have been to send them to the Intl. Space Station



Not possible. The Columbia being the first ( and because it was the first )
was over built to a degree that it was significantly heavier than any of the
fallowing shuttles.  Being heavier, and because no shuttle is ever launched
with more weight than needed for the mission, it did not ( at any time )
have the fuel to reach the Intl. Space Station that was in higher orbit.



where they could have docked and just sat it out until we could send a
different shuttle to get most of them and if there were still two left up
there in the Intl. Space Station they could be brought back in one of the
Russian ships as they have three seats and can be flown by one person.

---

Then would you be leaving the crew of the Intl. Space Station in danger?
There is one and only one escape ship at the Intl. Space Station.  Each time
a Russian capsule goes up, they take the one that was left there from the
time before, back down to earth.



They
may also have been able to stay until the second shuttle arrival if that
was determined to be the better solution.  Keeping in mind that if the
Columbia had been determined to be unsafe in space we may not have felt
that it was required to ground the fleet until we have clear answers as to
what the cause is and we would know the problem and cause from the
information that was developed to determine that they should not try the
reentry in it.

--

That is fine, but, they had no way of knowing it wasn't safe, and no way to
find out. Even if they did, I think that you are forgetting that there is
only a limited supply of food, air, and water available (even the space
station is low on water at this point), and the fastest the next shuttle
could be ready is/was 2 months. Each shuttle goes through a 3-4 month
refurbishment to make sure they are safe.   If it was the foam from the
external tank, that caused the problem, the rest of the shuttles would still
be grounded until a solution could be found, tested, and new tanks made,
they would not jeopardize a different shuttle with a tank that was covered
with the old foam.





Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://archive.nnytech.net/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




RE: [biofuel]palm source

2003-02-04 Thread Keith Addison

Hi Myles

David-

And the numbers in such tables can be widely disparate.

Naturally - the situation they're grown in, the growing methods, and 
much besides, are also widely disparate.

We use rather low averages, I've said here a few times that any 
small-scale grower could almost certainly do very much better.

For example, Euphorbia Lathyris, in Tickell (see
http://attra.ncat.org/attra-pub/biodiesel.html ) is rated as the 2nd highest
non-tree plant source of oil at 1119kg-oil/hectare, while at
journeytoforever it is only rated at 440kg-oil/hectare (below pumpkinseed)
and in fact 11% higher yield than rapeseed.
Meanwhile, Oil Palm at 5000kg oil/hectare is rated in both places as the
highest yielding tree.

So for trees, the answer's clear: oil palm.
For bushes, castor bean.
For smaller plants, it's hard to tell---I contend it's euphorbia lathyris
(gopher plant), but that may still be a matter of dispute

I don't think it's very relevant anyway, yield is only one factor and 
often not the most important one, unless you're doing monocrops, the 
most expensive and troublesome way. More important is which crop fits 
the local requirements best. That is most likely to be several crops, 
integrated with the rest of the farming operations. Low input, high 
output. If you do it wrong you can use exactly the same crop(s) to 
achieve (?) high input low output.

meanwhile it
grows better than anything else in our yard and nearly all year round here
in Portland, Oregon---very wild, free and productiveI just don't know a
cheap easy way to get oil from it safely (elements of the plant are
considered toxic or cancerous).

http://www.hort.purdue.edu/newcrop/duke_energy/Euphorbia_lathyris.html
Euphorbia lathyris

http://www.hort.purdue.edu/newcrop/proceedings1990/V1-232.html#Euphorbia
Arid-land Industrial Crops

Try a search here:
Plants For A Future
http://www.ibiblio.org/pfaf/D_search.html

Best

Keith


-Myles Twete, Portland

-Original Message-
From: Keith Addison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 11:30 AM
To: biofuel@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [biofuel]palm source


