[swinog] E-Mail Address has changed
Guten Tag Diese Mailbox ist nicht mehr gltig. Ihr Mail wird an [EMAIL PROTECTED] weitergeleitet. Bitte kontaktieren sie fr geschftliche Angelegenheiten, die nicht so lange warten knnen entweder Herrn Steven Glogger ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) oder [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mit freundlichen Grssen easynet AG -- Hi This Mailbox is not valid anymore. Your mail has been forwarded to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For urgent business matters, please contact either Steven Glogger ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) or [EMAIL PROTECTED] Best regards, easynet AG ___ swinog mailing list swinog@swinog.ch http://lists.init7.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
Re: [swinog] Experiences with Foundry Bigiron-gear
BigIron is a Switch - not a router... O.k. - maybe Foundry says, it's a router. But when you try to do some advanced routing on that box - forget it... That's my experience with those things - you might hear other... Cheers, Viktor On Mittwoch 01 Dezember 2004 12.05, Gunther Stammwitz wrote: Hello colleagues, At the moment we're using Cisco 12000 gear in our network and now I'd like to buy another router in order to increase our redundancy. Another provided pointed at his foundry bigiron 8000 and told me how well it is running. Okay.. What he didn't know where the technical facts like pps or where the asic is (on the line- or management card) and so on but he said that the machine can sustain a dos attack of up to a gigabit without problems. Anyone here who has experience with the Bigiron series and would like to share some thoughts? Please feel free to contact me via pm too :-)) Thanks for your help in advance, Gunther ___ swinog mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.init7.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog ___ swinog mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.init7.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
Re: [swinog] TIX problems ?
No problems here - everything normal... On Dienstag 30 November 2004 15.40, Jerome Tissieres wrote: Hello all, Did some of you had problems/strange things at TIX today at 3:30 PM ? We lost some peers on the public IX and a card on another router crashed exactly at the same time... Thanks, Jerome ___ swinog mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.init7.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog ___ swinog mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.init7.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
Re: [swinog] FOTD -- Fun of the day
According to the whois entry, they are located in Utah, which has 8 hours of time difference to Switzerland... So they'll probably notice it in 1-2 hours... :-) Cheers, Viktor On Montag 29 November 2004 14.35, Stefan Rothenbühler wrote: Hacked by realloc ;) Thats nice. But they didn't notice yet. ___ swinog mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.init7.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
Re: [swinog] New meaning of Networking
This happens, when a techie explains something to his manager, the manager explains it to sales, sales to marketing and marketing does the default-answers for the support-team... :-) SCNR ___ swinog mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.init7.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
Re: [swinog] New meaning of Networking
worldwide. According to Econophone's Support you can even attach two devices at the same time so both phones will ring if someone calls your number. Whoever picks up the phone first gets the call. Is that the same Support that wrote the other answer? ah - allright... never mind... *g* ___ swinog mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.init7.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
Re: [swinog] looking for a 7200VXR300/400
Since Swisscom is replacing all Ciscos in the BBCS backbone with Junipers, maybe they'll have to sell some used Ciscos soon? Does anybody know, what they are doing with the old stuff? Just because it's too weak/small/old for Swisscom, doesn't mean it's crap... On Donnerstag 18 November 2004 11.45, Pascal Gloor wrote: Hi SwiNOG'ers I'm looking for a 7200-VXR300 or 400 for a good price indeed :-) No need to send me URLs of ebay, I know where it is :-P I write here to ask you if you have such a router, not to ask about URLs :-) Pascal ___ swinog mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.init7.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
Re: [swinog] ITU wants to clog routers
Interesting It's clear, that the NRO doesn't like the idea... but it would definitely solve many problems, if IP space was assigned per country... (yes, I know, that the RIRs would still exist, but let's assume, that ALL IP-Space would only be assigned by countries) - Webshops who may not sell to certain countries could simply block some ranges - You could block mail with IPs from nigeria in them to never again receive mails from people who want to give you millions of $$$ - Route aggregation would be easy On the other hand there are also some negatives: - Countries like China could easily filter out traffic from US sites or any other country they don't like - International provides would have to get netblocks in each country they operate in, not only one large block at a cenral location But since IPv6 is never going into large-scale production, this discussion is maculature anyway :-) Cheers, Viktor On Donnerstag 18 November 2004 15.20, Peter Keel wrote: http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/53394 The ITU would like to delegate IPv6-addressblocks to states, most probably resulting in huge routing-tables. Here's the document, take a look at section 4.2b http://www.itu.int/ITU-T/tsb-director/itut-wsis/files/zhao-netgov01.pdf Here's what the NRO thinks about it: http://www.nro.net/documents/pdf/nro17.pdf Seegras ___ swinog mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.init7.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
[swinog] Steinmann V2.0 here
Hi all My wife and I are happy to announce that our daughter Anna Sophie was born yesterday (tuesday, 19.10) at 14:15 - or in binary form: 1 + 1 = 11 :-) Pics and more will follow this weekend on www.stony.com. Cheers, Viktor ___ swinog mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.init7.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
Re: [swinog] TIX Problem?
Sorry - not really a flap, if it lasts for 40 minutes, huh ;-) On Donnerstag 30 September 2004 14.09, Viktor Steinmann wrote: We see the flap too... On Donnerstag 30 September 2004 14.06, Pascal Gloor wrote: We lost 6 peers about 30 minutes ago. Others seems to have the same. What's wrong? Power? Switch problem? Pascal ___ swinog mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.init7.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog ___ swinog mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.init7.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
Re: [swinog] TIX Problem?
Lost peers are: 8404, 13030, 6805, 8327, 21232, 24889 Or cleartext: Cablecom, Init7, Telefonica, Deckpoint, GGA Maur, Monzoon Strange combination, isn't it ... On Donnerstag 30 September 2004 14.20, Michel Renfer wrote: Hi André No. At least not on the Foundry Switch. Maybe you have a Spanning-Tree problem? No, at least not on our port... actually we lost 6 peers (including cablecom and init7). Rest is working normally. cheers, michel ___ swinog mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.init7.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog ___ swinog mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.init7.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
Re: [swinog] SwissIX announces free peering ports
Very cool, Fredy Looking forward to price reduction @ TIX :-) Viktor On Donnerstag 16 September 2004 22.03, Fredy Kuenzler wrote: Dear all, We are happy to announce that, effective October 1st, 2004, recurring fees for peering ports will be waived. No more monthly or yearly charges! Thanks to all SwissIX sponsors! Please check out the website: http://www.swissix.ch/ If you would like to get connected, please follow this procedure: http://www.swissix.ch/how_to_get_connected.php SwissIX is now online on 3 locations: InterXion, IXEurope-1, iwb Basel. In the next few days, IXEurope-2 will be available too. Happy peering! Fredy ___ swinog mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.init7.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog ___ swinog mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.init7.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
Re: [swinog] Reply-to: header [was: Re: WAN link provider]
Agree with Daniel. When replying on a mailing-list, I know, that my answer goes to the list. Don't change that. Viktor On Montag 13 September 2004 23.01, Daniel Lorch wrote: Hi It only generates confusion and embarrassment, and I think we should be able to rely on people being able to use their mailer's reply to all feature when they want to write followups. 1000% ACK ... Don't patronise us! -1 (I'm lazy, I like it this way) Daniel ___ swinog mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.init7.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog ___ swinog mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.init7.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
Re: [swinog] DNS black listing
We don't use it, but I guess it makes sense against DOS attacks on UDP protocols. By blocking unassigned IP Blocks on the border of your network, you can at least prevent some of the DOS traffic Cheers, Viktor On Freitag 10 September 2004 09.04, Frédéric jachiet wrote: Hi all, Does someone already heard about DNS Black listing ? We had the phenomen with a new block of IP adresses from RIPE that wasn't allowed to make DNS query by some DNS Server. Is it something used by ISP on this list ? Cheers, Fred ___ swinog mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.init7.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
Re: [swinog] REQUEST: Off topic
Usually providers will sponsor bandwidth and/or rackspace - but not money (except the big players). But if somebody should really look into this request, then I think it would be a good idea to state the approximate amount, that an ISP would have to invest in this. Regards, Viktor On Wed, 1 Sep 2004 13:02:27 +0200 Ladu, Daniele [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ... What do we need ? As we are not able to start our project, without paying the IFPI Annual Fee, we need a sponsor, who can help us regarding this payment. ___ swinog mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.init7.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
Re: [swinog] Telco IT Afterwork Party
I received that invitation by unsolicited mail and ergo it was considered as spam. Don't know, if anybody wants to join an afterwork party organized by spammers... On Mittwoch, 25. August 2004 10.37, Alexis Caceda wrote: Already heard about that? (Sorry for the German) Morgen Mittwoch findet die erste Afterwork Party der Telco IT in Zürich statt. Wir hoffen auf viel Begeisterung. Immer Mittwochs, von 17h bis 20h, in einer angenehmen und atmosphärischen Umgebung - im lebendigen Kreis Föif mitten in Zürich. - www.saeulenhalle.ch Al ___ swinog mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.init7.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog ___ swinog mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.init7.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
Re: [swinog] geek count + 1
Whow! Congratulations - all the best to you and your family! Viktor At 01:19 15.08.2004, you wrote: Was supposed to be a girl, but ROOT decided something else for us. On friday the 13th of August I became a daddy! pics 'n' stuff on http://www.spale.com/esteban/ ;-) Pascal ___ swinog mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.init7.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
Re: [swinog] bandwidth limitation
Every decent Cisco router with a recent IOS is capable of this... E.g. a 3640 or so... Cheers, Viktor On Donnerstag, 5. August 2004 17.31, Gabriel Boissonnard wrote: Hello, Let's say we have IP transit from a provider, and would like to split it between several customers. Number of customer is small (10). Example: Provider | 5Mbps -Our POP- |1Mbps |512kbps |512kbps |3Mbps Cust.1 Cust.2Cust.3Cust.4 We therefore need some sort of equipment capable of bandwidth limitation or trafic shaping in our POP. How would you solve that, which kind of equipment in our POP? Any prefered manufacturer? Thanks, Gabriel ___ swinog mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.init7.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog ___ swinog mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.init7.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
[swinog] Swisscom's Money-Making Machine
Girls and Boys Let me tell you a fairy tale. Once upon a time, it was summer and the birds were singing in the trees, there was a telco, who chose to replace some cabling in their telephone exchange. Unfortunately, they made a mistake and a leased line service went down. Suddenly, the birds stopped singing and the sky was overclouding. Since it was a friday afternoon, and the SLA for that leased line was just standard, this telco wasn't aware, that they had made a mistake. Fortunately, the guys who were impacted by this outage, made the telco aware of this failure and asked them politely to fix the problem as soon as possible. The telco agreed to fix the leased line immediately. Of course, they would charge 1'600 gold pieces to the stupid guys who dared to ask, to do it immediately. Remeber - it was just a standard SLA. And why would anyone use a leased line on a weekend? Some poor telco engineer had to travel far, far away to that exchange and fix the line on friday evening, when he could have spent some quality time with his wife and children. So, dear girls and boys, what can we learn from this? If you want to get rich quick, you have to break stuff, and then let someone pay you to fix it in useful time. Thanks for your attention, Viktor -- Viktor Steinmann - System and Network Engineer Easynet AG, Hardturmstrasse 135, 8005 Zuerich, Switzerland Phone: +41 1 560 32 00, Fax: +41 1 560 32 01 ___ swinog mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.init7.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
Re: [swinog] Swisscom's Money-Making Machine
On Dienstag, 3. August 2004 15.00, Stanislav Sinyagin wrote: You haven't still answered my question: according to the contract terms, what's Swisscom's commitment to fix the service that is broken on Friday afternoon? The standard SLA says, that Swisscom only fixes problems during workhours. So that means, that Friday 17:00 they drop their screwdriver and re-start working on the problem Monday 08:00. That's what's on paper. Real life experience is again somewhat different: If you tell them on Friday afternoon at 14:30, that you have a problem, they don't even start working on it, because they assume, that they won't have fixed it until 17:00 anyway - so they start working on it a Monday 11:00 (they have to drink their coffee first). Cheers, Viktor ___ swinog mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.init7.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
[swinog] Congratulations to DE-CIX
(german only, sorry) http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/47909 20 GBit/s going through DE-CIX - I think that's somehow like a birthday. Therefore: CONGRATULATIONS ...and thanks for helping make the internet faster ;-) Viktor -- Viktor Steinmann - System and Network Engineer Easynet AG, Hardturmstrasse 135, 8005 Zuerich, Switzerland Phone: +41 1 560 32 00, Fax: +41 1 560 32 01 ___ swinog mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.init7.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
Re: separate Spam List? (was: Re: [swinog] Hegi is spamming over spamcom)
/me raises his hand We all know, that Spam is bad. But handling our abuse-box is already enough for most of us on the list - no need to share that experience every time it occurs... Cheers, Viktor On Freitag, 30. April 2004 16.12, Fredy Kuenzler wrote: Andre Oppermann wrote: I would very much prefer if you or anyone else would keep this SPAM reports to the newsgroups ch.admin to keep the level of useless junk at least here down. Ist there a need for spam / abuse / postmaster list? I agree with Andre that abuse / uce issues should not be discussed here. ch.admin is, unfortunately, a junkbox too. Please raise your hands. F. ___ swinog mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.init7.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog ___ swinog mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.init7.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