 If you can't find the info online, there is a wonderful by Josh Tickel
 called From the Fryer to the Fuel Tank which has charts with this data.
 ---
 Jesse Parris  |  studio53  |  53 maitland rd  |  stamford, ct  06906
 203.324.4371www.jesseparris.com/

Vegetable oil yields
http://journeytoforever.org/biodiesel_yield.html

Keith

 - Original Message -
 From: Crabb, David [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: biofuel@yahoogroups.com
 Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 12:48 PM
 Subject: RE: [biofuel]palm source
 
 
   Does anyone know what species produces the most oil?
  
   how about maturity times?
  
   thanks


Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://archive.nnytech.net/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




RE: [biofuel]palm source

2003-02-04 Thread Keith Addison

And on that note, I sent off some email a while back for some Jatropha
seeds and have still not received any information back from Reinhard.  I
am kinda miffed cause he was a poster quite often here and on
biofuels-biz.  Anyone know of a seed source?


Try ECHO:
http://www.echonet.org/
ECHO: Networking Global Hunger Solutions

Best

Keith


James Slayden

On Tue, 4 Feb 2003, Crabb, David wrote:

  Does anyone know what species produces the most oil?
 
  how about maturity times?
 
  thanks


Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://archive.nnytech.net/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




Re: [biofuel] (fwd) [ETList] Top Ten Myths about Ethanol

2003-02-04 Thread Robby Davenport

if ethanol causes canser the booze industry (which I have supported for 
25 years) is screwed . and I guess so am I!! Robby

murdoch wrote:

Last one for now.

From:
http://www.ethanol.org/Information/Myths%20about%20Ethanol.htm

Top Ten Myths about Ethanol
(according to your friends at the MTBE industry, as listed on a pro-MTBE
website)

1 - Ethanol is listed as a known human carcinogen by the International
Agency for Research on Cancer.

Ethanol Response:  Ethanol has been found to cause liver cancer for heavy
drinkers.  Ethanol used in gasoline has not been found to pose any risk to
human health.  Quite the opposite is true for virtually every chemical in
gasoline that ethanol replaces, including benzene and MTBE, which is listed
as a possible human carcinogen.

2 - The cost of Reformulated Gasoline with ethanol will increase 3-6 cents
per gallons compared to RFG with MTBE.

Ethanol Response:  It is doubtful that the cost of Reformulated Gasoline
will increase with ethanol instead of MTBE.  Any cost increase would be more
than offset by what taxpayers will save in not having to clean up pollution
caused by MTBE.

3 - Spills of pure ethanol or gasoline containing ethanol from leaking
storage tanks can create a benzene plume up to 150% larger than a spill from
a non-ethanol fuel.

Ethanol Response:  First off, how could a spill of pure ethanol create a
benzene plume?  That pretty much shows you how accurate their accusations
are.  Studies on benzene plums are incomplete and inconclusive.  In
addition, ethanol would reduce the chances of benzene getting into the
ground and the groundwater because ethanol effectively reduces the amount of
benzene in gasoline by diluting it to lower levels when ethanol is added to
gasoline.

4 - Ethanol cannot be shipped by pipeline because of its high affinity for
water posing significant distribution costs and hurdles for gasoline
blenders.

Ethanol Response:  Ethanol has been shipped via pipeline.  Technology is
improving that will allow for greater distribution of ethanol via pipeline,
including processes whereby the pipeline companies are able to remove the
water and other contaminants from their pipelines, which will improve the
quality of all fuels shipped via pipeline.  Ethanol shipped via rail and
barge from the Midwestern United States to places like California is still
much more cost efficient then shipping oil, gasoline and MTBE from the
Middle East.

5 - According to a study by Cornell University, for every gallon of ethanol
produced, 1.4 gallons of energy is consumed in the process, compared to 0.15
gallons used in the manufacture of gasoline.