Re: [swinog] ns1.ip-plus.net
I don't think, that the bandwith aspect is even worth mentioning... at least my NetFlow Statistics say so... I guess, this protection of their DNS servers is not done because of bandwidth but because of security concerns (as many others before me already mentioned here). Cheers, Viktor On Freitag, 30. April 2004 00.39, Matthias Hertzog wrote: BTW: Would be interesting, how man bandwith they saved with that change. M.H. ___ swinog mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.init7.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
Re: [swinog] MD5 Hype
Same here all I hear when asking some people who *know* what's going on give more or less an answer sounding like: I could tell you, but then I'd have to kill you... Cheers, Viktor On Montag, 19. April 2004 11.37, Alexander Bochmann wrote: Hi, ...on Sat, Apr 17, 2004 at 11:21:24AM +0200, Fredy Kuenzler wrote: We got dozens of MD5 requests in the last 48 hours, so I guess it must be a really big mess. It seems it's more like only very few people know how big the mess is, and all the info I can get (as almost everyone else, it seems) is in the line of yes, there is a problem, but we can't tell you what it is - using MD5 will help, though. I still don't think this is a responsible way to deal with a vulnerability that is rumored to affect basic internet infrastructure - seems more like some people who bought an advance notification service from some security company or router vendor want to see their investment pay off. Alex. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/
Re: [swinog] Phonecall: Spam from Baertsch Buerobedarf
Humm... the business-model of these guys is just great: - Spam like hell and make e-mail communication obsolete - People start using paper and copiers again for their correspondence - They sell even more office supplies ...or maybe NOT! SCNR, Viktor On Donnerstag, 15. April 2004 10.05, Benoit Panizzon wrote: Hi All Just had a phonecall to that company. They assured me that they only took addresses from legal sources Twixtel Addresses without a *. They did also collect addresses from public internet databases (I assume he means switch whois even if he couldn't tell me). Anyway, he sees nothing wrong in opt-out like they offer in their spammail. Typical Spamer I would say :-( -Benoit- -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/ -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/
Re: [swinog] Lambdanet ready to peer @TIX
No offense, but isn't LambdaNet the company that has gone broke last week? (Insolvenz) Cheers, Viktor On Monday 23 February 2004 15:22, Peering-Tech wrote: Dear TIX members, Lambdanet have just connected to the TIX. We have published our peering details and requirements at http://peering.lambdanet.net We have already contacted several networks directly, however we also invite all other members to fill in our online request if interested in peering and if you believe you can fulfill our requirements. Please directly reply to this e-mail for any other questions. Kind regards Karsten About LambdaNet: Connecting key European data centres and more than 100 cities in 12 countries, LambdaNet's 22,000-kilometer fibre and IP network is one of the most powerful and closely woven networks in Europe, servicing more than 230 customers. Its European customer base is stable, serving a broad range of telecommunications operators (telcos, voice/access, mobile, ISP, ASP and CATV) including Vodafone D2, Cable Wireless and Telia within Europe and into the East Coast of the USA. Additionally, LambdaNet operates Metropolitan Area Networks (MANs) in fourteen European centers of business - London, Amsterdam, Brussels, Paris, Marseille, Bordeaux, Strasburg, Lyon, Madrid, Vienna, Frankfurt, Dusseldorf, Munich and Hamburg. LambdaNet Group offers traditional transport services (wavelength, bandwidth and collocation services) and delivers higher value services that include advanced IP transport (IP Transit, Virtual Private Networks). For more information, please visit www.lambdanet.net - Karsten Koepp IP Network Planning and Peering Lambdanet Communications Deutschland AG (AS13237) Guenther-Wagner-Allee 13 D-30177 Hannover (Germany) Phone +49 (0)511 / 84 88 - 12 55 Fax +49 (0)511 / 84 88 - 12 59 Mobile +49 (0)173 / 6 29 - 12 55 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] News Facts on our Website: www.lambdanet.net - -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/ -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/
Re: [swinog] Limiting Bandwidth on Cisco 3550 XL Switchport
(maybe not the thing you're looking for, but IHMO the best solution) If you have a spare machine (can be a 486), you can install FreeBSD with dummynet (trafficshaper) there and simply enter the IPs of the machines you would like to slow down (dummynet can even create random packet loss or latencies etc. :-)) Of course the machine needs 2 network interfaces and is basically a single point of failure... but it's cheap :-) If you have 2 machines, you can put them both in and configure them as bridges - then your single point of failure is gone and you have a nice trafficshaper-solution, which can even be used as a stateful firewall to protect the hosts attached to that switch... (with ipfw2) Cheers, Viktor On Monday 16 February 2004 16:58, Tobias Glasow wrote: Hi Guys, i'm looking for a fast an easy way to setup a maximum bandwith a port of a cisco catalyst 3550 switch can use (e.g. 512 kbit/s) (wow, a sentence with 3 a's :)) Options like limit-rate are not available :( Does anyone have a short piece of config for me? Thanks, Tobias -- Magnet.ch AG Güterstrasse 86 CH-4053 Basel T 0842 420 420 F 0842 420 422 eMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] WWW: http://www.magnet.ch -- Magnet.ch AG - Ihr unabhängiger Internet Provider -- -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/ -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/
Re: [swinog] Again, Cablecom filtering!
Cablecom gave SwiNOG a contact address... email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fax.: +41 1 277 95 12 Why not use that? Cheers, Viktor On Thursday 05 February 2004 14:54, Peter Baumann wrote: Hello I have again a problem with the strange email cablecom-filtering. We have a customer here which got A NEW IP-RANGE from colt-telecom. This customer cannot connect to mx.hispeed.ch port 25. The customer is now complaining that he cannot send email to swissonline.ch and hispeed.ch, the same like usually. I checked this, it seems that there's a filter for this new ip-range, why? How can you filter new ip-ranges which were never used before? AND YES, I'VE SETUP REVERSE DNS FOR THIS HOST! the src-ip is: 212.203.75.130 The src-ip-range is: 212.203.75.128/29 I sent an email some days ago to the proposed contact: [EMAIL PROTECTED], I never got an answer back. Can anyone from cablecom contact me directly to solve this problem asap. +41 44 200 00 00 Thanks Peter -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/ -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/
[swinog] Looking for Hardware
Hi guys I'm willing to buy 1 x Cisco 1601 2 x WIC-1T I'll pay about 200-300 CHF for the Router and about 150 CHF for 1 WIC. Love it or leave it. Thanks Viktor -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/
Re: [swinog] be-event?
The BE organisator (Gloggi) is currently quite busy - so he doesn't find too much time to organize a BE right now. But I guess, he'll organize one for late january/early february... But who needs beer at these temparatures anyway... I'd rather settle for some hot tea... *b* (nobody says, that you cannot put some rum inside) :-) Cheers, Viktor On Thursday 15 January 2004 09:15, Roger Buchwalder wrote: Hello Can me please tell me somebody when the next be-event-zh is? Maybe i've got the forget-virus... greets Rog -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/ -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/
[swinog] UPS and AirCo
If anybody is interested in the following hardware, please contact me off-list... - Gutor- 20KW USV Anlage (Neupreis CHF 14'500.-) - Sanyo Split Klimaanlage 10.6 kw Kälteleistung (Neupreis CHF 9360.-) Cheers, Viktor -- Viktor Steinmann - System and Network Engineer Easynet AG, Hardturmstrasse 135, 8005 Zuerich, Switzerland Phone: +41 1 560 32 00, Fax: +41 1 560 32 01 -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/
Re: [swinog] adsl speed
Double would be a little too much... since not everybody really uses his full bandwidth, the impact on the backbone will probably be between below 30% of traffic increase. It always depends on your customer structure - if you have many Kazaa/eDonkey/etc. users, they'll use the full bandwidth all the time. If you have many business-customers, which only use mail and web, the bandwidth increase is not relevant... But if your backbone is near the max (let's say, you have a 10 Mbps uplink to your upstream-provider and you already use 7 Mbps), then you'll have to think about an upgrade soon... Cheers, Viktor On Tuesday 02 December 2003 09:50, Stefan Buetler wrote: hello how do you big providers handle this. we're just a small webservice mailservice provider with no adsl. do you double your backbone speed? just curious... cheers stef Roger Buchwalder wrote: hello did somebody got news about the reaction of the swisscom regarding speed? Cheers Rog -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/
[swinog] Swisscom - HELP!
Swisscom shut down their F/E-Port to our LNS... (The port on their STE is down) All their Helpdesk told us, was to open a Connectivity Trouble Ticket... but hey - they're the wrong people... A few thousand ADSL-customers are down and Swisscom wants a TT... AArrgg... Downtime is now 30 minutes and we've heard nothing - nada from Swisscom. Does anyone from Swisscom read this? Does any SwiNOG guy have an internal number of the REAL people who can solve this? Please contact me off-list, thanks! Viktor -- Viktor Steinmann - System and Network Engineer Easynet AG, Hardturmstrasse 135, 8005 Zuerich, Switzerland Phone: +41 1 560 32 00, Fax: +41 1 560 32 01 -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/
Re: [swinog] JFYI: Google Peering @TIX
Starting when? 194.42.48.584 15169 349769 365434 3481731100 3w6d2 Still up'n'running... ;-) Cheers, Viktor On Thursday 30 October 2003 10:39, Erich Hohermuth wrote: For those who don't read the LINX mailinglist: snip TIX Zurich, Switzerland IP Address - 194.42.48.58 NO LONGER PEERING HERE! /snip -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/
Re: [swinog] VRRP between Juniper and Cisco
Don't know if this helps, but I have VRRP on my foundrys configured as follows: ip vrrp-extended vrid 2 backup priority 50 non-preempt-mode advertise backup ip-address 217.8.193.1 enable and on the other router ip vrrp-extended vrid 2 backup non-preempt-mode ip-address 217.8.193.1 enable Maybe this helps? Cheers, Viktor On Thursday 30 October 2003 14:22, Alain Pellmont wrote: hi guys does somebody have a hint how to get vrrp to work between a 7500 and an m40 ? the juniper stays always in master state :( even when changing the priority thanks alain -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/ -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/
Re: [swinog] SwiNOG-BE1 - Beer Event 1 in GVA ??
Beer DDos' are usually predictable - they happen usually on events such as bachelor partys (Polterabend) and military social events (e.g. Kompanieabend). But still if a DDos can be predicted, there's not always a way to stop it... :-) Viktor On Thursday 30 October 2003 16:15, Steven Glogger wrote: but what about a DDos? ;-) can you explain me how to use a riverhead box for that situation? :) -steven -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/
Re: [swinog] Postfix help
Are you sure, that the mails in the queue are real mails - and not just bounces for spam, which is not deliverable? It they're bounces... they'll dissappear from the queue in 4 days :-) Cheers, Viktor On Friday 24 October 2003 13:57, Marcel Prisi wrote: Hi all ! We have a strange trouble with an old postfix server with about 1200 accounts running on Trustix Linux 1.5 with kernel 2.2.2x . The thing works, but the mail queue has about 17000 mail in and every mail takes about 10 hours to be processed ... the load is not high and disks have no big activity, but the queue doesn't get smaller, as if it had to have about 17000 mails in. I tried postfix flush, postfix stop ; postfix start tuning /proc/sys/fs/file-max and other stuff with no success. It seems to be related to a trouble with a full /var partition, which has now enough room. The local admin told me the only successful way was a rm -f incoming/* ... have you better idea ?? Thanks -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/ -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/
Re: [swinog] closing 7th edition
I agree. It was a very good meeting with many interesting topics. Thanks to our sponsors who made it all possible. Viktor On Wednesday 22 October 2003 20:39, julien mabillard wrote: hi, just some words for saying i was very happy to be there and it was an interesting day. i couldn't stay for the social evening unfortunately but anyway i thank people for coming and setting up the meeting. see you next. julien. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/
Re: [swinog] Compliants from ADSL Users in the Biel area
So - a generell problem... Generell Protection Error? SCNR Dear Customer We already received some complaints about this area. We opened a Connectivity Ticket with number 5896. We will inform you also as soon as we get another update. If it works out that we have a generell problem in this region we will inform all ISP's by E-Mail with a BBCS Outage Mail. Best regards, -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/
Re: [swinog] Domain grabbing: nextra.ch
Reading mails from a customers inbox as an ISP is not only not nice - it's not allowed by law if you can prove that fact, you can sue them... Cheers, Viktor On Thursday 02 October 2003 13:17, Nik Hug wrote: Since I got bounces from @nextra.ch, I thought of checking this domain at nic.ch, and surprise surprise: http://www.switch.ch/id/search-domain.html?dom_id=nextra.ch A customer (had a hosting contract with nextra for his domain) told me some week ago that mhs changed his switch password without any notice nor permission. The dns-change wasn't made with a sammelantrag from switch. As I saw, mhs made a reqeust to get a lost password for this domain at switch and then grabbed the switch mail from the customers inbox not very nice from my point of view. greetings nik -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/ -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/
Re: [swinog] Re: Case ID 1070964 - Notice of Claimed Infringement
Fredy et all I get about 10 such complaints per week: My statement: As long as *nobody* pays me the time I need to find out, which customer belongs to which IP, I will not do that work. Any legal issue has to be communicated by signed letter - or else it will land in the trashcan anyway... I'm thinking about blocking those addresses for a long time - nobody can urge me to accept email from anybody ;-) Cheers, Viktor On Thursday 25 September 2003 22:31, Fredy Kuenzler wrote: Mark, MediaSentry Copyright Infringement wrote: RE: Unauthorized Distribution of the Copyrighted Motion Picture Entitled Matrix: Reloaded, The Dear Fredy Kuenzler: ---snip-snap--- -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/
Re: [swinog] as1257
Yup: 194.42.48.674 1257 108197 101181000 1w2d Active Cheers, Vikor On Friday 12 September 2003 15:34, Roger Buchwalder wrote: Hello I've got some problems with the peer to AS1257 this Link is down over a week. I've email'd them, but no answer... Do you guys have the same status? Cheers Rog . -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/ -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/
[swinog] Fwd: www.swinog.ch
SCHPAMMERS!!! Let's all click the supplied link... (wget --limit-rate= -r LINK) ^^ ;-) Cheers, Viktor ---BeginMessage--- Title: www.swinog.ch On Tue Sep 09, 2003 at 10:02:08 AM EDT we were unable to reach your website: http://www.swinog.ch/noc.html due to the following reason: 404 Object Not Found We discovered this error during our normal course of website content checking for one of our search engine clients. If you would like your website monitored for free and receive notifications like this in the future, click here. Click here to learn more about us. Sincerely, Connie Davis InternetSeer.com Your email address was found during a prior visit to your website on 06-24-2002. The error listed above was verified from both of our indexing servers in Philadelphia, Pa. and Los Angeles, Ca. This error could have been caused by any number of events, including connectivity problems on our part and/or connectivity problems in the Internet as we tried to reach your site. This error should not be construed as a guaranteed problem on the part of your website or hosting company since there are never any guaranteed connection routes on the Internet. If would like to be excluded from any potential future contact, click here. [EMAIL PROTECTED] SRC=""> ---End Message---
Re: [swinog] filtering ICMP...