Ethanol Response:  The widely touted, and tragically flawed Cornell
University Study has been discredited in numerous ways.  For one, many of
the assumptions made in the study have been shown to be inaccurate.  For
example, the study uses numbers that portray all the corn grown in the
United States as having come from irrigated fields.  In reality, only 15% of
the corn grown in the United States is grown under irrigation.  Secondly,
many other credible studies show that there is much more energy in a gallon
of ethanol than it takes to produce it, including a benchmark study by the
United States Department of Agriculture.  Copies of those studies can be
found at the American Coalition for Ethanol website (www.ethanol.org).

6 - It takes 1.5 gallons of ethanol to drive as many miles as one gallon of
gasoline.

Ethanol Response:  This is a misleading statement since no one drives on
pure ethanol.  Most motorists will not notice any difference in mileage
using the standard 10% ethanol blend.  For trivia purposes, it takes only
about 8 ozs. of MTBE to pollute an Olympic-size swimming pool and make the
water virtually undrinkable.

7 - Every gallon of ethanol removes 53 cents from the Federal Highway Trust
Fund because of a special tax break for producers.

Ethanol Response:  Congress has determined that it is good tax policy to tax
ethanol blends less than straight gasoline.  It is a reflection of the
reduced costs of using ethanol compared to using gasoline and MTBE.  No tax
dollars are used to clean up pollution caused by ethanol, yet billions of
dollars are used to clean up and deal with MTBE and gasoline pollution in
the ground, the air and the water.  In addition, there is no cost to
taxpayers to militarily secure a supply of ethanol.  Also, ethanol
production and use, which is located in the United States, adds jobs and
money to our economy by reducing the amount of oil and MTBE the United
States needs to import and by creating markets for surplus farm products.

8 - Ethanol increases the vapor pressure of gasoline by 1 psi. resulting in
higher evaporative emissions of Volatile Organic Compounds, while tailpipe
emissions of Acetaldehyde increase 150%.

Ethanol Response:  This is another example of twisting the truth.  All
gasoline, whether it has ethanol in it or not, has to meet government
standards with regards to 

Re: [biofuel] Re: Re: Democracy--Nazi Germany was Democratic!???

2003-02-04 Thread Hakan Falk


Dear Thor,

I am familiar with this and more, but if you go through
democratic systems, without direct or proportional
representation, the wrong guy can come to power and
this without representing the popular vote. US have such
a system and the current president is an example on
that. It is true that the Nazis and Hitler hijacked the
democracy, I have never claimed anything else, The
fact is however that he came to power trough democratic
vote and in a democracy. Sharon in Israel have roughly
the same popular base as Hitler had in the beginning.

It is many other factors to consider in the German history.
Among them the piece in Versailles who was enormously
stupid and the major reason for creating an environment
were such a sick person as Hitler could be seen as a
salvation. He also became dictator by democratic means,
as you rightfully pointed out. Why Hitler got his powers
was because of the terrorist acts that history show was
engineered by the Nazis themselves. I think that it was
an early version of Homeland defence.

Yes, the industrialists saw Hitler as a fairly dumb puppet.
That made them underestimate him and they thought
that he would deliver, which he also partly did.

It is good that you clarified the history a bit and it is a lot
more to it. Please read what you wrote a couple of times
and draw some parallels with things that happens in some
of todays democracies. You will see the picture also and
understand why I am worried. I am not saying that it will
develop along the same lines, only that it is similarities.

If you read what I am saying, you have to agree that Hitler
came into power in a democracy. He got his power by
democratic means and in a crisis situation, which could
be extended by the war situation that the country was in.

Yes, it was German resistance and I have even met some
of them when I was young in the 50's. Friends of my mother,
from the time 1936 to 1937, when she studied in Munich.
It was a much larger resistance to Hitler among intellectuals
and students than todays history implies.