2) unacceptable, cause they no more deliver full internet access. Especially for BGP customers... For ADSL/dial-up customers, it might be acceptable, if the customer has a possibility to turn off the filters... Cheers, Viktor -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/
[swinog] Osirusoft Blacklist down
Maybe you've seen it on Slashdot, maybe not. If you're using the Blacklist relays.osirusoft.com you might reject ALL mail... don't use it anymore... Cheers, Viktor -- Viktor Steinmann - System and Network Engineer Easynet AG, Hardturmstrasse 135, 8005 Zuerich, Switzerland Phone: +41 1 560 32 00, Fax: +41 1 560 32 01 -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/
Re: AW: [swinog] clock summer-time on Cisco?
Mike Meyers Mode Oh BEHAVE! /Mike Meyers Mode :-)) On Tuesday 26 August 2003 17:00, Andre Oppermann wrote: Viktor Steinmann wrote: Same here... (exactly the same... freaky, isn't it? ;-)) SCO MODE Yes, and all of you violated my exclusive copyright dating back to ancient history! And all my trade secrets too! But I wont tell you what exactly I own! Muaah...!!! Fist I will sue IP-Plus and Sunrise. Oh, and the rest of you will have to pay $.02 for my no-hassles license! If you don't pay, I will write many press releases and a have a lot of interviews with IT Reseller and talk about thinking to think about to prepare some list which could then potentially be used to sue each of you on the basis of some law whose name just escaped my great mastermind. (or was the BüPF maybe???) Yea, that was it! Everybody is a terrorist! Wait until I tell my numerous allies! They will come to help me to destroy... hmmm... who?... me?... no!... Muaaah...!!! /SCO MODE ;-) -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/
Re: [swinog] 12.3.1a on LNS
core1.router uptime is 4 weeks, 1 day, 9 hours, 15 minutes System returned to ROM by reload at 02:24:22 CEST Wed Jun 25 2003 System restarted at 02:25:42 CEST Wed Jun 25 2003 System image file is disk0:c7400-js-mz.122-15.T2.bin Uptime would be higher, if I hadn't rebooted for testing purposes... Of course, I don't know, if 12.2(25)T2 is as stable on the 7200 as it is on the 7400... Cheers, Viktor On Thursday 24 July 2003 11:38, Pascal Gloor wrote: Since I upgraded, I dont get any accouting anymore. TAC says, downgrade... uh... after Fredy's mail I m a bit scared to do that. Anyone got a 12.2(x)T running well on an LNS? (I was running 12.2(11)T before). Pascal -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/ -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/
Re: [swinog] Cisco Security Advisory: Cisco IOS Interface Blocked by IPv4 Packet
A little too late - we've been attacked tonight... Oh well... we'll survive :-) Cheers, Viktor On Thursday 17 July 2003 08:47, Roman Hochuli wrote: Hello Guys I think everybody should take a look at this advisory: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/routers/ps341/products_security_advi sory09186a00801a34c2.shtml Happy upgrading... :-| Regards, Roman -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/ -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/
Re: [swinog] Strange AS16221 Announce
Why didn't you put the netmask on the network? I'm sure that somewhere in the router you configured ip classless, so you cannot assume, that the router will automatically assume, that 195.129.116.0 is a C-Class network... Cheers, Viktor On Wednesday 11 June 2003 08:14, Roger Buchwalder wrote: Hello We do have some strange problem. we should announce 2 networks: 1. 217.118.192.0/20 2. 195.129.116./24 In our Router the bgp config says: router bgp 16221 no synchronization bgp router-id 217.118.192.109 bgp log-neighbor-changes bgp deterministic-med network 195.129.116.0 network 217.118.192.0 mask 255.255.240.0 what does your router see? only the 217.118.192.0/20? why not the 195.129.116.0/24? strange, strange... :( cheers Roger -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/
Re: AW: [swinog] Black Sheep Swiss ISP: Backbone Solutions (was: Backbone PRO)
We gladly peer with every ISP there is in CH for free.. BUT A company which sends out spam and doesn't respect internet standards like netiquette is NO ISP. They are just a company lucky enough to have an own AS. So they should pay for transit to get their spam to us. Peering session removed. Viktor On Friday 04 April 2003 11:49, Jim Romaguera wrote: it'd seems like a case of 'cutting your nose off to spite your face'... - for too long dominant (imho: normally Telco mindset) ISPs (read Swisscom others in CH, UUnet in US, etc) have used peerings as 'weapons' or 'incentives' (I won't peer with you because you should pay us for a peering, etc). swinog actually helps to get around such nonsense. it seems a pity to see normal ISPs starting to use a peering as a 'penality or reward'. in the first instance a peerings goal is to help both parties get better and/or cost effective performance for them and their customers in the peer I mean it ain't like you won't get the spam traffic..you'll simply get it via your upstream (paying) link. - i'd say there's probably other ways to get to your result (blocking someone's spam) - but as always, each ISP can do what he likes with his peerings (that's the beauty of zero-settlement peers) Cheers JIm -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/
Re: [swinog] Swinog-6 - Too many participants
I think it's a bad step to try to create an exclusive and elitary club out of the open-minded SwiNOG. Who says, that we are open-minded? We are Swiss! :-) SCNR, Stony -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/
Re: [swinog] Swinog-6 - Too many participants
I couldn't agree more... Viktor On Friday 28 March 2003 10:43, Patrick Studer wrote: ... We don't think that this user group should be A CUG, but perhaps if there isn't enoght place, that at first, ISP are welcome (max. 2 persons per ISP), and if there is still place, the could be also other peoples. That should be just an idea to think about. Comments welcome. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/
Re: WAS: [swinog] Swinog-6 - Too many participants, IS: Call for Beer :)
I'm (of course) in :-) Stony (aka Viktor) On Friday 28 March 2003 11:47, Steven Glogger wrote: hi all involved. Unless it's unreasonably difficult to get larger facilities, why not just create sub-events? as already discussed privately with stony we could have a private 'meeting' for having a beer or something like that. so, i'm asking who is joining me while having a beer or something like that next Monday, 31th of March (1 Day before LI should work :)) in Zurich @ ZurichExpress-Bar (http://www.n-e-w-s.ch/) around 18:00 o'clock? greetings steven -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/ -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/
Re: [swinog] Dynamic users and routes
Ummm I had a similar problem about 2 weeks ago and was also looking for exactly the same thing - I gave up after 4 hours of googling, reading cisco docs and trying to create some nasty hack with policy-based-routing... Only radius-attributes did the trick... but if you find out something else, I'd be interested in the results, too :-) Viktor On Thursday 27 March 2003 01:17, Andre Oppermann wrote: Hello, I've got a little Cisco problem. There is a 2600 router with two BRI interfaces and there are a couple of other routers out there periodically connecting to it. I'm using virtual-templates to allow for mppp channel bundling. So the interface is alway changing. Sometimes this user has got vi2, the other time vi3 and so on. Putting a static route route with ip route blabla is not an option. Now the problem is how can I associate a separate static route (ie. 192.168.40/24 and so on) to the users that connect to the 2600? I've been searching the Cisco website for documentation all night and can't find a useful solution other than putting a RADIUS or TACACS server in place to handle the routes. Is there any way to bond a static route to a given user thats connects to the machine in a way that can be done entirely local on the router? The IOS I have on it is 12.2.T13(3). -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/
[swinog] Cisco arrogance...
Hi everyone I wanted to order a Cisco 1601 @ our distributor and got the information, that this product doesn't exist anymore. So I wanted to check back with Cisco, if that's really true, of is our distributor just doesn't want to sell this thing anymore (because there's nothing mentioned on the Cisco Website, that this product is EOL) Just a small phonecall, I thought - But When I asked the phone receptionist for the PM, I just got the answer, that I'll have to ask my re-seller. Telling her, that I don't want to speak to a reseller, because that's what I just did, I got the answer, that I would have to talk to a different re-seller then... No chance to get through to somebody with a clue. The Cisco Website doesn't contain any *useful* contact information for Switzeland - It says, that their CEO's name is Mark Helfenstein - but no e-mail address Can anybody give me an e-mail address of somebody @ Cisco with a clue and not arrogant enough to deny any customer contact?? Any suggestions for a nice replacment for the 1601 (NOT from Cisco...)? Cheers, Viktor -- Viktor Steinmann - System and Network Engineer Easynet AG, Hardturmstrasse 135, 8005 Zuerich, Switzerland Phone: +41 1 560 32 00, Fax: +41 1 560 32 01 -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/
Re: [swinog] SwiNOG-6 announcement / Call for presentations
I agree totally with Andre, except for the Sprint stuff - if Sprint sponsors our meeting, I'm O.k. to listen to their sales guy there. But where has the PGP signing session gone, that everybody thought, was a good idea? Cheers, Viktor On Tuesday 25 February 2003 10:06, Andre Oppermann wrote: Pascal Gloor wrote: AC would a presentation about Internet prefix filtering / (routing table size reduction) be of interest for the next SWINOG ? Sure :-) Unfortunatly our schedule is already filled up :-/ But, one of the presentation is not 100% sure. If its discarded, you may have an hour or so for your presentation. I'll keep you updated. Hello Pascal, not that I want to complain, but the agenda in the afternoon looks very much like a corporate sales presentation... I mean why do we need Sprint to tell us about trends in IP networking? Don't we know that ourselfs? I am sure their network has less than 20ms and bla blabla whatevery SLA and blablabla... Then the overview of an GSM/GPRS network we already had last meeting and it wasn't that funny... Also the DDoS solutions from riverhead are nice and I bet it works best if all ISPs would install such a box in their networks... and then if everyone has installed it, it can also manage all the other problems an ISP usually has to deal with... spam, lawful inception, blocking file sharing, sending automatic invoices on behalf of RIAA and MPAA, etc... Yea, I guess in the end I am complaining. I personally rather have Nicolas giving a talk about the newest security issues with our equipement or Andre giving a talk about how they are crippling the routing tables at Swisscom instead of having some carrier/vendor sales reps giving a talk about their greatest and latest. I mean this is SWINOG after all and not the conference part of Internet Expo. Just ranting, no personal offense! ;) -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/
Re: [swinog] SwiNOG-6 announcement / Call for presentations
I'd be interested in that - not so much, because I want to do it on my network, but out of curiosity, what swisscom does :-) Cheers, Viktor On Monday 24 February 2003 18:16, Andre Chapuis wrote: Hi, would a presentation about Internet prefix filtering / (routing table size reduction) be of interest for the next SWINOG ? Please advise, André - Andre Chapuis IP+ Engineering Swisscom Ltd Genfergasse 14 3050 Bern +41 31 893 89 61 [EMAIL PROTECTED] CCIE #6023 -- - This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/ -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/ -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/
Re: [swinog] ADSL Featured on Kassensturz / SF1
Did you expect anything else? %-] F. No - but something else just occured to me. Is it just plain luck, that on the same day, that Cablecom announces phone over cable, they get a great review on Kassensturz? While watching TV yesterday, I imagined the Cablecom marketing manager sitting at home with a glass of champagne and smiling from ear to ear... Viktor -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/
Re: [swinog] Size-Limitation of E-Mails :)
10 Megs per Mail (after encoding) People should definitely learn to use FTP for larger files... :-) Viktor On Wednesday 19 February 2003 13:54, Steven Glogger wrote: just a question by my side: what is your maximum size of email? (had a discussion with people who have 2.5 or 5 meg limits) greetings steven -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/ -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/
Re: [swinog] NPE-G1
If you don't use PXF (turn it off!), you might want to try 12.2(13)T - but it depends (as always) on the features you need. It runs stable for me Cheers, Viktor On Friday 14 February 2003 16:13, Michel Renfer wrote: Hi all! Which IOS do you use with NPE-G1 and seems to be stable? :-) regards, michel -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/ -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/
Re: [swinog] Google at TIX
First time I asked for a peering, I got no answer for 2 months. When I wrote again, I got the peering up'n'runing within 2 hours... Just try again :-) Cheers, Viktor On Thursday 13 February 2003 15:54, Michel Renfer wrote: Did anyone of you have a peering with google? I wrote several times to their email address but never get an answer... regards, mike -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/ -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/
Re: [swinog] for all you hardware freaks
/me is getting wek knees and shaky hands - or the other way 'round... :-) On Wednesday 12 February 2003 10:00, S Brown wrote: http://hardware.localhost.nl/index.php?ct=browseshowdir=pictures -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/ -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/
Re: [swinog] Tiscali-ADSL blocking outbound SNMP traffic?