Historic judgements and evaluations can always be made
and balanced ones starts to be accepted not until around
100 years after the events. It is difficult to judge before that.
I have a mother in law who, during the Spanish civil war,
refused to dance with the commander of the socialist forces
(not Franco, but the good guys according my Swedish
history). The day after, her 16 year old brother was arrested
and executed, without any reasons or political involvement.

Hakan


At 04:52 PM 2/4/2003 -0800, you wrote:
Hakan, Curtis, and others who may have weighed in with
similar opinions,

First, let me apologize for a late response to this
thread÷I was both lurking and busy with other matters.

Hakan, you asserted that the Naziâs had democratic
support and that Fascist Germany and Italy held
elections until the outbreak of war.  But you offer no
facts or evidence to support your view.

In the November 1932 elections, the Nazi Party
garnered 37% of the votes, give or take, and seats in
the Reichstag, more than the combined total of the
next two largest parties, the Social Democrats and the
Communists.  Hardly an absolute majority, but
sufficient in the fragmented political scene of the
Weimar Republic for Hitler was to be appointed
Chancellor by Hindenburg.  After coming to power, he
swiftly dismantled all democratic organs of the state
that could challenge his power.  This is well
documented (see below for a few references).

It is much discussed, the degree to which Hitler had
the support of the German people.  Like Mussolini (and
Roosevelt) he did get the country moving economically,
and reinstilled a sense of national pride and purpose.
  Hitler promised a lot groups in Germany what they
wanted.  Hitler used the Jews and other sections of
society as scapegoats, blaming all the problems on
them.  To many Germans at the time Hitler made sense,
he united the bulk of the German populace by providing
explanations for Germany's problems.

But to say he did so ãdemocraticallyä seems to me a
gross bastardization of the notion of democracy.
Hitler may not have ãforced himself on the German
people,ä but he certainly forced himself on the German
State, rapidly and radically transforming all
governmental institutions to suit his will.  Hitler
quickly and brutally suppressed all opposition,
through the use of the secret police and court system.
  The Reichstag passed the enabling act in March 1933
to give Hitler dictatorial power for 4 years.  Is that
democratic?  The Nazis outlawed other political
parties.  Is that democratic?  The Naziâs were blatant
and ruthless in their use of force to silence their
critics.  Hitler opened Dachau, the first
concentration camp, also in March 1933, into which
went communists, jews, criminals, and anyone else who
opposed or defied the Nazi Party and its ideology.  Is
that democratic?

Throughout the period of the Third Reich there was
active, clandestine opposition 

Re: [biofuel]palm source

2003-02-04 Thread Ken Riznyk [EMAIL PROTECTED]

I found this web site  http://www.miles2go.com/suc2.htm  

--- In biofuel@yahoogroups.com, James Slayden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 And on that note, I sent off some email a while back for some 
Jatropha
 seeds and have still not received any information back from 
Reinhard.  I
 am kinda miffed cause he was a poster quite often here and on
 biofuels-biz.  Anyone know of a seed source?
 
 
 James Slayden
 
 On Tue, 4 Feb 2003, Crabb, David wrote:
 
  Does anyone know what species produces the most oil?
  
  how about maturity times?
  
  thanks
  
  
  Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
  http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
  
  Biofuels list archives:
  http://archive.nnytech.net/
  
  Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
  To unsubscribe, send an email to:
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of 
Service.
 



Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://archive.nnytech.net/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




Re: [biofuel] Re: Re: Democracy--Nazi Germany was Democratic!???

2003-02-04 Thread Hakan Falk


Thor,

I wanted to take the winter war separately, see
below.

At 04:52 PM 2/4/2003 -0800, you wrote:
snip
Also, I can't imagine where you got the notion that
Germany fought in the Winter War against Finland.  The
Soviet Union and Germany had a non-aggression pact
during that time, in which the Soviets recognized
German's right to all of Poland except the four
Eastern provinces, and Germany Russia's right to the
Baltic States and parts of Finland (if Stalin could
take them).  But that is a far cry from Germany
participating in the war against Finland.  If you have
some evidence to the contrary, I'd love to see it.