On Monday 03 February 2003 09:37, Viktor Steinmann wrote: used to block SNMP, Telnet and SNMP for ADSL customers (internet to That should read SNMP, Telnet and FTP (ZyXEL Configs can be uploaded via FTP with the default password!) Cheers, Viktor -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/
Re: [swinog] RouteServer Maintenance
On Tuesday 28 January 2003 15:42, Viktor Steinmann wrote: On Tuesday 28 January 2003 15:40, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hey Pascal if you have to send an email to us anytimes that u reboot your route server, then u will send 15 emails a day ;))) Don't worry, he's not going to load a windows kernel ;-) Somehow my answer got lost :-) Anyway - it was not worth it probably... Cheers, -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/
Re: [swinog] RouteServer Maintenance
A - HA - I think I found a nasty bug... Fredy? Did you somehow play with the mailing-list? It cuts off the last line of my mails... Or is that my mailer? I use KMail 1.4.3 Cheers, Viktor On Tuesday 28 January 2003 15:45, Viktor Steinmann wrote: On Tuesday 28 January 2003 15:42, Viktor Steinmann wrote: On Tuesday 28 January 2003 15:40, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hey Pascal if you have to send an email to us anytimes that u reboot your route server, then u will send 15 emails a day ;))) Don't worry, he's not going to load a windows kernel ;-) Somehow my answer got lost :-) Anyway - it was not worth it probably... Cheers, -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/ -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/
Re: [swinog] [Fwd: Sperrverfügungen der Untersuchungsrichterin des Kantons Waadt - Muster für eine Einsprache]
Unless you're packet filtering, restricting access via DNS or proxy is pointless, as I can bypass the proxy or use another DNS server, and I doubt anyone here realistically has the capacity to firewall all their clients. However, wouldn't actually complying with this sort of advice send a signal to a non-technical bureaucrat that it is, indeed possible? Remember that a lot of these people have no concept of scale--if it's possible for one address, it must be doable for ten million I guess every techie agrees on the point, that blocking access to a site by means of DNS or proxy filtering is pretty useless. However - it's what they want us to do. So let's not give 'em ideas on what else could be done... :-) Cheers, Viktor -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/
Re: [swinog] [Fwd: Sperrverfügungen der Untersuchungsrichterin des Kantons Waadt - Muster für eine Einsprache]
Any news? On Tuesday 17 December 2002 13:53, Andre Oppermann wrote: FYI. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/
Re: [swinog] [Fwd: Sperrverfügungen der Untersuchungsrichterin des Kantons Waadt - Muster für eine Einsprache]
Oehmm... don't you think, that's a little too much. They only asked to block proxy access and to fake the DNS entries in the letter... Viktor On Tuesday 17 December 2002 16:32, Andre Chapuis wrote: AS3303 will blackhole the affected IP-addresses tonight André At 16:18 17.12.2002 +0100, Viktor Steinmann wrote: Any news? On Tuesday 17 December 2002 13:53, Andre Oppermann wrote: FYI. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/ - Andre Chapuis IP+ Engineering Swisscom Ltd Genfergasse 14 3050 Bern +41 31 893 89 61 [EMAIL PROTECTED] CCIE #6023 -- -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/ -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/
Re: [swinog] Re: [swinog] [Fwd: Sperrverfügungen der Untersuchungsrichterin des Kantons Waadt - Muster für eine Einsprache]
offer Would you like to buy transit from a non-filtering ISP with own transatlantik links? /offer :-) Viktor On Tuesday 17 December 2002 16:40, Pascal Gloor wrote: noflame Since when your ISP customers buy filtered Internet access ? If you want to do it, do it on your DNS and proxy, and done affect the service you're offering to your customers. /noflame P. On Tuesday 17 December 2002 16:32, Andre Chapuis wrote: AS3303 will blackhole the affected IP-addresses tonight André At 16:18 17.12.2002 +0100, Viktor Steinmann wrote: Any news? On Tuesday 17 December 2002 13:53, Andre Oppermann wrote: FYI. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/ - Andre Chapuis IP+ Engineering Swisscom Ltd Genfergasse 14 3050 Bern +41 31 893 89 61 [EMAIL PROTECTED] CCIE #6023 -- -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/ -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/ -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/ -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/
Re: [swinog] RE: [swinog] [Fwd: Sperrverfügungen der Untersuchungsrichterin des Kantons Waadt - Muster für eine Einsprache]
AS4589 will do the filtering only on the DNS servers located in CH (there's no proxy). We'll run fake-zones for appel-au-peuple.org and swiss-corruption.com pointing to an empty webserver. The letter states, that filtering is not to be turned on, if other websites would be affected, which is the case for geocities.com. Cheers, Viktor On Tuesday 17 December 2002 16:52, Thoma, Stefan wrote: FYI: AS6730 will do the (hopefully temp.) proxy/dns 'filtering' from tonight. Stefan -Original Message- From: Viktor Steinmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Dienstag, 17. Dezember 2002 16:19 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [swinog] [Fwd: Sperrverfügungen der Untersuchungsrichterin des Kantons Waadt - Muster für eine Einsprache] Any news? On Tuesday 17 December 2002 13:53, Andre Oppermann wrote: FYI. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/ -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/
Re: [swinog] Re: [swinog] Re: [swinog] [Fwd: Sperrverfügungen der Untersuchungsrichterin des Kantons Waadt -Muster für eine Einsprache]
I was just thinking... (maybe not a good idea at this time of the day...) If VIT recommends to blacklist the sites anyway and to send the protest letter... why would we need to send the letter today? I think, it's early enough tomorrow... Cheers, Viktor (I need a beer) On Tuesday 17 December 2002 17:27, Pascal Gloor wrote: Document from VIT received, those who didnt get it directly may ask me for it. P. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/ -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/
Re: [swinog] Fw: Sperrverfügung der Untersuchungsrichterin des Kantons Waadt - Weiteres Vorgehen
imho you can fake a primary zone on every DNS server - and if there's a fake zone, the server won't try to do a recursive lookup (which djbdns doesn't do anyway iirc) Cheers, Viktor On Monday 16 December 2002 17:24, Andre Oppermann wrote: Ms. Widmer writes in the last sentence that if the letter does not give us time we shall prepare to block the websites. What if you can't do that because your DNS software does not allow for it? (eg. DJBDNS) And you don't have a proxy? I will write back excatly that. In addition to the letter from VIT. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/
[swinog] Swiss gov strikes again / Canton Vaud
In the heise news article it says, that VIT (Verband Inside Telecom) is gonna make a letter available to all ISPs, which can then be sent to the judge. Does anyone know, when/where this letter will be available? Cheers, Viktor -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/
[swinog] Swiss gov strikes again / Canton Vaud
What to do about the latest letter, many of you might have received from the Canton Vaud with the order to block access to www.appel-au-peuple-suisse.ch de.geocities.com/justicecontrol/ www.swiss-corruption.com ??? I don't speak french very well, but I think I understood that we should block these sites on our proxies? Can this be it? Or do I have to blackhole-route the IP? Or make a fake DNS entry into our DNS servers for these sites? Anyway - seems like another braindead approach to internet control by the swiss govs... Viktor -- Viktor Steinmann - System and Network Engineer Easynet AG, Hardturmstrasse 135, 8005 Zuerich, Switzerland Phone: +41 1 560 32 00, Fax: +41 1 560 32 01 -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/
Re: AW: [swinog] Swiss gov strikes again / Canton Vaud
How about, just one of us contacts Mr. Schwarzenegger (so he doesn't get spammed). Andre: Since you're somehow the law-guru of this group (according to your past mails) - can you contact him? Cheers, Viktor well, i think i give the contact details (i hope he doesn't hate me now, because he get's spammed) Universitat Zurich Rechtswissenschaftliches Institut Prof. Dr. iur. Christian Schwarzenegger Assistenzprofessor fur Strafrecht, Strafprozessrecht und Kriminologie Wilfriedstrasse 6, CH-8032 Zurich Tel. 01 634 30 60, Fax. 01 634 43 99 E-Mail: christian [dot] schwarzenegger [at] rwi [dot] unizh [dot] ch http://www.rwi.unizh.ch/schwarzenegger/home.htm -steven -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/ -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/
Re: [swinog] Swiss gov strikes again / Canton Vaud
I suggest a joint press release of Swinog and SIUG, stating that we're not agree and why. I can contribute with our press-mailing-list (appx 100 adresses). Opinions? You got a GO from me... :-) Viktor -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/
Re: R: [swinog] Swiss gov strikes again / Canton Vaud
---snip-- to block a website!). Free tip from BAKOM: just block the website for 2-3 weeks, write this in a letter to Judge Dessaux, then un-block the website after that period has passed. If no further communication is received from the above mentioned judge, the matter can be considered closed. Otherwise we'd have to discuss further. How does that sound? Doesn't sound good to me. Because then every single small judge will try to do the same. I think, we should fight this court order right now, so we can prevent a flood of such orders... Keeping track 2-3 weeks for ONE court order is easy - but for more I'll have to open a new queue in RT... :-/ Cheers, Viktor -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/
Re: AW: R: [swinog] Swiss gov strikes again / Canton Vaud
Probably these people have internet access at home too, so AOL (or the swiss equivalent) would have to block as well :-) eg Viktor On Thursday 12 December 2002 16:59, Fredy Kuenzler wrote: Steven Glogger wrote: put 0.0.0.0 netmask 0.0.0.0 (/0?) in a filter and block everything :) so no problems anymore :) Could AS6370 and AS9177 set a filter for 145.232.0.0/16 (Etat de Vaud) to make the court happy? F. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/ -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/
Re: [swinog] Swiss gov strikes again / Canton Vaud
Here you go :-) It seems as if most of the providers will not obey (as you might have read in the thread). If you need the whole thread, you can read it under http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog@swinog.ch/msg00847.html Cheers, Viktor On Thursday 12 December 2002 17:35, Holger Bleich wrote: Hello, I've read your posting in the swinog-list. We will publish an short article about the occurrence on our news-service www.heise.de, perhaps today. Could you post this e-mail in the swinog-list? I would like to know if there is a provider who will not obey the directive of the judge. It would be kind if you contact me:-) Kind Regards Holger Bleich == Redakteur c't - magazin für computer technik Heise Zeitschriften Verlag GmbH Co KG [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.heise.de -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/
Re: [swinog] swiss internet information
Hi Marco I'll give you a hint, in case you don't get any answers: Most of the stuff you're asking here is highly sensitive information, which no provider is willing to give out, except for large deal proposals (but then only with a non-disclosure agreement). Other stuff is extremely hard to find out (e.g. the IP-Adresses/Classes assigned to CH ISPs). Try and find the Info in the RIPE database... it will take you some time to do it - and nobody will do it for you (for free), I guess... (correct me, if I'm wrong) Cheers, Viktor On Sunday 01 December 2002 23:57, : : /\\/\\/\\RCO : : wrote: Hi all! I've joined this list on the advice of some people from another mailinglist ([wlan-security]) - they think you could provide me more information especially on the provider related stuff. so I'd like to ask you if you could help to get some informationen about the following topics (about switzerland only): - who is owning the cables (fibre optics) in switzerland. - where do we have A/B/C-class nets and who has acces to them. - how many important backbones are there and where are them. - number of users per provider? and what technology they use (modem, cable, adsl, sdsl,...) - which provider has how much bandwith, how is it regulated? - how many webservers/hostaccounts are there in switzerland (per provider) I'm trying to get data (numbers, statistical data) about the subjects above for my actual study project. I'm studying new media at the school of art and design zürich (HGKZ) in the end I'll make a kind of graphical mapping of this data. I'm appreciating any little information / link , etc. a lot! Marco -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/ -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/
Re: [swinog] IRC Server
Thanks for your input. On Thursday 26 September 2002 18:05, Daniel Lorch wrote: hi, The server would only allow IP-Adresses from SwiNOG and not be member of any major IRC network - so we can keep the scriptkiddies out. How do you classify SwiNOG members? People peering with TIX? How about people that are here merely out of curiosity (such as me :)) ? A password-protected channel would be preferrable. No - SwiNOG members are simply members of the mailing-list in my opinion. Everybody interested in using the IRC-Server would send me a list of his/her IP-Adresses to allow (typically 2: home and work) and these IPs will be allowed by the IRC-config file. Protection of the channel is not necessary then (except, if you want to make your own, private channel on the server then). Whaddayathink? Logging and archiving IRC-discussions isn't as easy as with mail -- I definitively prefer the latter. I don't want to miss interesting discussions, just because I can't hang around 24/7 in a # channel. That's right. But the purpose would not be to have important discussions, but just to be closer together, than on a mailing list. -daniel -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/ -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/
Re: [swinog] IRC Server
On the other hand I like to change my nick often - which is usually a problem on official IRC networks... and /nick I-am-out-to-lunch-but-will-read-later-on does not work usually :-) Cheers, Viktor On Thursday 26 September 2002 17:12, Pascal Gloor wrote: why add a ressouce when we already have it? Never heard of redundancy? :) correct, that's why you will be able to connect thru 24 different servers ;-P -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/ -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/
Re: [swinog] Where to sell old equipment?
O.k. - actually it's only one thing now: 1 RedBack SMS-500 with all the software (AOS) needed to terminate ADSL connections, plus one spare FastEthernet Card for it. The router was only in use for about 3 months and is not yet a year old. Cheers, Viktor On Thursday 25 July 2002 12:18, Fredy Kuenzler wrote: Viktor Steinmann wrote: Anybody got an idea where you can sell old equipment (routers) in CH? Actually, there is nothing about 2ndhand trading in the SwiNOG charter, however I guess noone would mind if you post the list of equipment here?! F. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/
Re: [swinog] Memory Question
iirc you can just put in normal PC-100 memory with ECC Give it a try - you'll save 5000 CHF :-) Cheers, Viktor On Thursday 11 July 2002 08:34, Michel Renfer wrote: Hi Marcel If i remember right, 71xx and 7200 with NPE-300 uses the same type of DRAM Memory. Possible that you will fill such a module... regards, mike -Original Message- From: Marcel Stutz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 8:27 AM To: Swinog Subject: [swinog] Memory Question Hi all, we need Urgend Memory for a Cisco 7140 Does someone wehre have such MEMORY around and like to selling this ? We need 2 x MEM-7120/40-128S= If yes pleas send a mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] or Call +41 61 416 97 02 or +41 61 416 97 05 Mit freundlichen Grüssen Marcel Stutz -- Magnet.Com AG CH-4142 Münchenstein Aliothstr. 60 Tel. ++41 61 413 13 13 Fax. ++41 61 413 13 12 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] WWW: http://www.magnet.ch --- Magnet.Com - Ihr schneller Internet-Provider --- -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/ -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/ -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/
Re: [swinog] Swisscom and thier policy arround copper connections
On Tuesday 18 June 2002 10:50, Fredy Kuenzler wrote: Michel Renfer wrote: If i'm right, Swisscom had offically announced that policy change a year or two ago officially. But nowbody informed us about the newst joke with only one exchange... They changed policy or made it effective AFAIK beginning of 2002 without information to their customers (the ISP's) and let them walk into the open knife. I lost business about 6 weeks ago :-( Do you know, who got the business then? If it's Swisscom, maybe somebody in Comcom is interested to hear that? Cheers, Stony -- Viktor Steinmann - System and Network Engineer Easynet AG, Hardturmstrasse 135, 8005 Zuerich, Switzerland Phone: +41 1 560 32 00, Fax: +41 1 560 32 01 -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/