Both of my parents was in the Swedish voluntary forces
in Finland and I guess that I have a tendency to belive
what they told me.

If you come by my place some time, I can show
you a video made from my fathers 8 mm films during
his service as physician in the Winter War. One sequence
show a shot down Nazi fighter plane, I guess that this
could serve well as proof. My mother was serving as
nurse in Rovanemi during the Winter War. Hitler provided
air support for Stalin during the winter war, as he did
for Franco in the Spanish civil war.

The Nazis participated on the Finnish side in the
continuation war and the they fought against Stalin.
Maybe you want some proof of that too. My father
was there too, but my mother stayed home in Sweden
because I was born in May 1941.


snip

Best,

Thor



Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://archive.nnytech.net/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




[biofuel] Introduction and some questions - Newbie

2003-02-04 Thread Rui Fernandes

Hi,

I am a gearhead first and foremost.  A friend of mine has a VW Jetta diesel
(TDI) and he introduced me to Biodiesel. I do not currently own a diesel
vehicle but I am looking to convert my Toyota LandCruiser to diesel, plus I
want to look at the potential of using a biofuel for heating oil.  I found the
idea of using WVO very attractive.
It seems to me from what I am reading (please correct me if I am wrong) that
the key for producing biodiesel is having an effective continuous process
right?  I have looked at all kinds of websites that talk about having developed
some kind of continuous process, but I have not found any real info. Any
suggestions?
The only really interesting info that I found was at
http://www.biodieselgear.com/documentation/
where there is document (Methanol Super Critical Transesterification Method)
where it is dicussed that under the right circumstances you can produce
biodiesel without acid or base, and in 4 minutes.  This type of process seems
to be more inline with the requirements of a continuous process.  The drawback
is the required pressure of 35 MPa (~5600 psi) and temperature of 350C.  At
first it looked like this was out of reach of a garage project, but maybe
with some careful planning...  Has anyone looked at the pressures produced by
direct injection fuel pumps?  The Dodge/Cummins direct injection pump puts out
24000 psi... Hmmm

By the way I live in the Boston area and would love to look at how Biodiesel is
actually produced.  Anyone live close by that has a running setup for
processing biodiesel that would be willing to share/show how biodiesel is
actualy produced..

Thanks,
-Rui 

=
-
Rui Fernandes
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Boston - USA
-

__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com


Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://archive.nnytech.net/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




Re: [biofuel] Re: Re: Democracy--Nazi Germany wasDemocratic!???

2003-02-04 Thread MH

 Please read what you wrote a couple of times
 and draw some parallels with things that happens in some
 of todays democracies. You will see the picture also and
 understand why I am worried. I am not saying that it will
 develop along the same lines, only that it is similarities.

 I did just that Haken.  You and Thor make some interesting
 points.  Over here in the USA Homeland I've been reading from
 the *Veterans for Common Sense*  www.veteransforcommonsense.org
 who have been posting some interesting thoughts about current
 events and commentaries listed below each article submitted. 

 There's been several interesting articles and one
 that caught my attention is called --

 US Reaps Grim Harvest of Chem/Bio Sales to Iraq
 Anne Summers Sydney Morning Herald 
  www.smh.com.au/articles/2003/02/02/1044122258580.html
 Febrary 3, 2003 
 http://www.veteransforcommonsense.org/article.asp?id=334

 Ultimately, the West is a source of any weapons of mass destruction in Iraq's 
hands.
 A lot of people are asking how President George Bush and his Defence Secretary,
 Donald Rumsfeld, are so certain, given the inconclusive nature of the UN 
weapons
 inspectors' findings, that Iraq possess weapons of mass destruction. Here's 
how ... 


 It's not related to Nazis or biofuel but what appears
 to be the peculiarities within US democracy.  

 __

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://archive.nnytech.net/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/